BNSF Railway Company-Abandonment Exemption-in Washington County, MN, 41558-41559 [2011-17713]
Download as PDF
wreier-aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
41558
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 135 / Thursday, July 14, 2011 / Notices
experienced when comparing MY 1997
Mustang vehicle thefts (with
immobilizers) to MY 1995 Mustang
vehicle thefts (without immobilizers).
Mazda also stated that the Highway Loss
Data Institute’s (HLDI) September 1997
Theft Loss Bulletin reported an overall
theft loss decrease of approximately
50% for both the Ford Mustang and
Taurus models upon installation of an
antitheft immobilization device.
Additionally, Mazda referenced a July
2000 International Institute for Highway
Safety news release which reported that
when comparing theft loss data before
and after equipping vehicles with
passive immobilizer devices, the data
showed an average theft reduction of
approximately 50% for vehicles with
immobilizer devices.
Based on the supporting evidence
submitted by Mazda, the agency
believes that the antitheft device for the
Mazda CX–5 vehicle line is likely to be
as effective in reducing and deterring
motor vehicle theft as compliance with
the parts-marking requirements of the
Theft Prevention Standard (49 CFR part
541).
The agency also notes that the device
will provide four of the five types of
performance listed in § 543.6(a)(3):
promoting activation; preventing defeat
or circumvention of the device by
unauthorized persons; preventing
operation of the vehicle by
unauthorized entrants; and ensuring the
reliability and durability of the device.
Pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 33106 and 49
CFR 543.7(b), the agency grants a
petition for exemption from the partsmarking requirements of part 541 either
in whole or in part, if it determines that,
based upon substantial evidence, the
standard equipment antitheft device is
likely to be as effective in reducing and
deterring motor vehicle theft as
compliance with the parts-marking
requirements of part 541. The agency
finds that Mazda has provided adequate
reasons for its belief that the antitheft
device for its new vehicle line is likely
to be as effective in reducing and
deterring motor vehicle theft as
compliance with the parts-marking
requirements of the Theft Prevention
Standard (49 CFR part 541). This
conclusion is based on the information
Mazda provided about its device.
For the foregoing reasons, the agency
hereby grants in full Mazda’s petition
for exemption for the Mazda CX–5
vehicle line from the parts-marking
requirements of 49 CFR part 541,
beginning with MY 2013 vehicles. The
agency notes that 49 CFR part 541,
Appendix A–1, identifies those lines
that are exempted from the Theft
Prevention Standard for a given model
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:55 Jul 13, 2011
Jkt 223001
year. 49 CFR 543.7(f) contains
publication requirements incident to the
disposition of all part 543 petitions.
Advanced listing, including the release
of future product nameplates, the
beginning model year for which the
petition is granted and a general
description of the antitheft device is
necessary in order to notify law
enforcement agencies of new vehicle
lines exempted from the parts-marking
requirements of the Theft Prevention
Standard.
If Mazda decides not to use the
exemption for this line, it must formally
notify the agency. If such a decision is
made, the line must be fully marked
according to the requirements under 49
CFR 541.5 and 541.6 (marking of major
component parts and replacement
parts).
NHTSA notes that if Mazda wishes in
the future to modify the device on
which this exemption is based, the
company may have to submit a petition
to modify the exemption.
Part 543.7(d) states that a part 543
exemption applies only to vehicles that
belong to a line exempted under this
part and equipped with the anti-theft
device on which the line’s exemption is
based. Further, § 543.9(c)(2) provides for
the submission of petitions ‘‘to modify
an exemption to permit the use of an
antitheft device similar to but differing
from the one specified in that
exemption.’’
The agency wishes to minimize the
administrative burden that § 543.9(c)(2)
could place on exempted vehicle
manufacturers and itself. The agency
did not intend in drafting part 543 to
require the submission of a modification
petition for every change to the
components or design of an antitheft
device. The significance of many such
changes could be de minimis. Therefore,
NHTSA suggests that if the
manufacturer contemplates making any
changes, the effects of which might be
characterized as de minimis, it should
consult the agency before preparing and
submitting a petition to modify.
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 33106; delegation of
authority at 49 CFR 1.50.
Issued on: July 8, 2011.
Christopher J. Bonanti,
Associate Administrator for Rulemaking.
[FR Doc. 2011–17715 Filed 7–13–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–59–P
PO 00000
Frm 00111
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Surface Transportation Board
[Docket No. AB 6 (Sub-No. 474X)]
BNSF Railway Company—
Abandonment Exemption—in
Washington County, MN
BNSF Railway Company (BNSF) filed
a verified notice of exemption under 49
CFR Part 1152 subpart F—Exempt
Abandonments to abandon a 0.51-mile
line of railroad between milepost 15.59
and milepost 16.10 in Washington
County, MN.1 The line traverses United
States Postal Service Zip Code 55038.
BNSF has certified that: (1) No local
traffic has moved over the line for at
least 2 years; (2) no overhead traffic has
been handled on the line for at least 2
years; (3) no formal complaint filed by
a user of rail service on the line (or by
a state or local government entity acting
on behalf of such user) regarding
cessation of service over the line either
is pending with the Surface
Transportation Board (Board) or with
any U.S. District Court or has been
decided in favor of complainant within
the 2-year period. As provided under 49
CFR 1105.11, BNSF has certified that it
served its Environmental and Historic
Reports as required under 49 CFR
1105.7 and 1105.8. BNSF also has
certified that the requirements at 49 CFR
1105.12 (newspaper publication) and 49
CFR 1152.50(d)(1) (notice to
governmental agencies) have been met.
As a condition to this exemption, any
employee adversely affected by the
abandonment shall be protected under
Oregon Short Line Railroad—
Abandonment Portion Goshen Branch
Between Firth & Ammon, in Bingham &
Bonneville Counties, Idaho, 360 I.C.C.
91 (1979). To address whether this
condition adequately protects affected
employees, a petition for partial
revocation under 49 U.S.C. 10502(d)
must be filed.
All interested persons should be
aware that, following abandonment of
rail service and salvage of the line, the
line may be suitable for other public
use, including interim trail use.
Provided no formal expression of intent
to file an offer of financial assistance
(OFA) has been received, this
exemption will be effective on August
13, 2011, unless stayed pending
1 This transaction is related to a concurrently
filed notice of exemption in Docket No. AB 882
(Sub-No. 3X), Minnesota Commercial Railway
Company—Discontinuance of Service Exemption—
in Washington County, Minnesota, in which
Minnesota Commercial Railway Company seeks an
exemption to discontinue its lease operations over
the same 0.51-mile rail line.
E:\FR\FM\14JYN1.SGM
14JYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 135 / Thursday, July 14, 2011 / Notices
wreier-aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
reconsideration. Petitions to stay that do
not involve environmental issues,2
formal expressions of intent to file an
OFA under 49 CFR 1152.27(c)(2),3 and
trail use/rail banking requests under 49
CFR 1152.29 must be filed by July 25,
2011. Petitions to reopen or requests for
public use conditions under 49 CFR
1152.28 must be filed by August 3,
2011, with the Surface Transportation
Board, 395 E Street, SW., Washington,
DC 20423–0001.
A copy of any petition filed with the
Board should be sent to BNSF’s
representative: Courtney Biery Estes,
General Attorney, BNSF Railway
Company, 2500 Lou Menk Drive, AOB–
3, Fort Worth, TX 76131.
If the verified notice contains false or
misleading information, the exemption
is void ab initio.
BNSF has filed environmental and
historic reports that address the effects,
if any, of the abandonment on the
environment and historic resources.
OEA will issue an environmental
assessment (EA) by July 19, 2011.
Interested persons may obtain a copy of
the EA by writing to OEA (Room 1100,
Surface Transportation Board,
Washington, DC 20423–0001) or by
calling OEA at (202) 245–0305.
Assistance for the hearing impaired is
available through the Federal
Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1–
800–877–8339. Comments on
environmental and historic preservation
matters must be filed within 15 days
after the EA becomes available to the
public.
Environmental, historic preservation,
public use, or trail use/rail banking
conditions will be imposed, where
appropriate, in a subsequent decision.
Pursuant to the provisions of 49 CFR
1152.29(e)(2), BNSF shall file a notice of
consummation with the Board to signify
that it has exercised the authority
granted and fully abandoned the line. If
consummation has not been effected by
BNSF’s filing of a notice of
consummation by July 14, 2012, and
there are no legal or regulatory barriers
to consummation, the authority to
abandon will automatically expire.
2 The Board will grant a stay if an informed
decision on environmental issues (whether raised
by a party or by the Board’s Office of Environmental
Analysis (OEA) in its independent investigation)
cannot be made before the exemption’s effective
date. See Exemption of Out-of-Serv. Rail Lines, 5
I.C.C.2d 377 (1989). Any request for a stay should
be filed as soon as possible so that the Board may
take appropriate action before the exemption’s
effective date.
3 Each OFA must be accompanied by the filing
fee, which is currently set at $1,500. See 49 CFR
1002.2(f)(25).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:55 Jul 13, 2011
Jkt 223001
Board decisions and notices are
available on our Web site at https://
WWW.STB.DOT.GOV.
Decided: July 11, 2011.
By the Board.
Rachel D. Campbell,
Director, Office of Proceedings.
Andrea Pope-Matheson,
Clearance Clerk.
[FR Doc. 2011–17713 Filed 7–13–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Surface Transportation Board
[Docket No. AB 882 (Sub–No. 3X)]
Minnesota Commercial Railway
Company—Discontinuance of Service
Exemption—in Washington County,
MN 1
Minnesota Commercial Railway
Company (MNNR) filed a verified notice
of exemption under 49 CFR Part 1152
subpart F—Exempt Abandonments and
Discontinuances of Service to
discontinue service over a 0.51-mile line
of railroad owned by BNSF Railway
Company (BNSF) between milepost
15.59 and milepost 16.10 at Hugo, in
Washington County, MN. The line
traverses United States Postal Service
Zip Code 55038.2
MNNR has certified that: (1) No local
traffic has moved over the line for at
least 2 years; (2) no overhead traffic has
been handled on the line for at least 2
years; and (3) no formal complaint filed
by a user of rail service on the line (or
by a state or local government entity
acting on behalf of such user) regarding
cessation of service over the line either
is pending with the Surface
Transportation Board or with any U.S.
District Court or has been decided in
favor of complainant within the 2-year
period. MNNR also has certified that the
requirements at 49 CFR 1105.12
(newspaper publication) and 49 CFR
1152.50(d)(1) (notice to governmental
agencies) have been met.
As a condition to this exemption, any
employee adversely affected by the
discontinuance of service shall be
protected under Oregon Short Line
1 This transaction is related to a concurrently
filed verified notice of exemption filed in Docket
No. AB 6 (Sub–No. 474X), BNSF Railway
Company—Abandonment Exemption—in
Washington County, MN, in which BNSF seeks an
exemption under 49 CFR Part 1152 subpart F to
abandon the same 0.51-mile line.
2 MNNR was authorized to lease and operate the
line in Minnesota Commercial Railway Company—
Lease & Operation Exemption—Burlington
Northern Santa Fe Railway Co., FD 33577 (STB
served Apr. 10, 1998).
PO 00000
Frm 00112
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
41559
Railroad —Abandonment Portion
Goshen Branch Between Firth &
Ammon, in Bingham & Bonneville
Counties, Idaho, 360 I.C.C. 91 (1979). To
address whether this condition
adequately protects affected employees,
a petition for partial revocation under
49 U.S.C. 10502(d) must be filed.
Provided no formal expression of
intent to file an offer of financial
assistance (OFA) has been received, this
exemption will be effective on August
13, 2011, unless stayed pending
reconsideration. Petitions to stay that do
not involve environmental issues and
formal expressions of intent to file an
OFA for continued rail service under 49
CFR 1152.27(c)(2) 3 must be filed by July
25, 2011.4 Petitions to reopen must be
filed by August 3, 2011, with the
Surface Transportation Board, 395 E
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20423–
0001.
A copy of any petition filed with the
Board should be sent to MNNR’s
representative: Karl Morell, Ball Janik
LLP, 655 Fifteenth Street, NW., Suite
225, Washington, DC 20005.
If the verified notice contains false or
misleading information, the exemption
is void ab initio.
Board decisions and notices are
available on our Web site at https://
WWW.STB.DOT.GOV.
Decided: July 11, 2011.
By the Board.
Rachel D. Campbell,
Director, Office of Proceedings.
Andrea Pope-Matheson,
Clearance Clerk.
[FR Doc. 2011–17719 Filed 7–13–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Debt Management Advisory Committee
Meeting
Notice is hereby given, pursuant to 5
U.S.C. App. 2, § 10(a)(2), that a meeting
will be held at the Hay-Adams Hotel,
16th Street and Pennsylvania Avenue,
NW.,Washington, DC, on August 2, 2011
at 9:30 a.m. of the following debt
management advisory committee:
Treasury Borrowing Advisory
Committee of The Securities Industry
and Financial Markets Association.
3 Each OFA must be accompanied by the filing
fee, which is currently set at $1,500. See 49 CFR
1002.2(f)(25).
4 Because this is a discontinuance proceeding and
not an abandonment, trail use/rail banking and
public use conditions are not appropriate. Likewise,
no environmental or historic documentation is
required here under 49 CFR 1105.6(c) and 49 CFR
1105.8(b), respectively.
E:\FR\FM\14JYN1.SGM
14JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 135 (Thursday, July 14, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 41558-41559]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-17713]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Surface Transportation Board
[Docket No. AB 6 (Sub-No. 474X)]
BNSF Railway Company--Abandonment Exemption--in Washington
County, MN
BNSF Railway Company (BNSF) filed a verified notice of exemption
under 49 CFR Part 1152 subpart F--Exempt Abandonments to abandon a
0.51-mile line of railroad between milepost 15.59 and milepost 16.10 in
Washington County, MN.\1\ The line traverses United States Postal
Service Zip Code 55038.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ This transaction is related to a concurrently filed notice
of exemption in Docket No. AB 882 (Sub-No. 3X), Minnesota Commercial
Railway Company--Discontinuance of Service Exemption--in Washington
County, Minnesota, in which Minnesota Commercial Railway Company
seeks an exemption to discontinue its lease operations over the same
0.51-mile rail line.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
BNSF has certified that: (1) No local traffic has moved over the
line for at least 2 years; (2) no overhead traffic has been handled on
the line for at least 2 years; (3) no formal complaint filed by a user
of rail service on the line (or by a state or local government entity
acting on behalf of such user) regarding cessation of service over the
line either is pending with the Surface Transportation Board (Board) or
with any U.S. District Court or has been decided in favor of
complainant within the 2-year period. As provided under 49 CFR 1105.11,
BNSF has certified that it served its Environmental and Historic
Reports as required under 49 CFR 1105.7 and 1105.8. BNSF also has
certified that the requirements at 49 CFR 1105.12 (newspaper
publication) and 49 CFR 1152.50(d)(1) (notice to governmental agencies)
have been met.
As a condition to this exemption, any employee adversely affected
by the abandonment shall be protected under Oregon Short Line
Railroad--Abandonment Portion Goshen Branch Between Firth & Ammon, in
Bingham & Bonneville Counties, Idaho, 360 I.C.C. 91 (1979). To address
whether this condition adequately protects affected employees, a
petition for partial revocation under 49 U.S.C. 10502(d) must be filed.
All interested persons should be aware that, following abandonment
of rail service and salvage of the line, the line may be suitable for
other public use, including interim trail use. Provided no formal
expression of intent to file an offer of financial assistance (OFA) has
been received, this exemption will be effective on August 13, 2011,
unless stayed pending
[[Page 41559]]
reconsideration. Petitions to stay that do not involve environmental
issues,\2\ formal expressions of intent to file an OFA under 49 CFR
1152.27(c)(2),\3\ and trail use/rail banking requests under 49 CFR
1152.29 must be filed by July 25, 2011. Petitions to reopen or requests
for public use conditions under 49 CFR 1152.28 must be filed by August
3, 2011, with the Surface Transportation Board, 395 E Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20423-0001.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ The Board will grant a stay if an informed decision on
environmental issues (whether raised by a party or by the Board's
Office of Environmental Analysis (OEA) in its independent
investigation) cannot be made before the exemption's effective date.
See Exemption of Out-of-Serv. Rail Lines, 5 I.C.C.2d 377 (1989). Any
request for a stay should be filed as soon as possible so that the
Board may take appropriate action before the exemption's effective
date.
\3\ Each OFA must be accompanied by the filing fee, which is
currently set at $1,500. See 49 CFR 1002.2(f)(25).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
A copy of any petition filed with the Board should be sent to
BNSF's representative: Courtney Biery Estes, General Attorney, BNSF
Railway Company, 2500 Lou Menk Drive, AOB-3, Fort Worth, TX 76131.
If the verified notice contains false or misleading information,
the exemption is void ab initio.
BNSF has filed environmental and historic reports that address the
effects, if any, of the abandonment on the environment and historic
resources. OEA will issue an environmental assessment (EA) by July 19,
2011. Interested persons may obtain a copy of the EA by writing to OEA
(Room 1100, Surface Transportation Board, Washington, DC 20423-0001) or
by calling OEA at (202) 245-0305. Assistance for the hearing impaired
is available through the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-
800-877-8339. Comments on environmental and historic preservation
matters must be filed within 15 days after the EA becomes available to
the public.
Environmental, historic preservation, public use, or trail use/rail
banking conditions will be imposed, where appropriate, in a subsequent
decision.
Pursuant to the provisions of 49 CFR 1152.29(e)(2), BNSF shall file
a notice of consummation with the Board to signify that it has
exercised the authority granted and fully abandoned the line. If
consummation has not been effected by BNSF's filing of a notice of
consummation by July 14, 2012, and there are no legal or regulatory
barriers to consummation, the authority to abandon will automatically
expire.
Board decisions and notices are available on our Web site at https://WWW.STB.DOT.GOV.
Decided: July 11, 2011.
By the Board.
Rachel D. Campbell,
Director, Office of Proceedings.
Andrea Pope-Matheson,
Clearance Clerk.
[FR Doc. 2011-17713 Filed 7-13-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-01-P