International Fisheries; Pacific Tuna Fisheries; Recommendations Adopted by the Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission, 39808-39810 [2011-17079]
Download as PDF
wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with PROPOSALS_PART 1
39808
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 130 / Thursday, July 7, 2011 / Proposed Rules
• The habitat components (primary
constituent elements) essential to the
conservation of the species, such as
specific soil characteristics, plant
associations, or pollinators, and the
quantity and spatial arrangement of
these features on the landscape needed
to provide for the conservation of the
species;
• What areas not occupied at the time
of listing are essential for the
conservation of the species, if any, and
why; and
• Special management considerations
or protections that the features essential
to the conservation of Lepidium
papilliferum may require, including
managing for the potential effects of
climate change.
(3) Land use designations and current
or planned activities in the subject areas
and their possible impacts on proposed
critical habitat.
(4) Any probable economic, national
security, or other relevant impacts of
designating any area that may be
included in the final designation. We
are particularly interested in any
impacts on small entities, and the
benefits of including or excluding areas
that are subject to these impacts.
(5) Whether the benefits of excluding
any particular area from critical habitat
outweigh the benefits of including that
area in critical habitat under section
4(b)(2) of the Act, after considering both
the potential impacts and benefits of the
proposed critical habitat designation.
Under section 4(b)(2) of the Act, we may
exclude an area from critical habitat if
we determine that the benefits of such
exclusion outweigh the benefits of
including that particular area as critical
habitat, unless failure to designate that
specific area as critical habitat will
result in the extinction of the species.
We are considering the possible
exclusion of areas under private
ownership, in particular, as we
anticipate the benefits of exclusion may
outweigh the benefits of inclusion in
those areas. We, therefore, request
specific information on:
• The benefits of including any
specific areas in the final designation
and supporting rationale;
• The benefits of excluding any
specific areas from the final designation
and supporting rationale; and
• Whether any specific exclusions
may result in the extinction of the
species and why.
(6) The use of Public Land Survey
System quarter-quarter sections to
delineate the proposed critical habitat
designation; we used quarter-quarter
sections in this proposed rule because
they are the most commonly used
minimum size and method for
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:25 Jul 06, 2011
Jkt 223001
delineating land ownership boundaries
within the range of Lepidium
papilliferum.
(7) Information on the projected and
reasonably likely impacts of climate
change on Lepidium papilliferum and
on the critical habitat areas we are
proposing.
(8) Whether we could improve or
modify our approach to designating
critical habitat in any way to provide for
greater public participation and
understanding, or to better
accommodate public concerns and
comment.
Our final determination concerning
critical habitat for Lepidium
papilliferum will take into
consideration all written comments we
receive during the comment period,
including comments from peer
reviewers, comments we receive during
any public hearing should one be
requested, and any additional
information we receive during the
extended comment period. All
comments will be included in the
public record for this rulemaking. On
the basis of peer reviewer and public
comments, we may, during the
development of our final determination,
find that areas within the proposed
designation do not meet the definition
of critical habitat, that some
modifications to the described
boundaries are appropriate, or that areas
may or may not be appropriate for
exclusion under section 4(b)(2) of the
Act.
You may submit your comments and
materials concerning our proposed rule
by one of the methods listed in the
ADDRESSES section. We request that you
send comments only by the methods
described in the ADDRESSES section.
If you submit a comment via https://
www.regulations.gov, your entire
submission—including any personal
identifying information—will be posted
on the Web site. If your submission is
made via a hardcopy that includes
personal identifying information, you
may request at the top of your document
that we withhold this personal
identifying information from public
review. However, we cannot guarantee
that we will be able to do so. We will
post all hardcopy submissions on
https://www.regulations.gov. Please
include sufficient information with your
comments to allow us to verify any
scientific or commercial information
you include.
Comments and materials we receive,
as well as supporting documentation we
used in preparing the proposed rule,
will be available for public inspection
on https://www.regulations.gov, or by
appointment, during normal business
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
hours, at the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service, Idaho Fish and Wildlife Office
(see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT).
We will take into consideration all
comments and any additional
information we received during this
extended comment period on the
proposed rule during the preparation of
a final rulemaking. Accordingly, the
final decision may differ from the
proposal.
Authors
The primary authors of this notice are
the staff members of the Idaho Fish and
Wildlife Office (see FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section).
Authority: The authority for this action is
the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as
amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).
Dated: June 24, 2011.
Rachel Jacobson,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Fish and
Wildlife and Parks.
[FR Doc. 2011–16748 Filed 7–6–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 300
Docket No. 110620342–1340–02]
RIN 0648–BA66
International Fisheries; Pacific Tuna
Fisheries; Recommendations Adopted
by the Inter-American Tropical Tuna
Commission
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Advanced Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking; request for comments.
AGENCY:
NMFS is requesting public
comment on certain amendments under
consideration for the regulations
governing the longline and purse seine
fisheries targeting tuna and tuna-like
species in the eastern Pacific Ocean
(EPO) to conform to recommendations
adopted by the Inter-American Tropical
Tuna Commission (IATTC). This
rulemaking would be issued under
authority of the Tuna Conventions Act
of 1950. At its Eighty-first Meeting, held
in September 2010, members of the
IATTC adopted three recommendations.
This ANPR discusses two of these
decisions, the Recommendation on
Tuna Conservation 2011–2013 (C–10–
01) and the Recommendation
Prohibiting Fishing on Data Buoys (C–
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\07JYP1.SGM
07JYP1
wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with PROPOSALS_PART 1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 130 / Thursday, July 7, 2011 / Proposed Rules
10–03), which would require
rulemaking to implement domestically.
DATES: Comments must be submitted in
writing by July 27, 2011.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by 0648–BA66, by any one of
the following methods:
• Electronic Submissions: Submit all
electronic public comments via the
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov.
• Fax: 562–980–4047, Attn: Heidi
Hermsmeyer.
• Mail: Rodney R. McInnis, Regional
Administrator, NMFS Southwest
Regional Office (SWR), 501 W. Ocean
Blvd., Suite 4200, Long Beach, CA
90802. Include the identifier ‘‘0648–
BA66’’ in the comments.
Instructions: All comments received
are a part of the public record and will
generally be posted to https://
www.regulations.gov without change.
All Personal Identifying Information (for
example, name, address, etc.)
voluntarily submitted by the commenter
may be publicly accessible. Do not
submit Confidential Business
Information or otherwise sensitive or
protected information.
NMFS will accept anonymous
comments (enter N/A in the required
fields, if you wish to remain
anonymous). You may submit
attachments to electronic comments in
Microsoft Word, Excel, WordPerfect, or
Adobe PDF file formats only.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Heidi Hermsmeyer, NMFS SWR, 562–
980–4036.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: At its
Eighty-first Meeting, held in September
2010, members of the IATTC adopted
the following three recommendations:
(1) Recommendation on Tuna
Conservation 2011–2013 (C–10–01); (2)
Recommendation on Seabirds (C–10–
02); and (3) Recommendation
Prohibiting Fishing on Data Buoys (C–
10–03). Recommendation C–10–02
established measures to mitigate the
impact of the longline fishery on
seabirds, which are similar to those in
place in the Western and Central Pacific
Fisheries Commission (WCPFC)
Convention Area. The United States has
domestic seabird conservation measures
in place for U.S. longline fisheries that
operate in the EPO that satisfy the
recommendations adopted in
Recommendation C–10–02, thus no
additional regulatory action is required
to implement this recommendation. The
United States is considering amending
regulations to implement IATTC
Recommendations C–10–01 and C–10–
03. While this is the preferred course of
action at this time, the United States is
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:25 Jul 06, 2011
Jkt 223001
also considering not amending the
regulations currently in effect, which
implement IATTC Resolution C–09–01,
or removing those regulations. The
United States is considering these
alternatives because there has been
some uncertainty regarding whether
Resolution C–09–01 required
ratification by the IATTC in 2010 to
remain effective in 2011, and whether
Recommendation C–10–01 replaced
Resolution C–09–01 for all intents and
purposes. All active resolutions and
recommendations are available on the
following IATTC Web site: https://
www.iattc.org/
ResolutionsActiveENG.htm.
Potential Changes to Tuna Conservation
Measures for 2011–2013
The Recommendation on Tuna
Conservation for 2011–2013 is very
similar to the Resolution on a
Multiannual Program for the
Conservation of Tuna in the Eastern
Pacific Ocean in 2009–2011 (IATTC
Resolution C–09–01), which was
adopted in 2009 by the IATTC. The
United States implemented IATTC
Resolution C–09–01 in November 2010
(74 FR 61046, November 23, 2009).
Similar to Resolution C–09–01, the main
objectives of Recommendation C–10–01
are to limit the fishing mortality of
yellowfin tuna (Thunnus albacares) and
to reduce the fishing mortality of bigeye
tuna (Thunnus obesus) in the EPO. The
measures are based in part on the
recommendations and analysis of
IATTC scientific staff and the 2010
stock assessments of bigeye and
yellowfin tuna completed by IATTC
staff. The differences between
Recommendation C–10–01 and
Resolution C–09–01 that are being
considered for rulemaking are: (1) A
change in the length of the closure
period of the IATTC Convention Area
for tuna purse seine vessels class sizes
4–6 (182 metric tons carrying capacity
or greater) in 2011 from 73 days to 62
days and continuation of that closure
period in 2012 and 2013; (2)
continuation of the annual 500 metric
ton bigeye tuna quota in the longline
fishery for vessels over 24 meters in
length from 2011–2013; and (3) renewal
of the tuna retention program for 2011
that requires all bigeye, skipjack, and
yellowfin tuna caught by a U.S. purse
seine vessel of class sizes 4–6 (i.e.,
larger than 182 cubic meters carrying
capacity) be retained on board and
landed, except fish deemed unfit for
human consumption for reasons other
than size. The single exemption for this
would be the final set of a trip, when
there may be insufficient well space
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
39809
remaining to accommodate all the tuna
caught in that set. Additionally, NMFS
is considering giving vessel owners the
option of choosing between the two
possible purse seine closure periods that
were established under IATTC
Recommendation C–10–01 for each
applicable year, rather than requiring
the entire U.S. fleet to adhere to the later
closure period as was done in 2009 and
2010. It appears that most, if not all,
other members of the IATTC are
implementing the closure period on a
vessel-by-vessel basis since it provides
fleets with greater flexibility. The two
options would be July 29 to September
28, or November 18 to January 18 of the
following year for 2011, 2012, and 2013.
Potential Prohibition on Fishing
Around Data Buoys
The main objective of the
Recommendation Prohibiting Fishing on
Data Buoys is to stop vandalism and
damage to data buoys from fishing
vessels that often leads to loss of data
critical to weather forecasting, tsunami
warnings, search and rescue efforts, and
research of the marine environment and
that IATTC members expend time and
resources to locate, replace, and repair
data buoys damaged or lost by fishing
methods or vandalism.
Recommendation C–10–03 defines data
buoys as floating devices, either drifting
or anchored, that are deployed by
governmental or recognized scientific
organizations or entities for the purpose
of electronically collecting
environmental data, and not in support
of fishing activities.
Recommendation C–10–03 urges
members to prohibit fishing vessels
from fishing within one nautical mile of,
or interacting with, a data buoy in the
EPO. A possible rulemaking action
would: (1) Prohibit encircling a data
buoy with fishing gear, tying up to or
attaching the vessel, or any fishing gear,
part or portion of the vessel, to a data
buoy, and, if the buoy is anchored,
cutting its anchor line; (2) prohibit
fishing vessels from taking on board a
data buoy, unless specifically
authorized or requested to do so by a
member or cooperating non-member of
the IATTC or owner responsible for that
buoy; (3) encourage fishing vessels
operating in the EPO to keep watch for
data buoys at sea and to take all
reasonable measures to avoid fishing
gear entanglement or directly interacting
in any way with those data buoys; and
(4) require fishing vessels that become
entangled with a data buoy to remove
the entangled fishing gear with as little
damage to the data buoy as possible.
However, any scientific research
program would be allowed to operate
E:\FR\FM\07JYP1.SGM
07JYP1
39810
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 130 / Thursday, July 7, 2011 / Proposed Rules
fishing vessels within one nautical mile
of a data buoy, provided the IATTC
Secretariat is notified in advance about
the operation and the fishing gear/vessel
does not interact with a data buoy.
Executive Order 12866: This action
has been determined to be not
significant under EO 12866.
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 951 et seq.
Dated: June 30, 2011.
John Oliver,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for
Operations, National Marine Fisheries
Service.
[FR Doc. 2011–17079 Filed 7–6–11; 8:45 am]
wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with PROPOSALS_PART 1
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:25 Jul 06, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
E:\FR\FM\07JYP1.SGM
07JYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 130 (Thursday, July 7, 2011)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 39808-39810]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-17079]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
50 CFR Part 300
Docket No. 110620342-1340-02]
RIN 0648-BA66
International Fisheries; Pacific Tuna Fisheries; Recommendations
Adopted by the Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: NMFS is requesting public comment on certain amendments under
consideration for the regulations governing the longline and purse
seine fisheries targeting tuna and tuna-like species in the eastern
Pacific Ocean (EPO) to conform to recommendations adopted by the Inter-
American Tropical Tuna Commission (IATTC). This rulemaking would be
issued under authority of the Tuna Conventions Act of 1950. At its
Eighty-first Meeting, held in September 2010, members of the IATTC
adopted three recommendations. This ANPR discusses two of these
decisions, the Recommendation on Tuna Conservation 2011-2013 (C-10-01)
and the Recommendation Prohibiting Fishing on Data Buoys (C-
[[Page 39809]]
10-03), which would require rulemaking to implement domestically.
DATES: Comments must be submitted in writing by July 27, 2011.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by 0648-BA66, by any one
of the following methods:
Electronic Submissions: Submit all electronic public
comments via the Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Fax: 562-980-4047, Attn: Heidi Hermsmeyer.
Mail: Rodney R. McInnis, Regional Administrator, NMFS
Southwest Regional Office (SWR), 501 W. Ocean Blvd., Suite 4200, Long
Beach, CA 90802. Include the identifier ``0648-BA66'' in the comments.
Instructions: All comments received are a part of the public record
and will generally be posted to https://www.regulations.gov without
change. All Personal Identifying Information (for example, name,
address, etc.) voluntarily submitted by the commenter may be publicly
accessible. Do not submit Confidential Business Information or
otherwise sensitive or protected information.
NMFS will accept anonymous comments (enter N/A in the required
fields, if you wish to remain anonymous). You may submit attachments to
electronic comments in Microsoft Word, Excel, WordPerfect, or Adobe PDF
file formats only.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Heidi Hermsmeyer, NMFS SWR, 562-980-
4036.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: At its Eighty-first Meeting, held in
September 2010, members of the IATTC adopted the following three
recommendations: (1) Recommendation on Tuna Conservation 2011-2013 (C-
10-01); (2) Recommendation on Seabirds (C-10-02); and (3)
Recommendation Prohibiting Fishing on Data Buoys (C-10-03).
Recommendation C-10-02 established measures to mitigate the impact of
the longline fishery on seabirds, which are similar to those in place
in the Western and Central Pacific Fisheries Commission (WCPFC)
Convention Area. The United States has domestic seabird conservation
measures in place for U.S. longline fisheries that operate in the EPO
that satisfy the recommendations adopted in Recommendation C-10-02,
thus no additional regulatory action is required to implement this
recommendation. The United States is considering amending regulations
to implement IATTC Recommendations C-10-01 and C-10-03. While this is
the preferred course of action at this time, the United States is also
considering not amending the regulations currently in effect, which
implement IATTC Resolution C-09-01, or removing those regulations. The
United States is considering these alternatives because there has been
some uncertainty regarding whether Resolution C-09-01 required
ratification by the IATTC in 2010 to remain effective in 2011, and
whether Recommendation C-10-01 replaced Resolution C-09-01 for all
intents and purposes. All active resolutions and recommendations are
available on the following IATTC Web site: https://www.iattc.org/ResolutionsActiveENG.htm.
Potential Changes to Tuna Conservation Measures for 2011-2013
The Recommendation on Tuna Conservation for 2011-2013 is very
similar to the Resolution on a Multiannual Program for the Conservation
of Tuna in the Eastern Pacific Ocean in 2009-2011 (IATTC Resolution C-
09-01), which was adopted in 2009 by the IATTC. The United States
implemented IATTC Resolution C-09-01 in November 2010 (74 FR 61046,
November 23, 2009). Similar to Resolution C-09-01, the main objectives
of Recommendation C-10-01 are to limit the fishing mortality of
yellowfin tuna (Thunnus albacares) and to reduce the fishing mortality
of bigeye tuna (Thunnus obesus) in the EPO. The measures are based in
part on the recommendations and analysis of IATTC scientific staff and
the 2010 stock assessments of bigeye and yellowfin tuna completed by
IATTC staff. The differences between Recommendation C-10-01 and
Resolution C-09-01 that are being considered for rulemaking are: (1) A
change in the length of the closure period of the IATTC Convention Area
for tuna purse seine vessels class sizes 4-6 (182 metric tons carrying
capacity or greater) in 2011 from 73 days to 62 days and continuation
of that closure period in 2012 and 2013; (2) continuation of the annual
500 metric ton bigeye tuna quota in the longline fishery for vessels
over 24 meters in length from 2011-2013; and (3) renewal of the tuna
retention program for 2011 that requires all bigeye, skipjack, and
yellowfin tuna caught by a U.S. purse seine vessel of class sizes 4-6
(i.e., larger than 182 cubic meters carrying capacity) be retained on
board and landed, except fish deemed unfit for human consumption for
reasons other than size. The single exemption for this would be the
final set of a trip, when there may be insufficient well space
remaining to accommodate all the tuna caught in that set. Additionally,
NMFS is considering giving vessel owners the option of choosing between
the two possible purse seine closure periods that were established
under IATTC Recommendation C-10-01 for each applicable year, rather
than requiring the entire U.S. fleet to adhere to the later closure
period as was done in 2009 and 2010. It appears that most, if not all,
other members of the IATTC are implementing the closure period on a
vessel-by-vessel basis since it provides fleets with greater
flexibility. The two options would be July 29 to September 28, or
November 18 to January 18 of the following year for 2011, 2012, and
2013.
Potential Prohibition on Fishing Around Data Buoys
The main objective of the Recommendation Prohibiting Fishing on
Data Buoys is to stop vandalism and damage to data buoys from fishing
vessels that often leads to loss of data critical to weather
forecasting, tsunami warnings, search and rescue efforts, and research
of the marine environment and that IATTC members expend time and
resources to locate, replace, and repair data buoys damaged or lost by
fishing methods or vandalism. Recommendation C-10-03 defines data buoys
as floating devices, either drifting or anchored, that are deployed by
governmental or recognized scientific organizations or entities for the
purpose of electronically collecting environmental data, and not in
support of fishing activities.
Recommendation C-10-03 urges members to prohibit fishing vessels
from fishing within one nautical mile of, or interacting with, a data
buoy in the EPO. A possible rulemaking action would: (1) Prohibit
encircling a data buoy with fishing gear, tying up to or attaching the
vessel, or any fishing gear, part or portion of the vessel, to a data
buoy, and, if the buoy is anchored, cutting its anchor line; (2)
prohibit fishing vessels from taking on board a data buoy, unless
specifically authorized or requested to do so by a member or
cooperating non-member of the IATTC or owner responsible for that buoy;
(3) encourage fishing vessels operating in the EPO to keep watch for
data buoys at sea and to take all reasonable measures to avoid fishing
gear entanglement or directly interacting in any way with those data
buoys; and (4) require fishing vessels that become entangled with a
data buoy to remove the entangled fishing gear with as little damage to
the data buoy as possible. However, any scientific research program
would be allowed to operate
[[Page 39810]]
fishing vessels within one nautical mile of a data buoy, provided the
IATTC Secretariat is notified in advance about the operation and the
fishing gear/vessel does not interact with a data buoy.
Executive Order 12866: This action has been determined to be not
significant under EO 12866.
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 951 et seq.
Dated: June 30, 2011.
John Oliver,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for Operations, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2011-17079 Filed 7-6-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P