Notice of Issuance of Final Determination Concerning Certain Digital Projectors, 49782-49785 [2011-20452]
Download as PDF
49782
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 155 / Thursday, August 11, 2011 / Notices
State of Tennessee is hereby amended to
include the following area among those
areas determined to have been adversely
affected by the event declared a major
disaster by the President in his
declaration of July 20, 2011.
Anderson County for Public Assistance.
(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used
for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030,
Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora
Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling;
97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034,
Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA);
97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant;
97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to
Individuals and Households in Presidentially
Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049,
Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance—
Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals
and Households; 97.050, Presidentially
Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals
and Households—Other Needs; 97.036,
Disaster Grants—Public Assistance
(Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039,
Hazard Mitigation Grant.)
W. Craig Fugate,
Administrator, Federal Emergency
Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2011–20366 Filed 8–10–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111–23–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Certificate of Origin
U.S. Customs and Border
Protection, Department of Homeland
Security.
ACTION: 30-Day Notice and request for
comments; Extension of an existing
collection of information.
AGENCY:
U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (CBP) of the Department of
Homeland Security will be submitting
the following information collection
request to the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) for review and approval
in accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act: Certificate of Origin
(CBP Form 3229). This is a proposed
extension of an information collection
that was previously approved. CBP is
proposing that this information
collection be extended with a change to
the burden hours. This document is
published to obtain comments from the
public and affected agencies. This
proposed information collection was
previously published in the Federal
Register (76 FR 19119) on April 6, 2011,
allowing for a 60-day comment period.
One comment was received. This notice
allows for an additional 30 days for
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:59 Aug 10, 2011
Jkt 223001
public comments. This process is
conducted in accordance with 5 CFR
1320.10.
Written comments should be
received on or before September 12,
2011.
DATES:
Interested persons are
invited to submit written comments on
this proposed information collection to
the Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs, Office of Management and
Budget. Comments should be addressed
to the OMB Desk Officer for Customs
and Border Protection, Department of
Homeland Security, and sent via
electronic mail to
oira_submission@omb.eop.gov or faxed
to (202) 395–5806.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Requests for additional information
should be directed to Tracey Denning,
U.S. Customs and Border Protection,
Regulations and Rulings, Office of
International Trade, 799 9th Street,
NW., 5th Floor, Washington, DC 20229–
1177, at 202–325–0265.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: CBP
invites the general public and other
Federal agencies to comment on
proposed and/or continuing information
collections pursuant to the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–13;
44 U.S.C. 3505(c)(2)). The comments
should address: (a) Whether the
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
whether the information shall have
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
agency’s estimates of the burden of the
collection of information; (c) ways to
enhance the quality, utility, and clarity
of the information to be collected; (d)
ways to minimize the burden including
the use of automated collection
techniques or the use of other forms of
information technology; and (e) the
annual costs burden to respondents or
record keepers from the collection of
information (a total capital/startup costs
and operations and maintenance costs).
The comments that are submitted will
be summarized and included in the CBP
request for Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) approval. All comments
will become a matter of public record.
In this document CBP is soliciting
comments concerning the following
information collection:
Title: Certificate of Origin.
OMB Number: 1651–0016.
Form Number: CBP Form 3229.
Abstract: CBP Form 3229, Certificate
of Origin, is used by shippers to declare
that goods being imported into the
United States are produced or
manufactured in a U.S. insular
ADDRESSES:
PO 00000
Frm 00058
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
possession from materials grown,
produced or manufactured in such
possession, and to list the foreign
materials included in the goods,
including their description and value.
CBP Form 3229 is used as
documentation for goods entitled to
enter the U.S. free of duty. This form is
authorized by General Note 3(a)(iv) of
the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
Untied States (19 U.S.C. 1202) and is
provided for by 19 CFR 7.3 CBP Form
3229 is accessible at: https://
forms.cbp.gov/pdf/CBP_Form_3229.pdf.
Current Actions: CBP proposes to
extend the expiration date of this
information collection with a change to
the burden hours based on revised
estimates by CBP of the number of forms
filed annually. There is no change to the
information being collected or to CBP
Form 3229.
Type of Review: Extension (with
change).
Affected Public: Businesses.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
113.
Estimated Number of Responses per
Respondent: 20.
Estimated Number of Total Annual
Responses: 2,260.
Estimated Time per Response: 22
minutes.
Estimated Total Annual Burden
Hours: 814.
Dated: August 8, 2011.
Tracey Denning,
Agency Clearance Officer, U.S. Customs and
Border Protection.
[FR Doc. 2011–20449 Filed 8–10–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111–14–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
CUSTOMS AND BORDER
PROTECTION
Notice of Issuance of Final
Determination Concerning Certain
Digital Projectors
U.S. Customs and Border
Protection, Department of Homeland
Security.
ACTION: Notice of final determination.
AGENCY:
This document provides
notice that U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (‘‘CBP’’) has issued a final
determination concerning the country of
origin of certain digital projectors. Based
upon the facts presented, CBP has
concluded that the assembly and
programming operations performed in
Taiwan substantially transform the nonTAA country components of the
projectors. Therefore, the country of
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\11AUN1.SGM
11AUN1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 155 / Thursday, August 11, 2011 / Notices
origin of the projectors is Taiwan for
purposes of U.S. government
procurement.
The final determination was
issued on July 29, 2011. A copy of the
final determination is attached. Any
party-at-interest, as defined in 19 CFR
177.22(d), may seek judicial review of
this final determination on or before
September 12, 2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Heather K. Pinnock, Valuation and
Special Programs Branch: (202) 325–
0034.
DATES:
Notice is
hereby given that on July 29, 2011,
pursuant to subpart B of part 177, U.S.
Customs and Border Protection
Regulations (19 CFR part 177, subpart
B), CBP issued a final determination
concerning the country of origin of
digital projectors which may be offered
to the U.S. Government under an
undesignated government procurement
contract. This final determination, HQ
H146735, was issued under procedures
set forth at 19 CFR part 177, subpart B,
which implements Title III of the Trade
Agreements Act of 1979, as amended
(19 U.S.C. 2511–18). In the final
determination, CBP concluded that,
based upon the facts presented, the
assembly and programming operations
performed in Taiwan substantially
transform the non-TAA country
components of the projectors. Therefore,
the country of origin of the projectors is
Taiwan for purposes of U.S. government
procurement.
Section 177.29, CBP Regulations (19
CFR 177.29), provides that a notice of
final determination shall be published
in the Federal Register within 60 days
of the date the final determination is
issued. Section 177.30, CBP Regulations
(19 CFR 177.30), provides that any
party-at-interest, as defined in 19 CFR
177.22(d), may seek judicial review of a
final determination within 30 days of
publication of such determination in the
Federal Register.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Dated: July 29, 2011.
Sandra L. Bell,
Executive Director, Regulations and Rulings,
Office of International Trade.
Attachment
HQ H146735
July 29, 2011
MAR–2 OT:RR:CTF:VS H146735 HkP
Category: Marking
Munford Page Hall, Esq.
William C. Sjoberg, Esq.
Adduci, Mastriani & Schaumberg LLP
1200 Seventeenth Street, NW
Washington, DC 20036.
RE: Final Determination; Substantial
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:59 Aug 10, 2011
Jkt 223001
Transformation; Country of Origin of
Certain Digital Projectors
Dear Mr. Hall and Mr. Sjoberg:
This is in response to your letter dated
January 21, 2011, requesting a final
determination on behalf of a foreign
manufacturer, pursuant to subpart B of part
177 of the U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (CBP) Regulations (19 C.F.R. Part
177). Under these regulations, which
implement Title III of the Trade Agreements
Act of 1979 (TAA), as amended (19 U.S.C.
§ 2511 et seq.), CBP issues country of origin
advisory rulings and final determinations as
to whether an article is or would be a product
of a designated country or instrumentality for
the purposes of granting waivers of certain
‘‘Buy American’’ restrictions in U.S. law or
practice for products offered for sale to the
U.S. Government.
This final determination concerns the
country of origin of two models of digital
projectors. We note that as the manufacturer
of the digital projectors, the foreign
manufacturer is a party-at-interest within the
meaning of 19 CFR 177.22(d)(1) and is
entitled to request this final determination.
Facts:
According to the submitted information,
the subject merchandise is two models of
digital projectors, Model A and Model B
(collectively, the digital projector). The
projector is a 9cm x 30cm x 20cm, 2.5kg,
digital light processing (DLP) projector,
designed to use a high-intensity discharge
(HID) arc lamp as the light source to project
images from computers and other video
sources. It can produce an image size of up
to 307 inches diagonally. The main
differences between Model A and Model B
are the resolution of the projected image and
the throw ratio (basically the viewing
distance from the screen).
The projector is composed of the following
components:
Components of Taiwanese origin include:
(1) System firmware, which controls the
functions of the keypad, remote controller,
USB port, lamp brightness, volume, and onscreen display main menu, as well as image
processing. The fully assembled projector is
programmed in Taiwan with this firmware.
(2) Power control firmware, used to control
the on/off function of the projector and to
retrieve the input/output (I/O) setting of the
projector in the latest turn-off from an
electronically erasable programmable read
only memory (EEPROM). The firmware
detects the power signal and transmits the
command to the low voltage power supply
(LVPS) to output the required voltage for the
system and the lamp. The firmware also
controls the operation of the fans and detects
their operating status. The fully assembled
projector is programmed in Taiwan with this
firmware.
(3) Extended Display Identification Data
(EDID) firmware, a Video Electronics
Standard Association (VESA) data format
that contains basic information about the
projector and its capabilities, including
vendor information, maximum image size,
color characteristics, factory pre-set timings,
frequency range limits, and character strings
for the model name and serial number. The
PO 00000
Frm 00059
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
49783
information is stored in the display and uses
the Display Data Channel (DDC) to
communicate between the projector and a
personal computer graphics adapter. The
system uses this information for
configuration purposes. The fully assembled
projector is programmed in Taiwan with this
firmware.
(4) Network firmware, which contains the
network protocol, is used to receive
instructions to control the projector from a
remote user using a computer. The firmware
may be updated in Taiwan during the
assembly and testing processes.
Components of Chinese origin include:
(1) Bottom cover module, comprised of
parts from Korea, China, and Taiwan.
(2) Elevator module, used to adjust the
height of the projector, comprised of parts
from China and Japan.
(3) Right cover module, comprised of parts
from China.
(4) Input/Output (I/O) cover module,
comprised of parts from China.
(5) Top cover module, comprised of parts
from Japan, Taiwan, China, the U.S., and
Korea.
(6) Cosmetic module, comprised of parts
from China.
(7) Fan modules, comprised of the system
(axial) fan module and the lamp blower
module attached to the lamp housing,
comprised of parts from China.
(8) Lamp driver (ballast) module,
comprised of parts from China.
(9) Lamp driver firmware, used to control
lamp ignition and to obtain the ballast
waveform that controls the output current
with respect to the angle of the color wheel.
White light, generated by a high intensity
discharge arc lamp, passes through the filter
to generate different colors. The firmware is
programmed into an IC on the lamp driver
module (Chinese component no. 8) in China.
(10) Color wheel module, which includes
the color wheel, photo sensor board with
photo sensor, and bracket. It acts as a timevarying wavelength filter to allow certain
wavelengths of light to pass through at the
appropriate times so that the filtered light
may be modulated by the light valve, DMD
(digital micromirror device, i.e., an optical
semiconductor), to produce the projected
image with full color. Module parts are from
Japan, China, and Taiwan.
(11) Zoom ring module, comprised of parts
from China.
(12) Lamp module, comprised of parts from
China.
(13) Lamp cover module, comprised of
parts from China.
(14) Semi-finished optical engine module,
which includes a Taiwanese-origin DMD, a
DMD board, an optical lens, a projection lens,
and rod integrator. Module parts are from
Taiwan and China.
(15) Main board module, which stores the
system firmware (Taiwanese component no.
1) on a Taiwanese-origin DDP2431 processor,
comprised of parts from China, the Czech
Republic, Taiwan, Japan, Korea, and the U.S.
(16) Low voltage power supply (LVPS)
module, comprised of parts from Taiwan,
Japan, Korea, China, and the U.S.
(17) Local area network (LAN) module
board, comprised of parts from the U.S. and
E:\FR\FM\11AUN1.SGM
11AUN1
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
49784
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 155 / Thursday, August 11, 2011 / Notices
unnamed countries. It is programmed with
Taiwanese-origin network firmware
(Taiwanese component no. 4) in China.
(18) Miscellaneous items: screws, EMI
gaskets, tape (Mylar and 3M), 16-pin wiring,
brackets, main board spacers, insulating
rubber, Mylar film, and elevator feet.
Modules 1–8 and 10–17 are assembled in
China and shipped to Taiwan. The
miscellaneous Chinese components
described at no. 18 above are also shipped to
Taiwan to be assembled with the 16 Chinese
modules.
In Taiwan, the imported modules and
components are inspected and then
assembled into a complete digital projector
using the Chinese screws, EMI gaskets, tape
(Mylar and 3M), 16-pin wiring, brackets,
main board spacers, insulating rubber, Mylar
film, and an elevator foot. The projector is
then programmed with the power control
firmware and system firmware developed in
Taiwan, and then subjected to various tests.
During the testing stage, the projector is also
loaded with Taiwanese-origin EDID
firmware, which programs the identification
of the projector into the EEPROM on the
main board.
ISSUE:
What is the country of origin of the
projector for purposes of U.S. government
procurement?
LAW AND ANALYSIS:
Pursuant to Subpart B of Part 177, 19
C.F.R. § 177.21 et seq., which implements
Title III of the Trade Agreements Act of 1979,
as amended (19 U.S.C. § 2511 et seq.), CBP
issues country of origin advisory rulings and
final determinations as to whether an article
is or would be a product of a designated
country or instrumentality for the purposes
of granting waivers of certain ‘‘Buy
American’’ restrictions in U.S. law or
practice for products offered for sale to the
U.S. Government.
Under the rule of origin set forth under 19
U.S.C. § 2518(4)(B):
An article is a product of a country or
instrumentality only if (i) it is wholly the
growth, product, or manufacture of that
country or instrumentality, or (ii) in the case
of an article which consists in whole or in
part of materials from another country or
instrumentality, it has been substantially
transformed into a new and different article
of commerce with a name, character, or use
distinct from that of the article or articles
from which it was so transformed.
See also 19 C.F.R. § 177.22(a).
In determining whether the combining of
parts or materials constitutes a substantial
transformation, the determinative issue is the
extent of operations performed and whether
the parts lose their identity and become an
integral part of the new article. Belcrest
Linens v. United States, 573 F. Supp. 1149
(Ct. Int’l Trade 1983), aff’d, 741 F.2d 1368
(Fed. Cir. 1984). Assembly operations that are
minimal or simple, as opposed to complex or
meaningful, will generally not result in a
substantial transformation.
In Data General v. United States, 4 Ct. Int’l
Trade 182 (1982), the court determined that
for purposes of determining eligibility under
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:59 Aug 10, 2011
Jkt 223001
item 807.00, Tariff Schedules of the United
States (predecessor to subheading
9802.00.80, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of
the United States), the programming of a
foreign PROM (Programmable Read-Only
Memory chip) in the United States
substantially transformed the PROM into a
U.S. article. In programming the imported
PROMs, the U.S. engineers systematically
caused various distinct electronic
interconnections to be formed within each
integrated circuit. The programming
bestowed upon each circuit its electronic
function, that is, its ‘‘memory’’ which could
be retrieved. A distinct physical change was
effected in the PROM by the opening or
closing of the fuses, depending on the
method of programming. This physical
alteration, not visible to the naked eye, could
be discerned by electronic testing of the
PROM. The court noted that the programs
were designed by a U.S. project engineer
with many years of experience in ‘‘designing
and building hardware.’’ While replicating
the program pattern from a ‘‘master’’ PROM
may be a quick one-step process, the
development of the pattern and the
production of the ‘‘master’’ PROM required
much time and expertise. The court noted
that it was undisputed that programming
altered the character of a PROM. The essence
of the article, its interconnections or stored
memory, was established by programming.
The court concluded that altering the nonfunctioning circuitry comprising a PROM
through technological expertise in order to
produce a functioning read only memory
device, possessing a desired distinctive
circuit pattern, was no less a ‘‘substantial
transformation’’ than the manual
interconnection of transistors, resistors and
diodes upon a circuit board creating a similar
pattern.
You argue that Taiwan is the country of
origin of the projector because it is the
country in which the following actions occur:
design and development of the projector,
including the main board; addition of the
majority of the value (materials and labor);
fabrication of many parts, including the data
processors (the DMD and DDP2431) that are
claimed to be the major functional parts of
the projector; development of four of the five
firmware files used to operate the projector;
programming of the main board with system
firmware and programming of the control
panel with power control firmware; assembly
of the Chinese modules with disparate parts
to make a functional projector; and, testing
and adjustment of the projector. You point
out that 60 percent of the total cost of
materials (including accessories and packing
material) comes from the United States and
TAA designated countries, and that the
processing in Taiwan will require 180 steps,
including assembly, programming, testing,
and packing.
Further, you claim that the Chinese
modules are substantially transformed in
Taiwan when they are assembled into a
projector. As a result of the color wheel
module being assembled with the semifinished optical engine module in Taiwan,
the HID arc lamp can be used as a light
source and the DMD can be used as a light
valve to produce color images. When the
PO 00000
Frm 00060
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
lamp ballast is connected to the LVPS, the
ballast gains a power source, and when
connected to the main board, the lamp can
be controlled. Connecting the Chinese main
board module to the semi-finished optical
engine module, the DMD board, fan modules,
and color wheel module allows all the boards
attached to the main module to be controlled.
The LVPS powers the main board so that the
modules attached to it can operate. Finally,
assembling the top cover module with the
main board module allows the projector to be
controlled through the keypad.
You state that factors such as the resources
expended on design and development, extent
and nature of post-assembly inspection and
testing procedure, and worker skill required
during the manufacturing process have been
considered in determining whether a
substantial transformation occurred. In
support of your position you cite
Headquarters Ruling Letters (HQ) H100055
(May 8, 2010), H034843 (May 5, 2009), and
H015324 (April 23, 2008), 559534 (June 4,
1996), among others.
HQ H100055 concerned a motorized lift
unit, designed, developed and engineered in
Sweden, for an overhead patient lift system.
The PCBA was assembled and programmed
prior to its importation in Sweden but it was
designed in Sweden and its software program
was written in Sweden. The unit was then
assembled in Sweden, which included the
manufacture of the electrical motor. CBP
found that the manufacturing and testing
operations in Sweden were sufficiently
complex and meaningful to transform the
individual components into the lift unit,
thereby making Sweden the country of origin
of the unit. HQ H034843 concerned a USB
flash drive partially manufactured in China
and in Israel or the United States. CBP
concluded that there was a substantial
transformation either in Israel or in the
United States, depending on the location
where the final three manufacturing
operations took place. HQ H015324 involved
stereoscopic displays assembled in the U.S.
from non-U.S. parts. U.S. assembly resulted
in a substantial transformation of imported
LCD monitors and a beamsplitter mirror.
In this case, the bottom cover module,
elevator module, right cover module, I/O
cover module, cosmetic module, two fan
modules, lamp driver module programmed in
China with Chinese firmware, zoom ring
module, lamp module, lamp cover module,
semi-finished optical engine module, color
wheel module, main board module, top cover
module, LAN module programmed in China
with Taiwanese-origin firmware, and the
LVPS module, from China are assembled
together in Taiwan with other Chinese
components to form a complete projector.
After assembly, the projector is programmed
in Taiwan with three types of firmware
developed in Taiwan. The first, power
control firmware, is used to control on/off
functions and to retrieve the input/output
setting from the last time the projector was
turned off. The second, system firmware,
controls the functions of the keypad, remote
control, USB port, lamp brightness, volume,
on-screen display menu, and image
processing. The third, EDID firmware,
contains basic information about the
E:\FR\FM\11AUN1.SGM
11AUN1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 155 / Thursday, August 11, 2011 / Notices
projector, such as maximum image size, color
characteristics, factory pre-set timings, and
frequency range limits. We find that the
assembly and programming operations
performed in Taiwan are sufficiently
complex and meaningful so as to create a
new article with a new character, name and
use. See, for e.g., HQ H034843 and H100055.
Moreover, we note that some of the Chinese
modules were made using Taiwanese parts.
Through the operations undertaken in
Taiwan, the individual parts lose their
identities and become integral to the new and
different article, i.e., the projector. See
Belcrest Linens. Accordingly, we find that the
country of origin of the projector is Taiwan.
HOLDING:
Based on the facts in this case, we find that
the assembly and programming operations
performed in Taiwan substantially transform
the non-TAA country components of the
projector. Therefore, the country of origin of
the Model A and Model B projectors is
Taiwan for purposes of U.S. government
procurement.
Notice of this final determination will be
given in the Federal Register, as required by
19 C.F.R. § 177.29. Any party-at-interest other
than the party which requested this final
determination may request, pursuant to 19
C.F.R. § 177.31, that CBP reexamine the
matter anew and issue a new final
determination. Pursuant to 19 C.F.R.
§ 177.30, any party-at-interest may, within 30
days of publication of the Federal Register
Notice referenced above, seek judicial review
of this final determination before the Court
of International Trade.
Sincerely,
Sandra L. Bell, Executive Director,
Regulations and Rulings
Office of International Trade.
[FR Doc. 2011–20452 Filed 8–10–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111–14–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Indian Affairs
Notice of Intent To Prepare an
Environmental Impact Statement for
the Proposed Samish Indian Nation
Fee-to-Trust Acquisition and Casino
Project, Skagit County, WA
Bureau of Indian Affairs,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The Bureau of Indian Affairs
(BIA) as lead agency is gathering
information necessary for preparing an
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)
in connection with the Samish Indian
Nation’s (Tribe’s) application for a
proposed 11.41-acre fee-to-trust transfer
and casino project to be located in
Anacortes, Washington. The purpose of
the proposed action is to improve the
economic status of the tribal
government so it can better provide
housing, health care, education, cultural
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:59 Aug 10, 2011
Jkt 223001
programs, and other services to its
members. This notice also announces a
public scoping meeting to identify
potential issues and content for
inclusion in the EIS.
DATES: Written comments on the scope
of the EIS will be accepted until
September 16, 2011. The public scoping
meeting will be held on September 14,
2011, from 6 p.m. to 9 p.m. PDT, or
until the last comment is heard.
ADDRESSES: You may mail or hand carry
written comments to Mr. Stanley
Speaks, Northwest Regional Director,
Bureau of Indian Affairs, Northwest
Region, 911 NE 11th Avenue, Portland,
Oregon 97232. Please include your
name, return caption, address and
‘‘DEIS Scoping Comments, Samish
Indian Nation Casino Project’’ on the
first page of your written comments.
The public scoping meeting will be held
at Fidalgo Bay Resort Community
Center, 4701 Fidalgo Bay Road,
Anacortes, WA 98221.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr.
B.J. Howerton, Environmental
Protection Specialist, BIA Northwest
Region, (503) 231–6749.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
proposed action would transfer
approximately 11.41 acres of land from
fee to trust status. After the transfer, the
Tribe would develop a casino, parking,
and other supporting facilities. The
property is located within the
incorporated boundaries of the City of
Anacortes, Washington, southeast of the
intersection of Thompson Road and
State Route 20. Areas of environmental
concern identified for analysis in the
EIS include land resources, water
resources, air quality, noise, biological
resources, cultural resources, resource
use patterns, traffic and transportation,
public health/environmental hazards,
public services and utilities,
socioeconomics, environmental justice,
and visual resources/aesthetics.
Alternatives identified for analysis
include the proposed action, a no-action
alternative, a reduced-intensity
development alternative, a non-gaming
alternative, and an alternate site
location alternative. The range of issues
and alternatives is open to revision
based on comments received in
response to this notice. Additional
information, including a map of the
project site, is available by contacting
the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this
notice. Other related approvals may be
required to implement the project,
including approval of the Tribe’s fee-totrust application, determination of the
site’s eligibility for gaming, compliance
with the Clean Water Act, and local
PO 00000
Frm 00061
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
49785
service agreements. To the extent
applicable, the EIS will identify and
evaluate issues related to these
approvals.
Public Comment Availability
Comments, including names and
addresses of respondents, will be
available for public review at the
address shown in the ADDRESSES
section, during regular business hours, 8
a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except holidays. Before
including your address, phone number,
e-mail address, or other personal
identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment—including your
personal identifying information—may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask in your comment that
your personal identifying information
be withheld from public review, we
cannot guarantee that this will occur.
Authority
This notice is published in
accordance with sections 1503.1 of the
Council on Environmental Quality
Regulations (40 CFR parts 1500 through
1508) and section 46.305 of the
Department of the Interior Regulations
(43 CFR part 46), implementing the
procedural requirements of NEPA, as
amended (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.), and
is in the exercise of authority delegated
to the Assistant Secretary—Indian
Affairs, by part 209 of the Departmental
Manual.
Dated: July 29, 2011.
Larry Echo Hawk,
Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs.
[FR Doc. 2011–20476 Filed 8–10–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–W7–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
[LLCA 942000 L57000000 BX0000]
Filing of Plats of Survey: California
Bureau of Land Management,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The plats of survey and
supplemental plats of lands described
below are scheduled to be officially
filed in the Bureau of Land Management
California State Office, Sacramento,
California, thirty (30) calendar days
from the date of this publication.
ADDRESSES: A copy of the plats may be
obtained from the California State
Office, Bureau of Land Management,
2800 Cottage Way, Sacramento,
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\11AUN1.SGM
11AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 155 (Thursday, August 11, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 49782-49785]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-20452]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION
Notice of Issuance of Final Determination Concerning Certain
Digital Projectors
AGENCY: U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland
Security.
ACTION: Notice of final determination.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document provides notice that U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (``CBP'') has issued a final determination concerning the
country of origin of certain digital projectors. Based upon the facts
presented, CBP has concluded that the assembly and programming
operations performed in Taiwan substantially transform the non-TAA
country components of the projectors. Therefore, the country of
[[Page 49783]]
origin of the projectors is Taiwan for purposes of U.S. government
procurement.
DATES: The final determination was issued on July 29, 2011. A copy of
the final determination is attached. Any party-at-interest, as defined
in 19 CFR 177.22(d), may seek judicial review of this final
determination on or before September 12, 2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Heather K. Pinnock, Valuation and
Special Programs Branch: (202) 325-0034.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that on July 29,
2011, pursuant to subpart B of part 177, U.S. Customs and Border
Protection Regulations (19 CFR part 177, subpart B), CBP issued a final
determination concerning the country of origin of digital projectors
which may be offered to the U.S. Government under an undesignated
government procurement contract. This final determination, HQ H146735,
was issued under procedures set forth at 19 CFR part 177, subpart B,
which implements Title III of the Trade Agreements Act of 1979, as
amended (19 U.S.C. 2511-18). In the final determination, CBP concluded
that, based upon the facts presented, the assembly and programming
operations performed in Taiwan substantially transform the non-TAA
country components of the projectors. Therefore, the country of origin
of the projectors is Taiwan for purposes of U.S. government
procurement.
Section 177.29, CBP Regulations (19 CFR 177.29), provides that a
notice of final determination shall be published in the Federal
Register within 60 days of the date the final determination is issued.
Section 177.30, CBP Regulations (19 CFR 177.30), provides that any
party-at-interest, as defined in 19 CFR 177.22(d), may seek judicial
review of a final determination within 30 days of publication of such
determination in the Federal Register.
Dated: July 29, 2011.
Sandra L. Bell,
Executive Director, Regulations and Rulings, Office of International
Trade.
Attachment
HQ H146735
July 29, 2011
MAR-2 OT:RR:CTF:VS H146735 HkP
Category: Marking
Munford Page Hall, Esq.
William C. Sjoberg, Esq.
Adduci, Mastriani & Schaumberg LLP
1200 Seventeenth Street, NW
Washington, DC 20036.
RE: Final Determination; Substantial Transformation; Country of
Origin of Certain Digital Projectors
Dear Mr. Hall and Mr. Sjoberg:
This is in response to your letter dated January 21, 2011,
requesting a final determination on behalf of a foreign
manufacturer, pursuant to subpart B of part 177 of the U.S. Customs
and Border Protection (CBP) Regulations (19 C.F.R. Part 177). Under
these regulations, which implement Title III of the Trade Agreements
Act of 1979 (TAA), as amended (19 U.S.C. Sec. 2511 et seq.), CBP
issues country of origin advisory rulings and final determinations
as to whether an article is or would be a product of a designated
country or instrumentality for the purposes of granting waivers of
certain ``Buy American'' restrictions in U.S. law or practice for
products offered for sale to the U.S. Government.
This final determination concerns the country of origin of two
models of digital projectors. We note that as the manufacturer of
the digital projectors, the foreign manufacturer is a party-at-
interest within the meaning of 19 CFR 177.22(d)(1) and is entitled
to request this final determination.
Facts:
According to the submitted information, the subject merchandise
is two models of digital projectors, Model A and Model B
(collectively, the digital projector). The projector is a 9cm x 30cm
x 20cm, 2.5kg, digital light processing (DLP) projector, designed to
use a high-intensity discharge (HID) arc lamp as the light source to
project images from computers and other video sources. It can
produce an image size of up to 307 inches diagonally. The main
differences between Model A and Model B are the resolution of the
projected image and the throw ratio (basically the viewing distance
from the screen).
The projector is composed of the following components:
Components of Taiwanese origin include:
(1) System firmware, which controls the functions of the keypad,
remote controller, USB port, lamp brightness, volume, and on-screen
display main menu, as well as image processing. The fully assembled
projector is programmed in Taiwan with this firmware.
(2) Power control firmware, used to control the on/off function
of the projector and to retrieve the input/output (I/O) setting of
the projector in the latest turn-off from an electronically erasable
programmable read only memory (EEPROM). The firmware detects the
power signal and transmits the command to the low voltage power
supply (LVPS) to output the required voltage for the system and the
lamp. The firmware also controls the operation of the fans and
detects their operating status. The fully assembled projector is
programmed in Taiwan with this firmware.
(3) Extended Display Identification Data (EDID) firmware, a
Video Electronics Standard Association (VESA) data format that
contains basic information about the projector and its capabilities,
including vendor information, maximum image size, color
characteristics, factory pre-set timings, frequency range limits,
and character strings for the model name and serial number. The
information is stored in the display and uses the Display Data
Channel (DDC) to communicate between the projector and a personal
computer graphics adapter. The system uses this information for
configuration purposes. The fully assembled projector is programmed
in Taiwan with this firmware.
(4) Network firmware, which contains the network protocol, is
used to receive instructions to control the projector from a remote
user using a computer. The firmware may be updated in Taiwan during
the assembly and testing processes.
Components of Chinese origin include:
(1) Bottom cover module, comprised of parts from Korea, China,
and Taiwan.
(2) Elevator module, used to adjust the height of the projector,
comprised of parts from China and Japan.
(3) Right cover module, comprised of parts from China.
(4) Input/Output (I/O) cover module, comprised of parts from
China.
(5) Top cover module, comprised of parts from Japan, Taiwan,
China, the U.S., and Korea.
(6) Cosmetic module, comprised of parts from China.
(7) Fan modules, comprised of the system (axial) fan module and
the lamp blower module attached to the lamp housing, comprised of
parts from China.
(8) Lamp driver (ballast) module, comprised of parts from China.
(9) Lamp driver firmware, used to control lamp ignition and to
obtain the ballast waveform that controls the output current with
respect to the angle of the color wheel. White light, generated by a
high intensity discharge arc lamp, passes through the filter to
generate different colors. The firmware is programmed into an IC on
the lamp driver module (Chinese component no. 8) in China.
(10) Color wheel module, which includes the color wheel, photo
sensor board with photo sensor, and bracket. It acts as a time-
varying wavelength filter to allow certain wavelengths of light to
pass through at the appropriate times so that the filtered light may
be modulated by the light valve, DMD (digital micromirror device,
i.e., an optical semiconductor), to produce the projected image with
full color. Module parts are from Japan, China, and Taiwan.
(11) Zoom ring module, comprised of parts from China.
(12) Lamp module, comprised of parts from China.
(13) Lamp cover module, comprised of parts from China.
(14) Semi-finished optical engine module, which includes a
Taiwanese-origin DMD, a DMD board, an optical lens, a projection
lens, and rod integrator. Module parts are from Taiwan and China.
(15) Main board module, which stores the system firmware
(Taiwanese component no. 1) on a Taiwanese-origin DDP2431 processor,
comprised of parts from China, the Czech Republic, Taiwan, Japan,
Korea, and the U.S.
(16) Low voltage power supply (LVPS) module, comprised of parts
from Taiwan, Japan, Korea, China, and the U.S.
(17) Local area network (LAN) module board, comprised of parts
from the U.S. and
[[Page 49784]]
unnamed countries. It is programmed with Taiwanese-origin network
firmware (Taiwanese component no. 4) in China.
(18) Miscellaneous items: screws, EMI gaskets, tape (Mylar and
3M), 16-pin wiring, brackets, main board spacers, insulating rubber,
Mylar film, and elevator feet.
Modules 1-8 and 10-17 are assembled in China and shipped to
Taiwan. The miscellaneous Chinese components described at no. 18
above are also shipped to Taiwan to be assembled with the 16 Chinese
modules.
In Taiwan, the imported modules and components are inspected and
then assembled into a complete digital projector using the Chinese
screws, EMI gaskets, tape (Mylar and 3M), 16-pin wiring, brackets,
main board spacers, insulating rubber, Mylar film, and an elevator
foot. The projector is then programmed with the power control
firmware and system firmware developed in Taiwan, and then subjected
to various tests. During the testing stage, the projector is also
loaded with Taiwanese-origin EDID firmware, which programs the
identification of the projector into the EEPROM on the main board.
ISSUE:
What is the country of origin of the projector for purposes of
U.S. government procurement?
LAW AND ANALYSIS:
Pursuant to Subpart B of Part 177, 19 C.F.R. Sec. 177.21 et
seq., which implements Title III of the Trade Agreements Act of
1979, as amended (19 U.S.C. Sec. 2511 et seq.), CBP issues country
of origin advisory rulings and final determinations as to whether an
article is or would be a product of a designated country or
instrumentality for the purposes of granting waivers of certain
``Buy American'' restrictions in U.S. law or practice for products
offered for sale to the U.S. Government.
Under the rule of origin set forth under 19 U.S.C. Sec.
2518(4)(B):
An article is a product of a country or instrumentality only if
(i) it is wholly the growth, product, or manufacture of that country
or instrumentality, or (ii) in the case of an article which consists
in whole or in part of materials from another country or
instrumentality, it has been substantially transformed into a new
and different article of commerce with a name, character, or use
distinct from that of the article or articles from which it was so
transformed.
See also 19 C.F.R. Sec. 177.22(a).
In determining whether the combining of parts or materials
constitutes a substantial transformation, the determinative issue is
the extent of operations performed and whether the parts lose their
identity and become an integral part of the new article. Belcrest
Linens v. United States, 573 F. Supp. 1149 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1983),
aff'd, 741 F.2d 1368 (Fed. Cir. 1984). Assembly operations that are
minimal or simple, as opposed to complex or meaningful, will
generally not result in a substantial transformation.
In Data General v. United States, 4 Ct. Int'l Trade 182 (1982),
the court determined that for purposes of determining eligibility
under item 807.00, Tariff Schedules of the United States
(predecessor to subheading 9802.00.80, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of
the United States), the programming of a foreign PROM (Programmable
Read-Only Memory chip) in the United States substantially
transformed the PROM into a U.S. article. In programming the
imported PROMs, the U.S. engineers systematically caused various
distinct electronic interconnections to be formed within each
integrated circuit. The programming bestowed upon each circuit its
electronic function, that is, its ``memory'' which could be
retrieved. A distinct physical change was effected in the PROM by
the opening or closing of the fuses, depending on the method of
programming. This physical alteration, not visible to the naked eye,
could be discerned by electronic testing of the PROM. The court
noted that the programs were designed by a U.S. project engineer
with many years of experience in ``designing and building
hardware.'' While replicating the program pattern from a ``master''
PROM may be a quick one-step process, the development of the pattern
and the production of the ``master'' PROM required much time and
expertise. The court noted that it was undisputed that programming
altered the character of a PROM. The essence of the article, its
interconnections or stored memory, was established by programming.
The court concluded that altering the non-functioning circuitry
comprising a PROM through technological expertise in order to
produce a functioning read only memory device, possessing a desired
distinctive circuit pattern, was no less a ``substantial
transformation'' than the manual interconnection of transistors,
resistors and diodes upon a circuit board creating a similar
pattern.
You argue that Taiwan is the country of origin of the projector
because it is the country in which the following actions occur:
design and development of the projector, including the main board;
addition of the majority of the value (materials and labor);
fabrication of many parts, including the data processors (the DMD
and DDP2431) that are claimed to be the major functional parts of
the projector; development of four of the five firmware files used
to operate the projector; programming of the main board with system
firmware and programming of the control panel with power control
firmware; assembly of the Chinese modules with disparate parts to
make a functional projector; and, testing and adjustment of the
projector. You point out that 60 percent of the total cost of
materials (including accessories and packing material) comes from
the United States and TAA designated countries, and that the
processing in Taiwan will require 180 steps, including assembly,
programming, testing, and packing.
Further, you claim that the Chinese modules are substantially
transformed in Taiwan when they are assembled into a projector. As a
result of the color wheel module being assembled with the semi-
finished optical engine module in Taiwan, the HID arc lamp can be
used as a light source and the DMD can be used as a light valve to
produce color images. When the lamp ballast is connected to the
LVPS, the ballast gains a power source, and when connected to the
main board, the lamp can be controlled. Connecting the Chinese main
board module to the semi-finished optical engine module, the DMD
board, fan modules, and color wheel module allows all the boards
attached to the main module to be controlled. The LVPS powers the
main board so that the modules attached to it can operate. Finally,
assembling the top cover module with the main board module allows
the projector to be controlled through the keypad.
You state that factors such as the resources expended on design
and development, extent and nature of post-assembly inspection and
testing procedure, and worker skill required during the
manufacturing process have been considered in determining whether a
substantial transformation occurred. In support of your position you
cite Headquarters Ruling Letters (HQ) H100055 (May 8, 2010), H034843
(May 5, 2009), and H015324 (April 23, 2008), 559534 (June 4, 1996),
among others.
HQ H100055 concerned a motorized lift unit, designed, developed
and engineered in Sweden, for an overhead patient lift system. The
PCBA was assembled and programmed prior to its importation in Sweden
but it was designed in Sweden and its software program was written
in Sweden. The unit was then assembled in Sweden, which included the
manufacture of the electrical motor. CBP found that the
manufacturing and testing operations in Sweden were sufficiently
complex and meaningful to transform the individual components into
the lift unit, thereby making Sweden the country of origin of the
unit. HQ H034843 concerned a USB flash drive partially manufactured
in China and in Israel or the United States. CBP concluded that
there was a substantial transformation either in Israel or in the
United States, depending on the location where the final three
manufacturing operations took place. HQ H015324 involved
stereoscopic displays assembled in the U.S. from non-U.S. parts.
U.S. assembly resulted in a substantial transformation of imported
LCD monitors and a beamsplitter mirror.
In this case, the bottom cover module, elevator module, right
cover module, I/O cover module, cosmetic module, two fan modules,
lamp driver module programmed in China with Chinese firmware, zoom
ring module, lamp module, lamp cover module, semi-finished optical
engine module, color wheel module, main board module, top cover
module, LAN module programmed in China with Taiwanese-origin
firmware, and the LVPS module, from China are assembled together in
Taiwan with other Chinese components to form a complete projector.
After assembly, the projector is programmed in Taiwan with three
types of firmware developed in Taiwan. The first, power control
firmware, is used to control on/off functions and to retrieve the
input/output setting from the last time the projector was turned
off. The second, system firmware, controls the functions of the
keypad, remote control, USB port, lamp brightness, volume, on-screen
display menu, and image processing. The third, EDID firmware,
contains basic information about the
[[Page 49785]]
projector, such as maximum image size, color characteristics,
factory pre-set timings, and frequency range limits. We find that
the assembly and programming operations performed in Taiwan are
sufficiently complex and meaningful so as to create a new article
with a new character, name and use. See, for e.g., HQ H034843 and
H100055. Moreover, we note that some of the Chinese modules were
made using Taiwanese parts. Through the operations undertaken in
Taiwan, the individual parts lose their identities and become
integral to the new and different article, i.e., the projector. See
Belcrest Linens. Accordingly, we find that the country of origin of
the projector is Taiwan.
HOLDING:
Based on the facts in this case, we find that the assembly and
programming operations performed in Taiwan substantially transform
the non-TAA country components of the projector. Therefore, the
country of origin of the Model A and Model B projectors is Taiwan
for purposes of U.S. government procurement.
Notice of this final determination will be given in the Federal
Register, as required by 19 C.F.R. Sec. 177.29. Any party-at-
interest other than the party which requested this final
determination may request, pursuant to 19 C.F.R. Sec. 177.31, that
CBP reexamine the matter anew and issue a new final determination.
Pursuant to 19 C.F.R. Sec. 177.30, any party-at-interest may,
within 30 days of publication of the Federal Register Notice
referenced above, seek judicial review of this final determination
before the Court of International Trade.
Sincerely,
Sandra L. Bell, Executive Director,
Regulations and Rulings
Office of International Trade.
[FR Doc. 2011-20452 Filed 8-10-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-14-P