Kentucky Regulatory Program, 50436-50438 [2011-20660]
Download as PDF
50436
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
Vol. 76, No. 157
Monday, August 15, 2011
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains notices to the public of the proposed
issuance of rules and regulations. The
purpose of these notices is to give interested
persons an opportunity to participate in the
rule making prior to the adoption of the final
rules.
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Indian Gaming Commission
25 CFR Chapter III
Class II Gaming Regulation Proposals
Submitted by Poarch Band of Creek
Indians on Behalf of Tribal Gaming
Working Group
National Indian Gaming
Commission, Interior
ACTION: Request for comments.
AGENCY:
The National Indian Gaming
Commission (NIGC) is publishing for
comment Class II Gaming Regulation
Proposals submitted on July 28, 2011 by
the Poarch Band of Creek Indians (PBCI)
on behalf of the Tribal Gaming Working
Group (TGWG). PBCI and TGWG state
their proposals were drafted with the
intent of ensuring that all controls are
covered in the current regulations,
while at the same time removing some
of the strict procedural steps and tasks
not appropriately characterized as
standards. PBCI and TGWG also assert
that the current regulations are difficult
to use and apply due to duplication
across multiple sections, dated
terminology, and procedures that are
obsolete and not reflective of current
technology.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before October 7, 2011.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
by any one of the following methods,
however, please note that comments
sent by electronic mail are strongly
encouraged.
• E-mail comments to:
reg.review@nigc.gov.
• Mail comments to: Lael Echo-Hawk,
Counselor to the Chair, National Indian
Gaming Commission, 1441 L Street,
NW., Suite 9100, Washington, DC
20005.
• Hand deliver comments to: 1441 L
Street, NW., Suite 9100, Washington,
DC 20005.
• Fax comments to: Lael Echo-Hawk,
Counselor to the Chair, National Indian
Gaming Commission at 202–632–0045.
wreier-aviles on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:58 Aug 12, 2011
Jkt 223001
Lael
Echo-Hawk, Counselor to the Chair,
National Indian Gaming Commission,
1441 L Street, NW., Suite 9100,
Washington, DC 20005. Telephone:
202–632–7009; email:
reg.review@nigc.gov
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
I. General Information
The National Indian Gaming
Commission (NIGC) is requesting
comments on the Class II Gaming
Regulation Proposals submitted on July
28, 2011 by the Poarch Band of Creek
Indians (PBCI) on behalf of the Tribal
Gaming Working Group (TGWG). PBCI
and TGWG state their proposals were
drafted with the intent of ensuring that
all controls are covered in 25 CFR Part
543, while at the same time removing
some of the strict procedural steps and
tasks not appropriately characterized as
standards. PBCI and TGWG also assert
that the current regulations are difficult
to use and apply due to duplication
across multiple sections, dated
terminology, and procedures that are
obsolete and not reflective of current
technology.
A. How can I get copies of this
document and other comments
submitted in regard to this document?
You can access publicly available
documents related to this document at
https://www.nigc.gov/Portals/0/NIGC%
20Uploads/Tribal%20Consultation/
Regulatory%20Review%202010-2011/
NRRA/AAAFinalPackageSubmitted
NIGCon072911.pdf. Public comments
related to this action can be found at
https://www.nigc.gov/Tribal_
Consultation/Regulatory_Review_20112012/Group_3_25_CFR_Parts_543_
547.aspx.
B. What should I consider as I prepare
my comments for NIGC?
When submitting comments,
remember to:
1. Explain why you agree or disagree;
suggest alternatives and substitute
language for your requested changes.
2. Describe any assumptions and
provide any technical information and/
or date that you used.
3. If you estimate potential costs of
burdens, explain how you arrived at
your estimate in sufficient detail to
allow for it to be reproduced.
4. Provide specific examples to
illustrate your concerns and suggest
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
alternatives. Explain your views as
clearly as possible.
5. Make sure to submit your
comments by the comment period
deadline identified.
II. What action is the agency taking?
NIGC is announcing the availability of
Class II Gaming Regulation proposals
from PCBI and TGWG and requesting
comment from the public.
List of Subjects
Class II Minimum Internal Control
Standards, Class II Technical Standards,
and related Guidance and Bulletin
documents.
Dated: August 10, 2011, Washington, DC.
Tracie L. Stevens,
Chairwoman.
Steffani A. Cochran,
Vice-Chairwoman.
Daniel J. Little,
Associate Commissioner.
[FR Doc. 2011–20721 Filed 8–12–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Office of Surface Mining Reclamation
and Enforcement
30 CFR Part 917
[KY–254–FOR; OSM–2011–0005]
Kentucky Regulatory Program
Office of Surface Mining
Reclamation and Enforcement (OSM),
Interior.
ACTION: Proposed rule; public comment
period and opportunity for public
hearing.
AGENCY:
We are announcing receipt of
a proposed amendment to the Kentucky
Regulatory Program (hereinafter, the
‘‘Kentucky program’’) under the Surface
Mining Control and Reclamation Act of
1977 (SMCRA or the Act). On May 10,
2011, Kentucky submitted proposed
bonding revisions to the Kentucky
Revised Statutes (KRS) as authorized by
House Bill 385 (HB 385), which passed
during the State’s regular 2011
legislative session. HB 385 amends the
Kentucky Revised Statutes to require
that, as of the effective date of the Act,
any determination by the Energy and
Environmental Cabinet (EEC) to change
a bond requirement or bond amount
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\15AUP1.SGM
15AUP1
wreier-aviles on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 157 / Monday, August 15, 2011 / Proposed Rules
currently in use will result in a new
administrative regulation that includes
all bond requirements, including the
bond amount; HB 385 also prohibits
bond amounts from being instituted as
policy. Finally, it requires an
administrative regulation that fails to
include bond amounts to be declared
deficient automatically.
This document gives the times and
locations that the Kentucky program
and this submittal are available for your
inspection, the comment period during
which you may submit written
comments, and the procedures that we
will follow for the public hearing, if one
is requested.
DATES: We will accept written
comments until 4 p.m., E.S.T.,
September 14, 2011. If requested, we
will hold a public hearing on September
9, 2011. We will accept requests to
speak until 4 p.m., E.S.T., on August 30,
2011.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by ‘‘SATS No. KY–254–FOR;
Docket Number OSM–2011–0005’’ by
either of the following two methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. The proposed rule
has been assigned Docket ID: OSM–
2011–0005. If you would like to submit
comments through the Federal
eRulemaking Portal, go to https://
www.regulations.gov and follow the
instructions; or
Mail/Hand Delivery/Courier: Joseph L.
Blackburn, Field Office Director,
Lexington Field Office, Office of Surface
Mining Reclamation and Enforcement,
2675 Regency Road, Lexington,
Kentucky 40503.
Instructions: For detailed instructions
on submitting comments and additional
information on the rulemaking process,
see the ‘‘Public Comment Procedures’’
heading of the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION section in this document.
Docket: In addition to obtaining
copies of documents at https://
www.regulations.gov, you may also
obtain information at the addresses
listed below during normal business
hours, Monday through Friday,
excluding holidays. You may receive
one free copy of the amendment by
contacting OSM’s Lexington Field
Office.
Joseph L. Blackburn, Field Office
Director, Lexington Field Office, Office
of Surface Mining Reclamation and
Enforcement, 2675 Regency Road,
Lexington, Kentucky 40503, (859) 260–
3900.
Carl E. Campbell, Commissioner,
Department for Natural Resources, 2
Hudson Hollow, Frankfort, Kentucky
40601, Telephone: (502) 564–6940.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:58 Aug 12, 2011
Jkt 223001
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Joseph L. Blackburn, Telephone: (859)
260–3900. E-mail:
jblackburn@osmre.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background on the Kentucky Program
II. Description of the Proposed Amendment
III. Public Comment Procedures
IV. Procedural Determinations
I. Background on the Kentucky
Program
Section 503(a) of the Act permits a
State to assume primacy for the
regulation of surface coal mining and
reclamation operations on non-Federal
and non-Indian lands within its borders
by demonstrating that its program
includes, among other things, ‘‘a State
law which provides for the regulation of
surface coal mining and reclamation
operations in accordance with the
requirements of this Act * * *; and
rules and regulations consistent with
regulations issued by the Secretary
pursuant to this Act.’’ See 30 U.S.C.
1253(a)(1) and (7). On the basis of these
criteria, the Secretary of the Interior
conditionally approved the Kentucky
program on May 18, 1982. You can find
background information on the
Kentucky program, including the
Secretary’s findings, the disposition of
comments, and conditions of approval
of the Kentucky program in the May 18,
1982, Federal Register (47 FR 21434).
You can also find later actions
concerning Kentucky’s program and
program amendments at 30 CFR 917.11,
917.12, 917.13, 917.15, 917.16, and
917.17.
II. Description of the Proposed
Amendment
On March 17, 2011, Governor Beshear
signed House Bill (HB) 385 which was
approved by the 2011 Kentucky General
Assembly. HB 385 amends Kentucky
Revised Statutes 350.060 to require as of
the effective date of the Act that any
determination by the Energy and
Environmental Cabinet (EEC) to change
a bond requirement or bond amount
currently in use will result in a new
administrative regulation that includes
all bond requirements including the
bond amount; proscribe bond amounts
from being instituted as policy; require
after the effective date of the Act an
administrative regulation that fails to
include bond amounts to be declared
automatically deficient.
1. KRS 350.060 (11) Processing Permit
Applications
The State proposes to delete ‘‘The
cabinet shall’’ and insert ‘‘Within thirty
(30) days of a cabinet determination of
a need to change a bond protocol
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
50437
currently in use, the cabinet shall
immediately.’’ This proposed State
revision falls under the Federal
provisions at 30 CFR 800.14 and section
509 of SMCRA.
2. KRS 350.060 (11) Processing Permit
Applications
The State proposes to add new
language at the end of (11) to ensure that
Bond protocols will include the formula
for establishing the amount of the bond
or be automatically declared deficient in
accordance to KRS Chapter 13A. This
proposed State revision falls under the
Federal provisions at 30 CFR 800.15 and
section 509 of SMCRA.
III. Public Comment Procedures
Under the provisions of 30 CFR
732.17(h), we are seeking your
comments on whether the Kentucky
program now satisfies the applicable
program approval criteria of 30 CFR
732.15. If we approve these revisions,
they will become part of the Kentucky
program.
Written or Electronic Comments
If you submit written comments, they
should be specific, confined to issues
pertinent to the proposed regulations,
and explain the reason for any
recommended change(s). We appreciate
any and all comments, but those most
useful and likely to influence decisions
on the final regulations will be those
that either involve personal experience
or include citations to and analyses of
SMCRA, its legislative history, its
implementing regulations, case law,
other pertinent Tribal or Federal laws or
regulations, technical literature, or other
relevant publications. We cannot ensure
that comments received after the close
of the comment period (see DATES) or at
locations other than those listed above
(see ADDRESSES) will be included in the
docket for this rulemaking and
considered.
Public Availability of Comments
Before including your address, phone
number, e-mail address, or other
personal identifying information in your
comment, be aware that your entire
comment—including your personal
identifying information—may be made
publicly available at any time. While
you may ask us in your comment to
withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so. We will not consider anonymous
comments.
Public Hearing
If you wish to speak at the public
hearing, contact the person listed under
E:\FR\FM\15AUP1.SGM
15AUP1
50438
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 157 / Monday, August 15, 2011 / Proposed Rules
by 4
p.m., E.S.T. on August 30, 2011. If you
are disabled and need reasonable
accommodations to attend a public
hearing, contact the person listed under
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. We
will arrange the location and time of the
hearing with those persons requesting
the hearing. If no one requests an
opportunity to speak, we will not hold
the hearing.
To assist the transcriber and ensure an
accurate record, we request, that if
possible, each person who speaks at a
public hearing provide us with a written
copy of his or her comments. The public
hearing will continue on the specified
date until everyone scheduled to speak
has been given an opportunity to be
heard. If you are in the audience and
have not been scheduled to speak and
wish to do so, you will be allowed to
speak after those who have been
scheduled. We will end the hearing after
everyone scheduled to speak and others
present in the audience who wish to
speak, have been heard.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
Public Meeting
If there is only limited interest in
participating in a public hearing, we
may hold a public meeting rather than
a public hearing. If you wish to meet
with us to discuss the amendment,
please request a meeting by contacting
the person listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT. All such meetings
are open to the public and, if possible,
we will post notices of meetings at the
locations listed under ADDRESSES. We
will make a written summary of each
meeting a part of the administrative
record.
IV. Procedural Determinations
Executive Order 12866—Regulatory
Planning and Review
This rule is exempted from review by
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) under Executive Order 12866.
wreier-aviles on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with PROPOSALS
Other Laws and Executive Orders
Affecting Rulemaking
When a State submits a program
amendment to OSM for review, our
regulations at 30 CFR 732.17(h) require
us to publish a notice in the Federal
Register indicating receipt of the
proposed amendment, its text or a
summary of its terms, and an
opportunity for public comment. We
conclude our review of the proposed
amendment after the close of the public
comment period and determine whether
the amendment should be approved,
approved in part, or not approved. At
that time, we will also make the
determinations and certifications
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:58 Aug 12, 2011
Jkt 223001
required by the various laws and
executive orders governing the
rulemaking process and include them in
the final rule.
List of Subjects in 30 CFR Part 917
Intergovernmental relations, Surface
mining, Underground mining.
Dated: June 13, 2011.
Michael K. Robinson,
Acting Regional Director, Appalachian
Region.
[FR Doc. 2011–20660 Filed 8–12–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–05–P
POSTAL SERVICE
39 CFR Part 111
Folded Self-Mailers and Unenveloped
Mailpieces
Postal ServiceTM.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The Postal Service proposes
to revise the Mailing Standards of the
United States Postal Service, Domestic
Mail Manual (DMM®) 201.3.14 to
provide standards for creating folded
self-mailers (FSM) and other
unenveloped mailpieces such as forms,
statements, and official notices that will
improve processing of these pieces on
automated Postal processing equipment.
DATES: We must receive your comments
on or before September 14, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Mail or hand-deliver
written comments to the manager,
Product Classification, U.S. Postal
Service®, 475 L’Enfant Plaza, SW.,
Room 4446, Washington, DC 20260–
5015. Interested parties may review and
photocopy all written comments at
USPS® Headquarters Library, 475
L’Enfant Plaza, SW., 11th Floor N,
Washington, DC between 9 a.m. and 4
p.m., Monday through Friday. Email
comments that contain the name and
address of the commenter, may be sent
to: mailingstandards@usps.gov, with a
subject line of ‘‘FSM.’’ Faxed comments
will not be accepted.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Craig Vance at 202–268–7595, or Susan
Thomas at 202–268–8069.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In this
proposed rule, the Postal Service
defines letter-sized FSM, provides
detailed standards about the basic
elements of all FSM letter-sized pieces,
and introduces ‘‘panels’’ as a basic
element for constructing FSMs.
Additionally, optional creative elements
that are currently found in FSM designs,
but are not defined in the DMM, are
added.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
History
To improve the quality of FSMs, the
USPS, in collaboration with the mailing
industry, implemented a series of tests
designed to identify the characteristics
of FSMs that could be processed
successfully on automated letter-sorting
machines. Industry members,
recommended through the Mailers
Technical Advisory Council (MTAC),
Postal Customer Councils (PCC) and the
Business Service Network, were asked
to provide sample mailpieces for testing.
A wide array of mail owners, mail
service providers, and vendors
participated. The collaboration resulted
in a better understanding of the
capabilities and needs of the mailing
community and enabled the Postal
Service to align terms commonly used
in the mailing industry with those in the
proposed standards. Working together,
the Postal Service attempted to strike a
balance between innovation and
mailpiece machinability.
The outcome of this collaboration is a
streamlined framework of proposed
standards that aligns with existing
letter-mail standards, provides specific
information, and clearly defines the
characteristics of additional design
elements for mailers who create FSM
mailpieces. Folded self-mailer
maximum dimensions and weights are
now proposed to align with other
unenveloped letter standards. The
dimensions will better delineate
envelope and oversized cards when
compared to unenveloped-type mail.
Improved standards that are clear and
easy to understand will encourage
consistency and level-set the playing
field minimizing delays in production
and will help the Postal Service to
control costs.
Postal letter sorting equipment is
capable of processing letters at the rate
of 10 pieces per second. When prepared
according to current standards and
processed at that speed, some FSM
designs have higher rates of damage and
cause jams in letter sorting equipment
that result in diverting those pieces to
flat sorters or manual handling. Both
alternate processes are time consuming
and costly. This proposed rule provides
standards for FSM and other
unenveloped letter designs so those
mailpieces can better withstand the
rigors of letter automation processing.
Testing
The collaborative testing focused on
the primary characteristics of folded
self-mailers. Four characteristics proved
to be the most important—dimensions,
basis weight of the paper that forms the
E:\FR\FM\15AUP1.SGM
15AUP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 157 (Monday, August 15, 2011)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 50436-50438]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-20660]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement
30 CFR Part 917
[KY-254-FOR; OSM-2011-0005]
Kentucky Regulatory Program
AGENCY: Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement (OSM),
Interior.
ACTION: Proposed rule; public comment period and opportunity for public
hearing.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are announcing receipt of a proposed amendment to the
Kentucky Regulatory Program (hereinafter, the ``Kentucky program'')
under the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 (SMCRA or
the Act). On May 10, 2011, Kentucky submitted proposed bonding
revisions to the Kentucky Revised Statutes (KRS) as authorized by House
Bill 385 (HB 385), which passed during the State's regular 2011
legislative session. HB 385 amends the Kentucky Revised Statutes to
require that, as of the effective date of the Act, any determination by
the Energy and Environmental Cabinet (EEC) to change a bond requirement
or bond amount
[[Page 50437]]
currently in use will result in a new administrative regulation that
includes all bond requirements, including the bond amount; HB 385 also
prohibits bond amounts from being instituted as policy. Finally, it
requires an administrative regulation that fails to include bond
amounts to be declared deficient automatically.
This document gives the times and locations that the Kentucky
program and this submittal are available for your inspection, the
comment period during which you may submit written comments, and the
procedures that we will follow for the public hearing, if one is
requested.
DATES: We will accept written comments until 4 p.m., E.S.T., September
14, 2011. If requested, we will hold a public hearing on September 9,
2011. We will accept requests to speak until 4 p.m., E.S.T., on August
30, 2011.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by ``SATS No. KY-254-
FOR; Docket Number OSM-2011-0005'' by either of the following two
methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov. The
proposed rule has been assigned Docket ID: OSM-2011-0005. If you would
like to submit comments through the Federal eRulemaking Portal, go to
https://www.regulations.gov and follow the instructions; or
Mail/Hand Delivery/Courier: Joseph L. Blackburn, Field Office
Director, Lexington Field Office, Office of Surface Mining Reclamation
and Enforcement, 2675 Regency Road, Lexington, Kentucky 40503.
Instructions: For detailed instructions on submitting comments and
additional information on the rulemaking process, see the ``Public
Comment Procedures'' heading of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
in this document.
Docket: In addition to obtaining copies of documents at https://www.regulations.gov, you may also obtain information at the addresses
listed below during normal business hours, Monday through Friday,
excluding holidays. You may receive one free copy of the amendment by
contacting OSM's Lexington Field Office.
Joseph L. Blackburn, Field Office Director, Lexington Field Office,
Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement, 2675 Regency
Road, Lexington, Kentucky 40503, (859) 260-3900.
Carl E. Campbell, Commissioner, Department for Natural Resources, 2
Hudson Hollow, Frankfort, Kentucky 40601, Telephone: (502) 564-6940.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joseph L. Blackburn, Telephone: (859)
260-3900. E-mail: jblackburn@osmre.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background on the Kentucky Program
II. Description of the Proposed Amendment
III. Public Comment Procedures
IV. Procedural Determinations
I. Background on the Kentucky Program
Section 503(a) of the Act permits a State to assume primacy for the
regulation of surface coal mining and reclamation operations on non-
Federal and non-Indian lands within its borders by demonstrating that
its program includes, among other things, ``a State law which provides
for the regulation of surface coal mining and reclamation operations in
accordance with the requirements of this Act * * *; and rules and
regulations consistent with regulations issued by the Secretary
pursuant to this Act.'' See 30 U.S.C. 1253(a)(1) and (7). On the basis
of these criteria, the Secretary of the Interior conditionally approved
the Kentucky program on May 18, 1982. You can find background
information on the Kentucky program, including the Secretary's
findings, the disposition of comments, and conditions of approval of
the Kentucky program in the May 18, 1982, Federal Register (47 FR
21434). You can also find later actions concerning Kentucky's program
and program amendments at 30 CFR 917.11, 917.12, 917.13, 917.15,
917.16, and 917.17.
II. Description of the Proposed Amendment
On March 17, 2011, Governor Beshear signed House Bill (HB) 385
which was approved by the 2011 Kentucky General Assembly. HB 385 amends
Kentucky Revised Statutes 350.060 to require as of the effective date
of the Act that any determination by the Energy and Environmental
Cabinet (EEC) to change a bond requirement or bond amount currently in
use will result in a new administrative regulation that includes all
bond requirements including the bond amount; proscribe bond amounts
from being instituted as policy; require after the effective date of
the Act an administrative regulation that fails to include bond amounts
to be declared automatically deficient.
1. KRS 350.060 (11) Processing Permit Applications
The State proposes to delete ``The cabinet shall'' and insert
``Within thirty (30) days of a cabinet determination of a need to
change a bond protocol currently in use, the cabinet shall
immediately.'' This proposed State revision falls under the Federal
provisions at 30 CFR 800.14 and section 509 of SMCRA.
2. KRS 350.060 (11) Processing Permit Applications
The State proposes to add new language at the end of (11) to ensure
that Bond protocols will include the formula for establishing the
amount of the bond or be automatically declared deficient in accordance
to KRS Chapter 13A. This proposed State revision falls under the
Federal provisions at 30 CFR 800.15 and section 509 of SMCRA.
III. Public Comment Procedures
Under the provisions of 30 CFR 732.17(h), we are seeking your
comments on whether the Kentucky program now satisfies the applicable
program approval criteria of 30 CFR 732.15. If we approve these
revisions, they will become part of the Kentucky program.
Written or Electronic Comments
If you submit written comments, they should be specific, confined
to issues pertinent to the proposed regulations, and explain the reason
for any recommended change(s). We appreciate any and all comments, but
those most useful and likely to influence decisions on the final
regulations will be those that either involve personal experience or
include citations to and analyses of SMCRA, its legislative history,
its implementing regulations, case law, other pertinent Tribal or
Federal laws or regulations, technical literature, or other relevant
publications. We cannot ensure that comments received after the close
of the comment period (see DATES) or at locations other than those
listed above (see ADDRESSES) will be included in the docket for this
rulemaking and considered.
Public Availability of Comments
Before including your address, phone number, e-mail address, or
other personal identifying information in your comment, be aware that
your entire comment--including your personal identifying information--
may be made publicly available at any time. While you may ask us in
your comment to withhold your personal identifying information from
public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be able to do so. We
will not consider anonymous comments.
Public Hearing
If you wish to speak at the public hearing, contact the person
listed under
[[Page 50438]]
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT by 4 p.m., E.S.T. on August 30, 2011.
If you are disabled and need reasonable accommodations to attend a
public hearing, contact the person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT. We will arrange the location and time of the hearing with
those persons requesting the hearing. If no one requests an opportunity
to speak, we will not hold the hearing.
To assist the transcriber and ensure an accurate record, we
request, that if possible, each person who speaks at a public hearing
provide us with a written copy of his or her comments. The public
hearing will continue on the specified date until everyone scheduled to
speak has been given an opportunity to be heard. If you are in the
audience and have not been scheduled to speak and wish to do so, you
will be allowed to speak after those who have been scheduled. We will
end the hearing after everyone scheduled to speak and others present in
the audience who wish to speak, have been heard.
Public Meeting
If there is only limited interest in participating in a public
hearing, we may hold a public meeting rather than a public hearing. If
you wish to meet with us to discuss the amendment, please request a
meeting by contacting the person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT. All such meetings are open to the public and, if possible, we
will post notices of meetings at the locations listed under ADDRESSES.
We will make a written summary of each meeting a part of the
administrative record.
IV. Procedural Determinations
Executive Order 12866--Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is exempted from review by the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) under Executive Order 12866.
Other Laws and Executive Orders Affecting Rulemaking
When a State submits a program amendment to OSM for review, our
regulations at 30 CFR 732.17(h) require us to publish a notice in the
Federal Register indicating receipt of the proposed amendment, its text
or a summary of its terms, and an opportunity for public comment. We
conclude our review of the proposed amendment after the close of the
public comment period and determine whether the amendment should be
approved, approved in part, or not approved. At that time, we will also
make the determinations and certifications required by the various laws
and executive orders governing the rulemaking process and include them
in the final rule.
List of Subjects in 30 CFR Part 917
Intergovernmental relations, Surface mining, Underground mining.
Dated: June 13, 2011.
Michael K. Robinson,
Acting Regional Director, Appalachian Region.
[FR Doc. 2011-20660 Filed 8-12-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-05-P