Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Indiana; Modifications to Indiana Prevention of Significant Deterioration and Non-attainment New Source Review Rules, 40242-40246 [2011-17036]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
wreier-aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with RULES
40242
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 131 / Friday, July 8, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
2004; ARM 17.8.749, effective 10/17/
2003, publication 6/30/2006; ARM
17.8.759, effective 10/17/2003,
publication 12/31/2003; ARM 17.8.763,
effective 10/17/2003, publication 6/30/
2006; ARM 17.8.764, effective 10/17/
2003, publication 6/30/2006; ARM
17.8.602, effective 6/17/2005,
publication 3/31/2007; ARM 17.8.767,
effective 6/17/2005, publication 6/30/
2006; ARM 17.8.802, effective 6/17/
2005, publication 12/31/2005; ARM
17.8.1102, effective 6/17/2005,
publication 3/31/2007; ARM 17.8.759,
effective 12/23/2005, publication 9/30/
2006.
(B) ARM submission dated May 28,
2003.
(1) The following provisions of the
ARM are amended effective 12/27/2002:
17.8.101, Definitions, (4) ‘‘Air quality
preconstruction permit,’’; 17.8.110,
Malfunctions, (7), (8), and (9); 17.8.818,
Review of Major Stationary Sources and
Major Modifications—Source
Applicability and Exemptions, (1);
17.8.825, Sources Impacting Federal
Class I Areas—Additional
Requirements, (3); 17.8.826, Public
Participation; 17.8.904, When Montana
Air Quality Permit Required; 17.8.905,
Additional Conditions of Montana Air
Quality Permit, (1) and (4); 17.8.906,
Baseline for Determining Credit for
Emissions and Air Quality Offsets;
17.8.1004, When Montana Air Quality
Permit Required; 17.8.1005, Additional
Conditions of Montana Air Quality
Permit, (1), (2) and (5); 17.8.1106,
Visibility Impact Analysis; 17.8.1109,
Adverse Impact and Federal Land
Manager.
(2) The following new provisions of
the ARM are effective 12/27/2002:
17.8.740, Definitions, (except for the
phrase in 17.8.740(2) ‘‘includes a
reasonable period of time for startup
and shakedown and’’; the phrase in
17.8.740(8)(a) ‘‘, except when a permit
is not required under ARM 17.8.745’’;
the phrase in 17.8.740(8)(c) ‘‘, except as
provided in ARM 17.8.745’’;
17.8.740(10) ‘‘Negligible risk to the
public health, safety, and welfare and to
the environment’’; and 17.8.740(14)
‘‘Routine Maintenance, repair, or
replacement’’); 17.8.743, Montana Air
Quality Permits—When Required,
(except the phrase in 17.8.743(1) ‘‘and
17.8.745,’’, the phrase in 17.8.743(1)(b)
‘‘asphalt concrete plants, mineral
crushers, and’’, and 17.8.743(1)(c));
17.8.744, Montana Air Quality
Permits—General Exclusions; 17.8.748,
New or Modified Emitting Units—Permit
Application Requirements; 17.8.749,
Conditions For Issuance or Denial of
Permit, (1), (3), (4), (5), (6), and (8);
17.8.752, Emission Control
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:25 Jul 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
Requirements; 17.8.755, Inspection of
Permit; 17.8.756, Compliance with
Other Requirements; 17.8.759, Review of
Permit Applications, (1) through (3);
17.8.760, Additional Review of Permit
Applications; 17.8.762, Duration of
Permit; 17.8.763, Revocation of Permit,
(1) and (4); 17.8.764, Administrative
Amendment to Permit, (1) (except for
the phrase in 17.8.764(1)(b) ‘‘unless the
increase meets the criteria in ARM
17.8.745 for a de minimis change not
requiring a permit, or’’), (2) and (3);
17.8.765, Transfer of Permit; 17.8.767,
Incorporation by Reference, (1)(a)
through (c).
(C) ARM submission dated March 09,
2004.
(1) The following provisions of the
ARM are amended effective 10/17/2003:
17.8.749, Conditions For Issuance or
Denial of Permit, (7); 17.8.759, Review
of Permit Applications; 17.8.763,
Revocation of Permit, (2) and (3);
17.8.764, Administrative Amendment to
Permit, (2) and (3).
(D) ARM submission dated October
25, 2005.
(1) The following provisions of the
ARM are amended effective 6/17/2005:
17.8.102, Incorporation by Reference—
Publication Dates; 17.8.103,
Incorporation by Reference and
Availability of Referenced Documents;
17.8.302, Incorporation by Reference;
17.8.602, Incorporation by Reference;
17.8.767, Incorporation by Reference,
(1)(d) through (g), (2), (3), and (4);
17.8.802, Incorporation by Reference;
17.8.902, Incorporation by Reference;
17.8.1002, Incorporation by Reference;
17.8.1102, Incorporation by Reference.
(E) ARM submission dated October
16, 2006.
(1) The following provisions of the
ARM are amended effective 12/23/2005:
17.8.759, Review of Permit Applications,
(4) through (6).
*
*
*
*
*
Editorial Note: This document was
received in the Office of the Federal Register
on June 30, 2011.
[FR Doc. 2011–16935 Filed 7–7–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R05–OAR–2010–1002; FRL–9430–7]
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans; Indiana;
Modifications to Indiana Prevention of
Significant Deterioration and Nonattainment New Source Review Rules
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
AGENCY:
EPA is approving Indiana’s
modifications to its Prevention of
Significant Deterioration (PSD) and
Nonattainment New Source Review
(NNSR) rules. The amendments include
grammatical changes, corrections to
numbering, addition of definitions
consistent with Federal PSD and NNSR
regulations, and removal of references to
provisions which were vacated in the
Federal rules. Indiana submitted these
rule revisions to EPA for approval on
November 24, 2010. They are consistent
with the current Federal PSD and NNSR
regulations.
DATES: This direct final rule will be
effective September 6, 2011, unless EPA
receives adverse comments by August 8,
2011. If adverse comments are received,
EPA will publish a timely withdrawal of
the direct final rule in the Federal
Register informing the public that the
rule will not take effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R05–
OAR–2010–1002, by one of the
following methods:
1. https://www.regulations.gov: Follow
the on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
2. E-mail: pamela.blakley@epa.gov.
3. Fax: (312) 692–2450.
4. Mail: Pamela Blakley, Chief, Air
Permits Section, Air Programs Branch
(AR–18J), U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, 77 West Jackson
Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604.
5. Hand Delivery: Pamela Blakley,
Chief, Air Permits Section, Air Programs
Branch (AR–18J), U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, 77 West Jackson
Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604.
Such deliveries are only accepted
during the Regional Office normal hours
of operation, and special arrangements
should be made for deliveries of boxed
information. The Regional Office official
hours of business are Monday through
Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., excluding
Federal holidays.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
Docket ID No. EPA–R05–OAR–2010–
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\08JYR1.SGM
08JYR1
wreier-aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 131 / Friday, July 8, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
1002. EPA’s policy is that all comments
received will be included in the public
docket without change and may be
made available online at https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise
protected through https://
www.regulations.gov or e-mail. The
https://www.regulations.gov Web site is
an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which
means EPA will not know your identity
or contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment.
If you send an e-mail comment directly
to EPA without going through https://
www.regulations.gov your e-mail
address will be automatically captured
and included as part of the comment
that is placed in the public docket and
made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA
recommends that you include your
name and other contact information in
the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA
cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact
you for clarification, EPA may not be
able to consider your comment.
Electronic files should avoid the use of
special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or
viruses.
Docket: All documents in the docket
are listed in the https://
www.regulations.gov index. Although
listed in the index, some information is
not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material,
will be publicly available only in hard
copy. Publicly available docket
materials are available either
electronically in https://
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at
the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Region 5, Air and Radiation
Division, 77 West Jackson Boulevard,
Chicago, Illinois 60604. This facility is
open from 8:30 AM to 4:30 PM, Monday
through Friday, excluding Federal
holidays. We recommend that you
telephone Charmagne Ackerman,
Environmental Engineer, at (312) 886–
0448 before visiting the Region 5 office.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Charmagne Ackerman, Environmental
Engineer, Air Permits Section, Air
Programs Branch (AR–18J), U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard,
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:25 Jul 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312) 886–0448,
ackerman.charmagne@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document whenever
‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean
EPA. This supplementary information
section is arranged as follows:
I. What is being addressed in this document?
II. What are the changes that EPA is
approving?
III. What action is EPA taking?
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews.
I. What is being addressed in this
document?
We are approving amendments to
Indiana’s PSD and Emission Offset
regulations. Previously, EPA approved
revisions to these regulations into the
State Implementation Plan (SIP) on June
18, 2007 (72 FR 33395). On November
24, 2010, the Indiana Department of
Environmental Management (IDEM)
requested that EPA approve PSD and
Emission Offset rule amendments to the
SIP. The rule amendments include
grammatical changes, corrections to
numbering notation, the addition of
definitions consistent with Federal PSD
and NNSR regulations, and removal of
references to provisions which were
vacated in the New Source Review
(NSR) Reform Rules. These amendments
are contained in Indiana’s PSD rules at
326 IAC 2–2–1, 326 IAC 2–2–2, 326 IAC
2–2–4, 326 IAC 2–2–5, 326 IAC 2–2–7,
326 IAC 2–2–8 and 326 IAC 2–2–10, and
Emission Offset rules at 326 IAC 2–3–
1, 326 IAC 2–3–2, and 326 IAC 2–3–3.
II. What are the changes that EPA is
approving?
On December 31, 2002, EPA
published final rule changes to the PSD
and NSR programs (67 FR 80186) (2002
NSR Reform Rules), and on November 7,
2003, EPA published a notice of final
action on the reconsideration of the
December 31, 2002 final rule changes
(68 FR 63021). After the 2002 NSR
Reform Rules were finalized and
effective (March 3, 2003), various
petitioners challenged numerous
aspects, along with portions of EPA’s
1980 PSD and NNSR Rules (45 FR 5276,
August 7, 1980). On June 24, 2005, the
United States Circuit Court of Appeals
for the DC Circuit Court issued a
decision on the challenges to the 2002
NSR Reform Rules. See New York v.
United States, 413 F.3d 3 (DC Cir. 2005).
In summary, the DC Circuit Court
vacated portions of the 2002 NSR
Reform Rules pertaining to ‘‘clean
units’’ and ‘‘pollution control projects’’
(PCPs), remanded a portion of the
‘‘reasonable possibility’’ provisions (40
CFR 52.21(r)(6) and 40 CFR
51.166(r)(6)), and either upheld or did
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
40243
not comment on the other provisions
included as part of the 2002 NSR
Reform Rules.
On June 13, 2007 (72 FR 32526), EPA
took final action to revise the 2002 NSR
Reform Rules to remove from Federal
law all provisions pertaining to clean
units and the PCP exemption that were
vacated by the DC Circuit Court. In the
final partial approval of the NSR Reform
rules into the Indiana SIP (72 FR 33395),
EPA did not take action on the clean
unit and PCP portions of the rules at
IDEM’s request. Although today’s action
is proposing to approve Indiana’s
removal of these provisions, EPA never
approved them into the SIP. Indiana has
removed the following rules due to
references to clean units and PCPs: 326
IAC 2–2–1(m), (dd)(2)(H), (ii)(6)(D), and
(ll); 326 IAC 2–2–2 (d)(5) and (f); 2–2–
4(a)(3); 2–2–5(b); 2–3–1(j), (y)(2)(H),
(cc)(3)(B)(iii), and (cc)(3)(B)(iv)(EE),(gg);
326 IAC 2–3–2(c)(5) and (l); and 326
IAC 2–3–3(b)(12). Additionally, IDEM
has removed references to clean units
and PCPs in 326 IAC 2–2–4(a) and (b);
2–2–7(a); 2–2–8(b); and 2–2–10; 2–3–
2(m), but the remainder of those
subsections remain intact.
In New York v. United States, the DC
Circuit also remanded EPA’s
‘‘reasonable possibility’’ provision,
which identifies for sources and
reviewing authorities the circumstances
under which a major stationary source
undergoing a modification that does not
trigger major NSR must keep records.
On December 21, 2007, EPA addressed
the Court’s remand, and took final
action to establish that a ‘‘reasonable
possibility’’ applies where source
emissions equal or exceed 50 percent of
the Clean Air Act (CAA) NSR
significance levels for any pollutant (72
FR 72607). See 40 CFR 52.21(r)(b). IDEM
added 326 IAC 2–2–8(b)(6) and 326 IAC
2–3–2(l)(6) to include provisions that
are consistent with EPA’s reasonable
possibility language.
The November 7, 2003,
reconsideration rule added the
definition for ‘‘replacement unit’’ at 40
CFR 52.21 (b)(33), which means an
emissions unit for which all the criteria
listed in paragraphs (b)(33)(i) through
(iv) of this section are met. No creditable
emission reductions shall be generated
from shutting down the existing
emissions unit that is replaced. The
definition has been added to Indiana’s
regulations at 326 IAC 2–2–1(tt) and 326
IAC 2–3–1(nn).
IDEM has also added ‘‘oxides of
nitrogen’’ (unless a NOX waiver is in
effect) to the following sections of the
Emission Offset rules: 326 IAC 2–3–1(p),
(y), (z), (pp); 326 IAC 2–3–2(b) and (g);
and 326 IAC 2–3–3(a)(5)(B). Oxides of
E:\FR\FM\08JYR1.SGM
08JYR1
40244
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 131 / Friday, July 8, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
nitrogen were added pursuant to section
182(f) of the CAA as it is a known
precursor to the formation of ozone.
IDEM’s revisions in 326 IAC 2–2–1
through 2–2–5, 326 IAC 2–2–7, 326 IAC
2–2–8, 326 IAC 2–2–10, and 326 IAC 2–
3–1 through 2–3–3 also include
corrections to grammatical errors, use of
acronyms and corrections to numbering
notations due to several subsections
being added and removed.
III. What action is EPA taking?
EPA is approving the revisions to the
PSD rules at 326–IAC 2–2–1, 326 IAC 2–
2–2, 326 IAC 2–2–4, 326 IAC 2–2–5, 326
IAC 2–2–7, 326 IAC 2–2–8 and 326 IAC
2–2–10, and Emission Offset rules at
326 IAC 2–3–1, 326 IAC 2–3–2, and 326
IAC 2–3–3.
We are publishing this action without
prior proposal because we view this as
a noncontroversial amendment and
anticipate no adverse comments.
However, in the proposed rules section
of this Federal Register publication, we
are publishing a separate document that
will serve as the proposal to approve the
state plan if relevant adverse written
comments are filed. This rule will be
effective September 6, 2011 without
further notice unless we receive relevant
adverse written comments by August 8,
2011. If we receive such comments, we
will withdraw this action before the
effective date by publishing a
subsequent document that will
withdraw the final action. All public
comments received will then be
addressed in a subsequent final rule
based on the proposed action. EPA will
not institute a second comment period.
Any parties interested in commenting
on this action should do so at this time.
Please note that if EPA receives adverse
comment on an amendment, paragraph,
or section of this rule and if that
provision may be severed from the
remainder of the rule, EPA may adopt
as final those provisions of the rule that
are not the subject of an adverse
comment. If we do not receive any
comments, this action will be effective
September 6, 2011.
wreier-aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with RULES
IV. Statutory and executive order
reviews.
Under the CAA, the Administrator is
required to approve a SIP submission
that complies with the provisions of the
CAA and applicable Federal regulations.
42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions,
EPA’s role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the CAA. Accordingly, this action
merely approves state law as meeting
Federal requirements and does not
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:25 Jul 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
impose additional requirements beyond
those imposed by state law. For that
reason, this action:
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget under
Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993);
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the CAA; and
• Does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this rule does not have
Tribal implications as specified by
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249,
November 9, 2000), because the SIP is
not approved to apply in Indian country
located in the state, and EPA notes that
it will not impose substantial direct
costs on Tribal governments or preempt
Tribal law.
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this action and other
required information to the U.S. Senate,
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it
is published in the Federal Register.
This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA,
petitions for judicial review of this
action must be filed in the United States
Court of Appeals for the appropriate
circuit by September 6, 2011. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the
Administrator of this final rule does not
affect the finality of this action for the
purposes of judicial review nor does it
extend the time within which a petition
for judicial review may be filed, and
shall not postpone the effectiveness of
such rule or action. Parties with
objections to this direct final rule are
encouraged to file a comment in
response to the parallel notice of
proposed rulemaking for this action
published in the proposed rules section
of today’s Federal Register, rather than
file an immediate petition for judicial
review of this direct final rule, so that
EPA can withdraw this direct final rule
and address the comment in the
proposed rulemaking. This action may
not be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section
307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference,
Intergovernmental relations, Lead,
Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate
matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile
organic compounds.
Dated: June 28, 2011.
Susan Hedman,
Regional Administrator, Region 5.
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
PART 52—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart P—Indiana
2. In § 52.770 the table in paragraph
(c) is amended by revising the entry for
‘‘Article 2. Permit Review Rules’’ to read
as follows:
■
§ 52.770
*
Identification of plan.
*
*
(c) * * *
E:\FR\FM\08JYR1.SGM
08JYR1
*
*
40245
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 131 / Friday, July 8, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
EPA-APPROVED INDIANA REGULATIONS
Indiana
citation
Indiana
effective date
Subject
*
*
*
EPA approval date
*
Article 2. Permit Review Rules
*
*
Rule 1.1. General Provisions
2–1.1–6 .......
2–1.1–7 .......
2–1.1–8 .......
2–1.1–9.5 ....
Public notice .....................................................
Fees ..................................................................
Time periods for determination on permit applications.
General provisions; term of permit ...................
6/26/1999
9/10/2004
6/26/1999
6/27/2003, 68 FR 38197.
6/18/2007, 72 FR 33395.
6/27/2003, 68 FR 38197.
12/16/2007
10/6/2009, 74 FR 51240.
Rule 2. Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) Requirements
2–2–1 ..........
Definitions .........................................................
10/31/2010
2–2–2 ..........
Applicability .......................................................
10/31/2010
2–2–3 ..........
2–2–4 ..........
Control technology review; requirements .........
Air quality analysis; requirements .....................
9/10/2004
10/31/2010
2–2–5 ..........
Air quality impact; requirements .......................
10/31/2010
2–2–6 ..........
2–2–8 ..........
Increment consumption; requirements .............
Source obligation ..............................................
9/10/2004
10/31/2010
2–2–10 ........
Source information ............................................
10/31/2010
2–2–11
2–2–12
2–2–13
2–2–15
2–2–16
Stack height provisions .....................................
Permit rescission ..............................................
Area designation and redesignation .................
Public participation ............................................
Ambient air ceilings ..........................................
4/22/2001
4/8/2004
4/22/2001
4/22/2001
4/22/2001
........
........
........
........
........
7/8/2011, [Insert page number
ument begins].
7/8/2011, [Insert page number
ument begins].
6/18/2007, 72 FR 33395.
7/8/2011, [Insert page number
ument begins].
7/8/2011, [Insert page number
ument begins].
6/18/2007, 72 FR 33395.
7/8/2011, [Insert page number
ument begins].
7/8/2011, [Insert page number
ument begins].
6/27/2003, 68 FR 38197.
5/20/2004, 69 FR 29071.
6/27/2003, 68 FR 38197.
6/27/2003, 68 FR 38197.
6/27/2003, 68 FR 38197.
where the docwhere the docwhere the docwhere the docwhere the docwhere the doc-
Rule 2.4. Actuals Plantwide Applicability Limitations in Attainment Areas
2–2.4–1
2–2.4–2
2–2.4–3
2–2.4–4
2–2.4–5
2–2.4–6
2–2.4–7
2–2.4–8
.......
.......
.......
.......
.......
.......
.......
.......
2–2.4–9 .......
2–2.4–10 .....
2–2.4–11 .....
2–2.4–12
2–2.4–13
2–2.4–14
2–2.4–15
.....
.....
.....
.....
Applicability .......................................................
Definitions .........................................................
Permit application requirements .......................
General requirements for establishing PALs ....
Public participation requirements for PALs ......
Establishing a 10 year actuals PAL level .........
Contents of the PAL permit ..............................
PAL effective period and reopening of the PAL
permit.
Expiration of a PAL ...........................................
Renewal of a PAL .............................................
Increasing a PAL during the PAL effective period.
Monitoring requirements for PALs ....................
Record keeping requirements ..........................
Reporting and notification requirements ...........
Termination and revocation of a PAL ...............
9/10/2004
9/10/2004
9/10/2004
9/10/2004
9/10/2004
9/10/2004
9/10/2004
9/10/2004
6/18/2007,
6/18/2007,
6/18/2007,
6/18/2007,
6/18/2007,
6/18/2007,
6/18/2007,
6/18/2007,
72
72
72
72
72
72
72
72
9/10/2004
9/10/2004
9/10/2004
6/18/2007, 72 FR 33395.
6/18/2007, 72 FR 33395.
6/18/2007, 72 FR 33395.
9/10/2004
9/10/2004
9/10/2004
9/10/2004
6/18/2007,
6/18/2007,
6/18/2007,
6/18/2007,
72
72
72
72
FR
FR
FR
FR
FR
FR
FR
FR
FR
FR
FR
FR
33395.
33395.
33395.
33395.
33395.
33395.
33395.
33395.
33395.
33395.
33395.
33395.
Rule 3. Emission Offset
Definitions .........................................................
10/31/2010
2–3–2 ..........
Applicability .......................................................
10/31/2010
2–3–3 ..........
wreier-aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with RULES
2–3–1 ..........
Applicable requirements ...................................
10/31/2010
2–3–4 ..........
2–3–5 ..........
Banking of emission offsets ..............................
Location of offsetting emissions .......................
12/13/1993
12/13/1993
7/8/2011, [Insert page number where the document begins].
7/8/2011, [Insert page number where the document begins].
7/8/2011, [Insert page number where the document begins].
10/7/1994, 59 FR 51108.
10/7/1994, 59 FR 51108.
Rule 3.4. Actuals Plantwide Applicability Limitations in Nonattainment Areas
2–3.4–1
2–3.4–2
2–3.4–3
2–3.4–4
2–3.4–5
.......
.......
.......
.......
.......
VerDate Mar<15>2010
Applicability .......................................................
Definitions .........................................................
Permit application requirements .......................
Establishing PALs; general requirements ........
Public participation requirements for PALs ......
15:25 Jul 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00029
9/10/2004
9/10/2004
9/10/2004
9/10/2004
9/10/2004
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
6/18/2007,
6/18/2007,
6/18/2007,
6/18/2007,
6/18/2007,
72
72
72
72
72
FR
FR
FR
FR
FR
33395.
33395.
33395.
33395.
33395.
E:\FR\FM\08JYR1.SGM
08JYR1
Notes
*
40246
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 131 / Friday, July 8, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
EPA-APPROVED INDIANA REGULATIONS—Continued
Indiana
citation
Subject
2–3.4–6 .......
2–3.4–7 .......
2–3.4–8 .......
Establishing a 10 year actuals PAL level .........
Contents of the PAL permit ..............................
PAL effective period and reopening of the PAL
permit.
Expiration of a PAL ...........................................
Renewal of a PAL .............................................
Increasing a PAL during the PAL effective period.
Monitoring requirements for PALs ....................
Record keeping requirements ..........................
Reporting and notification requirements ...........
Termination and revocation of a PAL ...............
2–3.4–9 .......
2–3.4–10 .....
2–3.4–11 .....
2–3.4–12
2–3.4–13
2–3.4–14
2–3.4–15
.....
.....
.....
.....
Indiana
effective date
EPA approval date
9/10/2004
9/10/2004
9/10/2004
6/18/2007, 72 FR 33395.
6/18/2007, 72 FR 33395.
6/18/2007, 72 FR 33395.
9/10/2004
9/10/2004
9/10/2004
6/18/2007, 72 FR 33395.
6/18/2007, 72 FR 33395.
6/18/2007, 72 FR 33395.
9/10/2004
9/10/2004
9/10/2004
9/10/2004
6/18/2007,
6/18/2007,
6/18/2007,
6/18/2007,
Notes
72
72
72
72
FR
FR
FR
FR
33395.
33395.
33395.
33395.
Rule 5.1. Construction of New Sources
2–5.1–4 .......
Transition procedures .......................................
9/10/2004
6/18/2007, 72 FR 33395.
Rule 6. Emission Reporting
2–6–1
2–6–2
2–6–3
2–6–4
2–6–5
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
Applicability .......................................................
Definitions .........................................................
Compliance schedule .......................................
Requirements ....................................................
Additional information requests ........................
8/13/2006
3/27/2004
8/13/2006
8/13/2006
3/27/2004
3/29/2007, 72 FR 14678.
10/29/2004, 69 FR 63069.
3/29/2007, 72 FR 14678.
3/29/2007, 72 FR 14678.
10/29/2004, 69 FR 63069.
Rule 8. Federally Enforceable State Operating Permit Program
2–8–1 ..........
2–8–2 ..........
2–8–3 ..........
2–8–4 ..........
2–8–5 ..........
2–8–6 ..........
2–8–7 ..........
2–8–8 ..........
2–8–9 ..........
2–8–10 ........
2–8–11 ........
2–8–11.1 .....
2–8–12 ........
2–8–13 ........
2–8–14 ........
2–8–15 ........
2–8–16 ........
2–8–17 ........
Definitions .........................................................
Applicability .......................................................
Permit application .............................................
Permit content ...................................................
Compliance requirements for FESOPs ............
Federally enforceable requirements .................
Permit issuance, renewal, and revisions ..........
Permit reopening ..............................................
Permit expiration ...............................................
Administrative permit amendments ..................
Permit modification (Repealed) ........................
Permit revisions ................................................
Emergency provision ........................................
Public notice .....................................................
Review by U.S. EPA .........................................
Operational flexibility .........................................
Fees ..................................................................
Local agencies ..................................................
2–9–1 ..........
2–9–2 ..........
Rule 9. Source Specific Operating Agreement Program
General provisions ............................................
6/24/1994 4/2/1996, 61 FR 14487.
Source specific restrictions and conditions
6/24/1994 4/2/1996, 61 FR 14487 .....................................
(Repealed).
*
*
*
*
*
*
6/24/1994
6/24/1994
6/24/1994
12/16/2007
6/24/1994
6/24/1994
6/24/1994
6/24/1994
6/24/1994
6/24/1994
6/24/1994
6/24/1994
6/24/1994
6/24/1994
6/24/1994
6/24/1994
6/24/1994
6/24/1994
*
*
8/18/1995,
8/18/1995,
8/18/1995,
10/6/2009,
8/18/1995,
8/18/1995,
8/18/1995,
8/18/1995,
8/18/1995,
8/18/1995,
8/18/1995,
8/18/1995,
8/18/1995,
8/18/1995,
8/18/1995,
8/18/1995,
8/18/1995,
8/18/1995,
*
60
60
60
74
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
FR
FR
FR
FR
FR
FR
FR
FR
FR
FR
FR
FR
FR
FR
FR
FR
FR
FR
43008.
43008.
43008.
51240.
43008.
43008.
43008.
43008.
43008.
43008.
43008.
43008.
43008.
43008.
43008.
43008.
43008.
43008.
*
*
ACTION:
SUMMARY:
wreier-aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with RULES
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
[EPA–R05–OAR–2006–0976; FRL–9430–5]
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans; Ohio;
Control of Gasoline Volatility;
Correction
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
AGENCY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:27 Jul 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
*
Final rule; correcting
amendment.
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[FR Doc. 2011–17036 Filed 7–7–11; 8:45 am]
Sec. 2(a),
2(b), and
2(e)
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
This document corrects an
error in the codification in a May 25,
2007, final rule under the Clean Air Act
pertaining to a request for the use of low
Reid Vapor Pressure (RVP) fuel in the
Cincinnati and Dayton areas. Clinton
County, Ohio is actually not part of the
area affected by the rulemaking.
DATES: Effective Date: This final rule is
effective on July 8, 2011.
E:\FR\FM\08JYR1.SGM
08JYR1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 131 (Friday, July 8, 2011)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 40242-40246]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-17036]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R05-OAR-2010-1002; FRL-9430-7]
Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans;
Indiana; Modifications to Indiana Prevention of Significant
Deterioration and Non-attainment New Source Review Rules
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA is approving Indiana's modifications to its Prevention of
Significant Deterioration (PSD) and Nonattainment New Source Review
(NNSR) rules. The amendments include grammatical changes, corrections
to numbering, addition of definitions consistent with Federal PSD and
NNSR regulations, and removal of references to provisions which were
vacated in the Federal rules. Indiana submitted these rule revisions to
EPA for approval on November 24, 2010. They are consistent with the
current Federal PSD and NNSR regulations.
DATES: This direct final rule will be effective September 6, 2011,
unless EPA receives adverse comments by August 8, 2011. If adverse
comments are received, EPA will publish a timely withdrawal of the
direct final rule in the Federal Register informing the public that the
rule will not take effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R05-
OAR-2010-1002, by one of the following methods:
1. https://www.regulations.gov: Follow the on-line instructions for
submitting comments.
2. E-mail: pamela.blakley@epa.gov.
3. Fax: (312) 692-2450.
4. Mail: Pamela Blakley, Chief, Air Permits Section, Air Programs
Branch (AR-18J), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 77 West Jackson
Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604.
5. Hand Delivery: Pamela Blakley, Chief, Air Permits Section, Air
Programs Branch (AR-18J), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 77 West
Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604. Such deliveries are only
accepted during the Regional Office normal hours of operation, and
special arrangements should be made for deliveries of boxed
information. The Regional Office official hours of business are Monday
through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., excluding Federal holidays.
Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA-R05-OAR-
2010-
[[Page 40243]]
1002. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included in
the public docket without change and may be made available online at
https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise protected through https://www.regulations.gov or e-mail. The https://www.regulations.gov Web site
is an ``anonymous access'' system, which means EPA will not know your
identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body of
your comment. If you send an e-mail comment directly to EPA without
going through https://www.regulations.gov your e-mail address will be
automatically captured and included as part of the comment that is
placed in the public docket and made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you include your name
and other contact information in the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA
may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid
the use of special characters, any form of encryption, and be free of
any defects or viruses.
Docket: All documents in the docket are listed in the https://www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such
as copyrighted material, will be publicly available only in hard copy.
Publicly available docket materials are available either electronically
in https://www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Region 5, Air and Radiation Division, 77 West
Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604. This facility is open from
8:30 AM to 4:30 PM, Monday through Friday, excluding Federal holidays.
We recommend that you telephone Charmagne Ackerman, Environmental
Engineer, at (312) 886-0448 before visiting the Region 5 office.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Charmagne Ackerman, Environmental
Engineer, Air Permits Section, Air Programs Branch (AR-18J), U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard,
Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312) 886-0448, ackerman.charmagne@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document whenever ``we,''
``us,'' or ``our'' is used, we mean EPA. This supplementary information
section is arranged as follows:
I. What is being addressed in this document?
II. What are the changes that EPA is approving?
III. What action is EPA taking?
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews.
I. What is being addressed in this document?
We are approving amendments to Indiana's PSD and Emission Offset
regulations. Previously, EPA approved revisions to these regulations
into the State Implementation Plan (SIP) on June 18, 2007 (72 FR
33395). On November 24, 2010, the Indiana Department of Environmental
Management (IDEM) requested that EPA approve PSD and Emission Offset
rule amendments to the SIP. The rule amendments include grammatical
changes, corrections to numbering notation, the addition of definitions
consistent with Federal PSD and NNSR regulations, and removal of
references to provisions which were vacated in the New Source Review
(NSR) Reform Rules. These amendments are contained in Indiana's PSD
rules at 326 IAC 2-2-1, 326 IAC 2-2-2, 326 IAC 2-2-4, 326 IAC 2-2-5,
326 IAC 2-2-7, 326 IAC 2-2-8 and 326 IAC 2-2-10, and Emission Offset
rules at 326 IAC 2-3-1, 326 IAC 2-3-2, and 326 IAC 2-3-3.
II. What are the changes that EPA is approving?
On December 31, 2002, EPA published final rule changes to the PSD
and NSR programs (67 FR 80186) (2002 NSR Reform Rules), and on November
7, 2003, EPA published a notice of final action on the reconsideration
of the December 31, 2002 final rule changes (68 FR 63021). After the
2002 NSR Reform Rules were finalized and effective (March 3, 2003),
various petitioners challenged numerous aspects, along with portions of
EPA's 1980 PSD and NNSR Rules (45 FR 5276, August 7, 1980). On June 24,
2005, the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit
Court issued a decision on the challenges to the 2002 NSR Reform Rules.
See New York v. United States, 413 F.3d 3 (DC Cir. 2005). In summary,
the DC Circuit Court vacated portions of the 2002 NSR Reform Rules
pertaining to ``clean units'' and ``pollution control projects''
(PCPs), remanded a portion of the ``reasonable possibility'' provisions
(40 CFR 52.21(r)(6) and 40 CFR 51.166(r)(6)), and either upheld or did
not comment on the other provisions included as part of the 2002 NSR
Reform Rules.
On June 13, 2007 (72 FR 32526), EPA took final action to revise the
2002 NSR Reform Rules to remove from Federal law all provisions
pertaining to clean units and the PCP exemption that were vacated by
the DC Circuit Court. In the final partial approval of the NSR Reform
rules into the Indiana SIP (72 FR 33395), EPA did not take action on
the clean unit and PCP portions of the rules at IDEM's request.
Although today's action is proposing to approve Indiana's removal of
these provisions, EPA never approved them into the SIP. Indiana has
removed the following rules due to references to clean units and PCPs:
326 IAC 2-2-1(m), (dd)(2)(H), (ii)(6)(D), and (ll); 326 IAC 2-2-2
(d)(5) and (f); 2-2-4(a)(3); 2-2-5(b); 2-3-1(j), (y)(2)(H),
(cc)(3)(B)(iii), and (cc)(3)(B)(iv)(EE),(gg); 326 IAC 2-3-2(c)(5) and
(l); and 326 IAC 2-3-3(b)(12). Additionally, IDEM has removed
references to clean units and PCPs in 326 IAC 2-2-4(a) and (b); 2-2-
7(a); 2-2-8(b); and 2-2-10; 2-3-2(m), but the remainder of those
subsections remain intact.
In New York v. United States, the DC Circuit also remanded EPA's
``reasonable possibility'' provision, which identifies for sources and
reviewing authorities the circumstances under which a major stationary
source undergoing a modification that does not trigger major NSR must
keep records. On December 21, 2007, EPA addressed the Court's remand,
and took final action to establish that a ``reasonable possibility''
applies where source emissions equal or exceed 50 percent of the Clean
Air Act (CAA) NSR significance levels for any pollutant (72 FR 72607).
See 40 CFR 52.21(r)(b). IDEM added 326 IAC 2-2-8(b)(6) and 326 IAC 2-3-
2(l)(6) to include provisions that are consistent with EPA's reasonable
possibility language.
The November 7, 2003, reconsideration rule added the definition for
``replacement unit'' at 40 CFR 52.21 (b)(33), which means an emissions
unit for which all the criteria listed in paragraphs (b)(33)(i) through
(iv) of this section are met. No creditable emission reductions shall
be generated from shutting down the existing emissions unit that is
replaced. The definition has been added to Indiana's regulations at 326
IAC 2-2-1(tt) and 326 IAC 2-3-1(nn).
IDEM has also added ``oxides of nitrogen'' (unless a NOX
waiver is in effect) to the following sections of the Emission Offset
rules: 326 IAC 2-3-1(p), (y), (z), (pp); 326 IAC 2-3-2(b) and (g); and
326 IAC 2-3-3(a)(5)(B). Oxides of
[[Page 40244]]
nitrogen were added pursuant to section 182(f) of the CAA as it is a
known precursor to the formation of ozone.
IDEM's revisions in 326 IAC 2-2-1 through 2-2-5, 326 IAC 2-2-7, 326
IAC 2-2-8, 326 IAC 2-2-10, and 326 IAC 2-3-1 through 2-3-3 also include
corrections to grammatical errors, use of acronyms and corrections to
numbering notations due to several subsections being added and removed.
III. What action is EPA taking?
EPA is approving the revisions to the PSD rules at 326-IAC 2-2-1,
326 IAC 2-2-2, 326 IAC 2-2-4, 326 IAC 2-2-5, 326 IAC 2-2-7, 326 IAC 2-
2-8 and 326 IAC 2-2-10, and Emission Offset rules at 326 IAC 2-3-1, 326
IAC 2-3-2, and 326 IAC 2-3-3.
We are publishing this action without prior proposal because we
view this as a noncontroversial amendment and anticipate no adverse
comments. However, in the proposed rules section of this Federal
Register publication, we are publishing a separate document that will
serve as the proposal to approve the state plan if relevant adverse
written comments are filed. This rule will be effective September 6,
2011 without further notice unless we receive relevant adverse written
comments by August 8, 2011. If we receive such comments, we will
withdraw this action before the effective date by publishing a
subsequent document that will withdraw the final action. All public
comments received will then be addressed in a subsequent final rule
based on the proposed action. EPA will not institute a second comment
period. Any parties interested in commenting on this action should do
so at this time. Please note that if EPA receives adverse comment on an
amendment, paragraph, or section of this rule and if that provision may
be severed from the remainder of the rule, EPA may adopt as final those
provisions of the rule that are not the subject of an adverse comment.
If we do not receive any comments, this action will be effective
September 6, 2011.
IV. Statutory and executive order reviews.
Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the CAA and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this
action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and
does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state
law. For that reason, this action:
Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993);
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the CAA; and
Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this rule does not have Tribal implications as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000),
because the SIP is not approved to apply in Indian country located in
the state, and EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct
costs on Tribal governments or preempt Tribal law.
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for
the appropriate circuit by September 6, 2011. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect
the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor
does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may
be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or
action. Parties with objections to this direct final rule are
encouraged to file a comment in response to the parallel notice of
proposed rulemaking for this action published in the proposed rules
section of today's Federal Register, rather than file an immediate
petition for judicial review of this direct final rule, so that EPA can
withdraw this direct final rule and address the comment in the proposed
rulemaking. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Lead, Nitrogen
dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile organic compounds.
Dated: June 28, 2011.
Susan Hedman,
Regional Administrator, Region 5.
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
PART 52--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart P--Indiana
0
2. In Sec. 52.770 the table in paragraph (c) is amended by revising
the entry for ``Article 2. Permit Review Rules'' to read as follows:
Sec. 52.770 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
[[Page 40245]]
EPA-Approved Indiana Regulations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Indiana
Indiana citation Subject effective date EPA approval date Notes
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
Article 2. Permit Review Rules
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rule 1.1. General Provisions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2-1.1-6................... Public notice............ 6/26/1999 6/27/2003, 68 FR 38197...
2-1.1-7................... Fees..................... 9/10/2004 6/18/2007, 72 FR 33395...
2-1.1-8................... Time periods for 6/26/1999 6/27/2003, 68 FR 38197...
determination on permit
applications.
2-1.1-9.5................. General provisions; term 12/16/2007 10/6/2009, 74 FR 51240...
of permit.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rule 2. Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) Requirements
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2-2-1..................... Definitions.............. 10/31/2010 7/8/2011, [Insert page
number where the
document begins].
2-2-2..................... Applicability............ 10/31/2010 7/8/2011, [Insert page
number where the
document begins].
2-2-3..................... Control technology 9/10/2004 6/18/2007, 72 FR 33395...
review; requirements.
2-2-4..................... Air quality analysis; 10/31/2010 7/8/2011, [Insert page
requirements. number where the
document begins].
2-2-5..................... Air quality impact; 10/31/2010 7/8/2011, [Insert page
requirements. number where the
document begins].
2-2-6..................... Increment consumption; 9/10/2004 6/18/2007, 72 FR 33395...
requirements.
2-2-8..................... Source obligation........ 10/31/2010 7/8/2011, [Insert page
number where the
document begins].
2-2-10.................... Source information....... 10/31/2010 7/8/2011, [Insert page
number where the
document begins].
2-2-11.................... Stack height provisions.. 4/22/2001 6/27/2003, 68 FR 38197...
2-2-12.................... Permit rescission........ 4/8/2004 5/20/2004, 69 FR 29071...
2-2-13.................... Area designation and 4/22/2001 6/27/2003, 68 FR 38197...
redesignation.
2-2-15.................... Public participation..... 4/22/2001 6/27/2003, 68 FR 38197...
2-2-16.................... Ambient air ceilings..... 4/22/2001 6/27/2003, 68 FR 38197...
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rule 2.4. Actuals Plantwide Applicability Limitations in Attainment Areas
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2-2.4-1................... Applicability............ 9/10/2004 6/18/2007, 72 FR 33395...
2-2.4-2................... Definitions.............. 9/10/2004 6/18/2007, 72 FR 33395...
2-2.4-3................... Permit application 9/10/2004 6/18/2007, 72 FR 33395...
requirements.
2-2.4-4................... General requirements for 9/10/2004 6/18/2007, 72 FR 33395...
establishing PALs.
2-2.4-5................... Public participation 9/10/2004 6/18/2007, 72 FR 33395...
requirements for PALs.
2-2.4-6................... Establishing a 10 year 9/10/2004 6/18/2007, 72 FR 33395...
actuals PAL level.
2-2.4-7................... Contents of the PAL 9/10/2004 6/18/2007, 72 FR 33395...
permit.
2-2.4-8................... PAL effective period and 9/10/2004 6/18/2007, 72 FR 33395...
reopening of the PAL
permit.
2-2.4-9................... Expiration of a PAL...... 9/10/2004 6/18/2007, 72 FR 33395...
2-2.4-10.................. Renewal of a PAL......... 9/10/2004 6/18/2007, 72 FR 33395...
2-2.4-11.................. Increasing a PAL during 9/10/2004 6/18/2007, 72 FR 33395...
the PAL effective period.
2-2.4-12.................. Monitoring requirements 9/10/2004 6/18/2007, 72 FR 33395...
for PALs.
2-2.4-13.................. Record keeping 9/10/2004 6/18/2007, 72 FR 33395...
requirements.
2-2.4-14.................. Reporting and 9/10/2004 6/18/2007, 72 FR 33395...
notification
requirements.
2-2.4-15.................. Termination and 9/10/2004 6/18/2007, 72 FR 33395...
revocation of a PAL.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rule 3. Emission Offset
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2-3-1..................... Definitions.............. 10/31/2010 7/8/2011, [Insert page
number where the
document begins].
2-3-2..................... Applicability............ 10/31/2010 7/8/2011, [Insert page
number where the
document begins].
2-3-3..................... Applicable requirements.. 10/31/2010 7/8/2011, [Insert page
number where the
document begins].
2-3-4..................... Banking of emission 12/13/1993 10/7/1994, 59 FR 51108...
offsets.
2-3-5..................... Location of offsetting 12/13/1993 10/7/1994, 59 FR 51108...
emissions.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rule 3.4. Actuals Plantwide Applicability Limitations in Nonattainment Areas
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2-3.4-1................... Applicability............ 9/10/2004 6/18/2007, 72 FR 33395...
2-3.4-2................... Definitions.............. 9/10/2004 6/18/2007, 72 FR 33395...
2-3.4-3................... Permit application 9/10/2004 6/18/2007, 72 FR 33395...
requirements.
2-3.4-4................... Establishing PALs; 9/10/2004 6/18/2007, 72 FR 33395...
general requirements.
2-3.4-5................... Public participation 9/10/2004 6/18/2007, 72 FR 33395...
requirements for PALs.
[[Page 40246]]
2-3.4-6................... Establishing a 10 year 9/10/2004 6/18/2007, 72 FR 33395...
actuals PAL level.
2-3.4-7................... Contents of the PAL 9/10/2004 6/18/2007, 72 FR 33395...
permit.
2-3.4-8................... PAL effective period and 9/10/2004 6/18/2007, 72 FR 33395...
reopening of the PAL
permit.
2-3.4-9................... Expiration of a PAL...... 9/10/2004 6/18/2007, 72 FR 33395...
2-3.4-10.................. Renewal of a PAL......... 9/10/2004 6/18/2007, 72 FR 33395...
2-3.4-11.................. Increasing a PAL during 9/10/2004 6/18/2007, 72 FR 33395...
the PAL effective period.
2-3.4-12.................. Monitoring requirements 9/10/2004 6/18/2007, 72 FR 33395...
for PALs.
2-3.4-13.................. Record keeping 9/10/2004 6/18/2007, 72 FR 33395...
requirements.
2-3.4-14.................. Reporting and 9/10/2004 6/18/2007, 72 FR 33395...
notification
requirements.
2-3.4-15.................. Termination and 9/10/2004 6/18/2007, 72 FR 33395...
revocation of a PAL.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rule 5.1. Construction of New Sources
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2-5.1-4................... Transition procedures.... 9/10/2004 6/18/2007, 72 FR 33395...
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rule 6. Emission Reporting
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2-6-1..................... Applicability............ 8/13/2006 3/29/2007, 72 FR 14678...
2-6-2..................... Definitions.............. 3/27/2004 10/29/2004, 69 FR 63069..
2-6-3..................... Compliance schedule...... 8/13/2006 3/29/2007, 72 FR 14678...
2-6-4..................... Requirements............. 8/13/2006 3/29/2007, 72 FR 14678...
2-6-5..................... Additional information 3/27/2004 10/29/2004, 69 FR 63069..
requests.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rule 8. Federally Enforceable State Operating Permit Program
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2-8-1..................... Definitions.............. 6/24/1994 8/18/1995, 60 FR 43008...
2-8-2..................... Applicability............ 6/24/1994 8/18/1995, 60 FR 43008...
2-8-3..................... Permit application....... 6/24/1994 8/18/1995, 60 FR 43008...
2-8-4..................... Permit content........... 12/16/2007 10/6/2009, 74 FR 51240...
2-8-5..................... Compliance requirements 6/24/1994 8/18/1995, 60 FR 43008...
for FESOPs.
2-8-6..................... Federally enforceable 6/24/1994 8/18/1995, 60 FR 43008...
requirements.
2-8-7..................... Permit issuance, renewal, 6/24/1994 8/18/1995, 60 FR 43008...
and revisions.
2-8-8..................... Permit reopening......... 6/24/1994 8/18/1995, 60 FR 43008...
2-8-9..................... Permit expiration........ 6/24/1994 8/18/1995, 60 FR 43008...
2-8-10.................... Administrative permit 6/24/1994 8/18/1995, 60 FR 43008...
amendments.
2-8-11.................... Permit modification 6/24/1994 8/18/1995, 60 FR 43008...
(Repealed).
2-8-11.1.................. Permit revisions......... 6/24/1994 8/18/1995, 60 FR 43008...
2-8-12.................... Emergency provision...... 6/24/1994 8/18/1995, 60 FR 43008...
2-8-13.................... Public notice............ 6/24/1994 8/18/1995, 60 FR 43008...
2-8-14.................... Review by U.S. EPA....... 6/24/1994 8/18/1995, 60 FR 43008...
2-8-15.................... Operational flexibility.. 6/24/1994 8/18/1995, 60 FR 43008...
2-8-16.................... Fees..................... 6/24/1994 8/18/1995, 60 FR 43008...
2-8-17.................... Local agencies........... 6/24/1994 8/18/1995, 60 FR 43008...
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rule 9. Source Specific Operating Agreement Program
2-9-1..................... General provisions....... 6/24/1994 4/2/1996, 61 FR 14487....
2-9-2..................... Source specific 6/24/1994 4/2/1996, 61 FR 14487.... Sec. 2(a),
restrictions and 2(b), and
conditions (Repealed). 2(e)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2011-17036 Filed 7-7-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
