Privacy Act of 1974: Implementation of Exemptions; Department of Homeland Security/ALL-029 Civil Rights and Civil Liberties Records System of Records, 44451-44452 [2011-18832]
Download as PDF
44451
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
Vol. 76, No. 143
Tuesday, July 26, 2011
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by
the Superintendent of Documents. Prices of
new books are listed in the first FEDERAL
REGISTER issue of each week.
enforcement requirements. The system
of records is the DHS/ALL–029 Civil
Rights and Civil Liberties Records
System of Records. The DHS/ALL–029
Civil Rights and Civil Liberties Records
system of records notice (SORN) was
published concurrently in the Federal
Register, 75 FR 39266, July 8, 2010, and
comments were invited on both the
NPRM and SORN.
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Public Comments
DHS received one comment on the
NPRM and one comment on the SORN.
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains regulatory documents having general
applicability and legal effect, most of which
are keyed to and codified in the Code of
Federal Regulations, which is published under
50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
Office of the Secretary
6 CFR Part 5
[Docket No. DHS–2011–0051]
Privacy Act of 1974: Implementation of
Exemptions; Department of Homeland
Security/ALL–029 Civil Rights and Civil
Liberties Records System of Records
AGENCY: Privacy Office, DHS.
AGENCY: Final rule.
SUMMARY: The Department of Homeland
Security is issuing a final rule to amend
its regulations to exempt portions of a
newly established system of records
titled, ‘‘Department of Homeland
Security/ALL–029 Civil Rights and Civil
Liberties Records System of Records’’
from certain provisions of the Privacy
Act. Specifically, the Department
exempts portions of the ‘‘Department of
Homeland Security/ALL–029 Civil
Rights and Civil Liberties Records
System of Records’’ from one or more
provisions of the Privacy Act because of
criminal, civil, and administrative
enforcement requirements.
DATES: Effective Date: This final rule is
effective July 26, 2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
general questions and privacy issues
please contact: Mary Ellen Callahan
(703–235–0780), Chief Privacy Officer,
Privacy Office, Department of Homeland
Security, Washington, DC 20528.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
wreier-aviles on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with RULES
Background
The Department of Homeland
Security (DHS) published a notice of
proposed rulemaking (NPRM) in the
Federal Register, 75 FR 39184, July 8,
2010, proposing to exempt portions of
the system of records from one or more
provisions of the Privacy Act because of
criminal, civil, and administrative
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:50 Jul 25, 2011
Jkt 223001
NPRM
Public Comment: The commenter
asked that DHS ‘‘consider then the
longevity of your agency’s [DHS]
decision to classify civil rights records;
pent up negativity tends to torrentially
destroy future objectives, and
undermines the legitimacy of the work
done to bring justice to those who
deserve its retribution.’’
DHS Response: DHS is not seeking,
through the proposed rule, to classify
civil rights records. Rather, DHS has
exempted certain records within this
system of records from release under the
Privacy Act because they are classified
records, investigatory records compiled
for law enforcement purposes, records
related to the protection of the President
and others, and investigatory records
used for employee and contractor
suitability determinations.
SORN
Public Comment: The commenter
noted that ‘‘many persons affected by
these programs are afraid to complain
about misconduct because they fear that
the personally identifying information
that they provide will not be kept
confidential or that they will be
retaliated against by the agencies about
which they complain. The SORN does
nothing to alleviate these fears. In fact,
it makes explicit that identifying
information will be shared among
government agencies, including state
and local agencies. This was a missed
opportunity to ensure that complaints
may be made without fear of reprisal. It
does not provide any meaningful
opportunity for complainants to learn
the results of their complaints.’’
DHS Response: The purpose of a
Privacy Act SORN is to provide
reasonable notice to the public on
information that the Department is
collecting, maintaining, and retrieving
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
by personal identifier related directly to
an individual in an agency system. The
purpose is also to state the purpose,
information on records and individuals
covered, information sharing with other
entities, records retention, and redress
on information within that system. It is
not intended to be a mechanism for
complainants to learn the results of their
complaints. There is a separate process
for that. Information received within
these systems of records must be
protected by government agencies as
outlined in statutes, executive orders,
regulations, and DHS policy; in this
case, records related to civil rights and
civil liberties. There are limits to
sharing information in a Privacy Act
system of records, this includes between
Federal, state, and local agencies
including law enforcement. Sharing
must be done in accordance with the
routine uses in the Privacy Act system
of records as published in the Federal
Register. Routine uses apply to
information sharing external to DHS.
The term ‘‘routine use’’ is defined, with
respect to the disclosure of a record, as
the use of such record for a purpose
which is compatible with the purpose
for which the record was collected. This
ensures the public receives adequate
notice of the Department’s planned uses
of the information in the system of
records.
DHS will implement this rulemaking
as proposed.
List of Subjects in 6 CFR Part 5
Freedom of information; Privacy.
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, DHS amends Chapter I of
Title 6, Code of Federal Regulations, as
follows:
PART 5—DISCLOSURE OF RECORDS
AND INFORMATION
1. The authority citation for Part 5
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 6 U.S.C. § 101 et seq.; Pub. L.
107–296, 116 Stat. 2135; 5 U.S.C. 301.
Subpart A also issued under 5 U.S.C. 552.
Subpart B also issued under 5 U.S.C. 552a.
2. In Appendix C to Part 5, revise
paragraph 2 to read as follows:
■
Appendix C to Part 5—DHS Systems of
Records Exempt From the Privacy Act
*
*
*
*
*
2. The DHS/ALL–029 Civil Rights and
Civil Liberties Records System of Records
consists of electronic and paper records and
E:\FR\FM\26JYR1.SGM
26JYR1
wreier-aviles on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with RULES
44452
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 143 / Tuesday, July 26, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
will be used by DHS and its components. The
DHS/ALL–029 Civil Rights and Civil
Liberties Records System of Records is a
repository of information held by DHS in
connection with its several and varied
missions and functions, including, but not
limited to the enforcement of civil and
criminal laws; investigations, inquiries, and
proceedings thereunder; national security
and intelligence activities; and protection of
the President of the United States or other
individuals pursuant to Section 3056 and
3056A of Title 18. The DHS/ALL–029 Civil
Rights and Civil Liberties Records System of
Records contains information that is
collected by, on behalf of, in support of, or
in cooperation with DHS and its components
and may contain personally identifiable
information collected by other Federal, state,
local, Tribal, foreign, or international
government agencies. The Secretary of
Homeland Security has exempted this system
from the following provisions of the Privacy
Act, subject to limitations set forth in 5
U.S.C. 552a(c)(3); (d); (e)(1), (e)(4)(G),
(e)(4)(H), (e)(4)(I); and (f) pursuant to 5 U.S.C.
§ 552a(k)(1), (k)(2), (k)(3), and (k)(5).
Exemptions from these particular subsections
are justified, on a case-by-case basis to be
determined at the time a request is made, for
the following reasons:
(a) From subsection (c)(3) (Accounting for
Disclosures) because release of the
accounting of disclosures could alert the
individual who is the subject of an
investigation of an actual or potential
criminal, civil, or regulatory violation to the
existence of that investigation and reveal
investigative interest on the part of DHS as
well as the recipient agency. Disclosure of
the accounting would, therefore, present a
serious impediment to law enforcement
efforts and/or efforts to preserve national
security. Disclosure of the accounting would
also permit the individual who is the subject
of a record to impede the investigation, to
tamper with witnesses or evidence, and to
avoid detection or apprehension, which
would undermine the entire investigative
process.
(b) From subsection (d) (Access to Records)
because access to the records contained in
this system of records could inform the
individual who is the subject of an
investigation of an actual or potential
criminal, civil, or regulatory violation to the
existence of that investigation and reveal
investigative interest on the part of DHS or
another agency. Access to the records could
permit the individual who is the subject of
a record to impede the investigation, to
tamper with witnesses or evidence, and to
avoid detection or apprehension.
Amendment of the records could interfere
with ongoing investigations and law
enforcement activities and would impose an
unreasonable administrative burden by
requiring investigations to be continually
reinvestigated. In addition, permitting access
and amendment to such information could
disclose security-sensitive information that
could be detrimental to homeland security.
(c) From subsection (e)(1) (Relevancy and
Necessity of Information) because in the
course of investigations into potential
violations of Federal law, the accuracy of
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:34 Jul 25, 2011
Jkt 223001
information obtained or introduced
occasionally may be unclear, or the
information may not be strictly relevant or
necessary to a specific investigation. In the
interests of effective law enforcement, it is
appropriate to retain all information that may
aid in establishing patterns of unlawful
activity.
(d) From subsections (e)(4)(G), (e)(4)(H),
and (e)(4)(I) (Agency Requirements) and (f)
(Agency Rules), because portions of this
system are exempt from the individual access
provisions of subsection (d) for the reasons
noted above, and therefore DHS is not
required to establish requirements, rules, or
procedures with respect to such access.
Providing notice to individuals with respect
to existence of records pertaining to them in
the system of records or otherwise setting up
procedures pursuant to which individuals
may access and view records pertaining to
themselves in the system would undermine
investigative efforts and reveal the identities
of witnesses, and potential witnesses, and
confidential informants.
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: June 9, 2011.
Mary Ellen Callahan,
Chief Privacy Officer, Department of
Homeland Security.
[FR Doc. 2011–18832 Filed 7–25–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–9B–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Office of the Secretary
6 CFR Part 5
[Docket No. DHS–2011–0054]
Privacy Act of 1974: Implementation of
Exemptions; Department of Homeland
Security National Protection and
Programs Directorate—001 National
Infrastructure Coordinating Center
Records System of Records
Privacy Office, DHS.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Department of Homeland
Security is issuing a final rule to amend
its regulations to exempt portions of a
newly established system of records
titled, ‘‘Department of Homeland
Security/National Protection and
Programs Directorate—001 National
Infrastructure Coordinating Center
Records System of Records’’ from
certain provisions of the Privacy Act.
Specifically, the Department exempts
portions of the ‘‘Department of
Homeland Security/National Protection
and Programs Directorate—001 National
Infrastructure Coordinating Center
Records System of Records’’ from one or
more provisions of the Privacy Act
because of criminal, civil, and
administrative enforcement
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
requirements. The Department will not
claim Privacy Act exemption (k)(3) as
originally published in the Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking.
DATES: Effective Date: This final rule is
effective July 26, 2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
general questions please contact: Emily
Andrew (703–235–2182), Senior Privacy
Officer, National Protection and
Programs Directorate, Department of
Homeland Security, Washington, DC
20525. For privacy issues please
contact: Mary Ellen Callahan (703–235–
0780), Chief Privacy Officer, Privacy
Office, Department of Homeland
Security, Washington, DC 20528.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The Department of Homeland
Security (DHS), National Protection and
Programs Directorate (NPPD), published
a notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM) in the Federal Register, 75 FR
69603, on November 15, 2010,
proposing to exempt portions of the
system of records from one or more
provisions of the Privacy Act because of
criminal, civil, and administrative
enforcement requirements. The system
of records is the DHS/NPPD—001
National Infrastructure Coordinating
Center (NICC) Records System of
Records. The DHS/NPPD—001 NICC
Records system of records notice
(SORN) was published concurrently in
the Federal Register, 75 FR 69693,
November 15, 2010, and comments were
invited on both the NPRM and SORN.
The Department will not claim Privacy
Act exemption (k)(3) as originally
published in the NPRM.
Public Comments
DHS received one set of public
comments from the Electronic Privacy
Information Center (EPIC). Comments
submitted for the NPRM and SORN
were identical. Each comment is
outlined below followed by the
Department’s response.
1. By exempting this system of
records from certain provisions of the
Privacy Act, DHS is contravening the
purpose of the Act.
Comment: EPIC urged DHS to limit its
exemptions from the Privacy Act’s
provisions, including 5 U.S.C.
552a(c)(3), which entitles individuals to
an accounting of disclosures of their
records, stating that individuals should
be able to know, after an investigation
is completed or made public, the
information stored about them in the
system. Further, EPIC wrote that
because information from informants
may be used to initiate investigations,
E:\FR\FM\26JYR1.SGM
26JYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 143 (Tuesday, July 26, 2011)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 44451-44452]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-18832]
========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents.
Prices of new books are listed in the first FEDERAL REGISTER issue of each
week.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 143 / Tuesday, July 26, 2011 / Rules
and Regulations
[[Page 44451]]
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Office of the Secretary
6 CFR Part 5
[Docket No. DHS-2011-0051]
Privacy Act of 1974: Implementation of Exemptions; Department of
Homeland Security/ALL-029 Civil Rights and Civil Liberties Records
System of Records
AGENCY: Privacy Office, DHS.
AGENCY: Final rule.
SUMMARY: The Department of Homeland Security is issuing a final rule to
amend its regulations to exempt portions of a newly established system
of records titled, ``Department of Homeland Security/ALL-029 Civil
Rights and Civil Liberties Records System of Records'' from certain
provisions of the Privacy Act. Specifically, the Department exempts
portions of the ``Department of Homeland Security/ALL-029 Civil Rights
and Civil Liberties Records System of Records'' from one or more
provisions of the Privacy Act because of criminal, civil, and
administrative enforcement requirements.
DATES: Effective Date: This final rule is effective July 26, 2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For general questions and privacy
issues please contact: Mary Ellen Callahan (703-235-0780), Chief
Privacy Officer, Privacy Office, Department of Homeland Security,
Washington, DC 20528.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) published a notice of
proposed rulemaking (NPRM) in the Federal Register, 75 FR 39184, July
8, 2010, proposing to exempt portions of the system of records from one
or more provisions of the Privacy Act because of criminal, civil, and
administrative enforcement requirements. The system of records is the
DHS/ALL-029 Civil Rights and Civil Liberties Records System of Records.
The DHS/ALL-029 Civil Rights and Civil Liberties Records system of
records notice (SORN) was published concurrently in the Federal
Register, 75 FR 39266, July 8, 2010, and comments were invited on both
the NPRM and SORN.
Public Comments
DHS received one comment on the NPRM and one comment on the SORN.
NPRM
Public Comment: The commenter asked that DHS ``consider then the
longevity of your agency's [DHS] decision to classify civil rights
records; pent up negativity tends to torrentially destroy future
objectives, and undermines the legitimacy of the work done to bring
justice to those who deserve its retribution.''
DHS Response: DHS is not seeking, through the proposed rule, to
classify civil rights records. Rather, DHS has exempted certain records
within this system of records from release under the Privacy Act
because they are classified records, investigatory records compiled for
law enforcement purposes, records related to the protection of the
President and others, and investigatory records used for employee and
contractor suitability determinations.
SORN
Public Comment: The commenter noted that ``many persons affected by
these programs are afraid to complain about misconduct because they
fear that the personally identifying information that they provide will
not be kept confidential or that they will be retaliated against by the
agencies about which they complain. The SORN does nothing to alleviate
these fears. In fact, it makes explicit that identifying information
will be shared among government agencies, including state and local
agencies. This was a missed opportunity to ensure that complaints may
be made without fear of reprisal. It does not provide any meaningful
opportunity for complainants to learn the results of their
complaints.''
DHS Response: The purpose of a Privacy Act SORN is to provide
reasonable notice to the public on information that the Department is
collecting, maintaining, and retrieving by personal identifier related
directly to an individual in an agency system. The purpose is also to
state the purpose, information on records and individuals covered,
information sharing with other entities, records retention, and redress
on information within that system. It is not intended to be a mechanism
for complainants to learn the results of their complaints. There is a
separate process for that. Information received within these systems of
records must be protected by government agencies as outlined in
statutes, executive orders, regulations, and DHS policy; in this case,
records related to civil rights and civil liberties. There are limits
to sharing information in a Privacy Act system of records, this
includes between Federal, state, and local agencies including law
enforcement. Sharing must be done in accordance with the routine uses
in the Privacy Act system of records as published in the Federal
Register. Routine uses apply to information sharing external to DHS.
The term ``routine use'' is defined, with respect to the disclosure of
a record, as the use of such record for a purpose which is compatible
with the purpose for which the record was collected. This ensures the
public receives adequate notice of the Department's planned uses of the
information in the system of records.
DHS will implement this rulemaking as proposed.
List of Subjects in 6 CFR Part 5
Freedom of information; Privacy.
For the reasons stated in the preamble, DHS amends Chapter I of
Title 6, Code of Federal Regulations, as follows:
PART 5--DISCLOSURE OF RECORDS AND INFORMATION
0
1. The authority citation for Part 5 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 6 U.S.C. Sec. 101 et seq.; Pub. L. 107-296, 116
Stat. 2135; 5 U.S.C. 301. Subpart A also issued under 5 U.S.C. 552.
Subpart B also issued under 5 U.S.C. 552a.
0
2. In Appendix C to Part 5, revise paragraph 2 to read as follows:
Appendix C to Part 5--DHS Systems of Records Exempt From the Privacy
Act
* * * * *
2. The DHS/ALL-029 Civil Rights and Civil Liberties Records
System of Records consists of electronic and paper records and
[[Page 44452]]
will be used by DHS and its components. The DHS/ALL-029 Civil Rights
and Civil Liberties Records System of Records is a repository of
information held by DHS in connection with its several and varied
missions and functions, including, but not limited to the
enforcement of civil and criminal laws; investigations, inquiries,
and proceedings thereunder; national security and intelligence
activities; and protection of the President of the United States or
other individuals pursuant to Section 3056 and 3056A of Title 18.
The DHS/ALL-029 Civil Rights and Civil Liberties Records System of
Records contains information that is collected by, on behalf of, in
support of, or in cooperation with DHS and its components and may
contain personally identifiable information collected by other
Federal, state, local, Tribal, foreign, or international government
agencies. The Secretary of Homeland Security has exempted this
system from the following provisions of the Privacy Act, subject to
limitations set forth in 5 U.S.C. 552a(c)(3); (d); (e)(1),
(e)(4)(G), (e)(4)(H), (e)(4)(I); and (f) pursuant to 5 U.S.C. Sec.
552a(k)(1), (k)(2), (k)(3), and (k)(5). Exemptions from these
particular subsections are justified, on a case-by-case basis to be
determined at the time a request is made, for the following reasons:
(a) From subsection (c)(3) (Accounting for Disclosures) because
release of the accounting of disclosures could alert the individual
who is the subject of an investigation of an actual or potential
criminal, civil, or regulatory violation to the existence of that
investigation and reveal investigative interest on the part of DHS
as well as the recipient agency. Disclosure of the accounting would,
therefore, present a serious impediment to law enforcement efforts
and/or efforts to preserve national security. Disclosure of the
accounting would also permit the individual who is the subject of a
record to impede the investigation, to tamper with witnesses or
evidence, and to avoid detection or apprehension, which would
undermine the entire investigative process.
(b) From subsection (d) (Access to Records) because access to
the records contained in this system of records could inform the
individual who is the subject of an investigation of an actual or
potential criminal, civil, or regulatory violation to the existence
of that investigation and reveal investigative interest on the part
of DHS or another agency. Access to the records could permit the
individual who is the subject of a record to impede the
investigation, to tamper with witnesses or evidence, and to avoid
detection or apprehension. Amendment of the records could interfere
with ongoing investigations and law enforcement activities and would
impose an unreasonable administrative burden by requiring
investigations to be continually reinvestigated. In addition,
permitting access and amendment to such information could disclose
security-sensitive information that could be detrimental to homeland
security.
(c) From subsection (e)(1) (Relevancy and Necessity of
Information) because in the course of investigations into potential
violations of Federal law, the accuracy of information obtained or
introduced occasionally may be unclear, or the information may not
be strictly relevant or necessary to a specific investigation. In
the interests of effective law enforcement, it is appropriate to
retain all information that may aid in establishing patterns of
unlawful activity.
(d) From subsections (e)(4)(G), (e)(4)(H), and (e)(4)(I) (Agency
Requirements) and (f) (Agency Rules), because portions of this
system are exempt from the individual access provisions of
subsection (d) for the reasons noted above, and therefore DHS is not
required to establish requirements, rules, or procedures with
respect to such access. Providing notice to individuals with respect
to existence of records pertaining to them in the system of records
or otherwise setting up procedures pursuant to which individuals may
access and view records pertaining to themselves in the system would
undermine investigative efforts and reveal the identities of
witnesses, and potential witnesses, and confidential informants.
* * * * *
Dated: June 9, 2011.
Mary Ellen Callahan,
Chief Privacy Officer, Department of Homeland Security.
[FR Doc. 2011-18832 Filed 7-25-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-9B-P