Retrospective Regulatory Review Under E.O. 13563, 47527-47529 [2011-19947]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 151 / Friday, August 5, 2011 / Proposed Rules
erowe on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
Service Bulletin 737–53A1166, dated June
30, 1994; Boeing Service Bulletin 737–
53A1166, Revision 1, dated May 25, 1995; or
Part 6 of the Accomplishment Instructions of
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737–53A1166,
Revision 2, dated May 25, 2006; constitutes
terminating action for the inspections
required by this AD.
(1) Installation of the preventative
modification.
(2) Replacement of the cracked chord and
installation of the preventative modification.
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(s)(1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft
Certification Office (ACO), FAA, has the
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if
requested using the procedures found in 14
CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19,
send your request to your principal inspector
or local Flight Standards District Office, as
appropriate. If sending information directly
to the manager of the ACO, send it to the
attention of the person identified in the
Related Information section of this AD.
Information may be e-mailed to: 9-ANMSeattle-ACO-AMOC-Requests@faa.gov.
(2) Before using any approved AMOC,
notify your appropriate principal inspector,
or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/
certificate holding district office.
(3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable
level of safety may be used for any repair
required by this AD if it is approved by the
Boeing Commercial Airplanes Organization
Designation Authorization (ODA) that has
been authorized by the Manager, Seattle ACO
to make those findings. For a repair method
to be approved, the repair must meet the
certification basis of the airplane, and the
approval must specifically refer to this AD.
(4) AMOCs approved for AD 95–12–17 are
approved as AMOCs for the corresponding
provisions of this AD.
(5) For airplanes identified in tables 2, 3,
and 5 of paragraph 1.E., ‘‘Compliance’’ of
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737–53A1166,
Revision 2, dated May 25, 2006: The
Manager, Seattle ACO, approves the
inspection methods, thresholds, and
repetitive intervals therein as an AMOC for
the inspections of Structurally Significant
Items (SSIs) F–29A and F–29B required by
paragraphs (g) and (h) of AD 2008–08–23,
Amendment 39–15477 (Boeing 737–100/200/
200C Supplemental Structural Inspection
Document (SSID) D6–37089, Revision E,
dated May 1, 2007), and paragraphs (g) and
(h) of AD 2008–09–13, Amendment 39–
15494 (Boeing 737–400/500/600 SSID D6–
82669, dated May 1, 2007). This approval
applies only to SSIs F–29A and F–29B of the
applicable SSID and only for the portions of
the BS 727 outer chord that have been
inspected or that have been repaired or
modified in accordance with Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin 737–53A1166, Revision 2,
dated May 25, 2006. All provisions of ADs
2008–08–23 and 2008–09–13 that are not
specifically referenced in this paragraph
remain fully applicable and must be done. If
operators request this AMOC, they must
revise their FAA-approved maintenance or
inspection program to incorporate the
alternative inspections in this paragraph.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:53 Aug 04, 2011
Jkt 223001
Related Information
(t) For more information about this AD,
contact Alan Pohl, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe Branch, ANM–120S, FAA, Seattle
ACO, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington 98057–3356; phone: (425) 917–
6450; fax: (425) 917–6590; e-mail:
alan.pohl@faa.gov.
(u) For service information identified in
this AD, contact Boeing Commercial
Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services
Management, P.O. Box 3707, MC 2H–65,
Seattle, Washington 98124–2207; telephone
206–544–5000, extension 1; fax 206–766–
5680; e-mail me.boecom@boeing.com;
Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You
may review copies of the referenced service
information at the FAA, Transport Airplane
Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA, call
425–227–1221.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on July 26,
2011.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2011–19904 Filed 8–4–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Bureau of Industry and Security
15 CFR Chapter VII
[Docket No. 110711380–1379–01]
RIN 0694–XA37
Retrospective Regulatory Review
Under E.O. 13563
Bureau of Industry and
Security, Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of inquiry.
AGENCY:
The Bureau of Industry and
Security (BIS), Department of
Commerce, is currently engaged in the
Export Control Reform Initiative, which
will fundamentally reform the U.S.
export control system. Retrospective
review of the regulations administered
by BIS is an essential aspect of the
Export Control Reform Initiative. In
addition to this effort, and pursuant to
President Obama’s direction in
Executive Order 13563, BIS is
conducting a retrospective review of
portions of the Export Administration
Regulations, Chemical Weapons
Convention Regulations, Additional
Protocol Regulations, and National
Defense Industrial Base Regulations to
determine how they might be clarified
or streamlined to be more effective or
less burdensome. Through this notice of
inquiry, BIS seeks public comments on
how it should undertake its
retrospective review of regulations.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
47527
Comments must be received by
BIS no later than February 1, 2012.
ADDRESSES: Comments may be
submitted to the Federal rulemaking
portal (https://www.regulations.gov). The
regulations.gov ID for this notice of
inquiry is: BIS–2011–0027. In order to
maximize the open exchange of ideas,
BIS strongly encourages comment
submission through regulations.gov.
However, comments may also be
submitted via e-mail to
publiccommments@bis.doc.gov or on
paper to Regulatory Policy Division,
Bureau of Industry and Security, Room
2099B, U.S. Department of Commerce,
Washington, DC 20230. Please refer to
RIN 0694–XA37 in all comments and in
the subject line of e-mail comments. All
comments (including any personally
identifying information) will be made
available for public inspection and
copying.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Hillary Hess, Director, Regulatory Policy
Division, Office of Exporter Services,
Bureau of Industry and Security at 202–
482–2440 or rpd2@bis.doc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
DATES:
Executive Order 13563
On January 18, 2011, President Barack
Obama issued Executive Order 13563,
affirming general principles of
regulation and directing government
agencies to improve regulation and
regulatory review. Among other things,
the President stressed the need for the
regulatory system to allow for public
participation and an open exchange of
ideas, as well as promote predictability
and reduce uncertainty. The President
also emphasized that regulations must
be accessible, consistent, written in
plain language, and easy to understand.
As part of its ongoing effort to ensure
that its regulations are clear, effective,
and up-to-date, BIS is issuing this notice
of inquiry soliciting public comments
on its existing and proposed rules, with
the exception of those rules related to
the Export Control Reform Initiative, as
described below. BIS requests that
comments on rules related to export
control reform be submitted in response
to those specific rules and notices rather
than to this broader notice of inquiry,
which pertains to other aspects of the
Export Administration Regulations and
to the Chemical Weapons Convention
Regulations, the Additional Protocol
Regulations, and National Security
Industrial Base Regulations.
The Export Control Reform Initiative
In August 2009, the President directed
a broad-based interagency review of the
U.S. export control system with the goal
E:\FR\FM\05AUP1.SGM
05AUP1
erowe on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
47528
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 151 / Friday, August 5, 2011 / Proposed Rules
of strengthening national security and
the competitiveness of key U.S.
manufacturing and technology sectors
by focusing on current threats and
adapting to the changing economic and
technological landscape. The review
determined that the current export
control system is overly complicated,
contains too many redundancies, and,
in trying to protect too much,
diminishes our ability to focus our
efforts on the most critical national
security priorities. As a result, the
Administration began the Export
Control Reform Initiative, which will
fundamentally reform the U.S. export
control system. The Export Control
Reform Initiative is designed to enhance
U.S. national security and strengthen
the United States’ ability to counter
threats such as the proliferation of
weapons of mass destruction. The
Administration determined that
fundamental reform is needed in each of
the export control system’s four
component areas: transformation to a
single control list, a single licensing
agency, a single information technology
system, and a single primary
enforcement coordination agency. The
Administration is implementing the
reform in three phases. The first two
phases involve short- and medium-term
adjustments to the current export
control system, with a focus on
establishing harmonized control lists
and processes among the Departments
of Commerce, State, and the Treasury, to
the extent practicable, in order to build
toward the third phase of the single
control list, licensing agency,
information technology system, and
enforcement coordination agency.
Under this approach, new criteria for
determining what items need to be
controlled and a common set of policies
for determining when an export license
is required will be implemented. The
control list criteria will be based on
transparent rules, which will reduce the
uncertainty faced by our allies, U.S.
industry, and its foreign partners, and
will allow the government to erect
higher walls around the most sensitive
items in order to enhance national
security.
On December 9, 2010, BIS issued a
proposed rule (75 FR 76653) describing
the proposed new License Exception
Strategic Trade Authorization (STA)
that will be an initial step in the Export
Control Reform Initiative. License
Exception STA will authorize, with
conditions, the export, reexport and
transfer (in-country) of specified items
to destinations that pose relatively low
risk of unauthorized uses. To safeguard
against reexports to destinations that are
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:53 Aug 04, 2011
Jkt 223001
not authorized under License Exception
STA, it will impose notification and
consignee statement requirements on
these transactions. Also on December 9,
BIS issued an Advance Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking (75 FR 76664)
soliciting public comments on how the
descriptions of items on the Commerce
Control List (CCL) could be clarified and
made more ‘‘positive’’ in the sense of
using objective parameters rather than
subjective criteria to determine the
items’ classifications, which in turn
determine license requirements. This
notice also sought public comments on
‘‘tiering’’ items in a manner consistent
with the control criteria the
Administration has developed as part of
the reform effort: The degree to which
an item provides the United States with
a critical, substantial, or significant
military or intelligence advantage; and
the availability of that item outside
certain groups of countries. The
Department of State’s Directorate of
Defense Trade Controls published
requests for comment on revisions to the
U.S. Munitions List on December 10,
2010 (75 FR 76930).
BIS received numerous comments on
the proposed License Exception STA
and the CCL notice, most of them
detailed, thoughtful, and technically
expert. BIS issued the final rule
implementing License Exception STA
on June 16, 2011 (76FR 35276) having
benefited significantly from such public
participation, and anticipates that the
continuing effort to coordinate,
simplify, and harmonize export controls
across agencies will be similarly
informed by public response to the
notice.
A core proposal intended to bring
about the initiative’s national security
objectives is to transfer jurisdiction over
less significant defense articles,
principally generic parts and
components, that are controlled by the
regulations administered by the State
Department to the export control
regulations administered by the
Commerce Department, which are more
capable of having controls tailored to
the significance of the item and the
degree of risk associated with its export
to different groups of countries. This
plan will advance the national security
objectives of export control reform by
allowing for greater interoperability
with our NATO partners and other close
allies and also will strengthen the
industrial base by removing incentives
for foreign companies to design out or
avoid US-origin content. This plan will
also significantly reduce the licensing
and other collateral burdens on
exporters and the government while at
the same time harmonizing the system
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
to allow for the eventual creation of a
single list of controlled items
administered by a single licensing
agency. (See ‘‘Proposed Revisions to the
Export Administration Regulations
(EAR): Control of Items the President
Determines No Longer Warrant Control
Under the United States Munitions List
(USML),’’ published on July 15, 2011
(76 FR 41958).)
In the coming months, the agencies
involved in the Export Control Reform
Initiative will continue the regulatory
modifications necessary to harmonize
export control lists and definitions,
which will involve issuing a number of
proposals. This effort will draw heavily
on the resources of those agencies, but
it will require the efforts of members of
the public as well, who take time from
their normal duties to review proposals
and submit comments.
Export Administration Regulations
The Export Control Reform Initiative
is BIS’s top priority, and as noted above,
BIS requests that submission of reformrelated comments be directed toward
each specific proposal as it is published
rather than as part of a general response
to this notice of inquiry. Many key
aspects of the EAR—which items are
subject to the EAR and when they
require licenses to which destination—
will be addressed substantively by the
Export Control Reform Initiative. In this
notice of inquiry, BIS seeks comments
on aspects of the EAR that are not
immediately affected by the reform
initiative and that could be clarified or
streamlined to be more effective or less
burdensome.
Controls imposed by the EAR protect
the national security and advance the
foreign policy interests of the United
States, creating a necessary licensing
burden. This necessary licensing burden
entails an equally necessary compliance
burden. BIS seeks comments identifying
any unnecessary compliance burden
caused by rules that are unduly
complex, outmoded, inconsistent, or
overlapping, and comments identifying
ways to make any aspect of the EAR
more effectively protect the national
security or advance the foreign policy
interests of the United States.
Chemical Weapons Convention
Regulations
The Chemical Weapons Convention
Regulations (15 CFR parts 710 through
729) (CWCR) implement certain
obligations of the United States under
the Convention on the Prohibition of the
Development, Production, Stockpiling
and Use of Chemical Weapons and on
Their Destruction, known as the CWC or
Convention.
E:\FR\FM\05AUP1.SGM
05AUP1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 151 / Friday, August 5, 2011 / Proposed Rules
Additional Protocol Regulations
The Additional Protocol Regulations
(15 CFR parts 781 through 786) (APR)
implement certain obligations of the
United States under the Protocol
Additional to the Agreement Between
the United States of America and the
International Atomic Energy Agency
Concerning the Application of
Safeguards in the United States of
America, known as the Additional
Protocol. These obligations relate to
nuclear fuel cycle-related activities.
National Security Industrial Base
Regulations
The National Security Industrial Base
Regulations (15 CFR 700 through 705)
include the Defense Priorities and
Allocations System, Reporting of Offsets
Agreements in Sales of Weapon Systems
or Defense-Related Items to Foreign
Countries or Foreign Firms, and Effect
of Imported Articles on the National
Security. Because the rules regarding
reporting of offsets agreements were
recently revised (74 FR 68136), BIS is
not soliciting comments on 15 CFR part
701 with this notice of inquiry. BIS also
published a proposed rule regarding the
Defense Priorities and Allocations
System Regulations (75 FR 32122) and
has yet to publish a final rule. BIS is not
soliciting comments on 15 CFR part 700
with this notice of inquiry.
Public Comments
erowe on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
With respect to improving existing
rules or eliminating outmoded ones, BIS
would like to receive comments that are
as specific and well-supported as
possible. Helpful comments will
include a description of a problem or
concern, available data on cost or
economic impact, and a proposed
solution. BIS also welcomes comments
on rules the public considers effective
or well designed. BIS is also interested
in information on foreign countries’
implementation of export controls. In
the interest of fostering open exchange,
BIS encourages those interested in
submitting comments to peruse those
already posted on regulations.gov.
Dated: August 1, 2011.
Kevin J. Wolf,
Assistant Secretary for Export
Administration.
COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING
COMMISSION
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
17 CFR Parts 1, 23, and 39
Coast Guard
RIN 3038–AD51
33 CFR Part 167
Customer Clearing Documentation and
Timing of Acceptance for Clearing;
Correction
Commodity Futures Trading
Commission.
AGENCY:
Notice of proposed rulemaking;
Correction.
ACTION:
This document corrects
incorrect text published in the Federal
Register of August 1, 2011, regarding
Customer Clearing Documentation and
Timing of Acceptance for Clearing.
SUMMARY:
John
C. Lawton, Deputy Director and Chief
Counsel, 202–418–5480,
jlawton@cftc.gov, or Christopher A.
Hower, Attorney-Advisor, 202–418–
6703, chower@cftc.gov, Division of
Clearing and Intermediary Oversight,
Commodity Futures Trading
Commission, Three Lafayette Centre,
1155 21st Street, NW., Washington, DC
20581.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
In FR Doc.
2011–19365 appearing on page 45737 in
the Federal Register issue of Monday,
August 1, 2011, the following
corrections are made:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
§ 1.72
[Corrected]
On page 45737, in the left column, in
§ 1.72(e), the text ‘‘Prevents compliance
with the time frames set forth in
§ 1.73(a)(9)(ii), § 23.609(a)(9)(ii),’’ is
corrected to read, ‘‘Prevents compliance
with the time frames set forth in
§ 1.74(b), § 23.610(b),’’.
§ 23.608
[Corrected]
On page 45737, in the middle column,
in § 23.608(e), the text ‘‘Prevents
compliance with the time frames set
forth in § 1.73(a)(9)(ii),
§ 23.609(a)(9)(ii),’’ is corrected to read,
‘‘Prevents compliance with the time
frames set forth in § 1.74(b),
§ 23.610(b),’’.
[FR Doc. 2011–19947 Filed 8–4–11; 8:45 am]
Dated: August 1, 2011.
David A. Stawick,
Secretary of the Commission.
BILLING CODE 3510–33–P
[FR Doc. 2011–19874 Filed 8–4–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:53 Aug 04, 2011
Jkt 223001
47529
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
[Docket No. USCG–2005–21650]
Port Access Route Study: In the
Waters of Montauk Channel and Block
Island Sound
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of availability of
Preliminary Study Recommendations
with request for comments.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard announces
the availability of Preliminary Study
Recommendations of a Port Access
Route Study evaluating the continued
applicability of and the need for
modifications to the current vessel
routing measures in the Waters of
Montauk Channel and Block Island
Sound. The goals of the study are to
help reduce the risk of marine casualties
and increase vessel traffic management
efficiency in the study area. Preliminary
recommendations indicate that marine
transportation safety would be
enhanced through modifications to the
existing vessel routing systems. The
Coast Guard solicits comments on the
preliminary recommendations
presented in this document so we can
complete our Port Access Route Study.
DATES: Comments and related material
must either be submitted to our online
docket via https://www.regulations.gov
on or before October 4, 2011 or reach
the Docket management facility by that
date.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by docket number USCG–
2005–21650 using any one of the
following methods:
(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov.
(2) Fax: 202–493–2251.
(3) Mail: Docket Management Facility
(M–30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590–
0001.
(4) Hand delivery: Same as mail
address above, between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays. The telephone number
is 202–366–9329.
To avoid duplication, please use only
one of these four methods. See the
‘‘Public Participation and Request for
Comments’’ portion of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
below for instructions on submitting
comments.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\05AUP1.SGM
05AUP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 151 (Friday, August 5, 2011)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 47527-47529]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-19947]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Bureau of Industry and Security
15 CFR Chapter VII
[Docket No. 110711380-1379-01]
RIN 0694-XA37
Retrospective Regulatory Review Under E.O. 13563
AGENCY: Bureau of Industry and Security, Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of inquiry.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS), Department of
Commerce, is currently engaged in the Export Control Reform Initiative,
which will fundamentally reform the U.S. export control system.
Retrospective review of the regulations administered by BIS is an
essential aspect of the Export Control Reform Initiative. In addition
to this effort, and pursuant to President Obama's direction in
Executive Order 13563, BIS is conducting a retrospective review of
portions of the Export Administration Regulations, Chemical Weapons
Convention Regulations, Additional Protocol Regulations, and National
Defense Industrial Base Regulations to determine how they might be
clarified or streamlined to be more effective or less burdensome.
Through this notice of inquiry, BIS seeks public comments on how it
should undertake its retrospective review of regulations.
DATES: Comments must be received by BIS no later than February 1, 2012.
ADDRESSES: Comments may be submitted to the Federal rulemaking portal
(https://www.regulations.gov). The regulations.gov ID for this notice of
inquiry is: BIS-2011-0027. In order to maximize the open exchange of
ideas, BIS strongly encourages comment submission through
regulations.gov. However, comments may also be submitted via e-mail to
publiccommments@bis.doc.gov or on paper to Regulatory Policy Division,
Bureau of Industry and Security, Room 2099B, U.S. Department of
Commerce, Washington, DC 20230. Please refer to RIN 0694-XA37 in all
comments and in the subject line of e-mail comments. All comments
(including any personally identifying information) will be made
available for public inspection and copying.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Hillary Hess, Director, Regulatory
Policy Division, Office of Exporter Services, Bureau of Industry and
Security at 202-482-2440 or rpd2@bis.doc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Executive Order 13563
On January 18, 2011, President Barack Obama issued Executive Order
13563, affirming general principles of regulation and directing
government agencies to improve regulation and regulatory review. Among
other things, the President stressed the need for the regulatory system
to allow for public participation and an open exchange of ideas, as
well as promote predictability and reduce uncertainty. The President
also emphasized that regulations must be accessible, consistent,
written in plain language, and easy to understand. As part of its
ongoing effort to ensure that its regulations are clear, effective, and
up-to-date, BIS is issuing this notice of inquiry soliciting public
comments on its existing and proposed rules, with the exception of
those rules related to the Export Control Reform Initiative, as
described below. BIS requests that comments on rules related to export
control reform be submitted in response to those specific rules and
notices rather than to this broader notice of inquiry, which pertains
to other aspects of the Export Administration Regulations and to the
Chemical Weapons Convention Regulations, the Additional Protocol
Regulations, and National Security Industrial Base Regulations.
The Export Control Reform Initiative
In August 2009, the President directed a broad-based interagency
review of the U.S. export control system with the goal
[[Page 47528]]
of strengthening national security and the competitiveness of key U.S.
manufacturing and technology sectors by focusing on current threats and
adapting to the changing economic and technological landscape. The
review determined that the current export control system is overly
complicated, contains too many redundancies, and, in trying to protect
too much, diminishes our ability to focus our efforts on the most
critical national security priorities. As a result, the Administration
began the Export Control Reform Initiative, which will fundamentally
reform the U.S. export control system. The Export Control Reform
Initiative is designed to enhance U.S. national security and strengthen
the United States' ability to counter threats such as the proliferation
of weapons of mass destruction. The Administration determined that
fundamental reform is needed in each of the export control system's
four component areas: transformation to a single control list, a single
licensing agency, a single information technology system, and a single
primary enforcement coordination agency. The Administration is
implementing the reform in three phases. The first two phases involve
short- and medium-term adjustments to the current export control
system, with a focus on establishing harmonized control lists and
processes among the Departments of Commerce, State, and the Treasury,
to the extent practicable, in order to build toward the third phase of
the single control list, licensing agency, information technology
system, and enforcement coordination agency. Under this approach, new
criteria for determining what items need to be controlled and a common
set of policies for determining when an export license is required will
be implemented. The control list criteria will be based on transparent
rules, which will reduce the uncertainty faced by our allies, U.S.
industry, and its foreign partners, and will allow the government to
erect higher walls around the most sensitive items in order to enhance
national security.
On December 9, 2010, BIS issued a proposed rule (75 FR 76653)
describing the proposed new License Exception Strategic Trade
Authorization (STA) that will be an initial step in the Export Control
Reform Initiative. License Exception STA will authorize, with
conditions, the export, reexport and transfer (in-country) of specified
items to destinations that pose relatively low risk of unauthorized
uses. To safeguard against reexports to destinations that are not
authorized under License Exception STA, it will impose notification and
consignee statement requirements on these transactions. Also on
December 9, BIS issued an Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (75 FR
76664) soliciting public comments on how the descriptions of items on
the Commerce Control List (CCL) could be clarified and made more
``positive'' in the sense of using objective parameters rather than
subjective criteria to determine the items' classifications, which in
turn determine license requirements. This notice also sought public
comments on ``tiering'' items in a manner consistent with the control
criteria the Administration has developed as part of the reform effort:
The degree to which an item provides the United States with a critical,
substantial, or significant military or intelligence advantage; and the
availability of that item outside certain groups of countries. The
Department of State's Directorate of Defense Trade Controls published
requests for comment on revisions to the U.S. Munitions List on
December 10, 2010 (75 FR 76930).
BIS received numerous comments on the proposed License Exception
STA and the CCL notice, most of them detailed, thoughtful, and
technically expert. BIS issued the final rule implementing License
Exception STA on June 16, 2011 (76FR 35276) having benefited
significantly from such public participation, and anticipates that the
continuing effort to coordinate, simplify, and harmonize export
controls across agencies will be similarly informed by public response
to the notice.
A core proposal intended to bring about the initiative's national
security objectives is to transfer jurisdiction over less significant
defense articles, principally generic parts and components, that are
controlled by the regulations administered by the State Department to
the export control regulations administered by the Commerce Department,
which are more capable of having controls tailored to the significance
of the item and the degree of risk associated with its export to
different groups of countries. This plan will advance the national
security objectives of export control reform by allowing for greater
interoperability with our NATO partners and other close allies and also
will strengthen the industrial base by removing incentives for foreign
companies to design out or avoid US-origin content. This plan will also
significantly reduce the licensing and other collateral burdens on
exporters and the government while at the same time harmonizing the
system to allow for the eventual creation of a single list of
controlled items administered by a single licensing agency. (See
``Proposed Revisions to the Export Administration Regulations (EAR):
Control of Items the President Determines No Longer Warrant Control
Under the United States Munitions List (USML),'' published on July 15,
2011 (76 FR 41958).)
In the coming months, the agencies involved in the Export Control
Reform Initiative will continue the regulatory modifications necessary
to harmonize export control lists and definitions, which will involve
issuing a number of proposals. This effort will draw heavily on the
resources of those agencies, but it will require the efforts of members
of the public as well, who take time from their normal duties to review
proposals and submit comments.
Export Administration Regulations
The Export Control Reform Initiative is BIS's top priority, and as
noted above, BIS requests that submission of reform-related comments be
directed toward each specific proposal as it is published rather than
as part of a general response to this notice of inquiry. Many key
aspects of the EAR--which items are subject to the EAR and when they
require licenses to which destination--will be addressed substantively
by the Export Control Reform Initiative. In this notice of inquiry, BIS
seeks comments on aspects of the EAR that are not immediately affected
by the reform initiative and that could be clarified or streamlined to
be more effective or less burdensome.
Controls imposed by the EAR protect the national security and
advance the foreign policy interests of the United States, creating a
necessary licensing burden. This necessary licensing burden entails an
equally necessary compliance burden. BIS seeks comments identifying any
unnecessary compliance burden caused by rules that are unduly complex,
outmoded, inconsistent, or overlapping, and comments identifying ways
to make any aspect of the EAR more effectively protect the national
security or advance the foreign policy interests of the United States.
Chemical Weapons Convention Regulations
The Chemical Weapons Convention Regulations (15 CFR parts 710
through 729) (CWCR) implement certain obligations of the United States
under the Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production,
Stockpiling and Use of Chemical Weapons and on Their Destruction, known
as the CWC or Convention.
[[Page 47529]]
Additional Protocol Regulations
The Additional Protocol Regulations (15 CFR parts 781 through 786)
(APR) implement certain obligations of the United States under the
Protocol Additional to the Agreement Between the United States of
America and the International Atomic Energy Agency Concerning the
Application of Safeguards in the United States of America, known as the
Additional Protocol. These obligations relate to nuclear fuel cycle-
related activities.
National Security Industrial Base Regulations
The National Security Industrial Base Regulations (15 CFR 700
through 705) include the Defense Priorities and Allocations System,
Reporting of Offsets Agreements in Sales of Weapon Systems or Defense-
Related Items to Foreign Countries or Foreign Firms, and Effect of
Imported Articles on the National Security. Because the rules regarding
reporting of offsets agreements were recently revised (74 FR 68136),
BIS is not soliciting comments on 15 CFR part 701 with this notice of
inquiry. BIS also published a proposed rule regarding the Defense
Priorities and Allocations System Regulations (75 FR 32122) and has yet
to publish a final rule. BIS is not soliciting comments on 15 CFR part
700 with this notice of inquiry.
Public Comments
With respect to improving existing rules or eliminating outmoded
ones, BIS would like to receive comments that are as specific and well-
supported as possible. Helpful comments will include a description of a
problem or concern, available data on cost or economic impact, and a
proposed solution. BIS also welcomes comments on rules the public
considers effective or well designed. BIS is also interested in
information on foreign countries' implementation of export controls. In
the interest of fostering open exchange, BIS encourages those
interested in submitting comments to peruse those already posted on
regulations.gov.
Dated: August 1, 2011.
Kevin J. Wolf,
Assistant Secretary for Export Administration.
[FR Doc. 2011-19947 Filed 8-4-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-33-P