Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act; Establishment of Consumer Operated and Oriented Plan (CO-OP) Program, 43237-43250 [2011-18342]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 139 / Wednesday, July 20, 2011 / Proposed Rules
provide agency flexibility. GSA is
leading three working groups comprised
of representatives from Federal agencies
to revise those areas of the FTR which
pertain to Temporary Duty (TDY) Travel
Allowances that include special
conveyances, per diem and air
transportation. The purpose of this
notice is to announce that the working
groups will hold a public meeting to
receive information from industry and
the public on best practices in the
aforementioned areas.
DATES: The meeting will take place on
September 7, 2011 and September 8,
2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Marcerto Barr, GSA, 1275 First Street,
NE., Washington, DC 20417; telephone:
(202) 208–7654; or e-mail:
Marcerto.Barr@gsa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Background
The U.S. General Services
Administration under applicable
authorities, such as 5 U.S.C. 5707; 20
U.S.C. 905(a); 31 U.S.C. 1353; 40 U.S.C.
121(c); 49 U.S.C. 40118; E.O. 11609, as
amended; 3 CFR 1971–1975 Comp., p.
586; and E.O. 13563, is currently
addressing the following categories of
the FTR Chapter 301- TDY Allowances
and related appendices: special
conveyances (includes ground
transportation and rental cars), per diem
(includes meals, incidental expenses,
and lodging), and air transportation
(includes common carriage
transportation). GSA is leading three
working groups comprised of Federal
agency representatives to address these
categories. The last major rewrite of the
FTR took place in 1998.
Meeting Details
Place: The 2-day public meetings will
be held at the GSA Auditorium, 1800 F
Street, NW., Washington, DC 20405. The
meeting is open to industry and the
general public beginning at 10 a.m. EST
through 4 p.m. EST.
Attendance: The event is open to the
public based upon space availability.
Attendees and speakers must preregister. A limited number of speakers
will be allowed to make oral
presentations based upon space and on
a first-come, first-serve basis.
Additionally individuals are welcome to
submit written materials to the working
groups.
Pre-Registration: To pre-register, as an
attendee or speaker contact Ms. Barr as
detailed above. Participants interested
in speaking should indicate the category
you would like to address, your name,
company name or organization (if
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:45 Jul 19, 2011
Jkt 223001
applicable), telephone number and
email no later than the close of business
on August 23, 2011.
Agenda: Presentations from industry
and the public will be time limited.
Each registered presenter will be
allotted a total of 20 minutes.
Statements and Presentations: Send
written or electronic statements and
requests to make oral presentations to
the contact person listed above.
Submissions must be provided to Ms.
Barr at Marcerto.Barr@gsa.gov no later
than the close of business on August 23,
2011.
Information on Services for
Individuals with Disabilities:
Individuals requiring special
accommodations at the meeting, please
contact Ms. Barr no later than the close
of business on August 23, 2011.
Dated: July 14, 2011.
Janet C. Dobbs,
Director, Office of Travel, Transportation &
Asset Mgmt.
[FR Doc. 2011–18305 Filed 7–19–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820–14–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
45 CFR Part 156
[CMS–9983–P]
RIN 0938–AQ98
Patient Protection and Affordable Care
Act; Establishment of Consumer
Operated and Oriented Plan (CO–OP)
Program
Department of Health and
Human Services.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
This proposed rule would
implement the Consumer Operated and
Oriented Plan (CO–OP) program, which
provides loans to foster the creation of
consumer-governed, private, nonprofit
health insurance issuers to offer
qualified health plans in the Affordable
Insurance Exchanges (Exchanges). The
purpose of this program is to create a
new CO–OP in every State in order to
expand the number of health plans
available in the Exchanges with a focus
on integrated care and greater plan
accountability.
DATES: To be assured consideration,
comments must be received at one of
the addresses provided below, no later
than 5 p.m. on September 16, 2011.
ADDRESSES: In commenting, please refer
to file code CMS–9983–P. Because of
staff and resource limitations, we cannot
accept comments by facsimile (FAX)
transmission.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
43237
You may submit comments in one of
four ways (please choose only one of the
ways listed):
1. Electronically. You may submit
electronic comments on this regulation
to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow
the ‘‘Submit a comment’’ instructions.
2. By regular mail. You may mail
written comments to the following
address only:
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services, Department of Health and
Human Services, Attention: CMS–
9983–P, P.O. Box 8010, Baltimore,
MD 21244–8010.
Please allow sufficient time for mailed
comments to be received before the
close of the comment period.
3. By express or overnight mail. You
may send written comments to the
following address only:
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services, Department of Health and
Human Services, Attention: CMS–
9983–P, Mail Stop C4–26–05, 7500
Security Boulevard, Baltimore, MD
21244–1850.
4. By hand or courier. Alternatively,
you may deliver (by hand or courier)
your written comments only to the
following addresses prior to the close of
the comment period:
a. For delivery in Washington, DC—
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services, Department of Health and
Human Services, Room 445–G, Hubert
H. Humphrey Building, 200
Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC 20201.
(Because access to the interior of the
Hubert H. Humphrey Building is not
readily available to persons without
Federal government identification,
commenters are encouraged to leave
their comments in the CMS drop slots
located in the main lobby of the
building. A stamp-in clock is available
for persons wishing to retain a proof of
filing by stamping in and retaining an
extra copy of the comments being filed.)
b. For delivery in Baltimore, MD—
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services, Department of Health and
Human Services, 7500 Security
Boulevard, Baltimore, MD 21244–
1850.
If you intend to deliver your
comments to the Baltimore address, call
telephone number (410) 786–9994 in
advance to schedule your arrival with
one of our staff members.
Submission of comments on
paperwork requirements. You may
submit comments on this document’s
paperwork requirements by following
the instructions at the end of the
E:\FR\FM\20JYP1.SGM
20JYP1
43238
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 139 / Wednesday, July 20, 2011 / Proposed Rules
‘‘Collection of Information
Requirements’’ section in this
document. Comments erroneously
mailed to the addresses indicated as
appropriate for hand or courier delivery
may be delayed and received after the
comment period.
For information on viewing public
comments, see the beginning of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Anne Bollinger, (301) 492–4395 for
issues related to eligibility and CO–OP
standards. Catherine Demmerle, (301)
492–4156 for issues related to
conversions and program integrity.
Meghan Elrington, (301) 492–4388 for
general issues and issues related to loan
terms.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Acronym List
Because of the many terms to which
we refer by acronym in this proposed
rule, we are listing the acronyms used
and their corresponding meanings in
alphabetical order below:
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
CCIIO Center for Consumer Information &
Insurance Oversight
CMS Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services
CO–OP Consumer Operated and Oriented
Plan
FACA Federal Advisory Committee Act
HHS Department of Health and Human
Services
OIG Office of Inspector General
OMB Office of Management and Budget
PHS Act Public Health Service Act
QHP Qualified Health Plan
RFC Request for Comment
SHOP Small Business Health Options
Program
Executive Summary: The Patient
Protection and Affordable Care Act,
Public Law 111–148, enacted on March
23, 2010 and the Health Care and
Education Reconciliation Act of 2010,
Public Law 111–152, enacted on March
30, 2010, are collectively referred to in
this proposed rule as the ‘‘Affordable
Care Act.’’ The Department of Defense
and Full-Year Continuing
Appropriations Act, 2011, Public Law
112–10, which amended the Affordable
Care Act, was enacted on April 15,
2011. Section 1322 of the Affordable
Care Act created the Consumer
Operated and Oriented Plan program
(CO–OP program) to foster the creation
of new consumer-governed, private,
nonprofit health insurance issuers,
known as ‘‘CO–OPs.’’ In addition to
improving consumer choice and plan
accountability, the CO–OP program also
seeks to promote integrated models of
care and enhance competition in the
Affordable Insurance Exchanges
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:45 Jul 19, 2011
Jkt 223001
established under sections 1311 and
1321 of the Affordable Care Act.
The statute provides loans to
capitalize eligible prospective CO–OPs
with a goal of having at least one CO–
OP in each State. The statute permits
the funding of multiple CO–OPs in any
State, provided that there is sufficient
funding to capitalize at least one CO–OP
in each State. Congress provided budget
authority of $3.8 billion for the program.
This proposed rule: (1) Sets forth the
eligibility standards for the CO–OP
program; (2) establishes some terms for
loans; and (3) provides certain basic
standards that organizations must meet
to participate in this program and
become a CO–OP. The overall approach
and intent of this proposed rule is to
provide flexibility for organizations to
develop and create a CO–OP.
Acknowledging the significant variation
in market conditions and populations
served that CO–OPs will face, CMS
encourages diversity in the
organizational design and approach.
Starting in 2014, individuals and
small businesses will be able to
purchase private health insurance
through State-based competitive
marketplaces called Affordable
Insurance Exchanges. Exchanges will
offer Americans competition, choice,
and clout. Insurance companies will
compete for business on a level playing
field, driving down costs. Consumers
will have a choice of health plans to fit
their needs. Exchanges will give
individuals and small businesses the
same purchasing clout as big businesses.
The Departments of Health and Human
Services, Labor, and the Treasury (the
Departments) are issuing regulations
implementing Exchanges in several
phases. The first in this series was a
Request for Comment relating to
Exchanges, published in the Federal
Register on August 3, 2010. Second,
Initial Guidance to States on Exchanges
was published issued on November 18,
2010. Third, a proposed rule for the
application, review, and reporting
process for waivers for State innovation
was published in the Federal Register
on March 14, 2011 (76 FR 13553).
Fourth, on July 15, 2011, two proposed
regulations were published in the
Federal Register to implement
components of the Exchange and health
insurance premium stabilization
policies in the Affordable Care Act
including one entitled, ‘‘Patient
Protection and Affordable Care Act;
Establishment of Qualified Health Plans
and Exchanges,’’ hereinafter referred to
as ‘‘Exchanges proposed rule.’’ Fifth,
additional regulations, including this
one, are being published in the Federal
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Register to implement Exchange related
components of the Affordable Care Act.
Submitting Comments: Comments
from the public are welcome on all
issues set forth in this proposed rule to
assist CMS in fully considering issues
and developing policies. Comments
should reference the file code CMS–
9983–P and the specific section on
which a comment is made.
Inspection of Public Comments: All
comments received before the close of
the comment period are available for
viewing by the public, including any
personally identifiable or confidential
business information that is included in
a comment. We post all comments
received before the close of the
comment period as soon as possible
after they have been received, on the
following Web site: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the search
instructions on that Web site to view
public comments.
Comments received in a timely
manner will also be available for public
inspection as they are received,
generally beginning approximately 3
weeks after publication of a document,
at the headquarters of the Centers for
Medicare & Medicaid Services, 7500
Security Boulevard, Baltimore,
Maryland 21244, Monday through
Friday of each week from 8:30 a.m. to
4 p.m. To schedule an appointment to
view public comments, phone 1–800–
743–3951.
Table of Contents
I. Background
A. Overview
B. Statutory Basis for the Consumer
Operated and Oriented Plan (CO–OP)
Program
C. Purpose of the Consumer Operated and
Oriented Plan (CO–OP) Program
D. Request for Comment
E. Structure of the Proposed Rule
II. Provisions of the Proposed Regulation
A. Basis and Scope (§ 156.500)
B. Definitions (§ 156.505)
C. Eligibility (§ 156.510)
1. General
2. Exclusions from Eligibility
D. CO–OP Standards (§ 156.515)
1. General
2. Governance Requirements
3. Requirements to Issue Health Plans and
Become a CO–OP
E. Loan Terms (§ 156.520)
1. Overview of Loans
2. Repayment Period
3. Interest Rates
4. Failure to Pay
5. Deeming of CO–OP Qualified Health
Plans
6. Conversions
III. Collection of Information Requirements
IV. Response to Comments
V. Regulatory Impact Analysis
A. Introduction
E:\FR\FM\20JYP1.SGM
20JYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 139 / Wednesday, July 20, 2011 / Proposed Rules
B. Statement of Need, Health Insurance
Markets, and CO–OP Plans
C. Anticipated Costs
D. Anticipated Benefits
E. Alternatives Considered
F. Accounting Statement
VI. Other Requirements for Analysis of
Economic Effects Regulations Text
I. Background
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
A. Overview
The CO–OP program provides Federal
loans to foster and encourage the
creation of new consumer-run, private
health insurers in every State that will
provide consumers and small
businesses with greater choice in the
Exchanges starting in 2014. These new
consumer-run, private, nonprofit
insurers will be a vehicle for providing
higher quality care that is affordable,
coordinated, and responsive.
B. Statutory Basis for the Consumer
Operated and Oriented Plan (CO–OP)
Program
Section 1322(a) of the Affordable Care
Act directs CMS to establish the CO–OP
program to foster the creation of
member-governed qualified nonprofit
health insurance issuers to offer CO–OP
qualified health plans in the individual
and small group markets in the States in
which they are licensed to offer such
plans.
Section 1322(b)(1) of the Affordable
Care Act provides that CMS shall
provide two types of loans to
organizations applying to become
qualified nonprofit health insurance
issuers: Start-up Loans and repayable
grants (Solvency Loans). Start-up Loans
will provide assistance with start-up
costs and Solvency Loans will provide
assistance in meeting solvency
requirements in the States in which the
organization is licensed to issue CO–OP
qualified health plans.
Section 1322(b)(2) provides that in
making awards, CMS must take into
account the recommendations of the
Advisory board further described in
section 1322(b)(4) of the Affordable Care
Act and give priority to applicants that
offer CO–OP qualified health plans on a
statewide basis, use integrated care
models, and have significant private
support.
Section 1322(b)(2) of the Affordable
Care Act also directs CMS to ensure that
there is sufficient funding to establish at
least one qualified nonprofit health
insurance issuer in each State and the
District of Columbia. It permits CMS to
fund additional qualified nonprofit
health insurance issuers in any State if
the funding is sufficient to do so. If no
entities in a State apply, CMS may use
funds to encourage the establishment of
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:45 Jul 19, 2011
Jkt 223001
a qualified nonprofit health insurance
issuer in the State or the expansion of
another qualified nonprofit health
insurance issuer from another State to
that State.
Section 1322(b)(2) of the Affordable
Care Act also directs any organization
receiving a loan to enter into an
agreement to meet the standards to
become a qualified nonprofit health
insurance issuer and any other terms
and conditions of the loan awards.
Section 1322(b)(2)(c)(iii) of the
Affordable Care Act provides that, if
CMS determines that an organization
has failed to meet any provisions of the
loan agreement or failed to correct such
failure within a reasonable period of
time, the organization must repay an
amount equal to the sum of:
• 110 percent of the aggregate amount
of loans received; plus
• Interest on the aggregate amount of
loans for the period the loans were
outstanding starting from the date of
drawdown.
CMS must notify the Department of
the Treasury of any determination of a
failure to comply with the CO–OP
program standards that may affect an
issuer’s tax-exempt status under section
501(c)(29) of the Code.
Under section 1322(b)(3), Start-up
Loans must be repaid within 5 years,
and Solvency Loans must be repaid
within 15 years. Repayment terms in the
award of loans must take into
consideration any appropriate State
reserve requirements, solvency
regulations, and requisite surplus note
arrangements that must be constructed
by a qualified health insurance issuer in
a State to receive and maintain
licensure.
Section 1322(c)(1) of the Affordable
Care Act defines ‘‘qualified nonprofit
health insurance issuer’’ as an
organization that:
• Is organized under State law as a
private, nonprofit, member corporation;
• Conducts activities of which
substantially all consist of the issuance
of CO–OP qualified health plans in the
individual and small group markets in
each State in which it is licensed to
issue such plans; and
• Meets the other requirements in
subsection 1322(c) of the Affordable
Care Act.
Section 1322(c)(2) of the Affordable
Care Act states that an organization is
not eligible to become a qualified
nonprofit health insurance issuer if the
organization or a related entity (or any
predecessor of either) was a health
insurance issuer on July 16, 2009. In
addition, an organization cannot be
treated as eligible to apply for a loan
under the CO–OP program if it is
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
43239
sponsored by a State or local
government, any political subdivision
thereof, or any instrumentality of such
government or political subdivision. A
CO–OP must be a private, nonprofit
health insurance issuer.
Section 1322(c)(3) of the Affordable
Care Act establishes governance
requirements for a qualified nonprofit
health insurance issuer. To ensure
consumer control, the governance of the
organization must be subject to a
majority vote of its members. The
organization’s governing documents
must incorporate ethics and conflict of
interest standards to protect CO–OP
members against insurance industry
involvement and interference. To ensure
consumer orientation, the organization
is required to operate with a strong
consumer focus, including timeliness,
responsiveness, and accountability to
members.
Section 1322(c)(4) of the Affordable
Care Act directs the organization to use
any profits to lower premiums, improve
benefits, or for other programs intended
to improve the quality of health care
delivered to its members.
Section 1322(c)(5) of the Affordable
Care Act directs that the organization
must meet all the State standards for
licensure that other issuers of qualified
health plans must meet in any State
where the issuer offers a CO–OP
qualified health plan, including
solvency and licensure requirements
and any other State law described in
section 1324(b) of the Affordable Care
Act.
Section 1322(c)(6) of the Affordable
Care Act prohibits a qualified nonprofit
health insurance issuer from offering a
health plan in a State until that State
has in effect (or CMS has implemented
for the State) the market reforms
outlined in part A of title XXVII of the
Public Health Service Act (as amended
by subtitles A and C of title I of the
Affordable Care Act) including but not
limited to, the requirements for
guaranteed issue and limitations on
premium variation.
Section 1322(e) of the Affordable Care
Act prohibits representatives of any
Federal, State, or local government (or
of any political subdivision or
instrumentality thereof), and
representatives of an organization that
was an existing issuer or a related entity
(or predecessor of either) on July 16,
2009, from serving on the board of
directors of the qualified nonprofit
health insurance issuer or a private
purchasing council established under
section 1322(d) of the Affordable Care
Act.
E:\FR\FM\20JYP1.SGM
20JYP1
43240
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 139 / Wednesday, July 20, 2011 / Proposed Rules
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Together, these provisions form the
statutory basis for the CO–OP program
established under this rule.
C. Purpose of the Consumer-Operated
and Oriented Plan Program
Section 1322 of the Affordable Care
Act established the CO–OP program to
provide loans to foster the creation of
new consumer-governed nonprofit
health insurance issuers (referred to as
CO–OPs) that will operate with a strong
consumer focus. The statute divides the
loans into two types: loans for start-up
costs to be repaid in 5 years (‘‘Start-up
Loans’’) and loans to enable CO–OPs to
meet State insurance solvency and
reserve requirements to be repaid in 15
years (‘‘Solvency Loans’’). Section
1322(b)(2)(A) of the Affordable Care Act
directs CMS to ensure that there is
sufficient funding to establish at least
one CO–OP in each State and to give
priority to organizations capable of
offering CO–OP qualified health plans
on a Statewide basis. To further ensure
the presence of CO–OPs in the
Exchanges, section 1301(a)(2) of the
statute deems CO–OP qualified health
plans offered by a qualified nonprofit
health insurance issuer eligible to
participate in the Exchanges.
The CO–OP program also seeks to
promote improved models of care.
Existing health insurance cooperatives
and other business cooperatives provide
possible models for the successful
development of CO–OPs around the
country. One major barrier to continued
development of this model has been the
difficulty of obtaining adequate
capitalization for start-up costs and
State reserve requirements. The CO–OP
program is designed to help overcome
this major barrier to new issuer
formation by providing funding for
these critical activities.
Pursuant to section 1322(b)(4) of the
Affordable Care Act, the Comptroller
General announced the appointment of
a 15 member CO–OP Program Advisory
Board to make recommendations to
CMS on awarding loans on June 23,
2010. Section 1322(b)(2)(A) directs the
Secretary to consider the
recommendations of the Advisory Board
when awarding loans under the CO–OP
program. After taking comments in three
day-long public hearings from January
through March, 2011 and written
comments, the Advisory Board
approved its final recommendations and
report on April 15, 2011. The Advisory
Board’s final report is available at:
https://cciio.hhs.gov/resources/files/
coop_faca_finalreport_04152011.pdf.
The Advisory Board generally advised
the Department to develop flexible
criteria that recognize the diversity of
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:45 Jul 19, 2011
Jkt 223001
market conditions around the country to
enable the development of various CO–
OP models and allow different types of
sponsorship. It also strongly encouraged
the Department to provide technical
assistance at all stages of the process in
order to enhance the viability of
individual CO–OPs and the success of
the program.
The Advisory Board developed four
major principles for awarding loans.
CMS concurs with those principles:
(1) Consumer operation, control, and
focus must be the salient features of the
CO–OP and must be sustained over
time;
(2) Solvency and the financial
stability of coverage should be
maintained and promoted;
(3) CO–OPs should encourage care
coordination, quality and efficiency to
the extent feasible in local provider and
health plan markets; and
(4) Initial loans should be rolled out
as expeditiously as possible so that CO–
OPs can compete in the Exchanges in
the critical first open enrollment period.
CMS also concurs with the Advisory
Board in recognizing that potential CO–
OPs will initially present different
capabilities and levels of development.
This proposed rule incorporates the
principles endorsed by the Advisory
Board by allowing diversity among CO–
OPs and maintaining the vision outlined
in the Advisory Board Final Report. The
CO–OP program will offer an entry
point to eligible organizations that seek
to provide more consumer-focused
coverage and create additional
competition for insurance that will
make high-quality care more affordable.
By creating more health plan choices,
CO–OPs can benefit all consumers.
D. Request for Comment
On February 2, 2011, CMS published
a Request for Comment (RFC) in the
Federal Register (76 FR 5774) seeking
public comment on the rules that will
govern the CO–OP program. The
comment period closed on March 4,
2011. CMS has considered and
incorporated the comments received in
developing specific regulatory
proposals.
The public response to the RFC
yielded 55 unique comment
submissions. A total of 65 unique
entities submitted comments, including
entities that submitted stand-alone
comments and multiple individuals
who signed onto one comment
submission. The 65 total unique
commenters included consumers and
consumer advocacy organizations,
medical and health care professional
trade associations and societies, health
insurers and insurance trade
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
associations, health benefits
consultants, and actuaries. The majority
of the comments related to the types of
organizations that would likely become
successful CO–OPs and the criteria CMS
should use in awarding loans.
E. Structure of the Proposed Rule
The regulations outlined in this
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking will be
codified in the new 45 CFR part 156
subpart F. The major subjects covered in
this proposed rule under subpart F of
part 156 are described below.
• Section 156.500 describes the
statutory basis of the CO–OP program
and the scope of this proposed rule;
• Section 156.505 sets forth
definitions for the terms applied in
subpart F;
• Section 156.510 specifies the
criteria to be eligible for a loan under
the CO–OP program;
• Section 156.515 sets forth the
standards for a CO–OP; and
• Section 156.520 sets forth the terms
for loans awarded under the CO–OP
program including repayment terms and
interest rates.
II. Provisions of the Proposed
Regulations
A. Basis and scope (§ 156.500)
Section 156.500 specifies the general
statutory authority for and scope of
standards proposed in subpart F. The
CO–OP program fosters the creation of
qualified nonprofit health insurance
issuers to offer CO–OP qualified health
plans in the individual and small group
markets. Subpart F establishes certain
governance requirements for CO–OPs
and the terms for loans awarded under
the CO–OP program. Applicants may
apply for loans to help fund start-up
costs and meet the solvency
requirements of States in which the
applicant seeks to be licensed to issue
CO–OP qualified health plans.
B. Definitions (§ 156.505)
Section 156.505 sets forth definitions
for terms that are used throughout
subpart F. Many of the definitions
presented in § 156.505 are taken directly
from the Affordable Care Act, but new
definitions were created when
necessary. All definitions proposed are
intended to apply only to subpart F.
Several of the terms used in subpart
F are defined elsewhere in Parts 155 and
156, which have been proposed
previously (76 FR 41866). The terms
‘‘individual market,’’ ‘‘small group
market,’’ ‘‘SHOP,’’ and ‘‘Exchange’’ are
defined in § 155.20. ‘‘Individual
market’’ is defined as the market for
health insurance coverage offered to
E:\FR\FM\20JYP1.SGM
20JYP1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 139 / Wednesday, July 20, 2011 / Proposed Rules
individuals other than in connection
with a group health plan. ‘‘Small group
market’’ is defined as the health
insurance market under which
individuals obtain health insurance
coverage (directly or through any
arrangement) on behalf of themselves
(and their dependents) through a group
health plan maintained by a small
employer. ‘‘SHOP’’ is defined as a Small
Business Health Options Program
operated by an Exchange through which
a qualified employer can provide its
employees and their dependents with
access to one or more QHPs.
‘‘Exchange’’ is defined as a
governmental agency or non-profit
entity that meets the applicable
requirements of this part and makes
QHPs available to qualified individuals
and qualified employers. Unless
otherwise identified, this term refers to
State Exchanges, regional Exchanges,
subsidiary Exchanges, and a Federallyfacilitated Exchange.
CMS proposes that a ‘‘CO–OP
qualified health plan’’ means a health
plan that has in effect a certification that
it meets the standards described in
subpart C of part 156, which has been
previously proposed (76 FR 41866),
except that the plan can be deemed
certified by CMS or an entity designated
by CMS as described in 156.520(e).
‘‘Applicant’’ is defined as an entity
eligible to apply for a loan described in
§ 156.520.
A ‘‘qualified nonprofit health
insurance issuer’’ is a loan recipient,
which satisfies or can reasonably be
expected to satisfy the standards in
section 1322(c) of the Affordable Care
Act and § 156.515 within the time
frames specified in this subpart, until
such time as CMS determines the loan
recipient does not satisfy or cannot
reasonably be expected to satisfy these
standards. This ensures that loan
recipients can receive the benefits of
section 1322(h), addressing the tax
exemption for qualified nonprofit health
insurance issuers, at the appropriate
time, as determined by the Internal
Revenue Service. CMS proposes that the
term ‘‘consumer operated and oriented
plan (CO–OP)’’ means a loan recipient
that satisfies the standards in section
1322(c) of the Affordable Care Act and
§ 156.515 within the time frames
specified in this subpart. Thus, to be
considered a CO–OP, a loan recipient
must meet the governance and health
plan issuance standards described in
§ 156.515 within the timeframes
established in this subpart. In addition,
the loan recipient must comply with
State insurance laws and State
insurance reforms and ensure that
revenues in excess of expenses inure to
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:45 Jul 19, 2011
Jkt 223001
the benefit of its members in accordance
with section 1322(c)(4) of the Affordable
Care Act.
We define a ‘‘nonprofit member
corporation’’ (also referred to as a
‘‘nonprofit member organization’’) as a
nonprofit, not-for-profit, public benefit,
or similar membership entity organized
as appropriate under State law. For the
purposes of this subpart, as defined in
section 1304(d) of the Affordable Care
Act, ‘‘State’’ means each of the 50 States
and the District of Columbia. CMS
proposes that in order for an
organization to be eligible for CO–OP
loans (and become an ‘‘applicant’’) it
would first have to meet the definition
of a nonprofit member organization.
CMS proposes to adopt the Advisory
Board’s recommendation to use the
terms ‘‘formation board’’ and
‘‘operational board’’ when discussing
the governance requirements for a CO–
OP. The term ‘‘formation board’’ means
the initial board of directors of the
applicant or loan recipient before it has
begun accepting enrollment and
conducted an election to the board of
directors. ‘‘Operational board’’ means
the board of directors elected by the
members of the CO–OP after it has
begun accepting enrollment. A
‘‘member’’ is an individual covered
under health insurance policies issued
by a CO–OP.
Section 1322(c)(2)(A) of the
Affordable Care Act prohibits an
organization from participating as a
‘‘qualified nonprofit health insurance
issuer’’ in the CO–OP program ‘‘if the
organization or a related entity (or any
predecessor of either) was a health
insurance issuer on July 16, 2009.’’
Consistent with section 1551 of the
Affordable Care Act, we propose that an
entity is an ‘‘issuer’’ under this subpart
if it satisfies the definition in section
2791(b)(2) of the Public Health Service
Act: an insurance company, insurance
service, or insurance organization
(including a health maintenance
organization) which is licensed to
engage in the business of insurance in
a State and which is subject to State law
which regulates insurance.
Additionally, ‘‘pre-existing issuer’’
means (for the purposes of this subpart)
a health insurance issuer that was in
existence on July 16, 2009. We seek
comments on this definition.
CMS proposes the definition of
‘‘related entity’’ to mean an organization
that shares common ownership or
control with a pre-existing issuer or a
trade association whose members
consist of pre-existing issuers, and
satisfies at least one of the following
conditions: (1) Retains responsibilities
for the services to be provided by the
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
43241
issuer; (2) furnishes services to the
issuer’s enrollees under an oral or
written agreement; or (3) performs some
of the issuer’s management functions
under contract or delegation. Thus, CMS
would permit a nonprofit organization
that is not an issuer or the
representative of an issuer but shares
control with an existing issuer to
‘‘sponsor’’ or facilitate the creation of a
CO–OP if the applicant (and resulting
CO–OP) and the existing issuer do not
share the same chief executive or any of
the board of directors. We seek
comment on this interpretation.
‘‘Sponsor’’ is defined as an
organization or individual that is
involved in the development, creation,
or organization of the CO–OP or
provides financial support to a CO–OP.
We propose that a ‘‘predecessor’’ means
any entity that participates in a merger,
consolidation, purchase or acquisition
of property or stock, corporate
separation, or other similar business
transaction that results in the formation
of the new entity.
Section 1322(b)(1) of the Affordable
Care Act directs CMS to award to
applicants loans to provide assistance in
meeting start-up costs and any State
solvency requirements in the States in
which the applicant seeks to be licensed
to issue CO–OP qualified health plans.
‘‘Start-up Loan’’ means a loan provided
by CMS to a loan recipient for costs
associated with creating and developing
a CO–OP. The term ‘‘Solvency Loan’’
means a loan provided by CMS to a loan
recipient in order to meet State solvency
and reserve requirements.
C. Eligibility (§ 156.510)
Section 156.510 outlines the
minimum standards that an
organization must meet to be eligible to
receive a loan from the CO–OP program
to create a new private consumeroperated insurer.
1. General
In paragraph (a), we propose that the
applicant declare its intention to
become a CO–OP. Since the loan
recipient may not meet all of the
conditions to be considered a CO–OP at
the time of the application, it is
important that the organization intend
to meet all of the standards and
demonstrate the likelihood of being able
to meet such requirements by the time
periods established in this subpart
before the award is made, especially
those related to consumer focus and
consumer governance of the
organization.
Consistent with the recommendation
of the Advisory Board, CMS proposes
the applicant have formed a nonprofit
E:\FR\FM\20JYP1.SGM
20JYP1
43242
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 139 / Wednesday, July 20, 2011 / Proposed Rules
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
member organization under State law
prior to applying for a loan. This means
that the new nonprofit member
corporation, and not an organization
that is sponsoring the creation of a CO–
OP, would be the applicant for and
recipient of a loan.
2. Exclusions From Eligibility
Paragraph (b) codifies the conditions
in section 1322(c)(2) of the Affordable
Care Act under which an organization
will not be eligible to participate in the
CO–OP program. Paragraph (b)(1)(i)
codifies that if an organization is a preexisting issuer, a related entity, or any
predecessor of either, it is not eligible
for loans under the CO–OP program and
therefore, cannot become a CO–OP. In
addition, an organization is not eligible
for the CO–OP program if the
organization or a related entity (or any
predecessor of either) is a trade
association whose members consist of
pre-existing issuers. We seek comment
on this interpretation.
Paragraph (b)(1)(ii) codifies that, if an
organization is sponsored by a State or
local government, any political
subdivision thereof, or any
instrumentality of such government or
political subdivision, it is not eligible to
be a CO–OP and cannot apply for a loan
under the CO–OP program. CMS
considered whether this prohibition
should apply to provider organizations
that are associated with State university
medical centers and concluded that
medical centers, physician practices,
hospitals, and other organizations that
are part of a State university system are
instrumentalities of the State. We
believe that the prohibition against
sponsorship by State or local
government, and their political
subdivisions and instrumentalities,
must also apply to medical centers that
are part of State or local governments
and to medical practice groups that are
created and overseen by a medical
center owned by State or local
government. This prohibition would not
apply to Indian tribes. We invite
comment on these interpretations.
As incorporated in section 1551 of the
Affordable Care Act, section 2791(b)(2)
of the PHS Act defines a ‘‘health
insurance issuer’’ as ‘‘an insurance
company, insurance service, or
insurance organization * * * which is
licensed to engage in the business of
insurance in a State and which is
subject to State law which regulates
insurance (within the meaning of
section 514(b)(2) of the Employee
Retirement Income Security Act of
1974).’’ CMS believes that the following
types of entities are examples of
organizations that are not ‘‘issuers’’ and
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:45 Jul 19, 2011
Jkt 223001
would be eligible to sponsor applicants
for loans under the CO–OP program
provided that they otherwise meet the
requirements for eligibility:
(1) A prospective applicant not
licensed by its State as a health
insurance issuer on July 16, 2009, but
which has subsequently achieved a
State license,
(2) Self-funded and Taft-Hartley group
health plans, and
(3) Church plans that were not
licensed issuers on July 16, 2009, and
(4) Three-share or multi-share
programs not licensed by their State
insurance regulator.
CMS invites comment on how these
organizations and others like them
would sponsor an applicant.
Taking into account comments
received on the RFC and the
recommendations of the Advisory
Board, in paragraph (b)(2)(i) CMS
proposes that a nonprofit organization
that is not an issuer but that currently
sponsors an issuer would remain
eligible to sponsor an applicant for a
CO–OP loan in certain circumstances.
Specifically a nonprofit non-issuer
organization that currently sponsors a
pre-existing issuer and meets other
eligibility parameters may sponsor an
applicant for a CO–OP loan provided
that the pre-existing issuer does not
share any of the board or the same chief
executive with the applicant. We seek
comment on this interpretation.
In paragraph (b)(2)(ii), we are further
proposing that an organization that has
purchased assets from a preexisting
issuer in an arm’s-length transaction
where neither party was in a position to
exert undue influence on the other is
eligible to apply for a CO–OP loan.
Therefore, an organization is eligible for
CO–OP loans if it contracts for services,
including health provider network
access, premium billing, and case
management from a health insurance
issuer that existed on July 16, 2009, as
long as the existing issuer has no control
over the new private nonprofit issuer.
Conversely, an applicant and a preexisting issuer could have common
control by a non-issuer organization.
The applicant and pre-existing issuer
would not be related entities unless the
pre-existing issuer also provided the
CO–OP’s services or management
functions.
D. CO–OP Standards (§ 156.515)
1. General
A CO–OP must satisfy the standards
set forth in all statutory, regulatory, or
other requirements as applicable. CMS
proposes additional standards that a
CO–OP must meet in § 156.515, many of
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
which are recommendations made by
the Advisory Board in the final report
dated April 15, 2011. We invite
comment on these proposed standards,
which are set forth below.
2. Governance Requirements
In response to the RFC, provider
organizations submitted comments that
suggested that providers may be in the
best position to sponsor CO–OPs and
encouraged CMS to impose no
additional standards related to
governance beyond those in the statute.
In contrast, other commenters suggested
that CMS set specific standards for the
composition of the governing body,
such as those to avoid conflicts and to
encourage diverse representation on
governing bodies that are representative
of the local population. Other
commenters expressed concern that in
some markets providers could create a
CO–OP and control pricing in the
market.
Section 1322(c)(3)(C) of the
Affordable Care Act directs the
Secretary to promulgate regulations
requiring the organization to operate
with a strong consumer focus, including
timeliness, responsiveness, and
accountability to members. Pursuant to
this authority and taking into account
the comments, CMS proposes additional
governance requirements in paragraph
(b). These proposed standards reflect the
recommendations of the Advisory
Board.
Paragraph (b)(1) proposes that a CO–
OP implement policies and procedures
to foster and ensure member control of
the organization. Section 1322(c)(3) of
the Affordable Care Act states that the
governance of the organization be
subject to a majority vote of its
members. Paragraph (b)(1)(i) proposes
that the organization be governed by an
operational board with each of its
directors elected by a majority vote of its
members. In paragraph (b)(1)(ii), we
propose that every member of the CO–
OP be eligible to vote for each director
of the CO–OP during the elections
described in (b)(1)(iv). In paragraph
(b)(1)(iii), we propose that each member
of the organization have one vote in the
elections of directors.
Paragraph (b)(1)(iv) proposes that the
first election of the operational board of
directors occur no later than one year
after the effective date on which the
CO–OP provides coverage to its first
member. The Advisory Board
recommended that this election should
take place within the first year after
enrollment begins or when a certain
designated membership level is reached,
but should occur no later than two years
after the organization enrolls its first
E:\FR\FM\20JYP1.SGM
20JYP1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 139 / Wednesday, July 20, 2011 / Proposed Rules
member, recognizing that a certain level
of membership is necessary for
meaningful elections. CMS is concerned
that the Advisory Board’s
recommendation of an election date of
the start-up period plus two years after
enrollment will delay the introduction
of consumer governance beyond a point
where it can have an impact on the
strategic direction of the CO–OP. We do
not believe that holding an election one
year after coverage begins will burden
the formation board or CO–OP
operations since the formation board
will have the full start-up period plus
one year to plan for this transition. We
solicit comments on the proposed
timeline.
Paragraph (b)(1)(v) proposes that the
elections for the board of directors of the
organization be contested and that there
be more candidates for open positions
on the board than there are positions.
We are not specifying the mechanism by
which the CO–OP will achieve this
standard, but we believe that the CO–
OP’s bylaws should address this
standard, most likely by creating a
nominating committee that will ensure
that this standard is met. This standard
will help ensure that consumer
members of the organization have a
choice of candidates for the board of
directors, provide an opportunity for a
change in directors, and help prevent a
group of directors from exerting
disproportionate control over the
organization. CMS believes that the
operation of contested elections will
provide safeguards against the long-term
entrenchment or undue influence of any
individual director while protecting the
members’ choice of directors.
Consistent with the recommendations
of the Advisory Board and commenters
to the RFC, paragraph (b)(1)(vi) proposes
that a majority of the voting directors
must be members of the organization.
While all directors must be elected by
the members, a CO–OP may want to
reserve positions for directors who have
certain types of expertise that are
essential to the governance of the
organization, such as providers or
individuals with experience in health
care operations or finance. CMS
recognizes that it may not be possible to
find members of the CO–OP with the
desired expertise who are willing to
serve as directors. The purpose of this
provision is to recognize the need to
allow for directors who are not
members, but to ensure that members
who are consumers of the services of the
organization are the majority of the
board of directors and that the
governance of the organization is
accountable to consumers.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:45 Jul 19, 2011
Jkt 223001
Standards for the operational board of
directors, consistent with the
recommendations of the Advisory Board
are included in (b)(2). Paragraph (b)(2)(i)
specifies that each director must meet
ethical, conflict-of-interest, and
disclosure standards. Specifically, each
director must act in the sole interest of
the CO–OP and its members, avoid selfdealing, and act prudently and
consistently with the terms of the CO–
OP’s governance documents and
applicable State and Federal law.
Paragraph (b)(2)(ii) specifies that each
voting director has only one vote on
matters before the board. This standard
also recognizes that a CO–OP may
choose to have directors who provide
expertise but do not vote. Non-voting
directors must bring specific expertise
or be members of the management team
of the CO–OP, whose participation in
the board of directors is considered
essential.
Paragraph (b)(2)(iii) acknowledges
that positions on the board of directors
may be designated for individuals with
certain types of expertise or experience.
The type of expertise that is needed may
vary over time and the CO–OP may
choose to enlist candidates for the board
with certain types of expertise through
its nominating process.
Paragraph (b)(2)(iv) specifies that
positions on the board that are
designated for individuals with
specialized expertise, experience, or
affiliation (for example, providers,
employers, labor representatives) cannot
constitute a majority of the operational
board even if the individuals serving in
designated seats are members of the
CO–OP. This standard should be
addressed in the bylaws of the CO–OP,
in the conflict of interest standard for
board members, and in the nominating
procedures of the CO–OP.
Paragraph (b)(2)(v) codifies the
limitation in section 1322(e) of the
Affordable Care Act that no
representative of any Federal, State or
local government (or of any political
subdivision or instrumentality thereof)
and no representative of any
organization described in § 156.510(b)(i)
may serve on the board of directors.
Paragraph (b)(3) codifies the provision
that an organization must have
governing documents that incorporate
ethics and conflict of interest standards
protecting against insurance industry
involvement and interference. At a
minimum, the standards must establish
procedures for identifying potential
conflicts of interest and addressing any
violation of the standards.
Paragraph (b)(4) codifies the provision
that the CO–OP must operate with a
strong consumer focus, including
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
43243
timeliness, responsiveness, and
accountability to members. Finally, the
CO–OP must demonstrate financial
viability and the ability to meet all other
statutory, legal, or other requirements.
3. Requirements to Issue Health Plans
and Become a CO–OP
In paragraph (c)(1), CMS codifies
section 1322(c)(1)(B) of the Affordable
Care Act that provides that substantially
all of the activities of the CO–OP consist
of the issuance of CO–OP qualified
health plans in the individual and small
group markets in each State in which it
is licensed to issue such plans. CMS
proposes that a CO–OP will satisfy this
standard if at least two-thirds of the
contracts for health insurance coverage
issued by a CO–OP are CO–OP qualified
health plans offered in the individual
and small group markets in the States in
which the CO–OP operates. An
organization must continually meet this
requirement to be considered a CO–OP.
Members of the Advisory Board noted
that State insurance regulations
generally refer to the contracts for
insurance, not the number of lives
covered under each contract, when
referring to policy issuance. The
Advisory Board therefore recommended
that: the interpretation of ‘‘substantially
all’’ refer to contracts issued; the
proportion of contracts that must meet
the ‘‘substantially all’’ test be
interpreted to provide CO–OPs
maximum flexibility; and CO–OPs be
allowed to meet that standard over time
to build enrollment gradually in the
individual and small group market.
Consistent with the Advisory Board
recommendations on this issue and
public comment received in response to
the RFC, CMS interprets the statute to
mean that each insurance policy or
contract that an issuer sells constitutes
a single activity. We solicit comments
on whether two-third is the appropriate
threshold for this standard.
This proposed standard would allow
providers wishing to sponsor CO–OPs to
enroll their own employees in the CO–
OP and thereby encourage provider
participation. It would also permit CO–
OPs to participate in Medicaid and
Children’s Health Insurance Program
(CHIP), which would enable individuals
and families to remain with the same
health insurance issuer and providers if
they move between the Exchange and
these programs.
In paragraph (c)(2), CMS proposes
that a CO–OP applicant receiving a
Start-up Loan or Solvency Loan offer at
least one CO–OP qualified health plan
at both the silver and gold benefit levels,
as defined in section 1302(d) of the
Affordable Care Act, in every individual
E:\FR\FM\20JYP1.SGM
20JYP1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
43244
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 139 / Wednesday, July 20, 2011 / Proposed Rules
market Exchange that serves the
geographic market in which it is
licensed and intends to provide health
care coverage (market area). In addition,
CMS proposes that if a CO–OP chooses
to offer coverage in the small group
market outside the Exchange, a CO–OP
must commit to offering at least one
CO–OP qualified health plan at both the
silver and gold benefit levels in the
SHOP of any market area where the CO–
OP is licensed. Note that it is a choice
for a CO–OP to offer coverage in the
small group market, but if it does so, it
must also offer coverage through SHOP
to prevent adverse selection against
SHOP. These standards are consistent
with section 1301 of the Affordable Care
Act providing that health insurance
issuers that participate in the Exchanges
offer qualified health plans at both the
silver and gold benefit levels.
In paragraph (c)(3) CMS proposes that
within the earlier of thirty-six months
following the initial drawdown of a
Start-up Loan or six months following
the initial drawdown of the Solvency
Loan, a loan recipient be licensed in a
State and offer at least one CO–OP
qualified health plan at the silver and
gold benefit levels (as defined in section
1302(d) of the Affordable Care Act) in
an individual market Exchange and, if
offering a health plan in the small group
market, in a SHOP. Thus, the loan
recipient must satisfy the requirements
of title XXVII of the Public Health
Service Act applicable to health
insurance coverage in the individual
market and small group market, if
applicable and comply with all
standards generally applicable to
qualified health plan issuers. To
continue offering CO–OP qualified
health plans in the Exchanges, a CO–OP
must continue to meet these standards.
Due to concerns regarding the ability
of a CO–OP to establish sufficient
enrollment to make its health plans
viable, CMS proposes that when offering
a CO–OP qualified health plan in an
Exchange for the first time, loan
recipients may only begin to offer health
plans and accept enrollment during an
open enrollment period for the
applicable Exchange. We seek comment
on this proposal.
In paragraph (d), CMS proposes that
a loan recipient must satisfy the
requirements of section 1322(c) of the
Affordable Care Act and § 156.515 and
become a CO–OP within fifty-four
months following the first drawdown of
a Start-up Loan or eighteen months
following the initial drawdown of a
Solvency Loan.
These provisions will ensure that loan
recipients actively work toward
becoming a CO–OP that offers CO–OP
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:45 Jul 19, 2011
Jkt 223001
qualified health plans in the Exchanges.
Commenters to the RFC indicated that it
could take from 6 months to 3 years for
a new CO–OP to become operational
and begin accepting enrollment, with
most commenters stating that 18 to 24
months would be needed to become
operational. CMS believes that the
proposed timeframes provide sufficient
time for a loan recipient to offer CO–OP
qualified health plans in the Exchanges
and become a new CO–OP that meets all
of the governance requirements of the
CO–OP program. We request comment
on these proposed standards.
E. Loan Terms (§ 156.520)
1. Overview of Loans
Paragraph (a)(1), proposes that
organizations that meet eligibility
standards according to § 156.510 can
apply for Start-up Loans and Solvency
Loans (pursuant to a separate CO–OP
program Funding Opportunity
Announcement (FOA)). Organizations
may apply for Start-up Loans to assist
with start-up costs associated with
establishing a CO–OP. In addition, CMS
proposes that organizations that meet
the eligibility standards may apply for
Solvency Loans to assist in meeting the
solvency requirements of States in
which the applicant seeks to be licensed
to issue CO–OP qualified health plans.
Section § 156.520 outlines the terms
of the loans awarded under the CO–OP
program. Other than the 5-year and 15year repayment periods, the statute
leaves the specific terms of the loans to
CMS’s discretion but requires that CMS
take into consideration State solvency
requirements. Accordingly, CMS
proposes loan terms that are consistent
with the goals of the CO–OP program,
most likely to encourage successful CO–
OPs, and protect the Federal
investment.
The Advisory Board strongly
recommended that CMS begin awarding
loans in late 2011 or early 2012 to
provide sufficient time for CO–OPs to
become operational and accept
enrollment during the first Exchange
open enrollment period to compete for
membership and gain the level of
enrollment needed to be viable.
Commenters to the RFC generally agreed
that it is important for CMS to provide
startup funding to CO–OPs as soon as
possible. Accordingly, we intend to
begin awarding CO–OP loans in this
timeframe.
As a condition of licensure as a health
insurer, State insurance departments
require that an insurer maintain an
amount of capital that is consistent with
its size and risk profile. This measure of
reserve is called risk-based capital
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
(RBC). State law establishes a variety of
required regulatory actions if an
insurer’s RBC falls below established
levels or percent of RBC. These
regulatory interventions can range from
a corrective action plan to liquidation of
the insurer if it is insolvent. Solvency
and the financial health of insurers is
historically a State-regulated function.
Solvency Loans are intended to help
loan recipients meet the reserve
requirements, solvency regulations, and
requisite surplus note arrangements in
each State. Since Solvency Loans must
be repaid to the Federal government
within 15 years, the Advisory Board
expressed a concern that they will be
treated by States as debt rather than
capital that satisfies State solvency and
reserve requirements.
A loan is considered a liability and
typically would not assist an
organization in meeting solvency
requirements, since the liability would
have to be subtracted from the
calculation of reserves in order to
determine the net protection afforded to
enrollees. In order to assist CO–OPs in
meeting State solvency requirements,
the loans will be structured so that
premiums would go to pay claims and
meet cash reserve requirements before
repayment to CMS. The goal of this
provision is to satisfy the reserve
requirements of the individual
insurance department in the States in
which each CO–OP seeks licensure. The
Advisory Board proposed that CO–OPs
discuss the appropriate mechanisms
with their insurance regulators for
structuring the loans to meet reserve
requirements and include a description
of those mechanisms in their
applications so that loan and repayment
terms for that applicant conform to the
State’s requirements.
CMS proposes in § 156.520(a)(3) to
structure Solvency Loans to each loan
recipient in a manner that meets State
reserve and solvency requirements so
that the loan recipient can fund its
required capital reserves. This ensures
that they are recognized as contributing
to State reserve and solvency
requirements in the States in which the
applicant intends to offer CO–OP
qualified health plans. We request
comment on this provision.
2. Repayment Period
Section 1322(b)(3) of the Affordable
Care Act states that loans awarded must
be repaid within 5 years and 15 years
respectively, taking into consideration
any appropriate State reserve
requirements, solvency regulations, and
requisite surplus note arrangements that
must be constructed in a State. This
standard is codified in § 156.520(b).
E:\FR\FM\20JYP1.SGM
20JYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 139 / Wednesday, July 20, 2011 / Proposed Rules
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Loan recipients must make loan
payments consistent with the repayment
schedule approved by CMS and agreed
to by the loan recipient until the loans
have been paid in full. Recognizing that
it would be difficult for a loan recipient
to begin repaying the loans before it has
enrolled members and received
premiums, the Advisory Board
recommended that loan repayment
begin after the loan recipient has begun
receiving enrollment. Commenters to
the RFC generally recommended
repayment schedules for loans that are
flexible. Most commenters indicated
that preventing the failure of a CO–OP
should take priority over repayment
because insolvency of a CO–OP would
harm its members and create disruption
in insurance markets.
CMS agrees with the commenters and
believes that a flexible repayment
approach would promote the growth of
CO–OPs, serve the interests of the CO–
OP members and the public, and
enhance the likelihood of full
repayment. Flexibility in the repayment
schedule helps address the diversity in
each CO–OP’s local market conditions,
projected member risk profiles, business
strategy, and projected enrollment size.
CMS proposes to permit individualized
repayment schedules to be submitted
with the application with features such
as a grace period, graduated repayments,
or balloon payments at the end of the
repayment period.
The Advisory Board recommended an
enhanced oversight process for cases
where a loan recipient is not meeting
the terms and conditions of its loan but
where CMS has concluded that
discontinuing funding is not in the best
interest of the members, the public, or
the government. Consistent with the
Advisory Board’s recommendation,
CMS may execute a loan modification or
workout when a loan recipient is having
difficulty making loan repayments. If a
loan recipient is unable to (1) make
repayments or meet other conditions of
the loan without adversely affecting
coverage stability, member control,
quality of care, or the public interest
generally or (2) meet State reserve and
solvency requirements, CMS would
have the option to execute a loan
modification or workout.
3. Interest Rates
In § 156.520(c), CMS proposes that
loan recipients pay an interest rate
benchmarked to the average interest rate
on marketable Treasury securities of
similar maturity. These interest rates are
tied to prevailing market conditions
while providing low cost loans that are
consistent with the statute’s direction to
foster the development of viable private
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:45 Jul 19, 2011
Jkt 223001
nonprofit CO–OPs. CMS is considering
reductions to the benchmarked rate for
Start-Up Loans and Solvency Loans to
make it easier for new CO–OPs to repay
their loans.
Section 1322(b)(2)(C)(iii) of the
Affordable Care Act states that if CMS
determines that a loan recipient has
failed to meet any of its contractual
obligations, or has used Federal funds in
a prohibited or improper manner, the
loan recipient must repay to CMS 110
percent of the aggregate amount of loans
received under this section, plus
interest. This provision is codified in
§ 156.520(c) so that if a loan recipient’s
loan agreement is terminated by CMS,
the loan recipient would be charged the
statutory penalty and an interest rate
equal to the average interest rate on
marketable Treasury securities of
similar maturity. We request public
comment on the proposed interest rates
and the structure of the debt instrument.
4. Failure to Pay
In § 156.520(d), CMS proposes to use
any and all remedies available to it
under law to collect loan payments or
penalty payments if a loan recipient
fails to make payments consistent with
the repayment schedule in its loan
agreement or in a loan modification or
workout.
5. Deeming of CO–OP Qualified Health
Plans
In § 156.520(e) we codify the
‘‘deeming’’ provisions of section
1301(a)(2) of the Affordable Care Act. To
be deemed certified to participate in an
Exchange, we propose that a loan
recipient must be in compliance with
the terms of the CO–OP program, the
Federal standards for CO–OP qualified
health plans set forth pursuant to
section 1311(c) of the Affordable Care
Act and State standards. CMS or an
entity designated by CMS will make a
determination regarding whether or not
a loan recipient meets these standards
based on evidence provided by the loan
recipient. CMS or its designee will
notify the Exchange in which the loan
recipient proposes to operate that the
loan recipient is deemed certified to
participate. Similarly, if a loan recipient
loses its deemed status for any reason,
CMS or its designee will provide notice
to the applicable Exchanges.
A loan recipient that is deemed
certified to participate in the Exchange
would be exempt from the certification
procedures for each applicable
Exchange. However, the loan recipient
must still meet any standards
established by CMS for all qualified
health plans participating in an
Exchange, along with all State
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
43245
requirements in the case where a State
is operating the Exchange.
6. Conversions
The Advisory Board expressed a
concern about the potential for
successful CO–OPs to become targets for
conversion to for-profit, non-consumer
operated entities. Such an outcome
could reduce consumer control, limit
choice, and weaken competition in the
insurance marketplace. Accordingly, the
Advisory Board recommended imposing
conditions on conversions that would
create strong disincentives for a
company to acquire a CO–OP and for a
CO–OP to pursue such offers. Because
allowing conversions to a for-profit or
non-consumer operated entity would be
contrary to the goals of the CO–OP
program, CMS proposes to prohibit such
conversions. This prohibition on
conversions and sales to for-profit or
non-consumer operated entities would
ensure that loans awarded under this
program are used to sustain program
goals over time.
CMS recognizes the potential for
changes in CO–OP governance in
circumstances other than conversions
and sales to for-profit or non-consumeroperated entities. Since the goals of the
CO–OP program are to make available
new consumer-governed private
nonprofit health plans and expand
competition in the Exchanges, CMS
proposes to prohibit any transaction by
a CO–OP that would result in a change
to a governance structure that does not
meet the standards in § 156.515 or any
other program standards. We request
comment on these prohibitions.
III. Collection of Information
Requirements
Under the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995, we are required to provide 60day notice in the Federal Register and
solicit public comment before an
information collection request is
submitted to the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) for review and
approval. We will solicit comments on
the information collection request in
association with the implementation of
the CO–OP program (for example,
application, reporting) in one or more
future 60-day notices.
V. Regulatory Impact Analysis (RIA)
A. Introduction
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess all costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
E:\FR\FM\20JYP1.SGM
20JYP1
43246
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 139 / Wednesday, July 20, 2011 / Proposed Rules
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
environmental, public health and safety
effects, distributive impacts, and
equity). An RIA must be prepared for
rules with economically significant
effects ($100 million or more in any 1
year). This proposed rule is
economically significant. Accordingly,
the Office of Management and Budget
has reviewed this proposed rule.
B. Statement of Need, Health Insurance
Markets, and CO–OP Plans
The Affordable Care Act established
the Consumer Operated and Oriented
Plan (CO–OP) program. Section
1322(b)(3) of the Affordable Care Act
requires CMS to promulgate regulations
to implement this program. The purpose
of this program is to create a new CO–
OP in every State in order to expand the
number of qualified health plans
available in the Exchanges with a focus
on integrated care and greater plan
accountability.
Only a few States offer insurance
choices sponsored and managed by
entities primarily focused on meeting
the health insurance needs and
preferences of consumers, as
determined directly by consumers or
their elected representatives. Currently,
we believe that there are four issuers in
the country that meet this standard,
located in the States of Washington,
Idaho, Minnesota, and Wisconsin.
While these issuers cover in excess of
one million lives, their market share is
only about one percent of private
insurance coverage.
Congress has provided budget
authority of $3.8 billion to assist
sponsoring organizations in creating
such plans and to do so with enough
capital and reserves to become licensed
and ultimately effective competitors in
State insurance markets. These funds
will enable CO–OPs to use Federal
government loans (‘‘Solvency Loans’’) to
meet the requirements for risk-based
capital that State insurance
commissions impose on health plans to
ensure that they will be able to finance
the services they have contractually
promised their enrollees.
The Affordable Care Act, as
implemented through this regulation,
prohibits issuers that existed prior to
July 16, 2009 from participating in the
CO–OP program but allows CO–OPs to
use experienced managers and health
care organizations to manage the
functions they have to perform in
providing health insurance. Further, as
indicated throughout the preamble to
this proposed rule, the CO–OP Advisory
Board in its advice to the Secretary, and
the Department in its proposed
provisions, have consistently favored
provisions that would give CO–OP
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:45 Jul 19, 2011
Jkt 223001
flexibility, within the boundaries set by
the statute, in setting up and operating
these plans.
CO–OPs may not, however, enter the
program unless their activities are
limited primarily to issuing plans in the
individual and small group markets.
CO–OPs will therefore face the problem
of being either brand new organizations
or existing organizations facing a major
change in purpose.
C. Anticipated Federal Costs
As previously explained, Congress
has provided $3.8 billion to assist
sponsoring organizations in creating
such plans and to do so with enough
capital and reserves to become licensed
and ultimately effective competitors in
State insurance markets.1 The capital
requirements for CO–OPs would be
financed, in part, by member premiums
and in part by the $3.8 billion dollars
available for loans over the next five
years. The net Federal costs of these
loans to CO–OPs are ‘‘transfers.’’ The
net transfer costs resulting from default
and loss of interest over the relevant 5
year (Start-up Loan) and 15 year
(Solvency Loan) periods are estimated
later in this analysis, in Table 1. We
estimate that 65 percent of the Solvency
Loans and 60 percent of the Start-up
Loans will be repaid. Our estimates use
one percent below the current yields for
5-year U.S. Treasury bonds as the
repayment interest rate on Start-up
Loans and two percent below the
current yields for longer term U.S.
Treasury Bonds as the repayment rate
for the Solvency Loans.
D. Anticipated Benefits
CO–OPs also offer a unique
opportunity to foster and spread
emerging models of integrated delivery
systems, both to improve health
outcomes and to lower health costs (see,
for example, testimony of Sara Collins
before the Advisory Committee, The
Consumer Operated and Oriented Plan
(CO–OP) Program Under the Affordable
Care Act: Potential and Options for
Spreading Mission-Driven Integrated
Delivery Systems, at https://www.
commonwealthfund.org/∼/media/Files/
Publications/Testimony/2011/Jan/
Collins_CoOp%20testimony_
11311.pdf). CO–OPs can adopt new
models and new arrangements that are
1 We note that these capital requirements are not
‘‘cost’’ for the purpose of calculating the benefits
and costs of this Federal program. Costs, in the
context of this program, are the resources spent on
applying for and complying with the terms of the
loans. As noted above, we will solicit comments on
the information collection requests associated with
the implementation of the CO–OP program (for
example, application, reporting) in one or more
future 60-day notices.
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
more patient-centered than the current
fragmented delivery system. Improved
delivery systems may provide better
health outcomes due to coordinated
care, better chronic disease
management, and improved quality of
care.
In addition, by adding competition in
numerous local and State markets, CO–
OPs have the potential to promote
efficiency, reduce premiums or
premium growth, and improve service
and benefits to enrollees. By their
nature, traditional cooperatives, on
which the CO–OP program is modeled,
focus on responsiveness to their
members and accountability to member
needs, which may create flexibility to
reduce administrative costs. Direct
savings could be substantial after the
initial start-up period given the
magnitude of the total spending that
may be involved. Resulting attempts to
regain market share by traditional
insurance issuers competing with CO–
OPs could lead to system-wide savings
across millions of enrollees.
E. Alternatives Considered
Throughout this proposed rule we
have presented and analyzed
alternatives. The program is largely
defined by the statute, but in this
proposed rule, we have sought to
identify options that would best enable
newly formed CO–OPs to offer CO–OP
qualified health plans. We welcome
comments on any other alternatives that
would improve the proposed rule and
the likelihood of program success.
The most important alternatives to
our proposed standards would be to
impose either a higher or lower interest
repayment on loans. Among the
thousands of Federal programs
providing financial assistance, the great
majority make grants that are not
repayable. The Federal government also
provides financial assistance through
loan programs. Borrower interest rates,
in some cases, are higher than Treasury
rates, while in other cases rates are
subsidized by the Government (see the
estimates in the Federal Credit
Supplement volume of the Budget of the
United States Government for FY 2012,
at https://www.gpoaccess.gov/usbudget/
fy12/cr_supp.html).
There is also a tradeoff between the
amount of a loan subsidy and the likely
default rate. For example, if a 1 percent
increase in the interest rate were to
increase the likelihood of total default
by 1 percent or more, the net effect
would be to increase Federal costs. In
the CO–OP program, substantially
higher interest rates could threaten
required solvency reserves. We cannot
predict quantitatively the effects of
E:\FR\FM\20JYP1.SGM
20JYP1
43247
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 139 / Wednesday, July 20, 2011 / Proposed Rules
interest charges on the willingness of
organizations to sponsor CO–OPs, but
substantially higher interest charges
would clearly reduce the likelihood of
CO–OPs being created in as many
States. Higher interest charges could
also reduce the ability of CO–OPs to
expand and correspondingly reduce the
benefits of the program.
F. Accounting Statement
As required by OMB Circular A–4, we
have prepared an accounting statement.
The transfer costs shown are the net
costs resulting from default and loss of
interest over the relevant 5 year (Startup Loan) and 15 year (Solvency Loan)
periods. We have estimated that $600
million would be used for Start-up
Loans and $3,200 million would be
used for Solvency Loans. As previously
presented, for purposes of this
calculation our primary estimate is that
65 percent of the Solvency Loans and 60
percent of the Start-up Loans are repaid.
We have used a low-cost estimate that
assumes 80 percent repayment of all
loans and a high-cost estimate that
assumes 50 percent repayment of all
loans. Our estimates use one percent
below the current yields for 5-year U.S.
Treasury bonds as the repayment
interest rate on Start-up loans and two
percent below the current yields for the
average of 10-year and 20-year U.S.
Treasury Bonds as the repayment rate
for the Solvency Loans (see https://
www.treasury.gov/resource-center/datachart-center/interest-rates/Pages/
TextView.aspx?data=yield).
TABLE 1—ACCOUNTING STATEMENT: CLASSIFICATION OF ESTIMATED COSTS AND SAVINGS
[$ in millions]
Units
Primary
estimate
Category
Low estimate
High estimate
Year
dollars
Discount
rate (%)
Period
covered
Benefits
Qualitative: New CO–OP enrollees served may experience better health outcomes. There are also potential cost savings system-wide from
competitive effects on other health care plans. Net benefits will depend on the extent to which CO–OP plans augment or substitute for other
health care insurance and services.
Costs
Qualitative: Costs include administrative burdens associated with applying for and complying with the terms of the loans.
Transfers
Federal Government Costs ....................................................
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
VI. Other Requirements for Analysis of
Economic Effects
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
requires agencies to determine whether
proposed rules would have a
‘‘significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities’’
and, if so, to prepare a Regulatory
Flexibility Analysis to identify options
that could mitigate the impact of the
proposed regulation on small
businesses.
All CO–OPs established under the
program will be private nonprofit
organizations and hence qualify as small
entities under the RFA. CMS interprets
the requirement as applying only to
regulations with negative impacts, but
routinely prepares a voluntary
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis for
regulations with significant positive
impacts.
The positive economic impacts of the
program on CO–OPs will clearly be
‘‘significant,’’ particularly in the effects
on thousands of small businesses that
are likely to purchase insurance through
the Exchanges and would benefit from
the lower premium costs that CO–OPs
will likely create. Moreover, small
businesses will have the opportunity to
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:45 Jul 19, 2011
Jkt 223001
$210 million
$110 million
$190 million
$80 million
$230 million
$140 million
create consortia to help sponsor CO–
OPs and may actively pursue these
savings. In the light of the benefits to
these small entities, the Department has
prepared a voluntary Regulatory
Flexibility Analysis. The preceding
economic analysis, together with the
remainder of this preamble, constitutes
that analysis.
Section 1102(b) of the Social Security
Act requires us to prepare a regulatory
impact analysis if a rule may have a
significant impact on the operations of
a substantial number of small rural
hospitals. We do not believe a
regulatory impact analysis is required
here because this proposed rule would
not have a direct effect on small rural
hospitals or other providers.
Section 202 of the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 requires
that agencies assess anticipated costs
and benefits before issuing any rule
whose mandates on State, local, or tribal
governments in the aggregate, or on the
private sector, require spending in any
1 year of $100 million in 1995 dollars,
updated annually for inflation. This
proposed rule would impose no such
mandates. Accordingly, no analysis
under UMRA is required.
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
2012
2012
7
3
2012–31
2012–31
Executive Order 13132 on Federalism
establishes requirements that an agency
must meet when a proposed rule
imposes substantial costs on State and
local governments, preempts State law,
or otherwise has Federalism
implications. This proposed rule does
not trigger these requirements.
List of Subjects in 45 CFR Part 156
Administrative practice and
procedure, Advertising, Advisory
committees, Brokers, Conflict of
interest, Consumer protection, Grant
programs—health, Grants
administration, Health care, Health
insurance, Health maintenance
organization (HMO), Health records,
Hospitals, Indians, Individuals with
disabilities, Loan programs—health,
Organization and functions
(Government agencies), Medicaid,
Public assistance programs, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements, Safety,
State and local governments, Sunshine
Act, Technical Assistance, Women, and
Youth.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, the Department of Health and
Human Services proposes to further
amend 45 CFR part 156, as proposed to
E:\FR\FM\20JYP1.SGM
20JYP1
43248
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 139 / Wednesday, July 20, 2011 / Proposed Rules
be added at 76 FR 41866, July 15, 2011,
as set forth below:
PART 156—HEALTH PLAN
REQUIREMENTS UNDER THE
PATIENT PROTECTION AND
AFFORDABLE CARE ACT, INCLUDING
REQUIREMENTS RELATED TO
EXCHANGES
1. The authority citation for part 156
continues to read as follows:
Authority: Title I of the Affordable Care
Act, Sections 1301–1304, 1311–1312, 1321,
1322, 1324, 1334, 1342–1343, and 1401–
1402.
2. Subpart F is added to read as
follows:
Subpart F—Consumer Operated and
Oriented Plan Program
Sec.
156.500 Basis and scope.
156.505 Definitions.
156.510 Eligibility.
156.515 CO–OP minimum standards.
156.520 Loan terms.
Subpart F—Consumer Operated and
Oriented Plan Program
§ 156.500
Basis and scope.
This subpart implements section 1322
of the Affordable Care Act by
establishing the Consumer Operated and
Oriented Plan (CO–OP) program to
foster the creation of new consumergoverned, private, nonprofit health
insurance issuers, known as ‘‘CO–OPs.’’
Under this program, loans are awarded
to encourage the development of CO–
OPs. Applicants that meet the eligibility
standards of the CO–OP program may
apply to receive loans to help fund startup costs and meet the solvency
requirements of States in which the
applicant seeks to be licensed to issue
CO–OP qualified health plans. This
subpart sets forth the governance
requirements for the CO–OP program
and the terms for loans awarded under
the CO–OP program.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 156.505
Definitions.
The following definitions apply to
this subpart:
Applicant means an entity eligible to
apply for a loan described in § 156.520
of this subpart.
Consumer operated and oriented plan
(CO–OP) means a loan recipient that
satisfies the standards in section 1322(c)
of the Affordable Care Act and § 156.515
of this subpart within the timeframes
specified in this subpart.
CO–OP qualified health plan means a
health plan that has in effect a
certification that it meets the standards
described in subpart C of part 156,
except that the plan can be deemed
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:45 Jul 19, 2011
Jkt 223001
certified by CMS or an entity designated
by CMS as described in § 156.520(e).
Exchange has the meaning given to
the term in proposed § 155.20.
Formation board means the initial
board of directors of the applicant or
loan recipient before it has begun
accepting enrollment and had an
election by the members of the
organization to the board of directors.
Individual market has the meaning
given to the term in proposed § 155.20.
Issuer means an insurance company,
insurance service, or insurance
organization (including a health
maintenance organization) which is
licensed to engage in the business of
insurance in a State and which is
subject to State law which regulates
insurance.
Member means an individual covered
under health insurance policies issued
by a loan recipient.
Nonprofit member organization or
nonprofit member corporation means a
nonprofit, not-for-profit, public benefit,
or similar membership entity organized
as appropriate under State law.
Operational board means the board of
directors elected by the members of the
loan recipient after it has begun
accepting enrollment.
Predecessor, with respect to a new
entity, means any entity that
participates in a merger, consolidation,
purchase or acquisition of property or
stock, corporate separation, or other
similar business transaction that results
in the formation of the new entity.
Pre-existing issuer means a health
insurance issuer that was in existence
on July 16, 2009.
Qualified nonprofit health insurance
issuer means a loan recipient, which
satisfies or can reasonably be expected
to satisfy the standards in section
1322(c) of the Affordable Care Act and
§ 156.515 of this subpart within the time
frames specified in this subpart, until
such time as CMS determines the loan
recipient does not satisfy or cannot
reasonably be expected to satisfy these
standards.
Related entity means an entity that
shares common ownership or control
with a pre-existing issuer or a trade
association whose members consist of
pre-existing issuers, and satisfies at least
one of the following conditions:
(1) Retains responsibilities for the
services to be provided by the issuer;
(2) Furnishes services to the issuer’s
enrollees under an oral or written
agreement; or
(3) Performs some of the issuer’s
management functions under contract or
delegation.
SHOP has the meaning given to the
term in proposed § 155.20.
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Small group market has the meaning
given to the term in proposed § 155.20.
Solvency Loan means a loan provided
by CMS to a loan recipient in order to
meet State solvency and reserve
requirements.
Sponsor means an organization or
individual that is involved in the
development, creation, or organization
of the CO–OP or provides financial
support to a CO–OP.
Start-up Loan means a loan provided
by CMS to a loan recipient for costs
associated with establishing a CO–OP.
State has the meaning given to the
term in proposed § 155.20.
§ 156.510
Eligibility.
(a) General. In addition to the
eligibility standards set forth in the CO–
OP program Funding Opportunity
Announcement (FOA), to be eligible to
apply for and receive a loan under the
CO–OP program, an organization must
intend to become a CO–OP and be a
nonprofit member organization.
(b) Exclusions from eligibility. (1)
Subject to paragraph (b)(2) of this
section, an organization is not eligible to
apply for a loan if:
(i) The organization is a pre-existing
issuer, a trade association whose
members consist of pre-existing issuers,
a related entity, or a predecessor of
either; or
(ii) A State or local government, any
political subdivision thereof, or any
instrumentality of such government or
political subdivision is a sponsor of the
organization.
(2) The exclusion of pre-existing
issuers in paragraph (b)(1)(i) of this
section does not exclude from eligibility
an applicant that:
(i) Has as a sponsor a nonprofit
organization that is not an issuer or a
trade association whose members
consist of issuers and that also sponsors
a pre-existing issuer, provided that the
pre-existing issuer does not share any of
its board or the same chief executive
with the applicant; or
(ii) Has purchased assets from a
preexisting issuer provided that it is an
arm’s-length transaction where neither
party was in a position to exert undue
influence on the other.
§ 156.515
CO–OP standards.
(a) General. A CO–OP must satisfy the
standards in this section in addition to
all other statutory, regulatory, or other
requirements.
(b) Governance requirements. A CO–
OP must meet the following governance
requirements:
(1) Member control. A CO–OP must
implement policies and procedures to
foster and ensure member control of the
E:\FR\FM\20JYP1.SGM
20JYP1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 139 / Wednesday, July 20, 2011 / Proposed Rules
organization. Accordingly, a CO–OP
must meet the following the
requirements:
(i) The CO–OP must be governed by
an operational board with all of its
directors elected by a majority vote of
the CO–OP’s members;
(ii) All members must be eligible to
vote for each director on the
organization’s operational board;
(iii) Each member of the organization
must have one vote in the elections of
the directors of the organization’s
operational board;
(iv) Elections of the directors on the
organization’s operational board must
occur no later than one year after the
effective date on which the organization
provides coverage to its first member;
(v) Elections of the directors on the
organization’s operational board must
be contested so that the number of
candidates for vacant positions on the
operational board exceeds the number
of vacant positions; and
(vi) The majority of the voting
directors on the operational board must
be members of the organization.
(2) Standards for board of directors.
The operational board for a CO–OP
must meet the following standards:
(i) Each director must meet ethical,
conflict-of-interest, and disclosure
standards including that each director
act in the sole interest of the CO–OP;
(ii) Each director has one vote unless
he or she is a non-voting director;
(iii) Positions on the board of
directors may be designated for
individuals with specialized expertise,
experience, or affiliation (for example,
providers, employers, and unions);
(iv) Positions on the operational board
that are designated for individuals with
specialized expertise, experience, or
affiliation cannot constitute a majority
of the operational board even if the
individuals in those positions are
members of the CO–OP. This provision
does not prevent any individual from
seeking election to the operational board
based on being a member of the CO–OP;
and
(v) Limitation on government and
issuer participation. No representative
of any Federal, State or local
government (or of any political
subdivision or instrumentality thereof)
and no representative of any
organization described in
§ 156.510(b)(1)(i) of this subpart may
serve on the CO–OP’s formation board
or operational board.
(3) Ethics and conflict of interest
protections. The CO–OP must have
governing documents that incorporate
ethics, conflict of interest, and
disclosure standards. The standards
must protect against insurance industry
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:45 Jul 19, 2011
Jkt 223001
involvement and interference. In
addition, the standards must ensure that
each director acts in the sole interest of
the CO–OP and its members, avoids self
dealing, and acts prudently and
consistently with the terms of the CO–
OP’s governance documents and
applicable State and Federal law. At a
minimum, these standards must
include:
(i) A mechanism to identify potential
ethical or other conflicts of interest;
(ii) A duty on the CO–OP’s executive
officers and directors to disclose all
potential conflicts of interest;
(iii) A process to determine the extent
to which a conflict exists;
(iv) A process to address any conflict
of interest; and
(v) A process to be followed in the
event a director or executive officer of
the CO–OP violates these standards.
(4) Consumer focus. The CO–OP must
operate with a strong consumer focus,
including timeliness, responsiveness,
and accountability to members.
(c) Standards for health plan
issuance. A CO–OP must meet several
standards for the issuance of health
plans in the individual and small group
market.
(1) At least two-thirds of the policies
or contracts for health insurance
coverage issued by a CO–OP in each
State in which it is licensed must be
CO–OP qualified health plans offered in
the individual and small group markets.
(2) Loan recipients must offer a CO–
OP qualified health plan at the silver
and gold benefit levels, defined in
section 1302(d) of the Affordable Care
Act, in every individual market
Exchange that serves the geographic
regions in which the organization is
licensed and intends to provide health
care coverage. If offering at least one
plan in the small group market, loan
recipients must offer a CO–OP qualified
health plan at both the silver and gold
benefit levels, defined in section
1302(d) of the Affordable Care Act, in
each SHOP that serves the geographic
regions in which the organization offers
coverage in the small group market.
(3) Within the earlier of thirty-six
months following the initial drawdown
of the Start-up Loan or 6 months
following the initial drawdown of the
Solvency Loan, loan recipients must be
licensed in a State and offer at least one
CO–OP qualified health plan at the
silver and gold benefit levels, defined in
section 1302(d) of the Affordable Care
Act, in the individual market Exchanges
and if the loan recipient offers coverage
in the small group market, at the silver
and gold benefit levels, defined in
section 1302(d) of the Affordable Care
Act, in the SHOPs. Loan recipients may
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
43249
only begin offering plans and accepting
enrollment in the Exchanges for new
CO–OP qualified health plans during
the open enrollment period for each
applicable Exchange.
(d) Requirement to become a CO–OP.
Loan recipients must meet the standards
of § 156.515 of this subpart no later than
fifty-four months following initial
drawdown of the Start-up Loan or
eighteen months following the initial
drawdown of a Solvency Loan.
§ 156.520
Loan terms.
(a) Overview of Loans. (1) Applicants
may apply for the following loans under
this section: Start-up Loans and
Solvency Loans.
(2) All loans awarded under this
subpart must be used in a manner that
is consistent with the FOA, the loan
agreement, and all other statutory,
regulatory, or other requirements.
(3) Solvency Loans awarded under
this subsection will be structured in a
manner that ensures that the loan
amount is recognized by State insurance
regulators as contributing to the Statedetermined reserve requirements or
other solvency requirements (rather
than debt) consistent with the insurance
regulations for the States in which the
loan recipient will offer a CO–OP
qualified health plan.
(b) Repayment period. The loan
recipient must make loan payments
consistent with the approved repayment
schedule in the loan agreement until the
loan is paid in full consistent with State
reserve requirements, solvency
regulations, and requisite surplus note
arrangements. Subject to their ability to
meet State reserve requirements,
solvency regulations, or requisite
surplus note arrangements, the loan
recipient must repay its loans and, if
applicable, penalties within the
repayment periods in paragraphs (b)(1),
(2), or (3) of this section.
(1) The contractual repayment period
for Start-up Loans and any associated
penalty is five years following each
drawdown of loan funds consistent with
the terms of the loan agreement.
(2) The contractual repayment period
for Solvency Loans and any associated
penalty is fifteen years following each
drawdown of loan funds consistent with
the terms of the loan agreement.
(3) Changes to the loan terms,
including the repayment periods, may
be executed if CMS determines that the
loan recipient is unable to repay the
loans as a result of State reserve
requirements, solvency regulations, or
requisite surplus note arrangements or
without compromising coverage
stability, member control, quality of
care, or market stability. In the case of
E:\FR\FM\20JYP1.SGM
20JYP1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
43250
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 139 / Wednesday, July 20, 2011 / Proposed Rules
a loan modification or workout, the
repayment period for loans awarded
under this subpart is the repayment
period established in the loan
modification or workout. The revised
terms must meet all other regulatory,
statutory, and other requirements.
(c) Interest rates. Loan recipients will
be charged interest for the loans
awarded under this subpart. Interest
will be accrued starting from the date of
drawdown on the loan amounts that
have been drawn down and not yet
repaid by the loan recipient. The
interest rate will be determined based
on the date of award.
(d) Failure to pay. Loan recipients that
fail to make loan payments consistent
with the repayment schedule or loan
modification or workout approved by
CMS will be subject to any and all
remedies available to CMS under law to
collect the debt.
(e) Deeming of CO–OP qualified
health plans. Health plans offered by a
loan recipient may be deemed certified
as a CO–OP qualified health plan to
participate in the Exchanges for up to 10
years following the life of any loan
awarded to the loan recipient under this
subpart, consistent with section
1301(a)(2) of the Affordable Care Act.
An Exchange must recognize a health
plan offered by a loan recipient as an
eligible participant of the Exchange if it
is deemed certified by CMS or an entity
designated by CMS. To be deemed as
certified to participate in the Exchanges,
the loan recipient must comply with the
standards for CO–OP qualified health
plans set forth pursuant to section
1311(c) of the Affordable Care Act, all
State-specific standards established by
an Exchange for qualified health plans
operating in that Exchange, and the
standards of the CO–OP program as set
forth in this subpart. If a loan recipient
is deemed to be certified or loses its
deemed status and is no longer deemed
as certified to participate in the
Exchanges, CMS or an entity designated
by CMS will provide notice to the
Exchanges in which the loan recipient
offers CO–OP qualified health plans.
(f) Conversions. The loan recipient
shall not convert or sell to a for-profit
or non-consumer operated entity at any
time after receiving a loan under this
subpart. The loan recipient shall not
undertake any transaction that would
result in the CO–OP implementing a
governance structure that does not meet
the standards in this subpart.
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
Program No. 93.773, Medicare—Hospital
Insurance; and Program No. 93.774,
Medicare—Supplementary Medical
Insurance Program)
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:45 Jul 19, 2011
Jkt 223001
Dated: July 15, 2011.
Marilyn Tavenner,
Principal Deputy Administrator and Chief
Operating Officer, Centers for Medicare &
Medicaid Services.
Approved: July 15, 2011.
Kathleen Sebelius,
Secretary, Department of Health and Human
Services.
[FR Doc. 2011–18342 Filed 7–18–11; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 4120–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 654
[Docket No. 110707375–1374–01]
RIN 0648–BB07
Fisheries of the Caribbean, Gulf of
Mexico, and South Atlantic; Stone
Crab Fishery of the Gulf of Mexico;
Removal of Regulations
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule; request for
comments.
AGENCY:
NMFS proposes to repeal the
Fishery Management Plan for the Stone
Crab Fishery of the Gulf of Mexico
(FMP) and remove its implementing
regulations, as requested by the Gulf of
Mexico Fishery Management Council
(Council). The stone crab fishery takes
place primarily in state waters (off the
coast of Florida) and Florida’s Fish and
Wildlife Conservation Commission
(FWC) is extending its management into
Federal waters. Repealing the Federal
regulations would eliminate duplication
of management efforts, reduce costs, and
align with the President’s Executive
Order 13563, ‘‘Improving Regulation
and Regulatory Review,’’ to ensure
Federal regulations are more effective
and less burdensome in achieving
regulatory objectives. The intended
effect of this action is to enhance the
effectiveness and efficiency of managing
the stone crab fishery in the Gulf of
Mexico (Gulf).
DATES: Written comments must be
received on or before August 19, 2011.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
on the proposed rule identified by
NOAA–NMFS–2011–0140 by any of the
following methods:
• Electronic submissions: Submit
electronic comments via the Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Mail: Susan Gerhart, Southeast
Regional Office, NMFS, 263 13th
Avenue South, St. Petersburg, FL 33701.
Instructions: All comments received
are a part of the public record and will
generally be posted to https://
www.regulations.gov without change.
All Personal Identifying Information (for
example, name, address, etc.)
voluntarily submitted by the commenter
may be publicly accessible. Do not
submit Confidential Business
Information or otherwise sensitive or
protected information.
To submit comments through the
Federal e-rulemaking portal: https://
www.regulations.gov, click on ‘‘submit a
comment,’’ then enter ‘‘NOAA–NMFS–
2011–0140’’ in the keyword search and
click on ‘‘search.’’ To view posted
comments during the comment period,
enter ‘‘NOAA–NMFS–2011–0140’’ in
the keyword search and click on
‘‘search.’’ NMFS will accept anonymous
comments (enter N/A in the required
field if you wish to remain anonymous).
You may submit attachments to
electronic comments in Microsoft Word,
Excel, WordPerfect, or Adobe PDF file
formats only.
Comments received through means
not specified in this rule will not be
considered.
Electronic copies of documents
supporting this proposed rule, which
include an environmental assessment
and an initial regulatory flexibility
analysis (IRFA), may be obtained from
Southeast Regional Office Web site at
https://sero.nmfs.noaa.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Susan Gerhart, telephone: 727–824–
5305 or e-mail:
Susan.Gerhart@noaa.gov.
The stone
crab fishery of the Gulf of Mexico (Gulf)
is managed under the FMP. The FMP
was prepared by the Council and
implemented through regulations at 50
CFR part 654 under the authority of the
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act
(Magnuson-Stevens Act).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The commercial stone crab fishery is
limited primarily to the coastal waters
off the State of Florida, with a small
amount of landings occurring off of
Louisiana and Texas. Florida has
actively managed the Florida stone crab
fishery since 1929.
The Federal FMP, implemented in
1979, applies only to Federal Gulf
waters adjacent to Florida waters. It was
originally implemented to reduce gear
E:\FR\FM\20JYP1.SGM
20JYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 139 (Wednesday, July 20, 2011)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 43237-43250]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-18342]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
45 CFR Part 156
[CMS-9983-P]
RIN 0938-AQ98
Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act; Establishment of
Consumer Operated and Oriented Plan (CO-OP) Program
AGENCY: Department of Health and Human Services.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This proposed rule would implement the Consumer Operated and
Oriented Plan (CO-OP) program, which provides loans to foster the
creation of consumer-governed, private, nonprofit health insurance
issuers to offer qualified health plans in the Affordable Insurance
Exchanges (Exchanges). The purpose of this program is to create a new
CO-OP in every State in order to expand the number of health plans
available in the Exchanges with a focus on integrated care and greater
plan accountability.
DATES: To be assured consideration, comments must be received at one of
the addresses provided below, no later than 5 p.m. on September 16,
2011.
ADDRESSES: In commenting, please refer to file code CMS-9983-P. Because
of staff and resource limitations, we cannot accept comments by
facsimile (FAX) transmission.
You may submit comments in one of four ways (please choose only one
of the ways listed):
1. Electronically. You may submit electronic comments on this
regulation to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the ``Submit a
comment'' instructions.
2. By regular mail. You may mail written comments to the following
address only:
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Department of Health and
Human Services, Attention: CMS-9983-P, P.O. Box 8010, Baltimore, MD
21244-8010.
Please allow sufficient time for mailed comments to be received
before the close of the comment period.
3. By express or overnight mail. You may send written comments to
the following address only:
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Department of Health and
Human Services, Attention: CMS-9983-P, Mail Stop C4-26-05, 7500
Security Boulevard, Baltimore, MD 21244-1850.
4. By hand or courier. Alternatively, you may deliver (by hand or
courier) your written comments only to the following addresses prior to
the close of the comment period:
a. For delivery in Washington, DC--
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Department of Health and
Human Services, Room 445-G, Hubert H. Humphrey Building, 200
Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20201.
(Because access to the interior of the Hubert H. Humphrey Building
is not readily available to persons without Federal government
identification, commenters are encouraged to leave their comments in
the CMS drop slots located in the main lobby of the building. A stamp-
in clock is available for persons wishing to retain a proof of filing
by stamping in and retaining an extra copy of the comments being
filed.)
b. For delivery in Baltimore, MD--
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Department of Health and
Human Services, 7500 Security Boulevard, Baltimore, MD 21244-1850.
If you intend to deliver your comments to the Baltimore address,
call telephone number (410) 786-9994 in advance to schedule your
arrival with one of our staff members.
Submission of comments on paperwork requirements. You may submit
comments on this document's paperwork requirements by following the
instructions at the end of the
[[Page 43238]]
``Collection of Information Requirements'' section in this document.
Comments erroneously mailed to the addresses indicated as appropriate
for hand or courier delivery may be delayed and received after the
comment period.
For information on viewing public comments, see the beginning of
the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Anne Bollinger, (301) 492-4395 for
issues related to eligibility and CO-OP standards. Catherine Demmerle,
(301) 492-4156 for issues related to conversions and program integrity.
Meghan Elrington, (301) 492-4388 for general issues and issues related
to loan terms.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Acronym List
Because of the many terms to which we refer by acronym in this
proposed rule, we are listing the acronyms used and their corresponding
meanings in alphabetical order below:
CCIIO Center for Consumer Information & Insurance Oversight
CMS Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
CO-OP Consumer Operated and Oriented Plan
FACA Federal Advisory Committee Act
HHS Department of Health and Human Services
OIG Office of Inspector General
OMB Office of Management and Budget
PHS Act Public Health Service Act
QHP Qualified Health Plan
RFC Request for Comment
SHOP Small Business Health Options Program
Executive Summary: The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act,
Public Law 111-148, enacted on March 23, 2010 and the Health Care and
Education Reconciliation Act of 2010, Public Law 111-152, enacted on
March 30, 2010, are collectively referred to in this proposed rule as
the ``Affordable Care Act.'' The Department of Defense and Full-Year
Continuing Appropriations Act, 2011, Public Law 112-10, which amended
the Affordable Care Act, was enacted on April 15, 2011. Section 1322 of
the Affordable Care Act created the Consumer Operated and Oriented Plan
program (CO-OP program) to foster the creation of new consumer-
governed, private, nonprofit health insurance issuers, known as ``CO-
OPs.'' In addition to improving consumer choice and plan
accountability, the CO-OP program also seeks to promote integrated
models of care and enhance competition in the Affordable Insurance
Exchanges established under sections 1311 and 1321 of the Affordable
Care Act.
The statute provides loans to capitalize eligible prospective CO-
OPs with a goal of having at least one CO-OP in each State. The statute
permits the funding of multiple CO-OPs in any State, provided that
there is sufficient funding to capitalize at least one CO-OP in each
State. Congress provided budget authority of $3.8 billion for the
program.
This proposed rule: (1) Sets forth the eligibility standards for
the CO-OP program; (2) establishes some terms for loans; and (3)
provides certain basic standards that organizations must meet to
participate in this program and become a CO-OP. The overall approach
and intent of this proposed rule is to provide flexibility for
organizations to develop and create a CO-OP. Acknowledging the
significant variation in market conditions and populations served that
CO-OPs will face, CMS encourages diversity in the organizational design
and approach.
Starting in 2014, individuals and small businesses will be able to
purchase private health insurance through State-based competitive
marketplaces called Affordable Insurance Exchanges. Exchanges will
offer Americans competition, choice, and clout. Insurance companies
will compete for business on a level playing field, driving down costs.
Consumers will have a choice of health plans to fit their needs.
Exchanges will give individuals and small businesses the same
purchasing clout as big businesses. The Departments of Health and Human
Services, Labor, and the Treasury (the Departments) are issuing
regulations implementing Exchanges in several phases. The first in this
series was a Request for Comment relating to Exchanges, published in
the Federal Register on August 3, 2010. Second, Initial Guidance to
States on Exchanges was published issued on November 18, 2010. Third, a
proposed rule for the application, review, and reporting process for
waivers for State innovation was published in the Federal Register on
March 14, 2011 (76 FR 13553). Fourth, on July 15, 2011, two proposed
regulations were published in the Federal Register to implement
components of the Exchange and health insurance premium stabilization
policies in the Affordable Care Act including one entitled, ``Patient
Protection and Affordable Care Act; Establishment of Qualified Health
Plans and Exchanges,'' hereinafter referred to as ``Exchanges proposed
rule.'' Fifth, additional regulations, including this one, are being
published in the Federal Register to implement Exchange related
components of the Affordable Care Act.
Submitting Comments: Comments from the public are welcome on all
issues set forth in this proposed rule to assist CMS in fully
considering issues and developing policies. Comments should reference
the file code CMS-9983-P and the specific section on which a comment is
made.
Inspection of Public Comments: All comments received before the
close of the comment period are available for viewing by the public,
including any personally identifiable or confidential business
information that is included in a comment. We post all comments
received before the close of the comment period as soon as possible
after they have been received, on the following Web site: https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the search instructions on that Web site to
view public comments.
Comments received in a timely manner will also be available for
public inspection as they are received, generally beginning
approximately 3 weeks after publication of a document, at the
headquarters of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, 7500
Security Boulevard, Baltimore, Maryland 21244, Monday through Friday of
each week from 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m. To schedule an appointment to view
public comments, phone 1-800-743-3951.
Table of Contents
I. Background
A. Overview
B. Statutory Basis for the Consumer Operated and Oriented Plan
(CO-OP) Program
C. Purpose of the Consumer Operated and Oriented Plan (CO-OP)
Program
D. Request for Comment
E. Structure of the Proposed Rule
II. Provisions of the Proposed Regulation
A. Basis and Scope (Sec. 156.500)
B. Definitions (Sec. 156.505)
C. Eligibility (Sec. 156.510)
1. General
2. Exclusions from Eligibility
D. CO-OP Standards (Sec. 156.515)
1. General
2. Governance Requirements
3. Requirements to Issue Health Plans and Become a CO-OP
E. Loan Terms (Sec. 156.520)
1. Overview of Loans
2. Repayment Period
3. Interest Rates
4. Failure to Pay
5. Deeming of CO-OP Qualified Health Plans
6. Conversions
III. Collection of Information Requirements
IV. Response to Comments
V. Regulatory Impact Analysis
A. Introduction
[[Page 43239]]
B. Statement of Need, Health Insurance Markets, and CO-OP Plans
C. Anticipated Costs
D. Anticipated Benefits
E. Alternatives Considered
F. Accounting Statement
VI. Other Requirements for Analysis of Economic Effects Regulations
Text
I. Background
A. Overview
The CO-OP program provides Federal loans to foster and encourage
the creation of new consumer-run, private health insurers in every
State that will provide consumers and small businesses with greater
choice in the Exchanges starting in 2014. These new consumer-run,
private, nonprofit insurers will be a vehicle for providing higher
quality care that is affordable, coordinated, and responsive.
B. Statutory Basis for the Consumer Operated and Oriented Plan (CO-OP)
Program
Section 1322(a) of the Affordable Care Act directs CMS to establish
the CO-OP program to foster the creation of member-governed qualified
nonprofit health insurance issuers to offer CO-OP qualified health
plans in the individual and small group markets in the States in which
they are licensed to offer such plans.
Section 1322(b)(1) of the Affordable Care Act provides that CMS
shall provide two types of loans to organizations applying to become
qualified nonprofit health insurance issuers: Start-up Loans and
repayable grants (Solvency Loans). Start-up Loans will provide
assistance with start-up costs and Solvency Loans will provide
assistance in meeting solvency requirements in the States in which the
organization is licensed to issue CO-OP qualified health plans.
Section 1322(b)(2) provides that in making awards, CMS must take
into account the recommendations of the Advisory board further
described in section 1322(b)(4) of the Affordable Care Act and give
priority to applicants that offer CO-OP qualified health plans on a
statewide basis, use integrated care models, and have significant
private support.
Section 1322(b)(2) of the Affordable Care Act also directs CMS to
ensure that there is sufficient funding to establish at least one
qualified nonprofit health insurance issuer in each State and the
District of Columbia. It permits CMS to fund additional qualified
nonprofit health insurance issuers in any State if the funding is
sufficient to do so. If no entities in a State apply, CMS may use funds
to encourage the establishment of a qualified nonprofit health
insurance issuer in the State or the expansion of another qualified
nonprofit health insurance issuer from another State to that State.
Section 1322(b)(2) of the Affordable Care Act also directs any
organization receiving a loan to enter into an agreement to meet the
standards to become a qualified nonprofit health insurance issuer and
any other terms and conditions of the loan awards.
Section 1322(b)(2)(c)(iii) of the Affordable Care Act provides
that, if CMS determines that an organization has failed to meet any
provisions of the loan agreement or failed to correct such failure
within a reasonable period of time, the organization must repay an
amount equal to the sum of:
110 percent of the aggregate amount of loans received;
plus
Interest on the aggregate amount of loans for the period
the loans were outstanding starting from the date of drawdown.
CMS must notify the Department of the Treasury of any determination
of a failure to comply with the CO-OP program standards that may affect
an issuer's tax-exempt status under section 501(c)(29) of the Code.
Under section 1322(b)(3), Start-up Loans must be repaid within 5
years, and Solvency Loans must be repaid within 15 years. Repayment
terms in the award of loans must take into consideration any
appropriate State reserve requirements, solvency regulations, and
requisite surplus note arrangements that must be constructed by a
qualified health insurance issuer in a State to receive and maintain
licensure.
Section 1322(c)(1) of the Affordable Care Act defines ``qualified
nonprofit health insurance issuer'' as an organization that:
Is organized under State law as a private, nonprofit,
member corporation;
Conducts activities of which substantially all consist of
the issuance of CO-OP qualified health plans in the individual and
small group markets in each State in which it is licensed to issue such
plans; and
Meets the other requirements in subsection 1322(c) of the
Affordable Care Act.
Section 1322(c)(2) of the Affordable Care Act states that an
organization is not eligible to become a qualified nonprofit health
insurance issuer if the organization or a related entity (or any
predecessor of either) was a health insurance issuer on July 16, 2009.
In addition, an organization cannot be treated as eligible to apply for
a loan under the CO-OP program if it is sponsored by a State or local
government, any political subdivision thereof, or any instrumentality
of such government or political subdivision. A CO-OP must be a private,
nonprofit health insurance issuer.
Section 1322(c)(3) of the Affordable Care Act establishes
governance requirements for a qualified nonprofit health insurance
issuer. To ensure consumer control, the governance of the organization
must be subject to a majority vote of its members. The organization's
governing documents must incorporate ethics and conflict of interest
standards to protect CO-OP members against insurance industry
involvement and interference. To ensure consumer orientation, the
organization is required to operate with a strong consumer focus,
including timeliness, responsiveness, and accountability to members.
Section 1322(c)(4) of the Affordable Care Act directs the
organization to use any profits to lower premiums, improve benefits, or
for other programs intended to improve the quality of health care
delivered to its members.
Section 1322(c)(5) of the Affordable Care Act directs that the
organization must meet all the State standards for licensure that other
issuers of qualified health plans must meet in any State where the
issuer offers a CO-OP qualified health plan, including solvency and
licensure requirements and any other State law described in section
1324(b) of the Affordable Care Act.
Section 1322(c)(6) of the Affordable Care Act prohibits a qualified
nonprofit health insurance issuer from offering a health plan in a
State until that State has in effect (or CMS has implemented for the
State) the market reforms outlined in part A of title XXVII of the
Public Health Service Act (as amended by subtitles A and C of title I
of the Affordable Care Act) including but not limited to, the
requirements for guaranteed issue and limitations on premium variation.
Section 1322(e) of the Affordable Care Act prohibits
representatives of any Federal, State, or local government (or of any
political subdivision or instrumentality thereof), and representatives
of an organization that was an existing issuer or a related entity (or
predecessor of either) on July 16, 2009, from serving on the board of
directors of the qualified nonprofit health insurance issuer or a
private purchasing council established under section 1322(d) of the
Affordable Care Act.
[[Page 43240]]
Together, these provisions form the statutory basis for the CO-OP
program established under this rule.
C. Purpose of the Consumer-Operated and Oriented Plan Program
Section 1322 of the Affordable Care Act established the CO-OP
program to provide loans to foster the creation of new consumer-
governed nonprofit health insurance issuers (referred to as CO-OPs)
that will operate with a strong consumer focus. The statute divides the
loans into two types: loans for start-up costs to be repaid in 5 years
(``Start-up Loans'') and loans to enable CO-OPs to meet State insurance
solvency and reserve requirements to be repaid in 15 years (``Solvency
Loans''). Section 1322(b)(2)(A) of the Affordable Care Act directs CMS
to ensure that there is sufficient funding to establish at least one
CO-OP in each State and to give priority to organizations capable of
offering CO-OP qualified health plans on a Statewide basis. To further
ensure the presence of CO-OPs in the Exchanges, section 1301(a)(2) of
the statute deems CO-OP qualified health plans offered by a qualified
nonprofit health insurance issuer eligible to participate in the
Exchanges.
The CO-OP program also seeks to promote improved models of care.
Existing health insurance cooperatives and other business cooperatives
provide possible models for the successful development of CO-OPs around
the country. One major barrier to continued development of this model
has been the difficulty of obtaining adequate capitalization for start-
up costs and State reserve requirements. The CO-OP program is designed
to help overcome this major barrier to new issuer formation by
providing funding for these critical activities.
Pursuant to section 1322(b)(4) of the Affordable Care Act, the
Comptroller General announced the appointment of a 15 member CO-OP
Program Advisory Board to make recommendations to CMS on awarding loans
on June 23, 2010. Section 1322(b)(2)(A) directs the Secretary to
consider the recommendations of the Advisory Board when awarding loans
under the CO-OP program. After taking comments in three day-long public
hearings from January through March, 2011 and written comments, the
Advisory Board approved its final recommendations and report on April
15, 2011. The Advisory Board's final report is available at: https://cciio.hhs.gov/resources/files/coop_faca_finalreport_04152011.pdf.
The Advisory Board generally advised the Department to develop flexible
criteria that recognize the diversity of market conditions around the
country to enable the development of various CO-OP models and allow
different types of sponsorship. It also strongly encouraged the
Department to provide technical assistance at all stages of the process
in order to enhance the viability of individual CO-OPs and the success
of the program.
The Advisory Board developed four major principles for awarding
loans. CMS concurs with those principles:
(1) Consumer operation, control, and focus must be the salient
features of the CO-OP and must be sustained over time;
(2) Solvency and the financial stability of coverage should be
maintained and promoted;
(3) CO-OPs should encourage care coordination, quality and
efficiency to the extent feasible in local provider and health plan
markets; and
(4) Initial loans should be rolled out as expeditiously as possible
so that CO-OPs can compete in the Exchanges in the critical first open
enrollment period.
CMS also concurs with the Advisory Board in recognizing that
potential CO-OPs will initially present different capabilities and
levels of development. This proposed rule incorporates the principles
endorsed by the Advisory Board by allowing diversity among CO-OPs and
maintaining the vision outlined in the Advisory Board Final Report. The
CO-OP program will offer an entry point to eligible organizations that
seek to provide more consumer-focused coverage and create additional
competition for insurance that will make high-quality care more
affordable. By creating more health plan choices, CO-OPs can benefit
all consumers.
D. Request for Comment
On February 2, 2011, CMS published a Request for Comment (RFC) in
the Federal Register (76 FR 5774) seeking public comment on the rules
that will govern the CO-OP program. The comment period closed on March
4, 2011. CMS has considered and incorporated the comments received in
developing specific regulatory proposals.
The public response to the RFC yielded 55 unique comment
submissions. A total of 65 unique entities submitted comments,
including entities that submitted stand-alone comments and multiple
individuals who signed onto one comment submission. The 65 total unique
commenters included consumers and consumer advocacy organizations,
medical and health care professional trade associations and societies,
health insurers and insurance trade associations, health benefits
consultants, and actuaries. The majority of the comments related to the
types of organizations that would likely become successful CO-OPs and
the criteria CMS should use in awarding loans.
E. Structure of the Proposed Rule
The regulations outlined in this Notice of Proposed Rulemaking will
be codified in the new 45 CFR part 156 subpart F. The major subjects
covered in this proposed rule under subpart F of part 156 are described
below.
Section 156.500 describes the statutory basis of the CO-OP
program and the scope of this proposed rule;
Section 156.505 sets forth definitions for the terms
applied in subpart F;
Section 156.510 specifies the criteria to be eligible for
a loan under the CO-OP program;
Section 156.515 sets forth the standards for a CO-OP; and
Section 156.520 sets forth the terms for loans awarded
under the CO-OP program including repayment terms and interest rates.
II. Provisions of the Proposed Regulations
A. Basis and scope (Sec. 156.500)
Section 156.500 specifies the general statutory authority for and
scope of standards proposed in subpart F. The CO-OP program fosters the
creation of qualified nonprofit health insurance issuers to offer CO-OP
qualified health plans in the individual and small group markets.
Subpart F establishes certain governance requirements for CO-OPs and
the terms for loans awarded under the CO-OP program. Applicants may
apply for loans to help fund start-up costs and meet the solvency
requirements of States in which the applicant seeks to be licensed to
issue CO-OP qualified health plans.
B. Definitions (Sec. 156.505)
Section 156.505 sets forth definitions for terms that are used
throughout subpart F. Many of the definitions presented in Sec.
156.505 are taken directly from the Affordable Care Act, but new
definitions were created when necessary. All definitions proposed are
intended to apply only to subpart F.
Several of the terms used in subpart F are defined elsewhere in
Parts 155 and 156, which have been proposed previously (76 FR 41866).
The terms ``individual market,'' ``small group market,'' ``SHOP,'' and
``Exchange'' are defined in Sec. 155.20. ``Individual market'' is
defined as the market for health insurance coverage offered to
[[Page 43241]]
individuals other than in connection with a group health plan. ``Small
group market'' is defined as the health insurance market under which
individuals obtain health insurance coverage (directly or through any
arrangement) on behalf of themselves (and their dependents) through a
group health plan maintained by a small employer. ``SHOP'' is defined
as a Small Business Health Options Program operated by an Exchange
through which a qualified employer can provide its employees and their
dependents with access to one or more QHPs. ``Exchange'' is defined as
a governmental agency or non-profit entity that meets the applicable
requirements of this part and makes QHPs available to qualified
individuals and qualified employers. Unless otherwise identified, this
term refers to State Exchanges, regional Exchanges, subsidiary
Exchanges, and a Federally-facilitated Exchange.
CMS proposes that a ``CO-OP qualified health plan'' means a health
plan that has in effect a certification that it meets the standards
described in subpart C of part 156, which has been previously proposed
(76 FR 41866), except that the plan can be deemed certified by CMS or
an entity designated by CMS as described in 156.520(e).
``Applicant'' is defined as an entity eligible to apply for a loan
described in Sec. 156.520.
A ``qualified nonprofit health insurance issuer'' is a loan
recipient, which satisfies or can reasonably be expected to satisfy the
standards in section 1322(c) of the Affordable Care Act and Sec.
156.515 within the time frames specified in this subpart, until such
time as CMS determines the loan recipient does not satisfy or cannot
reasonably be expected to satisfy these standards. This ensures that
loan recipients can receive the benefits of section 1322(h), addressing
the tax exemption for qualified nonprofit health insurance issuers, at
the appropriate time, as determined by the Internal Revenue Service.
CMS proposes that the term ``consumer operated and oriented plan (CO-
OP)'' means a loan recipient that satisfies the standards in section
1322(c) of the Affordable Care Act and Sec. 156.515 within the time
frames specified in this subpart. Thus, to be considered a CO-OP, a
loan recipient must meet the governance and health plan issuance
standards described in Sec. 156.515 within the timeframes established
in this subpart. In addition, the loan recipient must comply with State
insurance laws and State insurance reforms and ensure that revenues in
excess of expenses inure to the benefit of its members in accordance
with section 1322(c)(4) of the Affordable Care Act.
We define a ``nonprofit member corporation'' (also referred to as a
``nonprofit member organization'') as a nonprofit, not-for-profit,
public benefit, or similar membership entity organized as appropriate
under State law. For the purposes of this subpart, as defined in
section 1304(d) of the Affordable Care Act, ``State'' means each of the
50 States and the District of Columbia. CMS proposes that in order for
an organization to be eligible for CO-OP loans (and become an
``applicant'') it would first have to meet the definition of a
nonprofit member organization.
CMS proposes to adopt the Advisory Board's recommendation to use
the terms ``formation board'' and ``operational board'' when discussing
the governance requirements for a CO-OP. The term ``formation board''
means the initial board of directors of the applicant or loan recipient
before it has begun accepting enrollment and conducted an election to
the board of directors. ``Operational board'' means the board of
directors elected by the members of the CO-OP after it has begun
accepting enrollment. A ``member'' is an individual covered under
health insurance policies issued by a CO-OP.
Section 1322(c)(2)(A) of the Affordable Care Act prohibits an
organization from participating as a ``qualified nonprofit health
insurance issuer'' in the CO-OP program ``if the organization or a
related entity (or any predecessor of either) was a health insurance
issuer on July 16, 2009.'' Consistent with section 1551 of the
Affordable Care Act, we propose that an entity is an ``issuer'' under
this subpart if it satisfies the definition in section 2791(b)(2) of
the Public Health Service Act: an insurance company, insurance service,
or insurance organization (including a health maintenance organization)
which is licensed to engage in the business of insurance in a State and
which is subject to State law which regulates insurance. Additionally,
``pre-existing issuer'' means (for the purposes of this subpart) a
health insurance issuer that was in existence on July 16, 2009. We seek
comments on this definition.
CMS proposes the definition of ``related entity'' to mean an
organization that shares common ownership or control with a pre-
existing issuer or a trade association whose members consist of pre-
existing issuers, and satisfies at least one of the following
conditions: (1) Retains responsibilities for the services to be
provided by the issuer; (2) furnishes services to the issuer's
enrollees under an oral or written agreement; or (3) performs some of
the issuer's management functions under contract or delegation. Thus,
CMS would permit a nonprofit organization that is not an issuer or the
representative of an issuer but shares control with an existing issuer
to ``sponsor'' or facilitate the creation of a CO-OP if the applicant
(and resulting CO-OP) and the existing issuer do not share the same
chief executive or any of the board of directors. We seek comment on
this interpretation.
``Sponsor'' is defined as an organization or individual that is
involved in the development, creation, or organization of the CO-OP or
provides financial support to a CO-OP. We propose that a
``predecessor'' means any entity that participates in a merger,
consolidation, purchase or acquisition of property or stock, corporate
separation, or other similar business transaction that results in the
formation of the new entity.
Section 1322(b)(1) of the Affordable Care Act directs CMS to award
to applicants loans to provide assistance in meeting start-up costs and
any State solvency requirements in the States in which the applicant
seeks to be licensed to issue CO-OP qualified health plans. ``Start-up
Loan'' means a loan provided by CMS to a loan recipient for costs
associated with creating and developing a CO-OP. The term ``Solvency
Loan'' means a loan provided by CMS to a loan recipient in order to
meet State solvency and reserve requirements.
C. Eligibility (Sec. 156.510)
Section 156.510 outlines the minimum standards that an organization
must meet to be eligible to receive a loan from the CO-OP program to
create a new private consumer-operated insurer.
1. General
In paragraph (a), we propose that the applicant declare its
intention to become a CO-OP. Since the loan recipient may not meet all
of the conditions to be considered a CO-OP at the time of the
application, it is important that the organization intend to meet all
of the standards and demonstrate the likelihood of being able to meet
such requirements by the time periods established in this subpart
before the award is made, especially those related to consumer focus
and consumer governance of the organization.
Consistent with the recommendation of the Advisory Board, CMS
proposes the applicant have formed a nonprofit
[[Page 43242]]
member organization under State law prior to applying for a loan. This
means that the new nonprofit member corporation, and not an
organization that is sponsoring the creation of a CO-OP, would be the
applicant for and recipient of a loan.
2. Exclusions From Eligibility
Paragraph (b) codifies the conditions in section 1322(c)(2) of the
Affordable Care Act under which an organization will not be eligible to
participate in the CO-OP program. Paragraph (b)(1)(i) codifies that if
an organization is a pre-existing issuer, a related entity, or any
predecessor of either, it is not eligible for loans under the CO-OP
program and therefore, cannot become a CO-OP. In addition, an
organization is not eligible for the CO-OP program if the organization
or a related entity (or any predecessor of either) is a trade
association whose members consist of pre-existing issuers. We seek
comment on this interpretation.
Paragraph (b)(1)(ii) codifies that, if an organization is sponsored
by a State or local government, any political subdivision thereof, or
any instrumentality of such government or political subdivision, it is
not eligible to be a CO-OP and cannot apply for a loan under the CO-OP
program. CMS considered whether this prohibition should apply to
provider organizations that are associated with State university
medical centers and concluded that medical centers, physician
practices, hospitals, and other organizations that are part of a State
university system are instrumentalities of the State. We believe that
the prohibition against sponsorship by State or local government, and
their political subdivisions and instrumentalities, must also apply to
medical centers that are part of State or local governments and to
medical practice groups that are created and overseen by a medical
center owned by State or local government. This prohibition would not
apply to Indian tribes. We invite comment on these interpretations.
As incorporated in section 1551 of the Affordable Care Act, section
2791(b)(2) of the PHS Act defines a ``health insurance issuer'' as ``an
insurance company, insurance service, or insurance organization * * *
which is licensed to engage in the business of insurance in a State and
which is subject to State law which regulates insurance (within the
meaning of section 514(b)(2) of the Employee Retirement Income Security
Act of 1974).'' CMS believes that the following types of entities are
examples of organizations that are not ``issuers'' and would be
eligible to sponsor applicants for loans under the CO-OP program
provided that they otherwise meet the requirements for eligibility:
(1) A prospective applicant not licensed by its State as a health
insurance issuer on July 16, 2009, but which has subsequently achieved
a State license,
(2) Self-funded and Taft-Hartley group health plans, and
(3) Church plans that were not licensed issuers on July 16, 2009,
and
(4) Three-share or multi-share programs not licensed by their State
insurance regulator.
CMS invites comment on how these organizations and others like them
would sponsor an applicant.
Taking into account comments received on the RFC and the
recommendations of the Advisory Board, in paragraph (b)(2)(i) CMS
proposes that a nonprofit organization that is not an issuer but that
currently sponsors an issuer would remain eligible to sponsor an
applicant for a CO-OP loan in certain circumstances. Specifically a
nonprofit non-issuer organization that currently sponsors a pre-
existing issuer and meets other eligibility parameters may sponsor an
applicant for a CO-OP loan provided that the pre-existing issuer does
not share any of the board or the same chief executive with the
applicant. We seek comment on this interpretation.
In paragraph (b)(2)(ii), we are further proposing that an
organization that has purchased assets from a preexisting issuer in an
arm's-length transaction where neither party was in a position to exert
undue influence on the other is eligible to apply for a CO-OP loan.
Therefore, an organization is eligible for CO-OP loans if it contracts
for services, including health provider network access, premium
billing, and case management from a health insurance issuer that
existed on July 16, 2009, as long as the existing issuer has no control
over the new private nonprofit issuer. Conversely, an applicant and a
pre-existing issuer could have common control by a non-issuer
organization. The applicant and pre-existing issuer would not be
related entities unless the pre-existing issuer also provided the CO-
OP's services or management functions.
D. CO-OP Standards (Sec. 156.515)
1. General
A CO-OP must satisfy the standards set forth in all statutory,
regulatory, or other requirements as applicable. CMS proposes
additional standards that a CO-OP must meet in Sec. 156.515, many of
which are recommendations made by the Advisory Board in the final
report dated April 15, 2011. We invite comment on these proposed
standards, which are set forth below.
2. Governance Requirements
In response to the RFC, provider organizations submitted comments
that suggested that providers may be in the best position to sponsor
CO-OPs and encouraged CMS to impose no additional standards related to
governance beyond those in the statute. In contrast, other commenters
suggested that CMS set specific standards for the composition of the
governing body, such as those to avoid conflicts and to encourage
diverse representation on governing bodies that are representative of
the local population. Other commenters expressed concern that in some
markets providers could create a CO-OP and control pricing in the
market.
Section 1322(c)(3)(C) of the Affordable Care Act directs the
Secretary to promulgate regulations requiring the organization to
operate with a strong consumer focus, including timeliness,
responsiveness, and accountability to members. Pursuant to this
authority and taking into account the comments, CMS proposes additional
governance requirements in paragraph (b). These proposed standards
reflect the recommendations of the Advisory Board.
Paragraph (b)(1) proposes that a CO-OP implement policies and
procedures to foster and ensure member control of the organization.
Section 1322(c)(3) of the Affordable Care Act states that the
governance of the organization be subject to a majority vote of its
members. Paragraph (b)(1)(i) proposes that the organization be governed
by an operational board with each of its directors elected by a
majority vote of its members. In paragraph (b)(1)(ii), we propose that
every member of the CO-OP be eligible to vote for each director of the
CO-OP during the elections described in (b)(1)(iv). In paragraph
(b)(1)(iii), we propose that each member of the organization have one
vote in the elections of directors.
Paragraph (b)(1)(iv) proposes that the first election of the
operational board of directors occur no later than one year after the
effective date on which the CO-OP provides coverage to its first
member. The Advisory Board recommended that this election should take
place within the first year after enrollment begins or when a certain
designated membership level is reached, but should occur no later than
two years after the organization enrolls its first
[[Page 43243]]
member, recognizing that a certain level of membership is necessary for
meaningful elections. CMS is concerned that the Advisory Board's
recommendation of an election date of the start-up period plus two
years after enrollment will delay the introduction of consumer
governance beyond a point where it can have an impact on the strategic
direction of the CO-OP. We do not believe that holding an election one
year after coverage begins will burden the formation board or CO-OP
operations since the formation board will have the full start-up period
plus one year to plan for this transition. We solicit comments on the
proposed timeline.
Paragraph (b)(1)(v) proposes that the elections for the board of
directors of the organization be contested and that there be more
candidates for open positions on the board than there are positions. We
are not specifying the mechanism by which the CO-OP will achieve this
standard, but we believe that the CO-OP's bylaws should address this
standard, most likely by creating a nominating committee that will
ensure that this standard is met. This standard will help ensure that
consumer members of the organization have a choice of candidates for
the board of directors, provide an opportunity for a change in
directors, and help prevent a group of directors from exerting
disproportionate control over the organization. CMS believes that the
operation of contested elections will provide safeguards against the
long-term entrenchment or undue influence of any individual director
while protecting the members' choice of directors.
Consistent with the recommendations of the Advisory Board and
commenters to the RFC, paragraph (b)(1)(vi) proposes that a majority of
the voting directors must be members of the organization. While all
directors must be elected by the members, a CO-OP may want to reserve
positions for directors who have certain types of expertise that are
essential to the governance of the organization, such as providers or
individuals with experience in health care operations or finance. CMS
recognizes that it may not be possible to find members of the CO-OP
with the desired expertise who are willing to serve as directors. The
purpose of this provision is to recognize the need to allow for
directors who are not members, but to ensure that members who are
consumers of the services of the organization are the majority of the
board of directors and that the governance of the organization is
accountable to consumers.
Standards for the operational board of directors, consistent with
the recommendations of the Advisory Board are included in (b)(2).
Paragraph (b)(2)(i) specifies that each director must meet ethical,
conflict-of-interest, and disclosure standards. Specifically, each
director must act in the sole interest of the CO-OP and its members,
avoid self-dealing, and act prudently and consistently with the terms
of the CO-OP's governance documents and applicable State and Federal
law.
Paragraph (b)(2)(ii) specifies that each voting director has only
one vote on matters before the board. This standard also recognizes
that a CO-OP may choose to have directors who provide expertise but do
not vote. Non-voting directors must bring specific expertise or be
members of the management team of the CO-OP, whose participation in the
board of directors is considered essential.
Paragraph (b)(2)(iii) acknowledges that positions on the board of
directors may be designated for individuals with certain types of
expertise or experience. The type of expertise that is needed may vary
over time and the CO-OP may choose to enlist candidates for the board
with certain types of expertise through its nominating process.
Paragraph (b)(2)(iv) specifies that positions on the board that are
designated for individuals with specialized expertise, experience, or
affiliation (for example, providers, employers, labor representatives)
cannot constitute a majority of the operational board even if the
individuals serving in designated seats are members of the CO-OP. This
standard should be addressed in the bylaws of the CO-OP, in the
conflict of interest standard for board members, and in the nominating
procedures of the CO-OP.
Paragraph (b)(2)(v) codifies the limitation in section 1322(e) of
the Affordable Care Act that no representative of any Federal, State or
local government (or of any political subdivision or instrumentality
thereof) and no representative of any organization described in Sec.
156.510(b)(i) may serve on the board of directors.
Paragraph (b)(3) codifies the provision that an organization must
have governing documents that incorporate ethics and conflict of
interest standards protecting against insurance industry involvement
and interference. At a minimum, the standards must establish procedures
for identifying potential conflicts of interest and addressing any
violation of the standards.
Paragraph (b)(4) codifies the provision that the CO-OP must operate
with a strong consumer focus, including timeliness, responsiveness, and
accountability to members. Finally, the CO-OP must demonstrate
financial viability and the ability to meet all other statutory, legal,
or other requirements.
3. Requirements to Issue Health Plans and Become a CO-OP
In paragraph (c)(1), CMS codifies section 1322(c)(1)(B) of the
Affordable Care Act that provides that substantially all of the
activities of the CO-OP consist of the issuance of CO-OP qualified
health plans in the individual and small group markets in each State in
which it is licensed to issue such plans. CMS proposes that a CO-OP
will satisfy this standard if at least two-thirds of the contracts for
health insurance coverage issued by a CO-OP are CO-OP qualified health
plans offered in the individual and small group markets in the States
in which the CO-OP operates. An organization must continually meet this
requirement to be considered a CO-OP. Members of the Advisory Board
noted that State insurance regulations generally refer to the contracts
for insurance, not the number of lives covered under each contract,
when referring to policy issuance. The Advisory Board therefore
recommended that: the interpretation of ``substantially all'' refer to
contracts issued; the proportion of contracts that must meet the
``substantially all'' test be interpreted to provide CO-OPs maximum
flexibility; and CO-OPs be allowed to meet that standard over time to
build enrollment gradually in the individual and small group market.
Consistent with the Advisory Board recommendations on this issue and
public comment received in response to the RFC, CMS interprets the
statute to mean that each insurance policy or contract that an issuer
sells constitutes a single activity. We solicit comments on whether
two-third is the appropriate threshold for this standard.
This proposed standard would allow providers wishing to sponsor CO-
OPs to enroll their own employees in the CO-OP and thereby encourage
provider participation. It would also permit CO-OPs to participate in
Medicaid and Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP), which would
enable individuals and families to remain with the same health
insurance issuer and providers if they move between the Exchange and
these programs.
In paragraph (c)(2), CMS proposes that a CO-OP applicant receiving
a Start-up Loan or Solvency Loan offer at least one CO-OP qualified
health plan at both the silver and gold benefit levels, as defined in
section 1302(d) of the Affordable Care Act, in every individual
[[Page 43244]]
market Exchange that serves the geographic market in which it is
licensed and intends to provide health care coverage (market area). In
addition, CMS proposes that if a CO-OP chooses to offer coverage in the
small group market outside the Exchange, a CO-OP must commit to
offering at least one CO-OP qualified health plan at both the silver
and gold benefit levels in the SHOP of any market area where the CO-OP
is licensed. Note that it is a choice for a CO-OP to offer coverage in
the small group market, but if it does so, it must also offer coverage
through SHOP to prevent adverse selection against SHOP. These standards
are consistent with section 1301 of the Affordable Care Act providing
that health insurance issuers that participate in the Exchanges offer
qualified health plans at both the silver and gold benefit levels.
In paragraph (c)(3) CMS proposes that within the earlier of thirty-
six months following the initial drawdown of a Start-up Loan or six
months following the initial drawdown of the Solvency Loan, a loan
recipient be licensed in a State and offer at least one CO-OP qualified
health plan at the silver and gold benefit levels (as defined in
section 1302(d) of the Affordable Care Act) in an individual market
Exchange and, if offering a health plan in the small group market, in a
SHOP. Thus, the loan recipient must satisfy the requirements of title
XXVII of the Public Health Service Act applicable to health insurance
coverage in the individual market and small group market, if applicable
and comply with all standards generally applicable to qualified health
plan issuers. To continue offering CO-OP qualified health plans in the
Exchanges, a CO-OP must continue to meet these standards.
Due to concerns regarding the ability of a CO-OP to establish
sufficient enrollment to make its health plans viable, CMS proposes
that when offering a CO-OP qualified health plan in an Exchange for the
first time, loan recipients may only begin to offer health plans and
accept enrollment during an open enrollment period for the applicable
Exchange. We seek comment on this proposal.
In paragraph (d), CMS proposes that a loan recipient must satisfy
the requirements of section 1322(c) of the Affordable Care Act and
Sec. 156.515 and become a CO-OP within fifty-four months following the
first drawdown of a Start-up Loan or eighteen months following the
initial drawdown of a Solvency Loan.
These provisions will ensure that loan recipients actively work
toward becoming a CO-OP that offers CO-OP qualified health plans in the
Exchanges. Commenters to the RFC indicated that it could take from 6
months to 3 years for a new CO-OP to become operational and begin
accepting enrollment, with most commenters stating that 18 to 24 months
would be needed to become operational. CMS believes that the proposed
timeframes provide sufficient time for a loan recipient to offer CO-OP
qualified health plans in the Exchanges and become a new CO-OP that
meets all of the governance requirements of the CO-OP program. We
request comment on these proposed standards.
E. Loan Terms (Sec. 156.520)
1. Overview of Loans
Paragraph (a)(1), proposes that organizations that meet eligibility
standards according to Sec. 156.510 can apply for Start-up Loans and
Solvency Loans (pursuant to a separate CO-OP program Funding
Opportunity Announcement (FOA)). Organizations may apply for Start-up
Loans to assist with start-up costs associated with establishing a CO-
OP. In addition, CMS proposes that organizations that meet the
eligibility standards may apply for Solvency Loans to assist in meeting
the solvency requirements of States in which the applicant seeks to be
licensed to issue CO-OP qualified health plans.
Section Sec. 156.520 outlines the terms of the loans awarded under
the CO-OP program. Other than the 5-year and 15-year repayment periods,
the statute leaves the specific terms of the loans to CMS's discretion
but requires that CMS take into consideration State solvency
requirements. Accordingly, CMS proposes loan terms that are consistent
with the goals of the CO-OP program, most likely to encourage
successful CO-OPs, and protect the Federal investment.
The Advisory Board strongly recommended that CMS begin awarding
loans in late 2011 or early 2012 to provide sufficient time for CO-OPs
to become operational and accept enrollment during the first Exchange
open enrollment period to compete for membership and gain the level of
enrollment needed to be viable. Commenters to the RFC generally agreed
that it is important for CMS to provide startup funding to CO-OPs as
soon as possible. Accordingly, we intend to begin awarding CO-OP loans
in this timeframe.
As a condition of licensure as a health insurer, State insurance
departments require that an insurer maintain an amount of capital that
is consistent with its size and risk profile. This measure of reserve
is called risk-based capital (RBC). State law establishes a variety of
required regulatory actions if an insurer's RBC falls below established
levels or percent of RBC. These regulatory interventions can range from
a corrective action plan to liquidation of the insurer if it is
insolvent. Solvency and the financial health of insurers is
historically a State-regulated function.
Solvency Loans are intended to help loan recipients meet the
reserve requirements, solvency regulations, and requisite surplus note
arrangements in each State. Since Solvency Loans must be repaid to the
Federal government within 15 years, the Advisory Board expressed a
concern that they will be treated by States as debt rather than capital
that satisfies State solvency and reserve requirements.
A loan is considered a liability and typically would not assist an
organization in meeting solvency requirements, since the liability
would have to be subtracted from the calculation of reserves in order
to determine the net protection afforded to enrollees. In order to
assist CO-OPs in meeting State solvency requirements, the loans will be
structured so that premiums would go to pay claims and meet cash
reserve requirements before repayment to CMS. The goal of this
provision is to satisfy the reserve requirements of the individual
insurance department in the States in which each CO-OP seeks licensure.
The Advisory Board proposed that CO-OPs discuss the appropriate
mechanisms with their insurance regulators for structuring the loans to
meet reserve requirements and include a description of those mechanisms
in their applications so that loan and repayment terms for that
applicant conform to the State's requirements.
CMS proposes in Sec. 156.520(a)(3) to structure Solvency Loans to
each loan recipient in a manner that meets State reserve and solvency
requirements so that the loan recipient can fund its required capital
reserves. This ensures that they are recognized as contributing to
State reserve and solvency requirements in the States in which the
applicant intends to offer CO-OP qualified health plans. We request
comment on this provision.
2. Repayment Period
Section 1322(b)(3) of the Affordable Care Act states that loans
awarded must be repaid within 5 years and 15 years respectively, taking
into consideration any appropriate State reserve requirements, solvency
regulations, and requisite surplus note arrangements that must be
constructed in a State. This standard is codified in Sec. 156.520(b).
[[Page 43245]]
Loan recipients must make loan payments consistent with the
repayment schedule approved by CMS and agreed to by the loan recipient
until the loans have been paid in full. Recognizing that it would be
difficult for a loan recipient to begin repaying the loans before it
has enrolled members and received premiums, the Advisory Board
recommended that loan repayment begin after the loan recipient has
begun receiving enrollment. Commenters to the RFC generally recommended
repayment schedules for loans that are flexible. Most commenters
indicated that preventing the failure of a CO-OP should take priority
over repayment because insolvency of a CO-OP would harm its members and
create disruption in insurance markets.
CMS agrees with the commenters and believes that a flexible
repayment approach would promote the growth of CO-OPs, serve the
interests of the CO-OP members and the public, and enhance the
likelihood of full repayment. Flexibility in the repayment schedule
helps address the diversity in each CO-OP's local market conditions,
projected member risk profiles, business strategy, and projected
enrollment size. CMS proposes to permit individualized repayment
schedules to be submitted with the application with features such as a
grace period, graduated repayments, or balloon payments at the end of
the repayment period.
The Advisory Board recommended an enhanced oversight process for
cases where a loan recipient is not meeting the terms and conditions of
its loan but where CMS has concluded that discontinuing funding is not
in the best interest of the members, the public, or the government.
Consistent with the Advisory Board's recommendation, CMS may execute a
loan modification or workout when a loan recipient is having difficulty
making loan repayments. If a loan recipient is unable to (1) make
repayments or meet other conditions of the loan without adversely
affecting coverage stability, member control, quality of care, or the
public interest generally or (2) meet State reserve and solvency
requirements, CMS would have the option to execute a loan modification
or workout.
3. Interest Rates
In Sec. 156.520(c), CMS proposes that loan recipients pay an
interest rate benchmarked to the average interest rate on marketable
Treasury securities of similar maturity. These interest rates are tied
to prevailing market conditions while providing low cost loans that are
consistent with the statute's direction to foster the development of
viable private nonprofit CO-OPs. CMS is considering reductions to the
benchmarked rate for Start-Up Loans and Solvency Loans to make it
easier for new CO-OPs to repay their loans.
Section 1322(b)(2)(C)(iii) of the Affordable Care Act states that
if CMS determines that a loan recipient has failed to meet any of its
contractual obligations, or has used Federal funds in a prohibited or
improper manner, the loan recipient must repay to CMS 110 percent of
the aggregate amount of loans received under this section, plus
interest. This provision is codified in Sec. 156.520(c) so that if a
loan recipient's loan agreement is terminated by CMS, the loan
recipient would be charged the statutory penalty and an interest rate
equal to the average interest rate on marketable Treasury securities of
similar maturity. We request public comment on the proposed interest
rates and the structure of the debt instrument.
4. Failure to Pay
In Sec. 156.520(d), CMS proposes to use any and all remedies
available to it under law to collect loan payments or penalty payments
if a loan recipient fails to make payments consistent with the
repayment schedule in its loan agreement or in a loan modification or
workout.
5. Deeming of CO-OP Qualified Health Plans
In Sec. 156.520(e) we codify the ``deeming'' provisions of section
1301(a)(2) of the Affordable Care Act. To be deemed certified to
participate in an Exchange, we propose that a loan recipient must be in
compliance with the terms of the CO-OP program, the Federal standards
for CO-OP qualified health plans set forth pursuant to section 1311(c)
of the Affordable Care Act and State standards. CMS or an entity
designated by CMS will make a determination regarding whether or not a
loan recipient meets these standards based on evidence provided by the
loan recipient. CMS or its designee will notify the Exchange in which
the loan recipient proposes to operate that the loan recipient is
deemed certified to participate. Similarly, if a loan recipient loses
its deemed status for any reason, CMS or its designee will provide
notice to the applicable Exchanges.
A loan recipient that is deemed certified to participate in the
Exchange would be exempt from the certification procedures for each
applicable Exchange. However, the loan recipient must still meet any
standards established by CMS for all qualified health plans
participating in an Exchange, along with all State requirements in the
case where a State is operating the Exchange.
6. Conversions
The Advisory Board expressed a concern about the potential for
successful CO-OPs to become targets for conversion to for-profit, non-
consumer operated entities. Such an outcome could reduce consumer
control, limit choice, and weaken competition in the insurance
marketplace. Accordingly, the Advisory Board recommended imposing
conditions on conversions that would create strong disincentives for a
company to acquire a CO-OP and for a CO-OP to pursue such offers.
Because allowing conversions to a for-profit or non-consumer operated
entity would be contrary to the goals of the CO-OP program, CMS
proposes to prohibit such conversions. This prohibition on conversions
and sales to for-profit or non-consumer operated entities would ensure
that loans awarded under this program are used to sustain program goals
over time.
CMS recognizes the potential for changes in CO-OP governance in
circumstances other than conversions and sales to for-profit or non-
consumer-operated entities. Since the goals of the CO-OP program are to
make available new consumer-governed private nonprofit health plans and
expand competition in the Exchanges, CMS proposes to prohibit any
transaction by a CO-OP that would result in a change to a governance
structure that does not meet the standards in Sec. 156.515 or any
other program standards. We request comment on these prohibitions.
III. Collection of Information Requirements
Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, we are required to
provide 60-day notice in the Federal Register and solicit public
comment before an information collection request is submitted to the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and approval. We will
solicit comments on the information collection request in association
with the implementation of the CO-OP program (for example, application,
reporting) in one or more future 60-day notices.
V. Regulatory Impact Analysis (RIA)
A. Introduction
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess all
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential economic,
[[Page 43246]]
environmental, public health and safety effects, distributive impacts,
and equity). An RIA must be prepared for rules with economically
significant effects ($100 million or more in any 1 year). This proposed
rule is economically significant. Accordingly, the Office of Management
and Budget has reviewed this proposed rule.
B. Statement of Need, Health Insurance Markets, and CO-OP Plans
The Affordable Care Act established the Consumer Operated and
Oriented Plan (CO-OP) program. Section 1322(b)(3) of the Affordable
Care Act requires CMS to promulgate regulations to implement this
program. The purpose of this program is to create a new CO-OP in every
State in order to expand the number of qualified health plans available
in the Exchanges with a focus on integrated care and greater plan
accountability.
Only a few States offer insurance choices sponsored and managed by
entities primarily focused on meeting the health insurance needs and
preferences of consumers, as determined directly by consumers or their
elected representatives. Currently, we believe that there are four
issuers in the country that meet this standard, located in the States
of Washington, Idaho, Minnesota, and Wisconsin. While these issuers
cover in excess of one million lives, their market share is only about
one percent of private insurance coverage.
Congress has provided budget authority of $3.8 billion to assist
sponsoring organizations in creating such plans and to do so with
enough capital and reserves to become licensed and ultimately effective
competitors in State insurance markets. These funds will enable CO-OPs
to use Federal government loans (``Solvency Loans'') to meet the
requirements for risk-based capital that State insurance commissions
impose on health plans to ensure that they will be able to finance the
services they have contractually promised their enrollees.
The Affordable Care Act, as implemented through this regulation,
prohibits issuers that existed prior to July 16, 2009 from
participating in the CO-OP program but allows CO-OPs to use experienced
managers and health care organizations to manage the functions they
have to perform in providing health insurance. Further, as indicated
throughout the preamble to this proposed rule, the CO-OP Advisory Board
in its advice to the Secretary, and the Department in its