Common Crop Insurance Regulations; Onion Crop Insurance Provisions, 43606-43610 [2011-18053]
Download as PDF
43606
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
Vol. 76, No. 140
Thursday, July 21, 2011
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains notices to the public of the proposed
issuance of rules and regulations. The
purpose of these notices is to give interested
persons an opportunity to participate in the
rule making prior to the adoption of the final
rules.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Federal Crop Insurance Corporation
7 CFR Part 457
[Docket No. FCIC–11–0004]
RIN 0563–AC29
Common Crop Insurance Regulations;
Onion Crop Insurance Provisions
Federal Crop Insurance
Corporation, USDA.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The Federal Crop Insurance
Corporation (FCIC) proposes to amend
the Common Crop Insurance
Regulations, Onion Crop Insurance
Provisions. The intended effect of this
action is to provide policy changes, to
clarify existing policy provisions to
better meet the needs of insured
producers, and to reduce vulnerability
to program fraud, waste, and abuse. The
proposed changes will be effective for
the 2013 and succeeding crop years.
DATES: Written comments and opinions
on this proposed rule will be accepted
until close of business September 19,
2011 and will be considered when the
rule is to be made final.
ADDRESSES: FCIC prefers that comments
be submitted electronically through the
Federal eRulemaking Portal. You may
submit comments, identified by Docket
ID No. FCIC–11–0004, by any of the
following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Mail: Director, Product
Administration and Standards Division,
Risk Management Agency, United States
Department of Agriculture, P.O. Box
419205, Kansas City, MO 64133–6205.
All comments received, including
those received by mail, will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided, and can
be accessed by the public. All comments
must include the agency name and
docket number or Regulatory
wreier-aviles on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:58 Jul 20, 2011
Jkt 223001
Information Number (RIN) for this rule.
For detailed instructions on submitting
comments and additional information,
see https://www.regulations.gov. If you
are submitting comments electronically
through the Federal eRulemaking Portal
and want to attach a document, we ask
that it be in a text-based format. If you
want to attach a document that is a
scanned Adobe PDF file, it must be
scanned as text and not as an image,
thus allowing FCIC to search and copy
certain portions of your submission. For
questions regarding attaching a
document that is a scanned Adobe PDF
file, please contact the RMA Web
Content Team at (816) 823–4694 or by
e-mail at
rmaweb.content@rma.usda.gov.
Privacy Act: Anyone is able to search
the electronic form of all comments
received for any dockets by the name of
the individual submitting the comment
(or signing the comment, if submitted
on behalf of an association, business,
labor union, etc.). You may review the
complete User Notice and Privacy
Notice for Regulations.gov at https://
www.regulations.gov/#!privacyNotice.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Director, Product Administration and
Standards Division, Risk Management
Agency, United States Department of
Agriculture, Beacon Facility, Stop 0812,
Room 421, P.O. Box 419205, Kansas
City, MO 64141–6205, telephone (816)
926–7730.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Executive Order 12866
This rule has been determined to be
non-significant for the purposes of
Executive Order 12866 and, therefore, it
has not been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget.
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
Pursuant to the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. chapter 35), the collections of
information in this rule have been
approved by OMB under control
number 0563–0053.
E-Government Act Compliance
FCIC is committed to complying with
the E-Government Act, to promote the
use of the Internet and other
information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizen
access to Government information and
services, and for other purposes.
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA) establishes
requirements for Federal agencies to
assess the effects of their regulatory
actions on State, local, and tribal
governments and the private sector.
This rule contains no Federal mandates
(under the regulatory provisions of title
II of the UMRA) for State, local, and
tribal governments or the private sector.
Therefore, this rule is not subject to the
requirements of sections 202 and 205 of
UMRA.
Executive Order 13132
It has been determined under section
1(a) of Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, that this rule does not have
sufficient implications to warrant
consultation with the States. The
provisions contained in this rule will
not have a substantial direct effect on
States, or on the relationship between
the national government and the States,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
Executive Order 13175
This rule has been reviewed in
accordance with the requirements of
Executive Order 13175, Consultation
and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments. The review reveals that
this regulation will not have substantial
and direct effects on Tribal governments
and will not have significant Tribal
implications.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
FCIC certifies that this regulation will
not have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small
entities. Program requirements for the
Federal crop insurance program are the
same for all producers regardless of the
size of their farming operation. For
instance, all producers are required to
submit an application and acreage
report to establish their insurance
guarantees and compute premium
amounts, and all producers are required
to submit a notice of loss and
production information to determine the
amount of an indemnity payment in the
event of an insured cause of crop loss.
Whether a producer has 10 acres or
1000 acres, there is no difference in the
kind of information collected. To ensure
crop insurance is available to small
E:\FR\FM\21JYP1.SGM
21JYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 140 / Thursday, July 21, 2011 / Proposed Rules
entities, the Federal Crop Insurance Act
authorizes FCIC to waive collection of
administrative fees from limited
resource farmers. FCIC believes this
waiver helps to ensure that small
entities are given the same opportunities
as large entities to manage their risks
through the use of crop insurance. A
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis has not
been prepared since this regulation does
not have an impact on small entities,
and, therefore, this regulation is exempt
from the provisions of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 605).
Federal Assistance Program
This program is listed in the Catalog
of Federal Domestic Assistance under
No. 10.450.
Executive Order 12372
This program is not subject to the
provisions of Executive Order 12372,
which require intergovernmental
consultation with State and local
officials. See the Notice related to 7 CFR
part 3015, subpart V, published at 48 FR
29115, June 24, 1983.
Executive Order 12988
This proposed rule has been reviewed
in accordance with Executive Order
12988 on civil justice reform. The
provisions of this rule will not have a
retroactive effect. The provisions of this
rule will preempt State and local laws
to the extent such State and local laws
are inconsistent herewith. With respect
to any direct action taken by FCIC or to
require the insurance provider to take
specific action under the terms of the
crop insurance policy, the
administrative appeal provisions
published at 7 CFR part 11 or 7 CFR part
400, subpart J for the informal
administrative review process of good
farming practices as applicable, must be
exhausted before any action against
FCIC for judicial review may be brought.
wreier-aviles on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with PROPOSALS
Environmental Evaluation
This action is not expected to have a
significant economic impact on the
quality of the human environment,
health, or safety. Therefore, neither an
Environmental Assessment nor an
Environmental Impact Statement is
needed.
Background
FCIC proposes to amend the Common
Crop Insurance Regulations (7 CFR part
457) by revising § 457.135, Onion Crop
Insurance Provisions, to be effective for
the 2013 and succeeding crop years.
Several requests have been made for
changes to improve the insurance
coverage offered, address program
integrity issues, simplify program
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:58 Jul 20, 2011
Jkt 223001
administration, and improve clarity of
the policy provisions.
The proposed changes are as follows:
1. FCIC proposes to remove all section
titles of the Basic Provisions. This
information is currently contained in
parenthesis following references to
section numbers of the Basic Provisions
throughout the Crop Provisions.
2. Section 1—FCIC proposes to revise
the definitions of ‘‘direct seeded’’ and
‘‘transplanted’’ by adding the phrase
‘‘onions planted by’’ to the beginning of
both definitions. This revision will
further clarify that these terms are a
planting method.
FCIC proposes to revise the definition
of ‘‘non-storage onions’’ by removing
the term generally in both places it is
used, since this term is vague and
ambiguous. The characteristics listed
are those considered for non-storage
onions.
FCIC proposes to revise the definition
of ‘‘onion production’’ by removing the
language regarding recoverable size and
condition, since these terms are vague
and ambiguous.
FCIC proposes to add the definitions
of ‘‘processor’’ and ‘‘processor contract’’
because the terms are used in the
definition of ‘‘storage onions.’’
FCIC proposes to revise paragraph (a)
of the definition of ‘‘production
guarantee (per acre)’’ by changing the
first stage production guarantee for
direct seeded and transplanted storage
and non-storage onions from thirty-five
percent to forty-five percent of the final
stage production guarantee. The Special
Provisions already establish a higher
first stage production guarantee for most
onion producing areas. Also, a
contracted onion crop insurance
evaluation found that a first stage loss
incurs more production costs than a
prevented planting loss and, therefore,
should have a higher production
guarantee compared to prevented
planting. This change will coincide with
the lowering of the prevented planting
guarantee in section 15 from forty-five
percent to thirty-five percent of the final
stage guarantee. FCIC also proposes to
revise paragraph (b) by adding ‘‘60%’’ in
parenthesis following the written phrase
‘‘60 percent’’ for consistency.
FCIC proposes to add the definition
‘‘sets’’ to specify they are onion bulbs
that are planted by hand or by machine.
FCIC proposes to revise the definition
of ‘‘storage onions’’ by removing the
terms generally and normally, since
these terms are vague and ambiguous.
The characteristics listed are those
considered for storage onions. The
definition is also being revised to
include varieties grown for a processor
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
43607
under the requirements of a processor
contract.
FCIC proposes to revise the definition
of ‘‘topping’’ by replacing the term
‘‘bent over’’ with the term ‘‘broken.’’
FCIC proposes to remove the
definition of ‘‘type’’ as onion types will
be designated in the Special Provisions.
3. Section 2—FCIC proposes to revise
section 2 by removing the language
indicating section 2 is to be used in
place of the provisions regarding
establishing optional units in section 34
of the Basic Provisions. The provisions
in section 2 of the Onion Crop
Provisions are to be used in addition to
the provisions in section 34 of the Basic
Provisions.
4. Section 3—FCIC proposes to revise
section 3(b)(2) to add language
consistent with section 3(b)(1)
designating the end of the second stage
production guarantee. The first stage
ends at the emergence of the fourth leaf
for direct seeded or 30 days after
planting for transplanted, and the
second stage ends when the onions are
eligible for the final stage. This makes
the second stage consistent with the first
and final stage production guarantees.
FCIC proposes to revise section 3(b)(3)
by deleting duplicative language that
provides the calculation for ‘‘production
guarantee (per acre)’’ that is already
contained in paragraph (c) of the
definition in section 1.
FCIC proposes to revise section 3(c) to
clarify that the production guarantee, for
indemnity purposes, will be based on
the stage in which damage occurred for
any acreage of onions damaged in the
first or second stage when a majority of
producers in the area would not
normally continue to care for the crop,
even if the producer elects to continue
such care. FCIC also proposes to delete
the phrase ‘‘deemed to be destroyed’’ to
clarify that if the producer continues to
care for the damaged onion acreage,
then any later appraised unharvested
production or harvested production will
be used as production to count.
5. Section 4—FCIC proposes to revise
this section to list the contract change
dates because it has added coverage to
more states, which have different
contract change dates based on the
cancellation and termination dates.
FCIC also proposes to add language that
other contract change dates may be
designated in the Special Provisions.
6. Section 5—FCIC proposes to add
language to the introductory text to
allow other or changes to the
cancellation and termination dates if
designated in the Special Provisions.
FCIC proposes to add Arizona to the
states with a cancellation and
termination date of August 31.
E:\FR\FM\21JYP1.SGM
21JYP1
wreier-aviles on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with PROPOSALS
43608
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 140 / Thursday, July 21, 2011 / Proposed Rules
FCIC proposes to add the cancellation
date of September 30 and termination
date of November 30 for Hawaii.
FCIC proposes to add the cancellation
and termination date of November 30
for all California counties except Lassen,
Modoc, Shasta and Siskiyou.
7. Section 6—FCIC proposes to add a
new section 6 to require the producer to
provide a copy of all processor contracts
by the acreage reporting date, if the
Special Provisions specify a processor
contract is required to insure processing
onions. This is consistent with other
Crop Provisions in regards to processing
crops.
8. Redesignated section 8—FCIC
proposes to revise the introductory text
in redesignated section 8 to include
shallots on the list of onions that are
excluded as an insured crop, since
shallots are not insurable under these
Crop Provisions.
9. Redesignated section 10—FCIC
proposes to revise redesignated section
10(b) by adding language that the
provisions in 10(b) are to be used in
accordance with the provisions in
section 11 of the Basic Provisions.
FCIC proposes to revise redesignated
section 10(b)(1) by redesignating section
10(b)(1)(i) as 10(b)(1)(ii) and adding a
new section 10(b)(1)(i) for the end of
insurance date of May 20 for 1015 Super
Sweets, and any other non-storage
onions in Cameron, Hidalgo, Starr, and
Willacy Counties, Texas; adding a new
section 10(b)(1)(iii) to specify the end of
insurance date in Arizona is June 30 for
all storage and non-storage onions;
adding a new section 10(b)(1)(iv) to
specify the end of insurance date is July
15 for 1015 Super Sweets, and other
non-storage onions for all Texas
counties except Cameron, Hidalgo,
Starr, and Willacy; revising new section
10(b)(1)(v) by adding the phrase ‘‘fall
planted’’ and deleting the phrase ‘‘and
any other non-storage onions’’ to specify
the end of insurance date is July 31 for
fall planted Walla Walla Sweets, in the
states of Oregon and Washington;
adding a new subsection 10(b)(1)(vi) to
specify the end of insurance date is
August 31 for all non-storage onions not
otherwise specified; and adding a new
section 10(b)(1)(vii) to specify the end of
insurance date is October 15 for all
storage onions not otherwise specified.
This change will make the end of
insurance period more consistent with
the actual growing season for a specified
area.
FCIC proposes to revise redesignated
10(b)(2)(i) by removing the phrase
‘‘removal of the onions from the field’’
because the language regarding removal
is used in the definition of ‘‘harvest’’
and harvest is already a basis for the end
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:58 Jul 20, 2011
Jkt 223001
of the insurance period in section 11(b)
of the Basic Provisions.
10. Redesignated section 13—FCIC
proposes to revise redesignated section
13(a) to clarify any required
representative samples of the
unharvested crop cannot be topped,
lifted or dug. Since onions placed in
bags and boxes but not yet removed
from the field are considered
unharvested, the added language
clarifies the representative sample must
be comprised of a crop area undisturbed
by the pre-harvest processes of topping
and lifting or digging.
11. Redesignated section 14—FCIC
proposes to add an example for
settlement of claim immediately
following section 14(b)(7).
FCIC proposes to revise redesignated
section 14(c)(iv) to clarify that appraised
production for acreage that does not
qualify for the final stage guarantee is
reduced by the difference between the
first or second stage production
guarantee (as applicable) and the final
stage production guarantee to determine
the total production to count for
production lost on any acreage prior to
the final stage. FCIC also proposes to
add an example regarding the
calculation for total production to count
in a production stage loss immediately
following section 14(c)(1)(iv).
12. Redesignated section 15—FCIC
proposes to revise redesignated section
15 to decrease the prevented planting
coverage from 45 percent to 35 percent
of the final stage production guarantee.
Prevented planting coverage was
reduced to reflect the lower input costs
compared to the first stage production
guarantee, which has input costs for
planting. This change will coincide with
increasing the first stage production
guarantee for direct seeded storage and
non-storage onions from 35 percent to
45 percent of the final stage guarantee
in the definition of ‘‘production
guarantee (per acre)’’ in section 1.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 457
Crop insurance, Onion, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Proposed Rule
Accordingly, as set forth in the
preamble, the Federal Crop Insurance
Corporation proposes to amend 7 CFR
part 457 effective for the 2013 and
succeeding crop years as follows:
PART 457—COMMON CROP
INSURANCE REGULATIONS
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR
part 457 continues to read as follows:
PO 00000
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 1506(l), 1506(o).
2. Amend § 457.135 as follows:
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
a. Revise the introductory text;
b. Add definitions in section 1 for
‘‘Processor’’, ‘‘Processor contract’’, and
‘‘Sets’’; amend the definition of ‘‘Nonstorage onions’’ by removing the phrase
‘‘generally’’ everywhere it appears; and
revise the definitions of ‘‘Direct
seeded’’, ‘‘Onion production’’,
‘‘Production guarantee (per acre)’’,
‘‘Storage onions’’, ‘‘Topping’’,
‘‘Transplanted’’; and remove the
definition of ‘‘Type’’;
c. Remove the first section 2 heading
and revise section 2;
d. Amend section 3(a) by removing
the phrase ‘‘(Insurance Guarantees,
Coverage Levels, and Prices for
Determining Indemnities)’’;
e. Revise sections 3(b)(2)(i) and
3(b)(2)(ii);
f. Revise section 3(b)(3);
g. Revise section 3(c);
h. Revise section 4;
i. Revise section 5;
j. Redesignate sections 6 through 14 as
sections 7 through 15, respectively, and
add a new section 6;
k. Amend newly redesignated section
7 by removing the phrase ‘‘(Annual
Premium)’’;
l. Revise newly redesignated section 8
introductory text;
m. Amend newly redesignated section
9 introductory text by removing the
phrase ‘‘(Insurable Acreage)’’;
n. Amend newly redesignated section
10(a) by removing the phrase
‘‘(Insurance Period)’’;
o. Revise newly redesignated section
10(b);
p. Amend newly redesignated
sections 11(a) and 11(b) by removing the
phrase ‘‘(Causes of Loss)’’;
q. Amend newly redesignated section
12(a) by removing the phrase
‘‘(Replanting Payment)’’;
r. Revise newly redesignated section
13(a);
s. Amend newly redesignated section
14 by removing the phrase ‘‘section 13’’
and adding the phrase ‘‘section 14’’ in
its place everywhere it appears;
t. Add an example after newly
designated section 14(b)(7);
u. Amend newly redesignated section
14(c)(1)(i)(B) by removing the phrase
‘‘section 12’’ and adding the phrase
‘‘section 13’’ in its place;
v. Revise newly redesignated section
14(c)(1)(iv);
w. Add an example after newly
redesignated section 14(c)(1)(iv); and
x. Revise newly redesignated section
15.
The revised and added text reads as
follows:
E:\FR\FM\21JYP1.SGM
21JYP1
43609
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 140 / Thursday, July 21, 2011 / Proposed Rules
§ 457.135 Onion crop insurance
provisions.
The onion crop insurance provisions
for the 2013 and succeeding crop years
are as follows:
*
*
*
*
*
1. Definitions.
*
*
*
*
*
Direct seeded. Onions planted by
placing onion seed by machine or by
hand at the correct depth, into a
seedbed that has been properly prepared
for the planting method and production
practice.
*
*
*
*
*
Onion production. Onions with
excess dirt and foliage material removed
and that are not considered damaged
onion production.
*
*
*
*
*
Processor. Any business enterprise
regularly engaged in buying and
processing onions, that possesses all
licenses and permits for processing
onions required by the State in which it
operates, and that possesses facilities, or
has contractual access to such facilities,
with enough equipment to accept and
process contracted onions within a
reasonable amount of time after harvest.
Processor contract. A written
agreement between the producer and a
processor, containing at a minimum:
(a) The producer’s commitment to
plant and grow onions of the types
designated in the Special Provisions and
to deliver the onion production to the
processor;
(b) The processor’s commitment to
purchase all the production from a
specified number of acres or the
specified quantity of onion production
stated in the processor contract; and
(c) The price that will be paid for the
production.
Production guarantee (per acre).
(a) First stage production guarantee—
Forty-five percent (45%) of the final
stage production guarantee for direct
seeded and transplanted storage and
non-storage onions, unless otherwise
specified in the Special Provisions.
(b) Second stage production
guarantee—Seventy percent (70%) of
the final stage production guarantee for
direct seeded storage onions and 60
percent (60%) of the final stage
production guarantee for transplanted
storage onions and all non-storage
onions, unless otherwise specified in
the Special Provisions.
(c) Final stage production guarantee—
The quantity of onions (in
hundredweight) determined by
multiplying the approved yield per acre
by the coverage level percentage you
elect.
Sets. Onion bulbs that are planted by
hand or by machine.
Storage onions. Onions other than a
Bermuda, Granex, or Grano variety, or
hybrids developed from these varieties
that are harvested as a bulb and dried
to a lower moisture content, are firmer,
have more outer layers of paper-like
skin, and are darker in color than nonstorage onions. They are more pungent,
have a lower sugar content, and can be
stored for several months under proper
conditions prior to use without
deterioration. Includes varieties grown
for a processor under the requirements
of a processor contract.
Topping. A pre-harvest process to
initiate curing, in which onion foliage is
removed or broken.
Transplanted. Onions planted by
placing of the onion plant or bulb, by
machine or by hand at the correct depth,
into a seedbed that has been properly
prepared for the planting method and
production practice.
2. Unit Division.
In addition to the requirements of
section 34 of the Basic Provisions,
optional units may be established by
type, if separate types are designated in
the Special Provisions.
3. * * *
(b) * * *
(2) * * *
(i) For direct seeded storage and nonstorage onions, from the emergence of
the fourth leaf until eligible for the final
stage; and
(ii) For transplanted storage and nonstorage onions, from the 31st day after
transplanting of onion plants or sets
until eligible for the final stage.
(3) Final stage extends from the
completion of topping and lifting or
digging on the acreage until the end of
the insurance period.
(c) The indemnity payable for any
acreage of onions will be based on the
stage the plants had achieved when
damage occurred. Any acreage of onions
damaged in the first or second stage, to
the extent that the majority of producers
in the area would not normally further
care for the onions, will have a
production guarantee, for indemnity
purposes, based on the stage in which
the damage occurred, even if you
continue to care for the damaged
onions.
4. Contract Changes.
In accordance with section 4 of the
Basic Provisions, the contract change
date is:
(a) June 30 preceding the cancellation
date for counties with an August 31,
September 30, or November 30
cancellation date;
(b) November 30 preceding the
cancellation date for counties with a
February 1 cancellation date; or
(c) As designated in the Special
Provisions.
5. Cancellation and Termination
Dates.
In accordance with section 2 of the
Basic Provisions, the cancellation and
termination dates are as follows, unless
otherwise designated in the Special
Provisions:
Cancellation date
Arizona; Georgia; Kinney, Uvalde, Medina, Bexar, Wilson, Karnes, Bee, and
San Patricio Counties, Texas, and all Texas Counties lying south thereof.
Umatilla County, Oregon; and Walla Walla County, Washington ..........................
Hawaii .....................................................................................................................
All California Counties, except Lassen, Modoc, Shasta and Siskiyou ...................
All other states and counties ..................................................................................
wreier-aviles on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with PROPOSALS
State & county
August 31 ..............................................
August 31.
August 31 ..............................................
September 30 ........................................
November 30 .........................................
February 1 .............................................
September 30.
November 30.
November 30.
February 1.
6. Report of Acreage.
In addition to the provisions of
section 6 of the Basic Provisions, if the
Special Provisions require a processor
contract to insure your onions, you must
provide a copy of all your processor
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:58 Jul 20, 2011
Jkt 223001
contracts to us on or before the acreage
reporting date.
*
*
*
*
*
8. * * *
In accordance with section 8 of the
Basic Provisions, the crop insured will
be all the storage and non-storage
onions (excluding green (bunch) or seed
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Termination date
onions, chives, garlic, leeks, shallots,
and scallions) in the county for which
a premium rate is provided by the
actuarial documents:
*
*
*
*
*
10. * * *
(b) In accordance with the provisions
of section 11 of the Basic Provisions,
E:\FR\FM\21JYP1.SGM
21JYP1
wreier-aviles on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with PROPOSALS
43610
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 140 / Thursday, July 21, 2011 / Proposed Rules
unless otherwise designated in the
Special Provisions, the insurance period
ends at the earliest of:
(1) The calendar date for the end of
the insurance period as follows:
(i) May 20 for 1015 Super Sweets, and
any other non-storage onions in
Cameron, Hidalgo, Starr, and Willacy
Counties, Texas;
(ii) June 1 for Vidalia, and any other
non-storage onions planted in the state
of Georgia;
(iii) June 30 for all storage and nonstorage onions in Arizona;
(iv) July 15 for 1015 Super Sweets,
and any other non-storage onions for all
Texas counties except Cameron,
Hidalgo, Starr, and Willacy;
(v) July 31 for fall planted Walla
Walla Sweets, in the states of Oregon
and Washington;
(vi) August 31 for all non-storage
onions not otherwise specified; and
(vii) October 15 for all storage onions
not otherwise specified; or
(2) In addition to the requirements of
section 11(b) of the Basic Provision,
fourteen days after lifting or digging.
*
*
*
*
*
13. * * *
(a) In accordance with the
requirements of section 14 of the Basic
Provisions, any representative samples
of the unharvested crop that may be
required cannot be topped, lifted, or dug
and must be at least 10 feet wide and
extend the entire length of each field in
the unit. The samples must not be
harvested or destroyed until the earlier
of our inspection or 15 days after
harvest of the balance of the unit is
completed.
*
*
*
*
*
14. * * *
(b) * * *
(7) * * *
For Example:
You have a 100 percent share in 100
acres of a unit of transplanted storage
onions with a production guarantee of
200 hundredweight per acre, and you
select 100 percent of the price election
of $8.00 per hundredweight. You suffer
a covered cause of loss on 25 acres
during the second stage which has a
second stage production guarantee of 60
percent of the final stage production
guarantee which equals 120
hundredweight per acre. The appraised
production on the 25 acres was 2,500
hundredweight of onion production.
Your harvested onion production on the
remaining 75 acres is 16,000
hundredweight total production to
count. Your indemnity will be
calculated as follows:
(1) 25 acres × 120 hundredweight (200
× .60) second stage production
guarantee = 3,000 hundredweight, and
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:58 Jul 20, 2011
Jkt 223001
75 acres × 200 hundredweight final
stage production guarantee = 15,000
hundredweight;
(2) 3,000 hundredweight second stage
production guarantee × $8.00 price
election = $24,000 value of second stage
production guarantee, and
15,000 hundredweight final stage
production guarantee × $8.00 price
election = $120,000 value of final stage
production guarantee;
(3) $24,000 value of second stage
production + $120,000 value of final
stage production guarantee = $144,000
total value of production guarantee;
(4) 500 hundredweight second stage
total production to count (from section
14(c)(1)(iv) example) × $8.00 price
election = $4,000 value of second stage
total production to count, and
16,000 hundredweight final stage total
production to count × 8.00 price
election = $128,000 value of final stage
production to count;
(5) $4,000 value of second stage total
production to count + $128,000 value of
final stage total production to count =
$132,000 total value of production to
count;
(6) $144,000 total value of production
guarantee ¥ $132,000 total value of
production to count = $12,000 value of
loss; and
(7) $12,000 × 100 percent share =
$12,000 indemnity payment.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(1) * * *
(iv) For acreage that does not qualify
for the final stage production guarantee,
and is not subject to section 14 (c)(1)(i)
and (ii), the appraised production is
reduced by the difference between the
first or second stage (as applicable) and
the final stage production guarantee;
and
For Example:
You have 100 acres of a unit of
transplanted storage onions with a
production guarantee of 200
hundredweight per acre. You suffer a
covered cause of loss on 25 acres during
the second stage which has a second
stage production guarantee of 60 percent
of the final stage production guarantee.
The appraised production on the 25
acres was 2,500 hundredweight of onion
production. Your second stage total
production to count on the 25 acres will
be calculated as follows:
25 acres × 200 hundredweight final
stage production guarantee = 5,000
hundredweight final stage production
guarantee,
5,000 hundredweight final stage
production guarantee × 60 percent
second stage production guarantee =
3,000 hundredweight second stage
production guarantee,
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
5,000 hundredweight final stage
production guarantee ¥ 3,000
hundredweight second stage production
guarantee = 2,000 hundredweight
difference between second stage and
final stage production guarantee, and
2,500 hundredweight appraised ¥
2,000 hundredweight difference = 500
hundredweight second stage total
production to count (for section 14(b)
example).
*
*
*
*
*
15. Prevented Planting.
Your prevented planting coverage will
be 35 percent of your final stage
production guarantee for timely planted
acreage. Additional prevented planting
coverage levels are not available for
onions.
Signed in Washington, DC, on July 12,
2011.
William J. Murphy,
Manager, Federal Crop Insurance
Corporation.
[FR Doc. 2011–18053 Filed 7–20–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–08–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 71
[Docket No. FAA–2011–0431; Airspace
Docket No. 11–AGL–11]
Proposed Amendment of Class E
Airspace; Spearfish, SD
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
This action proposes to
amend Class E airspace at Spearfish, SD.
Additional controlled airspace is
necessary to accommodate new
Standard Instrument Approach
Procedures (SIAP) at Black Hills
Airport-Clyde Ice Field. The geographic
coordinates of the airport also would be
updated. The FAA is taking this action
to enhance the safety and management
of Instrument Flight Rules (IFR)
operations for SIAPs at the airport.
DATES: 0901 UTC. Comments must be
received on or before September 6,
2011.
ADDRESSES: Send comments on this
proposal to the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, 1200
New Jersey Avenue, SE., West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
Washington, DC 20590–0001. You must
identify the docket number FAA–2011–
0431/Airspace Docket No. 11–AGL–11,
at the beginning of your comments. You
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\21JYP1.SGM
21JYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 140 (Thursday, July 21, 2011)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 43606-43610]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-18053]
========================================================================
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 140 / Thursday, July 21, 2011 /
Proposed Rules
[[Page 43606]]
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Federal Crop Insurance Corporation
7 CFR Part 457
[Docket No. FCIC-11-0004]
RIN 0563-AC29
Common Crop Insurance Regulations; Onion Crop Insurance
Provisions
AGENCY: Federal Crop Insurance Corporation, USDA.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Federal Crop Insurance Corporation (FCIC) proposes to
amend the Common Crop Insurance Regulations, Onion Crop Insurance
Provisions. The intended effect of this action is to provide policy
changes, to clarify existing policy provisions to better meet the needs
of insured producers, and to reduce vulnerability to program fraud,
waste, and abuse. The proposed changes will be effective for the 2013
and succeeding crop years.
DATES: Written comments and opinions on this proposed rule will be
accepted until close of business September 19, 2011 and will be
considered when the rule is to be made final.
ADDRESSES: FCIC prefers that comments be submitted electronically
through the Federal eRulemaking Portal. You may submit comments,
identified by Docket ID No. FCIC-11-0004, by any of the following
methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Mail: Director, Product Administration and Standards
Division, Risk Management Agency, United States Department of
Agriculture, P.O. Box 419205, Kansas City, MO 64133-6205.
All comments received, including those received by mail, will be
posted without change to https://www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided, and can be accessed by the public. All
comments must include the agency name and docket number or Regulatory
Information Number (RIN) for this rule. For detailed instructions on
submitting comments and additional information, see https://www.regulations.gov. If you are submitting comments electronically
through the Federal eRulemaking Portal and want to attach a document,
we ask that it be in a text-based format. If you want to attach a
document that is a scanned Adobe PDF file, it must be scanned as text
and not as an image, thus allowing FCIC to search and copy certain
portions of your submission. For questions regarding attaching a
document that is a scanned Adobe PDF file, please contact the RMA Web
Content Team at (816) 823-4694 or by e-mail at
rmaweb.content@rma.usda.gov.
Privacy Act: Anyone is able to search the electronic form of all
comments received for any dockets by the name of the individual
submitting the comment (or signing the comment, if submitted on behalf
of an association, business, labor union, etc.). You may review the
complete User Notice and Privacy Notice for Regulations.gov at https://www.regulations.gov/#!privacyNotice.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Director, Product Administration and
Standards Division, Risk Management Agency, United States Department of
Agriculture, Beacon Facility, Stop 0812, Room 421, P.O. Box 419205,
Kansas City, MO 64141-6205, telephone (816) 926-7730.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Executive Order 12866
This rule has been determined to be non-significant for the
purposes of Executive Order 12866 and, therefore, it has not been
reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget.
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
Pursuant to the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. chapter 35), the collections of information in this rule
have been approved by OMB under control number 0563-0053.
E-Government Act Compliance
FCIC is committed to complying with the E-Government Act, to
promote the use of the Internet and other information technologies to
provide increased opportunities for citizen access to Government
information and services, and for other purposes.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA)
establishes requirements for Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their regulatory actions on State, local, and tribal governments and
the private sector. This rule contains no Federal mandates (under the
regulatory provisions of title II of the UMRA) for State, local, and
tribal governments or the private sector. Therefore, this rule is not
subject to the requirements of sections 202 and 205 of UMRA.
Executive Order 13132
It has been determined under section 1(a) of Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, that this rule does not have sufficient implications to
warrant consultation with the States. The provisions contained in this
rule will not have a substantial direct effect on States, or on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government.
Executive Order 13175
This rule has been reviewed in accordance with the requirements of
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments. The review reveals that this regulation will not have
substantial and direct effects on Tribal governments and will not have
significant Tribal implications.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
FCIC certifies that this regulation will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. Program
requirements for the Federal crop insurance program are the same for
all producers regardless of the size of their farming operation. For
instance, all producers are required to submit an application and
acreage report to establish their insurance guarantees and compute
premium amounts, and all producers are required to submit a notice of
loss and production information to determine the amount of an indemnity
payment in the event of an insured cause of crop loss. Whether a
producer has 10 acres or 1000 acres, there is no difference in the kind
of information collected. To ensure crop insurance is available to
small
[[Page 43607]]
entities, the Federal Crop Insurance Act authorizes FCIC to waive
collection of administrative fees from limited resource farmers. FCIC
believes this waiver helps to ensure that small entities are given the
same opportunities as large entities to manage their risks through the
use of crop insurance. A Regulatory Flexibility Analysis has not been
prepared since this regulation does not have an impact on small
entities, and, therefore, this regulation is exempt from the provisions
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 605).
Federal Assistance Program
This program is listed in the Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance under No. 10.450.
Executive Order 12372
This program is not subject to the provisions of Executive Order
12372, which require intergovernmental consultation with State and
local officials. See the Notice related to 7 CFR part 3015, subpart V,
published at 48 FR 29115, June 24, 1983.
Executive Order 12988
This proposed rule has been reviewed in accordance with Executive
Order 12988 on civil justice reform. The provisions of this rule will
not have a retroactive effect. The provisions of this rule will preempt
State and local laws to the extent such State and local laws are
inconsistent herewith. With respect to any direct action taken by FCIC
or to require the insurance provider to take specific action under the
terms of the crop insurance policy, the administrative appeal
provisions published at 7 CFR part 11 or 7 CFR part 400, subpart J for
the informal administrative review process of good farming practices as
applicable, must be exhausted before any action against FCIC for
judicial review may be brought.
Environmental Evaluation
This action is not expected to have a significant economic impact
on the quality of the human environment, health, or safety. Therefore,
neither an Environmental Assessment nor an Environmental Impact
Statement is needed.
Background
FCIC proposes to amend the Common Crop Insurance Regulations (7 CFR
part 457) by revising Sec. 457.135, Onion Crop Insurance Provisions,
to be effective for the 2013 and succeeding crop years. Several
requests have been made for changes to improve the insurance coverage
offered, address program integrity issues, simplify program
administration, and improve clarity of the policy provisions.
The proposed changes are as follows:
1. FCIC proposes to remove all section titles of the Basic
Provisions. This information is currently contained in parenthesis
following references to section numbers of the Basic Provisions
throughout the Crop Provisions.
2. Section 1--FCIC proposes to revise the definitions of ``direct
seeded'' and ``transplanted'' by adding the phrase ``onions planted
by'' to the beginning of both definitions. This revision will further
clarify that these terms are a planting method.
FCIC proposes to revise the definition of ``non-storage onions'' by
removing the term generally in both places it is used, since this term
is vague and ambiguous. The characteristics listed are those considered
for non-storage onions.
FCIC proposes to revise the definition of ``onion production'' by
removing the language regarding recoverable size and condition, since
these terms are vague and ambiguous.
FCIC proposes to add the definitions of ``processor'' and
``processor contract'' because the terms are used in the definition of
``storage onions.''
FCIC proposes to revise paragraph (a) of the definition of
``production guarantee (per acre)'' by changing the first stage
production guarantee for direct seeded and transplanted storage and
non-storage onions from thirty-five percent to forty-five percent of
the final stage production guarantee. The Special Provisions already
establish a higher first stage production guarantee for most onion
producing areas. Also, a contracted onion crop insurance evaluation
found that a first stage loss incurs more production costs than a
prevented planting loss and, therefore, should have a higher production
guarantee compared to prevented planting. This change will coincide
with the lowering of the prevented planting guarantee in section 15
from forty-five percent to thirty-five percent of the final stage
guarantee. FCIC also proposes to revise paragraph (b) by adding ``60%''
in parenthesis following the written phrase ``60 percent'' for
consistency.
FCIC proposes to add the definition ``sets'' to specify they are
onion bulbs that are planted by hand or by machine.
FCIC proposes to revise the definition of ``storage onions'' by
removing the terms generally and normally, since these terms are vague
and ambiguous. The characteristics listed are those considered for
storage onions. The definition is also being revised to include
varieties grown for a processor under the requirements of a processor
contract.
FCIC proposes to revise the definition of ``topping'' by replacing
the term ``bent over'' with the term ``broken.''
FCIC proposes to remove the definition of ``type'' as onion types
will be designated in the Special Provisions.
3. Section 2--FCIC proposes to revise section 2 by removing the
language indicating section 2 is to be used in place of the provisions
regarding establishing optional units in section 34 of the Basic
Provisions. The provisions in section 2 of the Onion Crop Provisions
are to be used in addition to the provisions in section 34 of the Basic
Provisions.
4. Section 3--FCIC proposes to revise section 3(b)(2) to add
language consistent with section 3(b)(1) designating the end of the
second stage production guarantee. The first stage ends at the
emergence of the fourth leaf for direct seeded or 30 days after
planting for transplanted, and the second stage ends when the onions
are eligible for the final stage. This makes the second stage
consistent with the first and final stage production guarantees.
FCIC proposes to revise section 3(b)(3) by deleting duplicative
language that provides the calculation for ``production guarantee (per
acre)'' that is already contained in paragraph (c) of the definition in
section 1.
FCIC proposes to revise section 3(c) to clarify that the production
guarantee, for indemnity purposes, will be based on the stage in which
damage occurred for any acreage of onions damaged in the first or
second stage when a majority of producers in the area would not
normally continue to care for the crop, even if the producer elects to
continue such care. FCIC also proposes to delete the phrase ``deemed to
be destroyed'' to clarify that if the producer continues to care for
the damaged onion acreage, then any later appraised unharvested
production or harvested production will be used as production to count.
5. Section 4--FCIC proposes to revise this section to list the
contract change dates because it has added coverage to more states,
which have different contract change dates based on the cancellation
and termination dates. FCIC also proposes to add language that other
contract change dates may be designated in the Special Provisions.
6. Section 5--FCIC proposes to add language to the introductory
text to allow other or changes to the cancellation and termination
dates if designated in the Special Provisions.
FCIC proposes to add Arizona to the states with a cancellation and
termination date of August 31.
[[Page 43608]]
FCIC proposes to add the cancellation date of September 30 and
termination date of November 30 for Hawaii.
FCIC proposes to add the cancellation and termination date of
November 30 for all California counties except Lassen, Modoc, Shasta
and Siskiyou.
7. Section 6--FCIC proposes to add a new section 6 to require the
producer to provide a copy of all processor contracts by the acreage
reporting date, if the Special Provisions specify a processor contract
is required to insure processing onions. This is consistent with other
Crop Provisions in regards to processing crops.
8. Redesignated section 8--FCIC proposes to revise the introductory
text in redesignated section 8 to include shallots on the list of
onions that are excluded as an insured crop, since shallots are not
insurable under these Crop Provisions.
9. Redesignated section 10--FCIC proposes to revise redesignated
section 10(b) by adding language that the provisions in 10(b) are to be
used in accordance with the provisions in section 11 of the Basic
Provisions.
FCIC proposes to revise redesignated section 10(b)(1) by
redesignating section 10(b)(1)(i) as 10(b)(1)(ii) and adding a new
section 10(b)(1)(i) for the end of insurance date of May 20 for 1015
Super Sweets, and any other non-storage onions in Cameron, Hidalgo,
Starr, and Willacy Counties, Texas; adding a new section 10(b)(1)(iii)
to specify the end of insurance date in Arizona is June 30 for all
storage and non-storage onions; adding a new section 10(b)(1)(iv) to
specify the end of insurance date is July 15 for 1015 Super Sweets, and
other non-storage onions for all Texas counties except Cameron,
Hidalgo, Starr, and Willacy; revising new section 10(b)(1)(v) by adding
the phrase ``fall planted'' and deleting the phrase ``and any other
non-storage onions'' to specify the end of insurance date is July 31
for fall planted Walla Walla Sweets, in the states of Oregon and
Washington; adding a new subsection 10(b)(1)(vi) to specify the end of
insurance date is August 31 for all non-storage onions not otherwise
specified; and adding a new section 10(b)(1)(vii) to specify the end of
insurance date is October 15 for all storage onions not otherwise
specified. This change will make the end of insurance period more
consistent with the actual growing season for a specified area.
FCIC proposes to revise redesignated 10(b)(2)(i) by removing the
phrase ``removal of the onions from the field'' because the language
regarding removal is used in the definition of ``harvest'' and harvest
is already a basis for the end of the insurance period in section 11(b)
of the Basic Provisions.
10. Redesignated section 13--FCIC proposes to revise redesignated
section 13(a) to clarify any required representative samples of the
unharvested crop cannot be topped, lifted or dug. Since onions placed
in bags and boxes but not yet removed from the field are considered
unharvested, the added language clarifies the representative sample
must be comprised of a crop area undisturbed by the pre-harvest
processes of topping and lifting or digging.
11. Redesignated section 14--FCIC proposes to add an example for
settlement of claim immediately following section 14(b)(7).
FCIC proposes to revise redesignated section 14(c)(iv) to clarify
that appraised production for acreage that does not qualify for the
final stage guarantee is reduced by the difference between the first or
second stage production guarantee (as applicable) and the final stage
production guarantee to determine the total production to count for
production lost on any acreage prior to the final stage. FCIC also
proposes to add an example regarding the calculation for total
production to count in a production stage loss immediately following
section 14(c)(1)(iv).
12. Redesignated section 15--FCIC proposes to revise redesignated
section 15 to decrease the prevented planting coverage from 45 percent
to 35 percent of the final stage production guarantee. Prevented
planting coverage was reduced to reflect the lower input costs compared
to the first stage production guarantee, which has input costs for
planting. This change will coincide with increasing the first stage
production guarantee for direct seeded storage and non-storage onions
from 35 percent to 45 percent of the final stage guarantee in the
definition of ``production guarantee (per acre)'' in section 1.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 457
Crop insurance, Onion, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Proposed Rule
Accordingly, as set forth in the preamble, the Federal Crop
Insurance Corporation proposes to amend 7 CFR part 457 effective for
the 2013 and succeeding crop years as follows:
PART 457--COMMON CROP INSURANCE REGULATIONS
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR part 457 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 1506(l), 1506(o).
2. Amend Sec. 457.135 as follows:
a. Revise the introductory text;
b. Add definitions in section 1 for ``Processor'', ``Processor
contract'', and ``Sets''; amend the definition of ``Non-storage
onions'' by removing the phrase ``generally'' everywhere it appears;
and revise the definitions of ``Direct seeded'', ``Onion production'',
``Production guarantee (per acre)'', ``Storage onions'', ``Topping'',
``Transplanted''; and remove the definition of ``Type'';
c. Remove the first section 2 heading and revise section 2;
d. Amend section 3(a) by removing the phrase ``(Insurance
Guarantees, Coverage Levels, and Prices for Determining Indemnities)'';
e. Revise sections 3(b)(2)(i) and 3(b)(2)(ii);
f. Revise section 3(b)(3);
g. Revise section 3(c);
h. Revise section 4;
i. Revise section 5;
j. Redesignate sections 6 through 14 as sections 7 through 15,
respectively, and add a new section 6;
k. Amend newly redesignated section 7 by removing the phrase
``(Annual Premium)'';
l. Revise newly redesignated section 8 introductory text;
m. Amend newly redesignated section 9 introductory text by removing
the phrase ``(Insurable Acreage)'';
n. Amend newly redesignated section 10(a) by removing the phrase
``(Insurance Period)'';
o. Revise newly redesignated section 10(b);
p. Amend newly redesignated sections 11(a) and 11(b) by removing
the phrase ``(Causes of Loss)'';
q. Amend newly redesignated section 12(a) by removing the phrase
``(Replanting Payment)'';
r. Revise newly redesignated section 13(a);
s. Amend newly redesignated section 14 by removing the phrase
``section 13'' and adding the phrase ``section 14'' in its place
everywhere it appears;
t. Add an example after newly designated section 14(b)(7);
u. Amend newly redesignated section 14(c)(1)(i)(B) by removing the
phrase ``section 12'' and adding the phrase ``section 13'' in its
place;
v. Revise newly redesignated section 14(c)(1)(iv);
w. Add an example after newly redesignated section 14(c)(1)(iv);
and
x. Revise newly redesignated section 15.
The revised and added text reads as follows:
[[Page 43609]]
Sec. 457.135 Onion crop insurance provisions.
The onion crop insurance provisions for the 2013 and succeeding
crop years are as follows:
* * * * *
1. Definitions.
* * * * *
Direct seeded. Onions planted by placing onion seed by machine or
by hand at the correct depth, into a seedbed that has been properly
prepared for the planting method and production practice.
* * * * *
Onion production. Onions with excess dirt and foliage material
removed and that are not considered damaged onion production.
* * * * *
Processor. Any business enterprise regularly engaged in buying and
processing onions, that possesses all licenses and permits for
processing onions required by the State in which it operates, and that
possesses facilities, or has contractual access to such facilities,
with enough equipment to accept and process contracted onions within a
reasonable amount of time after harvest.
Processor contract. A written agreement between the producer and a
processor, containing at a minimum:
(a) The producer's commitment to plant and grow onions of the types
designated in the Special Provisions and to deliver the onion
production to the processor;
(b) The processor's commitment to purchase all the production from
a specified number of acres or the specified quantity of onion
production stated in the processor contract; and
(c) The price that will be paid for the production.
Production guarantee (per acre).
(a) First stage production guarantee--Forty-five percent (45%) of
the final stage production guarantee for direct seeded and transplanted
storage and non-storage onions, unless otherwise specified in the
Special Provisions.
(b) Second stage production guarantee--Seventy percent (70%) of the
final stage production guarantee for direct seeded storage onions and
60 percent (60%) of the final stage production guarantee for
transplanted storage onions and all non-storage onions, unless
otherwise specified in the Special Provisions.
(c) Final stage production guarantee--The quantity of onions (in
hundredweight) determined by multiplying the approved yield per acre by
the coverage level percentage you elect.
Sets. Onion bulbs that are planted by hand or by machine.
Storage onions. Onions other than a Bermuda, Granex, or Grano
variety, or hybrids developed from these varieties that are harvested
as a bulb and dried to a lower moisture content, are firmer, have more
outer layers of paper-like skin, and are darker in color than non-
storage onions. They are more pungent, have a lower sugar content, and
can be stored for several months under proper conditions prior to use
without deterioration. Includes varieties grown for a processor under
the requirements of a processor contract.
Topping. A pre-harvest process to initiate curing, in which onion
foliage is removed or broken.
Transplanted. Onions planted by placing of the onion plant or bulb,
by machine or by hand at the correct depth, into a seedbed that has
been properly prepared for the planting method and production practice.
2. Unit Division.
In addition to the requirements of section 34 of the Basic
Provisions, optional units may be established by type, if separate
types are designated in the Special Provisions.
3. * * *
(b) * * *
(2) * * *
(i) For direct seeded storage and non-storage onions, from the
emergence of the fourth leaf until eligible for the final stage; and
(ii) For transplanted storage and non-storage onions, from the 31st
day after transplanting of onion plants or sets until eligible for the
final stage.
(3) Final stage extends from the completion of topping and lifting
or digging on the acreage until the end of the insurance period.
(c) The indemnity payable for any acreage of onions will be based
on the stage the plants had achieved when damage occurred. Any acreage
of onions damaged in the first or second stage, to the extent that the
majority of producers in the area would not normally further care for
the onions, will have a production guarantee, for indemnity purposes,
based on the stage in which the damage occurred, even if you continue
to care for the damaged onions.
4. Contract Changes.
In accordance with section 4 of the Basic Provisions, the contract
change date is:
(a) June 30 preceding the cancellation date for counties with an
August 31, September 30, or November 30 cancellation date;
(b) November 30 preceding the cancellation date for counties with a
February 1 cancellation date; or
(c) As designated in the Special Provisions.
5. Cancellation and Termination Dates.
In accordance with section 2 of the Basic Provisions, the
cancellation and termination dates are as follows, unless otherwise
designated in the Special Provisions:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cancellation
State & county date Termination date
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Arizona; Georgia; Kinney, August 31...... August 31.
Uvalde, Medina, Bexar,
Wilson, Karnes, Bee, and San
Patricio Counties, Texas,
and all Texas Counties lying
south thereof.
Umatilla County, Oregon; and August 31...... September 30.
Walla Walla County,
Washington.
Hawaii....................... September 30... November 30.
All California Counties, November 30.... November 30.
except Lassen, Modoc, Shasta
and Siskiyou.
All other states and counties February 1..... February 1.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
6. Report of Acreage.
In addition to the provisions of section 6 of the Basic Provisions,
if the Special Provisions require a processor contract to insure your
onions, you must provide a copy of all your processor contracts to us
on or before the acreage reporting date.
* * * * *
8. * * *
In accordance with section 8 of the Basic Provisions, the crop
insured will be all the storage and non-storage onions (excluding green
(bunch) or seed onions, chives, garlic, leeks, shallots, and scallions)
in the county for which a premium rate is provided by the actuarial
documents:
* * * * *
10. * * *
(b) In accordance with the provisions of section 11 of the Basic
Provisions,
[[Page 43610]]
unless otherwise designated in the Special Provisions, the insurance
period ends at the earliest of:
(1) The calendar date for the end of the insurance period as
follows:
(i) May 20 for 1015 Super Sweets, and any other non-storage onions
in Cameron, Hidalgo, Starr, and Willacy Counties, Texas;
(ii) June 1 for Vidalia, and any other non-storage onions planted
in the state of Georgia;
(iii) June 30 for all storage and non-storage onions in Arizona;
(iv) July 15 for 1015 Super Sweets, and any other non-storage
onions for all Texas counties except Cameron, Hidalgo, Starr, and
Willacy;
(v) July 31 for fall planted Walla Walla Sweets, in the states of
Oregon and Washington;
(vi) August 31 for all non-storage onions not otherwise specified;
and
(vii) October 15 for all storage onions not otherwise specified; or
(2) In addition to the requirements of section 11(b) of the Basic
Provision, fourteen days after lifting or digging.
* * * * *
13. * * *
(a) In accordance with the requirements of section 14 of the Basic
Provisions, any representative samples of the unharvested crop that may
be required cannot be topped, lifted, or dug and must be at least 10
feet wide and extend the entire length of each field in the unit. The
samples must not be harvested or destroyed until the earlier of our
inspection or 15 days after harvest of the balance of the unit is
completed.
* * * * *
14. * * *
(b) * * *
(7) * * *
For Example:
You have a 100 percent share in 100 acres of a unit of transplanted
storage onions with a production guarantee of 200 hundredweight per
acre, and you select 100 percent of the price election of $8.00 per
hundredweight. You suffer a covered cause of loss on 25 acres during
the second stage which has a second stage production guarantee of 60
percent of the final stage production guarantee which equals 120
hundredweight per acre. The appraised production on the 25 acres was
2,500 hundredweight of onion production. Your harvested onion
production on the remaining 75 acres is 16,000 hundredweight total
production to count. Your indemnity will be calculated as follows:
(1) 25 acres x 120 hundredweight (200 x .60) second stage
production guarantee = 3,000 hundredweight, and
75 acres x 200 hundredweight final stage production guarantee =
15,000 hundredweight;
(2) 3,000 hundredweight second stage production guarantee x $8.00
price election = $24,000 value of second stage production guarantee,
and
15,000 hundredweight final stage production guarantee x $8.00 price
election = $120,000 value of final stage production guarantee;
(3) $24,000 value of second stage production + $120,000 value of
final stage production guarantee = $144,000 total value of production
guarantee;
(4) 500 hundredweight second stage total production to count (from
section 14(c)(1)(iv) example) x $8.00 price election = $4,000 value of
second stage total production to count, and
16,000 hundredweight final stage total production to count x 8.00
price election = $128,000 value of final stage production to count;
(5) $4,000 value of second stage total production to count +
$128,000 value of final stage total production to count = $132,000
total value of production to count;
(6) $144,000 total value of production guarantee - $132,000 total
value of production to count = $12,000 value of loss; and
(7) $12,000 x 100 percent share = $12,000 indemnity payment.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(1) * * *
(iv) For acreage that does not qualify for the final stage
production guarantee, and is not subject to section 14 (c)(1)(i) and
(ii), the appraised production is reduced by the difference between the
first or second stage (as applicable) and the final stage production
guarantee; and
For Example:
You have 100 acres of a unit of transplanted storage onions with a
production guarantee of 200 hundredweight per acre. You suffer a
covered cause of loss on 25 acres during the second stage which has a
second stage production guarantee of 60 percent of the final stage
production guarantee. The appraised production on the 25 acres was
2,500 hundredweight of onion production. Your second stage total
production to count on the 25 acres will be calculated as follows:
25 acres x 200 hundredweight final stage production guarantee =
5,000 hundredweight final stage production guarantee,
5,000 hundredweight final stage production guarantee x 60 percent
second stage production guarantee = 3,000 hundredweight second stage
production guarantee,
5,000 hundredweight final stage production guarantee - 3,000
hundredweight second stage production guarantee = 2,000 hundredweight
difference between second stage and final stage production guarantee,
and
2,500 hundredweight appraised - 2,000 hundredweight difference =
500 hundredweight second stage total production to count (for section
14(b) example).
* * * * *
15. Prevented Planting.
Your prevented planting coverage will be 35 percent of your final
stage production guarantee for timely planted acreage. Additional
prevented planting coverage levels are not available for onions.
Signed in Washington, DC, on July 12, 2011.
William J. Murphy,
Manager, Federal Crop Insurance Corporation.
[FR Doc. 2011-18053 Filed 7-20-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-08-P