Maneb; Tolerance Actions, 40811-40815 [2011-17365]
Download as PDF
jdjones on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 133 / Tuesday, July 12, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
(i) Location. All waters of the Charles
River within a 350-yard radius of the
fireworks barges located in the vicinity
of position 42°21.47′ N, 071°05.00′ W
(NAD 83).
(ii) Enforcement Period. This safety
zone will be enforced from 9 p.m. to
11 p.m. on July 4, 2011. In the case this
event is rescheduled due to inclement
weather, this safety zone will be
enforced from 9 p.m. to 11 p.m. on July
5, 2011.
(7) Town of Nahant Fireworks,
Nahant, MA.
(i) Location. All waters of Nahant
Harbor within a 350-yard radius of the
fireworks launch site on Bailey’s Hill
Park located at position 42°25.1′ N,
070°55.8′ W (NAD 83).
(ii) Enforcement Period. This safety
zone will be enforced from 9 p.m. to
11 p.m. on July 4, 2011. In the case this
event is rescheduled due to inclement
weather, this safety zone will be
enforced from 9 p.m. to 11 p.m. on July
5, 2011.
(8) City of Salem Fireworks, Salem,
MA.
(i) Location. All waters of Salem
Harbor, within a 350-yard radius of the
fireworks launch site located on Derby
Wharf at position 42°31.15′ N,
070°53.13′ W (NAD 83).
(ii) Enforcement Period. This safety
zone will be enforced from 9 p.m. to
10 p.m. on July 4, 2011. In the case this
event is rescheduled due to inclement
weather, this safety zone will be
enforced from 9 p.m. to 10 p.m. on July
5, 2011.
(9) Plymouth 4th of July Celebration
Fireworks, Plymouth, MA.
(i) Location. All waters of Plymouth
Harbor within a 350-yard radius of the
fireworks launch site located at position
42°57.3′ N, 070°38.3′ W (NAD 83).
(ii) Enforcement Period. This safety
zone will be enforced from 9 p.m. to
10 p.m. on July 4, 2011. In the case this
event is rescheduled due to inclement
weather, this safety zone will be
enforced from 9 p.m. to 10 p.m. on July
5, 2011.
(10) Beverly Homecoming Fireworks.
(i) Location. All waters of Beverly
Harbor within a 350-yard radius of the
fireworks barge located at position
42°32.62′ N, 070°52.15′ W (NAD 83).
(ii) Enforcement Period. This safety
zone will be enforced from 9 p.m. to
11 p.m. on August 7, 2011.
(11) Hingham 4th of July Fireworks.
(i) Location. All waters within a 350yard radius of the beach on Button
Island located at position 42°15.07′ N,
070°53.03′ W (NAD 83).
(ii) Enforcement Period. This safety
zone will be enforced from 9:30 p.m. to
10:30 p.m. on July 2, 2011. In the case
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:10 Jul 11, 2011
Jkt 223001
this event is rescheduled due to
inclement weather, this safety zone will
be enforced from 9:30 p.m. to 10:30 p.m.
on July 9, 2011.
(12) Gloucester July 4th Celebration
Fireworks.
(i) Location. All waters of Gloucester
Harbor, Stage Fort Park, within a 350yard radius of the fireworks launch site
on the beach located at position 42°36.3′
N, 070°40.5′ W (NAD 83).
(ii) Enforcement Period. This safety
zone will be enforced from 8 p.m. to 11
p.m. on July 3, 2011.
(13) Gloucester Schooner Festival
Fireworks.
(i) Location. All waters of Gloucester
Harbor within a 350-yard radius of the
launch site on the beach located at
position 42°36.3′ N, 070°40.5′ W (NAD
83).
(ii) Enforcement Period. This safety
zone will be enforced from 7 p.m. to
11 p.m. on September 3, 2011. In the
case this event is rescheduled due to
inclement weather, this safety zone will
be enforced from 7 p.m. to 11 p.m. on
September 5, 2011.
(b) Regulations. (1) In accordance
with the general regulations in § 165.23
of this part, entering into, transiting
through, mooring or anchoring within
these regulated areas is prohibited
unless authorized by the Captain of the
Port (COTP) Boston, or the designated
on-scene representative.
(2) The ‘‘on-scene representative’’ is
any Coast Guard commissioned,
warrant, or petty officer who has been
designated by the COTP Boston to act
on his behalf. The on-scene
representative will be aboard either a
Coast Guard or Coast Guard Auxiliary
vessel.
(3) Vessel operators desiring to enter
or operate within the regulated areas
shall contact the COTP or the
designated on-scene representative via
VHF channel 16 or 617–223–5750
(Sector Boston command center) to
obtain permission to do so.
(4) Vessel operators given permission
to enter or operate in the regulated areas
must comply with all directions given to
them by the Captain of the Port or the
designated on-scene representative.
(c) Effective Period. This rule is
effective in the CFR on July 12, 2011
through 11:59 p.m. September 9, 2011.
This rule is effective with actual notice
for purposes of enforcement beginning
at 8:30 p.m., June 27, 2011.
Dated: June 27, 2011.
N.E. Knapp,
Commander, U.S. Coast Guard, Acting
Captain of the Port Sector Boston.
[FR Doc. 2011–17393 Filed 7–11–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
40811
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 180
[EPA–HQ–OPP–2010–0327; FRL–8878–6]
Maneb; Tolerance Actions
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
EPA is revoking all the
tolerances for the fungicide maneb with
expiration/revocation dates that provide
sufficient time to use existing stocks of
the canceled registrations for the last
food uses of maneb in the United States.
DATES: This regulation is effective July
12, 2011. Objections and requests for
hearings must be received on or before
September 12, 2011 and must be filed in
accordance with the instructions
provided in 40 CFR part 178 (see also
Unit I.C. of the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION).
SUMMARY:
EPA has established a
docket for this action under docket
identification (ID) number EPA–HQ–
OPP–2010–0327. All documents in the
docket are listed in the docket index
available at https://www.regulations.gov.
Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available,
e.g., Confidential Business Information
(CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the Internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available in the electronic docket at
https://www.regulations.gov, or, if only
available in hard copy, at the OPP
Regulatory Public Docket in Rm. S–
4400, One Potomac Yard (South Bldg.),
2777 S. Crystal Dr., Arlington, VA. The
Docket Facility is open from 8:30 a.m.
to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday,
excluding legal holidays. The Docket
Facility telephone number is (703) 305–
5805.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Joseph Nevola, Pesticide Re-evaluation
Division (7508P), Office of Pesticide
Programs, Environmental Protection
Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW.,
Washington, DC 20460–0001; telephone
number: (703) 308–8037; e-mail
address: nevola.joseph@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
ADDRESSES:
I. General Information
A. Does this action apply to me?
You may be potentially affected by
this action if you are an agricultural
E:\FR\FM\12JYR1.SGM
12JYR1
40812
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 133 / Tuesday, July 12, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
request, identified by docket ID number
EPA–HQ–OPP–2010–0327, by one of
the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line
instructions for submitting comments.
• Mail: Office of Pesticide Programs
(OPP) Regulatory Public Docket (7502P),
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington,
DC 20460–0001.
• Delivery: OPP Regulatory Public
Docket (7502P), Environmental
Protection Agency, Rm. S–4400, One
Potomac Yard (South Bldg.), 2777 S.
Crystal Dr., Arlington, VA. Deliveries
are only accepted during the Docket
Facility’s normal hours of operation
(8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through
Friday, excluding legal holidays).
Special arrangements should be made
for deliveries of boxed information. The
Docket Facility telephone number is
(703) 305–5805.
B. How can I get electronic access to
other related information?
You may access a frequently updated
electronic version of 40 CFR part 180
through the Government Printing
Office’s e-CFR site at https://
ecfr.gpoaccess.gov/cgi/t/text/textidx?&c=ecfr&tpl=/ecfrbrowse/Title40/
40tab_02.tpl.
jdjones on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with RULES
producer, food manufacturer, or
pesticide manufacturer. Potentially
affected entities may include, but are
not limited to:
• Crop production (NAICS code 111).
• Animal production (NAICS code
112).
• Food manufacturing (NAICS code
311).
• Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS
code 32532).
This listing is not intended to be
exhaustive, but rather provides a guide
for readers regarding entities likely to be
affected by this action. Other types of
entities not listed in this unit could also
be affected. The North American
Industrial Classification System
(NAICS) codes have been provided to
assist you and others in determining
whether this action might apply to
certain entities. If you have any
questions regarding the applicability of
this action to a particular entity, consult
the person listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT.
A. What action is the Agency taking?
C. How can I file an objection or hearing
request?
Under the Federal Food, Drug, and
Cosmetic Act (FFDCA) section 408(g),
21 U.S.C. 346a, any person may file an
objection to any aspect of this regulation
and may also request a hearing on those
objections. You must file your objection
or request a hearing on this regulation
in accordance with the instructions
provided in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure
proper receipt by EPA, you must
identify docket ID number EPA–HQ–
OPP–2010–0327 in the subject line on
the first page of your submission. All
objections and requests for a hearing
must be in writing, and must be
received by the Hearing Clerk on or
before September 12, 2011. Addresses
for mail and hand delivery of objections
and hearing requests are provided in 40
CFR 178.25(b).
In addition to filing an objection or
hearing request with the Hearing Clerk
as described in 40 CFR part 178, please
submit a copy of the filing that does not
contain any CBI for inclusion in the
public docket. Information not marked
confidential pursuant to 40 CFR part 2
may be disclosed publicly by EPA
without prior notice. Submit a copy of
your non-CBI objection or hearing
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:10 Jul 11, 2011
Jkt 223001
II. Background
In the Federal Register of May 26,
2010 (75 FR 29475) (FRL–8826–2), EPA
issued a proposal to revoke all the
tolerances for residues of the fungicide
maneb after receipt and approval of
requests for voluntary cancellation by
registrants of the last registrations for
food uses of maneb in the United States.
Also, the proposal provided a 60-day
comment period which invited public
comment for consideration and for
support of tolerance retention under
FFDCA standards.
In this final rule, EPA is revoking all
the tolerances for the fungicide maneb,
with delayed expiration/revocation
dates in response to public comments
requesting more time to use existing
stocks of the canceled registrations. In
addition, EPA had proposed in the May
26, 2010 issue of the Federal Register to
remove the expired tolerance in 40 CFR
180.110(b) for maneb residues in or on
walnut, and reserve that paragraph.
However, EPA previously removed that
expired tolerance and reserved that
paragraph in a final rule published in
the Federal Register of June 15, 2011
(76 FR 34883) (FRL–8875–4). Therefore,
no further changes are being made to 40
CFR 180.110(b).
In response to the proposal published
in the Federal Register of May 26, 2010
(75 FR 29475), EPA received comments
during the 60-day public comment
period, as follows:
Comments. Commenters from the
Regional Vegetable Extension Agent
with the University of Florida, the
Pesticide Safety Education Program of
Oklahoma State University, and two
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
growers requested that maneb use be
extended until exhaustion for pepper,
lettuce, grapes grown for wine, and leafy
vegetables. One commenter requested
that maneb use on broccoli, cabbage,
and lettuce be extended for 5 years.
Most comments received from multiple
individual growers and also from the
Cranberry Institute, the Department of
Plant and Environmental Protection
Sciences, College of Tropical
Agriculture and Human Resources of
the University of Hawaii, Florida Fruit
and Vegetable Association, Arizona Pest
Management Center, California’s Glenn
County Department of Agriculture,
California’s Tehama County Department
of Agriculture, and Colorado
Department of Agriculture, requested
that maneb use be extended (for use on
commodities such as almond, broccoli,
cabbage, celery, cranberry, eggplant,
lettuce, onion, pepper, potato, and
tomato) and for timeframes ranging from
a few months to over 2 years; i.e., the
end of 2012.
Agency response. In the Federal
Register of May 26, 2010 (75 FR 29475)
(FRL–8826–2), EPA proposed to revoke
the maneb tolerances on the date of final
rule publication in the Federal Register,
which the Agency expected to occur in
2010. Based on the comments received,
the Agency agrees that there is a need
for more time to exhaust existing stocks
of maneb. Therefore, EPA is revoking
the tolerances for maneb in 40 CFR
180.110 with the expiration/revocation
dates of December 31, 2012. The Agency
believes the extended time is sufficient
and consistent with the general outlook
of the public comments received.
B. What is the Agency’s authority for
taking this action?
EPA may issue a regulation revoking
tolerances under FFDCA section 408(e).
EPA’s general practice is to revoke
tolerances for residues of pesticide
active ingredients on crops for which
the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and
Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) registrations
no longer exist and on which the
pesticide may therefore no longer be
used in the United States. EPA has
historically been concerned that
retention of tolerances that are not
necessary to cover residues in or on
legally treated foods may encourage
misuse of pesticides within the United
States. Nonetheless, EPA will establish
and maintain tolerances even when
corresponding domestic uses are
canceled if the tolerances, which EPA
refers to as ‘‘import tolerances,’’ are
necessary to allow importation into the
United States of food containing such
pesticide residues. However, where
there are no imported commodities that
E:\FR\FM\12JYR1.SGM
12JYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 133 / Tuesday, July 12, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
require these import tolerances, the
Agency believes it is appropriate to
revoke tolerances for unregistered
pesticides in order to prevent potential
misuse.
C. When do these actions become
effective?
As noted in the DATES section, this
regulation is effective on the date of the
publication in the Federal Register. In
this final rule, EPA is revoking all the
maneb tolerances with expiration/
revocation dates of December 31, 2012.
Based on the comments received during
the 60-day public comment period, the
Agency believes that the expiration/
revocation dates allow users to exhaust
existing stocks and allow sufficient time
for passage of treated commodities
through the channels of trade.
Any commodities listed in the
regulatory text of this document that are
treated with the pesticides subject to
this final rule, and that are in the
channels of trade following the
tolerance revocations, shall be subject to
FFDCA section 408(1)(5), as established
by the Food Quality Protection Act
(FQPA). Under this unit, any residues of
these pesticides in or on such food shall
not render the food adulterated so long
as it is shown to the satisfaction of the
Food and Drug Administration that:
1. The residue is present as the result
of an application or use of the pesticide
at a time and in a manner that was
lawful under FIFRA.
2. The residue does not exceed the
level that was authorized at the time of
the application or use to be present on
the food under a tolerance or exemption
from tolerance. Evidence to show that
food was lawfully treated may include
records that verify the dates that the
pesticide was applied to such food.
jdjones on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with RULES
III. International Residue Limits
In making its tolerance decisions, EPA
seeks to harmonize U.S. tolerances with
international standards whenever
possible, consistent with U.S. food
safety standards and agricultural
practices. EPA considers the
international maximum residue limits
(MRLs) established by the Codex
Alimentarius Commission (Codex), as
required by FFDCA section 408(b)(4).
The Codex Alimentarius is a joint U.N.
Food and Agriculture Organization/
World Health Organization food
standards program, and it is recognized
as an international food safety
standards-setting organization in trade
agreements to which the United States
is a party. EPA may establish a tolerance
that is different from a Codex MRL;
however, FFDCA section 408(b)(4)
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:10 Jul 11, 2011
Jkt 223001
requires that EPA explain the reasons
for departing from the Codex level.
The Codex has not established a MRL
for maneb per se, but has MRLs for total
dithiocarbamates (which includes the
dithiocarbamate maneb), determined as
carbon disulfide.
IV. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
In this final rule, EPA revokes specific
tolerances established under FFDCA
section 408. The Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) has exempted this
type of action (i.e., a tolerance
revocation for which extraordinary
circumstances do not exist) from review
under Executive Order 12866, entitled
Regulatory Planning and Review (58 FR
51735, October 4, 1993). Because this
rule has been exempted from review
under Executive Order 12866 due to its
lack of significance, this rule is not
subject to Executive Order 13211,
entitled Actions Concerning Regulations
That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use (66 FR 28355, May
22, 2001). This final rule does not
contain any information collections
subject to OMB approval under the
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA), 44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq., or impose any
enforceable duty or contain any
unfunded mandate as described under
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA) (Pub. L.
104–4). Nor does it require any special
considerations as required by Executive
Order 12898, entitled Federal Actions to
Address Environmental Justice in
Minority Populations and Low-Income
Populations (59 FR 7629, February 16,
1994); or OMB review or any other
Agency action under Executive Order
13045, entitled Protection of Children
from Environmental Health Risks and
Safety Risks (62 FR 19885, April 23,
1997). This action does not involve any
technical standards that would require
Agency consideration of voluntary
consensus standards pursuant to section
12(d) of the National Technology
Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995
(NTTAA), Public Law 104–13, section
12(d) (15 U.S.C. 272 note). Pursuant to
the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.), the Agency
previously assessed whether revocations
of tolerances might significantly impact
a substantial number of small entities
and concluded that, as a general matter,
these actions do not impose a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. This analysis
was published on December 17, 1997
(62 FR 66020) (FRL–5753–1), and was
provided to the Chief Counsel for
Advocacy of the Small Business
Administration. Taking into account
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
40813
this analysis, and available information
concerning the pesticides listed in this
rule, the Agency hereby certifies that
this final rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. In a
memorandum dated May 25, 2001, EPA
determined that eight conditions must
all be satisfied in order for an import
tolerance or tolerance exemption
revocation to adversely affect a
significant number of small entity
importers, and that there is a negligible
joint probability of all eight conditions
holding simultaneously with respect to
any particular revocation. (This Agency
document is available in the docket of
the proposed rule, as mentioned in Unit
II.A.). Furthermore, for the pesticides
named in this final rule, the Agency
knows of no extraordinary
circumstances that exist as to the
present revocations that would change
EPA’s previous analysis. In addition, the
Agency has determined that this action
will not have a substantial direct effect
on States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government, as specified in
Executive Order 13132, entitled
Federalism (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999). Executive Order 13132 requires
EPA to develop an accountable process
to ensure ‘‘meaningful and timely input
by State and local officials in the
development of regulatory policies that
have federalism implications.’’ ‘‘Policies
that have federalism implications’’ is
defined in the Executive order to
include regulations that have
‘‘substantial direct effects on the States,
on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.’’ This final rule
directly regulates growers, food
processors, food handlers, and food
retailers, not States. This action does not
alter the relationships or distribution of
power and responsibilities established
by Congress in the preemption
provisions of section 408(n)(4) of
FFDCA. For these same reasons, the
Agency has determined that this rule
does not have any ‘‘tribal implications’’
as described in Executive Order 13175,
entitled Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments (65 FR
67249, November 9, 2000). Executive
Order 13175, requires EPA to develop
an accountable process to ensure
‘‘meaningful and timely input by tribal
officials in the development of
regulatory policies that have tribal
implications.’’ ‘‘Policies that have tribal
E:\FR\FM\12JYR1.SGM
12JYR1
40814
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 133 / Tuesday, July 12, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
implications’’ is defined in the
Executive order to include regulations
that have ‘‘substantial direct effects on
one or more Indian tribes, on the
relationship between the Federal
Government and the Indian tribes, or on
the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.’’ This
rule will not have substantial direct
effects on tribal governments, on the
relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, as
specified in Executive Order 13175.
Thus, Executive Order 13175 does not
apply to this rule.
V. Congressional Review Act
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report to each House of
the Congress and to the Comptroller
General of the United States. EPA will
submit a report containing this rule and
other required information to the U.S.
Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller
General of the United States prior to
publication of this final rule in the
Federal Register. This final rule is not
a ‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180
Environmental protection,
Administrative practice and procedure,
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides
and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Dated: June 29, 2011.
Steven Bradbury,
Director, Office of Pesticide Programs.
Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is
amended as follows:
PART 180—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 180
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371.
2. Section 180.110 is amended by
revising the table in paragraph (a) to
read as follows:
■
§ 180.110
Maneb; tolerances for residues.
(a) * * *
Parts per million
jdjones on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with RULES
Commodity
Almond ...................................................................................................................................................................
Apple ......................................................................................................................................................................
Apricot ....................................................................................................................................................................
Banana (not more than 0.5 part per million shall be in the pulp after peel is removed and discarded
(preharvest application only)) .............................................................................................................................
Bean, dry, seed .....................................................................................................................................................
Bean, succulent .....................................................................................................................................................
Beet, sugar, tops ...................................................................................................................................................
Broccoli ..................................................................................................................................................................
Brussels sprouts ....................................................................................................................................................
Cabbage ................................................................................................................................................................
Cabbage, Chinese, bok choy ................................................................................................................................
Cabbage, Chinese, napa .......................................................................................................................................
Carrot, roots ...........................................................................................................................................................
Cauliflower .............................................................................................................................................................
Celery .....................................................................................................................................................................
Collards ..................................................................................................................................................................
Corn, sweet, kernel plus cob with husks removed ...............................................................................................
Cranberry ...............................................................................................................................................................
Cucumber ..............................................................................................................................................................
Eggplant .................................................................................................................................................................
Endive ....................................................................................................................................................................
Fig ..........................................................................................................................................................................
Grape .....................................................................................................................................................................
Kale ........................................................................................................................................................................
Kohlrabi ..................................................................................................................................................................
Lettuce ...................................................................................................................................................................
Melon .....................................................................................................................................................................
Mustard greens ......................................................................................................................................................
Nectarine ................................................................................................................................................................
Onion .....................................................................................................................................................................
Papaya ...................................................................................................................................................................
Peach .....................................................................................................................................................................
Pepper ...................................................................................................................................................................
Potato .....................................................................................................................................................................
Pumpkin .................................................................................................................................................................
Squash, summer ....................................................................................................................................................
Squash, winter .......................................................................................................................................................
Tomato ...................................................................................................................................................................
Turnip, greens ........................................................................................................................................................
Turnip, roots ...........................................................................................................................................................
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:10 Jul 11, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 9990
E:\FR\FM\12JYR1.SGM
12JYR1
Expiration/revocation date
0.1
2
10
12/31/12
12/31/12
12/31/12
4
7
10
45
10
10
10
10
10
7
10
5
10
5
7
4
7
10
7
7
10
10
10
4
10
10
7
10
10
7
0.1
7
4
4
4
10
7
12/31/12
12/31/12
12/31/12
12/31/12
12/31/12
12/31/12
12/31/12
12/31/12
12/31/12
12/31/12
12/31/12
12/31/12
12/31/12
12/31/12
12/31/12
12/31/12
12/31/12
12/31/12
12/31/12
12/31/12
12/31/12
12/31/12
12/31/12
12/31/12
12/31/12
12/31/12
12/31/12
12/31/12
12/31/12
12/31/12
12/31/12
12/31/12
12/31/12
12/31/12
12/31/12
12/31/12
12/31/12
40815
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 133 / Tuesday, July 12, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2011–17365 Filed 7–11–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Federal Emergency Management
Agency
44 CFR Part 65
[Docket ID FEMA–2011–0002]
Changes in Flood Elevation
Determinations
Federal Emergency
Management Agency, DHS.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
Modified Base (1% annualchance) Flood Elevations (BFEs) are
finalized for the communities listed
below. These modified BFEs will be
used to calculate flood insurance
premium rates for new buildings and
their contents.
DATES: The effective dates for these
modified BFEs are indicated on the
following table and revise the Flood
Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs) in effect
for the listed communities prior to this
date.
ADDRESSES: The modified BFEs for each
community are available for inspection
at the office of the Chief Executive
Officer of each community. The
respective addresses are listed in the
table below.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Luis
Rodriguez, Chief, Engineering
Management Branch, Federal Insurance
and Mitigation Administration, Federal
Emergency Management Agency, 500 C
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20472,
(202) 646–4064, or (e-mail)
luis.rodriguez1@dhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Federal Emergency Management Agency
(FEMA) makes the final determinations
SUMMARY:
State and county
jdjones on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with RULES
Alabama:
Calhoun (FEMA
Docket No.:
B–1165).
Calhoun (FEMA
Docket No.:
B–1165).
Arizona:
Pinal (FEMA
Docket No.:
B–1172).
Pinal (FEMA
Docket No.:
B–1172).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
listed below of the modified BFEs for
each community listed. These modified
BFEs have been published in
newspapers of local circulation and
ninety (90) days have elapsed since that
publication. The Deputy Federal
Insurance and Mitigation Administrator
has resolved any appeals resulting from
this notification.
The modified BFEs are not listed for
each community in this notice.
However, this final rule includes the
address of the Chief Executive Officer of
the community where the modified BFE
determinations are available for
inspection.
The modified BFEs are made pursuant
to section 206 of the Flood Disaster
Protection Act of 1973, 42 U.S.C. 4105,
and are in accordance with the National
Flood Insurance Act of 1968, 42 U.S.C.
4001 et seq., and with 44 CFR part 65.
For rating purposes, the currently
effective community number is shown
and must be used for all new policies
and renewals.
The modified BFEs are the basis for
the floodplain management measures
that the community is required either to
adopt or to show evidence of being
already in effect in order to qualify or
to remain qualified for participation in
the National Flood Insurance Program
(NFIP).
These modified BFEs, together with
the floodplain management criteria
required by 44 CFR 60.3, are the
minimum that are required. They
should not be construed to mean that
the community must change any
existing ordinances that are more
stringent in their floodplain
management requirements. The
community may at any time enact
stricter requirements of its own or
pursuant to policies established by other
Federal, State, or regional entities.
These modified BFEs are used to meet
the floodplain management
requirements of the NFIP and also are
used to calculate the appropriate flood
insurance premium rates for new
buildings built after these elevations are
made final, and for the contents in those
buildings. The changes in BFEs are in
accordance with 44 CFR 65.4.
National Environmental Policy Act.
This final rule is categorically excluded
from the requirements of 44 CFR part
10, Environmental Consideration. An
environmental impact assessment has
not been prepared.
Regulatory Flexibility Act. As flood
elevation determinations are not within
the scope of the Regulatory Flexibility
Act, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, a regulatory
flexibility analysis is not required.
Regulatory Classification. This final
rule is not a significant regulatory action
under the criteria of section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866 of September 30,
1993, Regulatory Planning and Review,
58 FR 51735.
Executive Order 13132, Federalism.
This final rule involves no policies that
have federalism implications under
Executive Order 13132, Federalism.
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform. This final rule meets the
applicable standards of Executive Order
12988.
List of Subjects in 44 CFR Part 65
Flood insurance, Floodplains,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Accordingly, 44 CFR part 65 is
amended to read as follows:
PART 65—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 65
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 4001 et seq.;
Reorganization Plan No. 3 of 1978, 3 CFR,
1978 Comp., p. 329; E.O. 12127, 44 FR 19367,
3 CFR, 1979 Comp., p. 376.
§ 65.4
[Amended]
2. The tables published under the
authority of § 65.4 are amended as
follows:
■
Location and case
No.
Date and name of newspaper
where notice was published
Chief executive officer of community
Effective date of
modification
City of Oxford (10–
04–2692P).
October 22, 2010; October 29,
2010; The Anniston Star.
February 28, 2011 ..........
010023
Unincorporated
areas of Calhoun
County (10–04–
2692P).
October 22, 2010; October 29,
2010; The Anniston Star.
The Honorable Leon Smith, Mayor, City
of Oxford, P.O. Box 3383, Oxford, AL
36203.
Mr. James ‘‘Pappy’’ Dunn, Commissioner,
Calhoun County, 1702 Noble Street,
Suite 103, Anniston, AL 36201.
February 28, 2011 ..........
010013
City of Casa Grande
(10–09–1532P).
November 12, 2010; November
19, 2010; The Casa Grande
Dispatch.
November 5, 2010 ..........
040080
City of Maricopa
(10–09–2020P).
November 4, 2010; November
11, 2010; The Casa Grande
Dispatch.
The Honorable Robert M. Jackson,
Mayor, City of Casa Grande, 510 East
Florence Boulevard, Casa Grande, AZ
85122.
The Honorable Anthony Smith, Mayor,
City of Maricopa, 45145 West Madison
Avenue, Maricopa, AZ 85139.
March 11, 2011 ..............
040052
15:10 Jul 11, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\12JYR1.SGM
12JYR1
Community
No.
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 133 (Tuesday, July 12, 2011)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 40811-40815]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-17365]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 180
[EPA-HQ-OPP-2010-0327; FRL-8878-6]
Maneb; Tolerance Actions
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA is revoking all the tolerances for the fungicide maneb
with expiration/revocation dates that provide sufficient time to use
existing stocks of the canceled registrations for the last food uses of
maneb in the United States.
DATES: This regulation is effective July 12, 2011. Objections and
requests for hearings must be received on or before September 12, 2011
and must be filed in accordance with the instructions provided in 40
CFR part 178 (see also Unit I.C. of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION).
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under docket
identification (ID) number EPA-HQ-OPP-2010-0327. All documents in the
docket are listed in the docket index available at https://www.regulations.gov. Although listed in the index, some information is
not publicly available, e.g., Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain
other material, such as copyrighted material, is not placed on the
Internet and will be publicly available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are available in the electronic
docket at https://www.regulations.gov, or, if only available in hard
copy, at the OPP Regulatory Public Docket in Rm. S-4400, One Potomac
Yard (South Bldg.), 2777 S. Crystal Dr., Arlington, VA. The Docket
Facility is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday,
excluding legal holidays. The Docket Facility telephone number is (703)
305-5805.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joseph Nevola, Pesticide Re-evaluation
Division (7508P), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460-
0001; telephone number: (703) 308-8037; e-mail address:
nevola.joseph@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
A. Does this action apply to me?
You may be potentially affected by this action if you are an
agricultural
[[Page 40812]]
producer, food manufacturer, or pesticide manufacturer. Potentially
affected entities may include, but are not limited to:
Crop production (NAICS code 111).
Animal production (NAICS code 112).
Food manufacturing (NAICS code 311).
Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS code 32532).
This listing is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides
a guide for readers regarding entities likely to be affected by this
action. Other types of entities not listed in this unit could also be
affected. The North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS)
codes have been provided to assist you and others in determining
whether this action might apply to certain entities. If you have any
questions regarding the applicability of this action to a particular
entity, consult the person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT.
B. How can I get electronic access to other related information?
You may access a frequently updated electronic version of 40 CFR
part 180 through the Government Printing Office's e-CFR site at https://ecfr.gpoaccess.gov/cgi/t/text/text-idx?&c=ecfr&tpl=/ecfrbrowse/Title40/40tab_02.tpl.
C. How can I file an objection or hearing request?
Under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA) section
408(g), 21 U.S.C. 346a, any person may file an objection to any aspect
of this regulation and may also request a hearing on those objections.
You must file your objection or request a hearing on this regulation in
accordance with the instructions provided in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure
proper receipt by EPA, you must identify docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-
2010-0327 in the subject line on the first page of your submission. All
objections and requests for a hearing must be in writing, and must be
received by the Hearing Clerk on or before September 12, 2011.
Addresses for mail and hand delivery of objections and hearing requests
are provided in 40 CFR 178.25(b).
In addition to filing an objection or hearing request with the
Hearing Clerk as described in 40 CFR part 178, please submit a copy of
the filing that does not contain any CBI for inclusion in the public
docket. Information not marked confidential pursuant to 40 CFR part 2
may be disclosed publicly by EPA without prior notice. Submit a copy of
your non-CBI objection or hearing request, identified by docket ID
number EPA-HQ-OPP-2010-0327, by one of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the on-line instructions for submitting comments.
Mail: Office of Pesticide Programs (OPP) Regulatory Public
Docket (7502P), Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania
Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001.
Delivery: OPP Regulatory Public Docket (7502P),
Environmental Protection Agency, Rm. S-4400, One Potomac Yard (South
Bldg.), 2777 S. Crystal Dr., Arlington, VA. Deliveries are only
accepted during the Docket Facility's normal hours of operation (8:30
a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays).
Special arrangements should be made for deliveries of boxed
information. The Docket Facility telephone number is (703) 305-5805.
II. Background
A. What action is the Agency taking?
In the Federal Register of May 26, 2010 (75 FR 29475) (FRL-8826-2),
EPA issued a proposal to revoke all the tolerances for residues of the
fungicide maneb after receipt and approval of requests for voluntary
cancellation by registrants of the last registrations for food uses of
maneb in the United States. Also, the proposal provided a 60-day
comment period which invited public comment for consideration and for
support of tolerance retention under FFDCA standards.
In this final rule, EPA is revoking all the tolerances for the
fungicide maneb, with delayed expiration/revocation dates in response
to public comments requesting more time to use existing stocks of the
canceled registrations. In addition, EPA had proposed in the May 26,
2010 issue of the Federal Register to remove the expired tolerance in
40 CFR 180.110(b) for maneb residues in or on walnut, and reserve that
paragraph. However, EPA previously removed that expired tolerance and
reserved that paragraph in a final rule published in the Federal
Register of June 15, 2011 (76 FR 34883) (FRL-8875-4). Therefore, no
further changes are being made to 40 CFR 180.110(b).
In response to the proposal published in the Federal Register of
May 26, 2010 (75 FR 29475), EPA received comments during the 60-day
public comment period, as follows:
Comments. Commenters from the Regional Vegetable Extension Agent
with the University of Florida, the Pesticide Safety Education Program
of Oklahoma State University, and two growers requested that maneb use
be extended until exhaustion for pepper, lettuce, grapes grown for
wine, and leafy vegetables. One commenter requested that maneb use on
broccoli, cabbage, and lettuce be extended for 5 years. Most comments
received from multiple individual growers and also from the Cranberry
Institute, the Department of Plant and Environmental Protection
Sciences, College of Tropical Agriculture and Human Resources of the
University of Hawaii, Florida Fruit and Vegetable Association, Arizona
Pest Management Center, California's Glenn County Department of
Agriculture, California's Tehama County Department of Agriculture, and
Colorado Department of Agriculture, requested that maneb use be
extended (for use on commodities such as almond, broccoli, cabbage,
celery, cranberry, eggplant, lettuce, onion, pepper, potato, and
tomato) and for timeframes ranging from a few months to over 2 years;
i.e., the end of 2012.
Agency response. In the Federal Register of May 26, 2010 (75 FR
29475) (FRL-8826-2), EPA proposed to revoke the maneb tolerances on the
date of final rule publication in the Federal Register, which the
Agency expected to occur in 2010. Based on the comments received, the
Agency agrees that there is a need for more time to exhaust existing
stocks of maneb. Therefore, EPA is revoking the tolerances for maneb in
40 CFR 180.110 with the expiration/revocation dates of December 31,
2012. The Agency believes the extended time is sufficient and
consistent with the general outlook of the public comments received.
B. What is the Agency's authority for taking this action?
EPA may issue a regulation revoking tolerances under FFDCA section
408(e). EPA's general practice is to revoke tolerances for residues of
pesticide active ingredients on crops for which the Federal
Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) registrations no
longer exist and on which the pesticide may therefore no longer be used
in the United States. EPA has historically been concerned that
retention of tolerances that are not necessary to cover residues in or
on legally treated foods may encourage misuse of pesticides within the
United States. Nonetheless, EPA will establish and maintain tolerances
even when corresponding domestic uses are canceled if the tolerances,
which EPA refers to as ``import tolerances,'' are necessary to allow
importation into the United States of food containing such pesticide
residues. However, where there are no imported commodities that
[[Page 40813]]
require these import tolerances, the Agency believes it is appropriate
to revoke tolerances for unregistered pesticides in order to prevent
potential misuse.
C. When do these actions become effective?
As noted in the DATES section, this regulation is effective on the
date of the publication in the Federal Register. In this final rule,
EPA is revoking all the maneb tolerances with expiration/revocation
dates of December 31, 2012. Based on the comments received during the
60-day public comment period, the Agency believes that the expiration/
revocation dates allow users to exhaust existing stocks and allow
sufficient time for passage of treated commodities through the channels
of trade.
Any commodities listed in the regulatory text of this document that
are treated with the pesticides subject to this final rule, and that
are in the channels of trade following the tolerance revocations, shall
be subject to FFDCA section 408(1)(5), as established by the Food
Quality Protection Act (FQPA). Under this unit, any residues of these
pesticides in or on such food shall not render the food adulterated so
long as it is shown to the satisfaction of the Food and Drug
Administration that:
1. The residue is present as the result of an application or use of
the pesticide at a time and in a manner that was lawful under FIFRA.
2. The residue does not exceed the level that was authorized at the
time of the application or use to be present on the food under a
tolerance or exemption from tolerance. Evidence to show that food was
lawfully treated may include records that verify the dates that the
pesticide was applied to such food.
III. International Residue Limits
In making its tolerance decisions, EPA seeks to harmonize U.S.
tolerances with international standards whenever possible, consistent
with U.S. food safety standards and agricultural practices. EPA
considers the international maximum residue limits (MRLs) established
by the Codex Alimentarius Commission (Codex), as required by FFDCA
section 408(b)(4). The Codex Alimentarius is a joint U.N. Food and
Agriculture Organization/World Health Organization food standards
program, and it is recognized as an international food safety
standards-setting organization in trade agreements to which the United
States is a party. EPA may establish a tolerance that is different from
a Codex MRL; however, FFDCA section 408(b)(4) requires that EPA explain
the reasons for departing from the Codex level.
The Codex has not established a MRL for maneb per se, but has MRLs
for total dithiocarbamates (which includes the dithiocarbamate maneb),
determined as carbon disulfide.
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
In this final rule, EPA revokes specific tolerances established
under FFDCA section 408. The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has
exempted this type of action (i.e., a tolerance revocation for which
extraordinary circumstances do not exist) from review under Executive
Order 12866, entitled Regulatory Planning and Review (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993). Because this rule has been exempted from review under
Executive Order 12866 due to its lack of significance, this rule is not
subject to Executive Order 13211, entitled Actions Concerning
Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or
Use (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001). This final rule does not contain any
information collections subject to OMB approval under the Paperwork
Reduction Act (PRA), 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq., or impose any enforceable
duty or contain any unfunded mandate as described under Title II of the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA) (Pub. L. 104-4). Nor does
it require any special considerations as required by Executive Order
12898, entitled Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice in
Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations (59 FR 7629, February
16, 1994); or OMB review or any other Agency action under Executive
Order 13045, entitled Protection of Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997). This action does
not involve any technical standards that would require Agency
consideration of voluntary consensus standards pursuant to section
12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995
(NTTAA), Public Law 104-13, section 12(d) (15 U.S.C. 272 note).
Pursuant to the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et
seq.), the Agency previously assessed whether revocations of tolerances
might significantly impact a substantial number of small entities and
concluded that, as a general matter, these actions do not impose a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
This analysis was published on December 17, 1997 (62 FR 66020) (FRL-
5753-1), and was provided to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the
Small Business Administration. Taking into account this analysis, and
available information concerning the pesticides listed in this rule,
the Agency hereby certifies that this final rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
In a memorandum dated May 25, 2001, EPA determined that eight
conditions must all be satisfied in order for an import tolerance or
tolerance exemption revocation to adversely affect a significant number
of small entity importers, and that there is a negligible joint
probability of all eight conditions holding simultaneously with respect
to any particular revocation. (This Agency document is available in the
docket of the proposed rule, as mentioned in Unit II.A.). Furthermore,
for the pesticides named in this final rule, the Agency knows of no
extraordinary circumstances that exist as to the present revocations
that would change EPA's previous analysis. In addition, the Agency has
determined that this action will not have a substantial direct effect
on States, on the relationship between the national government and the
States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government, as specified in Executive Order 13132,
entitled Federalism (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999). Executive Order
13132 requires EPA to develop an accountable process to ensure
``meaningful and timely input by State and local officials in the
development of regulatory policies that have federalism implications.''
``Policies that have federalism implications'' is defined in the
Executive order to include regulations that have ``substantial direct
effects on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.'' This final
rule directly regulates growers, food processors, food handlers, and
food retailers, not States. This action does not alter the
relationships or distribution of power and responsibilities established
by Congress in the preemption provisions of section 408(n)(4) of FFDCA.
For these same reasons, the Agency has determined that this rule does
not have any ``tribal implications'' as described in Executive Order
13175, entitled Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). Executive Order 13175,
requires EPA to develop an accountable process to ensure ``meaningful
and timely input by tribal officials in the development of regulatory
policies that have tribal implications.'' ``Policies that have tribal
[[Page 40814]]
implications'' is defined in the Executive order to include regulations
that have ``substantial direct effects on one or more Indian tribes, on
the relationship between the Federal Government and the Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes.'' This rule will not have
substantial direct effects on tribal governments, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, as specified in Executive Order 13175.
Thus, Executive Order 13175 does not apply to this rule.
V. Congressional Review Act
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report to each House of the Congress and to
the Comptroller General of the United States. EPA will submit a report
containing this rule and other required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the
United States prior to publication of this final rule in the Federal
Register. This final rule is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5
U.S.C. 804(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180
Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides and pests, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: June 29, 2011.
Steven Bradbury,
Director, Office of Pesticide Programs.
Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is amended as follows:
PART 180--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for part 180 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371.
0
2. Section 180.110 is amended by revising the table in paragraph (a) to
read as follows:
Sec. 180.110 Maneb; tolerances for residues.
(a) * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Expiration/
Commodity Parts per revocation
million date
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Almond................................. 0.1 12/31/12
Apple.................................. 2 12/31/12
Apricot................................ 10 12/31/12
Banana (not more than 0.5 part per 4 12/31/12
million shall be in the pulp after
peel is removed and discarded
(preharvest application only))........
Bean, dry, seed........................ 7 12/31/12
Bean, succulent........................ 10 12/31/12
Beet, sugar, tops...................... 45 12/31/12
Broccoli............................... 10 12/31/12
Brussels sprouts....................... 10 12/31/12
Cabbage................................ 10 12/31/12
Cabbage, Chinese, bok choy............. 10 12/31/12
Cabbage, Chinese, napa................. 10 12/31/12
Carrot, roots.......................... 7 12/31/12
Cauliflower............................ 10 12/31/12
Celery................................. 5 12/31/12
Collards............................... 10 12/31/12
Corn, sweet, kernel plus cob with husks 5 12/31/12
removed...............................
Cranberry.............................. 7 12/31/12
Cucumber............................... 4 12/31/12
Eggplant............................... 7 12/31/12
Endive................................. 10 12/31/12
Fig.................................... 7 12/31/12
Grape.................................. 7 12/31/12
Kale................................... 10 12/31/12
Kohlrabi............................... 10 12/31/12
Lettuce................................ 10 12/31/12
Melon.................................. 4 12/31/12
Mustard greens......................... 10 12/31/12
Nectarine.............................. 10 12/31/12
Onion.................................. 7 12/31/12
Papaya................................. 10 12/31/12
Peach.................................. 10 12/31/12
Pepper................................. 7 12/31/12
Potato................................. 0.1 12/31/12
Pumpkin................................ 7 12/31/12
Squash, summer......................... 4 12/31/12
Squash, winter......................... 4 12/31/12
Tomato................................. 4 12/31/12
Turnip, greens......................... 10 12/31/12
Turnip, roots.......................... 7 12/31/12
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 40815]]
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2011-17365 Filed 7-11-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P