Endangered and Threatened Species; 5-Year Reviews for 5 Evolutionarily Significant Units of Pacific Salmon and 1 Distinct Population Segment of Steelhead in California, 50447-50448 [2011-20459]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 157 / Monday, August 15, 2011 / Proposed Rules
Inspiration Avenue and D Avenue,
where a modified BFE of 80 feet,
referenced to the North American
Vertical Datum of 1988, is proposed,
due to the error in listing the location
description for the Rowell Creek BFE of
80 feet, referenced to the North
American Vertical Datum of 1988, in the
previously published proposed rule at
75 FR 31347. In addition, this proposed
rule is reopening the comment period
for Sal Taylor Creek Tributary 2, from
the location at the confluence with Sal
Taylor Creek, where a modified BFE of
62 feet, referenced to the North
American Vertical Datum of 1988, is
proposed, to the location approximately
1,500 feet upstream of the confluence
with Sal Taylor Creek Tributary 3,
where a modified BFE of 68 feet,
referenced to the North American
Vertical Datum of 1988, is proposed,
due to the error in listing the modified
BFEs for this flooding source in the
previously published proposed rule at
75 FR 31347.
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No.
97.022, ‘‘Flood Insurance.’’)
Dated: August 5, 2011.
Sandra K. Knight,
Federal Insurance and Mitigation
Administrator, Mitigation, Department of
Homeland Security, Federal Emergency
Management Agency.
BILLING CODE 9110–12–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Parts 223 and 224
RIN 0648–XA619
Endangered and Threatened Species;
5-Year Reviews for 5 Evolutionarily
Significant Units of Pacific Salmon and
1 Distinct Population Segment of
Steelhead in California
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of availability of 5-year
reviews.
wreier-aviles on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with PROPOSALS
AGENCY:
We, the National Marine
Fisheries Service (NMFS) Southwest
Region, announce the availability of
5-year reviews for five ESUs of Pacific
salmon (Oncorhynchus sp.) and one
DPS of steelhead (Oncorhynchus
mykiss) in California, as required by the
ESA. After reviewing the best available
scientific and commercial data, our 5-
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:58 Aug 12, 2011
Jkt 223001
Additional information
about the 5-year review process,
including copies of the 5-year review
reports, may be obtained by visiting the
NMFS Southwest Regional Office Web
site at https://swr.nmfs.noaa.gov/ or by
writing to us at: NMFS Southwest
Region, 501 W. Ocean Blvd., Suite 4200,
Long Beach, CA 90802; Attn: Craig
Wingert.
ADDRESSES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Craig Wingert at the above address or at
(562) 980–4021.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
[FR Doc. 2011–20715 Filed 8–12–11; 8:45 am]
SUMMARY:
year reviews indicate that these species
should remain listed as determined in
2005 and 2006, respectively. Our
reviews recommend that the southward
extension of boundaries for California
Coastal Chinook salmon and Central
California Coast coho salmon should be
considered. Our 5-year review also
recommends that six hatchery stocks
should be removed from the California
Coastal Chinook salmon ESU because
those hatchery programs have been
terminated.
Under the ESA, a list of endangered
and threatened wildlife and plant
species must be maintained. The list is
published at 50 CFR 17.11 (for animals)
and 17.12 (for plants). Section 4(c)(2)(A)
of the ESA requires that NMFS conduct
a review of listed species under its
jurisdiction at least once every 5 years
(‘‘5-year reviews’’). Pursuant to section
4(c)(2)(B) of the ESA, we determine
whether any species should be delisted
and removed from the list, reclassified
from endangered to threatened, or
reclassified from threatened to
endangered on the basis of such
reviews. In conducting 5-year reviews,
we consider the best scientific and
commercial data, including new
information that has become available
since the last listing determination or
most recent status review of a species.
On March 18, 2010, NMFS announced
the initiation of 5-year reviews for listed
Pacific salmon ESUs and steelhead
DPSs in California, Oregon, Washington,
and Idaho (75 FR 13082). Both ESUs
and DPSs are treated as ‘‘species’’ under
the ESA and we use the term ‘‘species’’
to refer to both in the remainder of this
notice. In the March 18, 2010
announcement, we requested new
information regarding the biological
status of these ESUs and DPSs and the
factors that affect them from the public,
concerned governmental agencies,
Tribes, the scientific community,
environmental entities, and other
interested parties.
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
50447
This notice of availability addresses
our completed 5-year reviews for: (1)
Southern Oregon/Northern California
coho salmon; (2) California Coastal
Chinook salmon; (3) Central California
Coast coho salmon; (4) Sacramento
River winter-run Chinook salmon; (5)
Central Valley spring-run Chinook
salmon; and (6) Central Valley
steelhead. The results of 5-year reviews
for the other ESUs and DPSs discussed
in the March 18, 2010 notice of
initiation will be announced in
forthcoming notices from the NMFS
Southwest and Northwest Regions,
respectively.
We used a two-step process to
complete the reviews. First, we asked
scientists from our Southwest Fisheries
Science Center to collect and analyze
new information about each species’
viability. To evaluate each species’
viability, our scientists applied the
agency’s Viable Salmonid Population
(VSP) framework, which relies on
evaluating four key population
parameters (abundance, productivity,
spatial structure, and diversity). Using
this framework, they compiled and
evaluated all new relevant information
on these four parameters and then
updated the overall viability status of
each species. They also considered new
genetic and biogeographic information
related to each species’ freshwater and
estuarine geographic boundaries. At the
end of this process, the Center prepared
a report detailing the results and
conclusions from their analyses.
Fishery biologists from the Southwest
Region and its field offices completed
the second step in the review process.
These biologists reviewed new
information on the five ESA 4(a)(1)
factors considered when determining if
a species should be listed as threatened
or endangered, including: (1) The
present or threatened destruction,
modification, or curtailment of its
habitat or range; (2) overutilization for
commercial, recreational, scientific, or
educational purposes; (3) disease or
predation; (4) inadequacy of existing
regulatory mechanisms; and, (5) other
natural or man-made factors affecting its
continued existence. They also
evaluated new information on hatchery
programs associated with each species
to inform an updated assessment about
whether specific hatchery programs
should be considered part of the species
that were evaluated. In doing so, they
applied our Policy Addressing the Role
of Artificially Propagated Pacific
Salmon and Steelhead in Listing
Determinations under the ESA (70 FR
37204). The 5-year review reports
prepared by the Southwest Region, the
Southwest Science Center’s updated
E:\FR\FM\15AUP1.SGM
15AUP1
50448
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 157 / Monday, August 15, 2011 / Proposed Rules
status assessment, and additional
information concerning these species
are available on the Southwest Region’s
Web site: https://swr.nmfs.noaa.gov/.
With regard to the salmon and
steelhead species subject to this notice
of availability, we evaluated information
that has become available on the species
since they were previously reviewed in
2005 (70 FR 37160) and 2006 (71 FR
834), respectively. After considering the
best available information, our 5-year
reviews recommend that each of these
species should remain listed as
determined in 2005 and 2006. Our
reviews also recommend that the
southern boundaries of two species
(California Coastal Chinook salmon and
Central California Coast coho salmon
ESUs) should be extended. Finally, our
reviews also recommend that six
hatchery stocks should be removed from
the California Coastal Chinook salmon
ESU based on information
demonstrating the hatchery programs
propagating these stocks have been
terminated since the last status review.
In furtherance of these
recommendations, we have already
proposed to change the southern
boundary of Central California Coast
coho salmon (76 FR 6383). We will
consider proposing the adjustment of
the species boundary and hatchery
status for California Coastal Chinook
salmon in a separate rulemaking. We
conclude that these 5-year reviews meet
the requirements of the ESA.
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.
Dated: August 8, 2011.
Therese Conant,
Deputy Chief, Endangered Species Division,
Office of Protected Resources, National
Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2011–20459 Filed 8–12–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Parts 223 and 224
wreier-aviles on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with PROPOSALS
RIN 0648–XA535
Endangered and Threatened Species;
5-Year Reviews for 17 Evolutionarily
Significant Units and Distinct
Population Segments of Pacific
Salmon and Steelhead
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of availability of 5-year
reviews.
AGENCY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:58 Aug 12, 2011
Jkt 223001
NMFS Northwest Region
announces the availability of 5-year
reviews for 11 evolutionarily significant
units (ESUs) of Pacific salmon
(Oncorhynchus sp.) and 6 distinct
population segments (DPSs) of steelhead
(Oncorhynchus mykiss) in Oregon,
Washington, and Idaho as required by
the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as
amended (ESA). The purpose of the
reviews was to evaluate whether the
listing classifications of these salmonids
remains accurate or should be changed.
After reviewing the best available
scientific and commercial data, we
conclude that the 11 ESUs of Pacific
salmon and 6 DPSs of steelhead in
Oregon, Washington, and Idaho shall
remain listed as determined in 2005,
2006, and 2007.
ADDRESSES: Additional information
about the 5-year reviews may be
obtained by visiting the NMFS
Northwest Regional Office Web site:
https://www.nwr.noaa.gov/, or by writing
to us at: NMFS Northwest Region, 1201
Lloyd Blvd., Suite 1100, Portland, OR
97232.
SUMMARY:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Eric
Murray (503) 231–2378.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Under the ESA, a list of endangered
and threatened wildlife and plant
species must be maintained. The list is
published at 50 CFR 17.11 and 50 CFR
223.102 (for animals) and 17.12 (for
plants). Section 4(c)(2)(A) of the ESA
requires that we conduct a review of
listed species at least once every 5 years.
On the basis of such reviews under
section 4(c)(2)(B), we determine
whether any species should be removed
from the list (delisted), or reclassified
from endangered to threatened or from
threatened to endangered. During 5-year
reviews, we consider the best scientific
and commercial data available,
including new information that has
become available since the last listing
determination or most recent status
review of a species.
On March 18, 2010, the NMFS
Northwest and Southwest Regional
Offices announced initiation of 5-year
reviews of Pacific salmon ESUs and
steelhead DPSs (75 FR 13082). Both
ESUs and DPSs are treated as ‘species’
under the ESA, and we use the term
‘species’ to refer to both in the
remainder of this notice. At the time of
our announcement, we requested
information on species viability,
protective efforts, and threats to the
species from the public, concerned
governmental agencies, Tribes, the
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
scientific community, environmental
entities, and other interested parties.
This notice addresses the following
salmon species: (1) Upper Columbia
River spring-run Chinook salmon; (2)
Snake River spring/summer-run
Chinook salmon; (3) Puget Sound
Chinook salmon; (4) Lower Columbia
River Chinook salmon; (5) Upper
Willamette Chinook salmon; (6) Snake
River fall-run Chinook salmon; (7) Hood
Canal summer-run chum salmon; (8)
Columbia River chum salmon; (9) Lower
Columbia River coho salmon; (10) Snake
River sockeye salmon; and (11) Ozette
Lake sockeye salmon. We did not
complete a 5-year review for the Oregon
Coast coho salmon because, as part of a
legal settlement, we previously agreed
to conduct a new review of the status of
this species. On June 20, 2011, we
issued a final rule re-promulgating the
threatened listing for Oregon Coast coho
salmon (76 FR 35755).
This notice also addresses the
following steelhead species: (1) Upper
Columbia River steelhead DPS; (2)
Middle Columbia River steelhead DPS;
(3) Snake River Basin steelhead DPS; (4)
Lower Columbia River steelhead DPS;
(5) Upper Willamette steelhead DPS;
and (6) Puget Sound steelhead DPS.
Information about these species can be
found at our Northwest Regional Web
site: https://www.nwr.noaa.gov/.
We used a two-step process to
complete the reviews of the listed
salmonid species in Oregon,
Washington, and Idaho. First, we asked
scientists from our Northwest Fisheries
Science Center to collect and analyze
new information about species viability.
To evaluate viability, our scientists
apply the Viable Salmonid Population
(VSP) concept. The VSP concept relies
on evaluating four criteria—abundance,
productivity, spatial structure, and
diversity—to assess species viability.
They also considered new genetic and
biogeographic information regarding
species’ boundaries. At the end of this
process, the science team prepared a
report detailing the results of their
analyses. This report is available at our
regional Web site.
Salmon management biologists from
our Northwest Regional Office
completed the second step in the review
process. These biologists, organized into
geographically-based teams, reviewed
new information related to the five ESA
section 4(a)(1) factors, which we
consider when determining if a species
should be listed as threatened or
endangered or be de-listed. These are:
(1) The present or threatened
destruction, modification, or
curtailment of the species’ habitat or
range; (2) overutilization for
E:\FR\FM\15AUP1.SGM
15AUP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 157 (Monday, August 15, 2011)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 50447-50448]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-20459]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
50 CFR Parts 223 and 224
RIN 0648-XA619
Endangered and Threatened Species; 5-Year Reviews for 5
Evolutionarily Significant Units of Pacific Salmon and 1 Distinct
Population Segment of Steelhead in California
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of availability of 5-year reviews.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We, the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) Southwest
Region, announce the availability of 5-year reviews for five ESUs of
Pacific salmon (Oncorhynchus sp.) and one DPS of steelhead
(Oncorhynchus mykiss) in California, as required by the ESA. After
reviewing the best available scientific and commercial data, our 5-year
reviews indicate that these species should remain listed as determined
in 2005 and 2006, respectively. Our reviews recommend that the
southward extension of boundaries for California Coastal Chinook salmon
and Central California Coast coho salmon should be considered. Our 5-
year review also recommends that six hatchery stocks should be removed
from the California Coastal Chinook salmon ESU because those hatchery
programs have been terminated.
ADDRESSES: Additional information about the 5-year review process,
including copies of the 5-year review reports, may be obtained by
visiting the NMFS Southwest Regional Office Web site at https://swr.nmfs.noaa.gov/ or by writing to us at: NMFS Southwest Region, 501
W. Ocean Blvd., Suite 4200, Long Beach, CA 90802; Attn: Craig Wingert.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Craig Wingert at the above address or
at (562) 980-4021.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Under the ESA, a list of endangered and threatened wildlife and
plant species must be maintained. The list is published at 50 CFR 17.11
(for animals) and 17.12 (for plants). Section 4(c)(2)(A) of the ESA
requires that NMFS conduct a review of listed species under its
jurisdiction at least once every 5 years (``5-year reviews''). Pursuant
to section 4(c)(2)(B) of the ESA, we determine whether any species
should be delisted and removed from the list, reclassified from
endangered to threatened, or reclassified from threatened to endangered
on the basis of such reviews. In conducting 5-year reviews, we consider
the best scientific and commercial data, including new information that
has become available since the last listing determination or most
recent status review of a species.
On March 18, 2010, NMFS announced the initiation of 5-year reviews
for listed Pacific salmon ESUs and steelhead DPSs in California,
Oregon, Washington, and Idaho (75 FR 13082). Both ESUs and DPSs are
treated as ``species'' under the ESA and we use the term ``species'' to
refer to both in the remainder of this notice. In the March 18, 2010
announcement, we requested new information regarding the biological
status of these ESUs and DPSs and the factors that affect them from the
public, concerned governmental agencies, Tribes, the scientific
community, environmental entities, and other interested parties.
This notice of availability addresses our completed 5-year reviews
for: (1) Southern Oregon/Northern California coho salmon; (2)
California Coastal Chinook salmon; (3) Central California Coast coho
salmon; (4) Sacramento River winter-run Chinook salmon; (5) Central
Valley spring-run Chinook salmon; and (6) Central Valley steelhead. The
results of 5-year reviews for the other ESUs and DPSs discussed in the
March 18, 2010 notice of initiation will be announced in forthcoming
notices from the NMFS Southwest and Northwest Regions, respectively.
We used a two-step process to complete the reviews. First, we asked
scientists from our Southwest Fisheries Science Center to collect and
analyze new information about each species' viability. To evaluate each
species' viability, our scientists applied the agency's Viable Salmonid
Population (VSP) framework, which relies on evaluating four key
population parameters (abundance, productivity, spatial structure, and
diversity). Using this framework, they compiled and evaluated all new
relevant information on these four parameters and then updated the
overall viability status of each species. They also considered new
genetic and biogeographic information related to each species'
freshwater and estuarine geographic boundaries. At the end of this
process, the Center prepared a report detailing the results and
conclusions from their analyses.
Fishery biologists from the Southwest Region and its field offices
completed the second step in the review process. These biologists
reviewed new information on the five ESA 4(a)(1) factors considered
when determining if a species should be listed as threatened or
endangered, including: (1) The present or threatened destruction,
modification, or curtailment of its habitat or range; (2)
overutilization for commercial, recreational, scientific, or
educational purposes; (3) disease or predation; (4) inadequacy of
existing regulatory mechanisms; and, (5) other natural or man-made
factors affecting its continued existence. They also evaluated new
information on hatchery programs associated with each species to inform
an updated assessment about whether specific hatchery programs should
be considered part of the species that were evaluated. In doing so,
they applied our Policy Addressing the Role of Artificially Propagated
Pacific Salmon and Steelhead in Listing Determinations under the ESA
(70 FR 37204). The 5-year review reports prepared by the Southwest
Region, the Southwest Science Center's updated
[[Page 50448]]
status assessment, and additional information concerning these species
are available on the Southwest Region's Web site: https://swr.nmfs.noaa.gov/.
With regard to the salmon and steelhead species subject to this
notice of availability, we evaluated information that has become
available on the species since they were previously reviewed in 2005
(70 FR 37160) and 2006 (71 FR 834), respectively. After considering the
best available information, our 5-year reviews recommend that each of
these species should remain listed as determined in 2005 and 2006. Our
reviews also recommend that the southern boundaries of two species
(California Coastal Chinook salmon and Central California Coast coho
salmon ESUs) should be extended. Finally, our reviews also recommend
that six hatchery stocks should be removed from the California Coastal
Chinook salmon ESU based on information demonstrating the hatchery
programs propagating these stocks have been terminated since the last
status review.
In furtherance of these recommendations, we have already proposed
to change the southern boundary of Central California Coast coho salmon
(76 FR 6383). We will consider proposing the adjustment of the species
boundary and hatchery status for California Coastal Chinook salmon in a
separate rulemaking. We conclude that these 5-year reviews meet the
requirements of the ESA.
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.
Dated: August 8, 2011.
Therese Conant,
Deputy Chief, Endangered Species Division, Office of Protected
Resources, National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2011-20459 Filed 8-12-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P