Information Collection Being Reviewed by the Federal Communications Commission, 41257-41258 [2011-17562]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 134 / Wednesday, July 13, 2011 / Notices
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
OMB Control Number: 3060–0704.
Title: Sections 42.10, 42.11, 64.1900
and Section 254(g): Policies and Rules
Concerning the Interstate, Interexchange
Marketplace.
Form Number: N/A.
Type of Review: Extension of a
currently-approved collection.
Respondents: Business or other forprofit.
Number of Respondents and
Responses: 700 respondents; 2,800
responses.
Estimated Time per Response: .50–2
hours.
Frequency of Response: Annual
reporting requirements, third party
disclosure requirements and
recordkeeping requirement.
Obligation to Respond: Required to
obtain or retain benefits. Statutory
authority for this information collection
is contained in section 254(g) of the
Communications Act of 1934, as
amended.
Total Annual Burden: 2,450 hours.
Total Annual Cost: No cost.
Privacy Act Impact Assessment: No
impact.
Nature and Extent of Confidentiality:
The Commission is not requesting that
the respondents submit confidential
information to the Commission. If the
Commission requests respondents to
submit information which respondents
believe is confidential, respondents may
request confidential treatment of such
information under 47 CFR section 0.459
of the Commission’s rules.
Needs and Uses: The Commission
will submit this information collection
as an extension (no change in reporting,
third party disclosure requirements,
and/or recordkeeping requirements)
after this 60-day comment period in
order to obtain the full three year
clearance from the OMB. The four
information collection requirements
under this OMB Control Number are
information disclosure requirements,
internet posting requirements,
recordkeeping requirements, and annual
certification requirements. These
requirements are necessary to provide
consumers ready access to information
concerning the rates, terms, and
conditions governing the provision of
interstate, domestic, interexchange
services offered by nondominant
interexchange carriers (IXCs) in a
detariffed and increasingly competitive
environment. The information collected
under the information disclosure
requirement and the Internet posting
requirement must be disclosed to the
public to ensure that consumers have
access to the information they need to
select a telecommunications carrier and
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:36 Jul 12, 2011
Jkt 223001
to bring to the Commission’s attention
possible violations of the
Communications Act without a specific
public disclosure requirement. The
information collected under the
recordkeeping and certification
requirements will be used by the
Commission to ensure that affected
interexchange carriers fulfill their
obligations under the Communications
Act, as amended. There has been an
adjustment since the previous
submission because the number of
responses was miscalculated in the
previous submission. As such, the
number of responses has increased from
700 to 2,800 (an increase of 2,100
responses).
Federal Communications Commission.
Bulah P. Wheeler,
Deputy Manager, Office of the Secretary,
Office of Managing Director.
[FR Doc. 2011–17563 Filed 7–12–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712–01–P
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
Information Collection Being Reviewed
by the Federal Communications
Commission
Federal Communications
Commission.
ACTION: Notice and request for
comments.
AGENCY:
The Federal Communications
Commission (FCC), as part of its
continuing effort to reduce paperwork
burdens, invites the general public and
other Federal agencies to take this
opportunity to comment on the
following information collection, as
required by the Paperwork Reduction
Act (PRA) of 1995. Comments are
requested concerning (a) whether the
proposed collection of information is
necessary for the proper performance of
the functions of the Commission,
including whether the information shall
have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of
the Commission’s burden estimate; (c)
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information collected; (d)
ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on the
respondents, including the use of
automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology;
and (e) ways to further reduce the
information collection burden on small
business concerns with fewer than 25
employees.
The FCC may not conduct or sponsor
a collection of information unless it
displays a currently valid control
number. No person shall be subject to
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00072
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
41257
any penalty for failing to comply with
a collection of information subject to the
PRA that does not display a valid Office
of Management and Budget (OMB)
control number.
DATES: Written PRA comments should
be submitted on or before September 12,
2011. If you anticipate that you will be
submitting comments, but find it
difficult to do so within the period of
time allowed by this notice, you should
advise the contact listed below as soon
as possible.
ADDRESSES: Direct all PRA comments to
Paul Laurenzano, FCC, via e-mail
PRA@fcc.gov and to
Paul.Laurenzano@fcc.gov.
For
additional information about the
information collection, contact Paul
Laurenzano at (202) 418–1359.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
OMB Control Number: 3060–0511.
Title: ARMIS Access Report.
Report No.: FCC Report 43–04.
Type of Review: Extension of a
currently approved collection.
Respondents: Business or other forprofit.
Number of Respondents and
Responses: 76 respondents; 76
responses.
Estimated Time per Response: 153
hours.
Frequency of Response: Annual
reporting requirement.
Obligation to Respond: Mandatory.
Statutory authority for this information
collection is contained in 47 U.S.C. 161,
219(b) and 220 of the Communications
Act of 1934, as amended.
Total Annual Burden: 11,628 hours.
Total Annual Cost: No cost.
Privacy Act Impact Assessment: No
impact.
Nature and Extent of Confidentiality:
Ordinarily, questions of a sensitive
nature are not involved in the ARMIS
43–04 Access Report. The Commission
contends that areas in which detailed
information is required are fully subject
to regulation and the issue of data being
regarded as sensitive will arise on
special circumstances only. In such
circumstances, the Commission
instructs the respondent on the
appropriate procedures to follow to
safeguard sensitive data. Respondents
may request confidential treatment of
their documents under 47 CFR 0.459 of
the Commission’s rules.
Needs and Uses: The ARMIS Report
43–04, Access Report, collects the
results of the jurisdictional separations
and access charge procedures as
specified in Parts 36 and 69 of the
Commission’s Rules. The 43–04 Report
specifies information requirements in a
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
E:\FR\FM\13JYN1.SGM
13JYN1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
41258
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 134 / Wednesday, July 13, 2011 / Notices
consistent format and is essential to the
FCC to monitor revenue requirements,
joint cost allocations, jurisdictional
separations and access charges. There
are no changes to the ARMIS Report 43–
04.
Although the Commission has granted
conditional forbearance from FCC
Reports 43–04, the Commission still
seeks OMB approval because petitions
for reconsideration and review of those
forbearance decisions are currently
pending before the Commission and the
courts, respectively. On April 24, 2008,
the Commission in Petition of AT&T
Inc. for Forbearance under 47 U.S.C. 160
from Enforcement of Certain of the
Commission’s Cost Assignment Rules,
WC Docket Nos. 07–21, 05–342,
Memorandum Opinion and Order, 23
FCC Rcd 7302 (2008) (AT&T Cost
Assignment Forbearance Order), pet for
recon. pending, pet. for review pending,
NASUCA v. FCC, Case No. 08–1226 (DC
Cir. filed June 23, 2008) granted
forbearance, subject to conditions, from
the statutory provision and Commission
rules as requested in the Legacy AT&T
and Legacy BellSouth petitions
(collectively, ‘‘Cost Assignment Rules’’).
AT&T asked for and the Commission
granted forbearance from four of the
Commission’s reporting requirements—
the Access Report (ARMIS 43–04), the
Rate of Return Monitoring Report (FCC
Form 492), the Reg/Non-Reg Forecast
Report (FCC Form 495A) and the Reg/
Non-Reg Actual Usage Report (FCC
Form 495B)—because forbearance from
the Cost Assignment Rules renders these
reports meaningless. The Commission
had concluded that the various
accounting rules were intended to work
together to help ensure the primary
statutory goal of just and reasonable
rates. See Separations of Costs of
Regulated Telephone Service from Costs
of Nonregulated Activities: Amendment
of Part 31, the Uniform System of
Accounts for Class A and Class B
Telephone Companies to Provide for
Nonregulated Activities and to Provide
for Transactions Between Telephone
Companies and their Affiliates, CC
Docket 86–111, Report and Order, 2 FCC
Rcd 1298 (1987), petition for review
denied, Southwestern Bell Corp v. FCC,
896 F. 2d 1378 (DC Cir. 1990).
In Service Quality, Customer
Satisfaction, Infrastructure and
Operating Data Gathering, WC Docket
Nos. 08–190, 07–139, 07–204, 07–273,
07–21, Memorandum Opinion and
Order and Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking, 23 FCC Rcd 13647 (2008)
(Verizon/Qwest Cost Assignment
Forbearance Order), pet. for recon.
pending, pet. for review pending,
NASUCA v. FCC, Case No. 08–1353 (DC
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:36 Jul 12, 2011
Jkt 223001
Cir. filed Nov. 4, 2008) the Commission
extended to Verizon and Qwest
forbearance from the statutory provision
and Commission rules from the Cost
Assignment Rules to the same extend
granted AT&T in the AT&T Cost
Assignment Forbearance Order and
subject to the same conditions. The
Commission concluded that there is no
current Federal need for the Cost
Assignment Rules, as they apply to
Verizon and Qwest, to ensure that
charges and practices are just,
reasonable, and not unjustly
discriminatory; to protect consumers;
and to ensure the public interest. See
AT&T Cost Assignment Forbearance
Order, 23 FCC Rcd at 7307, paragraph
11.
Federal Communications Commission.
Bulah P. Wheeler,
Deputy Manager, Office of the Secretary,
Office of Managing Director.
[FR Doc. 2011–17562 Filed 7–12–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712–01–P
FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION
Ocean Transportation Intermediary
License Applicants
Notice is hereby given that the
following applicants have filed with the
Federal Maritime Commission an
application for a license as a NonVessel-Operating Common Carrier
(NVO) and/or Ocean Freight Forwarder
(OFF)—Ocean Transportation
Intermediary (OTI) pursuant to section
19 of the Shipping Act of 1984 as
amended (46 U.S.C. Chapter 409 and 46
CFR part 515). Notice is also hereby
given of the filing of applications to
amend an existing OTI license or the
Qualifying Individual (QI) for a license.
Interested persons may contact the
Office of Transportation Intermediaries,
Federal Maritime Commission,
Washington, DC 20573, by telephone at
(202) 523–5843 or by e-mail at
OTI@fmc.gov.
3 Plus Logistics Co. dba Touchdown
Freight Co. (NVO & OFF), 20250 S.
Alameda Street, Rancho Dominguez,
CA 90221. Officers: Kyung S. Kim,
Treasurer/CFO (Qualifying
Individual), Peter Y.S. Kim,
President/CEO/Secretary. Application
Type: Trade Name Change.
Amada Shipping Inc. (NVO & OFF),
27522 Via Valor, Capo Beach, CA
92624. Officers: Dana D. Fraser,
President/Treasurer (Qualifying
Individual), Yuxing Qian, Secretary.
Application Type: New NVO & OFF
License.
PO 00000
Frm 00073
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
ASO Logistics, Inc. (NVO), 3120 Via
Mondo, Rancho Dominguez, CA
90220. Officer: Simon Hwang,
President/CEO/Secretary/Treasurer/
CFO (Qualifying Individual).
Application Type: New NVO License.
Atlas Air Freight System, Inc. dba
Kenny International USA (NVO), 222
E. Redondo Beach Boulevard, Suite G,
Gardena, CA 90248. Officer: Min Soo
(A.K.A. Michael) Shin, President/
Sec./Treasurer (Qualifying
Individual). Application Type: New
NVO License.
BDL Logistics L.L.C. (NVO & OFF), 2387
Indigo Harbour Lane, League City, TX
77573. Officers: Reina G. Louden,
Managing Member (Qualifying
Individual), Bradley D. Louden,
Managing Member. Application Type:
Name Change/Business Structure
Change.
Cardinal Health 200, LLC (NVO & OFF),
7000 Cardinal Place, Dublin, OH
43017. Officers: Warren B. Hastings,
Vice President (Qualifying
Individual), Stephan A. Inacker,
President and GM. Application Type:
New NVO & OFF License.
Clover Systems, Inc. dba Clover Marine
(NVO & OFF), 1910 NW 97 Avenue,
Miami, FL 33018. Officers: Holly A.
Olivares, Vice President (Qualifying
Individual), Luis A. Rincon,
President. Application Type: QI
Change.
Convenient Freight System, Inc. (NVO),
690 Knox Street, #220, Torrance, CA
90502. Officers: Kook (A.K.A. Joseph)
S. Lee, Vice President (Qualifying
Individual), Bum K. Suh, President/
Secretary/CFO. Application Type: QI
Change.
Euro Cargo Express Inc. dba Pacific
Anchor Line Group (NVO), 154–09
146th Avenue, Jamaica, NY 11434.
Officers: Barbara Hiebendahl,
Secretary (Qualifying Individual),
Carlo Paravani, President/CEO.
Application Type: QI Change/Trade
Name Change.
IMAC International Corp (NVO & OFF),
527 Albert Street, East Meadow, NY
11554. Officers: Ben Leung, Secretary
(Qualifying Individual), Eric Tang,
President. Application Type: New
NVO and OFF License.
Logikor USA, Inc. (NVO & OFF), 3422
Old Capital Trail, #1516, Wilmington,
DE 19808–6192. Officers: Rick
Morgan, Director (Qualifying
Individual), Darryl King, President.
Application Type: New NVO & OFF
License.
Logistic Network of America LLC (NVO
& OFF), 17501 Biscayne Boulevard,
Suite 590, Miami, FL 33160. Officers:
Diana Y. Orsini, Manager (Qualifying
Individual), Arturo Altamirano,
E:\FR\FM\13JYN1.SGM
13JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 134 (Wednesday, July 13, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 41257-41258]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-17562]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
Information Collection Being Reviewed by the Federal
Communications Commission
AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.
ACTION: Notice and request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Federal Communications Commission (FCC), as part of its
continuing effort to reduce paperwork burdens, invites the general
public and other Federal agencies to take this opportunity to comment
on the following information collection, as required by the Paperwork
Reduction Act (PRA) of 1995. Comments are requested concerning (a)
whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the
proper performance of the functions of the Commission, including
whether the information shall have practical utility; (b) the accuracy
of the Commission's burden estimate; (c) ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information collected; (d) ways to minimize
the burden of the collection of information on the respondents,
including the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of
information technology; and (e) ways to further reduce the information
collection burden on small business concerns with fewer than 25
employees.
The FCC may not conduct or sponsor a collection of information
unless it displays a currently valid control number. No person shall be
subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of
information subject to the PRA that does not display a valid Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) control number.
DATES: Written PRA comments should be submitted on or before September
12, 2011. If you anticipate that you will be submitting comments, but
find it difficult to do so within the period of time allowed by this
notice, you should advise the contact listed below as soon as possible.
ADDRESSES: Direct all PRA comments to Paul Laurenzano, FCC, via e-mail
PRA@fcc.gov and to Paul.Laurenzano@fcc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For additional information about the
information collection, contact Paul Laurenzano at (202) 418-1359.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
OMB Control Number: 3060-0511.
Title: ARMIS Access Report.
Report No.: FCC Report 43-04.
Type of Review: Extension of a currently approved collection.
Respondents: Business or other for-profit.
Number of Respondents and Responses: 76 respondents; 76 responses.
Estimated Time per Response: 153 hours.
Frequency of Response: Annual reporting requirement.
Obligation to Respond: Mandatory. Statutory authority for this
information collection is contained in 47 U.S.C. 161, 219(b) and 220 of
the Communications Act of 1934, as amended.
Total Annual Burden: 11,628 hours.
Total Annual Cost: No cost.
Privacy Act Impact Assessment: No impact.
Nature and Extent of Confidentiality: Ordinarily, questions of a
sensitive nature are not involved in the ARMIS 43-04 Access Report. The
Commission contends that areas in which detailed information is
required are fully subject to regulation and the issue of data being
regarded as sensitive will arise on special circumstances only. In such
circumstances, the Commission instructs the respondent on the
appropriate procedures to follow to safeguard sensitive data.
Respondents may request confidential treatment of their documents under
47 CFR 0.459 of the Commission's rules.
Needs and Uses: The ARMIS Report 43-04, Access Report, collects the
results of the jurisdictional separations and access charge procedures
as specified in Parts 36 and 69 of the Commission's Rules. The 43-04
Report specifies information requirements in a
[[Page 41258]]
consistent format and is essential to the FCC to monitor revenue
requirements, joint cost allocations, jurisdictional separations and
access charges. There are no changes to the ARMIS Report 43-04.
Although the Commission has granted conditional forbearance from
FCC Reports 43-04, the Commission still seeks OMB approval because
petitions for reconsideration and review of those forbearance decisions
are currently pending before the Commission and the courts,
respectively. On April 24, 2008, the Commission in Petition of AT&T
Inc. for Forbearance under 47 U.S.C. 160 from Enforcement of Certain of
the Commission's Cost Assignment Rules, WC Docket Nos. 07-21, 05-342,
Memorandum Opinion and Order, 23 FCC Rcd 7302 (2008) (AT&T Cost
Assignment Forbearance Order), pet for recon. pending, pet. for review
pending, NASUCA v. FCC, Case No. 08-1226 (DC Cir. filed June 23, 2008)
granted forbearance, subject to conditions, from the statutory
provision and Commission rules as requested in the Legacy AT&T and
Legacy BellSouth petitions (collectively, ``Cost Assignment Rules'').
AT&T asked for and the Commission granted forbearance from four of the
Commission's reporting requirements--the Access Report (ARMIS 43-04),
the Rate of Return Monitoring Report (FCC Form 492), the Reg/Non-Reg
Forecast Report (FCC Form 495A) and the Reg/Non-Reg Actual Usage Report
(FCC Form 495B)--because forbearance from the Cost Assignment Rules
renders these reports meaningless. The Commission had concluded that
the various accounting rules were intended to work together to help
ensure the primary statutory goal of just and reasonable rates. See
Separations of Costs of Regulated Telephone Service from Costs of
Nonregulated Activities: Amendment of Part 31, the Uniform System of
Accounts for Class A and Class B Telephone Companies to Provide for
Nonregulated Activities and to Provide for Transactions Between
Telephone Companies and their Affiliates, CC Docket 86-111, Report and
Order, 2 FCC Rcd 1298 (1987), petition for review denied, Southwestern
Bell Corp v. FCC, 896 F. 2d 1378 (DC Cir. 1990).
In Service Quality, Customer Satisfaction, Infrastructure and
Operating Data Gathering, WC Docket Nos. 08-190, 07-139, 07-204, 07-
273, 07-21, Memorandum Opinion and Order and Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking, 23 FCC Rcd 13647 (2008) (Verizon/Qwest Cost Assignment
Forbearance Order), pet. for recon. pending, pet. for review pending,
NASUCA v. FCC, Case No. 08-1353 (DC Cir. filed Nov. 4, 2008) the
Commission extended to Verizon and Qwest forbearance from the statutory
provision and Commission rules from the Cost Assignment Rules to the
same extend granted AT&T in the AT&T Cost Assignment Forbearance Order
and subject to the same conditions. The Commission concluded that there
is no current Federal need for the Cost Assignment Rules, as they apply
to Verizon and Qwest, to ensure that charges and practices are just,
reasonable, and not unjustly discriminatory; to protect consumers; and
to ensure the public interest. See AT&T Cost Assignment Forbearance
Order, 23 FCC Rcd at 7307, paragraph 11.
Federal Communications Commission.
Bulah P. Wheeler,
Deputy Manager, Office of the Secretary, Office of Managing Director.
[FR Doc. 2011-17562 Filed 7-12-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P