Airworthiness Directives; Pratt & Whitney Corp. (PW) JT9D-7R4H1 Turbofan Engines, 41144-41145 [2011-17622]
Download as PDF
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
41144
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 134 / Wednesday, July 13, 2011 / Proposed Rules
installation which is not shown to be
extremely remote, may accumulate in
hazardous quantities within the
airplane.
(4) Installations of Lithium batteries
must meet the requirements of 14 CFR
25.863(a) through (d).
(5) No corrosive fluids or gases that
may escape from any Lithium battery
may damage surrounding structure or
any adjacent systems, equipment, or
electrical wiring of the airplane in such
a way as to cause a major or more severe
failure condition, as determined in
accordance with 14 CFR 25.1309(b).
(6) Each Lithium-battery installation
must have provisions to prevent any
hazardous effect on structure or
essential systems caused by the
maximum amount of heat the battery
can generate during a short circuit of the
battery or of its individual cells.
(7) Lithium-battery installations must
have a system to control automatically
the charging rate of the battery to
prevent battery overheating or
overcharging, and
(i) A battery-temperature-sensing and
over-temperature-warning system with a
means to automatically disconnect the
battery from its charging source in the
event of an over-temperature condition
or,
(ii) A battery-failure sensing-andwarning system with a means to
automatically disconnect the battery
from its charging source in the event of
battery failure.
(8) Any Lithium-battery installation,
the function of which is required for
safe operation of the airplane, must
incorporate a monitoring-and-warning
feature that will provide an indication
to the appropriate flight crewmembers
whenever the state-of-charge of the
batteries has fallen below levels
considered acceptable for dispatch of
the airplane.
(9) The instructions for continued
airworthiness required by § 25.1529
(and § 26.11) must contain maintenance
steps to assure that the Lithium batteries
are sufficiently charged at appropriate
intervals specified by the battery
manufacturer. The instructions for
continued airworthiness must also
contain procedures to ensure the
integrity of Lithium batteries in spares
storage to prevent the replacement of
batteries, the function of which are
required for safe operation of the
airplane, with batteries that have
experienced degraded charge-retention
ability or other damage due to
prolonged storage at a low state-ofcharge. Precautions should be included
in the continued-airworthiness
maintenance instructions to prevent
mishandling of Lithium batteries, which
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:42 Jul 12, 2011
Jkt 223001
could result in short-circuit or other
unintentional damage that could result
in personal injury or property damage.
Note 1: The term ‘‘sufficiently charged’’
means that the battery will retain enough of
a charge, expressed in ampere-hours, to
ensure that the battery cells will not be
damaged. A battery cell may be damaged by
lowering the charge below a point where
there is a reduction in the ability to charge
and retain a full charge. This reduction
would be greater than the reduction that may
result from normal operational degradation.
Note 2: These special conditions are not
intended to replace § 25.1353(c) in the
certification basis of the Cessna Model 680
airplane. These special conditions apply only
to Lithium-ion batteries and rechargeable
Lithium-battery-system installations. The
requirements of § 25.1353(c) remain in effect
for batteries and battery installations on the
Cessna Model 680 airplane that do not use
Lithium-ion batteries.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on July 1,
2011.
Jeffrey E. Duven,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2011–17535 Filed 7–12–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2011–0731; Directorate
Identifier 2010–NE–39–AD
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Pratt &
Whitney Corp. (PW) JT9D–7R4H1
Turbofan Engines
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
We propose to adopt a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for all PW
JT9D–7R4H1 turbofan engines. This
proposed AD would require removing
certain high-pressure compressor (HPC)
shafts before their certified life limits,
and establishes a new, lower life-limit
for these parts. This proposed AD was
prompted by reports of cracks in five
HPC shafts. We are proposing this AD
to correct the unsafe condition on these
products.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by August 29, 2011.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments,
using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following
methods:
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations,
M–30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail
address above between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the
Docket Management Facility between
9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD
docket contains this proposed AD, the
regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The
street address for the Docket Office
(phone: 800–647–5527) is in the
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be
available in the AD docket shortly after
receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ian
Dargin, Aerospace Engineer, Engine
Certification Office, FAA, 12 New
England Executive Park, Burlington, MA
01803; phone: 781–238–7178; fax: 781–
238–7199; e-mail: ian.dargin@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written
relevant data, views, or arguments about
this proposal. Send your comments to
an address listed under the ADDRESSES
section. Include ‘‘Docket No. FAA–
2011–0731; Directorate Identifier 2010–
NE–39–AD’’ at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite
comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy
aspects of this proposed AD. We will
consider all comments received by the
closing date and may amend this
proposed AD because of those
comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact we receive
about this proposed AD.
Discussion
We received reports of five JT9D–
7R4H1 engines containing an HPC shaft
with cracks in the thread grooves of the
rear shaft. These engines have the
highest-thrust rating of the JT9D models,
and were operating in hot
environments. Higher operating metal
E:\FR\FM\13JYP1.SGM
13JYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 134 / Wednesday, July 13, 2011 / Proposed Rules
temperatures impose a greater low-cycle
fatigue life debit for each operating
cycle, requiring removing the affected
shafts before reaching their certified life
limits. All of the cracked shafts were
from the same fleet and engine model.
This condition, if not corrected, could
result in failure of the HPC shaft that
could lead to an uncommanded in-flight
shutdown or a possible uncontained
engine failure and damage to the
airplane.
FAA’s Determination
We are proposing this AD because we
evaluated all the relevant information
and determined the unsafe condition
described previously is likely to exist or
develop in other products of the same
type design.
Proposed AD Requirements
This proposed AD would require:
• For HPC shafts that have more than
4,500 cycles-since-new (CSN) on the
effective date of this AD, removing the
HPC shaft from service within 500
cycles-in-service (CIS) after the effective
date of this proposed AD or at the next
shop visit after the effective date of this
proposed AD, whichever occurs first.
• For HPC shafts that have 4,500 or
fewer CSN on the effective date of this
AD, removing the HPC shaft from
service before exceeding 5,000 CSN.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this proposed AD
would not affect any engines installed
on airplanes of U.S. registry.
under Executive Order 13132. This
proposed AD would not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the national
Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify this proposed regulation:
(1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866,
(2) Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under
the DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26,
1979),
(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation
in Alaska, and
(4) Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part
39 as follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Authority for This Rulemaking
§ 39.13
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs, describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701:
‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD
would not have federalism implications
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:42 Jul 12, 2011
Jkt 223001
[Amended]
Pratt & Whitney Corp: Docket No. FAA–
2011–0731; Directorate Identifier 2010–
NE–39–AD.
(a) Comments Due Date
We must receive comments by August 29,
2011.
41145
(f) Engines With an HPC Shaft, P/N 808071,
That Has More Than 4,500 Cycles-SinceNew (CSN)
For engines with an HPC shaft, P/N
808071, that has more than 4,500 CSN on the
effective date of this AD, remove the HPC
shaft from service within 500 cycles-inservice (CIS) after the effective date of the AD
or at piece-part exposure, whichever occurs
first.
(g) Engines With an HPC Shaft, P/N 808071,
That Has 4,500 or Fewer CSN
For engines with an HPC shaft, P/N
808071, that has 4,500 or fewer CSN on the
effective date of this AD, remove the HPC
shaft from service before exceeding 5,000
CSN.
(h) Engines With an HPC Shaft, P/N 808070,
Removal From Service
For engines with an HPC shaft, P/N
808070, remove the HPC shaft, P/N 808070,
from service not later than 1,200 CSN.
(i) Installation Prohibition
After the effective date of this AD, do not
install or reinstall into any engine:
(1) Any HPC shaft, P/N 808071, that is at
piece-part exposure and exceeds the new
lower life limit of 5,000 CSN, or
(2) Any HPC shaft, P/N 808070, that is at
piece-part exposure and exceeds the new
lower life limit of 1,200 CSN.
(j) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
The Manager, Engine Certification Office,
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs
for this AD, if requested using the procedures
found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with
14 CFR 39.19.
(k) Related Information
For more information about this AD,
contact Ian Dargin, Aerospace Engineer,
Engine Certification Office, FAA, 12 New
England Executive Park, Burlington, MA
01803; phone: 781–238–7178; fax: 781–238–
7199; e-mail: ian.dargin@faa.gov.
Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on
July 7, 2011.
Peter A. White,
Acting Manager, Engine & Propeller
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2011–17622 Filed 7–12–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
Pratt & Whitney Corp (PW) JT9D–7R4H1
turbofan engines with a high-pressure
compressor (HPC) shaft, part numbers (P/Ns)
808070 or 808071, installed.
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
(d) Unsafe Condition
This AD was prompted by reports of cracks
in five HPC shafts. We are issuing this AD
to correct the unsafe condition on these
products.
[Docket No. FAA–2011–0560; Airspace
Docket No. 11–ANM–15]
(e) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the
compliance times specified, unless already
done.
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 71
Proposed Amendment of Class E
Airspace; Glendive, MT
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\13JYP1.SGM
13JYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 134 (Wednesday, July 13, 2011)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 41144-41145]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-17622]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2011-0731; Directorate Identifier 2010-NE-39-AD
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Pratt & Whitney Corp. (PW) JT9D-7R4H1
Turbofan Engines
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for all
PW JT9D-7R4H1 turbofan engines. This proposed AD would require removing
certain high-pressure compressor (HPC) shafts before their certified
life limits, and establishes a new, lower life-limit for these parts.
This proposed AD was prompted by reports of cracks in five HPC shafts.
We are proposing this AD to correct the unsafe condition on these
products.
DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by August 29, 2011.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: 202-493-2251.
Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail address above between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Management Facility
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street
address for the Docket Office (phone: 800-647-5527) is in the ADDRESSES
section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after
receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ian Dargin, Aerospace Engineer, Engine
Certification Office, FAA, 12 New England Executive Park, Burlington,
MA 01803; phone: 781-238-7178; fax: 781-238-7199; e-mail:
ian.dargin@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposal. Send your comments to an address listed
under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2011-0731;
Directorate Identifier 2010-NE-39-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD because of those comments.
We will post all comments we receive, without change, to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.
Discussion
We received reports of five JT9D-7R4H1 engines containing an HPC
shaft with cracks in the thread grooves of the rear shaft. These
engines have the highest-thrust rating of the JT9D models, and were
operating in hot environments. Higher operating metal
[[Page 41145]]
temperatures impose a greater low-cycle fatigue life debit for each
operating cycle, requiring removing the affected shafts before reaching
their certified life limits. All of the cracked shafts were from the
same fleet and engine model. This condition, if not corrected, could
result in failure of the HPC shaft that could lead to an uncommanded
in-flight shutdown or a possible uncontained engine failure and damage
to the airplane.
FAA's Determination
We are proposing this AD because we evaluated all the relevant
information and determined the unsafe condition described previously is
likely to exist or develop in other products of the same type design.
Proposed AD Requirements
This proposed AD would require:
For HPC shafts that have more than 4,500 cycles-since-new
(CSN) on the effective date of this AD, removing the HPC shaft from
service within 500 cycles-in-service (CIS) after the effective date of
this proposed AD or at the next shop visit after the effective date of
this proposed AD, whichever occurs first.
For HPC shafts that have 4,500 or fewer CSN on the
effective date of this AD, removing the HPC shaft from service before
exceeding 5,000 CSN.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this proposed AD would not affect any engines
installed on airplanes of U.S. registry.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
(1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
(2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
(4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new
airworthiness directive (AD):
Pratt & Whitney Corp: Docket No. FAA-2011-0731; Directorate
Identifier 2010-NE-39-AD.
(a) Comments Due Date
We must receive comments by August 29, 2011.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
Pratt & Whitney Corp (PW) JT9D-7R4H1 turbofan engines with a
high-pressure compressor (HPC) shaft, part numbers (P/Ns) 808070 or
808071, installed.
(d) Unsafe Condition
This AD was prompted by reports of cracks in five HPC shafts. We
are issuing this AD to correct the unsafe condition on these
products.
(e) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.
(f) Engines With an HPC Shaft, P/N 808071, That Has More Than 4,500
Cycles-Since-New (CSN)
For engines with an HPC shaft, P/N 808071, that has more than
4,500 CSN on the effective date of this AD, remove the HPC shaft
from service within 500 cycles-in-service (CIS) after the effective
date of the AD or at piece-part exposure, whichever occurs first.
(g) Engines With an HPC Shaft, P/N 808071, That Has 4,500 or Fewer CSN
For engines with an HPC shaft, P/N 808071, that has 4,500 or
fewer CSN on the effective date of this AD, remove the HPC shaft
from service before exceeding 5,000 CSN.
(h) Engines With an HPC Shaft, P/N 808070, Removal From Service
For engines with an HPC shaft, P/N 808070, remove the HPC shaft,
P/N 808070, from service not later than 1,200 CSN.
(i) Installation Prohibition
After the effective date of this AD, do not install or reinstall
into any engine:
(1) Any HPC shaft, P/N 808071, that is at piece-part exposure
and exceeds the new lower life limit of 5,000 CSN, or
(2) Any HPC shaft, P/N 808070, that is at piece-part exposure
and exceeds the new lower life limit of 1,200 CSN.
(j) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
The Manager, Engine Certification Office, FAA, has the authority
to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures
found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19.
(k) Related Information
For more information about this AD, contact Ian Dargin,
Aerospace Engineer, Engine Certification Office, FAA, 12 New England
Executive Park, Burlington, MA 01803; phone: 781-238-7178; fax: 781-
238-7199; e-mail: ian.dargin@faa.gov.
Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on July 7, 2011.
Peter A. White,
Acting Manager, Engine & Propeller Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2011-17622 Filed 7-12-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P