Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; 5-Year Status Reviews of Seven Listed Species, 44564-44566 [2011-18893]
Download as PDF
44564
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 143 / Tuesday, July 26, 2011 / Proposed Rules
wreier-aviles on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with PROPOSALS
combination of exposure and some
corroborating evidence of how the
species is likely impacted could suffice.
The mere identification of factors that
could impact a species negatively is not
sufficient to compel a finding that
listing is appropriate; we require
evidence that these factors are operative
threats that act on the species to the
point that the species meets the
definition of endangered or threatened
under the Act.
The analysis of threats (the five
factors) to determine if the status of GPE
meets the definition of endangered or
threatened was particularly challenging,
because the range of the species appears
to be greater than it was originally
thought to be. In addition to the Palouse
area prairie, the species has been
documented in dry forest habitat on the
east slope of the Cascades. Survey effort
for this species has been low, especially
outside of the Palouse grasslands, and
appropriate survey methods remain to
be developed. In addition, the life
history of the GPE is not completely
understood. There is still some
scientific debate regarding whether the
GPE is an anecic or endogeic species,
although the most recent field
observations and prevailing scientific
evidence indicates it is a deepburrowing anecic species (JohnsonMaynard 2010, p. 2), which would
result in a different exposure to threats
than if it were an endogeic species.
There is no scientific basis to conclude
that any of the activities identified as
threats by the petitioners are, in fact,
threats to the GPE.
Based on our review of the best
available scientific and commercial
information pertaining to the five
factors, we find that the threats are not
of sufficient imminence, intensity, or
magnitude to indicate that the GPE is in
danger of extinction (endangered), or
likely to become endangered within the
foreseeable future (threatened),
throughout all of its range. Therefore,
we find that the GPE does not meet the
definition of an endangered or
threatened species throughout its range.
Distinct Vertebrate Population Segment
and Significant Portion of the Range
Analysis
After assessing whether the species is
endangered or threatened throughout its
range, we next consider whether a
distinct vertebrate population segment
(DPS) or whether any significant portion
of the GPE range meets the definition of
endangered or is likely to become
endangered in the foreseeable future
(threatened), in accordance with the
Service’s Policy Regarding the
Recognition of Distinct Vertebrate
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:37 Jul 25, 2011
Jkt 223001
Population Segments under the
Endangered Species Act (61 FR 4722,
February 7, 1996). Because the GPE is
not a vertebrate species, the Distinct
Vertebrate Population Segment policy is
not applicable to this finding.
Significant Portion of the Range
Having determined that the GPE does
not meet the definition of an
endangered or threatened species, we
must next consider whether there are
any significant portions of the range
where the GPE is in danger of extinction
or is likely to become endangered in the
foreseeable future. Because of
significant uncertainties regarding the
range of the GPE, the limited survey
efforts, and the paucity of information
regarding its life history, there is
nothing to suggest that threats are
disproportionately acting on any portion
of the species’ range, such that the
species is at risk of extinction now or in
the foreseeable future. Therefore, we
find that listing the GPE as an
endangered or threatened species is not
warranted throughout all or a significant
portion of its range. The designation of
critical habitat for this species as
requested by the petitioner is not
appropriate, based on our determination
that the species does not warrant listing
under the Act.
The Service continues to be interested
in the status of this unique species. We
request that you submit any new
information concerning the status of, or
threats to, the GPE to our Washington
Fish and Wildlife Office (see
ADDRESSES) whenever it becomes
available. New information will help us
monitor the GPE and encourage its
conservation.
References Cited
A complete list of references cited is
available on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov and upon request
from the Washington Fish and Wildlife
Office (see ADDRESSES).
Author(s)
The primary authors of this notice are
the staff members of the Washington
Fish and Wildlife Office.
Authority
The authority for this section is
section 4 of the Endangered Species Act
of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et
seq.).
Dated: July 12, 2011.
David Cottingham,
Acting Director, U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service.
[FR Doc. 2011–18645 Filed 7–25–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
PO 00000
Frm 00062
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
50 CFR Part 17
[FWS–R3–ES–2011–N107; 30120–1113–
0000–C4]
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife
and Plants; 5-Year Status Reviews of
Seven Listed Species
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of initiation of reviews;
request for information.
AGENCY:
We, the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, are initiating 5-year
status reviews under the Endangered
Species Act of 1973, as amended (Act),
of seven animal and plant species. We
conduct these reviews to ensure that our
classification of each species on the
Lists of Endangered and Threatened
Wildlife and Plants as threatened or
endangered is accurate. A 5-year review
assesses the best scientific and
commercial data available at the time of
the review. We are requesting the public
to send us any information that has
become available since the most recent
status reviews on each of these species.
Based on review results, we will
determine whether we should change
the listing status of any of these species.
DATES: To ensure consideration, please
send your written information by
September 26, 2011. However, we will
continue to accept new information
about any listed species at any time.
ADDRESSES: For how and where to send
comments or information, see ‘‘VIII.
Contacts’’ under SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION.
SUMMARY:
To
request information, see ‘‘VIII. Contacts’’
under SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION.
Individuals who are hearing impaired or
speech impaired may call the Federal
Relay Service at 800–877–8337 for TTY
(telephone typewriter or teletypewriter)
assistance.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
I. Why do we conduct a 5-year review?
Under the Act (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.),
we maintain Lists of Endangered and
Threatened Wildlife and Plants (which
we collectively refer to as the List) in
the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) at
50 CFR 17.11 (for animals) and 17.12
(for plants). Section 4(c)(2)(A) of the Act
requires us to review each listed
species’ status at least once every 5
years. Then, under section 4(c)(2)(B), we
determine whether to remove any
species from the List (delist), to
E:\FR\FM\26JYP1.SGM
26JYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 143 / Tuesday, July 26, 2011 / Proposed Rules
reclassify it from endangered to
threatened, or to reclassify it from
threatened to endangered. Any change
in Federal classification requires a
separate rulemaking process.
In classifying, we use the following
definitions, from 50 CFR 424.02:
(A) Species includes any species or
subspecies of fish, wildlife, or plant,
and any distinct population segment of
any species of vertebrate, that
interbreeds when mature;
(B) Endangered species means any
species that is in danger of extinction
throughout all or a significant portion of
its range; and
(C) Threatened species means any
species that is likely to become an
endangered species within the
foreseeable future throughout all or a
significant portion of its range.
We must support delisting by the best
scientific and commercial data
available, and only consider delisting if
data substantiate that the species is
neither endangered nor threatened for
one or more of the following reasons (50
CFR 424.11(d)):
44565
(A) The species is considered extinct;
(B) The species is considered to be
recovered; or
(C) The original data available when
the species was listed, or the
interpretation of data, were in error.
Our regulations at 50 CFR 424.21
require that we publish a notice in the
Federal Register announcing the species
we are reviewing.
II. What species are under review?
This notice announces our active 5year status reviews of the species.
CURRENT LISTING STATUS OF SPECIES UNDER 5-YEAR STATUS REVIEW
Common name
Scientific name
Status
Where listed
Final listing rule publication
date and citation
ANIMALS
Bat, gray ................................
Myotis grisescens .................
Endangered ......
Bat, Indiana ............................
Myotis sodalis .......................
Endangered ......
Snake, copperbelly water ......
Threatened .......
Mussel, scaleshell ..................
Nerodia erythrogaster
neglecta.
Leptodea leptodon ................
Endangered ......
Pearlymussel, Curtis’ .............
Epioblasma florentina curtisii
Endangered ......
Central and Southeastern
U.S.A.
Eastern and Midwestern
U.S.A.
IN north of 40° N. Lat., MI,
OH.
U.S.A. (AL, AR, IA, IL, IN,
KY, MN, MO, OH, OK, SD,
TN, WI).
U.S.A. (AR, MO) ...................
April 28, 1976 (41 FR
17736).
March 11, 1967 (32 FR
4001).
January 29, 1997 (62 FR
4183).
October 9, 2001 (66 FR
51322).
June 14, 1976 (41 FR
24062).
PLANTS
Boltonia decurrens ................
Threatened .......
U.S.A. (IL, MO). ....................
Fassett’s locoweed ................
wreier-aviles on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with PROPOSALS
Decurrent false aster .............
Oxytropis campestris var.
chartacea.
Threatened .......
U.S.A. (WI) ............................
III. What do we consider in our review?
We consider all new information
available at the time we conduct a 5year status review. We consider the best
scientific and commercial data that have
become available since our current
listing determination, or most recent
status review that is accessible from our
Web site https://www.fws.gov/midwest/
Endangered/recovery/5yr_rev/
completed5yrs.html, such as:
(A) Species biology, including but not
limited to population trends,
distribution, abundance, demographics,
and genetics;
(B) Habitat conditions, including but
not limited to amount, distribution, and
suitability;
(C) Conservation measures that have
been implemented that benefit the
species;
(D) Threat status and trends (see five
factors under heading ‘‘How Do We
Determine Whether a Species Is
Endangered or Threatened?’’); and
(E) Other new information, data, or
corrections, including but not limited to
taxonomic or nomenclatural changes,
identification of erroneous information
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:37 Jul 25, 2011
Jkt 223001
contained in the List, and improved
analytical methods.
For the copperbelly water snake, we
specifically request information that
pertains only to the northern distinct
population segment (DPS). The
copperbelly watersnake was listed as a
DPS of a vertebrate taxon. The listed
DPS occurs in Michigan, Ohio, and
Indiana north of 40 degrees north
latitude (approximately Indianapolis,
Indiana). A DPS is defined in the
February 7, 1996, Policy Regarding the
Recognition of Distinct Vertebrate
Population Segments (61 FR 4722).
Three elements are considered to list a
population under the Act as a DPS: (1)
The discreteness of the population
segment in relation to the remainder of
the species to which it belongs; (2) The
significance of the population segment
to the species to which it belongs; and
(3) The population segment’s
conservation status in relation to the
Act’s standards for listing (i.e., is the
population segment endangered or
threatened?). Distinct population
segments of vertebrate species, as well
as subspecies of all listed species, may
PO 00000
Frm 00063
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
November 14, 1988 (53 FR
45858).
September 28, 1988 (53 FR
37972).
be proposed for separate reclassification
or for removal from the List. As required
by the DPS policy, we will assess the
validity of the current DPS designation
during the 5-year review. The southern
population (i.e., in Illinois, Kentucky,
and Indiana south of 40 degrees north
latitude) is not listed as a threatened
species at this time and is not part of
this 5-year review.
IV. How do we determine whether a
species is endangered or threatened?
Section 4(a)(1) of the Act requires that
we determine whether a species is
endangered or threatened based on one
or more of the five following factors:
(A) The present or threatened
destruction, modification, or
curtailment of its habitat or range;
(B) Overutilization for commercial,
recreational, scientific, or educational
purposes;
(C) Disease or predation;
(D) The inadequacy of existing
regulatory mechanisms; or
(E) Other natural or manmade factors
affecting its continued existence.
E:\FR\FM\26JYP1.SGM
26JYP1
44566
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 143 / Tuesday, July 26, 2011 / Proposed Rules
Under section 4(b)(1) of the Act, we
must base our assessment of these
factors solely on the best scientific and
commercial data available.
V. What could happen as a result of our
review?
For each species under review, if we
find new information that indicates a
change in classification may be
warranted, we may propose a new rule
that could do one of the following:
(A) Reclassify the species from
threatened to endangered (uplist);
(B) Reclassify the species from
endangered to threatened (downlist); or
(C) Remove the species from the List
(delist).
If we determine that a change in
classification is not warranted, then the
species remains on the List under its
current status.
VI. Request for New Information
To ensure that a 5-year review is
complete and based on the best
available scientific and commercial
information, we request new
information from all sources. See ‘‘What
Information Do We Consider in Our
Review?’’ for specific criteria. If you
submit information, support it with
documentation such as maps,
bibliographic references, methods used
to gather and analyze the data, and/or
copies of any pertinent publications,
reports, or letters by knowledgeable
sources.
Submit your comments and materials
to the appropriate U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service office listed under
‘‘VIII. Contacts.’’
Submit all electronic information in
Text or Rich Text format to FW3Midwest
Region_5YearReview@fws.gov. Please
send information for each species in a
separate e-mail. Provide your name and
return address in the body of your
message, and include the following
identifier in your e-mail subject line:
Information on 5-year review for [NAME
OF SPECIES].
VII. Public Availability of Comments
Before including your address, phone
number, e-mail address, or other
personal identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment—including your
personal identifying information—may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so. Comments and materials received
will be available for public inspection,
by appointment, during normal business
hours at the offices where the comments
are submitted.
VIII. Contacts
Send your comments and information
on the following species, as well as
requests for information, to the
corresponding contacts. You may view
information we receive in response to
this notice, as well as other
documentation in our files, at the
following locations by appointment,
during normal business hours.
Species
Contact person, phone, e-mail
Contact address
Gray bat ...............................
Dr. Paul McKenzie, (573) 234–2132, extension 107,
paul_mckenzie@fws.gov.
Indiana bat ...........................
Mr. Andrew King, (812) 334–4261, extension 1216,
andrew_king@fws.gov.
Copperbelly water snake .....
Ms. Barbara Hosler, (517) 351–6326,
barbara_hosler@fws.gov.
Scaleshell mussel and Curtis
pearlymussel.
Mr. Andy Roberts, (573) 234–2132, extension 110,
andy_roberts@fws.gov.
Boltonia decurrens ...............
Ms. Jody Millar, (309) 757–5800, extension 202,
jody_millar@fws.gov.
Ms.
Catherine
Carnes,
(920)
866–1732,
cathy_carnes@fws.gov.
Columbia Missouri Field Office, U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service, 101 Park DeVille Drive, Suite A, Columbia,
MO 65203–0007.
Bloomington Field Office, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 620 S. Walker Street, Bloomington, IN 47403–
2121.
East Lansing Field Office, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 2651 Coolidge Road, Suite 101, East Lansing,
MI 48823–6316.
Columbia Missouri Field Office, U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service, 101 Park DeVille Drive, Suite A, Columbia,
MO 65203–0007.
Rock Island Field Office, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service,
1511 47th Avenue, Moline, IL 61265.
Green Bay Field Office, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service,
2661 Scott Tower Drive, WI 54229–9565.
Oxytropis campestris var.
chartacea.
IX. Authority
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
We publish this notice under the
authority of the Endangered Species Act
of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et
seq.).
Fish and Wildlife Service
Dated: June 14, 2011.
Lynn M. Lewis,
Assistant Regional Director, Ecological
Services, Midwest Region.
wreier-aviles on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with PROPOSALS
[FR Doc. 2011–18893 Filed 7–25–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
50 CFR Part 17
[FWS–R3–ES–2011–0025; MO 92210–0–
0008–B2]
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife
and Plants; 12-Month Finding on a
Petition To List the Frigid Ambersnail
as Endangered
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of 12-month petition
finding.
AGENCY:
We, the Fish and Wildlife
Service (Service), announce a 12-month
finding on a petition to list the frigid
ambersnail (Catinella gelida) under the
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:11 Jul 25, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00064
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Endangered Species Act of 1973, as
amended (Act). After reviewing all
available scientific and commercial
information, we find that listing the
frigid ambersnail is not warranted
because currently living individuals that
were identified as frigid ambersnails do
not constitute a unique and valid,
currently living taxon; therefore, it is
not considered to be a listable entity
under the Act.
DATES: The finding announced in this
document was made July 26, 2011.
ADDRESSES: This finding is available on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov at Docket Number
FWS–R3–ES–2011–0025. The complete
file for this finding is available for
inspection, by appointment, during
normal business hours at the U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service, Rock Island
E:\FR\FM\26JYP1.SGM
26JYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 143 (Tuesday, July 26, 2011)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 44564-44566]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-18893]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
50 CFR Part 17
[FWS-R3-ES-2011-N107; 30120-1113-0000-C4]
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; 5-Year Status
Reviews of Seven Listed Species
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of initiation of reviews; request for information.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, are initiating 5-year
status reviews under the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended
(Act), of seven animal and plant species. We conduct these reviews to
ensure that our classification of each species on the Lists of
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants as threatened or
endangered is accurate. A 5-year review assesses the best scientific
and commercial data available at the time of the review. We are
requesting the public to send us any information that has become
available since the most recent status reviews on each of these
species. Based on review results, we will determine whether we should
change the listing status of any of these species.
DATES: To ensure consideration, please send your written information by
September 26, 2011. However, we will continue to accept new information
about any listed species at any time.
ADDRESSES: For how and where to send comments or information, see
``VIII. Contacts'' under SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: To request information, see ``VIII.
Contacts'' under SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION. Individuals who are hearing
impaired or speech impaired may call the Federal Relay Service at 800-
877-8337 for TTY (telephone typewriter or teletypewriter) assistance.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Why do we conduct a 5-year review?
Under the Act (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.), we maintain Lists of
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants (which we collectively
refer to as the List) in the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) at 50
CFR 17.11 (for animals) and 17.12 (for plants). Section 4(c)(2)(A) of
the Act requires us to review each listed species' status at least once
every 5 years. Then, under section 4(c)(2)(B), we determine whether to
remove any species from the List (delist), to
[[Page 44565]]
reclassify it from endangered to threatened, or to reclassify it from
threatened to endangered. Any change in Federal classification requires
a separate rulemaking process.
In classifying, we use the following definitions, from 50 CFR
424.02:
(A) Species includes any species or subspecies of fish, wildlife,
or plant, and any distinct population segment of any species of
vertebrate, that interbreeds when mature;
(B) Endangered species means any species that is in danger of
extinction throughout all or a significant portion of its range; and
(C) Threatened species means any species that is likely to become
an endangered species within the foreseeable future throughout all or a
significant portion of its range.
We must support delisting by the best scientific and commercial
data available, and only consider delisting if data substantiate that
the species is neither endangered nor threatened for one or more of the
following reasons (50 CFR 424.11(d)):
(A) The species is considered extinct;
(B) The species is considered to be recovered; or
(C) The original data available when the species was listed, or the
interpretation of data, were in error.
Our regulations at 50 CFR 424.21 require that we publish a notice
in the Federal Register announcing the species we are reviewing.
II. What species are under review?
This notice announces our active 5-year status reviews of the
species.
Current Listing Status of Species Under 5-Year Status Review
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Final listing
Common name Scientific name Status Where listed rule publication
date and citation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ANIMALS
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bat, gray...................... Myotis grisescens Endangered............ Central and April 28, 1976
Southeastern (41 FR 17736).
U.S.A.
Bat, Indiana................... Myotis sodalis... Endangered............ Eastern and March 11, 1967
Midwestern U.S.A. (32 FR 4001).
Snake, copperbelly water....... Nerodia Threatened............ IN north of January 29, 1997
erythrogaster 40[deg] N. Lat., (62 FR 4183).
neglecta. MI, OH.
Mussel, scaleshell............. Leptodea leptodon Endangered............ U.S.A. (AL, AR, October 9, 2001
IA, IL, IN, KY, (66 FR 51322).
MN, MO, OH, OK,
SD, TN, WI).
Pearlymussel, Curtis'.......... Epioblasma Endangered............ U.S.A. (AR, MO).. June 14, 1976 (41
florentina FR 24062).
curtisii.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PLANTS
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Decurrent false aster.......... Boltonia Threatened............ U.S.A. (IL, MO).. November 14, 1988
decurrens. (53 FR 45858).
Fassett's locoweed............. Oxytropis Threatened............ U.S.A. (WI)...... September 28,
campestris var. 1988 (53 FR
chartacea. 37972).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
III. What do we consider in our review?
We consider all new information available at the time we conduct a
5-year status review. We consider the best scientific and commercial
data that have become available since our current listing
determination, or most recent status review that is accessible from our
Web site https://www.fws.gov/midwest/Endangered/recovery/5yr_rev/completed5yrs.html, such as:
(A) Species biology, including but not limited to population
trends, distribution, abundance, demographics, and genetics;
(B) Habitat conditions, including but not limited to amount,
distribution, and suitability;
(C) Conservation measures that have been implemented that benefit
the species;
(D) Threat status and trends (see five factors under heading ``How
Do We Determine Whether a Species Is Endangered or Threatened?''); and
(E) Other new information, data, or corrections, including but not
limited to taxonomic or nomenclatural changes, identification of
erroneous information contained in the List, and improved analytical
methods.
For the copperbelly water snake, we specifically request
information that pertains only to the northern distinct population
segment (DPS). The copperbelly watersnake was listed as a DPS of a
vertebrate taxon. The listed DPS occurs in Michigan, Ohio, and Indiana
north of 40 degrees north latitude (approximately Indianapolis,
Indiana). A DPS is defined in the February 7, 1996, Policy Regarding
the Recognition of Distinct Vertebrate Population Segments (61 FR
4722). Three elements are considered to list a population under the Act
as a DPS: (1) The discreteness of the population segment in relation to
the remainder of the species to which it belongs; (2) The significance
of the population segment to the species to which it belongs; and (3)
The population segment's conservation status in relation to the Act's
standards for listing (i.e., is the population segment endangered or
threatened?). Distinct population segments of vertebrate species, as
well as subspecies of all listed species, may be proposed for separate
reclassification or for removal from the List. As required by the DPS
policy, we will assess the validity of the current DPS designation
during the 5-year review. The southern population (i.e., in Illinois,
Kentucky, and Indiana south of 40 degrees north latitude) is not listed
as a threatened species at this time and is not part of this 5-year
review.
IV. How do we determine whether a species is endangered or threatened?
Section 4(a)(1) of the Act requires that we determine whether a
species is endangered or threatened based on one or more of the five
following factors:
(A) The present or threatened destruction, modification, or
curtailment of its habitat or range;
(B) Overutilization for commercial, recreational, scientific, or
educational purposes;
(C) Disease or predation;
(D) The inadequacy of existing regulatory mechanisms; or
(E) Other natural or manmade factors affecting its continued
existence.
[[Page 44566]]
Under section 4(b)(1) of the Act, we must base our assessment of
these factors solely on the best scientific and commercial data
available.
V. What could happen as a result of our review?
For each species under review, if we find new information that
indicates a change in classification may be warranted, we may propose a
new rule that could do one of the following:
(A) Reclassify the species from threatened to endangered (uplist);
(B) Reclassify the species from endangered to threatened
(downlist); or
(C) Remove the species from the List (delist).
If we determine that a change in classification is not warranted,
then the species remains on the List under its current status.
VI. Request for New Information
To ensure that a 5-year review is complete and based on the best
available scientific and commercial information, we request new
information from all sources. See ``What Information Do We Consider in
Our Review?'' for specific criteria. If you submit information, support
it with documentation such as maps, bibliographic references, methods
used to gather and analyze the data, and/or copies of any pertinent
publications, reports, or letters by knowledgeable sources.
Submit your comments and materials to the appropriate U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service office listed under ``VIII. Contacts.''
Submit all electronic information in Text or Rich Text format to
FW3MidwestRegion_5YearReview@fws.gov. Please send information for each
species in a separate e-mail. Provide your name and return address in
the body of your message, and include the following identifier in your
e-mail subject line: Information on 5-year review for [NAME OF
SPECIES].
VII. Public Availability of Comments
Before including your address, phone number, e-mail address, or
other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be
aware that your entire comment--including your personal identifying
information--may be made publicly available at any time. While you can
ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be
able to do so. Comments and materials received will be available for
public inspection, by appointment, during normal business hours at the
offices where the comments are submitted.
VIII. Contacts
Send your comments and information on the following species, as
well as requests for information, to the corresponding contacts. You
may view information we receive in response to this notice, as well as
other documentation in our files, at the following locations by
appointment, during normal business hours.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Species Contact person, phone, e-mail Contact address
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gray bat............................. Dr. Paul McKenzie, (573) 234-2132, Columbia Missouri Field
extension 107, paul_mckenzie@fws.gov. Office, U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, 101 Park
DeVille Drive, Suite A,
Columbia, MO 65203-0007.
Indiana bat.......................... Mr. Andrew King, (812) 334-4261, extension Bloomington Field Office,
1216, U.S. Fish and Wildlife
andrew_king@fws.gov. Service, 620 S. Walker
Street, Bloomington, IN
47403-2121.
Copperbelly water snake.............. Ms. Barbara Hosler, (517) 351-6326, East Lansing Field Office,
barbara_hosler@fws.gov. U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service, 2651 Coolidge Road,
Suite 101, East Lansing, MI
48823-6316.
Scaleshell mussel and Curtis Mr. Andy Roberts, (573) 234-2132, Columbia Missouri Field
pearlymussel. extension 110, andy_roberts@fws.gov. Office, U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, 101 Park
DeVille Drive, Suite A,
Columbia, MO 65203-0007.
Boltonia decurrens................... Ms. Jody Millar, (309) 757-5800, extension Rock Island Field Office,
202, jody_millar@fws.gov. U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service, 1511 47th Avenue,
Moline, IL 61265.
Oxytropis campestris var. chartacea.. Ms. Catherine Carnes, (920) 866-1732, Green Bay Field Office, U.S.
cathy_carnes@fws.gov. Fish and Wildlife Service,
2661 Scott Tower Drive, WI
54229-9565.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
IX. Authority
We publish this notice under the authority of the Endangered
Species Act of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).
Dated: June 14, 2011.
Lynn M. Lewis,
Assistant Regional Director, Ecological Services, Midwest Region.
[FR Doc. 2011-18893 Filed 7-25-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P