Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; West Virginia; Determination of Attainment and Determination of Clean Data for the Annual 1997 Fine Particle Standard for the Charleston Area, 41739-41742 [2011-17868]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 136 / Friday, July 15, 2011 / Proposed Rules
otherwise impractical. Voluntary
consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., materials specifications,
test methods, sampling procedures, and
business practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies. The NTTAA directs
the EPA to provide Congress, through
OMB, explanations when the Agency
decides not to use available and
applicable voluntary consensus
standards.
This rulemaking does not involve
technical standards. Therefore, the EPA
is not considering the use of any
voluntary consensus standards.
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
J. Executive Order 12898: Federal
Actions to Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and
Low-Income Populations
Executive Order (EO) 12898 (59 FR
7629 (Feb. 16, 1994)) establishes Federal
executive policy on environmental
justice. Its main provision directs
federal agencies, to the greatest extent
practicable and permitted by law, to
make environmental justice part of their
mission by identifying and addressing,
as appropriate, disproportionately high
and adverse human health or
environmental effects of their programs,
policies, and activities on minority
populations and low-income
populations in the United States.
The EPA has determined that this
proposed rule will not have
disproportionately high and adverse
human health or environmental effects
on minority or low-income populations
because it does not affect the level of
protection provided to human health or
the environment. This action proposes
to waive the requirement for states to
adopt Stage II programs, based on a
determination of widespread use of
ORVR. The EPA believes that by the
date specified in the proposed rule, the
amount of control that ORVR alone will
achieve will be equivalent to the
amount of control Stage II alone would
achieve.
K. Determination Under Section 307(d)
Pursuant to sections 307(d)(1)(K) and
307(d)(1)(V) of the CAA, the
Administrator determines that this
action is subject to the provisions of
section 307(d). Section 307(d)(1)(V)
provides that the provisions of section
307(d) apply to ‘‘such other actions as
the Administrator may determine.’’
VI. Statutory Authority
The statutory authority for this action
is provided by sections 182(b)(3) and
202(a)(6) of the CAA, as amended (42
U.S.C. 7511a(b)(3) and 42
U.S.C.7521(a)(6)). This notice is also
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:05 Jul 14, 2011
Jkt 223001
41739
subject to section 307(d) of the CAA (42
U.S.C. 7407(d)).
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 51
40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection,
Administrative practice and procedure,
Air pollution control, Ozone, Particulate
matter, Volatile organic compounds.
[EPA–R03–OAR–2011–0454; FRL–9439–9]
Dated: July 8, 2011.
Lisa P. Jackson,
Administrator.
For reasons set forth in the preamble,
part 51 of chapter I of title 40 of the
Code of Federal Regulations is proposed
to be amended as follows:
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans; West
Virginia; Determination of Attainment
and Determination of Clean Data for
the Annual 1997 Fine Particle Standard
for the Charleston Area
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
EPA is proposing to make two
determinations regarding the
Charleston, West Virginia fine
particulate matter (PM2.5) nonattainment
area (hereafter referred to as ‘‘Charleston
Area’’ or ‘‘Area’’). First, EPA is
proposing to determine that the Area
has attained the 1997 annual average
PM2.5 National Ambient Air Quality
Standard (NAAQS). This proposed
determination of attainment is based
upon complete, quality-assured, and
certified ambient air monitoring data for
the 2007–2009 period showing that the
Charleston Area has attained the 1997
annual PM2.5 NAAQS and data available
to date for 2010 in EPA’s Air Quality
System (AQS) database that show the
area continues to attain. If EPA finalizes
this proposed determination of
attainment, the requirements for the
Charleston Area to submit attainment
demonstrations and associated
reasonably available control measures
(RACM), a reasonable further progress
(RFP) plan, contingency measures, and
other planning State Implementation
Plan (SIP) revisions related to
attainment of the standard shall be
suspended for so long as the Area
continues to attain the annual PM2.5
NAAQS. Second, EPA is also proposing
to determine based on quality-assured
and certified monitoring data for the
2007–2009 monitoring period that the
area has attained the 1997 annual PM2.5
NAAQS, by its applicable attainment
date of April 5, 2010.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before August 15, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments
regarding the Charleston Area,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R03–
OAR–2011–0454, by one of the
following methods:
A. https://www.regulations.gov. Follow
the on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
B. E-mail:
fernandez.cristina@epa.gov.
C. Mail: EPA–R03–OAR–2011–0454,
Cristina Fernandez, Associate Director,
SUMMARY:
PART 51—REQUIREMENTS FOR
PREPARATION, ADOPTION, AND
SUBMITTAL OF IMPLEMENTATION
PLANS
1. The authority citation for part 51
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 23 U.S.C. 101; 42 U.S.C. 7401–
7671q.
Subpart G—[Amended]
2. Section 51.126 is added to read as
follows:
§ 51.126 Determination of widespread use
of ORVR and waiver of CAA section
182(b)(3) Stage II gasoline vapor recovery
requirements.
(a) Pursuant to section 202(a)(6) of the
Clean Air Act, the Administrator has
determined that, effective June 30, 2013,
onboard refueling vapor recovery
(ORVR) systems are in widespread use
in the motor vehicle fleet within the
United States.
(b) Effective June 30, 2013, the
Administrator waives the requirement
of Clean Air Act section 182(b)(3) for
Stage II vapor recovery systems in ozone
nonattainment areas regardless of
classification. States must submit and
receive the EPA approval of a revision
to their State Implementation Plans
before removing Stage II requirements
that are contained therein.
(c) Notwithstanding paragraphs (a)
and (b) of this section, States may
submit to the EPA demonstrations that
ORVR systems are in widespread use for
areas within their borders as of a date
earlier than June 30, 2013, and may
request an earlier date for revision or
waiver of the Clean Air Act section
182(b)(3) Stage II requirement based on
such a demonstration. The
Administrator may act on such requests
by rule under Clean Air Act section
202(a)(6).
[FR Doc. 2011–17888 Filed 7–14–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\15JYP1.SGM
15JYP1
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
41740
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 136 / Friday, July 15, 2011 / Proposed Rules
Office of Air Program Planning, Mail
code 3AP30, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Region III, 1650
Arch Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
19103.
D. Hand Delivery: At the previouslylisted EPA Region III address. Such
deliveries are only accepted during the
Docket’s normal hours of operation, and
special arrangements should be made
for deliveries of boxed information.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
Docket ID No. EPA–R03–OAR–2011–
0454. EPA’s policy is that all comments
received will be included in the public
docket without change and may be
made available online at https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise
protected through https://
www.regulations.gov or e-mail. The
https://www.regulations.gov Web site is
an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which
means EPA will not know your identity
or contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment.
If you send an e-mail comment directly
to EPA without going through https://
www.regulations.gov your e-mail
address will be automatically captured
and included as part of the comment
that is placed in the public docket and
made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA
recommends that you include your
name and other contact information in
the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA
cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact
you for clarification, EPA may not be
able to consider your comment.
Electronic files should avoid the use of
special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or
viruses.
Docket: All documents in the
electronic docket are listed in the
https://www.regulations.gov index.
Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available,
i.e., CBI or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the Internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available either electronically in https://
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy
during normal business hours at the Air
Protection Division, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Region III, 1650
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:05 Jul 14, 2011
Jkt 223001
Arch Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
19103.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Asrah Khadr, (215) 814–2071, or by email at khadr.asrah@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. What actions is EPA taking?
II. What is the background for these actions?
III. Has the Charleston Area attained the 1997
annual PM2.5 standard?
A. Criteria
B. Charleston Area Air Quality
C. How did EPA address air quality in the
Charleston Area?
D. Has the Charleston Area met the 1997
annual PM2.5 air quality standard?
IV. What is the effect of these actions?
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. What actions is EPA taking?
In accordance with section 179(c)(1)
of the Clean Air Act (CAA), 42 United
States Code section 7509(c)(1), and 40
Code of Federal Register (CFR) section
51.1004(c), EPA is proposing to
determine that the Charleston Area
(composed of Kanawha and Putnam
Counties) has attained the 1997 annual
PM2.5 NAAQS. This proposed action is
based upon complete, quality-assured,
and certified ambient air monitoring
data for the 2007–2009 monitoring
period that show that the Area has
monitored attainment of the 1997
annual PM2.5 NAAQS and data available
to date for 2010 that show the Area
continues to attain. EPA is also
proposing to determine, in accordance
with EPA’s PM2.5 Implementation Rule
of April 25, 2007 (72 FR 20664), that the
Charleston Area has attained the 1997
annual PM2.5 NAAQS by its applicable
attainment date of April 5, 2010.
II. What is the background for these
actions?
On July 18, 1997 (62 FR 36852), EPA
established an annual PM2.5 NAAQS at
15.0 micrograms per cubic meter (μg/
m3) based on a 3-year average of annual
mean PM2.5 concentrations (hereafter
referred to as ‘‘the annual PM2.5
NAAQS’’ or ‘‘the annual standard’’). At
that time, EPA also established a 24hour standard of 65 μg/m3 (the ‘‘1997
24-hour standard’’). See 40 CFR 50.7.
On January 5, 2005 (70 FR 944), EPA
published its air quality designations
and classifications for the 1997 PM2.5
NAAQS based upon air quality
monitoring data from those monitors for
calendar years 2001–2003. These
designations became effective on April
5, 2005. The Charleston Area was
designated nonattainment for the annual
1997 PM2.5 NAAQS during this
designations process. See 40 CFR 81.349
(West Virginia).
On October 17, 2006 (71 FR 61144),
EPA retained the 1997 annual PM2.5
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
NAAQS at 15.0 μg/m3 based on a 3-year
average of annual mean PM2.5
concentrations and promulgated a 24hour standard of 35 μg/m3 based on a
3-year average of the 98th percentile of
24-hour concentrations (the ‘‘2006 24hour standard’’). On November 13,
2009, EPA designated the Charleston
Area as nonattainment for the 2006 24hour standard (74 FR 58688). In that
action, EPA also clarified the
designations for the PM2.5 NAAQS
promulgated in 1997, stating that the
Charleston Area was designated as
nonattainment for the annual standard
and attainment for the 1997 24-hour
standard. Today’s action, however, does
not address either the 1997 or the 2006
24-hour standard.
In response to legal challenges of the
annual standard promulgated in 2006,
the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District
of Columbia Circuit (DC Circuit)
remanded this standard to EPA for
further consideration. See American
Farm Bureau Federation and National
Pork Producers Council, et al. v. EPA,
559 F.3d 512 (DC Circuit 2009).
However, given that the 1997 and 2006
annual standards are essentially
identical, attainment of the 1997 annual
standard would also indicate attainment
of the remanded 2006 annual standard.
On April 25, 2007 (72 FR 20664), EPA
promulgated its PM2.5 implementation
rule, codified at 40 CFR part 51, subpart
Z, in which the Agency provided
guidance for state and tribal plans to
implement the 1997 PM2.5 standard.
This rule, at 40 CFR 51.1004(c),
specifies some of the regulatory
consequences of attaining the standard,
as discussed below.
III. Has the Charleston Area attained
the 1997 annual PM2.5 standard?
A. Criteria
Today’s rulemaking proposes to
approve that the Charleston Area has
attained the 1997 annual PM2.5 NAAQS,
based on the most recent three years of
quality-assured data and that the Area
attained the 1997 annual PM2.5 NAAQS
by its applicable attainment date of
April 5, 2010. Under EPA regulations at
40 CFR 50.7, the annual primary and
secondary PM2.5 standards are met when
the annual arithmetic mean
concentration, as determined in
accordance with 40 CFR part 50,
Appendix N, is less than or equal to
15.0 μg/m3 at all relevant monitoring
sites in the subject area.
B. Charleston Area Air Quality
EPA has determined that the PM2.5
monitoring network for the Charleston
Area is adequate. First, the number of
E:\FR\FM\15JYP1.SGM
15JYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 136 / Friday, July 15, 2011 / Proposed Rules
monitors in the Area meets the
minimum regulatory requirements given
in 40 CFR part 58 Appendix D. Second,
the monitoring is in accordance with
state monitoring plans that have been
reviewed and approved by EPA.
Table 1 shows the design values (i.e.,
the 3-year average of annual mean PM2.5
concentrations) for the 1997 annual
PM2.5 NAAQS for the Charleston Area
monitors for the years 2007–2009. All
data considered have been qualityassured, certified, and recorded in AQS.
The highest 3-year average annual
concentration for 2007–2009 on this
table was recorded in Kanawha County,
West Virginia at the South Charleston
site 54–039–1005, recording a 3-year
average annual concentration of 14.4 μg/
m3.
EPA’s review of these data indicates
that the Charleston Area has met the
41741
1997 annual PM2.5 NAAQS. Table 1 and
the related discussion below show that
based on EPA’s analysis of data for
2007–2009, the Area attained the 1997
annual PM2.5 standard by its attainment
date of April 5, 2010. In addition, Table
2 and the related discussion below,
show that the Area continues to attain
the standard based on data available to
date for 2010.
TABLE 1—2007–2009 ANNUAL AVERAGE CONCENTRATIONS IN THE CHARLESTON AREA
Site name
County
Site No.
Charleston .....................................................................................................................................
South Charleston ...........................................................................................................................
Kanawha ......
Kanawha ......
54–039–0010
54–039–1005
C. How did EPA address the air quality
in Charleston?
There are two monitors located in
Kanawha County. There is a monitor
located in Charleston and a monitor
located in South Charleston. There was
a Guthrie site monitor also located in
Kanawha County that was shut down in
2007 because a carbon monitor for the
PM2.5 chemical speciation network
replaced it at its respective location.
EPA data completeness requirements
require at least 75 percent of the
scheduled sampling days for each
quarter have valid data. See 40 CFR part
50, Appendix N section 4.1(b). The use
of less than complete data is subject to
the approval of EPA, which may
consider factors such as monitoring site
closures/moves, monitoring diligence,
and nearby concentrations in
determining whether to use such data
(40 CFR part 50, Appendix N, section
4.1(c)).
Determinations of attainment are
based on three years of complete,
quality-assured data. Nevertheless, any
such assessment should consider
additional quality-assured data, to the
extent that quality-assured data exist. In
accordance with Appendix N and
Design value
(μg/m3)
13.1
14.4
standard EPA practice, this review of
data is based on the three most recent
years of complete data, generally 2007–
2009. Quality-assured data are now
available for 2010, which EPA used to
compute preliminary design values. The
Charleston site has a preliminary 2008–
2010 design value of 11.8 μg/m3 and the
South Charleston site has a preliminary
2008–2010 design value of 13.2 μg/m3.
On the basis of this review, EPA is
proposing to determine that the
Charleston Area has attained the 1997
annual PM2.5 NAAQS and is soliciting
public comments on its proposed
determination.
TABLE 2—2008–2010 ANNUAL AVERAGE CONCENTRATIONS IN THE CHARLESTON AREA
Site name
County
Site No.
Charleston .....................................................................................................................................
South Charleston ...........................................................................................................................
Kanawha ......
Kanawha ......
54–039–0010
54–039–1005
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
D. Has the Charleston Area met the
1997 annual PM2.5 air quality standard?
EPA has reviewed the ambient air
monitoring data for PM2.5, consistent
with the requirements contained in 40
CFR part 50 and recorded the data in the
EPA AQS database, for the Charleston
Area from 2007 through the present
time.
On the basis of this review, EPA
proposes to determine that the
Charleston Area has attained and
continues to attain the 1997 annual
PM2.5 NAAQS based on the qualityassured data for the 2007–2009 period
and preliminary data for the 2008–2010
monitoring period. In addition, based on
EPA’s review of the data for 2007–2009
and in accordance with section 179(c)(1)
of the CAA and EPA’s regulations, EPA
proposes to determine that the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:05 Jul 14, 2011
Jkt 223001
Charleston Area attained the 1997
annual PM2.5 NAAQS by its applicable
attainment date of April 5, 2010.
IV. What is the effect of these actions?
If EPA’s proposed determination of
attainment, based on the most recent
three years of quality-assured data is
made final, the requirements for the
Charleston Area to submit attainment
demonstrations and associated RACM, a
RFP plan, contingency measures, and
any other planning SIPs related to
attainment of the 1997 annual PM2.5
NAAQS would be suspended for so long
as the Charleston Area continues to
attain the 1997 annual PM2.5 NAAQS.
See 40 CFR 51.1004(c). Notably, as
described below, any such
determination would not be equivalent
to the redesignation of the Charleston
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Preliminary
design value
(μg/m3)
11.8
13.2
Area to attainment for the 1997 annual
PM2.5 NAAQS.
If this proposed determination of
attainment is finalized and EPA
subsequently determines, after noticeand-comment rulemaking in the Federal
Register, that the Area has violated the
1997 annual PM2.5 NAAQS, the basis for
the suspension of the specific
requirements would no longer exist for
the Charleston Area, and the Area
would thereafter have to address the
applicable requirements. See 40 CFR
51.1004(c).
Finalizing this proposed action would
not constitute a redesignation of the
Area to attainment of the 1997 annual
PM2.5 NAAQS under section 107(d)(3) of
the CAA. Further, finalizing this
proposed action does not involve
approving maintenance plans for the
Area as required under section 175A of
E:\FR\FM\15JYP1.SGM
15JYP1
41742
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 136 / Friday, July 15, 2011 / Proposed Rules
the CAA, nor would it find that the Area
has met all other requirements for
redesignation. Even if EPA finalizes the
proposed action, the designation status
of the Charleston Area would remain
nonattainment for the 1997 annual
PM2.5 NAAQS until such time as EPA
determines that the Area meets the CAA
requirements for redesignation to
attainment and takes action to
redesignate the Charleston Area.
In addition, if EPA’s separate and
independent proposed determination
that the Area has attained the 1997
annual PM2.5 standard by its applicable
attainment date (April 5, 2010), is
finalized, EPA will have met its
requirement pursuant to section
179(c)(1) of the CAA to make a
determination based on the Area’s air
quality data as of the attainment date
whether the Area attained the standard
by that date. These two actions
described above are proposed
determinations regarding the Charleston
Area’s attainment only with respect to
the 1997 annual PM2.5 NAAQS. Today’s
actions do not address the 24-hour PM2.5
NAAQS.
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
V. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
These actions propose to make
determinations of attainment based on
air quality, and would, if finalized,
result in the suspension of certain
federal requirements, and it would not
impose additional requirements beyond
those imposed by state law. For that
reason, these proposed actions:
• Are not ‘‘significant regulatory
actions’’ subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget under
Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993);
• Do not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Are certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Do not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Do not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Are not economically significant
regulatory actions based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:05 Jul 14, 2011
Jkt 223001
• Are not significant regulatory
actions subject to Executive Order
13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
• Are not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the CAA; and
• Do not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, these proposed 1997
annual PM2.5 NAAQS determinations
for the Charleston Area do not have
tribal implications as specified by
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249,
November 9, 2000), because the SIP is
not approved to apply in Indian country
located in the state, and EPA notes that
it will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt
tribal law.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Particulate matter,
Reporting and record-keeping
requirements.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: June 27, 2011.
W. C. Early,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region III.
[FR Doc. 2011–17868 Filed 7–14–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R03–OAR–2011–0288; FRL–9440–2]
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans;
Pennsylvania; Control of Particulate
Matter Emissions From the Operation
of Outdoor Wood-Fired Boilers
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
EPA is proposing to approve
a State Implementation Plan (SIP)
revision submitted by the
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. This
revision pertains to the control of
particular matter emissions from the
operation of outdoor wood-fired boilers.
This action is being taken under the
Clean Air Act (CAA).
DATES: Written comments must be
received on or before August 15, 2011.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID Number EPA–
R03–OAR–2011–0288 by one of the
following methods
A. https://www.regulations.gov. Follow
the on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
B. E-mail: fernandez.cristina@epa.gov
C. Mail: EPA–R03–OAR–2011–0288,
Cristina Fernandez, Associate Director,
Office of Air Program Planning,
Mailcode 3AP30, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Region III, 1650
Arch Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
19103.
D. Hand Delivery: At the previouslylisted EPA Region III address. Such
deliveries are only accepted during the
Docket’s normal hours of operation, and
special arrangements should be made
for deliveries of boxed information.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
Docket ID No. EPA–R03–OAR–2011–
0288. EPA’s policy is that all comments
received will be included in the public
docket without change, and may be
made available online at https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise
protected through https://
www.regulations.gov or e-mail. The
https://www.regulations.gov Web site is
an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which
means EPA will not know your identity
or contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment.
If you send an e-mail comment directly
to EPA without going through https://
www.regulations.gov, your e-mail
address will be automatically captured
and included as part of the comment
that is placed in the public docket and
made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA
recommends that you include your
name and other contact information in
the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA
cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact
you for clarification, EPA may not be
able to consider your comment.
Electronic files should avoid the use of
special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or
viruses.
Docket: All documents in the
electronic docket are listed in the
https://www.regulations.gov index.
Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available,
i.e., CBI or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute.
ADDRESSES:
E:\FR\FM\15JYP1.SGM
15JYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 136 (Friday, July 15, 2011)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 41739-41742]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-17868]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R03-OAR-2011-0454; FRL-9439-9]
Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans;
West Virginia; Determination of Attainment and Determination of Clean
Data for the Annual 1997 Fine Particle Standard for the Charleston Area
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to make two determinations regarding the
Charleston, West Virginia fine particulate matter (PM2.5)
nonattainment area (hereafter referred to as ``Charleston Area'' or
``Area''). First, EPA is proposing to determine that the Area has
attained the 1997 annual average PM2.5 National Ambient Air
Quality Standard (NAAQS). This proposed determination of attainment is
based upon complete, quality-assured, and certified ambient air
monitoring data for the 2007-2009 period showing that the Charleston
Area has attained the 1997 annual PM2.5 NAAQS and data
available to date for 2010 in EPA's Air Quality System (AQS) database
that show the area continues to attain. If EPA finalizes this proposed
determination of attainment, the requirements for the Charleston Area
to submit attainment demonstrations and associated reasonably available
control measures (RACM), a reasonable further progress (RFP) plan,
contingency measures, and other planning State Implementation Plan
(SIP) revisions related to attainment of the standard shall be
suspended for so long as the Area continues to attain the annual
PM2.5 NAAQS. Second, EPA is also proposing to determine
based on quality-assured and certified monitoring data for the 2007-
2009 monitoring period that the area has attained the 1997 annual
PM2.5 NAAQS, by its applicable attainment date of April 5,
2010.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before August 15, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments regarding the Charleston Area,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R03-OAR-2011-0454, by one of the
following methods:
A. https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line instructions for
submitting comments.
B. E-mail: fernandez.cristina@epa.gov.
C. Mail: EPA-R03-OAR-2011-0454, Cristina Fernandez, Associate
Director,
[[Page 41740]]
Office of Air Program Planning, Mail code 3AP30, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Region III, 1650 Arch Street, Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania 19103.
D. Hand Delivery: At the previously-listed EPA Region III address.
Such deliveries are only accepted during the Docket's normal hours of
operation, and special arrangements should be made for deliveries of
boxed information.
Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA-R03-OAR-
2011-0454. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included
in the public docket without change and may be made available online at
https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise protected through https://www.regulations.gov or e-mail. The https://www.regulations.gov Web site
is an ``anonymous access'' system, which means EPA will not know your
identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body of
your comment. If you send an e-mail comment directly to EPA without
going through https://www.regulations.gov your e-mail address will be
automatically captured and included as part of the comment that is
placed in the public docket and made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you include your name
and other contact information in the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA
may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid
the use of special characters, any form of encryption, and be free of
any defects or viruses.
Docket: All documents in the electronic docket are listed in the
https://www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such
as copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket
materials are available either electronically in https://www.regulations.gov or in hard copy during normal business hours at the
Air Protection Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region
III, 1650 Arch Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Asrah Khadr, (215) 814-2071, or by e-
mail at khadr.asrah@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. What actions is EPA taking?
II. What is the background for these actions?
III. Has the Charleston Area attained the 1997 annual
PM2.5 standard?
A. Criteria
B. Charleston Area Air Quality
C. How did EPA address air quality in the Charleston Area?
D. Has the Charleston Area met the 1997 annual PM2.5
air quality standard?
IV. What is the effect of these actions?
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. What actions is EPA taking?
In accordance with section 179(c)(1) of the Clean Air Act (CAA), 42
United States Code section 7509(c)(1), and 40 Code of Federal Register
(CFR) section 51.1004(c), EPA is proposing to determine that the
Charleston Area (composed of Kanawha and Putnam Counties) has attained
the 1997 annual PM2.5 NAAQS. This proposed action is based
upon complete, quality-assured, and certified ambient air monitoring
data for the 2007-2009 monitoring period that show that the Area has
monitored attainment of the 1997 annual PM2.5 NAAQS and data
available to date for 2010 that show the Area continues to attain. EPA
is also proposing to determine, in accordance with EPA's
PM2.5 Implementation Rule of April 25, 2007 (72 FR 20664),
that the Charleston Area has attained the 1997 annual PM2.5
NAAQS by its applicable attainment date of April 5, 2010.
II. What is the background for these actions?
On July 18, 1997 (62 FR 36852), EPA established an annual
PM2.5 NAAQS at 15.0 micrograms per cubic meter ([mu]g/m\3\)
based on a 3-year average of annual mean PM2.5
concentrations (hereafter referred to as ``the annual PM2.5
NAAQS'' or ``the annual standard''). At that time, EPA also established
a 24-hour standard of 65 [mu]g/m\3\ (the ``1997 24-hour standard'').
See 40 CFR 50.7. On January 5, 2005 (70 FR 944), EPA published its air
quality designations and classifications for the 1997 PM2.5
NAAQS based upon air quality monitoring data from those monitors for
calendar years 2001-2003. These designations became effective on April
5, 2005. The Charleston Area was designated nonattainment for the
annual 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS during this designations process.
See 40 CFR 81.349 (West Virginia).
On October 17, 2006 (71 FR 61144), EPA retained the 1997 annual
PM2.5 NAAQS at 15.0 [mu]g/m\3\ based on a 3-year average of
annual mean PM2.5 concentrations and promulgated a 24-hour
standard of 35 [mu]g/m\3\ based on a 3-year average of the 98th
percentile of 24-hour concentrations (the ``2006 24-hour standard'').
On November 13, 2009, EPA designated the Charleston Area as
nonattainment for the 2006 24-hour standard (74 FR 58688). In that
action, EPA also clarified the designations for the PM2.5
NAAQS promulgated in 1997, stating that the Charleston Area was
designated as nonattainment for the annual standard and attainment for
the 1997 24-hour standard. Today's action, however, does not address
either the 1997 or the 2006 24-hour standard.
In response to legal challenges of the annual standard promulgated
in 2006, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
(DC Circuit) remanded this standard to EPA for further consideration.
See American Farm Bureau Federation and National Pork Producers
Council, et al. v. EPA, 559 F.3d 512 (DC Circuit 2009). However, given
that the 1997 and 2006 annual standards are essentially identical,
attainment of the 1997 annual standard would also indicate attainment
of the remanded 2006 annual standard.
On April 25, 2007 (72 FR 20664), EPA promulgated its
PM2.5 implementation rule, codified at 40 CFR part 51,
subpart Z, in which the Agency provided guidance for state and tribal
plans to implement the 1997 PM2.5 standard. This rule, at 40
CFR 51.1004(c), specifies some of the regulatory consequences of
attaining the standard, as discussed below.
III. Has the Charleston Area attained the 1997 annual PM2.5 standard?
A. Criteria
Today's rulemaking proposes to approve that the Charleston Area has
attained the 1997 annual PM2.5 NAAQS, based on the most
recent three years of quality-assured data and that the Area attained
the 1997 annual PM2.5 NAAQS by its applicable attainment
date of April 5, 2010. Under EPA regulations at 40 CFR 50.7, the annual
primary and secondary PM2.5 standards are met when the
annual arithmetic mean concentration, as determined in accordance with
40 CFR part 50, Appendix N, is less than or equal to 15.0 [micro]g/m\3\
at all relevant monitoring sites in the subject area.
B. Charleston Area Air Quality
EPA has determined that the PM2.5 monitoring network for
the Charleston Area is adequate. First, the number of
[[Page 41741]]
monitors in the Area meets the minimum regulatory requirements given in
40 CFR part 58 Appendix D. Second, the monitoring is in accordance with
state monitoring plans that have been reviewed and approved by EPA.
Table 1 shows the design values (i.e., the 3-year average of annual
mean PM2.5 concentrations) for the 1997 annual
PM2.5 NAAQS for the Charleston Area monitors for the years
2007-2009. All data considered have been quality-assured, certified,
and recorded in AQS. The highest 3-year average annual concentration
for 2007-2009 on this table was recorded in Kanawha County, West
Virginia at the South Charleston site 54-039-1005, recording a 3-year
average annual concentration of 14.4 [mu]g/m\3\.
EPA's review of these data indicates that the Charleston Area has
met the 1997 annual PM2.5 NAAQS. Table 1 and the related
discussion below show that based on EPA's analysis of data for 2007-
2009, the Area attained the 1997 annual PM2.5 standard by
its attainment date of April 5, 2010. In addition, Table 2 and the
related discussion below, show that the Area continues to attain the
standard based on data available to date for 2010.
Table 1--2007-2009 Annual Average Concentrations in the Charleston Area
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Design value
Site name County Site No. ([mu]g/m\3\)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Charleston................................... Kanawha.......................... 54-039-0010 13.1
South Charleston............................. Kanawha.......................... 54-039-1005 14.4
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
C. How did EPA address the air quality in Charleston?
There are two monitors located in Kanawha County. There is a
monitor located in Charleston and a monitor located in South
Charleston. There was a Guthrie site monitor also located in Kanawha
County that was shut down in 2007 because a carbon monitor for the
PM2.5 chemical speciation network replaced it at its
respective location. EPA data completeness requirements require at
least 75 percent of the scheduled sampling days for each quarter have
valid data. See 40 CFR part 50, Appendix N section 4.1(b). The use of
less than complete data is subject to the approval of EPA, which may
consider factors such as monitoring site closures/moves, monitoring
diligence, and nearby concentrations in determining whether to use such
data (40 CFR part 50, Appendix N, section 4.1(c)).
Determinations of attainment are based on three years of complete,
quality-assured data. Nevertheless, any such assessment should consider
additional quality-assured data, to the extent that quality-assured
data exist. In accordance with Appendix N and standard EPA practice,
this review of data is based on the three most recent years of complete
data, generally 2007-2009. Quality-assured data are now available for
2010, which EPA used to compute preliminary design values. The
Charleston site has a preliminary 2008-2010 design value of 11.8 [mu]g/
m\3\ and the South Charleston site has a preliminary 2008-2010 design
value of 13.2 [mu]g/m\3\. On the basis of this review, EPA is proposing
to determine that the Charleston Area has attained the 1997 annual
PM2.5 NAAQS and is soliciting public comments on its
proposed determination.
Table 2--2008-2010 Annual Average Concentrations in the Charleston Area
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Preliminary
Site name County Site No. design value
([mu]g/m\3\)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Charleston................................... Kanawha.......................... 54-039-0010 11.8
South Charleston............................. Kanawha.......................... 54-039-1005 13.2
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
D. Has the Charleston Area met the 1997 annual PM2.5 air
quality standard?
EPA has reviewed the ambient air monitoring data for
PM2.5, consistent with the requirements contained in 40 CFR
part 50 and recorded the data in the EPA AQS database, for the
Charleston Area from 2007 through the present time.
On the basis of this review, EPA proposes to determine that the
Charleston Area has attained and continues to attain the 1997 annual
PM2.5 NAAQS based on the quality-assured data for the 2007-
2009 period and preliminary data for the 2008-2010 monitoring period.
In addition, based on EPA's review of the data for 2007-2009 and in
accordance with section 179(c)(1) of the CAA and EPA's regulations, EPA
proposes to determine that the Charleston Area attained the 1997 annual
PM2.5 NAAQS by its applicable attainment date of April 5,
2010.
IV. What is the effect of these actions?
If EPA's proposed determination of attainment, based on the most
recent three years of quality-assured data is made final, the
requirements for the Charleston Area to submit attainment
demonstrations and associated RACM, a RFP plan, contingency measures,
and any other planning SIPs related to attainment of the 1997 annual
PM2.5 NAAQS would be suspended for so long as the Charleston
Area continues to attain the 1997 annual PM2.5 NAAQS. See 40
CFR 51.1004(c). Notably, as described below, any such determination
would not be equivalent to the redesignation of the Charleston Area to
attainment for the 1997 annual PM2.5 NAAQS.
If this proposed determination of attainment is finalized and EPA
subsequently determines, after notice-and-comment rulemaking in the
Federal Register, that the Area has violated the 1997 annual
PM2.5 NAAQS, the basis for the suspension of the specific
requirements would no longer exist for the Charleston Area, and the
Area would thereafter have to address the applicable requirements. See
40 CFR 51.1004(c).
Finalizing this proposed action would not constitute a
redesignation of the Area to attainment of the 1997 annual
PM2.5 NAAQS under section 107(d)(3) of the CAA. Further,
finalizing this proposed action does not involve approving maintenance
plans for the Area as required under section 175A of
[[Page 41742]]
the CAA, nor would it find that the Area has met all other requirements
for redesignation. Even if EPA finalizes the proposed action, the
designation status of the Charleston Area would remain nonattainment
for the 1997 annual PM2.5 NAAQS until such time as EPA
determines that the Area meets the CAA requirements for redesignation
to attainment and takes action to redesignate the Charleston Area.
In addition, if EPA's separate and independent proposed
determination that the Area has attained the 1997 annual
PM2.5 standard by its applicable attainment date (April 5,
2010), is finalized, EPA will have met its requirement pursuant to
section 179(c)(1) of the CAA to make a determination based on the
Area's air quality data as of the attainment date whether the Area
attained the standard by that date. These two actions described above
are proposed determinations regarding the Charleston Area's attainment
only with respect to the 1997 annual PM2.5 NAAQS. Today's
actions do not address the 24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS.
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
These actions propose to make determinations of attainment based on
air quality, and would, if finalized, result in the suspension of
certain federal requirements, and it would not impose additional
requirements beyond those imposed by state law. For that reason, these
proposed actions:
Are not ``significant regulatory actions'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993);
Do not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Are certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Do not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Do not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Are not economically significant regulatory actions based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Are not significant regulatory actions subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Are not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the CAA; and
Do not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, these proposed 1997 annual PM2.5 NAAQS
determinations for the Charleston Area do not have tribal implications
as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000),
because the SIP is not approved to apply in Indian country located in
the state, and EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Particulate
matter, Reporting and record-keeping requirements.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: June 27, 2011.
W. C. Early,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region III.
[FR Doc. 2011-17868 Filed 7-14-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P