Safety Zone; Fourth Annual Chillounge Night St. Petersburg Fireworks Display, Tampa Bay, St. Petersburg, FL, 44531-44533 [2011-18794]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 143 / Tuesday, July 26, 2011 / Proposed Rules
87 45 CFR part 160 and 45 CFR part 164,
subparts A and D.
88 The Common Rule evolved from a long
series of measures designed to protect
individual research subjects from physical
and mental harm. In contrast, the HIPAA
Privacy Rule evolved from data protection
standards such as the Fair Information
Practices. See Pritts JL (2008). The
Importance and Value of Protecting the
Privacy of Health Information: The Roles of
the HIPAA Privacy Rule and the Common
Rule in Health Research.
(4) Hand delivery: Same as mail
address above, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays. The telephone number
is 202–366–9329.
To avoid duplication, please use only
one of these four methods. See the
‘‘Public Participation and Request for
Comments’’ portion of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
below for instructions on submitting
comments.
[FR Doc. 2011–18792 Filed 7–22–11; 11:15 am]
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
If
you have questions on this proposed
rule, call or e-mail Marine Science
Technician First Class Jo A. Hoover,
Sector St. Petersburg Prevention
Department, Coast Guard; telephone
813–228–2191, e-mail
Jo.A.Hoover@uscg.mil. If you have
questions on viewing or submitting
material to the docket, call Renee V.
Wright, Program Manager, Docket
Operations, telephone 202–366–9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
BILLING CODE 4150–28–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG–2011–0615]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; Fourth Annual Chillounge
Night St. Petersburg Fireworks
Display, Tampa Bay, St. Petersburg, FL
Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
The Coast Guard proposes to
establish a temporary safety zone on the
waters of Tampa Bay in St. Petersburg,
Florida during the Fourth Annual
Chillounge Night St. Petersburg
Fireworks Display on Saturday,
November 19, 2011. The safety zone is
necessary to protect the public from the
hazards associated with launching
fireworks over navigable waters of the
United States. Persons and vessels
would be prohibited from entering,
transiting through, anchoring in, or
remaining within the safety zone unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port St.
Petersburg or a designated
representative.
DATES: Comments and related material
must be received by the Coast Guard on
or before September 9, 2011. Requests
for public meetings must be received by
the Coast Guard on or before August 10,
2011.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by docket number USCG–
2011–0615 using any one of the
following methods:
(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov.
(2) Fax: 202–493–2251.
(3) Mail: Docket Management Facility
(M–30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590–
0001.
wreier-aviles on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:37 Jul 25, 2011
Jkt 223001
Public Participation and Request for
Comments
We encourage you to participate in
this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All
comments received will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov and will include
any personal information you have
provided.
Submitting Comments
If you submit a comment, please
include the docket number for this
rulemaking (USCG–2011–0615),
indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment
applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation. You
may submit your comments and
material online (via https://
www.regulations.gov) or by fax, mail, or
hand delivery, but please use only one
of these means. If you submit a
comment online via https://
www.regulations.gov, it will be
considered received by the Coast Guard
when you successfully transmit the
comment. If you fax, hand deliver, or
mail your comment, it will be
considered as having been received by
the Coast Guard when it is received at
the Docket Management Facility. We
recommend that you include your name
and a mailing address, an e-mail
address, or a telephone number in the
body of your document so that we can
contact you if we have questions
regarding your submission.
To submit your comment online, go to
https://www.regulations.gov, click on the
‘‘submit a comment’’ box, which will
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
44531
then become highlighted in blue. In the
‘‘Document Type’’ drop down menu
select ‘‘Proposed Rule’’ and insert
‘‘USCG–2011–0615’’ in the ‘‘Keyword’’
box. Click ‘‘Search’’ then click on the
balloon shape in the ‘‘Actions’’ column.
If you submit your comments by mail or
hand delivery, submit them in an
unbound format, no larger than 8c by 11
inches, suitable for copying and
electronic filing. If you submit
comments by mail and would like to
know that they reached the Facility,
please enclose a stamped, self-addressed
postcard or envelope. We will consider
all comments and material received
during the comment period and may
change the rule based on your
comments.
Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as
documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to
https://www.regulations.gov, click on the
‘‘read comments’’ box, which will then
become highlighted in blue. In the
‘‘Keyword’’ box insert ‘‘USCG–2011–
0615’’ and click ‘‘Search.’’ Click the
‘‘Open Docket Folder’’ in the ‘‘Actions’’
column. You may also visit the Docket
Management Facility in Room W12–140
on the ground floor of the Department
of Transportation West Building, 1200
New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington,
DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. We have an agreement with
the Department of Transportation to use
the Docket Management Facility.
Privacy Act
Anyone can search the electronic
form of comments received into any of
our dockets by the name of the
individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on
behalf of an association, business, labor
union, etc.). You may review a Privacy
Act notice regarding our public dockets
in the January 17, 2008, issue of the
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).
Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public
meeting. But you may submit a request
for one on or before August 10, 2011
using one of the four methods specified
under ADDRESSES. Please explain why
you believe a public meeting would be
beneficial. If we determine that one
would aid this rulemaking, we will hold
one at a time and place announced by
a later notice in the Federal Register.
Basis and Purpose
The legal basis for the proposed rule
is the Coast Guard’s authority to
establish regulated navigation areas and
E:\FR\FM\26JYP1.SGM
26JYP1
44532
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 143 / Tuesday, July 26, 2011 / Proposed Rules
other limited access areas: 33 U.S.C.
1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701,
3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR
1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, 160.5; Public
Law 107–295, 116 Stat. 2064;
Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1.
The purpose of the proposed rule is
to protect the public from the hazards
associated with the launching of
fireworks over navigable waters of the
United States.
wreier-aviles on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with PROPOSALS
Discussion of Proposed Rule
On November 19, 2011, a fireworks
display is scheduled to take place
during the Fourth Annual Chillounge
Night St. Petersburg, an annual outdoor
party, in St. Petersburg, Florida. The
fireworks, which will be launched from
Spa Beach Park, will explode over the
waters of Tampa Bay. The fireworks
display is scheduled to commence at 10
p.m. and conclude at approximately
10:05 p.m.
The proposed rule would establish a
temporary safety zone that encompasses
certain waters of Tampa Bay in the
vicinity of Spa Beach in St. Petersburg,
Florida. The safety zone would be
enforced from 9:30 p.m. on November
19, 2011, 30 minutes prior to the
scheduled commencement of the
fireworks display at approximately 10
p.m., to ensure the safety zone is clear
of persons and vessels. Enforcement of
the safety zone would cease at 10:45
p.m. on November 19, 2011, 40 minutes
after the scheduled conclusion of the
fireworks display, to account for
possible delays. Persons and vessels
would be prohibited from entering,
transiting through, anchoring in, or
remaining within the safety zone unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port St.
Petersburg or a designated
representative. Persons and vessels
would be able to request authorization
to enter, transit through, anchor in, or
remain within the safety zone by
contacting the Captain of the Port St.
Petersburg by telephone at 727–824–
7524, or a designated representative via
VHF radio on channel 16, to request
authorization. The Coast Guard would
provide notice of the safety zone by
Local Notice to Mariners, Broadcast
Notice to Mariners, and on-scene
designated representatives.
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or
executive orders.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:37 Jul 25, 2011
Jkt 223001
Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 (‘‘Regulatory
Planning and Review’’) and 13563
(‘‘Improving Regulation and Regulatory
Review’’) direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, distributive impacts, and
equity). Executive Order 13563
emphasizes the importance of
quantifying both costs and benefits, of
reducing costs, of harmonizing rules,
and of promoting flexibility. This NPRM
has not been designated a ‘‘significant
regulatory action’’ under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866. Accordingly,
the NPRM has not been reviewed by the
Office of Management and Budget. A
draft regulatory assessment follows:
The economic impact of this proposed
rule is not significant for the following
reasons: (1) The safety zone would be
enforced for less than two hours; (2)
vessel traffic in the area would be
minimal during the enforcement period;
(3) although persons and vessels would
not be able to enter, transit through,
anchor in, or remain within the safety
zone without authorization from the
Captain of the Port St. Petersburg or a
designated representative, they would
be able to operate in the surrounding
area during the enforcement period; (4)
persons and vessels would still be able
to enter, transit through, anchor in, or
remain within the safety zone if
authorized by the Captain of the Port St.
Petersburg or a designated
representative; and (5) the Coast Guard
would provide advance notification of
the safety zone to the local maritime
community by Local Notice to Mariners
and Broadcast Notice to Mariners.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
whether this proposed rule would have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed rule
would not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities. This proposed rule may affect
the following entities, some of which
may be small entities: The owners or
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
operators of vessels intending to enter,
transit through, anchor in, or remain
within that portion of Tampa Bay
encompassed within the safety zone
from 9:30 p.m. until 10:45 p.m. on
November 19, 2011. For the reasons
discussed in the Executive Order 12866
and Executive Order 13563 section
above, this proposed rule would not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
If you think that your business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity
and that this proposed rule would have
a significant economic impact on it,
please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it
qualifies and how and to what degree
this proposed rule would economically
affect it.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this proposed rule so that
they can better evaluate its effects on
them and participate in the rulemaking.
If the proposed rule would affect your
small business, organization, or
governmental jurisdiction and you have
questions concerning its provisions or
options for compliance, please contact
Marine Science Technician First Class
Jo A. Hoover, Sector St. Petersburg
Prevention Department, Coast Guard;
telephone 813–228–2191, e-mail
Jo.A.Hoover@uscg.mil. The Coast Guard
will not retaliate against small entities
that question or complain about this
proposed rule or any policy or action of
the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This proposed rule would call for no
new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on State or local governments and
would either preempt State law or
impose a substantial direct cost of
compliance on them. We have analyzed
this proposed rule under that Order and
have determined that it does not have
implications for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
E:\FR\FM\26JYP1.SGM
26JYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 143 / Tuesday, July 26, 2011 / Proposed Rules
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or Tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 or more in any one year.
Though this proposed rule would not
result in such an expenditure, we do
discuss the effects of this proposed rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This proposed rule would not cause a
taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under
Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with
Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule meets applicable
standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce
burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This proposed rule is not an
economically significant rule and would
not create an environmental risk to
health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This proposed rule does not have
Tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have
a substantial direct effect on one or
more Indian Tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian Tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian Tribes.
wreier-aviles on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with PROPOSALS
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:37 Jul 25, 2011
Jkt 223001
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This proposed rule does not use
technical standards. Therefore, we did
not consider the use of voluntary
consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023–01
and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast
Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination
that this action is one of a category of
actions that do not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on
the human environment. A preliminary
environmental analysis checklist
supporting this determination is
available in the docket where indicated
under ADDRESSES. This proposed rule
involves establishing a temporary safety
zone, as described in paragraph 34(g) of
the Instruction, on the waters of Tampa
Bay in St. Petersburg, Florida that will
be enforced for less than two hours. We
seek any comments or information that
may lead to the discovery of a
significant environmental impact from
this proposed rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to
amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, 160.5; Pub. L.
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
44533
107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. Add a temporary § 165.T07–0615 to
read as follows:
§ 165.T07–0615 Safety Zone; Fourth
Annual Chillounge Night St. Petersburg
Fireworks Display, Tampa Bay, St.
Petersburg, FL.
(a) Regulated Area. The following
regulated area is a safety zone: all waters
of Tampa Bay within a 200 yard radius
of position 27°46’31’’N, 82°37’38’’W.
All coordinates are North American
Datum 1983.
(b) Definition. The term ‘‘designated
representative’’ means Coast Guard
Patrol Commanders, including Coast
Guard coxswains, petty officers, and
other officers operating Coast Guard
vessels, and Federal, state, and local
officers designated by or assisting the
Captain of the Port St. Petersburg in the
enforcement of the regulated area.
(c) Regulations.
(1) All persons and vessels are
prohibited from entering, transiting
through, anchoring in, or remaining
within the regulated area unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port St.
Petersburg or a designated
representative.
(2) Persons and vessels desiring to
enter, transit through, anchor in, or
remain within the regulated area may
contact the Captain of the Port St.
Petersburg by telephone at 727–824–
7524, or a designated representative via
VHF radio on channel 16, to request
authorization. If authorization to enter,
transit through, anchor in, or remain
within the regulated area is granted by
the Captain of the Port St. Petersburg or
a designated representative, all persons
and vessels receiving such authorization
must comply with the instructions of
the Captain of the Port St. Petersburg or
a designated representative.
(3) The Coast Guard will provide
notice of the regulated area by Local
Notice to Mariners, Broadcast Notice to
Mariners, and on-scene designated
representatives.
(d) Effective Date. This rule is
effective from 9:30 p.m. until 10:45 p.m.
on November 19, 2011.
Dated: July 8, 2011.
P.F. Martin,
Commander, U.S. Coast Guard, Acting
Captain of the Port St. Petersburg.
[FR Doc. 2011–18794 Filed 7–25–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
E:\FR\FM\26JYP1.SGM
26JYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 143 (Tuesday, July 26, 2011)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 44531-44533]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-18794]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG-2011-0615]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone; Fourth Annual Chillounge Night St. Petersburg
Fireworks Display, Tampa Bay, St. Petersburg, FL
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to establish a temporary safety zone
on the waters of Tampa Bay in St. Petersburg, Florida during the Fourth
Annual Chillounge Night St. Petersburg Fireworks Display on Saturday,
November 19, 2011. The safety zone is necessary to protect the public
from the hazards associated with launching fireworks over navigable
waters of the United States. Persons and vessels would be prohibited
from entering, transiting through, anchoring in, or remaining within
the safety zone unless authorized by the Captain of the Port St.
Petersburg or a designated representative.
DATES: Comments and related material must be received by the Coast
Guard on or before September 9, 2011. Requests for public meetings must
be received by the Coast Guard on or before August 10, 2011.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2011-0615 using any one of the following methods:
(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
(2) Fax: 202-493-2251.
(3) Mail: Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001.
(4) Hand delivery: Same as mail address above, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The telephone
number is 202-366-9329.
To avoid duplication, please use only one of these four methods.
See the ``Public Participation and Request for Comments'' portion of
the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below for instructions on
submitting comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this proposed
rule, call or e-mail Marine Science Technician First Class Jo A.
Hoover, Sector St. Petersburg Prevention Department, Coast Guard;
telephone 813-228-2191, e-mail Jo.A.Hoover@uscg.mil. If you have
questions on viewing or submitting material to the docket, call Renee
V. Wright, Program Manager, Docket Operations, telephone 202-366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Public Participation and Request for Comments
We encourage you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All comments received will be posted
without change to https://www.regulations.gov and will include any
personal information you have provided.
Submitting Comments
If you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking (USCG-2011-0615), indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation. You may submit your comments and material
online (via https://www.regulations.gov) or by fax, mail, or hand
delivery, but please use only one of these means. If you submit a
comment online via https://www.regulations.gov, it will be considered
received by the Coast Guard when you successfully transmit the comment.
If you fax, hand deliver, or mail your comment, it will be considered
as having been received by the Coast Guard when it is received at the
Docket Management Facility. We recommend that you include your name and
a mailing address, an e-mail address, or a telephone number in the body
of your document so that we can contact you if we have questions
regarding your submission.
To submit your comment online, go to https://www.regulations.gov,
click on the ``submit a comment'' box, which will then become
highlighted in blue. In the ``Document Type'' drop down menu select
``Proposed Rule'' and insert ``USCG-2011-0615'' in the ``Keyword'' box.
Click ``Search'' then click on the balloon shape in the ``Actions''
column. If you submit your comments by mail or hand delivery, submit
them in an unbound format, no larger than 8[frac12] by 11 inches,
suitable for copying and electronic filing. If you submit comments by
mail and would like to know that they reached the Facility, please
enclose a stamped, self-addressed postcard or envelope. We will
consider all comments and material received during the comment period
and may change the rule based on your comments.
Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov,
click on the ``read comments'' box, which will then become highlighted
in blue. In the ``Keyword'' box insert ``USCG-2011-0615'' and click
``Search.'' Click the ``Open Docket Folder'' in the ``Actions'' column.
You may also visit the Docket Management Facility in Room W12-140 on
the ground floor of the Department of Transportation West Building,
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. We have an
agreement with the Department of Transportation to use the Docket
Management Facility.
Privacy Act
Anyone can search the electronic form of comments received into any
of our dockets by the name of the individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may review a Privacy Act notice
regarding our public dockets in the January 17, 2008, issue of the
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).
Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public meeting. But you may submit a
request for one on or before August 10, 2011 using one of the four
methods specified under ADDRESSES. Please explain why you believe a
public meeting would be beneficial. If we determine that one would aid
this rulemaking, we will hold one at a time and place announced by a
later notice in the Federal Register.
Basis and Purpose
The legal basis for the proposed rule is the Coast Guard's
authority to establish regulated navigation areas and
[[Page 44532]]
other limited access areas: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter
701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6,
160.5; Public Law 107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland
Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
The purpose of the proposed rule is to protect the public from the
hazards associated with the launching of fireworks over navigable
waters of the United States.
Discussion of Proposed Rule
On November 19, 2011, a fireworks display is scheduled to take
place during the Fourth Annual Chillounge Night St. Petersburg, an
annual outdoor party, in St. Petersburg, Florida. The fireworks, which
will be launched from Spa Beach Park, will explode over the waters of
Tampa Bay. The fireworks display is scheduled to commence at 10 p.m.
and conclude at approximately 10:05 p.m.
The proposed rule would establish a temporary safety zone that
encompasses certain waters of Tampa Bay in the vicinity of Spa Beach in
St. Petersburg, Florida. The safety zone would be enforced from 9:30
p.m. on November 19, 2011, 30 minutes prior to the scheduled
commencement of the fireworks display at approximately 10 p.m., to
ensure the safety zone is clear of persons and vessels. Enforcement of
the safety zone would cease at 10:45 p.m. on November 19, 2011, 40
minutes after the scheduled conclusion of the fireworks display, to
account for possible delays. Persons and vessels would be prohibited
from entering, transiting through, anchoring in, or remaining within
the safety zone unless authorized by the Captain of the Port St.
Petersburg or a designated representative. Persons and vessels would be
able to request authorization to enter, transit through, anchor in, or
remain within the safety zone by contacting the Captain of the Port St.
Petersburg by telephone at 727-824-7524, or a designated representative
via VHF radio on channel 16, to request authorization. The Coast Guard
would provide notice of the safety zone by Local Notice to Mariners,
Broadcast Notice to Mariners, and on-scene designated representatives.
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes
and executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our
analyses based on 13 of these statutes or executive orders.
Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 (``Regulatory Planning and Review'') and
13563 (``Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review'') direct agencies
to assess the costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives
and, if regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that
maximize net benefits (including potential economic, environmental,
public health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity).
Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both
costs and benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of
promoting flexibility. This NPRM has not been designated a
``significant regulatory action'' under section 3(f) of Executive Order
12866. Accordingly, the NPRM has not been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget. A draft regulatory assessment follows:
The economic impact of this proposed rule is not significant for
the following reasons: (1) The safety zone would be enforced for less
than two hours; (2) vessel traffic in the area would be minimal during
the enforcement period; (3) although persons and vessels would not be
able to enter, transit through, anchor in, or remain within the safety
zone without authorization from the Captain of the Port St. Petersburg
or a designated representative, they would be able to operate in the
surrounding area during the enforcement period; (4) persons and vessels
would still be able to enter, transit through, anchor in, or remain
within the safety zone if authorized by the Captain of the Port St.
Petersburg or a designated representative; and (5) the Coast Guard
would provide advance notification of the safety zone to the local
maritime community by Local Notice to Mariners and Broadcast Notice to
Mariners.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this proposed rule would have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed
rule would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. This proposed rule may affect the following
entities, some of which may be small entities: The owners or operators
of vessels intending to enter, transit through, anchor in, or remain
within that portion of Tampa Bay encompassed within the safety zone
from 9:30 p.m. until 10:45 p.m. on November 19, 2011. For the reasons
discussed in the Executive Order 12866 and Executive Order 13563
section above, this proposed rule would not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities.
If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this proposed rule
would have a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment
(see ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to
what degree this proposed rule would economically affect it.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule so that they can better
evaluate its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking. If the
proposed rule would affect your small business, organization, or
governmental jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its
provisions or options for compliance, please contact Marine Science
Technician First Class Jo A. Hoover, Sector St. Petersburg Prevention
Department, Coast Guard; telephone 813-228-2191, e-mail
Jo.A.Hoover@uscg.mil. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this proposed rule or any
policy or action of the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This proposed rule would call for no new collection of information
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this proposed rule
under that Order and have determined that it does not have implications
for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions
[[Page 44533]]
that may result in the expenditure by a State, local, or Tribal
government, in the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000
or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule would not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this proposed rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This proposed rule would not cause a taking of private property or
otherwise have taking implications under Executive Order 12630,
Governmental Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected
Property Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and
3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize
litigation, eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This proposed rule is not an economically significant rule and
would not create an environmental risk to health or risk to safety that
might disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This proposed rule does not have Tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian Tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian Tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian Tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13211,
Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This proposed rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we
did not consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination that this action is one of a
category of actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human environment. A preliminary
environmental analysis checklist supporting this determination is
available in the docket where indicated under ADDRESSES. This proposed
rule involves establishing a temporary safety zone, as described in
paragraph 34(g) of the Instruction, on the waters of Tampa Bay in St.
Petersburg, Florida that will be enforced for less than two hours. We
seek any comments or information that may lead to the discovery of a
significant environmental impact from this proposed rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes
to amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701, 3306,
3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, 160.5; Pub.
L. 107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. Add a temporary Sec. 165.T07-0615 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T07-0615 Safety Zone; Fourth Annual Chillounge Night St.
Petersburg Fireworks Display, Tampa Bay, St. Petersburg, FL.
(a) Regulated Area. The following regulated area is a safety zone:
all waters of Tampa Bay within a 200 yard radius of position
27[deg]46'31''N, 82[deg]37'38''W. All coordinates are North American
Datum 1983.
(b) Definition. The term ``designated representative'' means Coast
Guard Patrol Commanders, including Coast Guard coxswains, petty
officers, and other officers operating Coast Guard vessels, and
Federal, state, and local officers designated by or assisting the
Captain of the Port St. Petersburg in the enforcement of the regulated
area.
(c) Regulations.
(1) All persons and vessels are prohibited from entering,
transiting through, anchoring in, or remaining within the regulated
area unless authorized by the Captain of the Port St. Petersburg or a
designated representative.
(2) Persons and vessels desiring to enter, transit through, anchor
in, or remain within the regulated area may contact the Captain of the
Port St. Petersburg by telephone at 727-824-7524, or a designated
representative via VHF radio on channel 16, to request authorization.
If authorization to enter, transit through, anchor in, or remain within
the regulated area is granted by the Captain of the Port St. Petersburg
or a designated representative, all persons and vessels receiving such
authorization must comply with the instructions of the Captain of the
Port St. Petersburg or a designated representative.
(3) The Coast Guard will provide notice of the regulated area by
Local Notice to Mariners, Broadcast Notice to Mariners, and on-scene
designated representatives.
(d) Effective Date. This rule is effective from 9:30 p.m. until
10:45 p.m. on November 19, 2011.
Dated: July 8, 2011.
P.F. Martin,
Commander, U.S. Coast Guard, Acting Captain of the Port St. Petersburg.
[FR Doc. 2011-18794 Filed 7-25-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P