Information Collection Being Reviewed by the Federal Communications Commission, 41257-41258 [2011-17562]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 134 / Wednesday, July 13, 2011 / Notices mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: OMB Control Number: 3060–0704. Title: Sections 42.10, 42.11, 64.1900 and Section 254(g): Policies and Rules Concerning the Interstate, Interexchange Marketplace. Form Number: N/A. Type of Review: Extension of a currently-approved collection. Respondents: Business or other forprofit. Number of Respondents and Responses: 700 respondents; 2,800 responses. Estimated Time per Response: .50–2 hours. Frequency of Response: Annual reporting requirements, third party disclosure requirements and recordkeeping requirement. Obligation to Respond: Required to obtain or retain benefits. Statutory authority for this information collection is contained in section 254(g) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended. Total Annual Burden: 2,450 hours. Total Annual Cost: No cost. Privacy Act Impact Assessment: No impact. Nature and Extent of Confidentiality: The Commission is not requesting that the respondents submit confidential information to the Commission. If the Commission requests respondents to submit information which respondents believe is confidential, respondents may request confidential treatment of such information under 47 CFR section 0.459 of the Commission’s rules. Needs and Uses: The Commission will submit this information collection as an extension (no change in reporting, third party disclosure requirements, and/or recordkeeping requirements) after this 60-day comment period in order to obtain the full three year clearance from the OMB. The four information collection requirements under this OMB Control Number are information disclosure requirements, internet posting requirements, recordkeeping requirements, and annual certification requirements. These requirements are necessary to provide consumers ready access to information concerning the rates, terms, and conditions governing the provision of interstate, domestic, interexchange services offered by nondominant interexchange carriers (IXCs) in a detariffed and increasingly competitive environment. The information collected under the information disclosure requirement and the Internet posting requirement must be disclosed to the public to ensure that consumers have access to the information they need to select a telecommunications carrier and VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:36 Jul 12, 2011 Jkt 223001 to bring to the Commission’s attention possible violations of the Communications Act without a specific public disclosure requirement. The information collected under the recordkeeping and certification requirements will be used by the Commission to ensure that affected interexchange carriers fulfill their obligations under the Communications Act, as amended. There has been an adjustment since the previous submission because the number of responses was miscalculated in the previous submission. As such, the number of responses has increased from 700 to 2,800 (an increase of 2,100 responses). Federal Communications Commission. Bulah P. Wheeler, Deputy Manager, Office of the Secretary, Office of Managing Director. [FR Doc. 2011–17563 Filed 7–12–11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6712–01–P FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Information Collection Being Reviewed by the Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission. ACTION: Notice and request for comments. AGENCY: The Federal Communications Commission (FCC), as part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork burdens, invites the general public and other Federal agencies to take this opportunity to comment on the following information collection, as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) of 1995. Comments are requested concerning (a) whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the Commission, including whether the information shall have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the Commission’s burden estimate; (c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information collected; (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on the respondents, including the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology; and (e) ways to further reduce the information collection burden on small business concerns with fewer than 25 employees. The FCC may not conduct or sponsor a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid control number. No person shall be subject to SUMMARY: PO 00000 Frm 00072 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 41257 any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information subject to the PRA that does not display a valid Office of Management and Budget (OMB) control number. DATES: Written PRA comments should be submitted on or before September 12, 2011. If you anticipate that you will be submitting comments, but find it difficult to do so within the period of time allowed by this notice, you should advise the contact listed below as soon as possible. ADDRESSES: Direct all PRA comments to Paul Laurenzano, FCC, via e-mail PRA@fcc.gov and to Paul.Laurenzano@fcc.gov. For additional information about the information collection, contact Paul Laurenzano at (202) 418–1359. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: OMB Control Number: 3060–0511. Title: ARMIS Access Report. Report No.: FCC Report 43–04. Type of Review: Extension of a currently approved collection. Respondents: Business or other forprofit. Number of Respondents and Responses: 76 respondents; 76 responses. Estimated Time per Response: 153 hours. Frequency of Response: Annual reporting requirement. Obligation to Respond: Mandatory. Statutory authority for this information collection is contained in 47 U.S.C. 161, 219(b) and 220 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended. Total Annual Burden: 11,628 hours. Total Annual Cost: No cost. Privacy Act Impact Assessment: No impact. Nature and Extent of Confidentiality: Ordinarily, questions of a sensitive nature are not involved in the ARMIS 43–04 Access Report. The Commission contends that areas in which detailed information is required are fully subject to regulation and the issue of data being regarded as sensitive will arise on special circumstances only. In such circumstances, the Commission instructs the respondent on the appropriate procedures to follow to safeguard sensitive data. Respondents may request confidential treatment of their documents under 47 CFR 0.459 of the Commission’s rules. Needs and Uses: The ARMIS Report 43–04, Access Report, collects the results of the jurisdictional separations and access charge procedures as specified in Parts 36 and 69 of the Commission’s Rules. The 43–04 Report specifies information requirements in a FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: E:\FR\FM\13JYN1.SGM 13JYN1 mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES 41258 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 134 / Wednesday, July 13, 2011 / Notices consistent format and is essential to the FCC to monitor revenue requirements, joint cost allocations, jurisdictional separations and access charges. There are no changes to the ARMIS Report 43– 04. Although the Commission has granted conditional forbearance from FCC Reports 43–04, the Commission still seeks OMB approval because petitions for reconsideration and review of those forbearance decisions are currently pending before the Commission and the courts, respectively. On April 24, 2008, the Commission in Petition of AT&T Inc. for Forbearance under 47 U.S.C. 160 from Enforcement of Certain of the Commission’s Cost Assignment Rules, WC Docket Nos. 07–21, 05–342, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 23 FCC Rcd 7302 (2008) (AT&T Cost Assignment Forbearance Order), pet for recon. pending, pet. for review pending, NASUCA v. FCC, Case No. 08–1226 (DC Cir. filed June 23, 2008) granted forbearance, subject to conditions, from the statutory provision and Commission rules as requested in the Legacy AT&T and Legacy BellSouth petitions (collectively, ‘‘Cost Assignment Rules’’). AT&T asked for and the Commission granted forbearance from four of the Commission’s reporting requirements— the Access Report (ARMIS 43–04), the Rate of Return Monitoring Report (FCC Form 492), the Reg/Non-Reg Forecast Report (FCC Form 495A) and the Reg/ Non-Reg Actual Usage Report (FCC Form 495B)—because forbearance from the Cost Assignment Rules renders these reports meaningless. The Commission had concluded that the various accounting rules were intended to work together to help ensure the primary statutory goal of just and reasonable rates. See Separations of Costs of Regulated Telephone Service from Costs of Nonregulated Activities: Amendment of Part 31, the Uniform System of Accounts for Class A and Class B Telephone Companies to Provide for Nonregulated Activities and to Provide for Transactions Between Telephone Companies and their Affiliates, CC Docket 86–111, Report and Order, 2 FCC Rcd 1298 (1987), petition for review denied, Southwestern Bell Corp v. FCC, 896 F. 2d 1378 (DC Cir. 1990). In Service Quality, Customer Satisfaction, Infrastructure and Operating Data Gathering, WC Docket Nos. 08–190, 07–139, 07–204, 07–273, 07–21, Memorandum Opinion and Order and Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 23 FCC Rcd 13647 (2008) (Verizon/Qwest Cost Assignment Forbearance Order), pet. for recon. pending, pet. for review pending, NASUCA v. FCC, Case No. 08–1353 (DC VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:36 Jul 12, 2011 Jkt 223001 Cir. filed Nov. 4, 2008) the Commission extended to Verizon and Qwest forbearance from the statutory provision and Commission rules from the Cost Assignment Rules to the same extend granted AT&T in the AT&T Cost Assignment Forbearance Order and subject to the same conditions. The Commission concluded that there is no current Federal need for the Cost Assignment Rules, as they apply to Verizon and Qwest, to ensure that charges and practices are just, reasonable, and not unjustly discriminatory; to protect consumers; and to ensure the public interest. See AT&T Cost Assignment Forbearance Order, 23 FCC Rcd at 7307, paragraph 11. Federal Communications Commission. Bulah P. Wheeler, Deputy Manager, Office of the Secretary, Office of Managing Director. [FR Doc. 2011–17562 Filed 7–12–11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6712–01–P FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION Ocean Transportation Intermediary License Applicants Notice is hereby given that the following applicants have filed with the Federal Maritime Commission an application for a license as a NonVessel-Operating Common Carrier (NVO) and/or Ocean Freight Forwarder (OFF)—Ocean Transportation Intermediary (OTI) pursuant to section 19 of the Shipping Act of 1984 as amended (46 U.S.C. Chapter 409 and 46 CFR part 515). Notice is also hereby given of the filing of applications to amend an existing OTI license or the Qualifying Individual (QI) for a license. Interested persons may contact the Office of Transportation Intermediaries, Federal Maritime Commission, Washington, DC 20573, by telephone at (202) 523–5843 or by e-mail at OTI@fmc.gov. 3 Plus Logistics Co. dba Touchdown Freight Co. (NVO & OFF), 20250 S. Alameda Street, Rancho Dominguez, CA 90221. Officers: Kyung S. Kim, Treasurer/CFO (Qualifying Individual), Peter Y.S. Kim, President/CEO/Secretary. Application Type: Trade Name Change. Amada Shipping Inc. (NVO & OFF), 27522 Via Valor, Capo Beach, CA 92624. Officers: Dana D. Fraser, President/Treasurer (Qualifying Individual), Yuxing Qian, Secretary. Application Type: New NVO & OFF License. PO 00000 Frm 00073 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 ASO Logistics, Inc. (NVO), 3120 Via Mondo, Rancho Dominguez, CA 90220. Officer: Simon Hwang, President/CEO/Secretary/Treasurer/ CFO (Qualifying Individual). Application Type: New NVO License. Atlas Air Freight System, Inc. dba Kenny International USA (NVO), 222 E. Redondo Beach Boulevard, Suite G, Gardena, CA 90248. Officer: Min Soo (A.K.A. Michael) Shin, President/ Sec./Treasurer (Qualifying Individual). Application Type: New NVO License. BDL Logistics L.L.C. (NVO & OFF), 2387 Indigo Harbour Lane, League City, TX 77573. Officers: Reina G. Louden, Managing Member (Qualifying Individual), Bradley D. Louden, Managing Member. Application Type: Name Change/Business Structure Change. Cardinal Health 200, LLC (NVO & OFF), 7000 Cardinal Place, Dublin, OH 43017. Officers: Warren B. Hastings, Vice President (Qualifying Individual), Stephan A. Inacker, President and GM. Application Type: New NVO & OFF License. Clover Systems, Inc. dba Clover Marine (NVO & OFF), 1910 NW 97 Avenue, Miami, FL 33018. Officers: Holly A. Olivares, Vice President (Qualifying Individual), Luis A. Rincon, President. Application Type: QI Change. Convenient Freight System, Inc. (NVO), 690 Knox Street, #220, Torrance, CA 90502. Officers: Kook (A.K.A. Joseph) S. Lee, Vice President (Qualifying Individual), Bum K. Suh, President/ Secretary/CFO. Application Type: QI Change. Euro Cargo Express Inc. dba Pacific Anchor Line Group (NVO), 154–09 146th Avenue, Jamaica, NY 11434. Officers: Barbara Hiebendahl, Secretary (Qualifying Individual), Carlo Paravani, President/CEO. Application Type: QI Change/Trade Name Change. IMAC International Corp (NVO & OFF), 527 Albert Street, East Meadow, NY 11554. Officers: Ben Leung, Secretary (Qualifying Individual), Eric Tang, President. Application Type: New NVO and OFF License. Logikor USA, Inc. (NVO & OFF), 3422 Old Capital Trail, #1516, Wilmington, DE 19808–6192. Officers: Rick Morgan, Director (Qualifying Individual), Darryl King, President. Application Type: New NVO & OFF License. Logistic Network of America LLC (NVO & OFF), 17501 Biscayne Boulevard, Suite 590, Miami, FL 33160. Officers: Diana Y. Orsini, Manager (Qualifying Individual), Arturo Altamirano, E:\FR\FM\13JYN1.SGM 13JYN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 134 (Wednesday, July 13, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 41257-41258]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-17562]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION


Information Collection Being Reviewed by the Federal 
Communications Commission

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Notice and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Federal Communications Commission (FCC), as part of its 
continuing effort to reduce paperwork burdens, invites the general 
public and other Federal agencies to take this opportunity to comment 
on the following information collection, as required by the Paperwork 
Reduction Act (PRA) of 1995. Comments are requested concerning (a) 
whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the 
proper performance of the functions of the Commission, including 
whether the information shall have practical utility; (b) the accuracy 
of the Commission's burden estimate; (c) ways to enhance the quality, 
utility, and clarity of the information collected; (d) ways to minimize 
the burden of the collection of information on the respondents, 
including the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of 
information technology; and (e) ways to further reduce the information 
collection burden on small business concerns with fewer than 25 
employees.
    The FCC may not conduct or sponsor a collection of information 
unless it displays a currently valid control number. No person shall be 
subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of 
information subject to the PRA that does not display a valid Office of 
Management and Budget (OMB) control number.

DATES: Written PRA comments should be submitted on or before September 
12, 2011. If you anticipate that you will be submitting comments, but 
find it difficult to do so within the period of time allowed by this 
notice, you should advise the contact listed below as soon as possible.

ADDRESSES: Direct all PRA comments to Paul Laurenzano, FCC, via e-mail 
PRA@fcc.gov and to Paul.Laurenzano@fcc.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For additional information about the 
information collection, contact Paul Laurenzano at (202) 418-1359.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 
    OMB Control Number: 3060-0511.
    Title: ARMIS Access Report.
    Report No.: FCC Report 43-04.
    Type of Review: Extension of a currently approved collection.
    Respondents: Business or other for-profit.
    Number of Respondents and Responses: 76 respondents; 76 responses.
    Estimated Time per Response: 153 hours.
    Frequency of Response: Annual reporting requirement.
    Obligation to Respond: Mandatory. Statutory authority for this 
information collection is contained in 47 U.S.C. 161, 219(b) and 220 of 
the Communications Act of 1934, as amended.
    Total Annual Burden: 11,628 hours.
    Total Annual Cost: No cost.
    Privacy Act Impact Assessment: No impact.
    Nature and Extent of Confidentiality: Ordinarily, questions of a 
sensitive nature are not involved in the ARMIS 43-04 Access Report. The 
Commission contends that areas in which detailed information is 
required are fully subject to regulation and the issue of data being 
regarded as sensitive will arise on special circumstances only. In such 
circumstances, the Commission instructs the respondent on the 
appropriate procedures to follow to safeguard sensitive data. 
Respondents may request confidential treatment of their documents under 
47 CFR 0.459 of the Commission's rules.
    Needs and Uses: The ARMIS Report 43-04, Access Report, collects the 
results of the jurisdictional separations and access charge procedures 
as specified in Parts 36 and 69 of the Commission's Rules. The 43-04 
Report specifies information requirements in a

[[Page 41258]]

consistent format and is essential to the FCC to monitor revenue 
requirements, joint cost allocations, jurisdictional separations and 
access charges. There are no changes to the ARMIS Report 43-04.
    Although the Commission has granted conditional forbearance from 
FCC Reports 43-04, the Commission still seeks OMB approval because 
petitions for reconsideration and review of those forbearance decisions 
are currently pending before the Commission and the courts, 
respectively. On April 24, 2008, the Commission in Petition of AT&T 
Inc. for Forbearance under 47 U.S.C. 160 from Enforcement of Certain of 
the Commission's Cost Assignment Rules, WC Docket Nos. 07-21, 05-342, 
Memorandum Opinion and Order, 23 FCC Rcd 7302 (2008) (AT&T Cost 
Assignment Forbearance Order), pet for recon. pending, pet. for review 
pending, NASUCA v. FCC, Case No. 08-1226 (DC Cir. filed June 23, 2008) 
granted forbearance, subject to conditions, from the statutory 
provision and Commission rules as requested in the Legacy AT&T and 
Legacy BellSouth petitions (collectively, ``Cost Assignment Rules''). 
AT&T asked for and the Commission granted forbearance from four of the 
Commission's reporting requirements--the Access Report (ARMIS 43-04), 
the Rate of Return Monitoring Report (FCC Form 492), the Reg/Non-Reg 
Forecast Report (FCC Form 495A) and the Reg/Non-Reg Actual Usage Report 
(FCC Form 495B)--because forbearance from the Cost Assignment Rules 
renders these reports meaningless. The Commission had concluded that 
the various accounting rules were intended to work together to help 
ensure the primary statutory goal of just and reasonable rates. See 
Separations of Costs of Regulated Telephone Service from Costs of 
Nonregulated Activities: Amendment of Part 31, the Uniform System of 
Accounts for Class A and Class B Telephone Companies to Provide for 
Nonregulated Activities and to Provide for Transactions Between 
Telephone Companies and their Affiliates, CC Docket 86-111, Report and 
Order, 2 FCC Rcd 1298 (1987), petition for review denied, Southwestern 
Bell Corp v. FCC, 896 F. 2d 1378 (DC Cir. 1990).
    In Service Quality, Customer Satisfaction, Infrastructure and 
Operating Data Gathering, WC Docket Nos. 08-190, 07-139, 07-204, 07-
273, 07-21, Memorandum Opinion and Order and Notice of Proposed 
Rulemaking, 23 FCC Rcd 13647 (2008) (Verizon/Qwest Cost Assignment 
Forbearance Order), pet. for recon. pending, pet. for review pending, 
NASUCA v. FCC, Case No. 08-1353 (DC Cir. filed Nov. 4, 2008) the 
Commission extended to Verizon and Qwest forbearance from the statutory 
provision and Commission rules from the Cost Assignment Rules to the 
same extend granted AT&T in the AT&T Cost Assignment Forbearance Order 
and subject to the same conditions. The Commission concluded that there 
is no current Federal need for the Cost Assignment Rules, as they apply 
to Verizon and Qwest, to ensure that charges and practices are just, 
reasonable, and not unjustly discriminatory; to protect consumers; and 
to ensure the public interest. See AT&T Cost Assignment Forbearance 
Order, 23 FCC Rcd at 7307, paragraph 11.

Federal Communications Commission.
Bulah P. Wheeler,
Deputy Manager, Office of the Secretary, Office of Managing Director.
[FR Doc. 2011-17562 Filed 7-12-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.