Maneb; Tolerance Actions, 40811-40815 [2011-17365]

Download as PDF jdjones on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with RULES Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 133 / Tuesday, July 12, 2011 / Rules and Regulations (i) Location. All waters of the Charles River within a 350-yard radius of the fireworks barges located in the vicinity of position 42°21.47′ N, 071°05.00′ W (NAD 83). (ii) Enforcement Period. This safety zone will be enforced from 9 p.m. to 11 p.m. on July 4, 2011. In the case this event is rescheduled due to inclement weather, this safety zone will be enforced from 9 p.m. to 11 p.m. on July 5, 2011. (7) Town of Nahant Fireworks, Nahant, MA. (i) Location. All waters of Nahant Harbor within a 350-yard radius of the fireworks launch site on Bailey’s Hill Park located at position 42°25.1′ N, 070°55.8′ W (NAD 83). (ii) Enforcement Period. This safety zone will be enforced from 9 p.m. to 11 p.m. on July 4, 2011. In the case this event is rescheduled due to inclement weather, this safety zone will be enforced from 9 p.m. to 11 p.m. on July 5, 2011. (8) City of Salem Fireworks, Salem, MA. (i) Location. All waters of Salem Harbor, within a 350-yard radius of the fireworks launch site located on Derby Wharf at position 42°31.15′ N, 070°53.13′ W (NAD 83). (ii) Enforcement Period. This safety zone will be enforced from 9 p.m. to 10 p.m. on July 4, 2011. In the case this event is rescheduled due to inclement weather, this safety zone will be enforced from 9 p.m. to 10 p.m. on July 5, 2011. (9) Plymouth 4th of July Celebration Fireworks, Plymouth, MA. (i) Location. All waters of Plymouth Harbor within a 350-yard radius of the fireworks launch site located at position 42°57.3′ N, 070°38.3′ W (NAD 83). (ii) Enforcement Period. This safety zone will be enforced from 9 p.m. to 10 p.m. on July 4, 2011. In the case this event is rescheduled due to inclement weather, this safety zone will be enforced from 9 p.m. to 10 p.m. on July 5, 2011. (10) Beverly Homecoming Fireworks. (i) Location. All waters of Beverly Harbor within a 350-yard radius of the fireworks barge located at position 42°32.62′ N, 070°52.15′ W (NAD 83). (ii) Enforcement Period. This safety zone will be enforced from 9 p.m. to 11 p.m. on August 7, 2011. (11) Hingham 4th of July Fireworks. (i) Location. All waters within a 350yard radius of the beach on Button Island located at position 42°15.07′ N, 070°53.03′ W (NAD 83). (ii) Enforcement Period. This safety zone will be enforced from 9:30 p.m. to 10:30 p.m. on July 2, 2011. In the case VerDate Mar<15>2010 15:10 Jul 11, 2011 Jkt 223001 this event is rescheduled due to inclement weather, this safety zone will be enforced from 9:30 p.m. to 10:30 p.m. on July 9, 2011. (12) Gloucester July 4th Celebration Fireworks. (i) Location. All waters of Gloucester Harbor, Stage Fort Park, within a 350yard radius of the fireworks launch site on the beach located at position 42°36.3′ N, 070°40.5′ W (NAD 83). (ii) Enforcement Period. This safety zone will be enforced from 8 p.m. to 11 p.m. on July 3, 2011. (13) Gloucester Schooner Festival Fireworks. (i) Location. All waters of Gloucester Harbor within a 350-yard radius of the launch site on the beach located at position 42°36.3′ N, 070°40.5′ W (NAD 83). (ii) Enforcement Period. This safety zone will be enforced from 7 p.m. to 11 p.m. on September 3, 2011. In the case this event is rescheduled due to inclement weather, this safety zone will be enforced from 7 p.m. to 11 p.m. on September 5, 2011. (b) Regulations. (1) In accordance with the general regulations in § 165.23 of this part, entering into, transiting through, mooring or anchoring within these regulated areas is prohibited unless authorized by the Captain of the Port (COTP) Boston, or the designated on-scene representative. (2) The ‘‘on-scene representative’’ is any Coast Guard commissioned, warrant, or petty officer who has been designated by the COTP Boston to act on his behalf. The on-scene representative will be aboard either a Coast Guard or Coast Guard Auxiliary vessel. (3) Vessel operators desiring to enter or operate within the regulated areas shall contact the COTP or the designated on-scene representative via VHF channel 16 or 617–223–5750 (Sector Boston command center) to obtain permission to do so. (4) Vessel operators given permission to enter or operate in the regulated areas must comply with all directions given to them by the Captain of the Port or the designated on-scene representative. (c) Effective Period. This rule is effective in the CFR on July 12, 2011 through 11:59 p.m. September 9, 2011. This rule is effective with actual notice for purposes of enforcement beginning at 8:30 p.m., June 27, 2011. Dated: June 27, 2011. N.E. Knapp, Commander, U.S. Coast Guard, Acting Captain of the Port Sector Boston. [FR Doc. 2011–17393 Filed 7–11–11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 9110–04–P PO 00000 Frm 00035 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 40811 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 180 [EPA–HQ–OPP–2010–0327; FRL–8878–6] Maneb; Tolerance Actions Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Final rule. AGENCY: EPA is revoking all the tolerances for the fungicide maneb with expiration/revocation dates that provide sufficient time to use existing stocks of the canceled registrations for the last food uses of maneb in the United States. DATES: This regulation is effective July 12, 2011. Objections and requests for hearings must be received on or before September 12, 2011 and must be filed in accordance with the instructions provided in 40 CFR part 178 (see also Unit I.C. of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION). SUMMARY: EPA has established a docket for this action under docket identification (ID) number EPA–HQ– OPP–2010–0327. All documents in the docket are listed in the docket index available at https://www.regulations.gov. Although listed in the index, some information is not publicly available, e.g., Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet and will be publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials are available in the electronic docket at https://www.regulations.gov, or, if only available in hard copy, at the OPP Regulatory Public Docket in Rm. S– 4400, One Potomac Yard (South Bldg.), 2777 S. Crystal Dr., Arlington, VA. The Docket Facility is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The Docket Facility telephone number is (703) 305– 5805. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joseph Nevola, Pesticide Re-evaluation Division (7508P), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460–0001; telephone number: (703) 308–8037; e-mail address: nevola.joseph@epa.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: ADDRESSES: I. General Information A. Does this action apply to me? You may be potentially affected by this action if you are an agricultural E:\FR\FM\12JYR1.SGM 12JYR1 40812 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 133 / Tuesday, July 12, 2011 / Rules and Regulations request, identified by docket ID number EPA–HQ–OPP–2010–0327, by one of the following methods: • Federal eRulemaking Portal: https:// www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line instructions for submitting comments. • Mail: Office of Pesticide Programs (OPP) Regulatory Public Docket (7502P), Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460–0001. • Delivery: OPP Regulatory Public Docket (7502P), Environmental Protection Agency, Rm. S–4400, One Potomac Yard (South Bldg.), 2777 S. Crystal Dr., Arlington, VA. Deliveries are only accepted during the Docket Facility’s normal hours of operation (8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays). Special arrangements should be made for deliveries of boxed information. The Docket Facility telephone number is (703) 305–5805. B. How can I get electronic access to other related information? You may access a frequently updated electronic version of 40 CFR part 180 through the Government Printing Office’s e-CFR site at https:// ecfr.gpoaccess.gov/cgi/t/text/textidx?&c=ecfr&tpl=/ecfrbrowse/Title40/ 40tab_02.tpl. jdjones on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with RULES producer, food manufacturer, or pesticide manufacturer. Potentially affected entities may include, but are not limited to: • Crop production (NAICS code 111). • Animal production (NAICS code 112). • Food manufacturing (NAICS code 311). • Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS code 32532). This listing is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides a guide for readers regarding entities likely to be affected by this action. Other types of entities not listed in this unit could also be affected. The North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS) codes have been provided to assist you and others in determining whether this action might apply to certain entities. If you have any questions regarding the applicability of this action to a particular entity, consult the person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. A. What action is the Agency taking? C. How can I file an objection or hearing request? Under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA) section 408(g), 21 U.S.C. 346a, any person may file an objection to any aspect of this regulation and may also request a hearing on those objections. You must file your objection or request a hearing on this regulation in accordance with the instructions provided in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, you must identify docket ID number EPA–HQ– OPP–2010–0327 in the subject line on the first page of your submission. All objections and requests for a hearing must be in writing, and must be received by the Hearing Clerk on or before September 12, 2011. Addresses for mail and hand delivery of objections and hearing requests are provided in 40 CFR 178.25(b). In addition to filing an objection or hearing request with the Hearing Clerk as described in 40 CFR part 178, please submit a copy of the filing that does not contain any CBI for inclusion in the public docket. Information not marked confidential pursuant to 40 CFR part 2 may be disclosed publicly by EPA without prior notice. Submit a copy of your non-CBI objection or hearing VerDate Mar<15>2010 15:10 Jul 11, 2011 Jkt 223001 II. Background In the Federal Register of May 26, 2010 (75 FR 29475) (FRL–8826–2), EPA issued a proposal to revoke all the tolerances for residues of the fungicide maneb after receipt and approval of requests for voluntary cancellation by registrants of the last registrations for food uses of maneb in the United States. Also, the proposal provided a 60-day comment period which invited public comment for consideration and for support of tolerance retention under FFDCA standards. In this final rule, EPA is revoking all the tolerances for the fungicide maneb, with delayed expiration/revocation dates in response to public comments requesting more time to use existing stocks of the canceled registrations. In addition, EPA had proposed in the May 26, 2010 issue of the Federal Register to remove the expired tolerance in 40 CFR 180.110(b) for maneb residues in or on walnut, and reserve that paragraph. However, EPA previously removed that expired tolerance and reserved that paragraph in a final rule published in the Federal Register of June 15, 2011 (76 FR 34883) (FRL–8875–4). Therefore, no further changes are being made to 40 CFR 180.110(b). In response to the proposal published in the Federal Register of May 26, 2010 (75 FR 29475), EPA received comments during the 60-day public comment period, as follows: Comments. Commenters from the Regional Vegetable Extension Agent with the University of Florida, the Pesticide Safety Education Program of Oklahoma State University, and two PO 00000 Frm 00036 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 growers requested that maneb use be extended until exhaustion for pepper, lettuce, grapes grown for wine, and leafy vegetables. One commenter requested that maneb use on broccoli, cabbage, and lettuce be extended for 5 years. Most comments received from multiple individual growers and also from the Cranberry Institute, the Department of Plant and Environmental Protection Sciences, College of Tropical Agriculture and Human Resources of the University of Hawaii, Florida Fruit and Vegetable Association, Arizona Pest Management Center, California’s Glenn County Department of Agriculture, California’s Tehama County Department of Agriculture, and Colorado Department of Agriculture, requested that maneb use be extended (for use on commodities such as almond, broccoli, cabbage, celery, cranberry, eggplant, lettuce, onion, pepper, potato, and tomato) and for timeframes ranging from a few months to over 2 years; i.e., the end of 2012. Agency response. In the Federal Register of May 26, 2010 (75 FR 29475) (FRL–8826–2), EPA proposed to revoke the maneb tolerances on the date of final rule publication in the Federal Register, which the Agency expected to occur in 2010. Based on the comments received, the Agency agrees that there is a need for more time to exhaust existing stocks of maneb. Therefore, EPA is revoking the tolerances for maneb in 40 CFR 180.110 with the expiration/revocation dates of December 31, 2012. The Agency believes the extended time is sufficient and consistent with the general outlook of the public comments received. B. What is the Agency’s authority for taking this action? EPA may issue a regulation revoking tolerances under FFDCA section 408(e). EPA’s general practice is to revoke tolerances for residues of pesticide active ingredients on crops for which the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) registrations no longer exist and on which the pesticide may therefore no longer be used in the United States. EPA has historically been concerned that retention of tolerances that are not necessary to cover residues in or on legally treated foods may encourage misuse of pesticides within the United States. Nonetheless, EPA will establish and maintain tolerances even when corresponding domestic uses are canceled if the tolerances, which EPA refers to as ‘‘import tolerances,’’ are necessary to allow importation into the United States of food containing such pesticide residues. However, where there are no imported commodities that E:\FR\FM\12JYR1.SGM 12JYR1 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 133 / Tuesday, July 12, 2011 / Rules and Regulations require these import tolerances, the Agency believes it is appropriate to revoke tolerances for unregistered pesticides in order to prevent potential misuse. C. When do these actions become effective? As noted in the DATES section, this regulation is effective on the date of the publication in the Federal Register. In this final rule, EPA is revoking all the maneb tolerances with expiration/ revocation dates of December 31, 2012. Based on the comments received during the 60-day public comment period, the Agency believes that the expiration/ revocation dates allow users to exhaust existing stocks and allow sufficient time for passage of treated commodities through the channels of trade. Any commodities listed in the regulatory text of this document that are treated with the pesticides subject to this final rule, and that are in the channels of trade following the tolerance revocations, shall be subject to FFDCA section 408(1)(5), as established by the Food Quality Protection Act (FQPA). Under this unit, any residues of these pesticides in or on such food shall not render the food adulterated so long as it is shown to the satisfaction of the Food and Drug Administration that: 1. The residue is present as the result of an application or use of the pesticide at a time and in a manner that was lawful under FIFRA. 2. The residue does not exceed the level that was authorized at the time of the application or use to be present on the food under a tolerance or exemption from tolerance. Evidence to show that food was lawfully treated may include records that verify the dates that the pesticide was applied to such food. jdjones on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with RULES III. International Residue Limits In making its tolerance decisions, EPA seeks to harmonize U.S. tolerances with international standards whenever possible, consistent with U.S. food safety standards and agricultural practices. EPA considers the international maximum residue limits (MRLs) established by the Codex Alimentarius Commission (Codex), as required by FFDCA section 408(b)(4). The Codex Alimentarius is a joint U.N. Food and Agriculture Organization/ World Health Organization food standards program, and it is recognized as an international food safety standards-setting organization in trade agreements to which the United States is a party. EPA may establish a tolerance that is different from a Codex MRL; however, FFDCA section 408(b)(4) VerDate Mar<15>2010 15:10 Jul 11, 2011 Jkt 223001 requires that EPA explain the reasons for departing from the Codex level. The Codex has not established a MRL for maneb per se, but has MRLs for total dithiocarbamates (which includes the dithiocarbamate maneb), determined as carbon disulfide. IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews In this final rule, EPA revokes specific tolerances established under FFDCA section 408. The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has exempted this type of action (i.e., a tolerance revocation for which extraordinary circumstances do not exist) from review under Executive Order 12866, entitled Regulatory Planning and Review (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993). Because this rule has been exempted from review under Executive Order 12866 due to its lack of significance, this rule is not subject to Executive Order 13211, entitled Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001). This final rule does not contain any information collections subject to OMB approval under the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA), 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq., or impose any enforceable duty or contain any unfunded mandate as described under Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA) (Pub. L. 104–4). Nor does it require any special considerations as required by Executive Order 12898, entitled Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994); or OMB review or any other Agency action under Executive Order 13045, entitled Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997). This action does not involve any technical standards that would require Agency consideration of voluntary consensus standards pursuant to section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (NTTAA), Public Law 104–13, section 12(d) (15 U.S.C. 272 note). Pursuant to the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.), the Agency previously assessed whether revocations of tolerances might significantly impact a substantial number of small entities and concluded that, as a general matter, these actions do not impose a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. This analysis was published on December 17, 1997 (62 FR 66020) (FRL–5753–1), and was provided to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business Administration. Taking into account PO 00000 Frm 00037 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 40813 this analysis, and available information concerning the pesticides listed in this rule, the Agency hereby certifies that this final rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. In a memorandum dated May 25, 2001, EPA determined that eight conditions must all be satisfied in order for an import tolerance or tolerance exemption revocation to adversely affect a significant number of small entity importers, and that there is a negligible joint probability of all eight conditions holding simultaneously with respect to any particular revocation. (This Agency document is available in the docket of the proposed rule, as mentioned in Unit II.A.). Furthermore, for the pesticides named in this final rule, the Agency knows of no extraordinary circumstances that exist as to the present revocations that would change EPA’s previous analysis. In addition, the Agency has determined that this action will not have a substantial direct effect on States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government, as specified in Executive Order 13132, entitled Federalism (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999). Executive Order 13132 requires EPA to develop an accountable process to ensure ‘‘meaningful and timely input by State and local officials in the development of regulatory policies that have federalism implications.’’ ‘‘Policies that have federalism implications’’ is defined in the Executive order to include regulations that have ‘‘substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.’’ This final rule directly regulates growers, food processors, food handlers, and food retailers, not States. This action does not alter the relationships or distribution of power and responsibilities established by Congress in the preemption provisions of section 408(n)(4) of FFDCA. For these same reasons, the Agency has determined that this rule does not have any ‘‘tribal implications’’ as described in Executive Order 13175, entitled Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). Executive Order 13175, requires EPA to develop an accountable process to ensure ‘‘meaningful and timely input by tribal officials in the development of regulatory policies that have tribal implications.’’ ‘‘Policies that have tribal E:\FR\FM\12JYR1.SGM 12JYR1 40814 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 133 / Tuesday, July 12, 2011 / Rules and Regulations implications’’ is defined in the Executive order to include regulations that have ‘‘substantial direct effects on one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and the Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.’’ This rule will not have substantial direct effects on tribal governments, on the relationship between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, as specified in Executive Order 13175. Thus, Executive Order 13175 does not apply to this rule. V. Congressional Review Act The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating the rule must submit a rule report to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the United States. EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of this final rule in the Federal Register. This final rule is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180 Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure, Agricultural commodities, Pesticides and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements. Dated: June 29, 2011. Steven Bradbury, Director, Office of Pesticide Programs. Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is amended as follows: PART 180—[AMENDED] 1. The authority citation for part 180 continues to read as follows: ■ Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371. 2. Section 180.110 is amended by revising the table in paragraph (a) to read as follows: ■ § 180.110 Maneb; tolerances for residues. (a) * * * Parts per million jdjones on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with RULES Commodity Almond ................................................................................................................................................................... Apple ...................................................................................................................................................................... Apricot .................................................................................................................................................................... Banana (not more than 0.5 part per million shall be in the pulp after peel is removed and discarded (preharvest application only)) ............................................................................................................................. Bean, dry, seed ..................................................................................................................................................... Bean, succulent ..................................................................................................................................................... Beet, sugar, tops ................................................................................................................................................... Broccoli .................................................................................................................................................................. Brussels sprouts .................................................................................................................................................... Cabbage ................................................................................................................................................................ Cabbage, Chinese, bok choy ................................................................................................................................ Cabbage, Chinese, napa ....................................................................................................................................... Carrot, roots ........................................................................................................................................................... Cauliflower ............................................................................................................................................................. Celery ..................................................................................................................................................................... Collards .................................................................................................................................................................. Corn, sweet, kernel plus cob with husks removed ............................................................................................... Cranberry ............................................................................................................................................................... Cucumber .............................................................................................................................................................. Eggplant ................................................................................................................................................................. Endive .................................................................................................................................................................... Fig .......................................................................................................................................................................... Grape ..................................................................................................................................................................... Kale ........................................................................................................................................................................ Kohlrabi .................................................................................................................................................................. Lettuce ................................................................................................................................................................... Melon ..................................................................................................................................................................... Mustard greens ...................................................................................................................................................... Nectarine ................................................................................................................................................................ Onion ..................................................................................................................................................................... Papaya ................................................................................................................................................................... Peach ..................................................................................................................................................................... Pepper ................................................................................................................................................................... Potato ..................................................................................................................................................................... Pumpkin ................................................................................................................................................................. Squash, summer .................................................................................................................................................... Squash, winter ....................................................................................................................................................... Tomato ................................................................................................................................................................... Turnip, greens ........................................................................................................................................................ Turnip, roots ........................................................................................................................................................... VerDate Mar<15>2010 15:10 Jul 11, 2011 Jkt 223001 PO 00000 Frm 00038 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 9990 E:\FR\FM\12JYR1.SGM 12JYR1 Expiration/revocation date 0.1 2 10 12/31/12 12/31/12 12/31/12 4 7 10 45 10 10 10 10 10 7 10 5 10 5 7 4 7 10 7 7 10 10 10 4 10 10 7 10 10 7 0.1 7 4 4 4 10 7 12/31/12 12/31/12 12/31/12 12/31/12 12/31/12 12/31/12 12/31/12 12/31/12 12/31/12 12/31/12 12/31/12 12/31/12 12/31/12 12/31/12 12/31/12 12/31/12 12/31/12 12/31/12 12/31/12 12/31/12 12/31/12 12/31/12 12/31/12 12/31/12 12/31/12 12/31/12 12/31/12 12/31/12 12/31/12 12/31/12 12/31/12 12/31/12 12/31/12 12/31/12 12/31/12 12/31/12 12/31/12 40815 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 133 / Tuesday, July 12, 2011 / Rules and Regulations * * * * * [FR Doc. 2011–17365 Filed 7–11–11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560–50–P DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY Federal Emergency Management Agency 44 CFR Part 65 [Docket ID FEMA–2011–0002] Changes in Flood Elevation Determinations Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS. ACTION: Final rule. AGENCY: Modified Base (1% annualchance) Flood Elevations (BFEs) are finalized for the communities listed below. These modified BFEs will be used to calculate flood insurance premium rates for new buildings and their contents. DATES: The effective dates for these modified BFEs are indicated on the following table and revise the Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs) in effect for the listed communities prior to this date. ADDRESSES: The modified BFEs for each community are available for inspection at the office of the Chief Executive Officer of each community. The respective addresses are listed in the table below. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Luis Rodriguez, Chief, Engineering Management Branch, Federal Insurance and Mitigation Administration, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW., Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646–4064, or (e-mail) luis.rodriguez1@dhs.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) makes the final determinations SUMMARY: State and county jdjones on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with RULES Alabama: Calhoun (FEMA Docket No.: B–1165). Calhoun (FEMA Docket No.: B–1165). Arizona: Pinal (FEMA Docket No.: B–1172). Pinal (FEMA Docket No.: B–1172). VerDate Mar<15>2010 listed below of the modified BFEs for each community listed. These modified BFEs have been published in newspapers of local circulation and ninety (90) days have elapsed since that publication. The Deputy Federal Insurance and Mitigation Administrator has resolved any appeals resulting from this notification. The modified BFEs are not listed for each community in this notice. However, this final rule includes the address of the Chief Executive Officer of the community where the modified BFE determinations are available for inspection. The modified BFEs are made pursuant to section 206 of the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973, 42 U.S.C. 4105, and are in accordance with the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968, 42 U.S.C. 4001 et seq., and with 44 CFR part 65. For rating purposes, the currently effective community number is shown and must be used for all new policies and renewals. The modified BFEs are the basis for the floodplain management measures that the community is required either to adopt or to show evidence of being already in effect in order to qualify or to remain qualified for participation in the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP). These modified BFEs, together with the floodplain management criteria required by 44 CFR 60.3, are the minimum that are required. They should not be construed to mean that the community must change any existing ordinances that are more stringent in their floodplain management requirements. The community may at any time enact stricter requirements of its own or pursuant to policies established by other Federal, State, or regional entities. These modified BFEs are used to meet the floodplain management requirements of the NFIP and also are used to calculate the appropriate flood insurance premium rates for new buildings built after these elevations are made final, and for the contents in those buildings. The changes in BFEs are in accordance with 44 CFR 65.4. National Environmental Policy Act. This final rule is categorically excluded from the requirements of 44 CFR part 10, Environmental Consideration. An environmental impact assessment has not been prepared. Regulatory Flexibility Act. As flood elevation determinations are not within the scope of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, a regulatory flexibility analysis is not required. Regulatory Classification. This final rule is not a significant regulatory action under the criteria of section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866 of September 30, 1993, Regulatory Planning and Review, 58 FR 51735. Executive Order 13132, Federalism. This final rule involves no policies that have federalism implications under Executive Order 13132, Federalism. Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform. This final rule meets the applicable standards of Executive Order 12988. List of Subjects in 44 CFR Part 65 Flood insurance, Floodplains, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements. Accordingly, 44 CFR part 65 is amended to read as follows: PART 65—[AMENDED] 1. The authority citation for part 65 continues to read as follows: ■ Authority: 42 U.S.C. 4001 et seq.; Reorganization Plan No. 3 of 1978, 3 CFR, 1978 Comp., p. 329; E.O. 12127, 44 FR 19367, 3 CFR, 1979 Comp., p. 376. § 65.4 [Amended] 2. The tables published under the authority of § 65.4 are amended as follows: ■ Location and case No. Date and name of newspaper where notice was published Chief executive officer of community Effective date of modification City of Oxford (10– 04–2692P). October 22, 2010; October 29, 2010; The Anniston Star. February 28, 2011 .......... 010023 Unincorporated areas of Calhoun County (10–04– 2692P). October 22, 2010; October 29, 2010; The Anniston Star. The Honorable Leon Smith, Mayor, City of Oxford, P.O. Box 3383, Oxford, AL 36203. Mr. James ‘‘Pappy’’ Dunn, Commissioner, Calhoun County, 1702 Noble Street, Suite 103, Anniston, AL 36201. February 28, 2011 .......... 010013 City of Casa Grande (10–09–1532P). November 12, 2010; November 19, 2010; The Casa Grande Dispatch. November 5, 2010 .......... 040080 City of Maricopa (10–09–2020P). November 4, 2010; November 11, 2010; The Casa Grande Dispatch. The Honorable Robert M. Jackson, Mayor, City of Casa Grande, 510 East Florence Boulevard, Casa Grande, AZ 85122. The Honorable Anthony Smith, Mayor, City of Maricopa, 45145 West Madison Avenue, Maricopa, AZ 85139. March 11, 2011 .............. 040052 15:10 Jul 11, 2011 Jkt 223001 PO 00000 Frm 00039 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\12JYR1.SGM 12JYR1 Community No.

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 133 (Tuesday, July 12, 2011)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 40811-40815]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-17365]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 180

[EPA-HQ-OPP-2010-0327; FRL-8878-6]


Maneb; Tolerance Actions

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA is revoking all the tolerances for the fungicide maneb 
with expiration/revocation dates that provide sufficient time to use 
existing stocks of the canceled registrations for the last food uses of 
maneb in the United States.

DATES: This regulation is effective July 12, 2011. Objections and 
requests for hearings must be received on or before September 12, 2011 
and must be filed in accordance with the instructions provided in 40 
CFR part 178 (see also Unit I.C. of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION).

ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under docket 
identification (ID) number EPA-HQ-OPP-2010-0327. All documents in the 
docket are listed in the docket index available at https://www.regulations.gov. Although listed in the index, some information is 
not publicly available, e.g., Confidential Business Information (CBI) 
or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain 
other material, such as copyrighted material, is not placed on the 
Internet and will be publicly available only in hard copy form. 
Publicly available docket materials are available in the electronic 
docket at https://www.regulations.gov, or, if only available in hard 
copy, at the OPP Regulatory Public Docket in Rm. S-4400, One Potomac 
Yard (South Bldg.), 2777 S. Crystal Dr., Arlington, VA. The Docket 
Facility is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, 
excluding legal holidays. The Docket Facility telephone number is (703) 
305-5805.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joseph Nevola, Pesticide Re-evaluation 
Division (7508P), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental 
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460-
0001; telephone number: (703) 308-8037; e-mail address: 
nevola.joseph@epa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. General Information

A. Does this action apply to me?

    You may be potentially affected by this action if you are an 
agricultural

[[Page 40812]]

producer, food manufacturer, or pesticide manufacturer. Potentially 
affected entities may include, but are not limited to:
     Crop production (NAICS code 111).
     Animal production (NAICS code 112).
     Food manufacturing (NAICS code 311).
     Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS code 32532).
    This listing is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides 
a guide for readers regarding entities likely to be affected by this 
action. Other types of entities not listed in this unit could also be 
affected. The North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS) 
codes have been provided to assist you and others in determining 
whether this action might apply to certain entities. If you have any 
questions regarding the applicability of this action to a particular 
entity, consult the person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION 
CONTACT.

B. How can I get electronic access to other related information?

    You may access a frequently updated electronic version of 40 CFR 
part 180 through the Government Printing Office's e-CFR site at https://ecfr.gpoaccess.gov/cgi/t/text/text-idx?&c=ecfr&tpl=/ecfrbrowse/Title40/40tab_02.tpl.

C. How can I file an objection or hearing request?

    Under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA) section 
408(g), 21 U.S.C. 346a, any person may file an objection to any aspect 
of this regulation and may also request a hearing on those objections. 
You must file your objection or request a hearing on this regulation in 
accordance with the instructions provided in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure 
proper receipt by EPA, you must identify docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-
2010-0327 in the subject line on the first page of your submission. All 
objections and requests for a hearing must be in writing, and must be 
received by the Hearing Clerk on or before September 12, 2011. 
Addresses for mail and hand delivery of objections and hearing requests 
are provided in 40 CFR 178.25(b).
    In addition to filing an objection or hearing request with the 
Hearing Clerk as described in 40 CFR part 178, please submit a copy of 
the filing that does not contain any CBI for inclusion in the public 
docket. Information not marked confidential pursuant to 40 CFR part 2 
may be disclosed publicly by EPA without prior notice. Submit a copy of 
your non-CBI objection or hearing request, identified by docket ID 
number EPA-HQ-OPP-2010-0327, by one of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov. 
Follow the on-line instructions for submitting comments.
     Mail: Office of Pesticide Programs (OPP) Regulatory Public 
Docket (7502P), Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania 
Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001.
     Delivery: OPP Regulatory Public Docket (7502P), 
Environmental Protection Agency, Rm. S-4400, One Potomac Yard (South 
Bldg.), 2777 S. Crystal Dr., Arlington, VA. Deliveries are only 
accepted during the Docket Facility's normal hours of operation (8:30 
a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays). 
Special arrangements should be made for deliveries of boxed 
information. The Docket Facility telephone number is (703) 305-5805.

II. Background

A. What action is the Agency taking?

    In the Federal Register of May 26, 2010 (75 FR 29475) (FRL-8826-2), 
EPA issued a proposal to revoke all the tolerances for residues of the 
fungicide maneb after receipt and approval of requests for voluntary 
cancellation by registrants of the last registrations for food uses of 
maneb in the United States. Also, the proposal provided a 60-day 
comment period which invited public comment for consideration and for 
support of tolerance retention under FFDCA standards.
    In this final rule, EPA is revoking all the tolerances for the 
fungicide maneb, with delayed expiration/revocation dates in response 
to public comments requesting more time to use existing stocks of the 
canceled registrations. In addition, EPA had proposed in the May 26, 
2010 issue of the Federal Register to remove the expired tolerance in 
40 CFR 180.110(b) for maneb residues in or on walnut, and reserve that 
paragraph. However, EPA previously removed that expired tolerance and 
reserved that paragraph in a final rule published in the Federal 
Register of June 15, 2011 (76 FR 34883) (FRL-8875-4). Therefore, no 
further changes are being made to 40 CFR 180.110(b).
    In response to the proposal published in the Federal Register of 
May 26, 2010 (75 FR 29475), EPA received comments during the 60-day 
public comment period, as follows:
    Comments. Commenters from the Regional Vegetable Extension Agent 
with the University of Florida, the Pesticide Safety Education Program 
of Oklahoma State University, and two growers requested that maneb use 
be extended until exhaustion for pepper, lettuce, grapes grown for 
wine, and leafy vegetables. One commenter requested that maneb use on 
broccoli, cabbage, and lettuce be extended for 5 years. Most comments 
received from multiple individual growers and also from the Cranberry 
Institute, the Department of Plant and Environmental Protection 
Sciences, College of Tropical Agriculture and Human Resources of the 
University of Hawaii, Florida Fruit and Vegetable Association, Arizona 
Pest Management Center, California's Glenn County Department of 
Agriculture, California's Tehama County Department of Agriculture, and 
Colorado Department of Agriculture, requested that maneb use be 
extended (for use on commodities such as almond, broccoli, cabbage, 
celery, cranberry, eggplant, lettuce, onion, pepper, potato, and 
tomato) and for timeframes ranging from a few months to over 2 years; 
i.e., the end of 2012.
    Agency response. In the Federal Register of May 26, 2010 (75 FR 
29475) (FRL-8826-2), EPA proposed to revoke the maneb tolerances on the 
date of final rule publication in the Federal Register, which the 
Agency expected to occur in 2010. Based on the comments received, the 
Agency agrees that there is a need for more time to exhaust existing 
stocks of maneb. Therefore, EPA is revoking the tolerances for maneb in 
40 CFR 180.110 with the expiration/revocation dates of December 31, 
2012. The Agency believes the extended time is sufficient and 
consistent with the general outlook of the public comments received.

B. What is the Agency's authority for taking this action?

    EPA may issue a regulation revoking tolerances under FFDCA section 
408(e). EPA's general practice is to revoke tolerances for residues of 
pesticide active ingredients on crops for which the Federal 
Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) registrations no 
longer exist and on which the pesticide may therefore no longer be used 
in the United States. EPA has historically been concerned that 
retention of tolerances that are not necessary to cover residues in or 
on legally treated foods may encourage misuse of pesticides within the 
United States. Nonetheless, EPA will establish and maintain tolerances 
even when corresponding domestic uses are canceled if the tolerances, 
which EPA refers to as ``import tolerances,'' are necessary to allow 
importation into the United States of food containing such pesticide 
residues. However, where there are no imported commodities that

[[Page 40813]]

require these import tolerances, the Agency believes it is appropriate 
to revoke tolerances for unregistered pesticides in order to prevent 
potential misuse.

C. When do these actions become effective?

    As noted in the DATES section, this regulation is effective on the 
date of the publication in the Federal Register. In this final rule, 
EPA is revoking all the maneb tolerances with expiration/revocation 
dates of December 31, 2012. Based on the comments received during the 
60-day public comment period, the Agency believes that the expiration/
revocation dates allow users to exhaust existing stocks and allow 
sufficient time for passage of treated commodities through the channels 
of trade.
    Any commodities listed in the regulatory text of this document that 
are treated with the pesticides subject to this final rule, and that 
are in the channels of trade following the tolerance revocations, shall 
be subject to FFDCA section 408(1)(5), as established by the Food 
Quality Protection Act (FQPA). Under this unit, any residues of these 
pesticides in or on such food shall not render the food adulterated so 
long as it is shown to the satisfaction of the Food and Drug 
Administration that:
    1. The residue is present as the result of an application or use of 
the pesticide at a time and in a manner that was lawful under FIFRA.
    2. The residue does not exceed the level that was authorized at the 
time of the application or use to be present on the food under a 
tolerance or exemption from tolerance. Evidence to show that food was 
lawfully treated may include records that verify the dates that the 
pesticide was applied to such food.

III. International Residue Limits

    In making its tolerance decisions, EPA seeks to harmonize U.S. 
tolerances with international standards whenever possible, consistent 
with U.S. food safety standards and agricultural practices. EPA 
considers the international maximum residue limits (MRLs) established 
by the Codex Alimentarius Commission (Codex), as required by FFDCA 
section 408(b)(4). The Codex Alimentarius is a joint U.N. Food and 
Agriculture Organization/World Health Organization food standards 
program, and it is recognized as an international food safety 
standards-setting organization in trade agreements to which the United 
States is a party. EPA may establish a tolerance that is different from 
a Codex MRL; however, FFDCA section 408(b)(4) requires that EPA explain 
the reasons for departing from the Codex level.
    The Codex has not established a MRL for maneb per se, but has MRLs 
for total dithiocarbamates (which includes the dithiocarbamate maneb), 
determined as carbon disulfide.

IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    In this final rule, EPA revokes specific tolerances established 
under FFDCA section 408. The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has 
exempted this type of action (i.e., a tolerance revocation for which 
extraordinary circumstances do not exist) from review under Executive 
Order 12866, entitled Regulatory Planning and Review (58 FR 51735, 
October 4, 1993). Because this rule has been exempted from review under 
Executive Order 12866 due to its lack of significance, this rule is not 
subject to Executive Order 13211, entitled Actions Concerning 
Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or 
Use (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001). This final rule does not contain any 
information collections subject to OMB approval under the Paperwork 
Reduction Act (PRA), 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq., or impose any enforceable 
duty or contain any unfunded mandate as described under Title II of the 
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA) (Pub. L. 104-4). Nor does 
it require any special considerations as required by Executive Order 
12898, entitled Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice in 
Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations (59 FR 7629, February 
16, 1994); or OMB review or any other Agency action under Executive 
Order 13045, entitled Protection of Children from Environmental Health 
Risks and Safety Risks (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997). This action does 
not involve any technical standards that would require Agency 
consideration of voluntary consensus standards pursuant to section 
12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 
(NTTAA), Public Law 104-13, section 12(d) (15 U.S.C. 272 note). 
Pursuant to the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et 
seq.), the Agency previously assessed whether revocations of tolerances 
might significantly impact a substantial number of small entities and 
concluded that, as a general matter, these actions do not impose a 
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. 
This analysis was published on December 17, 1997 (62 FR 66020) (FRL-
5753-1), and was provided to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the 
Small Business Administration. Taking into account this analysis, and 
available information concerning the pesticides listed in this rule, 
the Agency hereby certifies that this final rule will not have a 
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. 
In a memorandum dated May 25, 2001, EPA determined that eight 
conditions must all be satisfied in order for an import tolerance or 
tolerance exemption revocation to adversely affect a significant number 
of small entity importers, and that there is a negligible joint 
probability of all eight conditions holding simultaneously with respect 
to any particular revocation. (This Agency document is available in the 
docket of the proposed rule, as mentioned in Unit II.A.). Furthermore, 
for the pesticides named in this final rule, the Agency knows of no 
extraordinary circumstances that exist as to the present revocations 
that would change EPA's previous analysis. In addition, the Agency has 
determined that this action will not have a substantial direct effect 
on States, on the relationship between the national government and the 
States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the 
various levels of government, as specified in Executive Order 13132, 
entitled Federalism (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999). Executive Order 
13132 requires EPA to develop an accountable process to ensure 
``meaningful and timely input by State and local officials in the 
development of regulatory policies that have federalism implications.'' 
``Policies that have federalism implications'' is defined in the 
Executive order to include regulations that have ``substantial direct 
effects on the States, on the relationship between the national 
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and 
responsibilities among the various levels of government.'' This final 
rule directly regulates growers, food processors, food handlers, and 
food retailers, not States. This action does not alter the 
relationships or distribution of power and responsibilities established 
by Congress in the preemption provisions of section 408(n)(4) of FFDCA. 
For these same reasons, the Agency has determined that this rule does 
not have any ``tribal implications'' as described in Executive Order 
13175, entitled Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal 
Governments (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). Executive Order 13175, 
requires EPA to develop an accountable process to ensure ``meaningful 
and timely input by tribal officials in the development of regulatory 
policies that have tribal implications.'' ``Policies that have tribal

[[Page 40814]]

implications'' is defined in the Executive order to include regulations 
that have ``substantial direct effects on one or more Indian tribes, on 
the relationship between the Federal Government and the Indian tribes, 
or on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the 
Federal Government and Indian tribes.'' This rule will not have 
substantial direct effects on tribal governments, on the relationship 
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, or on the 
distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal 
Government and Indian tribes, as specified in Executive Order 13175. 
Thus, Executive Order 13175 does not apply to this rule.

V. Congressional Review Act

    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., generally 
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating 
the rule must submit a rule report to each House of the Congress and to 
the Comptroller General of the United States. EPA will submit a report 
containing this rule and other required information to the U.S. Senate, 
the U.S. House of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the 
United States prior to publication of this final rule in the Federal 
Register. This final rule is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 
U.S.C. 804(2).

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180

    Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure, 
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides and pests, Reporting and 
recordkeeping requirements.

    Dated: June 29, 2011.
Steven Bradbury,
Director, Office of Pesticide Programs.

    Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is amended as follows:

PART 180--[AMENDED]

0
1. The authority citation for part 180 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371.


0
2. Section 180.110 is amended by revising the table in paragraph (a) to 
read as follows:


Sec.  180.110  Maneb; tolerances for residues.

    (a) * * *

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                            Expiration/
               Commodity                    Parts per       revocation
                                             million           date
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Almond.................................              0.1        12/31/12
Apple..................................              2          12/31/12
Apricot................................             10          12/31/12
Banana (not more than 0.5 part per                   4          12/31/12
 million shall be in the pulp after
 peel is removed and discarded
 (preharvest application only))........
Bean, dry, seed........................              7          12/31/12
Bean, succulent........................             10          12/31/12
Beet, sugar, tops......................             45          12/31/12
Broccoli...............................             10          12/31/12
Brussels sprouts.......................             10          12/31/12
Cabbage................................             10          12/31/12
Cabbage, Chinese, bok choy.............             10          12/31/12
Cabbage, Chinese, napa.................             10          12/31/12
Carrot, roots..........................              7          12/31/12
Cauliflower............................             10          12/31/12
Celery.................................              5          12/31/12
Collards...............................             10          12/31/12
Corn, sweet, kernel plus cob with husks              5          12/31/12
 removed...............................
Cranberry..............................              7          12/31/12
Cucumber...............................              4          12/31/12
Eggplant...............................              7          12/31/12
Endive.................................             10          12/31/12
Fig....................................              7          12/31/12
Grape..................................              7          12/31/12
Kale...................................             10          12/31/12
Kohlrabi...............................             10          12/31/12
Lettuce................................             10          12/31/12
Melon..................................              4          12/31/12
Mustard greens.........................             10          12/31/12
Nectarine..............................             10          12/31/12
Onion..................................              7          12/31/12
Papaya.................................             10          12/31/12
Peach..................................             10          12/31/12
Pepper.................................              7          12/31/12
Potato.................................              0.1        12/31/12
Pumpkin................................              7          12/31/12
Squash, summer.........................              4          12/31/12
Squash, winter.........................              4          12/31/12
Tomato.................................              4          12/31/12
Turnip, greens.........................             10          12/31/12
Turnip, roots..........................              7          12/31/12
------------------------------------------------------------------------


[[Page 40815]]

* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2011-17365 Filed 7-11-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.