Solicitation for a Cooperative Agreement: Developing a Method for Conducting an Internal Evaluation of Gender-Informed Policy and Practice, 43726-43729 [2011-18409]
Download as PDF
43726
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 140 / Thursday, July 21, 2011 / Notices
Decree Library, P.O. Box 7611, U.S.
Department of Justice, Washington, DC
20044–7611 or by faxing or e-mailing a
request to Tonia Fleetwood
(tonia.fleetwood@usdoj.gov), fax no.
(202) 514–0097, phone confirmation
number (202) 514–1547. In requesting
from the Consent Decree Library a copy
of the consent decree for United States
v. Polyfoam Corp., Civil Action No.
4:11–cv–40134, please enclose a check
in the amount of $9.75 (25 cents per
page reproduction cost) payable to the
U.S. Treasury.
Ronald G. Gluck,
Assistant Section Chief, Environmental
Enforcement Section, Environment and
Natural Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 2011–18332 Filed 7–20–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
National Institute of Corrections
Solicitation for a Cooperative
Agreement: Developing a Method for
Conducting an Internal Evaluation of
Gender-Informed Policy and Practice
National Institute of
Corrections, U.S. Department of Justice.
ACTION: Solicitation for a Cooperative
Agreement.
AGENCY:
The National Institute of
Corrections (NIC) is seeking
applications from organizations, groups,
or individuals to enter into a
cooperative agreement for an 18-month
period to develop and pilot a
methodology for correctional
organizations to conduct an internal
evaluation of their current policy and
practice for working with women
offenders. This methodology must cover
a broad range of domains, such as
leadership, external collaboration,
management and operations, sanctions,
assessment and case planning, and
programs and services. The
methodology must be concise but
informative enough to be used by an
organization with an understanding of
evidence-based practices that
incorporate gender-informed research
and information. Additional
consideration may be given to an
applicant who can incorporate into the
methodology those elements applicable
to institutional and community
corrections environments. The
methodology should also include
supplemental information that
addresses an organization’s readiness
for change and a template that will help
organizations initiate an internal
strategic planning process. This award
wreier-aviles on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:00 Jul 20, 2011
Jkt 223001
will also cover the piloting of the
methodology, which should include
both onsite work and use of Web-based
technology, post-pilot revisions to the
methodology based on feedback, and a
design for conducting a process
evaluation to measure the efficacy of the
methodology.
The goal of this solicitation is to
create and provide a methodology for
organizations to (1) Conduct an
abbreviated internal evaluation of their
policies and practices specific to women
and (2) begin to plan strategically to
initiate the type of change required
within their agency to reach their
desired objectives. Information gathered
by organizations using this methodology
could also form the basis for resource
requests from funding entities,
formulation of technical assistance
requests to external sources, and a
vehicle to advance internal quality
assurance. The awardee will work
closely with designated NIC staff on all
aspects of the project to ensure
understanding of and agreement on the
scope of work to be performed, and to
work with other identified experts as
well who are recognized for their
expertise and practical experience in
working with justice-involved women.
To be considered, applicants must
demonstrate, at a minimum: In-depth
knowledge of research and practice
regarding gender-informed (women) and
evidence-based practices, organizational
readiness, strategic planning, and
process evaluation; In-depth knowledge
of the practices, programs, and
complexities specific to the operation of
women’s correctional facilities and
awareness of the issues relevant to
women on community release and
under supervision; In-depth knowledge
about the risks, needs, strengths, and
capacity for resiliency with justiceinvolved women; Specific examples of
expertise in directing project design and
implementation; Demonstrated ability to
work collaboratively with other experts
in the field of gender-informed
practices; Ability and capacity to
conduct Web-based events.
DATES: Applications must be received
by 4 p.m., EDT, August 24, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Mailed applications must be
sent to: Director, National Institute of
Corrections, 320 First St., NW., Room
215, Washington, DC 20534.
Applicants are encouraged to use
Federal Express, UPS, or similar service
to ensure delivery by the due date.
Hand delivered applications should
be brought to 500 First St., NW.,
Washington, DC 20534. At the front
security desk, dial 7–3106, ext. 0 for
pickup. Faxed or e-mailed applications
PO 00000
Frm 00078
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
will not be accepted. Electronic
applications can only be submitted via
https://www.grants.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A
copy of this announcement and links to
the required application forms can be
downloaded from the NIC Web site at
https://www.nicic.gov.
All technical or programmatic
questions concerning this
announcement should be directed to
Maureen Buell, Correctional Program
Specialist, National Institute of
Corrections, Administrative Division.
Ms. Buell can be reached directly at
1–800–995–6423 ext. 40121 or by
e-mail at mbuell@bop.gov. In addition to
the direct reply, all questions and
response will be posted on NIC’s Web
site at https://www.nicic.gov for public
review (the names of those submitting
questions will not be posted). The Web
site will be updated regularly and
postings will remain on the Web site
until the closing date of this cooperative
agreement solicitation. Only questions
received by 12 p.m. (EDT) on August 19,
2011 will be answered.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Overview: The goal of the solicitation
is to provide organizational leaders and
managers across the corrections
continuum (jails, prisons, community
corrections) with a method to (1) Begin
to internally evaluate the existence of
internal policy and practice and their
applicability to justice-involved women
by using evidence-based practices and
gender-informed research and
knowledge as a foundation, (2) identify
gaps and strengths in current services,
and (3) provide sufficient guidance for
an organization to begin to strategize
desired internal change. NIC has
incorporated much of the evidencebased, gender-informed research and
knowledge into a variety of products
that can be accessed on the NIC Web
site at https://www.nicic.gov and on
NIC’s women offender Web page at
https://www.nicic.gov/womenoffenders.
Background: NIC has provided a
broad range of services to organizations
that wanted to develop, enhance, and/
or revise their policies and practices to
better manage their increasing
population of justice-involved women.
Systems are often overwhelmed with
the increasing numbers of women,
surpassing the rate at which men have
been entering the system. From 1995 to
2005, the total number of female
prisoners increased 57% compared to a
34% increase in male prisoners
(Harrison & Beck (2006) Prison and Jail
Inmates at Midyear 2005 (NCJ
Publication No. 213133). The increasing
female population has presented
E:\FR\FM\21JYN1.SGM
21JYN1
wreier-aviles on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 140 / Thursday, July 21, 2011 / Notices
numerous challenges to the current
corrections paradigm, including overuse
of higher security beds driven by
classification systems not validated for
women; a lack of appropriate and
effective resources targeting women’s
assessed risks and needs; and the low
rates of success experienced by this
population, evidenced by the high rate
of returns due to technical violations
rather than new convictions. Women
offenders experience all of this despite
the fact that, except for a small
percentage, justice-involved women
present lower rates of both institutional
and community safety risk. Some
current correctional practices also have
had the unintended consequence of
‘‘driving women deeper into the
system.’’
In an attempt to deal with these
challenges, organizations often will
make piecemeal change (offer a
parenting program or have female
facilitators lead established programs),
which has limited positive impact with
women on items that are measured (e.g.,
recidivism data, program participation,
numbers and types of disciplinary
reports). However, as more
organizations become familiar with the
emerging research, they are interested in
making broader, long lasting change but
often do not know where to start. To try
to understand the problem more
thoroughly, NIC took a current and
retrospective look at the nature of
technical assistance requests specific to
justice-involved women and noted a
consistent theme. Although the details
of the requests varied, they all, in some
way, were requesting assistance to
improve management of their women’s
population. The following are examples
of common technical assistance
requests: (a) Mission has changed. (b)
The men have moved to another facility
and women are being transferred to a
facility that was designed for and has
historically housed only male offenders.
(c) A jurisdiction is building a new
facility for women and would like it to
be the best in the country, incorporating
the gender-informed research. (d) Staff
receive one hour of training in the
academy specific to working with
women. They want to design an
effective training program that they can
use in-house for their staff that is
specific to their needs and population.
(e) Women are surpassing men with
their rates of technical violations
resulting in revocations and returns to
prison. They want NIC to assess their
policies and procedures for women and
determine whether they are effective. (f)
There are few options for housing.
Women at various custody levels are
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:00 Jul 20, 2011
Jkt 223001
housed together. Although the
jurisdiction hasn’t had any major
assaultive events, they need assistance
in managing the population given their
current environment. (g) Women are
emerging from incarcerative settings
with few resources but significant
responsibilities. Many of them are
caring for children with substandard
housing, no job prospects or visible
source of income; parole or courtordered conditions of supervision with
no transportation; and really little more
than what is on their backs. How can a
jurisdiction work successfully with the
challenges reentering women present?
(h) Current classifications systems are
not accurately reflecting risk and need
for women. The facility ends up
overriding the instruments. They need
assistance in reviewing their current
assessment and classifications tools for
women and want recommendations for
improvement. (i) The jurisdiction is
overwhelmed with the needs of its
mental health population. They know
they need to include trauma-informed
practices to both benefit the women
offenders and their staff who interact
with them daily.
This is but a small sampling of
requests over the years, but it was the
impetus for collecting and organizing
the emerging research and knowledge
on women offenders.
Fortunately, as the rate of women
entering our nation’s justice systems
was dramatically increasing, also
emerging was a body of work that has
had significant impact on the field of
corrections. Evidence-based practices or
risk reduction research, considered to be
gender-neutral, and the gender-informed
research that has identified and
articulated specific areas that are unique
to and/or occur with increased
frequency with women. The latter body
of work has provided opportunities to
sharpen our knowledge and practices
regarding areas that contribute to risk
for women. NIC has paid considerable
attention to these emerging bodies of
work and has collected and organized
this information into a set of domains
that impact a wide range of practices in
women’s facilities and in community
corrections environments. This
information is continuously
incorporated into NIC’s current and
emerging products and services and has
informed technical assistance to the
field.
The development of an internal
evaluation methodology that contains
the items drawn from both the evidencebased and gender-informed bodies of
research and is in a concise and
accessible format provides an
opportunity for agency leadership and
PO 00000
Frm 00079
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
43727
management to assess policy and
practices that can contribute to or
detract from an organization’s overall
effectiveness in managing justiceinvolved women. It is also a tool that
can prepare an organization for
requesting technical assistance,
additional funding, or enhancing
internal quality assurance.
Purpose: This methodology will be
concise and informative, incorporating
evidence-based and gender-informed
items to be used by an organization to
reasonably conduct an internal
evaluation of their policy and practice
specific to their population of justiceinvolved women. Ideally this
methodology will inform policy and
practice in the operation of a women’s
facility and in effectively supervising
women in a community corrections
environment.
Scope of Work: It will include an
overview of the methodology, sources of
items chosen for inclusion, description
of the format, description of how an
organization should apply the
methodology, including the tasks of the
internal team, a description of the
piloting process, and instructions on
how an organization will rate or
prioritize the items as they are evaluated
internally. Also included in the
methodology is guidance to correctional
organizations on assessing
organizational readiness and strategic
planning for the purposes of advancing
the work with their population of
justice-involved women based on the
findings of their internal evaluation.
Finally, the applicant must describe a
process for how a pilot site or sites will
be chosen. As stated, the final product
will reflect revisions made to the
methodology after a pilot(s) has been
completed and will include a plan for
process evaluation. The awardee must
submit a detailed work plan with
timelines and milestones for
accomplishing project activities to the
assigned NIC correctional program
specialist (CPS) for approval prior to
any work being performed under this
agreement and must designate a point of
contact that will serve as the conduit of
information between the CPS and the
awardee.
Examples of issues for applicants to
consider for this project include
creation of methodology that is concise
and easy to understand yet provides
enough detail to ensure that a wide
range of practices are evaluated relative
to the research and knowledge on
justice-involved women. The intent of
this solicitation is to assist agencies in
accurately evaluating internal practices
for working with women, with
improved management and outcomes as
E:\FR\FM\21JYN1.SGM
21JYN1
wreier-aviles on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with NOTICES
43728
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 140 / Thursday, July 21, 2011 / Notices
an objective. This type of evaluation
runs the risk of resulting in a ‘‘halo
effect.’’ That is, agencies are at risk of
undermining objectivity when an
internal team looks at their own internal
practices. In order for an agency to
conduct an internal evaluation of their
practices, initial work must be
completed, including accessing relevant
data, knowledge of current policy and
practice, and a general vision of what
the agency would like to achieve.
Internal evaluators may have limited
knowledge about evidence-based and
gender-informed practice for women
offenders, may not believe there should
be differences in policy and practice
between male and female populations or
could misinterpret the intent of items in
the methodology. The applicant must
consider the challenges identified above
and propose strategies for successfully
addressing those areas within the
context of this project. Applicants are
encouraged to identify and address
additional issues and challenges that
they believe will impact the successful
development of this project.
Document Length: The length of the
document should be determined by
content—brevity and clarity are
encouraged.
Intended Audience: The primary
audience for this product is the
leadership and management of
correctional organizations. The
document will also be useful for
management of correctional institutions
for women and community corrections
organizations in the supervision of
women.
Distribution: This product is intended
to be distributed widely and made
available to the corrections field. It will
be available on the NIC Web site and
available free of charge through the NIC
Information Center.
Final Product: The completed
materials will have received editing
from a professional editor. Ideally,
materials will be electronically based.
The awardee must follow the Guidelines
for Preparing and Submitting
Manuscripts for Publication as found in
the ‘‘General Guidelines for Cooperative
Agreements,’’ which will be included in
the award package. The awardee will
deliver the final product to NIC in hard
copy and on disk in Word format. NIC
will be responsible for the final editing
process and document design, but the
awardee will remain available during
this time to answer questions and to
make revisions to the document. The
awardee must also ensure that all
products meet NIC’s standards for
accessibility and Section 508
compliance.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:00 Jul 20, 2011
Jkt 223001
Meetings: The cooperative agreement
awardee will attend an initial meeting
with NIC staff for a project overview and
preliminary planning. This will take
place shortly after the cooperative
agreement is awarded and will be held
in located to be mutually determined.
Washington, DC. Additionally, the
awardee should plan to meet with NIC
staff routinely as agreed upon by NIC
and the awardee during the course of
the cooperative agreement. Meetings
will be held no less than quarterly and
may be conducted via webinar or in
person as agreed upon by NIC and the
awardee.
Application Requirements: An
application package must include OMB
Standard Form 424, Application for
Federal Assistance; a cover letter that
identifies the audit agency responsible
for the applicant’s financial accounts as
well as the audit period or fiscal year
under which the applicant operates (e.g.
July 1 through June 30); an outline of
projected costs with the budget and
strategy narratives described in the
announcement. The following
additional forms must also be included:
OMB Standard Form 424A, Budget
Information—Non-Construction
Programs; OMB Standard Form 424B,
Assurances—Non-Construction
Programs (both available at https://
www.grants.gov); DOJ/FBOP/NIC
Certification Regarding Lobbying,
Debarment, Suspension and Other
Responsibility Matters; and the DrugFree Workplace Requirements (available
at https://www.nicic.gov/Downloads/
PDF/certif-frm.pdf).
Applications should be concisely
written, typed double spaced, and
reference the NIC opportunity number
and title referenced in this
announcement. If you are hand
delivering or submitting via Fed-Ex,
please include an original and three
copies of your full proposal (program
and budget narrative, application forms,
assurances, and other descriptions). The
original should have the applicant’s
signature in blue ink. Electronic
submissions will be accepted only via
https://www.grants.gov.
The project summary/abstract portion
of the application should be brief and
include: A summary of the application’s
project description. The summary must
be clear, accurate, and concise without
reference to other parts of the
application; A brief description of the
critical elements of the proposed
project, including the goals and
objectives for the project and how
strategies proposed meet those goals and
objectives.
Please place the following at the top
of the abstract: Project title, applicant
PO 00000
Frm 00080
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
name (legal name of applicant
organization), mailing address, e-mail
address, Web site address and contact
phone numbers, including voice and
fax, where applicable.
The narrative portion of the
application should include at a
minimum: A statement indicating the
applicant’s understanding of the
project’s purpose, goals and objectives.
The applicant should state this in
language other than that used in the
solicitation (i.e., do not simply repeat
the wording from the solicitation);
Project design and implementation:
This section should describe key design
points, implementation issues, and
opportunities; Project evaluation: This
section will describe the design of the
proposed process evaluation; Project
Management: Charts of measurable
milestones and timelines for the
completion of each milestone;
Capabilities and competencies: This
section should describe the
qualifications of the applicant
organization and any partner
organizations to do the work proposed
and the expertise of key staff to be
involved in the project. Attach resumes
that document relevant knowledge,
skills, and abilities to complete the
project for the principals and staff
members assigned to the project;
Budget: The budget should detail all
costs for the project, show consideration
for all contingencies for the project, a
commitment to work within the
proposed amount, and demonstrate the
ability to provide deliverables
reasonably according to schedule.
Authority: Public Law 93–415.
Funds Available: NIC is seeking the
applicant’s best ideas regarding
accomplishment of the scope of work
and the related costs for achieving the
goals of this solicitation. Funds may be
used only for the activities that are
linked to the desired outcome of the
project. The funding amount should not
exceed $120,000.
Eligibility of Applicants: An eligible
applicant is any state or general unit of
government, private agency, educational
institution, organization, individual, or
team with expertise in the described
areas. Applicants must have
demonstrated ability to implement a
project of this size and scope.
Review Considerations: Applications
will be reviewed by a team. Among the
criteria used to evaluate the applications
are indication of a clear understanding
of the project requirements; background,
experience, and expertise of the
proposed project staff, including any
sub-contractors; effectiveness of an
innovative approach to the project;
E:\FR\FM\21JYN1.SGM
21JYN1
wreier-aviles on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 140 / Thursday, July 21, 2011 / Notices
clear, concise description of all
elements and tasks of the project, with
sufficient and realistic timeframes
necessary to complete the tasks;
technical soundness of project design
and methodology; financial and
administrative integrity of the proposal,
including adherence to Federal financial
guidelines and processes; a sufficiently
detailed budget that shows
consideration of all contingencies for
this project and commitment to work
with the budget proposed; and
indication of availability work with NIC
staff.
Programmatic: 40 Points.
Are all of the elements and tasks as
outlined in the proposal fully and
clearly addressed? Is there a clear
description of how each project activity
will be accomplished, including major
tasks; the strategies to be employed;
required staffing; responsible parties,
and other required resources? Are there
any unique or exceptional approaches,
techniques, or design aspects proposed
that will enhance the project?
Project Management, Administration
and Budget: 30 Points.
Does the applicant identify reasonable
objectives, milestones, or measures to
track progress? Are the proposed
management and staffing plans clear,
realistic, and sufficient to carry out the
project? Is the applicant willing to meet
with NIC, at a minimum, as indicated in
the solicitation for this cooperative
agreement? Is the proposed budget
realistic, does it provide sufficient cost
detail/narrative, and does it represent
good value relative to the anticipated
results? Does the application include a
chart that aligns the budget with project
activities along a timeline with, at
minimum, quarterly benchmarks? In
terms of program value, is the estimated
cost reasonable in relation to work
performed and project products?
Organizational and Project Staff
Background: 30 Points.
Do the skills, knowledge, and
expertise of the organization and the
proposed project staff demonstrate a
high level of competency to carry out
the tasks? Does the applicant/
organization have the necessary
experience and organizational capacity
to carry out all goals of the project? If
consultants and/or partnerships are
proposed, is there a reasonable
justification for their inclusion in the
project and a clear structure to ensure
effective coordination?
Note: NIC will NOT award a cooperative
agreement to an applicant who does not have
a Dun and Bradstreet Database Universal
Number (DUNS) and is not registered in the
Central Contractor Registry (CCR). Applicants
can obtain a DUNS number at no cost by
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:00 Jul 20, 2011
Jkt 223001
calling the dedicated toll-free request line at
800–333–0505. Applicants who are sole
proprietors should dial 866–705–5711 and
select option #1.
Applicants may register in the CCR
online at the CCR Web site: https://
www.ccr.gov. Applicants can also
review a CCR handbook and worksheet
at this Web site.
Number of Awards: One.
NIC Opportunity Number: 11AD04.
Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance Number: 16.601.
Executive Order 12372: This project is
not subject to the provisions of
Executive Order 12372.
Morris L. Thigpen,
Director, National Institute of Corrections.
[FR Doc. 2011–18409 Filed 7–20–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–36–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
Notice of Random Assignment Study
To Evaluate Workforce Investment Act
Adult and Dislocated Worker
Programs; Request for Comment
Employment and Training
Administration (ETA), Labor.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The Department of Labor
(DOL or the Department) is prepared to
conduct an evaluation to provide
rigorous, nationally representative
estimates of the net impacts of intensive
services and training provided under
the Workforce Investment Act (WIA)
Adult and Dislocated Worker Programs.
The Department has determined that it
is in the public interest to use a random
assignment impact methodology for the
study. In the local workforce investment
areas (LWIAs) randomly selected to
participate in this evaluation, all
applicants for intensive services and
training under the WIA Adult and
Dislocated Worker programs will be
required to participate in the study
during a 12–18 month period. The
Department is soliciting comments
concerning the Department’s plan to
carry out the study.
DATES: Written comments on the plan to
require consent to participate in the
study during the designated LWIAs’
study enrollment periods must be
received by the office listed in the
addresses section below on or before
August 4, 2011.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
by any one of the following methods:
• Mail or Hand Delivery/Courier:
Please submit all written comments
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00081
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
43729
(including disk and CD–ROM
submissions) to Eileen Pederson, U.S.
Department of Labor, Employment and
Training Administration, Office of
Policy Development and Research, 200
Constitution Avenue, NW., Frances
Perkins Bldg., Room N–5641,
Washington, DC 20210. Commenters are
advised that mail delivery in the
Washington area may be delayed due to
security concerns. Hand-delivered
comments will be received at the above
address. All overnight mail will be
considered to be hand-delivered and
must be received at the designated place
by the date specified above.
• Facsimile: Please send comments to
Eileen Pederson’s attention, at fax
number (202) 693–2766.
• E-mail: Please send comments to
pederson.eileen@dol.gov.
Please submit your comments by only
one method. The Department will not
review comments received by means
other than those listed above or that are
received after the comment period has
closed.
Comments: All comments on this
notice will be retained by the
Department and released upon request
via e-mail to any member of the public.
The Department also will make all the
comments it received available for
public inspection by appointment
during normal business hours at the
above address. If you need assistance to
review the comments, the Department
will provide you with appropriate aids
such as readers or print magnifiers. The
Department will make copies of this
notice available, upon request, in large
print, Braille and electronic file on
computer disk. The Department will
consider providing the notice in other
formats upon request. To schedule an
appointment to review the comments
and/or obtain the notice in an
alternative format, contact the Office of
Policy Development and Research at
(202) 693–3700 (this is not a toll-free
number). You may also contact this
office at the address listed above.
The Department will retain all
comments received without making any
changes to the comments, including any
personal information provided. If
requested, the comments will be
released to the public. The Department
cautions commenters not to include
their personal information such as
Social Security Numbers, personal
addresses, telephone numbers, and email addresses in their comments as
such submitted information will be
released with the comment if the
comments are requested. It is the
commenter’s responsibility to safeguard
his or her information. If the comment
is submitted by e-mail, the e-mail
E:\FR\FM\21JYN1.SGM
21JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 140 (Thursday, July 21, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 43726-43729]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-18409]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
National Institute of Corrections
Solicitation for a Cooperative Agreement: Developing a Method for
Conducting an Internal Evaluation of Gender-Informed Policy and
Practice
AGENCY: National Institute of Corrections, U.S. Department of Justice.
ACTION: Solicitation for a Cooperative Agreement.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The National Institute of Corrections (NIC) is seeking
applications from organizations, groups, or individuals to enter into a
cooperative agreement for an 18-month period to develop and pilot a
methodology for correctional organizations to conduct an internal
evaluation of their current policy and practice for working with women
offenders. This methodology must cover a broad range of domains, such
as leadership, external collaboration, management and operations,
sanctions, assessment and case planning, and programs and services. The
methodology must be concise but informative enough to be used by an
organization with an understanding of evidence-based practices that
incorporate gender-informed research and information. Additional
consideration may be given to an applicant who can incorporate into the
methodology those elements applicable to institutional and community
corrections environments. The methodology should also include
supplemental information that addresses an organization's readiness for
change and a template that will help organizations initiate an internal
strategic planning process. This award will also cover the piloting of
the methodology, which should include both onsite work and use of Web-
based technology, post-pilot revisions to the methodology based on
feedback, and a design for conducting a process evaluation to measure
the efficacy of the methodology.
The goal of this solicitation is to create and provide a
methodology for organizations to (1) Conduct an abbreviated internal
evaluation of their policies and practices specific to women and (2)
begin to plan strategically to initiate the type of change required
within their agency to reach their desired objectives. Information
gathered by organizations using this methodology could also form the
basis for resource requests from funding entities, formulation of
technical assistance requests to external sources, and a vehicle to
advance internal quality assurance. The awardee will work closely with
designated NIC staff on all aspects of the project to ensure
understanding of and agreement on the scope of work to be performed,
and to work with other identified experts as well who are recognized
for their expertise and practical experience in working with justice-
involved women.
To be considered, applicants must demonstrate, at a minimum: In-
depth knowledge of research and practice regarding gender-informed
(women) and evidence-based practices, organizational readiness,
strategic planning, and process evaluation; In-depth knowledge of the
practices, programs, and complexities specific to the operation of
women's correctional facilities and awareness of the issues relevant to
women on community release and under supervision; In-depth knowledge
about the risks, needs, strengths, and capacity for resiliency with
justice-involved women; Specific examples of expertise in directing
project design and implementation; Demonstrated ability to work
collaboratively with other experts in the field of gender-informed
practices; Ability and capacity to conduct Web-based events.
DATES: Applications must be received by 4 p.m., EDT, August 24, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Mailed applications must be sent to: Director, National
Institute of Corrections, 320 First St., NW., Room 215, Washington, DC
20534.
Applicants are encouraged to use Federal Express, UPS, or similar
service to ensure delivery by the due date.
Hand delivered applications should be brought to 500 First St.,
NW., Washington, DC 20534. At the front security desk, dial 7-3106,
ext. 0 for pickup. Faxed or e-mailed applications will not be accepted.
Electronic applications can only be submitted via https://www.grants.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A copy of this announcement and links
to the required application forms can be downloaded from the NIC Web
site at https://www.nicic.gov.
All technical or programmatic questions concerning this
announcement should be directed to Maureen Buell, Correctional Program
Specialist, National Institute of Corrections, Administrative Division.
Ms. Buell can be reached directly at 1-800-995-6423 ext. 40121 or by e-
mail at mbuell@bop.gov. In addition to the direct reply, all questions
and response will be posted on NIC's Web site at https://www.nicic.gov
for public review (the names of those submitting questions will not be
posted). The Web site will be updated regularly and postings will
remain on the Web site until the closing date of this cooperative
agreement solicitation. Only questions received by 12 p.m. (EDT) on
August 19, 2011 will be answered.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Overview: The goal of the solicitation is to provide organizational
leaders and managers across the corrections continuum (jails, prisons,
community corrections) with a method to (1) Begin to internally
evaluate the existence of internal policy and practice and their
applicability to justice-involved women by using evidence-based
practices and gender-informed research and knowledge as a foundation,
(2) identify gaps and strengths in current services, and (3) provide
sufficient guidance for an organization to begin to strategize desired
internal change. NIC has incorporated much of the evidence-based,
gender-informed research and knowledge into a variety of products that
can be accessed on the NIC Web site at https://www.nicic.gov and on
NIC's women offender Web page at https://www.nicic.gov/womenoffenders.
Background: NIC has provided a broad range of services to
organizations that wanted to develop, enhance, and/or revise their
policies and practices to better manage their increasing population of
justice-involved women. Systems are often overwhelmed with the
increasing numbers of women, surpassing the rate at which men have been
entering the system. From 1995 to 2005, the total number of female
prisoners increased 57% compared to a 34% increase in male prisoners
(Harrison & Beck (2006) Prison and Jail Inmates at Midyear 2005 (NCJ
Publication No. 213133). The increasing female population has presented
[[Page 43727]]
numerous challenges to the current corrections paradigm, including
overuse of higher security beds driven by classification systems not
validated for women; a lack of appropriate and effective resources
targeting women's assessed risks and needs; and the low rates of
success experienced by this population, evidenced by the high rate of
returns due to technical violations rather than new convictions. Women
offenders experience all of this despite the fact that, except for a
small percentage, justice-involved women present lower rates of both
institutional and community safety risk. Some current correctional
practices also have had the unintended consequence of ``driving women
deeper into the system.''
In an attempt to deal with these challenges, organizations often
will make piecemeal change (offer a parenting program or have female
facilitators lead established programs), which has limited positive
impact with women on items that are measured (e.g., recidivism data,
program participation, numbers and types of disciplinary reports).
However, as more organizations become familiar with the emerging
research, they are interested in making broader, long lasting change
but often do not know where to start. To try to understand the problem
more thoroughly, NIC took a current and retrospective look at the
nature of technical assistance requests specific to justice-involved
women and noted a consistent theme. Although the details of the
requests varied, they all, in some way, were requesting assistance to
improve management of their women's population. The following are
examples of common technical assistance requests: (a) Mission has
changed. (b) The men have moved to another facility and women are being
transferred to a facility that was designed for and has historically
housed only male offenders. (c) A jurisdiction is building a new
facility for women and would like it to be the best in the country,
incorporating the gender-informed research. (d) Staff receive one hour
of training in the academy specific to working with women. They want to
design an effective training program that they can use in-house for
their staff that is specific to their needs and population. (e) Women
are surpassing men with their rates of technical violations resulting
in revocations and returns to prison. They want NIC to assess their
policies and procedures for women and determine whether they are
effective. (f) There are few options for housing. Women at various
custody levels are housed together. Although the jurisdiction hasn't
had any major assaultive events, they need assistance in managing the
population given their current environment. (g) Women are emerging from
incarcerative settings with few resources but significant
responsibilities. Many of them are caring for children with substandard
housing, no job prospects or visible source of income; parole or court-
ordered conditions of supervision with no transportation; and really
little more than what is on their backs. How can a jurisdiction work
successfully with the challenges reentering women present? (h) Current
classifications systems are not accurately reflecting risk and need for
women. The facility ends up overriding the instruments. They need
assistance in reviewing their current assessment and classifications
tools for women and want recommendations for improvement. (i) The
jurisdiction is overwhelmed with the needs of its mental health
population. They know they need to include trauma-informed practices to
both benefit the women offenders and their staff who interact with them
daily.
This is but a small sampling of requests over the years, but it was
the impetus for collecting and organizing the emerging research and
knowledge on women offenders.
Fortunately, as the rate of women entering our nation's justice
systems was dramatically increasing, also emerging was a body of work
that has had significant impact on the field of corrections. Evidence-
based practices or risk reduction research, considered to be gender-
neutral, and the gender-informed research that has identified and
articulated specific areas that are unique to and/or occur with
increased frequency with women. The latter body of work has provided
opportunities to sharpen our knowledge and practices regarding areas
that contribute to risk for women. NIC has paid considerable attention
to these emerging bodies of work and has collected and organized this
information into a set of domains that impact a wide range of practices
in women's facilities and in community corrections environments. This
information is continuously incorporated into NIC's current and
emerging products and services and has informed technical assistance to
the field.
The development of an internal evaluation methodology that contains
the items drawn from both the evidence-based and gender-informed bodies
of research and is in a concise and accessible format provides an
opportunity for agency leadership and management to assess policy and
practices that can contribute to or detract from an organization's
overall effectiveness in managing justice-involved women. It is also a
tool that can prepare an organization for requesting technical
assistance, additional funding, or enhancing internal quality
assurance.
Purpose: This methodology will be concise and informative,
incorporating evidence-based and gender-informed items to be used by an
organization to reasonably conduct an internal evaluation of their
policy and practice specific to their population of justice-involved
women. Ideally this methodology will inform policy and practice in the
operation of a women's facility and in effectively supervising women in
a community corrections environment.
Scope of Work: It will include an overview of the methodology,
sources of items chosen for inclusion, description of the format,
description of how an organization should apply the methodology,
including the tasks of the internal team, a description of the piloting
process, and instructions on how an organization will rate or
prioritize the items as they are evaluated internally. Also included in
the methodology is guidance to correctional organizations on assessing
organizational readiness and strategic planning for the purposes of
advancing the work with their population of justice-involved women
based on the findings of their internal evaluation. Finally, the
applicant must describe a process for how a pilot site or sites will be
chosen. As stated, the final product will reflect revisions made to the
methodology after a pilot(s) has been completed and will include a plan
for process evaluation. The awardee must submit a detailed work plan
with timelines and milestones for accomplishing project activities to
the assigned NIC correctional program specialist (CPS) for approval
prior to any work being performed under this agreement and must
designate a point of contact that will serve as the conduit of
information between the CPS and the awardee.
Examples of issues for applicants to consider for this project
include creation of methodology that is concise and easy to understand
yet provides enough detail to ensure that a wide range of practices are
evaluated relative to the research and knowledge on justice-involved
women. The intent of this solicitation is to assist agencies in
accurately evaluating internal practices for working with women, with
improved management and outcomes as
[[Page 43728]]
an objective. This type of evaluation runs the risk of resulting in a
``halo effect.'' That is, agencies are at risk of undermining
objectivity when an internal team looks at their own internal
practices. In order for an agency to conduct an internal evaluation of
their practices, initial work must be completed, including accessing
relevant data, knowledge of current policy and practice, and a general
vision of what the agency would like to achieve. Internal evaluators
may have limited knowledge about evidence-based and gender-informed
practice for women offenders, may not believe there should be
differences in policy and practice between male and female populations
or could misinterpret the intent of items in the methodology. The
applicant must consider the challenges identified above and propose
strategies for successfully addressing those areas within the context
of this project. Applicants are encouraged to identify and address
additional issues and challenges that they believe will impact the
successful development of this project.
Document Length: The length of the document should be determined by
content--brevity and clarity are encouraged.
Intended Audience: The primary audience for this product is the
leadership and management of correctional organizations. The document
will also be useful for management of correctional institutions for
women and community corrections organizations in the supervision of
women.
Distribution: This product is intended to be distributed widely and
made available to the corrections field. It will be available on the
NIC Web site and available free of charge through the NIC Information
Center.
Final Product: The completed materials will have received editing
from a professional editor. Ideally, materials will be electronically
based. The awardee must follow the Guidelines for Preparing and
Submitting Manuscripts for Publication as found in the ``General
Guidelines for Cooperative Agreements,'' which will be included in the
award package. The awardee will deliver the final product to NIC in
hard copy and on disk in Word format. NIC will be responsible for the
final editing process and document design, but the awardee will remain
available during this time to answer questions and to make revisions to
the document. The awardee must also ensure that all products meet NIC's
standards for accessibility and Section 508 compliance.
Meetings: The cooperative agreement awardee will attend an initial
meeting with NIC staff for a project overview and preliminary planning.
This will take place shortly after the cooperative agreement is awarded
and will be held in located to be mutually determined. Washington, DC.
Additionally, the awardee should plan to meet with NIC staff routinely
as agreed upon by NIC and the awardee during the course of the
cooperative agreement. Meetings will be held no less than quarterly and
may be conducted via webinar or in person as agreed upon by NIC and the
awardee.
Application Requirements: An application package must include OMB
Standard Form 424, Application for Federal Assistance; a cover letter
that identifies the audit agency responsible for the applicant's
financial accounts as well as the audit period or fiscal year under
which the applicant operates (e.g. July 1 through June 30); an outline
of projected costs with the budget and strategy narratives described in
the announcement. The following additional forms must also be included:
OMB Standard Form 424A, Budget Information--Non-Construction Programs;
OMB Standard Form 424B, Assurances--Non-Construction Programs (both
available at https://www.grants.gov); DOJ/FBOP/NIC Certification
Regarding Lobbying, Debarment, Suspension and Other Responsibility
Matters; and the Drug-Free Workplace Requirements (available at https://www.nicic.gov/Downloads/PDF/certif-frm.pdf).
Applications should be concisely written, typed double spaced, and
reference the NIC opportunity number and title referenced in this
announcement. If you are hand delivering or submitting via Fed-Ex,
please include an original and three copies of your full proposal
(program and budget narrative, application forms, assurances, and other
descriptions). The original should have the applicant's signature in
blue ink. Electronic submissions will be accepted only via https://www.grants.gov.
The project summary/abstract portion of the application should be
brief and include: A summary of the application's project description.
The summary must be clear, accurate, and concise without reference to
other parts of the application; A brief description of the critical
elements of the proposed project, including the goals and objectives
for the project and how strategies proposed meet those goals and
objectives.
Please place the following at the top of the abstract: Project
title, applicant name (legal name of applicant organization), mailing
address, e-mail address, Web site address and contact phone numbers,
including voice and fax, where applicable.
The narrative portion of the application should include at a
minimum: A statement indicating the applicant's understanding of the
project's purpose, goals and objectives. The applicant should state
this in language other than that used in the solicitation (i.e., do not
simply repeat the wording from the solicitation); Project design and
implementation: This section should describe key design points,
implementation issues, and opportunities; Project evaluation: This
section will describe the design of the proposed process evaluation;
Project Management: Charts of measurable milestones and timelines for
the completion of each milestone; Capabilities and competencies: This
section should describe the qualifications of the applicant
organization and any partner organizations to do the work proposed and
the expertise of key staff to be involved in the project. Attach
resumes that document relevant knowledge, skills, and abilities to
complete the project for the principals and staff members assigned to
the project; Budget: The budget should detail all costs for the
project, show consideration for all contingencies for the project, a
commitment to work within the proposed amount, and demonstrate the
ability to provide deliverables reasonably according to schedule.
Authority: Public Law 93-415.
Funds Available: NIC is seeking the applicant's best ideas
regarding accomplishment of the scope of work and the related costs for
achieving the goals of this solicitation. Funds may be used only for
the activities that are linked to the desired outcome of the project.
The funding amount should not exceed $120,000.
Eligibility of Applicants: An eligible applicant is any state or
general unit of government, private agency, educational institution,
organization, individual, or team with expertise in the described
areas. Applicants must have demonstrated ability to implement a project
of this size and scope.
Review Considerations: Applications will be reviewed by a team.
Among the criteria used to evaluate the applications are indication of
a clear understanding of the project requirements; background,
experience, and expertise of the proposed project staff, including any
sub-contractors; effectiveness of an innovative approach to the
project;
[[Page 43729]]
clear, concise description of all elements and tasks of the project,
with sufficient and realistic timeframes necessary to complete the
tasks; technical soundness of project design and methodology; financial
and administrative integrity of the proposal, including adherence to
Federal financial guidelines and processes; a sufficiently detailed
budget that shows consideration of all contingencies for this project
and commitment to work with the budget proposed; and indication of
availability work with NIC staff.
Programmatic: 40 Points.
Are all of the elements and tasks as outlined in the proposal fully
and clearly addressed? Is there a clear description of how each project
activity will be accomplished, including major tasks; the strategies to
be employed; required staffing; responsible parties, and other required
resources? Are there any unique or exceptional approaches, techniques,
or design aspects proposed that will enhance the project?
Project Management, Administration and Budget: 30 Points.
Does the applicant identify reasonable objectives, milestones, or
measures to track progress? Are the proposed management and staffing
plans clear, realistic, and sufficient to carry out the project? Is the
applicant willing to meet with NIC, at a minimum, as indicated in the
solicitation for this cooperative agreement? Is the proposed budget
realistic, does it provide sufficient cost detail/narrative, and does
it represent good value relative to the anticipated results? Does the
application include a chart that aligns the budget with project
activities along a timeline with, at minimum, quarterly benchmarks? In
terms of program value, is the estimated cost reasonable in relation to
work performed and project products?
Organizational and Project Staff Background: 30 Points.
Do the skills, knowledge, and expertise of the organization and the
proposed project staff demonstrate a high level of competency to carry
out the tasks? Does the applicant/organization have the necessary
experience and organizational capacity to carry out all goals of the
project? If consultants and/or partnerships are proposed, is there a
reasonable justification for their inclusion in the project and a clear
structure to ensure effective coordination?
Note: NIC will NOT award a cooperative agreement to an
applicant who does not have a Dun and Bradstreet Database Universal
Number (DUNS) and is not registered in the Central Contractor
Registry (CCR). Applicants can obtain a DUNS number at no cost by
calling the dedicated toll-free request line at 800-333-0505.
Applicants who are sole proprietors should dial 866-705-5711 and
select option 1.
Applicants may register in the CCR online at the CCR Web site:
https://www.ccr.gov. Applicants can also review a CCR handbook and
worksheet at this Web site.
Number of Awards: One.
NIC Opportunity Number: 11AD04.
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number: 16.601.
Executive Order 12372: This project is not subject to the
provisions of Executive Order 12372.
Morris L. Thigpen,
Director, National Institute of Corrections.
[FR Doc. 2011-18409 Filed 7-20-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-36-P