Revisions to the California State Implementation Plan, Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District, 43183-43185 [2011-18152]
Download as PDF
43183
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 139 / Wednesday, July 20, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
EPA is finalizing both an
approval and a limited approval and
limited disapproval of permitting rules
submitted for the Sacramento
Metropolitan Air Quality Management
District (SMAQMD or District) portion
of the California State Implementation
Plan (SIP). These revisions were
proposed in the Federal Register on
May 19, 2011 and concern New Source
Review (NSR) and Prevention of
Significant Deterioration (PSD) permit
programs for new and modified major
stationary sources of air pollution. We
are approving local rules that regulate
these emission sources under the Clean
Air Act as amended in 1990 (CAA).
DATES: Effective Date: This rule is
effective on August 19, 2011.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established docket
number EPA–R09–OAR–2011–0460 for
this action. Generally, documents in the
docket for this action are available
electronically at https://
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at
EPA Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street,
San Francisco, California. While all
documents are listed at https://
www.regulations.gov, some information
may be publicly available only at the
hard copy location (e.g., copyrighted
material, large maps, multi-volume
reports), and some may not be publicly
available in either location (e.g., CBI).
To inspect the hard copy materials,
please schedule an appointment during
normal business hours with the contact
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Laura Yannayon, EPA Region IX, (415)
972–3534, yannayon.laura@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document, ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us’’
and ‘‘our’’ refer to EPA.
Table of Contents
and its legislative history call for the
Administrator to find the rule to be of
‘‘nationwide scope or effect’’ and for
venue to be in the District of Columbia
Circuit.
Thus, any petitions for review of this
action related to a finding of failure to
submit SIPs related to the requirements
of section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) of the CAA
must be filed in the Court of Appeals for
the District of Columbia Circuit within
60 days from the date final action is
published in the Federal Register.
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
SUMMARY:
Environmental protection,
Administrative practice and procedure,
Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Dated: July 1, 2011.
Gina McCarthy,
Assistant Administrator, Office of Air and
Radiation.
[FR Doc. 2011–17738 Filed 7–19–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
Local agency
Revisions to the California State
Implementation Plan, Sacramento
Metropolitan Air Quality Management
District
AGENCY:
Local agency
203
On May 19, 2011 (76 FR 28942), EPA
proposed to approve the following rule
that was submitted for incorporation
into the California SIP.
Amended
contain more information on the basis
for this rulemaking and on our
evaluation of the submittal.
On May 19, 2011 (76 FR 28942), EPA
also proposed a limited approval and
214
1/27/11
Amended
Federal New Source Review .......................................................................
Jkt 223001
• The rule is missing adequate public
notice requirements for minor sources.
• The rule is missing provisions
meeting the requirements of 40 CFR
51.165(a)(5)(ii) and 40 CFR 51.307(b)(2).
• The rule contains a cross reference
to Rule 207—Title V—Federal Operating
Permit Program, which is not SIP
approved.
Our proposed rule and related TSD
contain more information on the basis
for this rulemaking and on our
evaluation of the submittal.
PO 00000
Frm 00073
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Submitted
1/28/11
limited disapproval of the following
rule that was submitted for
incorporation into the California SIP.
Rule title
We proposed a limited approval
because we determined that this rule
improves the SIP and is largely
consistent with the applicable CAA
requirements. We simultaneously
proposed a limited disapproval because
some rule provisions do not satisfy the
requirements of section 110 and part D
of the CAA.
Specifically:
• The rule is missing definitions for
the terms ‘‘begin actual construction,’’
‘‘federally enforceable’’ and ‘‘necessary
preconstruction approvals or permits.’’
16:14 Jul 19, 2011
I. Proposed Action
Prevention of Significant Deterioration .........................................................
Rule No.
SMAQMD ..........
I. Proposed Action
II. Public Comments and EPA Responses
III. EPA Action
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Rule title
We proposed to approve this rule
because we determined that it complied
with the applicable CAA requirements.
Our proposed rule and related
Technical Support Document (TSD)
jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with RULES
[EPA–R09–OAR–2011–0460; FRL–9438–6]
Rule No.
SMAQMD ..........
VerDate Mar<15>2010
40 CFR Part 52
Submitted
10/28/10
12/07/10
II. Public Comments and EPA
Responses
EPA’s proposed action provided a 30day public comment period. During this
period, we received no comments.
III. EPA Action
No comments were submitted that
change our assessment that the
submitted SMAQMD Rule 203 complies
with the applicable CAA requirements.
Therefore, under CAA section 110(k)(3)
and for the reasons set forth in our May
19, 2011 proposed rule, we are
finalizing a full approval of Rule 203.
E:\FR\FM\20JYR1.SGM
20JYR1
43184
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 139 / Wednesday, July 20, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
Additionally, no comments were
submitted that change our basis for
proposing a limited approval and
limited disapproval of submitted
SMAQMD Rule 214. Therefore, under
CAA sections 110(k)(3) and 301(a), we
are finalizing a limited approval and
limited disapproval of Rule 214. We are
finalizing a limited approval of the
submitted rule because we continue to
believe that the rule improves the SIP
and is largely consistent with relevant
CAA requirements. This action
incorporates the submitted rule into the
District portion of the California SIP,
including those provisions identified as
deficient. As authorized under sections
110(k)(3) and 301(a), EPA is
simultaneously finalizing a limited
disapproval of Rule 214. As a result,
sanctions will be imposed unless EPA
approves subsequent SIP revisions that
correct the rule deficiencies within 18
months of the effective date of this
action. These sanctions will be imposed
under section 179 of the Act according
to 40 CFR 52.31. In addition, EPA must
promulgate a federal implementation
plan (FIP) under section 110(c) unless
we approve subsequent SIP revisions
that correct the rule deficiencies within
24 months. Note that the submitted rule
has been adopted by the SMAQMD, and
EPA’s final limited disapproval does not
prevent the local agency from enforcing
it. The limited disapproval also does not
prevent any portion of the rule from
being incorporated by reference into the
federally enforceable SIP, as discussed
in a July 9, 1992 EPA memo found at:
https://www.epa.gov/nsr/ttnnsr01/gen/
pdf/memo-s.pdf.
IV. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
A. Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review
The Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) has exempted this regulatory
action from Executive Order 12866,
entitled ‘‘Regulatory Planning and
Review.’’
B. Paperwork Reduction Act
This action does not impose an
information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction
Act, 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq. Burden is
defined at 5 CFR 1320.3(b).
jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with RULES
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
generally requires an agency to conduct
a regulatory flexibility analysis of any
rule subject to notice and comment
rulemaking requirements unless the
agency certifies that the rule will not
have a significant economic impact on
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:14 Jul 19, 2011
Jkt 223001
a substantial number of small entities.
Small entities include small businesses,
small not-for-profit enterprises, and
small governmental jurisdictions.
This rule will not have a significant
impact on a substantial number of small
entities because SIP approvals and
limited approvals/limited disapprovals
under section 110 and subchapter I, part
D of the Clean Air Act do not create any
new requirements but simply approve
requirements that the State is already
imposing. Therefore, because this
limited approval/limited disapproval
action does not create any new
requirements, I certify that this action
will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
Moreover, due to the nature of the
Federal-State relationship under the
Clean Air Act, preparation of flexibility
analysis would constitute Federal
inquiry into the economic
reasonableness of State action. The
Clean Air Act forbids EPA to base its
actions concerning SIPs on such
grounds. Union Electric Co., v. U.S.
EPA, 427 U.S. 246, 255–66 (1976); 42
U.S.C. 7410(a)(2).
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
Under sections 202 of the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995
(‘‘Unfunded Mandates Act’’), signed
into law on March 22, 1995, EPA must
prepare a budgetary impact statement to
accompany any proposed or final rule
that includes a Federal mandate that
may result in estimated costs to State,
local, or tribal governments in the
aggregate; or to the private sector, of
$100 million or more. Under section
205, EPA must select the most costeffective and least burdensome
alternative that achieves the objectives
of the rule and is consistent with
statutory requirements. Section 203
requires EPA to establish a plan for
informing and advising any small
governments that may be significantly
or uniquely impacted by the rule.
EPA has determined that the limited
approval/limited disapproval action
promulgated does not include a Federal
mandate that may result in estimated
costs of $100 million or more to either
State, local, or tribal governments in the
aggregate, or to the private sector. This
Federal action approves pre-existing
requirements under State or local law,
and imposes no new requirements.
Accordingly, no additional costs to
State, local, or tribal governments, or to
the private sector, result from this
action.
PO 00000
Frm 00074
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E. Executive Order 13132, Federalism
Federalism (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999) revokes and replaces Executive
Orders 12612 (Federalism) and 12875
(Enhancing the Intergovernmental
Partnership). Executive Order 13132
requires EPA to develop an accountable
process to ensure ‘‘meaningful and
timely input by State and local officials
in the development of regulatory
policies that have federalism
implications.’’ ‘‘Policies that have
federalism implications’’ is defined in
the Executive Order to include
regulations that have ‘‘substantial direct
effects on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government.’’ Under
Executive Order 13132, EPA may not
issue a regulation that has federalism
implications, that imposes substantial
direct compliance costs, and that is not
required by statute, unless the Federal
government provides the funds
necessary to pay the direct compliance
costs incurred by State and local
governments, or EPA consults with
State and local officials early in the
process of developing the proposed
regulation. EPA also may not issue a
regulation that has federalism
implications and that preempts State
law unless the Agency consults with
State and local officials early in the
process of developing the proposed
regulation.
This rule will not have substantial
direct effects on the States, on the
relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government, as specified in
Executive Order 13132, because it
merely approves a State rule
implementing a Federal standard, and
does not alter the relationship or the
distribution of power and
responsibilities established in the Clean
Air Act. Thus, the requirements of
section 6 of the Executive Order do not
apply to this rule.
F. Executive Order 13175, Coordination
With Indian Tribal Governments
Executive Order 13175, entitled
‘‘Consultation and Coordination with
Indian Tribal Governments’’ (65 FR
67249, November 9, 2000), requires EPA
to develop an accountable process to
ensure ‘‘meaningful and timely input by
tribal officials in the development of
regulatory policies that have tribal
implications.’’ This final rule does not
have tribal implications, as specified in
Executive Order 13175. It will not have
E:\FR\FM\20JYR1.SGM
20JYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 139 / Wednesday, July 20, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
substantial direct effects on tribal
governments, on the relationship
between the Federal government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal government and Indian tribes.
Thus, Executive Order 13175 does not
apply to this rule.
G. Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children From Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks
EPA interprets Executive Order 13045
(62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997) as
applying only to those regulatory
actions that concern health or safety
risks, such that the analysis required
under section 5–501 of the Executive
Order has the potential to influence the
regulation. This rule is not subject to
Executive Order 13045, because it
approves a State rule implementing a
Federal standard.
H. Executive Order 13211, Actions That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use
This rule is not subject to Executive
Order 13211, ‘‘Actions Concerning
Regulations That Significantly Affect
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use’’ (66
FR 28355, May 22, 2001) because it is
not a significant regulatory action under
Executive Order 12866.
jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with RULES
I. National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act
Section 12 of the National Technology
Transfer and Advancement Act
(NTTAA) of 1995 requires Federal
agencies to evaluate existing technical
standards when developing a new
regulation. To comply with NTTAA,
EPA must consider and use ‘‘voluntary
consensus standards’’ (VCS) if available
and applicable when developing
programs and policies unless doing so
would be inconsistent with applicable
law or otherwise impractical.
The EPA believes that VCS are
inapplicable to this action. Today’s
action does not require the public to
perform activities conducive to the use
of VCS.
J. Executive Order 12898: Federal
Actions To Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and
Low-Income Populations
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629,
Feb. 16, 1994) establishes Federal
executive policy on environmental
justice. Its main provision directs
Federal agencies, to the greatest extent
practicable and permitted by law, to
make environmental justice part of their
mission by identifying and addressing,
as appropriate, disproportionately high
and adverse human health or
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:14 Jul 19, 2011
Jkt 223001
environmental effects of their programs,
policies, and activities on minority
populations and low-income
populations in the United States.
EPA lacks the discretionary authority
to address environmental justice in this
rulemaking.
43185
PART 52—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for Part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart F—California
2. Section 52.220 is amended by
adding paragraphs (c)(389) and (390) to
read as follows:
■
K. Congressional Review Act
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. section 801 et seq., as added by
the Small Business Regulatory
Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996,
generally provides that before a rule
may take effect, the agency
promulgating the rule must submit a
rule report, which includes a copy of
the rule, to each House of the Congress
and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report
containing this rule and other required
information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S.
House of Representatives, and the
Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it
is published in the Federal Register.
This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by 5 U.S.C. section 804(2). This
rule will be effective on August 19,
2011.
L. Petitions for Judicial Review
§ 52.220
Identification of plan.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(389) New and amended regulations
were submitted on December 7, 2010, by
the Governor’s Designee.
(i) Incorporation by Reference.
(A) Sacramento Metropolitan Air
Quality Management District.
(1) Rule 214, ‘‘Federal New Source
Review,’’ as adopted on October 28,
2010.
(390) Amended regulations were
submitted on January 28, 2011, by the
Governor’s Designee.
(i) Incorporation by Reference.
(A) Sacramento Metropolitan Air
Quality Management District.
(1) Rule 203, ‘‘Prevention of
Significant Deterioration,’’ as amended
on January 27, 2011.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2011–18152 Filed 7–19–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean
Air Act, petitions for judicial review of
this action must be filed in the United
States Court of Appeals for the
appropriate circuit by September 19,
2011. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of
this final rule does not affect the finality
of this rule for the purposes of judicial
review nor does it extend the time
within which a petition for judicial
review may be filed, and shall not
postpone the effectiveness of such rule
or action. This action may not be
challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements (see section
307(b)(2)).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Air pollution control, Environmental
protection, Incorporation by reference,
Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen
dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Volatile organic
compounds.
Dated: June 30, 2011.
Jared Blumenfeld,
Regional Administrator, Region IX.
Part 52, Chapter I, Title 40 of the Code
of Federal Regulations is amended as
follows:
PO 00000
Frm 00075
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 55
[EPA–R03–OAR–2011–0140; FRL- 9434–5 ]
Outer Continental Shelf Air
Regulations Consistency Update for
Virginia
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
AGENCY:
EPA is taking direct final
action to approve an update to a portion
of the Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) Air
Regulations. Requirements applying to
OCS sources located within 25 miles of
a State’s seaward boundary must be
updated periodically to maintain
continuity and ensure consistency with
the regulations of the corresponding
onshore area (COA), as mandated by the
Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990
(CAA). The specific portion of the OCS
air regulation that is being updated
pertains to the requirements for OCS
sources in the Commonwealth of
Virginia (Virginia). The intended effect
of approving the OCS requirements for
Virginia is to regulate emissions from
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\20JYR1.SGM
20JYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 139 (Wednesday, July 20, 2011)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 43183-43185]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-18152]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R09-OAR-2011-0460; FRL-9438-6]
Revisions to the California State Implementation Plan, Sacramento
Metropolitan Air Quality Management District
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA is finalizing both an approval and a limited approval and
limited disapproval of permitting rules submitted for the Sacramento
Metropolitan Air Quality Management District (SMAQMD or District)
portion of the California State Implementation Plan (SIP). These
revisions were proposed in the Federal Register on May 19, 2011 and
concern New Source Review (NSR) and Prevention of Significant
Deterioration (PSD) permit programs for new and modified major
stationary sources of air pollution. We are approving local rules that
regulate these emission sources under the Clean Air Act as amended in
1990 (CAA).
DATES: Effective Date: This rule is effective on August 19, 2011.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established docket number EPA-R09-OAR-2011-0460 for
this action. Generally, documents in the docket for this action are
available electronically at https://www.regulations.gov or in hard copy
at EPA Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, California. While
all documents are listed at https://www.regulations.gov, some
information may be publicly available only at the hard copy location
(e.g., copyrighted material, large maps, multi-volume reports), and
some may not be publicly available in either location (e.g., CBI). To
inspect the hard copy materials, please schedule an appointment during
normal business hours with the contact listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Laura Yannayon, EPA Region IX, (415)
972-3534, yannayon.laura@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, ``we,'' ``us'' and
``our'' refer to EPA.
Table of Contents
I. Proposed Action
II. Public Comments and EPA Responses
III. EPA Action
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Proposed Action
On May 19, 2011 (76 FR 28942), EPA proposed to approve the
following rule that was submitted for incorporation into the California
SIP.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Local agency Rule No. Rule title Amended Submitted
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SMAQMD............................ 203 Prevention of Significant 1/27/11 1/28/11
Deterioration.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
We proposed to approve this rule because we determined that it
complied with the applicable CAA requirements. Our proposed rule and
related Technical Support Document (TSD) contain more information on
the basis for this rulemaking and on our evaluation of the submittal.
On May 19, 2011 (76 FR 28942), EPA also proposed a limited approval
and limited disapproval of the following rule that was submitted for
incorporation into the California SIP.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Local agency Rule No. Rule title Amended Submitted
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SMAQMD............................ 214 Federal New Source Review... 10/28/10 12/07/10
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
We proposed a limited approval because we determined that this rule
improves the SIP and is largely consistent with the applicable CAA
requirements. We simultaneously proposed a limited disapproval because
some rule provisions do not satisfy the requirements of section 110 and
part D of the CAA.
Specifically:
The rule is missing definitions for the terms ``begin
actual construction,'' ``federally enforceable'' and ``necessary
preconstruction approvals or permits.''
The rule is missing adequate public notice requirements
for minor sources.
The rule is missing provisions meeting the requirements of
40 CFR 51.165(a)(5)(ii) and 40 CFR 51.307(b)(2).
The rule contains a cross reference to Rule 207--Title V--
Federal Operating Permit Program, which is not SIP approved.
Our proposed rule and related TSD contain more information on the
basis for this rulemaking and on our evaluation of the submittal.
II. Public Comments and EPA Responses
EPA's proposed action provided a 30-day public comment period.
During this period, we received no comments.
III. EPA Action
No comments were submitted that change our assessment that the
submitted SMAQMD Rule 203 complies with the applicable CAA
requirements. Therefore, under CAA section 110(k)(3) and for the
reasons set forth in our May 19, 2011 proposed rule, we are finalizing
a full approval of Rule 203.
[[Page 43184]]
Additionally, no comments were submitted that change our basis for
proposing a limited approval and limited disapproval of submitted
SMAQMD Rule 214. Therefore, under CAA sections 110(k)(3) and 301(a), we
are finalizing a limited approval and limited disapproval of Rule 214.
We are finalizing a limited approval of the submitted rule because we
continue to believe that the rule improves the SIP and is largely
consistent with relevant CAA requirements. This action incorporates the
submitted rule into the District portion of the California SIP,
including those provisions identified as deficient. As authorized under
sections 110(k)(3) and 301(a), EPA is simultaneously finalizing a
limited disapproval of Rule 214. As a result, sanctions will be imposed
unless EPA approves subsequent SIP revisions that correct the rule
deficiencies within 18 months of the effective date of this action.
These sanctions will be imposed under section 179 of the Act according
to 40 CFR 52.31. In addition, EPA must promulgate a federal
implementation plan (FIP) under section 110(c) unless we approve
subsequent SIP revisions that correct the rule deficiencies within 24
months. Note that the submitted rule has been adopted by the SMAQMD,
and EPA's final limited disapproval does not prevent the local agency
from enforcing it. The limited disapproval also does not prevent any
portion of the rule from being incorporated by reference into the
federally enforceable SIP, as discussed in a July 9, 1992 EPA memo
found at: https://www.epa.gov/nsr/ttnnsr01/gen/pdf/memo-s.pdf.
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
A. Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review
The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has exempted this
regulatory action from Executive Order 12866, entitled ``Regulatory
Planning and Review.''
B. Paperwork Reduction Act
This action does not impose an information collection burden under
the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.
Burden is defined at 5 CFR 1320.3(b).
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) generally requires an agency
to conduct a regulatory flexibility analysis of any rule subject to
notice and comment rulemaking requirements unless the agency certifies
that the rule will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities. Small entities include small
businesses, small not-for-profit enterprises, and small governmental
jurisdictions.
This rule will not have a significant impact on a substantial
number of small entities because SIP approvals and limited approvals/
limited disapprovals under section 110 and subchapter I, part D of the
Clean Air Act do not create any new requirements but simply approve
requirements that the State is already imposing. Therefore, because
this limited approval/limited disapproval action does not create any
new requirements, I certify that this action will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
Moreover, due to the nature of the Federal-State relationship under
the Clean Air Act, preparation of flexibility analysis would constitute
Federal inquiry into the economic reasonableness of State action. The
Clean Air Act forbids EPA to base its actions concerning SIPs on such
grounds. Union Electric Co., v. U.S. EPA, 427 U.S. 246, 255-66 (1976);
42 U.S.C. 7410(a)(2).
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
Under sections 202 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
(``Unfunded Mandates Act''), signed into law on March 22, 1995, EPA
must prepare a budgetary impact statement to accompany any proposed or
final rule that includes a Federal mandate that may result in estimated
costs to State, local, or tribal governments in the aggregate; or to
the private sector, of $100 million or more. Under section 205, EPA
must select the most cost-effective and least burdensome alternative
that achieves the objectives of the rule and is consistent with
statutory requirements. Section 203 requires EPA to establish a plan
for informing and advising any small governments that may be
significantly or uniquely impacted by the rule.
EPA has determined that the limited approval/limited disapproval
action promulgated does not include a Federal mandate that may result
in estimated costs of $100 million or more to either State, local, or
tribal governments in the aggregate, or to the private sector. This
Federal action approves pre-existing requirements under State or local
law, and imposes no new requirements. Accordingly, no additional costs
to State, local, or tribal governments, or to the private sector,
result from this action.
E. Executive Order 13132, Federalism
Federalism (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999) revokes and replaces
Executive Orders 12612 (Federalism) and 12875 (Enhancing the
Intergovernmental Partnership). Executive Order 13132 requires EPA to
develop an accountable process to ensure ``meaningful and timely input
by State and local officials in the development of regulatory policies
that have federalism implications.'' ``Policies that have federalism
implications'' is defined in the Executive Order to include regulations
that have ``substantial direct effects on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government.'' Under Executive Order 13132, EPA may not issue a
regulation that has federalism implications, that imposes substantial
direct compliance costs, and that is not required by statute, unless
the Federal government provides the funds necessary to pay the direct
compliance costs incurred by State and local governments, or EPA
consults with State and local officials early in the process of
developing the proposed regulation. EPA also may not issue a regulation
that has federalism implications and that preempts State law unless the
Agency consults with State and local officials early in the process of
developing the proposed regulation.
This rule will not have substantial direct effects on the States,
on the relationship between the national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various
levels of government, as specified in Executive Order 13132, because it
merely approves a State rule implementing a Federal standard, and does
not alter the relationship or the distribution of power and
responsibilities established in the Clean Air Act. Thus, the
requirements of section 6 of the Executive Order do not apply to this
rule.
F. Executive Order 13175, Coordination With Indian Tribal Governments
Executive Order 13175, entitled ``Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments'' (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000),
requires EPA to develop an accountable process to ensure ``meaningful
and timely input by tribal officials in the development of regulatory
policies that have tribal implications.'' This final rule does not have
tribal implications, as specified in Executive Order 13175. It will not
have
[[Page 43185]]
substantial direct effects on tribal governments, on the relationship
between the Federal government and Indian tribes, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal
government and Indian tribes. Thus, Executive Order 13175 does not
apply to this rule.
G. Executive Order 13045, Protection of Children From Environmental
Health Risks and Safety Risks
EPA interprets Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997)
as applying only to those regulatory actions that concern health or
safety risks, such that the analysis required under section 5-501 of
the Executive Order has the potential to influence the regulation. This
rule is not subject to Executive Order 13045, because it approves a
State rule implementing a Federal standard.
H. Executive Order 13211, Actions That Significantly Affect Energy
Supply, Distribution, or Use
This rule is not subject to Executive Order 13211, ``Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001) because it is not a
significant regulatory action under Executive Order 12866.
I. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act
Section 12 of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act
(NTTAA) of 1995 requires Federal agencies to evaluate existing
technical standards when developing a new regulation. To comply with
NTTAA, EPA must consider and use ``voluntary consensus standards''
(VCS) if available and applicable when developing programs and policies
unless doing so would be inconsistent with applicable law or otherwise
impractical.
The EPA believes that VCS are inapplicable to this action. Today's
action does not require the public to perform activities conducive to
the use of VCS.
J. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions To Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, Feb. 16, 1994) establishes
Federal executive policy on environmental justice. Its main provision
directs Federal agencies, to the greatest extent practicable and
permitted by law, to make environmental justice part of their mission
by identifying and addressing, as appropriate, disproportionately high
and adverse human health or environmental effects of their programs,
policies, and activities on minority populations and low-income
populations in the United States.
EPA lacks the discretionary authority to address environmental
justice in this rulemaking.
K. Congressional Review Act
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. section 801 et seq., as
added by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of
1996, generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency
promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy
of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller
General of the United States. EPA will submit a report containing this
rule and other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House
of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States
prior to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
section 804(2). This rule will be effective on August 19, 2011.
L. Petitions for Judicial Review
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by September 19, 2011. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule
does not affect the finality of this rule for the purposes of judicial
review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial
review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such
rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings
to enforce its requirements (see section 307(b)(2)).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Air pollution control, Environmental protection, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone,
Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile
organic compounds.
Dated: June 30, 2011.
Jared Blumenfeld,
Regional Administrator, Region IX.
Part 52, Chapter I, Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is
amended as follows:
PART 52--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for Part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart F--California
0
2. Section 52.220 is amended by adding paragraphs (c)(389) and (390) to
read as follows:
Sec. 52.220 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(389) New and amended regulations were submitted on December 7,
2010, by the Governor's Designee.
(i) Incorporation by Reference.
(A) Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District.
(1) Rule 214, ``Federal New Source Review,'' as adopted on October
28, 2010.
(390) Amended regulations were submitted on January 28, 2011, by
the Governor's Designee.
(i) Incorporation by Reference.
(A) Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District.
(1) Rule 203, ``Prevention of Significant Deterioration,'' as
amended on January 27, 2011.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2011-18152 Filed 7-19-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P