Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Model 747-400 and -400D Series Airplanes, 41673-41676 [2011-17401]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 136 / Friday, July 15, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
installed by STC or alteration, no further
action is required by this AD.
(iv) If you can positively determine
through inspection of the oxygen mask
container assembly that the date of
manufacture is after March 1, 2006, and you
can verify that the original oxygen masks in
the container assembly are installed, no
further action is required by this AD.
(2) If, as a result of any of the records
checks/inspections required in paragraph
(g)(1) of this AD, you determine that an
oxygen mask assembly part number listed in
B/E Aerospace Service Bulletin 174080–35–
04, Rev 000, dated September 6, 2010, is
installed, inspect the oxygen mask assembly
to determine if the in-line flow indicator
must be replaced following paragraph II.A. of
B/E Aerospace Service Bulletin 174080–35–
04, Rev 000, dated September 6, 2010. If you
can positively determine that the in-line flow
indicator does not require replacement, no
further action is required by this AD.
Modification/Replacement
(h) After the inspection in paragraph (g)(2)
of this AD and it was determined the in-line
flow indicator must be replaced, within 36
months after August 19, 2011 (the effective
date of this AD) or within 6,500 hours TIS
after August 19, 2011 (the effective date of
this AD), whichever occurs first, modify the
oxygen mask assembly by replacing the inline flow indicator following B/E Aerospace
Service Bulletin 174080–35–04, Rev 000,
dated September 6, 2010. As an alternative to
modifying the oxygen mask assembly, you
may replace the oxygen mask assembly with
an airworthy oxygen mask assembly FAAapproved for installation on the aircraft.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Parts Installation
(i) As of August 19, 2011 (the effective date
of this AD), do not install a B/E Aerospace
oxygen mask having a part number listed in
B/E Aerospace Service Bulletin 174080–35–
04, Rev 000, dated September 6, 2010, with
a manufacturing date on or after January 1,
2002, and before March 1, 2006, on any
aircraft, unless it has been modified
following the requirements of paragraph (h)
of this AD.
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(j)(1) The Manager, Wichita Aircraft
Certification Office (ACO), FAA, has the
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if
requested using the procedures found in 14
CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19,
send your request to your principal inspector
or local Flight Standards District Office, as
appropriate. If sending information directly
to the manager of the ACO, send it to the
attention of the person identified in the
Related Information section of this AD.
(2) Before using any approved AMOC,
notify your Principal Maintenance Inspector
or Principal Avionics Inspector, as
appropriate, or lacking a principal inspector,
your local Flight Standards District Office.
Related Information
(k) For more information about this AD,
contact David Fairback, Aerospace Engineer,
Wichita ACO, FAA, 1801 Airport Road,
Room 100, Wichita, Kansas 67209; telephone:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:47 Jul 14, 2011
Jkt 223001
(316) 946–4154; fax: (316) 946–4107; e-mail:
david.fairback@faa.gov.
(l) For service information identified in
this AD, contact B/E Aerospace, 10800
Pflumm Road, Lenexa, Kansas 66215;
telephone: (913) 338–9800; fax: (913) 469–
8419; Internet: https://www.beaerospace.com.
You may review copies of the referenced
service information at the FAA, Small
Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Kansas
City, Missouri 64106. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA, call
(816) 329–4148.
Material Incorporated by Reference
(m) You must use B/E Aerospace Service
Bulletin 174080–35–04, Rev 000, dated
September 6, 2010, to do the actions required
by this AD, unless the AD specifies
otherwise.
(1) The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference of
the service information under 5 U.S.C. 552(a)
and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) For service information identified in
this AD, contact B/E Aerospace, 10800
Pflumm Road, Lenexa, Kansas 66215;
telephone: (913) 338–9800; fax: (913) 469–
8419; Internet: https://www.beaerospace.com.
(3) You may review copies of the
referenced service information at the FAA,
Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust,
Kansas City, Missouri 64106. For information
on the availability of this material at the
FAA, call 816–329–4148.
(4) You may also review copies of the
service information that is incorporated by
reference at the National Archives and
Records Administration (NARA). For
information on the availability of this
material at an NARA facility, call 202–741–
6030, or go to https://www.archives.gov/
federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/
ibr_locations.html.
Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on July 1,
2011.
Earl Lawrence,
Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft
Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2011–17205 Filed 7–14–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2010–1159; Directorate
Identifier 2010–NM–006–AD; Amendment
39–16746; AD 2011–14–11]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing
Company Model 747–400 and –400D
Series Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
We are adopting a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for the
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00085
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
41673
products listed above. This AD requires
a general visual inspection to determine
the routing of the wire bundles in the
number two and number three engine
pylons near the leading edge, and
related investigative and corrective
actions if necessary. For certain
airplanes, this AD also requires certain
concurrent actions. This AD was
prompted by a report of a fuel leak from
the main fuel feed tube at the number
two engine pylon. We are issuing this
AD to detect and correct chafing of the
main fuel feed tube and the alternating
current motor-driven hydraulic pump
wire bundle, which could lead to arcing
from the exposed wire to the fuel feed
tube, and could result in a fire or
explosion.
DATES: This AD is effective August 19,
2011.
The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
of certain publications listed in the AD
as of August 19, 2011.
ADDRESSES: For service information
identified in this AD, contact Boeing
Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data
& Services Management, P.O. Box 3707,
MC 2H–65, Seattle, Washington 98124–
2207; telephone 206–544–5000,
extension 1; fax 206–766–5680; e-mail
me.boecom@boeing.com; Internet
https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You
may review copies of the referenced
service information at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601
Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington.
For information on the availability of
this material at the FAA, call 425–227–
1221.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the
Docket Management Facility between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD
docket contains this AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and
other information. The address for the
Docket Office (phone: 800–647–5527) is
Document Management Facility, U.S.
Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M–30, West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200
New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington,
DC 20590.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Tung Tran, Aerospace Engineer,
Propulsion Branch, ANM–140S, FAA,
Seattle Aircraft Certification Office,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington 98057–3356; phone: 425–
917–6505; fax: 425–917–6590; e-mail:
tung.tran@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\15JYR1.SGM
15JYR1
41674
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 136 / Friday, July 15, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
Discussion
We issued a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to include an airworthiness
directive (AD) that would apply to the
specified products. That NPRM
published in the Federal Register on
December 1, 2010 (75 FR 74663). That
NPRM proposed to require a general
visual inspection to determine the
routing of the wire bundles in the
number two and number three engine
pylons near the leading edge, and
related investigative and corrective
actions if necessary. For certain
airplanes, that NPRM also proposed to
require certain concurrent actions.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to
participate in developing this AD. The
following presents the comments
received on the proposal and the FAA’s
response to each comment.
Request To Change Wording of
Precipitating Event
Boeing requested a change to the
wording describing the precipitating
event specified in the Summary and
Discussion sections and paragraph (e) of
the NPRM to clarify the location of the
fuel leak. Boeing clarified that, for the
record, the fuel leaked from the main
fuel feed tube and drained through the
drain line.
We agree that changing the language
to specify the location of the leak makes
the description more accurate.
Therefore, we have changed the
wording appropriately in the Summary
section and paragraph (e) of this AD.
However, the subject text does not
appear in the Discussion section in the
final rule.
Request To Include Service Bulletin
Reference in the ‘‘FAA’s Determination
and Requirements of this Proposed AD’’
Paragraph of the NPRM
Boeing requested that we change the
last sentence of the ‘‘FAA’s
Determination and Requirements of this
Proposed AD’’ paragraph in the NPRM
to cite the specific service bulletin
number, revision level, and date to
differentiate between previous and new
service information.
We agree that the requested change
might clarify the information. However,
because that section is not restated in
the final rule, we cannot make the
requested change to this AD.
Request To Remove Cost of Concurrent
Actions
Boeing requested that we remove the
cost of the concurrent inspection and
bracket installation from the Costs of
Compliance section of the NPRM.
Boeing stated that the cost for the
concurrent inspection and bracket
installation was previously stated in AD
92–27–13, Amendment 39–8448 (58 FR
5920, January 25, 1993), and is not
necessary in this proposed AD.
We disagree that it is unnecessary to
include the cost of the concurrent
actions in this AD. We acknowledge that
these costs have already been stated in
an existing AD; however, we have
provided costs for required actions in
this AD, including concurrent actions,
regardless of whether operators might
already have done them. No change has
been made to the AD in this regard.
Request To Include On-Condition Costs
Boeing stated that we should include
the costs of inspecting the fuel feed tube
and the alternating current motor driven
hydraulic pump wire bundle, repairs,
replacing the fuel tube, and changing
the routing of the wire bundle to above
the support bracket.
We agree with the request to include
the costs of these actions specified
above. We have added an ‘‘On-condition
costs’’ table to reflect these costs.
Conclusion
We reviewed the relevant data,
considered the comments received, and
determined that air safety and the
public interest require adopting the AD
with the changes described previously—
and minor editorial changes. We have
determined that these minor changes:
• Are consistent with the intent that
was proposed in the NPRM for
correcting the unsafe condition; and
• Do not add any additional burden
upon the public than was already
proposed in the NPRM.
We also determined that these
changes will not significantly increase
the economic burden on any operator or
increase the scope of the AD.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD affects 15
airplanes of U.S. registry.
We estimate the following costs to
comply with this AD:
TABLE—ESTIMATED COSTS
Action
Average
labor rate
per hour
Work hours
Inspection of wire routing .....................................
Concurrent Inspection and Bracket Installation ...
We estimate the following costs to do
any necessary inspections or repairs that
would be required based on the results
1
9
Cost per
product
Parts
$85
$85
$0
$0
of the required inspection. We have no
way of determining the number of
Number of U.S.registered airplanes
$85
$765
15
15
Fleet cost
$1,275
$11,475
aircraft that might need these
inspections or repairs:
ON-CONDITION COSTS
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Action
Inspection of wire bundle and fuel feed tube ..................................................
Repair of wire bundle, repair or replacement of fuel feed tube, and wire
bundle routing change .................................................................................
The cost estimate figures discussed
above are based on assumptions that no
operator has yet accomplished any of
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:47 Jul 14, 2011
Jkt 223001
Average labor
rate per hour
Work hours
3
$85
$0
$255
7
$85
$26
$621
the actions required by this AD, and that
no operator would accomplish those
actions in the future if this AD were not
PO 00000
Frm 00086
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Cost per
product
Parts
adopted. However, we have been
advised that the concurrent inspection
and bracket installation have already
E:\FR\FM\15JYR1.SGM
15JYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 136 / Friday, July 15, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
been done on some affected airplanes.
Therefore, the future economic cost
impact of this rule on U.S. operators is
expected to be less than the cost impact
figure indicated above.
Effective Date
(a) This AD is effective August 19, 2011.
Bulletin 747–24A2168, Revision 3, dated July
29, 1993. Do all applicable related
investigative and corrective actions before
further flight. Doing the actions required by
paragraph (c) of AD 92–27–13, Amendment
39–8448, is an acceptable method of
compliance for the installation required by
this paragraph.
Note 1: For the purposes of this AD, a
detailed inspection is: ‘‘An intensive
examination of a specific item, installation,
or assembly to detect damage, failure, or
irregularity. Available lighting is normally
supplemented with a direct source of good
lighting at an intensity deemed appropriate.
Inspection aids such as mirror, magnifying
lenses, etc., may be necessary. Surface
cleaning and elaborate procedures may be
required.’’
Affected ADs
(b) AD 92–27–13, Amendment 39–8448,
affects this AD.
Credit for Actions Accomplished in
Accordance With Previous Service
Information
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to The Boeing
Company Model 747–400 and –400D series
airplanes, certificated in any category; as
specified in Boeing Service Bulletin 747–
29A2114, Revision 1, dated July 15, 2010.
(i) Actions accomplished before the
effective date of this AD, in accordance with
the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing
Alert Service Bulletin 747–29A2114, dated
October 1, 2009, are considered acceptable
for compliance with the corresponding
actions specified in paragraph (g) of this AD.
(j) Actions accomplished before the
effective date of this AD, in accordance with
the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing
Alert Service Bulletin 747–24A2168,
Revision 1, dated December 5, 1991; or
Revision 2, dated September 24, 1992; are
considered acceptable for compliance with
the corresponding actions specified in
paragraph (h) of this AD.
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs, describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701:
‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
§ 39.13
Regulatory Findings
Unsafe Condition
(e) This AD was prompted by a report of
a fuel leak from the main fuel feed tube at
the number two engine pylon. The Federal
Aviation Administration is issuing this AD to
detect and correct chafing of the main fuel
feed tube and the alternating current motordriven hydraulic pump wire bundle, which
could lead to arcing from the exposed wire
to the fuel feed tube, and could result in a
fire or explosion.
This AD will not have federalism
implications under Executive Order
13132. This AD will not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify that this AD:
(1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866,
(2) Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation
in Alaska, and
(4) Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as
follows:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:47 Jul 14, 2011
Jkt 223001
41675
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):
■
2011–14–11 The Boeing Company:
Amendment 39–16746; Docket No.
FAA–2010–1159; Directorate Identifier
2010–NM–006–AD.
Subject
(d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of
America Code 29: Hydraulic power.
Compliance
(f) You are responsible for having the
actions required by this AD performed within
the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.
Inspection
(g) Within 24 months after the effective
date of this AD, do a general visual
inspection to determine the routing of the
wire bundles in the number two and number
three engine pylons near the leading edge,
and do all applicable related investigative
and corrective actions, in accordance with
the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing
Service Bulletin 747–29A2114, Revision 1,
dated July 15, 2010. Do all applicable related
investigative and corrective actions before
further flight.
Concurrent Requirements
(h) For Model 747–400 series airplanes:
Before or concurrently with accomplishing
the requirements of paragraph (g) of this AD,
install all applicable cable support brackets
in the number two and number three engine
pylon areas, and do all applicable related
investigative and corrective actions, in
accordance with Phase II of Boeing Service
PO 00000
Frm 00087
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(k)(1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft
Certification Office (ACO), FAA, has the
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if
requested using the procedures found in 14
CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19,
send your request to your principal inspector
or local Flight Standards District Office, as
appropriate. If sending information directly
to the ACO, send it to ATTN: Tung Tran,
Aerospace Engineer, Propulsion Branch,
ANM–140S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft
Certification Office, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW.,
Renton, Washington 98057–3356, telephone:
425–917–6505; fax: 425–917–6590.
(2) To request a different method of
compliance or a different compliance time
for this AD, follow the procedures in 14 CFR
39.19. Before using any approved AMOC,
notify your appropriate principal inspector,
or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/
certificate holding district office. The AMOC
approval letter must specifically reference
this AD.
Related Information
(l) For more information about this AD,
contact Tung Tran, Aerospace Engineer,
Propulsion Branch, ANM–140S, FAA, Seattle
Aircraft Certification Office, 1601 Lind
Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057–
3356, telephone: 425–917–6505; fax: 425–
917–6590; e-mail: tung.tran@faa.gov.
E:\FR\FM\15JYR1.SGM
15JYR1
41676
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 136 / Friday, July 15, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
Material Incorporated by Reference
(m) You must use Boeing Service Bulletin
747–29A2114, Revision 1, dated July 15,
2010; and Boeing Service Bulletin 747–
24A2168, Revision 3, dated July 29, 1993; as
applicable; to do the actions required by this
AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
(1) The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference of
this service information under 5 U.S.C.
552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) For service information identified in
this AD, contact Boeing Commercial
Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services
Management, P.O. Box 3707, MC 2H–65,
Seattle, Washington 98124–2207; telephone
206–544–5000, extension 1; fax 206–766–
5680; e-mail me.boecom@boeing.com;
Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com.
(3) You may review copies of the service
information at the FAA, Transport Airplane
Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA, call
425–227–1221.
(4) You may also review copies of the
service information that is incorporated by
reference at the National Archives and
Records Administration (NARA). For
information on the availability of this
material at an NARA facility, call 202–741–
6030, or go to https://www.archives.gov/
federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/
ibr_locations.html.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on July 1,
2011.
Jeffrey E. Duven,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2011–17401 Filed 7–14–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
17 CFR Part 240
[Release No. 34–64874; File No. S7–30–11]
RIN 3235–AL19
Retail Foreign Exchange Transactions
Securities and Exchange
Commission.
ACTION: Interim final temporary rule;
request for comments.
AGENCY:
Under section 742(c) of the
Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and
Consumer Protection Act (‘‘Dodd-Frank
Act’’), certain foreign exchange
transactions with persons who are not
‘‘eligible contract participants’’
(commonly referred to as ‘‘retail forex
transactions,’’ and as further defined
below) with a registered broker or dealer
(‘‘broker-dealer’’) will be prohibited as
of July 16, 2011, in the absence of the
Commission adopting a rule to allow
such transactions under terms and
conditions prescribed by the
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:47 Jul 14, 2011
Jkt 223001
Commission. The Commission is
adopting interim final temporary Rule
15b12–1T to allow a registered brokerdealer to engage in a retail forex
business until July 16, 2012, provided
that the broker-dealer complies with the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Exchange Act’’), the rules and
regulations thereunder, and the rules of
the self-regulatory organization(s) of
which the broker-dealer is a member
(‘‘SRO rules’’), insofar as they are
applicable to retail forex transactions.
DATES: Effective Date: Rule 15b12–1T is
effective on July 15, 2011 and will
remain in effect until July 16, 2012.
Comment Date: Comments on the
interim final temporary rule should be
received on or before September 13,
2011.
ADDRESSES: Comments may be
submitted by any of the following
methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/interim-final-temp.shtml); or
• Send an e-mail to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File
Number S7–30–11 on the subject line;
or
• Use the Federal eRulemaking Portal
(https://www.regulations.gov). Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Elizabeth Murphy, Secretary,
Securities and Exchange Commission,
100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC
20549.
All submissions should refer to File
Number S7–30–11. This file number
should be included on the subject line
if e-mail is used. To help the
Commission to process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on its Web site:
(https://www.sec.gov/rules/interim-finaltemp.shtml). Comments are also
available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549 on official
business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. All comments received
will be posted without change; the
Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jo
Anne Swindler, Assistant Director;
Richard Vorosmarti, Special Counsel; or
Angie Le, Special Counsel, at (202) 551–
PO 00000
Frm 00088
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
5777, Division of Trading and Markets,
Securities and Exchange Commission,
100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC
20549.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Commission is adopting new Rule
15b12–1T under the Exchange Act as an
interim final temporary rule. The rule
will expire and no longer be effective on
July 16, 2012. The Commission is
soliciting comments on all aspects of
this interim final temporary rule. The
Commission will carefully consider any
comments received and intends to take
further action if it determines that
further action is necessary or
appropriate, either prior to or following
the expiration of the rule. In making this
determination, the Commission may
consider a number of alternative
approaches with respect to retail forex
transactions, including proposing new
rules for public comment; issuing a final
rule amending the interim final
temporary rule; issuing a final rule
adopting the interim final temporary
rule as final; or allowing the interim
final temporary rule to expire without
further action, which would allow the
statutory prohibition to take effect.
I. Background
On July 21, 2010, President Obama
signed into law the Dodd-Frank Act.1 As
amended by the Dodd-Frank Act,2 the
Commodity Exchange Act (‘‘CEA’’)
provides that a person for which there
is a Federal regulatory agency,3
including a broker-dealer registered
under section 15(b) (except pursuant to
paragraph (11) thereof) or 15C of the
Exchange Act,4 shall not enter into, or
offer to enter into, a transaction
described in section 2(c)(2)(B)(i)(I) of the
CEA with a person who is not an
‘‘eligible contract participant’’ 5 except
1 Public
Law 111–203, 124 Stat. 1376.
Law 111–203, § 742(c)(2) (to be codified
at 7 U.S.C. 2(c)(2)(E)).
3 7 U.S.C. 2(c)(2)(E)(i), as amended by § 742(c) of
the Dodd-Frank Act, defines a ‘‘Federal regulatory
agency’’ to mean the Commodity Futures Trading
Commission (‘‘CFTC’’), the Securities and Exchange
Commission, an appropriate Federal banking
agency, the National Credit Union Association, and
the Farm Credit Administration.
4 7 U.S.C. 2(c)(2)(B)(i)(II).
5 ‘‘Eligible contract participant’’ (‘‘ECP’’) is
defined in CEA section 1a(18), as re-designated and
amended by section 721 of the Dodd-Frank Act. See
Public Law 111–203, § 721 (amending CEA section
1a). The CEA’s definition of ECP generally is
comprised of regulated persons; entities that meet
a specified total asset test (e.g., a corporation,
partnership, proprietorship, organization, trust, or
other entity with total assets exceeding $10 million)
or an alternative monetary test coupled with a nonmonetary component (e.g., an entity with a net
worth in excess of $1 million and engaging in
business-related hedging; or certain employee
benefit plans, the investment decisions of which are
made by one of four enumerated types of regulated
2 Public
E:\FR\FM\15JYR1.SGM
15JYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 136 (Friday, July 15, 2011)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 41673-41676]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-17401]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2010-1159; Directorate Identifier 2010-NM-006-AD;
Amendment 39-16746; AD 2011-14-11]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Model 747-400 and -
400D Series Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This AD requires a general visual inspection to
determine the routing of the wire bundles in the number two and number
three engine pylons near the leading edge, and related investigative
and corrective actions if necessary. For certain airplanes, this AD
also requires certain concurrent actions. This AD was prompted by a
report of a fuel leak from the main fuel feed tube at the number two
engine pylon. We are issuing this AD to detect and correct chafing of
the main fuel feed tube and the alternating current motor-driven
hydraulic pump wire bundle, which could lead to arcing from the exposed
wire to the fuel feed tube, and could result in a fire or explosion.
DATES: This AD is effective August 19, 2011.
The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of certain publications listed in the AD as of August 19,
2011.
ADDRESSES: For service information identified in this AD, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services Management,
P.O. Box 3707, MC 2H-65, Seattle, Washington 98124-2207; telephone 206-
544-5000, extension 1; fax 206-766-5680; e-mail me.boecom@boeing.com;
Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You may review copies of the
referenced service information at the FAA, Transport Airplane
Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington. For information
on the availability of this material at the FAA, call 425-227-1221.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Management Facility
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this AD, the regulatory evaluation,
any comments received, and other information. The address for the
Docket Office (phone: 800-647-5527) is Document Management Facility,
U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tung Tran, Aerospace Engineer,
Propulsion Branch, ANM-140S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft Certification
Office, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; phone:
425-917-6505; fax: 425-917-6590; e-mail: tung.tran@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
[[Page 41674]]
Discussion
We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to include an airworthiness directive (AD) that would apply to
the specified products. That NPRM published in the Federal Register on
December 1, 2010 (75 FR 74663). That NPRM proposed to require a general
visual inspection to determine the routing of the wire bundles in the
number two and number three engine pylons near the leading edge, and
related investigative and corrective actions if necessary. For certain
airplanes, that NPRM also proposed to require certain concurrent
actions.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. The following presents the comments received on the proposal
and the FAA's response to each comment.
Request To Change Wording of Precipitating Event
Boeing requested a change to the wording describing the
precipitating event specified in the Summary and Discussion sections
and paragraph (e) of the NPRM to clarify the location of the fuel leak.
Boeing clarified that, for the record, the fuel leaked from the main
fuel feed tube and drained through the drain line.
We agree that changing the language to specify the location of the
leak makes the description more accurate. Therefore, we have changed
the wording appropriately in the Summary section and paragraph (e) of
this AD. However, the subject text does not appear in the Discussion
section in the final rule.
Request To Include Service Bulletin Reference in the ``FAA's
Determination and Requirements of this Proposed AD'' Paragraph of the
NPRM
Boeing requested that we change the last sentence of the ``FAA's
Determination and Requirements of this Proposed AD'' paragraph in the
NPRM to cite the specific service bulletin number, revision level, and
date to differentiate between previous and new service information.
We agree that the requested change might clarify the information.
However, because that section is not restated in the final rule, we
cannot make the requested change to this AD.
Request To Remove Cost of Concurrent Actions
Boeing requested that we remove the cost of the concurrent
inspection and bracket installation from the Costs of Compliance
section of the NPRM. Boeing stated that the cost for the concurrent
inspection and bracket installation was previously stated in AD 92-27-
13, Amendment 39-8448 (58 FR 5920, January 25, 1993), and is not
necessary in this proposed AD.
We disagree that it is unnecessary to include the cost of the
concurrent actions in this AD. We acknowledge that these costs have
already been stated in an existing AD; however, we have provided costs
for required actions in this AD, including concurrent actions,
regardless of whether operators might already have done them. No change
has been made to the AD in this regard.
Request To Include On-Condition Costs
Boeing stated that we should include the costs of inspecting the
fuel feed tube and the alternating current motor driven hydraulic pump
wire bundle, repairs, replacing the fuel tube, and changing the routing
of the wire bundle to above the support bracket.
We agree with the request to include the costs of these actions
specified above. We have added an ``On-condition costs'' table to
reflect these costs.
Conclusion
We reviewed the relevant data, considered the comments received,
and determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting
the AD with the changes described previously--and minor editorial
changes. We have determined that these minor changes:
Are consistent with the intent that was proposed in the
NPRM for correcting the unsafe condition; and
Do not add any additional burden upon the public than was
already proposed in the NPRM.
We also determined that these changes will not significantly
increase the economic burden on any operator or increase the scope of
the AD.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD affects 15 airplanes of U.S. registry.
We estimate the following costs to comply with this AD:
Table--Estimated Costs
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Average Number of U.S.-
Action Work hours labor rate Parts Cost per registered Fleet cost
per hour product airplanes
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inspection of wire routing......................................... 1 $85 $0 $85 15 $1,275
Concurrent Inspection and Bracket Installation..................... 9 $85 $0 $765 15 $11,475
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
We estimate the following costs to do any necessary inspections or
repairs that would be required based on the results of the required
inspection. We have no way of determining the number of aircraft that
might need these inspections or repairs:
On-Condition Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Average labor Cost per
Action Work hours rate per hour Parts product
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inspection of wire bundle and fuel feed tube.... 3 $85 $0 $255
Repair of wire bundle, repair or replacement of 7 $85 $26 $621
fuel feed tube, and wire bundle routing change.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The cost estimate figures discussed above are based on assumptions
that no operator has yet accomplished any of the actions required by
this AD, and that no operator would accomplish those actions in the
future if this AD were not adopted. However, we have been advised that
the concurrent inspection and bracket installation have already
[[Page 41675]]
been done on some affected airplanes. Therefore, the future economic
cost impact of this rule on U.S. operators is expected to be less than
the cost impact figure indicated above.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
This AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order
13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States,
on the relationship between the national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
(1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
(2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
(4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):
2011-14-11 The Boeing Company: Amendment 39-16746; Docket No. FAA-
2010-1159; Directorate Identifier 2010-NM-006-AD.
Effective Date
(a) This AD is effective August 19, 2011.
Affected ADs
(b) AD 92-27-13, Amendment 39-8448, affects this AD.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to The Boeing Company Model 747-400 and -
400D series airplanes, certificated in any category; as specified in
Boeing Service Bulletin 747-29A2114, Revision 1, dated July 15,
2010.
Subject
(d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 29:
Hydraulic power.
Unsafe Condition
(e) This AD was prompted by a report of a fuel leak from the
main fuel feed tube at the number two engine pylon. The Federal
Aviation Administration is issuing this AD to detect and correct
chafing of the main fuel feed tube and the alternating current
motor-driven hydraulic pump wire bundle, which could lead to arcing
from the exposed wire to the fuel feed tube, and could result in a
fire or explosion.
Compliance
(f) You are responsible for having the actions required by this
AD performed within the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.
Inspection
(g) Within 24 months after the effective date of this AD, do a
general visual inspection to determine the routing of the wire
bundles in the number two and number three engine pylons near the
leading edge, and do all applicable related investigative and
corrective actions, in accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Boeing Service Bulletin 747-29A2114, Revision 1,
dated July 15, 2010. Do all applicable related investigative and
corrective actions before further flight.
Concurrent Requirements
(h) For Model 747-400 series airplanes: Before or concurrently
with accomplishing the requirements of paragraph (g) of this AD,
install all applicable cable support brackets in the number two and
number three engine pylon areas, and do all applicable related
investigative and corrective actions, in accordance with Phase II of
Boeing Service Bulletin 747-24A2168, Revision 3, dated July 29,
1993. Do all applicable related investigative and corrective actions
before further flight. Doing the actions required by paragraph (c)
of AD 92-27-13, Amendment 39-8448, is an acceptable method of
compliance for the installation required by this paragraph.
Note 1: For the purposes of this AD, a detailed inspection is:
``An intensive examination of a specific item, installation, or
assembly to detect damage, failure, or irregularity. Available
lighting is normally supplemented with a direct source of good
lighting at an intensity deemed appropriate. Inspection aids such as
mirror, magnifying lenses, etc., may be necessary. Surface cleaning
and elaborate procedures may be required.''
Credit for Actions Accomplished in Accordance With Previous Service
Information
(i) Actions accomplished before the effective date of this AD,
in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin 747-29A2114, dated October 1, 2009, are considered
acceptable for compliance with the corresponding actions specified
in paragraph (g) of this AD.
(j) Actions accomplished before the effective date of this AD,
in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin 747-24A2168, Revision 1, dated December 5, 1991; or
Revision 2, dated September 24, 1992; are considered acceptable for
compliance with the corresponding actions specified in paragraph (h)
of this AD.
Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(k)(1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office (ACO),
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14
CFR 39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or local
Flight Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending
information directly to the ACO, send it to ATTN: Tung Tran,
Aerospace Engineer, Propulsion Branch, ANM-140S, FAA, Seattle
Aircraft Certification Office, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington 98057-3356, telephone: 425-917-6505; fax: 425-917-6590.
(2) To request a different method of compliance or a different
compliance time for this AD, follow the procedures in 14 CFR 39.19.
Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate principal
inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the
local flight standards district office/certificate holding district
office. The AMOC approval letter must specifically reference this
AD.
Related Information
(l) For more information about this AD, contact Tung Tran,
Aerospace Engineer, Propulsion Branch, ANM-140S, FAA, Seattle
Aircraft Certification Office, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington 98057-3356, telephone: 425-917-6505; fax: 425-917-6590;
e-mail: tung.tran@faa.gov.
[[Page 41676]]
Material Incorporated by Reference
(m) You must use Boeing Service Bulletin 747-29A2114, Revision
1, dated July 15, 2010; and Boeing Service Bulletin 747-24A2168,
Revision 3, dated July 29, 1993; as applicable; to do the actions
required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
(1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference of this service information under 5
U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services Management,
P.O. Box 3707, MC 2H-65, Seattle, Washington 98124-2207; telephone
206-544-5000, extension 1; fax 206-766-5680; e-mail
me.boecom@boeing.com; Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com.
(3) You may review copies of the service information at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington. For information on the availability of this material at
the FAA, call 425-227-1221.
(4) You may also review copies of the service information that
is incorporated by reference at the National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this
material at an NARA facility, call 202-741-6030, or go to https://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on July 1, 2011.
Jeffrey E. Duven,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2011-17401 Filed 7-14-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P