Endangered and Threatened Species; Recovery Plan for the Sei Whale, 43985-43986 [2011-18583]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 141 / Friday, July 22, 2011 / Notices
approaches that will best leverage the
Federal investment?
22. How should AMTech interact
with other Federal programs or
agencies?
23. What role can AMTech play in
developing, leading, or leveraging
consortia involving other Federal
agencies?
Dated: July 19, 2011.
Patrick Gallagher,
Under Secretary of Commerce for Standards
and Technology and Director.
[FR Doc. 2011–18580 Filed 7–21–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–13–P
Information or otherwise sensitive or
protected information.
NMFS will accept anonymous
comments (enter N/A in the required
fields, if you wish to remain
anonymous). You may submit
attachments to electronic comments in
Microsoft Word, Excel, WordPerfect, or
Adobe PDF file formats only.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Shannon Bettridge (301–427–8437),
e-mail Shannon.Bettridge@noaa.gov or
Larissa Plants (301–427–8471),
e-mail Larissa.Plants@noaa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
RIN 0648–XX37
Endangered and Threatened Species;
Recovery Plan for the Sei Whale
National Marine Fisheries
Service, National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration,
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of availability; request
for comments.
AGENCY:
The National Marine
Fisheries Service (NMFS) announces the
availability for public review of the draft
Recovery Plan (Plan) for the sei whale
(Balaenoptera borealis). NMFS is
soliciting review and comment from the
public and all interested parties on the
Plan, and will consider all substantive
comments received during the review
period before submitting the Plan for
final approval.
DATES: Comments on the draft Plan
must be received by close of business on
September 6, 2011.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by [0648– XX37], by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Submissions: Submit all
electronic public comments via the
Federal eRulemaking Portal https://
www.regulations.gov.
Mail: Angela Somma, National Marine
Fisheries Service, Office of Protected
Resources, Endangered Species
Division, 1325 East-West Highway,
Silver Spring, MD 20910.
Instructions: All comments received
are a part of the public record and will
generally be posted to https://
www.regulations.gov without change.
All Personal Identifying Information (for
example, name, address, etc.)
voluntarily submitted by the commenter
may be publicly accessible. Do not
submit Confidential Business
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:59 Jul 21, 2011
Jkt 223001
Recovery plans describe actions
beneficial to the conservation and
recovery of species listed under the
Endangered Species Act of 1973 (ESA),
as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).
Section 4(f)(1) of the ESA requires that
recovery plans incorporate: (1)
Objective, measurable criteria which,
when met, would result in a
determination that the species is no
longer threatened or endangered; (2)
site-specific management actions
necessary to achieve the Plan’s goals;
and (3) estimates of the time required
and costs to implement recovery
actions. The ESA requires the
development of recovery plans for each
listed species unless such a plan would
not promote its recovery.
The sei whale has been listed as
‘‘endangered’’ under the Endangered
Species Act (ESA) since its passage in
1973. Sei whales are widely distributed
in the world’s oceans and most
populations were reduced, some of
them considerably, by extensive
commercial whaling in the 1950s
through the early 1970s. They were
hunted by modern whalers primarily
after the preferred larger (or more easily
taken) baleen whale species had been
seriously depleted, including the right
(Eubalaena spp.), humpback (Megaptera
novaeangliae), gray (Eschrichtius
robustus), blue (Balaenoptera
musculus), and fin (Balaenoptera
physalus) whales. International
protection for this species only began in
the 1970s, but the taking of sei whales
continued at relatively low levels by
Icelandic and Japanese operations. Of
the commercially exploited ‘‘great
whales,’’ the sei whale is one of the least
well studied, and the current status of
most sei whale stocks is poorly known.
Sei whales have a global distribution
and can be found in the North Atlantic
Ocean, North Pacific Ocean, and
Southern Hemisphere. Currently, the
population structure of sei whales has
not been adequately defined.
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
43985
Because the current status of sei
whales is unknown, the primary
purpose of the draft Recovery Plan is to
provide a research strategy to obtain
data necessary to estimate population
abundance, trends, and structure and to
identify factors that may be limiting sei
whale recovery. The draft Recovery Plan
incorporates an adaptive management
strategy that divides recovery actions
into three tiers. Tier I includes: (1)
Continued international regulation of
whaling; (2) determining population
size, trends, and structure using
opportunistic data collection in
conjunction with passive acoustic
monitoring, if determined to be feasible;
and (3) continued stranding response
and associated data collection. After ten
years of conducting Tier I actions,
NMFS expects to evaluate this approach
to determine if the approach is
providing sufficient demographic data
to assess recovery (or if more efficient
data collection methods become
available). If the Tier I method proves to
be sufficient, NMFS will continue Tier
I data collection activities. If Tier I data
collection methods are insufficient,
NMFS will consider Tier II actions,
building upon research conducted
during Tier I. Tier II adds more
extensive directed demographic survey
research and actions that are dependent
upon acquiring comprehensive
information (e.g., assessment of threats
currently ranked as unknown). Tier III
recovery actions depend upon data
collected in Tiers I and/or II. When
sufficient data are obtained, Tier III
recovery activities will be undertaken as
feasible. Costs have been estimated for
Tier I recovery actions only.
Criteria for the reclassification of the
sei whale are included in the final
Recovery Plan. In summary, the sei
whale may be reclassified from
endangered to threatened when all of
the following have been met: (1) Given
current and projected threats and
environmental conditions, the sei whale
population in each ocean basin in
which it occurs (Atlantic Ocean, Pacific
Ocean, and Southern Hemisphere)
satisfies the risk analysis standard for
threatened status (has no more than a 1
percent chance of extinction in 100
years) and the global population has at
least 1,500 mature, reproductive
individuals (consisting of at least 250
mature females and at least 250 mature
males in each ocean basin). Mature is
defined as the number of individuals
known, estimated, or inferred to be
capable of reproduction. Any factors or
circumstances that are thought to
substantially contribute to a real risk of
extinction that cannot be incorporated
E:\FR\FM\22JYN1.SGM
22JYN1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
43986
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 141 / Friday, July 22, 2011 / Notices
into a Population Viability Analysis will
be carefully considered before
downlisting takes place; and (2) none of
the known threats to sei whales are
known to limit the continued growth of
populations. Specifically, the factors in
4(a)(l) of the ESA are being or have been
addressed: (A) The present or
threatened destruction, modification or
curtailment of a species’ habitat or
range; (B) overutilization for
commercial, recreational or educational
purposes; (C) disease or predation; (D)
the inadequacy of existing regulatory
mechanisms; and (E) other natural or
manmade factors. The population will
be considered for delisting if all of the
following can be met: (1) Given current
and projected threats and environmental
conditions, the total sei whale
population in each ocean basin in
which it occurs (Atlantic Ocean, Pacific
Ocean, and Southern Hemisphere)
satisfies the risk analysis standard for
unlisted status (has less than a 10
percent probability of becoming
endangered (has more than a 1 percent
chance of extinction in 100 years) in 20
years). Any factors or circumstances that
are thought to substantially contribute
to a real risk of extinction that cannot
be incorporated into a Population
Viability Analysis will be carefully
considered before delisting takes place;
and (2) none of the known threats to sei
whales are known to limit the continued
growth of populations. Specifically, the
factors in 4(a)(l) of the ESA are being or
have been addressed.
The time and cost to recovery is not
predictable with the current information
and global listing of sei whales. The
difficulty in gathering data on sei
whales and uncertainty about the
success of passive acoustic monitoring
in fulfilling data needs make it
impossible to give a timeframe to
recovery. While we are comfortable
estimating costs for the first 10 years of
plan implementation for Tier I actions
($11.872 million), any projections
beyond this date are likely to be
imprecise and unrealistic until we can
determine the success of passive
acoustic monitoring of sei whales to
obtain demographic data. The
anticipated date for removal from the
endangered species list also cannot be
determined because of the uncertainty
in the success of passive acoustic
monitoring of sei whales. The
effectiveness of many management
activities is not known on a global level.
Currently it is impossible to predict
when such measures will bring the
species to a point at which the
protections provided by the ESA are no
longer warranted, or even determine
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:59 Jul 21, 2011
Jkt 223001
whether the species has recovered
enough to be downlisted or delisted. In
the future, as more information is
obtained it should be possible to make
more informative projections about the
time to recovery, and its expense.
NMFS will consider all substantive
comments and information presented
during the public comment period in
the course of finalizing this Plan. NMFS
concludes that the Draft Recovery Plan
meets the requirements of the ESA.
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.
Dated: July 18, 2011.
Therese Conant,
Deputy Chief, Endangered Species Division,
Office of Protected Resources, National
Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2011–18583 Filed 7–21–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
RIN 0648–XA591
Endangered and Threatened Species;
Take of Anadromous Fish
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of receipt and request for
comment.
AGENCY:
Notice is hereby given that
NMFS has received two applications for
direct take permits, in the form of
Hatchery and Genetic Management
Plans (HGMPs) pursuant to the
Endangered Species Act of 1973, as
amended (ESA), one application from
the Washington Department of Fish and
Wildlife (WDFW) and one from the
Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) on behalf
of the Nez Perce Tribe (NPT). The Idaho
Department of Fish and Game (IDFG) is
identified as a co-applicant in the
WDFW HGMP. The proposed permits
would expire in 2018. This document
serves to notify the public of the
availability of the permit applications
and addenda for public review,
comment, and submission of written
data, views, arguments or other relevant
information. All comments and other
information received will become part
of the public record and will be
available for review pursuant to section
10(c) of the ESA.
DATES: Comments and other
submissions must be received at the
appropriate address or fax number (see
ADDRESSES) no later than 5 p.m. Pacific
time on August 22, 2011.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Written responses to the
application should be sent to Craig
Busack, National Marine Fisheries
Service, Salmon Management Division,
1201 NE. Lloyd Boulevard, Suite 1100,
Portland, OR 97232. Comments may
also be submitted by e-mail to:
SnakeFallPlans.nwr@noaa.gov. Include
in the subject line of the e-mail
comment the following identifier:
Comments on Snake Fall Chinook
HGMPs. Comments may also be sent via
facsimile (fax) to (503) 872–2737.
Requests for copies of the permit
applications should be directed to the
National Marine Fisheries Service,
Salmon Management Division, 1201 NE.
Lloyd Boulevard, Suite 1100, Portland,
OR 97232. The documents are also
available on the Internet at https://
www.nwr.noaa.gov. Comments received
will also be available for public
inspection, by appointment, during
normal business hours by calling (503)
230–5418.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Craig Busack at (503) 230–5412 or email: craig.busack@noaa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
ADDRESSES:
Species Covered in This Notice
Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus
tshawytscha): threatened, naturally
produced and artificially propagated
Snake River fall-run.
Background
Section 9 of the ESA and Federal
regulations prohibit the ‘‘taking’’ of a
species listed as endangered or
threatened. The term ‘‘take’’ is defined
under the ESA to mean harass, harm,
pursue, hunt, shoot, wound, kill, trap,
capture, or collect, or to attempt to
engage in any such conduct. NMFS may
issue permits to take listed species for
any act otherwise prohibited by section
9 for scientific purposes or to enhance
the propagation or survival of the
affected species under section
10(a)(1)(A) of the ESA. NMFS
regulations governing permits for
threatened and endangered species are
promulgated at 50 CFR 222.307.
On May 11, 2011, NMFS received an
application from the WDFW for an ESA
section 10(a)(1)(A) permit for the direct
take of ESA-listed Snake River fall
Chinook salmon in order to carry out
artificial propagation (hatchery)
programs at the Lyons Ferry, Oxbow,
and Umatilla Hatcheries and associated
facilities to enhance the species. The
purpose of these programs is to mitigate
for losses of Snake River fall Chinook
salmon caused by the four lower Snake
River dams and the Hells Canyon dam
complex.
E:\FR\FM\22JYN1.SGM
22JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 141 (Friday, July 22, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 43985-43986]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-18583]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
RIN 0648-XX37
Endangered and Threatened Species; Recovery Plan for the Sei
Whale
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service, National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration, Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of availability; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) announces the
availability for public review of the draft Recovery Plan (Plan) for
the sei whale (Balaenoptera borealis). NMFS is soliciting review and
comment from the public and all interested parties on the Plan, and
will consider all substantive comments received during the review
period before submitting the Plan for final approval.
DATES: Comments on the draft Plan must be received by close of business
on September 6, 2011.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by [0648- XX37], by any
of the following methods:
Electronic Submissions: Submit all electronic public comments via
the Federal eRulemaking Portal https://www.regulations.gov.
Mail: Angela Somma, National Marine Fisheries Service, Office of
Protected Resources, Endangered Species Division, 1325 East-West
Highway, Silver Spring, MD 20910.
Instructions: All comments received are a part of the public record
and will generally be posted to https://www.regulations.gov without
change. All Personal Identifying Information (for example, name,
address, etc.) voluntarily submitted by the commenter may be publicly
accessible. Do not submit Confidential Business Information or
otherwise sensitive or protected information.
NMFS will accept anonymous comments (enter N/A in the required
fields, if you wish to remain anonymous). You may submit attachments to
electronic comments in Microsoft Word, Excel, WordPerfect, or Adobe PDF
file formats only.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Shannon Bettridge (301-427-8437), e-
mail Shannon.Bettridge@noaa.gov or Larissa Plants (301-427-8471), e-
mail Larissa.Plants@noaa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Recovery plans describe actions beneficial to the conservation and
recovery of species listed under the Endangered Species Act of 1973
(ESA), as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). Section 4(f)(1) of the ESA
requires that recovery plans incorporate: (1) Objective, measurable
criteria which, when met, would result in a determination that the
species is no longer threatened or endangered; (2) site-specific
management actions necessary to achieve the Plan's goals; and (3)
estimates of the time required and costs to implement recovery actions.
The ESA requires the development of recovery plans for each listed
species unless such a plan would not promote its recovery.
The sei whale has been listed as ``endangered'' under the
Endangered Species Act (ESA) since its passage in 1973. Sei whales are
widely distributed in the world's oceans and most populations were
reduced, some of them considerably, by extensive commercial whaling in
the 1950s through the early 1970s. They were hunted by modern whalers
primarily after the preferred larger (or more easily taken) baleen
whale species had been seriously depleted, including the right
(Eubalaena spp.), humpback (Megaptera novaeangliae), gray (Eschrichtius
robustus), blue (Balaenoptera musculus), and fin (Balaenoptera
physalus) whales. International protection for this species only began
in the 1970s, but the taking of sei whales continued at relatively low
levels by Icelandic and Japanese operations. Of the commercially
exploited ``great whales,'' the sei whale is one of the least well
studied, and the current status of most sei whale stocks is poorly
known. Sei whales have a global distribution and can be found in the
North Atlantic Ocean, North Pacific Ocean, and Southern Hemisphere.
Currently, the population structure of sei whales has not been
adequately defined.
Because the current status of sei whales is unknown, the primary
purpose of the draft Recovery Plan is to provide a research strategy to
obtain data necessary to estimate population abundance, trends, and
structure and to identify factors that may be limiting sei whale
recovery. The draft Recovery Plan incorporates an adaptive management
strategy that divides recovery actions into three tiers. Tier I
includes: (1) Continued international regulation of whaling; (2)
determining population size, trends, and structure using opportunistic
data collection in conjunction with passive acoustic monitoring, if
determined to be feasible; and (3) continued stranding response and
associated data collection. After ten years of conducting Tier I
actions, NMFS expects to evaluate this approach to determine if the
approach is providing sufficient demographic data to assess recovery
(or if more efficient data collection methods become available). If the
Tier I method proves to be sufficient, NMFS will continue Tier I data
collection activities. If Tier I data collection methods are
insufficient, NMFS will consider Tier II actions, building upon
research conducted during Tier I. Tier II adds more extensive directed
demographic survey research and actions that are dependent upon
acquiring comprehensive information (e.g., assessment of threats
currently ranked as unknown). Tier III recovery actions depend upon
data collected in Tiers I and/or II. When sufficient data are obtained,
Tier III recovery activities will be undertaken as feasible. Costs have
been estimated for Tier I recovery actions only.
Criteria for the reclassification of the sei whale are included in
the final Recovery Plan. In summary, the sei whale may be reclassified
from endangered to threatened when all of the following have been met:
(1) Given current and projected threats and environmental conditions,
the sei whale population in each ocean basin in which it occurs
(Atlantic Ocean, Pacific Ocean, and Southern Hemisphere) satisfies the
risk analysis standard for threatened status (has no more than a 1
percent chance of extinction in 100 years) and the global population
has at least 1,500 mature, reproductive individuals (consisting of at
least 250 mature females and at least 250 mature males in each ocean
basin). Mature is defined as the number of individuals known,
estimated, or inferred to be capable of reproduction. Any factors or
circumstances that are thought to substantially contribute to a real
risk of extinction that cannot be incorporated
[[Page 43986]]
into a Population Viability Analysis will be carefully considered
before downlisting takes place; and (2) none of the known threats to
sei whales are known to limit the continued growth of populations.
Specifically, the factors in 4(a)(l) of the ESA are being or have been
addressed: (A) The present or threatened destruction, modification or
curtailment of a species' habitat or range; (B) overutilization for
commercial, recreational or educational purposes; (C) disease or
predation; (D) the inadequacy of existing regulatory mechanisms; and
(E) other natural or manmade factors. The population will be considered
for delisting if all of the following can be met: (1) Given current and
projected threats and environmental conditions, the total sei whale
population in each ocean basin in which it occurs (Atlantic Ocean,
Pacific Ocean, and Southern Hemisphere) satisfies the risk analysis
standard for unlisted status (has less than a 10 percent probability of
becoming endangered (has more than a 1 percent chance of extinction in
100 years) in 20 years). Any factors or circumstances that are thought
to substantially contribute to a real risk of extinction that cannot be
incorporated into a Population Viability Analysis will be carefully
considered before delisting takes place; and (2) none of the known
threats to sei whales are known to limit the continued growth of
populations. Specifically, the factors in 4(a)(l) of the ESA are being
or have been addressed.
The time and cost to recovery is not predictable with the current
information and global listing of sei whales. The difficulty in
gathering data on sei whales and uncertainty about the success of
passive acoustic monitoring in fulfilling data needs make it impossible
to give a timeframe to recovery. While we are comfortable estimating
costs for the first 10 years of plan implementation for Tier I actions
($11.872 million), any projections beyond this date are likely to be
imprecise and unrealistic until we can determine the success of passive
acoustic monitoring of sei whales to obtain demographic data. The
anticipated date for removal from the endangered species list also
cannot be determined because of the uncertainty in the success of
passive acoustic monitoring of sei whales. The effectiveness of many
management activities is not known on a global level. Currently it is
impossible to predict when such measures will bring the species to a
point at which the protections provided by the ESA are no longer
warranted, or even determine whether the species has recovered enough
to be downlisted or delisted. In the future, as more information is
obtained it should be possible to make more informative projections
about the time to recovery, and its expense.
NMFS will consider all substantive comments and information
presented during the public comment period in the course of finalizing
this Plan. NMFS concludes that the Draft Recovery Plan meets the
requirements of the ESA.
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.
Dated: July 18, 2011.
Therese Conant,
Deputy Chief, Endangered Species Division, Office of Protected
Resources, National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2011-18583 Filed 7-21-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P