Taking and Importing Marine Mammals; Military Training Activities and Research Conducted Within the Mariana Islands Range Complex, 50457-50460 [2011-20679]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 157 / Monday, August 15, 2011 / Notices
Saehan’s treatment under the order (i.e.,
Toray Advanced Materials will inherit
Toray Saehan’s revocation from the
order).
Instructions to U.S. Customs and
Border Protection
The Department will instruct U.S.
Customs and Border Protection to
liquidate entries of merchandise
produced or exported by Toray
Advanced Materials without regard to
antidumping duties, as Toray Advanced
Materials’ predecessor, Toray Saehan, is
revoked from the order.
Notification
This notice also serves as a reminder
to parties subject to administrative
protective orders (APOs) of their
responsibility concerning the
disposition of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.306. Timely written
notification of the return/destruction of
APO materials or conversion to judicial
protective order is hereby requested.
Failure to comply with the regulations
and terms of an APO is a sanctionable
violation.
This notice is in accordance with
sections 751(b) and 777(i)(1) and (2) of
the Act and 19 CFR 351.216(e).
Dated: August 5, 2011.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. 2011–20681 Filed 8–12–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
RIN 0648–XA567
Taking and Importing Marine
Mammals; Military Training Activities
and Research Conducted Within the
Mariana Islands Range Complex
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of issuance of a Letter of
Authorization.
AGENCY:
In accordance with the
Marine Mammal Protection Act
(MMPA), as amended, and
implementing regulations, notice is
hereby given that NMFS has issued a
letter of authorization (LOA) to the U.S.
Navy (Navy) to take marine mammals
incidental to Navy training,
maintenance, and research,
development, testing, and evaluation
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:05 Aug 12, 2011
Jkt 223001
(RDT&E) activities to be conducted
within the Mariana Islands Range
Complex (MIRC) Study Area for the
period of August 12, 2011, through
August 11, 2012.
This authorization is effective
from August 12, 2011, through August
11, 2012.
DATES:
The LOA and supporting
documentation may be obtained by
writing to P. Michael Payne, Office of
Protected Resources, NMFS, 1315 EastWest Highway, Silver Spring, MD
20910, or by telephoning one of the
contacts listed here.
ADDRESSES:
Jolie
Harrison or Brian D. Hopper, Office of
Protected Resources, NMFS, (301) 427–
8401.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Section
101(a)(5)(A) of the MMPA (16 U.S.C.
1361 et seq.) directs NMFS to allow,
upon request, the incidental taking of
marine mammals by U.S. citizens who
engage in a specified activity (other than
commercial fishing), if certain findings
are made by NMFS and regulations are
issued. Under the MMPA, the term
‘‘take’’ means to harass, hunt, capture,
or kill or to attempt to harass, hunt,
capture, or kill marine mammals.
Regulations governing the taking of
marine mammals by the Navy incidental
to MIRC training, maintenance, and
RDT&E became effective on August 3,
2010 (75 FR 45527, August 3, 2010), and
remain in effect through August 3, 2015.
The MIRC study area encompasses a
501,873 square nautical mile area (nm2)
around the islands, including Guam,
Tinian, Saipan, Rota, Farallon de
Meinilla, and also includes ocean areas
in both the Pacific Ocean and
Philippine Sea. For detailed information
on this action, please refer to the August
2010 final rule. These regulations
include mitigation, monitoring, and
reporting requirements and establish a
framework to authorize incidental take
through the issuance of LOAs.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Summary of Request
On April 18, 2011, NMFS received a
request from the Navy for a renewal of
an LOA issued on August 12, 2010, for
the taking of marine mammals
incidental to training and research
activities conducted within the MIRC
Study Area under regulations issued on
August 3, 2010 (75 FR 45527). The Navy
has complied with the measures
required in 50 CFR 218.104 and
218.105, as well as the associated 2010
LOA, and submitted the reports and
other documentation required in the
final rule and the 2010 LOA.
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
50457
Summary of Activity Under the 2010
LOA
As described in the Navy’s exercise
reports (both classified and
unclassified), in 2010, the training
activities conducted by the Navy were
within the scope and amounts
authorized by the 2010 LOA and the
levels of take remain within the scope
and amounts contemplated by the final
rule. Between August 12, 2010 and
February 15, 2011, the Navy conducted
one Multi Strike Group Exercise. The
exercise was conducted from September
16–21, 2010 and included one Sinking
Exercise (SINKEX), one underwater
demolition exercise, and one Air-toSurface Missile Exercise (A–S
MISSILEX).
Planned Activities and Estimated Take
for 2011–2012
In 2011–2012, the Navy expects to
conduct the same type and amount of
training contemplated in the final rule
and identified in the 2010 LOA.
Therefore, for the 2011 LOA, NMFS
authorizes the same amount of take that
was authorized in 2010.
Summary of Monitoring, Reporting,
and Other Requirements Under the
2010 LOA
Annual Exercise Reports
The Navy submitted their classified
and unclassified 2010 exercise reports
within the required timeframes and the
unclassified report is posted on NMFS’
Web site: https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/
permits/incidental.htm. NMFS has
reviewed both reports and they contain
the information required by the 2010
LOA. The reports indicate the amounts
of different types of training that
occurred from August 12, 2010, through
February 15, 2011. As mentioned above,
the Navy conducted one Multi Strike
Group Exercise consisting of various
training exercises addressed in the rule
(the rule analyzed the likely annual
impacts of up to two SINKEXs, 50
underwater demolitions, and two A–S
MISSILEXs).
The reports also list specific
information gathered when marine
mammals were detected by Navy
watchstanders, such as how far an
animal was from the vessel, whether
sonar was in use, and whether it was
powered or shut down. This
information indicates that the Navy
implemented the safety zone mitigation
measures as required. During the MultiStrike Group Exercise conducted in
September, 2010, no instances of
obvious behavioral disturbance were
reported by the Navy watchstanders in
their 10 marine mammal sightings
E:\FR\FM\15AUN1.SGM
15AUN1
50458
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 157 / Monday, August 15, 2011 / Notices
totaling 39 animals. Furthermore, safety
zones were adhered to, and vessels and
aircraft applied mitigation measures
when marine mammals were observed
within the requisite zones. There were
two marine mammal sightings within
200 yards of a Mid-Frequency Active
Sonar (MFAS) source during this
exercise. In both instances, the proper
mitigation was conducted and the
source was shut down; no unusual
behavior was observed.
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
2010 Monitoring
The Monitoring Plan for MIRC
committed the Navy to conduct
monitoring in 2010 and 2011 in
anticipation of the MMPA regulations
and LOAs being issued in March 2010.
Due to unforeseen delays, the final rule
and LOA were not issued until August
2010; however, the Navy had already
prepared a draft Monitoring Plan for
MIRC, and the visual surveys conducted
January through April 2010 in
collaboration with the NMFS Pacific
Islands Fisheries Science Center (PIFSC)
were consistent with its objectives. No
additional visual surveys occurred
between August 12, 2010 and February
12, 2011, but a winter survey was
conducted from February 17 to March 3,
2011. In addition, a summer survey and
the deployment of passive acoustic
monitoring devices is scheduled for
September 2011 and the Mariana
Islands Sea Turtle and Cetacean Survey
(MISTCS) acoustic data analysis is
currently underway. The Navy’s
monitoring accomplishments are
discussed in their 2010 Monitoring
Report, which is posted on NMFS’ Web
site (https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/
permits/incidental.htm). The Navy
submitted the 2010 Monitoring Report
within the required timeframe. The
report includes a summary of their 2010
monitoring effort and results (beginning
on page 4 of the monitoring report) and
the specific reports for each individual
effort are presented in the appendix.
Visual Surveys
From January 20 to February 6, 2010,
visual observations for cetaceans
occurred during an 18-day transit from
Hawaii to Guam aboard the NOAA R/V
OSCAR ELTON SETTE. These
monitoring efforts and their findings, if
available, will be discussed in greater
detail below.
The R/V SETTE surveyed 1,285 nm of
trackline over 16 days. The visual
observer teams encountered 25 cetacean
groups and obtained group size
estimates for all groups. Two of the
sightings were made by an independent
observer. Eight of the 25 cetacean
groups were identified to species. Time
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:05 Aug 12, 2011
Jkt 223001
and weather limitations prevented the
ship’s approach of more of the sighted
cetacean groups.
The R/V SETTE also conducted visual
observations for cetaceans during the
17-day transit from Guam to Hawaii
from April 19 to May 3, 2010. The
visual observer teams encountered 21
cetacean groups and obtained group size
estimates for all groups. One sighting
was made by an independent observer.
Sixteen of the 21 cetacean groups were
identified to species. Time and weather
limitations prevented the ship’s
approach of more of the sighted
cetacean groups; however, on one
occasion the small boat was launched
for biopsy sampling and photography of
a group of pilot whales.
From March 20 to April 11, 2010,
visual observations for cetaceans
occurred during transit periods of a 23day oceanography survey around Guam
and the southern portion of the
Northern Mariana Islands. The observer
team encountered nine cetacean groups
and was able to identify three to species.
Neither photos nor biopsy samples were
collected during this cruise because
cetacean observations were ancillary to
the primary objective and time
constraints did not allow the ship to
stop for photographing groups or
collecting samples.
Small vessel surveys for marine
mammals were conducted from January
to April 2010 by NMFS’ PIFSC around
the islands of Guam, Saipan and Tinian.
During the surveys conducted around
Guam from February 9–18, 2010, the
observer team encountered 11 groups of
cetaceans and identified 10 of the
groups to species. A total of 2,769
digital images were taken for species
identification and individual
recognition. Surveys conducted around
Saipan and Tinian from February 22–
March 3, 2010, encountered seven
cetacean groups and all were identified
to species. A total of 971 digital images
were taken for the purposes of species
identification and individual
recognition.
Photo Data Collection and Biopsy
Sampling
In conjunction with the vessel surveys
from Hawaii to Guam, the SETTE’s
small boat was launched on two
occasions for photography of sighted
animals and biopsy sampling. A single
biopsy sample was collected from a sei
whale in the waters off of Wake Island.
The sample was collected from the
Safeboat using a dart fired from a
crossbow. Upon collection, tissue
samples are sectioned in half, with one
half archived at PIFSC and the other
sent to the genetics lab at the Southwest
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Fisheries Science Center for studies on
the genetic population structure of
cetaceans in the Pacific. During the
transit from Guam to Hawaii, the
SETTE’s small boat was launched on
one occasion for biopsy sampling and
photography of a group of pilot whales.
A total of 1,243 photos were collected.
Most photos were taken from the flying
bridge or bow of the SETTE. Over 200
photos were taken from the small boat
during the pilot whale encounter. Most
of these photos will be used for
individual identification. Two biopsy
sampling attempts were made, but no
samples were collected.
During the small vessel surveys in the
waters surrounding Guam, Saipan and
Tinian, a total of 2,769 photos were
taken and eight biopsy samples were
collected. Photos will be used to study
social behavior and movement patterns
of identified individuals and to study
external features such as morphology or
coloration patterns, which may vary
geographically. The genetic data from
the biopsy samples will be used to study
the population structure of the sampled
cetacean group.
Passive Acoustic Monitoring
In addition to the visual observations
conducted during the high seas surveys
between Hawaii and Guam, a
hydrophone array was towed behind the
SETTE and sonobuoys were deployed to
acoustically monitor for the presence of
vocalizing cetaceans. The towed array
was deployed throughout the cruise—
collecting nearly continuous highfrequency clean acoustic data from the
four hydrophones. Over 100 acoustic
detections were collected, consisting
primarily of sperm and minke whale
vocalizations. In addition, 37 sonobuoys
were deployed over 15 days. Cetacean
vocalizations detected by the sonobuoys
included humpback, sperm, minke, fin,
and sei whale, as well as possible
delphinid clicks and whistles. The
SETTE also towed the hydrophone array
and deployed sonobuoys during the 15day transit from Guam to Hawaii. Over
150 hours of acoustic data were
recorded by the four hydrophones.
Sixty-seven vocalizations were detected,
consisting primarily of sperm and
minke whale; however, other acoustic
detections included pilot whales,
melon-headed whales, and false killer
whales. In addition, six acoustic
detections matched the visual sightings
of the observation team. Similar to the
first leg of the cruise, 37 sonobuoys
were deployed over the course of 15
days. Cetacean vocalizations detected by
the sonobuoys included delphinid
whistles and sperm, minke, and fin
whales.
E:\FR\FM\15AUN1.SGM
15AUN1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 157 / Monday, August 15, 2011 / Notices
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
The Navy purchased four passive
acoustic monitoring devices that will be
deployed around the Mariana Islands
during the summer 2011 visual survey.
These devices are capable of gathering
data throughout the year. In addition, if
funds permit, data from passive acoustic
monitoring devices currently deployed
off Saipan by other researchers will be
analyzed cooperatively among the
various agencies. Finally, data analysis
is currently underway involving the
four months of acoustic data gathered
using towed arrays and sonobuoys
during the MISTCS in 2007. This
dataset represents a large compilation of
acoustic detections, many of which also
correlate to visual detections. Results
from this analysis will be provided in
the 2012 Annual Monitoring Report.
In conclusion, the Navy’s
implementation of the monitoring plan
accomplished several goals, which
contribute to a larger body of data
intended to better characterize the
abundance, distribution, life history,
and behaviors of the species in the
MIRC study area. In general, the
monitoring conducted in 2010 satisfied
the objectives of the monitoring plan
and specifically contributed to the
following: (1) A greater knowledge and
understanding of the density and
distribution of species within the MIRC
study area; (2) the vocalizations of
different species, which advances the
development of automated classification
software; and (3) establishment of a
better baseline of species distribution
and abundance that will assist the Navy
and NMFS in determining, through
adaptive management, whether a shift
in monitoring is warranted.
NMFS concludes that the results of
these monitoring efforts when taken
together with the findings presented in
the 2010 exercise report (see Annual
Exercise Report section) do not warrant
making changes to the current
monitoring/mitigation requirements
identified in the LOA. While the data
collected by the Navy through
monitoring and reporting builds upon
the existing body of information in a
valuable way, none of the new data
contradict, or amend, the assumptions
that underlie the findings in the 2010
rule in a manner that would suggest
changing the current mitigation or
monitoring.
Adaptive Management
In general, adaptive management
allows NMFS to consider new
information from different sources to
determine (with input from the Navy
regarding practicability) if monitoring
efforts should be modified if new
information suggests that such
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:05 Aug 12, 2011
Jkt 223001
modifications are appropriate. All of the
5-year rules and LOAs issued to the
Navy include an adaptive management
component, which includes an annual
meeting between NMFS and the Navy.
NMFS and the Navy conducted an
adaptive management meeting in
October, 2010, which representatives
from the Marine Mammal Commission
participated in, wherein we reviewed
the Navy monitoring results through
August 1, 2010, discussed other Navy
research and development efforts, and
discussed other new information that
could potentially inform decisions
regarding Navy mitigation and
monitoring. None of the information
contained in the monitoring report or
discussed at the annual adaptive
management meeting led NMFS to
recommend any modifications to the
existing mitigation or monitoring
measures.
Integrated Comprehensive Monitoring
Report
The 2010 LOA required that the Navy
update the ICMP Plan to reflect
development in three areas, specifically:
(1) Identifying more specific monitoring
sub-goals under the major goals that
have been identified; (2) characterizing
Navy Range Complexes and study areas
within the context of the prioritization
guidelines described in the ICMP Plan;
and (3) continuing to develop data
management, organization and access
procedures. The Navy has updated the
ICMP Plan as required. Because the
ICMP is an evolving Program, we have
posted the ICMP on the NMFS Web site:
https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/permits/
incidental.htm.
Further, the Navy convened a
monitoring meeting in October, 2010 to
solicit input from NMFS and marine
mammal and acoustic scientists
regarding the comprehensive
development and improvement of the
more specific monitoring that should
occur across the Navy’s training areas.
Subsequent to those discussions, the
Navy assembled a scientific advisory
group (of Navy and outside scientists)
that will work on a proposed Navy
training area-wide monitoring plan that
better considers the biological,
logistical, and resource-specific factors
that are applicable in each area (and
which are summarized in the updated
ICMP) to maximize the effectiveness of
Navy monitoring within the context of
the information that is most needed.
Subsequently, NMFS and MMC
representatives will review this
proposed Navy-wide monitoring plan,
which will likely reflect monitoring
differences in some Navy training areas
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
50459
from what has been required in the
previous LOAs.
2011 Monitoring Meeting
The regulations that established the
framework for authorizing the taking of
marine mammals incidental to Navy
training activities required the Navy,
with guidance and support from NMFS,
to convene a Monitoring Workshop in
2011 (50 CFR 218.108(d)(2)). The
Marine Mammal Monitoring Workshop,
which included scientists,
representatives from non-governmental
organizations, and Marine Mammal
Commission staff, took place in June
2011. Pursuant to the regulations, this
workshop presented a consolidated
overview of monitoring activities
conducted in 2009 and 2010, as well as
the outcomes of selected monitoringrelated research. In 2010, the Navy
convened a Scientific Advisory Group
(SAG), comprised of experts in the
fields of marine mammals and
underwater acoustics, to review the
Navy’s current monitoring plans and
make recommendations. The results of
the SAG’s review were also presented at
the meeting. Participants engaged in
open discussion of the lessons learned,
and discussed how to improve the
Navy’s monitoring plan moving
forward. If changes to monitoring
approaches are identified at the
workshop that can be implemented
during the annual LOA renewal process
and subsequent 5-year regulations, the
Navy and NMFS will modify the Navywide monitoring plan and propose
appropriate changes to the monitoring
measures in specific LOAs for the
different Range Complexes and training
areas. For training areas with
substantive monitoring modifications,
NMFS will subsequently publish
proposed LOAs, with the modifications,
in the Federal Register and solicit
public input. After addressing public
comments and making changes as
appropriate, NMFS will issue new
training area LOAs that reflect the new
Navy-wide monitoring plan.
Authorization
The Navy complied with the
requirements of the 2010 LOA. Based on
our review of the record, NMFS has
determined that the marine mammal
take resulting from the 2010 military
readiness training and research
activities falls within the levels
previously anticipated, analyzed, and
authorized. Further, the level of taking
authorized in 2011 for the Navy’s MIRC
activities is consistent with our previous
findings made for the total taking
allowed under the MIRC regulations.
Finally, the record supports NMFS’
E:\FR\FM\15AUN1.SGM
15AUN1
50460
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 157 / Monday, August 15, 2011 / Notices
conclusion that the total number of
marine mammals taken by the 2011
MIRC activities will have no more than
a negligible impact on the affected
species or stock of marine mammals and
will not have an unmitigable adverse
impact on the availability of these
species or stocks for taking for
subsistence uses.
Accordingly, NMFS has issued a oneyear LOA for Navy training exercises
conducted in the MIRC Study Area from
August 12, 2011, through August 11,
2012.
Dated: August 9, 2011.
James H. Lecky,
Director, Office of Protected Resources,
National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2011–20679 Filed 8–12–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Office of the Secretary
[Docket ID: DOD–2011–OS–0090]
Privacy Act of 1974; Notice of a
Computer Matching Program
Defense Manpower Data
Center, Department of Defense (DoD).
ACTION: Notice of a Computer Matching
Program.
AGENCY:
Subsection (e)(12) of the
Privacy Act of 1974, as amended, (5
U.S.C. 552a) requires agencies to
publish advance notice of any proposed
or revised computer matching program
by the matching agency for public
comment; however, this notification
will be completed by the DoD, the
recipient agency. The DoD, as the
recipient agency under the Privacy Act
is hereby giving notice to the record
subjects of a computer matching
program between the Office of
Personnel Management (OPM), the
source agency and Defense Manpower
Data Center (DMDC) that their records
are being matched by computer. The
purpose of this agreement is for
disclosure of Federal Employees Health
Benefits (FEHB) Program and Federal
employment information to DMDC. This
disclosure by OPM will provide the DoD
with the FEHB eligibility and Federal
employment information necessary to
determine continuing eligibility for the
TRICARE Reserve Select (TRS) and
TRICARE Retired Reserve (TRR)
programs.
DATES: This proposed action will
become effective September 14, 2011
and matching may commence unless
changes to the matching program are
required due to public comments or by
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:05 Aug 12, 2011
Jkt 223001
Congressional or Office of Management
and Budget objections. Any public
comment must be received before the
effective date.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by docket number and title,
by any of the following methods:
• Federal Rulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Mail: Federal Docket Management
System Office, 1160 Defense Pentagon,
Washington, DC 20301–1160.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the agency name and
docket number for this Federal Register
document. The general policy for
comments and other submissions from
members of the public is to make these
submissions available for public
viewing on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov as they are
received without change, including any
personal identifiers or contact
information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Samuel P. Jenkins, Director for Privacy,
Defense Privacy and Civil Liberties
Office, 1901 S. Bell Street, Suite 920,
Arlington, VA 22202–4512, or by phone
at (703) 607–2943.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant
to subsection (o) of the Privacy Act of
1974, as amended, (5 U.S.C. 552a), the
DMDC and OPM have concluded an
agreement to conduct a computer
matching program between the agencies.
The purpose of this agreement is to
verify an individual’s continuing
eligibility for the TRICARE Reserve
Select (TRS) and TRICARE Retired
Reserve (TRR) Programs.
The parties to this agreement have
determined that a computer matching
program is the most efficient,
expeditious, and effective means of
obtaining the information needed by the
OPM to identify individual’s ineligible
to continue the TRICARE Reserve Select
and TRICARE Retired Reserve (TRR)
Programs. If this identification is not
accomplished by computer matching,
but is done manually, the cost would be
prohibitive and it is possible that not all
individuals would be identified.
A copy of the computer matching
agreement between OPM and DMDC is
available upon request to the public.
Requests should be submitted to the
address caption above or to the Office of
Personnel Management, 1900 E Street,
NW., Room 5415, Washington, DC
20415.
Set forth below is the notice of the
establishment of a computer matching
program required by paragraph 6.c. of
the Office of Management and Budget
Guidelines on computer matching
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
published in the Federal Register at 54
FR 25818 on June 19, 1989.
The matching agreement, as required
by 5 U.S.C. 552a(r) of the Privacy Act,
and an advance copy of this notice was
submitted on August 9, 2011, to the
House Committee on Government
Reform, the Senate Committee on
Governmental Affairs, and the
Administrator of the Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs,
Office of Management and Budget
pursuant to paragraph 4d of Appendix
I to OMB Circular No. A–130, ‘Federal
Agency Responsibilities for Maintaining
Records about Individuals,’ dated
February 8, 1996 (61 FR 6435).
Dated: August 9, 2011.
Aaron Siegel,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison
Officer, Department of Defense.
Notice of a Computer Matching
Agreement Between the Office of
Personnel Management and the Defense
Manpower Data Center, Department of
Defense for Disclosure of Federal
Employees Health Benefits (FEHB)
Program Eligibility in Determining
Eligibility for Tricare Reserve Select
(TRS) and TRICARE Retired Reserve
Programs (TRR).
A. Participating Agencies:
Participants in this computer matching
program are the Office of Personnel
Management (OPM) and the Defense
Manpower Data Center (DMDC) of the
Department of Defense (DoD). The
DMDC is the recipient agency and the
OPM is the source agency.
B. Purpose of the Match: The purpose
of this agreement is to establish the
conditions, safeguards and procedures
under which the Office of Personnel
Management (OPM) will disclose FEHB
eligibility and Federal employment
information to the Defense Manpower
Data Center (DMDC), Defense
Enrollment and Eligibility Reporting
System Office (DEERS), and the Office
of the Assistant Secretary of Defense
(Reserve Affairs). This disclosure by
OPM will provide the DoD with the
FEHB eligibility and Federal
employment information necessary to
determine continuing eligibility for the
TRICARE Reserve Select (TRS) and
TRICARE Retired Reserve (TRR)
programs.
C. Authority for Conducting the
Match: This CMA is executed to comply
with the Privacy Act of 1974 (section
552a of title 5 United States Code
(U.S.C.), as amended, (as amended by
Public Law (Pub. L.) 100–503, the
Computer Matching and Privacy
Protection Act (CMPPA) of 1988), the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) Circular A–130, titled
E:\FR\FM\15AUN1.SGM
15AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 157 (Monday, August 15, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 50457-50460]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-20679]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
RIN 0648-XA567
Taking and Importing Marine Mammals; Military Training Activities
and Research Conducted Within the Mariana Islands Range Complex
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of issuance of a Letter of Authorization.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In accordance with the Marine Mammal Protection Act (MMPA), as
amended, and implementing regulations, notice is hereby given that NMFS
has issued a letter of authorization (LOA) to the U.S. Navy (Navy) to
take marine mammals incidental to Navy training, maintenance, and
research, development, testing, and evaluation (RDT&E) activities to be
conducted within the Mariana Islands Range Complex (MIRC) Study Area
for the period of August 12, 2011, through August 11, 2012.
DATES: This authorization is effective from August 12, 2011, through
August 11, 2012.
ADDRESSES: The LOA and supporting documentation may be obtained by
writing to P. Michael Payne, Office of Protected Resources, NMFS, 1315
East-West Highway, Silver Spring, MD 20910, or by telephoning one of
the contacts listed here.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jolie Harrison or Brian D. Hopper,
Office of Protected Resources, NMFS, (301) 427-8401.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 101(a)(5)(A) of the MMPA (16 U.S.C.
1361 et seq.) directs NMFS to allow, upon request, the incidental
taking of marine mammals by U.S. citizens who engage in a specified
activity (other than commercial fishing), if certain findings are made
by NMFS and regulations are issued. Under the MMPA, the term ``take''
means to harass, hunt, capture, or kill or to attempt to harass, hunt,
capture, or kill marine mammals.
Regulations governing the taking of marine mammals by the Navy
incidental to MIRC training, maintenance, and RDT&E became effective on
August 3, 2010 (75 FR 45527, August 3, 2010), and remain in effect
through August 3, 2015. The MIRC study area encompasses a 501,873
square nautical mile area (nm\2\) around the islands, including Guam,
Tinian, Saipan, Rota, Farallon de Meinilla, and also includes ocean
areas in both the Pacific Ocean and Philippine Sea. For detailed
information on this action, please refer to the August 2010 final rule.
These regulations include mitigation, monitoring, and reporting
requirements and establish a framework to authorize incidental take
through the issuance of LOAs.
Summary of Request
On April 18, 2011, NMFS received a request from the Navy for a
renewal of an LOA issued on August 12, 2010, for the taking of marine
mammals incidental to training and research activities conducted within
the MIRC Study Area under regulations issued on August 3, 2010 (75 FR
45527). The Navy has complied with the measures required in 50 CFR
218.104 and 218.105, as well as the associated 2010 LOA, and submitted
the reports and other documentation required in the final rule and the
2010 LOA.
Summary of Activity Under the 2010 LOA
As described in the Navy's exercise reports (both classified and
unclassified), in 2010, the training activities conducted by the Navy
were within the scope and amounts authorized by the 2010 LOA and the
levels of take remain within the scope and amounts contemplated by the
final rule. Between August 12, 2010 and February 15, 2011, the Navy
conducted one Multi Strike Group Exercise. The exercise was conducted
from September 16-21, 2010 and included one Sinking Exercise (SINKEX),
one underwater demolition exercise, and one Air-to-Surface Missile
Exercise (A-S MISSILEX).
Planned Activities and Estimated Take for 2011-2012
In 2011-2012, the Navy expects to conduct the same type and amount
of training contemplated in the final rule and identified in the 2010
LOA. Therefore, for the 2011 LOA, NMFS authorizes the same amount of
take that was authorized in 2010.
Summary of Monitoring, Reporting, and Other Requirements Under the 2010
LOA
Annual Exercise Reports
The Navy submitted their classified and unclassified 2010 exercise
reports within the required timeframes and the unclassified report is
posted on NMFS' Web site: https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/permits/incidental.htm. NMFS has reviewed both reports and they contain the
information required by the 2010 LOA. The reports indicate the amounts
of different types of training that occurred from August 12, 2010,
through February 15, 2011. As mentioned above, the Navy conducted one
Multi Strike Group Exercise consisting of various training exercises
addressed in the rule (the rule analyzed the likely annual impacts of
up to two SINKEXs, 50 underwater demolitions, and two A-S MISSILEXs).
The reports also list specific information gathered when marine
mammals were detected by Navy watchstanders, such as how far an animal
was from the vessel, whether sonar was in use, and whether it was
powered or shut down. This information indicates that the Navy
implemented the safety zone mitigation measures as required. During the
Multi-Strike Group Exercise conducted in September, 2010, no instances
of obvious behavioral disturbance were reported by the Navy
watchstanders in their 10 marine mammal sightings
[[Page 50458]]
totaling 39 animals. Furthermore, safety zones were adhered to, and
vessels and aircraft applied mitigation measures when marine mammals
were observed within the requisite zones. There were two marine mammal
sightings within 200 yards of a Mid-Frequency Active Sonar (MFAS)
source during this exercise. In both instances, the proper mitigation
was conducted and the source was shut down; no unusual behavior was
observed.
2010 Monitoring
The Monitoring Plan for MIRC committed the Navy to conduct
monitoring in 2010 and 2011 in anticipation of the MMPA regulations and
LOAs being issued in March 2010. Due to unforeseen delays, the final
rule and LOA were not issued until August 2010; however, the Navy had
already prepared a draft Monitoring Plan for MIRC, and the visual
surveys conducted January through April 2010 in collaboration with the
NMFS Pacific Islands Fisheries Science Center (PIFSC) were consistent
with its objectives. No additional visual surveys occurred between
August 12, 2010 and February 12, 2011, but a winter survey was
conducted from February 17 to March 3, 2011. In addition, a summer
survey and the deployment of passive acoustic monitoring devices is
scheduled for September 2011 and the Mariana Islands Sea Turtle and
Cetacean Survey (MISTCS) acoustic data analysis is currently underway.
The Navy's monitoring accomplishments are discussed in their 2010
Monitoring Report, which is posted on NMFS' Web site (https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/permits/incidental.htm). The Navy submitted the
2010 Monitoring Report within the required timeframe. The report
includes a summary of their 2010 monitoring effort and results
(beginning on page 4 of the monitoring report) and the specific reports
for each individual effort are presented in the appendix.
Visual Surveys
From January 20 to February 6, 2010, visual observations for
cetaceans occurred during an 18-day transit from Hawaii to Guam aboard
the NOAA R/V OSCAR ELTON SETTE. These monitoring efforts and their
findings, if available, will be discussed in greater detail below.
The R/V SETTE surveyed 1,285 nm of trackline over 16 days. The
visual observer teams encountered 25 cetacean groups and obtained group
size estimates for all groups. Two of the sightings were made by an
independent observer. Eight of the 25 cetacean groups were identified
to species. Time and weather limitations prevented the ship's approach
of more of the sighted cetacean groups.
The R/V SETTE also conducted visual observations for cetaceans
during the 17-day transit from Guam to Hawaii from April 19 to May 3,
2010. The visual observer teams encountered 21 cetacean groups and
obtained group size estimates for all groups. One sighting was made by
an independent observer. Sixteen of the 21 cetacean groups were
identified to species. Time and weather limitations prevented the
ship's approach of more of the sighted cetacean groups; however, on one
occasion the small boat was launched for biopsy sampling and
photography of a group of pilot whales.
From March 20 to April 11, 2010, visual observations for cetaceans
occurred during transit periods of a 23-day oceanography survey around
Guam and the southern portion of the Northern Mariana Islands. The
observer team encountered nine cetacean groups and was able to identify
three to species. Neither photos nor biopsy samples were collected
during this cruise because cetacean observations were ancillary to the
primary objective and time constraints did not allow the ship to stop
for photographing groups or collecting samples.
Small vessel surveys for marine mammals were conducted from January
to April 2010 by NMFS' PIFSC around the islands of Guam, Saipan and
Tinian. During the surveys conducted around Guam from February 9-18,
2010, the observer team encountered 11 groups of cetaceans and
identified 10 of the groups to species. A total of 2,769 digital images
were taken for species identification and individual recognition.
Surveys conducted around Saipan and Tinian from February 22-March 3,
2010, encountered seven cetacean groups and all were identified to
species. A total of 971 digital images were taken for the purposes of
species identification and individual recognition.
Photo Data Collection and Biopsy Sampling
In conjunction with the vessel surveys from Hawaii to Guam, the
SETTE's small boat was launched on two occasions for photography of
sighted animals and biopsy sampling. A single biopsy sample was
collected from a sei whale in the waters off of Wake Island. The sample
was collected from the Safeboat using a dart fired from a crossbow.
Upon collection, tissue samples are sectioned in half, with one half
archived at PIFSC and the other sent to the genetics lab at the
Southwest Fisheries Science Center for studies on the genetic
population structure of cetaceans in the Pacific. During the transit
from Guam to Hawaii, the SETTE's small boat was launched on one
occasion for biopsy sampling and photography of a group of pilot
whales. A total of 1,243 photos were collected. Most photos were taken
from the flying bridge or bow of the SETTE. Over 200 photos were taken
from the small boat during the pilot whale encounter. Most of these
photos will be used for individual identification. Two biopsy sampling
attempts were made, but no samples were collected.
During the small vessel surveys in the waters surrounding Guam,
Saipan and Tinian, a total of 2,769 photos were taken and eight biopsy
samples were collected. Photos will be used to study social behavior
and movement patterns of identified individuals and to study external
features such as morphology or coloration patterns, which may vary
geographically. The genetic data from the biopsy samples will be used
to study the population structure of the sampled cetacean group.
Passive Acoustic Monitoring
In addition to the visual observations conducted during the high
seas surveys between Hawaii and Guam, a hydrophone array was towed
behind the SETTE and sonobuoys were deployed to acoustically monitor
for the presence of vocalizing cetaceans. The towed array was deployed
throughout the cruise--collecting nearly continuous high-frequency
clean acoustic data from the four hydrophones. Over 100 acoustic
detections were collected, consisting primarily of sperm and minke
whale vocalizations. In addition, 37 sonobuoys were deployed over 15
days. Cetacean vocalizations detected by the sonobuoys included
humpback, sperm, minke, fin, and sei whale, as well as possible
delphinid clicks and whistles. The SETTE also towed the hydrophone
array and deployed sonobuoys during the 15-day transit from Guam to
Hawaii. Over 150 hours of acoustic data were recorded by the four
hydrophones. Sixty-seven vocalizations were detected, consisting
primarily of sperm and minke whale; however, other acoustic detections
included pilot whales, melon-headed whales, and false killer whales. In
addition, six acoustic detections matched the visual sightings of the
observation team. Similar to the first leg of the cruise, 37 sonobuoys
were deployed over the course of 15 days. Cetacean vocalizations
detected by the sonobuoys included delphinid whistles and sperm, minke,
and fin whales.
[[Page 50459]]
The Navy purchased four passive acoustic monitoring devices that
will be deployed around the Mariana Islands during the summer 2011
visual survey. These devices are capable of gathering data throughout
the year. In addition, if funds permit, data from passive acoustic
monitoring devices currently deployed off Saipan by other researchers
will be analyzed cooperatively among the various agencies. Finally,
data analysis is currently underway involving the four months of
acoustic data gathered using towed arrays and sonobuoys during the
MISTCS in 2007. This dataset represents a large compilation of acoustic
detections, many of which also correlate to visual detections. Results
from this analysis will be provided in the 2012 Annual Monitoring
Report.
In conclusion, the Navy's implementation of the monitoring plan
accomplished several goals, which contribute to a larger body of data
intended to better characterize the abundance, distribution, life
history, and behaviors of the species in the MIRC study area. In
general, the monitoring conducted in 2010 satisfied the objectives of
the monitoring plan and specifically contributed to the following: (1)
A greater knowledge and understanding of the density and distribution
of species within the MIRC study area; (2) the vocalizations of
different species, which advances the development of automated
classification software; and (3) establishment of a better baseline of
species distribution and abundance that will assist the Navy and NMFS
in determining, through adaptive management, whether a shift in
monitoring is warranted.
NMFS concludes that the results of these monitoring efforts when
taken together with the findings presented in the 2010 exercise report
(see Annual Exercise Report section) do not warrant making changes to
the current monitoring/mitigation requirements identified in the LOA.
While the data collected by the Navy through monitoring and reporting
builds upon the existing body of information in a valuable way, none of
the new data contradict, or amend, the assumptions that underlie the
findings in the 2010 rule in a manner that would suggest changing the
current mitigation or monitoring.
Adaptive Management
In general, adaptive management allows NMFS to consider new
information from different sources to determine (with input from the
Navy regarding practicability) if monitoring efforts should be modified
if new information suggests that such modifications are appropriate.
All of the 5-year rules and LOAs issued to the Navy include an adaptive
management component, which includes an annual meeting between NMFS and
the Navy. NMFS and the Navy conducted an adaptive management meeting in
October, 2010, which representatives from the Marine Mammal Commission
participated in, wherein we reviewed the Navy monitoring results
through August 1, 2010, discussed other Navy research and development
efforts, and discussed other new information that could potentially
inform decisions regarding Navy mitigation and monitoring. None of the
information contained in the monitoring report or discussed at the
annual adaptive management meeting led NMFS to recommend any
modifications to the existing mitigation or monitoring measures.
Integrated Comprehensive Monitoring Report
The 2010 LOA required that the Navy update the ICMP Plan to reflect
development in three areas, specifically: (1) Identifying more specific
monitoring sub-goals under the major goals that have been identified;
(2) characterizing Navy Range Complexes and study areas within the
context of the prioritization guidelines described in the ICMP Plan;
and (3) continuing to develop data management, organization and access
procedures. The Navy has updated the ICMP Plan as required. Because the
ICMP is an evolving Program, we have posted the ICMP on the NMFS Web
site: https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/permits/incidental.htm.
Further, the Navy convened a monitoring meeting in October, 2010 to
solicit input from NMFS and marine mammal and acoustic scientists
regarding the comprehensive development and improvement of the more
specific monitoring that should occur across the Navy's training areas.
Subsequent to those discussions, the Navy assembled a scientific
advisory group (of Navy and outside scientists) that will work on a
proposed Navy training area-wide monitoring plan that better considers
the biological, logistical, and resource-specific factors that are
applicable in each area (and which are summarized in the updated ICMP)
to maximize the effectiveness of Navy monitoring within the context of
the information that is most needed. Subsequently, NMFS and MMC
representatives will review this proposed Navy-wide monitoring plan,
which will likely reflect monitoring differences in some Navy training
areas from what has been required in the previous LOAs.
2011 Monitoring Meeting
The regulations that established the framework for authorizing the
taking of marine mammals incidental to Navy training activities
required the Navy, with guidance and support from NMFS, to convene a
Monitoring Workshop in 2011 (50 CFR 218.108(d)(2)). The Marine Mammal
Monitoring Workshop, which included scientists, representatives from
non-governmental organizations, and Marine Mammal Commission staff,
took place in June 2011. Pursuant to the regulations, this workshop
presented a consolidated overview of monitoring activities conducted in
2009 and 2010, as well as the outcomes of selected monitoring-related
research. In 2010, the Navy convened a Scientific Advisory Group (SAG),
comprised of experts in the fields of marine mammals and underwater
acoustics, to review the Navy's current monitoring plans and make
recommendations. The results of the SAG's review were also presented at
the meeting. Participants engaged in open discussion of the lessons
learned, and discussed how to improve the Navy's monitoring plan moving
forward. If changes to monitoring approaches are identified at the
workshop that can be implemented during the annual LOA renewal process
and subsequent 5-year regulations, the Navy and NMFS will modify the
Navy-wide monitoring plan and propose appropriate changes to the
monitoring measures in specific LOAs for the different Range Complexes
and training areas. For training areas with substantive monitoring
modifications, NMFS will subsequently publish proposed LOAs, with the
modifications, in the Federal Register and solicit public input. After
addressing public comments and making changes as appropriate, NMFS will
issue new training area LOAs that reflect the new Navy-wide monitoring
plan.
Authorization
The Navy complied with the requirements of the 2010 LOA. Based on
our review of the record, NMFS has determined that the marine mammal
take resulting from the 2010 military readiness training and research
activities falls within the levels previously anticipated, analyzed,
and authorized. Further, the level of taking authorized in 2011 for the
Navy's MIRC activities is consistent with our previous findings made
for the total taking allowed under the MIRC regulations. Finally, the
record supports NMFS'
[[Page 50460]]
conclusion that the total number of marine mammals taken by the 2011
MIRC activities will have no more than a negligible impact on the
affected species or stock of marine mammals and will not have an
unmitigable adverse impact on the availability of these species or
stocks for taking for subsistence uses.
Accordingly, NMFS has issued a one-year LOA for Navy training
exercises conducted in the MIRC Study Area from August 12, 2011,
through August 11, 2012.
Dated: August 9, 2011.
James H. Lecky,
Director, Office of Protected Resources, National Marine Fisheries
Service.
[FR Doc. 2011-20679 Filed 8-12-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P