Conditions of Guarantee, 42593-42595 [2011-18007]
Download as PDF
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 138 / Tuesday, July 19, 2011 / Proposed Rules
acreage, and production information is
generally collected from the respondent
during a personal visit to the FSA
Service Center and again from the
respondent during a personal visit to the
insurance agent. The forms will still be
available to accommodate respondents
with no Internet access and those who
wish to continue to personally visit the
FSA Service Center and insurance agent
to report the information.
When a web-based single system is
fully implemented, respondents will be
allowed to report the information once.
The information will also be shared by
both FSA and RMA, as well as other
USDA agencies, such as NRCS and
NASS, that have the authority and need
for such information.
In each phase of system
implementation, some or all of the
commodity, acreage, and production
information in the existing approved
information collections will be reported
via web-based single source reporting
system. Furthermore, the information
collected will be the same as the
information currently approved.
Additionally, the respondent will only
have to report it one time through a
single source thereby reducing the
respondent’s burden of reporting such
information and eliminating the
duplicate reporting that may be
currently required. The information will
then be shared with the other agency
without having the producer personally
visit both offices. The information
collected will be the same as the
information currently approved and will
be used in the same manner it would be
used if reported separately to each
agency. FSA and RMA anticipate that
producers will be able to use their
precision-ag systems, farm management
information systems, or download data
files to directly report commodity,
acreage, and production information
needed to participate in USDA
programs.
The information being collected will
consist of, but not be limited to:
Producer name, location state,
commodity name, commodity type or
variety, location county, date planted,
land location (legal description, FSA
farm number, FSA track number, FSA
field number), intended use, prevented
planting acres, acres planted but failed,
planted acres, and production of
commodity produced.
FSA and RMA will implement the
web-based system in phases until fully
implemented. The first phase will be
initiated in the fall of 2011 in
Dickenson, Marion, McPherson, and
Saline Counties in Kansas, and only for
the collection of information from
producers regarding winter wheat. In
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:35 Jul 18, 2011
Jkt 223001
the first phase, approximately 200
respondents will use a web-based single
source reporting system and 3,705
respondents will report information
during a personal visit.
To ensure statutory criteria are met for
both Federal crop insurance programs,
FSA, and Commodity Credit
Corporation (CCC) programs, the
collection of commodity, acreage, and
production information is necessary.
This is not a request for a change,
addition or deletion to the currently
approved information collections.
However, the existing approved
information collections will be updated,
modified or eliminated, as applicable, to
reflect the reduction in burden on the
respondents when the web-based
system is fully implemented.
Respondents: Producers.
Estimated Annual Number of
Respondents Utilizing the Web-Based
Single Source Reporting System:
204,250.
Estimated Annual Number of
Respondents Reporting the Information
by Personally Visiting One Agency and
Sharing Information Between Agencies:
62,005.
Estimated Annual Number of
Responses per Respondent: 1.5.
Estimated Total Annual Burden on
Respondents Utilizing the Web-Based
Single Source Reporting System:
230,287 hours. (This estimated public
reporting burden is from the existing
OMB approved information collections
0560–0004.)
Estimated Total Annual Burden on
Respondents Reporting the Information
by Personally Visiting One Agency and
Having That Information Sharing
Information Between Agencies: 131,761
hours. (This estimated public reporting
burden is from the existing OMB
approved information collections 0560–
0004, including the estimated burden
for travel time.)
We are requesting comments on all
aspects of this information collection to
help us to:
(1) Evaluate whether the collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
agencies, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(2) Evaluate the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of burden including
the validity of the methodology and
assumptions used;
(3) Enhance the quality, utility and
clarity of the information to be
collected;
(4) Minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond through use of
appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
42593
collection techniques or other forms to
technology.
All comments in response to this
notice, including names and addresses
when provided, will be a matter of
public record. Comments will be
summarized and included in the request
for Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) approval.
Executive Order 13563, ‘‘Improving
Regulation and Regulatory Review’’
On January 18, 2011, the President
issued Executive Order 13563,
‘‘Improving Regulation and Regulatory
Review,’’ to ensure that Federal
regulations use the best available tools
to promote innovation that will reduce
costs and burden while allowing public
participation and an open exchange of
ideas. We are required to make the
agency’s regulatory program more
effective or less burdensome in
achieving the regulatory objectives. To
read background information on
Executive Order 13563, go to https://
www.regulations.gov/exchange/topic/
eo-13563.
Signed on July 11, 2011.
Karis T. Gutter,
Acting Under Secretary, Farm and Foreign
Agricultural Services.
[FR Doc. 2011–17923 Filed 7–18–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–05–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Rural Business-Cooperative Service
Rural Utilities Service
7 CFR Part 4279
RIN 0570–AA81
Conditions of Guarantee
AGENCY: Rural Business-Cooperative
Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
SUMMARY: The Rural BusinessCooperative Service is proposing to
amend its regulations for the Business
and Industry Guaranteed Loan Program
to ensure the Agency has sufficient
right(s) for reimbursement when an
Agency guaranteed portion of a loan is
sold to a holder. This action is necessary
because the rule is not sufficiently clear
that the use of loan funds for purposes
not approved by the Agency is a reason
to find the guarantee unenforceable
regardless of whether the guaranteed
portion of the loan has been sold to a
holder. This action ensures the Agency
has sufficient rights for reimbursement
when an Agency guaranteed portion of
the loan is sold to a holder.
E:\FR\FM\19JYP1.SGM
19JYP1
42594
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 138 / Tuesday, July 19, 2011 / Proposed Rules
DATES: Comments on this proposed rule
must be received on or before August
18, 2011. A second public comment
period will not be held.
You may submit comments
to this proposed rule by any of the
following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Mail: Submit written comments via
the U.S. Postal Service to the Branch
Chief, Regulations and Paperwork
Management Branch, U.S. Department
of Agriculture, STOP 0742, 1400
Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC 20250–0742.
• Hand Delivery/Courier: Submit
written comments via Federal Express
Mail or other courier service requiring a
street address to the Branch Chief,
Regulations and Paperwork
Management Branch, U.S. Department
of Agriculture, 300 7th Street, SW., 7th
Floor, Washington, DC 20024.
All written comments will be
available for public inspection during
regular work hours at the 300 7th Street,
SW., 7th Floor address listed above.
ADDRESSES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mr.
David Lewis, Rural Development,
Business Programs, U.S. Department of
Agriculture, 1400 Independence
Avenue, SW., Stop 3224, Washington,
DC 20250–3221; e-mail:
david.lewis@wdc.usda.gov; telephone
(202) 690–0797.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Classification
This rule has been determined to be
not significant for purposes of Executive
Order 12866 and has not been reviewed
by the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB).
Programs Affected
The Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance Program number assigned to
the Business and Industry Guaranteed
Loan Program is 10.782.
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Environmental Impact Statement
This document has been reviewed in
accordance with 7 CFR part 1940,
subpart G, ‘‘Environmental Program.’’
Rural Development has determined that
this action does not constitute a major
Federal action significantly affecting the
quality of the human environment and,
in accordance with the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of
1969, 42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq., an
Environmental Impact Statement is not
required.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:35 Jul 18, 2011
Jkt 223001
Executive Order 12372,
Intergovernmental Consultation
The program is subject to the
provisions of Executive Order 12372,
which requires intergovernmental
consultation with State and local
officials. Consultation will be completed
at the time of the action performed.
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
This rule has been reviewed under
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform. The Agency has determined
that this rule meets the applicable
standards provided in section 3 of the
Executive Order. Additionally, (1) All
state and local laws and regulations that
are in conflict with this rule will be
preempted; (2) no retroactive effect will
be given to the rule; and (3)
administrative appeal procedures, if
any, must be exhausted before litigation
against the Department or its agencies
may be initiated, in accordance with the
regulations of the National Appeals
Division of USDA at 7 CFR part 11.
Executive Order 13132, Federalism
The policies contained in this rule do
not have any substantial direct effect on
states, on the relationship between the
national government and the states, or
on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. Nor does this final
rule impose substantial direct
compliance costs on state and local
governments. Therefore, consultation
with states is not required.
Regulatory Flexibility Act Certification
Under section 605(b) of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C.
605(b), the Agency certifies that this
rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. The Agency
made this determination based on the
fact that this regulation only impacts
those who choose to participate in the
program. Small entity applicants will
not be impacted to a greater extent than
large entity applicants.
Unfunded Mandates
This rule contains no Federal
mandates (under the regulatory
provisions of Title II of the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995) for State,
local, and tribal governments or the
private sector. Thus, this rule is not
subject to the requirements of sections
202 and 205 of the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995.
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Executive Order 13175, Consultation
and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments
This executive order imposes
requirements on Rural Development in
the development of regulatory policies
that have tribal implications or preempt
tribal laws. Rural Development has
determined that the proposed rule does
not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribe(s) or on either
the relationship or the distribution of
powers and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Thus, this proposed rule is not subject
to the requirements of Executive Order
13175. If a tribe determines that this
rule has implications of which Rural
Development is not aware and would
like to engage with Rural Development
on this rule, please contact Rural
Development’s Native American
Coordinator at (202) 690–1681 or
AIAN@wdc.usda.gov.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule contains no new reporting
or recordkeeping requirements that
would require approval under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. chapter 35).
E-Government Act Compliance
Rural Development is committed to
complying with the E-Government Act,
to promote the use of the Internet and
other information technologies, to
provide increased opportunities for
citizen access to Government
information and services, and other
purposes.
I. Background
The Agency reviewed 7 CFR 4279.72,
which is composed of three paragraphs,
the first two of which are pertinent.
Section 4279.72(a) lays out the
conditions under which a guarantee is
not enforceable. The text separately
identifies four such conditions:
1. In cases of fraud or
misrepresentation of which a lender or
holder has actual knowledge at the time
it becomes such lender or holder or
which a lender or holder participates in
or condones;
2. To the extent that any loss is
occasioned by a provision for interest on
interest;
3. To the extent any loss is occasioned
by the violation of usury laws, negligent
servicing, or failure to obtain the
required security regardless of the time
at which the Agency acquires
knowledge thereof; and
4. To the extent that loan funds are
used for purposes other than those
specifically approved by the Agency in
its Conditional Commitment.
E:\FR\FM\19JYP1.SGM
19JYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 138 / Tuesday, July 19, 2011 / Proposed Rules
Section 4279.72(b) discusses rights
and liabilities when a guaranteed
portion of a loan is sold to a holder. It
states, in part, that the lender will be
liable for payments made by USDA to
any holder in the event of ‘‘material
fraud, negligence or misrepresentation
by the lender or the lender’s
participation in or condoning of such
material fraud, negligence or
misrepresentation.’’ Section 4279.72(b)
does not, however, refer to the other
conditions listed in § 4279.72(a).
The Agency believes the lender’s
responsibility to reimburse the Agency
for the improper activity should not be
dependent upon whether the lender or
holder owns the loan guarantee.
However, the Agency is concerned that
this policy is not sufficiently clear in
this regulation. Therefore, the Agency is
clarifying its position on this matter.
The regulatory change is not retroactive
nor does it affect the rights of current
holders. However, the Agency
recognizes that the issue should be
clarified in the regulation. Accordingly,
the Agency is proposing to make these
changes in this proposed rule.
II. Discussion of Change
Section 4279.72(a) addresses the
lender’s coverage under the loan note
guarantee. It also identifies those
instances when the conduct of a holder
may jeopardize their interest in the loan
note guarantee. Section 4279.72(b)
addresses the holder’s coverage under
the loan note guarantee. The change
being made by this rule clarifies that
having a holder purchase part of the
loan note guarantee does not increase
the coverage provided to the lender
under the loan note guarantee.
Therefore, the Agency will require the
lender to reimburse it for any amount it
pays to a holder that would not have
been paid to a lender under
§ 4279.72(a).
The Agency is proposing to revise
§ 4279.72(b) to address the situation
discussed in the ‘‘Background’’ section
and similar situations.
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 4279
Loan programs—Business and
industry—Rural development
assistance, Rural areas.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, chapter XLII, title 7 of the
Code of Federal Regulations is proposed
to be amended as follows:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:35 Jul 18, 2011
Jkt 223001
Chapter XLII—Rural Business-Cooperative
Service and Rural Utilities Service,
Department of Agriculture
PART 4279—GUARANTEED
LOANMAKING
1. The authority citation for part 4279
is revised to read as follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 7 U.S.C. 1932(a);
and 7 U.S.C. 1989.
Subpart A—General
2. Amend § 4279.72 by revising the
last sentence of paragraph (b) to read as
follows:
§ 4279.72
Conditions of guarantee.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * * The lender will reimburse
the Agency for any payments the
Agency makes to a holder of lender’s
guaranteed loan that, under the Loan
Note Guarantee, would not have been
paid to the lender had the lender
retained the entire interest in the
guaranteed loan and not conveyed an
interest to a holder.
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: July 12, 2011.
Dallas Tonsager,
Under Secretary Rural Development.
[FR Doc. 2011–18007 Filed 7–18–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–XY–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Animal and Plant Health Inspection
Service
9 CFR Parts 53, 71, 82, 93, 94, 95, and
104
[Docket No. APHIS–2009–0094]
RIN 0579–AD45
Importation of Live Birds and Poultry,
Poultry Meat, and Poultry Products
From a Region in the European Union
AGENCY: Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service, USDA.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
SUMMARY: We are proposing to amend
the regulations governing the
importation of animals and animal
products by recognizing 25 Member
States of the European Union as the
APHIS-defined European Union poultry
trade region and adding it to the list of
regions we consider to be free of
Newcastle disease. We are taking this
action based on a risk evaluation that
we prepared in which we determined
that the proposed region meets our
requirements for being considered free
of Newcastle disease. We also
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
42595
determined that the region meets our
requirements for being considered free
of highly pathogenic avian influenza. In
addition, we are proposing to establish
requirements governing the importation
of live birds and poultry, including
hatching eggs, and poultry meat and
products from the APHIS-defined
European Union poultry trade region,
and to update avian disease terms and
definitions. These actions would
facilitate the importation of live birds
and poultry, and poultry meat and
products, from the APHIS-defined
European Union poultry trade region
while protecting the United States from
communicable avian diseases.
DATES: We will consider all comments
that we receive on or before September
19, 2011.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
by either of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
(https://www.regulations.gov/
#!documentDetail;D=APHIS-2009-00940001).
• Postal Mail/Commercial Delivery:
Send your comment to Docket No.
APHIS–2009–0094, Regulatory Analysis
and Development, PPD, APHIS, Station
3A–03.8, 4700 River Road Unit 118,
Riverdale, MD 20737–1238.
Supporting documents and any
comments we receive on this docket
may be viewed at (https://
www.regulations.gov/
#!docketDetail;D=APHIS-2009-0094) or
in our reading room, which is located in
room 1141 of the USDA South Building,
14th Street and Independence Avenue,
SW., Washington, DC. Normal reading
room hours are 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except
holidays. To be sure someone is there to
help you, please call (202) 690–2817
before coming.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Javier Vargas, Case Manager, National
Center for Import and Export, Veterinary
Services, APHIS, 4700 River Road Unit
38, Riverdale, MD 20737–1231; (301)
734–4356.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service (APHIS) regulations
in title 9 of the Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR), parts 93, 94, and 95,
govern the importation into the United
States of specified animals and animal
products and byproducts to prevent the
introduction of various animal diseases,
including exotic Newcastle disease 1
1 For reasons explained later in this document,
we propose to replace in the regulations the term
E:\FR\FM\19JYP1.SGM
Continued
19JYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 138 (Tuesday, July 19, 2011)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 42593-42595]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-18007]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Rural Business-Cooperative Service
Rural Utilities Service
7 CFR Part 4279
RIN 0570-AA81
Conditions of Guarantee
AGENCY: Rural Business-Cooperative Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Rural Business-Cooperative Service is proposing to amend
its regulations for the Business and Industry Guaranteed Loan Program
to ensure the Agency has sufficient right(s) for reimbursement when an
Agency guaranteed portion of a loan is sold to a holder. This action is
necessary because the rule is not sufficiently clear that the use of
loan funds for purposes not approved by the Agency is a reason to find
the guarantee unenforceable regardless of whether the guaranteed
portion of the loan has been sold to a holder. This action ensures the
Agency has sufficient rights for reimbursement when an Agency
guaranteed portion of the loan is sold to a holder.
[[Page 42594]]
DATES: Comments on this proposed rule must be received on or before
August 18, 2011. A second public comment period will not be held.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments to this proposed rule by any of the
following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Mail: Submit written comments via the U.S. Postal Service
to the Branch Chief, Regulations and Paperwork Management Branch, U.S.
Department of Agriculture, STOP 0742, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC 20250-0742.
Hand Delivery/Courier: Submit written comments via Federal
Express Mail or other courier service requiring a street address to the
Branch Chief, Regulations and Paperwork Management Branch, U.S.
Department of Agriculture, 300 7th Street, SW., 7th Floor, Washington,
DC 20024.
All written comments will be available for public inspection during
regular work hours at the 300 7th Street, SW., 7th Floor address listed
above.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. David Lewis, Rural Development,
Business Programs, U.S. Department of Agriculture, 1400 Independence
Avenue, SW., Stop 3224, Washington, DC 20250-3221; e-mail:
david.lewis@wdc.usda.gov; telephone (202) 690-0797.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Classification
This rule has been determined to be not significant for purposes of
Executive Order 12866 and has not been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB).
Programs Affected
The Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program number assigned
to the Business and Industry Guaranteed Loan Program is 10.782.
Environmental Impact Statement
This document has been reviewed in accordance with 7 CFR part 1940,
subpart G, ``Environmental Program.'' Rural Development has determined
that this action does not constitute a major Federal action
significantly affecting the quality of the human environment and, in
accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969,
42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq., an Environmental Impact Statement is not
required.
Executive Order 12372, Intergovernmental Consultation
The program is subject to the provisions of Executive Order 12372,
which requires intergovernmental consultation with State and local
officials. Consultation will be completed at the time of the action
performed.
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
This rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform. The Agency has determined that this rule meets the
applicable standards provided in section 3 of the Executive Order.
Additionally, (1) All state and local laws and regulations that are in
conflict with this rule will be preempted; (2) no retroactive effect
will be given to the rule; and (3) administrative appeal procedures, if
any, must be exhausted before litigation against the Department or its
agencies may be initiated, in accordance with the regulations of the
National Appeals Division of USDA at 7 CFR part 11.
Executive Order 13132, Federalism
The policies contained in this rule do not have any substantial
direct effect on states, on the relationship between the national
government and the states, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government. Nor does this
final rule impose substantial direct compliance costs on state and
local governments. Therefore, consultation with states is not required.
Regulatory Flexibility Act Certification
Under section 605(b) of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C.
605(b), the Agency certifies that this rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. The Agency
made this determination based on the fact that this regulation only
impacts those who choose to participate in the program. Small entity
applicants will not be impacted to a greater extent than large entity
applicants.
Unfunded Mandates
This rule contains no Federal mandates (under the regulatory
provisions of Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995) for
State, local, and tribal governments or the private sector. Thus, this
rule is not subject to the requirements of sections 202 and 205 of the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995.
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments
This executive order imposes requirements on Rural Development in
the development of regulatory policies that have tribal implications or
preempt tribal laws. Rural Development has determined that the proposed
rule does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more Indian
tribe(s) or on either the relationship or the distribution of powers
and responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Thus, this proposed rule is not subject to the requirements of
Executive Order 13175. If a tribe determines that this rule has
implications of which Rural Development is not aware and would like to
engage with Rural Development on this rule, please contact Rural
Development's Native American Coordinator at (202) 690-1681 or
AIAN@wdc.usda.gov.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule contains no new reporting or recordkeeping requirements
that would require approval under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. chapter 35).
E-Government Act Compliance
Rural Development is committed to complying with the E-Government
Act, to promote the use of the Internet and other information
technologies, to provide increased opportunities for citizen access to
Government information and services, and other purposes.
I. Background
The Agency reviewed 7 CFR 4279.72, which is composed of three
paragraphs, the first two of which are pertinent.
Section 4279.72(a) lays out the conditions under which a guarantee
is not enforceable. The text separately identifies four such
conditions:
1. In cases of fraud or misrepresentation of which a lender or
holder has actual knowledge at the time it becomes such lender or
holder or which a lender or holder participates in or condones;
2. To the extent that any loss is occasioned by a provision for
interest on interest;
3. To the extent any loss is occasioned by the violation of usury
laws, negligent servicing, or failure to obtain the required security
regardless of the time at which the Agency acquires knowledge thereof;
and
4. To the extent that loan funds are used for purposes other than
those specifically approved by the Agency in its Conditional
Commitment.
[[Page 42595]]
Section 4279.72(b) discusses rights and liabilities when a
guaranteed portion of a loan is sold to a holder. It states, in part,
that the lender will be liable for payments made by USDA to any holder
in the event of ``material fraud, negligence or misrepresentation by
the lender or the lender's participation in or condoning of such
material fraud, negligence or misrepresentation.'' Section 4279.72(b)
does not, however, refer to the other conditions listed in Sec.
4279.72(a).
The Agency believes the lender's responsibility to reimburse the
Agency for the improper activity should not be dependent upon whether
the lender or holder owns the loan guarantee. However, the Agency is
concerned that this policy is not sufficiently clear in this
regulation. Therefore, the Agency is clarifying its position on this
matter. The regulatory change is not retroactive nor does it affect the
rights of current holders. However, the Agency recognizes that the
issue should be clarified in the regulation. Accordingly, the Agency is
proposing to make these changes in this proposed rule.
II. Discussion of Change
Section 4279.72(a) addresses the lender's coverage under the loan
note guarantee. It also identifies those instances when the conduct of
a holder may jeopardize their interest in the loan note guarantee.
Section 4279.72(b) addresses the holder's coverage under the loan note
guarantee. The change being made by this rule clarifies that having a
holder purchase part of the loan note guarantee does not increase the
coverage provided to the lender under the loan note guarantee.
Therefore, the Agency will require the lender to reimburse it for any
amount it pays to a holder that would not have been paid to a lender
under Sec. 4279.72(a).
The Agency is proposing to revise Sec. 4279.72(b) to address the
situation discussed in the ``Background'' section and similar
situations.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 4279
Loan programs--Business and industry--Rural development assistance,
Rural areas.
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, chapter XLII, title 7 of
the Code of Federal Regulations is proposed to be amended as follows:
Chapter XLII--Rural Business-Cooperative Service and Rural Utilities
Service, Department of Agriculture
PART 4279--GUARANTEED LOANMAKING
1. The authority citation for part 4279 is revised to read as
follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 7 U.S.C. 1932(a); and 7 U.S.C. 1989.
Subpart A--General
2. Amend Sec. 4279.72 by revising the last sentence of paragraph
(b) to read as follows:
Sec. 4279.72 Conditions of guarantee.
* * * * *
(b) * * * The lender will reimburse the Agency for any payments the
Agency makes to a holder of lender's guaranteed loan that, under the
Loan Note Guarantee, would not have been paid to the lender had the
lender retained the entire interest in the guaranteed loan and not
conveyed an interest to a holder.
* * * * *
Dated: July 12, 2011.
Dallas Tonsager,
Under Secretary Rural Development.
[FR Doc. 2011-18007 Filed 7-18-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-XY-P