Application of Regulations on Fuel Venting, 44457-44458 [2011-18191]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 143 / Tuesday, July 26, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
Paperwork Reduction Act
In accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501
et seq.), the information collection or
recordkeeping requirements included in
this rule have been approved by the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) under OMB control number
0579–0366.
E-Government Act Compliance
The Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service is committed to
compliance with the E-Government Act
to promote the use of the Internet and
other information technologies, to
provide increased opportunities for
citizen access to Government
information and services, and for other
purposes. For information pertinent to
E-Government Act compliance related
to this rule, please contact Mrs. Celeste
Sickles, APHIS’ Information Collection
Coordinator, at (301) 851–2908.
(c) The shepherd’s purse with roots
must be imported in commercial
shipments only.
(d) Each consignment of shepherd’s
purse with roots must be accompanied
by a phytosanitary certificate of
inspection issued by the NPPO of the
Republic of Korea stating that the
shipment has been inspected and found
free of quarantine pests with an
additional declaration stating that the
shepherd’s purse with roots has been
produced and inspected in accordance
with the requirements of 7 CFR 319.56–
51.
(Approved by the Office of Management and
Budget under control number 0579–0366)
Done in Washington, DC this 20th day of
July 2011.
Kevin Shea,
Acting Administrator, Animal and Plant
Health Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. 2011–18851 Filed 7–25–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–34–P
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 319
Coffee, Cotton, Fruits, Imports, Logs,
Nursery stock, Plant diseases and pests,
Quarantine, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Rice,
Vegetables.
Accordingly, we are amending 7 CFR
part 319 as follows:
PART 319—FOREIGN QUARANTINE
NOTICES
1. The authority citation for part 319
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 450, 7701–7772, and
7781–7786; 21 U.S.C. 136 and 136a; 7 CFR
2.22, 2.80, and 371.3.
2. A new § 319.56–51 is added to read
as follows:
■
wreier-aviles on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with RULES
§ 319.56–51 Shepherd’s purse with roots
from the Republic of Korea.
Shepherd’s purse (Capsella bursapastoris (L.) Medick) with roots from the
Republic of Korea may be imported only
under the following conditions:
(a) The shepherd’s purse with roots
must be grown in a pest-free place of
production that is registered with the
national plant protection organization
(NPPO) of the Republic of Korea. Fields
must be certified free of the quarantine
nematodes Hemicycliophora koreana,
Paratylenchus pandus, Rotylenchus
orientalis, and Rotylenchus pini by
sampling and microscopic inspection of
the samples by the NPPO of the
Republic of Korea. The sampling and
inspection protocol must be
preapproved by APHIS.
(b) The shepherd’s purse with roots
must be free from soil.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:34 Jul 25, 2011
Jkt 223001
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 34
[Docket No. FAA–2011–0746]
Application of Regulations on Fuel
Venting
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Policy determination.
AGENCY:
This document advises the
public of a recent decision by the
Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)
concerning the application of certain
provisions of the regulations regarding
fuel venting requirements.
DATES: We must receive your comments
by August 25, 2011.
ADDRESSES: This is a notice of a policy
determination only. You may send
comments identified by Docket Number
FAA–2011–0746 using any of the
following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and follow
the online instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
• Mail: Send comments to Docket
Operations, M–30; U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Room W12–140, West
Building Ground Floor, Washington, DC
20590–0001.
• Hand Delivery or Courier: Take
comments to Docket Operations in
Room W12–140 of the West Building
Ground Floor at 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC, between
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
44457
9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.
• Fax: Fax comments to Docket
Operations at 202–493–2251.
Privacy: The FAA will post all
comments it receives, without change,
to https://www.regulations.gov, including
any personal information the
commenter provides. Using the search
function of the docket Web site, anyone
can find and read the electronic form of
all comments received into any FAA
dockets, including the name of the
individual sending the comment (or
signing the comment for an association,
business, labor union, etc.). DOT’s
complete Privacy Act Statement can be
found in the Federal Register published
on April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477–19478),
as well as at https://DocketsInfo.dot.gov.
Docket: Background documents or
comments received may be read at
https://www.regulations.gov at any time.
Follow the online instructions for
accessing the docket or go to Docket
Operations in Room W12–140 of the
West Building Ground Floor at 1200
New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington,
DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Curtis Holsclaw, Office of Environment
and Energy (AEE–2), FAA, 800
Independence Ave., SW., Washington,
DC 20591; e-mail
Curtis.holsclaw@faa.gov, facsimile (202)
267–5594, telephone (202) 267–3575.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Title 14 of
the Code of Federal Regulations (14
CFR), part 34, § 34.11 is the regulation
that prohibits fuel venting, the
intentional discharge to the atmosphere
of fuel drained from fuel nozzle
manifolds after engines are shut down.
By its terms, the regulation does not
apply to normal fuel seepage from shaft
seals, joints, and fittings.
During a recent aircraft certification,
the FAA became aware of difficulties in
applying the language of § 34.11 to the
newest designs of aircraft engines. The
Boeing Models 747–8, 747–8F, and 787
series airplanes incorporate new
General Electric (GE) Model GEnx-2B
and GEnx-1B engines, respectively.
These GE engines include an advanced
technology fuel system that significantly
reduces fuel consumption and
emissions. This technology incorporates
the use of a larger, complex fuel
manifold and a new fuel nozzle design
that also uses check valves as an
alternative to a fuel manifold drainage
collection tank as a means to prevent
release of fuel after shutdown. While
this design reduces overall emissions,
flight tests revealed an intermittent,
inadvertent release of a small amount of
E:\FR\FM\26JYR1.SGM
26JYR1
wreier-aviles on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with RULES
44458
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 143 / Tuesday, July 26, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
fuel after the engines were shut down.
This release of fuel is caused by
unexpected elevated fuel manifold
pressures that result in the release of
fuel from the fuel nozzles. Under certain
atmospheric conditions this release of
fuel results in a visible vapor. This
event was not observed during the GEnx
engine’s certification testing under 14
CFR part 33, but only after it was
installed and operated on the subject
airplanes.
Following these observations, the
FAA reconsidered how the provisions of
§ 34.11 should be applied under the
circumstances of these certifications. A
review of the history of the section
found that it was promulgated in 1973
in response to short-sighted
environmental practices of the time,
including the routine dumping of up to
a gallon of raw fuel onto the ground
after engines were shut down. The
general prohibition in § 34.11 is stated
in the first sentence of that section, that
‘‘[n]o fuel venting emissions shall be
discharged into the atmosphere from
any new or in-use aircraft gas turbine
engine subject to the subpart.’’ The
second sentence appears to condition
this prohibition, stating that ‘‘[t]his
paragraph is directed at the elimination
of intentional discharge to the
atmosphere of fuel drained from fuel
nozzle manifolds after engines are shut
down and does not apply to normal fuel
seepage from shaft seals, joints, and
fittings.’’ The language of the second
sentence presents a unique situation in
aircraft certification by introducing the
concept of intent, without clearly
referencing where the intent attaches.
The second sentence also specifies three
locations where ‘‘seepage’’ is considered
normal and acceptable.
Historically, application of § 34.11 has
not been an issue. Aircraft engines
designed since promulgation of the rule
have not included any means by which
fuel is collected and dispersed outside
the engine after shutdown. The GEnx
engines at issue do not release fuel from
the three locations noted in the
regulation—shaft seals, joints, or
fittings. Nor does the amount of fuel or
the manner in which it is being released
rise to the level of historical fuel
dumping that prompted the adoption of
the regulation in 1973. Yet, small
quantities of fuel (up to 5.5 ounces) are
being released intermittently under
certain conditions, and the fuel is being
vaporized on contact with hot surfaces
inside the engine, resulting in the
visible fuel vapors that have been
observed when they emit from either the
inlet or exit plane of the engine.
The new engines incorporate
technological advances and
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:34 Jul 25, 2011
Jkt 223001
environmental performance
improvements that were never
envisioned when the original regulation
was adopted in 1973. These factors have
made it more difficult to reconcile the
design and function of these engines in
a certification context with a 38-year-old
regulation that was aimed at a different
set of circumstances. Application of the
current regulation has become less clear
in this context.
With the cooperation of the
equipment manufacturers, the FAA
investigated the safety and
environmental effects of the fuel release
and vaporization. The FAA consulted
with the Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) on the local air quality
impacts. While we were satisfied that no
safety and minimal environmental
effects are evident, we remain
concerned about compliance with the
intent of the current regulation, and the
inability of the current regulation to be
unambiguously applied to the
certification situation.
The FAA has determined that the best
course of action is to allow the current
certification of these engine/airframe
combinations. The certification basis
includes requirements that the
manufacturers develop and install
modifications that will eliminate these
intermittent fuel releases and observed
vapors that have been experienced
during certification testing. These
modifications will apply to newly
manufactured airplanes by December
31, 2012, and in-use airplanes by
December 31, 2014.
The technological advances
incorporated in these engines allow
them to more than exceed the separate
regulatory requirements for emissions
that are the focus of current
environmental compliance efforts. The
FAA will re-examine the language of the
fuel venting regulation and its
application during certification to
determine whether it needs to be
changed to address issues associated
with newer technologies. We may
consult with the EPA on whether to
propose changes to § 34.11 and its
companion regulation at 40 CFR 87.11.
We will also consider whether more
flexibility in application of the
regulation is appropriate based on the
experience gained during this
certification. The decision to proceed
with certification of the subject
airframe/engine combinations is an
effort to acknowledge the lack of clarity
in the application of the regulation to
the specific circumstances encountered.
The requirement to modify the aircraft
is intended to prevent any retrenchment
from the original regulatory intent.
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Issued in Washington, DC, on July 14,
2011.
Lourdes Q. Maurice,
Executive Director, Office of Environment and
Energy.
[FR Doc. 2011–18191 Filed 7–25–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2008–0402; Directorate
Identifier 2007–NM–165–AD; Amendment
39–16760; AD 2011–16–02]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing
Company Model 747 Airplanes and
Model 767 Airplanes Equipped With
General Electric Model CF6–80C2 or
CF6–80A Series Engines
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
We are adopting a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This AD requires
revising the airplane flight manual
(AFM) to advise the flightcrew to use
certain procedures during descent in
certain icing conditions. This AD was
prompted by reports of several in-flight
engine flameouts, including multiple
dual engine flameout events and one
total power loss event, in ice-crystal
icing conditions. We are issuing this AD
to ensure that the flightcrew has the
proper procedures to follow in certain
icing conditions. These certain icing
conditions could cause a multiple
engine flameout during flight with the
potential inability to restart the engines,
and consequent forced landing of the
airplane.
SUMMARY:
DATES:
This AD is effective August 30,
2011.
ADDRESSES:
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the
Docket Management Facility between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD
docket contains this AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and
other information. The address for the
Docket Office (phone: 800–647–5527) is
Document Management Facility, U.S.
Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M–30, West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200
E:\FR\FM\26JYR1.SGM
26JYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 143 (Tuesday, July 26, 2011)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 44457-44458]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-18191]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 34
[Docket No. FAA-2011-0746]
Application of Regulations on Fuel Venting
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Policy determination.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document advises the public of a recent decision by the
Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) concerning the application of
certain provisions of the regulations regarding fuel venting
requirements.
DATES: We must receive your comments by August 25, 2011.
ADDRESSES: This is a notice of a policy determination only. You may
send comments identified by Docket Number FAA-2011-0746 using any of
the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov and follow the online instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
Mail: Send comments to Docket Operations, M-30; U.S.
Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Room W12-
140, West Building Ground Floor, Washington, DC 20590-0001.
Hand Delivery or Courier: Take comments to Docket
Operations in Room W12-140 of the West Building Ground Floor at 1200
New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Fax: Fax comments to Docket Operations at 202-493-2251.
Privacy: The FAA will post all comments it receives, without
change, to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal
information the commenter provides. Using the search function of the
docket Web site, anyone can find and read the electronic form of all
comments received into any FAA dockets, including the name of the
individual sending the comment (or signing the comment for an
association, business, labor union, etc.). DOT's complete Privacy Act
Statement can be found in the Federal Register published on April 11,
2000 (65 FR 19477-19478), as well as at https://DocketsInfo.dot.gov.
Docket: Background documents or comments received may be read at
https://www.regulations.gov at any time. Follow the online instructions
for accessing the docket or go to Docket Operations in Room W12-140 of
the West Building Ground Floor at 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Curtis Holsclaw, Office of Environment
and Energy (AEE-2), FAA, 800 Independence Ave., SW., Washington, DC
20591; e-mail Curtis.holsclaw@faa.gov, facsimile (202) 267-5594,
telephone (202) 267-3575.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations
(14 CFR), part 34, Sec. 34.11 is the regulation that prohibits fuel
venting, the intentional discharge to the atmosphere of fuel drained
from fuel nozzle manifolds after engines are shut down. By its terms,
the regulation does not apply to normal fuel seepage from shaft seals,
joints, and fittings.
During a recent aircraft certification, the FAA became aware of
difficulties in applying the language of Sec. 34.11 to the newest
designs of aircraft engines. The Boeing Models 747-8, 747-8F, and 787
series airplanes incorporate new General Electric (GE) Model GEnx-2B
and GEnx-1B engines, respectively. These GE engines include an advanced
technology fuel system that significantly reduces fuel consumption and
emissions. This technology incorporates the use of a larger, complex
fuel manifold and a new fuel nozzle design that also uses check valves
as an alternative to a fuel manifold drainage collection tank as a
means to prevent release of fuel after shutdown. While this design
reduces overall emissions, flight tests revealed an intermittent,
inadvertent release of a small amount of
[[Page 44458]]
fuel after the engines were shut down. This release of fuel is caused
by unexpected elevated fuel manifold pressures that result in the
release of fuel from the fuel nozzles. Under certain atmospheric
conditions this release of fuel results in a visible vapor. This event
was not observed during the GEnx engine's certification testing under
14 CFR part 33, but only after it was installed and operated on the
subject airplanes.
Following these observations, the FAA reconsidered how the
provisions of Sec. 34.11 should be applied under the circumstances of
these certifications. A review of the history of the section found that
it was promulgated in 1973 in response to short-sighted environmental
practices of the time, including the routine dumping of up to a gallon
of raw fuel onto the ground after engines were shut down. The general
prohibition in Sec. 34.11 is stated in the first sentence of that
section, that ``[n]o fuel venting emissions shall be discharged into
the atmosphere from any new or in-use aircraft gas turbine engine
subject to the subpart.'' The second sentence appears to condition this
prohibition, stating that ``[t]his paragraph is directed at the
elimination of intentional discharge to the atmosphere of fuel drained
from fuel nozzle manifolds after engines are shut down and does not
apply to normal fuel seepage from shaft seals, joints, and fittings.''
The language of the second sentence presents a unique situation in
aircraft certification by introducing the concept of intent, without
clearly referencing where the intent attaches. The second sentence also
specifies three locations where ``seepage'' is considered normal and
acceptable.
Historically, application of Sec. 34.11 has not been an issue.
Aircraft engines designed since promulgation of the rule have not
included any means by which fuel is collected and dispersed outside the
engine after shutdown. The GEnx engines at issue do not release fuel
from the three locations noted in the regulation--shaft seals, joints,
or fittings. Nor does the amount of fuel or the manner in which it is
being released rise to the level of historical fuel dumping that
prompted the adoption of the regulation in 1973. Yet, small quantities
of fuel (up to 5.5 ounces) are being released intermittently under
certain conditions, and the fuel is being vaporized on contact with hot
surfaces inside the engine, resulting in the visible fuel vapors that
have been observed when they emit from either the inlet or exit plane
of the engine.
The new engines incorporate technological advances and
environmental performance improvements that were never envisioned when
the original regulation was adopted in 1973. These factors have made it
more difficult to reconcile the design and function of these engines in
a certification context with a 38-year-old regulation that was aimed at
a different set of circumstances. Application of the current regulation
has become less clear in this context.
With the cooperation of the equipment manufacturers, the FAA
investigated the safety and environmental effects of the fuel release
and vaporization. The FAA consulted with the Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) on the local air quality impacts. While we were satisfied
that no safety and minimal environmental effects are evident, we remain
concerned about compliance with the intent of the current regulation,
and the inability of the current regulation to be unambiguously applied
to the certification situation.
The FAA has determined that the best course of action is to allow
the current certification of these engine/airframe combinations. The
certification basis includes requirements that the manufacturers
develop and install modifications that will eliminate these
intermittent fuel releases and observed vapors that have been
experienced during certification testing. These modifications will
apply to newly manufactured airplanes by December 31, 2012, and in-use
airplanes by December 31, 2014.
The technological advances incorporated in these engines allow them
to more than exceed the separate regulatory requirements for emissions
that are the focus of current environmental compliance efforts. The FAA
will re-examine the language of the fuel venting regulation and its
application during certification to determine whether it needs to be
changed to address issues associated with newer technologies. We may
consult with the EPA on whether to propose changes to Sec. 34.11 and
its companion regulation at 40 CFR 87.11. We will also consider whether
more flexibility in application of the regulation is appropriate based
on the experience gained during this certification. The decision to
proceed with certification of the subject airframe/engine combinations
is an effort to acknowledge the lack of clarity in the application of
the regulation to the specific circumstances encountered. The
requirement to modify the aircraft is intended to prevent any
retrenchment from the original regulatory intent.
Issued in Washington, DC, on July 14, 2011.
Lourdes Q. Maurice,
Executive Director, Office of Environment and Energy.
[FR Doc. 2011-18191 Filed 7-25-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P