Southern Nuclear Operating Co., et al.; Combined Licenses for Vogtle Electric Generating Plant, Units 3 and 4, and Limited Work Authorizations, 50767-50769 [2011-20938]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 158 / Tuesday, August 16, 2011 / Notices
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
III
James R. Hall,
Senior Project Manager, Plant Licensing
Branch IV, Division of Operating Reactor
Licensing, Office of Nuclear Reactor
Regulation.
[FR Doc. 2011–20793 Filed 8–15–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[NRC–2010–0355; Order EA–11–180; Docket
Nos. 70–7003, 70–7004; License Nos. SNM–
7003, SNM–2011]
In the Matter of USEC Inc., American
Centrifuge Lead Cascade Facility, and
American Centrifuge Plant; Order
Extending the Date by Which the Direct
Transfer of Licenses Is To Be
Completed
I
USEC Inc. (USEC) is the holder of
materials licenses SNM–7003 and
SNM–2011 for the American Centrifuge
Lead Cascade Facility (Lead Cascade)
and American Centrifuge Plant (ACP),
respectively, which authorize the
licensee to: (1) Possess and use source
and special nuclear material at the Lead
Cascade at the Portsmouth Gaseous
Diffusion Plant site in Piketon, Ohio, in
accordance with materials license
number SNM–7003; and (2) construct
and operate a gas centrifuge uranium
enrichment facility (the ACP) at the
Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant site
in Piketon, Ohio, in accordance with
materials license number SNM–2011.
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
II
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission’s (NRC) Order, dated
February 10, 2011, approved the direct
transfer of the licenses of the above
facilities from USEC to the limited
liability company American Centrifuge
Operating, LLC (ACO), pursuant to
Sections 161(b), 161(i), 161(o) and 184
of the Atomic Energy Act, as amended;
42 United States Code (U.S.C.) 2201(b),
2201(i), and 2234; and Title 10 Code of
Federal Regulations (10 CFR) parts
30.34(b), 40.46, ‘‘Inalienability of
Licenses,’’ and 70.36, ‘‘Inalienability of
Licenses.’’ By its terms, the February 10,
2011, Order will become null and void
if the license transfers are not completed
within 180 days from February 10, 2011
(i.e., by August 9, 2011). However, the
February 10 Order further states that
upon written application and for good
cause shown, the 180-day period may be
extended by further Order.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:07 Aug 15, 2011
Jkt 223001
By letter dated July 22, 2011, as
supplemented by electronic
communication dated August 1, 2011,
USEC submitted a request to extend the
date by which the license transfers must
be completed from August 9, 2011, to
February9, 2012. USEC stated that it has
been working diligently with the
Department of Energy over the past
several months to conclude the review
process for USEC’s loan guarantee
application, but would not be able to
complete this process by August 9,
2011.
USEC states that there have been no
changes in the information and
technical and financial qualifications
presented in its September 10, 2010,
request to transfer the licenses. USEC
states that the basis for granting that
request has, thus, not changed and
remains valid. The NRC staff notes that
its basis for approving the transfers of
USEC’s licenses for the Lead Cascade
and the ACP from USEC to ACO is
documented in its Safety Evaluation
Report (SER) supporting the February 10
Order. The NRC staff concluded that the
basis for approval has not changed since
the issuance of the February 10 Order.
The NRC staff has considered the
submittal of July 22, 2011, as
supplemented by electronic
communication dated August 1, 2011,
and has determined that good cause has
been shown to extend, until February 9,
2012, the date by which the license
transfers must be completed.
IV
Accordingly, pursuant to Sections
161b, 161i, 161o, and 184 of the Atomic
Energy Act of 1954, as amended, 42
U.S.C. 2201(b), 2201(i), and 2234; and
10 CFR 30.34(b), 40.46, ‘‘Inalienability
of Licenses,’’ and 70.36, ‘‘Inalienability
of Licenses,’’ It Is Hereby Ordered that
the date by which the license transfers
described above must be completed is
extended to February 9, 2012. If the
proposed direct transfer of licenses is
not completed by February 9, 2012, this
Order and the February 10 Order shall
become null and void. However, upon
written application and for good cause
shown, the February 9, 2012, date may
be extended by further Order.
This Order is effective upon issuance.
The Order of February 10, 2011, as
modified by this Order, remains in full
force and effect.
For further details with respect to this
Order, see the submittal dated July 22,
2011 (Agencywide Documents Access
and Management System (ADAMS)
Accession No. ML11210B497), as
supplemented by electronic
PO 00000
Frm 00053
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
50767
communication dated August 1, 2011
(ADAMS Accession No. ML11213A282),
and the SER documenting NRC’s staff
evaluation of USEC’s submittal dated
July 22, 2011 (ADAMS Accession No.
ML112140088), which may be
examined—and/or copied for a fee—at
the NRC’s Public Document Room,
located at One White Flint North, 11555
Rockville Pike (First Floor), Rockville,
MD 20852; and accessible online in the
NRC Library at https://www.nrc.gov/
reading-rm/adams.html.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 8th day
of August 2011.
For the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission.
Catherine Haney,
Director, Office of Nuclear Material Safety
and Safeguards.
[FR Doc. 2011–20792 Filed 8–15–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[NRC–2008–0441; Docket Nos. 52–025–COL
and 52–026–COL]
Southern Nuclear Operating Co., et al.;
Combined Licenses for Vogtle Electric
Generating Plant, Units 3 and 4, and
Limited Work Authorizations
Nuclear Regulatory
Commission.
ACTION: Notice of hearing.
AGENCY:
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC or the Commission)
will convene an evidentiary session to
receive testimony and exhibits in the
uncontested portion of this proceeding
regarding the application of Southern
Nuclear Operating Company for two
combined licenses (COLs) seeking
approval to construct and operate new
nuclear power generation facilities at
the Vogtle Electric Generating Plant,
Units 3 & 4 (VEGP), as well as for two
limited work authorizations (LWAs) to
engage in selected construction
activities. This mandatory hearing will
concern safety and environmental
matters relating to the proposed
issuance of the requested COLs and
LWAs.
DATES: The hearing will be held on
September 27, 2011, from 9 a.m.
(Eastern Daylight Time). For a schedule
for submitting prefiled documents and
deadlines affecting Interested
Government Participants, see the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of
this document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Rochelle C. Bavol, Office of the
Secretary, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\16AUN1.SGM
16AUN1
50768
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 158 / Tuesday, August 16, 2011 / Notices
Commission, Washington, DC 20555–
0001, telephone: 301–415–1651; e-mail:
Rochelle.Bavol@nrc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The Commission hereby gives notice
that, pursuant to Section 189a of the
Atomic Energy Act, it will convene an
evidentiary session to receive testimony
and exhibits in the uncontested portion
of this proceeding regarding the March
28, 2008, application of Southern
Nuclear Operating Company, acting for
itself and Georgia Power Company,
Oglethorpe Power Corporation,
Municipal Electric Authority of Georgia,
and the City of Dalton, Georgia, for two
Title 10 of the Code of Federal
Regulations (10 CFR) part 52 combined
licenses (COLs), seeking approval to
construct and operate new nuclear
power generation facilities at the
existing Vogtle Electric Generating Plant
(VEGP) site near Waynesboro, Georgia.
This mandatory hearing will also
encompass the applicant’s October 2,
2009, request for two limited work
authorizations (LWAs) to engage in
selected construction activities as
defined in 10 CFR 50.10. This
mandatory hearing will concern safety
and environmental matters relating to
the proposed issuance of the requested
COLs and LWAs, as more fully
described below. Participants in the
hearing are not to address any contested
issues in their written filings or oral
presentations.
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Matters To Be Considered
The matter at issue in this proceeding
is whether the review of the application
by the Commission’s staff has been
adequate to support the findings found
in 10 CFR 52.97 and 10 CFR 51.107(a),
for each of the COLs to be issued, and
in 10 CFR 50.10 and 10 CFR 51.107(d),
with respect to the LWAs. Those
findings are as follows:
Issues Pursuant to the Atomic Energy
Act of 1954, as Amended
With respect to each COL: (1)
Whether the applicable standards and
requirements of the Act and the
Commission’s regulations have been
met; (2) whether any required
notifications to other agencies or bodies
have been duly made; (3) whether there
is reasonable assurance that the facility
will be constructed and will operate in
conformity with the license, the
provisions of the Act, and the
Commission’s regulations; (4) whether
the applicant is technically and
financially qualified to engage in the
activities authorized; and (5) whether
issuance of the license will not be
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:07 Aug 15, 2011
Jkt 223001
inimical to the common defense and
security or the health and safety of the
public.
With respect to the LWAs: (1)
Whether the applicable standards and
requirements of the Atomic Energy Act
of 1954, as amended, and the
Commission’s regulations applicable to
the activities to be conducted under the
LWAs, have been met; (2) whether the
applicant is technically qualified to
engage in the activities authorized; (3)
whether issuance of the LWAs will
provide reasonable assurance of
adequate protection to public health and
safety and will not be inimical to the
common defense and security; and (4)
whether there are no unresolved safety
issues relating to the activities to be
conducted under the LWAs that would
constitute good cause for withholding
the authorization.
Issues Pursuant to the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of
1969, as Amended
With respect to each COL: (1)
Determine whether the requirements of
Sections 102(2) (A), (C), and (E) of
NEPA and the applicable regulations in
10 CFR part 51 have been met; (2)
independently consider the final
balance among conflicting factors
contained in the record of the
proceeding with a view to determining
the appropriate action to be taken; (3)
determine, after weighing the
environmental, economic, technical,
and other benefits against
environmental and other costs, and
considering reasonable alternatives,
whether the combined license should be
issued, denied, or appropriately
conditioned to protect environmental
values; and (4) determine whether the
NEPA review conducted by the NRC
staff has been adequate.
With respect to the LWAs: (1)
Determine whether the requirements of
Section 102(2)(A), (C), and (E) of NEPA
and the regulations in Subpart A of 10
CFR part 51 have been met, with respect
to the activities to be conducted under
the LWAs; (2) independently consider
the balance among conflicting factors
with respect to the LWAs, which is
contained in the record of the
proceeding, with a review to
determining the appropriate action to be
taken; (3) determine whether the redress
plan will adequately redress the
activities performed under the LWAs,
should limited work activities be
terminated by the holder or the LWAs
be revoked by the NRC, or upon
effectiveness of the Commission’s final
decision denying the COL application;
and (4) determine whether the NEPA
PO 00000
Frm 00054
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
review conducted by the NRC staff for
the LWAs has been adequate.
Evidentiary Uncontested Hearing
The Commission will conduct this
hearing beginning at 9 a.m., Eastern
Daylight Time (EDT) on September 27,
2011, at the Commission’s headquarters
in Rockville, Maryland. The hearing on
these issues will continue on
subsequent days, if necessary.
Presiding Officer
The Commission is the presiding
officer for this proceeding.
Schedule for Submittal of Pre-Filed
Documents
No later than September 12, 2011,
unless the Commission directs
otherwise, the staff and the applicant
shall submit a list of its anticipated
witnesses for the hearing.
No later than September 12, 2011,
unless the Commission directs
otherwise, the applicant shall submit its
pre-filed written testimony. The staff
previously submitted its testimony on
August 9, 2011.
The Commission may issue written
questions to the applicant or the staff
before the hearing. If such questions are
issued, an order containing such
questions will be issued no later than
August 30, 2011. Responses to such
questions are due September 12, 2011,
unless the Commission directs
otherwise.
Interested Government Participants
No later than August 26, 2011, any
interested State, local government body,
or affected, Federally-recognized Indian
Tribe may file with the Commission a
statement of any issues or questions that
the State, local government body, or
Indian Tribe wishes the Commission to
give particular attention to as part of the
uncontested hearing process. Such
statement may be accompanied by any
supporting documentation that the
State, local government body, or Indian
Tribe sees fit to provide. Any statements
and supporting documentation (if any)
received by the Commission using the
agency’s E-filing system 1 by the
1 The process for accessing and using the agency’s
E-filing system is described in the September 16,
2008, notice of hearing that was issued by the
Commission for this proceeding. See Notice of
Hearing and Opportunity To Petition for Leave To
Intervene and Order Imposing Procedures for
Access to Sensitive Unclassified Non-Safeguards
Information and Safeguards Information for
Contention Preparation on a Combined License for
the Vogtle Electric Generating Plant Units 3 and 4
[73 FR 53446]. Participants who are unable to use
the EIE, or who will have difficulty complying with
EIE requirements in the time frame provided for
submission of written statements, may provide their
statements by electronic mail to
hearingdocket@nrc.gov.
E:\FR\FM\16AUN1.SGM
16AUN1
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 158 / Tuesday, August 16, 2011 / Notices
deadline indicated above will be made
part of the record of the proceeding. The
Commission will use such statements
and documents as appropriate to inform
its pre-hearing questions to the Staff and
applicant, its inquiries at the oral
hearing and its decision following the
hearing. The Commission may also
request, prior to September 13, 2011,
that one or more particular States, local
government bodies, or Indian Tribes
send one representative each to the
evidentiary hearing to answer
Commission questions and/or make a
statement for the purpose of assisting
the Commission’s exploration of one or
more of the issues raised by the State,
local government body, or Indian Tribe
in the pre-hearing filings described
above. The decision of whether to
request the presence of a representative
of a State, local government body, or
Indian Tribe at the evidentiary hearing
to make a statement and/or answer
Commission questions is solely at the
Commission’s discretion. The
Commission’s request will specify the
issue or issues that the representative
should be prepared to address.
States, local governments, or Indian
Tribes should be aware that this
evidentiary hearing is separate and
distinct from the NRC’s contested
hearing process. Issues within the scope
of contentions that have been admitted
in a contested proceeding for a COL
application are outside the scope of the
uncontested proceeding for that COL
application. In addition, while States,
local governments, or Indian Tribes
participating as described above may
take any position they wish, or no
position at all, with respect to issues
regarding the COL application or the
NRC Staff’s associated environmental
review that do fall within the scope of
the uncontested proceeding (i.e., issues
that are not within the scope of
admitted contentions), they should be
aware that many of the procedures and
rights applicable to the NRC’s contested
hearing process due to the inherently
adversarial nature of such proceedings
are not available with respect to this
uncontested hearing. Participation in
the NRC’s contested hearing process is
governed by 10 CFR 2.309 (for persons
or entities, including States, local
governments, or Indian Tribes, seeking
to file contentions of their own) and 10
CFR 2.315(c) (for interested States, local
governments, and Indian Tribes seeking
to participate with respect to
contentions filed by others).
Participation in this uncontested
hearing does not affect a State’s, local
government’s, or Indian Tribe’s right to
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:07 Aug 15, 2011
Jkt 223001
participate in the separate contested
hearing process.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 10th day
of August 2011.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Andrew L. Bates,
Acting Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2011–20938 Filed 8–12–11; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[NRC–2011–0006]
Sunshine Act Meetings
Nuclear
Regulatory Commission.
DATES: Weeks of August 15, 22, 29,
September 5, 12, 19, 2011.
PLACE: Commissioners’ Conference
Room, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville,
Maryland.
STATUS: Public and Closed.
AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETINGS:
Week of August 15, 2011
There are no meetings scheduled for
the week of August 15, 2011.
Week of August 22, 2011—Tentative
There are no meetings scheduled for
the week of August 22, 2011.
Week of August 29, 2011—Tentative
Tuesday, August 30, 2011
8:55 a.m. Affirmation Session (Public
Meeting) (Tentative)
Final Rule: Enhancements to
Emergency Preparedness
Regulations (10 CFR part 50 and 10
CFR part 52) (RIN–3150–Al10)
(Tentative)
This meeting will be webcast live at
the Web address—https://www.nrc.gov.
9 a.m. Information Briefing on
Inspections, Tests, Analyses, and
Acceptance Criteria (ITAAC)
Related Activities (Public Meeting)
(Contact: Aida Rivera-Varona, 301–
251–4001)
This meeting will be webcast live at
the Web address—https://www.nrc.gov.
Week of September 5, 2011—Tentative
There are no meetings scheduled for
the week of September 5, 2011.
Week of September 12, 2011—Tentative
There are no meetings scheduled for
the week of September 12, 2011.
Week of September 19, 2011—Tentative
There are no meetings scheduled for
the week of September 19, 2011.
*
*
*
*
*
* The schedule for Commission
meetings is subject to change on short
PO 00000
Frm 00055
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
50769
notice. To verify the status of meetings,
call (recording)—(301) 415–1292.
Contact person for more information:
Rochelle Bavol, (301) 415–1651.
*
*
*
*
*
The NRC Commission Meeting
Schedule can be found on the Internet
at: https://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/
public-meetings/schedule.html.
*
*
*
*
*
The NRC provides reasonable
accommodation to individuals with
disabilities where appropriate. If you
need a reasonable accommodation to
participate in these public meetings, or
need this meeting notice or the
transcript or other information from the
public meetings in another format (e.g.
braille, large print), please notify Bill
Dosch, Chief, Work Life and Benefits
Branch, at 301–415–6200, TDD: 301–
415–2100, or by e-mail at
william.dosch@nrc.gov. Determinations
on requests for reasonable
accommodation will be made on a caseby-case basis.
*
*
*
*
*
This notice is distributed
electronically to subscribers. If you no
longer wish to receive it, or would like
to be added to the distribution, please
contact the Office of the Secretary,
Washington, DC 20555 (301–415–1969),
or send an e-mail to
darlene.wright@nrc.gov.
Dated: August 11, 2011.
Rochelle C. Bavol,
Policy Coordinator, Office of the Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011–20940 Filed 8–12–11; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
OFFICE OF PERSONNEL
MANAGEMENT
[OMB Control number 3206–0248]
Submission for Review: Application for
Senior Administrative Law Judge (OPM
Form 1655), and Geographic
Preference Statement for Senior
Administrative Law Judge Applicant
(OPM Form 1655–A)
U.S. Office of Personnel
Management.
ACTION: 30-Day Notice and request for
comments.
AGENCY:
The Human Resources
Solutions, U.S. Office of Personnel
Management (OPM) offers the general
public and other Federal agencies the
opportunity to comment on an existing
information collection request (ICR)
3206–0248, OPM 1655, and OPM 1655–
A. These forms are used by retired
Administrative Law Judges seeking
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\16AUN1.SGM
16AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 158 (Tuesday, August 16, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 50767-50769]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-20938]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
[NRC-2008-0441; Docket Nos. 52-025-COL and 52-026-COL]
Southern Nuclear Operating Co., et al.; Combined Licenses for
Vogtle Electric Generating Plant, Units 3 and 4, and Limited Work
Authorizations
AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
ACTION: Notice of hearing.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or the Commission)
will convene an evidentiary session to receive testimony and exhibits
in the uncontested portion of this proceeding regarding the application
of Southern Nuclear Operating Company for two combined licenses (COLs)
seeking approval to construct and operate new nuclear power generation
facilities at the Vogtle Electric Generating Plant, Units 3 & 4 (VEGP),
as well as for two limited work authorizations (LWAs) to engage in
selected construction activities. This mandatory hearing will concern
safety and environmental matters relating to the proposed issuance of
the requested COLs and LWAs.
DATES: The hearing will be held on September 27, 2011, from 9 a.m.
(Eastern Daylight Time). For a schedule for submitting prefiled
documents and deadlines affecting Interested Government Participants,
see the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rochelle C. Bavol, Office of the
Secretary, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
[[Page 50768]]
Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001, telephone: 301-415-1651; e-mail:
Rochelle.Bavol@nrc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The Commission hereby gives notice that, pursuant to Section 189a
of the Atomic Energy Act, it will convene an evidentiary session to
receive testimony and exhibits in the uncontested portion of this
proceeding regarding the March 28, 2008, application of Southern
Nuclear Operating Company, acting for itself and Georgia Power Company,
Oglethorpe Power Corporation, Municipal Electric Authority of Georgia,
and the City of Dalton, Georgia, for two Title 10 of the Code of
Federal Regulations (10 CFR) part 52 combined licenses (COLs), seeking
approval to construct and operate new nuclear power generation
facilities at the existing Vogtle Electric Generating Plant (VEGP) site
near Waynesboro, Georgia. This mandatory hearing will also encompass
the applicant's October 2, 2009, request for two limited work
authorizations (LWAs) to engage in selected construction activities as
defined in 10 CFR 50.10. This mandatory hearing will concern safety and
environmental matters relating to the proposed issuance of the
requested COLs and LWAs, as more fully described below. Participants in
the hearing are not to address any contested issues in their written
filings or oral presentations.
Matters To Be Considered
The matter at issue in this proceeding is whether the review of the
application by the Commission's staff has been adequate to support the
findings found in 10 CFR 52.97 and 10 CFR 51.107(a), for each of the
COLs to be issued, and in 10 CFR 50.10 and 10 CFR 51.107(d), with
respect to the LWAs. Those findings are as follows:
Issues Pursuant to the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as Amended
With respect to each COL: (1) Whether the applicable standards and
requirements of the Act and the Commission's regulations have been met;
(2) whether any required notifications to other agencies or bodies have
been duly made; (3) whether there is reasonable assurance that the
facility will be constructed and will operate in conformity with the
license, the provisions of the Act, and the Commission's regulations;
(4) whether the applicant is technically and financially qualified to
engage in the activities authorized; and (5) whether issuance of the
license will not be inimical to the common defense and security or the
health and safety of the public.
With respect to the LWAs: (1) Whether the applicable standards and
requirements of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, and the
Commission's regulations applicable to the activities to be conducted
under the LWAs, have been met; (2) whether the applicant is technically
qualified to engage in the activities authorized; (3) whether issuance
of the LWAs will provide reasonable assurance of adequate protection to
public health and safety and will not be inimical to the common defense
and security; and (4) whether there are no unresolved safety issues
relating to the activities to be conducted under the LWAs that would
constitute good cause for withholding the authorization.
Issues Pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of
1969, as Amended
With respect to each COL: (1) Determine whether the requirements of
Sections 102(2) (A), (C), and (E) of NEPA and the applicable
regulations in 10 CFR part 51 have been met; (2) independently consider
the final balance among conflicting factors contained in the record of
the proceeding with a view to determining the appropriate action to be
taken; (3) determine, after weighing the environmental, economic,
technical, and other benefits against environmental and other costs,
and considering reasonable alternatives, whether the combined license
should be issued, denied, or appropriately conditioned to protect
environmental values; and (4) determine whether the NEPA review
conducted by the NRC staff has been adequate.
With respect to the LWAs: (1) Determine whether the requirements of
Section 102(2)(A), (C), and (E) of NEPA and the regulations in Subpart
A of 10 CFR part 51 have been met, with respect to the activities to be
conducted under the LWAs; (2) independently consider the balance among
conflicting factors with respect to the LWAs, which is contained in the
record of the proceeding, with a review to determining the appropriate
action to be taken; (3) determine whether the redress plan will
adequately redress the activities performed under the LWAs, should
limited work activities be terminated by the holder or the LWAs be
revoked by the NRC, or upon effectiveness of the Commission's final
decision denying the COL application; and (4) determine whether the
NEPA review conducted by the NRC staff for the LWAs has been adequate.
Evidentiary Uncontested Hearing
The Commission will conduct this hearing beginning at 9 a.m.,
Eastern Daylight Time (EDT) on September 27, 2011, at the Commission's
headquarters in Rockville, Maryland. The hearing on these issues will
continue on subsequent days, if necessary.
Presiding Officer
The Commission is the presiding officer for this proceeding.
Schedule for Submittal of Pre-Filed Documents
No later than September 12, 2011, unless the Commission directs
otherwise, the staff and the applicant shall submit a list of its
anticipated witnesses for the hearing.
No later than September 12, 2011, unless the Commission directs
otherwise, the applicant shall submit its pre-filed written testimony.
The staff previously submitted its testimony on August 9, 2011.
The Commission may issue written questions to the applicant or the
staff before the hearing. If such questions are issued, an order
containing such questions will be issued no later than August 30, 2011.
Responses to such questions are due September 12, 2011, unless the
Commission directs otherwise.
Interested Government Participants
No later than August 26, 2011, any interested State, local
government body, or affected, Federally-recognized Indian Tribe may
file with the Commission a statement of any issues or questions that
the State, local government body, or Indian Tribe wishes the Commission
to give particular attention to as part of the uncontested hearing
process. Such statement may be accompanied by any supporting
documentation that the State, local government body, or Indian Tribe
sees fit to provide. Any statements and supporting documentation (if
any) received by the Commission using the agency's E-filing system \1\
by the
[[Page 50769]]
deadline indicated above will be made part of the record of the
proceeding. The Commission will use such statements and documents as
appropriate to inform its pre-hearing questions to the Staff and
applicant, its inquiries at the oral hearing and its decision following
the hearing. The Commission may also request, prior to September 13,
2011, that one or more particular States, local government bodies, or
Indian Tribes send one representative each to the evidentiary hearing
to answer Commission questions and/or make a statement for the purpose
of assisting the Commission's exploration of one or more of the issues
raised by the State, local government body, or Indian Tribe in the pre-
hearing filings described above. The decision of whether to request the
presence of a representative of a State, local government body, or
Indian Tribe at the evidentiary hearing to make a statement and/or
answer Commission questions is solely at the Commission's discretion.
The Commission's request will specify the issue or issues that the
representative should be prepared to address.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The process for accessing and using the agency's E-filing
system is described in the September 16, 2008, notice of hearing
that was issued by the Commission for this proceeding. See Notice of
Hearing and Opportunity To Petition for Leave To Intervene and Order
Imposing Procedures for Access to Sensitive Unclassified Non-
Safeguards Information and Safeguards Information for Contention
Preparation on a Combined License for the Vogtle Electric Generating
Plant Units 3 and 4 [73 FR 53446]. Participants who are unable to
use the EIE, or who will have difficulty complying with EIE
requirements in the time frame provided for submission of written
statements, may provide their statements by electronic mail to
hearingdocket@nrc.gov.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
States, local governments, or Indian Tribes should be aware that
this evidentiary hearing is separate and distinct from the NRC's
contested hearing process. Issues within the scope of contentions that
have been admitted in a contested proceeding for a COL application are
outside the scope of the uncontested proceeding for that COL
application. In addition, while States, local governments, or Indian
Tribes participating as described above may take any position they
wish, or no position at all, with respect to issues regarding the COL
application or the NRC Staff's associated environmental review that do
fall within the scope of the uncontested proceeding (i.e., issues that
are not within the scope of admitted contentions), they should be aware
that many of the procedures and rights applicable to the NRC's
contested hearing process due to the inherently adversarial nature of
such proceedings are not available with respect to this uncontested
hearing. Participation in the NRC's contested hearing process is
governed by 10 CFR 2.309 (for persons or entities, including States,
local governments, or Indian Tribes, seeking to file contentions of
their own) and 10 CFR 2.315(c) (for interested States, local
governments, and Indian Tribes seeking to participate with respect to
contentions filed by others). Participation in this uncontested hearing
does not affect a State's, local government's, or Indian Tribe's right
to participate in the separate contested hearing process.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 10th day of August 2011.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Andrew L. Bates,
Acting Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2011-20938 Filed 8-12-11; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P