Standard Operating Procedure for “Notice to Industry” Letters, 43693-43694 [2011-18387]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 140 / Thursday, July 21, 2011 / Notices
E. The Role of UDI in Postmarket
Surveillance and Compliance
17. How we can use UDIs in healthrelated electronic data systems to
improve post-approval studies.
18. How the documentation of UDIs
can be used to improve the conduct of
recalls.
19. The issues associated with the use
of UDI in claims data sources.
20. How adverse event reporting can
be improved.
21. Other postmarket surveillance and
enforcement activities that can be
improved through the documentation of
UDIs in these databases.
wreier-aviles on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with NOTICES
F. UDIs in Personal Health Records
22. The device information currently
being transmitted from the EHR to a
patient’s PHR.
23. Any lessons learned that can be
applied from documenting medication
use.
24. How the documentation of UDI in
patients’ PHRs can be used for
postmarket surveillance, enforcement
activities and to improve device use.
25. Any differences in documentation
and tracking of device use needed for
different care settings (e.g., hospital,
outpatient clinic, and home) and
different device types (e.g., implants,
home/patient use) that need to be
considered.
III. Transcripts
Please be advised that as soon as a
transcript is available, it will be
accessible at https://
www.regulations.gov. It may be viewed
at the Division of Dockets Management
(HFA–305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm.
1061, Rockville, MD. A transcript will
also be available in either hardcopy or
on CD–ROM, after submission of a
Freedom of Information request. Written
requests are to be sent to Division of
Freedom of Information (HFI–35), Office
of Management Programs, Food and
Drug Administration, 5600 Fishers
Lane, rm. 6–30, Rockville, MD 20857. A
link to the transcripts will also be
available on the Internet at https://
www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/
NewsEvents/WorkshopsConferences/
ucm257194.htm (or go to https://
www.fda.gov and select this public
workshop from the posted events list),
approximately 45 days after the public
workshop.
Dated: July 15, 2011.
Nancy K. Stade,
Deputy Director for Policy, Center for Devices
and Radiological Health.
[FR Doc. 2011–18369 Filed 7–20–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:06 Jul 20, 2011
Jkt 223001
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2011–N–0477]
Standard Operating Procedure for
‘‘Notice to Industry’’ Letters
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice; request for comments.
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is announcing the
availability of the standard operating
procedure (SOP) for ‘‘Notice to
Industry’’ Letters. The SOP describes
the Center for Devices and Radiological
Health’s (CDRH) process to clarify and
more quickly inform stakeholders when
CDRH has changed its expectations
relating to, or otherwise has new
scientific information that could affect,
data submitted as part of an
Investigational Device Exemption (IDE)
or premarket submission that needs to
be disseminated in a timely manner.
DATES: The Agency encourages
interested parties to submit information
and either electronic or written
comments by September 19, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Submit electronic
comments or information to https://
www.regulations.gov. Submit written
comments to the Division of Dockets
Management (HFA–305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm.
1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Angela Krueger, Center for Devices and
Radiological Health, Food and Drug
Administration, 10903 New Hampshire
Ave., Bldg. 66, Rm. 1666, Silver Spring,
MD 20993, 301–796–6380, e-mail:
angela.krueger@fda.hhs.gov.
SUMMARY:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The Task Force on the Utilization of
Science in Regulatory Decision Making
(the Task Force) published a
Preliminary Report and
Recommendations in August 2010. In
the report, the Task Force noted that
when new scientific information
changes CDRH’s regulatory thinking, it
has been challenging for the Center to
communicate the change and its basis to
all affected parties in a meaningful and
timely manner. The Task Force
recommended that the Center make use
of more rapid tools for broad
communication on regulatory matters,
including establishing a standard
practice for sending ‘‘Notice to
Industry’’ Letters to all manufacturers of
a particular group of devices for which
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
43693
the Center has changed its expectations
for data submitted as part of an IDE or
premarket application on the basis of
new scientific information.
Currently, manufacturers typically
learn of changes CDRH implements at
the time of or soon after a decision is
made through individual engagement
with the Center, often not until after
they have prepared a premarket
submission. Reviewers may implement
these changes, such as requesting new
clinical data or using a new test method,
on a case by case basis, with immediate
supervisory concurrence when it is
necessary to protect the public health.
For example, a reviewer may request
that sponsors test their implantable
device for durability because new data
demonstrates that this type of device is
prone to failure due to premature wear
and tear of the technology. Although
CDRH may issue a detailed guidance
document, the document may not be
published until a year or more after a
branch- or division-level decision has
been made to request the information
because of the resource constraints in
developing guidance documents.
Therefore, CDRH believes that timely
communication with industry about
changes in regulatory expectations or
new scientific information is important.
The Task Force recommended that
CDRH use ‘‘Notice to Industry’’ Letters
in these circumstances, although not
required, and adopt a uniform template
and terminology for such letters,
including clear and consistent language
to indicate that the Center has changed
its regulatory expectations, the general
nature of the change, and the rationale
for the change. The Task Force
contemplated that CDRH could
potentially issue ‘‘Notice to Industry’’
Letters, if such letters constitute
guidance, as ‘‘Level 1—Immediately in
Effect’’ guidance documents under 21
CFR 10.115(g)(2), and would open a
public docket upon their issuance
through a notice of availability in the
Federal Register.
This SOP was developed to address
this recommendation from the Task
Force. Where appropriate, CDRH will
communicate new expectations as
‘‘Notice to Industry’’ Guidance Letters,
which will comply with Good Guidance
Practices, or CDRH will communicate
other new scientific information as
‘‘Notice to Industry’’ Advisory Letters.
The Center will post both types of
‘‘Notice to Industry’’ Letters on its Web
site, and will also use additional
methods for distributing the Letters to
identified stakeholders. When CDRH
issues a ‘‘Notice to Industry’’ Guidance
Letter concerning a change in premarket
expectations that will affect pending
E:\FR\FM\21JYN1.SGM
21JYN1
43694
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 140 / Thursday, July 21, 2011 / Notices
submissions, the Center will generally
specify an additional amount of time for
sponsors of those submissions to
address the new issues. Where
appropriate, ‘‘Notice to Industry’’
Guidance Letters would be followed as
quickly as possible by new or revised
guidance explaining the Center’s new
regulatory expectations (if any) in
greater detail and revising the guidance
where necessary in response to
comments received, so that external
constituencies have a fuller
understanding of the Center’s current
regulatory thinking.
II. Submission of Comments
Interested persons may submit to the
Division of Dockets Management (see
ADDRESSES) either electronic or written
comments regarding this document. It is
only necessary to send one set of
comments. It is no longer necessary to
send two copies of mailed comments.
Identify comments with the docket
number found in brackets in the
heading of this document. Received
comments may be seen in the Division
of Dockets Management between 9 a.m.
and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
Dated: July 15, 2011.
Nancy K. Stade,
Deputy Director for Policy, Center for Devices
and Radiological Health.
[FR Doc. 2011–18387 Filed 7–20–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
National Institutes of Health
wreier-aviles on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with NOTICES
Center for Scientific Review; Notice of
Closed Meeting
Pursuant to section 10(d) of the
Federal Advisory Committee Act, as
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is
hereby given of the following meeting.
The meeting will be closed to the
public in accordance with the
provisions set forth in sections
552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C.,
as amended. The grant applications and
the discussions could disclose
confidential trade secrets or commercial
property such as patentable material,
and personal information concerning
individuals associated with the grant
applications, the disclosure of which
would constitute a clearly unwarranted
invasion of personal privacy.
Name of Committee: Center for Scientific
Review Special Emphasis Panel; Member
Conflicts: Cystic Fibrosis, Lung Fibrosis, and
Lung Innate Immunity Applications.
Date: August 8, 2011.
Time: 9 a.m. to 12 p.m.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:00 Jul 20, 2011
Jkt 223001
Agenda: To review and evaluate grant
applications.
Place: National Institutes of Health, 6701
Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892,
(Telephone Conference Call).
Contact Person: Everett E Sinnett, PhD,
Scientific Review Officer, Center for
Scientific Review, National Institutes of
Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 2178,
MSC 7818, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301–435–
1016, sinnett@nih.gov.
This notice is being published less than
15 days prior to the meeting due to the
timing limitations imposed by the review and
funding cycle.
(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance
Program Nos. 93.306, Comparative Medicine;
93.333, Clinical Research, 93.306, 93.333,
93.337, 93.393–93.396, 93.837–93.844,
93.846–93.878, 93.892, 93.893, National
Institutes of Health, HHS)
Dated: July 14, 2011.
Jennifer S. Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory
Committee Policy.
Date: August 23, 2011.
Time: 12 p.m. to 2 p.m.
Agenda: To review and evaluate grant
applications.
Place: National Institutes of Health, 6701
Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892,
(Telephone Conference Call)
Contact Person: Rass M Shayiq, PhD,
Scientific Review Officer, Center for
Scientific Review, National Institute of
Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 2182,
MSC 7818, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 435–
2359, shayiqr@csr.nih.gov.
(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance
Program Nos. 93.306, Comparative Medicine;
93.333, Clinical Research, 93.306, 93.333,
93.337, 93.393–93.396, 93.837–93.844,
93.846–93.878, 93.892, 93.893, National
Institutes of Health, HHS)
Dated: July 15, 2011.
Jennifer S. Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory
Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2011–18418 Filed 7–20–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140–01–P
[FR Doc. 2011–18420 Filed 7–20–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
National Institutes of Health
Center for Scientific Review Notice of
Closed Meetings
Pursuant to section 10(d) of the
Federal Advisory Committee Act, as
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is
hereby given of the following meetings.
The meetings will be closed to the
public in accordance with the
provisions set forth in sections
552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C.,
as amended. The grant applications and
the discussions could disclose
confidential trade secrets or commercial
property such as patentable material,
and personal information concerning
individuals associated with the grant
applications, the disclosure of which
would constitute a clearly unwarranted
invasion of personal privacy.
Name of Committee: Center for Scientific
Review Special Emphasis Panel;
Neuroimaging.
Date: August 9, 2011.
Time: 12 p.m. to 1 p.m.
Agenda: To review and evaluate grant
applications.
Place: National Institutes of Health, 6701
Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892,
(Telephone Conference Call)
Contact Person: Eduardo A Montalvo, PhD,
Scientific Review Officer, Center for
Scientific Review, National Institutes of
Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 5108,
MSC 7852, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 435–
1168, montalve@csr.nih.gov.
Name of Committee: Center for Scientific
Review Special Emphasis Panel; Member
Conflict: Special Emphasis Panel.
PO 00000
Frm 00046
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
National Institutes of Health
National Institute of Diabetes and
Digestive and Kidney Diseases
Diabetes Mellitus Interagency
Coordinating Committee; Notice of
Meeting
The Diabetes Mellitus Interagency
Coordinating Committee (DMICC) will
hold a meeting on August 1, 2011, from
8:30 a.m. to 11:30 p.m. at the Bethesda
Marriott Suites, 6711 Democracy Blvd,
Bethesda, MD 20817. The meeting is
open to the public but attendance is
limited to space available. Non-Federal
individuals planning to attend the
meeting should notify the Contact
Person listed on this notice at least 2
days prior to the meeting. Individuals
who plan to attend and need special
assistance, such as sign language
interpretation or other reasonable
accommodations, should inform the
Contact Person listed below at least 10
days in advance of the meeting.
The DMICC facilitates cooperation,
communication, and collaboration on
diabetes among government entities.
DMICC meetings, held several times a
year, provide an opportunity for
members to learn about and discuss
current and future diabetes programs in
DMICC member organizations and to
identify opportunities for collaboration.
The August 1, 2011, DMICC meeting
will discuss ‘‘Guides and Guidelines.’’
Any member of the public interested
in presenting oral comments to the
Committee should notify the Contact
Person listed on this notice at least 10
E:\FR\FM\21JYN1.SGM
21JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 140 (Thursday, July 21, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 43693-43694]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-18387]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA-2011-N-0477]
Standard Operating Procedure for ``Notice to Industry'' Letters
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Notice; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing the
availability of the standard operating procedure (SOP) for ``Notice to
Industry'' Letters. The SOP describes the Center for Devices and
Radiological Health's (CDRH) process to clarify and more quickly inform
stakeholders when CDRH has changed its expectations relating to, or
otherwise has new scientific information that could affect, data
submitted as part of an Investigational Device Exemption (IDE) or
premarket submission that needs to be disseminated in a timely manner.
DATES: The Agency encourages interested parties to submit information
and either electronic or written comments by September 19, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Submit electronic comments or information to https://www.regulations.gov. Submit written comments to the Division of Dockets
Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane,
Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Angela Krueger, Center for Devices and
Radiological Health, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire
Ave., Bldg. 66, Rm. 1666, Silver Spring, MD 20993, 301-796-6380, e-
mail: angela.krueger@fda.hhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The Task Force on the Utilization of Science in Regulatory Decision
Making (the Task Force) published a Preliminary Report and
Recommendations in August 2010. In the report, the Task Force noted
that when new scientific information changes CDRH's regulatory
thinking, it has been challenging for the Center to communicate the
change and its basis to all affected parties in a meaningful and timely
manner. The Task Force recommended that the Center make use of more
rapid tools for broad communication on regulatory matters, including
establishing a standard practice for sending ``Notice to Industry''
Letters to all manufacturers of a particular group of devices for which
the Center has changed its expectations for data submitted as part of
an IDE or premarket application on the basis of new scientific
information.
Currently, manufacturers typically learn of changes CDRH implements
at the time of or soon after a decision is made through individual
engagement with the Center, often not until after they have prepared a
premarket submission. Reviewers may implement these changes, such as
requesting new clinical data or using a new test method, on a case by
case basis, with immediate supervisory concurrence when it is necessary
to protect the public health. For example, a reviewer may request that
sponsors test their implantable device for durability because new data
demonstrates that this type of device is prone to failure due to
premature wear and tear of the technology. Although CDRH may issue a
detailed guidance document, the document may not be published until a
year or more after a branch- or division-level decision has been made
to request the information because of the resource constraints in
developing guidance documents.
Therefore, CDRH believes that timely communication with industry
about changes in regulatory expectations or new scientific information
is important. The Task Force recommended that CDRH use ``Notice to
Industry'' Letters in these circumstances, although not required, and
adopt a uniform template and terminology for such letters, including
clear and consistent language to indicate that the Center has changed
its regulatory expectations, the general nature of the change, and the
rationale for the change. The Task Force contemplated that CDRH could
potentially issue ``Notice to Industry'' Letters, if such letters
constitute guidance, as ``Level 1--Immediately in Effect'' guidance
documents under 21 CFR 10.115(g)(2), and would open a public docket
upon their issuance through a notice of availability in the Federal
Register.
This SOP was developed to address this recommendation from the Task
Force. Where appropriate, CDRH will communicate new expectations as
``Notice to Industry'' Guidance Letters, which will comply with Good
Guidance Practices, or CDRH will communicate other new scientific
information as ``Notice to Industry'' Advisory Letters. The Center will
post both types of ``Notice to Industry'' Letters on its Web site, and
will also use additional methods for distributing the Letters to
identified stakeholders. When CDRH issues a ``Notice to Industry''
Guidance Letter concerning a change in premarket expectations that will
affect pending
[[Page 43694]]
submissions, the Center will generally specify an additional amount of
time for sponsors of those submissions to address the new issues. Where
appropriate, ``Notice to Industry'' Guidance Letters would be followed
as quickly as possible by new or revised guidance explaining the
Center's new regulatory expectations (if any) in greater detail and
revising the guidance where necessary in response to comments received,
so that external constituencies have a fuller understanding of the
Center's current regulatory thinking.
II. Submission of Comments
Interested persons may submit to the Division of Dockets Management
(see ADDRESSES) either electronic or written comments regarding this
document. It is only necessary to send one set of comments. It is no
longer necessary to send two copies of mailed comments. Identify
comments with the docket number found in brackets in the heading of
this document. Received comments may be seen in the Division of Dockets
Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
Dated: July 15, 2011.
Nancy K. Stade,
Deputy Director for Policy, Center for Devices and Radiological Health.
[FR Doc. 2011-18387 Filed 7-20-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-P