Food Labeling; Health Claim; Phytosterols and Risk of Coronary Heart Disease; Reopening of the Comment Period, 49707-49708 [2011-20406]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 155 / Thursday, August 11, 2011 / Proposed Rules
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
21 CFR Part 73
Blakeley Fitzpatrick, Center for Food
Safety and Applied Nutrition (HFS–
830), 5100 Paint Branch Pkwy., College
Park, MD 20740, 240–402–2176.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
[Docket Nos. FDA–2011–C–0344 and FDA–
2011–C–0463]
I. Background
Food and Drug Administration
CooperVision, Inc.; Filing of Color
Additive Petitions
Correction
In proposed rule document 2011–
16089 appearing on page 37690 in the
issue of Tuesday, June 28, 2011, make
the following correction:
On page 37690, in the first column, in
the twelfth line from the bottom of the
page,
‘‘methacryloxyethyl)phenstyamino]’’
should read
‘‘methacryloxyethyl)phenlyamino]’’.
[FR Doc. C1–2011–16089 Filed 8–10–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505–01–D
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
21 CFR Part 101
[Docket Nos. FDA–2000–P–0102, FDA–
2000–P–0133, and FDA–2006–P–0033]
Food Labeling; Health Claim;
Phytosterols and Risk of Coronary
Heart Disease; Reopening of the
Comment Period
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
Proposed rule; reopening of
comment period.
ACTION:
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is reopening the
comment period for the proposed rule
published in the Federal Register of
December 8, 2010, proposing to amend
regulations on plant sterol/stanol esters
and risk of coronary heart disease
(CHD). FDA is reopening the comment
period because the Agency received a
request for additional time to comment
on the proposed rule.
DATES: The comment period for the
proposed rule published December 8,
2010 (75 FR 76526), is reopened. Submit
either electronic or written comments
by October 25, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Submit electronic
comments https://www.regulations.gov.
Submit written comments to the
Division of Dockets Management (HFA–
305), Food and Drug Administration,
5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville,
MD 20852.
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:43 Aug 10, 2011
Jkt 223001
In the Federal Register of December 8,
2010 (75 FR 76526), FDA proposed to
amend its regulations in § 101.83 (21
CFR 101.83) on plant sterol/stanol esters
and risk of CHD (the phytosterols
proposed rule). Among other revisions,
the Agency proposed to: (1) Adopt the
term ‘‘phytosterols’’ as inclusive of both
plant sterols and stanols; (2) permit
claims on products with phytosterols,
derived from either vegetable oils or tall
oils, containing at least 80 percent of
beta-sitosterol, campesterol,
stigmasterol, sitostanol, and/or
campestanol (combined weight); (3)
replace the analytical methods FDA
uses to determine the amount and
nature of the substance with the
Sorenson and Sullivan method for
evaluation of campesterol, stigmasterol,
and beta-sitosterol in those foods for
which the method has been validated;
(4) revise the daily dietary intake of
phytosterols necessary to justify the
CHD risk reduction claim (2 grams (g)
per day) and the minimum amount of
phytosterols (non-esterified weight)
required to be in a serving of the food
(0.5 g per reference amount customarily
consumed (RACC)); (5) for conventional
food, limit the use of the claim to the
food uses of phytosterols that have been
submitted to FDA in a generally
recognized as safe notification to which
the Agency had no further questions
and where the conditions of use are
consistent with the eligibility
requirements for the health claim; (6)
remove the requirement that the health
claim include a recommendation that
phytosterols be consumed in two
servings eaten at different times of the
day, but require that the substance be
taken with meals or snacks; (7)
eliminate the enumeration of specific
conventional foods eligible to bear the
claim; (8) allow for the use of the health
claim on phytosterol ester-containing
dietary supplements (esterified with
food-grade fatty acids) but not on
nonesterified phytosterol-containing
dietary supplements; (9) clarify that the
limited exemption from the total fat
disqualifying level of more than 13 g
total fat per 50 g of food when the RACC
is 30 g or less or 2 tablespoons or less
applies to vegetable oil spreads
resembling margarine; (10) permit liquid
vegetable oils to be exempt from the
total fat disqualifying level on a per
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
49707
RACC, per labeled serving size, and per
50 g basis; and (11) permit liquid
vegetable oils to be exempt from the
minimum nutrient requirement and
vegetable oil spreads resembling
margarine to meet the 10 percent
minimum nutrient requirement by the
addition of Vitamin A consistent with
FDA’s fortification policy.
Interested persons were originally
given until February 22, 2011, to
comment on the proposed rule.
II. Request for Comments
After publication of the phytosterols
proposed rule, the Agency received two
petitions for an administrative stay of
action and two letters requesting that
FDA extend its enforcement discretion
based on FDA’s February 14, 2003, letter
of enforcement discretion to Cargill
Health and Food Technologies. Based
on concerns that 75 days was not
enough time for industry to come into
compliance with § 101.83 or to make the
claim consistent with the proposed
requirements in the phytosterols
proposed rule, the Agency issued, in the
Federal Register of February 18, 2011,
an extension of its enforcement
discretion based on the February 14,
2003, letter (76 FR 9525).
On February 10, 2011, the Agency
received a comment on the phytosterols
proposed rule by Venable LLP
requesting an extension of the comment
period until April 23, 2011, because the
period of time allowed for comment did
not provide enough time for them to
collect, assess, and comment on the
relevant data regarding the cholesterollowering efficacy of nonesterified
phytosterols in dietary supplements.
FDA did not respond to Venable LLP’s
request within the comment period and
cannot extend a closed comment period.
However, the Agency is reopening the
comment period for this rule in
response to Venable LLP’s request. The
Agency recognizes that additional time
to review and comment on the data
related to the relationship between
nonesterified phytosterols and reduced
risk of CHD would be helpful and
consistent with sound public policy,
therefore FDA is reopening the
comment period for all interested
persons on the phytosterols proposed
rule to allow for comments to be
submitted to the docket.
Following receipt of comments on
this document, FDA intends to publish
a final rule, which will amend § 101.83.
The reopening of the comment period
may result in the submission of
additional information that may cause
the Agency to reconsider its proposed
amendments to the phytosterols and
risk of coronary heart disease health
E:\FR\FM\11AUP1.SGM
11AUP1
49708
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 155 / Thursday, August 11, 2011 / Proposed Rules
claim. The Agency notes that a final rule
may vary from the proposal. To the
extent that manufacturers have labeled
their products consistent with the
proposed requirements, and the final
requirements differ from what the
Agency proposed, manufacturers will be
required to change their labels to
conform to the final rule.
III. How To Submit Comments
Interested persons may submit to the
Division of Dockets Management (see
ADDRESSES) either electronic or written
comments regarding this document. It is
only necessary to send one set of
comments. It is no longer necessary to
send two copies of mailed comments.
Identify comments with the docket
number found in brackets in the
heading of this document. Received
comments may be seen in the Division
of Dockets Management between 9 a.m.
and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
Dated: August 8, 2011.
Leslie Kux,
Acting Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2011–20406 Filed 8–10–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R07–OAR–2011–0470, FRL–9450–8]
Approval and Promulgation of
Implementation Plans; Iowa:
Prevention of Significant Deterioration;
Greenhouse Gas Permitting Authority
and Tailoring Rule
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
EPA is proposing to approve
a revision to the Iowa State
Implementation Plan (SIP) relating to
regulation of Greenhouse Gases (GHGs)
under Iowa’s Prevention of Significant
Deterioration (PSD) program. This
revision was submitted by the Iowa
Department of Natural Resources (IDNR)
to EPA on December 22, 2010. It is
intended to align Iowa’s regulations
with the ‘‘PSD and Title V Greenhouse
Gas Tailoring Final Rule.’’ EPA is
proposing to approve the revision
because the Agency has made the
preliminary determination that the SIP
revision, already adopted by Iowa as a
final effective rule, is in accordance
with the Clean Air Act (CAA or Act) and
EPA regulations regarding PSD
permitting for GHGs.
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:43 Aug 10, 2011
Jkt 223001
Comments must be received on
or before September 12, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R07–
OAR–2011–0470, by one of the
following methods:
1. https://www.regulations.gov: Follow
the on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
2. E-mail: gonzalez.larry@epa.gov.
3. Fax: (913) 551–7844.
4. Mail: Air Planning and
Development Branch, Air and Waste
Management Division, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 7, 901 North 5th Street, Kansas
City, Kansas 66101.
5. Hand Delivery or Courier: Mr. Larry
Gonzalez, Air Planning and
Development Branch, Air and Waste
Management Division, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 7, 901 North 5th Street, Kansas
City, Kansas 66101. Such deliveries are
only accepted during the Regional
Office’s normal hours of operation. The
Regional Office’s official hours of
business are Monday through Friday,
8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., excluding Federal
holidays.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
Docket ID No. EPA–R07–OAR–2011–
0470. EPA’s policy is that all comments
received will be included in the public
docket without change and may be
made available online at https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Do not submit through https://
www.regulations.gov or e-mail,
information that you consider to be CBI
or otherwise protected. The https://
www.regulations.gov Web site is an
‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which
means EPA will not know your identity
or contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment.
If you send an e-mail comment directly
to EPA without going through https://
www.regulations.gov, your e-mail
address will be automatically captured
and included as part of the comment
that is placed in the public docket and
made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA
recommends that you include your
name and other contact information in
the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA
cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact
you for clarification, EPA may not be
able to consider your comment.
Electronic files should avoid the use of
DATES:
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or
viruses. For additional information
about EPA’s public docket visit the EPA
Docket Center homepage at https://
www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm.
Docket: All documents in the
electronic docket are listed in the http:
//www.regulations.gov index. Although
listed in the index, some information is
not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material,
is not placed on the Internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy
form. Publicly available docket
materials are available either
electronically in https://
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at
the Air Planning and Development
Branch, Air and Waste Management
Division, U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Region 7, 901 North 5th Street,
Kansas City, Kansas 66101. EPA
requests that if at all possible, you
contact the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to
schedule your inspection. The Regional
Office’s official hours of business are
Monday through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to
4:30 p.m., excluding Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
information regarding the Iowa SIP,
contact Mr. Larry Gonzalez, Air
Planning and Development Branch, Air
and Waste Management Division, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 7, 901 North 5th Street, Kansas
City, Kansas 66101. Mr. Gonzalez’s
telephone number is (913) 551–7047; email address: gonzalez.larry@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. What action is EPA proposing in today’s
notice?
II. What is the background for the PSD SIP
approval proposed by EPA in today’s
notice?
III. What is EPA’s analysis of Iowa’s proposed
SIP revision?
IV. Proposed Action
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. What action is EPA proposing in
today’s notice?
On December 22, 2010, IDNR
submitted a request to EPA to approve
revisions to the State’s SIP and Title V
program to incorporate recent rule
amendments adopted by the Iowa
Environmental Protection Commission.
These adopted rules became effective in
the Iowa Administrative Code on that
date. These amendments establish
thresholds for GHG emissions in Iowa’s
PSD and Title V regulations at the same
emissions thresholds and in the same
E:\FR\FM\11AUP1.SGM
11AUP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 155 (Thursday, August 11, 2011)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 49707-49708]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-20406]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
21 CFR Part 101
[Docket Nos. FDA-2000-P-0102, FDA-2000-P-0133, and FDA-2006-P-0033]
Food Labeling; Health Claim; Phytosterols and Risk of Coronary
Heart Disease; Reopening of the Comment Period
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Proposed rule; reopening of comment period.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is reopening the
comment period for the proposed rule published in the Federal Register
of December 8, 2010, proposing to amend regulations on plant sterol/
stanol esters and risk of coronary heart disease (CHD). FDA is
reopening the comment period because the Agency received a request for
additional time to comment on the proposed rule.
DATES: The comment period for the proposed rule published December 8,
2010 (75 FR 76526), is reopened. Submit either electronic or written
comments by October 25, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Submit electronic comments https://www.regulations.gov.
Submit written comments to the Division of Dockets Management (HFA-
305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061,
Rockville, MD 20852.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Blakeley Fitzpatrick, Center for Food
Safety and Applied Nutrition (HFS-830), 5100 Paint Branch Pkwy.,
College Park, MD 20740, 240-402-2176.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
In the Federal Register of December 8, 2010 (75 FR 76526), FDA
proposed to amend its regulations in Sec. 101.83 (21 CFR 101.83) on
plant sterol/stanol esters and risk of CHD (the phytosterols proposed
rule). Among other revisions, the Agency proposed to: (1) Adopt the
term ``phytosterols'' as inclusive of both plant sterols and stanols;
(2) permit claims on products with phytosterols, derived from either
vegetable oils or tall oils, containing at least 80 percent of beta-
sitosterol, campesterol, stigmasterol, sitostanol, and/or campestanol
(combined weight); (3) replace the analytical methods FDA uses to
determine the amount and nature of the substance with the Sorenson and
Sullivan method for evaluation of campesterol, stigmasterol, and beta-
sitosterol in those foods for which the method has been validated; (4)
revise the daily dietary intake of phytosterols necessary to justify
the CHD risk reduction claim (2 grams (g) per day) and the minimum
amount of phytosterols (non-esterified weight) required to be in a
serving of the food (0.5 g per reference amount customarily consumed
(RACC)); (5) for conventional food, limit the use of the claim to the
food uses of phytosterols that have been submitted to FDA in a
generally recognized as safe notification to which the Agency had no
further questions and where the conditions of use are consistent with
the eligibility requirements for the health claim; (6) remove the
requirement that the health claim include a recommendation that
phytosterols be consumed in two servings eaten at different times of
the day, but require that the substance be taken with meals or snacks;
(7) eliminate the enumeration of specific conventional foods eligible
to bear the claim; (8) allow for the use of the health claim on
phytosterol ester-containing dietary supplements (esterified with food-
grade fatty acids) but not on nonesterified phytosterol-containing
dietary supplements; (9) clarify that the limited exemption from the
total fat disqualifying level of more than 13 g total fat per 50 g of
food when the RACC is 30 g or less or 2 tablespoons or less applies to
vegetable oil spreads resembling margarine; (10) permit liquid
vegetable oils to be exempt from the total fat disqualifying level on a
per RACC, per labeled serving size, and per 50 g basis; and (11) permit
liquid vegetable oils to be exempt from the minimum nutrient
requirement and vegetable oil spreads resembling margarine to meet the
10 percent minimum nutrient requirement by the addition of Vitamin A
consistent with FDA's fortification policy.
Interested persons were originally given until February 22, 2011,
to comment on the proposed rule.
II. Request for Comments
After publication of the phytosterols proposed rule, the Agency
received two petitions for an administrative stay of action and two
letters requesting that FDA extend its enforcement discretion based on
FDA's February 14, 2003, letter of enforcement discretion to Cargill
Health and Food Technologies. Based on concerns that 75 days was not
enough time for industry to come into compliance with Sec. 101.83 or
to make the claim consistent with the proposed requirements in the
phytosterols proposed rule, the Agency issued, in the Federal Register
of February 18, 2011, an extension of its enforcement discretion based
on the February 14, 2003, letter (76 FR 9525).
On February 10, 2011, the Agency received a comment on the
phytosterols proposed rule by Venable LLP requesting an extension of
the comment period until April 23, 2011, because the period of time
allowed for comment did not provide enough time for them to collect,
assess, and comment on the relevant data regarding the cholesterol-
lowering efficacy of nonesterified phytosterols in dietary supplements.
FDA did not respond to Venable LLP's request within the comment period
and cannot extend a closed comment period. However, the Agency is
reopening the comment period for this rule in response to Venable LLP's
request. The Agency recognizes that additional time to review and
comment on the data related to the relationship between nonesterified
phytosterols and reduced risk of CHD would be helpful and consistent
with sound public policy, therefore FDA is reopening the comment period
for all interested persons on the phytosterols proposed rule to allow
for comments to be submitted to the docket.
Following receipt of comments on this document, FDA intends to
publish a final rule, which will amend Sec. 101.83. The reopening of
the comment period may result in the submission of additional
information that may cause the Agency to reconsider its proposed
amendments to the phytosterols and risk of coronary heart disease
health
[[Page 49708]]
claim. The Agency notes that a final rule may vary from the proposal.
To the extent that manufacturers have labeled their products consistent
with the proposed requirements, and the final requirements differ from
what the Agency proposed, manufacturers will be required to change
their labels to conform to the final rule.
III. How To Submit Comments
Interested persons may submit to the Division of Dockets Management
(see ADDRESSES) either electronic or written comments regarding this
document. It is only necessary to send one set of comments. It is no
longer necessary to send two copies of mailed comments. Identify
comments with the docket number found in brackets in the heading of
this document. Received comments may be seen in the Division of Dockets
Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
Dated: August 8, 2011.
Leslie Kux,
Acting Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2011-20406 Filed 8-10-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-P