Methods of Accounting Used by Corporations That Acquire the Assets of Other Corporations, 45673-45689 [2011-19256]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 147 / Monday, August 1, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
responsibilities among the various
levels of government as described by
E.O. 13132. Therefore, we have
determined that this Final Rule will not
have a sufficient federalism implication
to warrant the preparation of a summary
impact statement.
F. Executive Order 13175—Indian
Tribal Governments
We reviewed this Final Rule under
the terms of E.O. 13175 and determined
it not to have tribal implications. The
Final Rule does not have substantial
direct effects on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes. As a
result, no tribal summary impact
statement has been prepared.
G. Assessment of Federal Regulations
and Policies on Families
Section 654 of the Treasury and
General Government Appropriations
Act, enacted as part of the Omnibus
Consolidated and Emergency
Supplemental Appropriations Act of
1999 (Pub. L. 105–277, 112 Stat. 2681)
requires us to assess the impact of this
Final Rule on family well-being. A rule
that is determined to have a negative
effect on families must be supported
with an adequate rationale. We have
assessed this Final Rule and determined
that it will not have a negative effect on
families.
H. Executive Order 12630—Government
Actions and Interference With
Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights
The Final Rule is not subject to E.O.
12630, Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights, because it
does not involve implementation of a
policy with takings implications.
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with RULES
I. Executive Order 12988—Civil Justice
The Final Rule has been drafted and
reviewed in accordance with E.O.
12988, Civil Justice Reform, and will not
unduly burden the Federal court
system. The Department has developed
the Final Rule to minimize litigation
and provide a clear legal standard for
affected conduct, and has reviewed the
Final Rule carefully to eliminate
drafting errors and ambiguities.
K. Paperwork Reduction Act
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
As part of our continuing effort to
reduce paperwork and respondent
burden, we conduct a preclearance
consultation program to provide the
general public and Federal agencies
with an opportunity to comment on
proposed and continuing collections of
information in accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA)
(44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)). This process
helps to ensure that the public
understands the collection instructions;
that respondents provide requested data
in the desired format; that reporting
burden (time and financial resources) is
minimized; that collection instruments
are clearly understood; and that we
properly assess the impact of collection
requirements on respondents.
The PRA requires all Federal agencies
to analyze proposed regulations for
potential time burdens on the regulated
community created by provisions
within the proposed regulations that
require the submission of information.
These information collection (IC)
requirements must be submitted to the
OMB for approval. Persons are not
required to respond to a collection of
information unless it displays a
currently valid OMB control number as
required in 5 CFR 1320.11(l) or it is
exempt from the PRA.
The majority of the IC requirements
for the current H–2B program are
approved under OMB control number
1205–0466 (which includes ETA Form
9141 and ETA Form 9142). There are no
burden adjustments that need to be
made to the analysis. For an additional
explanation of how we calculated the
burden hours and related costs, the PRA
package for information collection OMB
control number 1205–0466 may be
obtained at https://www.RegInfo.gov.
Internal Revenue Service
IV. Change of Effective Date of Wage
Rule
In the final rule published January 19,
2011, 76 FR 3452, under the DATES
section, the effective date of the final
rule is amended to read as follows:
This final rule is effective September
30, 2011.
Signed in Washington, this 26th day of July
2011.
Jane Oates,
Assistant Secretary, Employment and
Training Administration.
J. Plain Language
[FR Doc. 2011–19319 Filed 7–29–11; 8:45 am]
We drafted this Final Rule in plain
language.
BILLING CODE 4510–FP–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:27 Jul 29, 2011
Jkt 223001
45673
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
26 CFR Part 1
[TD 9534]
RIN 1545–BD81
Methods of Accounting Used by
Corporations That Acquire the Assets
of Other Corporations
Internal Revenue Service (IRS),
Treasury.
ACTION: Final regulations.
AGENCY:
This document contains final
regulations relating to the methods of
accounting, including the inventory
methods, to be used by corporations that
acquire the assets of other corporations
in certain corporate reorganizations and
tax-free liquidations. These regulations
clarify and simplify the rules regarding
the accounting methods to be used
following these reorganizations and
liquidations.
DATES: Effective date: These regulations
are effective on August 31, 2011.
Applicability date: For dates of
applicability, see §§ 1.381(a)–1(e),
1.381(c)(4)–1(f), 1.381(c)(5)–1(f), and
1.446–1(e)(4)(iii).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Cheryl Oseekey at (202) 622–4970 (not
a toll-free number).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
Background
This document contains amendments
to 26 CFR part 1. On November 16,
2007, the IRS and the Treasury
Department published a notice of
proposed rulemaking (REG–151884–03)
in the Federal Register (72 FR 64545).
This notice of proposed rulemaking,
while continuing most of the provisions
of the regulations originally issued
under sections 381(c)(4) and 381(c)(5) of
the Internal Revenue Code (Code)
regarding the methods of accounting to
be used by a corporation that acquires
the assets of another corporation in a
section 381(a) transaction, proposed to
clarify and simplify those existing
regulations. The IRS received no
comments in response to the notice of
proposed rulemaking. No public hearing
was requested or held. The proposed
regulations, as revised by this Treasury
decision, are adopted as final
regulations.
Explanation of Provisions
The final regulations differ somewhat
in organization and format from the
notice of proposed rulemaking. These
changes are intended to be editorial in
E:\FR\FM\01AUR1.SGM
01AUR1
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with RULES
45674
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 147 / Monday, August 1, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
nature and are not intended to alter the
substance and principles of the rules set
forth in the notice of proposed
rulemaking. The IRS and the Treasury
Department made these changes to
further advance the objective, as
expressed in the preamble to the notice
of proposed rulemaking, of reducing
uncertainty and controversy by
providing regulations under sections
381(c)(4) and 381(c)(5) that are clear,
consistent, and administrable. For
example, the final regulations under
sections 381(c)(4) and 381(c)(5) have
been drafted so that the regulations
mirror each other to the greatest extent
possible, thus highlighting the
consistencies of the regulations’
provisions. Similarly, many of the
examples in the notice of proposed
rulemaking have been revised in the
final regulations to specify the
substantive tax rule in the regulations
that the examples illustrate.
Additionally, new examples were added
to the final regulations to provide
further illustrations of the substantive
tax rules in these regulations.
The keystone of the final regulations
for sections 381(c)(4) and 381(c)(5)
continues to be whether the acquiring
corporation operates the trades or
businesses of the parties to a section
381(a) transaction as separate and
distinct trades or businesses following
the date of distribution or transfer. The
final regulations continue to provide
that when the acquiring corporation
operates the trades or businesses of the
parties as separate and distinct trades or
businesses after the date of distribution
or transfer, the acquiring corporation
will use a carryover method. In contrast,
when the acquiring corporation does not
operate the trades or businesses of the
parties as separate and distinct trades or
businesses after the date of distribution
or transfer, the acquiring corporation
will use a principal method. These rules
do not apply when a carryover method
or principal method, as applicable, is
not a permissible method, or when the
acquiring corporation chooses not to use
a carryover method or principal method.
In those cases, the general rules under
section 446(e) that govern methods of
accounting apply.
The final regulations modify the test
for determining a principal method
when the acquiring corporation does not
operate the trades or businesses of the
parties to the section 381(a) transaction
as separate and distinct trades or
businesses after the date of distribution
or transfer. Under the final regulations,
the determination of whether the
distributor or transferor corporation is
larger than the acquiring corporation is
made by comparing certain attributes
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:27 Jul 29, 2011
Jkt 223001
(that is, under section 381(c)(4) the
adjusted bases of the assets and gross
receipts, and under section 381(c)(5) the
fair market value of the inventory) of
only the trades or businesses that will
be integrated after the date of
distribution or transfer rather than
comparing the attributes for the entire
entity. The IRS and the Treasury
Department believe that the attributes of
a trade or business that will continue to
operate as a separate and distinct trade
or business after the date of distribution
or transfer should not influence the
determination of a principal method
that will be used by trades or businesses
that will be integrated after the date of
distribution or transfer. The IRS and the
Treasury Department also believe that
applying the test at the trade or business
level is consistent with § 1.446–1(d)
because methods of accounting are
generally determined at the trade or
business level.
The final regulations also provide
rules on how an acquiring corporation
identifies a principal method when an
acquiring corporation or a distributor or
transferor corporation operates more
than one separate and distinct trade or
business on the date of distribution or
transfer, has more than one method of
accounting used in the trades or
businesses, and the acquiring
corporation combines the trades or
businesses after the date of distribution
or transfer. While the IRS and the
Treasury Department do not think these
situations occur frequently, the final
regulations are revised to provide
certainty for an acquiring corporation
and to obviate the need to obtain a
ruling in these situations.
The final regulations under sections
381(c)(4) and 381(c)(5) clarify the
definition of ‘‘cut-off basis.’’ The final
regulations provide that cut-off basis
generally means a manner in which a
change in method of accounting is made
without a section 481(a) adjustment and
under which only the items arising after
the beginning of the year of change (or,
in the case of a change made to a
principal method, only the items arising
after the date of distribution or transfer)
are accounted for under the new method
of accounting. The definition of cut-off
basis is expanded in the final
regulations under section 381(c)(5) to
clarify that a taxpayer that makes a
change within the last-in, first-out
(LIFO) inventory method from one LIFO
method or sub-method to another LIFO
method or sub-method does not
recompute the cost of its beginning
inventories for the year of change under
the new LIFO inventory method when
it implements the change on a cut-off
basis.
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
The final regulations under section
381(c)(5) also make certain
organizational changes to § 1.381(c)(5)–
1(e)(6) of the notice of proposed
rulemaking with respect to the
integration of inventories after a section
381(a) transaction. These changes do not
change the substantive rules in the
notice of proposed rulemaking but are
intended to clarify that the rules apply
whether the inventory method of either
the acquiring corporation or the
transferor or distributor corporation
must be changed to a principal method.
The IRS and the Treasury Department
are considering issuing additional
guidance that would clarify or modify
the manner in which inventories must
be combined and integrated in a section
381(a) transaction.
Finally, the final regulations correct
the discussion of section 472(d) that was
in § 1.381(c)(5)–1(e)(6)(ii)(B) of the
notice of proposed rulemaking. Section
1.381(c)(5)–1(e)(6)(ii)(B) of the notice of
proposed rulemaking provided that the
restoration to cost of any previous writedowns to market value shall be taken
into account fully in the year that
included the date of distribution or
transfer. Consistent with the
amendments to section 472(d), the final
regulations provide that these
restorations shall be taken into account
by the acquiring corporation ratably in
each of the three taxable years beginning
with the taxable year that includes the
date of the distribution or transfer.
The IRS and the Treasury Department
are aware that some practitioners were
concerned that the notice of proposed
rulemaking did not provide audit
protection when an acquiring
corporation uses a principal method
after the date of distribution or transfer.
For the reasons expressed in the
preamble to the notice of proposed
rulemaking, the final regulations
continue to deny audit protection in
these circumstances. Unlike changes in
method of accounting under section
446(e) for which a taxpayer must
disclose its use of a method of
accounting, proper or improper, as part
of the process for obtaining consent to
make the change, changes to a principal
method pursuant to these final
regulations are made on the acquiring
corporation’s tax return with no
disclosure on a Form 3115,
‘‘Application for Change in Accounting
Method,’’ that a change in method of
accounting occurred.
The IRS and the Treasury Department
are aware that some taxpayers desire to
obtain audit protection for a required
change to a principal method by filing
a Form 3115. However, the IRS and the
Treasury Department believe that, given
E:\FR\FM\01AUR1.SGM
01AUR1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 147 / Monday, August 1, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
the need for efficient tax administration,
filing a Form 3115 merely to obtain
audit protection should not be allowed.
Although audit protection is not
provided for a change to a principal
method required under these
regulations, audit protection ordinarily
is provided for any voluntary change in
method of accounting for which a party
to a section 381(a) transaction obtains
consent under section 446(e) and the
generally applicable administrative
procedures.
Special Analyses
It has been determined that this
Treasury decision is not a significant
regulatory action as defined in
Executive Order 12866. Therefore, a
regulatory assessment is not required. It
is hereby certified that these regulations
will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities. Therefore, a regulatory
flexibility analysis under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. chapter 6) is
not required. This certification is based
on the belief of the IRS and the Treasury
Department that the corporate
reorganizations and tax-free liquidations
described in section 381(a) generally
involve large entities. In addition, these
final regulations reduce the burden on
taxpayers by clarifying and simplifying
the existing rules and make the
procedures for requesting changes in
methods of accounting relating to
corporate reorganizations and tax-free
liquidations described in section 381(a)
consistent with the general rules for
requesting changes in methods of
accounting. Pursuant to section 7805(f),
the notice of proposed rulemaking that
preceded these final regulations was
submitted to the Chief Counsel for
Advocacy of the Small Business
Administration for comment on its
impact on small business. Consistent
with 5 U.S.C. section 553(d), the
regulations are effective 30 days after
publication of this document in the
Federal Register.
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with RULES
Drafting Information
The principal author of these final
regulations is Cheryl Oseekey, Office of
Associate Chief Counsel (Income Tax
and Accounting). However, other
personnel from the IRS and the Treasury
Department participated in their
development.
List of Subjects in 26 CFR Part 1
Income taxes, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:27 Jul 29, 2011
Jkt 223001
Adoption of Amendments to the
Regulations
Accordingly, 26 CFR part 1 is
amended as follows:
PART 1—INCOME TAXES
Paragraph 1. The authority citation
for part 1 continues to read in part as
follows:
■
Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805 * * *
Section 1.381(c)(4)–1 also issued under 26
U.S.C. 381(c)(4). * * *
Section 1.381(c)(5)–1 also issued under 26
U.S.C. 381(c)(5). * * *
Par. 2. In § 1.381(a)–1, paragraph
(b)(1)(i) is revised and paragraph (e) is
added to read as follows:
■
§ 1.381(a)–1 General rule relating to
carryovers in certain corporate
acquisitions.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(1) * * * (i) The complete liquidation
of a subsidiary corporation upon which
no gain or loss is recognized in
accordance with the provisions of
section 332;
*
*
*
*
*
(e) Effective/applicability date. The
rules of paragraph (b)(1)(i) of this
section apply to corporate
reorganizations and tax-free liquidations
described in section 381(a) that occur on
or after August 31, 2011.
■ Par. 3. Section 1.381(c)(4)–1 is revised
to read as follows:
§ 1.381(c)(4)–1
Method of accounting.
(a) Introduction—(1) Purpose. This
section provides guidance regarding the
method of accounting or combination of
methods (other than inventory and
depreciation methods) an acquiring
corporation must use following a
distribution or transfer to which
sections 381(a) and 381(c)(4) apply and
how to implement any associated
change in method of accounting. See
§ 1.381(c)(5)–1 for guidance regarding
the inventory method an acquiring
corporation must use following a
distribution or transfer to which
sections 381(a) and 381(c)(5) apply. See
§ 1.381(c)(6)–1 for guidance regarding
the depreciation method an acquiring
corporation must use following a
distribution or transfer to which
sections 381(a) and 381(c)(6) apply.
(2) Carryover method requirement for
separate and distinct trades or
businesses. In a transaction to which
section 381(a) applies, if an acquiring
corporation continues to operate a trade
or business of the parties to the section
381(a) transaction as a separate and
distinct trade or business after the date
of distribution or transfer, the acquiring
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
45675
corporation must use a carryover
method as defined in paragraph (b)(5) of
this section for each continuing trade or
business, unless either the carryover
method is impermissible and must be
changed under paragraph (a)(4) of this
section or the acquiring corporation
changes the carryover method in
accordance with paragraph (a)(5) of this
section. The carryover method
requirement applies to the overall
method of accounting (for example, an
accrual method of accounting) and any
special method of accounting (for
example, the percentage of completion
method of accounting described in
section 460) as defined in paragraph
(b)(2) of this section used by each trade
or business after the date of distribution
or transfer. The acquiring corporation
need not secure the Commissioner’s
consent to continue a carryover method.
(3) Principal method requirement for
trades or businesses not operated as
separate and distinct trades or
businesses. In a transaction to which
section 381(a) applies, if an acquiring
corporation does not operate the trades
or businesses of the parties to the
section 381(a) transaction as separate
and distinct trades or businesses after
the date of distribution or transfer, the
acquiring corporation must use a
principal method determined under
paragraph (c) of this section, unless
either the principal method is
impermissible and must be changed
under paragraph (a)(4) of this section or
the acquiring corporation changes the
principal method in accordance with
paragraph (a)(5) of this section. The
principal method requirement applies to
the overall method of accounting (for
example, the cash receipts and
disbursements method of accounting)
and any special method of accounting
(for example, the installment method
under section 453) as defined in
paragraph (b)(2) of this section used by
each integrated trade or business after
the date of distribution or transfer. The
acquiring corporation must change to a
principal method in accordance with
paragraph (d)(1) of this section for each
integrated trade or business and need
not secure the Commissioner’s consent
to use a principal method.
(4) Carryover method or principal
method not a permissible method. If a
carryover method or principal method is
not a permissible method of accounting,
the acquiring corporation must secure
the Commissioner’s consent to change
to a permissible method of accounting
as provided in paragraph (d)(2) of this
section. If the acquiring corporation
must use a single method of accounting
for a particular item after the date of
distribution or transfer regardless of the
E:\FR\FM\01AUR1.SGM
01AUR1
45676
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 147 / Monday, August 1, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with RULES
number of separate and distinct trades
or businesses operated on that date, the
acquiring corporation must use the
principal method for that item as
determined under paragraph (c) of this
section, unless either the principal
method is impermissible and must be
changed under this paragraph (a)(4) or
the acquiring corporation changes the
principal method in accordance with
paragraph (a)(5) of this section.
(5) Voluntary change. Any party to a
section 381(a) transaction may request
permission under section 446(e) to
change a method of accounting for the
taxable year in which the transaction
occurs or is expected to occur. For
trades or businesses that will not
operate as separate and distinct trades
or businesses after the date of
distribution or transfer, a change in
method of accounting for the taxable
year that includes that date will be
granted only if the requested method is
the method that the acquiring
corporation must use after the date of
distribution or transfer. The time and
manner of obtaining the Commissioner’s
consent to change to a different method
of accounting is described in paragraph
(d)(2) of this section.
(6) Examples. The following examples
illustrate the rules of this paragraph (a).
Unless otherwise noted, the carryover
method is a permissible method of
accounting.
Example (1). Carryover method for
separate and distinct trades or businesses
after the date of distribution or transfer—(i)
Facts. X Corporation operates an
employment agency that uses the overall
cash receipts and disbursements method of
accounting. T Corporation operates an
educational institution that uses an overall
accrual method of accounting. X Corporation
acquires the assets of T Corporation in a
transaction to which section 381(a) applies.
After the date of distribution or transfer, X
Corporation operates the employment agency
as a trade or business that is separate and
distinct from the educational institution.
(ii) Conclusion. Because after the date of
distribution or transfer X Corporation
operates the employment agency as a
separate and distinct trade or business, under
paragraph (a)(2) of this section X Corporation
must use the carryover method for each
continuing trade or business, unless either
the carryover method is impermissible and
must be changed under paragraph (a)(4) of
this section or X Corporation changes the
carryover method in accordance with
paragraph (a)(5) of this section. As defined in
paragraph (b)(5) of this section, the carryover
method for the employment agency is the
cash receipts and disbursements method of
accounting and the carryover method for the
educational institution is the accrual method
of accounting used by T Corporation
immediately prior to the date of distribution
or transfer. There is no change in method of
accounting, and X Corporation need not
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:27 Jul 29, 2011
Jkt 223001
secure the Commissioner’s consent to use
either carryover method.
Example (2). Carryover method for a
special method of accounting—(i) Facts. X
Corporation provides personal grooming
consulting and T Corporation provides
weight management consulting. Both X
Corporation and T Corporation use the same
overall accrual method of accounting. X
Corporation has elected to use the recurring
item exception under § 1.461–5. T
Corporation does not use the recurring item
exception. X Corporation acquires the assets
of T Corporation in a transaction to which
section 381(a) applies. After the date of
distribution or transfer, X Corporation
operates the personal grooming consulting
business as a trade or business that is
separate and distinct from the weight
management consulting business.
(ii) Conclusion. Because after the date of
distribution or transfer, X Corporation
operates the personal grooming consulting
business as a separate and distinct trade or
business, under paragraph (a)(2) of this
section X Corporation must use a carryover
method for each continuing trade or
business, unless either the carryover method
is impermissible and must be changed under
paragraph (a)(4) of this section or X
Corporation changes the carryover method in
accordance with paragraph (a)(5) of this
section. As defined in paragraph (b)(5) of this
section, the carryover method for the overall
method of accounting for each trade or
business is the accrual method used
immediately prior to the date of distribution
or transfer. The carryover method for the
special method of accounting for the personal
grooming consulting business is the recurring
item exception under § 1.461–5 while the
carryover method for the weight management
consulting business is not to use the
recurring item exception under § 1.461–5.
There is no change in method of accounting,
and X Corporation need not secure the
Commissioner’s consent to use the carryover
methods of accounting.
Example (3). Carryover method for a
special method of accounting not
permissible—(i) Facts. X Corporation is an
engineering firm that uses the overall cash
receipts and disbursements method of
accounting and has elected under section 171
to amortize bond premium with respect to its
taxable bonds acquired at a premium. T
Corporation is a manufacturer that uses an
overall accrual method of accounting and has
not made a section 171 election to amortize
bond premium with respect to its taxable
bonds acquired at a premium. X Corporation
acquires the assets of T Corporation in a
transaction to which section 381(a) applies.
After the date of distribution or transfer, X
Corporation operates the engineering firm as
a trade or business that is separate and
distinct from the manufacturing business.
(ii) Conclusion. Because after the date of
distribution or transfer X Corporation
operates the engineering firm as a separate
and distinct trade or business, under
paragraph (a)(2) of this section X Corporation
must use a carryover method for each
continuing trade or business, unless either
the carryover method is impermissible and
must be changed under paragraph (a)(4) of
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
this section or X Corporation changes the
carryover method in accordance with
paragraph (a)(5) of this section. As defined in
paragraph (b)(5) of this section, the carryover
method for the overall method of accounting
for the engineering firm is the cash receipts
and disbursements method used by X
Corporation immediately prior to the date of
distribution or transfer, and the carryover
method for the overall method of accounting
for the manufacturing business is the accrual
method used by T Corporation immediately
prior to the date of distribution or transfer.
There is no change in method of accounting,
and X Corporation need not secure the
Commissioner’s consent to use either
carryover method. Notwithstanding that after
the date of distribution or transfer X
Corporation has two separate and distinct
trades or businesses, X Corporation is
permitted only one method of accounting for
amortizable bond premium under section
171. Because after the date of distribution or
transfer X Corporation must use a single
method of accounting for bond premium for
all trades or businesses, X Corporation must
use the principal method for that item as
determined under paragraph (c) of this
section, unless either the principal method is
impermissible and must be changed under
paragraph (a)(4) of this section or X
Corporation changes that method in
accordance with paragraph (a)(5) of this
section. X Corporation must change to the
principal method in accordance with
paragraph (d)(1) of this section. If amortizing
bond premium is not the principal method,
X Corporation may make an election to
amortize bond premium to the extent
permitted by section 171. See paragraph
(e)(2) of this section for rules on making
elections.
(b) Definitions. For purposes of this
section—
(1) Method of accounting. A method
of accounting has the same meaning as
provided in section 446 and any
applicable Income Tax Regulations.
(2) Special method of accounting. A
special method of accounting is a
method expressly permitted or required
by the Internal Revenue Code, Income
Tax Regulations, or administrative
guidance published in the Internal
Revenue Bulletin that deviates from the
normal application of the cash receipts
and disbursements method or an accrual
method of accounting. The installment
method under section 453, the mark-tomarket method under section 475, the
amortization of bond premium under
section 171, the percentage of
completion method under section 460,
the recurring item exception of § 1.461–
5, and the income deferral methods
under section 455 and § 1.451–5 are
examples of special methods of
accounting. See § 1.446–1(c)(1)(iii).
(3) Adoption of a method of
accounting. Adoption of a method of
accounting has the same meaning as
provided in § 1.446–1(e)(1).
E:\FR\FM\01AUR1.SGM
01AUR1
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 147 / Monday, August 1, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
(4) Change in method of accounting.
A change in method of accounting has
the same meaning as provided in
§ 1.446–1(e)(2).
(5) Carryover method. A carryover
method for the overall method of
accounting is the overall method of
accounting that each party to a section
381(a) transaction uses for each separate
and distinct trade or business
immediately prior to the date of
distribution or transfer. The carryover
method for a special method of
accounting for an item is the special
method of accounting for that item that
each party to a section 381(a)
transaction uses for each separate and
distinct trade or business immediately
prior to the date of distribution or
transfer.
(6) Principal method. A principal
method is an overall or special method
of accounting that is determined under
paragraph (c) of this section.
(7) Permissible method of accounting.
A permissible method of accounting is
a method of accounting that is proper or
permitted under the Internal Revenue
Code or any applicable Income Tax
Regulations.
(8) Acquiring corporation. An
acquiring corporation has the same
meaning as provided in § 1.381(a)–
1(b)(2).
(9) Distributor corporation. A
distributor corporation means the
corporation, foreign or domestic, that
distributes its assets to another
corporation described in section 332(b)
in a distribution to which section 332
(relating to liquidations of subsidiaries)
applies.
(10) Transferor corporation. A
transferor corporation means the
corporation, foreign or domestic, that
transfers its assets to another
corporation in a transfer to which
section 361 (relating to nonrecognition
of gain or loss to corporations) applies,
but only if—
(i) The transfer is in connection with
a reorganization described in section
368(a)(1)(A), (a)(1)(C), or (a)(1)(F), or
(ii) The transfer is in connection with
a reorganization described in section
368(a)(1)(D) or (a)(1)(G), provided the
requirements of section 354(b) are met.
(11) Parties to the section 381(a)
transaction. Parties to the section 381(a)
transaction means the acquiring
corporation and the distributor or
transferor corporation that participate in
a transaction to which section 381(a)
applies.
(12) Date of distribution or transfer.
The date of distribution or transfer has
the same meaning as provided in
section 381(b)(2) and § 1.381(b)–1(b).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:27 Jul 29, 2011
Jkt 223001
(13) Separate and distinct trades or
businesses. Separate and distinct trades
or businesses has the same meaning as
provided in § 1.446–1(d).
(14) Gross receipts. Gross receipts
means all the receipts, including
amounts that are excludible from gross
income, that must be taken into account
under the method of accounting used in
a representative period (determined
without regard to this section) for
federal income tax purposes. For
example, gross receipts includes income
from investments, amounts received for
services, rents, total sales (net of returns
and allowances), and both taxable and
tax-exempt interest. See paragraph (e)(5)
of this section for rules on determining
the representative period.
(15) Audit protection. Audit
protection means, for purposes of
paragraph (d)(1) of this section, that the
IRS will not require an acquiring
corporation that is required to change a
method of accounting under paragraph
(a)(3) of this section to change that
method for a taxable year ending prior
to the taxable year that includes the date
of distribution or transfer.
(16) Section 481(a) adjustment. The
section 481(a) adjustment means an
adjustment that must be taken into
account as required under section 481(a)
to prevent amounts from being
duplicated or omitted when the taxable
income of an acquiring corporation is
computed under a method of accounting
different from the method used to
compute taxable income for the
preceding taxable year.
(17) Cut-off basis. A cut-off basis
means a manner in which a change in
method of accounting is made without
a section 481(a) adjustment and under
which only the items arising after the
beginning of the year of change (or, in
the case of a change made under
paragraph (d)(1) of this section, after the
date of distribution or transfer) are
accounted for under the new method of
accounting.
(18) Adjustment period. The
adjustment period means the number of
taxable years for taking into account the
section 481(a) adjustment required as a
result of a change in method of
accounting.
(19) Component trade or business. A
component trade or business is a trade
or business of a party to the section
381(a) transaction that will be combined
and integrated with a trade or business
of the other party to the section 381
transaction. See paragraph (e)(4)(ii) of
this section for the determination of
whether a trade or business is operated
as a separate and distinct trade or
business after the date of distribution or
transfer.
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
45677
(c) Principal method—(1) In general.
For each integrated trade or business,
the principal method is generally the
method of accounting used by the
component trade or business of the
acquiring corporation immediately prior
to the date of distribution or transfer. If,
however, the component trade or
business of the distributor or transferor
corporation is larger than the
component trade or business of the
acquiring corporation on the date of
distribution or transfer, the principal
method is the method used by the
component trade or business of the
distributor or transferor corporation
immediately prior to that date. If the
larger component trade or business does
not have a special method of accounting
for a particular item immediately prior
to the date of distribution or transfer,
the principal method for that item is the
method of accounting used by the
component trade or business that does
have a special method of accounting for
that item. See paragraph (e)(9) of this
section for special rules concerning
methods of accounting that are elected
on a project-by-project, job-by-job, or
other similar basis. For each integrated
trade or business, the component trade
or business of the distributor or
transferor corporation is larger than the
component trade or business of the
acquiring corporation on the date of
distribution or transfer if—
(i) The aggregate of the adjusted bases
of the assets held by each component
trade or business of the distributor or
transferor corporation (determined
under section 1011 and any applicable
Income Tax Regulations) exceeds the
aggregate of the adjusted bases of the
assets of each component trade or
business of the acquiring corporation
immediately prior to the date of
distribution or transfer, and
(ii) The aggregate of the gross receipts
for a representative period of each
component trade or business of the
distributor or transferor corporation
exceeds the aggregate of the gross
receipts for the same period of each
component trade or business of the
acquiring corporation. See paragraph
(e)(5) of this section for rules on
determining the representative period.
(2) Multiple component trades or
businesses with different principal
methods. If a party to the section 381(a)
transaction has multiple component
trades or businesses and more than one
principal overall method of accounting
or more than one principal special
method of accounting for an item, then
the acquiring corporation may choose
which of the principal methods of
accounting used by such component
trades or businesses will be the
E:\FR\FM\01AUR1.SGM
01AUR1
45678
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 147 / Monday, August 1, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with RULES
principal methods of the integrated
trade or business. The acquiring
corporation must choose a principal
method that is a permissible method of
accounting. In general, a change to a
principal method in a transaction to
which section 381(a) and paragraph
(a)(3) of this section applies is made
under paragraph (d)(1) of this section.
(3) Examples. The following examples
illustrate the rules of this paragraph (c).
Unless otherwise noted, the principal
method is a permissible method of
accounting.
Example (1). Principal method is the
method used by the acquiring corporation—
(i) Facts. X Corporation and T Corporation
each operate an employment agency. X
Corporation uses the overall cash receipts
and disbursements method of accounting,
and T Corporation uses an overall accrual
method of accounting. X Corporation
acquires the assets of T Corporation in a
transaction to which section 381(a) applies.
The adjusted bases of the assets in X
Corporation’s employment agency
immediately prior to the date of distribution
or transfer exceed the adjusted bases of the
assets in T Corporation’s employment
agency, and the gross receipts in X
Corporation’s employment agency for the
representative period exceed the gross
receipts of T Corporation’s employment
agency for the period. After the date of
distribution or transfer, X Corporation’s
employment agency will not be operated as
a trade or business that is separate and
distinct from T Corporation’s employment
agency.
(ii) Conclusion. Because after the date of
distribution or transfer X Corporation will
not operate its employment agency as a
separate and distinct trade or business, X
Corporation must use a principal method
under paragraph (a)(3) of this section, unless
either the principal method is impermissible
and must be changed under paragraph (a)(4)
of this section or X Corporation changes the
principal method in accordance with
paragraph (a)(5) of this section. Because on
the date of distribution or transfer T
Corporation’s employment agency is not
larger than X Corporation’s employment
agency, the principal method for the overall
method of accounting is the cash receipts and
disbursements method used by X
Corporation’s employment agency. X
Corporation need not secure the
Commissioner’s consent to use this method
of accounting. However, in accordance with
paragraph (d)(1) of this section, X
Corporation must change the method of
accounting for the employment agency
acquired from T Corporation to the cash
receipts and disbursements method.
Example (2). Principal method is the
method used by the acquiring corporation—
(i) Facts. The facts are the same as in
Example (1), except that the gross receipts of
T Corporation’s employment agency for the
representative period exceed the gross
receipts of X Corporation’s employment
agency for the period.
(ii) Conclusion. The result is the same as
in Example (1). Although the gross receipts
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:27 Jul 29, 2011
Jkt 223001
of T Corporation’s employment agency
exceed the gross receipts of X Corporation’s
employment agency, T Corporation’s
employment agency is not larger than X
Corporation’s employment agency because
the adjusted bases of the assets of T
Corporation’s employment agency do not
exceed the adjusted bases of the assets of X
Corporation’s employment agency. Thus, the
principal method for the overall method of
accounting is the cash receipts and
disbursements method of accounting used by
X Corporation’s employment agency
immediately prior to the date of distribution
or transfer. X Corporation need not secure the
Commissioner’s consent to use this method
of accounting. However, in accordance with
paragraph (d)(1) of this section, X
Corporation must change the method of
accounting for the employment agency
business acquired from T Corporation to the
cash receipts and disbursements method.
Example (3). Principal method is the
method used by the distributor or transferor
corporation—(i) Facts. The facts are the same
as in Example (2), except that the adjusted
bases of the assets held by T Corporation’s
employment agency immediately prior to the
date of distribution or transfer exceed the
adjusted bases of the assets held by X
Corporation’s employment agency.
(ii) Conclusion. The principal method for
the overall method of accounting is the
accrual method of accounting used by T
Corporation’s employment agency
immediately prior to the date of distribution
or transfer because on the date of distribution
or transfer T Corporation’s employment
agency is larger than X Corporation’s
employment agency. The adjusted bases of
the assets of T Corporation’s employment
agency exceed the adjusted bases of the
assets of X Corporation’s employment
agency, and the gross receipts of T
Corporation’s employment agency exceed the
gross receipts of X Corporation’s employment
agency. X Corporation need not secure the
Commissioner’s consent to use this method
of accounting. However, in accordance with
paragraph (d)(1) of this section, X
Corporation must change the method of
accounting for the employment agency
business it operated prior to the date of
distribution or transfer to the accrual method
of accounting used by T Corporation’s
employment agency immediately prior to the
date of distribution or transfer.
Example (4). Impermissible principal
method—(i) Facts. The facts are the same as
in Example (1), except that X Corporation is
prohibited under section 448 from using the
cash receipts and disbursements method of
accounting after the date of distribution or
transfer.
(ii) Conclusion. Because section 448
prohibits X Corporation from using the cash
receipts and disbursements method of
accounting, X Corporation is not permitted to
use the principal method for the overall
method of accounting as determined in
Example (1). Because after the date of
distribution or transfer that method is not a
permissible method, under paragraph (a)(4)
of this section X Corporation must secure the
Commissioner’s consent to change to a
permissible method in accordance with the
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
procedures set forth in paragraph (d)(2) of
this section.
Example (5). Voluntary change not
allowable—(i) Facts. The facts are the same
as in Example (4), except that T Corporation
wants to discontinue using the overall
accrual method of accounting for its
employment agency and change to the cash
receipts and disbursements method for the
taxable year in which the section 381(a)
transaction occurs or is expected to occur.
(ii) Conclusion. Under paragraph (a)(5) of
this section, the Commissioner will grant a
request to change a method of accounting for
the taxable year that includes the date of
distribution or transfer only if the requested
method is the method that the acquiring
corporation must use after the date of
distribution or transfer. The Commissioner
will not consent to a request by T
Corporation to change to the cash receipts
and disbursements method for the taxable
year in which the section 381(a) transaction
occurs or is expected to occur because X
Corporation cannot use the cash receipts and
disbursements method after the date of
distribution or transfer.
Example (6). Principal methods are the
acquiring corporation’s methods—(i) Facts. X
Corporation and T Corporation each
publishes magazines. X Corporation acquires
the assets of T Corporation in a transaction
to which section 381(a) applies. Both X
Corporation and T Corporation use an overall
accrual method of accounting. X Corporation
has elected to defer income from its
subscription sales under section 455. T
Corporation has not elected to defer income
from its subscription sales under section 455
and instead has recognized the income from
these sales in accordance with section 451.
The adjusted bases of the assets in X
Corporation’s publication business
immediately prior to the date of distribution
or transfer exceed the adjusted bases of the
assets in T Corporation’s publication
business, and the gross receipts in X
Corporation’s publication business for the
representative period exceed the gross
receipts in T Corporation’s publication
business for the representative period. After
the date of distribution or transfer, X
Corporation will not operate its publication
business as a trade or business that is
separate and distinct from T Corporation’s
publication business.
(ii) Conclusion. Because after the date of
distribution or transfer X Corporation will
not operate its publication business as a
separate and distinct trade or business, X
Corporation must use the principal method
under paragraph (a)(3) of this section, unless
either the principal method is impermissible
and must be changed under paragraph (a)(4)
of this section or X Corporation changes the
principal method in accordance with
paragraph (a)(5) of this section. The adjusted
bases of the assets in T Corporation’s
publication business do not exceed the
adjusted bases of the assets in X
Corporation’s publication business, and the
gross receipts in T Corporation’s publication
business do not exceed the gross receipts in
X Corporation’s publication business.
Because on the date of distribution or transfer
T Corporation’s publication business is not
E:\FR\FM\01AUR1.SGM
01AUR1
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 147 / Monday, August 1, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
larger than X Corporation’s publication
business, the principal method for the overall
method of accounting is the accrual method
used by X Corporation’s publication business
immediately prior to the date of distribution
or transfer. The principal method for
subscription sales is the section 455 deferral
method used by X Corporation immediately
prior to the date of distribution or transfer.
X Corporation need not secure the
Commissioner’s consent to use the principal
method for either the overall method of
accounting or the special method of
accounting. However, in accordance with
paragraph (d)(1) of this section, X
Corporation must change both the overall
method of accounting and the special method
of accounting for the publication business
acquired from T Corporation to the accrual
method and the section 455 deferral method
used by X Corporation immediately prior to
the date of distribution or transfer.
Example (7). Principal methods are the
acquiring corporation’s methods—(i) Facts.
The facts are the same as in Example (6),
except that the adjusted bases of the assets
in T Corporation’s publication business
immediately prior to the date of distribution
or transfer exceed the adjusted bases of the
assets in X Corporation’s business.
(ii) Conclusion. The result is the same as
in Example (6). Because on the date of
distribution or transfer T Corporation’s
publication business is not larger than X
Corporation’s publication business, the
principal method for the overall method of
accounting is the accrual method used by X
Corporation’s publication business
immediately prior to the date of distribution
or transfer. The principal method for
subscription sales is the section 455 deferral
method used by X Corporation immediately
prior to the date of distribution or transfer.
X Corporation need not secure the
Commissioner’s consent to use the principal
method for either the overall method of
accounting or the special method of
accounting. However, in accordance with
paragraph (d)(1) of this section, X
Corporation must change both the overall
method of accounting and the special method
of accounting for the publication business
acquired from T Corporation to the accrual
method and the section 455 deferral method
used by X Corporation immediately prior to
the date of distribution or transfer.
Example (8). Principal method
determination when larger component trade
or business does not have a special method
of accounting—(i) Facts. X Corporation and
T Corporation both install ice skating rinks.
Both X Corporation and T Corporation use an
overall accrual method of accounting for
their respective businesses. X Corporation
completes its installation contracts within
the contracting year and uses an accrual
method of accounting to recognize the
revenue from its installation contracts. T
Corporation’s installation contracts are
subject to section 460, and T Corporation
recognizes the revenue from such contracts
under the percentage-of-completion method.
X Corporation acquires the assets of T
Corporation in a transaction to which section
381(a) applies. The adjusted bases of the
assets in X Corporation’s installation
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:27 Jul 29, 2011
Jkt 223001
business immediately prior to the date of
distribution or transfer exceed the adjusted
bases of the assets in T Corporation’s
installation business, and the gross receipts
in X Corporation’s installation business for
the representative period exceed the gross
receipts in T Corporation’s installation
business for the representative period. After
the date of distribution or transfer, X
Corporation will not operate its installation
business as a trade or business that is
separate and distinct from T Corporation’s
installation business.
(ii) Conclusion. Because after the date of
distribution or transfer X Corporation will
not operate its installation business as a
separate and distinct trade or business, X
Corporation must use a principal method
under paragraph (a)(3) of this section, unless
either the principal method is impermissible
and must be changed under paragraph (a)(4)
of this section or X Corporation changes the
principal method in accordance with
paragraph (a)(5) of this section. The adjusted
bases of the assets in T Corporation’s
installation business do not exceed the
adjusted bases of the assets in X
Corporation’s installation business, and the
gross receipts in T Corporation’s installation
business do not exceed the gross receipts in
X Corporation’s installation business.
Because on the date of distribution or transfer
T Corporation’s installation business is not
larger than X Corporation’s installation
business, the principal method for the overall
method of accounting is the accrual method
used by X Corporation’s installation business
immediately prior to the date of distribution
or transfer. X Corporation need not secure the
Commissioner’s consent to use the principal
method for the overall method of accounting.
However, in accordance with paragraph
(d)(1) of this section, X Corporation must
change the overall method of accounting for
the installation business acquired from T
Corporation to the accrual method used by X
Corporation. Under paragraph (c) of this
section, the principal method for T
Corporation’s long-term contracts is the
percentage-of-completion method used by T
Corporation immediately prior to the date of
distribution or transfer because X
Corporation’s installation business does not
have a method of accounting for long-term
contracts. There is no change in method of
accounting, and X Corporation need not
secure the Commissioner’s consent to use T
Corporation’s percentage-of-completion
method.
Example (9). Principal method
determination with a combined trade or
business and a separate and distinct trade or
business—(i) Facts. X Corporation operates a
tennis academy as a trade or business that is
separate and distinct from its trade or
business of operating a golf academy. X
Corporation uses the overall cash receipts
and disbursements method of accounting for
the tennis academy and an overall accrual
method of accounting for the golf academy.
T Corporation operates a tennis academy and
uses an accrual method of accounting for the
overall method. X Corporation acquires the
assets of T Corporation in a transaction to
which section 381(a) applies. After the date
of distribution or transfer, X Corporation will
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
45679
not operate its tennis academy as a trade or
business that is separate and distinct from T
Corporation’s tennis academy. X Corporation
will continue to operate its golf academy as
a trade or business that is separate and
distinct from the operation of the tennis
academy. The adjusted bases of the assets in
T Corporation’s tennis academy exceed the
adjusted bases of the assets in X
Corporation’s tennis academy immediately
prior to the date of distribution or transfer.
The gross receipts of T Corporation’s tennis
academy for the representative period exceed
the gross receipts of X Corporation’s tennis
academy for that period.
(ii) Conclusion. Because after the date of
distribution or transfer X Corporation will
not operate its tennis academy as a separate
and distinct trade or business, X Corporation
must use a principal method under
paragraph (a)(3) of this section, unless either
the principal method is impermissible and
must be changed under paragraph (a)(4) of
this section or X Corporation changes the
principal method in accordance with
paragraph (a)(5) of this section. Because on
the date of distribution or transfer the tennis
academy operated by T Corporation is larger
than the tennis academy operated by X
Corporation, the principal method for the
overall method of accounting for the
combined tennis academy business is the
accrual method used by T Corporation’s
tennis academy immediately prior to the date
of distribution or transfer. X Corporation
need not secure the Commissioner’s consent
to use the principal method for the overall
method of accounting. However, in
accordance with paragraph (d)(1) of this
section, X Corporation must change the
method of accounting for its tennis academy
to the accrual method. Because X
Corporation will operate the golf academy as
a separate trade or business, under paragraph
(a)(2) of this section X Corporation must
continue to use the accrual method that it
used immediately prior to the date of
distribution or transfer as the carryover
method for the golf academy. There is no
change in method of accounting, and X
Corporation need not secure the
Commissioner’s consent to use the carryover
method.
Example (10). Principal method
determination with multiple component
trades or businesses—(i) Facts. The facts are
the same as in Example (9), except that after
the date of distribution or transfer X
Corporation will not operate its golf academy
as a trade or business that is separate and
distinct from the tennis academy. In
addition, X Corporation’s component trades
or businesses are larger than T Corporation’s
component trade or business: (1) the adjusted
bases of the assets of X Corporation’s tennis
academy and golf academy businesses, in the
aggregate, exceed the adjusted bases of the
assets held by T Corporation’s tennis
academy; and (2) the gross receipts for the
representative period of X Corporation’s
tennis academy and golf academy businesses,
in the aggregate, exceed the gross receipts in
T Corporation’s tennis academy.
(ii) Conclusion. Because on the date of
distribution or transfer T Corporation’s tennis
academy is not larger than X Corporation’s
E:\FR\FM\01AUR1.SGM
01AUR1
45680
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 147 / Monday, August 1, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with RULES
combined tennis academy and golf academy,
the principal method for the overall method
of accounting is the method of accounting
used by the component trades or businesses
of X Corporation that will be combined with
T Corporation’s component trade or business
on that date. Because on the date of
distribution or transfer X Corporation
operates two component trades or businesses
with different overall methods of accounting
that will be integrated after the date of
distribution or transfer, X Corporation may
choose under paragraph (c)(2) of this section
which overall method (and any special
method of accounting) used by its component
trades or businesses will be the principal
method. X Corporation may choose to use
either the accrual method used by the golf
academy or the cash receipts and
disbursements method used by its tennis
academy as the principal method after the
date of distribution or transfer, if either
method is a permissible method. In
accordance with paragraph (d)(1) of this
section, X Corporation must change T
Corporation’s overall method of accounting
to the principal method. Under paragraph
(a)(3) of this section, X Corporation also must
change either its golf academy business or its
tennis academy business, depending on
which principal method X Corporation
selects, to the principal method.
(d) Procedures for changing a method
of accounting—(1) Change made to
principal method under paragraph
(a)(3) of this section—(i) Section 481(a)
adjustment—(A) In general. An
acquiring corporation that changes its
method of accounting or the distributor
or transferor corporation’s method of
accounting under paragraph (a)(3) of
this section does not need to secure the
Commissioner’s consent to use the
principal method. To the extent the use
of a principal method constitutes a
change in method of accounting, the
change in method is treated as a change
initiated by the acquiring corporation
for purposes of section 481(a)(2). Any
change to a principal method, whether
the change relates to a trade or business
of the acquiring corporation or a trade
or business of the distributor or
transferor corporation, must be reflected
on the acquiring corporation’s federal
income tax return for the taxable year
that includes the date of distribution or
transfer. The amount of the section
481(a) adjustment and the adjustment
period, if any, necessary to implement
a change to the principal method are
determined under § 1.446–1(e) and the
applicable administrative procedures
that govern voluntary changes in
methods of accounting under section
446(e). If the Internal Revenue Code, the
Income Tax Regulations, or
administrative procedures require that a
method of accounting be implemented
on a cut-off basis, the acquiring
corporation must implement the change
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:27 Jul 29, 2011
Jkt 223001
on a cut-off basis as of the date of
distribution or transfer on its federal
income tax return for the taxable year
that includes the date of distribution or
transfer. If the Internal Revenue Code,
the Income Tax Regulations, or
administrative procedures require a
section 481(a) adjustment, the acquiring
corporation must determine the section
481(a) adjustment and include the
appropriate amount of the section 481(a)
adjustment on its federal income tax
return for the taxable year that includes
the date of distribution or transfer and
subsequent taxable year(s), as necessary.
This adjustment is determined by the
acquiring corporation as of the
beginning of the day that is immediately
after the date of distribution or transfer.
(B) Example. The following example
illustrates the rules of this paragraph
(d)(1)(i):
Example. X Corporation uses the overall
cash receipts and disbursements method of
accounting, and T Corporation uses an
overall accrual method of accounting. X
Corporation acquires the assets of T
Corporation in a transaction to which section
381(a) applies. X Corporation determines that
under the rules of paragraph (c)(1) of this
section X Corporation must change the
method of accounting for the business
acquired from T Corporation to the cash
receipts and disbursements method. X
Corporation will determine the section 481(a)
adjustment pertaining to the change to the
cash receipts and disbursements method by
consolidating the adjustments (whether the
amounts thereof represent increases or
decreases in items of income or deductions)
arising with respect to balances in the
various accounts, such as accounts
receivable, as of the beginning of the day that
immediately follows the day on which X
Corporation acquires the assets of T
Corporation. X Corporation will reflect this
adjustment, or an appropriate part thereof, on
its federal income tax return for the taxable
year that includes the date of distribution or
transfer.
(ii) Audit protection. Notwithstanding
any other provision in any other Income
Tax Regulation or administrative
procedure, no audit protection is
provided for any change in method of
accounting under paragraph (d)(1) of
this section.
(iii) Other terms and conditions.
Except as otherwise provided in this
section, other terms and conditions
provided in § 1.446–1(e) and the
applicable administrative procedures for
voluntary changes in method of
accounting under section 446(e) apply
to a change in method of accounting
under this section. Thus, for example, if
the administrative procedures for a
particular change in method of
accounting have a term and condition
that provides for the acceleration of the
section 481(a) adjustment period, this
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
term and condition applies to a change
made under this paragraph (d)(1).
However, any scope limitation in the
applicable administrative procedures
will not apply for purposes of making a
change under this paragraph (d)(1). For
example, if the administrative
procedures provide as a limitation that
an identical change in method of
accounting is barred for a period of
years, this limitation will not bar a
change to the principal method made
under this section.
(2) Change made to a method of
accounting under paragraph (a)(4) or
(a)(5) of this section—(i) In general. A
party to a section 381(a) transaction that
changes a method of accounting under
either paragraph (a)(4) or paragraph
(a)(5) of this section must follow the
provisions of § 1.446–(1)(e) and the
applicable administrative procedures,
including scope limitations, for
voluntary changes in method of
accounting under section 446(e), except
as provided in paragraphs (d)(2)(ii) and
(d)(2)(iii) of this section. An application
on Form 3115, ‘‘Application for Change
in Accounting Method,’’ filed with the
IRS to change a method of accounting
under this paragraph (d)(2) should be
labeled ‘‘Filed under section 381(c)(4)’’
at the top.
(ii) Final year limitation. Any scope
limitation relating to the final year of a
trade or business will not apply to a
taxpayer that changes its method of
accounting in the final year of a trade or
business that is terminated as the result
of a section 381(a) transaction.
(iii) Time to file. Under the authority
of § 1.446–1(e)(3)(ii), for a change in
method of accounting requiring advance
consent, the application for a change in
method of accounting (for example,
Form 3115) must be filed with the IRS
on or before the later of—
(A) The due date for filing a Form
3115 as specified in § 1.446–1(e), for
example, the last day of the taxable year
in which the distribution or transfer
occurred, or
(B) The earlier of—
(1) The day that is 180 days after the
date of distribution or transfer, or
(2) The day on which the acquiring
corporation files its federal income tax
return for the taxable year in which the
distribution or transfer occurred.
(e) Rules and procedures—(1) No
method of accounting. If a party to a
section 381(a) transaction is not using a
method of accounting, does not have a
method of accounting for a particular
item, or came into existence as a result
of the transaction, the party will not be
treated as having a method of
accounting different from that used by
E:\FR\FM\01AUR1.SGM
01AUR1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 147 / Monday, August 1, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
another party to the section 381(a)
transaction.
(2) Elections and adoptions allowed.
If an election does not require the
Commissioner’s consent, an acquiring
corporation or a distributor or transferor
corporation is not precluded from
making any election that is otherwise
permissible for the taxable year that
includes the date of distribution or
transfer. For purposes of this section, a
corporation shall be deemed as having
made any election as of the first day of
the taxable year that includes the date
of distribution or transfer. Similarly,
where adoption is permissible, an
acquiring corporation or a distributor or
transferor corporation may adopt any
permissible method of accounting for
the taxable year that includes the date
of distribution or transfer.
(3) Elections continue after section
381(a) transaction—(i) General rule. An
acquiring corporation is not required to
renew any election not otherwise
requiring renewal and previously made
by it or by a distributor or transferor
corporation for a carryover method or a
principal method if the acquiring
corporation uses the method after the
section 381(a) transaction. If the
acquiring corporation uses a method
after the date of distribution or transfer,
an election made by the acquiring
corporation or by a distributor or
transferor corporation for that method
that was in effect on the date of
distribution or transfer continues after
the section 381(a) transaction as though
the distribution or transfer had not
occurred.
(ii) Example. The following example
illustrates the rules of this paragraph
(e)(3):
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with RULES
Example. The acquiring corporation, X
Corporation, previously elected to amortize
bond premium under section 171. X
Corporation acquires the assets of T
Corporation in a transaction to which section
381(a) applies. X Corporation determines
under the rules of paragraph (c)(1) of this
section that X Corporation’s method of
amortizing bond premium is the principal
method. After the date of distribution or
transfer, X Corporation is not required to
renew its bond premium amortization
election and is bound by it. Additionally, X
Corporation would not be required to renew
its election to amortize bond premium if the
method were the carryover method under
paragraph (a)(2) of this section.
(4) Appropriate times for certain
determinations—(i) Determining the
method of accounting. The method of
accounting used by a party to a section
381(a) transaction on the date of
distribution or transfer is the method of
accounting used by that party as of the
end of the day that is immediately prior
to the date of distribution or transfer.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:27 Jul 29, 2011
Jkt 223001
(ii) Determining whether there are
separate and distinct trades or
businesses after the date of distribution
or transfer. Whether an acquiring
corporation will operate the trades or
businesses of the parties to a section
381(a) transaction as separate and
distinct trades or businesses after the
date of distribution or transfer will be
determined as of the date of distribution
or transfer based upon the facts and
circumstances. Intent to combine books
and records of the trades or businesses
may be demonstrated by
contemporaneous records and
documents or by other objective
evidence that reflects the acquiring
corporation’s ultimate plan of operation,
even though the actual combination of
the books and records may extend
beyond the end of the taxable year that
includes the date of distribution or
transfer.
(5) Representative period for
aggregating gross receipts. The
representative period for measuring
gross receipts is generally the 12
consecutive months preceding the date
of distribution or transfer. If a
component trade or business was not in
existence for the 12 consecutive months
preceding the date of distribution or
transfer, then all component trades or
businesses of each integrated trade or
business will compare their gross
receipts for the period that such trade or
business was in existence. For example,
if the acquiring corporation’s
component trade or business was
formed in August and the date of
distribution or transfer occurred in
December of the same year, the gross
receipts for those five months will be
compared with the gross receipts of the
other component trades or businesses
for the same period.
(6) Establishing a method of
accounting. A method of accounting
used by the distributor or transferor
corporation immediately prior to the
date of distribution or transfer that
continues to be used by the acquiring
corporation after the date of distribution
or transfer is an established method of
accounting for purposes of section
446(e), whether or not such method is
proper or is permitted under the
Internal Revenue Code or any applicable
Income Tax Regulations.
(7) Other applicable provisions. This
section does not preempt any other
provision of the Internal Revenue Code
or the Income Tax Regulations that is
applicable to the acquiring corporation’s
circumstances. For example, income,
deductions, credits, allowances, and
exclusions may be allocated among the
parties to a section 381(a) transaction
and other taxpayers under sections 269
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
45681
and 482, if appropriate. Similarly,
transfers of contracts accounted for
using a long-term contract method of
accounting are governed by the rules
provided in § 1.460–4(k). Further, if
other paragraphs of section 381(c) apply
for purposes of determining the
methods of accounting to be used
following the date of distribution or
transfer, section 381(c)(4) and this
§ 1.381(c)(4)–1 will not apply to the tax
treatment of the items. For example, this
section does not apply to inventories
that an acquiring corporation obtains in
a transaction to which section 381(a)
applies. Instead, the rules of section
381(c)(5) govern the inventory method
to be used by the acquiring corporation
after the distribution or transfer.
Similarly, if the acquiring corporation
assumes an obligation of the distributor
or transferor corporation that gives rise
to a liability after the date of
distribution or transfer and to which
§ 1.381(c)(16)–1 applies, the
deductibility of the item is determined
under this section only after the rules of
section 381(c)(16) are applied.
(8) Character of items of income and
deduction. After the date of distribution
or transfer, items of income and
deduction have the same character in
the hands of the acquiring corporation
as they would have had in the hands of
the distributor or transferor corporation
if no distribution or transfer had
occurred.
(9) Method of accounting selected by
project or job. If other sections of the
Internal Revenue Code, Income Tax
Regulations, or other administrative
guidance permit an acquiring
corporation to elect a method of
accounting on a project-by-project, jobby-job, or other similar basis, then for
purposes of this section the method
elected with respect to each project or
job is the established method only for
that project or job. For example, the
election under section 460 to classify a
contract to perform both manufacturing
and construction activities as a longterm construction contract if at least 95
percent of the estimated total allocable
contract costs are reasonably allocated
to the construction activities is made on
a contract-by-contract basis.
Accordingly, the method of accounting
previously elected for a project or job
generally continues after the date of
distribution or transfer. However, if the
trades or businesses of the parties to a
section 381(a) transaction are not
operated as separate and distinct trades
or businesses after the date of
distribution or transfer, and two or more
of the parties to the section 381(a)
transaction previously worked on the
same project or job and used different
E:\FR\FM\01AUR1.SGM
01AUR1
45682
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 147 / Monday, August 1, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
methods of accounting for the project or
job immediately before the distribution
or transfer, then the acquiring
corporation must determine the
principal method for that project or job
under paragraph (c) of this section and
make changes, if necessary, to the
principal method in accordance with
paragraph (d)(1) of this section.
(10) Impermissible method of
accounting. This section does not limit
the Commissioner’s ability under
section 446(b) to determine whether a
taxpayer’s method of accounting is an
impermissible method or otherwise fails
to clearly reflect income. For example,
an acquiring corporation may not use
the method of accounting determined
under paragraph (a)(2) of this section if
the method fails to clearly reflect the
acquiring corporation’s income within
the meaning of section 446(b).
(f) Effective/applicability date. This
section applies to corporate
reorganizations and tax-free liquidations
described in section 381(a) that occur on
or after August 31, 2011.
■ Par. 4. Section 1.381(c)(5)–1 is revised
to read as follows:
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with RULES
§ 1.381(c)(5)–1
Inventory method.
(a) Introduction—(1) Purpose. This
section provides guidance regarding the
inventory method an acquiring
corporation must use following a
distribution or transfer to which
sections 381(a) and 381(c)(5) apply and
how to implement any associated
change in method of accounting. See
§ 1.381(c)(4)–1 for guidance regarding
the method of accounting or
combination of methods (other than
inventory and depreciation methods) an
acquiring corporation must use
following a distribution or transfer to
which sections 381(a) and 381(c)(4)
apply. See § 1.381(c)(6)–1 for guidance
regarding the depreciation method an
acquiring corporation must use
following a distribution or transfer to
which sections 381(a) and 381(c)(6)
apply.
(2) Carryover method requirement for
separate and distinct trades or
businesses. In a transaction to which
section 381(a) applies, if an acquiring
corporation continues to operate a trade
or business of the parties to the section
381(a) transaction as a separate and
distinct trade or business after the date
of distribution or transfer, the acquiring
corporation must use a carryover
method as defined in paragraph (b)(4) of
this section for each continuing trade or
business, unless either the carryover
method is impermissible and must be
changed under paragraph (a)(4) of this
section or the acquiring corporation
changes the carryover method in
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:27 Jul 29, 2011
Jkt 223001
accordance with paragraph (a)(5) of this
section. The acquiring corporation need
not secure the Commissioner’s consent
to continue a carryover method.
(3) Principal method requirement for
trades or businesses not operated as
separate and distinct trades or
businesses. In a transaction to which
section 381(a) applies, if an acquiring
corporation does not operate the trades
or businesses of the parties to the
section 381(a) transaction as separate
and distinct trades or businesses after
the date of distribution or transfer, the
acquiring corporation must use a
principal method determined under
paragraph (c) of this section, unless
either the principal method is
impermissible and must be changed
under paragraph (a)(4) of this section or
the acquiring corporation changes the
principal method in accordance with
paragraph (a)(5) of this section. The
acquiring corporation must change to a
principal method in accordance with
paragraph (d)(1) of this section for each
integrated trade or business and need
not secure the Commissioner’s consent
to use a principal method.
(4) Carryover method or principal
method not a permissible method. If a
carryover method or principal method is
not a permissible inventory method, the
acquiring corporation must secure the
Commissioner’s consent to change to a
permissible inventory method as
provided in paragraph (d)(2) of this
section. If the acquiring corporation
must use a single inventory method for
a particular type of goods after the date
of distribution or transfer regardless of
the number of separate and distinct
trades or businesses operated on that
date, the acquiring corporation must use
the principal method for that type of
goods as determined under paragraph
(c) of this section, unless either the
principal method is impermissible and
must be changed under this paragraph
(a)(4) or the acquiring corporation
changes the principal method in
accordance with paragraph (a)(5) of this
section.
(5) Voluntary change. Any party to a
section 381(a) transaction may request
permission under section 446(e) to
change an inventory method for the
taxable year in which the transaction
occurs or is expected to occur. For
trades or businesses that will not
operate as separate and distinct trades
or businesses after the date of
distribution or transfer, a change in
method of accounting for the taxable
year that includes that date will be
granted only if the requested inventory
method is the method that the acquiring
corporation must use after the date of
distribution or transfer. The time and
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
manner of obtaining the Commissioner’s
consent to change to a different
inventory method is described in
paragraph (d)(2) of this section.
(6) Examples. The following examples
illustrate the rules of this paragraph (a).
Unless otherwise noted, the carryover
method is a permissible inventory
method.
Example (1). Carryover method for
separate and distinct trades or businesses
after the date of distribution or transfer—(i)
Facts. X Corporation manufactures radios
and television sets. X Corporation uses the
first-in, first-out (FIFO) method of inventory
identification, the cost method of valuing its
inventories, and capitalizes inventory costs
in accordance with section 263A. T
Corporation manufactures washing machines
and dryers. T Corporation uses the last-in,
first-out (LIFO) method of inventory
identification, the cost method of valuing its
inventories, and capitalizes inventory costs
under section 263A using methods other than
those used by X Corporation. X Corporation
acquires the inventory of T Corporation in a
transaction to which section 381(a) applies.
After the date of distribution or transfer, X
Corporation operates its radio and television
manufacturing business as a trade or business
that is separate and distinct from its washing
machines and dryers manufacturing
business.
(ii) Conclusion. Because after the date of
distribution or transfer X Corporation
operates its manufacturing businesses as
separate and distinct trades or businesses,
under paragraph (a)(2) of this section X
Corporation must use the carryover methods
for each continuing trade or business, unless
either the carryover methods are
impermissible and must be changed under
paragraph (a)(4) of this section or X
Corporation changes the carryover methods
in accordance with paragraph (a)(5) of this
section. As defined in paragraph (b)(4) of this
section, the carryover methods for the radios
and television sets manufacturing business
are the FIFO method, the cost basis of
valuation, and X Corporation’s methods of
accounting for section 263A costs
immediately prior to the date of distribution
or transfer. The carryover methods for the
washing machines and dryers manufacturing
business are the LIFO method, the cost basis
of valuation, and T Corporation’s methods of
accounting for section 263A costs
immediately prior to the date of distribution
or transfer. There is no change in method of
accounting, and X Corporation need not
secure the Commissioner’s consent to use
any carryover method.
Example (2). Carryover method not
permissible—(i) Facts. X Corporation
manufactures food and beverages and uses
the FIFO method of inventory identification,
the cost method of valuing its inventories,
and capitalizes costs in accordance with
section 263A. T Corporation sells sporting
equipment. T Corporation uses the FIFO
method of inventory identification and the
cost method of valuing its inventories. T
Corporation does not capitalize costs under
section 263A because it meets the small
reseller exception under section 263A. X
E:\FR\FM\01AUR1.SGM
01AUR1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 147 / Monday, August 1, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with RULES
Corporation acquires the inventory of T
Corporation in a transaction to which section
381(a) applies. After the date of distribution
or transfer, X Corporation operates the food
and beverages business as a trade or business
that is separate and distinct from the sporting
equipment business, and X Corporation does
not qualify for the small reseller exception
under section 263A for its sporting
equipment business.
(ii) Conclusion. Because after the date of
distribution or transfer X Corporation
operates the food and beverages business as
a separate and distinct trade or business,
under paragraph (a)(2) of this section X
Corporation must use the carryover methods
for each continuing trade or business, unless
either the carryover methods are
impermissible and must be changed under
paragraph (a)(4) of this section or X
Corporation changes the carryover methods
in accordance with paragraph (a)(5) of this
section. As defined in paragraph (b)(4) of this
section, the carryover methods for the food
and beverages business are the FIFO method,
the cost basis of valuation, and X
Corporation’s methods of capitalizing costs
under section 263A immediately prior to the
date of distribution or transfer. The carryover
methods for the sporting equipment business
are the FIFO method and the cost basis of
valuation. There is no change in method of
accounting, and X Corporation need not
secure the Commissioner’s consent to use
any carryover method. However, because X
Corporation does not qualify for the small
reseller exception under section 263A for its
sporting equipment business, X Corporation’s
method of not capitalizing additional section
263A costs is an impermissible carryover
method under paragraph (a)(4) of this
section. X Corporation must secure the
Commissioner’s consent to change to a
permissible method of capitalizing costs
under section 263A for the sporting
equipment business as provided in paragraph
(d)(2) of this section.
(b) Definitions. (1) Inventory method.
An inventory method is a method of
accounting used to account for
merchandise on hand (including
finished goods, work in process, and
raw materials) at the beginning of a year
for purposes of computing taxable
income for that year. The term includes
not only the method for identifying
inventory, for example, the FIFO
inventory method or the LIFO inventory
method, but also all other methods
necessary to account for merchandise.
(2) Adoption of a method of
accounting. Adoption of a method of
accounting has the same meaning as
provided in § 1.446–1(e)(1).
(3) Change in method of accounting.
A change in method of accounting has
the same meaning as provided in
§ 1.446–1(e)(2).
(4) Carryover method. A carryover
method is an inventory method that
each party to a section 381(a)
transaction uses for each separate and
distinct trade or business immediately
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:27 Jul 29, 2011
Jkt 223001
prior to the date of distribution or
transfer.
(5) Principal method. A principal
method is an inventory method that is
determined under paragraph (c) of this
section.
(6) Permissible method of accounting.
A permissible method of accounting is
a method of accounting that is proper or
permitted under the Internal Revenue
Code or any applicable Income Tax
Regulations.
(7) Acquiring corporation. An
acquiring corporation has the same
meaning as provided in § 1.381(a)–
1(b)(2).
(8) Distributor corporation. A
distributor corporation means the
corporation, foreign or domestic, that
distributes its assets to another
corporation described in section 332(b)
in a distribution to which section 332
(relating to liquidations of subsidiaries)
applies.
(9) Transferor corporation. A
transferor corporation means the
corporation, foreign or domestic, that
transfers its assets to another
corporation in a transfer to which
section 361 (relating to nonrecognition
of gain or loss to corporations) applies,
but only if—
(i) The transfer is in connection with
a reorganization described in section
368(a)(1)(A), (a)(1)(C), or (a)(1)(F), or
(ii) The transfer is in connection with
a reorganization described in section
368(a)(1)(D) or (a)(1)(G), provided the
requirements of section 354(b) are met.
(10) Parties to the section 381(a)
transaction. Parties to the section 381(a)
transaction means the acquiring
corporation and the distributor or
transferor corporation that participate in
a transaction to which section 381(a)
applies.
(11) Date of distribution or transfer.
The date of distribution or transfer has
the same meaning as provided in
section 381(b)(2) and § 1.381(b)–1(b).
(12) Separate and distinct trades or
businesses. Separate and distinct trades
or businesses has the same meaning as
provided in § 1.446–1(d).
(13) Audit protection. Audit
protection means, for purposes of
paragraph (d)(1) of this section, that the
IRS will not require an acquiring
corporation that is required to change a
method of accounting under paragraph
(a)(3) of this section to change that
method for a taxable year ending prior
to the taxable year that includes the date
of distribution or transfer.
(14) Section 481(a) adjustment. The
section 481(a) adjustment means an
adjustment that must be taken into
account as required under section 481(a)
to prevent amounts from being
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
45683
duplicated or omitted when the taxable
income of an acquiring corporation is
computed under a method of accounting
different from the method used to
compute taxable income for the
preceding taxable year.
(15) Cut-off basis. A cut-off basis
means a manner in which a change in
method of accounting is made without
a section 481(a) adjustment and under
which only the items arising after the
beginning of the year of change (or, in
the case of a change made under
paragraph (d)(1) of this section, after the
date of distribution or transfer) are
accounted for under the new method of
accounting. When it implements the
change on a cut-off basis, a taxpayer
using the LIFO inventory method to
identify its inventory goods that makes
a change in method of accounting
within the LIFO inventory method from
one LIFO method or sub-method to
another LIFO method or sub-method
uses the new LIFO inventory method to
determine its current-year cost and baseyear cost of ending inventories for the
year of change, but does not recompute
the cost of beginning inventories for the
year of change using the new LIFO
inventory method.
(16) Adjustment period. The
adjustment period means the number of
taxable years for taking into account the
section 481(a) adjustment required as a
result of a change in method of
accounting.
(17) Component trade or business. A
component trade or business is a trade
or business of a party to the section
381(a) transaction that will be combined
and integrated with a trade or business
of the other party to the section 381
transaction. See paragraph (e)(7)(ii) of
this section for the determination of
whether a trade or business is operated
as a separate and distinct trade or
business after the date of distribution or
transfer.
(c) Principal method—(1) In general.
For each integrated trade or business,
the principal method for a particular
type of goods is generally the inventory
method used by the component trade or
business of the acquiring corporation
immediately prior to the date of
distribution or transfer for that type of
goods. If, however, on the date of
distribution or transfer the component
trade or business of the distributor or
transferor corporation holds more
inventory of a type of goods than the
component trade or business of the
acquiring corporation, the principal
method for such goods is the inventory
method used by the component trade or
business of the distributor or transferor
corporation immediately prior to that
date. For each integrated trade or
E:\FR\FM\01AUR1.SGM
01AUR1
45684
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 147 / Monday, August 1, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with RULES
business, the component trade or
business of the distributor or transferor
corporation holds more inventory if, for
a particular type of goods, the aggregate
of the fair market value of the goods
held by each component trade or
business of the distributor or transferor
corporation exceeds the aggregate of the
fair market value of the goods held by
each component trade or business of the
acquiring corporation immediately prior
to the date of distribution or transfer.
Alternatively, as a simplifying
convention, the acquiring corporation
may elect to apply the preceding
sentence to the aggregate fair market
value of the entire inventories, held by
each component trade or business of the
acquiring corporation and each
component trade or business of the
distributor or transferor corporation,
that will be integrated after the date of
distribution or transfer. If the
component trade or business with the
larger aggregate fair market value of the
entire inventories does not have an
inventory method for a particular type
of goods immediately prior to the date
of distribution or transfer, the principal
method for that type of goods is the
inventory method used by the
component trade or business that does
have an inventory method for that type
of goods.
(2) Multiple component trades or
businesses with different principal
methods. If a party to the section 381(a)
transaction has multiple component
trades or businesses and more than one
principal inventory method for a
particular type of goods, then the
acquiring corporation may choose
which of the inventory methods used by
such component trades or businesses
will be the principal method of the
integrated trade or business. The
acquiring corporation must choose a
principal method that is a permissible
method of accounting. In general, a
change to a principal method in a
transaction to which section 381(a) and
paragraph (a)(3) of this section apply is
made under paragraph (d)(1) of this
section.
(3) Examples. The following examples
illustrate the rules of this paragraph (c).
Unless otherwise noted, the principal
method is a permissible inventory
method.
Example (1). Principal methods are the
methods used by the acquiring corporation—
(i) Facts. X Corporation and T Corporation
each manufacture tennis equipment. X
Corporation’s manufacturing business uses
the FIFO method of inventory identification,
the cost method of valuing inventories, and
allocates indirect costs to the property
produced using the burden rate method
provided in § 1.263A–1(f)(3)(i). T
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:41 Jul 29, 2011
Jkt 223001
Corporation’s manufacturing business uses
the LIFO method of inventory identification,
the cost method of valuing its inventories,
and allocates indirect costs to the property it
produces using the standard cost method
provided in § 1.263A–1(f)(3)(ii). X
Corporation acquires the inventory of T
Corporation in a transaction to which section
381(a) applies. The fair market value of each
particular type of goods held by X
Corporation’s manufacturing business
immediately prior to the date of distribution
or transfer exceeds the fair market value of
each particular type of goods held by T
Corporation’s manufacturing business on that
date. After the date of distribution or transfer,
X Corporation will not operate its
manufacturing business as a trade or business
that is separate and distinct from T
Corporation’s manufacturing business.
(ii) Conclusion. Because after the date of
distribution or transfer X Corporation will
not operate its manufacturing business as a
separate and distinct trade or business, X
Corporation must use the principal methods
under paragraph (a)(3) of this section, unless
either the principal methods are
impermissible and must be changed under
paragraph (a)(4) of this section or X
Corporation changes the principal methods
in accordance with paragraph (a)(5) of this
section. The fair market value of each
particular type of goods held by T
Corporation’s manufacturing business
immediately prior to the date of distribution
or transfer does not exceed the fair market
value of each particular type of goods held
by X Corporation’s manufacturing business
on that date. Because on the date of
distribution or transfer T Corporation’s
manufacturing business does not hold more
inventory than X Corporation’s
manufacturing business, the principal
methods are the FIFO method of inventory
identification, the cost method of valuation,
and X Corporation’s method of allocating
indirect costs under section 263A using the
burden rate method. X Corporation need not
secure the Commissioner’s consent to use
these methods. However, in accordance with
paragraph (d)(1) of this section, X
Corporation must change the inventory
methods for the manufacturing business
acquired from T Corporation to the principal
methods.
Example (2). Principal methods are the
methods used by the acquiring corporation—
(i) Facts. The facts are the same as in
Example (1), except that the fair market value
of each particular type of goods held by X
Corporation’s manufacturing business
immediately prior to the date of distribution
or transfer is identical to the fair market
value of each particular type of goods held
by T Corporation’s manufacturing business
on that date.
(ii) Conclusion. The result is the same as
in Example (1). The principal methods are
the FIFO method of inventory identification,
the cost method of valuation, and X
Corporation’s method of allocating indirect
costs under section 263A using the burden
rate method. X Corporation need not secure
the Commissioner’s consent to use the
principal methods. However, in accordance
with paragraph (d)(1) of this section, X
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Corporation must change the inventory
methods for the manufacturing business
acquired from T Corporation to the principal
methods.
Example (3). Principal methods are the
methods used by the distributor or transferor
corporation—(i) Facts. The facts are the same
as in Example (1), except that the fair market
value of each particular type of goods held
by T Corporation’s manufacturing business
immediately prior to the date of distribution
or transfer exceeds the fair market value of
each particular type of goods held by X
Corporation’s manufacturing business on that
date.
(ii) Conclusion. Because after the date of
distribution or transfer X Corporation will
not operate its manufacturing business as a
separate and distinct trade or business, X
Corporation must use the principal methods
under paragraph (a)(3) of this section, unless
either the principal methods are
impermissible and must be changed under
paragraph (a)(4) of this section or X
Corporation changes the principal methods
in accordance with paragraph (a)(5) of this
section. The fair market value of each
particular type of goods held by T
Corporation’s manufacturing business
immediately prior to the date of distribution
or transfer exceeds the fair market value of
each particular type of goods held by X
Corporation’s manufacturing business on that
date. Because on the date of distribution or
transfer T Corporation’s manufacturing
business holds more inventory than X
Corporation’s manufacturing business, the
principal methods are the LIFO method of
inventory identification, the cost method of
valuation, and T Corporation’s method of
allocating indirect costs under section 263A
using the standard cost method. X
Corporation need not secure the
Commissioner’s consent to use the principal
methods. However, in accordance with
paragraph (d)(1) of this section, X
Corporation must change the inventory
methods for the manufacturing business
operated by X Corporation prior to the date
of distribution or transfer to the principal
methods.
Example (4). Voluntary change allowable—
(i) Facts. The facts are the same as in
Example (1), except that T Corporation wants
to discontinue using the LIFO method for its
manufacturing business and change to the
FIFO method for the taxable year in which
the section 381(a) transaction occurs or is
expected to occur.
(ii) Conclusion. Under paragraph (a)(5) of
this section, the Commissioner will grant a
request to change a method of accounting for
the taxable year that includes the date of
distribution or transfer only if the requested
method is the method that the acquiring
corporation must use after the date of
distribution or transfer. The Commissioner
will consent to a request by T Corporation to
change to the FIFO method for the taxable
year in which the section 381(a) transaction
occurs or is expected to occur because X
Corporation will use this method after the
date of distribution or transfer.
Example (5). Principal method
determination when larger component trade
or business does not have a method of
E:\FR\FM\01AUR1.SGM
01AUR1
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 147 / Monday, August 1, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
accounting for a particular type of goods—(i)
Facts. The facts are the same as in Example
(1), except that T Corporation’s
manufacturing business has a particular type
of goods that is not held by X Corporation’s
manufacturing business.
(ii) Conclusion. The result is similar to
Example (1). In general, the principal
methods are the FIFO method of inventory
identification, the cost method of valuation,
and X Corporation’s method of allocating
indirect costs to the property produced using
the burden rate method. X Corporation need
not secure the Commissioner’s consent to use
the principal methods. However, in
accordance with paragraph (d)(1) of this
section, X Corporation must change the
inventory methods for the manufacturing
business acquired from T Corporation to the
principal methods. Under paragraph (c) of
this section, the principal methods for the
particular type of goods held only by T
Corporation’s manufacturing business are the
LIFO method of inventory identification, the
cost method of valuation, and T
Corporation’s method of allocating indirect
costs to the property it produces using the
standard cost method. X Corporation must
determine whether the principal methods for
the type of goods previously held by T
Corporation are permissible given that such
methods are different than the principal
methods that must be used by X for all other
goods. If X Corporation’s use of the standard
cost method would be impermissible after
the date of distribution or transfer, X
Corporation must change to a permissible
method under section 263A for those goods
in accordance with paragraph (a)(4) of this
section.
Example (6). Inventory convention
elected—(i) Facts. X Corporation
manufactures planes and T Corporation
manufactures planes and communications
satellites. X Corporation’s manufacturing
business uses the FIFO method of inventory
identification and values its inventories at
cost or market, whichever is lower, while T
Corporation’s manufacturing business uses
the LIFO method of inventory identification
and values its inventories at cost. X
Corporation’s manufacturing business and T
Corporation’s manufacturing business, use
the same methods to capitalize costs under
section 263A. X Corporation acquires the
inventory of T Corporation in a transaction
to which section 381(a) applies. In lieu of
determining the fair market value of each
particular type of goods held on the date of
distribution or transfer, X Corporation elects
to value the entire inventories of its
manufacturing business and the entire
inventories of T Corporation’s manufacturing
business in accordance with paragraph (c)(1)
of this section. The fair market value of the
inventory held by T Corporation’s
manufacturing business immediately prior to
the date of distribution or transfer does not
exceed the fair market value of the inventory
held by X Corporation’s manufacturing
business on that date. After the date of
distribution or transfer, X Corporation will
not operate its manufacturing business as a
trade or business that is separate and distinct
from T Corporation’s manufacturing
business.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:27 Jul 29, 2011
Jkt 223001
(ii) Conclusion. Because after the date of
distribution or transfer X Corporation will
not operate its manufacturing business as a
separate and distinct trade or business, X
Corporation must use the principal methods
under paragraph (a)(3) of this section, unless
either the principal methods are
impermissible and must be changed under
paragraph (a)(4) of this section or X
Corporation changes the principal methods
in accordance with paragraph (a)(5) of this
section. The fair market value of the entire
inventory held by T Corporation’s
manufacturing business immediately prior to
the date of distribution or transfer does not
exceed the fair market value of the entire
inventory of X Corporation’s manufacturing
business on that date. Because on the date of
distribution or transfer T Corporation’s
manufacturing business does not hold more
inventory than X Corporation’s
manufacturing business, the principal
methods are the FIFO method, the cost or
market, whichever is lower, method of
valuation, and X Corporation’s method of
capitalizing costs under section 263A on the
date of distribution or transfer. X Corporation
need not secure the Commissioner’s consent
to use the principal methods. However, in
accordance with paragraph (d)(1) of this
section, X Corporation must change the
inventory methods for the manufacturing
business acquired from T Corporation to the
principal methods.
Example (7). Principal method
determination with a combined trade or
business and a separate and distinct trade or
business—(i) Facts. X Corporation
manufactures tennis equipment in a trade or
business that is separate and distinct from its
trade or business of manufacturing golf
equipment. X Corporation uses the FIFO
method of inventory identification for its
tennis equipment and the LIFO method of
inventory identification for its golf
equipment. X Corporation values the goods
in both inventories at cost and allocates
indirect costs to the property produced using
the burden rate method provided in
§ 1.263A–1(f)(3)(i). T Corporation
manufactures tennis equipment. T
Corporation’s manufacturing business uses
the FIFO method of inventory identification,
values inventories at cost, and allocates
indirect costs to the property it produces
using the standard cost method provided in
§ 1.263A–1(f)(3)(ii). X Corporation acquires
the inventory of T Corporation in a
transaction to which section 381(a) applies.
Immediately prior to the date of distribution
or transfer, the fair market value of T
Corporation’s inventories in the tennis
equipment manufacturing business exceeds
the fair market value of the inventories held
by X Corporation’s tennis equipment
manufacturing business. After the date of
distribution or transfer, X Corporation will
not operate its tennis equipment
manufacturing business as a trade or business
that is separate and distinct from T
Corporation’s tennis equipment
manufacturing business, but X Corporation
will operate its golf equipment
manufacturing business as a trade or business
that is separate and distinct from the tennis
equipment manufacturing business.
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
45685
(ii) Conclusion. Because after the date of
distribution or transfer X Corporation will
not operate its tennis equipment
manufacturing business as a separate and
distinct trade or business, X Corporation
must use the principal methods under
paragraph (a)(3) of this section, unless either
the principal methods are impermissible and
must be changed under paragraph (a)(4) of
this section or X Corporation changes the
principal methods in accordance with
paragraph (a)(5) of this section. Under
paragraph (c)(1) of this section, X
Corporation elects to compare the fair market
values of the entire inventories of the
component trades or businesses on the date
of distribution or transfer to determine
whether T Corporation holds more inventory
than X Corporation. The fair market value of
the inventory held by T Corporation’s tennis
equipment manufacturing business exceeds
the fair market value of the tennis equipment
held by X Corporation’s tennis equipment
manufacturing business. Because on the date
of distribution or transfer T Corporation’s
tennis equipment manufacturing business
holds more inventory than X Corporation’s
tennis equipment manufacturing business,
the principal methods for the combined
tennis equipment business are the FIFO
method of inventory identification, the cost
basis of valuation, and T Corporation’s
methods of allocating indirect costs under
section 263A using the standard cost method
provided in § 1.263A–1(f)(3)(ii). X
Corporation need not secure the
Commissioner’s consent to use the principal
methods. However, in accordance with
paragraph (d)(1) of this section, X
Corporation must change the methods of
accounting for its tennis equipment
manufacturing business to the principal
methods. Under paragraph (a)(2) of this
section, because X Corporation will operate
the golf equipment manufacturing business
as a separate trade or business, for the
inventories held by the golf equipment
manufacturing business X Corporation must
continue to use the LIFO method of
inventory identification, use the cost basis of
valuation, and allocate indirect costs under
section 263A using the burden rate method
provided in § 1.263A–1(f)(3)(i). There are no
changes in method of accounting for the golf
manufacturing business, and X Corporation
need not secure the Commissioner’s consent
to use these carryover methods.
Example (8). Principal method
determination with multiple component
trades or businesses—(i) Facts. The facts are
the same as in Example (7), except that after
the date of distribution or transfer X
Corporation will not operate the golf
equipment manufacturing business as a trade
or business that is separate and distinct from
the tennis equipment manufacturing
business. In addition, the fair market value of
the inventories of X Corporation’s tennis
equipment manufacturing business and golf
equipment manufacturing business, in the
aggregate, exceed the fair market value of the
inventories of T Corporation’s tennis
equipment manufacturing business.
(ii) Conclusion. Because on the date of
distribution or transfer T Corporation’s tennis
equipment manufacturing business does not
E:\FR\FM\01AUR1.SGM
01AUR1
45686
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 147 / Monday, August 1, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with RULES
hold more inventory than X Corporation’s
tennis equipment manufacturing business
and golf equipment manufacturing business,
in the aggregate, the principal method for
identifying inventory is the method used by
X Corporation’s component trade or business
on the date of distribution or transfer.
However, because on the date of distribution
or transfer X Corporation operates two
separate and distinct trades or businesses
with different inventory identification
methods that will be combined after the date
of distribution or transfer, X Corporation may
choose under paragraph (c)(2) of this section
which method used by its component trades
or businesses will be the principal method.
After the date of distribution or transfer, X
Corporation may use either the FIFO method
of inventory identification used by the tennis
equipment manufacturing business or the
LIFO method of inventory identification used
by the golf equipment manufacturing
business as the principal method of
identification, if either method is a
permissible method. For the integrated trade
or business, X Corporation will use the cost
method of valuation and allocate indirect
costs under section 263A using the burden
rate method provided in § 1.263A–1(f)(3)(i).
In accordance with paragraph (d)(1) of this
section, X Corporation must change the
inventory methods of T Corporation’s
manufacturing business to the principal
methods. Under paragraph (a)(3) of this
section, X Corporation also must change
either its golf equipment manufacturing
business or its tennis equipment
manufacturing business, depending on which
principal method X Corporation selects, to
the principal method.
(d) Procedures for changing a method
of accounting—(1) Change made to
principal method under paragraph
(a)(3) of this section—(i) Section 481(a)
adjustment—(A) In general. An
acquiring corporation that changes its
method of accounting or the distributor
or transferor corporation’s method of
accounting under paragraph (a)(3) of
this section does not need to secure the
Commissioner’s consent to use a
principal method. To the extent the use
of a principal method constitutes a
change in method of accounting, the
change in method is treated as a change
initiated by the acquiring corporation
for purposes of section 481(a)(2). Any
change to a principal method, whether
the change relates to a trade or business
of the acquiring corporation or a trade
or business of the distributor or
transferor corporation, must be reflected
on the acquiring corporation’s federal
income tax return for the taxable year
that includes the date of distribution or
transfer. The amount of the section
481(a) adjustment and the adjustment
period, if any, necessary to implement
a change to the principal method are
determined under § 1.446–1(e) and the
applicable administrative procedures
that govern voluntary changes in
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:27 Jul 29, 2011
Jkt 223001
methods of accounting under section
446(e). If the Internal Revenue Code, the
Income Tax Regulations, or
administrative procedures require that a
method of accounting be implemented
on a cut-off basis, the acquiring
corporation must implement the change,
on a cut-off basis as of the date of
distribution or transfer, on its federal
income tax return for the taxable year
that includes the date of distribution or
transfer. If the Internal Revenue Code,
the Income Tax Regulations, or
administrative procedures require a
section 481(a) adjustment, the acquiring
corporation must determine the section
481(a) adjustment and include the
appropriate amount of the section 481(a)
adjustment on its federal income tax
return for the taxable year that includes
the date of distribution or transfer and
subsequent taxable year(s), as necessary.
This adjustment is determined by the
acquiring corporation as of the
beginning of the day that is immediately
after the date of distribution or transfer.
(B) Example. The following example
illustrates the rules of this paragraph
(d)(1)(i):
Example. X Corporation uses the FIFO
method of inventory identification, and T
Corporation uses the LIFO method of
inventory identification. X Corporation
acquires the inventory of T Corporation in a
transaction to which section 381(a) applies.
X Corporation determines that under the
rules of paragraph (c)(1) of this section, X
Corporation must change the inventory
method for the business acquired from T
Corporation to the FIFO method. X
Corporation will determine the section 481(a)
adjustment pertaining to the change to the
FIFO method (whether the amounts thereof
represent increases or decreases in income)
as of the beginning of the day that
immediately follows the day on which X
Corporation acquires the inventory of T
Corporation. X Corporation will reflect this
adjustment, or an appropriate part thereof, on
its federal income tax return for the taxable
year that includes the date of distribution or
transfer.
(ii) Audit protection. Notwithstanding
any other provision in any other Income
Tax Regulation or administrative
procedure, no audit protection is
provided for any change in method of
accounting under paragraph (d)(1) of
this section.
(iii) Other terms and conditions.
Except as otherwise provided in this
section, other terms and conditions
provided in § 1.446–1(e) and the
applicable administrative procedures for
voluntary changes in method of
accounting under section 446(e) apply
to a change in method of accounting
under this section. Thus, for example, if
the administrative procedures for a
particular change in method of
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
accounting have a term and condition
that provides for the acceleration of the
section 481(a) adjustment period, this
term and condition applies to a change
made under this paragraph (d)(1).
However, any scope limitation in the
applicable administrative procedures
will not apply for purposes of making a
change under this paragraph (d)(1). For
example, if the administrative
procedures provide as a limitation that
an identical change in method of
accounting is barred for a period of
years, this limitation will not bar a
change to the principal method made
under this section.
(2) Change made to a method of
accounting under paragraph (a)(4) or
(a)(5) of this section—(i) In general. A
party to a section 381(a) transaction that
changes a method of accounting under
either paragraph (a)(4) or paragraph
(a)(5) of this section must follow the
provisions of § 1.446–(1)(e) and the
applicable administrative procedures,
including scope limitations, for
voluntary changes in method of
accounting under section 446(e), except
as provided in paragraphs (d)(2)(ii) and
(d)(2)(iii) of this section. An application
on Form 3115, ‘‘Application for Change
in Accounting Method,’’ filed with the
IRS to change a method of accounting
under this paragraph (d)(2) should be
labeled ‘‘Filed under section 381(c)(5)’’
at the top.
(ii) Final year limitation. Any scope
limitation relating to the final year of a
trade or business will not apply to a
taxpayer that changes its method of
accounting in the final year of a trade or
business that is terminated as the result
of a section 381(a) transaction.
(iii) Time to file. Under the authority
of § 1.446–1(e)(3)(ii), for a change in
method of accounting requiring advance
consent, the application for a change in
method of accounting (for example,
Form 3115), must be filed with the IRS
on or before the later of—
(A) The due date for filing a Form
3115 as specified in § 1.446–1(e), for
example, the last day of the taxable year
in which the distribution or transfer
occurred, or
(B) The earlier of—
(1) The day that is 180 days after the
date of distribution or transfer, or
(2) The day on which the acquiring
corporation files its federal income tax
return for the taxable year in which the
distribution or transfer occurred.
(e) Rules and procedures—(1)
Inventory method selected for a
particular type of goods. If other
sections of the Internal Revenue Code or
Income Tax Regulations allow a
taxpayer to elect an inventory method
for a particular type of goods, the
E:\FR\FM\01AUR1.SGM
01AUR1
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 147 / Monday, August 1, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
method elected with respect to those
goods is the established inventory
method only for those goods. For
example, an election to use the LIFO
inventory method to identify specified
goods in inventory, such as certain
products in finished goods, is the
inventory method only for those
products.
(2) No method of accounting. If a
party to a section 381(a) transaction is
not using an inventory method, does not
have an inventory method for a
particular type of goods, or came into
existence as a result of the transaction,
the party will not be treated as having
an inventory method different from that
used by another party to the section
381(a) transaction.
(3) Elections and adoptions allowed.
If an election does not require the
Commissioner’s consent, an acquiring
corporation or a distributor or transferor
corporation is not precluded from
making any election that is otherwise
permissible for the taxable year that
includes the date of distribution or
transfer. For example, an acquiring
corporation may elect to identify its
inventory using the LIFO inventory
method in the year of the distribution or
transfer. For purposes of this section, a
corporation shall be deemed as having
made any election as of the first day of
the taxable year that includes the date
of distribution or transfer. Similarly,
where adoption is permissible, an
acquiring corporation or a distributor or
transferor corporation may adopt any
permissible method of accounting for
the taxable year that includes the date
of distribution or transfer.
(4) Elections continue after section
381(a) transaction—(i) General rule. An
acquiring corporation is not required to
renew any election not requiring
renewal and previously made by it or by
a distributor or transferor corporation
for a carryover method or a principal
method if the acquiring corporation uses
the method after the section 381(a)
transaction. If the acquiring corporation
uses a method after the date of
distribution or transfer, an election
made by the acquiring corporation or by
a distributor or transferor corporation
for that method that was in effect on the
date of distribution or transfer continues
after the section 381(a) transaction as
though the distribution or transfer had
not occurred.
(ii) Example. The following example
illustrates the rules of paragraph (e)(4):
Example. Since its incorporation in 1982,
X Corporation elected to use the LIFO
inventory method under section 472 to
identify its inventory of tennis balls. Since its
incorporation in 2002, T Corporation elected
to use the FIFO inventory method to identify
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:27 Jul 29, 2011
Jkt 223001
its inventory of tennis balls. X Corporation
acquires the assets of T Corporation in a
transaction to which section 381(a) applies.
Immediately prior to the date of distribution
or transfer, the fair market value of X
Corporation’s inventory in its tennis balls
exceeds the fair market value of the tennis
balls inventory held by T Corporation. After
the date of distribution or transfer, X
Corporation will not operate its business as
a trade or business that is separate and
distinct from T Corporation’s business.
Because on the date of distribution or transfer
T Corporation does not hold more inventory
than X Corporation, the principal method for
identifying inventory is the method used by
X Corporation on the date of distribution or
transfer. After the date of distribution or
transfer, X Corporation need not renew its
election to identify inventory using the LIFO
inventory method, and X Corporation is
bound by the election.
(5) Adopting the LIFO inventory
method. A party to a section 381(a)
transaction will be deemed to be using
the LIFO inventory method for a
particular type of goods on the date of
distribution or transfer if that party
elects under section 472 to adopt that
inventory method with respect to those
goods for its taxable year within which
the date of distribution or transfer
occurs. See section 472 for the
requirements to adopt the LIFO
inventory method.
(6) Inventory layers treatment—(i)
Adjustments required after a section
381(a) transaction. An acquiring
corporation that determines the
principal method of taking an inventory
after a section 381(a) transaction under
paragraphs (a)(3) and (c) of this section
after the date of distribution or transfer
may need to integrate inventories and
make appropriate adjustments as
provided in paragraphs (e)(6)(ii) and
(e)(6)(iii) of this section.
(ii) LIFO inventory method used after
the section 381(a) transaction—(A) LIFO
inventory method used by the acquiring
corporation and the distributor or
transferor corporation—(1) Principal
method is the dollar-value LIFO
method. If, under paragraphs (a)(3) and
(c) of this section, the acquiring
corporation changes its inventory
method or the inventory method of the
distributor or transferor corporation
from the specific goods LIFO method of
pricing inventories to the dollar-value
LIFO method of pricing inventories
(dollar-value LIFO method) for a
particular type of goods, the inventory
accounted for under the specific goods
method shall be placed on the dollarvalue method as provided in § 1.472–
8(f), and then the inventory shall be
integrated with the inventory previously
accounted for under the dollar-value
LIFO method. If pools of each
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
45687
corporation are permitted or required to
be combined, the pools must be
combined as provided in § 1.472–
8(g)(2). For purposes of combining
pools, all base year inventories or layers
of increment that occur in taxable years
including the same December 31 shall
be combined. A base year inventory or
layer of increment occurring in any
short taxable year of a distributor or
transferor corporation shall be merged
with and considered a layer of
increment of its immediately preceding
taxable year.
(2) Principal method is the specific
goods LIFO method. If, under
paragraphs (a)(3) and (c) of this section,
the acquiring corporation changes its
inventory method or the inventory
method of the distributor or transferor
corporation from the dollar-value LIFO
method of pricing inventories to the
specific goods LIFO method of pricing
inventories, the acquiring corporation
shall treat the inventory being changed
to the specific goods LIFO method as
having the same acquisition dates and
costs as such inventory had under the
dollar-value LIFO method.
(B) Change from the FIFO inventory
method to either the specific goods LIFO
method or the dollar-value LIFO
method. If, under paragraphs (a)(3) and
(c) of this section, the acquiring
corporation changes its inventory
method or the inventory method of the
distributor or transferor corporation
from the FIFO inventory method to
either the specific goods LIFO method
or the dollar-value method of pricing
LIFO inventories, the inventory
accounted for under the FIFO inventory
method shall be treated by the acquiring
corporation as having been acquired at
their average unit cost in a single
transaction on the date of the
distribution or transfer. Thus, if an
inventory of a particular type of goods
is combined in an existing dollar-value
pool, the goods shall be treated as if
they were purchased by the acquiring
corporation at the average unit cost on
the date of the distribution or transfer
with respect to such pool. Alternatively,
if the goods are not combined in an
existing pool, the goods will be treated
as if they were purchased by the
acquiring corporation at the average unit
cost on the date of the distribution or
transfer with respect to a new pool, with
the base-year being the year of the
section 381(a) transaction. Adjustments
resulting from a restoration to cost of
any write-down to market value of the
inventories shall be taken into account
by the acquiring corporation ratably in
each of the three taxable years beginning
with the taxable year that includes the
E:\FR\FM\01AUR1.SGM
01AUR1
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with RULES
45688
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 147 / Monday, August 1, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
date of the distribution or transfer. See
section 472(d).
(iii) FIFO inventory method used after
the section 381(a) transaction—(A) FIFO
inventory method used by the acquiring
corporation and the distributor or
transferor corporation. If, under
paragraphs (a)(3) and (c) of this section,
the FIFO inventory method is the
principal method and the component
trades or businesses of both the
acquiring corporation and the
distributor or transferor corporation use
the FIFO method immediately prior to
the distribution or transfer, the
acquiring corporation must treat the
inventory that must change to the
principal method as having the same
acquisition dates and costs as such
inventory had immediately prior to the
date of distribution or transfer.
However, if the principal method of
valuing inventories is the cost or
market, whichever is lower, method, the
acquiring corporation must treat the
inventories that must change to the
principal method as having been
acquired at cost or market, whichever is
lower.
(B) Change from either the specific
goods LIFO method or the dollar-value
LIFO method to the FIFO inventory
method. If, under paragraphs (a)(3) and
(c) of this section, the acquiring
corporation changes its inventory
method or the inventory method of the
distributor or transferor corporation
from either the specific goods LIFO
method or the dollar-value LIFO method
to the FIFO inventory method, the
acquiring corporation must treat the
inventory accounted for under the LIFO
method as having the same acquisition
dates and costs that the inventory would
have had if the FIFO inventory method
had been used on the date of
distribution or transfer. However, if the
principal method of valuing inventories
is the cost or market, whichever is
lower, method, the acquiring
corporation must treat the inventories
accounted for under the LIFO method as
having been acquired at cost or market,
whichever is lower.
(7) Appropriate times for certain
determinations—(i) Determining the
inventory method. The inventory
method used by a party to a section
381(a) transaction on the date of
distribution or transfer is the method
used by that party as of the end of the
day that is immediately prior to the date
of distribution or transfer.
(ii) Determining whether there are
separate and distinct trades or
businesses after the date of distribution
or transfer. Whether an acquiring
corporation will operate the trades or
businesses of the parties to a section
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:27 Jul 29, 2011
Jkt 223001
381(a) transaction as separate and
distinct trades or businesses after the
date of distribution or transfer will be
determined as of the date of distribution
or transfer based upon the facts and
circumstances. Intent to combine books
and records of the trades or businesses
may be demonstrated by
contemporaneous records and
documents or by other objective
evidence that reflects the acquiring
corporation’s ultimate plan of operation,
even though the actual combination of
the books and records may extend
beyond the end of the taxable year that
includes the date of distribution or
transfer.
(8) Establishing an inventory method.
An inventory method used by the
distributor or transferor corporation
immediately prior to the date of
distribution or transfer that continues to
be used by the acquiring corporation
after the date of distribution or transfer
is an established method of accounting
for purposes of section 446(e), whether
or not such method is proper or is
permitted under the Internal Revenue
Code or any applicable Income Tax
Regulations.
(9) Other applicable provisions. This
section does not preempt any other
provision of the Internal Revenue Code
or the Income Tax Regulations that is
applicable to the acquiring corporation’s
circumstances. Section 381(c)(5) and
this § 1.381(c)(5)–1 determine only the
inventory method to be used after a
section 381(a) transaction. If other
paragraphs of section 381(c) apply for
purposes of determining the methods of
accounting to be used following the date
of distribution or transfer, section
381(c)(5) and this § 1.381(c)(5)–1 will
not apply to the tax treatment of the
items. Specifically, section 381(c)(5) and
this § 1.381(c)(5)–1 do not apply to
assets other than inventory that an
acquiring corporation obtains in a
transaction to which section 381(a)
applies.
(10) Use of the cash receipts and
disbursements method of accounting. If
immediately prior to the date of
distribution or transfer, an acquiring
corporation or a distributor or transferor
corporation uses the cash receipts and
disbursements method of accounting
within the meaning of section 446(c)(1)
and § 1.446–1(c)(1)(i), or is not required
to use an inventory method for its
goods, section 381(c)(5) and
§ 1.381(c)(5)–1 do not apply. Instead,
section 381(c)(4) and § 1.381(c)(4)–1
must be applied to determine the
methods of accounting that continue
after the transaction.
(11) Character of items of income and
deduction. After the date of distribution
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
or transfer, items of income and
deduction have the same character in
the hands of the acquiring corporation
as they would have had in the hands of
the distributor or transferor corporation
if no distribution or transfer had
occurred.
(12) Impermissible inventory method.
This section does not limit the
Commissioner’s ability under section
446(b) to determine whether a
taxpayer’s inventory method is an
impermissible method or otherwise fails
to clearly reflect income. For example,
an acquiring corporation may not use
the method of accounting determined
under paragraph (a)(2) of this section if
the method fails to clearly reflect the
acquiring corporation’s income within
the meaning of section 446(b).
(f) Effective/applicability date. This
section applies to corporate
reorganizations and tax-free liquidations
described in section 381(a) that occur on
or after August 31, 2011.
■ Par. 5. Section 1.446–1 is amended
by:
■ 1. Revising the first sentence and
adding a second new sentence in
paragraph (e)(3)(i).
■ 2. Revising the first sentence in
paragraph (e)(4)(i).
■ 3. Adding paragraph (e)(4)(iii).
The revisions and addition read as
follows:
§ 1.446–1 General rule for methods of
accounting.
*
*
*
*
*
(e) * * *
(3)(i) Except as otherwise provided
under the authority of paragraph
(e)(3)(ii) of this section, to secure the
Commissioner’s consent to a taxpayer’s
change in method of accounting the
taxpayer generally must file an
application on Form 3115, ‘‘Application
for Change in Accounting Method,’’
with the Commissioner during the
taxable year in which the taxpayer
desires to make the change in method of
accounting. See §§ 1.381(c)(4)–1(d)(2)
and 1.381(c)(5)–1(d)(2) for rules
allowing additional time, in some
circumstances, for the filing of an
application on Form 3115 with respect
to a transaction to which section 381(a)
applies. * * *
*
*
*
*
*
(4) * * * (i) * * * Except as provided
in paragraphs (e)(3)(iii), (e)(4)(ii), and
(e)(4)(iii) of this section, paragraph (e) of
this section applies on or after
December 30, 2003. * * *
*
*
*
*
*
(iii) Effective/applicability date for
paragraph (e)(3)(i). The rules of
paragraph (e)(3)(i) of this section apply
E:\FR\FM\01AUR1.SGM
01AUR1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 147 / Monday, August 1, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
to corporate reorganizations and tax-free
liquidations described in section 381(a)
that occur on or after August 31, 2011.
Approved: July 20, 2011.
Steven T. Miller,
Deputy Commissioner for Services and
Enforcement.
Emily S. McMahon,
Acting Assistant Secretary of the Treasury
(Tax Policy).
[FR Doc. 2011–19256 Filed 7–29–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Financial Crimes Enforcement Network
31 CFR Part 1010
RIN 1506–AA82
Financial Crimes Enforcement
Network; Repeal of the Final Rule and
Withdrawal of the Finding of Primary
Money Laundering Concern Against
VEF Banka
Financial Crimes Enforcement
Network (‘‘FinCEN’’), Treasury.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This document repeals
FinCEN’s final rule, ‘‘Imposition of
Special Measure Against VEF Banka’’ of
July 13, 2006, and withdraws the
finding of VEF Banka as a Financial
Institution of Primary Money
Laundering Concern of April 26, 2005,
issued pursuant to 31 U.S.C. 5318A of
the Bank Secrecy Act (the ‘‘BSA’’).
DATES: Effective Date: August 1, 2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Regulatory Policy and Programs
Division, Financial Crimes Enforcement
Network, (800) 949–2732 and select
Option 1.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
I. Background
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with RULES
A. Statutory Provisions
On October 26, 2001, the President
signed into law the Uniting and
Strengthening America by Providing
Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept
and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001,
Public Law 107–56 (‘‘USA PATRIOT
Act’’). Title III of the USA PATRIOT Act
amends the anti-money laundering
provisions of the BSA, codified at 12
U.S.C. 1829b, 12 U.S.C. 1951–1959, and
31 U.S.C. 5311–5314 and 5316–5332, to
promote the prevention, detection, and
prosecution of money laundering and
the financing of terrorism. Regulations
implementing the BSA appear at 31 CFR
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:27 Jul 29, 2011
Jkt 223001
Chapter X.1 The authority of the
Secretary of the Treasury (the
‘‘Secretary’’) to administer the BSA and
its implementing regulations has been
delegated to the Director of the
Financial Crimes Enforcement
Network.2
Section 311 of the USA PATRIOT Act
(‘‘section 311’’) added Section 5318A to
the BSA, granting the Secretary the
authority, upon finding that reasonable
grounds exist for concluding that a
foreign jurisdiction, foreign financial
institution, class of international
transactions, or type of account is of
‘‘primary money laundering concern,’’
to require domestic financial
institutions and domestic financial
agencies to take certain ‘‘special
measures’’ against the primary money
laundering concern.3
Taken as a whole, Section 5318A
provides the Secretary with a range of
options that can be adapted to target
specific money laundering and terrorist
financing concerns most effectively.
These options provide the authority to
bring additional and useful pressure on
those jurisdictions and institutions that
pose money-laundering threats and the
ability to take steps to protect the U.S.
financial system. Through the
imposition of various special measures,
FinCEN can: gain more information
about the concerned jurisdictions,
financial institutions, transactions, and
accounts; monitor more effectively the
respective jurisdictions, financial
institutions, transactions, and accounts;
and, ultimately, protect U.S. financial
institutions from involvement with
jurisdictions, financial institutions,
transactions, or accounts that pose a
money laundering concern.
B. VEF Banka
At the time of issuance of the final
rule on July 13, 2006, VEF Banka was
1 On October 26, 2010, FinCEN issued a final rule
creating a new Chapter X in Title 31 of the Code
of Federal Regulations for the BSA regulations. See
75 FR 65806 (October 26, 2010) (Transfer and
Reorganization of Bank Secrecy Act Regulations
Final Rule) (referred to herein as the ‘‘Chapter X
Final Rule’’). The Chapter X Final Rule became
effective on March 1, 2011.
2 Therefore, references to the authority of the
Secretary under section 311 of the USA PATRIOT
Act apply equally to the Director of the Financial
Crimes Enforcement Network.
3 Available special measures include requiring:
(1) Recordkeeping and reporting of certain financial
transactions; (2) collection of information relating to
beneficial ownership; (3) collection of information
relating to certain payable-through accounts; (4)
collection of information relating to certain
correspondent accounts; and (5) prohibition or
conditions on the opening or maintaining of
correspondent or payable-through accounts. 31
U.S.C. 5318A(b)(1)–(5). For a complete discussion
of the range of possible countermeasures, see 68 FR
18917 (April 17, 2003) (proposing to impose special
measures against Nauru).
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
45689
headquartered in Riga, Latvia. VEF
Banka was one of the smallest of
Latvia’s 23 banks, and, in 2004, was
reported to have approximately $80
million in assets and 87 employees.
Total assets for the bank, as of June 30,
2005, were 27.3 million LATS,
equivalent to approximately $47.4
million. VEF Banka had one subsidiary,
¯
Veiksmes lızings, which offered
financial leasing and factoring services.
In addition to its headquarters in Riga,
VEF Banka had one branch in Riga and
one representative office in the Czech
Republic. VEF Banka offered corporate
and private banking services, issued
credit cards for non-Latvians, and
provided currency exchange through
Internet banking services (i.e., virtual
currencies). In addition, according to its
financial statements, VEF Banka
maintained correspondent accounts in
countries worldwide, but reported none
in the United States at the time of the
final rule.
II. The Finding, Final Rule, and
Subsequent Developments
A. The Finding and Final Rule
Based upon review and analysis of
relevant information, consultations with
relevant Federal agencies and
departments, and after consideration of
the factors enumerated in section 311,
the Secretary, through his delegate, the
Director of FinCEN, found that
reasonable grounds existed for
concluding that VEF Banka was a
financial institution of primary money
laundering concern. This finding was
published on April 26, 2005,4 in a
notice of proposed rulemaking which
proposed prohibiting covered financial
institutions from, directly or indirectly,
opening or maintaining correspondent
accounts in the United States for VEF
Banka or any of its branches, offices, or
subsidiaries, pursuant to the authority
under 31 U.S.C. 5318A. The notice of
proposed rulemaking outlined the
various factors supporting the finding
and proposed prohibition.
After consulting with required
Federal agencies and parties, reviewing
public comments received from the
April 26, 2005 notice of proposed
rulemaking, and considering additional
relevant factors, FinCEN issued a final
rule on July 13, 2006 that imposed the
special measure authorized under 31
U.S.C. 5318A(b)(5) against VEF Banka.5
This final rule requires covered
financial institutions to terminate any
correspondent or payable-through
4 See 70 FR 21369 (April 26, 2005, RIN 1506–
AA82).
5 See 71 FR 39554 (July 13, 2006, RIN 1506–
AA82).
E:\FR\FM\01AUR1.SGM
01AUR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 147 (Monday, August 1, 2011)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 45673-45689]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-19256]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service
26 CFR Part 1
[TD 9534]
RIN 1545-BD81
Methods of Accounting Used by Corporations That Acquire the
Assets of Other Corporations
AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.
ACTION: Final regulations.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document contains final regulations relating to the
methods of accounting, including the inventory methods, to be used by
corporations that acquire the assets of other corporations in certain
corporate reorganizations and tax-free liquidations. These regulations
clarify and simplify the rules regarding the accounting methods to be
used following these reorganizations and liquidations.
DATES: Effective date: These regulations are effective on August 31,
2011.
Applicability date: For dates of applicability, see Sec. Sec.
1.381(a)-1(e), 1.381(c)(4)-1(f), 1.381(c)(5)-1(f), and 1.446-
1(e)(4)(iii).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cheryl Oseekey at (202) 622-4970 (not
a toll-free number).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
This document contains amendments to 26 CFR part 1. On November 16,
2007, the IRS and the Treasury Department published a notice of
proposed rulemaking (REG-151884-03) in the Federal Register (72 FR
64545). This notice of proposed rulemaking, while continuing most of
the provisions of the regulations originally issued under sections
381(c)(4) and 381(c)(5) of the Internal Revenue Code (Code) regarding
the methods of accounting to be used by a corporation that acquires the
assets of another corporation in a section 381(a) transaction, proposed
to clarify and simplify those existing regulations. The IRS received no
comments in response to the notice of proposed rulemaking. No public
hearing was requested or held. The proposed regulations, as revised by
this Treasury decision, are adopted as final regulations.
Explanation of Provisions
The final regulations differ somewhat in organization and format
from the notice of proposed rulemaking. These changes are intended to
be editorial in
[[Page 45674]]
nature and are not intended to alter the substance and principles of
the rules set forth in the notice of proposed rulemaking. The IRS and
the Treasury Department made these changes to further advance the
objective, as expressed in the preamble to the notice of proposed
rulemaking, of reducing uncertainty and controversy by providing
regulations under sections 381(c)(4) and 381(c)(5) that are clear,
consistent, and administrable. For example, the final regulations under
sections 381(c)(4) and 381(c)(5) have been drafted so that the
regulations mirror each other to the greatest extent possible, thus
highlighting the consistencies of the regulations' provisions.
Similarly, many of the examples in the notice of proposed rulemaking
have been revised in the final regulations to specify the substantive
tax rule in the regulations that the examples illustrate. Additionally,
new examples were added to the final regulations to provide further
illustrations of the substantive tax rules in these regulations.
The keystone of the final regulations for sections 381(c)(4) and
381(c)(5) continues to be whether the acquiring corporation operates
the trades or businesses of the parties to a section 381(a) transaction
as separate and distinct trades or businesses following the date of
distribution or transfer. The final regulations continue to provide
that when the acquiring corporation operates the trades or businesses
of the parties as separate and distinct trades or businesses after the
date of distribution or transfer, the acquiring corporation will use a
carryover method. In contrast, when the acquiring corporation does not
operate the trades or businesses of the parties as separate and
distinct trades or businesses after the date of distribution or
transfer, the acquiring corporation will use a principal method. These
rules do not apply when a carryover method or principal method, as
applicable, is not a permissible method, or when the acquiring
corporation chooses not to use a carryover method or principal method.
In those cases, the general rules under section 446(e) that govern
methods of accounting apply.
The final regulations modify the test for determining a principal
method when the acquiring corporation does not operate the trades or
businesses of the parties to the section 381(a) transaction as separate
and distinct trades or businesses after the date of distribution or
transfer. Under the final regulations, the determination of whether the
distributor or transferor corporation is larger than the acquiring
corporation is made by comparing certain attributes (that is, under
section 381(c)(4) the adjusted bases of the assets and gross receipts,
and under section 381(c)(5) the fair market value of the inventory) of
only the trades or businesses that will be integrated after the date of
distribution or transfer rather than comparing the attributes for the
entire entity. The IRS and the Treasury Department believe that the
attributes of a trade or business that will continue to operate as a
separate and distinct trade or business after the date of distribution
or transfer should not influence the determination of a principal
method that will be used by trades or businesses that will be
integrated after the date of distribution or transfer. The IRS and the
Treasury Department also believe that applying the test at the trade or
business level is consistent with Sec. 1.446-1(d) because methods of
accounting are generally determined at the trade or business level.
The final regulations also provide rules on how an acquiring
corporation identifies a principal method when an acquiring corporation
or a distributor or transferor corporation operates more than one
separate and distinct trade or business on the date of distribution or
transfer, has more than one method of accounting used in the trades or
businesses, and the acquiring corporation combines the trades or
businesses after the date of distribution or transfer. While the IRS
and the Treasury Department do not think these situations occur
frequently, the final regulations are revised to provide certainty for
an acquiring corporation and to obviate the need to obtain a ruling in
these situations.
The final regulations under sections 381(c)(4) and 381(c)(5)
clarify the definition of ``cut-off basis.'' The final regulations
provide that cut-off basis generally means a manner in which a change
in method of accounting is made without a section 481(a) adjustment and
under which only the items arising after the beginning of the year of
change (or, in the case of a change made to a principal method, only
the items arising after the date of distribution or transfer) are
accounted for under the new method of accounting. The definition of
cut-off basis is expanded in the final regulations under section
381(c)(5) to clarify that a taxpayer that makes a change within the
last-in, first-out (LIFO) inventory method from one LIFO method or sub-
method to another LIFO method or sub-method does not recompute the cost
of its beginning inventories for the year of change under the new LIFO
inventory method when it implements the change on a cut-off basis.
The final regulations under section 381(c)(5) also make certain
organizational changes to Sec. 1.381(c)(5)-1(e)(6) of the notice of
proposed rulemaking with respect to the integration of inventories
after a section 381(a) transaction. These changes do not change the
substantive rules in the notice of proposed rulemaking but are intended
to clarify that the rules apply whether the inventory method of either
the acquiring corporation or the transferor or distributor corporation
must be changed to a principal method. The IRS and the Treasury
Department are considering issuing additional guidance that would
clarify or modify the manner in which inventories must be combined and
integrated in a section 381(a) transaction.
Finally, the final regulations correct the discussion of section
472(d) that was in Sec. 1.381(c)(5)-1(e)(6)(ii)(B) of the notice of
proposed rulemaking. Section 1.381(c)(5)-1(e)(6)(ii)(B) of the notice
of proposed rulemaking provided that the restoration to cost of any
previous write-downs to market value shall be taken into account fully
in the year that included the date of distribution or transfer.
Consistent with the amendments to section 472(d), the final regulations
provide that these restorations shall be taken into account by the
acquiring corporation ratably in each of the three taxable years
beginning with the taxable year that includes the date of the
distribution or transfer.
The IRS and the Treasury Department are aware that some
practitioners were concerned that the notice of proposed rulemaking did
not provide audit protection when an acquiring corporation uses a
principal method after the date of distribution or transfer. For the
reasons expressed in the preamble to the notice of proposed rulemaking,
the final regulations continue to deny audit protection in these
circumstances. Unlike changes in method of accounting under section
446(e) for which a taxpayer must disclose its use of a method of
accounting, proper or improper, as part of the process for obtaining
consent to make the change, changes to a principal method pursuant to
these final regulations are made on the acquiring corporation's tax
return with no disclosure on a Form 3115, ``Application for Change in
Accounting Method,'' that a change in method of accounting occurred.
The IRS and the Treasury Department are aware that some taxpayers
desire to obtain audit protection for a required change to a principal
method by filing a Form 3115. However, the IRS and the Treasury
Department believe that, given
[[Page 45675]]
the need for efficient tax administration, filing a Form 3115 merely to
obtain audit protection should not be allowed. Although audit
protection is not provided for a change to a principal method required
under these regulations, audit protection ordinarily is provided for
any voluntary change in method of accounting for which a party to a
section 381(a) transaction obtains consent under section 446(e) and the
generally applicable administrative procedures.
Special Analyses
It has been determined that this Treasury decision is not a
significant regulatory action as defined in Executive Order 12866.
Therefore, a regulatory assessment is not required. It is hereby
certified that these regulations will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities. Therefore, a
regulatory flexibility analysis under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. chapter 6) is not required. This certification is based on the
belief of the IRS and the Treasury Department that the corporate
reorganizations and tax-free liquidations described in section 381(a)
generally involve large entities. In addition, these final regulations
reduce the burden on taxpayers by clarifying and simplifying the
existing rules and make the procedures for requesting changes in
methods of accounting relating to corporate reorganizations and tax-
free liquidations described in section 381(a) consistent with the
general rules for requesting changes in methods of accounting. Pursuant
to section 7805(f), the notice of proposed rulemaking that preceded
these final regulations was submitted to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy
of the Small Business Administration for comment on its impact on small
business. Consistent with 5 U.S.C. section 553(d), the regulations are
effective 30 days after publication of this document in the Federal
Register.
Drafting Information
The principal author of these final regulations is Cheryl Oseekey,
Office of Associate Chief Counsel (Income Tax and Accounting). However,
other personnel from the IRS and the Treasury Department participated
in their development.
List of Subjects in 26 CFR Part 1
Income taxes, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Adoption of Amendments to the Regulations
Accordingly, 26 CFR part 1 is amended as follows:
PART 1--INCOME TAXES
0
Paragraph 1. The authority citation for part 1 continues to read in
part as follows:
Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805 * * *
Section 1.381(c)(4)-1 also issued under 26 U.S.C. 381(c)(4). * *
*
Section 1.381(c)(5)-1 also issued under 26 U.S.C. 381(c)(5). * *
*
0
Par. 2. In Sec. 1.381(a)-1, paragraph (b)(1)(i) is revised and
paragraph (e) is added to read as follows:
Sec. 1.381(a)-1 General rule relating to carryovers in certain
corporate acquisitions.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(1) * * * (i) The complete liquidation of a subsidiary corporation
upon which no gain or loss is recognized in accordance with the
provisions of section 332;
* * * * *
(e) Effective/applicability date. The rules of paragraph (b)(1)(i)
of this section apply to corporate reorganizations and tax-free
liquidations described in section 381(a) that occur on or after August
31, 2011.
0
Par. 3. Section 1.381(c)(4)-1 is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 1.381(c)(4)-1 Method of accounting.
(a) Introduction--(1) Purpose. This section provides guidance
regarding the method of accounting or combination of methods (other
than inventory and depreciation methods) an acquiring corporation must
use following a distribution or transfer to which sections 381(a) and
381(c)(4) apply and how to implement any associated change in method of
accounting. See Sec. 1.381(c)(5)-1 for guidance regarding the
inventory method an acquiring corporation must use following a
distribution or transfer to which sections 381(a) and 381(c)(5) apply.
See Sec. 1.381(c)(6)-1 for guidance regarding the depreciation method
an acquiring corporation must use following a distribution or transfer
to which sections 381(a) and 381(c)(6) apply.
(2) Carryover method requirement for separate and distinct trades
or businesses. In a transaction to which section 381(a) applies, if an
acquiring corporation continues to operate a trade or business of the
parties to the section 381(a) transaction as a separate and distinct
trade or business after the date of distribution or transfer, the
acquiring corporation must use a carryover method as defined in
paragraph (b)(5) of this section for each continuing trade or business,
unless either the carryover method is impermissible and must be changed
under paragraph (a)(4) of this section or the acquiring corporation
changes the carryover method in accordance with paragraph (a)(5) of
this section. The carryover method requirement applies to the overall
method of accounting (for example, an accrual method of accounting) and
any special method of accounting (for example, the percentage of
completion method of accounting described in section 460) as defined in
paragraph (b)(2) of this section used by each trade or business after
the date of distribution or transfer. The acquiring corporation need
not secure the Commissioner's consent to continue a carryover method.
(3) Principal method requirement for trades or businesses not
operated as separate and distinct trades or businesses. In a
transaction to which section 381(a) applies, if an acquiring
corporation does not operate the trades or businesses of the parties to
the section 381(a) transaction as separate and distinct trades or
businesses after the date of distribution or transfer, the acquiring
corporation must use a principal method determined under paragraph (c)
of this section, unless either the principal method is impermissible
and must be changed under paragraph (a)(4) of this section or the
acquiring corporation changes the principal method in accordance with
paragraph (a)(5) of this section. The principal method requirement
applies to the overall method of accounting (for example, the cash
receipts and disbursements method of accounting) and any special method
of accounting (for example, the installment method under section 453)
as defined in paragraph (b)(2) of this section used by each integrated
trade or business after the date of distribution or transfer. The
acquiring corporation must change to a principal method in accordance
with paragraph (d)(1) of this section for each integrated trade or
business and need not secure the Commissioner's consent to use a
principal method.
(4) Carryover method or principal method not a permissible method.
If a carryover method or principal method is not a permissible method
of accounting, the acquiring corporation must secure the Commissioner's
consent to change to a permissible method of accounting as provided in
paragraph (d)(2) of this section. If the acquiring corporation must use
a single method of accounting for a particular item after the date of
distribution or transfer regardless of the
[[Page 45676]]
number of separate and distinct trades or businesses operated on that
date, the acquiring corporation must use the principal method for that
item as determined under paragraph (c) of this section, unless either
the principal method is impermissible and must be changed under this
paragraph (a)(4) or the acquiring corporation changes the principal
method in accordance with paragraph (a)(5) of this section.
(5) Voluntary change. Any party to a section 381(a) transaction may
request permission under section 446(e) to change a method of
accounting for the taxable year in which the transaction occurs or is
expected to occur. For trades or businesses that will not operate as
separate and distinct trades or businesses after the date of
distribution or transfer, a change in method of accounting for the
taxable year that includes that date will be granted only if the
requested method is the method that the acquiring corporation must use
after the date of distribution or transfer. The time and manner of
obtaining the Commissioner's consent to change to a different method of
accounting is described in paragraph (d)(2) of this section.
(6) Examples. The following examples illustrate the rules of this
paragraph (a). Unless otherwise noted, the carryover method is a
permissible method of accounting.
Example (1). Carryover method for separate and distinct trades
or businesses after the date of distribution or transfer--(i) Facts.
X Corporation operates an employment agency that uses the overall
cash receipts and disbursements method of accounting. T Corporation
operates an educational institution that uses an overall accrual
method of accounting. X Corporation acquires the assets of T
Corporation in a transaction to which section 381(a) applies. After
the date of distribution or transfer, X Corporation operates the
employment agency as a trade or business that is separate and
distinct from the educational institution.
(ii) Conclusion. Because after the date of distribution or
transfer X Corporation operates the employment agency as a separate
and distinct trade or business, under paragraph (a)(2) of this
section X Corporation must use the carryover method for each
continuing trade or business, unless either the carryover method is
impermissible and must be changed under paragraph (a)(4) of this
section or X Corporation changes the carryover method in accordance
with paragraph (a)(5) of this section. As defined in paragraph
(b)(5) of this section, the carryover method for the employment
agency is the cash receipts and disbursements method of accounting
and the carryover method for the educational institution is the
accrual method of accounting used by T Corporation immediately prior
to the date of distribution or transfer. There is no change in
method of accounting, and X Corporation need not secure the
Commissioner's consent to use either carryover method.
Example (2). Carryover method for a special method of
accounting--(i) Facts. X Corporation provides personal grooming
consulting and T Corporation provides weight management consulting.
Both X Corporation and T Corporation use the same overall accrual
method of accounting. X Corporation has elected to use the recurring
item exception under Sec. 1.461-5. T Corporation does not use the
recurring item exception. X Corporation acquires the assets of T
Corporation in a transaction to which section 381(a) applies. After
the date of distribution or transfer, X Corporation operates the
personal grooming consulting business as a trade or business that is
separate and distinct from the weight management consulting
business.
(ii) Conclusion. Because after the date of distribution or
transfer, X Corporation operates the personal grooming consulting
business as a separate and distinct trade or business, under
paragraph (a)(2) of this section X Corporation must use a carryover
method for each continuing trade or business, unless either the
carryover method is impermissible and must be changed under
paragraph (a)(4) of this section or X Corporation changes the
carryover method in accordance with paragraph (a)(5) of this
section. As defined in paragraph (b)(5) of this section, the
carryover method for the overall method of accounting for each trade
or business is the accrual method used immediately prior to the date
of distribution or transfer. The carryover method for the special
method of accounting for the personal grooming consulting business
is the recurring item exception under Sec. 1.461-5 while the
carryover method for the weight management consulting business is
not to use the recurring item exception under Sec. 1.461-5. There
is no change in method of accounting, and X Corporation need not
secure the Commissioner's consent to use the carryover methods of
accounting.
Example (3). Carryover method for a special method of accounting
not permissible--(i) Facts. X Corporation is an engineering firm
that uses the overall cash receipts and disbursements method of
accounting and has elected under section 171 to amortize bond
premium with respect to its taxable bonds acquired at a premium. T
Corporation is a manufacturer that uses an overall accrual method of
accounting and has not made a section 171 election to amortize bond
premium with respect to its taxable bonds acquired at a premium. X
Corporation acquires the assets of T Corporation in a transaction to
which section 381(a) applies. After the date of distribution or
transfer, X Corporation operates the engineering firm as a trade or
business that is separate and distinct from the manufacturing
business.
(ii) Conclusion. Because after the date of distribution or
transfer X Corporation operates the engineering firm as a separate
and distinct trade or business, under paragraph (a)(2) of this
section X Corporation must use a carryover method for each
continuing trade or business, unless either the carryover method is
impermissible and must be changed under paragraph (a)(4) of this
section or X Corporation changes the carryover method in accordance
with paragraph (a)(5) of this section. As defined in paragraph
(b)(5) of this section, the carryover method for the overall method
of accounting for the engineering firm is the cash receipts and
disbursements method used by X Corporation immediately prior to the
date of distribution or transfer, and the carryover method for the
overall method of accounting for the manufacturing business is the
accrual method used by T Corporation immediately prior to the date
of distribution or transfer. There is no change in method of
accounting, and X Corporation need not secure the Commissioner's
consent to use either carryover method. Notwithstanding that after
the date of distribution or transfer X Corporation has two separate
and distinct trades or businesses, X Corporation is permitted only
one method of accounting for amortizable bond premium under section
171. Because after the date of distribution or transfer X
Corporation must use a single method of accounting for bond premium
for all trades or businesses, X Corporation must use the principal
method for that item as determined under paragraph (c) of this
section, unless either the principal method is impermissible and
must be changed under paragraph (a)(4) of this section or X
Corporation changes that method in accordance with paragraph (a)(5)
of this section. X Corporation must change to the principal method
in accordance with paragraph (d)(1) of this section. If amortizing
bond premium is not the principal method, X Corporation may make an
election to amortize bond premium to the extent permitted by section
171. See paragraph (e)(2) of this section for rules on making
elections.
(b) Definitions. For purposes of this section--
(1) Method of accounting. A method of accounting has the same
meaning as provided in section 446 and any applicable Income Tax
Regulations.
(2) Special method of accounting. A special method of accounting is
a method expressly permitted or required by the Internal Revenue Code,
Income Tax Regulations, or administrative guidance published in the
Internal Revenue Bulletin that deviates from the normal application of
the cash receipts and disbursements method or an accrual method of
accounting. The installment method under section 453, the mark-to-
market method under section 475, the amortization of bond premium under
section 171, the percentage of completion method under section 460, the
recurring item exception of Sec. 1.461-5, and the income deferral
methods under section 455 and Sec. 1.451-5 are examples of special
methods of accounting. See Sec. 1.446-1(c)(1)(iii).
(3) Adoption of a method of accounting. Adoption of a method of
accounting has the same meaning as provided in Sec. 1.446-1(e)(1).
[[Page 45677]]
(4) Change in method of accounting. A change in method of
accounting has the same meaning as provided in Sec. 1.446-1(e)(2).
(5) Carryover method. A carryover method for the overall method of
accounting is the overall method of accounting that each party to a
section 381(a) transaction uses for each separate and distinct trade or
business immediately prior to the date of distribution or transfer. The
carryover method for a special method of accounting for an item is the
special method of accounting for that item that each party to a section
381(a) transaction uses for each separate and distinct trade or
business immediately prior to the date of distribution or transfer.
(6) Principal method. A principal method is an overall or special
method of accounting that is determined under paragraph (c) of this
section.
(7) Permissible method of accounting. A permissible method of
accounting is a method of accounting that is proper or permitted under
the Internal Revenue Code or any applicable Income Tax Regulations.
(8) Acquiring corporation. An acquiring corporation has the same
meaning as provided in Sec. 1.381(a)-1(b)(2).
(9) Distributor corporation. A distributor corporation means the
corporation, foreign or domestic, that distributes its assets to
another corporation described in section 332(b) in a distribution to
which section 332 (relating to liquidations of subsidiaries) applies.
(10) Transferor corporation. A transferor corporation means the
corporation, foreign or domestic, that transfers its assets to another
corporation in a transfer to which section 361 (relating to
nonrecognition of gain or loss to corporations) applies, but only if--
(i) The transfer is in connection with a reorganization described
in section 368(a)(1)(A), (a)(1)(C), or (a)(1)(F), or
(ii) The transfer is in connection with a reorganization described
in section 368(a)(1)(D) or (a)(1)(G), provided the requirements of
section 354(b) are met.
(11) Parties to the section 381(a) transaction. Parties to the
section 381(a) transaction means the acquiring corporation and the
distributor or transferor corporation that participate in a transaction
to which section 381(a) applies.
(12) Date of distribution or transfer. The date of distribution or
transfer has the same meaning as provided in section 381(b)(2) and
Sec. 1.381(b)-1(b).
(13) Separate and distinct trades or businesses. Separate and
distinct trades or businesses has the same meaning as provided in Sec.
1.446-1(d).
(14) Gross receipts. Gross receipts means all the receipts,
including amounts that are excludible from gross income, that must be
taken into account under the method of accounting used in a
representative period (determined without regard to this section) for
federal income tax purposes. For example, gross receipts includes
income from investments, amounts received for services, rents, total
sales (net of returns and allowances), and both taxable and tax-exempt
interest. See paragraph (e)(5) of this section for rules on determining
the representative period.
(15) Audit protection. Audit protection means, for purposes of
paragraph (d)(1) of this section, that the IRS will not require an
acquiring corporation that is required to change a method of accounting
under paragraph (a)(3) of this section to change that method for a
taxable year ending prior to the taxable year that includes the date of
distribution or transfer.
(16) Section 481(a) adjustment. The section 481(a) adjustment means
an adjustment that must be taken into account as required under section
481(a) to prevent amounts from being duplicated or omitted when the
taxable income of an acquiring corporation is computed under a method
of accounting different from the method used to compute taxable income
for the preceding taxable year.
(17) Cut-off basis. A cut-off basis means a manner in which a
change in method of accounting is made without a section 481(a)
adjustment and under which only the items arising after the beginning
of the year of change (or, in the case of a change made under paragraph
(d)(1) of this section, after the date of distribution or transfer) are
accounted for under the new method of accounting.
(18) Adjustment period. The adjustment period means the number of
taxable years for taking into account the section 481(a) adjustment
required as a result of a change in method of accounting.
(19) Component trade or business. A component trade or business is
a trade or business of a party to the section 381(a) transaction that
will be combined and integrated with a trade or business of the other
party to the section 381 transaction. See paragraph (e)(4)(ii) of this
section for the determination of whether a trade or business is
operated as a separate and distinct trade or business after the date of
distribution or transfer.
(c) Principal method--(1) In general. For each integrated trade or
business, the principal method is generally the method of accounting
used by the component trade or business of the acquiring corporation
immediately prior to the date of distribution or transfer. If, however,
the component trade or business of the distributor or transferor
corporation is larger than the component trade or business of the
acquiring corporation on the date of distribution or transfer, the
principal method is the method used by the component trade or business
of the distributor or transferor corporation immediately prior to that
date. If the larger component trade or business does not have a special
method of accounting for a particular item immediately prior to the
date of distribution or transfer, the principal method for that item is
the method of accounting used by the component trade or business that
does have a special method of accounting for that item. See paragraph
(e)(9) of this section for special rules concerning methods of
accounting that are elected on a project-by-project, job-by-job, or
other similar basis. For each integrated trade or business, the
component trade or business of the distributor or transferor
corporation is larger than the component trade or business of the
acquiring corporation on the date of distribution or transfer if--
(i) The aggregate of the adjusted bases of the assets held by each
component trade or business of the distributor or transferor
corporation (determined under section 1011 and any applicable Income
Tax Regulations) exceeds the aggregate of the adjusted bases of the
assets of each component trade or business of the acquiring corporation
immediately prior to the date of distribution or transfer, and
(ii) The aggregate of the gross receipts for a representative
period of each component trade or business of the distributor or
transferor corporation exceeds the aggregate of the gross receipts for
the same period of each component trade or business of the acquiring
corporation. See paragraph (e)(5) of this section for rules on
determining the representative period.
(2) Multiple component trades or businesses with different
principal methods. If a party to the section 381(a) transaction has
multiple component trades or businesses and more than one principal
overall method of accounting or more than one principal special method
of accounting for an item, then the acquiring corporation may choose
which of the principal methods of accounting used by such component
trades or businesses will be the
[[Page 45678]]
principal methods of the integrated trade or business. The acquiring
corporation must choose a principal method that is a permissible method
of accounting. In general, a change to a principal method in a
transaction to which section 381(a) and paragraph (a)(3) of this
section applies is made under paragraph (d)(1) of this section.
(3) Examples. The following examples illustrate the rules of this
paragraph (c). Unless otherwise noted, the principal method is a
permissible method of accounting.
Example (1). Principal method is the method used by the
acquiring corporation--(i) Facts. X Corporation and T Corporation
each operate an employment agency. X Corporation uses the overall
cash receipts and disbursements method of accounting, and T
Corporation uses an overall accrual method of accounting. X
Corporation acquires the assets of T Corporation in a transaction to
which section 381(a) applies. The adjusted bases of the assets in X
Corporation's employment agency immediately prior to the date of
distribution or transfer exceed the adjusted bases of the assets in
T Corporation's employment agency, and the gross receipts in X
Corporation's employment agency for the representative period exceed
the gross receipts of T Corporation's employment agency for the
period. After the date of distribution or transfer, X Corporation's
employment agency will not be operated as a trade or business that
is separate and distinct from T Corporation's employment agency.
(ii) Conclusion. Because after the date of distribution or
transfer X Corporation will not operate its employment agency as a
separate and distinct trade or business, X Corporation must use a
principal method under paragraph (a)(3) of this section, unless
either the principal method is impermissible and must be changed
under paragraph (a)(4) of this section or X Corporation changes the
principal method in accordance with paragraph (a)(5) of this
section. Because on the date of distribution or transfer T
Corporation's employment agency is not larger than X Corporation's
employment agency, the principal method for the overall method of
accounting is the cash receipts and disbursements method used by X
Corporation's employment agency. X Corporation need not secure the
Commissioner's consent to use this method of accounting. However, in
accordance with paragraph (d)(1) of this section, X Corporation must
change the method of accounting for the employment agency acquired
from T Corporation to the cash receipts and disbursements method.
Example (2). Principal method is the method used by the
acquiring corporation--(i) Facts. The facts are the same as in
Example (1), except that the gross receipts of T Corporation's
employment agency for the representative period exceed the gross
receipts of X Corporation's employment agency for the period.
(ii) Conclusion. The result is the same as in Example (1).
Although the gross receipts of T Corporation's employment agency
exceed the gross receipts of X Corporation's employment agency, T
Corporation's employment agency is not larger than X Corporation's
employment agency because the adjusted bases of the assets of T
Corporation's employment agency do not exceed the adjusted bases of
the assets of X Corporation's employment agency. Thus, the principal
method for the overall method of accounting is the cash receipts and
disbursements method of accounting used by X Corporation's
employment agency immediately prior to the date of distribution or
transfer. X Corporation need not secure the Commissioner's consent
to use this method of accounting. However, in accordance with
paragraph (d)(1) of this section, X Corporation must change the
method of accounting for the employment agency business acquired
from T Corporation to the cash receipts and disbursements method.
Example (3). Principal method is the method used by the
distributor or transferor corporation--(i) Facts. The facts are the
same as in Example (2), except that the adjusted bases of the assets
held by T Corporation's employment agency immediately prior to the
date of distribution or transfer exceed the adjusted bases of the
assets held by X Corporation's employment agency.
(ii) Conclusion. The principal method for the overall method of
accounting is the accrual method of accounting used by T
Corporation's employment agency immediately prior to the date of
distribution or transfer because on the date of distribution or
transfer T Corporation's employment agency is larger than X
Corporation's employment agency. The adjusted bases of the assets of
T Corporation's employment agency exceed the adjusted bases of the
assets of X Corporation's employment agency, and the gross receipts
of T Corporation's employment agency exceed the gross receipts of X
Corporation's employment agency. X Corporation need not secure the
Commissioner's consent to use this method of accounting. However, in
accordance with paragraph (d)(1) of this section, X Corporation must
change the method of accounting for the employment agency business
it operated prior to the date of distribution or transfer to the
accrual method of accounting used by T Corporation's employment
agency immediately prior to the date of distribution or transfer.
Example (4). Impermissible principal method--(i) Facts. The
facts are the same as in Example (1), except that X Corporation is
prohibited under section 448 from using the cash receipts and
disbursements method of accounting after the date of distribution or
transfer.
(ii) Conclusion. Because section 448 prohibits X Corporation
from using the cash receipts and disbursements method of accounting,
X Corporation is not permitted to use the principal method for the
overall method of accounting as determined in Example (1). Because
after the date of distribution or transfer that method is not a
permissible method, under paragraph (a)(4) of this section X
Corporation must secure the Commissioner's consent to change to a
permissible method in accordance with the procedures set forth in
paragraph (d)(2) of this section.
Example (5). Voluntary change not allowable--(i) Facts. The
facts are the same as in Example (4), except that T Corporation
wants to discontinue using the overall accrual method of accounting
for its employment agency and change to the cash receipts and
disbursements method for the taxable year in which the section
381(a) transaction occurs or is expected to occur.
(ii) Conclusion. Under paragraph (a)(5) of this section, the
Commissioner will grant a request to change a method of accounting
for the taxable year that includes the date of distribution or
transfer only if the requested method is the method that the
acquiring corporation must use after the date of distribution or
transfer. The Commissioner will not consent to a request by T
Corporation to change to the cash receipts and disbursements method
for the taxable year in which the section 381(a) transaction occurs
or is expected to occur because X Corporation cannot use the cash
receipts and disbursements method after the date of distribution or
transfer.
Example (6). Principal methods are the acquiring corporation's
methods--(i) Facts. X Corporation and T Corporation each publishes
magazines. X Corporation acquires the assets of T Corporation in a
transaction to which section 381(a) applies. Both X Corporation and
T Corporation use an overall accrual method of accounting. X
Corporation has elected to defer income from its subscription sales
under section 455. T Corporation has not elected to defer income
from its subscription sales under section 455 and instead has
recognized the income from these sales in accordance with section
451. The adjusted bases of the assets in X Corporation's publication
business immediately prior to the date of distribution or transfer
exceed the adjusted bases of the assets in T Corporation's
publication business, and the gross receipts in X Corporation's
publication business for the representative period exceed the gross
receipts in T Corporation's publication business for the
representative period. After the date of distribution or transfer, X
Corporation will not operate its publication business as a trade or
business that is separate and distinct from T Corporation's
publication business.
(ii) Conclusion. Because after the date of distribution or
transfer X Corporation will not operate its publication business as
a separate and distinct trade or business, X Corporation must use
the principal method under paragraph (a)(3) of this section, unless
either the principal method is impermissible and must be changed
under paragraph (a)(4) of this section or X Corporation changes the
principal method in accordance with paragraph (a)(5) of this
section. The adjusted bases of the assets in T Corporation's
publication business do not exceed the adjusted bases of the assets
in X Corporation's publication business, and the gross receipts in T
Corporation's publication business do not exceed the gross receipts
in X Corporation's publication business. Because on the date of
distribution or transfer T Corporation's publication business is not
[[Page 45679]]
larger than X Corporation's publication business, the principal
method for the overall method of accounting is the accrual method
used by X Corporation's publication business immediately prior to
the date of distribution or transfer. The principal method for
subscription sales is the section 455 deferral method used by X
Corporation immediately prior to the date of distribution or
transfer. X Corporation need not secure the Commissioner's consent
to use the principal method for either the overall method of
accounting or the special method of accounting. However, in
accordance with paragraph (d)(1) of this section, X Corporation must
change both the overall method of accounting and the special method
of accounting for the publication business acquired from T
Corporation to the accrual method and the section 455 deferral
method used by X Corporation immediately prior to the date of
distribution or transfer.
Example (7). Principal methods are the acquiring corporation's
methods--(i) Facts. The facts are the same as in Example (6), except
that the adjusted bases of the assets in T Corporation's publication
business immediately prior to the date of distribution or transfer
exceed the adjusted bases of the assets in X Corporation's business.
(ii) Conclusion. The result is the same as in Example (6).
Because on the date of distribution or transfer T Corporation's
publication business is not larger than X Corporation's publication
business, the principal method for the overall method of accounting
is the accrual method used by X Corporation's publication business
immediately prior to the date of distribution or transfer. The
principal method for subscription sales is the section 455 deferral
method used by X Corporation immediately prior to the date of
distribution or transfer. X Corporation need not secure the
Commissioner's consent to use the principal method for either the
overall method of accounting or the special method of accounting.
However, in accordance with paragraph (d)(1) of this section, X
Corporation must change both the overall method of accounting and
the special method of accounting for the publication business
acquired from T Corporation to the accrual method and the section
455 deferral method used by X Corporation immediately prior to the
date of distribution or transfer.
Example (8). Principal method determination when larger
component trade or business does not have a special method of
accounting--(i) Facts. X Corporation and T Corporation both install
ice skating rinks. Both X Corporation and T Corporation use an
overall accrual method of accounting for their respective
businesses. X Corporation completes its installation contracts
within the contracting year and uses an accrual method of accounting
to recognize the revenue from its installation contracts. T
Corporation's installation contracts are subject to section 460, and
T Corporation recognizes the revenue from such contracts under the
percentage-of-completion method. X Corporation acquires the assets
of T Corporation in a transaction to which section 381(a) applies.
The adjusted bases of the assets in X Corporation's installation
business immediately prior to the date of distribution or transfer
exceed the adjusted bases of the assets in T Corporation's
installation business, and the gross receipts in X Corporation's
installation business for the representative period exceed the gross
receipts in T Corporation's installation business for the
representative period. After the date of distribution or transfer, X
Corporation will not operate its installation business as a trade or
business that is separate and distinct from T Corporation's
installation business.
(ii) Conclusion. Because after the date of distribution or
transfer X Corporation will not operate its installation business as
a separate and distinct trade or business, X Corporation must use a
principal method under paragraph (a)(3) of this section, unless
either the principal method is impermissible and must be changed
under paragraph (a)(4) of this section or X Corporation changes the
principal method in accordance with paragraph (a)(5) of this
section. The adjusted bases of the assets in T Corporation's
installation business do not exceed the adjusted bases of the assets
in X Corporation's installation business, and the gross receipts in
T Corporation's installation business do not exceed the gross
receipts in X Corporation's installation business. Because on the
date of distribution or transfer T Corporation's installation
business is not larger than X Corporation's installation business,
the principal method for the overall method of accounting is the
accrual method used by X Corporation's installation business
immediately prior to the date of distribution or transfer. X
Corporation need not secure the Commissioner's consent to use the
principal method for the overall method of accounting. However, in
accordance with paragraph (d)(1) of this section, X Corporation must
change the overall method of accounting for the installation
business acquired from T Corporation to the accrual method used by X
Corporation. Under paragraph (c) of this section, the principal
method for T Corporation's long-term contracts is the percentage-of-
completion method used by T Corporation immediately prior to the
date of distribution or transfer because X Corporation's
installation business does not have a method of accounting for long-
term contracts. There is no change in method of accounting, and X
Corporation need not secure the Commissioner's consent to use T
Corporation's percentage-of-completion method.
Example (9). Principal method determination with a combined
trade or business and a separate and distinct trade or business--(i)
Facts. X Corporation operates a tennis academy as a trade or
business that is separate and distinct from its trade or business of
operating a golf academy. X Corporation uses the overall cash
receipts and disbursements method of accounting for the tennis
academy and an overall accrual method of accounting for the golf
academy. T Corporation operates a tennis academy and uses an accrual
method of accounting for the overall method. X Corporation acquires
the assets of T Corporation in a transaction to which section 381(a)
applies. After the date of distribution or transfer, X Corporation
will not operate its tennis academy as a trade or business that is
separate and distinct from T Corporation's tennis academy. X
Corporation will continue to operate its golf academy as a trade or
business that is separate and distinct from the operation of the
tennis academy. The adjusted bases of the assets in T Corporation's
tennis academy exceed the adjusted bases of the assets in X
Corporation's tennis academy immediately prior to the date of
distribution or transfer. The gross receipts of T Corporation's
tennis academy for the representative period exceed the gross
receipts of X Corporation's tennis academy for that period.
(ii) Conclusion. Because after the date of distribution or
transfer X Corporation will not operate its tennis academy as a
separate and distinct trade or business, X Corporation must use a
principal method under paragraph (a)(3) of this section, unless
either the principal method is impermissible and must be changed
under paragraph (a)(4) of this section or X Corporation changes the
principal method in accordance with paragraph (a)(5) of this
section. Because on the date of distribution or transfer the tennis
academy operated by T Corporation is larger than the tennis academy
operated by X Corporation, the principal method for the overall
method of accounting for the combined tennis academy business is the
accrual method used by T Corporation's tennis academy immediately
prior to the date of distribution or transfer. X Corporation need
not secure the Commissioner's consent to use the principal method
for the overall method of accounting. However, in accordance with
paragraph (d)(1) of this section, X Corporation must change the
method of accounting for its tennis academy to the accrual method.
Because X Corporation will operate the golf academy as a separate
trade or business, under paragraph (a)(2) of this section X
Corporation must continue to use the accrual method that it used
immediately prior to the date of distribution or transfer as the
carryover method for the golf academy. There is no change in method
of accounting, and X Corporation need not secure the Commissioner's
consent to use the carryover method.
Example (10). Principal method determination with multiple
component trades or businesses--(i) Facts. The facts are the same as
in Example (9), except that after the date of distribution or
transfer X Corporation will not operate its golf academy as a trade
or business that is separate and distinct from the tennis academy.
In addition, X Corporation's component trades or businesses are
larger than T Corporation's component trade or business: (1) the
adjusted bases of the assets of X Corporation's tennis academy and
golf academy businesses, in the aggregate, exceed the adjusted bases
of the assets held by T Corporation's tennis academy; and (2) the
gross receipts for the representative period of X Corporation's
tennis academy and golf academy businesses, in the aggregate, exceed
the gross receipts in T Corporation's tennis academy.
(ii) Conclusion. Because on the date of distribution or transfer
T Corporation's tennis academy is not larger than X Corporation's
[[Page 45680]]
combined tennis academy and golf academy, the principal method for
the overall method of accounting is the method of accounting used by
the component trades or businesses of X Corporation that will be
combined with T Corporation's component trade or business on that
date. Because on the date of distribution or transfer X Corporation
operates two component trades or businesses with different overall
methods of accounting that will be integrated after the date of
distribution or transfer, X Corporation may choose under paragraph
(c)(2) of this section which overall method (and any special method
of accounting) used by its component trades or businesses will be
the principal method. X Corporation may choose to use either the
accrual method used by the golf academy or the cash receipts and
disbursements method used by its tennis academy as the principal
method after the date of distribution or transfer, if either method
is a permissible method. In accordance with paragraph (d)(1) of this
section, X Corporation must change T Corporation's overall method of
accounting to the principal method. Under paragraph (a)(3) of this
section, X Corporation also must change either its golf academy
business or its tennis academy business, depending on which
principal method X Corporation selects, to the principal method.
(d) Procedures for changing a method of accounting--(1) Change made
to principal method under paragraph (a)(3) of this section--(i) Section
481(a) adjustment--(A) In general. An acquiring corporation that
changes its method of accounting or the distributor or transferor
corporation's method of accounting under paragraph (a)(3) of this
section does not need to secure the Commissioner's consent to use the
principal method. To the extent the use of a principal method
constitutes a change in method of accounting, the change in method is
treated as a change initiated by the acquiring corporation for purposes
of section 481(a)(2). Any change to a principal method, whether the
change relates to a trade or business of the acquiring corporation or a
trade or business of the distributor or transferor corporation, must be
reflected on the acquiring corporation's federal income tax return for
the taxable year that includes the date of distribution or transfer.
The amount of the section 481(a) adjustment and the adjustment period,
if any, necessary to implement a change to the principal method are
determined under Sec. 1.446-1(e) and the applicable administrative
procedures that govern voluntary changes in methods of accounting under
section 446(e). If the Internal Revenue Code, the Income Tax
Regulations, or administrative procedures require that a method of
accounting be implemented on a cut-off basis, the acquiring corporation
must implement the change on a cut-off basis as of the date of
distribution or transfer on its federal income tax return for the
taxable year that includes the date of distribution or transfer. If the
Internal Revenue Code, the Income Tax Regulations, or administrative
procedures require a section 481(a) adjustment, the acquiring
corporation must determine the section 481(a) adjustment and include
the appropriate amount of the section 481(a) adjustment on its federal
income tax return for the taxable year that includes the date of
distribution or transfer and subsequent taxable year(s), as necessary.
This adjustment is determined by the acquiring corporation as of the
beginning of the day that is immediately after the date of distribution
or transfer.
(B) Example. The following example illustrates the rules of this
paragraph (d)(1)(i):
Example. X Corporation uses the overall cash receipts and
disbursements method of accounting, and T Corporation uses an
overall accrual method of accounting. X Corporation acquires the
assets of T Corporation in a transaction to which section 381(a)
applies. X Corporation determines that under the rules of paragraph
(c)(1) of this section X Corporation must change the method of
accounting for the business acquired from T Corporation to the cash
receipts and disbursements method. X Corporation will determine the
section 481(a) adjustment pertaining to the change to the cash
receipts and disbursements method by consolidating the adjustments
(whether the amounts thereof represent increases or decreases in
items of income or deductions) arising with respect to balances in
the various accounts, such as accounts receivable, as of the
beginning of the day that immediately follows the day on which X
Corporation acquires the assets of T Corporation. X Corporation will
reflect this adjustment, or an appropriate part thereof, on its
federal income tax return for the taxable year that includes the
date of distribution or transfer.
(ii) Audit protection. Notwithstanding any other provision in any
other Income Tax Regulation or administrative procedure, no audit
protection is provided for any change in method of accounting under
paragraph (d)(1) of this section.
(iii) Other terms and conditions. Except as otherwise provided in
this section, other terms and conditions provided in Sec. 1.446-1(e)
and the applicable administrative procedures for voluntary changes in
method of accounting under section 446(e) apply to a change in method
of accounting under this section. Thus, for example, if the
administrative procedures for a particular change in method of
accounting have a term and condition that provides for the acceleration
of the section 481(a) adjustment period, this term and condition
applies to a change made under this paragraph (d)(1). However, any
scope limitation in the applicable administrative procedures will not
apply for purposes of making a change under this paragraph (d)(1). For
example, if the administrative procedures provide as a limitation that
an identical change in method of accounting is barred for a period of
years, this limitation will not bar a change to the principal method
made under this section.
(2) Change made to a method of accounting under paragraph (a)(4) or
(a)(5) of this section--(i) In general. A party to a section 381(a)
transaction that changes a method of accounting under either paragraph
(a)(4) or paragraph (a)(5) of this section must follow the provisions
of Sec. 1.446-(1)(e) and the applicable administrative procedures,
including scope limitations, for voluntary changes in method of
accounting under section 446(e), except as provided in paragraphs
(d)(2)(ii) and (d)(2)(iii) of this section. An application on Form
3115, ``Application for Change in Accounting Method,'' filed with the
IRS to change a method of accounting under this paragraph (d)(2) should
be labeled ``Filed under section 381(c)(4)'' at the top.
(ii) Final year limitation. Any scope limitation relating to the
final year of a trade or business will not apply to a taxpayer that
changes its method of accounting in the final year of a trade or
business that is terminated as the result of a section 381(a)
transaction.
(iii) Time to file. Under the authority of Sec. 1.446-1(e)(3)(ii),
for a change in method of accounting requiring advance consent, the
application for a change in method of accounting (for example, Form
3115) must be filed with the IRS on or before the later of--
(A) The due date for filing a Form 3115 as specified in Sec.
1.446-1(e), for example, the last day of the taxable year in which the
distribution or transfer occurred, or
(B) The earlier of--
(1) The day that is 180 days after the date of distribution or
transfer, or
(2) The day on which the acquiring corporation files its federal
income tax return for the taxable year in which the distribution or
transfer occurred.
(e) Rules and procedures--(1) No method of accounting. If a party
to a section 381(a) transaction is not using a method of accounting,
does not have a method of accounting for a particular item, or came
into existence as a result of the transaction, the party will not be
treated as having a method of accounting different from that used by
[[Page 45681]]
another party to the section 381(a) transaction.
(2) Elections and adoptions allowed. If an election does not
require the Commissioner's consent, an acquiring corporation or a
distributor or transferor corporation is not precluded from making any
election that is otherwise permissible for the taxable year that
includes the date of distribution or transfer. For purposes of this
section, a corporation shall be deemed as having made any election as
of the first day of the taxable year that includes the date of
distribution or transfer. Similarly, where adoption is permissible, an
acquiring corporation or a distributor or transferor corporation may
adopt any permissible method of accounting for the taxable year that
includes the date of distribution or transfer.
(3) Elections continue after section 381(a) transaction--(i)
General rule. An acquiring corporation is not required to renew any
election not otherwise requiring renewal and previously made by it or
by a distributor or transferor corporation for a carryover method or a
principal method if the acquiring corporation uses the method after the
section 381(a) transaction. If the acquiring corporation uses a method
after the date of distribution or transfer, an election made by the
acquiring corporation or by a distributor or transferor corporation for
that method that was in effect on the date of distribution or transfer
continues after the section 381(a) transaction as though the
distribution or transfer had not occurred.
(ii) Example. The following example illustrates the rules of this
paragraph (e)(3):
Example. The acquiring corporation, X Corporation, previously
elected to amortize bond premium under section 171. X Corporation
acquires the assets of T Corporation in a transaction to which
section 381(a) applies. X Corporation determines under the rules of
paragraph (c)(1) of this section that X Corporation's method of
amortizing bond premium is the principal method. After the date of
distribution or transfer, X Corporation is not required to renew its
bond premium amortization election and is bound by it. Additionally,
X Corporation would not be required to renew its election to
amortize bond premium if the method were the carryover method under
paragraph (a)(2) of this section.
(4) Appropriate times for certain determinations--(i) Determining
the method of accounting. The method of accounting used by a party to a
section 381(a) transaction on the date of distribution or transfer is
the method of accounting used by that party as of the end of the day
that is immediately prior to the date of distribution or transfer.
(ii) Determining whether there are separate and distinct trades or
businesses after the date of distribution or transfer. Whether an
acquiring corporation will operate the trades or businesses of the
parties to a section 381(a) transaction as separate and distinct trades
or businesses after the date of distribution or transfer will be
determined as of the date of distribution or transfer based upon the
facts and circumstances. Intent to combine books and records of the
trades or businesses may be demonstrated by contemporaneous records and
documents or by other objective evidence that reflects the acquiring
corporation's ultimate plan of operation, even though the actual
combination of the books and records may extend beyond the end of the
taxable year that includes the date of distribution or transfer.
(5) Representative period for aggregating gross receipts. The
representative period for measuring gross receipts is generally the 12
consecutive months preceding the date of distribution or transfer. If a
component trade or business was not in existence for the 12 consecutive
months preceding the date of distribution or transfer, then all
component trades or businesses of each integrated trade or business
will compare their gross receipts for the period that such trade or
business was in existence. For example, if the acquiring corporation's
component trade or business was formed in August and the date of
distribution or transfer occurred in December of the sa