Final Supplementary Rules To Require the Use of Certified Noxious-Weed-Free Forage and Straw on Bureau of Land Management Lands in the State of Idaho, 43706-43709 [2011-18336]
Download as PDF
43706
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 140 / Thursday, July 21, 2011 / Notices
In accordance with the
Federal Land Policy and Management
Act (FLPMA) and the Federal Advisory
Committee Act of 1972 (FACA), the U.S.
Department of the Interior, Bureau of
Land Management (BLM) Dakotas
Resource Advisory Council (RAC), will
meet as indicated below.
SUMMARY:
The next regular meeting of the
Dakotas Resource Advisory Council will
be held on Aug. 17, 2011 in Dickinson,
ND. The meeting will start at 8 a.m. and
adjourn at approximately 3:30 p.m.
When determined, the meeting location
will be announced in a news release.
DATES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mark Jacobsen, Public Affairs Specialist,
BLM Eastern Montana/Dakotas District,
111 Garryowen Road, Miles City,
Montana, 59301. Telephone: (406) 233–
2831. Persons who use a
telecommunications device for the deaf
(TDD) may call the Federal Information
Relay Service (FIRS) at 1–800–877–8339
to contact the above individual during
normal business hours. The FIRS is
available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week,
to leave a message or question with the
above individual. You will receive a
reply during normal business hours.
The 15member Council advises the Secretary
of the Interior through the Bureau of
Land Management on a variety of
planning and management issues
associated with public land
management in the Dakotas. At these
meetings, topics will include: North
Dakota and South Dakota Field Office
manager updates, subcommittee
briefings, work sessions and other issues
that the council may raise. All meetings
are open to the public and the public
may present written comments to the
Council. Each formal Council meeting
will also have time allocated for hearing
public comments. Depending on the
number of persons wishing to comment
and time available, the time for
individual oral comments may be
limited. Individuals who plan to attend
and need special assistance, such as
sign language interpretation, tour
transportation or other reasonable
accommodations should contact the
BLM as provided above.
wreier-aviles on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with NOTICES
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Dated: July 8, 2011.
M. Elaine Raper,
Manager, Eastern Montana, Dakotas District
.
[FR Doc. 2011–18376 Filed 7–20–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–DN–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:00 Jul 20, 2011
Jkt 223001
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
[LLID–931–000–L1020–0000–JP–0000252R]
Final Supplementary Rules To Require
the Use of Certified Noxious-WeedFree Forage and Straw on Bureau of
Land Management Lands in the State
of Idaho
Bureau of Land Management,
Interior.
ACTION: Final supplementary rules.
AGENCY:
The Bureau of Land
Management (BLM) in Idaho is
finalizing a supplementary rule that will
require anyone using, feeding, or storing
forage or straw on BLM-administered
land in Idaho to use certified noxiousweed-free forage and straw. Restoration,
rehabilitation, and stabilization projects
also will be required to use weed-free
straw bales and mulch for project work.
This action is a cooperative effort among
the BLM, the U.S. Forest Service
(USFS), and the Idaho State Department
of Agriculture (ISDA) that supports
Idaho State noxious weed laws.
DATES: These supplementary rules are
effective August 22, 2011.
ADDRESSES: You may direct inquiries by
letter to Roger Rosentreter, Botanist,
Bureau of Land Management, 1387 S.
Vinnell Way, Boise, ID 83709, or by email to Roger_Rosentreter@blm.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Roger Rosentreter, Botanist, Bureau of
Land Management, 1387 S. Vinnell
Way, Boise, ID 83709; telephone (208)
373–3824; e-mail
Roger_Rosentreter@blm.gov. Persons
who use a telecommunications device
for the deaf (TDD) may call the Federal
Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1–
800–877–8339 to contact the above
individual during normal business
hours. The FIRS is available 24 hours a
day, 7 days a week, to leave a message
or question with the above individual.
You will receive a reply during normal
business hours.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
I. Background
II. Discussion of Public Comments
III. Discussion of the Final Supplementary
Rules
IV. Procedural Matters
I. Background
Noxious and invasive weeds are a
serious problem in the Western United
States. Noxious weeds are spreading on
BLM lands at a rate of over 2,300 acres
per day, and on all Western public lands
at approximately 4,600 acres per day.
Species such as perennial pepperweed,
PO 00000
Frm 00058
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
purple loosestrife, yellow starthistle,
hoary cress (whitetop), leafy spurge,
diffuse knapweed, spotted knapweed,
Russian knapweed, Scotch thistle,
Canada thistle, rush skeletonweed, and
many others are non-native to the
United States and have no natural
enemies to keep their populations in
balance. Consequently, depending on
the circumstances (e.g., weed(s)
involved, soil type, range condition, and
climatic influences), these undesirable
weeds may rapidly invade healthy
ecosystems, displace native vegetation,
reduce species diversity, destroy
wildlife habitat, reduce forage for wild
and domestic ungulates, weaken
rehabilitation and landscape restoration
efforts, increase soil erosion and stream
sedimentation, create fire hazards, and/
or degrade special resource values.
To curb the spread of noxious weeds,
a growing number of Western States
have jointly developed noxious-weedfree forage certification standards, and
in cooperation with various Federal,
State, and county agencies, have also
passed weed management laws. Idaho
participates in a regional inspectioncertification process with Oregon,
Montana, Washington, Nevada, and
Wyoming and encourages, on a
voluntary basis, forage producers in
Idaho to grow and request voluntary
certification inspections of forage
products and straw.
Because forage products and straw
containing noxious weed seed
contribute to the spread and
establishment of weed infestations, the
USFS promulgated regulations in 1996,
known as a ‘‘Weed Free Hay Order,’’ to
address this issue. In response to that
Order, the State of Idaho implemented
a noxious-weed-free forage and straw
certification program in 1997. Under
Idaho Code, the ISDA wrote regulations
in 2007 (Title 22, chapter 24 NoxiousWeed-Free Forage and Straw Rules and
IDAPA 02.06.31). This program, which
is a cooperative effort between the ISDA
and the USFS, was established to limit
the introduction and spread of noxious
weeds through forage and straw onto
National Forest System lands and other
lands within Idaho. The Federal Plant
Protection Act of 2000 (7 U.S.C. 7701–
7751) directs agencies to develop
integrated management plans for
noxious weeds. These supplementary
rules are intended to complement the
existing regulatory framework.
These supplementary rules are
promulgated under the authority of the
Federal Land Policy and Management
Act (FLPMA) of 1976 (43 U.S.C. 1733(a)
and 1740) and 43 CFR 8365.1–6.
E:\FR\FM\21JYN1.SGM
21JYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 140 / Thursday, July 21, 2011 / Notices
II. Discussion of Public Comments
The BLM Idaho State Office proposed
supplementary rules in the Federal
Register on September 21, 2010 (75 FR
57496). Public comments were accepted
for a 60-day period ending on November
22, 2010. The BLM received three
written comments concerning the
proposed rules. All three comments
supported the proposed supplementary
rules.
Two of the comments suggested
revising proposed paragraph (4):
‘‘Certified noxious-weed-free
compressed forage bales are identified
with yellow binding (strapping) material
with the statement ‘ISDA NWFFS’ and
the manufacturer’s name printed in
purple.’’ The commenters suggested that
the paragraph be reworded as follows:
‘‘Certified noxious-weed-free
compressed forage bales are identified
by strapping/binding material
authorized by NAWMA [the North
American Weed Management
Association] with the same color and
marking requirements on products
certified by other NAWMA approved
agencies.’’ This revision is consistent
with the use of certification identifiers
required by other agencies, and has been
included in the final supplementary
rules.
The third comment suggested that the
BLM monitor livestock for what they
have eaten during the three days before
they are turned out onto the public
lands, to address the possibility that
weed seeds might pass through the
digestive tracts of the livestock and
subsequently germinate on the
rangelands. Although there is a slight
possibility of weed seeds surviving in
this manner, BLM staff concluded that
the resources and logistics of such
monitoring would provide marginal
benefit and would result in a significant
regulatory burden for the agency and
public. Consequently, these
supplementary rules were not amended
as suggested.
wreier-aviles on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with NOTICES
III. Discussion of the Final
Supplementary Rules
The final supplementary rules apply
to BLM-administered lands in Idaho and
provide for consistent management with
National Forest System lands across
jurisdictional boundaries. The final
supplementary rules will be
implemented by including a standard
stipulation in all Special Recreation
Permits and most other use
authorizations. Livestock grazing
permits would not need to include such
a stipulation because 43 CFR
4140.1(a)(3) already requires the
permittee to secure authorization before
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:00 Jul 20, 2011
Jkt 223001
supplemental feeding, maintenance
feeding, and emergency feeding on
lands administered by the BLM.
The supplementary rules require
holders of affected permits and use
authorizations to use certified noxiousweed-free forage and straw when they
use hay, cubes, and straw on BLMadministered public lands in Idaho.
Affected permittees includes
recreationists using pack and saddle
stock, grazing permittees, outfitters, and
contractors and operators who use straw
or mulch for reclamation or re-seeding
purposes. These individuals or groups
are required to use certified noxiousweed-free forage and straw while on
BLM-administered public lands in
Idaho, unless they have a permit or
letter signed by a BLM authorized
officer specifically authorizing the
otherwise-prohibited act, or are
transporting forage across public lands
from one private property to another
private property. The BLM in Idaho
allows forage certified by other States to
be used as forage on lands administered
by Idaho BLM offices.
In addition, in cooperation with the
USFS hay closure and the Idaho State
Department of Agriculture (ISDA)
Noxious-Weed-Free Forage and Straw
Certification (NWFFS) program, the
BLM prohibits the use of forage and
straw that has not been certified as
noxious-weed-free for all BLMadministered public lands within Idaho.
The BLM State Office in Idaho, in
cooperation with the ISDA, will
implement a public information plan
intended to publicize the
supplementary rules and notify visitors
and land users where they can purchase
state-certified noxious-weed-free forage
and straw.
Paragraph (1) of the proposed
supplementary rules provided for a 60day grace period between the effective
date and enforcement of the
supplementary rules. The BLM
recognizes that immediate compliance
with these supplementary rules might
not be realistic, and has determined that
it is appropriate to postpone
enforcement of these supplementary
rules for 30 days after the effective date
of these supplementary rules. During
that time, the BLM plans to concentrate
on education and outreach. The
proposed regulatory text referring to a
grace period has been revised to provide
for a specific enforcement date that is 30
days after the effective date of these
supplementary rules. This revised
language appears in the penalty
provision (i.e., paragraph (7)) of these
supplementary rules.
These supplementary rules are in
conformance with all BLM land use
PO 00000
Frm 00059
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
43707
plans within Idaho. The final
supplementary rules are consistent with
and supportive of the statewide
Conservation Plan for the Greater SageGrouse in Idaho (Idaho Sage-Grouse
Advisory Committee, 2006), which
recommends that the use of weed-free
forage on public and state lands be
required to discourage the spread of
invasive annuals and noxious weeds.
IV. Procedural Matters
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review
These supplementary rules are not a
significant regulatory action and are not
subject to review by the Office of
Management and Budget under
Executive Order 12866. These rules will
not have an annual effect of $100
million or more on the economy. They
will not adversely affect, in a material
way, the economy, productivity,
competition, jobs, the environment,
public health or safety, or State, local,
or Tribal governments, or communities.
These final supplementary rules will
not create a serious inconsistency or
otherwise interfere with an action taken
or planned by another agency. The final
supplementary rules do not materially
alter the budgetary effects of
entitlements, grants, user fees, or loan
programs or the right or obligations of
their recipients, nor do they raise novel
legal or policy issues. They merely
impose rules regarding the use of
certified noxious-weed-free forage and
straw on BLM-administered public
lands in Idaho.
National Environmental Policy Act
The BLM has prepared an
environmental assessment (EA) titled
‘‘Implementation of Requirements for
Certified Noxious-Weed-Free Forage
and Straw On Bureau of Land
Management Lands in Idaho.’’ The final
supplementary rules do not constitute a
major Federal action significantly
affecting the quality of the human
environment under Section 102(2)(C) of
the National Environmental Policy Act
of 1969 (NEPA), 42 U.S.C. 4332(2)(C). A
detailed environmental impact
statement under NEPA is not required.
The BLM has placed the EA and the
Finding of No Significant Impact on file
in the BLM Administrative Record at
the address specified in the ADDRESSES
section. The BLM invites the public to
review these documents.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
Congress enacted the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (RFA) of 1980, as
amended, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, to ensure
that Government regulations do not
E:\FR\FM\21JYN1.SGM
21JYN1
43708
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 140 / Thursday, July 21, 2011 / Notices
unnecessarily or disproportionately
burden small entities. The RFA requires
a regulatory flexibility analysis if a rule
would have a significant economic
impact, either detrimental or beneficial,
on a substantial number of small
entities. The final supplementary rules
are not specific to commercial,
organizational, or governmental entities
of any size, but instead are widely
applicable rules to protect the natural
resources and the environment on
public lands. The rules would have no
significant impact on a substantial
number of entities of any size.
Therefore, the BLM has determined
under the RFA that these final
supplementary rules do not require
preparation of a regulatory flexibility
analysis.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act
These final supplementary rules do
not constitute a ‘‘major rule’’ as defined
at 5 U.S.C. 804(2). They would not
result in an annual effect on the
economy of $100 million or more, in a
major increase in costs or prices for
consumers, individual industries,
Federal, State, or local government
agencies, or geographic regions, or in
significant adverse effects on
competition, employment, investment,
productivity, innovation, or on the
ability of United States-based
enterprises to compete with foreignbased enterprises in domestic and
export markets. They would merely
impose rules regarding the use of
certified noxious-weed-free forage and
straw on BLM-administered public
lands in Idaho.
wreier-aviles on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with NOTICES
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
These final supplementary rules do
not impose an unfunded mandate on
State, local, or Tribal governments in
the aggregate, or the private sector, of
more than $100 million per year, nor do
these final supplementary rules have a
significant or unique effect on small
governments. The final supplementary
rules do not require anything of State,
local, or Tribal governments. Therefore,
the BLM is not required to prepare a
statement containing the information
required by the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act (2 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).
Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference With
Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights (Takings)
The final supplementary rules are not
government action capable of interfering
with constitutionally protected property
rights. The final supplementary rules do
not have takings implications, do not
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:00 Jul 20, 2011
Jkt 223001
address property rights in any form, and
do not cause the impairment of anyone’s
property rights. Therefore, the
Department of the Interior has
determined that the final supplementary
rules would not cause a taking of private
property or require further discussion of
takings implications under this
Executive Order.
Executive Order 13132, Federalism
The final supplementary rules will
not have a substantial direct effect on
the States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. The final
supplementary rules apply in only one
State, Idaho, and do not address
jurisdictional issues involving the Idaho
State Government. Therefore, in
accordance with Executive Order 13132,
the BLM has determined that these final
supplementary rules do not have
sufficient Federalism implications to
warrant preparation of a Federalism
Assessment.
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform
Under Executive Order 12988, the
BLM Idaho State Office has determined
that these final supplementary rules
would not unduly burden the judicial
system and that they meet the
requirements of sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of the Order.
Executive Order 13175, Consultation
and Coordination With Indian
TribalGovernments
In accordance with Executive Order
13175, the proposed supplementary
rules and EA were mailed to all Idaho
Tribes for comment. Consultation was
conducted with the Shoshone-Paiute
Tribes, and no concerns were expressed.
In addition, the BLM Idaho State Office
has found that the final supplementary
rules do not include policies that have
tribal implications.
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use
These final supplementary rules are
not a significant energy action. The
rules will not have an adverse effect on
energy supplies, distribution, or use.
They only address the use of certified
noxious-weed-free forage and straw on
public lands and have no connection
with energy policy.
Paperwork Reduction Act
These final supplementary rules do
not contain information collection
PO 00000
Frm 00060
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
requirements that the Office of
Management and Budget must approve
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995, 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.
Author
The principal author of these final
supplementary rules is Roger
Rosentreter, Botanist, BLM Idaho State
Office.
For the reasons stated in the preamble
and under the authorities for
supplementary rules at 43 U.S.C.
1733(a) and 1740 and 43 CFR 8365.1–
6, the BLM Idaho State Director
establishes final supplementary rules for
public lands managed by the BLM in
Idaho, to read as follows:
Supplementary Rules To Require the
Use of Certified Noxious Weed-Free
Forage on Bureau of Land ManagementAdministered Lands in Idaho
(1) To prevent the spread of noxious
weeds on BLM-administered public
lands in Idaho, it is a prohibited act to
feed or store forage or straw on BLMadministered land that has not been
certified as noxious-weed-free.
Restoration, rehabilitation, and
stabilization projects also are required to
use noxious-weed-free straw bales and
mulch for project work.
(2) The certification program
currently includes 57 weeds that have
been designated as noxious in Idaho
under the Idaho State noxious-weed-free
standards, or certified to be free from
those weeds designated in the North
American Weed Free Forage Program
list, which was developed by the North
American Weed Management
Association (NAWMA). This NAWMA
list currently includes the 57 weeds
designated noxious in Idaho and also
includes an additional 15 invasive
weeds. The BLM in Idaho allows forage
that meets Idaho, NAWMA, or other
States’ standards for certification as
noxious-weed-free. Although weeds
may be added or removed from these
various lists, the BLM recognizes this
forage as certified noxious-weed-free as
long as it has been marked indicating
that it meets the standards for
certification.
(3) Certified noxious-weed-free hay
must be identified by one of the
following:
(a) State certification tag attached to
the bale string;
(b) At least one strand of purple and
yellow (intertwined) bale twine
encircling the bale;
(c) Blue and orange (intertwined) bale
twine encircling the bale; or
(d) Other colored twine encircling the
bale that is used to designate certified
forage.
E:\FR\FM\21JYN1.SGM
21JYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 140 / Thursday, July 21, 2011 / Notices
(4) Certified noxious-weed-free
compressed forage bales are identified
by strapping/binding material
authorized by NAWMA with the same
color and marking requirements on
products certified by other NAWMA
approved agencies.
(5) Certified noxious-weed-free forage
in bags is identified by a stamp, sticker,
or printing on the bag identifying it as
certified forage.
(6) The following persons/activities
are exempt from these supplementary
rules:
(a) Any person with a permit or letter
signed by a BLM authorized officer
specifically authorizing the prohibited
act, such as an authorized livestock
permittee during an emergency situation
in which livestock must be fed
uncertified forage or hay for a short
period of time until they can be moved
to safety; and
(b) Any person transporting hay or
forage across public lands from private
property to private property.
(7) Any person who knowingly and
willfully violates the provisions of these
supplementary rules on or after
September 19, 2011 may be required to
appear before a United States Magistrate
and may be subject to a fine of not more
than $1,000 or imprisonment of not
more than 12 months, or both, in
accordance with 43 U.S.C. 1733(a) and
43 CFR 8360.0–7.
Such violations may also be subject to
enhanced fines provided for by 18
U.S.C. 3571.
Steven A. Ellis,
Idaho State Director, Bureau of Land
Management.
[FR Doc. 2011–18336 Filed 7–20–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–GG–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service
[2253–665]
Notice of Inventory Completion:
Denver Museum of Nature & Science,
Denver, CO
National Park Service, Interior.
Notice.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Denver Museum of
Nature & Science has completed an
inventory of human remains and
associated funerary objects, in
consultation with the appropriate
Indian tribes, and has determined that
there is a cultural affiliation between the
human remains and associated funerary
objects and present-day Indian tribes.
Representatives of any Indian tribe that
wreier-aviles on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:00 Jul 20, 2011
Jkt 223001
believes itself to be culturally affiliated
with the human remains and associated
funerary objects may contact the Denver
Museum of Nature & Science.
Repatriation of the human remains and
associated funerary objects to the Indian
tribes stated below may occur if no
additional claimants come forward.
DATES: Representatives of any Indian
tribe that believes it has a cultural
affiliation with the human remains and
associated funerary objects should
contact the Denver Museum of Nature &
Science at the address below by August
22, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Chip ColwellChanthaphonh, Denver Museum of
Nature & Science, 2001 Colorado Blvd.,
Denver, CO 80204, telephone (303) 370–
6378.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is
here given in accordance with the
Native American Graves Protection and
Repatriation Act (NAGPRA), 25 U.S.C.
3003, of the completion of an inventory
of human remains and associated
funerary objects in the possession of the
Denver Museum of Nature & Science,
Denver, CO. The human remains and
associated funerary objects were
removed from Lancaster County, PA.
This notice is published as part of the
National Park Service’s administrative
responsibilities under NAGPRA, 25
U.S.C. 3003(d)(3). The determinations in
this notice are the sole responsibility of
the museum, institution, or Federal
agency that has control of the Native
American human remains and
associated funerary objects. The
National Park Service is not responsible
for the determinations in this notice.
Consultation
A detailed assessment of the human
remains was made by the Denver
Museum of Nature & Science
professional staff in consultation with
representatives of the AbsenteeShawnee Tribe of Indians of Oklahoma;
Cayuga Nation of New York; Delaware
Nation, Oklahoma; Delaware Tribe of
Indians, Oklahoma; Eastern Shawnee
Tribe of Oklahoma; Oneida Nation of
New York; Oneida Tribe of Indians of
Wisconsin; Onondaga Nation of New
York; Saint Regis Mohawk Tribe, New
York; Seneca Nation of New York;
Seneca-Cayuga Tribe of Oklahoma;
Shawnee Tribe, Oklahoma; Stockbridge
Munsee Community, Wisconsin;
Tonawanda Band of Seneca Indians;
Tuscarora Nation of New York; and the
Haudenosaunee Standing Committee on
Burial Rules and Regulations, a nonFederally recognized Indian
organization for the purposes of
NAGPRA.
PO 00000
Frm 00061
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
43709
History and Description of the Remains
Between 1926 and 1932, human
remains representing a minimum of two
individuals were removed from a burial
context at the Keller Site (a burial
component of the Washington Boro
Village Site), in Lancaster County, PA,
by Gerald B. Fenstermaker. On
December 15, 1965, Francis and Mary
Crane purchased the human remains as
a part of a larger collection from Mr.
Fenstermaker. At the time of the
purchase, the human remains were on
loan to the Hershey Museum, in
Hershey, PA, where they remained until
they were collected by the Cranes on
October 18, 1966. In 1983, the Cranes
donated the human remains to the
Denver Museum of Natural History, as
the museum was then called, and the
remains were accessioned into the
collections (DMNS catalogue numbers
AC.9471 and AC.9542). The human
remains are represented by one corked
vial of cut hair and ten teeth. Through
research and consultation, it was
determined that the hair and teeth are
human remains under NAGPRA. The
human remains were originally
determined to be culturally
unidentifiable, but have been
subsequently culturally affiliated. No
known individuals were identified. The
four associated funerary objects are one
corked vial of white paint (AC.9472);
one corked vial of red paint (AC.9473);
a double-necked ceramic jar (AC.9474);
and one necklace, which is made from
red, white, blue, and black trade beads,
four copper bells, two tubular copper
beads, one bear tooth, and one scoop
spoon made from a brass kettle
(AC.9542).
Between 1926 and 1935, human
remains representing a minimum of one
individual were removed from a burial
context in Pennsylvania by Gerald B.
Fenstermaker. Based on museum
records, Mr. Fenstermaker’s collection
history, and the associated funerary
objects, dating to the Contact period, it
is likely that these human remains were
removed from the Washington Boro
Village Site, in Lancaster County, PA.
On December 15, 1965, the Cranes also
purchased these human remains from
Mr. Fenstermaker. In 1983, the Cranes
donated the human remains to the
museum and the remains were
accessioned into the collections
(AC.9812A). The human remains are
represented by five teeth. Through
research and consultation, it was
determined that the teeth are human
remains under NAGPRA. The human
remains were originally determined to
be culturally unidentifiable, but have
been subsequently culturally affiliated.
E:\FR\FM\21JYN1.SGM
21JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 140 (Thursday, July 21, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 43706-43709]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-18336]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
[LLID-931-000-L1020-0000-JP-0000252R]
Final Supplementary Rules To Require the Use of Certified
Noxious-Weed-Free Forage and Straw on Bureau of Land Management Lands
in the State of Idaho
AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.
ACTION: Final supplementary rules.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) in Idaho is finalizing a
supplementary rule that will require anyone using, feeding, or storing
forage or straw on BLM-administered land in Idaho to use certified
noxious-weed-free forage and straw. Restoration, rehabilitation, and
stabilization projects also will be required to use weed-free straw
bales and mulch for project work. This action is a cooperative effort
among the BLM, the U.S. Forest Service (USFS), and the Idaho State
Department of Agriculture (ISDA) that supports Idaho State noxious weed
laws.
DATES: These supplementary rules are effective August 22, 2011.
ADDRESSES: You may direct inquiries by letter to Roger Rosentreter,
Botanist, Bureau of Land Management, 1387 S. Vinnell Way, Boise, ID
83709, or by e-mail to Roger_Rosentreter@blm.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Roger Rosentreter, Botanist, Bureau of
Land Management, 1387 S. Vinnell Way, Boise, ID 83709; telephone (208)
373-3824; e-mail Roger_Rosentreter@blm.gov. Persons who use a
telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD) may call the Federal
Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-8339 to contact the above
individual during normal business hours. The FIRS is available 24 hours
a day, 7 days a week, to leave a message or question with the above
individual. You will receive a reply during normal business hours.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
II. Discussion of Public Comments
III. Discussion of the Final Supplementary Rules
IV. Procedural Matters
I. Background
Noxious and invasive weeds are a serious problem in the Western
United States. Noxious weeds are spreading on BLM lands at a rate of
over 2,300 acres per day, and on all Western public lands at
approximately 4,600 acres per day. Species such as perennial
pepperweed, purple loosestrife, yellow starthistle, hoary cress
(whitetop), leafy spurge, diffuse knapweed, spotted knapweed, Russian
knapweed, Scotch thistle, Canada thistle, rush skeletonweed, and many
others are non-native to the United States and have no natural enemies
to keep their populations in balance. Consequently, depending on the
circumstances (e.g., weed(s) involved, soil type, range condition, and
climatic influences), these undesirable weeds may rapidly invade
healthy ecosystems, displace native vegetation, reduce species
diversity, destroy wildlife habitat, reduce forage for wild and
domestic ungulates, weaken rehabilitation and landscape restoration
efforts, increase soil erosion and stream sedimentation, create fire
hazards, and/or degrade special resource values.
To curb the spread of noxious weeds, a growing number of Western
States have jointly developed noxious-weed-free forage certification
standards, and in cooperation with various Federal, State, and county
agencies, have also passed weed management laws. Idaho participates in
a regional inspection-certification process with Oregon, Montana,
Washington, Nevada, and Wyoming and encourages, on a voluntary basis,
forage producers in Idaho to grow and request voluntary certification
inspections of forage products and straw.
Because forage products and straw containing noxious weed seed
contribute to the spread and establishment of weed infestations, the
USFS promulgated regulations in 1996, known as a ``Weed Free Hay
Order,'' to address this issue. In response to that Order, the State of
Idaho implemented a noxious-weed-free forage and straw certification
program in 1997. Under Idaho Code, the ISDA wrote regulations in 2007
(Title 22, chapter 24 Noxious-Weed-Free Forage and Straw Rules and
IDAPA 02.06.31). This program, which is a cooperative effort between
the ISDA and the USFS, was established to limit the introduction and
spread of noxious weeds through forage and straw onto National Forest
System lands and other lands within Idaho. The Federal Plant Protection
Act of 2000 (7 U.S.C. 7701-7751) directs agencies to develop integrated
management plans for noxious weeds. These supplementary rules are
intended to complement the existing regulatory framework.
These supplementary rules are promulgated under the authority of
the Federal Land Policy and Management Act (FLPMA) of 1976 (43 U.S.C.
1733(a) and 1740) and 43 CFR 8365.1-6.
[[Page 43707]]
II. Discussion of Public Comments
The BLM Idaho State Office proposed supplementary rules in the
Federal Register on September 21, 2010 (75 FR 57496). Public comments
were accepted for a 60-day period ending on November 22, 2010. The BLM
received three written comments concerning the proposed rules. All
three comments supported the proposed supplementary rules.
Two of the comments suggested revising proposed paragraph (4):
``Certified noxious-weed-free compressed forage bales are identified
with yellow binding (strapping) material with the statement `ISDA
NWFFS' and the manufacturer's name printed in purple.'' The commenters
suggested that the paragraph be reworded as follows: ``Certified
noxious-weed-free compressed forage bales are identified by strapping/
binding material authorized by NAWMA [the North American Weed
Management Association] with the same color and marking requirements on
products certified by other NAWMA approved agencies.'' This revision is
consistent with the use of certification identifiers required by other
agencies, and has been included in the final supplementary rules.
The third comment suggested that the BLM monitor livestock for what
they have eaten during the three days before they are turned out onto
the public lands, to address the possibility that weed seeds might pass
through the digestive tracts of the livestock and subsequently
germinate on the rangelands. Although there is a slight possibility of
weed seeds surviving in this manner, BLM staff concluded that the
resources and logistics of such monitoring would provide marginal
benefit and would result in a significant regulatory burden for the
agency and public. Consequently, these supplementary rules were not
amended as suggested.
III. Discussion of the Final Supplementary Rules
The final supplementary rules apply to BLM-administered lands in
Idaho and provide for consistent management with National Forest System
lands across jurisdictional boundaries. The final supplementary rules
will be implemented by including a standard stipulation in all Special
Recreation Permits and most other use authorizations. Livestock grazing
permits would not need to include such a stipulation because 43 CFR
4140.1(a)(3) already requires the permittee to secure authorization
before supplemental feeding, maintenance feeding, and emergency feeding
on lands administered by the BLM.
The supplementary rules require holders of affected permits and use
authorizations to use certified noxious-weed-free forage and straw when
they use hay, cubes, and straw on BLM-administered public lands in
Idaho. Affected permittees includes recreationists using pack and
saddle stock, grazing permittees, outfitters, and contractors and
operators who use straw or mulch for reclamation or re-seeding
purposes. These individuals or groups are required to use certified
noxious-weed-free forage and straw while on BLM-administered public
lands in Idaho, unless they have a permit or letter signed by a BLM
authorized officer specifically authorizing the otherwise-prohibited
act, or are transporting forage across public lands from one private
property to another private property. The BLM in Idaho allows forage
certified by other States to be used as forage on lands administered by
Idaho BLM offices.
In addition, in cooperation with the USFS hay closure and the Idaho
State Department of Agriculture (ISDA) Noxious-Weed-Free Forage and
Straw Certification (NWFFS) program, the BLM prohibits the use of
forage and straw that has not been certified as noxious-weed-free for
all BLM-administered public lands within Idaho. The BLM State Office in
Idaho, in cooperation with the ISDA, will implement a public
information plan intended to publicize the supplementary rules and
notify visitors and land users where they can purchase state-certified
noxious-weed-free forage and straw.
Paragraph (1) of the proposed supplementary rules provided for a
60-day grace period between the effective date and enforcement of the
supplementary rules. The BLM recognizes that immediate compliance with
these supplementary rules might not be realistic, and has determined
that it is appropriate to postpone enforcement of these supplementary
rules for 30 days after the effective date of these supplementary
rules. During that time, the BLM plans to concentrate on education and
outreach. The proposed regulatory text referring to a grace period has
been revised to provide for a specific enforcement date that is 30 days
after the effective date of these supplementary rules. This revised
language appears in the penalty provision (i.e., paragraph (7)) of
these supplementary rules.
These supplementary rules are in conformance with all BLM land use
plans within Idaho. The final supplementary rules are consistent with
and supportive of the statewide Conservation Plan for the Greater Sage-
Grouse in Idaho (Idaho Sage-Grouse Advisory Committee, 2006), which
recommends that the use of weed-free forage on public and state lands
be required to discourage the spread of invasive annuals and noxious
weeds.
IV. Procedural Matters
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review
These supplementary rules are not a significant regulatory action
and are not subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget
under Executive Order 12866. These rules will not have an annual effect
of $100 million or more on the economy. They will not adversely affect,
in a material way, the economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the
environment, public health or safety, or State, local, or Tribal
governments, or communities. These final supplementary rules will not
create a serious inconsistency or otherwise interfere with an action
taken or planned by another agency. The final supplementary rules do
not materially alter the budgetary effects of entitlements, grants,
user fees, or loan programs or the right or obligations of their
recipients, nor do they raise novel legal or policy issues. They merely
impose rules regarding the use of certified noxious-weed-free forage
and straw on BLM-administered public lands in Idaho.
National Environmental Policy Act
The BLM has prepared an environmental assessment (EA) titled
``Implementation of Requirements for Certified Noxious-Weed-Free Forage
and Straw On Bureau of Land Management Lands in Idaho.'' The final
supplementary rules do not constitute a major Federal action
significantly affecting the quality of the human environment under
Section 102(2)(C) of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA), 42 U.S.C. 4332(2)(C). A detailed environmental impact statement
under NEPA is not required. The BLM has placed the EA and the Finding
of No Significant Impact on file in the BLM Administrative Record at
the address specified in the ADDRESSES section. The BLM invites the
public to review these documents.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
Congress enacted the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) of 1980, as
amended, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, to ensure that Government regulations do not
[[Page 43708]]
unnecessarily or disproportionately burden small entities. The RFA
requires a regulatory flexibility analysis if a rule would have a
significant economic impact, either detrimental or beneficial, on a
substantial number of small entities. The final supplementary rules are
not specific to commercial, organizational, or governmental entities of
any size, but instead are widely applicable rules to protect the
natural resources and the environment on public lands. The rules would
have no significant impact on a substantial number of entities of any
size. Therefore, the BLM has determined under the RFA that these final
supplementary rules do not require preparation of a regulatory
flexibility analysis.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act
These final supplementary rules do not constitute a ``major rule''
as defined at 5 U.S.C. 804(2). They would not result in an annual
effect on the economy of $100 million or more, in a major increase in
costs or prices for consumers, individual industries, Federal, State,
or local government agencies, or geographic regions, or in significant
adverse effects on competition, employment, investment, productivity,
innovation, or on the ability of United States-based enterprises to
compete with foreign-based enterprises in domestic and export markets.
They would merely impose rules regarding the use of certified noxious-
weed-free forage and straw on BLM-administered public lands in Idaho.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
These final supplementary rules do not impose an unfunded mandate
on State, local, or Tribal governments in the aggregate, or the private
sector, of more than $100 million per year, nor do these final
supplementary rules have a significant or unique effect on small
governments. The final supplementary rules do not require anything of
State, local, or Tribal governments. Therefore, the BLM is not required
to prepare a statement containing the information required by the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (2 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).
Executive Order 12630, Governmental Actions and Interference With
Constitutionally Protected Property Rights (Takings)
The final supplementary rules are not government action capable of
interfering with constitutionally protected property rights. The final
supplementary rules do not have takings implications, do not address
property rights in any form, and do not cause the impairment of
anyone's property rights. Therefore, the Department of the Interior has
determined that the final supplementary rules would not cause a taking
of private property or require further discussion of takings
implications under this Executive Order.
Executive Order 13132, Federalism
The final supplementary rules will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government. The final
supplementary rules apply in only one State, Idaho, and do not address
jurisdictional issues involving the Idaho State Government. Therefore,
in accordance with Executive Order 13132, the BLM has determined that
these final supplementary rules do not have sufficient Federalism
implications to warrant preparation of a Federalism Assessment.
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform
Under Executive Order 12988, the BLM Idaho State Office has
determined that these final supplementary rules would not unduly burden
the judicial system and that they meet the requirements of sections
3(a) and 3(b)(2) of the Order.
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination With Indian
TribalGovernments
In accordance with Executive Order 13175, the proposed
supplementary rules and EA were mailed to all Idaho Tribes for comment.
Consultation was conducted with the Shoshone-Paiute Tribes, and no
concerns were expressed. In addition, the BLM Idaho State Office has
found that the final supplementary rules do not include policies that
have tribal implications.
Executive Order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use
These final supplementary rules are not a significant energy
action. The rules will not have an adverse effect on energy supplies,
distribution, or use. They only address the use of certified noxious-
weed-free forage and straw on public lands and have no connection with
energy policy.
Paperwork Reduction Act
These final supplementary rules do not contain information
collection requirements that the Office of Management and Budget must
approve under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C. 3501 et
seq.
Author
The principal author of these final supplementary rules is Roger
Rosentreter, Botanist, BLM Idaho State Office.
For the reasons stated in the preamble and under the authorities
for supplementary rules at 43 U.S.C. 1733(a) and 1740 and 43 CFR
8365.1-6, the BLM Idaho State Director establishes final supplementary
rules for public lands managed by the BLM in Idaho, to read as follows:
Supplementary Rules To Require the Use of Certified Noxious Weed-Free
Forage on Bureau of Land Management-Administered Lands in Idaho
(1) To prevent the spread of noxious weeds on BLM-administered
public lands in Idaho, it is a prohibited act to feed or store forage
or straw on BLM-administered land that has not been certified as
noxious-weed-free. Restoration, rehabilitation, and stabilization
projects also are required to use noxious-weed-free straw bales and
mulch for project work.
(2) The certification program currently includes 57 weeds that have
been designated as noxious in Idaho under the Idaho State noxious-weed-
free standards, or certified to be free from those weeds designated in
the North American Weed Free Forage Program list, which was developed
by the North American Weed Management Association (NAWMA). This NAWMA
list currently includes the 57 weeds designated noxious in Idaho and
also includes an additional 15 invasive weeds. The BLM in Idaho allows
forage that meets Idaho, NAWMA, or other States' standards for
certification as noxious-weed-free. Although weeds may be added or
removed from these various lists, the BLM recognizes this forage as
certified noxious-weed-free as long as it has been marked indicating
that it meets the standards for certification.
(3) Certified noxious-weed-free hay must be identified by one of
the following:
(a) State certification tag attached to the bale string;
(b) At least one strand of purple and yellow (intertwined) bale
twine encircling the bale;
(c) Blue and orange (intertwined) bale twine encircling the bale;
or
(d) Other colored twine encircling the bale that is used to
designate certified forage.
[[Page 43709]]
(4) Certified noxious-weed-free compressed forage bales are
identified by strapping/binding material authorized by NAWMA with the
same color and marking requirements on products certified by other
NAWMA approved agencies.
(5) Certified noxious-weed-free forage in bags is identified by a
stamp, sticker, or printing on the bag identifying it as certified
forage.
(6) The following persons/activities are exempt from these
supplementary rules:
(a) Any person with a permit or letter signed by a BLM authorized
officer specifically authorizing the prohibited act, such as an
authorized livestock permittee during an emergency situation in which
livestock must be fed uncertified forage or hay for a short period of
time until they can be moved to safety; and
(b) Any person transporting hay or forage across public lands from
private property to private property.
(7) Any person who knowingly and willfully violates the provisions
of these supplementary rules on or after September 19, 2011 may be
required to appear before a United States Magistrate and may be subject
to a fine of not more than $1,000 or imprisonment of not more than 12
months, or both, in accordance with 43 U.S.C. 1733(a) and 43 CFR
8360.0-7.
Such violations may also be subject to enhanced fines provided for
by 18 U.S.C. 3571.
Steven A. Ellis,
Idaho State Director, Bureau of Land Management.
[FR Doc. 2011-18336 Filed 7-20-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-GG-P