Federal Acquisition Regulation; Biobased Procurements, 41179-41181 [2011-17453]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 134 / Wednesday, July 13, 2011 / Proposed Rules
Mr.
William Clark, Procurement Analyst, at
(202) 219–1813 for clarification of
content. For information pertaining to
status or publication schedules, contact
the Regulatory Secretariat at (202) 501–
4755. Please cite FAR Case 2010–004.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
GENERAL SERVICES
ADMINISTRATION
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND
SPACE ADMINISTRATION
48 CFR Parts 2, 11, 23, and 52
[FAR Case 2010–004; Docket 2010–0004;
Sequence 1]
RIN 9000–AM03
Federal Acquisition Regulation;
Biobased Procurements
Department of Defense (DoD),
General Services Administration (GSA),
and National Aeronautics and Space
Administration (NASA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
DoD, GSA, and NASA are
proposing to amend the Federal
Acquisition Regulation (FAR) to
implement changes to the Farm Security
and Rural Investment Act. The rule
proposes to require contractors to report
the biobased products purchased under
service and construction contracts. This
will allow Federal agencies to monitor
compliance with the Federal preference
for purchasing biobased products.
DATES: Interested parties should submit
written comments to the Regulatory
Secretariat at one of the addressees
shown below on or before September
12, 2011 to be considered in the
formation of the final rule.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments in
response to FAR case 2010–004 by any
of the following methods:
• Regulations.gov: https://
www.regulations.gov. Submit comments
via the Federal eRulemaking portal by
inputting ‘‘FAR Case 2010–004’’ under
the heading ‘‘Enter Keyword or ID’’ and
selecting ‘‘Search.’’ Select the link
‘‘Submit a Comment’’ that corresponds
with ‘‘FAR Case 2010–004.’’ Follow the
instructions provided at the ‘‘Submit a
Comment’’ screen. Please include your
name, company name (if any), and
‘‘FAR Case 2010–004’’ on your attached
document.
• Fax: (202) 501–4067.
• Mail: General Services
Administration, Regulatory Secretariat
(MVCB), ATTN: Hada Flowers, 1275
First Street, NE., 7th Floor, Washington,
DC 20417.
Instructions: Please submit comments
only and cite FAR Case 2010–004, in all
correspondence related to this case. All
comments received will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal and/or business confidential
information provided.
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:42 Jul 12, 2011
Jkt 223001
I. Background
DoD, GSA, and NASA are proposing
to amend the Federal Acquisition
Regulation (FAR) to implement changes
to the Farm Security and Rural
Investment Act. The rule proposes to
require contractors to report the
biobased products purchased under
service and construction contracts. This
will allow Federal agencies to monitor
compliance with the Federal preference
for purchasing biobased products.
A. Overview
Section 9002 of the Farm Security and
Rural Investment Act of 2002, codified
at 7 U.S.C. 8102, was amended by the
Food, Conservation, and Energy Act of
2008 (Pub. L. 110–246). 7 U.S.C. 8102
requires Federal agencies to establish a
procurement program, develop
procurement specifications, procure
biobased products, and give preference
to those items that are composed of the
highest percentage of biobased products
practicable or those products that
comply with the regulations issued
under section 103 of Public Law 100–
556 (42 U.S.C. 6914b–1). 7 U.S.C. 8102
allows flexibility to procuring agencies
not to procure products if the product
cannot be acquired—
(i) Within a time frame providing for
compliance with the contract
performance schedule;
(ii) Meeting reasonable performance
requirements; or
(iii) At a reasonable price.
The Biobased Products Preference
Program was originally implemented in
the FAR on November 7, 2007 (72 FR
63040). This proposed rule will
implement additional provisions of 7
U.S.C. 8102 as amended by Public Law
110–246.
B. Invitation for Specific Comments
The rule is being published as a
proposed rule because the specific
method of collecting the information
required by Public Law 110–246 is not
specified in the statute but is necessary
for implementing in Federal contracts.
This proposed rule identifies the
specific proposed method.
(1) DoD, GSA, and NASA invite
comments on the least burdensome,
most cost-efficient method to collect
this information. DoD, GSA, and NASA
are particularly interested in current
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
41179
practices to track purchases of biobased
products.
(a) How is the purchase and use of
biobased products tracked and to what
level of detail are they tracked, e.g.,
product type, product name, quantity,
price?
(b) Is the tracking automated or
manual?
2. Comments are solicited on the level
of effort required to collect and report
this information under a specific federal
contract. Is the purchase and use of
biobased products allocated to a specific
contract as a direct cost or as an
overhead costs?
(3) The estimated burden includes
Fiscal Year 2009 and 2010 Federal
Procurement Data System contract
actions selected from the following
Product Service Codes: A—Research
and Development; F—Natural Resources
Management; J—Maintenance, Repair,
and Rebuilding of Equipment; M—
Operation of Government-Owned
Facility; S—Utilities and Housekeeping
Services; T—Photographic, Mapping,
Printing, and Publication Services; Y—
Construction of Structures and
Facilities; and Z—Maintenance, Repair
or Alteration of Real Property.
(a) Are there certain contracts where
biobased items are not typically
purchased, such as information
technology services, or should all
services be included in the information
collection?
(b) What impact or estimated burden
would there be on subcontractors under
contract actions which include FAR
52.223–2? What would be the average
number of subcontractors on such
contract actions?
(4) Comments are solicited on any
new technologies, including Internetbased technologies, that would reduce
the burden for this information
collection and afford significant
opportunities for reducing costs and
increasing simplification of the
collection.
II. Proposed Changes to the FAR
A. Definition
The definition of ‘‘biobased product’’
is revised in FAR part 2 in accordance
with the Public Law 110–246. A
corresponding change is made at FAR
23.404(e).
B. Limit on Data Collection
For biobased products, a prohibition
was added at FAR 11.302(c)(2) against
agencies collecting more data than
would typically be provided by other
business entities, other than data
confirming the biobased content of a
product. At FAR 23.405(a)(3) a cross-
E:\FR\FM\13JYP1.SGM
13JYP1
41180
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 134 / Wednesday, July 13, 2011 / Proposed Rules
reference is added to FAR 11.302(c) to
remind contracting officers that when
acquiring recovered material or
biobased products, the contracting
officer may request information or data
on such products, including on the
recycled or biobased content or related
standards of the products.
C. Annual Report
FAR 52.223–2, Affirmative
Procurement of Biobased Products
Under Service and Construction
Contracts, is proposed for amendment to
require the contractor to report annually
the product types and dollar value of
any biobased products purchased
during the preceding fiscal year on the
contract.
The purpose of this information
collection is to monitor Federal
agencies’ compliance with 7 U.S.C.
8102, Federal Procurement of Biobased
Products. Agencies can internally track
direct procurement of biobased items.
However, Federal agencies lack the
ability to directly track biobased
products purchased under service and
construction contracts. The proposed
information collection requirement is to
track biobased products purchased by
contractors under service and
construction contracts.
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
III. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders (E.O.s) 12866 and
13563 direct agencies to assess all costs
and benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, distributive impacts, and
equity). E.O. 13563 emphasizes the
importance of quantifying both costs
and benefits, of reducing costs, of
harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility. This is a significant
regulatory action and, therefore, was
subject to review under Section 6(b) of
E.O. 12866, Regulatory Planning and
Review, dated September 30, 1993. This
rule is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C.
804.
IV. Regulatory Flexibility Act
This proposed rule may have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
within the meaning of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act 5 U.S.C. 601, et seq.,
because the rule requires that the
contractor report on the product types
and dollar value of biobased products in
the performance of a service or
construction contract. Where this
information is not already available, this
may mean contractors will need to
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:42 Jul 12, 2011
Jkt 223001
create an inventory management system
to track the product types and dollar
value of biobased products purchased
for each contract. However, DoD, GSA,
and NASA expect that the impact will
be minimal, because the existing clause
being amended already requires the
contractor to make maximum use of
biobased products in the performance of
a service and construction contract, and
the change does not impose any
substantial requirements. Small
businesses are active suppliers of
biobased products, and this rule may
serve to enhance their participation in
this market.
In addition, the Small Business
Administration’s Office of Advocacy
estimates that compliance with
environmental requirements is
significantly more costly to small
businesses than large business. For
recent research on this topic, see
https://www.sba.gov/sites/default/files/
rs371tot.pdf.
The Regulatory Secretariat has
submitted a copy of the Interim
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (IRFA)
to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the
Small Business Administration. A copy
of the IRFA may be obtained from the
Regulatory Secretariat. The Councils
invite comments from small business
concerns and other interested parties on
the expected impact of this rule on
small entities.
DoD, GSA, and NASA will also
consider comments from small entities
concerning the existing regulations in
subparts affected by this rule in
accordance with 5 U.S.C. 610. Interested
parties must submit such comments
separately and should cite 5 U.S.C. 610
(FAR Case 2010–004) in
correspondence.
The analysis is summarized as
follows:
This rule implements 7 U.S.C. 8102 as
amended by Public Law 110–246, which
establishes the policy that Federal agencies
shall establish a procurement program,
develop procurement specifications, procure
biobased products, and give preference to
those items that are composed of the highest
percentage of biobased products practicable
or those products that comply with the
regulations issued under section 103 of
Public Law 100–556 (42 U.S.C. 6914b–1).
This rule imposes a reporting requirement
on prime contractors with construction or
service contracts, unless the contract will not
involve the use of USDA-designated items.
The rule promotes the use of biobased
products and requires an annual report on
the product types and dollar value of any
USDA-designated biobased products
purchased in carrying out service and
construction contracts during the previous
year. With regard to the submission of the
report, we estimate that 48,376 contractors
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
will be affected. Of those entities,
approximately 35,927 are small businesses.
V. Paperwork Reduction Act
The Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. chapter 35) applies because the
proposed rule contains information
collection requirements. Accordingly,
the Regulatory Secretariat will submit a
request for approval of a new
information collection requirement
concerning ‘‘Biobased Procurements’’ to
the Office of Management and Budget.
A. Annual Reporting Burden
Public reporting burden for this
collection of information is estimated to
average 5 hours per response, including
the time for reviewing instructions,
searching existing data sources,
gathering and maintaining the data
needed, and completing and reviewing
the collection of information.
The annual reporting burden is
estimated as follows:
Respondents: 48,376.
Responses per respondent: 5.
Total annual responses: 241,880.
Preparation hours per response: 5.
Total response burden hours: 1,209,400.
B. Request for Comments Regarding
Paperwork Burden
Submit comments, including
suggestions for reducing this burden,
not later than September 12, 2011 to:
FAR Desk Officer, OMB, Room 10102,
NEOB, Washington, DC 20503, and a
copy to the General Services
Administration, Regulatory Secretariat
(MVCB), Attn: Hada Flowers, 1275 First
Street, NE., 7th Floor, Washington, DC
20417.
Public comments are particularly
invited on: Whether this collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of functions of the FAR,
and will have practical utility; whether
our estimate of the public burden of this
collection of information is accurate,
and based on valid assumptions and
methodology; ways to enhance the
quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and ways in
which we can minimize the burden of
the collection of information on those
who are to respond, through the use of
appropriate technological collection
techniques or other forms of information
technology.
Requester may obtain a copy of the
supporting statement from the General
Services Administration, Regulatory
Secretariat (MVCB), 1275 First Street,
NE., 7th Floor, Washington, DC 20417.
Please cite OMB Control Number 9000–
0180, Biobased Procurements, in
correspondence.
E:\FR\FM\13JYP1.SGM
13JYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 134 / Wednesday, July 13, 2011 / Proposed Rules
List of Subjects in 48 CFR Parts 2, 11,
23, and 52
Government procurement.
Dated: July 6, 2011.
Laura Auletta,
Acting Director, Office of Governmentwide
Acquisition Policy, Office of Acquisition
Policy.
Therefore, DoD, GSA, and NASA
propose amending 48 CFR parts 2, 11,
23, and 52 as set forth below:
1. The authority citation for 48 CFR
parts 2, 11, 23, and 52 continues to read
as follows:
Authority: 40 U.S.C. 121(c); 10 U.S.C.
chapter 137; and 42 U.S.C. 2473(c).
§ 23.406
PART 2—DEFINITIONS OF WORDS
AND TERMS
§ 2.101
[Amended]
2. Amend section 2.101 by removing
from paragraph (b)(2), in the definition
‘‘biobased product’’, the words
‘‘(including plant, animal, and marine
materials) or’’ and adding ‘‘and’’ in its
place.
PART 11—DESCRIBING AGENCY
NEEDS
3. Amend section 11.302 by revising
paragraph (c)(2) to read as follows:
§ 11.302
Policy.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(2) For biobased products, agencies
may not require, as a condition of
purchase of such products, the vendor
or manufacturer to provide more data
than would typically be provided by
other business entities offering products
for sale to the agency, other than data
confirming the biobased content of a
product (see 7 CFR 2902.8).
PART 23—ENVIRONMENT, ENERGY
AND WATER EFFICIENCY,
RENEWABLE ENERGY
TECHNOLOGIES, OCCUPATIONAL
SAFETY, AND DRUG-FREE
WORKPLACE
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 23.404
[Amended]
4. Amend section 23.404 by removing
from paragraph (e)(1) the words
‘‘(including plant, animal, and marine
materials)’’.
5. Amend section 23.405 by revising
paragraph (a)(2) and adding (a)(3) to
read as follows:
§ 23.405
Procedures.
(a) * * *
(2) Biobased products. Contracting
officers should refer to USDA’s list of
USDA-designated items (available
through the Internet at https://
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:42 Jul 12, 2011
Jkt 223001
www.biopreferred.gov) and to their
agencies’ affirmative procurement
program when purchasing supplies that
contain biobased material or when
purchasing services that could include
supplies that contain biobased material.
(3) When acquiring recovered material
or biobased products, the contracting
officer may request information or data
on such products, including on the
recycled or biobased content or related
standards of the products (see
11.302(c)).
*
*
*
*
*
[Amended]
6. Amend section 23.406 by removing
from paragraph (b) ‘‘https://
www.usda.gov/biopreferred’’ and adding
‘‘https://www.biopreferred.gov’’ in its
place.
PART 52—SOLICITATION PROVISIONS
AND CONTRACT CLAUSES
7. Amend section 52.223–2 by—
a. Revising the date of the clause;
b. Removing from paragraph (b)
‘‘https://www.usda.gov/biopreferred’’
and adding https://www.biopreferred.gov
in its place; and
c. Adding paragraphs (c) and (d) to
read as follows:
52.223–2 Affirmative Procurement of
Biobased Products Under Service and
Construction Contracts
*
*
*
*
*
Affirmative Procurement of Biobased
Products Under Service and Construction
Contracts (Date)
*
*
*
*
*
(c) In the performance of this contract, the
Contractor shall—
(1) Report to the cognizant Contracting
Officer and the agency environmental
manager on the product types and dollar
value of any USDA-designated biobased
products purchased by the Contractor during
the previous year, between October 1 and
September 30, in this contract;
(2) Submit this report no later than—
(i) October 31 of each year during contract
performance; and
(ii) At the end of contract performance; and
(iii) Contact the cognizant environmental
manager to obtain the preferred submittal
format, if that format is not specified in this
contract.
(d) The cognizant environmental manager
for this contract is: llllllllll.
[Contracting Officer shall insert full name,
phone number, and email address or Web
site for reporting.]
[FR Doc. 2011–17453 Filed 7–12–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820–EP–P
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
41181
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
49 CFR Part 571
[Docket No. NHTSA–2011–0101]
RIN 2127–AK99
Federal Motor Vehicle Safety
Standards; Lamps, Reflective Devices,
and Associated Equipment
Department of Transportation
(DOT), National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration (NHTSA).
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
NHTSA is proposing to
restore the blue and green color
boundaries to Federal Motor Vehicle
Safety Standard (FMVSS) No. 108,
Lamps, Reflective Devices and
Associated Equipment, that were
removed when the agency published a
final rule reorganizing the standard on
December 4, 2007.
DATES: Comments to this proposal must
be received on or before September 12,
2011.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by the docket number in the
heading of this document, by any of the
following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments
on the electronic docket site by clicking
on ‘‘Help’’ or ‘‘FAQ.’’
• Mail: Docket Management Facility,
M–30, U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., West Building, Ground
Floor, Room W12–140, Washington, DC
20590.
• Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., West Building, Ground
Floor, Room W12–140, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m. Eastern Time, Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
Regardless of how you submit
comments, you should mention the
docket number of this document.
You may call the Docket Management
Facility at 202–366–9826.
Instructions: For detailed instructions
on submitting comments and additional
information on the rulemaking process,
see the Public Participation heading of
the Supplementary Information section
of this document. Note that all
comments received will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\13JYP1.SGM
13JYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 134 (Wednesday, July 13, 2011)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 41179-41181]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-17453]
[[Page 41179]]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION
48 CFR Parts 2, 11, 23, and 52
[FAR Case 2010-004; Docket 2010-0004; Sequence 1]
RIN 9000-AM03
Federal Acquisition Regulation; Biobased Procurements
AGENCY: Department of Defense (DoD), General Services Administration
(GSA), and National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: DoD, GSA, and NASA are proposing to amend the Federal
Acquisition Regulation (FAR) to implement changes to the Farm Security
and Rural Investment Act. The rule proposes to require contractors to
report the biobased products purchased under service and construction
contracts. This will allow Federal agencies to monitor compliance with
the Federal preference for purchasing biobased products.
DATES: Interested parties should submit written comments to the
Regulatory Secretariat at one of the addressees shown below on or
before September 12, 2011 to be considered in the formation of the
final rule.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments in response to FAR case 2010-004 by any of
the following methods:
Regulations.gov: https://www.regulations.gov. Submit
comments via the Federal eRulemaking portal by inputting ``FAR Case
2010-004'' under the heading ``Enter Keyword or ID'' and selecting
``Search.'' Select the link ``Submit a Comment'' that corresponds with
``FAR Case 2010-004.'' Follow the instructions provided at the ``Submit
a Comment'' screen. Please include your name, company name (if any),
and ``FAR Case 2010-004'' on your attached document.
Fax: (202) 501-4067.
Mail: General Services Administration, Regulatory
Secretariat (MVCB), ATTN: Hada Flowers, 1275 First Street, NE., 7th
Floor, Washington, DC 20417.
Instructions: Please submit comments only and cite FAR Case 2010-
004, in all correspondence related to this case. All comments received
will be posted without change to https://www.regulations.gov, including
any personal and/or business confidential information provided.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. William Clark, Procurement
Analyst, at (202) 219-1813 for clarification of content. For
information pertaining to status or publication schedules, contact the
Regulatory Secretariat at (202) 501-4755. Please cite FAR Case 2010-
004.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
DoD, GSA, and NASA are proposing to amend the Federal Acquisition
Regulation (FAR) to implement changes to the Farm Security and Rural
Investment Act. The rule proposes to require contractors to report the
biobased products purchased under service and construction contracts.
This will allow Federal agencies to monitor compliance with the Federal
preference for purchasing biobased products.
A. Overview
Section 9002 of the Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002,
codified at 7 U.S.C. 8102, was amended by the Food, Conservation, and
Energy Act of 2008 (Pub. L. 110-246). 7 U.S.C. 8102 requires Federal
agencies to establish a procurement program, develop procurement
specifications, procure biobased products, and give preference to those
items that are composed of the highest percentage of biobased products
practicable or those products that comply with the regulations issued
under section 103 of Public Law 100-556 (42 U.S.C. 6914b-1). 7 U.S.C.
8102 allows flexibility to procuring agencies not to procure products
if the product cannot be acquired--
(i) Within a time frame providing for compliance with the contract
performance schedule;
(ii) Meeting reasonable performance requirements; or
(iii) At a reasonable price.
The Biobased Products Preference Program was originally implemented
in the FAR on November 7, 2007 (72 FR 63040). This proposed rule will
implement additional provisions of 7 U.S.C. 8102 as amended by Public
Law 110-246.
B. Invitation for Specific Comments
The rule is being published as a proposed rule because the specific
method of collecting the information required by Public Law 110-246 is
not specified in the statute but is necessary for implementing in
Federal contracts. This proposed rule identifies the specific proposed
method.
(1) DoD, GSA, and NASA invite comments on the least burdensome,
most cost-efficient method to collect this information. DoD, GSA, and
NASA are particularly interested in current practices to track
purchases of biobased products.
(a) How is the purchase and use of biobased products tracked and to
what level of detail are they tracked, e.g., product type, product
name, quantity, price?
(b) Is the tracking automated or manual?
2. Comments are solicited on the level of effort required to
collect and report this information under a specific federal contract.
Is the purchase and use of biobased products allocated to a specific
contract as a direct cost or as an overhead costs?
(3) The estimated burden includes Fiscal Year 2009 and 2010 Federal
Procurement Data System contract actions selected from the following
Product Service Codes: A--Research and Development; F--Natural
Resources Management; J--Maintenance, Repair, and Rebuilding of
Equipment; M--Operation of Government-Owned Facility; S--Utilities and
Housekeeping Services; T--Photographic, Mapping, Printing, and
Publication Services; Y--Construction of Structures and Facilities; and
Z--Maintenance, Repair or Alteration of Real Property.
(a) Are there certain contracts where biobased items are not
typically purchased, such as information technology services, or should
all services be included in the information collection?
(b) What impact or estimated burden would there be on
subcontractors under contract actions which include FAR 52.223-2? What
would be the average number of subcontractors on such contract actions?
(4) Comments are solicited on any new technologies, including
Internet-based technologies, that would reduce the burden for this
information collection and afford significant opportunities for
reducing costs and increasing simplification of the collection.
II. Proposed Changes to the FAR
A. Definition
The definition of ``biobased product'' is revised in FAR part 2 in
accordance with the Public Law 110-246. A corresponding change is made
at FAR 23.404(e).
B. Limit on Data Collection
For biobased products, a prohibition was added at FAR 11.302(c)(2)
against agencies collecting more data than would typically be provided
by other business entities, other than data confirming the biobased
content of a product. At FAR 23.405(a)(3) a cross-
[[Page 41180]]
reference is added to FAR 11.302(c) to remind contracting officers that
when acquiring recovered material or biobased products, the contracting
officer may request information or data on such products, including on
the recycled or biobased content or related standards of the products.
C. Annual Report
FAR 52.223-2, Affirmative Procurement of Biobased Products Under
Service and Construction Contracts, is proposed for amendment to
require the contractor to report annually the product types and dollar
value of any biobased products purchased during the preceding fiscal
year on the contract.
The purpose of this information collection is to monitor Federal
agencies' compliance with 7 U.S.C. 8102, Federal Procurement of
Biobased Products. Agencies can internally track direct procurement of
biobased items. However, Federal agencies lack the ability to directly
track biobased products purchased under service and construction
contracts. The proposed information collection requirement is to track
biobased products purchased by contractors under service and
construction contracts.
III. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders (E.O.s) 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess
all costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public
health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). E.O.
13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and benefits,
of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting flexibility.
This is a significant regulatory action and, therefore, was subject to
review under Section 6(b) of E.O. 12866, Regulatory Planning and
Review, dated September 30, 1993. This rule is not a major rule under 5
U.S.C. 804.
IV. Regulatory Flexibility Act
This proposed rule may have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities within the meaning of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act 5 U.S.C. 601, et seq., because the rule
requires that the contractor report on the product types and dollar
value of biobased products in the performance of a service or
construction contract. Where this information is not already available,
this may mean contractors will need to create an inventory management
system to track the product types and dollar value of biobased products
purchased for each contract. However, DoD, GSA, and NASA expect that
the impact will be minimal, because the existing clause being amended
already requires the contractor to make maximum use of biobased
products in the performance of a service and construction contract, and
the change does not impose any substantial requirements. Small
businesses are active suppliers of biobased products, and this rule may
serve to enhance their participation in this market.
In addition, the Small Business Administration's Office of Advocacy
estimates that compliance with environmental requirements is
significantly more costly to small businesses than large business. For
recent research on this topic, see https://www.sba.gov/sites/default/files/rs371tot.pdf.
The Regulatory Secretariat has submitted a copy of the Interim
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (IRFA) to the Chief Counsel for
Advocacy of the Small Business Administration. A copy of the IRFA may
be obtained from the Regulatory Secretariat. The Councils invite
comments from small business concerns and other interested parties on
the expected impact of this rule on small entities.
DoD, GSA, and NASA will also consider comments from small entities
concerning the existing regulations in subparts affected by this rule
in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 610. Interested parties must submit such
comments separately and should cite 5 U.S.C. 610 (FAR Case 2010-004) in
correspondence.
The analysis is summarized as follows:
This rule implements 7 U.S.C. 8102 as amended by Public Law 110-
246, which establishes the policy that Federal agencies shall
establish a procurement program, develop procurement specifications,
procure biobased products, and give preference to those items that
are composed of the highest percentage of biobased products
practicable or those products that comply with the regulations
issued under section 103 of Public Law 100-556 (42 U.S.C. 6914b-1).
This rule imposes a reporting requirement on prime contractors
with construction or service contracts, unless the contract will not
involve the use of USDA-designated items.
The rule promotes the use of biobased products and requires an
annual report on the product types and dollar value of any USDA-
designated biobased products purchased in carrying out service and
construction contracts during the previous year. With regard to the
submission of the report, we estimate that 48,376 contractors will
be affected. Of those entities, approximately 35,927 are small
businesses.
V. Paperwork Reduction Act
The Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. chapter 35) applies because
the proposed rule contains information collection requirements.
Accordingly, the Regulatory Secretariat will submit a request for
approval of a new information collection requirement concerning
``Biobased Procurements'' to the Office of Management and Budget.
A. Annual Reporting Burden
Public reporting burden for this collection of information is
estimated to average 5 hours per response, including the time for
reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and
maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the
collection of information.
The annual reporting burden is estimated as follows:
Respondents: 48,376.
Responses per respondent: 5.
Total annual responses: 241,880.
Preparation hours per response: 5.
Total response burden hours: 1,209,400.
B. Request for Comments Regarding Paperwork Burden
Submit comments, including suggestions for reducing this burden,
not later than September 12, 2011 to: FAR Desk Officer, OMB, Room
10102, NEOB, Washington, DC 20503, and a copy to the General Services
Administration, Regulatory Secretariat (MVCB), Attn: Hada Flowers, 1275
First Street, NE., 7th Floor, Washington, DC 20417.
Public comments are particularly invited on: Whether this
collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of
functions of the FAR, and will have practical utility; whether our
estimate of the public burden of this collection of information is
accurate, and based on valid assumptions and methodology; ways to
enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be
collected; and ways in which we can minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who are to respond, through the use
of appropriate technological collection techniques or other forms of
information technology.
Requester may obtain a copy of the supporting statement from the
General Services Administration, Regulatory Secretariat (MVCB), 1275
First Street, NE., 7th Floor, Washington, DC 20417. Please cite OMB
Control Number 9000-0180, Biobased Procurements, in correspondence.
[[Page 41181]]
List of Subjects in 48 CFR Parts 2, 11, 23, and 52
Government procurement.
Dated: July 6, 2011.
Laura Auletta,
Acting Director, Office of Governmentwide Acquisition Policy, Office of
Acquisition Policy.
Therefore, DoD, GSA, and NASA propose amending 48 CFR parts 2, 11,
23, and 52 as set forth below:
1. The authority citation for 48 CFR parts 2, 11, 23, and 52
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 40 U.S.C. 121(c); 10 U.S.C. chapter 137; and 42
U.S.C. 2473(c).
PART 2--DEFINITIONS OF WORDS AND TERMS
Sec. 2.101 [Amended]
2. Amend section 2.101 by removing from paragraph (b)(2), in the
definition ``biobased product'', the words ``(including plant, animal,
and marine materials) or'' and adding ``and'' in its place.
PART 11--DESCRIBING AGENCY NEEDS
3. Amend section 11.302 by revising paragraph (c)(2) to read as
follows:
Sec. 11.302 Policy.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(2) For biobased products, agencies may not require, as a condition
of purchase of such products, the vendor or manufacturer to provide
more data than would typically be provided by other business entities
offering products for sale to the agency, other than data confirming
the biobased content of a product (see 7 CFR 2902.8).
PART 23--ENVIRONMENT, ENERGY AND WATER EFFICIENCY, RENEWABLE ENERGY
TECHNOLOGIES, OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY, AND DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE
Sec. 23.404 [Amended]
4. Amend section 23.404 by removing from paragraph (e)(1) the words
``(including plant, animal, and marine materials)''.
5. Amend section 23.405 by revising paragraph (a)(2) and adding
(a)(3) to read as follows:
Sec. 23.405 Procedures.
(a) * * *
(2) Biobased products. Contracting officers should refer to USDA's
list of USDA-designated items (available through the Internet at https://www.biopreferred.gov) and to their agencies' affirmative procurement
program when purchasing supplies that contain biobased material or when
purchasing services that could include supplies that contain biobased
material.
(3) When acquiring recovered material or biobased products, the
contracting officer may request information or data on such products,
including on the recycled or biobased content or related standards of
the products (see 11.302(c)).
* * * * *
Sec. 23.406 [Amended]
6. Amend section 23.406 by removing from paragraph (b) ``https://www.usda.gov/biopreferred'' and adding ``https://www.biopreferred.gov''
in its place.
PART 52--SOLICITATION PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT CLAUSES
7. Amend section 52.223-2 by--
a. Revising the date of the clause;
b. Removing from paragraph (b) ``https://www.usda.gov/biopreferred''
and adding https://www.biopreferred.gov in its place; and
c. Adding paragraphs (c) and (d) to read as follows:
52.223-2 Affirmative Procurement of Biobased Products Under Service and
Construction Contracts
* * * * *
Affirmative Procurement of Biobased Products Under Service and
Construction Contracts (Date)
* * * * *
(c) In the performance of this contract, the Contractor shall--
(1) Report to the cognizant Contracting Officer and the agency
environmental manager on the product types and dollar value of any
USDA-designated biobased products purchased by the Contractor during
the previous year, between October 1 and September 30, in this
contract;
(2) Submit this report no later than--
(i) October 31 of each year during contract performance; and
(ii) At the end of contract performance; and
(iii) Contact the cognizant environmental manager to obtain the
preferred submittal format, if that format is not specified in this
contract.
(d) The cognizant environmental manager for this contract is: --
------------------. [Contracting Officer shall insert full name,
phone number, and email address or Web site for reporting.]
[FR Doc. 2011-17453 Filed 7-12-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-EP-P