Final Supplementary Rules on Public Lands in Idaho, 40391-40393 [2011-17149]
Download as PDF
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 131 / Friday, July 8, 2011 / Notices
section 404 of the Clean Water Act of
1972, as amended (33 U.S.C. Section
1344), as well as special expertise in
aquatic ecosystems that could be
affected by the Ocotillo Project. The
BLM and Corps agree that it will be
beneficial to create a more streamlined,
coordinated approach in developing the
OWEF Draft PA/EIS/EIR. The two
Federal agencies will be developing a
Memorandum of Understanding for this
purpose.
The BLM’s purpose and need for the
Draft PA/EIS/EIR is to respond to OE
LLC’s application for a ROW grant to
construct, operate, maintain, and
decommission a wind energy facility on
public lands in compliance with
FLPMA, BLM ROW regulations, and
other applicable Federal laws. The BLM
will decide whether to grant, grant with
modification, or deny the ROW
application for the proposed OWEF.
Concurrently with its action on the
ROW request, the BLM is also proposing
to amend the CDCA Plan by designating
the project area as either available or
unavailable for wind energy projects.
The CDCA Plan, while recognizing the
potential compatibility of wind energy
generation facilities with other uses on
public lands, requires that all sites
proposed for power generation or
transmission not already identified in
the CDCA Plan be considered through
the plan amendment process. If the BLM
decides to amend the CDCA Plan, a
ROW for this project could be granted.
If not, the ROW could not be granted.
In addition to the proposed action and
a no action alternative, the BLM is
analyzing a 137-turbine alternative and
a 105-turbine alternative. The Draft PA/
EIS/EIR also analyzes two ‘‘no project’’
alternatives that reject the project but
amend the CDCA Plan to make the
project area either (1) available to future
wind energy generation projects; or
(2) unavailable to future wind energy
generation projects.
The Draft PA/EIS/EIR evaluates the
potential impacts of the proposed
OWEF on air quality, biological
resources, cultural resources, water
resources, geological resources and
hazards, land use, noise, paleontological
resources, public health,
socioeconomics, soils, traffic and
transportation, visual resources,
wilderness characteristics, and other
resources.
A Notice of Intent to Prepare an EIS/
EIR for the OWEF project was published
in the Federal Register on December 13,
2010 (75 FR 77654). The BLM held 2
public scoping meetings in El Centro
and Ocotillo, California, on January 5th
and 6th, 2011, respectively. The formal
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:52 Jul 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
scoping period ended on February 4,
2011.
Please note that public comments and
information submitted including names,
street addresses, and e-mail addresses of
persons who submit comments will be
available for public review at the above
address during regular business hours (8
a.m. to 4 p.m.), Monday through Friday,
except holidays.
Before including your phone number,
e-mail address, or other personal
identifying information in your
comments, you should be aware that
your entire comment—including your
personal identifying information—may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
Authority: 40 CFR 1506.6, 1506.10, 43 CFR
1610.2, and 1610.5.
Thomas Pogacnik,
Deputy State Director, California.
[FR Doc. 2011–17159 Filed 7–7–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–40–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
[LLID9900000.L1210000.NU0000; G0–00]
Final Supplementary Rules on Public
Lands in Idaho
Bureau of Land Management,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of final supplementary
rules.
AGENCY:
The Bureau of Land
Management (BLM) Idaho State Office is
establishing supplementary rules
relating to the illegal use and possession
of alcohol, drugs, and drug
paraphernalia on public lands. The BLM
State Office is also establishing final
supplementary rules prohibiting the
possession of an open alcoholic
beverage container by operators or
passengers in or on either a vehicle or
off-highway vehicle, on public lands
administered by the BLM in Idaho.
These supplementary rules are
necessary to protect natural resources
and the health and safety of public land
users. These supplementary rules will
allow BLM Law Enforcement personnel
to continue enforcing existing public
land regulations pertaining to alcohol
and drug use in a manner consistent
with current State of Idaho statutes.
DATES: These rules are effective August
8, 2011.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00070
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
40391
You may direct inquiries to
Keith McGrath, State Staff Law
Enforcement Ranger, Bureau of Land
Management, Idaho State Office, 1387 S.
Vinnell Way, Boise, Idaho 83709; or by
e-mail to Keith_McGrath@blm.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Keith McGrath, Bureau of Land
Management, (208) 373–4046,
Keith_McGrath@blm.gov. Persons who
use a telecommunications device for the
deaf (TDD) may contact this individual
by calling the Federal Information Relay
Service (FIRS) at (800) 877–8339, 24
hours a day, 7 days a week. You will
receive a reply during normal business
hours.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
ADDRESSES:
I. Background
II. Discussion of Public Comments
III. Discussion of Final Supplementary Rules
IV. Procedural Matters
I. Background
Although two BLM Districts in the
State of Idaho have issued rules
mirroring the State of Idaho statutes
pertaining to underage possession and
consumption of alcohol, the BLM has no
statewide supplementary rules
regarding the illegal possession or use of
alcohol on public lands. In the absence
of specific regulations, law enforcement
officers have regulated this illegal
behavior under broader regulations,
creating a lack of consistency with
surrounding governing entities. These
final supplementary rules will bring
consistency to all BLM-administered
land throughout the State and promote
consistency between the BLM and other
agencies, including the State of Idaho,
County Sheriff’s Offices, Idaho State
Police, and various Federal agencies
where working relationships and
partnerships exist in public land
management.
In keeping with the BLM’s goal to
reduce threats to public health, safety,
and property, these final supplementary
rules are necessary to protect natural
resources, allow for safe public
recreation, reduce the potential for
damage to the environment, and
enhance the safety of visitors and
neighboring residents. Alcohol-related
offenses are a growing problem on the
public lands. Unlawful consumption of
alcohol and drugs has the potential to
pose a significant health and safety
hazard to all users. Operation of motor
vehicles while under the influence of
alcohol or drugs has been demonstrated
to result in the destruction of natural
resources and property, and/or serious
physical injury or death. Vandalism to
public land resources resulting from
illegal alcohol and drug use and the
E:\FR\FM\08JYN1.SGM
08JYN1
40392
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 131 / Friday, July 8, 2011 / Notices
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
clear risks to public safety demonstrate
the need for greater regulation of these
activities.
For the purposes of these final
supplementary rules, an alcoholic
beverage is any liquid or solid
containing more than 3 percent of
alcohol by weight. The BLM has chosen
3 percent alcohol by weight to account
for 3.2 percent beer sold in Idaho. The
State of Idaho defines an alcoholic
beverage as a liquid or solid containing
more than 4 percent of alcohol by
weight, and addresses prohibition of
open containers of beer in motor
vehicles, including 3.2 percent beer, in
a slightly different manner than BLM
rules. The BLM has determined that
setting the threshold at 3 percent
alcohol by weight would be the clearest
way to account for all Idaho State
prohibitions.
Possession of drug paraphernalia has
frequently been linked to other illegal
uses of controlled substances including
cultivation, manufacture, and
possession for distribution. The BLM, in
keeping with the mandates of the
President’s Office of National Drug
Control Policy National Drug Control
Strategy, will continue its efforts to
reduce illegal use of controlled
substances on public lands. These final
supplementary rules provide for
consistent application and enforcement
of alcohol and drug regulations on
public lands, further enhancing public
safety by all public land users.
These final supplementary rules
supersede that portion of the existing
supplementary rule enacted in the BLM
Idaho Falls District (67 FR 30958) and
the restriction orders (ID–060–20 and
ID–420–05) currently in place for the
BLM Coeur d’Alene District pertaining
to the underage possession and
consumption of alcoholic beverages and
the possession of an open container of
alcohol in a motor vehicle.
II. Discussion of Public Comments
The BLM Idaho State Office proposed
supplementary rules in the Federal
Register on September 22, 2010 (75 FR
57813). Public comments were accepted
by mail and/or e-mail for a 60-day
period ending on November 22, 2010.
The BLM received two written
comments concerning the proposed
rules. One commenter sought
clarification on whether violators of the
rules would be required to appear before
a magistrate. Under these rules,
violators would have the option of
mailing payment of the fine associated
with the citation or appearing before a
magistrate.
The second commenter voiced
concern about the fiscal impact of the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:52 Jul 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
proposed supplementary rules, as well
as about the creation of new laws. These
final supplementary rules will have no
budgetary impact and do not create new
laws, but rather serve to allow BLM Law
Enforcement to continue to enforce
existing laws in a manner consistent
with Idaho Statutes and those of
surrounding States. As such, neither
comment resulted in changes to the
proposed rules.
III. Discussion of Final Supplementary
Rules
The final supplementary rules apply
to BLM-managed lands within the State
of Idaho. These final supplementary
rules are necessary to protect natural
resources and the health and safety of
public land users. These supplementary
rules will allow BLM Law Enforcement
personnel to enforce existing public
land regulations pertaining to alcohol
and drug use in a manner consistent
with current State of Idaho statutes.
No changes to the proposed
supplementary rules were necessary
after public comment and the final
supplementary rules remain as
proposed, with the exception of some
minor editing that is not substantive.
IV. Procedural Matters
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review
The final supplementary rules are not
a significant regulatory action and are
not subject to review by the Office of
Management and Budget under
Executive Order 12866. The final
supplementary rules will not have an
effect of $100 million or more on the
economy. They will not adversely affect,
in a material way, the economy,
productivity, competition, jobs, the
environment, public health or safety, or
State, local, or Tribal governments or
communities. The final supplementary
rules will not create a serious
inconsistency or otherwise interfere
with an action taken or planned by
another agency. The final
supplementary rules do not materially
alter the budgetary effects of
entitlements, grants, user fees, or loan
programs or the right or obligations of
their recipients; nor do they raise novel
legal or policy issues. The rules merely
contain rules of conduct for public use
of a limited selection of public lands
and provide greater consistency with
the Idaho State Code to protect public
health and safety.
National Environmental Policy Act
The BLM has found that these final
supplementary rules comprise a
category or kind of action that has no
PO 00000
Frm 00071
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
significant individual or cumulative
effect on the quality of the human
environment. See 40 CFR 1508.4; 43
CFR 46.210. Specifically, the
establishment of these final
supplementary rules is an action that is
of an administrative, financial, legal,
technical, or procedural nature within
the meaning of 43 CFR 46.210(i), and
none of the extraordinary circumstances
listed at 43 CFR 46.215 are applicable.
Therefore, the BLM is not required to
prepare an environmental assessment or
an environmental impact statement for
these final supplementary rules.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
Congress enacted the Regulatory
Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA), as
amended, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, to ensure
that Government regulations do not
unnecessarily or disproportionately
burden small entities. The RFA requires
a regulatory flexibility analysis if a rule
would have a significant economic
impact, either detrimental or beneficial,
on a substantial number of small
entities. These final supplementary
rules merely establish rules of conduct
for public use of a limited area of public
lands and should have no effect on
business entities of any size. Therefore,
the BLM has determined under the RFA
that these final supplementary rules
would not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act (SBREFA)
These final supplementary rules do
not constitute a ‘‘major rule’’ as defined
at 5 U.S.C. 804(2). They would not
result in an effect on the economy of
$100 million or more, an increase in
costs or prices, or significant adverse
effects on competition, employment,
investment, productivity, innovation, or
the ability of United States-based
enterprises to compete with foreignbased enterprises in domestic and
export markets. These rules merely
establish rules of conduct for public use
of a limited area of public lands and do
not affect commercial or business
activities of any kind.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
These final supplementary rules do
not impose an unfunded mandate on
State, local, or Tribal governments or
the private sector of more than $100
million per year; nor do these final
supplementary rules have a significant
or unique effect on State, local, or Tribal
governments or the private sector. These
final rules have no effect on State, local,
or Tribal governments and do not
impose any requirements on any of
E:\FR\FM\08JYN1.SGM
08JYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 131 / Friday, July 8, 2011 / Notices
these entities. Therefore, the BLM is not
required to prepare a statement
containing the information required by
the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (2
U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).
Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference With
Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights (Takings)
These final supplementary rules do
not have significant takings
implications, nor are they capable of
interfering with constitutionally
protected property rights. Therefore, the
BLM has determined that these rules
will not cause a ‘‘taking’’ of private
property or require preparation of a
takings assessment.
Executive Order 13132, Federalism
The final supplementary rules will
not have a substantial direct effect on
the States, on the relationship between
the Federal Government and the States,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. The final
supplementary rules do not conflict
with any Idaho State law or regulation.
Therefore, in accordance with Executive
Order 13132, the BLM has determined
that these final supplementary rules do
not have sufficient federalism
implications to warrant preparation of a
Federalism Assessment.
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform
The BLM has determined that these
final supplementary rules would not
unduly burden the judicial system and
that they meet the requirements of
Sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988.
Executive Order 13175, Consultation
and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments
The BLM has found that these
supplementary rules do not include
policies that have Tribal implications.
The supplementary rules prohibit the
illegal use of alcoholic beverages and
illegal drugs on public lands and do not
involve Indian Tribal rights.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Information Quality Act
The Information Quality Act (Section
515 of Pub. L. 106–554) requires Federal
agencies to maintain adequate quality,
objectivity, utility, and integrity of the
information that they disseminate. In
developing these supplementary rules,
the BLM did not conduct or use a study,
experiment, or survey or disseminate
any information to the public.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:52 Jul 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
40393
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use
These final supplementary rules do
not constitute a significant energy
action. The final supplementary rules
will not have an adverse effect on
energy supplies, production, or
consumption, and have no connection
with energy policy.
C. You must not possess any drug
paraphernalia in violation of any State law.
Penalties: On public lands under section
303(a) of the Federal Land Policy and
Management Act of 1976 (43 U.S.C. 1733(a))
and 43 CFR 8360.0–7, any person who
violates any of these supplementary rules
may be tried before a United States
Magistrate and fined no more than $1,000 or
imprisoned for no more than 12 months, or
both. Such violations may also be subject to
enhanced fines provided for by 18 U.S.C.
3571.
Paperwork Reduction Act
These final supplementary rules do
not contain information collection
requirements that the Office of
Management and Budget must approve
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995, 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.
Peter J. Ditton,
BLM Idaho State Director, Acting.
Author
The principal author of this
supplementary rule is Keith McGrath,
State Staff Law Enforcement Ranger,
Bureau of Land Management.
For the reasons stated in the
Preamble, and under the authority of 43
CFR 8365.1–6, the Idaho State Director,
Bureau of Land Management, issues
supplementary rules for public lands in
Idaho, to read as follows:
Notice of Lodging of Consent Decrees
Supplementary Rules for the State of Idaho
Definitions
Alcoholic beverage means any liquid or
solid, patented or not, containing alcohol,
spirits, or wine, and susceptible of being
consumed by a human being, for beverage
purposes, and containing more than 3
percent of alcohol by weight.
Alcohol means the product of distillation
of any fermented liquor, rectified either once
or more often, whatever may be the origin
thereof, or synthetic ethyl alcohol.
Beer means any alcoholic beverage
obtained by the alcoholic fermentation of an
infusion or decoction of barley, malt and/or
other ingredients in drinkable water.
Wine means any alcoholic beverage
obtained by the fermentation of the natural
sugar content of fruits (grapes, apples, etc.) or
other agricultural products containing sugar
(honey, milk, etc.).
Vehicle means any motorized
transportation conveyance designed and
licensed for use on roadways, such as an
automobile, bus, or truck, and any motorized
conveyance originally equipped with safety
belts.
Off-Highway Vehicle (OHV) means any
motorized vehicle capable of, or designed for,
travel on or immediately over land, water, or
other natural terrain.
On public land administered by the BLM
within the State of Idaho:
A. You must not violate any State laws
relating to the purchase, possession, supply,
use or consumption of alcohol.
B. You must not drink or possess an open
alcoholic beverage, including beer or wine,
while operating or as a passenger in or on
either a vehicle or off highway vehicle.
PO 00000
Frm 00072
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
[FR Doc. 2011–17149 Filed 7–7–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–GG–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Notice is hereby given that on July 1,
2011, two proposed Consent Decrees
were lodged with the United States
District Court for the Central District of
California. The Consent Decrees were
lodged in the case United States et al.
v. Seachrome Corporation, Civil Action
No. 11–0382 (C.D. Cal.) (consolidated
with, inter alia, Civil Action No. 02–
4565 (C.D. Cal.)).
The United States of America
(‘‘United States’’), on behalf of the
Administrator of the United States
Environmental Protection Agency
(‘‘EPA’’), and the California Department
of Toxic Substances Control
(‘‘Department’’) filed a complaint
pursuant to Section 107 of the
Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation, and Liability
Act of 1980, as amended (‘‘CERCLA’’),
42 U.S.C. 9607, seeking reimbursement
of response costs incurred or to be
incurred for response actions taken in
connection with the release or
threatened release of hazardous
substances at the South El Monte
Operable Unit of the San Gabriel Valley
Area 1 Superfund Site in South El
Monte, Los Angeles County, California
(the ‘‘South El Monte O.U.’’). The
United States’ and Department’s suit
was consolidated with existing lawsuits
also related to the South El Monte O.U.
Under the first proposed Consent
Decree, Aerojet-General Corp., a
potentially responsible party with
respect to the South El Monte O.U., will
pay a total of about $6.8 million to the
United States, the Department, and
certain plaintiffs in the consolidated
lawsuits. Under the second Consent
Decree, Mammoet Western, Inc., Time
Realty Investments, and Tonks
Properties, potentially responsible
parties with respect to the South El
Monte O.U., will collectively pay a total
E:\FR\FM\08JYN1.SGM
08JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 131 (Friday, July 8, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 40391-40393]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-17149]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
[LLID9900000.L1210000.NU0000; G0-00]
Final Supplementary Rules on Public Lands in Idaho
AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of final supplementary rules.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Idaho State Office is
establishing supplementary rules relating to the illegal use and
possession of alcohol, drugs, and drug paraphernalia on public lands.
The BLM State Office is also establishing final supplementary rules
prohibiting the possession of an open alcoholic beverage container by
operators or passengers in or on either a vehicle or off-highway
vehicle, on public lands administered by the BLM in Idaho. These
supplementary rules are necessary to protect natural resources and the
health and safety of public land users. These supplementary rules will
allow BLM Law Enforcement personnel to continue enforcing existing
public land regulations pertaining to alcohol and drug use in a manner
consistent with current State of Idaho statutes.
DATES: These rules are effective August 8, 2011.
ADDRESSES: You may direct inquiries to Keith McGrath, State Staff Law
Enforcement Ranger, Bureau of Land Management, Idaho State Office, 1387
S. Vinnell Way, Boise, Idaho 83709; or by e-mail to Keith_McGrath@blm.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Keith McGrath, Bureau of Land
Management, (208) 373-4046, Keith_McGrath@blm.gov. Persons who use a
telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD) may contact this
individual by calling the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at
(800) 877-8339, 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. You will receive a reply
during normal business hours.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
II. Discussion of Public Comments
III. Discussion of Final Supplementary Rules
IV. Procedural Matters
I. Background
Although two BLM Districts in the State of Idaho have issued rules
mirroring the State of Idaho statutes pertaining to underage possession
and consumption of alcohol, the BLM has no statewide supplementary
rules regarding the illegal possession or use of alcohol on public
lands. In the absence of specific regulations, law enforcement officers
have regulated this illegal behavior under broader regulations,
creating a lack of consistency with surrounding governing entities.
These final supplementary rules will bring consistency to all BLM-
administered land throughout the State and promote consistency between
the BLM and other agencies, including the State of Idaho, County
Sheriff's Offices, Idaho State Police, and various Federal agencies
where working relationships and partnerships exist in public land
management.
In keeping with the BLM's goal to reduce threats to public health,
safety, and property, these final supplementary rules are necessary to
protect natural resources, allow for safe public recreation, reduce the
potential for damage to the environment, and enhance the safety of
visitors and neighboring residents. Alcohol-related offenses are a
growing problem on the public lands. Unlawful consumption of alcohol
and drugs has the potential to pose a significant health and safety
hazard to all users. Operation of motor vehicles while under the
influence of alcohol or drugs has been demonstrated to result in the
destruction of natural resources and property, and/or serious physical
injury or death. Vandalism to public land resources resulting from
illegal alcohol and drug use and the
[[Page 40392]]
clear risks to public safety demonstrate the need for greater
regulation of these activities.
For the purposes of these final supplementary rules, an alcoholic
beverage is any liquid or solid containing more than 3 percent of
alcohol by weight. The BLM has chosen 3 percent alcohol by weight to
account for 3.2 percent beer sold in Idaho. The State of Idaho defines
an alcoholic beverage as a liquid or solid containing more than 4
percent of alcohol by weight, and addresses prohibition of open
containers of beer in motor vehicles, including 3.2 percent beer, in a
slightly different manner than BLM rules. The BLM has determined that
setting the threshold at 3 percent alcohol by weight would be the
clearest way to account for all Idaho State prohibitions.
Possession of drug paraphernalia has frequently been linked to
other illegal uses of controlled substances including cultivation,
manufacture, and possession for distribution. The BLM, in keeping with
the mandates of the President's Office of National Drug Control Policy
National Drug Control Strategy, will continue its efforts to reduce
illegal use of controlled substances on public lands. These final
supplementary rules provide for consistent application and enforcement
of alcohol and drug regulations on public lands, further enhancing
public safety by all public land users.
These final supplementary rules supersede that portion of the
existing supplementary rule enacted in the BLM Idaho Falls District (67
FR 30958) and the restriction orders (ID-060-20 and ID-420-05)
currently in place for the BLM Coeur d'Alene District pertaining to the
underage possession and consumption of alcoholic beverages and the
possession of an open container of alcohol in a motor vehicle.
II. Discussion of Public Comments
The BLM Idaho State Office proposed supplementary rules in the
Federal Register on September 22, 2010 (75 FR 57813). Public comments
were accepted by mail and/or e-mail for a 60-day period ending on
November 22, 2010. The BLM received two written comments concerning the
proposed rules. One commenter sought clarification on whether violators
of the rules would be required to appear before a magistrate. Under
these rules, violators would have the option of mailing payment of the
fine associated with the citation or appearing before a magistrate.
The second commenter voiced concern about the fiscal impact of the
proposed supplementary rules, as well as about the creation of new
laws. These final supplementary rules will have no budgetary impact and
do not create new laws, but rather serve to allow BLM Law Enforcement
to continue to enforce existing laws in a manner consistent with Idaho
Statutes and those of surrounding States. As such, neither comment
resulted in changes to the proposed rules.
III. Discussion of Final Supplementary Rules
The final supplementary rules apply to BLM-managed lands within the
State of Idaho. These final supplementary rules are necessary to
protect natural resources and the health and safety of public land
users. These supplementary rules will allow BLM Law Enforcement
personnel to enforce existing public land regulations pertaining to
alcohol and drug use in a manner consistent with current State of Idaho
statutes.
No changes to the proposed supplementary rules were necessary after
public comment and the final supplementary rules remain as proposed,
with the exception of some minor editing that is not substantive.
IV. Procedural Matters
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review
The final supplementary rules are not a significant regulatory
action and are not subject to review by the Office of Management and
Budget under Executive Order 12866. The final supplementary rules will
not have an effect of $100 million or more on the economy. They will
not adversely affect, in a material way, the economy, productivity,
competition, jobs, the environment, public health or safety, or State,
local, or Tribal governments or communities. The final supplementary
rules will not create a serious inconsistency or otherwise interfere
with an action taken or planned by another agency. The final
supplementary rules do not materially alter the budgetary effects of
entitlements, grants, user fees, or loan programs or the right or
obligations of their recipients; nor do they raise novel legal or
policy issues. The rules merely contain rules of conduct for public use
of a limited selection of public lands and provide greater consistency
with the Idaho State Code to protect public health and safety.
National Environmental Policy Act
The BLM has found that these final supplementary rules comprise a
category or kind of action that has no significant individual or
cumulative effect on the quality of the human environment. See 40 CFR
1508.4; 43 CFR 46.210. Specifically, the establishment of these final
supplementary rules is an action that is of an administrative,
financial, legal, technical, or procedural nature within the meaning of
43 CFR 46.210(i), and none of the extraordinary circumstances listed at
43 CFR 46.215 are applicable. Therefore, the BLM is not required to
prepare an environmental assessment or an environmental impact
statement for these final supplementary rules.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
Congress enacted the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA), as
amended, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, to ensure that Government regulations do not
unnecessarily or disproportionately burden small entities. The RFA
requires a regulatory flexibility analysis if a rule would have a
significant economic impact, either detrimental or beneficial, on a
substantial number of small entities. These final supplementary rules
merely establish rules of conduct for public use of a limited area of
public lands and should have no effect on business entities of any
size. Therefore, the BLM has determined under the RFA that these final
supplementary rules would not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act (SBREFA)
These final supplementary rules do not constitute a ``major rule''
as defined at 5 U.S.C. 804(2). They would not result in an effect on
the economy of $100 million or more, an increase in costs or prices, or
significant adverse effects on competition, employment, investment,
productivity, innovation, or the ability of United States-based
enterprises to compete with foreign-based enterprises in domestic and
export markets. These rules merely establish rules of conduct for
public use of a limited area of public lands and do not affect
commercial or business activities of any kind.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
These final supplementary rules do not impose an unfunded mandate
on State, local, or Tribal governments or the private sector of more
than $100 million per year; nor do these final supplementary rules have
a significant or unique effect on State, local, or Tribal governments
or the private sector. These final rules have no effect on State,
local, or Tribal governments and do not impose any requirements on any
of
[[Page 40393]]
these entities. Therefore, the BLM is not required to prepare a
statement containing the information required by the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act (2 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).
Executive Order 12630, Governmental Actions and Interference With
Constitutionally Protected Property Rights (Takings)
These final supplementary rules do not have significant takings
implications, nor are they capable of interfering with constitutionally
protected property rights. Therefore, the BLM has determined that these
rules will not cause a ``taking'' of private property or require
preparation of a takings assessment.
Executive Order 13132, Federalism
The final supplementary rules will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government. The final
supplementary rules do not conflict with any Idaho State law or
regulation. Therefore, in accordance with Executive Order 13132, the
BLM has determined that these final supplementary rules do not have
sufficient federalism implications to warrant preparation of a
Federalism Assessment.
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform
The BLM has determined that these final supplementary rules would
not unduly burden the judicial system and that they meet the
requirements of Sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988.
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments
The BLM has found that these supplementary rules do not include
policies that have Tribal implications. The supplementary rules
prohibit the illegal use of alcoholic beverages and illegal drugs on
public lands and do not involve Indian Tribal rights.
Information Quality Act
The Information Quality Act (Section 515 of Pub. L. 106-554)
requires Federal agencies to maintain adequate quality, objectivity,
utility, and integrity of the information that they disseminate. In
developing these supplementary rules, the BLM did not conduct or use a
study, experiment, or survey or disseminate any information to the
public.
Executive Order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use
These final supplementary rules do not constitute a significant
energy action. The final supplementary rules will not have an adverse
effect on energy supplies, production, or consumption, and have no
connection with energy policy.
Paperwork Reduction Act
These final supplementary rules do not contain information
collection requirements that the Office of Management and Budget must
approve under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C. 3501 et
seq.
Author
The principal author of this supplementary rule is Keith McGrath,
State Staff Law Enforcement Ranger, Bureau of Land Management.
For the reasons stated in the Preamble, and under the authority of
43 CFR 8365.1-6, the Idaho State Director, Bureau of Land Management,
issues supplementary rules for public lands in Idaho, to read as
follows:
Supplementary Rules for the State of Idaho
Definitions
Alcoholic beverage means any liquid or solid, patented or not,
containing alcohol, spirits, or wine, and susceptible of being
consumed by a human being, for beverage purposes, and containing
more than 3 percent of alcohol by weight.
Alcohol means the product of distillation of any fermented
liquor, rectified either once or more often, whatever may be the
origin thereof, or synthetic ethyl alcohol.
Beer means any alcoholic beverage obtained by the alcoholic
fermentation of an infusion or decoction of barley, malt and/or
other ingredients in drinkable water.
Wine means any alcoholic beverage obtained by the fermentation
of the natural sugar content of fruits (grapes, apples, etc.) or
other agricultural products containing sugar (honey, milk, etc.).
Vehicle means any motorized transportation conveyance designed
and licensed for use on roadways, such as an automobile, bus, or
truck, and any motorized conveyance originally equipped with safety
belts.
Off-Highway Vehicle (OHV) means any motorized vehicle capable
of, or designed for, travel on or immediately over land, water, or
other natural terrain.
On public land administered by the BLM within the State of
Idaho:
A. You must not violate any State laws relating to the purchase,
possession, supply, use or consumption of alcohol.
B. You must not drink or possess an open alcoholic beverage,
including beer or wine, while operating or as a passenger in or on
either a vehicle or off highway vehicle.
C. You must not possess any drug paraphernalia in violation of
any State law.
Penalties: On public lands under section 303(a) of the Federal
Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 (43 U.S.C. 1733(a)) and 43
CFR 8360.0-7, any person who violates any of these supplementary
rules may be tried before a United States Magistrate and fined no
more than $1,000 or imprisoned for no more than 12 months, or both.
Such violations may also be subject to enhanced fines provided for
by 18 U.S.C. 3571.
Peter J. Ditton,
BLM Idaho State Director, Acting.
[FR Doc. 2011-17149 Filed 7-7-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-GG-P