Airworthiness Directives; Honeywell International Inc. TPE331-10 and TPE331-11 Series Turboprop Engines, 48749-48751 [2011-20170]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 153 / Tuesday, August 9, 2011 / Proposed Rules
value of a panel) starting on October 12,
2011. Manufacturers shall use this
paragraph (c) for the purposes of
certifying compliance with the
applicable energy conservation
standards and for all representations of
energy efficiency/energy use starting on
January 1, 2015.
*
*
*
*
*
(5) * * * Testing must be performed
on a completed panel; foam may not be
used for the test sample.
*
*
*
*
*
International Inc., 111 S. 34th Street,
Phoenix, AZ 85034–2802; Web site:
https://portal.honeywell.com; or call
Honeywell toll free at (800) 601–3099
(U.S./Canada) or (602) 365–3099
(International Direct). You may review
copies of the referenced service
information at the FAA, Engine &
Propeller Directorate, 12 New England
Executive Park, Burlington, MA 01803.
For information on the availability of
this material at the FAA, call (781) 238–
7125.
[FR Doc. 2011–20114 Filed 8–8–11; 8:45 am]
Examining the AD Docket
BILLING CODE 6450–01–P
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the
Docket Management Facility between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD
docket contains this proposed AD, the
regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The
street address for the Docket Office
(phone: 800–647–5527) is in the
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be
available in the AD docket shortly after
receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Joseph Costa, Aerospace Engineer, Los
Angles Aircraft Certification Office,
FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate,
3960 Paramount Blvd., Lakewood, CA
90712–4137; phone: (562) 627–5246;
fax: (562) 627–5210; e-mail:
joseph.costa@faa.gov.
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2011–0789; Directorate
Identifier 2011–NE–04–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Honeywell
International Inc. TPE331–10 and
TPE331–11 Series Turboprop Engines
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
We propose to adopt a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This proposed
AD would require inspecting certain
serial number (S/N) first stage turbine
disks, part number (P/N) 3101520–1 and
P/N 3107079–1. This proposed AD was
prompted by a report of an uncontained
failure of a first stage turbine disk that
had a metallurgical defect. We are
proposing this AD to prevent
uncontained failure of the first stage
turbine disk and damage to the airplane.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by September 23,
2011.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by
any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail
address above between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
For service information identified in
this proposed AD, contact Honeywell
jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:11 Aug 08, 2011
Jkt 223001
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written
relevant data, views, or arguments about
this proposal. Send your comments to
an address listed under the ADDRESSES
section. Include ‘‘Docket No. FAA–
2011–0789; Directorate Identifier 2011–
NE–04–AD’’ at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite
comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy
aspects of this proposed AD. We will
consider all comments received by the
closing date and may amend this
proposed AD because of those
comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact we receive
about this proposed AD.
Discussion
In May 2008, we received a report of
an uncontained separation of a first
stage turbine disk, P/N 3107079–1. The
disk was installed in a TPE331–11U
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
48749
turboprop engine. That disk, which has
a 20,000-cycle life, failed after
accumulating 8,314 cycles-in-service.
The fracture revealed a large meltrelated oxide cluster inclusion in the
web area of the disk, which occurred
during the forging alloy melting process.
The disk was produced from Waspaloy
material, from Heat Lot 9–7121, which
was melted by Special Metals in 1980.
We have determined that approximately
360 turbine disks were produced from
the same heat lot as the failed forged
turbine disk and therefore may have
similar inclusions. This condition, if not
corrected, could result in uncontained
failure of the first stage turbine disks
made from these billets and damage to
the airplane.
Relevant Service Information
We reviewed Honeywell International
Inc. Alert Service Bulletin (ASB)
TPE331–72–A2156, dated December 2,
2008. The Honeywell ASB TPE331–72–
A2156, dated December 2, 2008,
provides S/Ns of the affected turbine
disks and describes procedures for
initial and repetitive fluorescent
penetrant inspection (FPI) and eddy
current inspection (ECI) of the first stage
turbine disk.
FAA’s Determination
We are proposing this AD because we
evaluated all the relevant information
and determined the unsafe condition
described previously is likely to exist or
develop in other products of the same
type design.
Proposed AD Requirements
This proposed AD would require:
• For turbine disks that have an S/N
listed in Table 1 of this proposed AD
with 4,100 or fewer cycles-since-new
(CSN) on the effective date of this
proposed AD, performing an initial FPI
and ECI within 4,500 CSN or at the next
access, whichever occurs first.
• For turbine disks that have an S/N
listed in Table 1 of this proposed AD
with more than 4,100 CSN on the
effective date of this proposed AD,
performing an initial FPI and ECI within
400 cycles-in-service after the effective
date of this proposed AD or at the next
access, whichever occurs first.
• Thereafter, for turbine disks that
have an S/N listed in Table 1 of this
proposed AD, perform a repetitive FPI
and ECI at each scheduled hot section
inspection, but not to exceed 3,600
hours-since-last inspection.
The proposed AD would require that
you do these actions using the service
information described previously.
E:\FR\FM\09AUP1.SGM
09AUP1
48750
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 153 / Tuesday, August 9, 2011 / Proposed Rules
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this proposed AD
would affect 90 engines installed on
airplanes of U.S. registry. We also
estimate that it would take about 20
work-hours per engine to perform the
proposed actions, and that the average
labor rate is $85 per work-hour.
Required parts would cost about
$19,000 per engine. We estimate that
one disk would fail the initial
inspection and that repetitive
inspections would be performed on 89
engines. We estimate that one engine
would fail the repetitive inspections and
that further repetitive inspections would
be performed on 88 engines. We
estimate that an additional one disk
would fail those repetitive inspections
before retirement. Based on these
figures, we estimate the total cost of the
proposed AD to U.S. operators to be
$511,155.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs, describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in Subtitle VII,
part A, subpart III, Section 44701:
‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD
would not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This
proposed AD would not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the national
Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify this proposed regulation:
(1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866,
(2) Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under
the DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26,
1979),
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:11 Aug 08, 2011
Jkt 223001
(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation
in Alaska, and
(4) Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part
39 as follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):
Honeywell International Inc. (Formerly
AlliedSignal Inc., Garrett Engine
Division; Garrett Turbine Engine
Company; and AiResearch
Manufacturing Company of Arizona):
Docket No. FAA–2011–0789; Directorate
Identifier 2011–NE–04–AD.
Comments Due Date
(a) We must receive comments by
September 23, 2011.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) Honeywell International Inc. TPE331–
10, –10AV, –10GP, –10GT, –10N, –10P, –10R,
–10T, –10U, –10UA, –10UF, –10UG,
–10UGR, –10UR, and TPE331–11U model
turboprop engines with a first stage turbine
disk, part number (P/N) 3101520–1 or
3107079–1, with a serial number (S/N) listed
in Table 2 of Honeywell International Inc.
Alert Service Bulletin (ASB) TPE331–72–
A2156, dated December 2, 2008, installed.
Unsafe Condition
(d) This AD was prompted by a report of
an uncontained failure of a first stage turbine
disk that had a metallurgical defect. We are
issuing this AD to prevent uncontained
failure of the first stage turbine disk and
damage to the airplane.
Compliance
(e) Comply with this AD within the
compliance times specified, unless already
done.
Initial Inspection
(f) For first stage turbine disks, P/N
3101520–1 or 3107079–1, that have an S/N
listed in Table 2 of Honeywell International
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Inc. ASB TPE331–72–A2156, dated
December 2, 2008, inspect the disks as
follows:
(1) For turbine disks with 4,100 or fewer
cycles-since-new (CSN) on the effective date
of this proposed AD, perform an initial
fluorescent penetrant inspection (FPI) by
using paragraph 3.B.(2) through 3.B.(5) of
Honeywell International Inc. ASB TPE331–
72–A2156, dated December 2, 2008, within
4,500 CSN or at the next access, whichever
occurs first.
(2) For turbine disks with more than 4,100
CSN on the effective date of this proposed
AD, perform an initial FPI by using
paragraph 3.B.(2) through 3.B.(5) of
Honeywell International Inc. ASB TPE331–
72–A2156, dated December 2, 2008, within
400 cycles-in-service (CIS) after the effective
date of this proposed AD or at the next
access, whichever occurs first.
(3) If the disk passes the FPI inspection,
perform a special eddy current inspection
(ECI) by using paragraph 3.B.(6) of
Honeywell International Inc. ASB TPE331–
72–A2156, dated December 2, 2008, before
returning the disk to service.
(g) If you find a crack in the disk, remove
the disk from service.
Repetitive Inspection
(h) Thereafter, for first stage turbine disks,
P/N 3101520–1 or 3107079–1, that have an
S/N listed in Table 2 of Honeywell
International Inc. ASB TPE331–72–A2156,
dated December 2, 2008, inspect the disks as
follows:
(1) Perform a repetitive inspection at each
scheduled hot section inspection, but not to
exceed 3,600 hours-since-last inspection. Use
paragraph 3.B.(2) through 3.B.(5) of
Honeywell International Inc. ASB TPE331–
72–A2156, dated December 2, 2008.
(2) If the disk passes the FPI inspection,
perform a special ECI by using paragraph
3.B.(6) of Honeywell International Inc. ASB
TPE331–72–A2156, dated December 2, 2008,
before returning the disk to service.
(i) If you find a crack in the disk, remove
the disk from service.
Definition
(j) For the purpose of this AD, ‘‘next access
to the first stage turbine disk’’ is defined as
the removal of the second stage turbine
nozzle from the turbine stator housing.
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(k) The Manager, Los Angles Aircraft
Certification Office, FAA, has the authority to
approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
Related Information
(l) For more information about this AD,
contact Joseph Costa, Aerospace Engineer,
Los Angeles Aircraft Certification Office,
FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 3960
Paramount Blvd., Lakewood, CA 90712–
4137; phone: (562) 627–5246; fax: (562) 627–
5210; e-mail: joseph.costa@faa.gov.
(m) For service information identified in
this AD, contact Honeywell International
Inc., 111 S. 34th Street, Phoenix, AZ 85034–
2802; Web site: https://portal.honeywell.com;
or call Honeywell toll free at (800) 601–3099
E:\FR\FM\09AUP1.SGM
09AUP1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 153 / Tuesday, August 9, 2011 / Proposed Rules
(U.S./Canada) or (602) 365–3099
(International Direct). You may review copies
of the referenced service information at the
FAA, Engine & Propeller Directorate, 12 New
England Executive Park, Burlington, MA
01803. For information on the availability of
this material at the FAA, call (781) 238–7125.
Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on
August 1, 2011.
Peter A. White,
Acting Manager, Engine & Propeller
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2011–20170 Filed 8–8–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
21 CFR Part 573
[Docket No. FDA–2011–F–0549]
Lanxess Corp.; Filing of Food Additive
Petition (Animal Use); Calcium
Formate
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice of petition.
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is announcing
that Lanxess Corp. has filed a petition
proposing that the food additive
regulations be amended to provide for
the safe use of calcium formate in
poultry and swine feed as a nutrient and
digestive aid.
DATES: Submit either electronic or
written comments on the petitioner’s
environmental assessment by September
8, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Submit electronic
comments to: https://
www.regulations.gov. Submit written
comments to the Division of Dockets
Management (HFA–305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm.
1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Isabel W. Pocurull, Center for Veterinary
Medicine, Food and Drug
Administration, 7519 Standish Pl.,
Rockville, MD 20855, 240–453–6853, email: isabel.pocurull@fda.hhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the
Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act
(section 409(b)(5) (21 U.S.C. 348(b)(5)),
notice is given that a food additive
petition (FAP 2261) has been filed by
Lanxess Corp. (Lanxess), 111 RIDC Park
West Dr., Pittsburgh, PA 15275–1112.
The petition proposes to amend the food
additive regulations in part 573 Food
Additives Permitted in Feed and
Drinking Water of Animals (21 CFR part
jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:11 Aug 08, 2011
Jkt 223001
573) to provide for the safe use of
calcium formate in poultry and swine
feed as a nutrient and digestive aid.
The potential environmental impact
of this action is being reviewed. To
encourage public participation
consistent with regulations issued under
the National Environmental Policy Act
(40 CFR 1501.4(b)), the Agency is
placing the environmental assessment
submitted with the petition that is the
subject of this notice on public display
at the Division of Dockets Management
(see DATES and ADDRESSES) for public
review and comment.
Interested persons may submit to the
Division of Dockets Management (see
ADDRESSES) either electronic or written
comments regarding this document. It is
only necessary to send one set of
comments. It is no longer necessary to
send two copies of mailed comments.
Identify comments with the docket
number found in brackets in the
heading of this document. Received
comments may be seen in the Division
of Dockets Management between 9 a.m.
and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
FDA will also place on public display
any amendments to, or comments on,
the petitioner’s environmental
assessment without further
announcement in the Federal Register.
If, based on its review, the Agency finds
that an environmental impact statement
is not required, and this petition results
in a regulation, the notice of availability
of the Agency’s finding of no significant
impact and the evidence supporting that
finding will be published with the
regulation in the Federal Register in
accordance with 21 CFR 25.51(b).
Dated: August 3, 2011.
Bernadette Dunham,
Director, Center for Veterinary Medicine.
[FR Doc. 2011–20126 Filed 8–8–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–P
48751
Captain of the Port Sector Lake
Michigan has determined that to better
protect such infrastructure, while also
mitigating burdens on waterway users,
it is necessary to amend these security
zones in our regulations. Specifically,
the Coast Guard proposes to reduce the
size of an existing security zone,
disestablish another security zone, and
create three new security zones.
DATES: Comments and related materials
must reach the Coast Guard on or before
September 8, 2011.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by Coast Guard docket
number USCG–2011–0489 to the Docket
Management Facility at the U.S.
Department of Transportation. To avoid
duplication, please use only one of the
following methods:
(1) Online: https://
www.regulations.gov.
(2) Mail: Docket Management Facility
(M–30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590–
0001.
(3) Hand delivery: Room W12–140 on
the Ground Floor of the West Building,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The telephone
number is 202–366–9329.
(4) Fax: 202–493–2251.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this proposed
rule, call MST1 Brenden Otjen Coast
Guard Marine Safety Unit, Willowbrook,
IL at (630) 986–2155. If you have
questions on viewing or submitting
material to the docket, call Renee V.
Wright, Program Manager, Docket
Operations, telephone 202–366–9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Public Participation and Request for
Comments
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG–2011–0489]
RIN 1625–AA87
Security Zones; Captain of the Port
Lake Michigan Zone
We encourage you to participate in
this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All
comments received will be posted,
without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov and will include
any personal information you have
provided. We have an agreement with
the Department of Transportation (DOT)
to use the Docket Management Facility.
Please see ‘‘Privacy Act’’ paragraph
below.
AGENCY:
Submitting Comments
Based on a review of safety
and security zones around critical
infrastructure in the Chicago area, the
If you submit a comment, please
include the docket number for this
rulemaking (USCG–2011–0489),
indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment
Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\09AUP1.SGM
09AUP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 153 (Tuesday, August 9, 2011)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 48749-48751]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-20170]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2011-0789; Directorate Identifier 2011-NE-04-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Honeywell International Inc. TPE331-10
and TPE331-11 Series Turboprop Engines
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This proposed AD would require inspecting
certain serial number (S/N) first stage turbine disks, part number (P/
N) 3101520-1 and P/N 3107079-1. This proposed AD was prompted by a
report of an uncontained failure of a first stage turbine disk that had
a metallurgical defect. We are proposing this AD to prevent uncontained
failure of the first stage turbine disk and damage to the airplane.
DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by September 23,
2011.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: 202-493-2251.
Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail address above between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in this proposed AD, contact
Honeywell International Inc., 111 S. 34th Street, Phoenix, AZ 85034-
2802; Web site: https://portal.honeywell.com; or call Honeywell toll
free at (800) 601-3099 (U.S./Canada) or (602) 365-3099 (International
Direct). You may review copies of the referenced service information at
the FAA, Engine & Propeller Directorate, 12 New England Executive Park,
Burlington, MA 01803. For information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call (781) 238-7125.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Management Facility
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street
address for the Docket Office (phone: 800-647-5527) is in the ADDRESSES
section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after
receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joseph Costa, Aerospace Engineer, Los
Angles Aircraft Certification Office, FAA, Transport Airplane
Directorate, 3960 Paramount Blvd., Lakewood, CA 90712-4137; phone:
(562) 627-5246; fax: (562) 627-5210; e-mail: joseph.costa@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposal. Send your comments to an address listed
under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2011-0789;
Directorate Identifier 2011-NE-04-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD because of those comments.
We will post all comments we receive, without change, to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.
Discussion
In May 2008, we received a report of an uncontained separation of a
first stage turbine disk, P/N 3107079-1. The disk was installed in a
TPE331-11U turboprop engine. That disk, which has a 20,000-cycle life,
failed after accumulating 8,314 cycles-in-service. The fracture
revealed a large melt-related oxide cluster inclusion in the web area
of the disk, which occurred during the forging alloy melting process.
The disk was produced from Waspaloy material, from Heat Lot 9-7121,
which was melted by Special Metals in 1980. We have determined that
approximately 360 turbine disks were produced from the same heat lot as
the failed forged turbine disk and therefore may have similar
inclusions. This condition, if not corrected, could result in
uncontained failure of the first stage turbine disks made from these
billets and damage to the airplane.
Relevant Service Information
We reviewed Honeywell International Inc. Alert Service Bulletin
(ASB) TPE331-72-A2156, dated December 2, 2008. The Honeywell ASB
TPE331-72-A2156, dated December 2, 2008, provides S/Ns of the affected
turbine disks and describes procedures for initial and repetitive
fluorescent penetrant inspection (FPI) and eddy current inspection
(ECI) of the first stage turbine disk.
FAA's Determination
We are proposing this AD because we evaluated all the relevant
information and determined the unsafe condition described previously is
likely to exist or develop in other products of the same type design.
Proposed AD Requirements
This proposed AD would require:
For turbine disks that have an S/N listed in Table 1 of
this proposed AD with 4,100 or fewer cycles-since-new (CSN) on the
effective date of this proposed AD, performing an initial FPI and ECI
within 4,500 CSN or at the next access, whichever occurs first.
For turbine disks that have an S/N listed in Table 1 of
this proposed AD with more than 4,100 CSN on the effective date of this
proposed AD, performing an initial FPI and ECI within 400 cycles-in-
service after the effective date of this proposed AD or at the next
access, whichever occurs first.
Thereafter, for turbine disks that have an S/N listed in
Table 1 of this proposed AD, perform a repetitive FPI and ECI at each
scheduled hot section inspection, but not to exceed 3,600 hours-since-
last inspection.
The proposed AD would require that you do these actions using the
service information described previously.
[[Page 48750]]
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this proposed AD would affect 90 engines installed
on airplanes of U.S. registry. We also estimate that it would take
about 20 work-hours per engine to perform the proposed actions, and
that the average labor rate is $85 per work-hour. Required parts would
cost about $19,000 per engine. We estimate that one disk would fail the
initial inspection and that repetitive inspections would be performed
on 89 engines. We estimate that one engine would fail the repetitive
inspections and that further repetitive inspections would be performed
on 88 engines. We estimate that an additional one disk would fail those
repetitive inspections before retirement. Based on these figures, we
estimate the total cost of the proposed AD to U.S. operators to be
$511,155.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, part A, subpart III, Section 44701: ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
(1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
(2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
(4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new
airworthiness directive (AD):
Honeywell International Inc. (Formerly AlliedSignal Inc., Garrett
Engine Division; Garrett Turbine Engine Company; and AiResearch
Manufacturing Company of Arizona): Docket No. FAA-2011-0789;
Directorate Identifier 2011-NE-04-AD.
Comments Due Date
(a) We must receive comments by September 23, 2011.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) Honeywell International Inc. TPE331-10, -10AV, -10GP, -10GT,
-10N, -10P, -10R, -10T, -10U, -10UA, -10UF, -10UG, -10UGR, -10UR,
and TPE331-11U model turboprop engines with a first stage turbine
disk, part number (P/N) 3101520-1 or 3107079-1, with a serial number
(S/N) listed in Table 2 of Honeywell International Inc. Alert
Service Bulletin (ASB) TPE331-72-A2156, dated December 2, 2008,
installed.
Unsafe Condition
(d) This AD was prompted by a report of an uncontained failure
of a first stage turbine disk that had a metallurgical defect. We
are issuing this AD to prevent uncontained failure of the first
stage turbine disk and damage to the airplane.
Compliance
(e) Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.
Initial Inspection
(f) For first stage turbine disks, P/N 3101520-1 or 3107079-1,
that have an S/N listed in Table 2 of Honeywell International Inc.
ASB TPE331-72-A2156, dated December 2, 2008, inspect the disks as
follows:
(1) For turbine disks with 4,100 or fewer cycles-since-new (CSN)
on the effective date of this proposed AD, perform an initial
fluorescent penetrant inspection (FPI) by using paragraph 3.B.(2)
through 3.B.(5) of Honeywell International Inc. ASB TPE331-72-A2156,
dated December 2, 2008, within 4,500 CSN or at the next access,
whichever occurs first.
(2) For turbine disks with more than 4,100 CSN on the effective
date of this proposed AD, perform an initial FPI by using paragraph
3.B.(2) through 3.B.(5) of Honeywell International Inc. ASB TPE331-
72-A2156, dated December 2, 2008, within 400 cycles-in-service (CIS)
after the effective date of this proposed AD or at the next access,
whichever occurs first.
(3) If the disk passes the FPI inspection, perform a special
eddy current inspection (ECI) by using paragraph 3.B.(6) of
Honeywell International Inc. ASB TPE331-72-A2156, dated December 2,
2008, before returning the disk to service.
(g) If you find a crack in the disk, remove the disk from
service.
Repetitive Inspection
(h) Thereafter, for first stage turbine disks, P/N 3101520-1 or
3107079-1, that have an S/N listed in Table 2 of Honeywell
International Inc. ASB TPE331-72-A2156, dated December 2, 2008,
inspect the disks as follows:
(1) Perform a repetitive inspection at each scheduled hot
section inspection, but not to exceed 3,600 hours-since-last
inspection. Use paragraph 3.B.(2) through 3.B.(5) of Honeywell
International Inc. ASB TPE331-72-A2156, dated December 2, 2008.
(2) If the disk passes the FPI inspection, perform a special ECI
by using paragraph 3.B.(6) of Honeywell International Inc. ASB
TPE331-72-A2156, dated December 2, 2008, before returning the disk
to service.
(i) If you find a crack in the disk, remove the disk from
service.
Definition
(j) For the purpose of this AD, ``next access to the first stage
turbine disk'' is defined as the removal of the second stage turbine
nozzle from the turbine stator housing.
Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(k) The Manager, Los Angles Aircraft Certification Office, FAA,
has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using
the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
Related Information
(l) For more information about this AD, contact Joseph Costa,
Aerospace Engineer, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification Office, FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 3960 Paramount Blvd., Lakewood, CA
90712-4137; phone: (562) 627-5246; fax: (562) 627-5210; e-mail:
joseph.costa@faa.gov.
(m) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Honeywell International Inc., 111 S. 34th Street, Phoenix, AZ 85034-
2802; Web site: https://portal.honeywell.com; or call Honeywell toll
free at (800) 601-3099
[[Page 48751]]
(U.S./Canada) or (602) 365-3099 (International Direct). You may
review copies of the referenced service information at the FAA,
Engine & Propeller Directorate, 12 New England Executive Park,
Burlington, MA 01803. For information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call (781) 238-7125.
Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on August 1, 2011.
Peter A. White,
Acting Manager, Engine & Propeller Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2011-20170 Filed 8-8-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P