Notice of Public Information Collection(s) Being Reviewed by the Federal Communications Commission, Comments Requested, 45794-45796 [2011-19408]
Download as PDF
45794
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 147 / Monday, August 1, 2011 / Notices
provided in the body of a comment will
be included as part of the comment that
is placed in the official public docket,
and made available in EPA’s electronic
public docket. If EPA cannot read your
comment due to technical difficulties
and cannot contact you for clarification,
EPA may not be able to consider your
comment.
Use of the https://www.regulations.gov
Web site to submit comments to EPA
electronically is EPA’s preferred method
for receiving comments. The electronic
public docket system is an ‘‘anonymous
access’’ system, which means EPA will
not know your identity, e-mail address,
or other contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment.
In contrast to EPA’s electronic public
docket, EPA’s electronic mail (e-mail)
system is not an ‘‘anonymous access’’
system. If you send an e-mail comment
directly to the Docket without going
through https://www.regulations.gov,
your e-mail address is automatically
captured and included as part of the
comment that is placed in the official
public docket, and made available in
EPA’s electronic public docket.
Dated: July 26, 2011.
Richard B. Ossias,
Associate General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2011–19397 Filed 7–29–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[FRL–9446–5]
Public Water System Supervision
Program Revision for the State of
Louisiana
United States Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice of proposed approval.
Notice is hereby given that
the State of Louisiana is revising its
approved Public Water System
Supervision Program, by adopting new
regulations for the Public Notification
Rule, Filter Backwash Recycling Rule,
Long Term 1 Enhanced Surface Water
Treatment Rule, Radionuclides Rule,
and the Revised Drinking Water
Standard for Arsenic Rule, promulgated
and published in the Federal Register at
72 FR 57782 on October 10, 2007.
Louisiana has adopted the Public
Notification Rule, Filter Backwash
Recycling Rule, Long Term 1 Enhanced
Surface Water Treatment Rule,
Radionuclides Rule, and the Revised
Drinking Water Standard for Arsenic
Rule, to strengthen the protection of
public health. EPA has determined that
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:45 Jul 29, 2011
Jkt 223001
All interested parties may
request a public hearing. A request for
a public hearing must be submitted by
August 31, 2011 to the Regional
Administrator at the EPA Region 6
address shown below. Frivolous or
insubstantial requests for a hearing may
be denied by the Regional
Administrator. However, if a substantial
request for a public hearing is made by
August 31, 2011, a public hearing will
be held. If no timely and appropriate
request for a hearing is received and the
Regional Administrator does not elect to
hold a hearing on his own motion, this
determination shall become final and
effective on August 31, 2011. Any
request for a public hearing shall
include the following information: The
name, address, and telephone number of
the individual, organization, or other
entity requesting a hearing; a brief
statement of the requesting person’s
interest in the Regional Administrator’s
determination and a brief statement of
the information that the requesting
person intends to submit at such
hearing; and the signature of the
individual making the request or, if the
request is made on behalf of an
organization or other entity, the
signature of a responsible official of the
organization or other entity.
DATES:
All documents relating to
this determination are available for
inspection between the hours of 8 a.m.
and 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday,
at the following offices: DHH–OPH–
CEHS Engineering Services, 628 N.
Fourth Street, P.O. Box 4489, Baton
Rouge, LA 70821; and the EPA Region
6, Drinking Water Section (6WQ–SD),
1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 1200, Dallas,
Texas 75202.
ADDRESSES:
AGENCY:
SUMMARY:
the proposed program revisions
submitted by Louisiana for these
revisions are no less stringent than the
corresponding federal regulations.
Therefore, EPA proposes to approve
these program revisions.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Andy Waite, EPA Region 6, Drinking
Water Section at the Dallas address
given above or at telephone (214) 665–
7332, or waite.andrew@epa.gov.
Authority: Section 1413 of the Safe
Drinking Water Act, as amended (1996), and
40 CFR part 141 and 142 of the National
Primary Drinking Water Regulations.
Dated: July 20, 2011
Al Armendariz,
Regional Administrator, Region 6.
[FR Doc. 2011–19396 Filed 7–29–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
Notice of Public Information
Collection(s) Being Reviewed by the
Federal Communications Commission,
Comments Requested
July 21, 2011.
The Federal Communications
Commission, as part of its continuing
effort to reduce paperwork burden
invites the general public and other
Federal agencies to take this
opportunity to comment on the
following information collection(s), as
required by the Paperwork Reduction
Act (PRA) of 1995, 44 U.S.C. 3501–3520.
Comments are requested concerning: (a)
Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
Commission, including whether the
information shall have practical utility;
(b) the accuracy of the Commission’s
burden estimate; (c) ways to enhance
the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information collected; (d) ways to
minimize the burden of the collection of
information on the respondents,
including the use of automated
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology; and (e) ways to
further reduce the information
collection burden on small business
concerns with fewer than 25 employees.
The FCC may not conduct or sponsor
a collection of information unless it
displays a currently valid control
number. No person shall be subject to
any penalty for failing to comply with
a collection of information subject to the
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) that
does not display a currently valid OMB
control number.
DATES: Written Paperwork Reduction
Act (PRA) comments should be
submitted on or before September 30,
2011. If you anticipate that you will be
submitting PRA comments, but find it
difficult to do so within the period of
time allowed by this notice, you should
advise the FCC contact listed below as
soon as possible.
ADDRESSES: Direct all PRA comments to
Nicholas A. Fraser, Office of
Management and Budget, via fax at 202–
395–5167 or via the Internet at
Nicholas_A._Fraser@omb.eop.gov and
to the Federal Communications
Commission via e-mail to PRA@fcc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Leslie F. Smith, Office of Managing
Director, (202) 418–0217. For additional
information, contact Leslie F. Smith at
Leslie.Smith@fcc.gov or call 202–418–
0217.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\01AUN1.SGM
01AUN1
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 147 / Monday, August 1, 2011 / Notices
OMB Control Number: 3060–0430.
Title: Section 1.1206, Permit-butDisclose Proceedings.
Form Number: N/A.
Type of Review: Revision of a
currently approved collection.
Respondents: Individuals or
households; Business or other for-profit;
Not-for-profit institutions; Federal
Government; and State, local, or tribal
governments.
Number of Respondents and
Responses: 11,500 respondents; 11,500
responses.
Estimated Time per Response: 45
minutes (0.75 hours).
Frequency of Response: On occasion
reporting requirements.
Obligation to Respond: Required to
obtain or retain benefits. Statutory
authority for this information collection
is contained in sections 4(i) and (j),
303(r), and 409 of the Communications
Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C.
154(i) and (j), 303(r), and 409.
Total Annual Burden: 25,875 hours.
Total Annual Cost: $0.00.
Privacy Act Impact Assessment: No
impact(s).
Nature and Extent of Confidentiality:
Consistent with the Commission’s rules
on confidential treatment of
submissions, under 47 CFR 0.459, a
presenter may request confidential
treatment of ex parte presentations. In
addition, the Commission will permit
parties to remove metadata containing
confidential or privileged information,
and the Commission will also not
require parties to file electronically ex
parte notices that contain confidential
information. The Commission will,
however, require a redacted version to
be filed electronically at the same time
the paper filing is submitted, and that
the redacted version must be machinereadable whenever technically possible.
Needs and Uses: The Commission’s
rules, under 47 CFR 1.1206, require that
a public record be made of ex parte
presentations (i.e., written presentations
not served on all parties to the
proceeding or oral presentations as to
which all parties have not been given
notice and an opportunity to be present)
to decision-making personnel in
‘‘permit-but-disclose’’ proceedings, such
as notice-and-comment rulemakings and
declaratory ruling proceedings.
On February 2, 2011, the FCC released
a Report and Order and Further Notice
of Proposed Rulemaking, GC Docket
Number 10–43, FCC 11–11, which
amended and reformed the
Commission’s rules on ex parte
presentations (47 CFR 1.1206(b)(2))
made in the course of Commission
rulemakings and other permit-butdisclose proceedings. The modifications
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:45 Jul 29, 2011
Jkt 223001
to the existing rules adopted in this
Report and Order require that parties
file more descriptive summaries of their
ex parte contacts, by ensuring that other
parties and the public have an adequate
opportunity to review and respond to
information submitted ex parte, and by
improving the FCC’s oversight and
enforcement of the ex parte rules. The
modified ex parte rules provide as
follows: (1) Ex parte notices will be
required for all oral ex parte
presentations in permit-but-disclose
proceedings, not just for those
presentations that involve new
information or arguments not already in
the record; (2) If an oral ex parte
presentation is limited to material
already in the written record, the notice
must contain either a succinct summary
of the matters discussed or a citation to
the page or paragraph number in the
party’s written submission(s) where the
matters discussed can be found; (3)
Notices for all ex parte presentations
must include the name of the person(s)
who made the ex parte presentation as
well as a list of all persons attending or
otherwise participating in the meeting at
which the presentation was made; (4)
Notices of ex parte presentations made
outside the Sunshine period must be
filed within two business days of the
presentation; (5) The Sunshine period
will begin on the day (including
business days, weekends, and holidays)
after issuance of the Sunshine notice,
rather than when the Sunshine Agenda
is issued (as the current rules provide);
(6) If an ex parte presentation is made
on the day the Sunshine notice is
released, an ex parte notice must be
submitted by the next business day, and
any reply would be due by the following
business day. If a permissible ex parte
presentation is made during the
Sunshine period (under an exception to
the Sunshine period prohibition), the ex
parte notice is due by the end of the
same day on which the presentation was
made, and any reply would need to be
filed by the next business day. Any
reply must be in writing and limited to
the issues raised in the ex parte notice
to which the reply is directed; (7)
Commissioners and agency staff may
continue to request ex parte
presentations during the Sunshine
period, but these presentations should
be limited to the specific information
required by the Commission; (8) Ex
parte notices must be submitted
electronically in machine-readable
format. PDF images created by scanning
a paper document may not be
submitted, except in cases in which a
word-processing version of the
document is not available. Confidential
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
45795
information may continue to be
submitted by paper filing, but a redacted
version must be filed electronically at
the same time the paper filing is
submitted. An exception to the
electronic filing requirement will be
made in cases in which the filing party
claims hardship. The basis for the
hardship claim must be substantiated in
the ex parte filing; (9) To facilitate
stricter enforcement of the ex parte
rules, the Enforcement Bureau is
authorized to levy forfeitures for ex
parte rule violations; (10) Copies of
electronically filed ex parte notices
must also be sent electronically to all
staff and Commissioners present at the
ex parte meeting so as to enable them
to review the notices for accuracy and
completeness. Filers may be asked to
submit corrections or further
information as necessary for compliance
with the rules; and (11) Minor
conforming and clarifying rule changes
proposed in the Notice are adopted. The
only changes entailing increased
information collection are the
requirement that parties making
permissible ex parte presentations in
restricted proceedings file an ex parte
notice, and that ex parte notices contain
either a summary of the presentation or
a reference to where the information can
be found in the written record, and that
ex parte notices list all persons
attending the presentation.
The information is used by parties to
permit-but-disclose proceedings,
including interested members of the
public, to respond to the arguments
made and data offered in the
presentations. The responses may then
be used by the Commission in its
decision-making. The availability of the
ex parte materials ensures that the
Commission’s decisional processes are
fair, impartial, and comport with the
concept of due process in that all
interested parties can know of and
respond to the arguments made to the
decision-making officials.
On May 10, 2011, the Commission
published a notice in the Federal
Register (76 FR 27048) announcing that
it had sought OMB approval under the
emergency processing provisions of the
PRA for this information collection.
OMB approved this collection as an
emergency on May 16, 2011. With this
60-day notice, the Commission is
beginning the regular PRA process
seeking OMB approval for this
collection for three years.
E:\FR\FM\01AUN1.SGM
01AUN1
45796
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 147 / Monday, August 1, 2011 / Notices
Federal Communications Commission.
Marlene H. Dortch,
Secretary, Office of the Secretary, Office of
Managing Director.
[FR Doc. 2011–19408 Filed 7–29–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712–01–P
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
Information Collection Being
Submitted to the Office of Management
and Budget for Review and Approval
Federal Communications
Commission.
ACTION: Notice and request for
comments.
AGENCY:
The Federal Communications
Commission (FCC), as part of its
continuing effort to reduce paperwork
burdens, invites the general public and
other Federal agencies to take this
opportunity to comment on the
following information collection, as
required by the Paperwork Reduction
Act (PRA) of 1995. Comments are
requested concerning (a) Whether the
proposed collection of information is
necessary for the proper performance of
the functions of the Commission,
including whether the information shall
have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of
the Commission’s burden estimate; (c)
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information collected; (d)
ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on the
respondents, including the use of
automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology;
and (e) ways to further reduce the
information collection burden on small
business concerns with fewer than 25
employees.
The FCC may not conduct or sponsor
a collection of information unless it
displays a currently valid control
number. No person shall be subject to
any penalty for failing to comply with
a collection of information subject to the
PRA that does not display a valid Office
of Management and Budget (OMB)
control number.
DATES: Written comments should be
submitted on or before August 31, 2011.
If you anticipate that you will be
submitting comments, but find it
difficult to do so within the period of
time allowed by this notice, you should
advise the contacts below as soon as
possible.
ADDRESSES: Direct all PRA comments to
Nicholas A. Fraser, OMB, via fax 202–
395–5167, or via e-mail
Nicholas_A._Fraser@omb.eop.gov; and
to Cathy Williams, FCC, via e-mail
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:45 Jul 29, 2011
Jkt 223001
PRA@fcc.gov and to
Cathy.Williams@fcc.gov. Include in the
comments the OMB control number as
shown in the ‘‘Supplementary
Information’’ section below.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
additional information or copies of the
information collection, contact Cathy
Williams at (202) 418–2918. To view a
copy of this information collection
request (ICR) submitted to OMB: (1) Go
to the Web page https://www.reginfo.gov/
public/do/PRAMain, (2) look for the
section of the Web page called
‘‘Currently Under Review,’’ (3) click on
the downward-pointing arrow in the
‘‘Select Agency’’ box below the
‘‘Currently Under Review’’ heading, (4)
select ‘‘Federal Communications
Commission’’ from the list of agencies
presented in the ‘‘Select Agency’’ box,
(5) click the ‘‘Submit’’ button to the
right of the ‘‘Select Agency’’ box, (6)
when the list of FCC ICRs currently
under review appears, look for the OMB
control number of this ICR and then
click on the ICR Reference Number. A
copy of the FCC submission to OMB
will be displayed.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
OMB Control Number: 3060–1145.
Title: Structure and Practices of the
Video Relay Service Program, CG
Docket No. 10–51.
Form Number: N/A.
Type of Review: Revision of a
currently approved collection.
Respondents: Business or other forprofit.
Number of Respondents and
Responses: 20 respondents; 1,423
responses.
Estimated Time per Response: .5
hours (30 minutes) to 50 hours.
Frequency of Response: Annual,
monthly, on occasion, one-time, and
semi-annually reporting requirements;
recordkeeping and third party
disclosure requirements.
Obligation to Respond: Required to
obtain or retain benefit. The statutory
authority for the information collection
requirements is found at Section 225 of
the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. 225.
The law was enacted on July 26, 1990,
as Title IV of the ADA, Pub. L. 101–336,
104 Stat. 327, 366–69.
Total Annual Burden: 4,632 hours.
Total Annual Cost: $35,600.
Nature and Extent of Confidentiality:
An assurance of confidentiality is not
offered because this information
collection does not require the
collection of personally identifiable
information (PII) from individuals.
Privacy Impact Assessment: No
impact(s).
Needs and Uses: On April 6, 2011, in
document FCC 11–54, the Commission
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
released a Report and Order, published
at 76 FR 24393, May 2, 2011, adopting
final rules designed to eliminate the
waste, fraud and abuse that has plagued
the VRS program and had threatened its
ability to continue serving Americans
who use it and its long-term viability.
The Report and Order contains
information collection requirements
with respect to the following eight
requirements, all of which aims to
ensure the sustainability and integrity of
the TRS program and the TRS Fund.
Though the Report and Order
emphasizes VRS, many of the
requirements also apply to other or all
forms of TRS—which includes the
adoption of the interim rule, several
new information collection
requirements; and all the proposed
information collection requirements,
except the ‘‘Transparency and the
Disclosure of Provider Financial and
Call Data’’ requirement, as previously
proposed and published at 75 FR 51735,
August 23, 2010.
(a) Provider Certification Under
Penalty of Perjury. The Chief Executive
Officer (CEO), Chief Financial Officer
(CFO), or other senior executive of a
TRS provider shall certify, under
penalty of perjury, that: (1) Minutes
submitted to the Interstate TRS Fund
(Fund) administrator for compensation
were handled in compliance with
section 225 of the Act and the
Commission’s rules and orders, and are
not the result of impermissible financial
incentives, or payments or kickbacks, to
generate calls, and (2) cost and demand
data submitted to the Fund
administrator related to the
determination of compensation rates or
methodologies are true and correct.
(b) Requiring Providers To Submit
Information About New and Existing
Call Centers. VRS providers shall
submit a written statement to the
Commission and the TRS Fund
administrator containing the locations
of all of their call centers that handle
VRS calls, including call centers located
outside the United States, twice a year,
on April 1st and October 1st. In addition
to the street address of each call center,
the rules require that these statements
contain (1) The number of individual
CAs and CA managers employed at each
call center; and (2) the name and contact
information (phone number and e-mail
address) for the managers at each call
center. (3) VRS providers shall notify
the Commission and the TRS Fund
administrator in writing at least 30 days
prior to any change to their call centers’
locations, including the opening,
closing, or relocation of any center.
(c) Data Filed With the Fund
Administrator To Support Payment
E:\FR\FM\01AUN1.SGM
01AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 147 (Monday, August 1, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 45794-45796]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-19408]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
Notice of Public Information Collection(s) Being Reviewed by the
Federal Communications Commission, Comments Requested
July 21, 2011.
SUMMARY: The Federal Communications Commission, as part of its
continuing effort to reduce paperwork burden invites the general public
and other Federal agencies to take this opportunity to comment on the
following information collection(s), as required by the Paperwork
Reduction Act (PRA) of 1995, 44 U.S.C. 3501-3520. Comments are
requested concerning: (a) Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of
the Commission, including whether the information shall have practical
utility; (b) the accuracy of the Commission's burden estimate; (c) ways
to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information
collected; (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of
information on the respondents, including the use of automated
collection techniques or other forms of information technology; and (e)
ways to further reduce the information collection burden on small
business concerns with fewer than 25 employees.
The FCC may not conduct or sponsor a collection of information
unless it displays a currently valid control number. No person shall be
subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of
information subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) that does not
display a currently valid OMB control number.
DATES: Written Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) comments should be
submitted on or before September 30, 2011. If you anticipate that you
will be submitting PRA comments, but find it difficult to do so within
the period of time allowed by this notice, you should advise the FCC
contact listed below as soon as possible.
ADDRESSES: Direct all PRA comments to Nicholas A. Fraser, Office of
Management and Budget, via fax at 202-395-5167 or via the Internet at
Nicholas_A._Fraser@omb.eop.gov and to the Federal Communications
Commission via e-mail to PRA@fcc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Leslie F. Smith, Office of Managing
Director, (202) 418-0217. For additional information, contact Leslie F.
Smith at Leslie.Smith@fcc.gov or call 202-418-0217.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
[[Page 45795]]
OMB Control Number: 3060-0430.
Title: Section 1.1206, Permit-but-Disclose Proceedings.
Form Number: N/A.
Type of Review: Revision of a currently approved collection.
Respondents: Individuals or households; Business or other for-
profit; Not-for-profit institutions; Federal Government; and State,
local, or tribal governments.
Number of Respondents and Responses: 11,500 respondents; 11,500
responses.
Estimated Time per Response: 45 minutes (0.75 hours).
Frequency of Response: On occasion reporting requirements.
Obligation to Respond: Required to obtain or retain benefits.
Statutory authority for this information collection is contained in
sections 4(i) and (j), 303(r), and 409 of the Communications Act of
1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i) and (j), 303(r), and 409.
Total Annual Burden: 25,875 hours.
Total Annual Cost: $0.00.
Privacy Act Impact Assessment: No impact(s).
Nature and Extent of Confidentiality: Consistent with the
Commission's rules on confidential treatment of submissions, under 47
CFR 0.459, a presenter may request confidential treatment of ex parte
presentations. In addition, the Commission will permit parties to
remove metadata containing confidential or privileged information, and
the Commission will also not require parties to file electronically ex
parte notices that contain confidential information. The Commission
will, however, require a redacted version to be filed electronically at
the same time the paper filing is submitted, and that the redacted
version must be machine-readable whenever technically possible.
Needs and Uses: The Commission's rules, under 47 CFR 1.1206,
require that a public record be made of ex parte presentations (i.e.,
written presentations not served on all parties to the proceeding or
oral presentations as to which all parties have not been given notice
and an opportunity to be present) to decision-making personnel in
``permit-but-disclose'' proceedings, such as notice-and-comment
rulemakings and declaratory ruling proceedings.
On February 2, 2011, the FCC released a Report and Order and
Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, GC Docket Number 10-43, FCC 11-
11, which amended and reformed the Commission's rules on ex parte
presentations (47 CFR 1.1206(b)(2)) made in the course of Commission
rulemakings and other permit-but-disclose proceedings. The
modifications to the existing rules adopted in this Report and Order
require that parties file more descriptive summaries of their ex parte
contacts, by ensuring that other parties and the public have an
adequate opportunity to review and respond to information submitted ex
parte, and by improving the FCC's oversight and enforcement of the ex
parte rules. The modified ex parte rules provide as follows: (1) Ex
parte notices will be required for all oral ex parte presentations in
permit-but-disclose proceedings, not just for those presentations that
involve new information or arguments not already in the record; (2) If
an oral ex parte presentation is limited to material already in the
written record, the notice must contain either a succinct summary of
the matters discussed or a citation to the page or paragraph number in
the party's written submission(s) where the matters discussed can be
found; (3) Notices for all ex parte presentations must include the name
of the person(s) who made the ex parte presentation as well as a list
of all persons attending or otherwise participating in the meeting at
which the presentation was made; (4) Notices of ex parte presentations
made outside the Sunshine period must be filed within two business days
of the presentation; (5) The Sunshine period will begin on the day
(including business days, weekends, and holidays) after issuance of the
Sunshine notice, rather than when the Sunshine Agenda is issued (as the
current rules provide); (6) If an ex parte presentation is made on the
day the Sunshine notice is released, an ex parte notice must be
submitted by the next business day, and any reply would be due by the
following business day. If a permissible ex parte presentation is made
during the Sunshine period (under an exception to the Sunshine period
prohibition), the ex parte notice is due by the end of the same day on
which the presentation was made, and any reply would need to be filed
by the next business day. Any reply must be in writing and limited to
the issues raised in the ex parte notice to which the reply is
directed; (7) Commissioners and agency staff may continue to request ex
parte presentations during the Sunshine period, but these presentations
should be limited to the specific information required by the
Commission; (8) Ex parte notices must be submitted electronically in
machine-readable format. PDF images created by scanning a paper
document may not be submitted, except in cases in which a word-
processing version of the document is not available. Confidential
information may continue to be submitted by paper filing, but a
redacted version must be filed electronically at the same time the
paper filing is submitted. An exception to the electronic filing
requirement will be made in cases in which the filing party claims
hardship. The basis for the hardship claim must be substantiated in the
ex parte filing; (9) To facilitate stricter enforcement of the ex parte
rules, the Enforcement Bureau is authorized to levy forfeitures for ex
parte rule violations; (10) Copies of electronically filed ex parte
notices must also be sent electronically to all staff and Commissioners
present at the ex parte meeting so as to enable them to review the
notices for accuracy and completeness. Filers may be asked to submit
corrections or further information as necessary for compliance with the
rules; and (11) Minor conforming and clarifying rule changes proposed
in the Notice are adopted. The only changes entailing increased
information collection are the requirement that parties making
permissible ex parte presentations in restricted proceedings file an ex
parte notice, and that ex parte notices contain either a summary of the
presentation or a reference to where the information can be found in
the written record, and that ex parte notices list all persons
attending the presentation.
The information is used by parties to permit-but-disclose
proceedings, including interested members of the public, to respond to
the arguments made and data offered in the presentations. The responses
may then be used by the Commission in its decision-making. The
availability of the ex parte materials ensures that the Commission's
decisional processes are fair, impartial, and comport with the concept
of due process in that all interested parties can know of and respond
to the arguments made to the decision-making officials.
On May 10, 2011, the Commission published a notice in the Federal
Register (76 FR 27048) announcing that it had sought OMB approval under
the emergency processing provisions of the PRA for this information
collection. OMB approved this collection as an emergency on May 16,
2011. With this 60-day notice, the Commission is beginning the regular
PRA process seeking OMB approval for this collection for three years.
[[Page 45796]]
Federal Communications Commission.
Marlene H. Dortch,
Secretary, Office of the Secretary, Office of Managing Director.
[FR Doc. 2011-19408 Filed 7-29-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P