Drawbridge Operation Regulation; New Jersey Intracoastal Waterway (NJICW), Atlantic City, NJ, 50161-50163 [2011-20499]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 156 / Friday, August 12, 2011 / Proposed Rules
services; (10) advertising services; (11)
auxiliary insurance services; (12)
computer and data processing services;
(13) construction services; (14) data base
and other information services; (15)
educational and training services; (16)
engineering, architectural, and
surveying services; (17) financial
services (purchases only); (18) industrial
engineering services; (19) industrialtype maintenance, installation,
alteration, and training services; (20)
legal services; (21) management,
consulting, and public relations services
(includes expenses allocated to/from a
parent and its affiliates); (22)
merchanting services; (23) mining
services; (24) operational leasing
services; (25) trade-related services,
other than merchanting services; (26)
performing arts, sports, and other live
performances, presentations, and
events; (27) premiums paid on primary
insurance (payments only); (28) losses
recovered on primary insurance; (29)
research and development services; (30)
telecommunications services; (31)
agricultural services; (32) contract
manufacturing services; (33)
disbursements to fund production costs
of motion pictures; (34) disbursements
to fund news-gathering costs and
production costs of program material
other than news; (35) waste treatment
and depollution services; and (36) other
selected services.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2011–20418 Filed 8–11–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 117
[Docket No. USCG–2011–0698]
RIN 1625–AA09
Drawbridge Operation Regulation; New
Jersey Intracoastal Waterway (NJICW),
Atlantic City, NJ
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard proposes to
change the regulations that govern the
operation of two New Jersey Department
of Transportation (NJDOT) bridges: The
Route 30/Abescon Boulevard Bridge
across Beach Thorofare, NJICW mile
67.2 and the US 40–322 (Albany
Avenue) Bridge across Inside Thorofare,
NJICW mile 70.0, both at Atlantic City,
NJ. The proposed changes will alter the
dates that these bridges are allowed to
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:21 Aug 11, 2011
Jkt 223001
have delayed openings or remain in the
closed position to accommodate heavy
volumes of vehicular traffic due to the
annual July 4th fireworks shows and the
annual Air Show at Bader Field.
DATES: Comments and related material
must reach the Coast Guard on or before
October 11, 2011.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by docket number USCG–
2011–0698 using any one of the
following methods:
(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov.
(2) Fax: 202–493–2251.
(3) Mail: Docket Management Facility
(M–30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC, 20590–
0001.
(4) Hand delivery: Same as mail
address above, between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays. The telephone number
is 202–366–9329.
To avoid duplication, please use only
one of these four methods. See the
‘‘Public Participation and Request for
Comments’’ portion of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
below for instructions on submitting
comments.
If
you have questions on this proposed
rule, call or e-mail Lindsey Middleton,
Coast Guard; telephone 757–398–6629,
e-mail Lindsey.R.Middleton@uscg.mil. If
you have questions on viewing or
submitting material to the docket, call
Renee V. Wright, Program Manager,
Docket Operations, telephone 202–366–
9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Public Participation and Request for
Comments
We encourage you to participate in
this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All
comments received will be posted,
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov and will include
any personal information you have
provided.
Submitting Comments
If you submit a comment, please
include the docket number for this
rulemaking (USCG–2011–0698),
indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment
applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation. You
may submit your comments and
material online (https://
www.regulations.gov), or by fax, mail or
hand delivery, but please use only one
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
50161
of these means. If you submit a
comment online via https://
www.regulations.gov, it will be
considered received by the Coast Guard
when you successfully transmit the
comment. If you fax, hand deliver, or
mail your comment, it will be
considered as having been received by
the Coast Guard when it is received at
the Docket Management Facility. We
recommend that you include your name
and a mailing address, an e-mail
address, or a phone number in the body
of your document so that we can contact
you if we have questions regarding your
submission.
To submit your comment online, go to
https://www.regulations.gov, click on the
‘‘submit a comment’’ box, which will
then become highlighted in blue. In the
‘‘Document Type’’ drop down menu
select ‘‘Proposed Rules’’ and insert
‘‘USCG–2011–0698’’ in the ‘‘Keyword’’
box. Click ‘‘Search’’ then click on the
balloon shape in the ‘‘Actions’’ column.
If you submit your comments by mail or
hand delivery, submit them in an
unbound format, no larger than 81⁄2 by
11 inches, suitable for copying and
electronic filing. If you submit them by
mail and would like to know that they
reached the Facility, please enclose a
stamped, self-addressed postcard or
envelope. We will consider all
comments and material received during
the comment period and may change
the rule based on your comments.
Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as
documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to
https://www.regulations.gov, click on the
‘‘read comments’’ box, which will then
become highlighted in blue. In the
‘‘Keyword’’ box insert ‘‘USCG–2011–
0698’’ and click ‘‘Search.’’ Click the
‘‘Open Docket Folder’’ in the ‘‘Actions’’
column. You may also visit the Docket
Management Facility in Room W12–140
on the ground floor of the Department
of Transportation West Building, 1200
New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington,
DC, 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. We have an agreement with
the Department of Transportation to use
the Docket Management Facility.
Privacy Act
Anyone can search the electronic
form of comments received into any of
our dockets by the name of the
individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on
behalf of an association, business, labor
union, etc.). You may review a Privacy
Act notice regarding our public dockets
E:\FR\FM\12AUP1.SGM
12AUP1
50162
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 156 / Friday, August 12, 2011 / Proposed Rules
in the January 17, 2008, issue of the
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).
Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public
meeting. But you may submit a request
for one using one of the four methods
specified under ADDRESSES. Please
explain why one would be beneficial. If
we determine that one would aid this
rulemaking, we will hold one at a time
and place announced by a later notice
in the Federal Register.
For information on facilities or
services for individuals with disabilities
or to request special assistance at the
public meeting, contact Lindsey
Middleton at the telephone number or email address indicated under the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of
this notice.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
Basis and Purpose
NJDOT has requested a change in the
operation regulations of the Route 30/
Abescon Boulevard Bridge across Beach
Thorofare, NJICW mile 67.2 and the US
40–322 (Albany Avenue) Bridge across
Inside Thorofare, NJICW mile 70.0, both
at Atlantic City, NJ. The Atlantic City
July 4th fireworks show and the Air
Show at Bader Field are annual events
held in Atlantic City and heavy volumes
of vehicular traffic transit across both
bridges to attend them. The Coast Guard
proposes to allow the above mentioned
bridges to remain in the closed position
from 9:40 p.m. through 11:15 p.m. on
July 4th or on July 5th should inclement
weather prevent the fireworks event
from taking place as planned. The Coast
Guard also proposes to allow the above
mentioned bridges to open every two
hours on the hour from 10 a.m. through
4 p.m. and to remain in the closed
position from
4 p.m. through 8 p.m. on the third or
fourth Wednesday of every August. The
exact dates of the closures will be
published locally in the Local Notice to
Mariners and Broadcast Notice to
Mariners.
The Route 30/Abescon Boulevard
Bridge is a bascule drawbridge with a
vertical clearance of 20 feet above mean
high water in the closed position and
unlimited in the open position. The
current operating schedule for the
bridge is set out in 33 CFR 117.733(e)
and was last amended in April 2009.
The US 40–322 (Albany Avenue Bridge)
is a bascule drawbridge with a vertical
clearance of 10 feet above mean high
water in the closed position and
unlimited in the open position. The
current operating schedule for the
bridge is set out in 33 CFR 117.733(f)
and was last amended in April 2009.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:21 Aug 11, 2011
Jkt 223001
Discussion of Proposed Rule
The Coast Guard proposes to revise 33
CFR 117.733(e) for the Route 30/
Abescon Boulevard Bridge, mile 67.2
across Beach Thorofare and 33 CFR
117.733(f) for the US 40–322 (Albany
Avenue Bridge), mile 70.0 across Inside
Thorofare. The proposed amendments
would allow both bridges to remain in
the closed position from 9:40 p.m.
through 11:15 p.m. on July 4 or on July
5 should inclement weather prevent the
fireworks event from taking place as
planned; to open every two hours on the
hour from 10 a.m. until 4 p.m. and to
remain in the closed position from 4
p.m. until 8 p.m. on the third or fourth
Wednesday of every August.
Vessels that are able to transit under
the bridges without openings may do so
at any time. The Atlantic Ocean is an
alternate route for vessels unable to pass
through the bridges in the closed
positions. Both bridges will be able to
open for emergencies.
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or
executive orders.
Regulatory Planning and Review
This proposed rule is not a
‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866,
Regulatory Planning and Review, as
supplemented by Executive Order
13563, Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review, and does not require
an assessment of potential costs and
benefits under section 6(a)(3). The
Office of Management and Budget has
not reviewed it under those Orders.
The proposed changes are expected to
have minimal impact on mariners due
to the short duration that the
drawbridges will be maintained in the
closed position and have delayed
openings. Both events have been
observed in past years with little to no
impact on marine traffic. It is also a
necessary measure to facilitate public
safety that allows for the orderly
movement of vehicular traffic before,
during, and after the events.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
whether this proposed rule would have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed rule
would not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities. These proposed rules would
affect the following entities, some of
which might be small entities: the
owners or operators of vessels needing
to transit under any of the bridges
between the hours of delayed openings
or closures on either event day.
This action will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities because the
rule adds minimal restrictions to the
movement of navigation and mariners
who plan their transits in accordance
with the scheduled bridge closures can
minimize delay. Vessels that can safely
transit under the bridges may do so at
any time.
If you think that your business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity
and that this rule would have a
significant economic impact on it,
please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it
qualifies and how and to what degree
this rule would economically affect it.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this proposed rule so that
they can better evaluate its effects on
them and participate in the rulemaking.
If the rule would affect your small
business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact Lindsey
Middleton, Bridge Management
Specialist, Fifth Coast Guard District,
(757) 398–6629 or
Lindsey.R.Middleton@uscg.mil. The
Coast Guard will not retaliate against
small entities that question or complain
about this proposed rule or any policy
or action of the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This proposed rule would call for no
new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction 44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on State or local governments and
would either preempt State law or
impose a substantial direct cost of
E:\FR\FM\12AUP1.SGM
12AUP1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 156 / Friday, August 12, 2011 / Proposed Rules
compliance on them. We have analyzed
this proposed rule under that Order and
have determined that it does not have
implications for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or Tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this
proposed rule will not result in such an
expenditure, we do discuss the effects of
this rule elsewhere in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This proposed rule would not cause a
taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under
Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with
Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule meets applicable
standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce
burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This rule is not an economically
significant rule and would not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to
safety that might disproportionately
affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
This proposed rule does not have
Tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have
a substantial direct effect on one or
more Indian Tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian Tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian Tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:21 Aug 11, 2011
Jkt 223001
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This proposed rule does not use
technical standards. Therefore, we did
not consider the use of voluntary
consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023–01,
and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD which guides the Coast
Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination
that this action is one of a category of
actions which do not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on
the human environment because it
simply promulgates the operating
regulations or procedures for
drawbridges. We seek any comments or
information that may lead to the
discovery of a significant environmental
impact from this proposed rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117
Bridges.
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; 33 CFR 1.05–1;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
2. Revise § 117.733(e) and (f) to read
as follows:
§ 117.733 New Jersey Intracoastal
Waterway.
*
*
*
*
*
(e) The draw of the Route 30 Bridge
across Beach Thorofare, mile 67.2 at
Atlantic City, shall open on signal if at
least four hours of notice is given;
except that:
(1) From April 1 through October 31,
from 7 a.m. to 11 p.m. the draw need
only open on the hour.
(2) On July 4, the draw need not open
from 9:40 p.m. until 11:15 p.m. to
accommodate the annual July 4th
fireworks show. Should inclement
weather prevent the fireworks event
from taking place as planned, the draw
need not open from 9:40 p.m. until
11:15 p.m. on July 5th to accommodate
the annual July 4th fireworks show.
(3) On the third or fourth Wednesday
of August, the draw will open every two
hours on the hour from 10 a.m. until
4 p.m. and need not open from 4 p.m.
until 8 p.m. to accommodate the annual
Air Show.
(f) * * *
(3) On July 4, the draw need not open
from 9:40 p.m. until 11:15 p.m. to
accommodate the annual July 4th
fireworks show. Should inclement
weather prevent the fireworks event
from taking place as planned, the draw
need not open from 9:40 p.m. until
11:15 p.m. on July 5th to accommodate
the annual July 4th fireworks show.
(4) On the third or fourth Wednesday
of August, the draw will open every two
hours on the hour from 10 a.m. until
4 p.m. and need not open from 4 p.m.
until 8 p.m. to accommodate the annual
Air Show.
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: August 2, 2011.
William D. Lee,
Rear Admiral, United States Coast Guard
Commander, Fifth Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 2011–20499 Filed 8–11–11; 8:45 am]
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to
amend 33 CFR part 117 as follows:
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
PART 117—DRAWBRIDGE
OPERATION REGULATIONS
1. The authority citation for part 117
continues to read as follows:
PO 00000
Frm 00019
50163
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
E:\FR\FM\12AUP1.SGM
12AUP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 156 (Friday, August 12, 2011)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 50161-50163]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-20499]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 117
[Docket No. USCG-2011-0698]
RIN 1625-AA09
Drawbridge Operation Regulation; New Jersey Intracoastal Waterway
(NJICW), Atlantic City, NJ
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to change the regulations that govern
the operation of two New Jersey Department of Transportation (NJDOT)
bridges: The Route 30/Abescon Boulevard Bridge across Beach Thorofare,
NJICW mile 67.2 and the US 40-322 (Albany Avenue) Bridge across Inside
Thorofare, NJICW mile 70.0, both at Atlantic City, NJ. The proposed
changes will alter the dates that these bridges are allowed to have
delayed openings or remain in the closed position to accommodate heavy
volumes of vehicular traffic due to the annual July 4th fireworks shows
and the annual Air Show at Bader Field.
DATES: Comments and related material must reach the Coast Guard on or
before October 11, 2011.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2011-0698 using any one of the following methods:
(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
(2) Fax: 202-493-2251.
(3) Mail: Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC, 20590-0001.
(4) Hand delivery: Same as mail address above, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The telephone
number is 202-366-9329.
To avoid duplication, please use only one of these four methods.
See the ``Public Participation and Request for Comments'' portion of
the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below for instructions on
submitting comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this proposed
rule, call or e-mail Lindsey Middleton, Coast Guard; telephone 757-398-
6629, e-mail Lindsey.R.Middleton@uscg.mil. If you have questions on
viewing or submitting material to the docket, call Renee V. Wright,
Program Manager, Docket Operations, telephone 202-366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Public Participation and Request for Comments
We encourage you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All comments received will be posted,
without change to https://www.regulations.gov and will include any
personal information you have provided.
Submitting Comments
If you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking (USCG-2011-0698), indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation. You may submit your comments and material
online (https://www.regulations.gov), or by fax, mail or hand delivery,
but please use only one of these means. If you submit a comment online
via https://www.regulations.gov, it will be considered received by the
Coast Guard when you successfully transmit the comment. If you fax,
hand deliver, or mail your comment, it will be considered as having
been received by the Coast Guard when it is received at the Docket
Management Facility. We recommend that you include your name and a
mailing address, an e-mail address, or a phone number in the body of
your document so that we can contact you if we have questions regarding
your submission.
To submit your comment online, go to https://www.regulations.gov,
click on the ``submit a comment'' box, which will then become
highlighted in blue. In the ``Document Type'' drop down menu select
``Proposed Rules'' and insert ``USCG-2011-0698'' in the ``Keyword''
box. Click ``Search'' then click on the balloon shape in the
``Actions'' column. If you submit your comments by mail or hand
delivery, submit them in an unbound format, no larger than 8\1/2\ by 11
inches, suitable for copying and electronic filing. If you submit them
by mail and would like to know that they reached the Facility, please
enclose a stamped, self-addressed postcard or envelope. We will
consider all comments and material received during the comment period
and may change the rule based on your comments.
Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov,
click on the ``read comments'' box, which will then become highlighted
in blue. In the ``Keyword'' box insert ``USCG-2011-0698'' and click
``Search.'' Click the ``Open Docket Folder'' in the ``Actions'' column.
You may also visit the Docket Management Facility in Room W12-140 on
the ground floor of the Department of Transportation West Building,
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC, 20590, between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. We have an
agreement with the Department of Transportation to use the Docket
Management Facility.
Privacy Act
Anyone can search the electronic form of comments received into any
of our dockets by the name of the individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may review a Privacy Act notice
regarding our public dockets
[[Page 50162]]
in the January 17, 2008, issue of the Federal Register (73 FR 3316).
Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public meeting. But you may submit a
request for one using one of the four methods specified under
ADDRESSES. Please explain why one would be beneficial. If we determine
that one would aid this rulemaking, we will hold one at a time and
place announced by a later notice in the Federal Register.
For information on facilities or services for individuals with
disabilities or to request special assistance at the public meeting,
contact Lindsey Middleton at the telephone number or e-mail address
indicated under the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this
notice.
Basis and Purpose
NJDOT has requested a change in the operation regulations of the
Route 30/Abescon Boulevard Bridge across Beach Thorofare, NJICW mile
67.2 and the US 40-322 (Albany Avenue) Bridge across Inside Thorofare,
NJICW mile 70.0, both at Atlantic City, NJ. The Atlantic City July 4th
fireworks show and the Air Show at Bader Field are annual events held
in Atlantic City and heavy volumes of vehicular traffic transit across
both bridges to attend them. The Coast Guard proposes to allow the
above mentioned bridges to remain in the closed position from 9:40 p.m.
through 11:15 p.m. on July 4th or on July 5th should inclement weather
prevent the fireworks event from taking place as planned. The Coast
Guard also proposes to allow the above mentioned bridges to open every
two hours on the hour from 10 a.m. through 4 p.m. and to remain in the
closed position from 4 p.m. through 8 p.m. on the third or fourth
Wednesday of every August. The exact dates of the closures will be
published locally in the Local Notice to Mariners and Broadcast Notice
to Mariners.
The Route 30/Abescon Boulevard Bridge is a bascule drawbridge with
a vertical clearance of 20 feet above mean high water in the closed
position and unlimited in the open position. The current operating
schedule for the bridge is set out in 33 CFR 117.733(e) and was last
amended in April 2009. The US 40-322 (Albany Avenue Bridge) is a
bascule drawbridge with a vertical clearance of 10 feet above mean high
water in the closed position and unlimited in the open position. The
current operating schedule for the bridge is set out in 33 CFR
117.733(f) and was last amended in April 2009.
Discussion of Proposed Rule
The Coast Guard proposes to revise 33 CFR 117.733(e) for the Route
30/Abescon Boulevard Bridge, mile 67.2 across Beach Thorofare and 33
CFR 117.733(f) for the US 40-322 (Albany Avenue Bridge), mile 70.0
across Inside Thorofare. The proposed amendments would allow both
bridges to remain in the closed position from 9:40 p.m. through 11:15
p.m. on July 4 or on July 5 should inclement weather prevent the
fireworks event from taking place as planned; to open every two hours
on the hour from 10 a.m. until 4 p.m. and to remain in the closed
position from 4 p.m. until 8 p.m. on the third or fourth Wednesday of
every August.
Vessels that are able to transit under the bridges without openings
may do so at any time. The Atlantic Ocean is an alternate route for
vessels unable to pass through the bridges in the closed positions.
Both bridges will be able to open for emergencies.
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes
and executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our
analyses based on 13 of these statutes or executive orders.
Regulatory Planning and Review
This proposed rule is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review,
as supplemented by Executive Order 13563, Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review, and does not require an assessment of potential
costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3). The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under those Orders.
The proposed changes are expected to have minimal impact on
mariners due to the short duration that the drawbridges will be
maintained in the closed position and have delayed openings. Both
events have been observed in past years with little to no impact on
marine traffic. It is also a necessary measure to facilitate public
safety that allows for the orderly movement of vehicular traffic
before, during, and after the events.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this proposed rule would have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed
rule would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. These proposed rules would affect the
following entities, some of which might be small entities: the owners
or operators of vessels needing to transit under any of the bridges
between the hours of delayed openings or closures on either event day.
This action will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities because the rule adds minimal
restrictions to the movement of navigation and mariners who plan their
transits in accordance with the scheduled bridge closures can minimize
delay. Vessels that can safely transit under the bridges may do so at
any time.
If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what
degree this rule would economically affect it.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule so that they can better
evaluate its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking. If the
rule would affect your small business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its provisions or
options for compliance, please contact Lindsey Middleton, Bridge
Management Specialist, Fifth Coast Guard District, (757) 398-6629 or
Lindsey.R.Middleton@uscg.mil. The Coast Guard will not retaliate
against small entities that question or complain about this proposed
rule or any policy or action of the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This proposed rule would call for no new collection of information
under the Paperwork Reduction 44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of
[[Page 50163]]
compliance on them. We have analyzed this proposed rule under that
Order and have determined that it does not have implications for
federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or Tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule will not
result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This proposed rule would not cause a taking of private property or
otherwise have taking implications under Executive Order 12630,
Governmental Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected
Property Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and
3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize
litigation, eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This rule is not an economically significant rule and would not
create an environmental risk to health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This proposed rule does not have Tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian Tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian Tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian Tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13211,
Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This proposed rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we
did not consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023-01, and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD which guides the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination that this action is one of a
category of actions which do not individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human environment because it simply
promulgates the operating regulations or procedures for drawbridges. We
seek any comments or information that may lead to the discovery of a
significant environmental impact from this proposed rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117
Bridges.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes
to amend 33 CFR part 117 as follows:
PART 117--DRAWBRIDGE OPERATION REGULATIONS
1. The authority citation for part 117 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; 33 CFR 1.05-1; Department of Homeland
Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. Revise Sec. 117.733(e) and (f) to read as follows:
Sec. 117.733 New Jersey Intracoastal Waterway.
* * * * *
(e) The draw of the Route 30 Bridge across Beach Thorofare, mile
67.2 at Atlantic City, shall open on signal if at least four hours of
notice is given; except that:
(1) From April 1 through October 31, from 7 a.m. to 11 p.m. the
draw need only open on the hour.
(2) On July 4, the draw need not open from 9:40 p.m. until 11:15
p.m. to accommodate the annual July 4th fireworks show. Should
inclement weather prevent the fireworks event from taking place as
planned, the draw need not open from 9:40 p.m. until 11:15 p.m. on July
5th to accommodate the annual July 4th fireworks show.
(3) On the third or fourth Wednesday of August, the draw will open
every two hours on the hour from 10 a.m. until 4 p.m. and need not open
from 4 p.m. until 8 p.m. to accommodate the annual Air Show.
(f) * * *
(3) On July 4, the draw need not open from 9:40 p.m. until 11:15
p.m. to accommodate the annual July 4th fireworks show. Should
inclement weather prevent the fireworks event from taking place as
planned, the draw need not open from 9:40 p.m. until 11:15 p.m. on July
5th to accommodate the annual July 4th fireworks show.
(4) On the third or fourth Wednesday of August, the draw will open
every two hours on the hour from 10 a.m. until 4 p.m. and need not open
from 4 p.m. until 8 p.m. to accommodate the annual Air Show.
* * * * *
Dated: August 2, 2011.
William D. Lee,
Rear Admiral, United States Coast Guard Commander, Fifth Coast Guard
District.
[FR Doc. 2011-20499 Filed 8-11-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P