Revisions to the California State Implementation Plan, South Coast Air Quality Management District, 50128-50129 [2011-20456]
Download as PDF
50128
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 156 / Friday, August 12, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
TABLE 2 OF § 165.T01–0671—Continued
2.8
2.8.2
August
Haverhill River Ruckus Fireworks ..........................................................................
• Location: All waters of the Merrimack River near
Newburyport, MA, within a 420-foot radius of position
(NAD 83): 42°49.0′ N, 070°52.7′ W.
• Date: August 20, 2011.
• Rain Date: August 21, 2011.
• Time: 9 p.m. to 10 p.m.
• Location: All waters of the Merrimack River near Haverhill, MA, within a 210-foot radius of position (NAD
83): 42°46.3′ N, 071°5.1′ W.
2.9
2.9.1
Federal Realty Fireworks .......................................................................................
Dated: August 2, 2011.
J.N. Healey,
Captain, U. S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Boston.
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
Revisions to the California State
Implementation Plan, South Coast Air
Quality Management District
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
EPA is finalizing approval of
revisions to the South Coast Air Quality
Management District (SCAQMD) portion
of the California State Implementation
SUMMARY:
Local agency
Effective Date: This rule is
effective on September 12, 2011.
EPA has established docket
number EPA–R09–OAR–2011–0416 for
this action. Generally, documents in the
docket for this action are available
electronically at https://www.regulations.
gov or in hard copy at EPA Region IX,
75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco,
California. While all documents in the
docket are listed at https://www.
regulations.gov, some information may
be publicly available only at the hard
copy location (e.g., copyrighted
ADDRESSES:
Rule #
SCAQMD ....................................
2002
We proposed to approve this rule
because we determined that it complied
with the relevant CAA requirements.
Our proposed action contains more
information on the rule and our
evaluation.
II. Public Comments and EPA
Responses
EPA’s proposed action provided a 30day public comment period. During this
period, we received no comments.
19:01 Aug 11, 2011
Date: September 17, 2011.
Rain Date: September 18, 2011.
Time: 8:30 p.m. to 10 p.m.
Location: All waters of the Mystic River near Somerville, MA within a 280-foot radius of position (NAD
83): 42°23.9′ N, 071°4.8′ W.
DATES:
[EPA–R09–OAR–2011–0416; FRL–9446–7]
VerDate Mar<15>2010
•
•
•
•
Plan (SIP). These revisions concern
oxides of nitrogen (NOX) and oxides of
sulfur (SOX) emissions from facilities
emitting 4 tons or more per year of NOX
or SOX in the year 1990 or any
subsequent year under the SCAQMD’s
Regional Clean Air Incentives Market
(RECLAIM) program. We are approving
a local rule that regulates these emission
sources under the Clean Air Act as
amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act).
[FR Doc. 2011–20501 Filed 8–11–11; 8:45 am]
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
September
Jkt 223001
material, large maps, multi-volume
reports), and some may not be available
in either location (e.g., confidential
business information (CBI)). To inspect
the hard copy materials, please schedule
an appointment during normal business
hours with the contact listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lily
Wong, EPA Region IX, (415) 947–4114,
wong.lily@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document, ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us’’
and ‘‘our’’ refer to EPA.
Table of Contents
I. Proposed Action
II. Public Comments and EPA Responses
III. EPA Action
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Proposed Action
On May 27, 2011 (76 FR 30896), EPA
proposed to approve the following rule
into the California SIP.
Rule title
Adopted
Allocations for Oxides of Nitrogen (NOX) and Oxides of Sulfur
(SOX).
III. EPA Action
No comments were submitted that
change our assessment that the
submitted rule comply with the relevant
CAA requirements. Therefore, as
authorized in section 110(k)(3) of the
Act, EPA is fully approving this rule
into the California SIP.
IV. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the Clean Air Act, the
Administrator is required to approve a
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
11/05/10
Submitted
04/05/11
SIP submission that complies with the
provisions of the Act and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k);
40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP
submissions, EPA’s role is to approve
State choices, provided that they meet
the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
Accordingly, this action merely
approves State law as meeting Federal
requirements and does not impose
additional requirements beyond those
imposed by State law. For that reason,
this action:
E:\FR\FM\12AUR1.SGM
12AUR1
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 156 / Friday, August 12, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget under
Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993);
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act;
and
• Does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address
disproportionate human health or
environmental effects with practical,
appropriate, and legally permissible
methods under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this rule does not have
tribal implications as specified by
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249,
November 9, 2000), because the SIP is
not approved to apply in Indian country
located in the State, and EPA notes that
it will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt
tribal law.
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this action and other
required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. A major rule
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:11 Aug 11, 2011
Jkt 223001
cannot take effect until 60 days after it
is published in the Federal Register.
This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean
Air Act, petitions for judicial review of
this action must be filed in the United
States Court of Appeals for the
appropriate circuit by October 11, 2011.
Filing a petition for reconsideration by
the Administrator of this final rule does
not affect the finality of this action for
the purposes of judicial review nor does
it extend the time within which a
petition for judicial review may be filed,
and shall not postpone the effectiveness
of such rule or action. This action may
not be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements (see section
307(b)(2)).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations,
Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: July 18, 2011.
Jared Blumenfeld,
Regional Administrator, Region IX.
Part 52, Chapter I, Title 40 of the Code
of Federal Regulations is amended as
follows:
PART 52 [AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for Part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart F—California
2. Section 52.220, is amended by
adding paragraph (c)(388) (i)(A)(4) to
read as follows:
■
§ 52.220
Identification of plan.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(388) * * *
(i) * * *
(A) * * *
(4) Rule 2002, ‘‘Allocations for Oxides
of Nitrogen (NOX) and Oxides of Sulfur
(SOX),’’ amended November 5, 2010.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2011–20456 Filed 8–11–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
50129
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Parts 72 and 75
[EPA–HQ–OAR–2009–0837; FRL–9450–7]
RIN 2060–AQ06
Protocol Gas Verification Program and
Minimum Competency Requirements
for Air Emission Testing; Corrections
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
AGENCY:
EPA is taking direct final
action on corrections to the Protocol Gas
Verification Program and Minimum
Competency Requirements for Air
Emission Testing final rule, which was
published in the Federal Register of
March 28, 2011 (76 FR 17288). The final
rule also made a number of other
changes to the regulations. After the
final rule was published, it was brought
to our attention that there are some
incorrect and incomplete statements in
the preamble, some potentially
confusing statements in a paragraph of
the rule text, and the title of Appendix
D to Part 75 was inadvertently changed
and is incorrect.
DATES: This rule is effective on October
11, 2011 without further notice, unless
EPA receives adverse comments by
September 12, 2011. If we receive such
comments, we will publish a timely
withdrawal in the Federal Register to
notify the public that this direct final
rule will not take effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–
OAR–2009–0837, by one of the
following methods:
• https://www.regulations.gov: Follow
the online instructions for submitting
comments.
• Mail: Air and Radiation Docket and
Information Center, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Mailcode: 2822T,
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20460.
• Hand Delivery: Air and Radiation
Docket, EPA West Building, Room 3334,
1301 Constitution Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20460. Such deliveries
are only accepted during the Docket’s
normal hours of operation, and special
arrangements should be made for
deliveries of boxed information.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–OAR–2009–
0837. EPA’s policy is that all comments
received will be included in the public
docket without change and may be
made available online at https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided, unless
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\12AUR1.SGM
12AUR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 156 (Friday, August 12, 2011)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 50128-50129]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-20456]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R09-OAR-2011-0416; FRL-9446-7]
Revisions to the California State Implementation Plan, South
Coast Air Quality Management District
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA is finalizing approval of revisions to the South Coast Air
Quality Management District (SCAQMD) portion of the California State
Implementation Plan (SIP). These revisions concern oxides of nitrogen
(NOX) and oxides of sulfur (SOX) emissions from
facilities emitting 4 tons or more per year of NOX or
SOX in the year 1990 or any subsequent year under the
SCAQMD's Regional Clean Air Incentives Market (RECLAIM) program. We are
approving a local rule that regulates these emission sources under the
Clean Air Act as amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act).
DATES: Effective Date: This rule is effective on September 12, 2011.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established docket number EPA-R09-OAR-2011-0416 for
this action. Generally, documents in the docket for this action are
available electronically at https://www.regulations.gov or in hard copy
at EPA Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, California. While
all documents in the docket are listed at https://www.regulations.gov,
some information may be publicly available only at the hard copy
location (e.g., copyrighted material, large maps, multi-volume
reports), and some may not be available in either location (e.g.,
confidential business information (CBI)). To inspect the hard copy
materials, please schedule an appointment during normal business hours
with the contact listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lily Wong, EPA Region IX, (415) 947-
4114, wong.lily@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, ``we,'' ``us'' and
``our'' refer to EPA.
Table of Contents
I. Proposed Action
II. Public Comments and EPA Responses
III. EPA Action
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Proposed Action
On May 27, 2011 (76 FR 30896), EPA proposed to approve the
following rule into the California SIP.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rule
Local agency Rule title Adopted Submitted
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SCAQMD.................................... 2002 Allocations for Oxides of 11/05/10 04/05/11
Nitrogen (NOX) and Oxides of
Sulfur (SOX).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
We proposed to approve this rule because we determined that it
complied with the relevant CAA requirements. Our proposed action
contains more information on the rule and our evaluation.
II. Public Comments and EPA Responses
EPA's proposed action provided a 30-day public comment period.
During this period, we received no comments.
III. EPA Action
No comments were submitted that change our assessment that the
submitted rule comply with the relevant CAA requirements. Therefore, as
authorized in section 110(k)(3) of the Act, EPA is fully approving this
rule into the California SIP.
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and
applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve State
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
Accordingly, this action merely approves State law as meeting Federal
requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those
imposed by State law. For that reason, this action:
[[Page 50129]]
Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993);
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the Clean Air Act; and
Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address disproportionate human health or environmental effects with
practical, appropriate, and legally permissible methods under Executive
Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this rule does not have tribal implications as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000),
because the SIP is not approved to apply in Indian country located in
the State, and EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law.
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by October 11, 2011. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule
does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of
judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for
judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness
of such rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in
proceedings to enforce its requirements (see section 307(b)(2)).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: July 18, 2011.
Jared Blumenfeld,
Regional Administrator, Region IX.
Part 52, Chapter I, Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is
amended as follows:
PART 52 [AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for Part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart F--California
0
2. Section 52.220, is amended by adding paragraph (c)(388) (i)(A)(4) to
read as follows:
Sec. 52.220 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(388) * * *
(i) * * *
(A) * * *
(4) Rule 2002, ``Allocations for Oxides of Nitrogen
(NOX) and Oxides of Sulfur (SOX),'' amended
November 5, 2010.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2011-20456 Filed 8-11-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P