Retail Foreign Exchange Transactions, 41375-41392 [2011-17514]
Download as PDF
41375
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
Vol. 76, No. 135
Thursday, July 14, 2011
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains regulatory documents having general
applicability and legal effect, most of which
are keyed to and codified in the Code of
Federal Regulations, which is published under
50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by
the Superintendent of Documents. Prices of
new books are listed in the first FEDERAL
REGISTER issue of each week.
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Office of the Comptroller of the
Currency
12 CFR Part 48
[Docket ID OCC–2011–0010]
RIN 1557–AD42
Retail Foreign Exchange Transactions
Office of the Comptroller of the
Currency, Department of the Treasury.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Office of the Comptroller
of the Currency (OCC) is adopting a
final rule authorizing national banks,
Federal branches and agencies of foreign
banks, and their operating subsidiaries
to engage in off-exchange transactions in
foreign currency with retail customers.
The rule also describes various
requirements with which national
banks, Federal branches and agencies of
foreign banks, and their operating
subsidiaries must comply to conduct
such transactions.
DATES: This rule is effective July 15,
2011.
SUMMARY:
United States financial institution 3 for
which there is a Federal regulatory
agency 4 shall not enter into, or offer to
enter into, a transaction described in
section 2(c)(2)(B)(i)(I) of the CEA with a
retail customer 5 except pursuant to a
rule or regulation of a Federal regulatory
agency allowing the transaction under
such terms and conditions as the
Federal regulatory agency shall
prescribe 6 (a ‘‘retail forex rule’’).
Section 2(c)(2)(B)(i)(I) includes ‘‘an
agreement, contract, or transaction in
foreign currency that * * * is a contract
of sale of a commodity for future
delivery (or an option on such a
contract) or an option (other than an
option executed or traded on a national
securities exchange registered pursuant
to section 6(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
78f(a)).’’ 7 A Federal regulatory agency’s
retail forex rule must treat similarly all
such futures and options and all
agreements, contracts, or transactions
that are functionally or economically
similar to such futures and options.8
Retail forex rules must prescribe
appropriate requirements with respect
to disclosure, recordkeeping, capital and
margin, reporting, business conduct,
and documentation requirements and
may include such other standards or
requirements as the Federal regulatory
agency determines to be necessary.9
This Dodd-Frank Act amendment to the
CEA takes effect 360 days from the
enactment of the Act.10 Therefore, as of
July 16, 2011, national banks, Federal
branches and agencies of foreign banks,
and operating subsidiaries of the
foregoing (collectively, national banks)
may not engage in a retail forex
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Tena Alexander, Senior Counsel, or
Roman Goldstein, Attorney, Securities
and Corporate Practices Division, (202)
874–5120.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
wreier-aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with RULES
I. Background
On July 21, 2010, President Obama
signed into law the Dodd-Frank Wall
Street Reform and Consumer Protection
Act (Dodd-Frank Act).1 As amended by
the Dodd-Frank Act,2 the Commodity
Exchange Act (CEA) provides that a
1 Public
Law 111–203, 124 Stat. 1376.
Act § 742(c)(2) (to be codified at 7
U.S.C. 2(c)(2)(E)). In this preamble, citations to the
retail forex statutory provisions are to the sections
in which the provisions will be codified in the CEA.
2 Dodd-Frank
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:53 Jul 13, 2011
Jkt 223001
3 The CEA defines ‘‘financial institution’’ as
including ‘‘a depository institution (as defined in
section 3 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (12
U.S.C. 1813)).’’ 7 U.S.C. 1a(21)(E). National banks
are depository institutions. See 12 U.S.C. 1813(a)(1)
and (c)(1).
4 For purposes of the retail forex rules, ‘‘Federal
regulatory agency’’ includes ‘‘an appropriate
Federal banking agency.’’ 7 U.S.C. 2(c)(2)(E)(i)(III).
The OCC is the appropriate Federal banking agency
for national banks and Federal branches and
agencies of foreign banks. 12 U.S.C. 1813(q)(1);
Dodd-Frank Act § 721(a)(2) (amending 7 U.S.C. 1a
to define ‘‘appropriate Federal banking agency’’ by
reference to 12 U.S.C. 1813).
5 A retail customer is a person that is not an
‘‘eligible contract participant’’ under the CEA.
6 7 U.S.C. 2(c)(2)(E)(ii)(I).
7 7 U.S.C. 2(c)(2)(B)(i)(II).
8 7 U.S.C. 2(c)(2)(E)(iii)(II).
9 7 U.S.C. 2(c)(2)(E)(iii)(I).
10 See Dodd-Frank Act § 754.
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
transaction except pursuant to retail
forex rules issued by the OCC.
In addition, on July 21, 2011, the OCC
will become the appropriate Federal
banking agency for Federal savings
associations.11 The OCC plans to
regulate retail forex transactions
conducted by Federal savings
associations under the same terms as in
this rule. However, the OCC cannot
issue regulations governing Federal
savings associations until July 21, 2011.
Therefore, the OCC anticipates issuing
on that date an interim final rule with
request for public comment that would
expand the scope of this regulation to
cover Federal savings associations.
II. Overview of the Proposed Rule and
Related Actions
On September 10, 2010, the
Commodity Futures Trading
Commission (CFTC) issued a retail forex
rule for persons subject to its
jurisdiction.12 On April 22, 2011, the
OCC proposed a retail forex rule for
national banks modeled on the CFTC’s
retail forex rule.13 The OCC decided to
model its retail forex rule on the CFTC’s
rule to promote regulatory
comparability and because the CFTC
developed its retail forex rule with the
benefit of over 9,100 comments from a
range of commenters, including
individuals who trade forex,
intermediaries, CFTC registrants
currently serving as counterparties in
retail forex transactions, trade
associations or coalitions of industry
participants, one committee of a county
lawyers’ association, a registered futures
association, and numerous law firms
representing institutional clients. The
OCC proposed to authorize national
banks to engage in retail forex
transactions and subject those
transactions to requirements relating to
disclosure, record keeping, capital and
margin, reporting, business conduct,
and documentation.
On May 17, 2011, the Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation (FDIC) proposed
11 Dodd-Frank
Act § 312.
of Off-Exchange Retail Foreign
Exchange Transactions and Intermediaries, 75 FR
55409 (Sept. 10, 2010) (Final CFTC Retail Forex
Rule). The CFTC proposed these rules prior to the
enactment of the Dodd-Frank Act. Regulation of
Off-Exchange Retail Foreign Exchange Transactions
and Intermediaries, 75 FR 3281 (Jan. 20, 2010)
(Proposed CFTC Retail Forex Rule).
13 Retail Foreign Exchange Transactions, 76 FR
22633 (Apr. 22, 2011) (Proposed OCC Retail Forex
Rule).
12 Regulation
E:\FR\FM\14JYR1.SGM
14JYR1
41376
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 135 / Thursday, July 14, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
a retail forex rule for entities for which
it is the appropriate Federal banking
agency under the Federal Deposit
Insurance Act.14 The OCC’s and the
FDIC’s proposals were substantially
similar.
wreier-aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with RULES
III. Comments on the Proposed Rule
The comment period for the proposed
OCC retail forex rule ended on May 23,
2011. The OCC received a total of three
comments by that date. Of these, one
was submitted by a large bank that
engages in retail forex transactions (the
commenter) and two were submitted by
individuals. The latter two comments
did not relate to the proposal. The
commenter generally supported the
OCC’s proposed rule while requesting
certain clarifications and changes. The
commenter’s comments to specific
sections of the proposal are addressed in
the Section-by-Section Analysis below.
In light of the comments received, the
final rule, for the most part, is similar
to the proposed rule; the significant
changes are described in the Section-bySection analysis.
In the preamble to the proposal, the
OCC indicated that retail forex
transactions are subject to the
Interagency Statement on Retail Sales of
Nondeposit Investment Products (NDIP
Policy Statement).15 The NDIP Policy
Statement sets out guidance regarding
the OCC’s expectations when a national
bank engages in the sale of nondeposit
investment products to retail customers.
The NDIP Policy Statement addresses
issues such as disclosure, suitability,
sales practices, compensation, and
compliance.
In the proposal, the OCC asked for
comment on whether application of the
NDIP Policy Statement created issues
that the OCC should address.
The commenter said that the NDIP
Policy Statement should not apply to
retail forex transactions, asserting that
the retail forex rule, alone, would be
sufficient to protect retail customers,
and the imposition of the NDIP Policy
Statement on retail forex transactions
would create confusion and ambiguity.
No specific provisions were identified,
however, that create confusion or
ambiguity. The commenter further
argued that because the NDIP Policy
Statement does not apply to CFTC
registrants, its application to retail forex
transactions would not promote
consistent regulatory treatment of retail
forex transactions.
14 Retail
Foreign Exchange Transactions, 76 FR
28358 (May 17, 2011) (Proposed FDIC Retail Forex
Rule).
15 See OCC Bulletin 94–13 (Feb. 24, 1994); see
also OCC Bulletin 1995–52 (Sept. 22, 1995).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:53 Jul 13, 2011
Jkt 223001
The OCC believes that it is
appropriate to apply the NDIP Policy
Statement to retail forex transactions.
The consumer protections that the NDIP
Policy Statement provides are no less
important for retail forex transactions
than for other nondeposit investment
products. Moreover, there is no direct
conflict between this rule and the NDIP
Policy Statement because the statement
requires national banks to develop
policies and procedures to ensure that
nondeposit investment product sales are
conducted in compliance with
applicable laws and regulations.16 If a
national bank has questions regarding
how the NDIP Policy Statement applies
to its retail forex business, it should
seek clarification from its examiners.
IV. Section-by-Section Analysis
Section 48.1—Authority, Purpose, and
Scope
This section authorizes a national
bank to conduct retail forex
transactions.
The OCC requested comment on
whether the retail forex rule should
apply to national banks’ foreign
branches conducting retail forex
transactions abroad, whether with U.S.
or foreign customers.
The commenter responded that there
is no U.S. policy interest in applying
U.S. consumer protection rules to
transactions with non-U.S. residents
conducted by foreign branches. Those
transactions are subject to foreign
regulatory requirements that could be
inconsistent with the retail forex rule.
Subjecting those transactions to two sets
of regulatory requirements would also
place national banks at a competitive
disadvantage abroad.
The OCC recognizes the concerns
raised by the commenter.
Retail forex transactions between a
foreign branch of a national bank and a
non-U.S. customer are subject to any
applicable disclosure, recordkeeping,
capital, margin, reporting, business
conduct, documentation, and other
requirements of applicable foreign law.
Therefore, those transactions are not
subject to the requirements of §§ 48.3
and 48.5 to 48.16.
Section 48.2—Definitions
This section defines terms specific to
retail forex transactions and to the
regulatory requirements that apply to
retail forex transactions.
16 There are, of course, differences in the
regulations that generally govern national banks
versus those that govern CFTC registrants, such as
capital rules. The NDIP Policy Statement, because
it governs bank activities more generally, is similar
to capital rules.
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
The definition of ‘‘retail forex
transaction’’ generally includes the
following transactions in foreign
currency between a national bank and a
person that is not an eligible contract
participant: 17 (i) A future or option on
such a future; 18 (ii) options not traded
on a registered national securities
exchange; 19 and (iii) certain leveraged,
margined, or bank-financed
transactions,20 including rolling spot
forex transactions. The definition
generally tracks the statutory language
in section 2(c)(2)(B) and (C) of the
CEA.21
Certain transactions in foreign
currency are not ‘‘retail forex
transactions.’’ For example, a spot forex
transaction in which one currency is
bought for another and the two
currencies are exchanged within two
days would not meet the definition of
‘‘retail forex transaction.’’ 22 Similarly,
‘‘retail forex transaction’’ does not
include a forward contract that creates
an enforceable obligation to make or
take delivery, provided that each
counterparty has the ability to deliver
and accept delivery in connection with
its line of business.23 In addition, the
definition does not include transactions
conducted through an exchange,
because in those cases the exchange
17 The definition of ‘‘eligible contract participant’’
is found in the CEA and is discussed below.
18 7 U.S.C. 2(c)(2)(B)(i)(I).
19 7 U.S.C. 2(c)(2)(B)(i)(I).
20 7 U.S.C. 2(c)(2)(C).
21 7 U.S.C. 2(c)(2)(B) and (C).
22 See generally CFTC v. Int’l Fin. Servs. (New
York), Inc., 323 F. Supp. 2d 482, 495 (S.D.N.Y.
2004) (distinguishing between foreign exchange
futures contracts and spot contracts in foreign
exchange, and noting that foreign currency trades
settled within two days are ordinarily spot
transactions rather than futures contracts); see also
Bank Brussels Lambert v. Intermetals Corp., 779 F.
Supp. 741, 748 (S.D.N.Y. 1991).
23 See 7 U.S.C. 2(c)(2)(C)(i)(II)(bb)(BB); CFTC v.
Int’l Fin. Servs. (New York), Inc., 323 F. Supp. 2d
482, 495 (S.D.N.Y. 2004) (distinguishing between
forward contracts in foreign exchange and foreign
exchange futures contracts); see also William L.
Stein, The Exchange-Trading Requirement of the
Commodity Exchange Act, 41 Vand. L. Rev. 473,
491 (1988). In contrast to forward contracts, futures
contracts generally include several or all of the
following characteristics: (i) Standardized
nonnegotiable terms (other than price and quantity);
(ii) parties are required to deposit initial margin to
secure their obligations under the contract; (iii)
parties are obligated and entitled to pay or receive
variation margin in the amount of gain or loss on
the position periodically over the period the
contract is outstanding; (iv) purchasers and sellers
are permitted to close out their positions by selling
or purchasing offsetting contracts; and (v)
settlement may be provided for by either (a) cash
payment through a clearing entity that acts as the
counterparty to both sides of the contract without
delivery of the underlying commodity; or (b)
physical delivery of the underlying commodity. See
Edward F. Greene et al., U.S. Regulation of
International Securities and Derivatives Markets
§ 14.08[2] (8th ed. 2006).
E:\FR\FM\14JYR1.SGM
14JYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 135 / Thursday, July 14, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
wreier-aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with RULES
would be the counterparty to both the
national bank and the retail forex
customer, rather than the national bank
directly facing the retail forex customer.
The proposed rule sought comment
on whether leveraged, margined, or
bank-financed forex transactions,
including rolling spot forex transactions
(so-called Zelener 24 contracts), should
be regulated as retail forex transactions;
the OCC preliminary believed that they
should.25
The commenter supported the
inclusion of rolling spot forex
transactions in the definition of ‘‘retail
forex transaction.’’ A rolling spot forex
transaction nominally requires delivery
of currency within two days, like spot
transactions. However, in practice, the
contracts are indefinitely renewed every
other day and no currency is actually
delivered until one party affirmatively
closes out the position.26 Therefore, the
contracts are economically more like
futures than spot contracts, although
courts have held them to be spot
contracts in form.27 Like the CFTC’s
retail forex rule and the FDIC’s
proposed retail forex rule, the final
rule’s definition of ‘‘retail forex
transaction’’ includes leveraged,
margined, or bank-financed rolling spot
forex transactions, as well as certain
other leveraged, margined, or bankfinanced forex transactions.
The commenter sought clarification
that forex forwards would not be
included in the definition, because
transactions that convert or exchange
actual currencies for any commercial or
investment purpose are a traditional
product offered by national banks and
do not raise the consumer protection
issues associated with futures or rolling
spot forex transactions.
The OCC agrees that a forex forward
that is not leveraged, margined, or
financed by the national bank does not
meet the definition of ‘‘retail forex
transaction.’’ However, a leveraged,
margined, or bank-financed forex
forward is a retail forex transaction
unless it creates an enforceable
24 CFTC v. Zelener, 373 F.3d 861 (7th Cir. 2004);
see also CFTC v. Erskine, 512 F.3d 309 (6th Cir.
2008).
25 7 U.S.C. 2(c)(2)(E)(iii) (requiring that retail
forex rules treat all functionally or economically
similar transactions similarly); see 17 CFR 5.1(m)
(defining ‘‘retail forex transaction’’ for CFTCregistered retail forex dealers).
26 For example, in Zelener, the retail forex dealer
retained the right, at the date of delivery of the
currency to deliver the currency, roll the
transaction over, or offset all or a portion of the
transaction with another open position held by the
customer. See CFTC v. Zelener, 373 F.3d 861, 868
(7th Cir. 2004).
27 See, e.g., CFTC v. Erskine, 512 F.3d 309, 326
(6th Cir. 2008); CFTC v. Zelener, 373 F.3d 861, 869
(7th Cir. 2004).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:53 Jul 13, 2011
Jkt 223001
obligation to deliver between a seller
and a buyer that have the ability to
deliver and accept delivery,
respectively, in connection with their
line of business 28 or the OCC
determines that the forward is not
functionally or economically similar to
a forex future or option, as described
below.
The final rule contains a provision
that allows the OCC to exempt specific
transactions or kinds of transaction from
the third prong of the ‘‘retail forex
transaction’’ definition. The OCC is
concerned that certain traditional
banking products, which are
distinguishable from speculative rolling
spot forex transactions, may
inadvertently fall within the definition
of ‘‘retail forex transaction’’ as
leveraged, margined, or bank-financed
forex transactions. This result was not
intended by the Dodd-Frank Act, which
requires retail forex rules to treat
similarly transactions that are
functionally or economically similar to
forex futures or options.29 National
banks may seek a determination that a
given transaction or kind of transaction
does not fall within the third prong of
the ‘‘retail forex transaction’’ definition
by submitting a written request to the
OCC.
The commenter asked for
confirmation that deposit accounts with
foreign exchange features are outside
the scope of the rule.
The Legal Certainty for Bank Products
Act of 2000, as amended by the DoddFrank Act, generally exempts
‘‘identified banking products’’ from the
CEA.30 Identified banking products
include: Deposit accounts, savings
accounts, certificates of deposit, or other
deposit instruments issued by a bank;
banker’s acceptances; letters of credit
issued or loans made by a bank; debit
accounts at a bank arising from a credit
card or similar arrangement; and certain
loan participations.31 Because identified
banking products are not subject to the
CEA, they are not prohibited by section
2(c)(2)(E)(ii) of the CEA. To provide
clarity, the final rule excludes identified
7 U.S.C. 2(c)(2)(C)(i)(II)(bb)(BB).
U.S.C. 2(c)(2)(E)(iii)(II).
30 7 U.S.C. 27a(a)(1). An identified banking
product offered by a national bank could become
subject to the CEA if the OCC determines, in
consultation with the CFTC and the Securities and
Exchange Commission, that the product would
meet the definition of a ‘‘swap’’ under the CEA or
a ‘‘security-based swap’’ under Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 and has become known to the trade as
a swap or security-based swap, or otherwise has
been structured as an identified banking product for
the purpose of evading the provisions of the CEA,
the Securities Act of 1933, or the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934. 7 U.S.C. 27a(b).
31 7 U.S.C. 27(b) (citing Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act
§ 206(a)(1) to (5)).
PO 00000
28 See
29 7
Frm 00003
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
41377
banking products from the definition of
‘‘retail forex transaction.’’ Identified
banking products that have embedded
foreign exchange features, for example a
deposit account in which the customer
may deposit funds in one currency and
withdraw funds in another, are not
retail forex transactions.
This section defines several terms by
reference to the CEA, the most
important of which is ‘‘eligible contract
participant.’’ Foreign currency
transactions with eligible contract
participants are not considered retail
forex transactions and are therefore not
subject to this rule. In addition to a
variety of financial entities, certain
governmental entities, businesses, and
individuals may be eligible contract
participants.32
Section 48.3—Prohibited Transactions
This section prohibits a national bank
and its institution-affiliated parties from
engaging in fraudulent conduct in
connection with retail forex
transactions. This section also prohibits
a national bank from acting as a
counterparty to a retail forex transaction
if the national bank or its affiliate
exercises discretion over the customer’s
retail forex account because the OCC
views such self-dealing as
inappropriate.
The OCC received no comments to
this section and adopts it as proposed.
32 The term ‘‘eligible contract participant’’ is
defined at 7 U.S.C. 1a(18), and for purposes most
relevant to this rule generally includes:
(a) A corporation, partnership, proprietorship,
organization, trust, or other entity—
(1) That has total assets exceeding $10,000,000;
(2) The obligations of which under an agreement,
contract, or transaction are guaranteed or otherwise
supported by a letter of credit or keepwell, support,
or other agreement by certain other eligible contract
participants; or
(3) That—
(i) Has a net worth exceeding $1,000,000; and
(ii) Enters into an agreement, contract, or
transaction in connection with the conduct of the
entity’s business or to manage the risk associated
with an asset or liability owned or incurred or
reasonably likely to be owned or incurred by the
entity in the conduct of the entity’s business;
(b) Subject to certain exclusions,
(1) A governmental entity (including the United
States, a State, or a foreign government) or political
subdivision of a governmental entity;
(2) A multinational or supranational
governmental entity; and
(3) An instrumentality, agency, or department of
an entity described in (b)(1) or (2); and
(c) An individual who has amounts invested on
a discretionary basis, the aggregate of which is in
excess of—
(1) $10,000,000; or
(2) $5,000,000 and who enters into the agreement,
contract, or transaction in order to manage the risk
associated with an asset owned or liability incurred,
or reasonably likely to be owned or incurred, by the
individual.
E:\FR\FM\14JYR1.SGM
14JYR1
41378
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 135 / Thursday, July 14, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
wreier-aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with RULES
Section 48.4—Supervisory NonObjection
This section requires a national bank
to obtain a written supervisory nonobjection prior to engaging in a retail
forex business. To obtain such nonobjection, the national bank will have to
provide such information as the OCC
deems necessary to determine that the
national bank would satisfy the
requirements of the rule. This
information will include information
on: Customer due diligence (including
credit evaluations, customer
appropriateness, and ‘‘know your
customer’’ documentation); new
product approvals; haircuts for noncash
margin; and conflicts of interest. In
addition, the national bank must
establish that it has adequate written
policies, procedures, and risk
measurement and management systems
and controls.
National banks engaged in retail forex
transactions as of the effective date of
this rule that promptly request the
OCC’s review of their retail forex
business will have six months, or a
longer period provided by the OCC, to
bring their operations into conformance
with the rule. Under this rule, a national
bank that requests the OCC’s review
within 30 days of the effective date of
the final retail forex rule and submits
such information as the OCC may
request within the timeframe the OCC
provides will be deemed to be operating
its retail forex business pursuant to a
rule or regulation of a Federal regulatory
agency, as required under the CEA, for
such period.33
A national bank need not join a
futures self-regulatory organization as a
condition of conducting a retail forex
business.
The commenter supported the
adoption of this section, and the OCC
adopts it as proposed.
Section 48.5—Application and Closing
Out of Offsetting Long and Short
Positions
This section requires a national bank
to close out offsetting long and short
positions in a retail forex account. The
national bank would have to offset such
positions regardless of whether the
customer has instructed otherwise. The
CFTC concluded that keeping open long
and short positions in a retail forex
customer’s account removes the
opportunity for the customer to profit
on the transactions, increases the fees
paid by the customer, and invites
abuse.34 The OCC agreed with this
33 7
U.S.C. 2(c)(2)(E)(ii)(I).
34 Proposed CFTC Retail Forex Rule, 75 FR at
3287 n.54.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:53 Jul 13, 2011
Jkt 223001
concern in the notice of proposed
rulemaking.
The commenter stated that a customer
should be permitted to provide
instructions with respect to the manner
in which the customer’s retail forex
transaction are offset when: (i) The
customer maintains separate accounts
managed by different advisors; (ii) the
customer maintains separate accounts
using different trading strategies; or (iii)
the customer employs different trading
strategies in one account and applies
certain orders to risk-manage that
exposure. The commenter also sought
clarification that a customer could
provide specific offset instructions in
writing or orally, and that those
instructions can be made on a blanket
basis.
The OCC agrees that a customer
should be able to offset retail forex
transactions in a particular manner, if
he or she so chooses. Paragraph (c) has
been modified to provide that,
notwithstanding the default offset rules
in paragraphs (a) and (b), the national
bank must offset retail forex transactions
pursuant to a customer’s specific
instructions. Blanket instructions are
not sufficient for this purpose, as they
could obviate the default rule. However,
offset instructions need not be given
separately for each pair of orders in
order to be ‘‘specific.’’ Instructions that
apply to sufficiently defined sets of
transactions could be specific enough.
Finally, consistent with the changes to
§ 48.12, retail forex customers may make
offset instructions in writing or orally.
The national bank must create and
maintain a record of each offset
instruction.35
Section 48.6—Disclosure
This section requires a national bank
to provide retail forex customers with a
risk disclosure statement similar to the
one required by the CFTC’s retail forex
rule but tailored to address certain
unique characteristics of retail forex in
national banks. The prescribed risk
disclosure statement would describe the
risks associated with retail forex
transactions.
The commenter agreed with the need
for a robust risk disclosure statement
but suggested that a shorter, clearer,
more direct, and less redundant
statement would be more effective. The
final rule incorporates several changes
to the disclosures to eliminate
redundancies, address ambiguities, and
convey the information more clearly.
The proposal requested comment on
whether the risk disclosure statement
35 See
PO 00000
§ 48.7(a)(6) and (g).
Frm 00004
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
should disclose the percentage of
profitable retail forex accounts.
The commenter said that disclosing
the ratio of profitable to nonprofitable
retail forex accounts is not useful
because those ratios depend on many
factors (including the trading expertise
of customers) and could suggest one
national bank is a more attractive retail
forex counterparty than another.
In its retail forex rule, the CFTC
requires its registrants to disclose to
retail customers the percentage of retail
forex accounts that earned a profit and
the percentage of such accounts that
experienced a loss during each of the
most recent four calendar quarters.36
The CFTC explained that the vast
majority of retail customers who enter
these transactions do so solely for
speculative purposes and that relatively
few of these participants trade
profitably.37 In its final rule, the CFTC
found this requirement appropriate to
protect retail customers from inherent
conflicts embedded in the operations of
the retail over-the-counter forex
industry.38 The OCC agrees with the
CFTC and the final rule requires this
disclosure.
The proposal requested comment on
whether the risk disclosure statement
should include a disclosure that when
a retail customer loses money trading,
the dealer makes money.
The commenter said that this
disclosure is inaccurate because the
bank immediately hedges retail forex
transactions or nets them with similar
transactions and therefore does not
profit from exchange rate fluctuations.
The commenter argued it is more
accurate to inform customers that the
bank may or does mark-up (or markdown) transactions or apply
commission rates to transactions that
will create income for the bank.
The OCC understands that the
economic model of a retail forex
business may be to profit from spreads,
fees, and commissions. Nonetheless,
because a national bank engaging in
retail forex transactions is trading as
principal, by definition, when the retail
forex customer loses money on a retail
forex transaction, the national bank
makes money on that transaction. The
OCC therefore believes that this
disclosure is accurate and helps
potential retail forex customers
understand the nature of retail forex
transactions. Similarly, the CFTC’s retail
forex rule requires a disclosure that
when a retail customer loses money
36 17
CFR 5.5(e)(1).
CFTC Retail Forex Rule, 75 FR at
37 Proposed
3289.
38 Final CFTC Retail Forex Rule, 75 FR at 55412.
E:\FR\FM\14JYR1.SGM
14JYR1
wreier-aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 135 / Thursday, July 14, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
trading, the dealer makes money on
such trades, in addition to any fees,
commissions, or spreads.39 The final
rule includes this disclosure
requirement.
The proposal asked whether it would
be convenient to national banks and
retail forex customers to allow the retail
forex risk disclosure to be combined
with other disclosures that national
banks make to their customers.
The commenter asked the OCC to
confirm that national banks may add
topics to the risk disclosure statement.
The OCC is concerned that the
effectiveness of the disclosure could be
diminished if surrounded by other
topics. Therefore, the final rule requires
the risk disclosure statement to be given
to potential retail forex customers as set
forth in the rule. National banks may
describe and provide additional
information on retail forex transactions
in a separate document.
The commenter further asked the OCC
to confirm that the risk disclosure
statement may be appended to account
opening agreements or forms and that a
single signature by the customer on a
combined account agreement and
disclosure form can be used as long as
the customer is directed to and
acknowledges the risk disclosure
statement immediately prior to the
signature line.
The OCC believes that a separate risk
disclosure document appropriately
highlights the risks in retail forex
transactions and that requiring a
separate signature for the separate risk
disclosure appropriately calls a
potential retail forex customer’s
attention to the risk disclosure
statement. However, a national bank
may attach the risk disclosure to a
related document, such as the account
agreement.
The proposal requested comment on
whether the risk disclosure statement
should include a disclosure of fees that
the national bank charges to retail forex
customers.
The commenter agreed that the
disclosure of fees is appropriate, but
should not include income from
hedging retail forex customers’ positions
or income streams not charged to the
customer. Moreover, the commenter
stated that it is impractical to
numerically state the bid/ask spread
given that it may vary.
The final rule, like the proposed rule,
does not require national banks to
disclose income streams not charged to
the retail forex customer. However, a
national bank must do more than simply
describe the means by which it earns
39 17
CFR 5.5(b).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:53 Jul 13, 2011
Jkt 223001
revenue. To the extent practical, it must
quantify the fees, charges, spreads, or
commissions that the national bank may
impose on the retail forex customer in
connection with the customer’s retail
forex account or a retail forex
transaction.40 The OCC further believes
that disclosure of the bid/ask spread is
possible in a variety of ways. If a
national bank bases its prices off of the
prices provided by a third party, then
the national bank may disclose the use
of the third party’s pricing and the
markup charged to retail forex
customers. Alternatively, the national
bank may disclose the bid/ask spread by
quoting both the bid and ask prices to
retail forex customers prior to entering
into a retail forex transaction. These
quotes may be provided as part of an
electronic trading platform or, after a
retail forex customer calls the national
bank for a retail forex transaction, by
providing both a bid and ask price for
the transaction.
The commenter read the disclosure to
suggest that the national bank cannot
seek to recover losses not covered by a
customer’s margin account via an
appropriate dispute resolution forum
and asked the OCC to confirm that this
was not the case.
Section 48.9(d)(4) requires a national
bank, in the event that a retail forex
customer’s margin falls below the
amount needed to satisfy the margin
requirement to either: (1) Collect
sufficient margin from the retail forex
customer; or (2) liquidate the retail forex
customer’s retail forex transactions. The
final rule does not forbid a national
bank from seeking to recover a
deficiency from a retail forex customer
in an appropriate venue. The disclosure
has been revised to make this fact clear.
Finally, the commenter said that the
disclosure regarding the availability of
FDIC-insurance for retail forex
transactions should be clarified.
The disclosure requires a national
bank to state that retail forex
transactions are not FDIC-insured. The
commenter agreed with that statement.
It noted, however, that margin funds
may be insured deposits. The FDICinsured status of funds held in a retail
forex margin account will depend on
whether such funds are held in a
manner that meets the requirements of
the Federal Deposit Insurance Act and
its implementing regulations. National
banks may accurately disclose the
availability of FDIC insurance for retail
forex margin accounts in a separate
document as permitted by law.
40 The final rule clarifies that a national bank
must disclose spreads in addition to fees,
commissions, and charges.
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
41379
Section 48.7—Recordkeeping
This section specifies which
documents and records that a national
bank engaged in retail forex transactions
must retain for examination by the OCC.
This section also prescribes document
maintenance standards. The OCC notes
that records may be kept electronically
as permitted under the Electronic
Signatures in Global and National
Commerce Act.41
The OCC received no comments on
this section. Recordkeeping
requirements found in § 48.13(a)(3) of
the proposed rule were moved into this
section to centralize recordkeeping
requirements in one section.
Furthermore, the recordkeeping
requirements have been modified to
accommodate oral orders and offset
instructions. A national bank must
create an audio recording of oral orders
and offset instructions.
Section 48.8—Capital Requirements
This section requires that a national
bank that offers or enters into retail
forex transactions must be ‘‘well
capitalized’’ as defined in the OCC’s
prompt corrective action regulation.42 In
addition, a national bank must continue
to hold capital against retail forex
transactions as provided in the OCC’s
capital regulation.43 This rule does not
amend the OCC’s prompt corrective
action regulation or capital regulation.
The proposed rule contained a
provision allowing the OCC to exempt
a national bank from the wellcapitalized requirement. This provision
has been removed in light of the general
reservation of authority in § 48.17.
Section 48.9—Margin Requirements
Paragraph (a) requires a national bank
that engages in retail forex transactions,
in advance of any such transaction, to
collect from the retail forex customer
margin equal to at least 2 percent of the
notional value of the retail forex
transaction if the transaction is in a
major currency pair and at least 5
percent of the notional value of the
retail forex transaction otherwise. These
margin requirements are identical to the
requirements imposed by the CFTC’s
retail forex rule.
The proposal requested comments on
whether it should define the major
currencies in the final rule but did not
receive any. The final rule adopts the
proposal’s approach to identifying the
major currencies.
A major currency pair is a currency
pair with two major currencies. The
41 15
U.S.C. 7001(d).
CFR part 6.
43 12 CFR part 3.
42 12
E:\FR\FM\14JYR1.SGM
14JYR1
41380
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 135 / Thursday, July 14, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
wreier-aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with RULES
major currencies currently are the U.S.
Dollar (USD), Canadian Dollar (CAD),
Euro (EUR), United Kingdom Pound
(GBP), Japanese Yen (JPY), Swiss Franc
(CHF), New Zealand Dollar (NZD),
Australian Dollar (AUD), Swedish
Kronor (SEK), Danish Kroner (DKK),
and Norwegian Krone (NOK).44 An
evolving market could change the major
currencies, so the OCC is not proposing
to define the term ‘‘major currency,’’ but
rather expects that national banks will
obtain an interpretive letter from the
OCC prior to treating any currency other
than those listed above as a ‘‘major
currency.’’ 45
For retail forex transactions, margin
protects the retail forex customer from
the risks related to trading with
excessive leverage. The volatility of the
foreign currency markets exposes retail
forex customers to substantial risk of
loss. High leverage ratios can
significantly increase a customer’s
losses and gains. Even a small move
against a customer’s position can result
in a substantial loss. Even with required
margin, losses can exceed the margin
posted and, if the account is not closed
out, and, depending on the specific
circumstances, the customer could be
liable for additional losses. Given the
risks that are inherent in the trading of
retail forex transactions by retail
customers, the only funds that should
be invested in such transactions are
those that the customer can afford to
lose.
Prior to the CFTC’s rule, nonbank
dealers routinely permitted customers to
trade with 1 percent margin (leverage of
100:1) and sometimes with as little as
0.25 percent margin (leverage of 400:1).
When the CFTC proposed its retail forex
rule in January 2010, it proposed a
margin requirement of 10 percent
(leverage of 10:1). In response to
comments, the CFTC reduced the
required margin in the final rule to 2
percent (leverage of 50:1) for trades
involving major currencies and 5
percent (leverage of 20:1) for trades
involving non-major currencies.
The proposal requested comment on
whether these margin requirements
were appropriate to protect retail forex
customers.
The commenter did not object to the
amount of margin required. However,
the commenter suggested that the
44 See National Futures Association, Forex
Transactions: A Regulatory Guide 17 (Feb. 2011);
Federal Reserve Bank of New York, Survey of North
American Foreign Exchange Volume tbl. 3e (Jan.
2011); Bank for International Settlements, Report on
Global Foreign Exchange Market Activity in 2010 at
15 tbl. B.6 (Dec. 2010).
45 The Final CFTC Retail Forex Rule similarly
does not define ‘‘major currency.’’
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:53 Jul 13, 2011
Jkt 223001
margin required by this paragraph
should be initial margin rather than
maintenance margin. The commenter
also suggested that national banks be
allowed to set maintenance margin
levels as a matter of the banks’ credit
and risk policies in a manner that
balances (i) protecting customers from a
forced close-put of their positions as
soon as an adverse market move erodes
margin under the 2 or 5 percent
minimum level with (ii) the need to
promptly collect margin and close out
positions when a customer fails to meet
a margin call. The commenter also
suggested that customers should have
some reasonable time to meet margin
calls before they are deemed to have
defaulted and face a forced liquidation
of their positions.
Subject to reasonable collection times
as described below, a national bank
must ensure that there is always
sufficient margin in a retail forex
customer’s margin account for the
customer’s open retail forex
transactions. If the amount of margin in
a retail forex customer’s margin account
is insufficient to meet the requirements
of paragraph (a), then § 48.9(d)(4)
requires the national bank to make a
margin call to replenish the margin
account to an acceptable level and, if
the customer does not comply with the
margin call, to liquidate the retail forex
customer’s retail forex transactions.
Retail forex customers should have a
reasonable amount of time to post
required margin for retail forex
transactions. Market practice is for retail
forex counterparties to make margin
calls at the close of trading on a trading
day based on margin levels at the end
of that day or at the open of trading on
the next trading day based on margin
levels at the end of that prior day. If the
retail forex customer does not post
sufficient margin by the end of the next
close of trading, then the retail forex
counterparty liquidates the customer’s
retail forex account. In other words, by
the close of business on a given trading
day, the margin account must be
sufficient to meet the margin
requirements as at the end of the prior
trading day.
Paragraph (b) specifies the acceptable
forms of margin that customers may
post. National banks must establish
policies and procedures providing for
haircuts for noncash margin collected
from customers and must review these
haircuts annually. It may be prudent for
national banks to review and modify the
size of the haircuts more frequently. The
OCC requested comment on whether the
final rule should specify haircuts for
noncash margin. The OCC received no
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
comments on this paragraph and adopts
this paragraph as proposed.
Paragraph (c) requires a national bank
to hold each retail forex customer’s
retail forex transaction margin in a
separate account. This paragraph is
designed to work with the prohibition
on set-off in paragraph (e), so that a
national bank may not have an account
agreement that treats all of a retail forex
customer’s assets held by a bank as
margin for retail forex transactions.
The commenter requested
clarification that this paragraph allows
national banks to place margin into an
omnibus or commingled account for
operational convenience, provided that
the bank keeps records of each
customer’s margin balance.
A national bank may place margin
collected from retail forex customers
into an omnibus or commingled account
if the bank keeps records of each retail
forex customer’s margin balance. A
‘‘separate account’’ is one separate from
the retail forex customer’s other
accounts at the bank. For example,
margin for retail forex transactions
cannot be held in a retail forex
customer’s savings account. Funds in a
savings account pledged as retail forex
margin must be transferred to a separate
margin account, which could be an
individual or an omnibus margin
account. The final rule contains slightly
modified language to clarify this intent.
The FDIC-insured status of funds held
in an omnibus account will depend on
whether such funds are held in a
manner that meets the requirements of
the Federal Deposit Insurance Act and
its implementing regulations.
Paragraph (d) requires a national bank
to collect additional margin from the
customer or to liquidate the customer’s
position if the amount of margin held by
the national bank fails to meet the
requirements of paragraph (a). The
proposed rule would have required the
national bank to mark the customer’s
open retail forex positions and the value
of the customer’s margin to the market
daily to ensure that a retail forex
customer does not accumulate
substantial losses not covered by
margin.
The proposal requested comment on
how frequently retail forex customers’
margin accounts should be marked to
market.
The commenter asked that the final
rules permit marking to market more
frequently than daily if the national
bank’s systems and customer
agreements permit. The final rule, like
the proposed rule, requires marking to
market at least once per day. Nothing in
paragraph (d) forbids a more frequent
schedule.
E:\FR\FM\14JYR1.SGM
14JYR1
wreier-aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 135 / Thursday, July 14, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
Paragraph (e) prohibits a national
bank from applying a retail forex
customer’s retail forex obligations
against any asset or liability of the retail
forex customer other than money or
property pledged as margin.46 A
national bank’s relationship with a retail
forex customer may evolve out of a prior
relationship of providing financial
services or may evolve into such a
relationship. Thus, it is more likely that
a national bank acting as a retail forex
counterparty will hold other assets or
liabilities of a retail forex customer, for
example a deposit account or mortgage,
than a retail forex dealer regulated by
the CFTC. The OCC believes that it is
inappropriate to allow a national bank
to leave trades open and allow
additional obligations to accrue that can
be applied against a retail forex
customer’s other assets or liabilities
held by the national bank. However,
should a retail forex customer’s retail
forex obligations exceed the amount of
margin he or she has pledged, this rule
does not forbid a national bank from
seeking to recover the deficiency in an
appropriate forum, such as a court of
law. Paragraph (e) does not apply to
debts a retail forex customer owes to a
national bank as recognized in a
judgment of a court of competent
jurisdiction.
The commenter suggested that retail
forex customers should be able to
pledge assets other than those held in
the customer’s margin account. For
example, a customer could nominate a
deposit account as containing margin
for its retail forex transactions.
Nothing in this rule prevents retail
forex customers from pledging other
assets they have at the bank as margin
for retail forex transactions. However,
once those assets are pledged as margin,
the national bank must transfer them to
the separate margin account. For
example, if a retail forex customer
pledges $500 in her checking account as
margin, then the bank must deduct $500
from the checking account and place
$500 in the margin account. The OCC
believes this transfer appropriately
alerts retail forex customers to the
nature of the pledge. A national bank
may not evade this requirement by
merely taking a security interest in
assets pledged as margin: pledged assets
must be placed in a separate margin
account.
46 The
final rule clarifies that the prohibition on
setting off retail forex ‘‘losses’’ in the proposed rule
was meant to include costs related to retail forex
transactions, such as fees, spreads, charges, and
commissions.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:53 Jul 13, 2011
Jkt 223001
Section 48.10—Required Reporting to
Customers
This section requires a national bank
engaging in retail forex transactions to
provide each retail forex customer a
monthly statement and confirmation
statements.
The proposal sought comment on
whether this section provides for
statements that would be useful and
meaningful to retail forex customers or
whether other information would be
more appropriate.
The commenter sought clarification
that the statements may be provided
electronically, and also suggested that
retail forex customers would be better
served with continuous online access to
account information rather than
monthly statements.
The OCC encourages national banks
to provide real-time, continuous access
to account information. This rule does
not prevent national banks from doing
so. However, the OCC believes it is
valuable to require national banks to
provide retail forex account information
to retail forex customers at least once
per month. Monthly statements may be
provided electronically as permitted
under the Electronic Signatures in
Global and National Commerce Act.47
Section 48.11—Unlawful
Representations
This section prohibits a national bank
and its institution-affiliated parties from
representing that the Federal
government, the OCC, or any other
Federal agency has sponsored,
recommended, or approved retail forex
transactions or products in any way.
This section also prohibits a national
bank from implying or representing that
it will guarantee against or limit retail
forex customer losses or not collect
margin as required by § 48.9. This
section does not prohibit a national
bank from sharing in a loss resulting
from error or mishandling of an order.
Guaranties entered into prior to
effectiveness of the prohibition would
only be affected if an attempt is made
to extend, modify, or renew them. This
section also does not prohibit a national
bank from hedging or otherwise
mitigating its own exposure to retail
forex transactions or any other foreign
exchange risk.
The OCC received no comments to
this section and adopts it as proposed.
Section 48.12—Authorization to Trade
The proposed rule required national
banks to have specific written
authorization from a retail forex
PO 00000
47 15
U.S.C. 7001(c).
Frm 00007
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
41381
customer before effecting a retail forex
transaction.
The commenter said that requiring
specific written authorization from a
retail forex customer before effecting a
retail forex transaction for that customer
would be burdensome and detrimental
to the customer’s interests, if, for
example, the customer cannot convey
written instructions because of technical
difficulties.
The OCC agrees with this concern and
further notes that the CFTC’s retail forex
rule does not require written
authorization for each retail forex
transaction. The final rule requires a
national bank to obtain a retail forex
customer’s specific authorization
(written or oral) to effect a particular
trade. National banks must keep records
of authorizations to trade pursuant to
this rule.
Section 48.13—Trading and
Operational Standards
This section largely follows the
trading standards of the CFTC’s retail
forex rule, which were developed to
prevent some of the deceptive or unfair
practices identified by the CFTC and the
National Futures Association.
Under paragraph (a), a national bank
engaging in retail forex transactions is
required to establish and enforce
internal rules, procedures, and controls
(1) to prevent front running, a practice
in which transactions in accounts of the
national bank or its related persons are
executed before a similar customer
order; and (2) to establish settlement
prices fairly and objectively.
The commenter requested
clarification that the prohibition on
front running applies only when the
person entering orders for the bank’s
account or the account of related
persons has knowledge of unexecuted
retail customer orders, and that a
national bank may comply with this
provision by erecting a firewall between
the retail forex order book and other
forex trading desks.
The final rule requires national banks
to establish reasonable policies,
procedures, and controls to address
front running. This provision is
designed to prevent the national banks
from unfairly taking advantage of
information they gain from customer
trades. Effective firewalls and
information barriers are reasonable
policies, procedures, and controls to
ensure that a national bank does not
take unfair advantage of its retail forex
customers. The final rule clarifies
paragraph (a) accordingly.
Paragraph (b) prohibits a national
bank engaging in retail forex
transactions from disclosing that it
E:\FR\FM\14JYR1.SGM
14JYR1
wreier-aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with RULES
41382
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 135 / Thursday, July 14, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
holds another person’s order unless
disclosure is necessary for execution or
is made at the OCC’s request. The OCC
received no comments on this paragraph
and adopts this paragraph as proposed.
Paragraph (c) ensures that related
persons of another retail forex
counterparty do not open accounts with
a national bank without the knowledge
and authorization of the account
surveillance personnel of the other retail
forex counterparty with which they are
affiliated. Similarly, paragraph (d)
ensures that related persons of a
national bank do not open accounts
with other retail forex counterparties
without the knowledge and
authorization of the account
surveillance personnel of the national
bank with which they are affiliated.
The commenter requested
confirmation that national banks may
rely on a representation of potential
customers that they are not affiliated
with a retail forex counterparty.
Paragraph (c) prohibits a national bank
from knowingly handling the retail forex
account of a related person of a retail
forex counterparty. To the extent
reasonable, national banks may rely on
representations of potential retail forex
customers. If, however, a national bank
has actual knowledge that a retail forex
customer is a related person of a retail
forex counterparty, then no
representation by the customer will
allow the bank to handle that retail
forex account. A national bank should
inquire as to whether a potential retail
forex customer is related to a retail forex
counterparty to avoid violating
paragraph (c) through willful ignorance.
The commenter also requested
clarification that these paragraphs apply
only to employees of firms that offer
retail forex transactions, and, in the case
of banks, only employees of the retail
forex business and not any employee of
the bank that offers retail forex
transactions. The OCC agrees that the
prohibitions in paragraph (c) and (d)
should only apply to employees
working in the retail forex business;
paragraphs (c) and (d) are designed to
prevent evasion of the prohibition
against front running. The final rule
clarifies this point.
Paragraph (e) prohibits a national
bank engaging in retail forex
transactions from (1) entering a retail
forex transaction to be executed at a
price that is not at or near prices at
which other retail forex customers have
executed materially similar transactions
with the national bank during the same
time period, (2) changing prices after
confirmation, (3) providing a retail forex
customer with a new bid price that is
higher (or lower) than previously
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:53 Jul 13, 2011
Jkt 223001
provided without providing a new ask
price that is similarly higher (or lower)
as well, and (4) establishing a new
position for a retail forex customer
(except to offset an existing position) if
the national bank holds one or more
outstanding orders of other retail forex
customers for the same currency pair at
a comparable price.
Paragraph (e)(3) does not prevent a
national bank from changing the bid or
ask prices of a retail forex transaction to
respond to market events. The OCC
understands that market practice among
CFTC-registrants is not to offer requotes
but to simply reject orders and advise
customers they may submit a new order
(which the dealer may or may not
accept). Similarly, a national bank may
reject an order and advise customers
that they may submit a new order.
The proposal sought comment on
whether paragraph (e)(3) appropriately
protected retail forex customers or
whether a prohibition on re-quoting
would be simpler.
The commenter argued that the
prohibition on re-quoting in paragraph
(e)(3) is overly broad and should permit
new bids or offers to reflect updated
spreads. In the alternative, the
commenter suggested prohibiting requoting and requiring that, in the event
an order is not confirmed, the customer
must submit a new order at the thencurrently displayed price. As stated
above, rather than allowing requotes, a
national bank may reject orders and
request that customers submit a new
order. Paragraph (e)(3) is consistent with
the CFTC’s retail forex rule and the OCC
adopts it as proposed.
Paragraph (e)(4) requires a national
bank engaging in retail forex
transactions to execute similar orders in
the order they are received. The
prohibition prevents a national bank
from offering preferred execution to
some of its retail forex customers but
not others.
forex account. Generally, a national
bank must provide retail forex
customers 30 days’ prior notice before
transferring or assigning their account.
Affected customers may then instruct
the national bank to transfer the account
to an institution of their choosing or
liquidate the account. There are three
exceptions to the above notice
requirement: a transfer in connection
with the receivership or conservatorship
under the Federal Deposit Insurance
Act; a transfer pursuant to a retail forex
customer’s specific request; and a
transfer otherwise allowed by applicable
law. A national bank that is the
transferee of retail forex accounts must
generally provide the transferred
customers with the risk disclosure
statement of § 48.6 and obtain each
affected customer’s written
acknowledgement within 60 days.
The OCC received no comments to
this section and adopts it as proposed.
Section 48.14—Supervision
This section imposes on a national
bank and its agents, officers, and
employees a duty to supervise
subordinates with responsibility for
retail forex transactions to ensure
compliance with the OCC’s retail forex
rule.
The proposal requested comment on
whether this section imposed
requirements not already encompassed
by safety and soundness standards.
Having received no comments to this
section, the OCC adopts it as proposed.
V. Regulatory Analysis
Section 48.15—Notice of Transfers
This section describes the
requirements for transferring a retail
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Section 48.16—Customer Dispute
Resolution
This section imposes limitations on
how a national bank may handle
disputes arising out of a retail forex
transaction. For example, this section
would restrict a national bank’s ability
to require mandatory arbitration for
such disputes.
The OCC received no comments to
this section and adopts is as proposed.
Section 48.17—Reservation of Authority
This section allows the OCC to
modify certain requirements of this rule
consistent with safety and soundness
and the protection of retail forex
customers. The OCC understands the
need for flexibility as foreign exchange
products or foreign exchange trading
procedures develop and to ensure that
such products or trading procedures are
subject to appropriate customer
protection and safety and soundness
standards.
A. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA),
5 U.S.C. 601 et seq., generally requires
an agency that is issuing a proposed rule
to prepare and make available for public
comment an initial regulatory flexibility
analysis that describes the impact of the
proposed rule on small entities. The
RFA provides that an agency is not
required to prepare and publish an
initial regulatory flexibility analysis if
the agency certifies that the proposed
rule will not, if promulgated as a final
rule, have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small
entities. Under regulations issued by the
E:\FR\FM\14JYR1.SGM
14JYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 135 / Thursday, July 14, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
wreier-aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with RULES
Small Business Administration, a small
entity includes a commercial bank with
assets of $175 million or less.48 This
rule as proposed would impose
recordkeeping and disclosure
requirements on banks, including small
banks, which engage in retail forex
transactions with their customers.
Pursuant to section 605(b) of the RFA,
the OCC certified that this rule, as
proposed, would not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of the small entities it
supervises. Accordingly, a regulatory
flexibility analysis was not required. In
making this determination, the OCC
estimated that there were no small
banking organizations currently
engaging in retail forex transactions
with their customers. Therefore, the
OCC estimates that no small banking
organizations under its supervision
would be affected by this final rule.
B. Paperwork Reduction Act
In conjunction with the Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM),49 the
OCC submitted the information
collection requirements contained
therein to OMB for review under the
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA). In
response, the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) filed comments with the
OCC in accordance with 5 CFR
1320.11(c). The comments indicated
that OMB was withholding approval at
that time. The Agencies were directed to
examine public comment in response to
the NPRM and include in the
supporting statement of the information
collection request (ICR) to be filed at the
final rule stage a description of how the
agency has responded to any public
comments on the ICR, including
comments maximizing the practical
utility of the collection and minimizing
the burden. The OCC received one
comment addressing the substance and/
or method of the disclosure and
reporting requirements contained in the
proposed rule. This comment and the
OCC’s response to the comment is
included in the preamble discussion
and in a revised Supporting Statement
submitted to OMB.
The information collection
requirements contained in this final rule
have been submitted by the OCC to
OMB for review and approval under 44
U.S.C. 3506 and 5 CFR part 1320. In
accordance with section 3512 of the
PRA, 44 U.S.C. 3512, the OCC may not
conduct or sponsor, and a respondent is
not required to respond to, an
48 Small Business Administration regulations
define ‘‘small entities’’ to include banks with a fourquarter average of total assets of $175 million or
less. 13 CFR 121.201.
49 76 FR 22633 (April 22, 2011).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:53 Jul 13, 2011
Jkt 223001
information collection unless it displays
a currently valid OMB control number.
The information collection requirements
are found in §§ 48.4–48.7, 48.9–48.10,
48.13, and 48.15–48.16.
Comments continue to be invited on:
(a) Whether the collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the OCC’s functions,
including whether the information has
practical utility;
(b) The accuracy of the estimate of the
burden of the information collection,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
(c) Ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to
be collected;
(d) Ways to minimize the burden of
information collection on respondents,
including through the use of automated
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology; and
(e) Estimates of capital or startup costs
and costs of operation, maintenance,
and purchase of services to provide
information.
All comments will become a matter of
public record. Comments should be
addressed to: Communications Division,
Office of the Comptroller of the
Currency, Public Information Room,
Mailstop 2–3, Attention: 1557–0250, 250
E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20219. In
addition, comments may be sent by fax
to 202–874–5274, or by electronic mail
to regs.comments@occ.treas.gov. You
may personally inspect and photocopy
comments at the OCC, 250 E Street,
SW., Washington, DC 20219. For
security reasons, the OCC requires that
visitors make an appointment to inspect
comments. You may do so by calling
202–874–4700. Upon arrival, visitors
will be required to present valid
government-issued photo identification
and submit to security screening in
order to inspect and photocopy
comments.
Additionally, you should send a copy
of your comments to the OMB Desk
Officer, by mail to U.S. Office of
Management and Budget, 725 17th
Street, NW., 10235, Washington, DC
20503, or by fax to 202–395–6974.
Proposed Information Collection
Title of Information Collection: Retail
Foreign Exchange Transactions.
Frequency of Response: On occasion.
Affected Public: Businesses or other
for-profit.
Respondents: National banks and
Federal branches and agencies of foreign
banks.
Reporting Requirements
The reporting requirements in § 48.4
require that, prior to initiating a retail
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
41383
forex business, a national bank provide
the OCC with prior notice and obtain a
written supervisory non-objection letter.
In order to obtain a supervisory nonobjection letter, a national bank must
have written policies and procedures
and risk measurement and management
systems and controls in place to ensure
that retail forex transactions are
conducted in a safe and sound manner.
The national bank must also provide
other information required by the OCC,
such as documentation of customer due
diligence, new product approvals, and
haircuts applied to noncash margins. A
national bank already engaging in a
retail forex business may continue to do
so, provided it requests an extension of
time.
Disclosure Requirements
Section 48.5, regarding the
application and closing out of offsetting
long and short positions, requires a
national bank to promptly provide the
customer with a statement reflecting the
financial result of the transactions and
the name of the introducing broker to
the account. The customer provides
specific written instructions on how the
offsetting transaction should be applied.
Section 48.6 requires that a national
bank furnish a retail forex customer
with a written disclosure before opening
an account that will engage in retail
forex transactions for a retail forex
customer and receive an
acknowledgment from the customer that
it was received and understood. It also
requires the disclosure by a national
bank of its fees and other charges and
its profitable accounts ratio.
Section 48.10 requires a national bank
to issue monthly statements to each
retail forex customer and to send
confirmation statements following
transactions.
Section 48.13(b) allows disclosure by
a national bank that an order of another
person is being held by them only when
necessary to the effective execution of
the order or when the disclosure is
requested by the OCC. Section 48.13(c)
prohibits a national bank engaging in
retail forex transactions from knowingly
handling the account of any related
person of another retail forex
counterparty unless it receives proper
written authorization, promptly
prepares a written record of the order,
and transmits to the counterparty copies
all statements and written records.
Section 48.13(d) prohibits a related
person of a national bank engaging in
forex transactions from having an
account with another retail forex
counterparty unless the counterparty
receives proper written authorization
and transmits copies of all statements
E:\FR\FM\14JYR1.SGM
14JYR1
41384
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 135 / Thursday, July 14, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
and written records for the related
person’s retail forex accounts to the
national bank.
Section 48.15 requires a national bank
to provide a retail forex customer with
30 days’ prior notice of any assignment
of any position or transfer of any
account of the retail forex customer. It
also requires a national bank to which
retail forex accounts or positions are
assigned or transferred to provide the
affected customers with risk disclosure
statements and forms of
acknowledgment and receive the signed
acknowledgments within 60 days.
The customer dispute resolution
provisions in § 48.16 requires certain
endorsements, acknowledgments, and
signature language. Section 48.16 also
requires that within 10 days after receipt
of notice from the retail forex customer
that the customer intends to submit a
claim to arbitration, the national bank
provides to the customer a list of
persons qualified in the dispute
resolution, and that the customer must
notify the national bank of the person
selected within 45 days of receipt of
such list.
wreier-aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with RULES
Policies and Procedures; Recordkeeping
Sections 48.7 and 48.13(a) require that
a national bank engaging in retail forex
transactions keep full, complete, and
systematic records and establish and
implement internal rules, procedures,
and controls. Section 48.7 also requires
that a national bank keep account,
financial ledger, transaction and daily
records; price logs; records of methods
used to determine bids or asked prices;
memorandum orders; post-execution
allocation of bunched orders; records
regarding its ratio of profitable accounts
and possible violations of law; records
for noncash margin; order tickets; and
monthly statements and confirmations.
Section 48.9 requires policies and
procedures for haircuts for noncash
margin collected under the rule’s
margin requirements and annual
evaluations and modifications of the
haircuts.
1532, requires that an agency prepare a
budgetary impact statement before
promulgating any rule likely to result in
a Federal mandate that may result in the
expenditure by State, local, and tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100 million or more
in any one year. If a budgetary impact
statement is required, section 205 of the
Unfunded Mandates Act also requires
an agency to identify and consider a
reasonable number of regulatory
alternatives before promulgating a rule.
The OCC has determined that this rule
will not result in expenditures by State,
local, and tribal governments, or by the
private sector, of $100 million or more
in any one year.50 Accordingly, this
final rule is not subject to section 202
of the Unfunded Mandates Act.
D. Effective Date Under the
Administrative Procedures Act
This final rule takes effect on July 15,
2011. 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(1) requires
publication of a substantive rule not less
than 30 days before its effective date,
except in cases in which the rule grants
or recognizes an exemption or relieves
a restriction. Section 2(c)(2)(E)(ii) of the
CEA would prohibit national banks
from engaging in retail forex
transactions unless this final rule
becomes effective on July 16, 2011. This
final rule would relieve that restriction
and allow national banks to continue to
engage in retail forex transactions
without delay. Furthermore, under 5
U.S.C. 553(d)(3), an agency may find
good cause to publish a rule less than
30 days before its effective date. The
OCC finds such good cause, as the 30day delayed effective date is
unnecessary under the provisions of the
final rule. In § 48.4(c) of the final rule,
the OCC allows national banks a 30-day
grace period to inform the OCC of its
retail forex activity, along with up to a
six-month window to comply with the
provisions of the retail forex rule.
Estimated PRA Burden
Estimated Number of Respondents: 42
national banks; 3 service providers.
Total Reporting Burden: 672 hours.
Total Disclosure Burden: 54,166
hours.
Total Recordkeeping Burden: 12,416
hours.
Total Annual Burden: 67,254 hours.
E. Effective Date Under the CDRI Act
The Riegle Community Development
and Regulatory Improvement Act of
1994 (CDRI Act), 12 U.S.C. 4801 et seq.,
provides that new regulations that
impose additional reporting or
disclosure requirements on insured
depository institutions do not take effect
until the first day of a calendar quarter
after the regulation is published, unless
the agency determines there is good
cause for the regulation to become
C. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995
Section 202 of the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995
(Unfunded Mandates Act), 2 U.S.C.
50 In particular, the OCC notes that forex
transactions between national banks and
governmental entities are not retail forex
transactions subject to this rule, because
governmental entities are eligible contract
participants. See 7 U.S.C. 1a(18)(A)(vii).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:53 Jul 13, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
effective at an earlier date. The OCC
finds good cause that this final rule
should become effective on July 15,
2011, as it would be in the public
interest to require the disclosure and
consumer protection provisions in this
rule to take effect at this earlier date. If
the rule did not become effective until
October 1, 2011, then national banks
would not be able to provide retail forex
transactions to customers to meet their
financial needs.
List of Subjects in 12 CFR Part 48
Banks, Consumer protection,
Definitions, Federal branches and
agencies, Foreign currencies, Foreign
exchange, National banks, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements.
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, part 48 to Title 12, Chapter I
of the Code of Federal Regulations is
added to read as follows:
PART 48—RETAIL FOREIGN
EXCHANGE TRANSACTIONS
Sec.
48.1
48.2
48.3
48.4
48.5
Authority, purpose, and scope.
Definitions.
Prohibited transactions.
Supervisory non-objection.
Application and closing out of
offsetting long and short positions.
48.6 Disclosure.
48.7 Recordkeeping.
48.8 Capital requirements.
48.9 Margin requirements.
48.10 Required reporting to customers.
48.11 Unlawful representations.
48.12 Authorization to trade.
48.13 Trading and operational standards.
48.14 Supervision.
48.15 Notice of transfers.
48.16 Customer dispute resolution.
48.17 Reservation of authority.
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 27 et seq.; 12 U.S.C.
1 et seq., 24, 93a, 161, 1813(q), 1818, 1831o,
3102, 3106a, 3108.
§ 48.1
Authority, purpose, and scope.
(a) Authority. A national bank may
engage in retail foreign exchange
transactions. A national bank engaging
in such transactions must comply with
the requirements of this part.
(b) Purpose. This part establishes
rules applicable to retail foreign
exchange transactions engaged in by
national banks and applies on or after
the effective date.
(c) Scope. Except as provided in
paragraph (d) of this section, this part
applies to national banks.
(d) International applicability.
Sections 48.3 and 48.5 to 48.16 do not
apply to retail foreign exchange
transactions between a foreign branch of
a national bank and a non-U.S.
customer. With respect to those
transactions, the foreign branch remains
E:\FR\FM\14JYR1.SGM
14JYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 135 / Thursday, July 14, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
subject to any disclosure,
recordkeeping, capital, margin,
reporting, business conduct,
documentation, and other requirements
of foreign law applicable to the branch.
wreier-aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with RULES
§ 48.2
Definitions.
In addition to the definitions in this
section, for purposes of this part, the
following terms have the same meaning
as in the Commodity Exchange Act:
‘‘Affiliated person of a futures
commission merchant’’; ‘‘associated
person’’; ‘‘contract of sale’’;
‘‘commodity’’; ‘‘eligible contract
participant’’; ‘‘futures commission
merchant’’; ‘‘future delivery’’; ‘‘option’’;
‘‘security’’; and ‘‘security futures
product’’.
Affiliate has the same meaning as in
section 2(k) of the Bank Holding
Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C.
1841(k)).
Commodity Exchange Act means the
Commodity Exchange Act (7 U.S.C. 1 et
seq.).
Forex means foreign exchange.
Identified banking product has the
same meaning as in section 401(b) of the
Legal Certainty for Bank Products Act of
2000 (7 U.S.C. 27(b)).
Institution-affiliated party or IAP has
the same meaning as in section 3(u)(1),
(2), or (3) of the Federal Deposit
Insurance Act (12 U.S.C. 1813(u)(1), (2),
or (3)).
Introducing broker means any person
that solicits or accepts orders from a
retail forex customer in connection with
retail forex transactions.
National bank means:
(1) A national bank;
(2) A Federal branch or agency of a
foreign bank, each as defined in 12
U.S.C. 3101; and
(3) An operating subsidiary of a
national bank or an operating subsidiary
of a Federal branch or agency of a
foreign bank.
Related person, when used in
reference to a retail forex counterparty,
means:
(1) Any general partner, officer,
director, or owner of 10 percent or more
of the capital stock of the retail forex
counterparty;
(2) An associated person or employee
of the retail forex counterparty, if the
retail forex counterparty is not a
national bank;
(3) An IAP of the retail forex
counterparty, if the retail forex
counterparty is a national bank; and
(4) A relative or spouse of any of the
foregoing persons, or a relative of such
spouse, who shares the same home as
any of the foregoing persons.
Retail foreign exchange dealer means
any person other than a retail forex
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:53 Jul 13, 2011
Jkt 223001
customer that is, or that offers to be, the
counterparty to a retail forex
transaction, except for a person
described in item (aa), (bb), (cc)(AA),
(dd), or (ff) of section 2(c)(2)(B)(i)(II) of
the Commodity Exchange Act (7 U.S.C.
2(c)(2)(B)(i)(II)).
Retail forex account means the
account of a retail forex customer,
established with a national bank, in
which retail forex transactions with the
national bank as counterparty are
undertaken, or the account of a retail
forex customer that is established in
order to enter into such transactions.
Retail forex account agreement means
the contractual agreement between a
national bank and a retail forex
customer that contains the terms
governing the customer’s retail forex
account with the national bank.
Retail forex business means engaging
in one or more retail forex transactions
with the intent to derive income from
those transactions, either directly or
indirectly.
Retail forex counterparty includes, as
appropriate:
(1) A national bank;
(2) A retail foreign exchange dealer;
(3) A futures commission merchant;
and
(4) An affiliated person of a futures
commission merchant.
Retail forex customer means a
customer that is not an eligible contract
participant, acting on his, her, or its
own behalf and engaging in retail forex
transactions.
Retail forex obligation means an
obligation of a retail forex customer
with respect to a retail forex transaction,
including trading losses, fees, spreads,
charges, and commissions.
Retail forex proprietary account
means: A retail forex account carried on
the books of a national bank for one of
the following persons; a retail forex
account of which 10 percent or more is
owned by one of the following persons;
or a retail forex account of which an
aggregate of 10 percent or more of which
is owned by more than one of the
following persons:
(1) The national bank;
(2) An officer, director, or owner of 10
percent or more of the capital stock of
the national bank; or
(3) An employee of the national bank,
whose duties include:
(i) The management of the national
bank’s business;
(ii) The handling of the national
bank’s retail forex transactions;
(iii) The keeping of records, including
without limitation the software used to
make or maintain those records,
pertaining to the national bank’s retail
forex transactions; or
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
41385
(iv) The signing or co-signing of
checks or drafts on behalf of the
national bank;
(4) A spouse or minor dependent
living in the same household as any of
the foregoing persons; or
(5) An affiliate of the national bank.
Retail forex transaction means an
agreement, contract, or transaction in
foreign currency, other than an
identified banking product or a part of
an identified banking product, that is
offered or entered into by a national
bank with a person that is not an
eligible contract participant and that is:
(1) A contract of sale of a commodity
for future delivery or an option on such
a contract;
(2) An option, other than an option
executed or traded on a national
securities exchange registered pursuant
to section 6(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
78(f)(a)); or
(3) Offered or entered into on a
leveraged or margined basis, or financed
by a national bank, its affiliate, or any
person acting in concert with the
national bank or its affiliate on a similar
basis, other than:
(i) A security that is not a security
futures product as defined in section
1a(47) of the Commodity Exchange Act
(7 U.S.C. 1a(47)); or
(ii) A contract of sale that:
(A) Results in actual delivery within
two days; or
(B) Creates an enforceable obligation
to deliver between a seller and buyer
that have the ability to deliver and
accept delivery, respectively, in
connection with their line of business;
or
(iii) An agreement, contract, or
transaction that the OCC determines is
not functionally or economically similar
to:
(A) A contract of sale of a commodity
for future delivery or an option on such
a contract; or
(B) An option, other than an option
executed or traded on a national
securities exchange registered pursuant
to section 6(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
78(f)(a)).
§ 48.3
Prohibited transactions.
(a) Fraudulent conduct prohibited. No
national bank or its IAPs may, directly
or indirectly, in or in connection with
any retail forex transaction:
(1) Cheat or defraud or attempt to
cheat or defraud any person;
(2) Willfully make or cause to be
made to any person any false report or
statement or cause to be entered for any
person any false record; or
E:\FR\FM\14JYR1.SGM
14JYR1
41386
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 135 / Thursday, July 14, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
(3) Willfully deceive or attempt to
deceive any person by any means
whatsoever.
(b) Acting as counterparty and
exercising discretion prohibited. If a
national bank can cause retail forex
transactions to be effected for a retail
forex customer without the retail forex
customer’s specific authorization, then
neither the national bank nor its
affiliates may act as the counterparty for
any retail forex transaction with that
retail forex customer.
wreier-aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with RULES
§ 48.4
Supervisory non-objection.
(a) Supervisory non-objection
required. Before commencing a retail
forex business, a national bank must
provide the OCC with prior notice and
obtain from the OCC a written
supervisory non-objection.
(b) Requirements for obtaining
supervisory non-objection.
(1) In order to obtain a written
supervisory non-objection, a national
bank must:
(i) Establish to the satisfaction of the
OCC that the national bank has
established and implemented written
policies, procedures, and risk
measurement and management systems
and controls for the purpose of ensuring
that it conducts retail forex transactions
in a safe and sound manner and in
compliance with this part; and
(ii) Provide such other information as
the OCC may require.
(2) The information provided under
paragraph (b)(1) of this section must
include, without limitation, information
regarding:
(i) Customer due diligence, including
without limitation credit evaluations,
customer appropriateness, and ‘‘know
your customer’’ documentation;
(ii) New product approvals;
(iii) The haircuts that the national
bank will apply to noncash margin as
provided in § 48.9(b)(2); and
(iv) Conflicts of interest.
(c) Treatment of existing retail forex
businesses. A national bank that is
engaged in a retail forex business on
July 15, 2011, may continue to do so for
up to six months, subject to an
extension of time by the OCC, if it
requests the supervisory non-objection
required by paragraph (a) of this section
within 30 days of July 15, 2011, and
submits the information required to be
submitted under paragraph (b) of this
section.
(d) Compliance with the Commodity
Exchange Act. A national bank that is
engaged in a retail forex business on
July 15, 2011 and complies with
paragraph (c) of this section will be
deemed, during the six-month or
extended period described in paragraph
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:53 Jul 13, 2011
Jkt 223001
(c) of this section, to be acting pursuant
to a rule or regulation described in
section 2(c)(2)(E)(ii)(I) of the Commodity
Exchange Act (7 U.S.C. 2(c)(2)(E)(ii)(I)).
§ 48.5 Application and closing out of
offsetting long and short positions.
(a) Application of purchases and
sales. Any national bank that—
(1) Engages in a retail forex
transaction involving the purchase of
any currency for the account of any
retail forex customer when the account
of such retail forex customer at the time
of such purchase has an open retail
forex transaction for the sale of the same
currency;
(2) Engages in a retail forex
transaction involving the sale of any
currency for the account of any retail
forex customer when the account of
such retail forex customer at the time of
such sale has an open retail forex
transaction for the purchase of the same
currency;
(3) Purchases a put or call option
involving foreign currency for the
account of any retail forex customer
when the account of such retail forex
customer at the time of such purchase
has a short put or call option position
with the same underlying currency,
strike price, and expiration date as that
purchased; or
(4) Sells a put or call option involving
foreign currency for the account of any
retail forex customer when the account
of such retail forex customer at the time
of such sale has a long put or call option
position with the same underlying
currency, strike price, and expiration
date as that sold must:
(i) Immediately apply such purchase
or sale against such previously held
opposite transaction; and
(ii) Promptly furnish such retail forex
customer with a statement showing the
financial result of the transactions
involved and the name of any
introducing broker to the account.
(b) Close-out against oldest open
position. In all instances in which the
short or long position in a customer’s
retail forex account immediately prior to
an offsetting purchase or sale is greater
than the quantity purchased or sold, the
national bank must apply such
offsetting purchase or sale to the oldest
portion of the previously held short or
long position.
(c) Transactions to be applied as
directed by customer. Notwithstanding
paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section, to
the extent the national bank allows
retail forex customers to use other
methods of offsetting retail forex
transactions, the offsetting transaction
must be applied as directed by a retail
forex customer’s specific instructions.
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
These instructions may not be made by
the national bank or an IAP of the
national bank.
§ 48.6
Disclosure.
(a) Risk disclosure statement required.
No national bank may open or maintain
open an account that will engage in
retail forex transactions for a retail forex
customer unless the national bank has
furnished the retail forex customer with
a separate written disclosure statement
containing only the language set forth in
paragraph (d) of this section and the
disclosures required by paragraphs (e)
and (f) of this section.
(b) Acknowledgment of risk disclosure
statement required. The national bank
must receive from the retail forex
customer a written acknowledgment
signed and dated by the customer that
the customer received and understood
the written disclosure statement
required by paragraph (a) of this section.
(c) Placement of risk disclosure
statement. The disclosure statement
may be attached to other documents as
the initial page(s) of such documents
and as the only material on such
page(s).
(d) Content of risk disclosure
statement. The language set forth in the
written disclosure statement required by
paragraph (a) of this section is as
follows:
Risk Disclosure Statement
Retail forex transactions involve the
leveraged trading of contracts denominated
in foreign currency with a national bank as
your counterparty. Because of the leverage
and the other risks disclosed here, you can
rapidly lose all of the funds or property you
pledge to the national bank as margin for
retail forex trading. You may lose more than
you pledge as margin.
If your margin falls below the required
amount, and you fail to provide the required
additional margin, your national bank is
required to liquidate your retail forex
transactions. Your national bank cannot
apply your retail forex losses to any of your
assets or liabilities at the bank other than
funds or property that you have pledged as
margin for retail forex transactions. However,
if you lose more money than you have
pledged as margin, the bank may seek to
recover that deficiency in an appropriate
forum, such as a court of law.
You should be aware of and carefully
consider the following points before
determining whether retail forex trading is
appropriate for you.
(1) Trading is not on a regulated market or
exchange—your national bank is your trading
counterparty and has conflicting interests.
The retail forex transaction you are entering
into is not conducted on an interbank market
nor is it conducted on a futures exchange
subject to regulation as a designated contract
market by the Commodity Futures Trading
Commission. The foreign currency trades you
transact are trades with your national bank as
E:\FR\FM\14JYR1.SGM
14JYR1
wreier-aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 135 / Thursday, July 14, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
the counterparty. When you sell, the national
bank is the buyer. When you buy, the
national bank is the seller. As a result, when
you lose money trading, your national bank
is making money on such trades, in addition
to any fees, commissions, or spreads the
national bank may charge.
(2) An electronic trading platform for retail
foreign currency transactions is not an
exchange. It is an electronic connection for
accessing your national bank. The terms of
availability of such a platform are governed
only by your contract with your national
bank. Any trading platform that you may use
to enter into off-exchange foreign currency
transactions is only connected to your
national bank. You are accessing that trading
platform only to transact with your national
bank. You are not trading with any other
entities or customers of the national bank by
accessing such platform. The availability and
operation of any such platform, including the
consequences of the unavailability of the
trading platform for any reason, is governed
only by the terms of your account agreement
with the national bank.
(3) You may be able to offset or liquidate
any trading positions only through your
banking entity because the transactions are
not made on an exchange or regulated
contract market, and your national bank may
set its own prices. Your ability to close your
transactions or offset positions is limited to
what your national bank will offer to you, as
there is no other market for these
transactions. Your national bank may offer
any prices it wishes, including prices derived
from outside sources or not in its discretion.
Your national bank may establish its prices
by offering spreads from third-party prices,
but it is under no obligation to do so or to
continue to do so. Your national bank may
offer different prices to different customers at
any point in time on its own terms. The
terms of your account agreement alone
govern the obligations your national bank has
to you to offer prices and offer offset or
liquidating transactions in your account and
make any payments to you. The prices
offered by your national bank may or may not
reflect prices available elsewhere at any
exchange, interbank, or other market for
foreign currency.
(4) Paid solicitors may have undisclosed
conflicts. The national bank may compensate
introducing brokers for introducing your
account in ways that are not disclosed to you.
Such paid solicitors are not required to have,
and may not have, any special expertise in
trading and may have conflicts of interest
based on the method by which they are
compensated. You should thoroughly
investigate the manner in which all such
solicitors are compensated and be very
cautious in granting any person or entity
authority to trade on your behalf. You should
always consider obtaining dated written
confirmation of any information you are
relying on from your national bank in making
any trading or account decisions.
(5) Retail forex transactions are not insured
by the Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation.
(6) Retail forex transactions are not a
deposit in, or guaranteed by, a national bank.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:53 Jul 13, 2011
Jkt 223001
(7) Retail forex transactions are subject to
investment risks, including possible loss of
all amounts invested.
Finally, you should thoroughly investigate
any statements by any national bank that
minimize the importance of, or contradict,
any of the terms of this risk disclosure. These
statements may indicate sales fraud.
This brief statement cannot, of course,
disclose all the risks and other aspects of
trading off-exchange foreign currency with a
national bank.
I hereby acknowledge that I have received
and understood this risk disclosure
statement.
lllllllllllllllllllll
Date
lllllllllllllllllllll
Signature of Customer
(e)(1) Disclosure of profitable
accounts ratio. Immediately following
the language set forth in paragraph (d)
of this section, the statement required
by paragraph (a) of this section must
include, for each of the most recent four
calendar quarters during which the
national bank maintained retail forex
customer accounts:
(i) The total number of retail forex
customer accounts maintained by the
national bank over which the national
bank does not exercise investment
discretion;
(ii) The percentage of such accounts
that were profitable for retail forex
customer accounts during the quarter;
and
(iii) The percentage of such accounts
that were not profitable for retail forex
customer accounts during the quarter.
(2) The national bank’s statement of
profitable trades must include the
following legend: ‘‘Past performance is
not necessarily indicative of future
results.’’ Each national bank must
provide, upon request, to any retail
forex customer or prospective retail
forex customer the total number of retail
forex accounts maintained by the
national bank for which the national
bank does not exercise investment
discretion, the percentage of such
accounts that were profitable, and the
percentage of such accounts that were
not profitable for each calendar quarter
during the most recent five-year period
during which the national bank
maintained such accounts.
(f) Disclosure of fees and other
charges. Immediately following the
language required by paragraph (e) of
this section, the statement required by
paragraph (a) of this section must
include:
(1) The amount of any fee, charge,
spread, or commission that the national
bank may impose on the retail forex
customer in connection with a retail
forex account or retail forex transaction;
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
41387
(2) An explanation of how the
national bank will determine the
amount of such fees, charges, spreads,
or commissions; and
(3) The circumstances under which
the national bank may impose such fees,
charges, spreads, or commissions.
(g) Future disclosure requirements. If,
with regard to a retail forex customer,
the national bank changes any fee,
charge, or commission required to be
disclosed under paragraph (f) of this
section, then the national bank must
mail or deliver to the retail forex
customer a notice of the changes at least
15 days prior to the effective date of the
change.
(h) Form of disclosure requirements.
The disclosures required by this section
must be clear and conspicuous and
designed to call attention to the nature
and significance of the information
provided.
(i) Other disclosure requirements
unaffected. This section does not relieve
a national bank from any other
disclosure obligation it may have under
applicable law.
§ 48.7
Recordkeeping.
(a) General rule. A national bank
engaging in retail forex transactions
must keep full, complete, and
systematic records, together with all
pertinent data and memoranda,
pertaining to its retail forex business,
including the following 6 types of
records:
(1) Retail forex account records. For
each retail forex account:
(i) The name and address of the
person for whom the account is carried
or introduced and the principal
occupation or business of the person;
(ii) The name of any other person
guaranteeing the account or exercising
trading control with respect to the
account;
(iii) The establishment or termination
of the account;
(iv) A means to identify the person
that has solicited and is responsible for
the account;
(v) The funds in the account, net of
any commissions and fees;
(vi) The account’s net profits and
losses on open trades;
(vii) The funds in the account plus or
minus the net profits and losses on open
trades, adjusted for the net option value
in the case of open options positions;
(viii) Financial ledger records that
show all charges against and credits to
the account, including deposits,
withdrawals, and transfers, and charges
or credits resulting from losses or gains
on closed transactions; and
(ix) A list of all retail forex
transactions executed for the account,
E:\FR\FM\14JYR1.SGM
14JYR1
wreier-aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with RULES
41388
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 135 / Thursday, July 14, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
with the details specified in paragraph
(a)(2) of this section.
(2) Retail forex transaction records.
For each retail forex transaction:
(i) The date and time the national
bank received the order;
(ii) The price at which the national
bank placed the order, or, in the case of
an option, the premium that the retail
forex customer paid;
(iii) The customer account
identification information;
(iv) The currency pair;
(v) The size or quantity of the order;
(vi) Whether the order was a buy or
sell order;
(vii) The type of order, if the order
was not a market order;
(viii) The size and price at which the
order is executed, or in the case of an
option, the amount of the premium paid
for each option purchased, or the
amount credited for each option sold;
(ix) For options, whether the option is
a put or call, expiration date, quantity,
underlying contract for future delivery
or underlying physical, strike price, and
details of the purchase price of the
option, including premium, mark-up,
commission, and fees; and
(x) For futures, the delivery date; and
(xi) If the order was made on a trading
platform:
(A) The price quoted on the trading
platform when the order was placed, or,
in the case of an option, the premium
quoted;
(B) The date and time the order was
transmitted to the trading platform; and
(C) The date and time the order was
executed.
(3) Price changes on a trading
platform. If a trading platform is used,
daily logs showing each price change on
the platform, the time of the change to
the nearest second, and the trading
volume at that time and price.
(4) Methods or algorithms. Any
method or algorithm used to determine
the bid or asked price for any retail
forex transaction or the prices at which
customer orders are executed,
including, but not limited to, any
markups, fees, commissions or other
items which affect the profitability or
risk of loss of a retail forex customer’s
transaction.
(5) Daily records which show for each
business day complete details of:
(i) All retail forex transactions that are
futures transactions executed on that
day, including the date, price, quantity,
market, currency pair, delivery date,
and the person for whom such
transaction was made;
(ii) All retail forex transactions that
are option transactions executed on that
day, including the date, whether the
transaction involved a put or call, the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:53 Jul 13, 2011
Jkt 223001
expiration date, quantity, currency pair,
delivery date, strike price, details of the
purchase price of the option, including
premium, mark-up, commission and
fees, and the person for whom the
transaction was made; and
(iii) All other retail forex transactions
executed on that day for such account,
including the date, price, quantity,
currency and the person for whom such
transaction was made.
(6) Other records. Written
acknowledgments of receipt of the risk
disclosure statement required by
§ 48.6(b), offset instructions pursuant to
§ 48.5(c), records required under
paragraphs (b) through (f) of this
section, trading cards, signature cards,
street books, journals, ledgers, payment
records, copies of statements of
purchase, and all other records, data,
and memoranda that have been
prepared in the course of the national
bank’s retail forex business.
(b) Ratio of profitable accounts.
(1) With respect to its active retail
forex customer accounts over which it
did not exercise investment discretion
and that are not retail forex proprietary
accounts open for any period of time
during the quarter, a national bank must
prepare and maintain on a quarterly
basis (calendar quarter):
(i) A calculation of the percentage of
such accounts that were profitable;
(ii) A calculation of the percentage of
such accounts that were not profitable;
and
(iii) Data supporting the calculations
described in paragraphs (b)(1)(i) and (ii)
of this section.
(2) In calculating whether a retail
forex account was profitable or not
profitable during the quarter, the
national bank must compute the
realized and unrealized gains or losses
on all retail forex transactions carried in
the retail forex account at any time
during the quarter, subtract all fees,
commissions, and any other charges
posted to the retail forex account during
the quarter, and add any interest income
and other income or rebates credited to
the retail forex account during the
quarter. All deposits and withdrawals of
funds made by the retail forex customer
during the quarter must be excluded
from the computation of whether the
retail forex account was profitable or not
profitable during the quarter.
Computations that result in a zero or
negative number must be considered a
retail forex account that was not
profitable. Computations that result in a
positive number must be considered a
retail forex account that was profitable.
(3) A retail forex account must be
considered ‘‘active’’ for purposes of
paragraph (b)(1) of this section if and
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
only if for the relevant calendar quarter
a retail forex transaction was executed
in that account or the retail forex
account contained an open position
resulting from a retail forex transaction.
(c) Records related to violations of
law. A national bank engaging in retail
forex transactions must make a record of
all communications received by the
national bank or its IAPs concerning
facts giving rise to possible violations of
law related to the national bank’s retail
forex business. The record must contain:
The name of the complainant, if
provided; the date of the
communication; the relevant agreement,
contract, or transaction; the substance of
the communication; the name of the
person that received the
communication; and the final
disposition of the matter.
(d) Records for noncash margin. A
national bank must maintain a record of
all noncash margin collected pursuant
to § 48.9. The record must show
separately for each retail forex customer:
(1) A description of the securities or
property received;
(2) The name and address of such
retail forex customer;
(3) The dates when the securities or
property were received;
(4) The identity of the depositories or
other places where such securities or
property are segregated or held, if
applicable;
(5) The dates in which the national
bank placed or removed such securities
or property into or from such
depositories; and
(6) The dates of return of such
securities or property to such retail
forex customer, or other disposition
thereof, together with the facts and
circumstances of such other disposition.
(e) Order Tickets.
(1) Except as provided in paragraph
(e)(2) of this section, immediately upon
the receipt of a retail forex transaction
order, a national bank must prepare an
order ticket for the order (whether
unfulfilled, executed, or canceled). The
order ticket must include:
(i) Account identification (account or
customer name with which the retail
forex transaction was effected);
(ii) Order number;
(iii) Type of order (market order, limit
order, or subject to special instructions);
(iv) Date and time, to the nearest
minute, that the retail forex transaction
order was received (as evidenced by
time-stamp or other timing device);
(v) Time, to the nearest minute, that
the retail forex transaction order was
executed; and
(vi) Price at which the retail forex
transaction was executed.
(2) Post-execution allocation of
bunched orders. Specific identifiers for
E:\FR\FM\14JYR1.SGM
14JYR1
wreier-aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 135 / Thursday, July 14, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
retail forex accounts included in
bunched orders need not be recorded at
time of order placement or upon report
of execution as required under
paragraph (e)(1) of this section if the
following requirements are met:
(i) The national bank placing and
directing the allocation of an order
eligible for post-execution allocation has
been granted written investment
discretion with regard to participating
customer accounts and makes the
following information available to retail
forex customers upon request:
(A) The general nature of the postexecution allocation methodology the
national bank will use;
(B) Whether the national bank has any
interest in accounts that may be
included with customer accounts in
bunched orders eligible for postexecution allocation; and
(C) Summary or composite data
sufficient for that customer to compare
the customer’s results with those of
other comparable customers and, if
applicable, any account in which the
national bank has an interest.
(ii) Post-execution allocations are
made as soon as practicable after the
entire transaction is executed;
(iii) Post-execution allocations are fair
and equitable, with no account or group
of accounts receiving consistently
favorable or unfavorable treatment; and
(iv) The post-execution allocation
methodology is sufficiently objective
and specific to permit the OCC to verify
the fairness of the allocations using that
methodology.
(f) Record of monthly statements and
confirmations. A national bank must
retain a copy of each monthly statement
and confirmation required by § 48.10.
(g) Form of record and manner of
maintenance. The records required by
this section must clearly and accurately
reflect the information required and
provide an adequate basis for the audit
of the information. A national bank
must create and maintain audio
recordings of oral orders and oral offset
instructions. Record maintenance may
include the use of automated or
electronic records provided that the
records are easily retrievable and readily
available for inspection.
(h) Length of maintenance. A national
bank must keep each record required by
this section for at least five years from
the date the record is created.
§ 48.8
Capital requirements.
A national bank offering or entering
into retail forex transactions must be
well capitalized as defined by 12 CFR
part 6.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:53 Jul 13, 2011
Jkt 223001
§ 48.9
Margin requirements.
(a) Margin required. A national bank
engaging, or offering to engage, in retail
forex transactions must collect from
each retail forex customer an amount of
margin not less than:
(1) Two percent of the notional value
of the retail forex transaction for major
currency pairs and 5 percent of the
notional value of the retail forex
transaction for all other currency pairs;
(2) For short options, 2 percent for
major currency pairs and 5 percent for
all other currency pairs of the notional
value of the retail forex transaction, plus
the premium received by the retail forex
customer; or
(3) For long options, the full premium
charged and received by the national
bank.
(b)(1) Form of margin. Margin
collected under paragraph (a) of this
section or pledged by a retail forex
customer for retail forex transactions
must be in the form of cash or the
following financial instruments:
(i) Obligations of the United States
and obligations fully guaranteed as to
principal and interest by the United
States;
(ii) General obligations of any State or
of any political subdivision thereof;
(iii) General obligations issued or
guaranteed by any enterprise, as defined
in 12 U.S.C. 4502(10);
(iv) Certificates of deposit issued by
an insured depository institution, as
defined in section 3(c)(2) of the Federal
Deposit Insurance Act (12 U.S.C.
1813(c)(2));
(v) Commercial paper;
(vi) Corporate notes or bonds;
(vii) General obligations of a sovereign
nation;
(viii) Interests in money market
mutual funds; and
(ix) Such other financial instruments
as the OCC deems appropriate.
(2) Haircuts. A national bank must
establish written policies and
procedures that include:
(i) Haircuts for noncash margin
collected under this section; and
(ii) Annual evaluation, and, if
appropriate, modification, of the
haircuts.
(c) Separate margin account. Margin
collected by the national bank from a
retail forex customer for retail forex
transactions or pledged by a retail forex
customer for retail forex transactions
must be placed into a separate account.
(d) Margin calls; liquidation of
position.
(1) For each retail forex customer, at
least once per day, a national bank
must:
(i) Mark the value of the retail forex
customer’s open retail forex positions to
market;
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
41389
(ii) Mark the value of the margin
collected under this section from the
retail forex customer to market; and
(iii) Determine whether, based on the
marks in paragraphs (d)(1)(i) and (ii) of
this section, the national bank has
collected margin from the retail forex
customer sufficient to satisfy the
requirements of this section.
(2) If, pursuant to paragraph (d)(1)(iii)
of this section, the national bank
determines that it has not collected
margin from the retail forex customer
sufficient to satisfy the requirements of
this section then, within a reasonable
period of time, the national bank must
either:
(i) Collect margin from the retail forex
customer sufficient to satisfy the
requirements of this section; or
(ii) Liquidate the retail forex
customer’s retail forex transactions.
(e) Set-off prohibited. A national bank
may not:
(1) Apply a retail forex customer’s
retail forex obligations against any funds
or other asset of the retail forex
customer other than margin in the
separate margin account described in
paragraph (c) of this section;
(2) Apply a retail forex customer’s
retail forex obligations to increase the
amount owed by the retail forex
customer to the national bank under any
loan; or
(3) Collect the margin required under
this section by use of any right of setoff.
§ 48.10
Required reporting to customers.
(a) Monthly statements. Each national
bank must promptly furnish to each
retail forex customer, as of the close of
the last business day of each month or
as of any regular monthly date selected,
except for accounts in which there are
neither open positions at the end of the
statement period nor any changes to the
account balance since the prior
statement period but, in any event, not
less frequently than once every three
months, a statement that clearly shows:
(1) For each retail forex customer:
(i) The open retail forex transactions
with prices at which acquired;
(ii) The net unrealized profits or
losses in all open retail forex
transactions marked to the market;
(iii) Any money, securities, or other
property in the separate margin account
required by § 48.9(c); and
(iv) A detailed accounting of all
financial charges and credits to the
retail forex customer’s retail forex
accounts during the monthly reporting
period, including: Money, securities, or
property received from or disbursed to
such customer; realized profits and
losses; and fees, charges, spreads, and
commissions.
E:\FR\FM\14JYR1.SGM
14JYR1
wreier-aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with RULES
41390
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 135 / Thursday, July 14, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
(2) For each retail forex customer
engaging in retail forex transactions that
are options:
(i) All such options purchased, sold,
exercised, or expired during the
monthly reporting period, identified by
underlying retail forex transaction or
underlying currency, strike price,
transaction date, and expiration date;
(ii) The open option positions carried
for such customer and arising as of the
end of the monthly reporting period,
identified by underlying retail forex
transaction or underlying currency,
strike price, transaction date, and
expiration date;
(iii) All such option positions marked
to the market and the amount each
position is in the money, if any;
(iv) Any money, securities, or other
property in the separate margin account
required by § 48.9(c); and
(v) A detailed accounting of all
financial charges and credits to the
retail forex customer’s retail forex
accounts during the monthly reporting
period, including: Money, securities, or
property received from or disbursed to
such customer; realized profits and
losses; premiums and mark-ups; and
fees, charges, and commissions.
(b) Confirmation statement. Each
national bank must, not later than the
next business day after any retail forex
transaction, send:
(1) To each retail forex customer, a
written confirmation of each retail forex
transaction caused to be executed by it
for the customer, including offsetting
transactions executed during the same
business day and the rollover of an open
retail forex transaction to the next
business day;
(2) To each retail forex customer
engaging in forex option transactions, a
written confirmation of each forex
option transaction, containing at least
the following information:
(i) The retail forex customer’s account
identification number;
(ii) A separate listing of the actual
amount of the premium, as well as each
markup thereon, if applicable, and all
other commissions, costs, fees, and
other charges incurred in connection
with the forex option transaction;
(iii) The strike price;
(iv) The underlying retail forex
transaction or underlying currency;
(v) The final exercise date of the forex
option purchased or sold; and
(vi) The date that the forex option
transaction was executed.
(3) To each retail forex customer
engaging in forex option transactions,
upon the expiration or exercise of any
option, a written confirmation statement
thereof, which statement must include
the date of such occurrence, a
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:53 Jul 13, 2011
Jkt 223001
description of the option involved, and,
in the case of exercise, the details of the
retail forex or physical currency
position that resulted therefrom
including, if applicable, the final trading
date of the retail forex transaction
underlying the option.
(c) Notwithstanding paragraph (b) of
this section, a retail forex transaction
that is caused to be executed for a
pooled investment vehicle that engages
in retail forex transactions need be
confirmed only to the operator of such
pooled investment vehicle.
(d) Controlled accounts. With respect
to any account controlled by any person
other than the retail forex customer for
whom such account is carried, each
national bank must promptly furnish in
writing to such other person the
information required by paragraphs (a)
and (b) of this section.
(e) Introduced accounts. Each
statement provided pursuant to the
provisions of this section must, if
applicable, show that the account for
which the national bank was introduced
by an introducing broker and the name
of the introducing broker.
§ 48.11
Unlawful representations.
(a) No implication or representation of
limiting losses. No national bank
engaged in retail foreign exchange
transactions or its IAPs may imply or
represent that it will, with respect to
any retail customer forex account, for or
on behalf of any person:
(1) Guarantee such person or account
against loss;
(2) Limit the loss of such person or
account; or
(3) Not call for or attempt to collect
margin as established for retail forex
customers.
(b) No implication of representation of
engaging in prohibited acts. No national
bank or its IAPs may in any way imply
or represent that it will engage in any of
the acts or practices described in
paragraph (a) of this section.
(c) No Federal government
endorsement. No national bank or its
IAPs may represent or imply in any
manner whatsoever that any retail forex
transaction or retail forex product has
been sponsored, recommended, or
approved by the OCC, the Federal
government, or any agency thereof.
(d) Assuming or sharing of liability
from bank error. This section does not
prevent a national bank from assuming
or sharing in the losses resulting from
the national bank’s error or mishandling
of a retail forex transaction.
(e) Certain guaranties unaffected. This
section does not affect any guarantee
entered into prior to the effective date
of this part, but this section does apply
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
to any extension, modification, or
renewal thereof entered into after such
date.
§ 48.12
Authorization to trade.
(a) Specific authorization required. No
national bank may directly or indirectly
effect a retail forex transaction for the
account of any retail forex customer
unless, before the retail forex
transaction occurs, the retail forex
customer specifically authorized the
national bank to effect the retail forex
transaction.
(b) Requirements for specific
authorization. A retail forex transaction
is ‘‘specifically authorized’’ for purposes
of this section if the retail forex
customer specifies:
(1) The precise retail forex transaction
to be effected;
(2) The exact amount of the foreign
currency to be purchased or sold; and
(3) In the case of an option, the
identity of the foreign currency or
contract that underlies the option.
§ 48.13
Trading and operational standards.
(a) Internal rules, procedures, and
controls required. A national bank
engaging in retail forex transactions
must establish and implement internal
policies, procedures, and controls
designed, at a minimum, to:
(1) Ensure, to the extent reasonable,
that each retail forex transaction that is
executable at or near the price that the
national bank has quoted to the retail
forex customer is entered for execution
before any retail forex transaction for:
(i) A proprietary account;
(ii) An account for which a related
person may originate orders without the
prior specific consent of the account
owner, if the related person has gained
knowledge of the retail forex customer’s
order prior to the transmission of an
order for a proprietary account;
(iii) An account in which a related
person has an interest, if the related
person has gained knowledge of the
retail forex customer’s order prior to the
transmission of an order for a
proprietary account; or
(iv) An account in which a related
person may originate orders without the
prior specific consent of the account
owner, if the related person has gained
knowledge of the retail forex customer’s
order prior to the transmission of an
order for a proprietary account;
(2) Prevent national-bank related
persons from placing orders, directly or
indirectly, with another person in a
manner designed to circumvent the
provisions of paragraph (a)(1) of this
section; and
(3) Fairly and objectively establish
settlement prices for retail forex
transactions.
E:\FR\FM\14JYR1.SGM
14JYR1
wreier-aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 135 / Thursday, July 14, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
(b) Disclosure of retail forex
transactions. No national bank engaging
in retail forex transactions may disclose
that an order of another person is being
held by the national bank, unless the
disclosure is necessary to the effective
execution of such order or the
disclosure is made at the request of the
OCC.
(c) Handling of retail forex accounts
of related persons of retail forex
counterparties. No national bank
engaging in retail forex transactions may
knowingly handle the retail forex
account of an employee of another retail
forex counterparty’s retail forex
business unless the national bank:
(1) Receives written authorization
from a person designated by the other
retail forex counterparty with
responsibility for the surveillance over
the account pursuant to paragraph (a)(2)
of this section;
(2) Prepares immediately upon receipt
of an order for the account a written
record of the order, including the
account identification and order
number, and records thereon to the
nearest minute, by time-stamp or other
timing device, the date and time the
order was received; and
(3) Transmits on a regular basis to the
other retail forex counterparty copies of
all statements for the account and of all
written records prepared upon the
receipt of orders for the account
pursuant to paragraph (c)(2) of this
section.
(d) Related person of national bank
establishing account at another retail
forex counterparty. No related person of
a national bank working in the national
bank’s retail forex business may have an
account, directly or indirectly, with
another retail forex counterparty unless
the other retail forex counterparty:
(1) Receives written authorization to
open and maintain the account from a
person designated by the national bank
with responsibility for the surveillance
over the account pursuant to paragraph
(a)(2) of this section; and
(2) Transmits on a regular basis to the
national bank copies of all statements
for the account and of all written
records prepared by the other retail
forex counterparty upon receipt of
orders for the account pursuant to
paragraph (a)(2) of this section.
(e) Prohibited trading practices. No
national bank engaging in retail forex
transactions may:
(1) Enter into a retail forex
transaction, to be executed pursuant to
a market or limit order at a price that is
not at or near the price at which other
retail forex customers, during that same
time period, have executed retail forex
transactions with the national bank;
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:53 Jul 13, 2011
Jkt 223001
41391
(2) Adjust or alter prices for a retail
forex transaction after the transaction
has been confirmed to the retail forex
customer;
(3) Provide to a retail forex customer
a new bid price for a retail forex
transaction that is higher than its
previous bid without providing a new
asked price that is also higher than its
previous asked price by a similar
amount;
(4) Provide to a retail forex customer
a new bid price for a retail forex
transaction that is lower than its
previous bid without providing a new
asked price that is also lower than its
previous asked price by a similar
amount; or
(5) Establish a new position for a
retail forex customer (except one that
offsets an existing position for that retail
forex customer) where the national bank
holds outstanding orders of other retail
forex customers for the same currency
pair at a comparable price.
(1) Requested by the retail forex
customer;
(2) Made by the Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation as receiver or
conservator under the Federal Deposit
Insurance Act; or
(3) Otherwise authorized by
applicable law.
(c) Obligations of transferee national
bank. A national bank to which retail
forex accounts or positions are assigned
or transferred under paragraph (a) of
this section must provide to the affected
retail forex customers the risk disclosure
statements and forms of
acknowledgment required by this part
and receive the required signed
acknowledgments within 60 days of
such assignments or transfers. This
requirement does not apply if the
national bank has clear written evidence
that the retail forex customer has
received and acknowledged receipt of
the required disclosure statements.
§ 48.14
(a) Voluntary submission of claims to
dispute or settlement procedures. No
national bank may enter into any
agreement or understanding with a
retail forex customer in which the
customer agrees, prior to the time a
claim or grievance arises, to submit such
claim or grievance to any settlement
procedure unless the following
conditions are satisfied:
(1) Signing the agreement is not a
condition for the customer to use the
services offered by the national bank.
(2) If the agreement is contained as a
clause or clauses of a broader
agreement, the customer separately
endorses the clause or clauses.
(3) The agreement advises the retail
forex customer that, at such time as the
customer notifies the national bank that
the customer intends to submit a claim
to arbitration, or at such time the
national bank notifies the customer of
its intent to submit a claim to
arbitration, the customer will have the
opportunity to choose a person qualified
in dispute resolution to conduct the
proceeding.
(4) The agreement must acknowledge
that the national bank will pay any
incremental fees that may be assessed in
connection with the dispute resolution,
unless it is determined in the
proceeding that the retail forex customer
has acted in bad faith in initiating the
proceeding.
(5) The agreement must include the
following language printed in large
boldface type:
Two forums exist for the resolution of
disputes related to retail forex
transactions: Civil court litigation and
arbitration conducted by a private
Supervision.
(a) Supervision by the national bank.
A national bank engaging in retail forex
transactions must diligently supervise
the handling by its officers, employees,
and agents (or persons occupying a
similar status or performing a similar
function) of all retail forex accounts
carried, operated, or advised by at the
national bank and all activities of its
officers, employees, and agents (or
persons occupying a similar status or
performing a similar function) relating
to its retail forex business.
(b) Supervision by officers, employees,
or agents. An officer, employee, or agent
of a national bank must diligently
supervise his or her subordinates’
handling of all retail forex accounts at
the national bank and all the
subordinates’ activities relating to the
national bank’s retail forex business.
§ 48.15
Notice of transfers.
(a) Prior notice generally required.
Except as provided in paragraph (b) of
this section, a national bank must
provide a retail forex customer with 30
days’ prior notice of any assignment of
any position or transfer of any account
of the retail forex customer. The notice
must include a statement that the retail
forex customer is not required to accept
the proposed assignment or transfer and
may direct the national bank to
liquidate the positions of the retail forex
customer or transfer the account to a
retail forex counterparty of the retail
forex customer’s selection.
(b) Exceptions. The requirements of
paragraph (a) of this section do not
apply to transfers:
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
§ 48.16
E:\FR\FM\14JYR1.SGM
Customer dispute resolution.
14JYR1
wreier-aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with RULES
41392
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 135 / Thursday, July 14, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
organization. The opportunity to settle
disputes by arbitration may in some
cases provide benefits to customers,
including the ability to obtain an
expeditious and final resolution of
disputes without incurring substantial
cost. Each customer must individually
examine the relative merits of
arbitration and consent to this
arbitration agreement must be
voluntary.
By signing this agreement, you: (1)
May be waiving your right to sue in a
court of law; and (2) are agreeing to be
bound by arbitration of any claims or
counterclaims that you or [insert name
of national bank] may submit to
arbitration under this agreement. In the
event a dispute arises, you will be
notified if [insert name of national bank]
intends to submit the dispute to
arbitration.
You need not sign this agreement to
open or maintain a retail forex account
with [insert name of national bank].
(b) Election of forum.
(1) Within 10 business days after
receipt of notice from the retail forex
customer that the customer intends to
submit a claim to arbitration, the
national bank must provide the
customer with a list of persons qualified
in dispute resolution.
(2) The customer must, within 45
days after receipt of such list, notify the
national bank of the person selected.
The customer’s failure to provide such
notice must give the national bank the
right to select a person from the list.
(c) Enforceability. A dispute
settlement procedure may require
parties using the procedure to agree,
under applicable state law, submission
agreement, or otherwise, to be bound by
an award rendered in the procedure if
the agreement to submit the claim or
grievance to the procedure complies
with paragraph (a) of this section or the
agreement to submit the claim or
grievance to the procedure was made
after the claim or grievance arose. Any
award so rendered by the procedure will
be enforceable in accordance with
applicable law.
(d) Time limits for submission of
claims. The dispute settlement
procedure used by the parties may not
include any unreasonably short
limitation period foreclosing submission
of a customer’s claims or grievances or
counterclaims.
(e) Counterclaims. A procedure for the
settlement of a retail forex customer’s
claims or grievances against a national
bank or employee thereof may permit
the submission of a counterclaim in the
procedure by a person against whom a
claim or grievance is brought if the
counterclaim:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:53 Jul 13, 2011
Jkt 223001
(1) Arises out of the transaction or
occurrence that is the subject of the
retail forex customer’s claim or
grievance; and
(2) Does not require for adjudication
the presence of essential witnesses,
parties, or third persons over which the
settlement process lacks jurisdiction.
§ 48.17
Reservation of authority.
The OCC may modify the disclosure,
recordkeeping, capital and margin,
reporting, business conduct,
documentation, or other standards or
requirements under this part for a
specific retail forex transaction or a
class of retail forex transactions if the
OCC determines that the modification is
consistent with safety and soundness
and the protection of retail forex
customers.
Dated: July 7, 2011.
John Walsh,
Acting Comptroller of the Currency.
[FR Doc. 2011–17514 Filed 7–13–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810–33–P
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE
CORPORATION
12 CFR Parts 329 and 330
RIN 3064–AD78
Interest on Deposits; Deposit
Insurance Coverage
Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation (FDIC).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The FDIC is issuing a final
rule amending its regulations to reflect
section 627 of the Dodd-Frank Wall
Street Reform and Consumer Protection
Act (the DFA),1 repealing the
prohibition against the payment of
interest on demand deposit accounts
effective July 21, 2011.
DATES: The final rule is effective July 21,
2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Martin Becker, Senior Consumer Affairs
Specialist, Division of Consumer and
Depositor Protection, (703) 254–2233,
Mark Mellon, Counsel, Legal Division,
(202) 898–3884, Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation, 550 17th Street,
NW., Washington, DC 20429.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
I. Background
Section 627 of the DFA repealed the
statutory prohibition against the
payment of interest on demand
deposits, effective one year from the
PO 00000
1 Public
Law 111–203, 124 Stat. 1376.
Frm 00018
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
date of the DFA’s enactment, July 21,
2011. Section 343 of the DFA amended
section 11(a)(1) of the Federal Deposit
Insurance Act, 12 U.S.C. 1821(a)(1), to
provide full insurance coverage for
depository institution noninterestbearing transaction accounts from
December 31, 2010, through December
31, 2012.
In light of the prospective repeal of
the demand deposit interest prohibition,
the FDIC proposed to rescind 12 CFR
part 329, the regulation which
implements that prohibition with
respect to state-chartered, nonmember
(SNM) banks to be effective on the same
date as the statutory repeal, July 21,
2011. 76 FR 21265 (Apr. 15, 2011)
(NPR). At the same time, however, a
regulatory definition of the term
‘‘interest’’ would still be useful in
interpreting the requirements of section
343 of the DFA providing temporary,
unlimited deposit insurance coverage
for noninterest-bearing transaction
accounts. For this reason, in the NPR
the FDIC also proposed to transfer the
definition of ‘‘interest’’ found at 12 CFR
329.1(c) to Part 330, specifically the
definitions section at 12 CFR 330.1. The
FDIC also specifically solicited
comment on whether other parts of Part
329 could also prove useful and
therefore should be moved into Part 330
as well. In addition, the FDIC sought
comment on every other aspect of the
proposed rule.2
II. Comment Summary and Discussion
The FDIC received eight comments on
the NPR. Three were from community
banks, one was from a large depository
institution, two were from depository
institution trade groups, one from a
financial consulting firm, and one was
from a legal representative for a money
market fund.
The chief points were:
1. The FDIC should stop or delay
repeal of the prohibition (four
commenters);
2. Community banks will be harmed
by repeal of the prohibition (four
commenters);
3. The FDIC should add the Part 329
section concerning premiums to Part
330 (three commenters); and
4. The FDIC should adopt or
incorporate all Federal Reserve
interpretations and advisory opinions
2 In counterpart to this rulemaking, the Board of
Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the
Federal Reserve) have issued a notice of proposed
rulemaking to repeal 12 CFR Part 217, Prohibition
Against Payment of Interest on Demand Deposits
(Regulation Q). See 76 Federal Register 20892 (Apr.
14, 2011). Regulation Q implements the prohibition
against the payment of interest on demand deposits
with respect to member banks.
E:\FR\FM\14JYR1.SGM
14JYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 135 (Thursday, July 14, 2011)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 41375-41392]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-17514]
========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents.
Prices of new books are listed in the first FEDERAL REGISTER issue of each
week.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 135 / Thursday, July 14, 2011 / Rules
and Regulations
[[Page 41375]]
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Office of the Comptroller of the Currency
12 CFR Part 48
[Docket ID OCC-2011-0010]
RIN 1557-AD42
Retail Foreign Exchange Transactions
AGENCY: Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, Department of the
Treasury.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) is
adopting a final rule authorizing national banks, Federal branches and
agencies of foreign banks, and their operating subsidiaries to engage
in off-exchange transactions in foreign currency with retail customers.
The rule also describes various requirements with which national banks,
Federal branches and agencies of foreign banks, and their operating
subsidiaries must comply to conduct such transactions.
DATES: This rule is effective July 15, 2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tena Alexander, Senior Counsel, or
Roman Goldstein, Attorney, Securities and Corporate Practices Division,
(202) 874-5120.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
On July 21, 2010, President Obama signed into law the Dodd-Frank
Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (Dodd-Frank Act).\1\ As
amended by the Dodd-Frank Act,\2\ the Commodity Exchange Act (CEA)
provides that a United States financial institution \3\ for which there
is a Federal regulatory agency \4\ shall not enter into, or offer to
enter into, a transaction described in section 2(c)(2)(B)(i)(I) of the
CEA with a retail customer \5\ except pursuant to a rule or regulation
of a Federal regulatory agency allowing the transaction under such
terms and conditions as the Federal regulatory agency shall prescribe
\6\ (a ``retail forex rule''). Section 2(c)(2)(B)(i)(I) includes ``an
agreement, contract, or transaction in foreign currency that * * * is a
contract of sale of a commodity for future delivery (or an option on
such a contract) or an option (other than an option executed or traded
on a national securities exchange registered pursuant to section 6(a)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78f(a)).'' \7\ A
Federal regulatory agency's retail forex rule must treat similarly all
such futures and options and all agreements, contracts, or transactions
that are functionally or economically similar to such futures and
options.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Public Law 111-203, 124 Stat. 1376.
\2\ Dodd-Frank Act Sec. 742(c)(2) (to be codified at 7 U.S.C.
2(c)(2)(E)). In this preamble, citations to the retail forex
statutory provisions are to the sections in which the provisions
will be codified in the CEA.
\3\ The CEA defines ``financial institution'' as including ``a
depository institution (as defined in section 3 of the Federal
Deposit Insurance Act (12 U.S.C. 1813)).'' 7 U.S.C. 1a(21)(E).
National banks are depository institutions. See 12 U.S.C. 1813(a)(1)
and (c)(1).
\4\ For purposes of the retail forex rules, ``Federal regulatory
agency'' includes ``an appropriate Federal banking agency.'' 7
U.S.C. 2(c)(2)(E)(i)(III). The OCC is the appropriate Federal
banking agency for national banks and Federal branches and agencies
of foreign banks. 12 U.S.C. 1813(q)(1); Dodd-Frank Act Sec.
721(a)(2) (amending 7 U.S.C. 1a to define ``appropriate Federal
banking agency'' by reference to 12 U.S.C. 1813).
\5\ A retail customer is a person that is not an ``eligible
contract participant'' under the CEA.
\6\ 7 U.S.C. 2(c)(2)(E)(ii)(I).
\7\ 7 U.S.C. 2(c)(2)(B)(i)(II).
\8\ 7 U.S.C. 2(c)(2)(E)(iii)(II).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Retail forex rules must prescribe appropriate requirements with
respect to disclosure, recordkeeping, capital and margin, reporting,
business conduct, and documentation requirements and may include such
other standards or requirements as the Federal regulatory agency
determines to be necessary.\9\ This Dodd-Frank Act amendment to the CEA
takes effect 360 days from the enactment of the Act.\10\ Therefore, as
of July 16, 2011, national banks, Federal branches and agencies of
foreign banks, and operating subsidiaries of the foregoing
(collectively, national banks) may not engage in a retail forex
transaction except pursuant to retail forex rules issued by the OCC.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ 7 U.S.C. 2(c)(2)(E)(iii)(I).
\10\ See Dodd-Frank Act Sec. 754.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In addition, on July 21, 2011, the OCC will become the appropriate
Federal banking agency for Federal savings associations.\11\ The OCC
plans to regulate retail forex transactions conducted by Federal
savings associations under the same terms as in this rule. However, the
OCC cannot issue regulations governing Federal savings associations
until July 21, 2011. Therefore, the OCC anticipates issuing on that
date an interim final rule with request for public comment that would
expand the scope of this regulation to cover Federal savings
associations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ Dodd-Frank Act Sec. 312.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
II. Overview of the Proposed Rule and Related Actions
On September 10, 2010, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission
(CFTC) issued a retail forex rule for persons subject to its
jurisdiction.\12\ On April 22, 2011, the OCC proposed a retail forex
rule for national banks modeled on the CFTC's retail forex rule.\13\
The OCC decided to model its retail forex rule on the CFTC's rule to
promote regulatory comparability and because the CFTC developed its
retail forex rule with the benefit of over 9,100 comments from a range
of commenters, including individuals who trade forex, intermediaries,
CFTC registrants currently serving as counterparties in retail forex
transactions, trade associations or coalitions of industry
participants, one committee of a county lawyers' association, a
registered futures association, and numerous law firms representing
institutional clients. The OCC proposed to authorize national banks to
engage in retail forex transactions and subject those transactions to
requirements relating to disclosure, record keeping, capital and
margin, reporting, business conduct, and documentation.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ Regulation of Off-Exchange Retail Foreign Exchange
Transactions and Intermediaries, 75 FR 55409 (Sept. 10, 2010) (Final
CFTC Retail Forex Rule). The CFTC proposed these rules prior to the
enactment of the Dodd-Frank Act. Regulation of Off-Exchange Retail
Foreign Exchange Transactions and Intermediaries, 75 FR 3281 (Jan.
20, 2010) (Proposed CFTC Retail Forex Rule).
\13\ Retail Foreign Exchange Transactions, 76 FR 22633 (Apr. 22,
2011) (Proposed OCC Retail Forex Rule).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On May 17, 2011, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC)
proposed
[[Page 41376]]
a retail forex rule for entities for which it is the appropriate
Federal banking agency under the Federal Deposit Insurance Act.\14\ The
OCC's and the FDIC's proposals were substantially similar.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ Retail Foreign Exchange Transactions, 76 FR 28358 (May 17,
2011) (Proposed FDIC Retail Forex Rule).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
III. Comments on the Proposed Rule
The comment period for the proposed OCC retail forex rule ended on
May 23, 2011. The OCC received a total of three comments by that date.
Of these, one was submitted by a large bank that engages in retail
forex transactions (the commenter) and two were submitted by
individuals. The latter two comments did not relate to the proposal.
The commenter generally supported the OCC's proposed rule while
requesting certain clarifications and changes. The commenter's comments
to specific sections of the proposal are addressed in the Section-by-
Section Analysis below. In light of the comments received, the final
rule, for the most part, is similar to the proposed rule; the
significant changes are described in the Section-by-Section analysis.
In the preamble to the proposal, the OCC indicated that retail
forex transactions are subject to the Interagency Statement on Retail
Sales of Nondeposit Investment Products (NDIP Policy Statement).\15\
The NDIP Policy Statement sets out guidance regarding the OCC's
expectations when a national bank engages in the sale of nondeposit
investment products to retail customers. The NDIP Policy Statement
addresses issues such as disclosure, suitability, sales practices,
compensation, and compliance.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ See OCC Bulletin 94-13 (Feb. 24, 1994); see also OCC
Bulletin 1995-52 (Sept. 22, 1995).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In the proposal, the OCC asked for comment on whether application
of the NDIP Policy Statement created issues that the OCC should
address.
The commenter said that the NDIP Policy Statement should not apply
to retail forex transactions, asserting that the retail forex rule,
alone, would be sufficient to protect retail customers, and the
imposition of the NDIP Policy Statement on retail forex transactions
would create confusion and ambiguity. No specific provisions were
identified, however, that create confusion or ambiguity. The commenter
further argued that because the NDIP Policy Statement does not apply to
CFTC registrants, its application to retail forex transactions would
not promote consistent regulatory treatment of retail forex
transactions.
The OCC believes that it is appropriate to apply the NDIP Policy
Statement to retail forex transactions. The consumer protections that
the NDIP Policy Statement provides are no less important for retail
forex transactions than for other nondeposit investment products.
Moreover, there is no direct conflict between this rule and the NDIP
Policy Statement because the statement requires national banks to
develop policies and procedures to ensure that nondeposit investment
product sales are conducted in compliance with applicable laws and
regulations.\16\ If a national bank has questions regarding how the
NDIP Policy Statement applies to its retail forex business, it should
seek clarification from its examiners.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\ There are, of course, differences in the regulations that
generally govern national banks versus those that govern CFTC
registrants, such as capital rules. The NDIP Policy Statement,
because it governs bank activities more generally, is similar to
capital rules.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Section-by-Section Analysis
Section 48.1--Authority, Purpose, and Scope
This section authorizes a national bank to conduct retail forex
transactions.
The OCC requested comment on whether the retail forex rule should
apply to national banks' foreign branches conducting retail forex
transactions abroad, whether with U.S. or foreign customers.
The commenter responded that there is no U.S. policy interest in
applying U.S. consumer protection rules to transactions with non-U.S.
residents conducted by foreign branches. Those transactions are subject
to foreign regulatory requirements that could be inconsistent with the
retail forex rule. Subjecting those transactions to two sets of
regulatory requirements would also place national banks at a
competitive disadvantage abroad.
The OCC recognizes the concerns raised by the commenter.
Retail forex transactions between a foreign branch of a national
bank and a non-U.S. customer are subject to any applicable disclosure,
recordkeeping, capital, margin, reporting, business conduct,
documentation, and other requirements of applicable foreign law.
Therefore, those transactions are not subject to the requirements of
Sec. Sec. 48.3 and 48.5 to 48.16.
Section 48.2--Definitions
This section defines terms specific to retail forex transactions
and to the regulatory requirements that apply to retail forex
transactions.
The definition of ``retail forex transaction'' generally includes
the following transactions in foreign currency between a national bank
and a person that is not an eligible contract participant: \17\ (i) A
future or option on such a future; \18\ (ii) options not traded on a
registered national securities exchange; \19\ and (iii) certain
leveraged, margined, or bank-financed transactions,\20\ including
rolling spot forex transactions. The definition generally tracks the
statutory language in section 2(c)(2)(B) and (C) of the CEA.\21\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\17\ The definition of ``eligible contract participant'' is
found in the CEA and is discussed below.
\18\ 7 U.S.C. 2(c)(2)(B)(i)(I).
\19\ 7 U.S.C. 2(c)(2)(B)(i)(I).
\20\ 7 U.S.C. 2(c)(2)(C).
\21\ 7 U.S.C. 2(c)(2)(B) and (C).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Certain transactions in foreign currency are not ``retail forex
transactions.'' For example, a spot forex transaction in which one
currency is bought for another and the two currencies are exchanged
within two days would not meet the definition of ``retail forex
transaction.'' \22\ Similarly, ``retail forex transaction'' does not
include a forward contract that creates an enforceable obligation to
make or take delivery, provided that each counterparty has the ability
to deliver and accept delivery in connection with its line of
business.\23\ In addition, the definition does not include transactions
conducted through an exchange, because in those cases the exchange
[[Page 41377]]
would be the counterparty to both the national bank and the retail
forex customer, rather than the national bank directly facing the
retail forex customer.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\22\ See generally CFTC v. Int'l Fin. Servs. (New York), Inc.,
323 F. Supp. 2d 482, 495 (S.D.N.Y. 2004) (distinguishing between
foreign exchange futures contracts and spot contracts in foreign
exchange, and noting that foreign currency trades settled within two
days are ordinarily spot transactions rather than futures
contracts); see also Bank Brussels Lambert v. Intermetals Corp., 779
F. Supp. 741, 748 (S.D.N.Y. 1991).
\23\ See 7 U.S.C. 2(c)(2)(C)(i)(II)(bb)(BB); CFTC v. Int'l Fin.
Servs. (New York), Inc., 323 F. Supp. 2d 482, 495 (S.D.N.Y. 2004)
(distinguishing between forward contracts in foreign exchange and
foreign exchange futures contracts); see also William L. Stein, The
Exchange-Trading Requirement of the Commodity Exchange Act, 41 Vand.
L. Rev. 473, 491 (1988). In contrast to forward contracts, futures
contracts generally include several or all of the following
characteristics: (i) Standardized nonnegotiable terms (other than
price and quantity); (ii) parties are required to deposit initial
margin to secure their obligations under the contract; (iii) parties
are obligated and entitled to pay or receive variation margin in the
amount of gain or loss on the position periodically over the period
the contract is outstanding; (iv) purchasers and sellers are
permitted to close out their positions by selling or purchasing
offsetting contracts; and (v) settlement may be provided for by
either (a) cash payment through a clearing entity that acts as the
counterparty to both sides of the contract without delivery of the
underlying commodity; or (b) physical delivery of the underlying
commodity. See Edward F. Greene et al., U.S. Regulation of
International Securities and Derivatives Markets Sec. 14.08[2] (8th
ed. 2006).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The proposed rule sought comment on whether leveraged, margined, or
bank-financed forex transactions, including rolling spot forex
transactions (so-called Zelener \24\ contracts), should be regulated as
retail forex transactions; the OCC preliminary believed that they
should.\25\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\24\ CFTC v. Zelener, 373 F.3d 861 (7th Cir. 2004); see also
CFTC v. Erskine, 512 F.3d 309 (6th Cir. 2008).
\25\ 7 U.S.C. 2(c)(2)(E)(iii) (requiring that retail forex rules
treat all functionally or economically similar transactions
similarly); see 17 CFR 5.1(m) (defining ``retail forex transaction''
for CFTC-registered retail forex dealers).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The commenter supported the inclusion of rolling spot forex
transactions in the definition of ``retail forex transaction.'' A
rolling spot forex transaction nominally requires delivery of currency
within two days, like spot transactions. However, in practice, the
contracts are indefinitely renewed every other day and no currency is
actually delivered until one party affirmatively closes out the
position.\26\ Therefore, the contracts are economically more like
futures than spot contracts, although courts have held them to be spot
contracts in form.\27\ Like the CFTC's retail forex rule and the FDIC's
proposed retail forex rule, the final rule's definition of ``retail
forex transaction'' includes leveraged, margined, or bank-financed
rolling spot forex transactions, as well as certain other leveraged,
margined, or bank-financed forex transactions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\26\ For example, in Zelener, the retail forex dealer retained
the right, at the date of delivery of the currency to deliver the
currency, roll the transaction over, or offset all or a portion of
the transaction with another open position held by the customer. See
CFTC v. Zelener, 373 F.3d 861, 868 (7th Cir. 2004).
\27\ See, e.g., CFTC v. Erskine, 512 F.3d 309, 326 (6th Cir.
2008); CFTC v. Zelener, 373 F.3d 861, 869 (7th Cir. 2004).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The commenter sought clarification that forex forwards would not be
included in the definition, because transactions that convert or
exchange actual currencies for any commercial or investment purpose are
a traditional product offered by national banks and do not raise the
consumer protection issues associated with futures or rolling spot
forex transactions.
The OCC agrees that a forex forward that is not leveraged,
margined, or financed by the national bank does not meet the definition
of ``retail forex transaction.'' However, a leveraged, margined, or
bank-financed forex forward is a retail forex transaction unless it
creates an enforceable obligation to deliver between a seller and a
buyer that have the ability to deliver and accept delivery,
respectively, in connection with their line of business \28\ or the OCC
determines that the forward is not functionally or economically similar
to a forex future or option, as described below.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\28\ See 7 U.S.C. 2(c)(2)(C)(i)(II)(bb)(BB).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The final rule contains a provision that allows the OCC to exempt
specific transactions or kinds of transaction from the third prong of
the ``retail forex transaction'' definition. The OCC is concerned that
certain traditional banking products, which are distinguishable from
speculative rolling spot forex transactions, may inadvertently fall
within the definition of ``retail forex transaction'' as leveraged,
margined, or bank-financed forex transactions. This result was not
intended by the Dodd-Frank Act, which requires retail forex rules to
treat similarly transactions that are functionally or economically
similar to forex futures or options.\29\ National banks may seek a
determination that a given transaction or kind of transaction does not
fall within the third prong of the ``retail forex transaction''
definition by submitting a written request to the OCC.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\29\ 7 U.S.C. 2(c)(2)(E)(iii)(II).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The commenter asked for confirmation that deposit accounts with
foreign exchange features are outside the scope of the rule.
The Legal Certainty for Bank Products Act of 2000, as amended by
the Dodd-Frank Act, generally exempts ``identified banking products''
from the CEA.\30\ Identified banking products include: Deposit
accounts, savings accounts, certificates of deposit, or other deposit
instruments issued by a bank; banker's acceptances; letters of credit
issued or loans made by a bank; debit accounts at a bank arising from a
credit card or similar arrangement; and certain loan
participations.\31\ Because identified banking products are not subject
to the CEA, they are not prohibited by section 2(c)(2)(E)(ii) of the
CEA. To provide clarity, the final rule excludes identified banking
products from the definition of ``retail forex transaction.''
Identified banking products that have embedded foreign exchange
features, for example a deposit account in which the customer may
deposit funds in one currency and withdraw funds in another, are not
retail forex transactions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\30\ 7 U.S.C. 27a(a)(1). An identified banking product offered
by a national bank could become subject to the CEA if the OCC
determines, in consultation with the CFTC and the Securities and
Exchange Commission, that the product would meet the definition of a
``swap'' under the CEA or a ``security-based swap'' under Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and has become known to the trade as a swap or
security-based swap, or otherwise has been structured as an
identified banking product for the purpose of evading the provisions
of the CEA, the Securities Act of 1933, or the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934. 7 U.S.C. 27a(b).
\31\ 7 U.S.C. 27(b) (citing Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act Sec.
206(a)(1) to (5)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
This section defines several terms by reference to the CEA, the
most important of which is ``eligible contract participant.'' Foreign
currency transactions with eligible contract participants are not
considered retail forex transactions and are therefore not subject to
this rule. In addition to a variety of financial entities, certain
governmental entities, businesses, and individuals may be eligible
contract participants.\32\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\32\ The term ``eligible contract participant'' is defined at 7
U.S.C. 1a(18), and for purposes most relevant to this rule generally
includes:
(a) A corporation, partnership, proprietorship, organization,
trust, or other entity--
(1) That has total assets exceeding $10,000,000;
(2) The obligations of which under an agreement, contract, or
transaction are guaranteed or otherwise supported by a letter of
credit or keepwell, support, or other agreement by certain other
eligible contract participants; or
(3) That--
(i) Has a net worth exceeding $1,000,000; and
(ii) Enters into an agreement, contract, or transaction in
connection with the conduct of the entity's business or to manage
the risk associated with an asset or liability owned or incurred or
reasonably likely to be owned or incurred by the entity in the
conduct of the entity's business;
(b) Subject to certain exclusions,
(1) A governmental entity (including the United States, a State,
or a foreign government) or political subdivision of a governmental
entity;
(2) A multinational or supranational governmental entity; and
(3) An instrumentality, agency, or department of an entity
described in (b)(1) or (2); and
(c) An individual who has amounts invested on a discretionary
basis, the aggregate of which is in excess of--
(1) $10,000,000; or
(2) $5,000,000 and who enters into the agreement, contract, or
transaction in order to manage the risk associated with an asset
owned or liability incurred, or reasonably likely to be owned or
incurred, by the individual.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section 48.3--Prohibited Transactions
This section prohibits a national bank and its institution-
affiliated parties from engaging in fraudulent conduct in connection
with retail forex transactions. This section also prohibits a national
bank from acting as a counterparty to a retail forex transaction if the
national bank or its affiliate exercises discretion over the customer's
retail forex account because the OCC views such self-dealing as
inappropriate.
The OCC received no comments to this section and adopts it as
proposed.
[[Page 41378]]
Section 48.4--Supervisory Non-Objection
This section requires a national bank to obtain a written
supervisory non-objection prior to engaging in a retail forex business.
To obtain such non-objection, the national bank will have to provide
such information as the OCC deems necessary to determine that the
national bank would satisfy the requirements of the rule. This
information will include information on: Customer due diligence
(including credit evaluations, customer appropriateness, and ``know
your customer'' documentation); new product approvals; haircuts for
noncash margin; and conflicts of interest. In addition, the national
bank must establish that it has adequate written policies, procedures,
and risk measurement and management systems and controls.
National banks engaged in retail forex transactions as of the
effective date of this rule that promptly request the OCC's review of
their retail forex business will have six months, or a longer period
provided by the OCC, to bring their operations into conformance with
the rule. Under this rule, a national bank that requests the OCC's
review within 30 days of the effective date of the final retail forex
rule and submits such information as the OCC may request within the
timeframe the OCC provides will be deemed to be operating its retail
forex business pursuant to a rule or regulation of a Federal regulatory
agency, as required under the CEA, for such period.\33\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\33\ 7 U.S.C. 2(c)(2)(E)(ii)(I).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
A national bank need not join a futures self-regulatory
organization as a condition of conducting a retail forex business.
The commenter supported the adoption of this section, and the OCC
adopts it as proposed.
Section 48.5--Application and Closing Out of Offsetting Long and Short
Positions
This section requires a national bank to close out offsetting long
and short positions in a retail forex account. The national bank would
have to offset such positions regardless of whether the customer has
instructed otherwise. The CFTC concluded that keeping open long and
short positions in a retail forex customer's account removes the
opportunity for the customer to profit on the transactions, increases
the fees paid by the customer, and invites abuse.\34\ The OCC agreed
with this concern in the notice of proposed rulemaking.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\34\ Proposed CFTC Retail Forex Rule, 75 FR at 3287 n.54.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The commenter stated that a customer should be permitted to provide
instructions with respect to the manner in which the customer's retail
forex transaction are offset when: (i) The customer maintains separate
accounts managed by different advisors; (ii) the customer maintains
separate accounts using different trading strategies; or (iii) the
customer employs different trading strategies in one account and
applies certain orders to risk-manage that exposure. The commenter also
sought clarification that a customer could provide specific offset
instructions in writing or orally, and that those instructions can be
made on a blanket basis.
The OCC agrees that a customer should be able to offset retail
forex transactions in a particular manner, if he or she so chooses.
Paragraph (c) has been modified to provide that, notwithstanding the
default offset rules in paragraphs (a) and (b), the national bank must
offset retail forex transactions pursuant to a customer's specific
instructions. Blanket instructions are not sufficient for this purpose,
as they could obviate the default rule. However, offset instructions
need not be given separately for each pair of orders in order to be
``specific.'' Instructions that apply to sufficiently defined sets of
transactions could be specific enough. Finally, consistent with the
changes to Sec. 48.12, retail forex customers may make offset
instructions in writing or orally. The national bank must create and
maintain a record of each offset instruction.\35\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\35\ See Sec. 48.7(a)(6) and (g).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section 48.6--Disclosure
This section requires a national bank to provide retail forex
customers with a risk disclosure statement similar to the one required
by the CFTC's retail forex rule but tailored to address certain unique
characteristics of retail forex in national banks. The prescribed risk
disclosure statement would describe the risks associated with retail
forex transactions.
The commenter agreed with the need for a robust risk disclosure
statement but suggested that a shorter, clearer, more direct, and less
redundant statement would be more effective. The final rule
incorporates several changes to the disclosures to eliminate
redundancies, address ambiguities, and convey the information more
clearly.
The proposal requested comment on whether the risk disclosure
statement should disclose the percentage of profitable retail forex
accounts.
The commenter said that disclosing the ratio of profitable to
nonprofitable retail forex accounts is not useful because those ratios
depend on many factors (including the trading expertise of customers)
and could suggest one national bank is a more attractive retail forex
counterparty than another.
In its retail forex rule, the CFTC requires its registrants to
disclose to retail customers the percentage of retail forex accounts
that earned a profit and the percentage of such accounts that
experienced a loss during each of the most recent four calendar
quarters.\36\ The CFTC explained that the vast majority of retail
customers who enter these transactions do so solely for speculative
purposes and that relatively few of these participants trade
profitably.\37\ In its final rule, the CFTC found this requirement
appropriate to protect retail customers from inherent conflicts
embedded in the operations of the retail over-the-counter forex
industry.\38\ The OCC agrees with the CFTC and the final rule requires
this disclosure.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\36\ 17 CFR 5.5(e)(1).
\37\ Proposed CFTC Retail Forex Rule, 75 FR at 3289.
\38\ Final CFTC Retail Forex Rule, 75 FR at 55412.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The proposal requested comment on whether the risk disclosure
statement should include a disclosure that when a retail customer loses
money trading, the dealer makes money.
The commenter said that this disclosure is inaccurate because the
bank immediately hedges retail forex transactions or nets them with
similar transactions and therefore does not profit from exchange rate
fluctuations. The commenter argued it is more accurate to inform
customers that the bank may or does mark-up (or mark-down) transactions
or apply commission rates to transactions that will create income for
the bank.
The OCC understands that the economic model of a retail forex
business may be to profit from spreads, fees, and commissions.
Nonetheless, because a national bank engaging in retail forex
transactions is trading as principal, by definition, when the retail
forex customer loses money on a retail forex transaction, the national
bank makes money on that transaction. The OCC therefore believes that
this disclosure is accurate and helps potential retail forex customers
understand the nature of retail forex transactions. Similarly, the
CFTC's retail forex rule requires a disclosure that when a retail
customer loses money
[[Page 41379]]
trading, the dealer makes money on such trades, in addition to any
fees, commissions, or spreads.\39\ The final rule includes this
disclosure requirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\39\ 17 CFR 5.5(b).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The proposal asked whether it would be convenient to national banks
and retail forex customers to allow the retail forex risk disclosure to
be combined with other disclosures that national banks make to their
customers.
The commenter asked the OCC to confirm that national banks may add
topics to the risk disclosure statement.
The OCC is concerned that the effectiveness of the disclosure could
be diminished if surrounded by other topics. Therefore, the final rule
requires the risk disclosure statement to be given to potential retail
forex customers as set forth in the rule. National banks may describe
and provide additional information on retail forex transactions in a
separate document.
The commenter further asked the OCC to confirm that the risk
disclosure statement may be appended to account opening agreements or
forms and that a single signature by the customer on a combined account
agreement and disclosure form can be used as long as the customer is
directed to and acknowledges the risk disclosure statement immediately
prior to the signature line.
The OCC believes that a separate risk disclosure document
appropriately highlights the risks in retail forex transactions and
that requiring a separate signature for the separate risk disclosure
appropriately calls a potential retail forex customer's attention to
the risk disclosure statement. However, a national bank may attach the
risk disclosure to a related document, such as the account agreement.
The proposal requested comment on whether the risk disclosure
statement should include a disclosure of fees that the national bank
charges to retail forex customers.
The commenter agreed that the disclosure of fees is appropriate,
but should not include income from hedging retail forex customers'
positions or income streams not charged to the customer. Moreover, the
commenter stated that it is impractical to numerically state the bid/
ask spread given that it may vary.
The final rule, like the proposed rule, does not require national
banks to disclose income streams not charged to the retail forex
customer. However, a national bank must do more than simply describe
the means by which it earns revenue. To the extent practical, it must
quantify the fees, charges, spreads, or commissions that the national
bank may impose on the retail forex customer in connection with the
customer's retail forex account or a retail forex transaction.\40\ The
OCC further believes that disclosure of the bid/ask spread is possible
in a variety of ways. If a national bank bases its prices off of the
prices provided by a third party, then the national bank may disclose
the use of the third party's pricing and the markup charged to retail
forex customers. Alternatively, the national bank may disclose the bid/
ask spread by quoting both the bid and ask prices to retail forex
customers prior to entering into a retail forex transaction. These
quotes may be provided as part of an electronic trading platform or,
after a retail forex customer calls the national bank for a retail
forex transaction, by providing both a bid and ask price for the
transaction.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\40\ The final rule clarifies that a national bank must disclose
spreads in addition to fees, commissions, and charges.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The commenter read the disclosure to suggest that the national bank
cannot seek to recover losses not covered by a customer's margin
account via an appropriate dispute resolution forum and asked the OCC
to confirm that this was not the case.
Section 48.9(d)(4) requires a national bank, in the event that a
retail forex customer's margin falls below the amount needed to satisfy
the margin requirement to either: (1) Collect sufficient margin from
the retail forex customer; or (2) liquidate the retail forex customer's
retail forex transactions. The final rule does not forbid a national
bank from seeking to recover a deficiency from a retail forex customer
in an appropriate venue. The disclosure has been revised to make this
fact clear.
Finally, the commenter said that the disclosure regarding the
availability of FDIC-insurance for retail forex transactions should be
clarified.
The disclosure requires a national bank to state that retail forex
transactions are not FDIC-insured. The commenter agreed with that
statement. It noted, however, that margin funds may be insured
deposits. The FDIC-insured status of funds held in a retail forex
margin account will depend on whether such funds are held in a manner
that meets the requirements of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act and
its implementing regulations. National banks may accurately disclose
the availability of FDIC insurance for retail forex margin accounts in
a separate document as permitted by law.
Section 48.7--Recordkeeping
This section specifies which documents and records that a national
bank engaged in retail forex transactions must retain for examination
by the OCC. This section also prescribes document maintenance
standards. The OCC notes that records may be kept electronically as
permitted under the Electronic Signatures in Global and National
Commerce Act.\41\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\41\ 15 U.S.C. 7001(d).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The OCC received no comments on this section. Recordkeeping
requirements found in Sec. 48.13(a)(3) of the proposed rule were moved
into this section to centralize recordkeeping requirements in one
section. Furthermore, the recordkeeping requirements have been modified
to accommodate oral orders and offset instructions. A national bank
must create an audio recording of oral orders and offset instructions.
Section 48.8--Capital Requirements
This section requires that a national bank that offers or enters
into retail forex transactions must be ``well capitalized'' as defined
in the OCC's prompt corrective action regulation.\42\ In addition, a
national bank must continue to hold capital against retail forex
transactions as provided in the OCC's capital regulation.\43\ This rule
does not amend the OCC's prompt corrective action regulation or capital
regulation.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\42\ 12 CFR part 6.
\43\ 12 CFR part 3.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The proposed rule contained a provision allowing the OCC to exempt
a national bank from the well-capitalized requirement. This provision
has been removed in light of the general reservation of authority in
Sec. 48.17.
Section 48.9--Margin Requirements
Paragraph (a) requires a national bank that engages in retail forex
transactions, in advance of any such transaction, to collect from the
retail forex customer margin equal to at least 2 percent of the
notional value of the retail forex transaction if the transaction is in
a major currency pair and at least 5 percent of the notional value of
the retail forex transaction otherwise. These margin requirements are
identical to the requirements imposed by the CFTC's retail forex rule.
The proposal requested comments on whether it should define the
major currencies in the final rule but did not receive any. The final
rule adopts the proposal's approach to identifying the major
currencies.
A major currency pair is a currency pair with two major currencies.
The
[[Page 41380]]
major currencies currently are the U.S. Dollar (USD), Canadian Dollar
(CAD), Euro (EUR), United Kingdom Pound (GBP), Japanese Yen (JPY),
Swiss Franc (CHF), New Zealand Dollar (NZD), Australian Dollar (AUD),
Swedish Kronor (SEK), Danish Kroner (DKK), and Norwegian Krone
(NOK).\44\ An evolving market could change the major currencies, so the
OCC is not proposing to define the term ``major currency,'' but rather
expects that national banks will obtain an interpretive letter from the
OCC prior to treating any currency other than those listed above as a
``major currency.'' \45\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\44\ See National Futures Association, Forex Transactions: A
Regulatory Guide 17 (Feb. 2011); Federal Reserve Bank of New York,
Survey of North American Foreign Exchange Volume tbl. 3e (Jan.
2011); Bank for International Settlements, Report on Global Foreign
Exchange Market Activity in 2010 at 15 tbl. B.6 (Dec. 2010).
\45\ The Final CFTC Retail Forex Rule similarly does not define
``major currency.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
For retail forex transactions, margin protects the retail forex
customer from the risks related to trading with excessive leverage. The
volatility of the foreign currency markets exposes retail forex
customers to substantial risk of loss. High leverage ratios can
significantly increase a customer's losses and gains. Even a small move
against a customer's position can result in a substantial loss. Even
with required margin, losses can exceed the margin posted and, if the
account is not closed out, and, depending on the specific
circumstances, the customer could be liable for additional losses.
Given the risks that are inherent in the trading of retail forex
transactions by retail customers, the only funds that should be
invested in such transactions are those that the customer can afford to
lose.
Prior to the CFTC's rule, nonbank dealers routinely permitted
customers to trade with 1 percent margin (leverage of 100:1) and
sometimes with as little as 0.25 percent margin (leverage of 400:1).
When the CFTC proposed its retail forex rule in January 2010, it
proposed a margin requirement of 10 percent (leverage of 10:1). In
response to comments, the CFTC reduced the required margin in the final
rule to 2 percent (leverage of 50:1) for trades involving major
currencies and 5 percent (leverage of 20:1) for trades involving non-
major currencies.
The proposal requested comment on whether these margin requirements
were appropriate to protect retail forex customers.
The commenter did not object to the amount of margin required.
However, the commenter suggested that the margin required by this
paragraph should be initial margin rather than maintenance margin. The
commenter also suggested that national banks be allowed to set
maintenance margin levels as a matter of the banks' credit and risk
policies in a manner that balances (i) protecting customers from a
forced close-put of their positions as soon as an adverse market move
erodes margin under the 2 or 5 percent minimum level with (ii) the need
to promptly collect margin and close out positions when a customer
fails to meet a margin call. The commenter also suggested that
customers should have some reasonable time to meet margin calls before
they are deemed to have defaulted and face a forced liquidation of
their positions.
Subject to reasonable collection times as described below, a
national bank must ensure that there is always sufficient margin in a
retail forex customer's margin account for the customer's open retail
forex transactions. If the amount of margin in a retail forex
customer's margin account is insufficient to meet the requirements of
paragraph (a), then Sec. 48.9(d)(4) requires the national bank to make
a margin call to replenish the margin account to an acceptable level
and, if the customer does not comply with the margin call, to liquidate
the retail forex customer's retail forex transactions. Retail forex
customers should have a reasonable amount of time to post required
margin for retail forex transactions. Market practice is for retail
forex counterparties to make margin calls at the close of trading on a
trading day based on margin levels at the end of that day or at the
open of trading on the next trading day based on margin levels at the
end of that prior day. If the retail forex customer does not post
sufficient margin by the end of the next close of trading, then the
retail forex counterparty liquidates the customer's retail forex
account. In other words, by the close of business on a given trading
day, the margin account must be sufficient to meet the margin
requirements as at the end of the prior trading day.
Paragraph (b) specifies the acceptable forms of margin that
customers may post. National banks must establish policies and
procedures providing for haircuts for noncash margin collected from
customers and must review these haircuts annually. It may be prudent
for national banks to review and modify the size of the haircuts more
frequently. The OCC requested comment on whether the final rule should
specify haircuts for noncash margin. The OCC received no comments on
this paragraph and adopts this paragraph as proposed.
Paragraph (c) requires a national bank to hold each retail forex
customer's retail forex transaction margin in a separate account. This
paragraph is designed to work with the prohibition on set-off in
paragraph (e), so that a national bank may not have an account
agreement that treats all of a retail forex customer's assets held by a
bank as margin for retail forex transactions.
The commenter requested clarification that this paragraph allows
national banks to place margin into an omnibus or commingled account
for operational convenience, provided that the bank keeps records of
each customer's margin balance.
A national bank may place margin collected from retail forex
customers into an omnibus or commingled account if the bank keeps
records of each retail forex customer's margin balance. A ``separate
account'' is one separate from the retail forex customer's other
accounts at the bank. For example, margin for retail forex transactions
cannot be held in a retail forex customer's savings account. Funds in a
savings account pledged as retail forex margin must be transferred to a
separate margin account, which could be an individual or an omnibus
margin account. The final rule contains slightly modified language to
clarify this intent. The FDIC-insured status of funds held in an
omnibus account will depend on whether such funds are held in a manner
that meets the requirements of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act and
its implementing regulations.
Paragraph (d) requires a national bank to collect additional margin
from the customer or to liquidate the customer's position if the amount
of margin held by the national bank fails to meet the requirements of
paragraph (a). The proposed rule would have required the national bank
to mark the customer's open retail forex positions and the value of the
customer's margin to the market daily to ensure that a retail forex
customer does not accumulate substantial losses not covered by margin.
The proposal requested comment on how frequently retail forex
customers' margin accounts should be marked to market.
The commenter asked that the final rules permit marking to market
more frequently than daily if the national bank's systems and customer
agreements permit. The final rule, like the proposed rule, requires
marking to market at least once per day. Nothing in paragraph (d)
forbids a more frequent schedule.
[[Page 41381]]
Paragraph (e) prohibits a national bank from applying a retail
forex customer's retail forex obligations against any asset or
liability of the retail forex customer other than money or property
pledged as margin.\46\ A national bank's relationship with a retail
forex customer may evolve out of a prior relationship of providing
financial services or may evolve into such a relationship. Thus, it is
more likely that a national bank acting as a retail forex counterparty
will hold other assets or liabilities of a retail forex customer, for
example a deposit account or mortgage, than a retail forex dealer
regulated by the CFTC. The OCC believes that it is inappropriate to
allow a national bank to leave trades open and allow additional
obligations to accrue that can be applied against a retail forex
customer's other assets or liabilities held by the national bank.
However, should a retail forex customer's retail forex obligations
exceed the amount of margin he or she has pledged, this rule does not
forbid a national bank from seeking to recover the deficiency in an
appropriate forum, such as a court of law. Paragraph (e) does not apply
to debts a retail forex customer owes to a national bank as recognized
in a judgment of a court of competent jurisdiction.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\46\ The final rule clarifies that the prohibition on setting
off retail forex ``losses'' in the proposed rule was meant to
include costs related to retail forex transactions, such as fees,
spreads, charges, and commissions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The commenter suggested that retail forex customers should be able
to pledge assets other than those held in the customer's margin
account. For example, a customer could nominate a deposit account as
containing margin for its retail forex transactions.
Nothing in this rule prevents retail forex customers from pledging
other assets they have at the bank as margin for retail forex
transactions. However, once those assets are pledged as margin, the
national bank must transfer them to the separate margin account. For
example, if a retail forex customer pledges $500 in her checking
account as margin, then the bank must deduct $500 from the checking
account and place $500 in the margin account. The OCC believes this
transfer appropriately alerts retail forex customers to the nature of
the pledge. A national bank may not evade this requirement by merely
taking a security interest in assets pledged as margin: pledged assets
must be placed in a separate margin account.
Section 48.10--Required Reporting to Customers
This section requires a national bank engaging in retail forex
transactions to provide each retail forex customer a monthly statement
and confirmation statements.
The proposal sought comment on whether this section provides for
statements that would be useful and meaningful to retail forex
customers or whether other information would be more appropriate.
The commenter sought clarification that the statements may be
provided electronically, and also suggested that retail forex customers
would be better served with continuous online access to account
information rather than monthly statements.
The OCC encourages national banks to provide real-time, continuous
access to account information. This rule does not prevent national
banks from doing so. However, the OCC believes it is valuable to
require national banks to provide retail forex account information to
retail forex customers at least once per month. Monthly statements may
be provided electronically as permitted under the Electronic Signatures
in Global and National Commerce Act.\47\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\47\ 15 U.S.C. 7001(c).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section 48.11--Unlawful Representations
This section prohibits a national bank and its institution-
affiliated parties from representing that the Federal government, the
OCC, or any other Federal agency has sponsored, recommended, or
approved retail forex transactions or products in any way. This section
also prohibits a national bank from implying or representing that it
will guarantee against or limit retail forex customer losses or not
collect margin as required by Sec. 48.9. This section does not
prohibit a national bank from sharing in a loss resulting from error or
mishandling of an order. Guaranties entered into prior to effectiveness
of the prohibition would only be affected if an attempt is made to
extend, modify, or renew them. This section also does not prohibit a
national bank from hedging or otherwise mitigating its own exposure to
retail forex transactions or any other foreign exchange risk.
The OCC received no comments to this section and adopts it as
proposed.
Section 48.12--Authorization to Trade
The proposed rule required national banks to have specific written
authorization from a retail forex customer before effecting a retail
forex transaction.
The commenter said that requiring specific written authorization
from a retail forex customer before effecting a retail forex
transaction for that customer would be burdensome and detrimental to
the customer's interests, if, for example, the customer cannot convey
written instructions because of technical difficulties.
The OCC agrees with this concern and further notes that the CFTC's
retail forex rule does not require written authorization for each
retail forex transaction. The final rule requires a national bank to
obtain a retail forex customer's specific authorization (written or
oral) to effect a particular trade. National banks must keep records of
authorizations to trade pursuant to this rule.
Section 48.13--Trading and Operational Standards
This section largely follows the trading standards of the CFTC's
retail forex rule, which were developed to prevent some of the
deceptive or unfair practices identified by the CFTC and the National
Futures Association.
Under paragraph (a), a national bank engaging in retail forex
transactions is required to establish and enforce internal rules,
procedures, and controls (1) to prevent front running, a practice in
which transactions in accounts of the national bank or its related
persons are executed before a similar customer order; and (2) to
establish settlement prices fairly and objectively.
The commenter requested clarification that the prohibition on front
running applies only when the person entering orders for the bank's
account or the account of related persons has knowledge of unexecuted
retail customer orders, and that a national bank may comply with this
provision by erecting a firewall between the retail forex order book
and other forex trading desks.
The final rule requires national banks to establish reasonable
policies, procedures, and controls to address front running. This
provision is designed to prevent the national banks from unfairly
taking advantage of information they gain from customer trades.
Effective firewalls and information barriers are reasonable policies,
procedures, and controls to ensure that a national bank does not take
unfair advantage of its retail forex customers. The final rule
clarifies paragraph (a) accordingly.
Paragraph (b) prohibits a national bank engaging in retail forex
transactions from disclosing that it
[[Page 41382]]
holds another person's order unless disclosure is necessary for
execution or is made at the OCC's request. The OCC received no comments
on this paragraph and adopts this paragraph as proposed.
Paragraph (c) ensures that related persons of another retail forex
counterparty do not open accounts with a national bank without the
knowledge and authorization of the account surveillance personnel of
the other retail forex counterparty with which they are affiliated.
Similarly, paragraph (d) ensures that related persons of a national
bank do not open accounts with other retail forex counterparties
without the knowledge and authorization of the account surveillance
personnel of the national bank with which they are affiliated.
The commenter requested confirmation that national banks may rely
on a representation of potential customers that they are not affiliated
with a retail forex counterparty. Paragraph (c) prohibits a national
bank from knowingly handling the retail forex account of a related
person of a retail forex counterparty. To the extent reasonable,
national banks may rely on representations of potential retail forex
customers. If, however, a national bank has actual knowledge that a
retail forex customer is a related person of a retail forex
counterparty, then no representation by the customer will allow the
bank to handle that retail forex account. A national bank should
inquire as to whether a potential retail forex customer is related to a
retail forex counterparty to avoid violating paragraph (c) through
willful ignorance.
The commenter also requested clarification that these paragraphs
apply only to employees of firms that offer retail forex transactions,
and, in the case of banks, only employees of the retail forex business
and not any employee of the bank that offers retail forex transactions.
The OCC agrees that the prohibitions in paragraph (c) and (d) should
only apply to employees working in the retail forex business;
paragraphs (c) and (d) are designed to prevent evasion of the
prohibition against front running. The final rule clarifies this point.
Paragraph (e) prohibits a national bank engaging in retail forex
transactions from (1) entering a retail forex transaction to be
executed at a price that is not at or near prices at which other retail
forex customers have executed materially similar transactions with the
national bank during the same time period, (2) changing prices after
confirmation, (3) providing a retail forex customer with a new bid
price that is higher (or lower) than previously provided without
providing a new ask price that is similarly higher (or lower) as well,
and (4) establishing a new position for a retail forex customer (except
to offset an existing position) if the national bank holds one or more
outstanding orders of other retail forex customers for the same
currency pair at a comparable price.
Paragraph (e)(3) does not prevent a national bank from changing the
bid or ask prices of a retail forex transaction to respond to market
events. The OCC understands that market practice among CFTC-registrants
is not to offer requotes but to simply reject orders and advise
customers they may submit a new order (which the dealer may or may not
accept). Similarly, a national bank may reject an order and advise
customers that they may submit a new order.
The proposal sought comment on whether paragraph (e)(3)
appropriately protected retail forex customers or whether a prohibition
on re-quoting would be simpler.
The commenter argued that the prohibition on re-quoting in
paragraph (e)(3) is overly broad and should permit new bids or offers
to reflect updated spreads. In the alternative, the commenter suggested
prohibiting re-quoting and requiring that, in the event an order is not
confirmed, the customer must submit a new order at the then-currently
displayed price. As stated above, rather than allowing requotes, a
national bank may reject orders and request that customers submit a new
order. Paragraph (e)(3) is consistent with the CFTC's retail forex rule
and the OCC adopts it as proposed.
Paragraph (e)(4) requires a national bank engaging in retail forex
transactions to execute similar orders in the order they are received.
The prohibition prevents a national bank from offering preferred
execution to some of its retail forex customers but not others.
Section 48.14--Supervision
This section imposes on a national bank and its agents, officers,
and employees a duty to supervise subordinates with responsibility for
retail forex transactions to ensure compliance with the OCC's retail
forex rule.
The proposal requested comment on whether this section imposed
requirements not already encompassed by safety and soundness standards.
Having received no comments to this section, the OCC adopts it as
proposed.
Section 48.15--Notice of Transfers
This section describes the requirements for transferring a retail
forex account. Generally, a national bank must provide retail forex
customers 30 days' prior notice before transferring or assigning their
account. Affected customers may then instruct the national bank to
transfer the account to an institution of their choosing or liquidate
the account. There are three exceptions to the above notice
requirement: a transfer in connection with the receivership or
conservatorship under the Federal Deposit Insurance Act; a transfer
pursuant to a retail forex customer's specific request; and a transfer
otherwise allowed by applicable law. A national bank that is the
transferee of retail forex accounts must generally provide the
transferred customers with the risk disclosure statement of Sec. 48.6
and obtain each affected customer's written acknowledgement within 60
days.
The OCC received no comments to this section and adopts it as
proposed.
Section 48.16--Customer Dispute Resolution
This section imposes limitations on how a national bank may handle
disputes arising out of a retail forex transaction. For example, this
section would restrict a national bank's ability to require mandatory
arbitration for such disputes.
The OCC received no comments to this section and adopts is as
proposed.
Section 48.17--Reservation of Authority
This section allows the OCC to modify certain requirements of this
rule consistent with safety and soundness and the protection of retail
forex customers. The OCC understands the need for flexibility as
foreign exchange products or foreign exchange trading procedures
develop and to ensure that such products or trading procedures are
subject to appropriate customer protection and safety and soundness
standards.
V. Regulatory Analysis
A. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.,
generally requires an agency that is issuing a proposed rule to prepare
and make available for public comment an initial regulatory flexibility
analysis that describes the impact of the proposed rule on small
entities. The RFA provides that an agency is not required to prepare
and publish an in