Foreign-Trade Zone 71-Windsor Locks, CT Application for Expansion, 40688-40689 [2011-17333]
Download as PDF
40688
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 132 / Monday, July 11, 2011 / Notices
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
c. What resources would winning
pilot cities need to carry out the
Challenge Competition?
d. How much technical assistance or
involvement will the pilot cities need
for the Challenge Competition? Are
there technical assistance programs that
the SC2 Interagency Partnership should
review to enhance the SC2 Pilot
Challenge?
3. Which practices (e.g., smart growth;
creative cities; healthy cities;
sustainable economic development;
regional innovation clusters) should the
SC2 Pilot Challenge include?
4. What information should EDA and
members of the SC2 Interagency
Partnership consider in selecting the six
city Grantees?
5. What information should EDA and
members of the SC2 Interagency
Partnership consider in selecting
multidisciplinary teams as eligible
participants to submit a proposal for a
comprehensive economic development
strategic plan?
6. To what extent should the SC2
Pilot Challenge encourage
multidisciplinary teams to develop
plans that speak to both the economic
development and land use needs or
opportunities of the city and region?
7. What criteria should EDA and
members of the SC2 Interagency
Partnership consider in connection with
the evaluation of proposals submitted
by the multidisciplinary teams?
8. What financial incentives should
the Federal government use to
encourage strong participation among
economic development professionals?
9. Would one large prize serve as a
more powerful incentive to having a
robust competition, or should the
competition be tiered in which
multidisciplinary teams compete over
the course of two or three ‘‘tiers’’ with
winning teams who advance to the
succeeding round receiving increasing
levels of prizes?
10. Are there any issues that EDA and
members of the SC2 Interagency
Partnership should consider in
connection with budgetary and time
frame constraints imposed on local
governments?
EDA’s Statutory Authority and the
America COMPETES Act
EDA’s authorizing statute is the
Public Works and Economic
Development Act of 1965, as amended
(42 U.S.C. 3121 et seq.) (PWEDA). The
specific authority for the Economic
Adjustment Assistance program is
section 209 of PWEDA (42 U.S.C. 3149).
EDA’s regulations at 13 CFR Parts 300–
302 and subpart A of 13 CFR Part 307
set forth the general and specific
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:30 Jul 08, 2011
Jkt 223001
regulatory requirements applicable to
the Economic Adjustment Assistance
program. EDA’s regulations and PWEDA
are accessible on EDA’s Web site at
https://www.eda.gov/InvestmentsGrants/
Lawsreg.xml.
Section 105 of America COMPETES
Act amends the Stevenson-Wydler
Technology Innovation Act of 1980 (15
U.S.C. 3701 et seq.) to permit any
agency head to ‘‘carry out a program to
award prizes competitively to stimulate
innovation that has the potential to
advance the mission of the respective
agency.’’ The Act authorizes agencies to
use Federal appropriated funds to
design prizes, administer prizes, and
offer monetary prizes for competitions.
EDA’s Matching Share Requirement
EDA requires a non-federal matching
share for its investments. As such, EDA
recognizes that local governments may
be in the process of developing or
ratifying operational budgets for the
coming year on a parallel timeline with
the anticipated publication of the FFO
for the SC2 Pilot Challenge. Generally,
the amount of an EDA grant may not
exceed fifty percent of the total cost of
the project. Projects may receive up to
eighty percent of total cost, based on the
relative needs of the region in which the
project will be located, as determined by
EDA, and in certain circumstances
based on need, up to 100 percent. See
section 204(a) of PWEDA (42 U.S.C.
3144) and 13 CFR 301.4(b)(1). Given
that EDA anticipates selecting distressed
cities, it is likely EDA will be able to set
the federal share at eighty percent or
higher.
In addition, the Grantee should
expend matching funds at the same rate
as granted funds in order to avoid
reaching the project completion stage
without having secured the needed
proportionate amount required in the
cooperative agreement with EDA. For
example, consider a $100,000 project
that receives eighty percent ($80,000)
award funds and has twenty percent
($20,000) cash matching funds. If
$25,000 is spent on the project in the
first quarter of implementation, then the
Grantee should expend $20,000 (eighty
percent) from award funds and $5,000
(twenty percent) in cash matching
funds.
Dated: July 6, 2011.
´
Tene Dolphin,
Chief of Staff, Economic Development
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce.
[FR Doc. 2011–17319 Filed 7–8–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–24–P
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Foreign-Trade Zones Board
[Docket 47–2011]
Foreign-Trade Zone 71—Windsor
Locks, CT Application for Expansion
An application has been submitted to
the Foreign-Trade Zones Board (the
Board) by the Economic and Industrial
Development Commission of Windsor
Locks (grantee of FTZ 71) requesting
authority to expand the zone to include
a new site in East Granby/Windsor,
Connecticut. The application was
submitted pursuant to the provisions of
the Foreign-Trade Zones Act, as
amended (19 U.S.C. 81a–81u), and the
regulations of the Board (15 CFR part
400). It was formally filed on July 5,
2011.
FTZ 71 was established by the Board
on July 8, 1981 (Board Order 177, 46 FR
36220, 7/14/81). The zone currently
consists of one site (17.5 acres) at the
Crown Industrial Park, 399 Turnpike
Road, Windsor Locks.
The applicant is requesting authority
to expand the zone to include the
following site: Proposed Site 2 (390
acres)—within the 600-acre New
England Tradeport business park
located at the intersection of Route 20
and International Drive in East Granby
and Windsor. The site will provide
warehousing and distribution services
to area businesses. No specific
manufacturing authority is being
requested at this time. Such requests
would be made to the Board on a caseby-case basis.
In accordance with the Board’s
regulations, Camille Evans of the FTZ
Staff is designated examiner to evaluate
and analyze the facts and information
presented in the application and case
record and to report findings and
recommendations to the Board.
Public comment is invited from
interested parties. Submissions (original
and 3 copies) shall be addressed to the
Board’s Executive Secretary at the
address below. The closing period for
their receipt is September 9, 2011.
Rebuttal comments in response to
material submitted during the foregoing
period may be submitted during the
subsequent 15-day period to September
26, 2011.
A copy of the application will be
available for public inspection at the
Office of the Executive Secretary,
Foreign-Trade Zones Board, Room 2111,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington,
DC 20230–0002, and in the ‘‘Reading
Room’’ section of the Board’s Web site,
E:\FR\FM\11JYN1.SGM
11JYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 132 / Monday, July 11, 2011 / Notices
which is accessible via https://
www.trade.gov/ftz.
For further information, contact
Camille Evans at
Camille.Evans@trade.gov or (202) 482–
2350.
Dated: July 5, 2011.
Andrew McGilvray,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011–17333 Filed 7–8–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–580–809]
Certain Circular Welded Non-Alloy
Steel Pipe From the Republic of Korea:
Extension of Time Limit for Preliminary
Results of the Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jennifer Meek or Mary Kolberg, AD/CVD
Operations, Office 1, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–2778 and (202)
482–1785, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
Background
On December 28, 2010, the
Department of Commerce (‘‘the
Department’’) published a notice of
initiation of the administrative review of
the antidumping duty order on certain
circular welded non-alloy steel pipe
(‘‘circular welded pipe’’) from the
Republic of Korea (‘‘Korea’’) for the
period November 1, 2009, through
October 31, 2010. See Initiation of
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Administrative Reviews and Request for
Revocation in Part, 75 FR 81565
(December 28, 2010). The current
deadline for the preliminary results of
this administrative review is August 2,
2011.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
Extension of Time Limit for Preliminary
Results
Section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act
of 1930, as amended (‘‘the Act’’),
requires the Department to issue the
preliminary results of an administrative
review within 245 days after the last day
of the anniversary month of an order for
which a review is requested and the
final results of review within 120 days
after the date on which the preliminary
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:30 Jul 08, 2011
Jkt 223001
results are published. If it is not
practicable to complete the review
within the time period, section
751(a)(3)(A) of the Act allows the
Department to extend these deadlines to
a maximum of 365 days and 180 days,
respectively.
The Department requires additional
time to analyze sales and cost
information submitted by the
respondents in this administrative
review because this review involves
complex sales and accounting issues.
Thus, it is not practicable to complete
this review within the originally
anticipated time limit (i.e., by August 2,
2011). Therefore, the Department is
extending the time limit for completion
of the preliminary results by 120 days
to not later than November 30, 2011, in
accordance with section 751(a)(3)(A) of
the Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h)(2).
We are issuing and publishing this
notice in accordance with sections
751(a)(3)(A) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: July 1, 2011.
Christian Marsh,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Operations.
[FR Doc. 2011–17337 Filed 7–8–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–428–840]
Lightweight Thermal Paper From
Germany: Extension of Time Limits for
the Preliminary Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
DATES: Effective Date: July 11, 2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Stephanie Moore or George McMahon,
AD/CVD Operations, Office 3, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Ave, NW., Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–3692 or (202) 482–
1167, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
Background
On December 28, 2010, the
Department of Commerce (the
Department) published a notice of
initiation of the administrative review of
the antidumping duty order on
lightweight thermal paper from
Germany (LTWP), covering the period
November 1, 2009, to October 31, 2010.
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
40689
See Initiation of Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Administrative
Reviews and Request for Revocation in
Part, 75 FR 81565 (December 28, 2010).
The preliminary results are currently
due no later than August 2, 2011.
Extension of Time Limit of Preliminary
Results
Section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act
of 1930, as amended (the Act), requires
that the Department make a preliminary
determination within 245 days after the
last day of the anniversary month of an
order for which a review is requested.
Section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act further
states that if it is not practicable to
complete the review within the time
period specified, the administering
authority may extend the 245-day
period to issue its preliminary results to
up to 365 days. We determine that
completion of the preliminary results of
this review within the 245-day period is
not practicable because the Department
needs additional time to analyze
complex issues regarding the rebate
program and petitioner’s allegation of
duty absorption. Given the complexity
of these issues, and in accordance with
section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act, we are
extending the time period for issuing
the preliminary results of this review by
120 days. Therefore, the preliminary
results are now due no later than
November 30, 2011. The final results
continue to be due 120 days after
publication of the preliminary results.
This notice is published pursuant to
sections 751(a)(3)(A) and 777(i)(1) of the
Act.
Dated: July 6, 2011.
Christian Marsh,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Operations.
[FR Doc. 2011–17335 Filed 7–8–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–570–898]
Chlorinated Isocyanurates From the
People’s Republic of China:
Preliminary Results of Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: In response to requests from
interested parties, the Department of
Commerce (the Department) is
conducting an administrative review of
the antidumping duty order on
chlorinated isocyanurates (chlorinated
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\11JYN1.SGM
11JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 132 (Monday, July 11, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 40688-40689]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-17333]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Foreign-Trade Zones Board
[Docket 47-2011]
Foreign-Trade Zone 71--Windsor Locks, CT Application for
Expansion
An application has been submitted to the Foreign-Trade Zones Board
(the Board) by the Economic and Industrial Development Commission of
Windsor Locks (grantee of FTZ 71) requesting authority to expand the
zone to include a new site in East Granby/Windsor, Connecticut. The
application was submitted pursuant to the provisions of the Foreign-
Trade Zones Act, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), and the regulations of
the Board (15 CFR part 400). It was formally filed on July 5, 2011.
FTZ 71 was established by the Board on July 8, 1981 (Board Order
177, 46 FR 36220, 7/14/81). The zone currently consists of one site
(17.5 acres) at the Crown Industrial Park, 399 Turnpike Road, Windsor
Locks.
The applicant is requesting authority to expand the zone to include
the following site: Proposed Site 2 (390 acres)--within the 600-acre
New England Tradeport business park located at the intersection of
Route 20 and International Drive in East Granby and Windsor. The site
will provide warehousing and distribution services to area businesses.
No specific manufacturing authority is being requested at this time.
Such requests would be made to the Board on a case-by-case basis.
In accordance with the Board's regulations, Camille Evans of the
FTZ Staff is designated examiner to evaluate and analyze the facts and
information presented in the application and case record and to report
findings and recommendations to the Board.
Public comment is invited from interested parties. Submissions
(original and 3 copies) shall be addressed to the Board's Executive
Secretary at the address below. The closing period for their receipt is
September 9, 2011. Rebuttal comments in response to material submitted
during the foregoing period may be submitted during the subsequent 15-
day period to September 26, 2011.
A copy of the application will be available for public inspection
at the Office of the Executive Secretary, Foreign-Trade Zones Board,
Room 2111, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20230-0002, and in the ``Reading Room'' section of the
Board's Web site,
[[Page 40689]]
which is accessible via https://www.trade.gov/ftz.
For further information, contact Camille Evans at
Camille.Evans@trade.gov or (202) 482-2350.
Dated: July 5, 2011.
Andrew McGilvray,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-17333 Filed 7-8-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P