Biweekly Notice; Applications and Amendments to Facility Operating Licenses Involving No Significant Hazards Considerations, 40937-40943 [2011-17439]

Agencies

• NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 133 (Tuesday, July 12, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 40937-40943]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-17439]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

[NRC-2011-0151]


Biweekly Notice; Applications and Amendments to Facility 
Operating Licenses Involving No Significant Hazards Considerations

Background

    Pursuant to Section 189a. (2) of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as 
amended (the Act), the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the 
Commission or NRC) is publishing this regular biweekly notice. The Act 
requires the Commission publish notice of any amendments issued, or 
proposed to be issued and grants the Commission the authority to issue 
and make immediately effective any amendment to an operating license 
upon a determination by the Commission that such amendment involves no 
significant hazards consideration, notwithstanding the pendency before 
the Commission of a request for a hearing from any person.
    This biweekly notice includes all notices of amendments issued, or 
proposed to be issued from June 16, 2011 to June 29, 2011. The last 
biweekly notice was published on June 28, 2011 (96 FR 37845).

ADDRESSES: Please include Docket ID NRC-2011-0151 in the subject line 
of your comments. Comments submitted in writing or in electronic form 
will be posted on the NRC Web site and on the Federal Rulemaking Web 
site, https://www.regulations.gov. Because your comments will not be 
edited to remove any identifying or contact information,

[[Page 40938]]

the NRC cautions you against including any information in your 
submission that you do not want to be publicly disclosed.
    The NRC requests that any party soliciting or aggregating comments 
received from other persons for submission to the NRC inform those 
persons that the NRC will not edit their comments to remove any 
identifying or contact information, and therefore, they should not 
include any information in their comments that they do not want 
publicly disclosed.
    You may submit comments by any one of the following methods.
     Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to https://www.regulations.gov and search for documents filed under Docket ID NRC-
2011-0151. Address questions about NRC dockets to Carol Gallagher 301-
492-3668; e-mail Carol.Gallagher@nrc.gov.
     Mail comments to: Chief, Rules, Announcements, and 
Directives Branch (RADB), Office of Administration, Mail Stop: TWB-05-
B01M, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001.
     Fax comments to: RADB at 301-492-3446.
    You can access publicly available documents related to this notice 
using the following methods:
     NRC's Public Document Room (PDR): The public may examine 
and have copied, for a fee, publicly available documents at the NRC's 
PDR, Room O1-F21, One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike, 
Rockville, Maryland 20852.
     NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System 
(ADAMS): Publicly available documents created or received at the NRC 
are accessible electronically through ADAMS in the NRC Library at 
https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. From this page, the public 
can gain entry into ADAMS, which provides text and image files of the 
NRC's public documents. If you do not have access to ADAMS or if there 
are problems in accessing the documents located in ADAMS, contact the 
NRC's PDR reference staff at 1-800-397-4209, 301-415-4737, or by e-mail 
to pdr.resource@nrc.gov.
     Federal Rulemaking Web site: Public comments and 
supporting materials related to this notice can be found at https://www.regulations.gov by searching on Docket ID: NRC-2011-0151.

Notice of Consideration of Issuance of Amendments to Facility Operating 
Licenses, Proposed No Significant Hazards Consideration Determination, 
and Opportunity for a Hearing

    The Commission has made a proposed determination that the following 
amendment requests involve no significant hazards consideration. Under 
the Commission's regulations in Title 10 of the Code of Federal 
Regulations (10 CFR) 50.92, this means that operation of the facility 
in accordance with the proposed amendment would not (1) Involve a 
significant increase in the probability or consequences of an accident 
previously evaluated; or (2) create the possibility of a new or 
different kind of accident from any accident previously evaluated; or 
(3) involve a significant reduction in a margin of safety. The basis 
for this proposed determination for each amendment request is shown 
below.
    The Commission is seeking public comments on this proposed 
determination. Any comments received within 30 days after the date of 
publication of this notice will be considered in making any final 
determination.
    Normally, the Commission will not issue the amendment until the 
expiration of 60 days after the date of publication of this notice. The 
Commission may issue the license amendment before expiration of the 60-
day period provided that its final determination is that the amendment 
involves no significant hazards consideration. In addition, the 
Commission may issue the amendment prior to the expiration of the 30-
day comment period should circumstances change during the 30-day 
comment period such that failure to act in a timely way would result, 
for example in derating or shutdown of the facility. Should the 
Commission take action prior to the expiration of either the comment 
period or the notice period, it will publish in the Federal Register a 
notice of issuance. Should the Commission make a final No Significant 
Hazards Consideration Determination, any hearing will take place after 
issuance. The Commission expects that the need to take this action will 
occur very infrequently.
    Within 60 days after the date of publication of this notice, any 
person(s) whose interest may be affected by this action may file a 
request for a hearing and a petition to intervene with respect to 
issuance of the amendment to the subject facility operating license. 
Requests for a hearing and a petition for leave to intervene shall be 
filed in accordance with the Commission's ''Rules of Practice for 
Domestic Licensing Proceedings'' in 10 CFR part 2. Interested person(s) 
should consult a current copy of 10 CFR 2.309, which is available at 
the Commission's PDR, located at One White Flint North, Room O1-F21, 
11555 Rockville Pike (first floor), Rockville, Maryland 20852. NRC 
regulations are accessible electronically from the NRC Library on the 
NRC Web site at https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/cfr/. If 
a request for a hearing or petition for leave to intervene is filed by 
the above date, the Commission or a presiding officer designated by the 
Commission or by the Chief Administrative Judge of the Atomic Safety 
and Licensing Board Panel, will rule on the request and/or petition; 
and the Secretary or the Chief Administrative Judge of the Atomic 
Safety and Licensing Board will issue a notice of a hearing or an 
appropriate order.
    As required by 10 CFR 2.309, a petition for leave to intervene 
shall set forth with particularity the interest of the petitioner in 
the proceeding, and how that interest may be affected by the results of 
the proceeding. The petition should specifically explain the reasons 
why intervention should be permitted with particular reference to the 
following general requirements: (1) The name, address, and telephone 
number of the requestor or petitioner; (2) the nature of the 
requestor's/petitioner's right under the Act to be made a party to the 
proceeding; (3) the nature and extent of the requestor's/petitioner's 
property, financial, or other interest in the proceeding; and (4) the 
possible effect of any decision or order which may be entered in the 
proceeding on the requestor's/petitioner's interest. The petition must 
also identify the specific contentions which the requestor/petitioner 
seeks to have litigated at the proceeding.
    Each contention must consist of a specific statement of the issue 
of law or fact to be raised or controverted. In addition, the 
requestor/petitioner shall provide a brief explanation of the bases for 
the contention and a concise statement of the alleged facts or expert 
opinion which support the contention and on which the requestor/
petitioner intends to rely in proving the contention at the hearing. 
The requestor/petitioner must also provide references to those specific 
sources and documents of which the petitioner is aware and on which the 
requestor/petitioner intends to rely to establish those facts or expert 
opinion. The petition must include sufficient information to show that 
a genuine dispute exists with the

[[Page 40939]]

applicant on a material issue of law or fact. Contentions shall be 
limited to matters within the scope of the amendment under 
consideration. The contention must be one which, if proven, would 
entitle the requestor/petitioner to relief. A requestor/petitioner who 
fails to satisfy these requirements with respect to at least one 
contention will not be permitted to participate as a party.
    Those permitted to intervene become parties to the proceeding, 
subject to any limitations in the order granting leave to intervene, 
and have the opportunity to participate fully in the conduct of the 
hearing.
    If a hearing is requested, the Commission will make a final 
determination on the issue of no significant hazards consideration. The 
final determination will serve to decide when the hearing is held. If 
the final determination is that the amendment request involves no 
significant hazards consideration, the Commission may issue the 
amendment and make it immediately effective, notwithstanding the 
request for a hearing. Any hearing held would take place after issuance 
of the amendment. If the final determination is that the amendment 
request involves a significant hazards consideration, then any hearing 
held would take place before the issuance of any amendment.
    All documents filed in NRC adjudicatory proceedings, including a 
request for hearing, a petition for leave to intervene, any motion or 
other document filed in the proceeding prior to the submission of a 
request for hearing or petition to intervene, and documents filed by 
interested governmental entities participating under 10 CFR 2.315(c), 
must be filed in accordance with the NRC E-Filing rule (72 FR 49139, 
August 28, 2007). The E-Filing process requires participants to submit 
and serve all adjudicatory documents over the internet, or in some 
cases to mail copies on electronic storage media. Participants may not 
submit paper copies of their filings unless they seek an exemption in 
accordance with the procedures described below.
    To comply with the procedural requirements of E-Filing, at least 
ten (10) days prior to the filing deadline, the participant should 
contact the Office of the Secretary by e-mail at 
hearing.docket@nrc.gov, or by telephone at 301-415-1677, to request (1) 
A digital identification (ID) certificate, which allows the participant 
(or its counsel or representative) to digitally sign documents and 
access the E-Submittal server for any proceeding in which it is 
participating; and (2) advise the Secretary that the participant will 
be submitting a request or petition for hearing (even in instances in 
which the participant, or its counsel or representative, already holds 
an NRC-issued digital ID certificate). Based upon this information, the 
Secretary will establish an electronic docket for the hearing in this 
proceeding if the Secretary has not already established an electronic 
docket.
    Information about applying for a digital ID certificate is 
available on NRC's public Web site at https://www.nrc.gov/site-help/e-submittals/apply-certificates.html. System requirements for accessing 
the E-Submittal server are detailed in NRC's ``Guidance for Electronic 
Submission,'' which is available on the agency's public Web site at 
https://www.nrc.gov/site-help/e-submittals.html. Participants may 
attempt to use other software not listed on the Web site, but should 
note that the NRC's E-Filing system does not support unlisted software, 
and the NRC Meta System Help Desk will not be able to offer assistance 
in using unlisted software.
    If a participant is electronically submitting a document to the NRC 
in accordance with the E-Filing rule, the participant must file the 
document using the NRC's online, Web-based submission form. In order to 
serve documents through the Electronic Information Exchange System, 
users will be required to install a Web browser plug-in from the NRC 
Web site. Further information on the Web-based submission form, 
including the installation of the Web browser plug-in, is available on 
the NRC's public Web site at https://www.nrc.gov/site-help/e-submittals.html.
    Once a participant has obtained a digital ID certificate and a 
docket has been created, the participant can then submit a request for 
hearing or petition for leave to intervene. Submissions should be in 
Portable Document Format (PDF) in accordance with NRC guidance 
available on the NRC public Web site at https://www.nrc.gov/site-help/e-submittals.html. A filing is considered complete at the time the 
documents are submitted through the NRC's E-Filing system. To be 
timely, an electronic filing must be submitted to the E-Filing system 
no later than 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on the due date. Upon receipt of 
a transmission, the E-Filing system time-stamps the document and sends 
the submitter an e-mail notice confirming receipt of the document. The 
E-Filing system also distributes an e-mail notice that provides access 
to the document to the NRC Office of the General Counsel and any others 
who have advised the Office of the Secretary that they wish to 
participate in the proceeding, so that the filer need not serve the 
documents on those participants separately. Therefore, applicants and 
other participants (or their counsel or representative) must apply for 
and receive a digital ID certificate before a hearing request/petition 
to intervene is filed so that they can obtain access to the document 
via the E-Filing system.
    A person filing electronically using the agency's adjudicatory E-
Filing system may seek assistance by contacting the NRC Meta System 
Help Desk through the ``Contact Us'' link located on the NRC Web site 
at https://www.nrc.gov/site-help/e-submittals.html, by e-mail at 
MSHD.Resource@nrc.gov, or by a toll-free call at 1-866-672-7640. The 
NRC Meta System Help Desk is available between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m., 
Eastern Time, Monday through Friday, excluding government holidays.
    Participants who believe that they have a good cause for not 
submitting documents electronically must file an exemption request, in 
accordance with 10 CFR 2.302(g), with their initial paper filing 
requesting authorization to continue to submit documents in paper 
format. Such filings must be submitted by: (1) First class mail 
addressed to the Office of the Secretary of the Commission, U.S. 
Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001, Attention: 
Rulemaking and Adjudications Staff; or (2) courier, express mail, or 
expedited delivery service to the Office of the Secretary, Sixteenth 
Floor, One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland 
20852, Attention: Rulemaking and Adjudications Staff. Participants 
filing a document in this manner are responsible for serving the 
document on all other participants. Filing is considered complete by 
first-class mail as of the time of deposit in the mail, or by courier, 
express mail, or expedited delivery service upon depositing the 
document with the provider of the service. A presiding officer, having 
granted an exemption request from using E-Filing, may require a 
participant or party to use E-Filing if the presiding officer 
subsequently determines that the reason for granting the exemption from 
use of E-Filing no longer exists.
    Documents submitted in adjudicatory proceedings will appear in 
NRC's electronic hearing docket which is available to the public at 
https://ehd1.nrc.gov/EHD, unless excluded pursuant to an order of the 
Commission, or the presiding officer. Participants are

[[Page 40940]]

requested not to include personal privacy information, such as social 
security numbers, home addresses, or home phone numbers in their 
filings, unless an NRC regulation or other law requires submission of 
such information. With respect to copyrighted works, except for limited 
excerpts that serve the purpose of the adjudicatory filings and would 
constitute a Fair Use application, participants are requested not to 
include copyrighted materials in their submission.
    Petitions for leave to intervene must be filed no later than 60 
days from the date of publication of this notice. Non-timely filings 
will not be entertained absent a determination by the presiding officer 
that the petition or request should be granted or the contentions 
should be admitted, based on a balancing of the factors specified in 10 
CFR 2.309(c)(1)(i)-(viii).
    For further details with respect to this license amendment 
application, see the application for amendment which is available for 
public inspection at the Commission's PDR, located at One White Flint 
North, Room O1F21, 11555 Rockville Pike (first floor), Rockville, 
Maryland 20852. Publicly available documents created or received at the 
NRC are accessible electronically through ADAMS in the NRC Library at 
https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. Persons who do not have 
access to ADAMS or who encounter problems in accessing the documents 
located in ADAMS, should contact the NRC PDR Reference staff at 1-800-
397-4209, 301-415-4737, or by e-mail to pdr.resource@nrc.gov.

FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company (the licensee), Docket Nos. 50-
334 and 50-412, Beaver Valley Power Station, Unit 1 and 2, Beaver 
County, Pennsylvania Docket No. 50-346, Davis-Besse Nuclear Power 
Station, Unit 1, Ottawa County, Ohio

    Date of amendment request: April 29, 2011.
    Description of amendment request: The proposed amendment would 
revise the Technical Specifications (TSs) to define a new time limit 
for restoring inoperable reactor coolant system (RCS) leakage detection 
instrumentation to operable status, establish alternate methods of 
monitoring RCS leakage when one or more required monitors are 
inoperable, and make TS Bases changes that reflect the proposed changes 
and more accurately reflect the contents of the facility design basis 
related to operability of the RCS leakage detection instrumentation. 
The proposed changes are consistent with Nuclear Regulatory Commission 
(NRC) approved Revision 3 to Technical Specification Task Force (TSTF) 
change traveler TSTF-513, ``Revise [Pressurized-Water Reactor] PWR 
Operability Requirements and Actions for RCS Leakage Instrumentation''.
    Basis for proposed no significant hazards consideration 
determination: As required by Title 10 of the Code of Federal 
Regulations (10 CFR) 50.91(a), the licensee has provided its analysis 
of the issue of no significant hazards consideration, which is 
presented below:

    1. Does the Proposed Amendment Involve a Significant increase in 
the Probability or Consequences of an Accident Previously Evaluated?
    Response: No.
    The proposed change clarifies the operability requirements for 
the RCS leakage detection instrumentation and reduces the time 
allowed for the plant to operate when the only TS-required operable 
RCS leakage detection monitor is the containment atmospheric gaseous 
radiation monitor. The monitoring of RCS leakage is not a precursor 
to any accident previously evaluated. The monitoring of RCS leakage 
is not used to mitigate the consequences of any accident previously 
evaluated.
    Therefore, it is concluded that the proposed change does not 
involve a significant increase in the probability or consequences of 
an accident previously evaluated.
    2. Does the Proposed Change Create the Possibility of a New or 
Different Kind of Accident from any Accident Previously Evaluated?
    Response: No.
    The proposed change clarifies the operability requirements for 
the RCS leakage detection instrumentation and reduces the time 
allowed for the plant to operate when the only TS-required operable 
RCS leakage detection monitor is the containment atmospheric gaseous 
radiation monitor. The proposed change does not involve a physical 
alteration of the plant (no new or different type of equipment will 
be installed) or a change in the methods governing normal plant 
operation. The proposed change maintains sufficient continuity and 
diversity of leak detection capability that the probability of 
piping evaluated and approved for Leak-Before-Break progressing to 
pipe rupture remains extremely low.
    Therefore, it is concluded that the proposed change does not 
create the possibility of a new or different kind of accident from 
any previously evaluated.
    3. Does the Proposed Change Involve a Significant Reduction in a 
Margin of Safety?
    Response: No.
    The proposed change clarifies the operability requirements for 
the RCS leakage detection instrumentation and reduces the time 
allowed for the plant to operate when the only TS-required operable 
RCS leakage detection monitor is the containment atmospheric gaseous 
radiation monitor. Reducing the amount of time the plant is allowed 
to operate with only the containment atmospheric gaseous radiation 
monitor operable increases the margin of safety by increasing the 
likelihood that an increase in RCS leakage will be detected before 
it potentially results in a gross failure.
    Therefore, it is concluded that the proposed change does not 
involve a significant reduction in a margin of safety.

    The NRC staff has reviewed the licensee's analysis and, based on 
this review, it appears that the three standards of 10 CFR 50.92(c) are 
satisfied. Therefore, the NRC staff proposes to determine that the 
requested amendments involve no significant hazards consideration.
    Attorney for licensee: David W. Jenkins, Attorney, FirstEnergy 
Corporation, 76 South Main Street, Akron, Ohio 44308.
    NRC Branch Chief: Jacob I. Zimmerman.

South Carolina Electric and Gas Company (SCE&G, the licensee), South 
Carolina Public Service Authority, Docket No. 50-395, Virgil C. Summer 
Nuclear Station, Unit 1, Fairfield County, South Carolina

    Date of amendment request: March 18, 2011.
    Description of amendment request: The proposed change would 
relocate several requirements of Technical Specification (TS) Section 
6.0, Administrative Controls, to the new Virgil C. Summer Nuclear 
Station, Unit 1 Quality Assurance Program Description.
    Basis for proposed no significant hazards consideration 
determination: As required by Title 10 of the Code of Federal 
Regulations (10 CFR) 50.91(a), the licensee has provided its analysis 
of the issue of no significant hazards consideration, which is 
presented below:

    1. Does the proposed change involve a significant increase in 
the probability or consequences of an accident previously evaluated?
    Response: No.
    The proposed changes involve the relocation of several 
administrative requirements from the TS to a document subject to the 
controls of 10 CFR 50.54(a), and is, therefore, administrative in 
nature. The relocated requirements involve review and audit, 
procedure review and approval, and record retention requirements. 
The change will not alter the physical design or operational 
procedures associated with any plant structure, system, or 
component. The change does not reduce the duties and 
responsibilities of the organizations performing the review, audit, 
and approval functions essential to ensuring the safe operation of 
the plant.
    2. Does the proposed amendment create the possibility of a new 
or different kind of

[[Page 40941]]

accident from any accident previously evaluated?
    Response: No.
    The proposed changes are administrative in nature. The changes 
do not alter the physical design, safety limits, or safety analysis 
assumptions, associated with the operation of the plant. 
Accordingly, the changes do not create the possibility of a new or 
different kind of accident from any accident previously evaluated 
because the proposed changes do not introduce a new or different 
accident initiator or introduce a new or different equipment failure 
mode or mechanism.
    3. Does the proposed amendment involve a significant reduction 
in a margin of safety?
    Response: No.
    The proposed changes conform to NRC regulatory guidance 
regarding the content of plant Technical Specifications. The 
guidance is presented in the Final Policy Statement published on 
July 22, 1993 (58 FR 39132), and Administrative Letter AL 95-06. The 
relocation of these administrative requirements will not reduce the 
quality assurance commitments as accepted by the NRC, nor reduce 
administrative controls essential to the safe operation of the 
plant. Future changes to these administrative requirements will be 
performed in accordance with 10 CFR 50.54(a), consistent with the 
guidance identified above. Accordingly, the relocation results in an 
equivalent level of regulatory control.
    Therefore, these changes do not involve a significant reduction 
in a margin of safety because the proposed changes do not reduce the 
margin of safety that exists in the present Technical 
Specifications.

    The NRC staff has reviewed the licensee's analysis and, based on 
this review, it appears that the three standards of 10 CFR 50.92(c) are 
satisfied. Therefore, the NRC staff proposes to determine that the 
amendment request involves no significant hazards consideration.
    Attorney for licensee: J. Hagood Hamilton, Jr., South Carolina 
Electric & Gas Company, Post Office Box 764, Columbia, South Carolina 
29218.
    NRC Branch Chief: Gloria Kulesa.

South Carolina Electric and Gas Company, South Carolina Public Service 
Authority, Docket No. 50-395, Virgil C. Summer Nuclear Station, Unit 1, 
Fairfield County, South Carolina

    Date of amendment request: May 2, 2011.
    Description of amendment request: The proposed change would revise 
Technical Specifications (TS) 3.4.6.1, ``RCS Leakage Detection 
Systems'', to (1) Define a new time limit for restoring inoperable 
Reactor Coolant System (RCS) leakage detection instrumentation to 
operable status, and (2) Establish alternate methods of monitoring RCS 
leakage when one or more required monitors are inoperable.
    Basis for proposed no significant hazards consideration 
determination: As required by Title 10 of the Code of Federal 
Regulations (10 CFR) 50.91(a), the licensee (i.e., SCE&G) has provided 
its analysis of the issue of no significant hazards consideration, 
which is presented below:

    1. Does the Proposed Change Involve a Significant Increase in 
the Probability or Consequences of an Accident Previously Evaluated?
    Response: No
    The proposed change clarifies the operability requirements for 
the RCS leakage detection instrumentation, provides appropriate 
allowed operating times and compensatory measures when RCS leakage 
detection monitors are inoperable, and revises the TS LCO [Limiting 
Condition for Operation], Actions, and Bases to conform more closely 
with the corresponding STS [Standard Technical Specification] 
requirements. The monitoring of RCS leakage is not a precursor to 
any accident previously evaluated. The monitoring of RCS leakage is 
not used to mitigate the consequences of any accident previously 
evaluated.
    Therefore, it is concluded that the proposed change does not 
involve a significant increase in the probability or consequences of 
an accident previously evaluated.
    2. Does the Proposed Change Create the Possibility of a New or 
Different Kind of Accident from any Accident Previously Evaluated?
    Response: No
    The proposed change clarifies the operability requirements for 
the RCS leakage detection instrumentation, provides appropriate 
allowed operating times and compensatory measures when RCS leakage 
detection monitors are inoperable, and revises the TS LCO, Actions, 
and Bases to conform more closely with the corresponding STS 
requirements. The proposed change does not involve a physical 
alteration of the plant (no new or different type of equipment will 
be installed) or a change in the methods governing normal plant 
operation. The proposed change maintains sufficient continuity and 
diversity of leak detection capability that the probability of 
piping evaluated and approved for Leak-Before-Break progressing to 
pipe rupture remains extremely low.
    Therefore, it is concluded that the proposed change does not 
create the possibility of a new or different kind of accident from 
any previously evaluated.
    3. Does the Proposed Change Involve a Significant Reduction in a 
Margin of Safety?
    Response: No
    The proposed change clarifies the operability requirements for 
the RCS leakage detection instrumentation, provides appropriate 
allowed operating times and compensatory measures when RCS leakage 
detection monitors are inoperable, and revises the TS LCO, Actions, 
and Bases to conform more closely with the corresponding STS 
requirements. The proposed change maintains sufficient continuity 
and diversity of leak detection capability (consistent with the STS) 
that an increase in RCS leakage will be detected before it 
potentially results in gross failure.
    Therefore, it is concluded that the proposed change does not 
involve a significant reduction in a margin of safety.

    The NRC staff has reviewed the licensee's analysis and, based on 
this review, it appears that the three standards of 10 CFR 50.92(c) are 
satisfied. Therefore, the NRC staff proposes to determine that the 
amendment request involves no significant hazards consideration.
    Attorney for licensee: J. Hagood Hamilton, Jr., South Carolina 
Electric & Gas Company, Post Office Box 764, Columbia, South Carolina 
29218.
    NRC Branch Chief: Gloria Kulesa.

Previously Published Notices of Consideration of Issuance of Amendments 
to Facility Operating Licenses, Proposed No Significant Hazards 
Consideration Determination, and Opportunity for a Hearing

    The following notices were previously published as separate 
individual notices. The notice content was the same as above. They were 
published as individual notices either because time did not allow the 
Commission to wait for this biweekly notice or because the action 
involved exigent circumstances. They are repeated here because the 
biweekly notice lists all amendments issued or proposed to be issued 
involving no significant hazards consideration.
    For details, see the individual notice in the Federal Register on 
the day and page cited. This notice does not extend the notice period 
of the original notice.

Southern Nuclear Operating Company, Inc., Docket Nos. 50-424 and 50-
425, Vogtle Electric Generating Plant, Units 1 and 2, Burke County, 
Georgia

    Date of amendment request: March 3, 2011.
    Brief description of amendment request: The proposed amendments 
would revise license and Technical Specifications (TSs) 3.3.1, 
``Reactor Protection System Instrumentation,'' and TS 3.3.2, 
``Engineered Safety Features Actuation System (ESFAS) 
Instrumentation.'' Specifically, the amendment would correct a non-
conservative error associated with the ESFAS Permissive P-14, ``Steam 
Generator Water Level High-High'' instrument setpoint and associated 
allowable value. The proposed change is described in Technical 
Specification Task Force Traveler TSTF-493-A, Revision 4, ``Clarify 
Application of Setpoint Methodology for LSSS [Limiting Safety System 
Setting]

[[Page 40942]]

Functions,'' Option A as described in the Notice of Availability 
published in the Federal Register on May 11, 2010 (75 FR 26294). TSTF-
493-A revises the Improved Standard TS to address Nuclear Regulatory 
Commission concerns that the TS requirement for LSSS may not be fully 
in compliance with the intent of Title 10 of the Code of Federal 
Regulations (10 CFR) 50.36.
    Date of publication of individual notice in Federal Register: May 
24, 2011 (76 FR 30206)
    Expiration date of individual notice: Comments, June 23, 2011; 
Hearing, July 25, 2011.

Notice of Issuance of Amendments to Facility Operating Licenses

    During the period since publication of the last biweekly notice, 
the Commission has issued the following amendments. The Commission has 
determined for each of these amendments that the application complies 
with the standards and requirements of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, 
as amended (the Act), and the Commission's rules and regulations. The 
Commission has made appropriate findings as required by the Act and the 
Commission's rules and regulations in 10 CFR Chapter I, which are set 
forth in the license amendment.
    Notice of Consideration of Issuance of Amendment to Facility 
Operating License, Proposed No Significant Hazards Consideration 
Determination, and Opportunity for A Hearing in connection with these 
actions was published in the Federal Register as indicated.
    Unless otherwise indicated, the Commission has determined that 
these amendments satisfy the criteria for categorical exclusion in 
accordance with 10 CFR 51.22. Therefore, pursuant to 10 CFR 51.22(b), 
no environmental impact statement or environmental assessment need be 
prepared for these amendments. If the Commission has prepared an 
environmental assessment under the special circumstances provision in 
10 CFR 51.22(b) and has made a determination based on that assessment, 
it is so indicated.
    For further details with respect to the action see (1) The 
applications for amendment, (2) the amendment, and (3) the Commission's 
related letter, Safety Evaluation and/or Environmental Assessment as 
indicated. All of these items are available for public inspection at 
the Commission's Public Document Room (PDR), located at One White Flint 
North, Room O1-F21, 11555 Rockville Pike (first floor), Rockville, 
Maryland 20852. Publicly available documents created or received at the 
NRC are accessible electronically through the Agencywide Documents 
Access and Management System (ADAMS) in the NRC Library at https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. If you do not have access to ADAMS 
or if there are problems in accessing the documents located in ADAMS, 
contact the PDR Reference staff at 1-800-397-4209, 301-415-4737 or by 
e-mail to pdr.resource@nrc.gov.

Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC, Docket Nos. 50-269, 50-270, and 50-287, 
Oconee Nuclear Station, Units 1, 2, and 3, Oconee County, South 
Carolina

    Date of application of amendments: June 29, 2009, as supplemented 
June 24, 2010, February 15, 2011, June 6, 2011, and June 15, 2011.
    Brief description of amendments: The amendments authorize changes 
to the Updated Final Safety Analysis Report, to allow the use of fiber 
reinforced polymer on masonry brick walls for uniform pressure loads 
resulting from a tornado event.
    Date of Issuance: June 27, 2011.
    Effective date: As of the date of issuance and shall be implemented 
within 90 days from the date of issuance.
    Amendment Nos.: 373, 375, and 374.
    Renewed Facility Operating License Nos. DPR-38, DPR-47, and DPR-55: 
Amendments revised the licenses and the technical specifications.
    Date of initial notice in Federal Register: December 14, 2010 (75 
FR 77908), and renoticed May 25, 2011 (76 FR 30399).
    The supplements dated June 24, 2010, February 15, 2011, June 6, 
2011, and June 15, 2011, provided additional information that clarified 
the application, did not expand the scope of the application as 
originally noticed, and did not change the staff's original proposed no 
significant hazards consideration determination.
    The Commission's related evaluation of the amendments is contained 
in a Safety Evaluation dated June 27, 2011.
    No significant hazards consideration comments received: No.

Exelon Generating Company, LLC, Docket No. 50-219, Oyster Creek Nuclear 
Generating Station, Ocean County, New Jersey

    Date of application for amendment: June 25, 2010, as supplemented 
by letters dated October 18, 2010, December 1, 2010, March 9, 2011, and 
May 16, 2011.
    Brief description of amendment: The amendment revises the Oyster 
Creek Nuclear Generating Station Technical Specifications (TSs) 
governing actions to be taken if a single emergency diesel generator 
(EDG) is inoperable. Specifically, the amendment removes the 
requirement to test the other EDG daily. Instead, the licensee is 
required to either test the other EDG once, or determine that it is not 
inoperable due to a common cause failure.
    Date of issuance: June 16, 2011.
    Effective date: As of its date of issuance, and shall be 
implemented within 60 days.
    Amendment No.: 278.
    Renewed Facility Operating License No. DPR-16: The amendment 
revised the License and Technical Specifications
    Date of initial notice in Federal Register: January 11, 2011 (76 FR 
1647). The supplements dated October 18, 2010, December 1, 2010, and 
March 9, 2011, provided additional information that clarified the 
application, did not expand the scope of the application as originally 
noticed, and did not change the NRC staff's original proposed no 
significant hazards determination.
    The Commission's related evaluation of the amendment is contained 
in a Safety Evaluation dated June 16, 2011.
    No significant hazards consideration comments received: No.
    Attorney for licensee: Mr. J. Bradley Fewell, Associate General 
Counsel, Exelon Generation Company LLC, 4300 Winfield Road, 
Warrenville, IL 60555.
    NRC Branch Chief: Harold Chernoff.

Exelon Generating Company, LLC, Docket No. 50-219, Oyster Creek Nuclear 
Generating Station, Ocean County, New Jersey

    Date of application for amendment: June 11, 2010, as supplemented 
by letter dated May 6, 2011.
    Brief description of amendment: The amendment revises the 
administrative requirements for the Responsibility and Review and Audit 
sections of the Environmental Technical Specifications for consistency 
with the fleet Quality Assurance Topical report.
    Date of issuance: June 28, 2011.
    Effective date: As of its date of issuance, and shall be 
implemented within 60 days.
    Amendment No.: 279.
    Renewed Facility Operating License No. DPR-16: The amendment 
revised the License and Technical Specifications
    Date of initial notice in Federal Register: November 2, 2010 (75 FR 
67402). The supplement dated May 6, 2011, provided additional 
information that clarified the application, did not expand the scope of 
the application as originally noticed, and did not change

[[Page 40943]]

the NRC staff's original proposed no significant hazards determination.
    The Commission's related evaluation of the amendment is contained 
in a Safety Evaluation dated June 28, 2011.
    No significant hazards consideration comments received: No.

Florida Power and Light Company, Docket Nos. 50-250 and 50-251, Turkey 
Point Plant, Units 3 and 4, Miami-Dade County, Florida

    Date of application for amendments: June 25, 2009, as supplemented 
by letters dated July 21, July 30, August 26, 2009, February 10, March 
15, April 14, April 28, May 21, June 11, June 23, June 25, September 2, 
September 15, October 13, December 14, 2010, and May 11, 2011.
    Brief description of amendments: The amendments revised the 
licensing bases to adopt the alternative source term as allowed in 
Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) 50.67.
    Date of issuance: June 23, 2011.
    Effective date: As of the date of issuance and shall be implemented 
by the completion of the Cycle 26 refueling outage for Unit 3 and Cycle 
27 refueling outage for Unit 4.
    Amendment Nos.: Unit 3-244 and Unit 4-240.
    Renewed Facility Operating License Nos. DPR-31 and DPR-41: 
Amendments revised the Operating Licenses and the Technical 
Specifications.
    Date of initial notice in Federal Register: December 29, 2009 (74 
FR 68870). The supplements dated July 21, July 30, August 26, 2009, 
February 10, March 15, April 14, April 28, June 11, June 23, June 25, 
September 2, September 15, October 13, December 14, 2010, and May 11, 
2011, provided additional information that clarified the application, 
did not expand the scope of the application as originally noticed, and 
did not change the staff's original proposed no significant hazards 
consideration determination as published in the Federal Register. The 
supplement dated May 21, 2010, changed the scope of the application as 
originally noticed. Due to the changes, the application was renoticed 
and published in the Federal Register on July 13, 2010 (75 FR 39978).
    The Commission's related evaluation of the amendments is contained 
in a Safety Evaluation dated June 23, 2011.
    No significant hazards consideration comments received: No.

    Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 30th day of June 2011.

    For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Allen G. Howe,
Deputy Director, Division of Operating Reactor Licensing, Office of 
Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
[FR Doc. 2011-17439 Filed 7-11-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P