Determination of Attainment, Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Indiana; Correction, 40262-40263 [2011-17050]
Download as PDF
40262
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 131 / Friday, July 8, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
EPA-APPROVED NEBRASKA NONREGULATORY PROVISIONS
Name of nonregulatory
SIP provision
Applicable
geographic or nonattainment area
*
(24) Section 110(a)(2) ....
Infrastructure Requirements for the 1997 8Hour Ozone NAAQS.
*
*
Statewide ......................
[FR Doc. 2011–17193 Filed 7–7–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R05–OAR–2009–0512; FRL–9430–6]
Determination of Attainment, Approval
and Promulgation of Air Quality
Implementation Plans; Indiana;
Correction
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule; correction.
AGENCY:
On March 12, 2010, EPA
published a final rule making a
determination that the entire ChicagoGary-Lake County, Illinois-Indiana
(IL-IN) 1997 eight-hour ozone
nonattainment area has attained the
1997 eight-hour ozone National
Ambient Air Quality Standard
(NAAQS). This action corrects an
omission in the regulatory text of the
aforementioned Federal Register
document.
SUMMARY:
Effective Date: This final rule is
effective on July 8, 2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Edward Doty, Environmental Scientist,
Attainment Planning and Maintenance
Section, Air Programs Branch (AR–18J),
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard,
Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312) 886–6057,
doty.edward@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document whenever
‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean
EPA. This action provides a technical
correction to the regulatory language in
the final rulemaking published at 75 FR
12088 on March 12, 2010. In that
rulemaking, EPA made a determination
that the entire Chicago-Gary-Lake
County, IL-IN ozone nonattainment area
has attained the 1997 eight-hour ozone
NAAQS. The determination was based
on complete, quality-assured ambient
air quality monitoring data for the
wreier-aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with RULES
DATES:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:25 Jul 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
State
submittal
date
12/7/07
EPA approval date
Explanation
*
*
7/8/11 ............................
[insert FR page number
where the document
begins].
*
*
This action addresses the following CAA elements, as applicable: 110(a)(2)(A), (B), (C),
(D)(ii), (E), (F), (G), (H), (J), (K), (L), and (M).
period of 2006–2008. Additional
background on the applicable NAAQS
and EPA’s data are contained in the
September 24, 2009 proposed rule at 74
FR 48703–48706.
As published on March 12, 2010, the
regulatory language contained an
omission which needs to be corrected.
Our determination was properly
codified for the Indiana portion of the
area (Lake and Porter Counties) in the
final rule at 75 FR 12089 with the
addition of 40 CFR 52.777(mm)).
However, an amendment to 40 CFR 52
codifying our determination for the
Illinois portion of the area, Cook,
DuPage, Kane, Lake, McHenry, and Will
Counties, and portions of Grundy
County (Aux Sable and Goose Lake
Townships) and Kendall County
(Oswego Township), was inadvertently
omitted. Therefore, EPA is correcting
this error by adding paragraph (jj) to 40
CFR 52.726 for Illinois.
Section 553 of the Administrative
Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B),
provides that, when an agency for good
cause finds that notice and public
procedure are impracticable,
unnecessary or contrary to the public
interest, the agency may issue a rule
without providing notice and an
opportunity for public comment. We
have determined that there is good
cause for making today’s rule final
without prior proposal and opportunity
for comment because this rule is not
substantive and imposes no regulatory
requirements, but merely corrects an
omitted citation in a previous action.
Thus, notice and public procedure are
unnecessary. We find that this
constitutes good cause under 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(B).
Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under Executive Order (E.O.) 12866
(58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), this
action is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ and is therefore not subject to
review by the Office of Management and
Budget. For this reason, this action is
also not subject to Executive Order
13211, ‘‘Actions Concerning Regulations
That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
PO 00000
Frm 00046
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Distribution, or Use’’ (66 FR 28355 (May
22, 2001)). Because the agency has made
a ‘‘good cause’’ finding that this action
is not subject to notice-and-comment
requirements under the Administrative
Procedures Act or any other statute as
indicated in the Supplementary
Information section above, it is not
subject to the regulatory flexibility
provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (5 U.S.C 601 et seq.), or to sections
202 and 205 of the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA) (Pub. L.
104–4). In addition, this action does not
significantly or uniquely affect small
governments or impose a significant
intergovernmental mandate, as
described in sections 203 and 204 of
UMRA. This rule also does not have a
substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian Tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian Tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian Tribes,
as specified by Executive Order 13175
(65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), nor
will it have substantial direct effects on
the States, on the relationship between
the National Government and the States,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of governments, as specified by
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255,
August 10, 1999). This rule also is not
subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997), because it is not
economically significant.
This technical correction action does
not involve technical standards; thus
the requirements of section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C.
272 note) do not apply. The rule also
does not involve special consideration
of environmental justice related issues
as required by Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). In
issuing this rule, EPA has taken the
necessary steps to eliminate drafting
errors and ambiguity, minimize
potential litigation, and provide a clear
legal standard for affected conduct, as
required by section 3 of Executive Order
12988 (61 FR 4729, February 7, 1996).
E:\FR\FM\08JYR1.SGM
08JYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 131 / Friday, July 8, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
EPA has complied with Executive Order
12630 (53 FR 8859, March 15, 1998) by
examining the takings implications of
the rule in accordance with the
‘‘Attorney General’s Supplemental
Guidelines for the Evaluation of Risk
and Avoidance of Unanticipated
Takings’’ issued under the executive
order. This rule does not impose an
information collection burden under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
The Congressional Review Act (5
U.S.C. 801 et seq.), as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. Section 808 allows
the issuing agency to make a rule
effective sooner than otherwise
provided by the CRA if the agency
makes a good cause finding that notice
and public procedure is impracticable,
unnecessary or contrary to the public
interest. This determination must be
supported by a brief statement. 5 U.S.C.
808(2). As stated previously, EPA had
made such a good cause finding,
including the reasons therefore, and
established an effective date of July 8,
2011. EPA will submit a report
containing this rule and other required
information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S.
House of Representatives, and the
Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. This correction to
40 CFR part 52 for Illinois is not a
‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Dated: June 24, 2011.
Susan Hedman,
Regional Administrator, Region 5.
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
PART 52—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for 40 CFR
part 52 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart O—Illinois
2. Section 52.726 is amended by
adding paragraph (jj) to read as follows:
■
wreier-aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with RULES
§ 52.726
Control strategy. Ozone.
*
*
*
*
*
(jj) Determination of attainment. On
June 5, 2009, the state of Indiana
requested that EPA find that the Indiana
portion of the Chicago-Gary-Lake
County, Illinois-Indiana (IL-IN) ozone
nonattainment area has attained the
1997 8-hour ozone National Ambient
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:25 Jul 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
Air Quality Standard (NAAQS). After
review of Indiana’s submission and
2006–2008 ozone air quality data for
this ozone nonattainment area, EPA
finds that the entire Chicago-Gary-Lake
County, IL-IN area has attained the 1997
8-hour ozone NAAQS. Therefore, EPA
has determined, as of March 12, 2010,
that Cook, DuPage, Kane, Lake,
McHenry, and Will Counties, and
portions of Grundy County (Aux Sable
and Goose Lake Townships) and
Kendall County (Oswego Township) in
Illinois have attained the 1997 8-hour
ozone standard.
[FR Doc. 2011–17050 Filed 7–7–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
47 CFR Parts 15 and 76
[CS Docket No. 97–80; PP Docket No. 00–
67; FCC 10–181]
Implementation of Section 304 of the
Telecommunications Act of 1996:
Commercial Availability of Navigation
Devices; Compatibility Between Cable
Systems and Consumer Electronics
Equipment
Federal Communications
Commission.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
In this document, we adopt
new rules designed to improve the
operation of the CableCARD regime
until a successor solution becomes
effective. The Commission has not been
fully successful in implementing the
command of Section 629 of the
Communications Act to ensure the
commercial availability of navigation
devices used by consumers to access the
services of multichannel video
programming distributors (‘‘MVPDs’’).
The rules adopted in this order are
intended to bolster support for retail
CableCARD devices so that consumers
may access cable services without
leasing a set-top box from their cable
operators.
SUMMARY:
Effective August 8, 2011, except
for §§ 76.1205(b)(1), 76.1205(b)(1)(i),
76.1205(b)(2), 76.1205(b)(5), and
76.1602(b), which contain information
collection requirements that have not
been approved by OMB. The Federal
Communications Commission will
publish a document in the Federal
Register announcing the effective date
of §§ 76.1205(b)(1), 76.1205(b)(1)(i),
76.1205(b)(2), 76.1205(b)(5), and
76.1602(b).
DATES:
PO 00000
Frm 00047
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
40263
The incorporation by reference of
certain publications listed in this rule is
approved by the Director of the Federal
Register as of August 8, 2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
additional information on this
proceeding, contact Brendan Murray,
Brendan.Murray@fcc.gov, of the Media
Bureau, Policy Division, (202) 418–2120
or Alison Neplokh,
Alison.Neplokh@fcc.gov, of the Media
Bureau, (202) 418–1083.
For additional information concerning
the information collection requirements
contained in this document, send an email to PRA@fcc.gov or contact Cathy
Williams on (202) 418–2918.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a
summary of the Commission’s (Third
Report and Order and Order on
Reconsideration), FCC 10–181, adopted
and released on October 14, 2010. The
full text of these documents is available
for public inspection and copying
during regular business hours in the
FCC Reference Center, Federal
Communications Commission, 445 12th
Street, SW., CY–A257, Washington, DC,
20554. These documents will also be
available via ECFS (https://www.fcc.gov/
cgb/ecfs/). (Documents will be available
electronically in ASCII, Word 97, and/
or Adobe Acrobat.) The complete text
may be purchased from the
Commission’s copy contractor, 445 12th
Street, SW., Room CY–B402,
Washington, DC 20554. To request these
documents in accessible formats
(computer diskettes, large print, audio
recording, and Braille), send an e-mail
to fcc504@fcc.gov or call the
Commission’s Consumer and
Governmental Affairs Bureau at (202)
418–0530 (voice), (202) 418–0432
(TTY).
Summary of the Report and Order and
Order on Reconsideration
1. In this Third Report and Order
(‘‘Order’’), we remedy shortcomings in
our CableCARD rules in order to
improve consumers’ experience with
retail navigation devices (such as set-top
boxes and digital cable-ready television
sets) and CableCARDs, the security
devices used in conjunction with
navigation devices to perform the
conditional access functions necessary
to access cable services. We believe
these rule changes are necessary to
discharge our responsibility under the
Act to assure the development of a retail
market for devices that can navigate
cable services. We seek to remove the
disparity in consumer experience
between those who choose to buy a
retail device and those who lease the
cable provider’s set-top box, as the
E:\FR\FM\08JYR1.SGM
08JYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 131 (Friday, July 8, 2011)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 40262-40263]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-17050]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R05-OAR-2009-0512; FRL-9430-6]
Determination of Attainment, Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans; Indiana; Correction
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule; correction.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: On March 12, 2010, EPA published a final rule making a
determination that the entire Chicago-Gary-Lake County, Illinois-
Indiana (IL-IN) 1997 eight-hour ozone nonattainment area has attained
the 1997 eight-hour ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard
(NAAQS). This action corrects an omission in the regulatory text of the
aforementioned Federal Register document.
DATES: Effective Date: This final rule is effective on July 8, 2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Edward Doty, Environmental Scientist,
Attainment Planning and Maintenance Section, Air Programs Branch (AR-
18J), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson
Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312) 886-6057,
doty.edward@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document whenever ``we,''
``us,'' or ``our'' is used, we mean EPA. This action provides a
technical correction to the regulatory language in the final rulemaking
published at 75 FR 12088 on March 12, 2010. In that rulemaking, EPA
made a determination that the entire Chicago-Gary-Lake County, IL-IN
ozone nonattainment area has attained the 1997 eight-hour ozone NAAQS.
The determination was based on complete, quality-assured ambient air
quality monitoring data for the period of 2006-2008. Additional
background on the applicable NAAQS and EPA's data are contained in the
September 24, 2009 proposed rule at 74 FR 48703-48706.
As published on March 12, 2010, the regulatory language contained
an omission which needs to be corrected. Our determination was properly
codified for the Indiana portion of the area (Lake and Porter Counties)
in the final rule at 75 FR 12089 with the addition of 40 CFR
52.777(mm)). However, an amendment to 40 CFR 52 codifying our
determination for the Illinois portion of the area, Cook, DuPage, Kane,
Lake, McHenry, and Will Counties, and portions of Grundy County (Aux
Sable and Goose Lake Townships) and Kendall County (Oswego Township),
was inadvertently omitted. Therefore, EPA is correcting this error by
adding paragraph (jj) to 40 CFR 52.726 for Illinois.
Section 553 of the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(B), provides that, when an agency for good cause finds that
notice and public procedure are impracticable, unnecessary or contrary
to the public interest, the agency may issue a rule without providing
notice and an opportunity for public comment. We have determined that
there is good cause for making today's rule final without prior
proposal and opportunity for comment because this rule is not
substantive and imposes no regulatory requirements, but merely corrects
an omitted citation in a previous action. Thus, notice and public
procedure are unnecessary. We find that this constitutes good cause
under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B).
Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under Executive Order (E.O.) 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993),
this action is not a ``significant regulatory action'' and is therefore
not subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget. For this
reason, this action is also not subject to Executive Order 13211,
``Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy
Supply, Distribution, or Use'' (66 FR 28355 (May 22, 2001)). Because
the agency has made a ``good cause'' finding that this action is not
subject to notice-and-comment requirements under the Administrative
Procedures Act or any other statute as indicated in the Supplementary
Information section above, it is not subject to the regulatory
flexibility provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C 601
et seq.), or to sections 202 and 205 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform
Act of 1995 (UMRA) (Pub. L. 104-4). In addition, this action does not
significantly or uniquely affect small governments or impose a
significant intergovernmental mandate, as described in sections 203 and
204 of UMRA. This rule also does not have a substantial direct effect
on one or more Indian Tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian Tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian Tribes, as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), nor
will it have substantial direct effects on the States, on the
relationship between the National Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
governments, as specified by Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August
10, 1999). This rule also is not subject to Executive Order 13045 (62
FR 19885, April 23, 1997), because it is not economically significant.
This technical correction action does not involve technical
standards; thus the requirements of section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) do
not apply. The rule also does not involve special consideration of
environmental justice related issues as required by Executive Order
12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). In issuing this rule, EPA has
taken the necessary steps to eliminate drafting errors and ambiguity,
minimize potential litigation, and provide a clear legal standard for
affected conduct, as required by section 3 of Executive Order 12988 (61
FR 4729, February 7, 1996).
[[Page 40263]]
EPA has complied with Executive Order 12630 (53 FR 8859, March 15,
1998) by examining the takings implications of the rule in accordance
with the ``Attorney General's Supplemental Guidelines for the
Evaluation of Risk and Avoidance of Unanticipated Takings'' issued
under the executive order. This rule does not impose an information
collection burden under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
3501 et seq.).
The Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.), as added by
the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996,
generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency
promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy
of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller
General of the United States. Section 808 allows the issuing agency to
make a rule effective sooner than otherwise provided by the CRA if the
agency makes a good cause finding that notice and public procedure is
impracticable, unnecessary or contrary to the public interest. This
determination must be supported by a brief statement. 5 U.S.C. 808(2).
As stated previously, EPA had made such a good cause finding, including
the reasons therefore, and established an effective date of July 8,
2011. EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other required
information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of
the rule in the Federal Register. This correction to 40 CFR part 52 for
Illinois is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Dated: June 24, 2011.
Susan Hedman,
Regional Administrator, Region 5.
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
PART 52--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for 40 CFR part 52 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart O--Illinois
0
2. Section 52.726 is amended by adding paragraph (jj) to read as
follows:
Sec. 52.726 Control strategy. Ozone.
* * * * *
(jj) Determination of attainment. On June 5, 2009, the state of
Indiana requested that EPA find that the Indiana portion of the
Chicago-Gary-Lake County, Illinois-Indiana (IL-IN) ozone nonattainment
area has attained the 1997 8-hour ozone National Ambient Air Quality
Standard (NAAQS). After review of Indiana's submission and 2006-2008
ozone air quality data for this ozone nonattainment area, EPA finds
that the entire Chicago-Gary-Lake County, IL-IN area has attained the
1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS. Therefore, EPA has determined, as of March 12,
2010, that Cook, DuPage, Kane, Lake, McHenry, and Will Counties, and
portions of Grundy County (Aux Sable and Goose Lake Townships) and
Kendall County (Oswego Township) in Illinois have attained the 1997 8-
hour ozone standard.
[FR Doc. 2011-17050 Filed 7-7-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P