Health Insurance Premium Tax Credit, 50931-50949 [2011-20728]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 159 / Wednesday, August 17, 2011 / Proposed Rules
of protection because the term ‘‘price
election’’ is not applicable to all plans
of insurance.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 402
Crop insurance, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Accordingly, as set forth in the
preamble, the Federal Crop Insurance
Corporation proposes to amend 7 CFR
part 402 as follows:
PART 402—CATASTROPHIC RISK
PROTECTION ENDORSEMENT
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR
part 402 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 1506(l), 1506(o).
2. Amend § 402.4 as follows:
a. Revise introductory text preceding
section 1;
b. Remove the definitions in section 1
for ‘‘approved yield,’’ ‘‘county,’’
‘‘expected market price,’’ ‘‘FSA,’’
‘‘household,’’ ‘‘limited resource farmer,’’
‘‘Secretary,’’ and ‘‘USDA;’’
c. Revise section 2(a) introductory
text;
d. Revise section 3(a);
e. Revise section 4(a);
f. Amend section 4(b) by removing the
phrase ‘‘expected market price’’ and
adding the phrase ‘‘price election’’ in its
place;
g. Amend section 4(c) by removing
the phrase ‘‘Actuarial Table or the
Special Provisions’’ and adding the
phrase ‘‘actuarial documents’’ in its
place;
h. Remove section 4(d);
i. Amend section 6(b) introductory
text by removing the phrase ‘‘Special
Provisions’’ and adding the phrase
‘‘actuarial documents’’ in its place;
j. Amend section 6(b)(1) by removing
the phrase ‘‘Special Provisions’’ and
adding the phrase ‘‘actuarial
documents’’ in its place;
k. Revise section 7; and
l. Amend section 9 by adding the
phrase ‘‘, projected prices, dollar
amounts of insurance, or dollar amounts
of protection’’ after the phrase ‘‘multiple
price elections’’ in the two instances
that it appears.
The revised text reads as follows:
§ 402.4 Catastrophic Risk Protection
Endorsement Provisions.
Emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
*
*
*
*
*
If a conflict exists among the policy
provisions; the order of priority is: (1)
This Endorsement; (2) the Special
Provisions; (3) any other Actuarial
Documents except the Special
Provisions; (4) the Commodity Exchange
Price Provisions, if applicable; and (5)
any of the policies specified in section
2, with (1) controlling (2), etc.
*
*
*
*
*
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:31 Aug 16, 2011
Jkt 223001
2. Eligibility, Life of Policy,
Cancellation, and Termination.
(a) You must have one of the
following policies in force to elect this
Endorsement:
(1) The Common Crop Insurance
Policy Basic Provisions (7 CFR 457.8)
and applicable Crop Provisions
(Catastrophic risk protection coverage is
not available under individual revenue
plans of insurance such as the Revenue
Protection and Revenue Protection with
Harvest Price Exclusion plans of
insurance);
(2) The Group Risk Plan of Insurance
Basic Provisions (7 CFR 407.9) and
applicable Crop Provisions, or its
successor provisions, if available for
catastrophic risk protection coverage
(Catastrophic risk protection coverage is
not available under area revenue plans
of insurance such as Group Risk Income
Protection—Harvest Price Option or
Group Risk Income Protection plans of
insurance or successor plans of
insurance); or
(3) Other crop policy only if
catastrophic risk protection coverage is
provided in the applicable crop policy.
*
*
*
*
*
3. Unit Division.
(a) This section is in lieu of the unit
provisions specified in the applicable
crop policy and is not applicable if you
are insured under the Group Risk Plan
of Insurance Basic Provisions (7 CFR
407.9) and applicable Crop Provisions,
or its successor provisions.
*
*
*
*
*
4. Insurance Guarantees, Coverage
Levels, and Prices for Determining
Indemnities.
(a) Unless otherwise specified in the
actuarial documents, catastrophic risk
protection coverage will offer protection
equal to:
(1) Fifty percent (50%) of your
approved yield indemnified at fifty-five
percent (55%) of the price election or
projected price, as applicable, if you are
insured under the Common Crop
Insurance Policy Basic Provisions (7
CFR 457.8) and applicable Crop
Provisions;
(2) Sixty-five percent (65%) of the
expected county yield indemnified at
forty-five percent (45%) of the
maximum protection per acre if you are
insured under the Group Risk Plan of
Insurance Basic Provisions (7 CFR
407.9) and applicable Crop Provisions,
or its successor provisions; or
(3) A comparable coverage as
established by FCIC for other crop
policies only if catastrophic risk
protection coverage is provided in the
applicable crop policy.
*
*
*
*
*
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
50931
7. Insured Crop.
(a) The crop insured is specified in
the applicable crop policy, however
notwithstanding any other policy
provision requiring the same insurance
coverage on all insurable acreage of the
crop in the county, if you purchase
additional coverage for a crop, you may
separately insure acreage under
catastrophic risk protection coverage
that has been designated as ‘‘high-risk’’
land by FCIC, provided that you execute
a High-Risk Land Exclusion Option and
obtain a catastrophic risk protection
coverage policy with the same approved
insurance provider on or before the
applicable sales closing date.
(b) You will be required to pay a
separate administrative fee for both the
additional coverage policy and the
catastrophic risk protection coverage
policy.
*
*
*
*
*
Signed in Washington, DC, on August 10,
2011.
William J. Murphy,
Manager, Federal Crop Insurance
Corporation.
[FR Doc. 2011–20850 Filed 8–16–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–08–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service
26 CFR Part 1
[REG–131491–10]
RIN 1545–BJ82
Health Insurance Premium Tax Credit
Internal Revenue Service (IRS),
Treasury.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
and notice of public hearing.
AGENCY:
This document contains
proposed regulations relating to the
health insurance premium tax credit
enacted by the Patient Protection and
Affordable Care Act and the Health Care
and Education Reconciliation Act of
2010, as amended by the Medicare and
Medicaid Extenders Act of 2010, the
Comprehensive 1099 Taxpayer
Protection and Repayment of Exchange
Subsidy Overpayments Act of 2011, and
the Department of Defense and FullYear Continuing Appropriations Act,
2011. These proposed regulations
provide guidance to individuals who
enroll in qualified health plans through
Affordable Insurance Exchanges and
claim the premium tax credit, and to
Exchanges that make qualified health
plans available to individuals and
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\17AUP1.SGM
17AUP1
50932
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 159 / Wednesday, August 17, 2011 / Proposed Rules
employers. This document also provides
notice of a public hearing on these
proposed regulations.
Written (including electronic)
comments must be received by October
31, 2011. Outlines of topics to be
discussed at the public hearing
scheduled for November 17, 2011, at
10 a.m. must be received by November
10, 2011.
DATES:
Send submissions to:
CC:PA:LPD:PR (REG–131491–10), Room
5203, Internal Revenue Service, PO Box
7604, Ben Franklin Station, Washington,
DC 20044. Submissions may be handdelivered Monday through Friday
between the hours of 8 a.m. and 4 p.m.
to CC:PA:LPD:PR (REG–131491–10),
Courier’s Desk, Internal Revenue
Service, 1111 Constitution Avenue,
NW., Washington, DC, or sent
electronically via the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov (IRS REG–131491–
10). The public hearing will be held in
the IRS Auditorium, Internal Revenue
Building, 1111 Constitution Avenue,
NW., Washington, DC.
ADDRESSES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Concerning the proposed regulations,
Shareen S. Pflanz, (202) 622–4920, or
Frank W. Dunham III, (202) 622–4960;
concerning the submission of
comments, the public hearing, and to be
placed on the building access list to
attend the public hearing, Funmi
Taylor, (202) 622–7180 (not toll-free
calls).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
Paperwork Reduction Act
The collection of information
contained in this notice of proposed
rulemaking has been submitted to the
Office of Management and Budget in
accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
3507(d)). Comments on the collection of
information should be sent to the Office
of Management and Budget, Attn: Desk
Officer for the Department of the
Treasury, Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs, Washington, DC
20503, with copies to the Internal
Revenue Service, Attn: IRS Reports
Clearance Officer,
SE:W:CAR:MP:T:T:SP, Washington, DC
20224. Comments on the collection of
information should be received by
October 17, 2011. Comments are
specifically requested concerning:
Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the IRS,
including whether the information will
have practical utility;
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:31 Aug 16, 2011
Jkt 223001
How the quality, utility, and clarity of
the information to be collected may be
enhanced;
How the burden of complying with
the proposed collection of information
may be minimized, including through
the application of automated collection
techniques or other forms of information
technology; and
Estimates of capital or start-up costs
and costs of operation, maintenance,
and purchase of services to provide
information.
The collection of information in these
proposed regulations is in § 1.36B–5.
The collection of information is
necessary to properly reconcile the
amount of the premium tax credit with
advance credit payments made under
section 1412 of the Patient Protection
and Affordable Care Act (42 U.S.C.
18082). The collection of information is
required to comply with the provisions
of section 36B(f)(3) of the Internal
Revenue Code (Code). The likely
respondents are Affordable Insurance
Exchanges established under section
1311 or 1321 of the Patient Protection
and Affordable Care Act (42 U.S.C.
13031 or 42 U.S.C. 18041).
The burden for the collection of
information contained in proposed
regulation § 1.36B–5 will be reflected in
the burden on a form that the IRS will
create to request the information in the
proposed regulation.
An agency may not conduct or
sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a collection of information
unless it displays a valid control
number assigned by the Office of
Management and Budget.
Background
Beginning in 2014, under the Patient
Protection and Affordable Care Act,
Public Law 111–148 (124 Stat. 119
(2010)), and the Health Care and
Education Reconciliation Act of 2010,
Public Law 111–152 (124 Stat. 1029
(2010)) (collectively, the Affordable Care
Act), individuals and small businesses
will be able to purchase private health
insurance through State-based
competitive marketplaces called
Affordable Insurance Exchanges
(Exchanges). Exchanges will offer
Americans competition and choice.
Insurance companies will compete for
business on a level playing field, driving
down costs. Consumers will have a
choice of health plans to fit their needs
and Exchanges will give individuals and
small businesses the same purchasing
power as big businesses. The
Departments of Health and Human
Services and Treasury are working in
close coordination to release guidance
related to Exchanges, in several phases.
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
The first in this series was a Request for
Comment relating to Exchanges,
published in the Federal Register on
August 3, 2010 (75 FR 45584). Second,
Initial Guidance to States on Exchanges
was issued on November 18, 2010.
Third, proposed regulations on the
application, review, and reporting
process for waivers for State innovation
was published in the Federal Register
on March 14, 2011 (76 FR 13553).
Fourth, two proposed regulations were
published in the Federal Register on
July 15, 2011 (76 FR 41866 and 76 FR
41930) to implement components of the
Exchange and health insurance
premium stabilization policies in the
Affordable Care Act. Fifth, three
proposed regulations, including this
one, are being published in the Federal
Register on August 17, 2011 to provide
guidance on the eligibility
determination process related to
enrollment in a qualified health plan or
insurance affordability program; on
Medicaid, the Children’s Health
Insurance Program (CHIP), and other
State health coverage programs; and
these proposed regulations on the
premium tax credit.
Section 1401 of the Affordable Care
Act amended the Code to add section
36B, allowing a refundable premium tax
credit to help individuals and families
afford health insurance coverage.
Section 36B was subsequently amended
by the Medicare and Medicaid
Extenders Act of 2010, Public Law 111–
309 (124 Stat. 3285 (2010)); the
Comprehensive 1099 Taxpayer
Protection and Repayment of Exchange
Subsidy Overpayments Act of 2011,
Public Law 112–9 (125 Stat. 36 (2011));
and the Department of Defense and FullYear Continuing Appropriations Act,
2011, Public Law 112–10 (125 Stat. 38
(2011)). The section 36B credit is
designed to make a qualified health plan
affordable by reducing a taxpayer’s outof-pocket premium cost.
Under section 1411 of the Affordable
Care Act (42 U.S.C. 18081), an Exchange
makes an advance determination of
credit eligibility for individuals
enrolling in coverage through the
Exchange and seeking financial
assistance. Using information available
at the time of enrollment, the Exchange
determines (1) whether the individual
meets the income and other
requirements for advance credit
payments, and (2) the amount of the
advance payments. Advance payments
are made monthly under section 1412 of
the Affordable Care Act (42 U.S.C.
18082) to the issuer of the qualified
health plan in which the individual
enrolls.
E:\FR\FM\17AUP1.SGM
17AUP1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 159 / Wednesday, August 17, 2011 / Proposed Rules
Emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
Eligibility
To be eligible for a premium tax
credit, an individual must be an
applicable taxpayer. Under section
36B(c)(1), an applicable taxpayer is a
taxpayer (1) With household income for
the taxable year between 100 percent
and 400 percent of the federal poverty
line (FPL) for the taxpayer’s family size,
(2) who may not be claimed as a
dependent by another taxpayer, and (3)
who files a joint return if married.
Section 36B(c)(1)(B) provides that a
taxpayer who is an alien lawfully
present in the United States, whose
household income is 100 percent of the
FPL or less, and who is not eligible for
Medicaid, nonetheless is treated as an
applicable taxpayer. Under section
36B(e)(2), an individual is lawfully
present if the individual is, and is
reasonably expected to be for the entire
period of enrollment for which the
credit is claimed, a U.S. citizen or
national or an alien lawfully present in
the United States.
Under section 36B(d)(1), a taxpayer’s
family consists of the individuals for
whom the taxpayer claims a personal
exemption deduction under section 151
for the taxable year. Taxpayers may
claim a personal exemption deduction
for themselves, a spouse, and each of
their dependents. Section 152 provides
that a taxpayer’s dependent may be a
qualifying child or qualifying relative,
including an unrelated individual who
lives with the taxpayer. Family size is
equal to the number of individuals in
the taxpayer’s family.
Section 36B(d)(2) defines household
income as the modified adjusted gross
income of all individuals included in
family size who are required to file an
income tax return. Modified adjusted
gross income means adjusted gross
income (within the meaning of section
62) increased by amounts excluded from
gross income under section 911 and taxexempt interest a taxpayer receives or
accrues during the taxable year.
Under section 36B(b)(1), a taxpayer’s
premium assistance credit amount is the
sum of the premium assistance amounts
for all coverage months in the taxable
year for individuals in the taxpayer’s
family. Section 36B(c)(2)(A) provides
that a coverage month is any month for
which the taxpayer or any family
member is covered by a qualified health
plan enrolled in through an Exchange
and the premium is paid by the taxpayer
or through an advance credit payment.
Under section 36B(c)(2)(B), a coverage
month for an individual does not
include a month in which the
individual is eligible for minimum
essential coverage, as defined in section
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:31 Aug 16, 2011
Jkt 223001
5000A(f), other than coverage offered in
the individual market. Minimum
essential coverage may be governmentsponsored coverage such as Medicare,
Medicaid, CHIP, TRICARE, and
veterans’ health care under Title 38
U.S.C. Certain employer-sponsored
plans also may be minimum essential
coverage. In general, under section
36B(c)(2)(C), an individual is eligible for
employer-sponsored minimum essential
coverage only if the employee’s share of
the premiums is affordable and the
coverage provides minimum value.
However, under section 36B(c)(2)(C)(iii),
an individual is treated as eligible for
employer-sponsored minimum essential
coverage if the individual actually
enrolls in an eligible employersponsored plan, even if the coverage
does not meet the affordability and
minimum value requirements.
Under section 5000A(f)(1)(E), the
Department of Health and Human
Services, in coordination with the
Treasury Department, may designate
other health benefits coverage as
minimum essential coverage.
Regulations under section 5000A are
expected to provide additional guidance
on minimum essential coverage.
Credit Computation
Section 36B(b)(1) provides that the
premium assistance credit amount is the
sum of the premium assistance amounts
for all coverage months in the taxable
year for individuals in the taxpayer’s
family. The premium assistance amount
for a coverage month is the lesser of (1)
the premiums for the month for one or
more qualified health plans that cover a
taxpayer or family member, or (2) the
excess of the adjusted monthly premium
for the second lowest cost silver plan (as
described in section 1302(d)(1)(B) of the
Affordable Care Act (42 U.S.C.
18022(d)(1)(B))) (the benchmark plan)
that applies to the taxpayer over 1⁄12 of
the product of the taxpayer’s household
income and the applicable percentage
for the taxable year. The adjusted
monthly premium, in general, is the
premium an insurer would charge for
the plan adjusted only for the ages of the
covered individuals.
Therefore, the monthly premium
assistance amount is the lesser of the
premium for the qualified health plan in
which a taxpayer or family member
enrolls, or the excess of the premium for
the benchmark plan over the applicable
percentage of the taxpayer’s household
income. In general, this percentage of
the taxpayer’s household income
represents the amount of the taxpayer’s
required out-of-pocket contribution to
the premium cost if the taxpayer
purchases the benchmark plan. The
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
50933
remainder of the premium for the
benchmark plan is the premium
assistance amount.
A taxpayer’s applicable percentage
increases as the taxpayer’s household
income as a percentage of the FPL (FPL
percentage) for the taxpayer’s family
size increases. For 2014, the applicable
percentage is 2 percent for taxpayers
with household income up to 133
percent of the FPL and increases from
3 percent to 9.5 percent for taxpayers
with household incomes between 133
percent and 400 percent of the FPL. The
applicable percentages may be adjusted
after 2014.
Taxpayers must pay the difference
between the premium assistance
amount and the premium for the plan
they choose. The amount of a taxpayer’s
credit is limited to the amount of actual
premiums for the taxable year.
Individuals not lawfully present are
not eligible to enroll in a qualified
health plan through an Exchange.
Accordingly, section 36B(e)(1)(A)
provides that, for a household with at
least one individual not lawfully
present, the portion (if any) of the
premium attributable to that individual
is not included in determining the
taxpayer’s credit. Section 36B(e)(1)(B)
provides that the family size for
computing the FPL percentage for a
family with at least one unlawfully
present individual is determined by
excluding the unlawfully present
individual. Household income for
computing the FPL percentage and
determining the applicable percentage is
the product of the taxpayer’s household
income (determined without regard to
section 36B(e)) and a fraction, the
numerator of which is the FPL for the
taxpayer’s family size excluding
individuals who are not lawfully
present, and the denominator of which
is the FPL for the taxpayer’s family size
including individuals who are not
lawfully present.
Reconciliation
A taxpayer must reconcile the actual
credit for the taxable year computed on
the taxpayer’s tax return with the
amount of advance payments. If a
taxpayer’s credit amount exceeds the
amount of the taxpayer’s advance
payments for the taxable year, the
taxpayer may receive the excess as an
income tax refund. If a taxpayer’s
advance payments exceed the taxpayer’s
credit amount, the taxpayer owes the
excess as an additional income tax
liability. However, section 36B(f)(2)(B)
places a graduated set of caps on the
additional tax liability for taxpayers
with household income under 400
percent of the FPL. The repayment
E:\FR\FM\17AUP1.SGM
17AUP1
50934
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 159 / Wednesday, August 17, 2011 / Proposed Rules
limitation amounts range from $600 to
$2,500 (one-half that amount for single
taxpayers) depending on FPL, and are
adjusted to reflect changes in the cost of
living beginning in 2015.
Section 36B(g) directs the Secretary of
the Treasury to issue regulations that
provide for coordinating the premium
tax credit with the program for advance
payments and for reconciling the credit
and advance payments when the
taxpayer’s filing status changes during
the taxable year.
Information Reporting
Section 36B(f)(3) directs an Exchange
to report to the IRS and taxpayers
certain information relating to health
plans provided through the Exchange,
including the amount of any advance
credit payments.
Explanation of Provisions
1. Eligibility for the Premium Tax Credit
The proposed regulations provide that
a taxpayer is eligible for the credit for
a taxable year if the taxpayer is an
applicable taxpayer and the taxpayer or
a member of the taxpayer’s family (1) is
enrolled in one or more qualified health
plans through an Exchange established
under section 1311 or 1321 of the
Affordable Care Act (42 U.S.C. 13031 or
42 U.S.C. 18041) and (2) is not eligible
for minimum essential coverage other
than coverage in the individual market.
a. Applicable Taxpayer
Emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
i. Lawfully Present Aliens
In general, to be an applicable
taxpayer, a taxpayer must have
household income that is at least 100
percent but not more than 400 percent
of the FPL. Under section 36B(c)(1)(B),
a lawfully present alien with household
income under 100 percent of the FPL
and not eligible for Medicaid is treated
as having household income of 100
percent of the FPL for purposes of
qualifying as an applicable taxpayer.
The proposed regulations provide that
premium assistance amounts for these
taxpayers are computed based on actual
household income. The proposed
regulations define lawfully present by
reference to 45 CFR 152.2, which
determines lawful presence for purposes
of the Pre-Existing Condition Insurance
Plan Program.
ii. Taxpayers With Household Income
Under 100 Percent of the FPL
The proposed regulations clarify the
treatment of a taxpayer who receives
advance credit payments but has
household income below 100 percent of
the FPL for the taxable year.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:31 Aug 16, 2011
Jkt 223001
Taxpayers with household incomes
below 100 percent of the FPL (other
than lawfully present aliens) are not
eligible for the premium tax credit
because they are eligible to receive
assistance through Medicaid. However,
an Exchange may approve a taxpayer for
advance credit payments based on
projecting a level of household income
for the taxable year that makes the
taxpayer ineligible for Medicaid. If,
contrary to that projection, the
taxpayer’s actual household income for
the taxable year is under 100 percent of
the FPL (for example, because the
taxpayer experiences a change in
circumstances, such as a job loss, during
the year), the taxpayer would not be an
applicable taxpayer, and would not be
eligible for the credit under the general
rule. Accordingly, the proposed
regulations provide a special rule
treating a taxpayer with household
income below 100 percent of the FPL as
an applicable taxpayer if, when a
taxpayer enrolls in a qualified health
plan, an Exchange projects that
household income for the taxpayer will
be between 100 and 400 percent of the
FPL for the taxable year and approves
advance credit payments. Premium
assistance amounts for these taxpayers
also are computed based on actual
household income and not a deemed
household income that equals 100
percent of the FPL.
iii. Individuals Who Are Incarcerated or
Not Lawfully Present
Under section 1312(f) of the
Affordable Care Act, individuals who
are incarcerated (other than pending
disposition of charges) or not lawfully
present in the United States may not
enroll in a qualified health plan through
an Exchange. However, these
individuals may have family members
who are eligible for Exchange coverage.
Accordingly, the proposed regulations
provide that an individual who is not
lawfully present in the United States or
is incarcerated, although not eligible to
enroll in a qualified health plan, may be
an applicable taxpayer if a family
member is eligible to and does enroll in
a qualified health plan.
b. Minimum Essential Coverage
i. Government-Sponsored Coverage
Under the proposed regulations, an
individual generally is eligible for
government-sponsored minimum
essential coverage for any month that
the individual meets the requirements
for coverage under a governmentsponsored program described in section
5000A(f)(1)(A). However, for purposes
of the premium tax credit, an individual
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
is eligible for minimum essential
coverage under a veterans’ health care
program only if the individual is
enrolled in a veteran’s health care
program identified as minimum
essential coverage in regulations issued
under section 5000A. The
Commissioner may define eligibility for
specific government-sponsored
programs further in published guidance
of general applicability, see
§ 601.601(d)(2) of this chapter. For
example, it is expected that future
guidance will provide that a person is
eligible for Medicaid on the basis of
being blind or disabled or needing longterm care services only when a State
Medicaid agency or the Social Security
Administration, as appropriate,
determines that the individual is blind
or disabled or requires long-term care
services.
In general, an individual is treated as
eligible for a government-sponsored
program on the first day of the first full
month in which the individual may
receive benefits. Thus, taxpayers would
not lose eligibility for the credit for a
month in which the taxpayer or a family
member is technically eligible for a
government program but cannot yet
receive benefits due to, for example, the
need for administrative processing.
However, an individual who fails to
complete the requirements to obtain
coverage available under a governmentsponsored program (other than coverage
under the veteran’s health care program)
reasonably promptly is treated as
eligible for the coverage on the first day
of the second calendar month following
the event that establishes eligibility
(such as reaching age 65 for Medicare).
An individual receiving advance
credit payments may apply and be
approved for government-sponsored
minimum essential coverage such as
Medicaid that, after approval, is
effective retroactively (overlapping
some advance payment coverage
months). The proposed regulations
provide that an individual in this
situation is treated as eligible for
minimum essential coverage no sooner
than the first day of the first calendar
month after the approval.
Comments are requested on whether
rules should provide additional
flexibility if operational challenges
prevent timely transition from coverage
under a qualified health plan to
coverage under a government-sponsored
program.
A taxpayer whom an Exchange has
determined to be ineligible for
Medicaid, CHIP, or a similar program at
the time of enrollment may end up with
household income for the taxable year
within the eligibility criteria for these
E:\FR\FM\17AUP1.SGM
17AUP1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 159 / Wednesday, August 17, 2011 / Proposed Rules
programs. Therefore, the proposed
regulations provide that an individual is
treated as not eligible for Medicaid,
CHIP, or a similar program for the
months of coverage under a qualified
health plan if an Exchange determines
that the individual is not eligible when
the individual enrolls. If the individual
subsequently enrolls in Medicaid, CHIP,
or a similar program, however, the full
months of enrollment in the
government-sponsored coverage are not
coverage months.
ii. Employer-Sponsored Coverage
Emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
A. In General
Section 5000A(f)(1)(B) provides that
minimum essential coverage includes
coverage under an eligible employersponsored plan. Under section
5000A(f)(2), an eligible employersponsored plan is a group health plan or
group health insurance coverage offered
by an employer to an employee that is
a governmental plan (within the
meaning of section 2791(d)(8) of the
Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C.
300gg–91(d)(8))), any other plan or
coverage offered in the small or large
group market, or a grandfathered plan
offered in the group market. Regulations
under section 5000A are expected to
provide that an employer-sponsored
plan will not fail to be minimum
essential coverage solely because it is a
plan to reimburse employees for
medical care for which reimbursement
is not provided under a policy of
accident and health insurance (a selfinsured plan).
Continuation coverage required under
federal law or required under a state law
that provides comparable continuation
coverage is eligible employer-sponsored
coverage. The proposed regulations
provide a special rule that an individual
eligible to enroll in continuation
coverage is eligible for minimum
essential coverage only if the individual
enrolls in the coverage.
The proposed regulations provide that
an individual generally is eligible for
minimum essential coverage through an
eligible employer-sponsored plan for a
month during a plan year if the
individual had the opportunity to enroll
in the plan, even if the enrollment
period has since closed. Thus, once an
individual fails to enroll in eligible
employer-sponsored coverage during an
employer-sponsored plan’s enrollment
period after having had the opportunity
to do so (assuming the coverage is
affordable and provides minimum
value), the months during the plan year
are not coverage months for the
individual, notwithstanding that the
individual is precluded from later
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:31 Aug 16, 2011
Jkt 223001
enrolling in the employer-sponsored
coverage for those months because the
enrollment period has expired.
Under section 36B(c)(2)(C), an
individual generally is eligible for
employer-sponsored minimum essential
coverage only if the employee’s share of
the premiums is affordable and the
coverage provides minimum value. An
individual is treated as eligible for
minimum essential coverage through an
eligible employer-sponsored plan,
however, if the individual actually
enrolls in the coverage, including
coverage that does not meet the
requirements for affordability and
minimum value.
B. Affordability of Employer-Sponsored
Coverage
Section 36B(c)(2)(C)(i) prescribes the
standards for determining whether
employer-sponsored coverage is
affordable for an employee as well as for
other individuals. In the case of an
employee, under section 36B(c)(2)(C)(i),
an employer-sponsored plan is not
affordable if ‘‘the employee’s required
contribution (within the meaning of
section 5000A(e)(1)(B)) with respect to
the plan exceeds 9.5 percent of the
applicable taxpayer’s household
income’’ for the taxable year. This
percentage may be adjusted after 2014.1
In the case of an individual other than
an employee, section 36B(c)(2)(C)(i)
provides that ‘‘this clause shall also
apply to an individual who is eligible to
enroll in the plan by reason of a
relationship the individual bears to the
employee.’’ The cross-referenced section
5000A(e)(1)(B) defines the term
‘‘required contribution’’ for this purpose
as ‘‘the portion of the annual premium
which would be paid by the individual
* * * for self-only coverage.’’
Thus, the statutory language specifies
that for both employees and others
(such as spouses or dependents) who
are eligible to enroll in employersponsored coverage by reason of their
relationship to an employee (related
individuals), the coverage is
unaffordable if the required contribution
for ‘‘self-only’’ coverage (as opposed to
family coverage or other coverage
applicable to multiple individuals)
1 In addition, the statute provides for the
Comptroller General, within 5 years of enactment,
to conduct a study, including legislative
recommendations, on the affordability of coverage,
including whether the percentage of household
income specified in section 36B(c)(2)(C) ‘‘is the
appropriate level for determining whether
employer-provided coverage is affordable for an
employee and whether such level may be lowered
without significantly increasing the costs to the
Federal Government and reducing employerprovided coverage.’’ See section 1401(c)(1) of the
Affordable Care Act.
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
50935
exceeds 9.5 percent of household
income. See Joint Committee on
Taxation, General Explanation of Tax
Legislation Enacted in the 111th
Congress, JCS–2–11 (March 2011) at 265
(stating that, for purposes of the
premium tax credit provisions of the
Act, ‘‘[u]naffordable is defined as
coverage with a premium required to be
paid by the employee that is more than
9.5 percent of the employee’s household
income, based on the self-only
coverage’’).
Consistent with these statutory
provisions, the proposed regulations
provide that an employer-sponsored
plan also is affordable for a related
individual for purposes of section 36B
if the employee’s required contribution
for self-only coverage under the plan
does not exceed 9.5 percent of the
applicable taxpayer’s household income
for the taxable year, even if the
employee’s required contribution for the
family coverage does exceed 9.5 percent
of the applicable taxpayer’s household
income for the year.
Although the affordability test for
related individuals for purposes of the
premium tax credit is based on the cost
of self-only coverage, future proposed
regulations under section 5000A are
expected to provide that the
affordability test for purposes of
applying the individual responsibility
requirement to related individuals is
based on the employee’s required
contribution for employer-sponsored
family coverage. Section 5000A
addresses affordability for employees in
section 5000A(e)(1)(B) and, separately,
for related individuals in section
5000A(e)(1)(C).
C. Employee Affordability Safe Harbor
The proposed regulations provide an
employee safe harbor for individuals
who were offered eligible employersponsored coverage that ultimately
proves to be affordable based on
household income for the taxable year
but who declined the offer because, at
the time of enrollment in a qualified
health plan, the Exchange determined
that the employer coverage would be
unaffordable. Under the safe harbor, an
eligible employer-sponsored plan is
treated as unaffordable for an entire
plan year. Thus, for the months during
the plan year (which may coincide or
overlap with the taxable year) a taxpayer
will not lose credit eligibility because,
as a result of changes during the taxable
year, the employer coverage would have
been affordable based on the household
income for that taxable year. The
taxpayer may, however, lose credit
eligibility for other reasons, for example
if the taxpayer’s household income for
E:\FR\FM\17AUP1.SGM
17AUP1
50936
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 159 / Wednesday, August 17, 2011 / Proposed Rules
Emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
the taxable year exceeds 400 percent of
the FPL. Regulations under section
4980H are expected to provide that an
employer is not subject to a penalty
merely because an employee receives a
premium tax credit under this employee
safe harbor if the employer offered to its
employees affordable coverage that
otherwise meets the requirements of
section 4980H.
employees—among the small percentage
of employees whose household income
is less than their wages from the
employer—would receive a premium
tax credit without resulting in an
assessable payment by their employer.
The Treasury Department and the IRS
intend to issue a request for comments
on this affordability safe harbor for
employers.
D. Affordability Safe Harbor for
Employers
In general, an applicable large
employer (as defined in section
4980H(c)(2)) that offers health coverage
to its full-time employees and their
dependents is subject to the assessable
payment under section 4980H(b) if at
least one full-time employee is certified
to receive a premium tax credit or costsharing reduction because the employersponsored coverage either does not
provide minimum value or is
unaffordable to the employee.
Employers have commented that they
will not know their employees’ actual
household income. As a result, even if
an employer intends to offer affordable
coverage to all full-time employees, one
or more full-time employees may be
certified to receive the premium tax
credit, and the employer may be subject
to the assessable payment under
4980H(b). Future proposed regulations
under section 4980H are expected to
provide an affordability safe harbor for
employers. Under this anticipated safe
harbor, an employer that meets certain
requirements, including offering its fulltime employees (and their dependents)
the opportunity to enroll in eligible
employer-sponsored coverage, will not
be subject to an assessable payment
under section 4980H(b) with respect to
an employee who receives a premium
tax credit or cost-sharing reduction for
a taxable year if the employee portion of
the self-only premium for the
employer’s lowest cost plan that
provides minimum value does not
exceed 9.5 percent of the employee’s
current W–2 wages from the employer.
Giving employers the ability to base
their affordability calculations on their
employees’ wages (which employers
know) instead of employees’ household
income (which employers generally do
not know) is intended to provide a more
workable and predictable method of
facilitating affordable employersponsored coverage for the benefit of
both employers and employees.
Notwithstanding this safe harbor,
employees’ eligibility for a premium tax
credit would continue to be based on
affordability of employer-sponsored
coverage relative to employees’
household income. Accordingly, some
E. Minimum Value
Section 36B(c)(2)(C)(ii) provides that
an eligible employer-sponsored plan
generally provides minimum value if
the plan’s share of the total allowed
costs of benefits provided under the
plan is at least 60 percent of those costs.
Under section 1302(d)(2) of the
Affordable Care Act (42 U.S.C.
18022(d)(2)), regulations to be issued by
the Secretary of Health and Human
Services will apply in determining the
percentage of ‘‘the total allowed costs of
benefits’’ provided under a group health
plan or health insurance coverage that
are covered by that plan or coverage.
The regulations under section
1302(d)(2) are expected to be proposed
later this year and to reflect the fact that
employer-sponsored group health plans
and health insurance coverage in the
large group market are not required to
provide each of the essential health
benefits or each of the 10 categories of
benefits described in section 1302(b)(1)
of the Affordable Care Act. It is also
anticipated that the regulations will
seek to further the objective of
preserving the existing system of
employer-sponsored coverage, but
without permitting the statutory
employer responsibility standards to be
avoided. We also are contemplating
whether to provide appropriate
transition relief with respect to the
minimum value requirement for
employers currently offering health care
coverage.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:31 Aug 16, 2011
Jkt 223001
2. Computing the Premium Tax Credit
A taxpayer’s credit is the sum of the
premium assistance amounts for each
coverage month in the taxable year. A
premium assistance amount is
computed for each coverage month
during the taxable year based on several
factors: household income, family size,
applicable percentage, benchmark plan
premium, and actual plan premium. A
month during which no one in the
taxpayer’s family is enrolled in a
qualified health plan through an
Exchange is not a coverage month. A
month is a coverage month only if the
taxpayer pays the premium for coverage
or receives the benefit of an advance
payment. The premium assistance
amount for a month that is not a
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
coverage month is zero. Household
income is determined on an annual
basis and is prorated for each month to
determine the monthly premium
assistance amount. The applicable
percentage is the same for each month
because it is derived from annual
household income and family size. A
taxpayer’s benchmark plan premium
may change during the year if, for
example, there are changes in the
members of the household covered
through the Exchange or the taxpayer
moves to a new State with different plan
rates.
a. Premiums Paid on Behalf of the
Taxpayer
The proposed regulations provide
that, in determining whether a month is
a coverage month, premiums that
another person pays for the coverage of
the taxpayer or a family member are
treated as paid by the taxpayer.
b. Applicable Benchmark Plan
Under section 36B(b)(2), the monthly
premium for the applicable second
lowest cost silver plan offered through
an Exchange is the benchmark for
computing a taxpayer’s monthly
premium assistance amount. To
determine the amount of premium tax
credit, a taxpayer must compute the
difference between the premium for this
plan and the applicable percentage of
the taxpayer’s household income,
regardless of the qualified health plan
the taxpayer purchases.
i. Multiple Categories of Coverage
Offered on an Exchange
Section 36B(b)(3)(B)(ii) identifies only
self-only and family as the categories of
coverage for the benchmark plan.
However, qualified health plans may
offer other categories of coverage based
on family composition, such as children
only, two adults, or one adult plus
children. See proposed 45 CFR
156.255(b). Thus, the proposed
regulations define family coverage as
any health insurance that covers more
than one individual.
Under the proposed regulations, the
‘‘applicable’’ benchmark plan for a
taxpayer is determined by finding the
second lowest cost plan at the silver
level that would cover those family
members actually enrolled in a qualified
health plan, not eligible for minimum
essential coverage other than coverage
in the individual market, not
incarcerated, and lawfully present in the
United States (the coverage family).
Thus, the applicable benchmark plan is
the self-only category of coverage for a
taxpayer who files as single with no
dependents, a taxpayer who purchases
E:\FR\FM\17AUP1.SGM
17AUP1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 159 / Wednesday, August 17, 2011 / Proposed Rules
Emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
self-only coverage, and a taxpayer
whose family includes only one
individual who is not eligible for
minimum essential coverage or one
lawfully present individual (thus
excluding from the credit computation
the portion of the premium attributable
to an individual not lawfully present, as
required by section 36B(e)(1)(A)). If an
Exchange offers more categories of
coverage than self-only and family, the
applicable benchmark plan is the
coverage category that applies to the
members of the taxpayer’s coverage
family.
ii. Families Who Purchase More Than
One Qualified Health Plan
Section 36B determines family size by
reference to individuals for whom the
taxpayer claims a personal exemption,
and family coverage under some
qualified health plans may not extend to
certain tax dependents (for example, a
niece). We note that the Department of
Health and Human Services has
requested comments in its proposed
regulations on Exchanges on whether
qualified health plans offered on an
Exchange should be required to cover
all members of the family if they live in
the same Exchange service area.
Pending the issuance of additional
guidance on this issue by Health and
Human Services, the proposed
regulations provide that, if the
applicable benchmark plan does not
cover a taxpayer’s full family, the
applicable benchmark plan premium for
these families is the sum of the
premiums for the benchmark plans that
cover the taxpayer’s family (for
example, for an uncle and two adult
dependent nieces, a self-only
benchmark plan for the uncle and a twoadult or family plan for the nieces). The
applicable benchmark plan is similarly
modified for taxpayers with family
members residing in different rating
areas (also known as Exchange service
areas, see proposed 45 CFR155.20).
However, the IRS and Treasury
Department are considering other
approaches for determining the
applicable benchmark plan in these
cases. For example, the applicable
benchmark plan for these families could
be the benchmark plan that would apply
to the family composition (such as one
adult plus children) if one plan covered
all members of the taxpayer’s family.
Alternatively, the applicable benchmark
plan premium could be the lesser of (1)
the premium for a combination of plans
that cover the taxpayer’s entire family,
or (2) the premium for a single plan that
covers the taxpayer’s entire family and
is more expensive than the second
lowest cost silver plan. Comments are
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:31 Aug 16, 2011
Jkt 223001
requested on these and other possible
approaches.
iii. One Qualified Health Plan Covering
More Than One Family
If a single qualified health plan covers
more than one taxpayer’s family (for
example a plan that covers adult
children under age 26 who are not tax
dependents), the allowable section 36B
credit is computed for each applicable
taxpayer covered by the plan. An
individual applicable percentage is
determined for each taxpayer based on
the taxpayer’s household income and
family size, and the separate applicable
benchmark plan. The premiums for the
qualified health plan the taxpayers
purchase are allocated to each taxpayer
in proportion to the premiums for each
taxpayer’s benchmark plan to determine
whether the premiums paid are less
than the benchmark premium minus the
taxpayer’s applicable percentage of
household income.
iv. Applicable Benchmark Plan That
Terminates or Closes to Enrollment
A qualified health plan that is the
second lowest cost silver plan for a
particular category of coverage, or the
lowest cost silver plan in that category,
may close to enrollment or terminate
during the taxable year. The proposed
regulations clarify that an applicable
benchmark plan is a plan offered
through the Exchange when a taxpayer
or family member enrolls in a qualified
health plan. Unless the taxpayer or a
family member is enrolled in the
applicable benchmark plan, a plan does
not cease to be the applicable
benchmark plan solely because the plan
or the lowest cost silver plan terminates
or closes to further enrollment during
the taxable year.
c. Pediatric Dental Coverage
Section 36B(b)(3)(E) provides that, for
purposes of determining the amount of
any monthly premium, if an individual
enrolls in both a qualified health plan
and a plan providing dental coverage as
described in section 1311(d)(2)(B)(ii) of
the Affordable Care Act (42 U.S.C.
13031(d)(2)(B)(ii)), the portion of the
premium for the dental plan that is
properly allocable to pediatric dental
benefits that are essential health benefits
is treated as a premium payable for the
individual’s qualified health plan. Thus,
the portion of the premium for the
separate pediatric dental coverage is
added to the premium for the
benchmark plan in computing the
credit. Comments are requested on
methods of determining the amount of
the premium properly allocable to
pediatric dental benefits.
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
50937
3. Reconciling the Credit and Advance
Credit Payments
The proposed regulations describe the
requirements for reconciling advance
payments of the credit with the actual
credit amount and determining the
amount of any resulting additional
credit or additional income tax liability.
The proposed regulations explain that
the credit is computed by using the
household income and family size for
the taxable year, but premium assistance
amounts for different coverage months
may be based on different applicable
benchmark plans if, for example, the
taxpayer’s family composition changes
during the taxable year.
a. Changes in Filing Status
Section 36B(g)(2) directs the Secretary
to provide regulations specifying how to
reconcile advance payments with the
actual credit when the taxpayer’s filing
status on the return claiming the credit
differs from the filing status used to
determine advance payments of the
credit. Filing status may be any of the
following: single, married filing jointly,
married filing separately, head of
household, or surviving spouse.
i. Computing the Credit When
Taxpayer’s Marital Status Changes
The proposed regulations provide
that, for a taxpayer who has a change in
marital status during the taxable year,
the credit generally is computed
according to the same rules that apply
to other taxpayers, using the applicable
benchmark plan or plans that apply to
the taxpayer’s marital status as of the
first day of each month. However, the
proposed regulations include special
rules for computing the credit for
taxpayers who divorce during the
taxable year. Comments are requested
on special rules for taxpayers who
marry during the taxable year and for
married taxpayers who face challenges
in being able to file a joint return.
ii. Taxpayers Who Divorce During the
Taxable Year
The proposed regulations provide
that, for purposes of reconciliation,
taxpayers who for some months during
a taxable year were married (within the
meaning of section 7703) and were
covered by the same qualified health
plan but are no longer married on the
last day of the taxable year, may agree
to allocate between themselves, in the
same proportion, the premiums for the
benchmark plan, premiums paid and
advance credit payments made during
the marriage. If the taxpayers do not
agree on an allocation, the taxpayers
must allocate 50 percent of these
amounts to each taxpayer. If only one of
E:\FR\FM\17AUP1.SGM
17AUP1
50938
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 159 / Wednesday, August 17, 2011 / Proposed Rules
the formerly married taxpayers was
enrolled in the plan, 100 percent of the
benchmark premiums, premiums for the
plan that taxpayer purchases, and
advance payments are allocated to that
taxpayer.
Emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
iii. Taxpayers Who Marry During the
Taxable Year
For individuals who marry during a
taxable year and receive advance credit
payments during the time before they
are married, the general rules for credit
computation and reconciliation could
lead to the individuals facing additional
tax upon reconciliation, even if the
Exchange accurately determines each
individual’s separate income for the
year at the time of enrollment. This may
occur, for example, in situations in
which the combination of two
individuals’ household incomes and
families results in the combined family
having a higher FPL percentage than
either of the component families would
have had if the individuals had not
married, and therefore having a higher
applicable percentage or being ineligible
for a credit. Comments are requested on
rules providing relief to certain
individuals who would owe additional
tax because they marry during a taxable
year when one or both individuals
receive advance credit payments prior
to marriage. Comments are requested on
how the premium assistance credit
amount should be computed in this
circumstance, including how household
income (which is required to be
determined on an annual basis) and
dependents for the taxable year would
be taken into account in the credit
computation.
iv. Married Taxpayers Filing Separately
Married taxpayers who file their
returns as married filing separately are
not applicable taxpayers and generally
are ineligible for the premium tax credit
for any month during the taxable year.
The proposed regulations provide that
taxpayers who receive advance credit
payments and file their tax returns as
married filing separately must allocate
50 percent of any advance credit
payments to each spouse for purposes of
determining their excess advance
payment amounts as part of the
reconciliation process. Although the
taxpayers owe additional tax for the
entire amount of the advance credit
payments, the section 36B(f)(2)(B)
repayment limitation applies to each
taxpayer whose household income is
below 400 percent of the federal poverty
line based on the household income and
family size reported on the return.
Some taxpayers who are married at
the time they enroll in a qualified health
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:31 Aug 16, 2011
Jkt 223001
plan and begin to receive advance credit
payments may not be able to file a joint
return for the coverage year. For
example, in situations involving
domestic abuse, when a divorce is
pending but not yet final, or when one
spouse is incarcerated, filing a joint
return may not be possible or prudent.
Comments are requested on rules to
provide relief for those married
taxpayers who have received advance
credit payments but face challenges in
being able to file a joint return.
Comments are requested in particular
on whether rules should take into
account whether (1) The spouses have
filed jointly for the preceding taxable
year, (2) the spouses attested to an
expectation to file jointly for purposes
of receiving the advance credit
payments, and (3) the spouses should be
allowed relief of this type for more than
one year.
Comments are requested on other
rules for reconciling the credit with
advance payments for taxpayers whose
filing status changes during the taxable
year.
b. Requirement To File a Return
The proposed regulations require
every taxpayer receiving advance credit
payments to file an income tax return on
or before the fifteenth day of the fourth
month following the close of the taxable
year. The requirement to file a return
applies whether or not a taxpayer is
otherwise required to file a return under
section 6012 or claims a premium tax
credit for the taxable year. Under
section 6081, the Commissioner may
grant a reasonable extension of time for
filing any income tax return.
Effective/Applicability Date
These regulations are proposed to
apply for taxable years ending after
December 31, 2013.
Special Analyses
It has been determined that this notice
of proposed rulemaking is not a
significant regulatory action as defined
in Executive Order 12866, as
supplemented by Executive Order
13563. Therefore, a regulatory
assessment is not required. It has also
been determined that section 553(b) of
the Administrative Procedure Act (5
U.S.C. chapter 5) does not apply to these
regulations, and, because the regulations
do not impose a collection of
information requirement on small
entities, the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. chapter 6) does not apply.
Pursuant to section 7805(f) of the Code,
this notice of proposed rulemaking has
been submitted to the Chief Counsel for
Advocacy of the Small Business
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Administration for comment on its
impact on small business.
Comments and Public Hearing
Before these proposed regulations are
adopted as final regulations,
consideration will be given to any
written comments (either electronic or a
signed paper original and eight (8)
copies) that are submitted timely to the
IRS. The IRS and Treasury Department
request comments on the clarity of the
proposed rules and how they can be
made easier to understand. All
comments will be available for public
inspection and copying.
A public hearing has been scheduled
for November 17, 2011, at 10 a.m., in the
auditorium, Internal Revenue Building,
1111 Constitution Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC. Due to building
security procedures, visitors must enter
at the Constitution Avenue entrance. All
visitors must present photo
identification to enter the building.
Because of access restrictions, visitors
will not be admitted beyond the
immediate entrance more than 30
minutes before the hearing starts. For
information about having your name
placed on the building access list to
attend the hearing, see the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this
preamble.
The rules of 26 CFR 601.601(a)(3)
apply to the hearing. Persons who wish
to present oral comments at the hearing
must submit written comments
(electronic or a signed paper original
and eight (8) copies) and an outline of
topics to be discussed and the time
devoted to each topic by November 10,
2011. A period of 10 minutes will be
allotted to each person for making
comments.
An agenda showing the scheduling of
the speakers will be prepared after the
deadline for receiving outlines has
passed. Copies of the agenda will be
available free of charge at the hearing.
Drafting Information
The principal authors of these
proposed regulations are Shareen S.
Pflanz, Frank W. Dunham III, and
Stephen J. Toomey of the Office of
Associate Chief Counsel (Income Tax
and Accounting). However, other
personnel from the IRS and the Treasury
Department participated in the
development of the regulations.
List of Subjects in 26 CFR Part 1
Income taxes, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
E:\FR\FM\17AUP1.SGM
17AUP1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 159 / Wednesday, August 17, 2011 / Proposed Rules
Proposed Amendments to the
Regulations
Accordingly, 26 CFR part 1 is
proposed to be amended as follows:
PART 1—INCOME TAXES
Paragraph 1. The authority citation
for part 1 is amended by adding entries
in numerical order to read in part as
follows:
Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805 * * *
Section 1.36B–4 also issued under 26
U.S.C. 36B(g).
Par. 2. Sections 1.36B–0, 1.36B–1,
1.36B–2, 1.36B–3, 1.36B–4, and 1.36B–
5 are added to read as follows:
§ 1.36B–0
Table of contents.
This section lists the captions
contained in §§ 1.36B–1 through 1.36B–
5.
§ 1.36B–1
Premium tax credit definitions.
(a) In general.
(b) Affordable Care Act.
(c) Qualified health plan.
(d) Family and family size.
(e) Household income.
(1) In general.
(2) Modified adjusted gross income.
(f) Dependent.
(g) Lawfully present.
(h) Federal poverty line.
(i) Reserved.
(j) Advance credit payment.
(k) Exchange.
(l) Self-only coverage.
(m) Family coverage.
(n) Rating area.
(o) Effective/applicability date.
Emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 1.36B–2
credit.
§ 1.36B–3 Computing the premium
assistance credit amount.
Eligibility for premium tax
(a) In general.
(b) Applicable taxpayer.
(1) In general.
(2) Married taxpayers must file joint
return.
(3) Dependents.
(4) Individuals not lawfully present or
incarcerated.
(5) Individuals lawfully present.
(6) Special rule for taxpayers with
household income below 100 percent of
the federal poverty line for the taxable
year.
(7) Computation of premium
assistance amounts for taxpayers with
household income below 100 percent of
the federal poverty line.
(c) Minimum essential coverage.
(1) In general.
(2) Government-sponsored minimum
essential coverage.
(i) In general.
(ii) Special rule for coverage under the
veteran’s health care program under
chapter 17 or 18 of Title 38, U.S.C.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:31 Aug 16, 2011
Jkt 223001
(iii) Time of eligibility.
(A) In general.
(B) Retroactive effect of eligibility
determination.
(iv) Determination of Medicaid or
Children’s Health Insurance Program
(CHIP) ineligibility.
(v) Examples.
(3) Employer-sponsored minimum
essential coverage.
(i) In general.
(ii) Plan year.
(iii) Eligibility for coverage months
during a plan year.
(A) In general.
(B) Example.
(iv) Special rule for continuation
coverage.
(v) Affordable coverage.
(A) In general.
(1) Affordability.
(2) Employee safe harbor.
(B) Required contribution percentage.
(C) Examples.
(vi) Minimum value.
(vii) Enrollment in eligible employersponsored plan.
(A) In general.
(B) Example.
(a) In general.
(b) Definitions.
(c) Coverage month.
(1) In general.
(2) Premiums paid for the taxpayer.
(3) Examples.
(d) Premium assistance amount.
(e) Adjusted monthly premium.
(f) Applicable benchmark plan.
(1) In general.
(2) Family coverage.
(3) Second lowest cost silver plan not
covering the taxpayer’s family.
(4) Benchmark plan terminates or
closes to enrollment.
(5) Examples.
(g) Applicable percentage.
(1) In general.
(2) Applicable percentage table.
(3) Examples.
(h) Plan covering more than one
family.
(1) In general.
(2) Example.
(i) Reserved.
(j) Additional benefits.
(1) In general.
(2) Method of allocation.
(k) Pediatric dental coverage.
(1) In general.
(2) Method of allocation.
(l) Families including individuals not
lawfully present.
(1) In general.
(2) Revised household income
computation.
(i) Statutory method.
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
50939
(ii) Comparable method.
§ 1.36B–4 Reconciling the premium tax
credit with advance credit payments.
(a) Reconciliation.
(1) In general.
(2) Credit computation.
(3) Limitation on additional tax.
(i) In general.
(ii) Additional tax limitation table.
(4) Examples.
(b) Changes in filing status.
(1) In general.
(2) Taxpayers not married to each
other at the end of the taxable year.
(3) Married taxpayers filing separate
returns.
(4) Examples.
§ 1.36B–5 Information reporting by
Exchanges.
(a) Information required to be
reported.
(b) Time and manner of reporting.
§ 1.36B–1
Premium tax credit definitions.
(a) In general. Section 36B allows a
refundable premium tax credit for
taxable years ending after December 31,
2013. The definitions in this section
apply to this section and §§ 1.36B–2
through 1.36B–5.
(b) Affordable Care Act. The term
Affordable Care Act refers to the Patient
Protection and Affordable Care Act,
Public Law 111–148 (124 Stat. 119
(2010)), and the Health Care and
Education Reconciliation Act of 2010,
Public Law 111–152 (124 Stat. 1029
(2010)), as amended by the Medicare
and Medicaid Extenders Act of 2010,
Public Law 111–309 (124 Stat. 3285
(2010)), the Comprehensive 1099
Taxpayer Protection and Repayment of
Exchange Subsidy Overpayments Act of
2011, Public Law 112–9 (125 Stat. 36
(2011)), and the Department of Defense
and Full-Year Continuing
Appropriations Act, 2011, Public Law
112–10 (125 Stat. 38 (2011)).
(c) Qualified health plan. The term
qualified health plan has the same
meaning as in section 1301(a) of the
Affordable Care Act (42 U.S.C. 18021(a))
but does not include a catastrophic plan
described in section 1302(e) of the
Affordable Care Act (42 U.S.C.
18022(e)).
(d) Family and family size. A
taxpayer’s family means the individuals
for whom a taxpayer properly claims a
deduction for a personal exemption
under section 151 for the taxable year.
Family size means the number of
individuals in the family. Family and
family size include an individual who is
exempt from the requirement to
maintain minimum essential coverage
under section 5000A.
E:\FR\FM\17AUP1.SGM
17AUP1
Emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
50940
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 159 / Wednesday, August 17, 2011 / Proposed Rules
(e) Household income—(1) In general.
Household income means the sum of—
(i) A taxpayer’s modified adjusted
gross income; plus
(ii) The aggregate modified adjusted
gross income of all other individuals
who—
(A) Are included in the taxpayer’s
family under paragraph (d) of this
section; and
(B) Are required to file an income tax
return for the taxable year (determined
without regard to the exception under
section (1)(g)(7) to the requirement to
file a return).
(2) Modified adjusted gross income.
Modified adjusted gross income means
adjusted gross income (within the
meaning of section 62) increased by
amounts excluded from gross income
under section 911 and tax-exempt
interest the taxpayer receives or accrues
during the taxable year.
(f) Dependent. Dependent has the
same meaning as in section 152.
(g) Lawfully present. Lawfully present
has the same meaning as in 45 CFR
152.2.
(h) Federal poverty line. The federal
poverty line means the most recently
published poverty guidelines (updated
periodically in the Federal Register by
the Secretary of Health and Human
Services under the authority of 42
U.S.C. 9902(2)) as of the first day of the
regular enrollment period for coverage
by a qualified health plan offered
through an Exchange for a calendar
year. Thus, the federal poverty line for
computing the premium tax credit for a
taxable year is the federal poverty line
in effect on the first day of the initial or
annual open enrollment period
preceding that taxable year. See 45 CFR
155.410.
(i) [Reserved]
(j) Advance credit payment. Advance
credit payment means an advance
payment of the premium tax credit as
provided in section 1412 of the
Affordable Care Act (42 U.S.C. 18082).
(k) Exchange. Exchange has the same
meaning as in 45 CFR 155.20.
(l) Self-only coverage. Self-only
coverage means health insurance that
covers one individual.
(m) Family coverage. Family coverage
means health insurance that covers
more than one individual.
(n) Rating area. Rating area means an
Exchange service area, as described in
45 CFR 155.20.
(o) Effective/applicability date. This
section and §§ 1.36B–2 through 1.36B–
5 apply for taxable years ending after
December 31, 2013.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:31 Aug 16, 2011
Jkt 223001
§ 1.36B–2
credit.
Eligibility for premium tax
(a) In general. An applicable taxpayer
(within the meaning of paragraph (b) of
this section) is allowed a premium
assistance amount only for any month
that the applicable taxpayer, or the
applicable taxpayer’s spouse or
dependent—
(1) Is enrolled in one or more
qualified health plans through an
Exchange; and
(2) Is not eligible for minimum
essential coverage (within the meaning
of paragraph (c) of this section) other
than coverage described in section
5000A(f)(1)(C) (relating to coverage in
the individual market).
(b) Applicable taxpayer—(1) In
general. Except as otherwise provided
in this paragraph (b), an applicable
taxpayer is a taxpayer whose household
income is at least 100 percent but not
more than 400 percent of the federal
poverty line for the taxpayer’s family
size for the taxable year.
(2) Married taxpayers must file joint
return. A taxpayer who is married
(within the meaning of section 7703) at
the close of the taxable year is an
applicable taxpayer only if the taxpayer
and the taxpayer’s spouse file a joint
return for the taxable year.
(3) Dependents. An individual is not
an applicable taxpayer if another
taxpayer may claim a deduction under
section 151 for the individual for a
taxable year beginning in the calendar
year in which the individual’s taxable
year begins.
(4) Individuals not lawfully present or
incarcerated. An individual who is not
lawfully present in the United States or
is incarcerated (other than incarceration
pending disposition of charges) may not
be covered by a qualified health plan
through an Exchange. However, the
individual may be an applicable
taxpayer if a family member is eligible
to enroll in a qualified health plan. See
sections 1312(f)(1)(B) and 1312(f)(3) of
the Affordable Care Act (42 U.S.C.
18032(f)(1)(B) and (f)(3)) and § 1.36B–
3(b)(2).
(5) Individuals lawfully present. If a
taxpayer’s household income is less
than 100 percent of the federal poverty
line for the taxpayer’s family size and
the taxpayer or a member of the
taxpayer’s family is an alien lawfully
present in the United States, the
taxpayer is treated as an applicable
taxpayer if—
(i) The taxpayer or family member is
not eligible for the Medicaid program;
and
(ii) The taxpayer would be an
applicable taxpayer if the taxpayer’s
household income for the taxable year
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
was between 100 and 400 percent of the
federal poverty line for the taxpayer’s
family size.
(6) Special rule for taxpayers with
household income below 100 percent of
the federal poverty line for the taxable
year. A taxpayer (other than a taxpayer
described in paragraph (b)(5) of this
section) whose household income for a
taxable year is less than 100 percent of
the federal poverty line for the
taxpayer’s family size is treated as an
applicable taxpayer if—
(i) The taxpayer or a family member
enrolls in a qualified health plan
through an Exchange;
(ii) An Exchange estimates at the time
of enrollment that the taxpayer’s
household income will be between 100
and 400 percent of the federal poverty
line for the taxable year;
(iii) Advance credit payments are
authorized and paid for one or more
months during the taxable year; and
(iv) The taxpayer would be an
applicable taxpayer if the taxpayer’s
household income for the taxable year
was between 100 and 400 percent of the
federal poverty line for the taxpayer’s
family size.
(7) Computation of premium
assistance amounts for taxpayers with
household income below 100 percent of
the federal poverty line. If a taxpayer is
treated as an applicable taxpayer under
paragraph (b)(5) or (b)(6) of this section,
the taxpayer’s actual household income
for the taxable year is used to compute
the premium assistance amounts under
§ 1.36B–3(d).
(c) Minimum essential coverage—(1)
In general. Minimum essential coverage
is defined in section 5000A(f) and
regulations issued under that section.
As described in section 5000A(f),
government-sponsored programs,
eligible employer-sponsored plans,
grandfathered health plans, and certain
other health benefits coverage are
minimum essential coverage.
(2) Government-sponsored minimum
essential coverage—(i) In general.
Except as provided in paragraph
(c)(2)(ii) of this section, for purposes of
section 36B, an individual is eligible for
government-sponsored minimum
essential coverage if the individual
meets the criteria for coverage under a
government-sponsored program
described in section 5000A(f)(1)(A). The
Commissioner may define eligibility for
specific government-sponsored
programs further in published guidance
of general applicability, see
§ 601.601(d)(2) of this chapter.
(ii) Special rule for coverage under the
veteran’s health care program under
chapter 17 or 18 of Title 38, U.S.C. An
individual is eligible for minimum
E:\FR\FM\17AUP1.SGM
17AUP1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 159 / Wednesday, August 17, 2011 / Proposed Rules
Emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
essential coverage under the veteran’s
health care program authorized under
chapter 17 or 18 of Title 38, U.S.C., only
if the individual is enrolled in a
veteran’s health care program identified
as minimum essential coverage in
regulations issued under section 5000A.
(iii) Time of eligibility—(A) In general.
An individual generally is treated as
eligible for a government-sponsored
program on the first day of the first full
month in which the individual may
receive benefits under the program.
However, an individual who fails to
complete the requirements necessary to
receive benefits available under a
government-sponsored program (other
than a veteran’s health care program)
reasonably promptly is treated as
eligible for government-sponsored
minimum essential coverage as of the
first day of the second calendar month
following the event that establishes
eligibility under paragraph (c)(2)(i) of
this section.
(B) Retroactive effect of eligibility
determination. If an individual
receiving advance credit payments is
determined to be eligible for
government-sponsored minimum
essential coverage that is effective
retroactively (such as Medicaid), the
individual is treated as eligible for
minimum essential coverage under that
program no earlier than the first day of
the first calendar month beginning after
the approval.
(iv) Determination of Medicaid or
Children’s Health Insurance Program
(CHIP) ineligibility. An individual is
treated as not eligible for Medicaid,
CHIP, or a similar program for a period
of coverage under a qualified health
plan if an Exchange determines that the
individual is not eligible for the
program when the individual enrolls in
the qualified health plan.
(v) Examples. The following examples
illustrate the provisions of this
paragraph (c)(2).
Example 1. Delay in coverage effectiveness.
On April 10, Taxpayer D applies for coverage
under a government-sponsored health care
program. D’s application is approved on July
12 but her coverage is not effective until
September 1. Under paragraph (c)(2)(iii)(A) of
this section, D is eligible for governmentsponsored minimum essential coverage on
September 1.
Example 2. Time of eligibility. Taxpayer E
turns 65 on June 3 and becomes eligible for
Medicare. Under section 5000A(f)(1)(A),
Medicare is minimum essential coverage.
However, E must enroll in Medicare to
receive benefits. E enrolls in Medicare on
June 11 and may receive benefits
immediately. Under paragraph (c)(2)(iii)(A)
of this section, E is eligible for governmentsponsored minimum essential coverage on
July 1, the first day of the first full month that
E may receive benefits under the program.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:31 Aug 16, 2011
Jkt 223001
Example 3. Time of eligibility, individual
fails to complete necessary requirements. The
facts are the same as in Example 2, except
that E fails to enroll in the Medicare
coverage. E is treated as eligible for
government-sponsored minimum essential
coverage under paragraph (c)(2)(iii)(A) of this
section as of August 1, the first day of the
second month following the event that
establishes eligibility (E turning 65).
Example 4. Retroactive effect of eligibility.
On April 10, 2015, Taxpayer G applies for
coverage under the Medicaid program. G’s
application is approved on May 15, 2015,
and her Medicaid coverage is effective as of
April 1, 2015. Under paragraph (c)(2)(iii)(B)
of this section, G is eligible for governmentsponsored minimum essential coverage on
June 1, 2015, the first day of the first calendar
month after approval.
Example 5. Determination of Medicaid
ineligibility. In November 2014, Taxpayer H
applies to the Exchange to enroll in a
qualified health plan and for advance credit
payments for 2015. The Exchange estimates
that H’s household income will be 140
percent of the federal poverty line for H’s
family size and determines that H is not
eligible for Medicaid. The Exchange
authorizes advance credit payments for H for
2015. H experiences a loss of household
income in June 2015 but does not return to
the Exchange in 2015 to apply for Medicaid
benefits or report his change in income. H’s
household income for 2015 is 130 percent of
the federal poverty line (within the Medicaid
income threshold). Under paragraph (c)(2)(iv)
of this section, H is treated as not eligible for
Medicaid for 2015.
Example 6. Mid-year Medicaid eligibility
redetermination. The facts are the same as in
Example 5, except that H returns to the
Exchange in July 2015 and the Exchange
determines H is eligible for Medicaid. The
Exchange discontinues H’s advance credit
payments effective August 1. Under
paragraphs (c)(2)(iii)(B) and (c)(2)(iv) of this
section, H is treated as not eligible for
Medicaid for the coverage months when H is
covered by a qualified health plan. H is
eligible for government-sponsored minimum
essential coverage for the coverage months
after H is approved for Medicaid, August
through December 2015.
(3) Employer-sponsored minimum
essential coverage—(i) In general. For
purposes of section 36B, an employee
who may enroll in an eligible employersponsored plan (as defined in section
5000A(f)(2)) and an individual who may
enroll in the plan because of a
relationship to the employee (a related
individual) are eligible for minimum
essential coverage under the plan for
any month only if the plan is affordable
and provides minimum value.
Government-sponsored programs
described in section 5000A(f)(1)(A) are
not eligible employer-sponsored plans.
(ii) Plan year. For purposes of this
paragraph (c)(3), a plan year is an
eligible employer-sponsored plan’s
regular 12-month coverage period (or
the remainder of a 12-month coverage
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
50941
period for a new employee or an
individual who enrolls during a special
enrollment period).
(iii) Eligibility for coverage months
during a plan year—(A) In general. An
employee or related individual may be
eligible for minimum essential coverage
under an eligible employer-sponsored
plan for a coverage month during a plan
year if the employee or related
individual could have enrolled in the
plan for that month during an open or
special enrollment period.
(B) Example. The following example
illustrates the provisions of this
paragraph (c)(3)(iii).
Example. (i) Taxpayer B is an employee
of Employer X. X offers its employees a
health insurance plan that has a plan year
(within the meaning of paragraph (c)(3)(ii) of
this section) from October 1 through
September 30. Employees may enroll during
an open season from August 1 to September
15. B does not enroll in X’s plan for the plan
year October 1, 2014, to September 30, 2015.
In November 2014 B enrolls in a qualified
health plan through an Exchange for calendar
year 2015.
(ii) B could have enrolled in X’s plan
during the August 1 to September 15
enrollment period. Therefore, unless X’s plan
is not affordable for B or does not provide
minimum value, B is eligible for minimum
essential coverage for the months that B is
enrolled in the qualified health plan during
X’s plan year (January through September
2015).
(iv) Special rule for continuation
coverage. An individual who may enroll
in continuation coverage required under
federal law or a state law that provides
comparable continuation coverage is
eligible for minimum essential coverage
only if the individual enrolls in the
coverage.
(v) Affordable coverage—(A) In
general—(1) Affordability. Except as
provided in paragraph (c)(3)(v)(A)(2) of
this section, an eligible employersponsored plan is affordable for an
employee or a related individual if the
portion of the annual premium the
employee must pay, whether by salary
reduction or otherwise (required
contribution), for self-only coverage for
the taxable year does not exceed the
required contribution percentage (as
defined in paragraph (c)(3)(v)(B) of this
section) of the applicable taxpayer’s
household income for the taxable year.
(2) Employee safe harbor. An
employer-sponsored plan is treated as
not affordable for an employee or a
related individual for a plan year if,
when the employee or a related
individual enrolls in a qualified health
plan for a period coinciding with the
plan year (in whole or in part), an
Exchange determines that the eligible
E:\FR\FM\17AUP1.SGM
17AUP1
50942
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 159 / Wednesday, August 17, 2011 / Proposed Rules
Emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
employer-sponsored plan is not
affordable.
(B) Required contribution percentage.
The required contribution percentage is
9.5 percent. The percentage may be
adjusted in published guidance of
general applicability, see § 601.601(d)(2)
of this chapter, for taxable years
beginning after December 31, 2014, to
reflect rates of premium growth relative
to growth in income and, for taxable
years beginning after December 31,
2018, to reflect rates of premium growth
relative to growth in the consumer price
index.
(C) Examples. The following
examples illustrate the provisions of
this paragraph (c)(3)(v). Unless stated
otherwise, in each example the taxpayer
is single and has no dependents, the
employer’s plan is an eligible employersponsored plan and provides minimum
value, the employee is not eligible for
other minimum essential coverage, and
the taxpayer, related individual, and
employer-sponsored plan have a
calendar taxable year.
Example 1. Basic determination of
affordability. In 2014 Taxpayer C has
household income of $47,000. C is an
employee of Employer X, which offers its
employees a health insurance plan that
requires C to contribute $3,450 for self-only
coverage for 2014 (7.3 percent of C’s
household income). Because C’s required
contribution for self-only coverage does not
exceed 9.5 percent of household income,
under paragraph (c)(3)(v)(A)(1) of this
section, X’s plan is affordable for C, and C
is eligible for minimum essential coverage for
all months in 2014.
Example 2. Basic determination of
affordability for a related individual. The
facts are the same as in Example 1, except
that C is married to J and X’s plan requires
C to contribute $5,300 for coverage for C and
J for 2014 (11.3 percent of C’s household
income). Because C’s required contribution
for self-only coverage ($3,450) does not
exceed 9.5 percent of household income,
under paragraph (c)(3)(v)(A)(1) of this
section, X’s plan is affordable for C and J, and
C and J are eligible for minimum essential
coverage for all months in 2014.
Example 3. Determination of
unaffordability at enrollment. (i) Taxpayer D
is an employee of Employer X. In November
2013 the Exchange in D’s rating area projects
that D’s 2014 household income will be
$37,000. It also verifies that D’s required
contribution for self-only coverage under X’s
health insurance plan will be $3,700 (10
percent of household income). Consequently,
the Exchange determines that X’s plan is
unaffordable. D enrolls in a qualified health
plan and not in X’s plan. In December 2014,
X pays D a $2,500 bonus. Thus, D’s actual
2014 household income is $39,500 and D’s
required contribution for coverage under X’s
plan is 9.4 percent of household income.
(ii) Based on D’s actual 2014 household
income, D’s required contribution does not
exceed 9.5 percent of household income and
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:31 Aug 16, 2011
Jkt 223001
X’s health plan is affordable for D. However,
when D enrolled in a qualified health plan
for 2014, the Exchange determined that X’s
plan was not affordable for D for 2014.
Consequently, under paragraph (c)(3)(v)(A)(2)
of this section, X’s plan is treated as not
affordable for D and D is treated as not
eligible for minimum essential coverage for
2014.
Example 4. Determination of
unaffordability for plan year. The facts are
the same as in Example 3, except that X’s
employee health insurance plan year is
September 1 to August 31. The Exchange in
D’s rating area determines in August 2014
that X’s plan is unaffordable for D based on
D’s projected household income for 2014. D
enrolls in a qualified health plan as of
September 1, 2014. Under paragraph
(c)(3)(v)(A)(2) of this section, X’s plan is
treated as not affordable for D and D is
treated as not eligible for minimum essential
coverage under X’s plan for the coverage
months September to December 2014 and
January through August 2015.
Example 5. Determination of
unaffordability for part of plan year. (i)
Taxpayer E is an employee of Employer X
beginning in May 2015. X’s employee health
insurance plan year is September 1 to August
31. E’s required contribution for self-only
coverage for May through August is $150 per
month ($1,800 for the full plan year). The
Exchange in E’s rating area determines E’s
household income for purposes of eligibility
for advance credit payments as $18,000. E’s
actual household income for the 2015 taxable
year is $20,000.
(ii) Whether coverage under X’s plan is
affordable for E is determined for the
remainder of X’s plan year (May through
August). E’s required contribution for a full
plan year ($1,800) exceeds 9.5 percent of E’s
household income (1,800/18,000 = 10
percent). Therefore, the Exchange determines
that X’s coverage is unaffordable for May
through August. Although E’s actual
household income for 2015 is $20,000 (and
E’s required contribution of $1,800 does not
exceed 9.5 percent of E’s household income),
under paragraph (c)(3)(v)(A)(2) of this
section, X’s plan is treated as unaffordable for
E for the part of the plan year May through
August 2015. Consequently, E is not eligible
for minimum essential coverage under X’s
plan for the period May through August
2015.
Example 6. Affordability determined for
part of a taxable year (part-year period). (i)
Taxpayer F is an employee of Employer X.
X’s employee health insurance plan year is
September 1 to August 31. F’s required
contribution for self-only coverage for the
period September 2014 through August 2015
is $150 per month or $1,800 for the plan year.
F does not ask the Exchange in his rating area
to determine whether X’s coverage is
affordable for F. F does not enroll in X’s plan
during X’s open season but enrolls in a
qualified health plan for September through
December 2014. F’s household income in
2014 is $18,000.
(ii) Because F is a calendar year taxpayer
and Employer X’s plan is not a calendar year
plan, F must determine the affordability of
X’s coverage for the part-year period in 2014
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
(September–December). F determines the
affordability of X’s plan for the September
through December 2014 period by comparing
the annual premiums ($1,800) to F’s 2014
household income. F’s required contribution
of $1,800 is 10 percent of F’s 2014 household
income. Because F’s required contribution
exceeds 9.5 percent of F’s 2014 household
income, X’s plan is not affordable for F for
the part-year period September through
December 2014 and F is not eligible for
minimum essential coverage under X’s plan
for that period.
(iii) F enrolls in Exchange coverage for
2015 and does not ask the Exchange to
determine whether X’s coverage is affordable.
F’s 2015 household income is $20,000.
(iv) F must determine if X’s plan is
affordable for the part-year period January
2015 through August 2015. F’s annual
required contribution ($1,800) is 9 percent of
F’s 2015 household income. Because F’s
required contribution does not exceed 9.5
percent of F’s 2015 household income, X’s
plan is affordable for F for the part-year
period January through August 2015 and F is
eligible for minimum essential coverage for
that period.
Example 7. Coverage unaffordable at year
end. Taxpayer G is employed by Employer X.
In November 2014 the Exchange in G’s rating
area determines that G is eligible for
affordable employer-sponsored coverage for
2015. G nonetheless enrolls in a qualified
health plan for 2015 but does not receive
advance credit payments. G’s 2015
household income is less than expected and
G’s required contribution for employersponsored coverage for 2015 exceeds 9.5
percent of G’s actual 2015 household income.
Under paragraph (c)(3)(v)(A)(1) of this
section, G is not eligible for minimum
essential coverage for 2015 and, if otherwise
eligible, G may claim a premium tax credit.
(vi) Minimum value. An eligible
employer-sponsored plan provides
minimum value only if the plan’s share
of the total allowed costs of benefits
provided under the plan (as determined
under regulations issued by the
Secretary of Health and Human Services
under section 1302(d)(2) of the
Affordable Care Act (42 U.S.C.
18022(d)(2))) is at least 60 percent.
(vii) Enrollment in eligible employersponsored plan—(A) In general. The
requirements of affordability and
minimum value do not apply if an
individual enrolls in an eligible
employer-sponsored plan.
(B) Example. The following example
illustrates the provisions of this
paragraph (c)(3)(vii).
Example. Taxpayer H is employed by
Employer X in 2014. H’s required
contribution for employer coverage exceeds
9.5 percent of H’s 2014 household income. H
enrolls in X’s plan for 2014. Under paragraph
(c)(3)(vii) of this section, H is eligible for
minimum essential coverage for 2014
because H is enrolled in an eligible
employer-sponsored plan for 2014.
E:\FR\FM\17AUP1.SGM
17AUP1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 159 / Wednesday, August 17, 2011 / Proposed Rules
§ 1.36B–3 Computing the premium
assistance credit amount.
Emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
(a) In general. A taxpayer’s premium
assistance credit amount for a taxable
year is the sum of the premium
assistance amounts determined under
paragraph (d) of this section for all
coverage months for individuals in the
taxpayer’s family.
(b) Definitions. For purposes of this
section—
(1) The cost of a qualified health plan
is the premium the plan charges; and
(2) The term coverage family refers to
members of the taxpayer’s family who
are not eligible for minimum essential
coverage (other than coverage in the
individual market), are lawfully present
in the United States, and are not
incarcerated (except pending
disposition of charges).
(c) Coverage month—(1) In general. A
month is a coverage month for an
individual if, as of the first day of the
month—
(i) The individual is covered by a
qualified health plan enrolled in
through an Exchange;
(ii) The individual’s premiums for
coverage under the plan are paid by the
taxpayer or by an advance credit
payment; and
(iii) The individual is not eligible for
minimum essential coverage (within the
meaning of § 1.36B–2(c)) other than
coverage described in section
5000A(f)(1)(C) (relating to coverage in
the individual market).
(2) Premiums paid for the taxpayer.
Premiums another person pays for
coverage of the taxpayer, taxpayer’s
spouse, or dependent are treated as paid
by the taxpayer.
(3) Examples. The following examples
illustrate the provisions of this
paragraph (c). In each example, unless
stated otherwise, the individuals are not
eligible for minimum essential coverage
other than coverage in the individual
market and the taxpayer is an applicable
taxpayer.
Example 1. (i) Taxpayer M is single with
no dependents. In December 2013 M enrolls
in a qualified health plan for 2014 and the
Exchange approves advance credit payments.
On May 15, 2014, M enlists in the U.S. Army
and is eligible immediately for governmentsponsored minimum essential coverage.
(ii) Under paragraph (c)(1) of this section,
January through May 2014 are coverage
months for M. June through December 2014
are not coverage months because M is eligible
for minimum essential coverage for those
months. Thus, under paragraph (a) of this
section, M’s premium assistance credit
amount for 2014 is the sum of the premium
assistance amounts for the months January
through May.
Example 2. (i) Taxpayer N has one
dependent, S. S is eligible for government-
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:31 Aug 16, 2011
Jkt 223001
sponsored minimum essential coverage. N is
not eligible for minimum essential coverage.
N enrolls in a qualified health plan for 2014
and the Exchange approves advance credit
payments. On August 1, 2014, S loses
eligibility for minimum essential coverage. N
cancels the qualified health plan that covers
only N and enrolls in a qualified health plan
that covers N and S for August through
December 2014.
(ii) Under paragraph (c)(1) of this section,
January through December of 2014 are
coverage months for N and August through
December are coverage months for N and S.
N’s premium assistance credit amount for
2014 is the sum of the premium assistance
amounts for these coverage months.
Example 3. (i) O and P are the divorced
parents of T. Under the divorce agreement
between O and P, T resides with P and P
claims T as a dependent. However, O must
pay premiums for health insurance for T. P
enrolls T in a qualified health plan for 2014.
O pays the premiums to the insurance
company.
(ii) Because P claims T as a dependent, P
(and not O) may claim a premium tax credit
for coverage for T. See § 1.36B–2(a). Under
paragraph (c)(2) of this section, the premiums
that O pays for coverage for T are treated as
paid by P. Thus, the months when T is
covered by a qualified health plan are
coverage months under paragraph (c)(1) of
this section in computing P’s premium tax
credit under paragraph (a) of this section.
(d) Premium assistance amount. The
premium assistance amount for a
coverage month is the lesser of—
(1) The premiums for the month for
one or more qualified health plans in
which a taxpayer or a member of the
taxpayer’s family enrolls; or
(2) The excess of the adjusted
monthly premium for the applicable
benchmark plan over 1⁄12 of the product
of a taxpayer’s household income and
the applicable percentage for the taxable
year.
(e) Adjusted monthly premium. The
adjusted monthly premium is the
premium an insurer would charge for
the applicable benchmark plan to cover
all members of the taxpayer’s coverage
family, adjusted only for the age of each
member of the coverage family as
allowed under section 2701 of the
Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C.
300gg).
(f) Applicable benchmark plan—(1) In
general. Except as otherwise provided
in this paragraph (f), the applicable
benchmark plan for a coverage month is
the second lowest cost silver plan (as
described in section 1302(d)(1)(B) of the
Affordable Care Act (42 U.S.C.
18022(d)(1)(B))) offered at the time a
taxpayer or family member enrolls in a
qualified health plan through the
Exchange in the rating area where the
taxpayer resides for—
(i) Self-only coverage for a taxpayer—
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
50943
(A) Who computes tax under section
1(c) (unmarried individuals other than
surviving spouses and heads of
household) and is not allowed a
deduction under section 151 for a
dependent for the taxable year;
(B) Who purchases only self-only
coverage for one individual; or
(C) Whose coverage family includes
only one individual; and
(ii) Family coverage for all other
taxpayers.
(2) Family coverage. If an Exchange
offers categories of family coverage (for
example, two adults, one adult with
children, two or more adults with
children, or children only), the
applicable benchmark plan for family
coverage is the coverage category that
applies to the members of the taxpayer’s
coverage family who enroll in a
qualified health plan (such as a plan
covering two adults if the members of
taxpayer’s coverage family are two
adults).
(3) Second lowest cost silver plan not
covering the taxpayer’s family. If the
applicable benchmark plan determined
under paragraphs (f)(1) and (f)(2) of this
section does not cover all members of a
taxpayer’s coverage family (for example,
because family members reside in
different rating areas), the premium for
the applicable benchmark plan is the
sum of the premiums for the applicable
benchmark plans determined under
paragraphs (f)(1) and (f)(2) of this
section that cover the components of the
taxpayer’s coverage family.
(4) Benchmark plan terminates or
closes to enrollment. A qualified health
plan that is the applicable benchmark
plan under this paragraph (f) for a
taxpayer does not cease to be the
applicable benchmark plan solely
because the plan or a lower cost plan
terminates or closes to enrollment
during the taxable year.
(5) Examples. The following examples
illustrate the rules of this paragraph (f).
In each example, unless otherwise
stated, the taxpayer is eligible to receive
a premium tax credit.
Example 1. Single taxpayer with no
dependents. Taxpayer V is single and resides
with his 24-year-old daughter but may not
claim her as a dependent. Taxpayer V
purchases family coverage for himself and
his daughter. The exchange in V’s rating area
offers only self-only and family coverage
categories. Under paragraph (f)(1)(i)(A) of this
section, V’s applicable benchmark plan is the
second lowest cost silver self-only plan. But
see paragraph (h) of this section for
computing the credit when multiple
taxpayers are covered by one qualified health
plan.
Example 2. Single taxpayer with one
dependent, two coverage categories. The facts
are the same as in Example 1, except that V
E:\FR\FM\17AUP1.SGM
17AUP1
50944
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 159 / Wednesday, August 17, 2011 / Proposed Rules
also resides with his teenage son and claims
him as a dependent. V purchases family
coverage for himself, his son, and his
daughter. Under paragraph (f)(1)(ii) of this
section, V’s applicable benchmark plan is the
second lowest cost silver family plan.
Example 3. Single taxpayer with one
dependent, multiple coverage categories. The
facts are the same as in Example 2, except
that the Exchange where V resides offers a
category of coverage for one adult and
children. Under paragraphs (f)(1)(ii) and (f)(2)
of this section, V’s applicable benchmark
plan is the second lowest cost silver plan for
one adult plus children.
Example 4. Single taxpayer with one
dependent, multiple coverage categories. The
facts are the same as in Example 2, except
that the Exchange where V resides offers a
category of coverage for one adult and one
child in addition to coverage for one adult
and children. Under paragraphs (f)(1)(ii) and
(f)(2) of this section, V’s applicable
benchmark plan is the second lowest cost
silver plan for one adult and one child.
Example 5. Applicable benchmark plan
unrelated to coverage purchased. Taxpayers
W and X, who are married, reside with X’s
two teenage daughters, whom they claim as
dependents. The Exchange where W and X
reside offers a category of coverage for one
adult plus children. W and X purchase selfonly coverage for W and one adult plus
children coverage for X and X’s daughters.
Under paragraph (f)(1)(ii) of this section, W’s
and X’s applicable benchmark plan is the
second lowest cost silver family plan.
Example 6. Minimum essential coverage
for some coverage months. Taxpayer Y
claims his daughter as a dependent. Y and
his daughter enroll in a qualified health plan
for 2014. The exchange in Y’s rating area
offers only self-only and family coverage
categories. Y, but not his daughter, is eligible
for government-sponsored minimum
essential coverage for September to December
2014. Thus, under paragraph (c)(1)(iii) of this
section, January through December are
coverage months for Y’s daughter and
January through August are coverage months
for Y. Because, under paragraphs (d) and
(f)(1) of this section, the premium assistance
amount for a coverage month is computed
based on the applicable benchmark plan for
that coverage month, Y’s applicable
benchmark plan for January through August
is the second lowest cost silver family plan
under paragraph (f)(1)(ii) of this section.
Under paragraph (f)(1)(i)(C) of this section,
Y’s applicable benchmark plan for September
through December is the second lowest cost
silver self-only plan.
Example 7. Family member eligible for
minimum essential coverage for the taxable
year. The facts are the same as in Example
6, except that Y is not eligible for
government-sponsored minimum essential
coverage for any months and Y’s daughter is
eligible for government-sponsored minimum
essential coverage for the entire year. Under
paragraph (f)(1)(i)(C) of this section, Y’s
applicable benchmark plan is the second
lowest cost silver self-only plan.
Example 8. Family required to buy
multiple plans to obtain coverage. (i)
Taxpayers X and Z are married and live in
different Exchange rating areas. X and Z have
one child, M, whom they claim as a
dependent and who resides with X. X and M
enroll in a qualified health plan covering one
adult plus children through the Exchange in
X’s rating area, and Z enrolls in a qualified
health plan providing self-only coverage
through the Exchange in Z’s rating area.
(ii) Under paragraph (f)(3) of this section,
the premium for the applicable benchmark
plan for computing X’s and Z’s premium
assistance credit amount is the sum of the
premium for the second lowest cost silver
one adult plus children plan offered through
the Exchange in X’s rating area and the
premium for the second lowest cost silver
self-only plan offered through the Exchange
in Z’s rating area.
Example 9. Benchmark plan closes to new
enrollees during the year. Taxpayers X, Y,
and Z each have coverage families consisting
of two adults. In the rating area where X, Y,
and Z reside, Plan 2 is the second lowest cost
silver plan and Plan 3 is the third lowest cost
silver plan covering two adults offered
through the Exchange. The X and Y families
each enroll in a qualified health plan that is
not the applicable benchmark plan in
November during the regular open
enrollment period. Plan 2 closes to new
enrollees the following June. Thus, on July 1,
Plan 3 is the second lowest cost silver plan
available to new enrollees through the
Exchange. The Z family enrolls in a qualified
health plan in July. Under paragraphs (f)(1),
(f)(2), and (f)(4) of this section, the applicable
benchmark plan is Plan 2 for X and Y for all
coverage months during the year. The
applicable benchmark plan for Z is Plan 3,
because Plan 2 is not offered through the
Exchange when the Z family enrolls.
Example 10. Benchmark plan terminates
for all enrollees during the year. The facts are
the same as in Example 9, except that Plan
2 terminates for all enrollees on June 30.
Under paragraphs (f)(1), (f)(2), and (f)(4) of
this section, Plan 2 is the applicable
benchmark plan for X and Y for all coverage
months during the year and Plan 3 is the
applicable benchmark plan for Z.
(g) Applicable percentage—(1) In
general. The applicable percentage
multiplied by a taxpayer’s household
income determines the taxpayer’s
required share of premiums for the
benchmark plan. This amount is
subtracted from the adjusted monthly
premium for the applicable benchmark
plan when computing the premium
assistance amount. The applicable
percentage is computed by first
determining the percentage that the
taxpayer’s household income bears to
the federal poverty line for the
taxpayer’s family size. The resulting
federal poverty line percentage is then
compared to the income categories
described in the table in paragraph (g)(2)
of this section (or successor tables). An
applicable percentage within an income
category increases on a sliding scale in
a linear manner and is rounded to the
nearest one-hundredth of one percent.
The applicable percentages in the table
may be adjusted in published guidance
of general applicability, see
§ 601.601(d)(2) of this chapter, for
taxable years beginning after December
31, 2014, to reflect rates of premium
growth relative to growth in income
and, for taxable years beginning after
December 31, 2018, to reflect rates of
premium growth relative to growth in
the consumer price index.
(2) Applicable percentage table.
Household income percentage of federal poverty line
Initial percentage
Emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
Less than 133% .......................................................................................................................................
At least 133% but less than 150% ..........................................................................................................
At least 150% but less than 200% ..........................................................................................................
At least 200% but less than 250% ..........................................................................................................
At least 250% but less than 300% ..........................................................................................................
At least 300% but less than 400% ..........................................................................................................
(3) Examples. The following examples
illustrate the rules of this paragraph (g).
Example 1. A’s household income is 275
percent of the federal poverty line for A’s
family size for that taxable year. In the table
in paragraph (g)(2) of this section, the initial
percentage for a taxpayer with household
income of 250 to 300 percent of the federal
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:31 Aug 16, 2011
Jkt 223001
poverty line is 8.05 and the final percentage
is 9.5. A’s federal poverty line percentage of
275 percent is halfway between 250 percent
and 300 percent. Thus, rounded to the
nearest one-hundredth of one percent, A’s
applicable percentage is 8.78, which is
halfway between the initial percentage of
8.05 and the final percentage of 9.5.
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
2.0
3.0
4.0
6.3
8.05
9.5
Final percentage
2.0
4.0
6.3
8.05
9.5
9.5
Example 2. (i) B’s household income is 210
percent of the federal poverty line for B’s
family size. In the table in paragraph (g)(2)
of this section, the initial percentage for a
taxpayer with household income of 200 to
250 percent of the federal poverty line is 6.3
and the final percentage is 8.05. B’s
applicable percentage is 6.65, computed as
follows:
E:\FR\FM\17AUP1.SGM
17AUP1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 159 / Wednesday, August 17, 2011 / Proposed Rules
(ii) Determine the excess of B’s FPL
percentage (210) over the initial
household income percentage in B’s
range (200), which is 10. Determine the
difference between the initial household
income percentage in the taxpayer’s
range (200) and the ending household
income percentage in the taxpayer’s
range (250), which is 50. Divide the first
amount by the second amount:
210 ¥ 200 = 10
250 ¥ 200 = 50
10/50 = .20.
(iii) Compute the difference between
the initial premium percentage (6.3) and
the second premium percentage (8.05)
in the taxpayer’s range; 8.05 ¥ 6.3 =
1.75.
(iv) Multiply the amount in the first
calculation (.20) by the amount in the
second calculation (1.75) and add the
product (.35) to the initial premium
percentage in B’s range (6.3), resulting
in B’s applicable percentage of 6.65:
.20 × 1.75 = .35
6.3 + .35 = 6.65.
Emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
(h) Plan covering more than one
family—(1) In general. If a single
qualified health plan covers more than
one family, each applicable taxpayer
covered by the plan may claim a
premium tax credit, if otherwise
allowable. Each taxpayer computes the
credit using that taxpayer’s applicable
percentage, household income, and the
benchmark plan that applies to the
taxpayer under paragraph (f) of this
section. In determining whether the
amount computed under paragraph
(d)(1) of this section (the premiums for
the qualified health plan in which the
taxpayer enrolls) is less than the amount
computed under paragraph (d)(2) of this
section (the benchmark plan premium
minus the product of household income
and the applicable percentage), the
premiums paid are allocated to each
taxpayer in proportion to the premiums
for each taxpayer’s benchmark plan.
(2) Example. The following example
illustrates the rules of this paragraph
(h).
Example. (i) Taxpayers A and B enroll in
a single qualified health plan. B is A’s 25year-old child who is not A’s dependent. B
has no dependents. The plan covers A, B,
and A’s two children who are A’s
dependents. The premium for the plan in
which A and B enroll is $15,000. The
premium for the second lowest cost silver
family plan is $12,000 and the premium for
the second lowest cost silver self-only plan
is $6,000. A and B are applicable taxpayers
and otherwise eligible to claim the premium
tax credit.
(ii) Under paragraph (h)(1) of this section,
both A and B may claim premium tax credits.
A computes her credit using her household
income, a family size of three, and a
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:31 Aug 16, 2011
Jkt 223001
benchmark plan premium of $12,000. B
computes his credit using his household
income, a family size of one, and a
benchmark plan premium of $6,000.
(iii) In determining whether the amount in
paragraph (d)(1) of this section (the
premiums for the qualified health plan A and
B purchase) is less than the amount in
paragraph (d)(2) of this section (the
benchmark plan premium minus the product
of household income and the applicable
percentage), the $15,000 premiums paid are
allocated to A and B in proportion to the
premiums for their applicable benchmark
plans. Thus, the portion of the premium
allocated to A is $10,000 ($15,000 × $12,000/
$18,000) and the portion allocated to B is
$5,000 ($15,000 × $6,000/$18,000).
(i) [Reserved]
(j) Additional benefits—(1) In general.
If a qualified health plan offers benefits
in addition to the essential health
benefits a qualified health plan must
provide under section 1302 of the
Affordable Care Act (42 U.S.C. 18022),
or a State requires a qualified health
plan to cover benefits in addition to
these essential health benefits, the
portion of the premium for the plan
properly allocable to the additional
benefits is excluded from the monthly
premiums under paragraph (d)(1) or
(d)(2) of this section.
(2) Method of allocation. The portion
of the premium properly allocable to
additional benefits is determined under
regulations issued by the Secretary of
Health and Human Services. See section
36B(b)(3)(D).
(k) Pediatric dental coverage—(1) In
general. For purposes of determining
the amount of the monthly premium a
taxpayer pays for coverage under
paragraph (d)(1) of this section, if an
individual enrolls in both a qualified
health plan and a plan described in
section 1311(d)(2)(B)(ii) of the
Affordable Care Act (42 U.S.C.
13031(d)(2)(B)(ii)) (Affordable Care Act
dental plan), the portion of the premium
for the Affordable Care Act dental plan
that is properly allocable to pediatric
dental benefits that are essential benefits
required to be provided by a qualified
health plan is treated as a premium
payable for the individual’s qualified
health plan.
(2) Method of allocation. [Reserved]
(l) Families including individuals not
lawfully present—(1) In general. If one
or more individuals for whom a
taxpayer is allowed a deduction under
section 151 are not lawfully present
(within the meaning of § 1.36B–1(g)),
the percentage a taxpayer’s household
income bears to the federal poverty line
for the taxpayer’s family size for
purposes of determining the applicable
percentage under paragraph (g) of this
section is determined by excluding
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
50945
individuals who are not lawfully
present from family size and by
determining household income in
accordance with paragraph (l)(2) of this
section.
(2) Revised household income
computation—(i) Statutory method. For
purposes of paragraph (l)(1) of this
section, household income is equal to
the product of the taxpayer’s household
income (determined without regard to
this paragraph (l)(2)) and a fraction—
(A) The numerator of which is the
federal poverty line for the taxpayer’s
family size determined by excluding
individuals who are not lawfully
present; and
(B) The denominator of which is the
federal poverty line for the taxpayer’s
family size determined by including
individuals who are not lawfully
present.
(ii) Comparable method. [Reserved]
§ 1.36B–4 Reconciling the premium tax
credit with advance credit payments.
(a) Reconciliation—(1) In general. The
amount of credit allowed under section
36B and this section is reconciled with
advance credit payments on a taxpayer’s
income tax return for a taxable year. A
taxpayer whose premium tax credit for
the taxable year exceeds the taxpayer’s
advance credit payments may receive
the excess as an income tax refund. A
taxpayer whose advance credit
payments for the taxable year exceed the
taxpayer’s premium tax credit owes the
excess as an additional income tax
liability.
(2) Credit computation. The premium
assistance credit amount is computed
on the taxpayer’s return using the
taxpayer’s household income and family
size for the taxable year. Thus, the
taxpayer’s contribution amount
(household income for the taxable year
times the applicable percentage) is
determined using the taxpayer’s
household income and family size at the
end of the taxable year. If the applicable
benchmark plan changes during the
taxable year, the taxpayer may be
required to use a different applicable
benchmark plan to determine the
premium assistance amounts for the
coverage months.
(3) Limitation on additional tax—(i)
In general. The additional tax imposed
under paragraph (a)(1) of this section on
a taxpayer whose household income is
less than 400 percent of the federal
poverty line is limited to the amounts
provided in the table in paragraph
(a)(3)(ii) of this section (or successor
tables). For taxable years beginning after
December 31, 2014, the limitation
amounts may be adjusted in published
guidance of general applicability, see
E:\FR\FM\17AUP1.SGM
17AUP1
50946
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 159 / Wednesday, August 17, 2011 / Proposed Rules
§ 601.601(d)(2) of this chapter, to reflect
changes in the consumer price index.
(ii) Additional tax limitation table.
Limitation amount
for taxpayers
whose tax is
determined under
section 1(c)
Household income percentage of federal poverty line
Less than 200% .......................................................................................................................................
At least 200% but less than 300% ..........................................................................................................
At least 300% but less than 400% ..........................................................................................................
Emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
(4) Examples. The rules of this
paragraph (a) are illustrated by the
following examples. Unless otherwise
stated, in each example the taxpayer is
allowed a premium tax credit, has a
calendar taxable year, and files an
income tax return for the taxable year.
Example 1. Household income increases.
(i) Taxpayer A is single and has no
dependents. The Exchange in A’s rating area
projects A’s 2014 household income to be
$27,225 (250 percent of the federal poverty
line for a family of one, applicable percentage
8.05). A enrolls in a qualified health plan.
The annual premium for the applicable
benchmark plan is $5,200. A’s advance credit
payments are $3,008 (benchmark plan
premium of $5,200 less contribution amount
of $2,192 (projected household income of
$27,225 × .0805) = $3,008).
(ii) A’s household income for 2014 is
$32,800, which is 301 percent of the federal
poverty line for a family of one (applicable
percentage 9.5). Consequently, A’s premium
tax credit for 2014 is $2,084 (benchmark plan
premium of $5,200 less contribution amount
of $3,116 (household income of $32,800 ×
.095). Because A’s advance credit payments
for 2014 are $3,008 and A’s 2014 credit is
$2,084, A has excess advance payments of
$924. Under paragraph (a)(1) of this section,
A’s tax liability for 2014 is increased by $924.
Example 2. Household income decreases.
The facts are the same as in Example 1,
except that A’s actual household income for
2014 is $21,780 (200 percent of the federal
poverty line for a family of one, applicable
percentage 6.3). Consequently, A’s premium
tax credit for 2014 is $3,828 ($5,200
benchmark plan premium less contribution
amount of $1,372 (household income of
$21,780 × .063)). Because A’s advance credit
payments for 2014 are $3,008, A is allowed
an additional credit of $820 ($3,828 less
$3,008).
Example 3. Family size decreases.
(i) Taxpayers B and C are married and have
two children (ages 17 and 20) whom they
claim as their dependents in 2013. The
Exchange in their rating area projects their
2014 household income to be $61,460 (275
percent of the federal poverty line for a
family of four, applicable percentage 8.78). B
and C enroll in a qualified health plan for
2014 that covers the four family members.
The annual premium for the applicable
benchmark plan is $14,100. B and C’s
advance credit payments for 2014 are $8,704
(benchmark plan premium of $14,100 less
contribution amount of $5,396 (projected
household income of $61,460 × .0878)).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:31 Aug 16, 2011
Jkt 223001
(ii) In 2014 B and C do not claim their 20year old child as their dependent.
Consequently, B and C’s family size for 2014
is three and their household income is 332
percent of the federal poverty line for a
family of three (applicable percentage 9.5).
Their premium tax credit for 2014 is $8,261
($14,100 benchmark plan premium less
$5,839 contribution amount (household
income of $61,460 × .095)). Because B and
C’s advance credit payments for 2014 are
$8,704 and their 2014 credit is $8,261, B and
C have excess advance payments of $443.
Under paragraph (a)(1) of this section, B and
C’s tax liability for 2014 is increased by $443.
Because B and C’s household income is
below 400 percent of the federal poverty line,
if B and C’s excess advance payments
exceeded $2,500, under the limitation of
paragraph (a)(3) of this section, B and C’s
additional tax liability would be limited to
that amount.
Example 4. Repayment limitation does not
apply. (i) Taxpayer D is single and has no
dependents. The Exchange in D’s rating area
approves advance credit payments for D
based on 2014 household income of $38,115
(350 percent of the federal poverty line for a
family of one, applicable percentage 9.5). D
enrolls in a qualified health plan. The annual
premium for the applicable benchmark plan
is $5,200. D’s advance credit payments are
$1,579 (benchmark plan premium of $5,200
less contribution amount of $3,621 (projected
household income of $38,115 × .095) =
$3,621).
(ii) D’s actual household income for 2014
is $43,778, which is 402 percent of the
federal poverty line for a family of one. D is
not an applicable taxpayer and may not claim
a premium tax credit. Additionally, the
repayment limitation of paragraph (a)(3) of
this section does not apply. Consequently, D
has excess advance payments of $1,579 (the
total amount of the advance credit payments
in 2014). Under paragraph (a)(1) of this
section, D’s tax liability for 2014 is increased
by $1,579.
Example 5. Coverage for less than a full
taxable year. (i) Taxpayer F is single and has
no dependents. In November 2013 the
Exchange in F’s rating area projects F’s 2014
household income to be $27,225 (250 percent
of the federal poverty line for a family of one,
applicable percentage 8.05). F enrolls in a
qualified health plan. The annual premium
for the applicable benchmark plan is $5,200.
F’s monthly advance credit payment is $251
(benchmark plan premium of $5,200 less
contribution amount of $2,192 (projected
household income of $27,225 × .0805) =
$3,008; $3,008/12 = $251).
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
$300
750
1,250
Limitation amount
for all other
taxpayers
$600
1,500
2,500
(ii) F begins a new job in August 2014 and
is eligible for employer-sponsored minimum
essential coverage for the period September
through December 2014. F discontinues her
Exchange coverage effective November 1,
2014. F’s household income for 2014 is
$28,000 (257 percent of the federal poverty
line for a family size of one, applicable
percentage 8.25).
(iii) Under § 1.36B–3(a), F’s premium
assistance credit amount is the sum of the
premium assistance amounts for the coverage
months. Under § 1.36B–3(c)(1)(iii), a month
in which an individual is eligible for
minimum essential coverage other than
coverage in the individual market is not a
coverage month. Because F is eligible for
employer-sponsored minimum essential
coverage as of September 1, only the months
January through August of 2014 are coverage
months.
(iv) If F had 12 coverage months in 2014,
F’s premium tax credit would be $2,890
(benchmark plan premium of $5,200 less
contribution amount of $2,310 (household
income of $28,000 × .0825)). Because F has
only eight coverage months in 2014, F’s
credit is $1,927 ($2,890/12 × 8). Because F
does not discontinue her Exchange coverage
until November 1, 2014, F’s advance credit
payments for 2014 are $2,510 ($251 × 10).
Consequently, F has excess advance
payments of $583 ($2,510 less $1,927) and
F’s tax liability for 2014 is increased by $583
under paragraph (a)(1) of this section.
Example 6. Changes in coverage months
and applicable benchmark plan. (i) Taxpayer
E claims one dependent, F. E is eligible for
government-sponsored minimum essential
coverage. E enrolls F in a qualified health
plan for 2014. The Exchange in E’s rating
area projects E’s 2014 household income to
be $29,420 (200 percent of the federal
poverty line for a family of two, applicable
percentage 6.3). The annual premium for E’s
applicable benchmark plan is $5,200. E’s
monthly advance credit payment is $279
(benchmark plan premium of $5,200 less
contribution amount of $1,853 (projected
household income of $29,420 × .063) =
$3,347; $3,347/12 = $279).
(ii) On August 1, 2014, E loses her
eligibility for government-sponsored
minimum essential coverage. E cancels the
qualified health plan that covers F and
enrolls in a qualified health plan that covers
E and F for August through December 2014.
The annual premium for the applicable
benchmark plan is $10,000. The Exchange
computes E’s monthly advance credit
payments for the period September through
December as $679 (benchmark plan premium
E:\FR\FM\17AUP1.SGM
17AUP1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 159 / Wednesday, August 17, 2011 / Proposed Rules
Emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
of $10,000 less contribution amount of
$1,853 (projected household income of
$29,420 × .063) = $8,147; $8,147/12 = $679).
E’s household income for 2014 is $28,000
(190 percent of the federal poverty line,
applicable percentage 5.84).
(iii) Under § 1.36B–3(c)(1), January through
July of 2014 are coverage months for F and
August through December are coverage
months for E and F. Under paragraph (a)(2)
of this section, E must compute her premium
tax credit using the premium for the
applicable benchmark plan for each coverage
month. E’s premium assistance credit amount
for 2014 is the sum of the premium
assistance amounts for all coverage months.
E reconciles her premium tax credit with
advance credit payments as follows:
Advance credit payments (Jan.
to July) ....................................
$1,953
Advance credit payments (Aug.
to Dec.) ...................................
3,395
50947
(4) Examples. The following examples
illustrate the provisions of this
paragraph (b). In each example, unless
4,970 otherwise indicated, each taxpayer uses
(iii) E’s advance credit payments for 2014
a calendar taxable year and no
are $4,790. E’s premium tax credit is $4,970.
individuals are eligible for minimum
Thus, E is allowed an additional credit of
essential coverage other than coverage
$180.
in the individual market.
(b) Changes in filing status—(1) In
Example 1. Taxpayers marry during the
general. A taxpayer whose marital status
taxable year. (i) P is a single taxpayer with
changes during the taxable year
no dependents. In 2013 the Exchange in the
computes the premium tax credit by
rating area where P resides determines that
using the applicable benchmark plan or P’s 2014 household income will be $40,000
plans for the taxpayer’s marital status as (367 percent of the federal poverty line,
of the first day of each coverage month.
applicable percentage 9.5). P enrolls in a
The taxpayer’s contribution amount
qualified health plan. The premium for the
applicable benchmark plan is $5,200. The
(household income for the taxable year
Exchange approves advance credit payments
times the applicable percentage) is
of $117 per month, computed as follows:
determined using the taxpayer’s
household income and family size at the $5,200 benchmark plan premium minus
contribution amount of $3,800 ($40,000 ×
end of the taxable year.
.095) equals $1,400 (total advance credit);
(2) Taxpayers not married to each
$1,400/12 = $117.
Total advance credit payother at the end of the taxable year.
(ii) Q is a single taxpayer with two
ments ...............................
5,348
Taxpayers who are married (within the
dependents. In 2013 the Exchange in the
rating area where Q resides determines that
meaning of section 7703) to each other
Benchmark plan premium (Jan.
Q’s 2014 household income will be $35,000
to July) ....................................
3,033 during a taxable year but are not
(189 percent of the federal poverty line,
married to each other on the last day of
Benchmark plan premium
applicable percentage 5.79). Q enrolls in a
(Aug. to Dec.) .........................
4,167 the taxable year, and who are enrolled
the
in the same qualified health plan at any qualified health plan. The premium forThe
applicable benchmark plan is $14,100.
Total benchmark plan pretime during the taxable year, must
Exchange approves advance credit payments
mium ...............................
7,200 allocate the premium for the applicable
of $1,006 per month, computed as follows:
benchmark plan, the premium for the
$14,100 benchmark plan premium minus
Contribution amount (taxable
plan in which the taxpayers enroll, and
contribution amount of $2,027 ($35,000 ×
year household income × ap.0579) equals $12,073 (total advance credit);
plicable percentage) ...............
1,635 the advance credit payments for the
period the taxpayers are married during $12,073/12 = $1,006.
Credit (total benchmark plan
(iii) P and Q marry on June 17, 2014, and
the taxable year. The taxpayers may
premium less required conenroll in one qualified health plan covering
allocate these items to each former
tribution, assuming not more
four family members, beginning July 1, 2014.
than premium paid) ...............
5,565 spouse in any proportion but must
The premium for the applicable benchmark
allocate all items in the same
(iv) E’s advance credit payments for 2014
plan is $14,100. Based on household income
proportion. If the taxpayers cannot agree of $75,000 and a family size of four (336
are $5,348. E’s premium tax credit is $5,565.
on an allocation, 50 percent of the
Thus, E is allowed an additional credit of
percent of the federal poverty line, applicable
percentage 9.5), the Exchange approves
$217.
premium for the applicable benchmark
advance credit payments of $581 per month,
Example 7. Part-year coverage and changes plan, the premiums for the plan in
computed as follows: $14,100 benchmark
in coverage months and applicable
which the taxpayers enroll, and the
plan premium minus contribution amount of
benchmark plan. (i) The facts are the same
advance credit payments for the period
$7,125 ($75,000 × .095) equals $6,975 (total
as in Example 7, except that both E and F are
are allocated to each taxpayer. If a plan
advance credit); $6,975/12 = $581.
eligible for government-sponsored minimum
covers only one of these taxpayers for
(iv) P and Q file a joint return for 2014 and
essential coverage for January and February
any period during a taxable year, the
report $75,000 in household income and a
2014, and E enrolls F in a qualified health
amounts for that period are allocated
family size of four. Under paragraph (b)(1) of
plan beginning in March 2014.
this section, P and Q compute their credit at
entirely to that taxpayer.
(ii) E reconciles her premium tax credit
reconciliation using the premiums for the
with advance credit payments as follows:
(3) Married taxpayers filing separate
applicable benchmark plans that apply for
tax returns. The premium tax credit is
Advance credit payments
the months married and the months not
(March to July) .......................
$1,395 allowed to married taxpayers only if
married, and their contribution amount based
Advance credit payments (Aug.
they file joint returns. See § 1.36B–
on their federal poverty line percentage at the
to Dec.) ...................................
3,395 2(b)(2). Married taxpayers who receive
end of the taxable year. P and Q reconcile
advance credit payments and file their
their premium tax credit with advance credit
Total advance credit payincome tax returns as married filing
payments as follows:
ments ...............................
4,790
separately have received excess advance Advance payments for P (Jan.
payments. The taxpayers must allocate
to June) ...................................
$700
Benchmark plan premium
Advance payments for Q (Jan.
(March to July) .......................
2,167 the advance credit payments to each
to June) ...................................
6,036
taxpayer equally for purposes of
Benchmark plan premium
Advance payments for P and Q
(Aug. to Dec.) .........................
4,166 determining their excess advance
(July to Dec.) ..........................
3,486
payment amounts under paragraph
Total benchmark plan pre(a)(1) of this section. The repayment
Total advance payments ....
10,222
mium ...............................
6,333 limitation described in paragraph (a)(3)
of this section applies to each taxpayer
Benchmark plan premium for P
Contribution amount for 10
based on the household income and
(Jan. to June) ...........................
2,600
coverage months (taxable
family size reported on that taxpayer’s
Benchmark plan premium for Q
year household income × ap(Jan. to June) ...........................
7,050
plicable percentage × 10/12)
1,363 return.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:31 Aug 16, 2011
Jkt 223001
Credit (total benchmark plan
premium less required contribution, assuming not more
than premium paid) ...............
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\17AUP1.SGM
17AUP1
50948
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 159 / Wednesday, August 17, 2011 / Proposed Rules
Benchmark plan premium for P
and Q (July to Dec.) ...............
7,050
Total benchmark plan premium ...............................
16,700
Contribution amount (taxable
year household income × applicable percentage) ...............
Credit (total benchmark plan
premium less required contribution, assuming not more
than premium paid) ...............
Additional tax ............................
7,125
9,575
647
(v) P’s and Q’s tax liability for 2014 is
increased by $647 under paragraph (a)(1) of
this section.
Example 2. Taxpayers divorce during the
taxable year, 50 percent allocation. (i)
Taxpayers R and S are married and have two
dependents. In 2013 the Exchange in the
rating area where the family resides
determines that their 2014 household income
will be $76,000 (340 percent of the federal
poverty line for a family of 4, applicable
percentage 9.5). R and S enroll in a qualified
health plan for 2014. The premium for the
applicable benchmark plan is $14,100. The
Exchange approves advance credit payments
of $573 per month, computed as follows:
$14,100 benchmark plan premium minus R
and S’s contribution amount of $7,220
($76,000 × .095) equals $6,880 (total advance
credit); $6,880/12 = $573.
(ii) R and S divorce on June 17, 2014, and
obtain separate qualified health plans
beginning July 1, 2014. R enrolls based on
household income of $60,000 and a family
size of three (324 percent of the federal
poverty line, applicable percentage 9.5). The
premium for the applicable benchmark plan
is $14,100. The Exchange approves advance
credit payments of $700 per month,
computed as follows: $14,100 benchmark
plan premium minus R’s contribution
amount of $5,700 ($60,000 × .095) equals
$8,400 (total advance credit); $8,400/12 =
$700.
(iii) S enrolls based on household income
of $16,000 and a family size of one (147
percent of the federal poverty line, applicable
percentage 3.82). The premium for the
applicable benchmark plan is $5,200. The
Exchange approves advance credit payments
of $382 per month, computed as follows:
$5,200 benchmark plan premium minus S’s
contribution amount of $611 ($16,000 ×
.0382) equals $4,589 (total advance credit);
$4,589/12 = $382. R and S do not agree on
an allocation of the premium for the
applicable benchmark plan, the premiums for
the plan in which they enroll, and the
advance credit payments for the period they
were married in the taxable year.
(iv) Under paragraph (b)(1) of this section,
R and S each compute their credit at
reconciliation using the premiums for the
applicable benchmark plans that apply to
them for the months married and the months
not married, and contribution amount based
on their federal poverty line percentages at
the end of the taxable year. Under paragraph
(b)(2) of this section, because R and S do not
agree on an allocation, R and S must equally
allocate the benchmark plan premium
($7,050) and the advance credit payments
($3,440) for the six-month period January
through June 2014 when they are married
and enrolled in the same qualified health
plan. Thus, R and S each are allocated $3,525
of the benchmark plan premium ($7,050/2)
and $1,720 of the advance credit payments
($3,440/2) for January through June.
(v) R reports on his 2014 tax return $60,000
in household income and family size of
three. S reports on her 2014 tax return
$16,000 in household income and family size
of one. R and S reconcile their premium tax
credit with advance credit payments as
follows:
R
S
Allocated advance payments (Jan. to June) ...........................................................................................................
Actual advance payments (July to Dec.) ...............................................................................................................
$1,720
4,200
$1,720
2,292
Total advance payments .................................................................................................................................
5,920
4,012
Allocated benchmark plan premium (Jan. to June) ..............................................................................................
Actual benchmark plan premium (July to Dec.) ...................................................................................................
3,525
7,050
3,525
2,600
Total benchmark plan premium .....................................................................................................................
10,575
6,125
Contribution amount (taxable year household income × applicable percentage) ..............................................
Credit (total benchmark plan premium less required contribution, assuming not more than premium paid)
Additional credit ....................................................................................................................................................
Additional tax .........................................................................................................................................................
5,700
4,875
........................
1,045
611
5,514
1,502
........................
(vi) Under paragraph (a)(1) of this section,
on their tax returns R’s tax liability is
increased by $1,045 and S is allowed $1,502
as additional credit.
Example 3. Taxpayers divorce during the
taxable year, allocation in proportion to
household income. (i) The facts are the same
as in Example 2, except that R and S decide
to allocate the benchmark plan premium
($7,050) and the advance credit payments
($3,440) for January through June 2014 in
proportion to their household incomes (79
percent and 21 percent). Thus, R is allocated
$5,570 of the benchmark plan premiums
($7,050 × .79) and $2,718 of the advance
credit payments ($3,440 × .79), and S is
allocated $1,480 of the benchmark plan
premiums ($7,050 × .21) and $722 of the
advance credit payments ($3,440 × .21). R
and S reconcile their premium tax credit
with advance credit payments as follows:
R
S
$2,718
4,200
$722
2,292
Total advance payments .................................................................................................................................
Emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
Allocated advance payments (Jan. to June) ...........................................................................................................
Actual advance payments (July to Dec.) ...............................................................................................................
6,918
3,014
Allocated benchmark plan premium (Jan. to June) ..............................................................................................
Actual benchmark plan premium (July to Dec.) ...................................................................................................
5,570
7,050
1,480
2,600
Total benchmark plan premium .....................................................................................................................
12,620
4,080
Contribution amount (taxable year household income × applicable percentage) ..............................................
Credit (total benchmark plan premium less required contribution, assuming not more than premium paid)
Additional credit ....................................................................................................................................................
5,700
6,920
2
611
3,469
455
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:17 Aug 16, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\17AUP1.SGM
17AUP1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 159 / Wednesday, August 17, 2011 / Proposed Rules
(ii) Under paragraph (a)(1) of this section,
on their tax returns R is allowed an
additional credit of $2 and S is allowed an
additional credit of $455.
Example 4. Married taxpayers filing
separate tax returns. (i) Taxpayers T and U
are married and have two dependents. In
2013, the Exchange in the rating area where
the family resides determines that their 2014
household income will be $76,000 (340
percent of the federal poverty line for a
family of 4, applicable percentage 9.5). T and
U enroll in a qualified health plan for 2014.
The premium for the applicable benchmark
plan is $14,100. The Exchange approves
advance credit payments of $573 per month,
computed as follows: $14,100 benchmark
plan premium minus T and U’s contribution
amount of $7,220 ($76,000 × .095) equals
$6,880 (total advance credit); $6,880/12 =
$573.
(ii) T and U file income tax returns for
2014 using a married filing separately filing
status. T reports household income of
$60,000 and a family size of three (324
percent of the federal poverty line). U reports
household income of $16,000 and a family
size of one (147 percent of the federal poverty
line).
(iii) Because T and U are married but do
not file a joint return for 2014, T and U are
not applicable taxpayers and are not allowed
a premium tax credit for 2014. See § 1.36B–
2(b)(2). Under paragraph (b)(3) of this
section, half of the advance credit payments
($6,880/2 = $3,440) is allocated to T and half
is allocated to U for purposes of determining
their excess advance payments. The
repayment limitation described in paragraph
(a)(3) of this section applies to T and U based
on the household income and family size
reported on each return. Consequently, T’s
tax liability for 2014 is increased by $2,500
and U’s tax liability for 2014 is increased by
$600.
Emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 1.36B–5 Information reporting by
Exchanges.
(a) Information required to be
reported. An Exchange must report to
the IRS and a taxpayer the following
information for a qualified health plan
the taxpayer enrolls in through the
Exchange—
(1) The premium and category of
coverage (such as self-only) for the
applicable benchmark plans used to
compute advance credit payments and
the period coverage was in effect;
(2) The total premium for the coverage
without reduction for advance credit
payments or cost sharing;
(3) The aggregate amounts of any
advance credit payments or cost sharing
reductions;
(4) The name, address and taxpayer
identification number (TIN) of the
primary insured and the name and TIN
of each other individual covered under
the policy;
(5) All information provided to the
Exchange at enrollment or during the
taxable year, including any change in
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:31 Aug 16, 2011
Jkt 223001
circumstances, necessary to determine
eligibility for and the amount of the
premium tax credit;
(6) All information necessary to
determine whether a taxpayer has
received excess advance payments; and
(7) Any other information required in
published guidance of general
applicability, see § 601.601(d)(2) of this
chapter.
(b) Time and manner of reporting.
The Commissioner may provide rules in
published guidance of general
applicability, see § 601.601(d)(2) of this
chapter, for the time and manner of
reporting under this section.
Par. 3. Section 1.6011–8 is added to
read as follows:
§ 1.6011–8 Requirement of income tax
return for taxpayers who claim the premium
tax credit under section 36B.
(a) Requirement of return. A taxpayer
who receives advance payments of the
premium tax credit under section 36B
must file an income tax return for that
taxable year on or before the fifteenth
day of the fourth month following the
close of the taxable year.
(b) Effective/applicability date. This
section applies for taxable years ending
after December 31, 2013.
Par. 4. In § 1.6012–1, paragraph
(a)(2)(viii) is added to read as follows:
§ 1.6012–1 Individuals required to make
returns of income.
(a) * * *
(2) * * *
(viii) For rules relating to returns
required of taxpayers who receive
advance payments of the premium tax
credit under section 36B, see § 1.6011–
8(a).
*
*
*
*
*
Steven T. Miller,
Deputy Commissioner for Services and
Enforcement.
[FR Doc. 2011–20728 Filed 8–12–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service
26 CFR Part 31
[REG–151687–10]
RIN 1545–BJ98
Withholding on Payments by
Government Entities to Persons
Providing Property or Services;
Hearing
Internal Revenue Service (IRS),
Treasury.
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
50949
Notice of public hearing on
proposed rulemaking.
ACTION:
This document provides
notice of public hearing on proposed
regulations relating to withholding by
government entities on payments to
persons providing property or services.
DATES: The public hearing is being held
on Monday, September 12, 2011, at
10 a.m. The IRS must receive outlines
of the topics to be discussed at the
public hearing by Friday, September 2,
2011.
ADDRESSES: The public hearing is being
held in the IRS Auditorium, Internal
Revenue Service Building, 1111
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington,
DC 20224. Send Submissions to
CC:PA:LPD:PR (REG–151687–10), Room
5205, Internal Revenue Service, P.O.
Box 7604, Ben Franklin Station,
Washington, DC 20044. Submissions
may be hand-delivered Monday through
Friday to CC:PA:LPD:PR (REG–151687–
10), Couriers Desk, Internal Revenue
Service, 1111 Constitution Avenue,
NW., Washington, DC or sent
electronically via the Federal
erulemaking Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov (REG–151687–10).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Concerning the regulations, A.G. Kelley,
(202) 622–6040; concerning submissions
of comments, the hearing and/or to be
placed on the building access list to
attend the hearing Funmi Taylor at (202)
622–7180 (not toll-free numbers).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
subject of the public hearing is the
notice of proposed rulemaking (REG–
151687–10), that was published in the
Federal Register on Monday, May 9,
2011 (76 FR 26678).
The rules of 26 CFR 601.601(a)(3)
apply to the hearing. Persons who wish
to present oral comments at the hearing
that submitted written comments by
August 8, 2011, must submit an outline
of the topics to be addressed and the
amount of time to be denoted to each
topic (Signed original and eight copies).
A period of 10 minutes is allotted to
each person for presenting oral
comments. After the deadline for
receiving outlines has passed, the IRS
will prepare an agenda containing the
schedule of speakers. Copies of the
agenda will be made available, free of
charge, at the hearing or in the Freedom
of Information Reading Room (FOIA RR)
(Room 1621) which is located at the
11th and Pennsylvania Avenue, NW.,
entrance, 1111 Constitution Avenue,
NW., Washington, DC.
Because of access restrictions, the IRS
will not admit visitors beyond the
immediate entrance area more than 30
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\17AUP1.SGM
17AUP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 159 (Wednesday, August 17, 2011)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 50931-50949]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-20728]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service
26 CFR Part 1
[REG-131491-10]
RIN 1545-BJ82
Health Insurance Premium Tax Credit
AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking and notice of public hearing.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document contains proposed regulations relating to the
health insurance premium tax credit enacted by the Patient Protection
and Affordable Care Act and the Health Care and Education
Reconciliation Act of 2010, as amended by the Medicare and Medicaid
Extenders Act of 2010, the Comprehensive 1099 Taxpayer Protection and
Repayment of Exchange Subsidy Overpayments Act of 2011, and the
Department of Defense and Full-Year Continuing Appropriations Act,
2011. These proposed regulations provide guidance to individuals who
enroll in qualified health plans through Affordable Insurance Exchanges
and claim the premium tax credit, and to Exchanges that make qualified
health plans available to individuals and
[[Page 50932]]
employers. This document also provides notice of a public hearing on
these proposed regulations.
DATES: Written (including electronic) comments must be received by
October 31, 2011. Outlines of topics to be discussed at the public
hearing scheduled for November 17, 2011, at 10 a.m. must be received by
November 10, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Send submissions to: CC:PA:LPD:PR (REG-131491-10), Room
5203, Internal Revenue Service, PO Box 7604, Ben Franklin Station,
Washington, DC 20044. Submissions may be hand-delivered Monday through
Friday between the hours of 8 a.m. and 4 p.m. to CC:PA:LPD:PR (REG-
131491-10), Courier's Desk, Internal Revenue Service, 1111 Constitution
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC, or sent electronically via the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at https://www.regulations.gov (IRS REG-131491-10).
The public hearing will be held in the IRS Auditorium, Internal Revenue
Building, 1111 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Concerning the proposed regulations,
Shareen S. Pflanz, (202) 622-4920, or Frank W. Dunham III, (202) 622-
4960; concerning the submission of comments, the public hearing, and to
be placed on the building access list to attend the public hearing,
Funmi Taylor, (202) 622-7180 (not toll-free calls).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Paperwork Reduction Act
The collection of information contained in this notice of proposed
rulemaking has been submitted to the Office of Management and Budget in
accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
3507(d)). Comments on the collection of information should be sent to
the Office of Management and Budget, Attn: Desk Officer for the
Department of the Treasury, Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs, Washington, DC 20503, with copies to the Internal Revenue
Service, Attn: IRS Reports Clearance Officer, SE:W:CAR:MP:T:T:SP,
Washington, DC 20224. Comments on the collection of information should
be received by October 17, 2011. Comments are specifically requested
concerning:
Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the
proper performance of the functions of the IRS, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
How the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be
collected may be enhanced;
How the burden of complying with the proposed collection of
information may be minimized, including through the application of
automated collection techniques or other forms of information
technology; and
Estimates of capital or start-up costs and costs of operation,
maintenance, and purchase of services to provide information.
The collection of information in these proposed regulations is in
Sec. 1.36B-5. The collection of information is necessary to properly
reconcile the amount of the premium tax credit with advance credit
payments made under section 1412 of the Patient Protection and
Affordable Care Act (42 U.S.C. 18082). The collection of information is
required to comply with the provisions of section 36B(f)(3) of the
Internal Revenue Code (Code). The likely respondents are Affordable
Insurance Exchanges established under section 1311 or 1321 of the
Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (42 U.S.C. 13031 or 42
U.S.C. 18041).
The burden for the collection of information contained in proposed
regulation Sec. 1.36B-5 will be reflected in the burden on a form that
the IRS will create to request the information in the proposed
regulation.
An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required
to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a valid
control number assigned by the Office of Management and Budget.
Background
Beginning in 2014, under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care
Act, Public Law 111-148 (124 Stat. 119 (2010)), and the Health Care and
Education Reconciliation Act of 2010, Public Law 111-152 (124 Stat.
1029 (2010)) (collectively, the Affordable Care Act), individuals and
small businesses will be able to purchase private health insurance
through State-based competitive marketplaces called Affordable
Insurance Exchanges (Exchanges). Exchanges will offer Americans
competition and choice. Insurance companies will compete for business
on a level playing field, driving down costs. Consumers will have a
choice of health plans to fit their needs and Exchanges will give
individuals and small businesses the same purchasing power as big
businesses. The Departments of Health and Human Services and Treasury
are working in close coordination to release guidance related to
Exchanges, in several phases. The first in this series was a Request
for Comment relating to Exchanges, published in the Federal Register on
August 3, 2010 (75 FR 45584). Second, Initial Guidance to States on
Exchanges was issued on November 18, 2010. Third, proposed regulations
on the application, review, and reporting process for waivers for State
innovation was published in the Federal Register on March 14, 2011 (76
FR 13553). Fourth, two proposed regulations were published in the
Federal Register on July 15, 2011 (76 FR 41866 and 76 FR 41930) to
implement components of the Exchange and health insurance premium
stabilization policies in the Affordable Care Act. Fifth, three
proposed regulations, including this one, are being published in the
Federal Register on August 17, 2011 to provide guidance on the
eligibility determination process related to enrollment in a qualified
health plan or insurance affordability program; on Medicaid, the
Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP), and other State health
coverage programs; and these proposed regulations on the premium tax
credit.
Section 1401 of the Affordable Care Act amended the Code to add
section 36B, allowing a refundable premium tax credit to help
individuals and families afford health insurance coverage. Section 36B
was subsequently amended by the Medicare and Medicaid Extenders Act of
2010, Public Law 111-309 (124 Stat. 3285 (2010)); the Comprehensive
1099 Taxpayer Protection and Repayment of Exchange Subsidy Overpayments
Act of 2011, Public Law 112-9 (125 Stat. 36 (2011)); and the Department
of Defense and Full-Year Continuing Appropriations Act, 2011, Public
Law 112-10 (125 Stat. 38 (2011)). The section 36B credit is designed to
make a qualified health plan affordable by reducing a taxpayer's out-
of-pocket premium cost.
Under section 1411 of the Affordable Care Act (42 U.S.C. 18081), an
Exchange makes an advance determination of credit eligibility for
individuals enrolling in coverage through the Exchange and seeking
financial assistance. Using information available at the time of
enrollment, the Exchange determines (1) whether the individual meets
the income and other requirements for advance credit payments, and (2)
the amount of the advance payments. Advance payments are made monthly
under section 1412 of the Affordable Care Act (42 U.S.C. 18082) to the
issuer of the qualified health plan in which the individual enrolls.
[[Page 50933]]
Eligibility
To be eligible for a premium tax credit, an individual must be an
applicable taxpayer. Under section 36B(c)(1), an applicable taxpayer is
a taxpayer (1) With household income for the taxable year between 100
percent and 400 percent of the federal poverty line (FPL) for the
taxpayer's family size, (2) who may not be claimed as a dependent by
another taxpayer, and (3) who files a joint return if married.
Section 36B(c)(1)(B) provides that a taxpayer who is an alien
lawfully present in the United States, whose household income is 100
percent of the FPL or less, and who is not eligible for Medicaid,
nonetheless is treated as an applicable taxpayer. Under section
36B(e)(2), an individual is lawfully present if the individual is, and
is reasonably expected to be for the entire period of enrollment for
which the credit is claimed, a U.S. citizen or national or an alien
lawfully present in the United States.
Under section 36B(d)(1), a taxpayer's family consists of the
individuals for whom the taxpayer claims a personal exemption deduction
under section 151 for the taxable year. Taxpayers may claim a personal
exemption deduction for themselves, a spouse, and each of their
dependents. Section 152 provides that a taxpayer's dependent may be a
qualifying child or qualifying relative, including an unrelated
individual who lives with the taxpayer. Family size is equal to the
number of individuals in the taxpayer's family.
Section 36B(d)(2) defines household income as the modified adjusted
gross income of all individuals included in family size who are
required to file an income tax return. Modified adjusted gross income
means adjusted gross income (within the meaning of section 62)
increased by amounts excluded from gross income under section 911 and
tax-exempt interest a taxpayer receives or accrues during the taxable
year.
Under section 36B(b)(1), a taxpayer's premium assistance credit
amount is the sum of the premium assistance amounts for all coverage
months in the taxable year for individuals in the taxpayer's family.
Section 36B(c)(2)(A) provides that a coverage month is any month for
which the taxpayer or any family member is covered by a qualified
health plan enrolled in through an Exchange and the premium is paid by
the taxpayer or through an advance credit payment.
Under section 36B(c)(2)(B), a coverage month for an individual does
not include a month in which the individual is eligible for minimum
essential coverage, as defined in section 5000A(f), other than coverage
offered in the individual market. Minimum essential coverage may be
government-sponsored coverage such as Medicare, Medicaid, CHIP,
TRICARE, and veterans' health care under Title 38 U.S.C. Certain
employer-sponsored plans also may be minimum essential coverage. In
general, under section 36B(c)(2)(C), an individual is eligible for
employer-sponsored minimum essential coverage only if the employee's
share of the premiums is affordable and the coverage provides minimum
value. However, under section 36B(c)(2)(C)(iii), an individual is
treated as eligible for employer-sponsored minimum essential coverage
if the individual actually enrolls in an eligible employer-sponsored
plan, even if the coverage does not meet the affordability and minimum
value requirements.
Under section 5000A(f)(1)(E), the Department of Health and Human
Services, in coordination with the Treasury Department, may designate
other health benefits coverage as minimum essential coverage.
Regulations under section 5000A are expected to provide additional
guidance on minimum essential coverage.
Credit Computation
Section 36B(b)(1) provides that the premium assistance credit
amount is the sum of the premium assistance amounts for all coverage
months in the taxable year for individuals in the taxpayer's family.
The premium assistance amount for a coverage month is the lesser of (1)
the premiums for the month for one or more qualified health plans that
cover a taxpayer or family member, or (2) the excess of the adjusted
monthly premium for the second lowest cost silver plan (as described in
section 1302(d)(1)(B) of the Affordable Care Act (42 U.S.C.
18022(d)(1)(B))) (the benchmark plan) that applies to the taxpayer over
\1/12\ of the product of the taxpayer's household income and the
applicable percentage for the taxable year. The adjusted monthly
premium, in general, is the premium an insurer would charge for the
plan adjusted only for the ages of the covered individuals.
Therefore, the monthly premium assistance amount is the lesser of
the premium for the qualified health plan in which a taxpayer or family
member enrolls, or the excess of the premium for the benchmark plan
over the applicable percentage of the taxpayer's household income. In
general, this percentage of the taxpayer's household income represents
the amount of the taxpayer's required out-of-pocket contribution to the
premium cost if the taxpayer purchases the benchmark plan. The
remainder of the premium for the benchmark plan is the premium
assistance amount.
A taxpayer's applicable percentage increases as the taxpayer's
household income as a percentage of the FPL (FPL percentage) for the
taxpayer's family size increases. For 2014, the applicable percentage
is 2 percent for taxpayers with household income up to 133 percent of
the FPL and increases from 3 percent to 9.5 percent for taxpayers with
household incomes between 133 percent and 400 percent of the FPL. The
applicable percentages may be adjusted after 2014.
Taxpayers must pay the difference between the premium assistance
amount and the premium for the plan they choose. The amount of a
taxpayer's credit is limited to the amount of actual premiums for the
taxable year.
Individuals not lawfully present are not eligible to enroll in a
qualified health plan through an Exchange. Accordingly, section
36B(e)(1)(A) provides that, for a household with at least one
individual not lawfully present, the portion (if any) of the premium
attributable to that individual is not included in determining the
taxpayer's credit. Section 36B(e)(1)(B) provides that the family size
for computing the FPL percentage for a family with at least one
unlawfully present individual is determined by excluding the unlawfully
present individual. Household income for computing the FPL percentage
and determining the applicable percentage is the product of the
taxpayer's household income (determined without regard to section
36B(e)) and a fraction, the numerator of which is the FPL for the
taxpayer's family size excluding individuals who are not lawfully
present, and the denominator of which is the FPL for the taxpayer's
family size including individuals who are not lawfully present.
Reconciliation
A taxpayer must reconcile the actual credit for the taxable year
computed on the taxpayer's tax return with the amount of advance
payments. If a taxpayer's credit amount exceeds the amount of the
taxpayer's advance payments for the taxable year, the taxpayer may
receive the excess as an income tax refund. If a taxpayer's advance
payments exceed the taxpayer's credit amount, the taxpayer owes the
excess as an additional income tax liability. However, section
36B(f)(2)(B) places a graduated set of caps on the additional tax
liability for taxpayers with household income under 400 percent of the
FPL. The repayment
[[Page 50934]]
limitation amounts range from $600 to $2,500 (one-half that amount for
single taxpayers) depending on FPL, and are adjusted to reflect changes
in the cost of living beginning in 2015.
Section 36B(g) directs the Secretary of the Treasury to issue
regulations that provide for coordinating the premium tax credit with
the program for advance payments and for reconciling the credit and
advance payments when the taxpayer's filing status changes during the
taxable year.
Information Reporting
Section 36B(f)(3) directs an Exchange to report to the IRS and
taxpayers certain information relating to health plans provided through
the Exchange, including the amount of any advance credit payments.
Explanation of Provisions
1. Eligibility for the Premium Tax Credit
The proposed regulations provide that a taxpayer is eligible for
the credit for a taxable year if the taxpayer is an applicable taxpayer
and the taxpayer or a member of the taxpayer's family (1) is enrolled
in one or more qualified health plans through an Exchange established
under section 1311 or 1321 of the Affordable Care Act (42 U.S.C. 13031
or 42 U.S.C. 18041) and (2) is not eligible for minimum essential
coverage other than coverage in the individual market.
a. Applicable Taxpayer
i. Lawfully Present Aliens
In general, to be an applicable taxpayer, a taxpayer must have
household income that is at least 100 percent but not more than 400
percent of the FPL. Under section 36B(c)(1)(B), a lawfully present
alien with household income under 100 percent of the FPL and not
eligible for Medicaid is treated as having household income of 100
percent of the FPL for purposes of qualifying as an applicable
taxpayer. The proposed regulations provide that premium assistance
amounts for these taxpayers are computed based on actual household
income. The proposed regulations define lawfully present by reference
to 45 CFR 152.2, which determines lawful presence for purposes of the
Pre-Existing Condition Insurance Plan Program.
ii. Taxpayers With Household Income Under 100 Percent of the FPL
The proposed regulations clarify the treatment of a taxpayer who
receives advance credit payments but has household income below 100
percent of the FPL for the taxable year.
Taxpayers with household incomes below 100 percent of the FPL
(other than lawfully present aliens) are not eligible for the premium
tax credit because they are eligible to receive assistance through
Medicaid. However, an Exchange may approve a taxpayer for advance
credit payments based on projecting a level of household income for the
taxable year that makes the taxpayer ineligible for Medicaid. If,
contrary to that projection, the taxpayer's actual household income for
the taxable year is under 100 percent of the FPL (for example, because
the taxpayer experiences a change in circumstances, such as a job loss,
during the year), the taxpayer would not be an applicable taxpayer, and
would not be eligible for the credit under the general rule.
Accordingly, the proposed regulations provide a special rule treating a
taxpayer with household income below 100 percent of the FPL as an
applicable taxpayer if, when a taxpayer enrolls in a qualified health
plan, an Exchange projects that household income for the taxpayer will
be between 100 and 400 percent of the FPL for the taxable year and
approves advance credit payments. Premium assistance amounts for these
taxpayers also are computed based on actual household income and not a
deemed household income that equals 100 percent of the FPL.
iii. Individuals Who Are Incarcerated or Not Lawfully Present
Under section 1312(f) of the Affordable Care Act, individuals who
are incarcerated (other than pending disposition of charges) or not
lawfully present in the United States may not enroll in a qualified
health plan through an Exchange. However, these individuals may have
family members who are eligible for Exchange coverage. Accordingly, the
proposed regulations provide that an individual who is not lawfully
present in the United States or is incarcerated, although not eligible
to enroll in a qualified health plan, may be an applicable taxpayer if
a family member is eligible to and does enroll in a qualified health
plan.
b. Minimum Essential Coverage
i. Government-Sponsored Coverage
Under the proposed regulations, an individual generally is eligible
for government-sponsored minimum essential coverage for any month that
the individual meets the requirements for coverage under a government-
sponsored program described in section 5000A(f)(1)(A). However, for
purposes of the premium tax credit, an individual is eligible for
minimum essential coverage under a veterans' health care program only
if the individual is enrolled in a veteran's health care program
identified as minimum essential coverage in regulations issued under
section 5000A. The Commissioner may define eligibility for specific
government-sponsored programs further in published guidance of general
applicability, see Sec. 601.601(d)(2) of this chapter. For example, it
is expected that future guidance will provide that a person is eligible
for Medicaid on the basis of being blind or disabled or needing long-
term care services only when a State Medicaid agency or the Social
Security Administration, as appropriate, determines that the individual
is blind or disabled or requires long-term care services.
In general, an individual is treated as eligible for a government-
sponsored program on the first day of the first full month in which the
individual may receive benefits. Thus, taxpayers would not lose
eligibility for the credit for a month in which the taxpayer or a
family member is technically eligible for a government program but
cannot yet receive benefits due to, for example, the need for
administrative processing. However, an individual who fails to complete
the requirements to obtain coverage available under a government-
sponsored program (other than coverage under the veteran's health care
program) reasonably promptly is treated as eligible for the coverage on
the first day of the second calendar month following the event that
establishes eligibility (such as reaching age 65 for Medicare).
An individual receiving advance credit payments may apply and be
approved for government-sponsored minimum essential coverage such as
Medicaid that, after approval, is effective retroactively (overlapping
some advance payment coverage months). The proposed regulations provide
that an individual in this situation is treated as eligible for minimum
essential coverage no sooner than the first day of the first calendar
month after the approval.
Comments are requested on whether rules should provide additional
flexibility if operational challenges prevent timely transition from
coverage under a qualified health plan to coverage under a government-
sponsored program.
A taxpayer whom an Exchange has determined to be ineligible for
Medicaid, CHIP, or a similar program at the time of enrollment may end
up with household income for the taxable year within the eligibility
criteria for these
[[Page 50935]]
programs. Therefore, the proposed regulations provide that an
individual is treated as not eligible for Medicaid, CHIP, or a similar
program for the months of coverage under a qualified health plan if an
Exchange determines that the individual is not eligible when the
individual enrolls. If the individual subsequently enrolls in Medicaid,
CHIP, or a similar program, however, the full months of enrollment in
the government-sponsored coverage are not coverage months.
ii. Employer-Sponsored Coverage
A. In General
Section 5000A(f)(1)(B) provides that minimum essential coverage
includes coverage under an eligible employer-sponsored plan. Under
section 5000A(f)(2), an eligible employer-sponsored plan is a group
health plan or group health insurance coverage offered by an employer
to an employee that is a governmental plan (within the meaning of
section 2791(d)(8) of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 300gg-
91(d)(8))), any other plan or coverage offered in the small or large
group market, or a grandfathered plan offered in the group market.
Regulations under section 5000A are expected to provide that an
employer-sponsored plan will not fail to be minimum essential coverage
solely because it is a plan to reimburse employees for medical care for
which reimbursement is not provided under a policy of accident and
health insurance (a self-insured plan).
Continuation coverage required under federal law or required under
a state law that provides comparable continuation coverage is eligible
employer-sponsored coverage. The proposed regulations provide a special
rule that an individual eligible to enroll in continuation coverage is
eligible for minimum essential coverage only if the individual enrolls
in the coverage.
The proposed regulations provide that an individual generally is
eligible for minimum essential coverage through an eligible employer-
sponsored plan for a month during a plan year if the individual had the
opportunity to enroll in the plan, even if the enrollment period has
since closed. Thus, once an individual fails to enroll in eligible
employer-sponsored coverage during an employer-sponsored plan's
enrollment period after having had the opportunity to do so (assuming
the coverage is affordable and provides minimum value), the months
during the plan year are not coverage months for the individual,
notwithstanding that the individual is precluded from later enrolling
in the employer-sponsored coverage for those months because the
enrollment period has expired.
Under section 36B(c)(2)(C), an individual generally is eligible for
employer-sponsored minimum essential coverage only if the employee's
share of the premiums is affordable and the coverage provides minimum
value. An individual is treated as eligible for minimum essential
coverage through an eligible employer-sponsored plan, however, if the
individual actually enrolls in the coverage, including coverage that
does not meet the requirements for affordability and minimum value.
B. Affordability of Employer-Sponsored Coverage
Section 36B(c)(2)(C)(i) prescribes the standards for determining
whether employer-sponsored coverage is affordable for an employee as
well as for other individuals. In the case of an employee, under
section 36B(c)(2)(C)(i), an employer-sponsored plan is not affordable
if ``the employee's required contribution (within the meaning of
section 5000A(e)(1)(B)) with respect to the plan exceeds 9.5 percent of
the applicable taxpayer's household income'' for the taxable year. This
percentage may be adjusted after 2014.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ In addition, the statute provides for the Comptroller
General, within 5 years of enactment, to conduct a study, including
legislative recommendations, on the affordability of coverage,
including whether the percentage of household income specified in
section 36B(c)(2)(C) ``is the appropriate level for determining
whether employer-provided coverage is affordable for an employee and
whether such level may be lowered without significantly increasing
the costs to the Federal Government and reducing employer-provided
coverage.'' See section 1401(c)(1) of the Affordable Care Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In the case of an individual other than an employee, section
36B(c)(2)(C)(i) provides that ``this clause shall also apply to an
individual who is eligible to enroll in the plan by reason of a
relationship the individual bears to the employee.'' The cross-
referenced section 5000A(e)(1)(B) defines the term ``required
contribution'' for this purpose as ``the portion of the annual premium
which would be paid by the individual * * * for self-only coverage.''
Thus, the statutory language specifies that for both employees and
others (such as spouses or dependents) who are eligible to enroll in
employer-sponsored coverage by reason of their relationship to an
employee (related individuals), the coverage is unaffordable if the
required contribution for ``self-only'' coverage (as opposed to family
coverage or other coverage applicable to multiple individuals) exceeds
9.5 percent of household income. See Joint Committee on Taxation,
General Explanation of Tax Legislation Enacted in the 111th Congress,
JCS-2-11 (March 2011) at 265 (stating that, for purposes of the premium
tax credit provisions of the Act, ``[u]naffordable is defined as
coverage with a premium required to be paid by the employee that is
more than 9.5 percent of the employee's household income, based on the
self-only coverage'').
Consistent with these statutory provisions, the proposed
regulations provide that an employer-sponsored plan also is affordable
for a related individual for purposes of section 36B if the employee's
required contribution for self-only coverage under the plan does not
exceed 9.5 percent of the applicable taxpayer's household income for
the taxable year, even if the employee's required contribution for the
family coverage does exceed 9.5 percent of the applicable taxpayer's
household income for the year.
Although the affordability test for related individuals for
purposes of the premium tax credit is based on the cost of self-only
coverage, future proposed regulations under section 5000A are expected
to provide that the affordability test for purposes of applying the
individual responsibility requirement to related individuals is based
on the employee's required contribution for employer-sponsored family
coverage. Section 5000A addresses affordability for employees in
section 5000A(e)(1)(B) and, separately, for related individuals in
section 5000A(e)(1)(C).
C. Employee Affordability Safe Harbor
The proposed regulations provide an employee safe harbor for
individuals who were offered eligible employer-sponsored coverage that
ultimately proves to be affordable based on household income for the
taxable year but who declined the offer because, at the time of
enrollment in a qualified health plan, the Exchange determined that the
employer coverage would be unaffordable. Under the safe harbor, an
eligible employer-sponsored plan is treated as unaffordable for an
entire plan year. Thus, for the months during the plan year (which may
coincide or overlap with the taxable year) a taxpayer will not lose
credit eligibility because, as a result of changes during the taxable
year, the employer coverage would have been affordable based on the
household income for that taxable year. The taxpayer may, however, lose
credit eligibility for other reasons, for example if the taxpayer's
household income for
[[Page 50936]]
the taxable year exceeds 400 percent of the FPL. Regulations under
section 4980H are expected to provide that an employer is not subject
to a penalty merely because an employee receives a premium tax credit
under this employee safe harbor if the employer offered to its
employees affordable coverage that otherwise meets the requirements of
section 4980H.
D. Affordability Safe Harbor for Employers
In general, an applicable large employer (as defined in section
4980H(c)(2)) that offers health coverage to its full-time employees and
their dependents is subject to the assessable payment under section
4980H(b) if at least one full-time employee is certified to receive a
premium tax credit or cost-sharing reduction because the employer-
sponsored coverage either does not provide minimum value or is
unaffordable to the employee.
Employers have commented that they will not know their employees'
actual household income. As a result, even if an employer intends to
offer affordable coverage to all full-time employees, one or more full-
time employees may be certified to receive the premium tax credit, and
the employer may be subject to the assessable payment under 4980H(b).
Future proposed regulations under section 4980H are expected to provide
an affordability safe harbor for employers. Under this anticipated safe
harbor, an employer that meets certain requirements, including offering
its full-time employees (and their dependents) the opportunity to
enroll in eligible employer-sponsored coverage, will not be subject to
an assessable payment under section 4980H(b) with respect to an
employee who receives a premium tax credit or cost-sharing reduction
for a taxable year if the employee portion of the self-only premium for
the employer's lowest cost plan that provides minimum value does not
exceed 9.5 percent of the employee's current W-2 wages from the
employer.
Giving employers the ability to base their affordability
calculations on their employees' wages (which employers know) instead
of employees' household income (which employers generally do not know)
is intended to provide a more workable and predictable method of
facilitating affordable employer-sponsored coverage for the benefit of
both employers and employees. Notwithstanding this safe harbor,
employees' eligibility for a premium tax credit would continue to be
based on affordability of employer-sponsored coverage relative to
employees' household income. Accordingly, some employees--among the
small percentage of employees whose household income is less than their
wages from the employer--would receive a premium tax credit without
resulting in an assessable payment by their employer. The Treasury
Department and the IRS intend to issue a request for comments on this
affordability safe harbor for employers.
E. Minimum Value
Section 36B(c)(2)(C)(ii) provides that an eligible employer-
sponsored plan generally provides minimum value if the plan's share of
the total allowed costs of benefits provided under the plan is at least
60 percent of those costs. Under section 1302(d)(2) of the Affordable
Care Act (42 U.S.C. 18022(d)(2)), regulations to be issued by the
Secretary of Health and Human Services will apply in determining the
percentage of ``the total allowed costs of benefits'' provided under a
group health plan or health insurance coverage that are covered by that
plan or coverage. The regulations under section 1302(d)(2) are expected
to be proposed later this year and to reflect the fact that employer-
sponsored group health plans and health insurance coverage in the large
group market are not required to provide each of the essential health
benefits or each of the 10 categories of benefits described in section
1302(b)(1) of the Affordable Care Act. It is also anticipated that the
regulations will seek to further the objective of preserving the
existing system of employer-sponsored coverage, but without permitting
the statutory employer responsibility standards to be avoided. We also
are contemplating whether to provide appropriate transition relief with
respect to the minimum value requirement for employers currently
offering health care coverage.
2. Computing the Premium Tax Credit
A taxpayer's credit is the sum of the premium assistance amounts
for each coverage month in the taxable year. A premium assistance
amount is computed for each coverage month during the taxable year
based on several factors: household income, family size, applicable
percentage, benchmark plan premium, and actual plan premium. A month
during which no one in the taxpayer's family is enrolled in a qualified
health plan through an Exchange is not a coverage month. A month is a
coverage month only if the taxpayer pays the premium for coverage or
receives the benefit of an advance payment. The premium assistance
amount for a month that is not a coverage month is zero. Household
income is determined on an annual basis and is prorated for each month
to determine the monthly premium assistance amount. The applicable
percentage is the same for each month because it is derived from annual
household income and family size. A taxpayer's benchmark plan premium
may change during the year if, for example, there are changes in the
members of the household covered through the Exchange or the taxpayer
moves to a new State with different plan rates.
a. Premiums Paid on Behalf of the Taxpayer
The proposed regulations provide that, in determining whether a
month is a coverage month, premiums that another person pays for the
coverage of the taxpayer or a family member are treated as paid by the
taxpayer.
b. Applicable Benchmark Plan
Under section 36B(b)(2), the monthly premium for the applicable
second lowest cost silver plan offered through an Exchange is the
benchmark for computing a taxpayer's monthly premium assistance amount.
To determine the amount of premium tax credit, a taxpayer must compute
the difference between the premium for this plan and the applicable
percentage of the taxpayer's household income, regardless of the
qualified health plan the taxpayer purchases.
i. Multiple Categories of Coverage Offered on an Exchange
Section 36B(b)(3)(B)(ii) identifies only self-only and family as
the categories of coverage for the benchmark plan. However, qualified
health plans may offer other categories of coverage based on family
composition, such as children only, two adults, or one adult plus
children. See proposed 45 CFR 156.255(b). Thus, the proposed
regulations define family coverage as any health insurance that covers
more than one individual.
Under the proposed regulations, the ``applicable'' benchmark plan
for a taxpayer is determined by finding the second lowest cost plan at
the silver level that would cover those family members actually
enrolled in a qualified health plan, not eligible for minimum essential
coverage other than coverage in the individual market, not
incarcerated, and lawfully present in the United States (the coverage
family). Thus, the applicable benchmark plan is the self-only category
of coverage for a taxpayer who files as single with no dependents, a
taxpayer who purchases
[[Page 50937]]
self-only coverage, and a taxpayer whose family includes only one
individual who is not eligible for minimum essential coverage or one
lawfully present individual (thus excluding from the credit computation
the portion of the premium attributable to an individual not lawfully
present, as required by section 36B(e)(1)(A)). If an Exchange offers
more categories of coverage than self-only and family, the applicable
benchmark plan is the coverage category that applies to the members of
the taxpayer's coverage family.
ii. Families Who Purchase More Than One Qualified Health Plan
Section 36B determines family size by reference to individuals for
whom the taxpayer claims a personal exemption, and family coverage
under some qualified health plans may not extend to certain tax
dependents (for example, a niece). We note that the Department of
Health and Human Services has requested comments in its proposed
regulations on Exchanges on whether qualified health plans offered on
an Exchange should be required to cover all members of the family if
they live in the same Exchange service area. Pending the issuance of
additional guidance on this issue by Health and Human Services, the
proposed regulations provide that, if the applicable benchmark plan
does not cover a taxpayer's full family, the applicable benchmark plan
premium for these families is the sum of the premiums for the benchmark
plans that cover the taxpayer's family (for example, for an uncle and
two adult dependent nieces, a self-only benchmark plan for the uncle
and a two-adult or family plan for the nieces). The applicable
benchmark plan is similarly modified for taxpayers with family members
residing in different rating areas (also known as Exchange service
areas, see proposed 45 CFR155.20). However, the IRS and Treasury
Department are considering other approaches for determining the
applicable benchmark plan in these cases. For example, the applicable
benchmark plan for these families could be the benchmark plan that
would apply to the family composition (such as one adult plus children)
if one plan covered all members of the taxpayer's family.
Alternatively, the applicable benchmark plan premium could be the
lesser of (1) the premium for a combination of plans that cover the
taxpayer's entire family, or (2) the premium for a single plan that
covers the taxpayer's entire family and is more expensive than the
second lowest cost silver plan. Comments are requested on these and
other possible approaches.
iii. One Qualified Health Plan Covering More Than One Family
If a single qualified health plan covers more than one taxpayer's
family (for example a plan that covers adult children under age 26 who
are not tax dependents), the allowable section 36B credit is computed
for each applicable taxpayer covered by the plan. An individual
applicable percentage is determined for each taxpayer based on the
taxpayer's household income and family size, and the separate
applicable benchmark plan. The premiums for the qualified health plan
the taxpayers purchase are allocated to each taxpayer in proportion to
the premiums for each taxpayer's benchmark plan to determine whether
the premiums paid are less than the benchmark premium minus the
taxpayer's applicable percentage of household income.
iv. Applicable Benchmark Plan That Terminates or Closes to Enrollment
A qualified health plan that is the second lowest cost silver plan
for a particular category of coverage, or the lowest cost silver plan
in that category, may close to enrollment or terminate during the
taxable year. The proposed regulations clarify that an applicable
benchmark plan is a plan offered through the Exchange when a taxpayer
or family member enrolls in a qualified health plan. Unless the
taxpayer or a family member is enrolled in the applicable benchmark
plan, a plan does not cease to be the applicable benchmark plan solely
because the plan or the lowest cost silver plan terminates or closes to
further enrollment during the taxable year.
c. Pediatric Dental Coverage
Section 36B(b)(3)(E) provides that, for purposes of determining the
amount of any monthly premium, if an individual enrolls in both a
qualified health plan and a plan providing dental coverage as described
in section 1311(d)(2)(B)(ii) of the Affordable Care Act (42 U.S.C.
13031(d)(2)(B)(ii)), the portion of the premium for the dental plan
that is properly allocable to pediatric dental benefits that are
essential health benefits is treated as a premium payable for the
individual's qualified health plan. Thus, the portion of the premium
for the separate pediatric dental coverage is added to the premium for
the benchmark plan in computing the credit. Comments are requested on
methods of determining the amount of the premium properly allocable to
pediatric dental benefits.
3. Reconciling the Credit and Advance Credit Payments
The proposed regulations describe the requirements for reconciling
advance payments of the credit with the actual credit amount and
determining the amount of any resulting additional credit or additional
income tax liability. The proposed regulations explain that the credit
is computed by using the household income and family size for the
taxable year, but premium assistance amounts for different coverage
months may be based on different applicable benchmark plans if, for
example, the taxpayer's family composition changes during the taxable
year.
a. Changes in Filing Status
Section 36B(g)(2) directs the Secretary to provide regulations
specifying how to reconcile advance payments with the actual credit
when the taxpayer's filing status on the return claiming the credit
differs from the filing status used to determine advance payments of
the credit. Filing status may be any of the following: single, married
filing jointly, married filing separately, head of household, or
surviving spouse.
i. Computing the Credit When Taxpayer's Marital Status Changes
The proposed regulations provide that, for a taxpayer who has a
change in marital status during the taxable year, the credit generally
is computed according to the same rules that apply to other taxpayers,
using the applicable benchmark plan or plans that apply to the
taxpayer's marital status as of the first day of each month. However,
the proposed regulations include special rules for computing the credit
for taxpayers who divorce during the taxable year. Comments are
requested on special rules for taxpayers who marry during the taxable
year and for married taxpayers who face challenges in being able to
file a joint return.
ii. Taxpayers Who Divorce During the Taxable Year
The proposed regulations provide that, for purposes of
reconciliation, taxpayers who for some months during a taxable year
were married (within the meaning of section 7703) and were covered by
the same qualified health plan but are no longer married on the last
day of the taxable year, may agree to allocate between themselves, in
the same proportion, the premiums for the benchmark plan, premiums paid
and advance credit payments made during the marriage. If the taxpayers
do not agree on an allocation, the taxpayers must allocate 50 percent
of these amounts to each taxpayer. If only one of
[[Page 50938]]
the formerly married taxpayers was enrolled in the plan, 100 percent of
the benchmark premiums, premiums for the plan that taxpayer purchases,
and advance payments are allocated to that taxpayer.
iii. Taxpayers Who Marry During the Taxable Year
For individuals who marry during a taxable year and receive advance
credit payments during the time before they are married, the general
rules for credit computation and reconciliation could lead to the
individuals facing additional tax upon reconciliation, even if the
Exchange accurately determines each individual's separate income for
the year at the time of enrollment. This may occur, for example, in
situations in which the combination of two individuals' household
incomes and families results in the combined family having a higher FPL
percentage than either of the component families would have had if the
individuals had not married, and therefore having a higher applicable
percentage or being ineligible for a credit. Comments are requested on
rules providing relief to certain individuals who would owe additional
tax because they marry during a taxable year when one or both
individuals receive advance credit payments prior to marriage. Comments
are requested on how the premium assistance credit amount should be
computed in this circumstance, including how household income (which is
required to be determined on an annual basis) and dependents for the
taxable year would be taken into account in the credit computation.
iv. Married Taxpayers Filing Separately
Married taxpayers who file their returns as married filing
separately are not applicable taxpayers and generally are ineligible
for the premium tax credit for any month during the taxable year. The
proposed regulations provide that taxpayers who receive advance credit
payments and file their tax returns as married filing separately must
allocate 50 percent of any advance credit payments to each spouse for
purposes of determining their excess advance payment amounts as part of
the reconciliation process. Although the taxpayers owe additional tax
for the entire amount of the advance credit payments, the section
36B(f)(2)(B) repayment limitation applies to each taxpayer whose
household income is below 400 percent of the federal poverty line based
on the household income and family size reported on the return.
Some taxpayers who are married at the time they enroll in a
qualified health plan and begin to receive advance credit payments may
not be able to file a joint return for the coverage year. For example,
in situations involving domestic abuse, when a divorce is pending but
not yet final, or when one spouse is incarcerated, filing a joint
return may not be possible or prudent. Comments are requested on rules
to provide relief for those married taxpayers who have received advance
credit payments but face challenges in being able to file a joint
return. Comments are requested in particular on whether rules should
take into account whether (1) The spouses have filed jointly for the
preceding taxable year, (2) the spouses attested to an expectation to
file jointly for purposes of receiving the advance credit payments, and
(3) the spouses should be allowed relief of this type for more than one
year.
Comments are requested on other rules for reconciling the credit
with advance payments for taxpayers whose filing status changes during
the taxable year.
b. Requirement To File a Return
The proposed regulations require every taxpayer receiving advance
credit payments to file an income tax return on or before the fifteenth
day of the fourth month following the close of the taxable year. The
requirement to file a return applies whether or not a taxpayer is
otherwise required to file a return under section 6012 or claims a
premium tax credit for the taxable year. Under section 6081, the
Commissioner may grant a reasonable extension of time for filing any
income tax return.
Effective/Applicability Date
These regulations are proposed to apply for taxable years ending
after December 31, 2013.
Special Analyses
It has been determined that this notice of proposed rulemaking is
not a significant regulatory action as defined in Executive Order
12866, as supplemented by Executive Order 13563. Therefore, a
regulatory assessment is not required. It has also been determined that
section 553(b) of the Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. chapter 5)
does not apply to these regulations, and, because the regulations do
not impose a collection of information requirement on small entities,
the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. chapter 6) does not apply.
Pursuant to section 7805(f) of the Code, this notice of proposed
rulemaking has been submitted to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the
Small Business Administration for comment on its impact on small
business.
Comments and Public Hearing
Before these proposed regulations are adopted as final regulations,
consideration will be given to any written comments (either electronic
or a signed paper original and eight (8) copies) that are submitted
timely to the IRS. The IRS and Treasury Department request comments on
the clarity of the proposed rules and how they can be made easier to
understand. All comments will be available for public inspection and
copying.
A public hearing has been scheduled for November 17, 2011, at 10
a.m., in the auditorium, Internal Revenue Building, 1111 Constitution
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC. Due to building security procedures,
visitors must enter at the Constitution Avenue entrance. All visitors
must present photo identification to enter the building. Because of
access restrictions, visitors will not be admitted beyond the immediate
entrance more than 30 minutes before the hearing starts. For
information about having your name placed on the building access list
to attend the hearing, see the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section
of this preamble.
The rules of 26 CFR 601.601(a)(3) apply to the hearing. Persons who
wish to present oral comments at the hearing must submit written
comments (electronic or a signed paper original and eight (8) copies)
and an outline of topics to be discussed and the time devoted to each
topic by November 10, 2011. A period of 10 minutes will be allotted to
each person for making comments.
An agenda showing the scheduling of the speakers will be prepared
after the deadline for receiving outlines has passed. Copies of the
agenda will be available free of charge at the hearing.
Drafting Information
The principal authors of these proposed regulations are Shareen S.
Pflanz, Frank W. Dunham III, and Stephen J. Toomey of the Office of
Associate Chief Counsel (Income Tax and Accounting). However, other
personnel from the IRS and the Treasury Department participated in the
development of the regulations.
List of Subjects in 26 CFR Part 1
Income taxes, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
[[Page 50939]]
Proposed Amendments to the Regulations
Accordingly, 26 CFR part 1 is proposed to be amended as follows:
PART 1--INCOME TAXES
Paragraph 1. The authority citation for part 1 is amended by adding
entries in numerical order to read in part as follows:
Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805 * * *
Section 1.36B-4 also issued under 26 U.S.C. 36B(g).
Par. 2. Sections 1.36B-0, 1.36B-1, 1.36B-2, 1.36B-3, 1.36B-4, and
1.36B-5 are added to read as follows:
Sec. 1.36B-0 Table of contents.
This section lists the captions contained in Sec. Sec. 1.36B-1
through 1.36B-5.
Sec. 1.36B-1 Premium tax credit definitions.
(a) In general.
(b) Affordable Care Act.
(c) Qualified health plan.
(d) Family and family size.
(e) Household income.
(1) In general.
(2) Modified adjusted gross income.
(f) Dependent.
(g) Lawfully present.
(h) Federal poverty line.
(i) Reserved.
(j) Advance credit payment.
(k) Exchange.
(l) Self-only coverage.
(m) Family coverage.
(n) Rating area.
(o) Effective/applicability date.
Sec. 1.36B-2 Eligibility for premium tax credit.
(a) In general.
(b) Applicable taxpayer.
(1) In general.
(2) Married taxpayers must file joint return.
(3) Dependents.
(4) Individuals not lawfully present or incarcerated.
(5) Individuals lawfully present.
(6) Special rule for taxpayers with household income below 100
percent of the federal poverty line for the taxable year.
(7) Computation of premium assistance amounts for taxpayers with
household income below 100 percent of the federal poverty line.
(c) Minimum essential coverage.
(1) In general.
(2) Government-sponsored minimum essential coverage.
(i) In general.
(ii) Special rule for coverage under the veteran's health care
program under chapter 17 or 18 of Title 38, U.S.C.
(iii) Time of eligibility.
(A) In general.
(B) Retroactive effect of eligibility determination.
(iv) Determination of Medicaid or Children's Health Insurance
Program (CHIP) ineligibility.
(v) Examples.
(3) Employer-sponsored minimum essential coverage.
(i) In general.
(ii) Plan year.
(iii) Eligibility for coverage months during a plan year.
(A) In general.
(B) Example.
(iv) Special rule for continuation coverage.
(v) Affordable coverage.
(A) In general.
(1) Affordability.
(2) Employee safe harbor.
(B) Required contribution percentage.
(C) Examples.
(vi) Minimum value.
(vii) Enrollment in eligible employer-sponsored plan.
(A) In general.
(B) Example.
Sec. 1.36B-3 Computing the premium assistance credit amount.
(a) In general.
(b) Definitions.
(c) Coverage month.
(1) In general.
(2) Premiums paid for the taxpayer.
(3) Examples.
(d) Premium assistance amount.
(e) Adjusted monthly premium.
(f) Applicable benchmark plan.
(1) In general.
(2) Family coverage.
(3) Second lowest cost silver plan not covering the taxpayer's
family.
(4) Benchmark plan terminates or closes to enrollment.
(5) Examples.
(g) Applicable percentage.
(1) In general.
(2) Applicable percentage table.
(3) Examples.
(h) Plan covering more than one family.
(1) In general.
(2) Example.
(i) Reserved.
(j) Additional benefits.
(1) In general.
(2) Method of allocation.
(k) Pediatric dental coverage.
(1) In general.
(2) Method of allocation.
(l) Families including individuals not lawfully present.
(1) In general.
(2) Revised household income computation.
(i) Statutory method.
(ii) Comparable method.
Sec. 1.36B-4 Reconciling the premium tax credit with advance credit
payments.
(a) Reconciliation.
(1) In general.
(2) Credit computation.
(3) Limitation on additional tax.
(i) In general.
(ii) Additional tax limitation table.
(4) Examples.
(b) Changes in filing status.
(1) In general.
(2) Taxpayers not married to each other at the end of the taxable
year.
(3) Married taxpayers filing separate returns.
(4) Examples.
Sec. 1.36B-5 Information reporting by Exchanges.
(a) Information required to be reported.
(b) Time and manner of reporting.
Sec. 1.36B-1 Premium tax credit definitions.
(a) In general. Section 36B allows a refundable premium tax credit
for taxable years ending after December 31, 2013. The definitions in
this section apply to this section and Sec. Sec. 1.36B-2 through
1.36B-5.
(b) Affordable Care Act. The term Affordable Care Act refers to the
Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, Public Law 111-148 (124
Stat. 119 (2010)), and the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act
of 2010, Public Law 111-152 (124 Stat. 1029 (2010)), as amended by the
Medicare and Medicaid Extenders Act of 2010, Public Law 111-309 (124
Stat. 3285 (2010)), the Comprehensive 1099 Taxpayer Protection and
Repayment of Exchange Subsidy Overpayments Act of 2011, Public Law 112-
9 (125 Stat. 36 (2011)), and the Department of Defense and Full-Year
Continuing Appropriations Act, 2011, Public Law 112-10 (125 Stat. 38
(2011)).
(c) Qualified health plan. The term qualified health plan has the
same meaning as in section 1301(a) of the Affordable Care Act (42
U.S.C. 18021(a)) but does not include a catastrophic plan described in
section 1302(e) of the Affordable Care Act (42 U.S.C. 18022(e)).
(d) Family and family size. A taxpayer's family means the
individuals for whom a taxpayer properly claims a deduction for a
personal exemption under section 151 for the taxable year. Family size
means the number of individuals in the family. Family and family size
include an individual who is exempt from the requirement to maintain
minimum essential coverage under section 5000A.
[[Page 50940]]
(e) Household income--(1) In general. Household income means the
sum of--
(i) A taxpayer's modified adjusted gross income; plus
(ii) The aggregate modified adjusted gross income of all other
individuals who--
(A) Are included in the taxpayer's family under paragraph (d) of
this section; and
(B) Are required to file an income tax return for the taxable year
(determined without regard to the exception under section (1)(g)(7) to
the requirement to file a return).
(2) Modified adjusted gross income. Modified adjusted gross income
means adjusted gross income (within the meaning of section 62)
increased by amounts excluded from gross income under section 911 and
tax-exempt interest the taxpayer receives or accrues during the taxable
year.
(f) Dependent. Dependent has the same meaning as in section 152.
(g) Lawfully present. Lawfully present has the same meaning as in
45 CFR 152.2.
(h) Federal poverty line. The federal poverty line means the most
recently published poverty guidelines (updated periodically in the
Federal Register by the Secretary of Health and Human Services under
the authority of 42 U.S.C. 9902(2)) as of the first day of the regular
enrollment period for coverage by a qualified health plan offered
through an Exchange for a calendar year. Thus, the federal poverty line
for computing the premium tax credit for a taxable year is the federal
poverty line in effect on the first day of the initial or annual open
enrollment period preceding that taxable year. See 45 CFR 155.410.
(i) [Reserved]
(j) Advance credit payment. Advance credit payment means an advance
payment of the premium tax credit as provided in section 1412 of the
Affordable Care Act (42 U.S.C. 18082).
(k) Exchange. Exchange has the same meaning as in 45 CFR 155.20.
(l) Self-only coverage. Self-only coverage means health insurance
that covers one individual.
(m) Family coverage. Family coverage means health insurance that
covers more than one individual.
(n) Rating area. Rating area means an Exchange service area, as
described in 45 CFR 155.20.
(o) Effective/applicability date. This section and Sec. Sec.
1.36B-2 through 1.36B-5 apply for taxable years ending after December
31, 2013.
Sec. 1.36B-2 Eligibility for premium tax credit.
(a) In general. An applicable taxpayer (within the meaning of
paragraph (b) of this section) is allowed a premium assistance amount
only for any month that the applicable taxpayer, or the applicable
taxpayer's spouse or dependent--
(1) Is enrolled in one or more qualified health plans through an
Exchange; and
(2) Is not eligible for minimum essential coverage (within the
meaning of paragraph (c) of this section) other than coverage described
in section 5000A(f)(1)(C) (relating to coverage in the individual
market).
(b) Applicable taxpayer--(1) In general. Except as otherwise
provided in this paragraph (b), an applicable taxpayer is a taxpayer
whose household income is at least 100 percent but not more than 400
percent of the federal poverty line for the taxpayer's family size for
the taxable year.
(2) Married taxpayers must file joint return. A taxpayer who is
married (within the meaning of section 7703) at the close of the
taxable year is an applicable taxpayer only if the taxpayer and the
taxpayer's spouse file a joint return for the taxable year.
(3) Dependents. An individual is not an applicable taxpayer if
another taxpayer may claim a deduction under section 151 for the
individual for a taxable year beginning in the calendar year in which
the individual's taxable year begins.
(4) Individuals not lawfully present or incarcerated. An individual
who is not lawfully present in the United States or is incarcerated
(other than incarceration pending disposition of charges) may not be
covered by a qualified health plan through an Exchange. However, the
individual may be an applicable taxpayer if a family member is eligible
to enroll in a qualified health plan. See sections 1312(f)(1)(B) and
1312(f)(3) of the Affordable Care Act (42 U.S.C. 18032(f)(1)(B) and
(f)(3)) and Sec. 1.36B-3(b)(2).
(5) Individuals lawfully present. If a taxpayer's household income
is less than 100 percent of the federal poverty line for the taxpayer's
family size and the taxpayer or a member of the taxpayer's family is an
alien lawfully present in the United States, the taxpayer is treated as
an applicable taxpayer if--
(i) The taxpayer or family member is not eligible for the Medicaid
program; and
(ii) The taxpayer would be an applicable taxpayer if the taxpayer's
household income for the taxable year was between 100 and 400 percent
of the federal poverty line for the taxpayer's family size.
(6) Special rule for taxpayers with household income below 100
percent of the federal poverty line for the taxable year. A taxpayer
(other than a taxpayer described in paragraph (b)(5) of this section)
whose household income for a taxable year is less than 100 percent of
the federal poverty line for the taxpayer's family size is treated as
an applicable taxpayer if--
(i) The taxpayer or a family member enrolls in a qualified health
plan through an Exchange;
(ii) An Exchange estimates at the time of enrollment that the
taxpayer's household income will be between 100 and 400 percent of the
federal poverty line for the taxable year;
(iii) Advance credit payments are authorized and paid for one or
more months during the taxable year; and
(iv) The taxpayer would be an applicable taxpayer if the taxpayer's
household income for the taxable year was between 100 and 400 percent
of the federal poverty line for the taxpayer's family size.
(7) Computation of premium assistance amounts for taxpayers with
household income below 100 percent of the federal poverty line. If a
taxpayer is treated as an applicable taxpayer under paragraph (b)(5) or
(b)(6) of this section, the taxpayer's actual household income for the
taxable year is used to compute the premium assistance amounts under
Sec. 1.36B-3(d).
(c) Minimum essential coverage--(1) In general. Minimum essential
coverage is defined in section 5000A(f) and regulations issued under
that section. As described in section 5000A(f), government-sponsored
programs, eligible employer-sponsored plans, grandfathered health
plans, and certain other health benefits coverage are minimum essential
coverage.
(2) Government-sponsored minimum essential coverage--(i) In
general. Except as provided in