North American Free-Trade Agreement, Article 1904; Binational Panel Reviews: Notice of Termination of Panel Review, 48145 [2011-20030]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 152 / Monday, August 8, 2011 / Notices
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
may also enter under the following tariff
numbers: 7225.11.00.00, 7225.19.00.00,
7225.30.30.50, 7225.30.70.00,
7225.40.70.00, 7225.99.00.90,
7226.11.10.00, 7226.11.90.30,
7226.11.90.60, 7226.19.10.00,
7226.19.90.00, 7226.91.50.00,
7226.91.70.00, 7226.91.80.00, and
7226.99.00.00. Subject merchandise
may also enter under 7210.70.30.00,
7210.90.90.00, 7211.14.00.30,
7212.40.10.00, 7212.40.50.00, and
7212.50.00.00. Although the HTSUS
subheadings are provided for
convenience and customs purposes, the
written description of the merchandise
subject to the order is dispositive.
Preliminary Rescission of Review
The Department has analyzed all of
the information on the record regarding
alleged U.S. entries of subject
merchandise during the POR by
Baosteel. As noted above, the
Department placed information on the
record from CBP that indicated that
subject merchandise produced by
Baosteel may have entered the United
States during the POR. Because the
information found in the CBP
documentation is proprietary, for
further discussion of this issue please
see the Memorandum to the File,
through Scot T. Fullerton, Program
Manager, from Steven Hampton,
International Trade Analyst, ‘‘Certain
Hot-Rolled Carbon Steel Flat Products
from the People’s Republic of China:
Analysis of CBP Entry Documentation,’’
(‘‘Analysis of CBP Entry
Documentation’’) dated concurrently
with this notice. Based on its analysis of
the record information, the Department
preliminarily finds that the merchandise
from the entry documentation is not
subject to the scope of the antidumping
duty order on hot-rolled carbon steel flat
products from the PRC.4
Because there is no information on
the record which indicates that Baosteel
made sales, shipments, or entries to the
United States of subject merchandise
during the POR, and because Baosteel is
the only company subject to this
administrative review, in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3) and
consistent with our practice, we are
preliminarily rescinding this review of
the antidumping duty order on hotrolled from the PRC for the period of
November 1, 2009, through October 31,
2010.5 If the Department adopts these
preliminary results for its final results,
the cash deposit rate for Baosteel will
4 See
Analysis of CBP Entry Documentation.
5 See Final Rescission of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review: Certain Hot-Rolled Carbon
Steel Flat Products from the People’s Republic of
China, 72 FR 41710 (July 31, 2007).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:57 Aug 05, 2011
Jkt 223001
continue to be the rate established in the
most recently completed segment of this
proceeding. If the Department continues
to find for its final results that the
merchandise is not subject to the scope
of the antidumping duty order on
certain hot-rolled carbon steel flat
products from the PRC, we will refer
this matter to CBP to determine the
appropriate Customs classification for
the merchandise in question.
Comments
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
North American Free-Trade
Agreement, Article 1904; Binational
Panel Reviews: Notice of Termination
of Panel Review
NAFTA Secretariat, United
States Section, International Trade
Administration, Department of
Commerce.
AGENCY:
Notice of Termination of Panel
Review of the Final Results of the first
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on Citric Acid
and Certain Citrate Salts from Canada,
Secretariat File No. USA–CDA–2011–
1904–03.
ACTION:
Interested parties may submit
comments for consideration in the
Department’s final results not later than
30 days after publication of this notice.
See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(ii). Responses to
those comments may be submitted not
later than five days following
submission of the comments. See 19
CFR 351.309(d). All written comments
must be submitted in accordance with
19 CFR 351.303, and must be served on
interested parties on the Department’s
service list in accordance with 19 CFR
351.303(f)(3). Interested parties may also
request a hearing within 30 days of
publication of this notice. See 19 CFR
351.310. The Department will issue the
final results of this administrative
review, which will include the results of
its analysis of issues raised in any such
comments, within 120 days of
publication of the preliminary results,
and will publish these results in the
Federal Register.
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as a preliminary
reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR
351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of
antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during this
review period. Failure to comply with
this requirement could result in the
Secretary’s presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties
occurred and the subsequent assessment
of double antidumping duties.
This notice is published in
accordance with sections 751 and
777(i)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended, and 19 CFR 351.213(d)(4).
Dated: July 29, 2011.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. 2011–20076 Filed 8–5–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
PO 00000
48145
Pursuant to the negotiated
settlement between the United States
and Canadian industries, the panel
review of the above-noted case is
terminated as of August 2, 2011. No
panel has been appointed to review this
panel.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Ellen Bohon, United States Secretary,
NAFTA Secretariat, Suite 2061, 14th
and Constitution Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20230, (202) 482–5438.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Chapter
19 of the North American Free-Trade
Agreement (‘‘Agreement’’) established a
mechanism to replace domestic judicial
review of final determinations in
antidumping and countervailing duty
cases involving imports from a NAFTA
country with review by independent
binational panels. When a Request for
Panel Review is filed, a panel is
established to act in place of national
courts to review expeditiously the final
determination to determine whether it
conforms to the antidumping or
countervailing duty law of the country
that made the determination.
Under Article 1904 of the Agreement,
which came into force on January 1,
1994, the Government of the United
States, the Government of Canada, and
the Government of Mexico established
Rules of Procedure for Article 1904
Binational Panel Reviews (‘‘Rules’’).
These Rules were published in the
Federal Register on February 23, 1994
(59 FR 8686). The panel review in this
matter was requested Pursuant to these
Rules and terminated in accordance
with the settlement agreement.
SUMMARY:
Dated: August 3, 2011
Ellen Bohon,
United States Secretary, NAFTA Secretariat.
[FR Doc. 2011–20030 Filed 8–5–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–GT–P
Frm 00029
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 9990
E:\FR\FM\08AUN1.SGM
08AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 152 (Monday, August 8, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 48145]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-20030]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
North American Free-Trade Agreement, Article 1904; Binational
Panel Reviews: Notice of Termination of Panel Review
AGENCY: NAFTA Secretariat, United States Section, International Trade
Administration, Department of Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of Termination of Panel Review of the Final Results of
the first administrative review of the antidumping duty order on Citric
Acid and Certain Citrate Salts from Canada, Secretariat File No. USA-
CDA-2011-1904-03.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Pursuant to the negotiated settlement between the United
States and Canadian industries, the panel review of the above-noted
case is terminated as of August 2, 2011. No panel has been appointed to
review this panel.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ellen Bohon, United States Secretary,
NAFTA Secretariat, Suite 2061, 14th and Constitution Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20230, (202) 482-5438.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Chapter 19 of the North American Free-Trade
Agreement (``Agreement'') established a mechanism to replace domestic
judicial review of final determinations in antidumping and
countervailing duty cases involving imports from a NAFTA country with
review by independent binational panels. When a Request for Panel
Review is filed, a panel is established to act in place of national
courts to review expeditiously the final determination to determine
whether it conforms to the antidumping or countervailing duty law of
the country that made the determination.
Under Article 1904 of the Agreement, which came into force on
January 1, 1994, the Government of the United States, the Government of
Canada, and the Government of Mexico established Rules of Procedure for
Article 1904 Binational Panel Reviews (``Rules''). These Rules were
published in the Federal Register on February 23, 1994 (59 FR 8686).
The panel review in this matter was requested Pursuant to these Rules
and terminated in accordance with the settlement agreement.
Dated: August 3, 2011
Ellen Bohon,
United States Secretary, NAFTA Secretariat.
[FR Doc. 2011-20030 Filed 8-5-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-GT-P