Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding Companies, 49478-49479 [2011-20261]
Download as PDF
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
49478
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 154 / Wednesday, August 10, 2011 / Notices
I. Statutory and Regulatory Background
In 1989, Congress established RefCorp
as a vehicle to provide funding for the
Resolution Trust Corporation to finance
its efforts to resolve the savings and loan
crisis. 12 U.S.C. 1441b(a), (b). RefCorp
issued approximately $30 billion of
long-term bonds, the last of which will
mature in April 2030. The interest due
on the RefCorp bonds is paid from
several sources, including contributions
from the Banks.
As initially enacted, the law required
the Banks to contribute $300 million
annually toward the RefCorp interest
payments. Public Law 101–73, Title V,
§ 511(a), 103 Stat. 394, (August 9, 1989).
In 1999, Congress amended the law to
require each Bank to pay 20 percent of
its net earnings annually toward the
RefCorp interest payments. Public Law
106–102, Title VI, § 607(a), 113 Stat.
1455, (November 12, 1999), codified at
12 U.S.C. 1441b(f)(2)(C)(i). The Banks’
payment obligation was to continue
until the value of all payments made by
the Banks to RefCorp equaled the value
of a benchmark annuity of $300 million
per year that commenced on the date
that the RefCorp bonds had been issued
and ended on the last maturity date for
the RefCorp bonds, which is April 15,
2030.
The law further directed the Federal
Housing Finance Board (Finance Board)
to determine annually the extent to
which the value of the Banks’
contributions for that year exceeded or
fell short of the value of the benchmark
annuity. In determining those values,
the law required the Finance Board to
use present-value factors established in
consultation with the Secretary of the
Treasury and further required that the
Finance Board terminate the Banks’
payment obligation once the value of
their payments equaled the value of the
benchmark annuity. Regulations of the
Finance Board, which remain in effect,
address the manner in which the
calculations of the Banks’ RefCorp
obligation, including its termination, are
to be conducted. 12 CFR part 997. In
2008, Congress established FHFA,
which, among other things, succeeded
to all of the above responsibilities of the
Finance Board with respect to the
determinations that are to be made
regarding the RefCorp payments, and
was required to submit semiannual
reports to Congress that estimated the
projected date on which the Banks
would satisfy their obligation to
contribute to the RefCorp debt service
payments. Public Law 110–289, Title I,
§ 1101, Title II, §§ 1204, 1213, Title III,
§ 1312, 122 Stat. 2661, 2785–86, 2791,
2798 (July 30, 2008).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:48 Aug 09, 2011
Jkt 223001
II. Termination of Payment Obligation
FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION
The Banks make their RefCorp
contributions on a quarterly basis, and
FHFA determines how the value of
those payments compares to the value of
the benchmark annuity on a quarterly
basis as well. To the extent that any
quarterly RefCorp payments exceed $75
million (one quarter of the $300 million
benchmark annuity) FHFA applies the
excess portion to simulate the purchase
of zero-coupon Treasury bonds, which
‘‘defeases’’ the most-distant of the
Banks’ remaining RefCorp payments
and effectively shortens the duration of
their repayment obligation.
Since 1999, all but two of the Banks’
quarterly RefCorp contributions have
exceeded the $75 million benchmark,
which has caused the termination date
to move incrementally closer. In its
most recent report to Congress on the
RefCorp obligation, FHFA projected that
if the Banks’ quarterly earnings
subsequent to December 31, 2010, were
to equal their average quarterly income
over the preceding four quarters, then
their final RefCorp contribution would
be made with the payment due on July
15, 2011.1
After consulting with the Department
of the Treasury and conducting the
calculations in accordance with 12 CFR
Part 997, FHFA determined that the
remaining amount owed by the Banks
for the RefCorp debt service was
$75,148,203.13, which amount the
Banks paid on July 15, 2011.
Accordingly, the Director has
determined that the payment made on
July 15, 2011, caused the value of all
RefCorp payments made by the Banks to
that date to equal the value of the
benchmark annuity, which terminates
the obligation of the Banks to contribute
toward the debt service for the RefCorp
bonds.
Notice of Agreements Filed
Authority: 12 U.S.C. 1441b(f)(2)(C)(iii).
Dated: August 5th, 2011.
Edward J. DeMarco,
Acting Director, Federal Housing Finance
Agency.
The Commission hereby gives notice
of the filing of the following agreements
under the Shipping Act of 1984.
Interested parties may submit comments
on the agreements to the Secretary,
Federal Maritime Commission,
Washington, DC 20573, within ten days
of the date this notice appears in the
Federal Register. Copies of the
agreements are available through the
Commission’s Web site (https://
www.fmc.gov) or by contacting the
Office of Agreements at (202)- 523–5793
or tradeanalysis@fmc.gov.
Agreement No.: 011383–045.
Title: Venezuelan Discussion
Agreement.
¨
Parties: Hamburg-Sud; King Ocean
Service de Venezuela; Seaboard Marine
Ltd., and SeaFreight Line, Ltd.
Filing Party: Wayne R. Rohde, Esq.;
Cozen O’Conner; 1627 I Street, NW.,
Suite 1100; Washington, DC 20006–
4007.
Synopsis: The amendment would
replace King Ocean Service de
Venezuela with King Ocean Services
Limited, Inc. as a party to the
agreement.
Agreement No.: 201162–008.
Title: NYSA–ILA Assessment
Agreement.
Parties: International Longshoremen’s
Association and New York Shipping
Association.
Filing Parties: Donato Caruso, Esq.;
The Lambos Firm; 303 South Broadway,
Suite 410; Tarrytown, NY 10591 and
Andre Mazzola, Esq.; Marrinan &
Mazzola Mardon, P.C.; 26 Broadway,
17th Floor; New York, NY 10004.
Synopsis: The amendment reduces
the assessment rate on certain
containers in the Bermuda trade.
By Order of the Federal Maritime
Commission.
Dated: August 5, 2011.
Karen V. Gregory,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011–20329 Filed 8–9–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730–01–P
[FR Doc. 2011–20311 Filed 8–9–11; 8:45 am]
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
BILLING CODE 8070–01–P
1 See
Letters from Edward J. DeMarco, Acting
Director, to Senator Tim Johnson, Chairman, and
Senator Richard C. Shelby, Ranking Member, of the
Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs,
and to Representative Spencer Bachus, Chairman,
and Representative Barney Frank, Ranking Member,
of the Committee on Financial Services, all dated
February 4, 2011.
PO 00000
Frm 00048
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Formations of, Acquisitions by, and
Mergers of Bank Holding Companies
The companies listed in this notice
have applied to the Board for approval,
pursuant to the Bank Holding Company
Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 1841 et seq.)
(BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part
225), and all other applicable statutes
E:\FR\FM\10AUN1.SGM
10AUN1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 154 / Wednesday, August 10, 2011 / Notices
and regulations to become a bank
holding company and/or to acquire the
assets or the ownership of, control of, or
the power to vote shares of a bank or
bank holding company and all of the
banks and nonbanking companies
owned by the bank holding company,
including the companies listed below.
The applications listed below, as well
as other related filings required by the
Board, are available for immediate
inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank
indicated. The application also will be
available for inspection at the offices of
the Board of Governors. Interested
persons may express their views in
writing on the standards enumerated in
the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the
proposal also involves the acquisition of
a nonbanking company, the review also
includes whether the acquisition of the
nonbanking company complies with the
standards in section 4 of the BHC Act
(12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise
noted, nonbanking activities will be
conducted throughout the United States.
Unless otherwise noted, comments
regarding each of these applications
must be received at the Reserve Bank
indicated or the offices of the Board of
Governors not later than September 6,
2011.
A. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago
(Colette A. Fried, Assistant Vice
President) 230 South LaSalle Street,
Chicago, Illinois 60690–1414:
1. Wintrust Financial Corporation,
Lake Forest, Illinois; to merge with Elgin
State Bancorp, Inc., and thereby
indirectly acquire Elgin State Bank, both
in Elgin, Illinois.
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
System, August 5, 2011.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2011–20261 Filed 8–9–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210–01–P
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
Franchise Rule Information Collection
Activities; Proposed Collection;
Comment Request
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
AGENCY: Federal Trade Commission
(‘‘Commission’’ or ‘‘FTC’’).
ACTION: Notice.
SUMMARY: The information collection
requirements described below will be
submitted to the Office of Management
and Budget (‘‘OMB’’) for review, as
required by the Paperwork Reduction
Act (‘‘PRA’’). The FTC is seeking public
comments on its proposal to extend
through December 31, 2014, the current
PRA clearance for information
collection requirements contained in its
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:48 Aug 09, 2011
Jkt 223001
Trade Regulation Rule on Disclosure
Requirements and Prohibitions
Concerning Franchising (‘‘Franchise
Rule’’). That clearance expires on
December 31, 2011.
DATES: Comments must be submitted on
or before October 11, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Interested parties may file a
comment online or on paper, by
following the instructions in the
Request for Comment part of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
below. Write ‘‘Franchise Rule, PRA
Comment, FTC File No. P094400’’ on
your comment, and file your comment
online at https://
ftcpublic.commentworks.com/ftc/
franchiserulePRA by following the
instructions on the Web-based form. If
you prefer to file your comment on
paper, mail or deliver your comment to
the following address: Federal Trade
Commission, Office of the Secretary,
Room H–113 (Annex J), 600
Pennsylvania Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20580.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Requests for additional information or
copies of the proposed information
requirements for the Franchise Rule
should be addressed to Craig Tregillus,
Staff Attorney, Division of Marketing
Practices, Bureau of Consumer
Protection, Federal Trade Commission,
Room H–238, 600 Pennsylvania Ave.,
NW., Washington, DC 20580, (202) 326–
2970.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the
PRA, 44 U.S.C. 3501–3521, Federal
agencies must obtain approval from
OMB for each collection of information
they conduct or sponsor. ‘‘Collection of
information’’ means agency requests or
requirements that members of the public
submit reports, keep records, or provide
information to a third party. 44 U.S.C.
3502(3); 5 CFR 1320.3(c). As required by
section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the PRA, the
FTC is providing this opportunity for
public comment before requesting that
OMB extend the existing paperwork
clearance for the Franchise Rule, 16 CFR
part 436 (OMB Control Number 3084–
0107).
The FTC invites comments on: (1)
Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(2) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate
of the burden of the proposed collection
of information, including the validity of
the methodology and assumptions used;
(3) ways to enhance the quality, utility,
and clarity of the information to be
collected; and (4) ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
PO 00000
Frm 00049
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
49479
on those who are to respond, including
through the use of appropriate
automated, electronic, mechanical, or
other technological collection
techniques or other forms of information
technology, e.g., permitting electronic
submission of responses.
The Franchise Rule ensures that
consumers who are considering a
franchise investment have access to the
material information they need to make
an informed investment decision
provided in a format that facilitates
comparisons of different franchise
offerings. The Rule requires that
franchisors disclose this information to
consumers and maintain records to
facilitate enforcement of the Rule.
Amendments to the Rule promulgated
on March 30, 2007, which took effect
after a one-year phase-in on July 1,
2008, merged the Rule’s disclosure
requirements with the disclosure format
accepted by 15 states that have franchise
registration or disclosure laws.1 The
amended Rule has significantly
minimized any compliance burden
beyond what is already required by state
law.
The amended Rule requires
franchisors to furnish to prospective
purchasers with a Franchise Disclosure
Document (‘‘FDD’’) that provides
information relating to the franchisor,
its business, the nature of the proposed
franchise, and any representations by
the franchisor about financial
performance regarding actual or
potential sales, income, or profits made
to a prospective franchise purchaser.
The franchisor must preserve materially
different copies of its disclosures and
franchise agreements, as well as
information that forms a reasonable
basis for any financial performance
representation it elects to make. These
requirements are subject to the PRA,
and for which the Commission seeks to
extend existing clearance.
Estimated annual hours burden:
16,750 hours.
Based on a review of trade
publications and information from state
regulatory authorities, staff believes
that, on average, from year to year, there
are approximately 2,500 sellers of
franchises covered by the Rule, with
perhaps about 10% of that total
reflecting an equal amount of new and
departing business entrants.2
Commission staffs burden hour estimate
reflects the incremental tasks that the
Rule may impose beyond the
1 72
FR 15544 et seq.
number, which was also used in the 2008
clearance request, appears to be consistent with the
number of business format franchise offerings
registered in compliance with state franchise laws,
and listed in franchise directories.
2 This
E:\FR\FM\10AUN1.SGM
10AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 154 (Wednesday, August 10, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 49478-49479]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-20261]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding
Companies
The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C.
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part 225), and all other
applicable statutes
[[Page 49479]]
and regulations to become a bank holding company and/or to acquire the
assets or the ownership of, control of, or the power to vote shares of
a bank or bank holding company and all of the banks and nonbanking
companies owned by the bank holding company, including the companies
listed below.
The applications listed below, as well as other related filings
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The application also will be available
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards
in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted,
nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States.
Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the
offices of the Board of Governors not later than September 6, 2011.
A. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (Colette A. Fried, Assistant
Vice President) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690-1414:
1. Wintrust Financial Corporation, Lake Forest, Illinois; to merge
with Elgin State Bancorp, Inc., and thereby indirectly acquire Elgin
State Bank, both in Elgin, Illinois.
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, August 5,
2011.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2011-20261 Filed 8-9-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P