Enbridge Offshore Pipelines (UTOS) LLC; Notice of Application, 49759-49760 [2011-20430]
Download as PDF
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 155 / Thursday, August 11, 2011 / Notices
Great Plains East, MISO, NYISO, and
ISO–NE.
This change is proposed because
under the NERC Functional Model (from
which three of the current form’s
respondent categories are derived),
Transmission System Operators do not
perform the functions necessary for
them to provide the required
information. In contrast, U.S. border
Balancing Authorities are the
appropriate entities to report crossborder actual and implemented
interchange. Interchange is any energy
transfer that crosses Balancing
Authority boundaries. Actual
Interchange means the metered value
electricity that flows from one balancing
authority area to another. Implemented
Interchange is the interchange values
that the Balancing Authority enters into
its Area Control Error equation, i.e., uses
to balance supply and demand of its
electric system.
A number of entities could report
implemented interchange provided on
the interchange scheduling e-tags.
Border Balancing Authorities are a
convenient provider of this information
since they would already be providing
actual interchange on the same
schedule. Under FERC-approved
mandatory reliability standards,
Balancing Authorities receive e-tag
information from the interchange
coordinator when the transmission path
is through their system.
We propose to drop the transmission
owner respondent category as it is no
longer necessary.
The existing survey breakdown of the
quantity and value of imports and
exports into cost-of-service and market
rates would be dropped. The breakdown
of volume by fuel source would be
dropped. Questions covering the total
cost of ancillary service along with a
general identification of the type of
ancillary services would be dropped.
For each import transaction, the
foreign source balancing authority
name, the U.S. sink balancing authority
name, the presidential permit number or
transmission service provider name
would be required. On the new Form
EIA–111 the type of service is
categorized as firm, non-firm, exchange,
or other. Payments are broken down
into energy revenues, other revenues
and total revenues.
For each export transaction, the DOE
export authorization number, U.S.
source balancing authority name, the
foreign sink balancing authority name,
the presidential permit number or
transmission service provider name
would be required. On the new Form
EIA–111 the type of service is
categorized as firm, non-firm, exchange,
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:59 Aug 10, 2011
Jkt 223001
or other. Payments are broken down
into energy payments, other payments,
and total payments.
U.S. border balancing authorities
would report actual interchange
received from and delivered to directly
interconnected foreign border balancing
authorities. Instead of scheduled
imports and exports reported by
transmission operators, U.S. border
balancing authorities would report
implemented interchange (the current
industry term) when the transmission
path is through their system, for each
combination of source and sink
balancing authorities.
Reporting of the characteristics of
transmission operations would be
replaced by quarterly reporting of events
that exceed DOE order terms.
Presidential permit and DOE export
authorization holders would report their
order number, the date and hour(s) of
the exceeded event and the specific
order term exceeded.
Reporting of existing and proposed
transmission facilities crossing the
border would be dropped.
III. Request for Comments
Prospective respondents and other
interested parties should comment on
the actions discussed in item II. The
following guidelines are provided to
assist in the preparation of comments.
As a Potential Respondent to the
Request for Information
A. Is the proposed collection of
information necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
agency and does the information have
practical utility?
B. What actions could be taken to
help ensure and maximize the quality,
objectivity, utility, and integrity of the
information to be collected?
C. Are the instructions and definitions
clear and sufficient? If not, which
instructions need clarification?
D. Can the information be submitted
by the respondent by the due date?
E. Public reporting burden for this
collection is estimated to average 6
hours per quarter for each respondent.
The estimated burden includes the total
time necessary to provide the requested
information. In your opinion, how
accurate is this estimate?
F. The agency estimates that the only
cost to a respondent is for the time it
will take to complete the collection.
Will a respondent incur any start-up
costs for reporting, or any recurring
annual costs for operation, maintenance,
and purchase of services associated with
the information collection?
G. What additional actions could be
taken to minimize the burden of this
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
49759
collection of information? Such actions
may involve the use of automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
H. Does any other Federal, State, or
local agency collect similar information?
If so, specify the agency, the data
element(s), and the methods of
collection.
As a Potential User of the Information
To Be Collected
A. Is the proposed collection of
information necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
agency and does the information have
practical utility?
B. What actions could be taken to
help ensure and maximize the quality,
objectivity, utility, and integrity of the
information disseminated?
C. Is the information useful at the
levels of detail to be collected?
D. For what purpose(s) would the
information be used? Be specific.
E. Are there alternate sources for the
information and are they useful? If so,
what are their weaknesses and/or
strengths?
Comments submitted in response to
this notice will be summarized and/or
included in the request for OMB
approval of the form. They also will
become a matter of public record.
Statutory Authority: Section 13(b) of the
Federal Energy Administration Act of 1974,
Pub. L. 93–275, codified at 15 U.S.C. 772(b).
Issued in Washington, DC on August 3,
2011.
Stephanie Brown,
Director, Office of Survey Development and
Statistical Integration, U. S. Energy
Information Administration.
[FR Doc. 2011–20401 Filed 8–10–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
[Docket No. CP11–526–000]
Enbridge Offshore Pipelines (UTOS)
LLC; Notice of Application
Take notice that on August 1, 2011,
Enbridge Offshore Pipelines (UTOS)
LLC, (UTOS) filed an application in
Docket No. CP11–526–000 pursuant to
section 7(b) of the Natural Gas Act and
Part 157 of the Commission’s
Regulations, seeking authorization to
abandon all services it provides under
its Part 284 blanket certificate and to
abandon its physical certificated
facilities which are located onshore and
in federal and state waters offshore
E:\FR\FM\11AUN1.SGM
11AUN1
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
49760
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 155 / Thursday, August 11, 2011 / Notices
Louisiana, and to defer the ultimate
disposition of these facilities for up to
three years. In the alternative, UTOS
seeks authorization to deactivate its
facilities for up to three years and seek
abandonment at that time, all as more
fully set forth in the application which
is on file with the Commission and open
for public inspection. UTOS asserts that
its proposal is consistent with the
recently Commission approved
settlement in Docket No. RP10–1393.
Any questions regarding this
application should be directed to
Cynthia Hornstein Roney, Manager,
Regulatory Compliance, Enbridge
Offshore Pipelines (UTOS) LLC, 1100
Louisiana, Suite 3300, Houston, Texas
77002, or call at (832) 214–9334.
Pursuant to section 157.9 of the
Commission’s rules, 18 CFR 157.9,
within 90 days of this Notice the
Commission staff will either: complete
its environmental assessment (EA) and
place it into the Commission’s public
record (eLibrary) for this proceeding; or
issue a Notice of Schedule for
Environmental Review. If a Notice of
Schedule for Environmental Review is
issued, it will indicate, among other
milestones, the anticipated date for the
Commission staff’s issuance of the final
environmental impact statement (FEIS)
or EA for this proposal. The filing of the
EA in the Commission’s public record
for this proceeding or the issuance of a
Notice of Schedule for Environmental
Review will serve to notify Federal and
state agencies of the timing for the
completion of all necessary reviews, and
the subsequent need to complete all
Federal authorizations within 90 days of
the date of issuance of the Commission
staff’s FEIS or EA.
There are two ways to become
involved in the Commission’s review of
this project. First, any person wishing to
obtain legal status by becoming a party
to the proceedings for this project
should, on or before the comment date
stated below, file with the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888
First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426,
a motion to intervene in accordance
with the requirements of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure (18 CFR 385.214 or 385.211)
and the Regulations under the NGA (18
CFR 157.10). A person obtaining party
status will be placed on the service list
maintained by the Secretary of the
Commission and will receive copies of
all documents filed by the applicant and
by all other parties. A party must submit
7 copies of filings made with the
Commission and must mail a copy to
the applicant and to every other party in
the proceeding. Only parties to the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:59 Aug 10, 2011
Jkt 223001
proceeding can ask for court review of
Commission orders in the proceeding.
However, a person does not have to
intervene in order to have comments
considered. The second way to
participate is by filing with the
Secretary of the Commission, as soon as
possible, an original and two copies of
comments in support of or in opposition
to this project. The Commission will
consider these comments in
determining the appropriate action to be
taken, but the filing of a comment alone
will not serve to make the filer a party
to the proceeding. The Commission’s
rules require that persons filing
comments in opposition to the project
provide copies of their protests only to
the party or parties directly involved in
the protest.
Persons who wish to comment only
on the environmental review of this
project should submit an original and
two copies of their comments to the
Secretary of the Commission.
Environmental commentors will be
placed on the Commission’s
environmental mailing list, will receive
copies of the environmental documents,
and will be notified of meetings
associated with the Commission’s
environmental review process.
Environmental commentors will not be
required to serve copies of filed
documents on all other parties.
However, the non-party commentors
will not receive copies of all documents
filed by other parties or issued by the
Commission (except for the mailing of
environmental documents issued by the
Commission) and will not have the right
to seek court review of the
Commission’s final order.
The Commission strongly encourages
electronic filings of comments, protests
and interventions in lieu of paper using
the ‘‘eFiling’’ link at https://
www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file
electronically should submit an original
and 7 copies of the protest or
intervention to the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.
This filing is accessible on-line at
https://www.ferc.gov, using the
‘‘eLibrary’’ link and is available for
review in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room in Washington, DC.
There is an ‘‘eSubscription’’ link on the
Web site that enables subscribers to
receive e-mail notification when a
document is added to a subscribed
docket(s). For assistance with any FERC
Online service, please e-mail
FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov, or call
(866) 208–3676 (toll free). For TTY, call
(202) 502–8659.
Comment Date: August 26, 2011.
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Dated: August 5, 2011.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011–20430 Filed 8–10–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
[Docket No. CP11–524–000]
Texas Eastern Transmission, LP;
Notice of Application
Take notice that on July 29, 2011,
Texas Eastern Transmission, LP (Texas
Eastern), 5400 Westheimer Court,
Houston, Texas 77056–5310, filed with
the Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission (Commission) an
application under section 7(b) of the
Natural Gas Act (NGA) for authorization
to abandon in place four reciprocating
compressor units with a total of 4,400
horsepower and related appurtenances
at Station No. 21–A of its Uniontown
Compressor Station located in Fayette
County, Pennsylvania. Texas Eastern
states that there will be no termination
or reduction in service to any existing
customers of Texas Eastern as a result of
the proposed abandonment of these
facilities, all as more fully set forth in
the application which is on file with the
Commission and open to public
inspection. This filing is available for
review at the Commission in the Public
Reference Room or may be viewed on
the Commission’s Web site Web at
https://www.ferc.gov using the
‘‘eLibrary’’ link. Enter the docket
number excluding the last three digits in
the docket number field to access the
document. For assistance, contact FERC
at FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov or call
toll-free, (886) 208–3676 or TTY, (202)
502–8659.
Any questions regarding the
application should be directed to Lisa
A. Connolly, General Manager, Rates &
Certificates, Texas Eastern
Transmission, LP, P.O. Box 1642,
Houston, Texas 77251–1642, or
telephone (713) 627–4102, or fax (713)
627–5947 or by e-mail
laconnolly@spectraenergy.com.
Pursuant to section 157.9 of the
Commission’s rules, 18 CFR 157.9,
within 90 days of this Notice the
Commission staff will either: Complete
its environmental assessment (EA) and
place it into the Commission’s public
record (eLibrary) for this proceeding; or
issue a Notice of Schedule for
Environmental Review. If a Notice of
Schedule for Environmental Review is
issued, it will indicate, among other
E:\FR\FM\11AUN1.SGM
11AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 155 (Thursday, August 11, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 49759-49760]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-20430]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. CP11-526-000]
Enbridge Offshore Pipelines (UTOS) LLC; Notice of Application
Take notice that on August 1, 2011, Enbridge Offshore Pipelines
(UTOS) LLC, (UTOS) filed an application in Docket No. CP11-526-000
pursuant to section 7(b) of the Natural Gas Act and Part 157 of the
Commission's Regulations, seeking authorization to abandon all services
it provides under its Part 284 blanket certificate and to abandon its
physical certificated facilities which are located onshore and in
federal and state waters offshore
[[Page 49760]]
Louisiana, and to defer the ultimate disposition of these facilities
for up to three years. In the alternative, UTOS seeks authorization to
deactivate its facilities for up to three years and seek abandonment at
that time, all as more fully set forth in the application which is on
file with the Commission and open for public inspection. UTOS asserts
that its proposal is consistent with the recently Commission approved
settlement in Docket No. RP10-1393.
Any questions regarding this application should be directed to
Cynthia Hornstein Roney, Manager, Regulatory Compliance, Enbridge
Offshore Pipelines (UTOS) LLC, 1100 Louisiana, Suite 3300, Houston,
Texas 77002, or call at (832) 214-9334.
Pursuant to section 157.9 of the Commission's rules, 18 CFR 157.9,
within 90 days of this Notice the Commission staff will either:
complete its environmental assessment (EA) and place it into the
Commission's public record (eLibrary) for this proceeding; or issue a
Notice of Schedule for Environmental Review. If a Notice of Schedule
for Environmental Review is issued, it will indicate, among other
milestones, the anticipated date for the Commission staff's issuance of
the final environmental impact statement (FEIS) or EA for this
proposal. The filing of the EA in the Commission's public record for
this proceeding or the issuance of a Notice of Schedule for
Environmental Review will serve to notify Federal and state agencies of
the timing for the completion of all necessary reviews, and the
subsequent need to complete all Federal authorizations within 90 days
of the date of issuance of the Commission staff's FEIS or EA.
There are two ways to become involved in the Commission's review of
this project. First, any person wishing to obtain legal status by
becoming a party to the proceedings for this project should, on or
before the comment date stated below, file with the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, a
motion to intervene in accordance with the requirements of the
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.214 or
385.211) and the Regulations under the NGA (18 CFR 157.10). A person
obtaining party status will be placed on the service list maintained by
the Secretary of the Commission and will receive copies of all
documents filed by the applicant and by all other parties. A party must
submit 7 copies of filings made with the Commission and must mail a
copy to the applicant and to every other party in the proceeding. Only
parties to the proceeding can ask for court review of Commission orders
in the proceeding.
However, a person does not have to intervene in order to have
comments considered. The second way to participate is by filing with
the Secretary of the Commission, as soon as possible, an original and
two copies of comments in support of or in opposition to this project.
The Commission will consider these comments in determining the
appropriate action to be taken, but the filing of a comment alone will
not serve to make the filer a party to the proceeding. The Commission's
rules require that persons filing comments in opposition to the project
provide copies of their protests only to the party or parties directly
involved in the protest.
Persons who wish to comment only on the environmental review of
this project should submit an original and two copies of their comments
to the Secretary of the Commission. Environmental commentors will be
placed on the Commission's environmental mailing list, will receive
copies of the environmental documents, and will be notified of meetings
associated with the Commission's environmental review process.
Environmental commentors will not be required to serve copies of filed
documents on all other parties. However, the non-party commentors will
not receive copies of all documents filed by other parties or issued by
the Commission (except for the mailing of environmental documents
issued by the Commission) and will not have the right to seek court
review of the Commission's final order.
The Commission strongly encourages electronic filings of comments,
protests and interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link
at https://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should
submit an original and 7 copies of the protest or intervention to the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20426.
This filing is accessible on-line at https://www.ferc.gov, using the
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription''
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail
FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
Comment Date: August 26, 2011.
Dated: August 5, 2011.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-20430 Filed 8-10-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P