Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; West Virginia and Ohio; Determinations of Attainment of the 1997 Annual Fine Particle Standard for the Parkersburg-Marietta and Wheeling Nonattainment Areas, 43634-43637 [2011-18427]
Download as PDF
wreier-aviles on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with PROPOSALS
43634
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 140 / Thursday, July 21, 2011 / Proposed Rules
Representatives and the Comptroller
General of the Government
Accountability Office. The changes in
this notice are not expected to result in
an annual effect on the economy of 100
million dollars or more, a major increase
in costs or prices, or significant adverse
effects on competition, employment,
investment, productivity, innovation, or
the ability of United States-based
enterprises to compete with foreignbased enterprises in domestic and
export markets. Therefore, this notice is
not expected to result in a ‘‘major rule’’
as defined in 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
K. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995: The changes proposed in this
notice do not involve a Federal
intergovernmental mandate that will
result in the expenditure by State, local,
and tribal governments, in the aggregate,
of 100 million dollars (as adjusted) or
more in any one year, or a Federal
private sector mandate that will result
in the expenditure by the private sector
of 100 million dollars (as adjusted) or
more in any one year, and will not
significantly or uniquely affect small
governments. Therefore, no actions are
necessary under the provisions of the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995. See 2 U.S.C. 1501 et seq.
L. National Environmental Policy Act:
This rule making will not have any
effect on the quality of environment and
is thus categorically excluded from
review under the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969. See
42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.
M. National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act: The requirements of
section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) are not
applicable because this rule making
does not contain provisions which
involve the use of technical standards.
N. Paperwork Reduction Act: The
changes in this rule making involve
information collection requirements
which are subject to review by the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). The
collection of information involved in
this notice has been reviewed and
approved by OMB under OMB control
number 0651–0031. This rule making
proposes to harmonize the standard for
materiality under §§ 1.56 and 1.555 with
the standard for materiality required to
establish inequitable conduct. This
notice does not propose any additional
fees or information collection
requirements on patent applicants or
patentees.
Notwithstanding any other provision
of law, no person is required to respond
to nor shall a person be subject to a
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:58 Jul 20, 2011
Jkt 223001
penalty for failure to comply with a
collection of information subject to the
requirements of the Paperwork
Reduction Act unless that collection of
information displays a currently valid
OMB control number.
Dated: July 15, 2011.
David J. Kappos,
Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual
Property and Director of the United States
Patent and Trademark Office.
List of Subjects in 37 CFR Part 1
BILLING CODE 3510–16–P
Administrative practice and
procedure, Courts, Freedom of
Information, Inventions and patents,
Reporting and record keeping
requirements, Small businesses.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, 37 CFR Part 1 is proposed to
be amended as follows:
PART 1—RULES OF PRACTICE IN
PATENT CASES
1. The authority citation for 37 CFR
Part 1 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 35 U.S.C. 2(b)(2).
2. Section 1.56 is amended by revising
paragraph (b) to read as follows:
§ 1.56 Duty to disclose information
material to patentability.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Information is material to
patentability if it is material under the
standard set forth in Therasense, Inc. v.
Becton, Dickinson & Co., ___ F.3d ___
(Fed. Cir. 2011). Information is material
to patentability under Therasense if:
(1) The Office would not allow a
claim if it were aware of the
information, applying the
preponderance of the evidence standard
and giving the claim its broadest
reasonable construction; or
(2) The applicant engages in
affirmative egregious misconduct before
the Office as to the information.
*
*
*
*
*
3. Section 1.555 is amended by
revising paragraph (b) to read as follows:
§ 1.555 Information material to
patentability in ex parte reexamination and
inter partes reexamination proceedings.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Information is material to
patentability if it is material under the
standard set forth in Therasense, Inc. v.
Becton, Dickinson & Co., ___ F.3d ___
(Fed. Cir. 2011). Information is material
to patentability under Therasense if:
(1) The Office would not find a claim
patentable if it were aware of the
information, applying the
preponderance of the evidence standard
and giving the claim its broadest
reasonable construction; or
(2) The patent owner engages in
affirmative egregious misconduct before
the Office as to the information.
*
*
*
*
*
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
[FR Doc. 2011–18408 Filed 7–20–11; 8:45 am]
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R03–OAR–2011–0469; FRL–9441–9]
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans; West
Virginia and Ohio; Determinations of
Attainment of the 1997 Annual Fine
Particle Standard for the ParkersburgMarietta and Wheeling Nonattainment
Areas
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
EPA is proposing to make a
determination that the ParkersburgMarietta, West Virginia-Ohio (WV-OH)
nonattainment area and the Wheeling,
WV-OH fine particle (PM2.5)
nonattainment areas (hereafter referred
to as ‘‘Areas’’) have attained the 1997
annual PM2.5 National Ambient Air
Quality Standard (NAAQS) by the
applicable attainment date of April 5,
2010. These determinations are based
upon complete, quality-assured, and
certified ambient air monitoring data for
the 2007–2009 monitoring period. EPA
is finding these Areas to be in
attainment, in accordance with the
requirements of the Clean Air Act
(CAA).
DATES: Written comments must be
received on or before August 22, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID Number EPA–
R03–OAR–2011–0469 by one of the
following methods:
A. https://www.regulations.gov. Follow
the on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
B. E-mail:
fernandez.cristina@epa.gov.
C. Mail: EPA–R03–OAR–2011–0469,
Cristina Fernandez, Associate Director,
Office of Air Program Planning,
Mailcode 3AP30, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Region III, 1650
Arch Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
19103.
D. Hand Delivery: At the previouslylisted EPA Region III address. Such
deliveries are only accepted during the
Docket’s normal hours of operation, and
special arrangements should be made
for deliveries of boxed information.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\21JYP1.SGM
21JYP1
wreier-aviles on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 140 / Thursday, July 21, 2011 / Proposed Rules
Instructions: Direct your comments to
Docket ID No. EPA–R03–OAR–2011–
0469. EPA’s policy is that all comments
received will be included in the public
docket without change, and may be
made available online at https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise
protected through https://
www.regulations.gov or e-mail. The
https://www.regulations.gov Web site is
an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which
means EPA will not know your identity
or contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment.
If you send an e-mail comment directly
to EPA without going through https://
www.regulations.gov, your e-mail
address will be automatically captured
and included as part of the comment
that is placed in the public docket and
made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA
recommends that you include your
name and other contact information in
the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA
cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact
you for clarification, EPA may not be
able to consider your comment.
Electronic files should avoid the use of
special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or
viruses.
Docket: All documents in the
electronic docket are listed in the
https://www.regulations.gov index.
Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available,
i.e., CBI or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the Internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available either electronically in https://
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy
during normal business hours at the Air
Protection Division, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Region III, 1650
Arch Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
19103.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Region 3, Irene Shandruk, Office of Air
Program Planning (3AP30),
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 3, 1650 Arch Street,
Philadelphia, PA 19103–2029, (215)
814–2166, shandruk.irene@epa.gov.
Region 5, Carolyn Persoon, Control
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:58 Jul 20, 2011
Jkt 223001
Strategies Section, Air Programs Branch
(AR–18J), Environmental Protection
Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson
Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604,
(312) 353–8290,
persoon.carolyn@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document, whenever
‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean
EPA.
This SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
section is arranged as follows:
I. What actions is EPA proposing?
II. What is the background of these actions?
III. What is EPA’s analysis of the relevant air
quality data?
IV. What are the effects of these actions?
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. What actions is EPA proposing?
In accordance with section 179(c)(1)
of the CAA, EPA is proposing to
determine that the Parkersburg-Marietta,
WV-OH PM2.5 nonattainment area and
the Wheeling, WV-OH PM2.5
nonattainment area have attained the
1997 annual PM2.5 NAAQS by the
applicable attainment date of April 5,
2010. The proposal is based upon
complete, quality-assured, and certified
ambient air monitoring data for the
2007–2009 monitoring period and EPA’s
determinations are in accordance with
EPA’s PM2.5 Implementation Rule of
April 25, 2007 (72 FR 20664).
II. What is the background of these
actions?
On July 18, 1997 (62 FR 36852), EPA
established a health-based PM2.5
NAAQS at 15.0 micrograms per cubic
meter (μg/m3) based on a 3-year average
of annual mean PM2.5 concentrations
(hereafter referred to as ‘‘the annual
PM2.5 NAAQS’’ or ‘‘the annual
standard’’). At that time, EPA also
established a 24-hour standard of 65 μg/
m3 (the ‘‘1997 24-hour standard’’). See
40 CFR 50.7. On January 5, 2005 (70 FR
944), EPA published its air quality
designations and classifications for the
1997 PM2.5 NAAQS based upon air
quality monitoring data from those
monitors for calendar years 2001–2003.
These designations became effective on
April 5, 2005. The Parkersburg-Marietta,
WV-OH and Wheeling, WV-OH
nonattainment areas were designated
nonattainment for the 1997 PM2.5
NAAQS during this designations
process. See 40 CFR 81.349 (West
Virginia) and 40 CFR 81.336 (Ohio). The
Parkersburg-Marietta, WV-OH
nonattainment area consists of Wood
County, WV, the Grant Tax District of
Pleasants County, WV, and Washington
County, OH. The Wheeling, WV-OH
nonattainment area consists of Marshall
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
43635
County, WV, Ohio County, WV, and
Belmont County, OH.
On October 17, 2006 (71 FR 61144),
EPA retained the 1997 annual PM2.5
NAAQS at 15 μg/m3 based on a 3-year
average of annual mean PM2.5
concentrations, and promulgated a 24hour standard of 35 μg/m3 based on a
3-year average of the 98th percentile of
24-hour concentrations (the ‘‘2006 24hour standard’’). On November 13,
2009, EPA designated the ParkersburgMarietta and Wheeling Areas as
attainment for the 2006 24-hour
standard (74 FR 58688). In that action,
EPA also clarified the designations for
the NAAQS promulgated in 1997,
stating that the Parkersburg-Marietta
and Wheeling Areas were designated as
nonattainment for the annual standard,
but attainment for the 1997 24-hour
standard. Today’s action, however, does
not address attainment of either the
1997 or the 2006 24-hour standard.
In response to legal challenges of the
annual standard promulgated in 2006,
the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District
of Columbia Circuit (DC Circuit)
remanded this standard to EPA for
further consideration. See American
Farm Bureau Federation and National
Pork Producers Council, et al. v. EPA,
559 F.3d 512 (DC Cir. 2009). However,
given that the 1997 and 2006 annual
standards are essentially identical,
attainment of the 1997 annual standard
would also indicate attainment of the
remanded 2006 annual standard.
EPA previously made clean data
determinations related to the 1997
annual PM2.5 NAAQS for each of these
Areas pursuant to 40 CFR 51.1004(c).
These determinations were made on
November 20, 2009 (74 FR 60199) and
remain in effect.
Under CAA section 179(c), EPA is
required to make a determination that a
nonattainment area has attained by its
attainment date, and publish that
determination in the Federal Register.
The determination of attainment is not
equivalent to a redesignation, and the
state must still meet the statutory
requirements for redesignation in order
for the Areas to be redesignated to
attainment.
Complete, quality-assured, and
certified PM2.5 air quality monitoring
data recorded in the EPA Air Quality
System (AQS) database for 2007 through
2009, show that the ParkersburgMarietta, WV-OH and Wheeling, WV–
OH nonattainment areas attained the
1997 annual PM2.5 NAAQS by their
applicable attainment date.
E:\FR\FM\21JYP1.SGM
21JYP1
43636
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 140 / Thursday, July 21, 2011 / Proposed Rules
III. What is EPA’s analysis of the
relevant air quality data?
EPA has reviewed the ambient air
monitoring data for PM2.5, consistent
with the requirements contained in 40
CFR part 50 and recorded in the data in
the EPA AQS database for the
Parkersburg-Marietta, WV-OH and
Wheeling, WV-OH nonattainment areas
for the monitoring period from 2007
through 2009. On the basis of that
review, EPA proposes to determine that
the Areas attained the 1997 annual
PM2.5 NAAQS by the April 5, 2010
attainment date.
Under EPA regulations at 40 CFR
50.7, the annual primary and secondary
PM2.5 standards are met when the
annual arithmetic mean concentrations,
as determined in accordance with 40
CFR part 50, Appendix N, is less than
or equal to 15.0 μg/m3, at all relevant
monitoring sites. The values calculated
in accordance with 40 CFR part 50,
Appendix N, are referred to as design
values, and these values are used to
determine if an area is attaining the
PM2.5 NAAQS. According to the PM2.5
implementation rule, the attainment
date for these Areas is April 5, 2010 and
the monitoring data from 2007 through
2009 is used to determine if the Areas
attained by April 5, 2010.
Table 1 shows the PM2.5 design values
for each monitor in the ParkersburgMarietta, WV-OH nonattainment area
and the Wheeling, WV-OH
nonattainment area, respectively, for the
years 2007–2009. All 2007–2009 design
values are below 15.0 μg/m3, and all
monitors meet the data completeness
requirements. Therefore, the
Parkersburg-Marietta, WV-OH and
Wheeling, WV-OH nonattainment areas
attained the 1997 annual PM2.5 NAAQS
by their attainment date.
TABLE 1.—ANNUAL PM2.5 DESIGN VALUES FOR PARKERSBURG-MARIETTA, WV-OH AND WHEELING, WV–OH
NONATTAINMENT AREAS *
State
Monitor ID
Certified annual design
value 2007–
2009
(μg/m 3)
541071002 ...............................................
No monitor ...............................................
No monitor ...............................................
13.7
........................
........................
540511002 ...............................................
540690010 ...............................................
No monitor ...............................................
13.4
13.2
........................
County
Parkersburg-Marietta, WV-OH
West Virginia ...........................................
Ohio .........................................................
Wood County ...........................................
Grant Tax District of Pleasants County ..
Washington County .................................
Wheeling, WV-OH
West Virginia ...........................................
Ohio .........................................................
Marshall County ......................................
Ohio County ............................................
Belmont County .......................................
* The data presented in Table 1 are available at https://www.epa.gov/air/airtrends/values.html.
wreier-aviles on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with PROPOSALS
IV. What are the effects of these
actions?
If EPA’s proposed determination that
the Parkersburg-Marietta, WV-OH and
Wheeling, WV-OH nonattainment areas
have attained the 1997 annual PM2.5
standard by the applicable attainment
date (April 5, 2010) is finalized, EPA
will have met its requirement pursuant
to section 179(c) of the CAA to make a
determination based on the Areas’ air
quality data as of the attainment date
that the Areas attained the standard by
that date. The action described above is
a proposed determination regarding the
Parkersburg-Marietta, WV-OH, and
Wheeling, WV-OH areas’ attainment of
the 1997 annual PM2.5 NAAQS.
Finalizing this proposed action would
not constitute a redesignation of the
Areas to attainment of the 1997 annual
PM2.5 NAAQS under section 107(d)(3) of
the CAA. Further, finalizing this
proposed action does not involve
approving maintenance plans for the
Areas as required under section 175A of
the CAA, nor would it find that the
Areas have met all other requirements
for redesignation. Even if EPA finalizes
the proposed action, the designation
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:58 Jul 20, 2011
Jkt 223001
status of the Parkersburg-Marietta, WVOH, and Wheeling, WV-OH areas would
remain nonattainment for the 1997
annual PM2.5 NAAQS until such time as
EPA determines that the Areas meet the
CAA requirements for redesignation to
attainment and take action to
redesignate the Parkersburg-Marietta,
WV-OH, and Wheeling, WV-OH areas.
EPA is soliciting comment on the
action discussed in this document.
These comments will be considered
before EPA takes final action. Please
note that if EPA receives adverse
comment on either of the proposed
determinations described above and if
that determination may be severed from
the remainder of the final agency action,
EPA may adopt as final these provisions
of the final agency action that are not
the subject of an adverse comment.
V. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
This action proposes to make
attainment determinations based on air
quality data and would not, if finalized,
result in the suspension of certain
Federal requirements and would not
impose any additional requirements.
For that reason, this proposed action:
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget under
Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993);
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
E:\FR\FM\21JYP1.SGM
21JYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 140 / Thursday, July 21, 2011 / Proposed Rules
• Is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act;
and
• Does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, these proposed PM2.5
NAAQS attainment determinations do
not have Tribal implications as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000), because
the SIP is not approved to apply in
Indian country located in the State, and
EPA notes that it will not impose
substantial direct costs on Tribal
governments or preempt Tribal law.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Intergovernmental
relations, Particulate matter, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: May 25, 2011.
W.C. Early,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 3.
Dated: June 24, 2011.
Susan Hedman,
Regional Administrator, Region 5.
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R07–OAR–2011–0451; FRL–9441–1]
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Plans: State of Missouri
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
EPA is proposing to approve
an April 20, 2011, request from the State
of Missouri to exempt sources of
Nitrogen Oxides (NOX) in the Missouri
portion of the St. Louis (MO-IL)
metropolitan 8-hour ozone
nonattainment area from the Clean Air
Act (CAA) requirements for NOX
Reasonably Available Control
Technology (RACT) for purposes of
attaining the 1997 8-hour ozone
National Ambient Air Quality Standard
(NAAQS). The Missouri NOX RACT
waiver request for its portion of the St.
wreier-aviles on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with PROPOSALS
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:58 Jul 20, 2011
Jkt 223001
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Lachala Kemp, Air Planning and
Development Branch, 901 N. 5th Street,
Kansas City, Kansas 66101 at 913 551
7214, or by e-mail at
kemp.lachala@epa.gov.
In the
final rules section of this Federal
Register, EPA is approving the State’s
request to exempt sources of NOX in the
Missouri portion of the St. Louis (MOIL) metropolitan 8-hour ozone
nonattainment area from the CAA
requirements for NOX RACT for
purposes of attaining the 1997 8-hour
ozone NAAQS. EPA is approving the
Missouri’s SIP revision as a direct final
rule without prior proposal because the
Agency views this as a noncontroversial submittal and anticipates
no adverse comments. A detailed
rationale for the approval is set forth in
the direct final rule. If no adverse
comments are received in response to
this action no further activity is
contemplated. If EPA receives adverse
comments, the direct final rule will be
withdrawn and all public comments
received will be addressed in a
subsequent final rule based on this
proposed rule. EPA will not institute a
second comment period. Any parties
interested in commenting on this action
should do so at this time.
For additional information, see the
direct final rule, which is located in the
rules section of this Federal Register.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
[FR Doc. 2011–18427 Filed 7–20–11; 8:45 am]
SUMMARY:
Louis metropolitan 8-hour ozone
nonattainment area is based on the most
recent three years of complete, qualityassured ozone monitoring data, which
demonstrate that additional reductions
of NOX emissions in the Area would not
contribute to attainment of the 1997
8-hour ozone NAAQS.
DATES: Comments on this proposed
action must be received in writing by
August 22, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R07–
OAR–2011–0451, by mail to Ms.
Lachala Kemp, Air Planning and
Development Branch, U.S. EPA Region
7, 901 North 5th Street, Kansas City,
Kansas 66101. Comments may also be
submitted electronically or through
hand delivery/courier by following the
detailed instructions in the ADDRESSES
section of the direct final rule located in
the rules section of this Federal
Register.
Dated: July 12, 2011.
Karl Brooks,
Regional Administrator, Region 7.
[FR Doc. 2011–18182 Filed 7–20–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
43637
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Federal Emergency Management
Agency
44 CFR Part 67
[Docket ID FEMA–2008–0020; Internal
Agency Docket No. FEMA–B–1038]
Proposed Flood Elevation
Determinations
Federal Emergency
Management Agency, DHS.
ACTION: Proposed rule; correction.
AGENCY:
On March 25, 2009, FEMA
published in the Federal Register a
proposed rule that contained an
erroneous table. This notice provides
corrections to that table, to be used in
lieu of the information published at 74
FR 12799. The table provided here
represents the flooding sources, location
of referenced elevations, effective and
modified elevations, and communities
affected for Monroe County, Kentucky,
and Incorporated Areas. Specifically, it
addresses the following flooding
sources: Bailey Branch (backwater
effects from Cumberland River), Butler
Branch (backwater effects from
Cumberland River), Cumberland River,
McFarland Creek (backwater effects
from Cumberland River), Meredith
Creek (backwater effects from
Cumberland River), Meshack Creek
(backwater effects from Cumberland
River), Murphy Branch (backwater
effects from Cumberland River), and
Ward Branch (backwater effects from
Cumberland River).
DATES: Comments are to be submitted
on or before October 19, 2011.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by Docket No. FEMA–B–
1038, to Luis Rodriguez, Chief,
Engineering Management Branch,
Federal Insurance and Mitigation
Administration, Federal Emergency
Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646–4064
or (e-mail) luis.rodriguez1@dhs.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Luis
Rodriguez, Chief, Engineering
Management Branch, Federal Insurance
and Mitigation Administration, Federal
Emergency Management Agency, 500 C
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20472,
(202) 646–4064 or (e-mail)
luis.rodriguez1@dhs.gov.
SUMMARY:
The
Federal Emergency Management Agency
(FEMA) publishes proposed
determinations of Base (1% annualchance) Flood Elevations (BFEs) and
modified BFEs for communities
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\21JYP1.SGM
21JYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 140 (Thursday, July 21, 2011)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 43634-43637]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-18427]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R03-OAR-2011-0469; FRL-9441-9]
Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans;
West Virginia and Ohio; Determinations of Attainment of the 1997 Annual
Fine Particle Standard for the Parkersburg-Marietta and Wheeling
Nonattainment Areas
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to make a determination that the Parkersburg-
Marietta, West Virginia-Ohio (WV-OH) nonattainment area and the
Wheeling, WV-OH fine particle (PM2.5) nonattainment areas
(hereafter referred to as ``Areas'') have attained the 1997 annual
PM2.5 National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) by the
applicable attainment date of April 5, 2010. These determinations are
based upon complete, quality-assured, and certified ambient air
monitoring data for the 2007-2009 monitoring period. EPA is finding
these Areas to be in attainment, in accordance with the requirements of
the Clean Air Act (CAA).
DATES: Written comments must be received on or before August 22, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID Number EPA-
R03-OAR-2011-0469 by one of the following methods:
A. https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line instructions for
submitting comments.
B. E-mail: fernandez.cristina@epa.gov.
C. Mail: EPA-R03-OAR-2011-0469, Cristina Fernandez, Associate
Director, Office of Air Program Planning, Mailcode 3AP30, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, Region III, 1650 Arch Street,
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103.
D. Hand Delivery: At the previously-listed EPA Region III address.
Such deliveries are only accepted during the Docket's normal hours of
operation, and special arrangements should be made for deliveries of
boxed information.
[[Page 43635]]
Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA-R03-OAR-
2011-0469. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included
in the public docket without change, and may be made available online
at https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise protected through https://www.regulations.gov or e-mail. The https://www.regulations.gov Web site
is an ``anonymous access'' system, which means EPA will not know your
identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body of
your comment. If you send an e-mail comment directly to EPA without
going through https://www.regulations.gov, your e-mail address will be
automatically captured and included as part of the comment that is
placed in the public docket and made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you include your name
and other contact information in the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA
may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid
the use of special characters, any form of encryption, and be free of
any defects or viruses.
Docket: All documents in the electronic docket are listed in the
https://www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such
as copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket
materials are available either electronically in https://www.regulations.gov or in hard copy during normal business hours at the
Air Protection Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region
III, 1650 Arch Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Region 3, Irene Shandruk, Office of
Air Program Planning (3AP30), Environmental Protection Agency, Region
3, 1650 Arch Street, Philadelphia, PA 19103-2029, (215) 814-2166,
shandruk.irene@epa.gov. Region 5, Carolyn Persoon, Control Strategies
Section, Air Programs Branch (AR-18J), Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312)
353-8290, persoon.carolyn@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, whenever ``we,''
``us,'' or ``our'' is used, we mean EPA.
This SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section is arranged as follows:
I. What actions is EPA proposing?
II. What is the background of these actions?
III. What is EPA's analysis of the relevant air quality data?
IV. What are the effects of these actions?
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. What actions is EPA proposing?
In accordance with section 179(c)(1) of the CAA, EPA is proposing
to determine that the Parkersburg-Marietta, WV-OH PM2.5
nonattainment area and the Wheeling, WV-OH PM2.5
nonattainment area have attained the 1997 annual PM2.5 NAAQS
by the applicable attainment date of April 5, 2010. The proposal is
based upon complete, quality-assured, and certified ambient air
monitoring data for the 2007-2009 monitoring period and EPA's
determinations are in accordance with EPA's PM2.5
Implementation Rule of April 25, 2007 (72 FR 20664).
II. What is the background of these actions?
On July 18, 1997 (62 FR 36852), EPA established a health-based
PM2.5 NAAQS at 15.0 micrograms per cubic meter ([micro]g/
m\3\) based on a 3-year average of annual mean PM2.5
concentrations (hereafter referred to as ``the annual PM2.5
NAAQS'' or ``the annual standard''). At that time, EPA also established
a 24-hour standard of 65 [micro]g/m\3\ (the ``1997 24-hour standard'').
See 40 CFR 50.7. On January 5, 2005 (70 FR 944), EPA published its air
quality designations and classifications for the 1997 PM2.5
NAAQS based upon air quality monitoring data from those monitors for
calendar years 2001-2003. These designations became effective on April
5, 2005. The Parkersburg-Marietta, WV-OH and Wheeling, WV-OH
nonattainment areas were designated nonattainment for the 1997
PM2.5 NAAQS during this designations process. See 40 CFR
81.349 (West Virginia) and 40 CFR 81.336 (Ohio). The Parkersburg-
Marietta, WV-OH nonattainment area consists of Wood County, WV, the
Grant Tax District of Pleasants County, WV, and Washington County, OH.
The Wheeling, WV-OH nonattainment area consists of Marshall County, WV,
Ohio County, WV, and Belmont County, OH.
On October 17, 2006 (71 FR 61144), EPA retained the 1997 annual
PM2.5 NAAQS at 15 [micro]g/m\3\ based on a 3-year average of
annual mean PM2.5 concentrations, and promulgated a 24-hour
standard of 35 [micro]g/m\3\ based on a 3-year average of the 98th
percentile of 24-hour concentrations (the ``2006 24-hour standard'').
On November 13, 2009, EPA designated the Parkersburg-Marietta and
Wheeling Areas as attainment for the 2006 24-hour standard (74 FR
58688). In that action, EPA also clarified the designations for the
NAAQS promulgated in 1997, stating that the Parkersburg-Marietta and
Wheeling Areas were designated as nonattainment for the annual
standard, but attainment for the 1997 24-hour standard. Today's action,
however, does not address attainment of either the 1997 or the 2006 24-
hour standard.
In response to legal challenges of the annual standard promulgated
in 2006, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
(DC Circuit) remanded this standard to EPA for further consideration.
See American Farm Bureau Federation and National Pork Producers
Council, et al. v. EPA, 559 F.3d 512 (DC Cir. 2009). However, given
that the 1997 and 2006 annual standards are essentially identical,
attainment of the 1997 annual standard would also indicate attainment
of the remanded 2006 annual standard.
EPA previously made clean data determinations related to the 1997
annual PM2.5 NAAQS for each of these Areas pursuant to 40
CFR 51.1004(c). These determinations were made on November 20, 2009 (74
FR 60199) and remain in effect.
Under CAA section 179(c), EPA is required to make a determination
that a nonattainment area has attained by its attainment date, and
publish that determination in the Federal Register. The determination
of attainment is not equivalent to a redesignation, and the state must
still meet the statutory requirements for redesignation in order for
the Areas to be redesignated to attainment.
Complete, quality-assured, and certified PM2.5 air
quality monitoring data recorded in the EPA Air Quality System (AQS)
database for 2007 through 2009, show that the Parkersburg-Marietta, WV-
OH and Wheeling, WV-OH nonattainment areas attained the 1997 annual
PM2.5 NAAQS by their applicable attainment date.
[[Page 43636]]
III. What is EPA's analysis of the relevant air quality data?
EPA has reviewed the ambient air monitoring data for
PM2.5, consistent with the requirements contained in 40 CFR
part 50 and recorded in the data in the EPA AQS database for the
Parkersburg-Marietta, WV-OH and Wheeling, WV-OH nonattainment areas for
the monitoring period from 2007 through 2009. On the basis of that
review, EPA proposes to determine that the Areas attained the 1997
annual PM2.5 NAAQS by the April 5, 2010 attainment date.
Under EPA regulations at 40 CFR 50.7, the annual primary and
secondary PM2.5 standards are met when the annual arithmetic
mean concentrations, as determined in accordance with 40 CFR part 50,
Appendix N, is less than or equal to 15.0 [micro]g/m\3\, at all
relevant monitoring sites. The values calculated in accordance with 40
CFR part 50, Appendix N, are referred to as design values, and these
values are used to determine if an area is attaining the
PM2.5 NAAQS. According to the PM2.5
implementation rule, the attainment date for these Areas is April 5,
2010 and the monitoring data from 2007 through 2009 is used to
determine if the Areas attained by April 5, 2010.
Table 1 shows the PM2.5 design values for each monitor
in the Parkersburg-Marietta, WV-OH nonattainment area and the Wheeling,
WV-OH nonattainment area, respectively, for the years 2007-2009. All
2007-2009 design values are below 15.0 [micro]g/m\3\, and all monitors
meet the data completeness requirements. Therefore, the Parkersburg-
Marietta, WV-OH and Wheeling, WV-OH nonattainment areas attained the
1997 annual PM2.5 NAAQS by their attainment date.
Table 1.--Annual PM2.5 Design Values for Parkersburg-Marietta, WV-OH and Wheeling, WV-OH Nonattainment Areas *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Certified
annual design
value 2007-
State County Monitor ID 2009
([micro]g/m
\3\)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Parkersburg-Marietta, WV-OH
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
West Virginia........................... Wood County............... 541071002................. 13.7
Grant Tax District of No monitor................ ..............
Pleasants County.
Ohio.................................... Washington County......... No monitor................ ..............
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Wheeling, WV-OH
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
West Virginia........................... Marshall County........... 540511002................. 13.4
Ohio County............... 540690010................. 13.2
Ohio.................................... Belmont County............ No monitor................ ..............
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* The data presented in Table 1 are available at https://www.epa.gov/air/airtrends/values.html.
IV. What are the effects of these actions?
If EPA's proposed determination that the Parkersburg-Marietta, WV-
OH and Wheeling, WV-OH nonattainment areas have attained the 1997
annual PM2.5 standard by the applicable attainment date
(April 5, 2010) is finalized, EPA will have met its requirement
pursuant to section 179(c) of the CAA to make a determination based on
the Areas' air quality data as of the attainment date that the Areas
attained the standard by that date. The action described above is a
proposed determination regarding the Parkersburg-Marietta, WV-OH, and
Wheeling, WV-OH areas' attainment of the 1997 annual PM2.5
NAAQS.
Finalizing this proposed action would not constitute a
redesignation of the Areas to attainment of the 1997 annual
PM2.5 NAAQS under section 107(d)(3) of the CAA. Further,
finalizing this proposed action does not involve approving maintenance
plans for the Areas as required under section 175A of the CAA, nor
would it find that the Areas have met all other requirements for
redesignation. Even if EPA finalizes the proposed action, the
designation status of the Parkersburg-Marietta, WV-OH, and Wheeling,
WV-OH areas would remain nonattainment for the 1997 annual
PM2.5 NAAQS until such time as EPA determines that the Areas
meet the CAA requirements for redesignation to attainment and take
action to redesignate the Parkersburg-Marietta, WV-OH, and Wheeling,
WV-OH areas.
EPA is soliciting comment on the action discussed in this document.
These comments will be considered before EPA takes final action. Please
note that if EPA receives adverse comment on either of the proposed
determinations described above and if that determination may be severed
from the remainder of the final agency action, EPA may adopt as final
these provisions of the final agency action that are not the subject of
an adverse comment.
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
This action proposes to make attainment determinations based on air
quality data and would not, if finalized, result in the suspension of
certain Federal requirements and would not impose any additional
requirements. For that reason, this proposed action:
Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993);
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
[[Page 43637]]
Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the Clean Air Act; and
Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, these proposed PM2.5 NAAQS attainment
determinations do not have Tribal implications as specified by
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), because the SIP
is not approved to apply in Indian country located in the State, and
EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct costs on Tribal
governments or preempt Tribal law.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Intergovernmental
relations, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: May 25, 2011.
W.C. Early,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 3.
Dated: June 24, 2011.
Susan Hedman,
Regional Administrator, Region 5.
[FR Doc. 2011-18427 Filed 7-20-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P