Nectarines and Peaches Grown in California; Suspension of Handling Requirements, 43533-43534 [2011-18396]
Download as PDF
43533
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
Vol. 76, No. 140
Thursday, July 21, 2011
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains regulatory documents having general
applicability and legal effect, most of which
are keyed to and codified in the Code of
Federal Regulations, which is published under
50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
Independence Avenue, S.W., STOP
0237, Washington, DC 20250–0237;
Telephone: (202) 720–2491, Fax: (202)
720–8938, or E-mail:
Laurel.May@ams.usda.gov.
This rule
is issued under Marketing Agreement
Nos. 916 and 917, both as amended (7
CFR parts 916 and 917), regulating the
handling of nectarines and peaches
grown in California, hereinafter referred
to as the ‘‘orders.’’ The orders are
effective under the Agricultural
Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as
amended (7 U.S.C. 601–674), hereinafter
referred to as the ‘‘Act.’’
The Department of Agriculture
(USDA) is issuing this rule in
conformance with Executive Order
12866.
The handling of nectarines and
peaches grown in California is regulated
by 7 CFR parts 916 and 917,
respectively. In early 2011, USDA
conducted mandatory referenda among
California nectarine and peach growers
to determine if they favored
continuation of their programs. The
referenda results demonstrated a lack of
grower support for continuing the
orders. Thus, USDA intends to
terminate the orders.
In an interim rule published in the
Federal Register on April 18, 2011, and
effective on April 19, 2011, (76 FR
21615, Doc. No. AMS–FV–11–0019,
FV11–916/917–5 IR), §§ 916.110,
916.115, 916.234, 916.235, 916.350 and
916.356 and 917.143, 917.150, 917.258,
917.259, 917.442, and 917.459, were
suspended indefinitely.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by
the Superintendent of Documents. Prices of
new books are listed in the first FEDERAL
REGISTER issue of each week.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Parts 916 and 917
[Doc. No. AMS–FV–11–0019; FV11–916/917–
5 FIR]
Nectarines and Peaches Grown in
California; Suspension of Handling
Requirements
Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Affirmation of interim rule as
final rule.
AGENCY:
The Department of
Agriculture (USDA) is adopting, as a
final rule, without change, an interim
rule that suspended the quality,
inspection, reporting, and assessment
requirements specified under the
California nectarine and peach
marketing orders (orders). The interim
rule suspended the handling regulations
for the 2011 and subsequent marketing
seasons relieving handlers of all
regulatory burdens under the orders
while USDA processes the terminations
of the orders.
DATES: Effective July 22, 2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jerry
L. Simmons, Marketing Specialist, or
Kurt J. Kimmel, Regional Manager,
California Marketing Field Office,
Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs,
AMS, USDA; Telephone: (559) 487–
5901; Fax: (559) 487–5906; or E-mail:
Jerry.Simmons@ams.usda.gov or
Kurt.Kimmel@ams.usda.gov.
Small businesses may obtain
information on complying with this and
other marketing order regulations by
viewing a guide at the following Web
site: https://www.ams.usda.gov/
MarketingOrdersSmallBusinessGuide;
or by contacting Laurel May, Marketing
Order Administration Branch, Fruit and
Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 1400
wreier-aviles on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:57 Jul 20, 2011
Jkt 223001
Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to requirements set forth in
the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5
U.S.C. 601–612), the Agricultural
Marketing Service (AMS) has
considered the economic impact of this
action on small entities. Accordingly,
AMS has prepared this final regulatory
flexibility analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit
regulatory actions to the scale of
business subject to such actions in order
that small businesses will not be unduly
or disproportionately burdened.
Marketing orders issued pursuant to the
Act, and the rules issued thereunder, are
unique in that they are brought about
through group action of essentially
small entities acting on their own
behalf.
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
There are approximately 97 California
nectarine and peach handlers subject to
regulation under the orders, and about
447 growers of these fruits in California.
Small agricultural service firms, which
include handlers, are defined by the
Small Business Administration as those
having annual receipts of less than
$7,000,000, and small agricultural
growers are defined as those having
annual receipts of less than $750,000
(13 CFR 121.201). A majority of these
handlers and growers may be classified
as small entities.
For the 2010 marketing season, the
committees’ staff estimated that the
average handler price received was
$10.50 per container or container
equivalent of nectarines or peaches. A
handler would have to ship at least
666,667 containers to have annual
receipts of $7,000,000. Given data on
shipments maintained by the
committees’ staff and the average
handler price received during the 2010
season, the committees’ staff estimates
that approximately 46 percent of
handlers in the industry would be
considered small entities.
For the 2010 marketing season, the
committees’ staff estimated the average
grower price received was $5.50 per
container or container equivalent for
nectarines and peaches. A grower would
have to produce at least 136,364
containers of nectarines and peaches to
have annual receipts of $750,000. Given
data maintained by the committees’ staff
and the average grower price received
during the 2010 season, the committees’
staff estimates that more than 80 percent
of the growers within the industry
would be considered small entities.
This rule continues in effect the
suspension of the quality, inspection,
reporting, and assessment requirements
for nectarines and peaches under the
orders. This action is consistent with
USDA’s decision to seek termination of
the nectarine and peach order
provisions. Suspension of the
requirements is expected to reduce the
regulatory burden on handlers and
growers of all sizes.
In accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, (44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35), the orders’ information
collection requirements have been
previously approved by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) and
assigned OMB No. 0581–0189,
Marketing Order Administration Branch
E:\FR\FM\21JYR1.SGM
21JYR1
43534
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 140 / Thursday, July 21, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
Generic OMB Fruit Crops. No changes
in those requirements as a result of this
action are necessary. Should any
changes become necessary, they would
be submitted to OMB for approval.
This rule will not impose any
additional reporting or recordkeeping
requirements on either small or large
California nectarine or peach handlers.
As with all Federal marketing order
programs, reports and forms are
periodically reviewed to reduce
information requirements and
duplication by industry and public
sector agencies. In addition, USDA has
not identified any relevant Federal rules
that duplicate, overlap or conflict with
this rule.
Comments on the interim rule were
required to be received on or before June
17, 2011. No comments were received.
Therefore, for the reasons given in the
interim rule, we are adopting the
interim rule as a final rule, without
change.
To view the interim rule, go to: https://
www.regulations.gov/
#!documentDetail;D=AMS-FV-11-00190001.
This action also affirms information
contained in the interim rule concerning
Executive Orders 12866 and 12988, the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35), and the E-Gov Act (44
U.S.C. 101).
After consideration of all relevant
material presented, it is found that the
regulatory requirements suspended by
the interim rule, (76 FR 21615, April 18,
2011), affirmed in this action, do not
tend to effectuate the declared policy of
the Act.
List of Subjects
7 CFR Part 916
Marketing agreements, Nectarines,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
7 CFR Part 917
wreier-aviles on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with RULES
Marketing agreements, Peaches, Pears,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Accordingly, the interim rule that
amended 7 CFR parts 916 and 917 and
that was published at 76 FR 21615 on
April 18, 2011, is adopted as a final
rule, without change.
Dated: July 14, 2011.
David R. Shipman,
Acting Administrator, Agricultural Marketing
Service.
[FR Doc. 2011–18396 Filed 7–20–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:57 Jul 20, 2011
Jkt 223001
Commission, Washington, DC 20555;
telephone: 301–415–4060; e-mail:
Howard.Benowitz@
nrc.govmailto:Howard.Benowitz@
nrc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
10 CFR Part 26
[NRC–2011–0058]
RIN 3150–AI94
Alternative to Minimum Days Off
Requirements
Nuclear Regulatory
Commission.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC or the Commission)
is amending its regulations governing
the fitness for duty of workers at nuclear
power plants. These amendments allow
holders of nuclear power plant
operating licenses the option to use a
different method from the one already
prescribed in the NRC’s regulations for
determining when certain nuclear
power plant workers must be afforded
time off from work to ensure that such
workers are not impaired due to
cumulative fatigue caused by work
schedules.
SUMMARY:
Effective Date: This final rule is
effective August 22, 2011.
ADDRESSES: You can access publicly
available documents related to this
document using the following methods:
• Federal rulemaking Web site: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov/ and search
for documents filed under Docket ID
NRC–2011–0058. Address questions
about NRC dockets to Carol Gallagher,
telephone: 301–492–3668, e-mail:
Carol.Gallagher@nrc.gov.
• NRC’s Public Document Room
(PDR): The public may examine and
have copied for a fee publicly available
documents at the NRC’s PDR, Public
File Area O–1F21, One White Flint
North, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville,
Maryland 20852.
• NRC’s Agencywide Documents
Access and Management System
(ADAMS): Publicly available documents
created or received at the NRC are
available online in the NRC Library at
https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/
adams.html. From this page, the public
can gain entry into ADAMS, which
provides text and image files of the
NRC’s public documents. If you do not
have access to ADAMS or if there are
problems in accessing the documents
located in ADAMS, contact the NRC’s
PDR reference staff at 1–800–397–4209,
or 301–415–4737, or by e-mail to
PDR.Resource@nrc.gov.
DATES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Howard Benowitz, Office of the General
Counsel, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
I. Background
A. NRC’s Fitness for Duty Regulations
B. Stakeholder Reaction to the Fitness for
Duty Requirements
C. Public Meetings and Commission
Direction
II. Public Input to the Final Rule
III. Description of the Final Rule
A. Maximum Weekly Average of 54 Hours
Worked Over a 6-Week Averaging Period
That Advances on a Weekly Basis
B. Alternative to the Minimum Days Off
Requirements
C. Applicability
IV. Section-by-Section Analysis
V. Availability of Documents
VI. Criminal Penalties
VII. Compatibility of Agreement State
Regulations
VIII. Assessment of Federal Regulations and
Policies on Families
IX. Voluntary Consensus Standards
X. Finding of No Significant Environmental
Impact: Environmental Assessment
XI. Paperwork Reduction Act Statement
XII. Regulatory Analysis
XIII. Regulatory Flexibility Certification
XIV. Backfit Analysis
XV. Congressional Review Act
I. Background
A. NRC’s Fitness for Duty Regulations
On March 31, 2008, the NRC
promulgated a final rule which
substantially revised its regulations for
fitness for duty (FFD) in Title 10 of the
Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR)
part 26 (73 FR 16966; March 31, 2008).
The revised regulations updated the
NRC’s FFD requirements and made
them more consistent with other
relevant Federal rules, guidelines, and
drug and alcohol testing programs that
impose similar requirements on the
private sector.
In addition, by establishing clear and
enforceable requirements for the
management of worker fatigue, the 2008
amendments require nuclear power
plant licensees to ensure that worker
fatigue does not adversely affect public
health and safety and the common
defense and security. Among these
fatigue management requirements is a
minimum days off requirement, which
requires licensees to manage cumulative
fatigue by providing workers with a
minimum number of days off over the
course of a period not to exceed 6
weeks.
B. Stakeholder Reaction to the Fitness
for Duty Requirements
On September 3, 2010, the Nuclear
Energy Institute (NEI) submitted a
E:\FR\FM\21JYR1.SGM
21JYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 140 (Thursday, July 21, 2011)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 43533-43534]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-18396]
========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents.
Prices of new books are listed in the first FEDERAL REGISTER issue of each
week.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 140 / Thursday, July 21, 2011 / Rules
and Regulations
[[Page 43533]]
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Parts 916 and 917
[Doc. No. AMS-FV-11-0019; FV11-916/917-5 FIR]
Nectarines and Peaches Grown in California; Suspension of
Handling Requirements
AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
ACTION: Affirmation of interim rule as final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Agriculture (USDA) is adopting, as a final
rule, without change, an interim rule that suspended the quality,
inspection, reporting, and assessment requirements specified under the
California nectarine and peach marketing orders (orders). The interim
rule suspended the handling regulations for the 2011 and subsequent
marketing seasons relieving handlers of all regulatory burdens under
the orders while USDA processes the terminations of the orders.
DATES: Effective July 22, 2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jerry L. Simmons, Marketing
Specialist, or Kurt J. Kimmel, Regional Manager, California Marketing
Field Office, Marketing Order Administration Branch, Fruit and
Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA; Telephone: (559) 487-5901; Fax: (559)
487-5906; or E-mail: Jerry.Simmons@ams.usda.gov or
Kurt.Kimmel@ams.usda.gov.
Small businesses may obtain information on complying with this and
other marketing order regulations by viewing a guide at the following
Web site: https://www.ams.usda.gov/MarketingOrdersSmallBusinessGuide; or
by contacting Laurel May, Marketing Order Administration Branch, Fruit
and Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., STOP
0237, Washington, DC 20250-0237; Telephone: (202) 720-2491, Fax: (202)
720-8938, or E-mail: Laurel.May@ams.usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule is issued under Marketing
Agreement Nos. 916 and 917, both as amended (7 CFR parts 916 and 917),
regulating the handling of nectarines and peaches grown in California,
hereinafter referred to as the ``orders.'' The orders are effective
under the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7
U.S.C. 601-674), hereinafter referred to as the ``Act.''
The Department of Agriculture (USDA) is issuing this rule in
conformance with Executive Order 12866.
The handling of nectarines and peaches grown in California is
regulated by 7 CFR parts 916 and 917, respectively. In early 2011, USDA
conducted mandatory referenda among California nectarine and peach
growers to determine if they favored continuation of their programs.
The referenda results demonstrated a lack of grower support for
continuing the orders. Thus, USDA intends to terminate the orders.
In an interim rule published in the Federal Register on April 18,
2011, and effective on April 19, 2011, (76 FR 21615, Doc. No. AMS-FV-
11-0019, FV11-916/917-5 IR), Sec. Sec. 916.110, 916.115, 916.234,
916.235, 916.350 and 916.356 and 917.143, 917.150, 917.258, 917.259,
917.442, and 917.459, were suspended indefinitely.
Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to requirements set forth in the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601-612), the Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS)
has considered the economic impact of this action on small entities.
Accordingly, AMS has prepared this final regulatory flexibility
analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of
business subject to such actions in order that small businesses will
not be unduly or disproportionately burdened. Marketing orders issued
pursuant to the Act, and the rules issued thereunder, are unique in
that they are brought about through group action of essentially small
entities acting on their own behalf.
There are approximately 97 California nectarine and peach handlers
subject to regulation under the orders, and about 447 growers of these
fruits in California. Small agricultural service firms, which include
handlers, are defined by the Small Business Administration as those
having annual receipts of less than $7,000,000, and small agricultural
growers are defined as those having annual receipts of less than
$750,000 (13 CFR 121.201). A majority of these handlers and growers may
be classified as small entities.
For the 2010 marketing season, the committees' staff estimated that
the average handler price received was $10.50 per container or
container equivalent of nectarines or peaches. A handler would have to
ship at least 666,667 containers to have annual receipts of $7,000,000.
Given data on shipments maintained by the committees' staff and the
average handler price received during the 2010 season, the committees'
staff estimates that approximately 46 percent of handlers in the
industry would be considered small entities.
For the 2010 marketing season, the committees' staff estimated the
average grower price received was $5.50 per container or container
equivalent for nectarines and peaches. A grower would have to produce
at least 136,364 containers of nectarines and peaches to have annual
receipts of $750,000. Given data maintained by the committees' staff
and the average grower price received during the 2010 season, the
committees' staff estimates that more than 80 percent of the growers
within the industry would be considered small entities.
This rule continues in effect the suspension of the quality,
inspection, reporting, and assessment requirements for nectarines and
peaches under the orders. This action is consistent with USDA's
decision to seek termination of the nectarine and peach order
provisions. Suspension of the requirements is expected to reduce the
regulatory burden on handlers and growers of all sizes.
In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, (44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35), the orders' information collection requirements have been
previously approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) and
assigned OMB No. 0581-0189, Marketing Order Administration Branch
[[Page 43534]]
Generic OMB Fruit Crops. No changes in those requirements as a result
of this action are necessary. Should any changes become necessary, they
would be submitted to OMB for approval.
This rule will not impose any additional reporting or recordkeeping
requirements on either small or large California nectarine or peach
handlers. As with all Federal marketing order programs, reports and
forms are periodically reviewed to reduce information requirements and
duplication by industry and public sector agencies. In addition, USDA
has not identified any relevant Federal rules that duplicate, overlap
or conflict with this rule.
Comments on the interim rule were required to be received on or
before June 17, 2011. No comments were received. Therefore, for the
reasons given in the interim rule, we are adopting the interim rule as
a final rule, without change.
To view the interim rule, go to: https://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=AMS-FV-11-0019-0001.
This action also affirms information contained in the interim rule
concerning Executive Orders 12866 and 12988, the Paperwork Reduction
Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35), and the E-Gov Act (44 U.S.C. 101).
After consideration of all relevant material presented, it is found
that the regulatory requirements suspended by the interim rule, (76 FR
21615, April 18, 2011), affirmed in this action, do not tend to
effectuate the declared policy of the Act.
List of Subjects
7 CFR Part 916
Marketing agreements, Nectarines, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
7 CFR Part 917
Marketing agreements, Peaches, Pears, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Accordingly, the interim rule that amended 7 CFR parts 916 and 917
and that was published at 76 FR 21615 on April 18, 2011, is adopted as
a final rule, without change.
Dated: July 14, 2011.
David R. Shipman,
Acting Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. 2011-18396 Filed 7-20-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-02-P