Integrated Resource Plan, 39470-39472 [2011-16840]
Download as PDF
39470
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 129 / Wednesday, July 6, 2011 / Notices
(e)(1), (e)(4)(G), (e)(4)(H), (e)(4)(I) and (f)
2007). See 22 CFR 171.36(b)(1), (b)(2),
and (b)(3) (2007).
[FR Doc. 2011–16898 Filed 7–5–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710–24–P
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
[Public Notice 7514]
Waiver of Restriction on Assistance to
the Central Government of Uzbekistan
Pursuant to Section 7086(c)(2) of the
Department of State, Foreign
Operations, and Related Programs
Appropriations Act, 2010 (Division F,
Pub. L.111–117), as carried forward by
the Full-Year Continuing
Appropriations Act, 2011 (Div. B, Pub.
L. 112–10) (‘‘the Act’’), and Department
of State Delegation of Authority Number
245–1, I hereby determine that it is
important to the national interest of the
United States to waive the requirements
of Section 7086(c)(1) of the Act with
respect to Uzbekistan and I hereby
waive such restriction.
This determination shall be reported
to the Congress, and published in the
Federal Register.
Dated: June 24, 2011.
Thomas Nides,
Deputy Secretary of State for Management
and Resources.
[FR Doc. 2011–16900 Filed 7–5–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710–31–P
TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY
Integrated Resource Plan
Tennessee Valley Authority.
Issuance of Record of Decision.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
This notice is provided in
accordance with the Council on
Environmental Quality’s regulations (40
CFR parts 1500 to 1508) and TVA’s
procedures for implementing the
National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA). TVA has decided to adopt the
preferred alternative in its final
environmental impact statement (EIS)
for the Integrated Resource Plan (IRP).
The notice of availability (NOA) of the
Final Environmental Impact Statement
for the Integrated Resource Plan was
published in the Federal Register on
March 11, 2011. The TVA Board of
Directors accepted the IRP and
authorized staff to implement the
preferred alternative at its April 14,
2011, meeting. This alternative, the
Preferred Planning Direction, will guide
TVA’s selection of energy resource
options to meet the energy needs of the
Tennessee Valley region over the next
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:17 Jul 05, 2011
Jkt 223001
20 years. The energy resource options
include new nuclear, natural gas-fired,
and renewable generation, increased
energy efficiency and demand
reduction, decreased coal-fired
generation, and new energy storage
capacity.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Charles P. Nicholson, NEPA
Compliance Manager, Tennessee Valley
Authority, 400 West Summit Hill Drive,
WT 11D, Knoxville, Tennessee 37902–
1499; telephone 865–632–3582, or email cpnicholson@tva.gov; Randall E.
Johnson, IRP Project Manager,
Tennessee Valley Authority, 1101
Market Street, LP 5D–C, Chattanooga,
Tennessee 37402; telephone 423–751–
3520, or e-mail rejohnson1@tva.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: TVA is an
agency and instrumentality of the
United States, established by an act of
Congress in 1933, to foster the social
and economic welfare of the people of
the Tennessee Valley region and to
promote the proper use and
conservation of the region’s natural
resources. One component of this
mission is the generation, transmission,
and sale of reliable and affordable
electric energy. TVA operates the
nation’s largest public power system,
producing 4 percent of all the electricity
in the nation. TVA provides electricity
to about 9 million people in an 80,000square mile area comprised of most of
Tennessee and parts of Virginia, North
Carolina, Georgia, Alabama, Mississippi,
and Kentucky. It provides wholesale
power to 155 independent power
distributors and 56 directly served large
industrial and Federal customers. The
TVA Act requires the TVA power
system to be self-supporting and
operating on a non-profit basis and
directs TVA to sell power at rates as low
as are feasible.
Dependable generating capacity on
the TVA power system is about 37,200
megawatts (MW). TVA generates most of
this power with 3 nuclear plants, 11
coal-fired plants, 9 combustion-turbine
plants, 3 combined cycle plants, 29
hydroelectric plants, a pumped-storage
facility, and several small renewable
facilities. A portion of delivered power
is provided through long-term power
purchase agreements. TVA has
generated an annual average of about
153,100 gigawatt hours (GWh) of power
in recent years. The major sources for
this power were coal (52 percent),
nuclear (28 percent), hydroelectric (6
percent), and natural gas (1 percent).
Other sources comprised less than 1
percent of TVA generation.
The recently completed IRP updates
TVA’s 1995 IRP, entitled Energy Vision
PO 00000
Frm 00095
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
2020. Consistent with Section 113 of the
Energy Policy Act of 1992, the IRP
planning process evaluated a range of
existing and incremental resources,
including new power supplies, energy
conservation and efficiency, and
renewable energy resources in order to
provide TVA’s customers adequate and
reliable service at the lowest system
cost.
Future Demand for Energy
TVA uses state-of-the-art energy
forecasting models to predict future
demands on its system. Because of the
uncertainty in predicting future
demands, TVA developed high,
medium, and low forecasts for both
peak load (in MW) and annual net
system energy (in GWh) through 2029.
Peak load is predicted to grow at an
average annual rate of 1.3 percent in the
medium-growth Spring 2010 Reference
Case, decrease slightly and then remain
flat under the low-growth forecast, and
grow at an annual rate of 2.0 percent
under the high-growth forecast. Net
system energy is predicted to grow at an
average annual rate of 1.1 percent in the
medium-growth case, decrease slightly
and then remain flat under the lowgrowth forecast, and grow at an annual
rate of 1.9 percent under the highgrowth forecast.
Based on these load growth forecasts,
TVA’s current firm capacity (including
TVA generation, energy efficiency and
demand response (EEDR) measures, and
power purchase agreements), and a 15
percent reserve capacity requirement,
TVA would need additional capacity
and generation or EEDR in the future.
The medium growth case need for
additional generating capacity or EEDR
programs is about 9,600 MWs and
29,100 GWhs of generation in 2019 and
about 15,500 MWs and 45,000 GWhs in
2029. Corresponding needs for the high
growth forecast are about 15,000 MWs
and 63,000 GWhs in 2019 and 27,000
MWs and 98,000 GWhs in 2020.
Corresponding needs for the low growth
forecast are about 1,500 MWs in 2019
and 2,000 MWs in 2029; no additional
generation would be required.
Alternatives Considered
Five alternative energy resource
strategies were evaluated in the Draft
EIS and IRP. These resource planning
strategies were identified as potential
alternative means to meet future
electrical energy needs on the TVA
system (load demand) and achieve a
sustainable future, consistent with the
Board’s vision and the TVA
Environmental Policy. These alternative
strategies are:
E:\FR\FM\06JYN1.SGM
06JYN1
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 129 / Wednesday, July 6, 2011 / Notices
Strategy A—Limited Change in
Current Resource Portfolio: Under this
strategy, TVA would continue to operate
its existing generating resources as long
as possible, continue to implement its
existing Energy Efficiency and Demand
Response (EEDR) programs, add
renewable energy resources, and rely on
power purchases to meet additional
load demands on the TVA system.
Strategy B—Baseline Plan Resource
Portfolios: Under this strategy, which is
the No Action Alternative, TVA would
continue TVA’s current power planning
approach including increasing its EEDR
programs, adding more renewable
energy resources, and idling some
existing coal-fired generating units.
Increased load demands above the
capacity of these resources primarily
would be met by additional natural gas
and nuclear capacity.
Strategy C—Diversity Focused
Resource Portfolio: Under this strategy,
compared to Strategy B, TVA would
increase EEDR efforts, the amount of
renewable energy resources added to the
power system, and the amount of coalfired capacity idled. To help manage
increased amounts of renewable
resources and to further diversify the
energy resources on the TVA system,
additional energy storage resources
would be constructed in the form of
hydro-electric pump storage capacity.
Increased load demands above the
capacity of these resources primarily
would be met by additional natural gas
and nuclear capacity.
Strategy D—Nuclear Focused
Resource Portfolio: Under this planning
strategy, additional EEDR, renewable,
and energy storage resources would be
added to the power system similar to
those in Strategy C. However, this
strategy includes the largest amount of
idled coal capacity (7,000 MWs), and
the likelihood that more nuclear
capacity would be used to meet load
demands is greater than in Strategy C.
Strategy E—EEDR and Renewables
Focused Resource Portfolio: Under this
planning strategy, the largest amounts of
EEDR and renewable resources would
be added to the TVA power system. Of
the strategies, the highest level of
transmission system upgrades would be
needed in Strategy E.
The strategies were analyzed in the
context of eight different scenarios. A
scenario is a set of uncertainties relevant
to power system planning and describes
plausible future economic, financial,
regulatory and legislative conditions, as
well as social trends and adoption of
technological innovations. One of the
eight scenarios served as the IRP
reference or baseline case. Potential 20year energy resource plans or portfolios
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:17 Jul 05, 2011
Jkt 223001
were developed for each combination of
strategy and scenario using a capacity
planning model. The capacity planning
model built each portfolio from a range
of potential energy resource options that
included TVA’s existing demand-side
and supply-side resources and new
EEDR programs, coal-fired generation
with carbon capture and sequestration,
natural gas-fired generation, nuclear
generation, renewable generation such
as hydroelectric, solar, biomass, and
wind energy, and energy storage
resources. Each portfolio was optimized
for the lowest net Present Value of
Revenue Requirements while meeting
energy balance, reserve, operational,
and other requirements. The portfolios
were then evaluated using an hourly
production costing program to
determine detailed revenue
requirements and short-term rates.
Additional metrics developed to rank
the portfolios included financial risk,
carbon dioxide emissions, thermal
cooling requirements, waste handling
costs, and changes in total employment
and personal income.
The two alternative strategies ranked
highest for the cost and risk factors were
Strategy C and Strategy E. Strategy B
ranked in the middle of the range and
Strategy D and Strategy A ranked
lowest. Strategies D and E had the best
(i.e., lowest) scores for the
environmental metrics and strategies A
and B had the worst scores. The
environmental scores for Strategy A
were lowest due to the continued
operation of all TVA coal plants and the
likely reliance on natural gas for most
future capacity additions through power
purchase agreements. The other four
strategies all had reductions in coal
capacity and, under most scenarios,
nuclear capacity additions; these factors
resulted in their lower carbon dioxide
emissions. The ranking of the strategies
by the two economic development
metrics was similar. Strategies B and D
performed similarly and had greatest
increases in total employment and
personal income under the high-growth
scenarios. Strategies D and E also
performed similarly and were in the
middle of the range. Strategy A
consistently ranked lowest for the
economic development metrics.
Based on this comparison two
alternative strategies, Strategy A—
Limited Change Resource Portfolio and
Strategy D—Nuclear Focused Resource
Portfolio were eliminated from further
consideration. An additional alternative
strategy was later developed from a
blend of features from the initial
strategies in response to public
comments on the Draft IRP and EIS and
additional analyses.
PO 00000
Frm 00096
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
39471
Strategy R—Recommended Planning
Direction: Under this strategy which
was staff’s recommended planning
direction, an optimized mix of
diversified energy resources would be
added to the TVA power system. Major
components of this mix are as follows:
• EEDR—3,600 to 5,100 MW (11,400
to 14,400 GWh) by 2020, with
subsequent further investment
depending upon program success;
• Renewable additions—1,500 to
2,500 MW of cost effective energy by
2020;
• Coal-fired capacity idled—2,400 to
4,700 MW of maximum net dependable
capacity by 2017, with consideration for
increasing the amount of coal capacity
idled;
• Energy storage—850 MW of
pumped storage capacity in 2020–2024;
• Nuclear additions—1,150 to 5,900
MW in 2013–2029;
• Coal additions—0 to 900 MW with
carbon capture ability in 2025—2029;
• Natural gas additions—900 to 9,300
MW in 2012–2029 used as intermediate
supply source.
This planning strategy is a blend of
Strategies C and E which performed
well financially, environmentally, and
in terms of risk and was identified as
the preferred alternative in the Final
EIS.
Public Involvement
TVA published a notice of intent to
prepare the IRP EIS in the Federal
Register on June 15, 2009. TVA then
actively engaged the public through
public scoping and public briefings
during the development of the IRP and
EIS. Participants could attend the
briefings in person or by Web
conference. TVA also established a
Stakeholder Review Group with
members consisting of individuals from
government agencies and business,
civic, and environmental organizations
including TVA customers and the
Tennessee Valley Public Power
Association. These individuals were
actively involved in the preparation of
the IRP and provided TVA comments
and critiques of IRP analyses and
process steps.
The Notice of Availability of the Draft
IRP and EIS was published in the
Federal Register by the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency
(USEPA) on September 24, 2010. TVA
accepted comments on the draft plan
and EIS until November 15, 2010.
During the comment period, TVA held
five public meetings to describe the
project and accept comments.
Stakeholders could also participate in
the meetings by Web conference. TVA
received 501 comment submissions on
E:\FR\FM\06JYN1.SGM
06JYN1
39472
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 129 / Wednesday, July 6, 2011 / Notices
the Draft IRP and EIS. After considering
and responding to all substantive
comments, developing the new
alternative Strategy R, and further
evaluating the strategies, TVA issued
the Final IRP and EIS. The NOA for the
Final IRP and EIS was published in the
Federal Register on March 11, 2011.
Environmentally Preferred Alternative
Alternative Strategy E—EEDR and
Renewables Focused Resource Portfolio
would result in the lowest overall
environmental impacts and is the
environmentally preferred alternative.
Strategy R—Recommended Planning
Direction had the second lowest level of
impacts to most environmental resource
areas. The difference in impacts
between Strategy E and Strategy R
would be reduced if the amount of coal
generating capacity that is idled as
Strategy R is implemented approaches
or exceeds the upper end of the 2,400
to 4,700 MW range.
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Decision
On April 14, 2011, the TVA Board of
Directors accepted the IRP and
authorized staff to implement the
preferred alternative, the Recommended
Planning Direction. The Board also
directed staff to repeat the integrated
resource planning process beginning no
later than 2015.
Compared to the best-performing of
the initially considered alternative
strategies, Strategy C—Diversity
Focused Resource Portfolio, and
Strategy E—EEDR and Renewables
Focused Resource Portfolio, the
recommend planning direction typically
performed best under the various
scenarios on total plan cost and risk/
benefit comparisons and performed
similarly to these other strategies with
respect to general economic conditions
in the Tennessee Valley region
represented by total employment and
personal income. However, it performed
slightly worse than Strategy E, but better
than Strategy C, with respect to
environmental impacts.
Mitigation Measures
The reduction of environmental
impacts was a major goal in TVA’s
integrated resource planning process. As
TVA deploys specific energy resources,
it will appropriately review and take
measures to reduce their potential
environmental impacts. TVA’s siting
processes for generation and
transmission facilities, as well as
processes for modifying these facilities,
are designed to avoid and/or minimize
potential adverse environmental
impacts. Potential impacts will also be
reduced through pollution prevention
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:17 Jul 05, 2011
Jkt 223001
measures and environmental controls
such as air pollution control systems,
wastewater treatment systems, and
thermal generating plant cooling
systems. Other potentially adverse
unavoidable impacts will be mitigated
by measures such as compensatory
wetlands mitigation, payments to in-lieu
stream mitigation programs and related
conservation initiatives, enhanced
management of other properties,
documentation and recovery of cultural
resources, and infrastructure
improvement assistance to local
communities.
Louis E. Gitomer, 600 Baltimore Ave.,
Suite 301, Towson, MD 21204.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Joseph H. Dettmar, (202) 245–0395.
[Assistance for the hearing impaired is
available through the Federal
Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1–
800–877–8339.]
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Board
granted the petition by decision served
on July 6, 2011, subject to standard
employee protective conditions.
Board decisions and notices are
available on our Web site at: https://
www.stb.dot.gov.
Dated: June 24, 2011.
Van M. Wardlaw,
Executive Vice President, Enterprise
Relations.
Decided: June 30, 2011.
By the Board, Chairman Elliott, Vice
Chairman Begeman, and Commissioner
Mulvey.
Jeffrey Herzig,
Clearance Clerk.
[FR Doc. 2011–16840 Filed 7–5–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8120–08–P
[FR Doc. 2011–16870 Filed 7–5–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Surface Transportation Board
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
[Docket No. FD 35495]
CSX Transportation, Inc.—Lease
Exemption—Consolidated Rail
Corporation
AGENCY:
Surface Transportation Board,
DOT.
ACTION:
Notice of Exemption.
Under 49 U.S.C. 10502, the
Board is granting a petition for
exemption from the prior approval
requirements of 49 U.S.C. 11323–25, for
CSX Transportation, Inc. (CSXT), to
lease from Consolidated Rail
Corporation (Conrail) approximately
1,303 feet of rail line (the Line) in the
South Jersey/Philadelphia Shared
Assets Area between mileposts 5.20 and
5.45 in Philadelphia, PA. Under the
lease, CSXT proposes to construct an
additional connection between its
Trenton Subdivision Line (Trenton
Line) and the Line. The new connection
would facilitate operations on the
Trenton Line and an Amtrak-owned,
Conrail-operated line (the Delair
Branch).
SUMMARY:
Petitioner has asked for
expedited consideration of the petition;
consequently, the exemption will be
effective on July 16, 2011. Petitions to
stay must be filed by July 11, 2011.
ADDRESSES: An original and 10 copies of
all pleadings, referring to Docket No. FD
35495, must be filed with the Surface
Transportation Board, 395 E Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20423–0001. In
addition, one copy of all pleadings must
be served on petitioner’s representative:
DATES:
PO 00000
Frm 00097
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Internal Revenue Service
Proposed Collection; Comment
Request for Form 8823
Internal Revenue Service (IRS),
Treasury.
ACTION: Notice and request for
comments.
AGENCY:
The Department of the
Treasury, as part of its continuing effort
to reduce paperwork and respondent
burden, invites the general public and
other Federal agencies to take this
opportunity to comment on proposed
and/or continuing information
collections, as required by the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,
Public Law 104–13 (44 U.S.C.
3506(c)(2)(A)). Currently, the IRS is
soliciting comments concerning Form
8823, Low-Income Housing Credit
Agencies Report of Noncompliance or
Building Disposition.
DATES: Written comments should be
received on or before September 6, 2011
to be assured of consideration.
ADDRESSES: Direct all written comments
to, Yvette B. Lawrence, Internal
Revenue Service, room 6129, 1111
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington,
DC 20224.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Requests for additional information or
copies of the form and instructions
should be directed to, Joel Goldberger
(202) 927–9368, or at Internal Revenue
Service, room 6129, 1111 Constitution
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20224,
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\06JYN1.SGM
06JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 129 (Wednesday, July 6, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 39470-39472]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-16840]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY
Integrated Resource Plan
AGENCY: Tennessee Valley Authority.
ACTION: Issuance of Record of Decision.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This notice is provided in accordance with the Council on
Environmental Quality's regulations (40 CFR parts 1500 to 1508) and
TVA's procedures for implementing the National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA). TVA has decided to adopt the preferred alternative in its final
environmental impact statement (EIS) for the Integrated Resource Plan
(IRP). The notice of availability (NOA) of the Final Environmental
Impact Statement for the Integrated Resource Plan was published in the
Federal Register on March 11, 2011. The TVA Board of Directors accepted
the IRP and authorized staff to implement the preferred alternative at
its April 14, 2011, meeting. This alternative, the Preferred Planning
Direction, will guide TVA's selection of energy resource options to
meet the energy needs of the Tennessee Valley region over the next 20
years. The energy resource options include new nuclear, natural gas-
fired, and renewable generation, increased energy efficiency and demand
reduction, decreased coal-fired generation, and new energy storage
capacity.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Charles P. Nicholson, NEPA Compliance
Manager, Tennessee Valley Authority, 400 West Summit Hill Drive, WT
11D, Knoxville, Tennessee 37902-1499; telephone 865-632-3582, or e-mail
cpnicholson@tva.gov; Randall E. Johnson, IRP Project Manager, Tennessee
Valley Authority, 1101 Market Street, LP 5D-C, Chattanooga, Tennessee
37402; telephone 423-751-3520, or e-mail rejohnson1@tva.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: TVA is an agency and instrumentality of the
United States, established by an act of Congress in 1933, to foster the
social and economic welfare of the people of the Tennessee Valley
region and to promote the proper use and conservation of the region's
natural resources. One component of this mission is the generation,
transmission, and sale of reliable and affordable electric energy. TVA
operates the nation's largest public power system, producing 4 percent
of all the electricity in the nation. TVA provides electricity to about
9 million people in an 80,000-square mile area comprised of most of
Tennessee and parts of Virginia, North Carolina, Georgia, Alabama,
Mississippi, and Kentucky. It provides wholesale power to 155
independent power distributors and 56 directly served large industrial
and Federal customers. The TVA Act requires the TVA power system to be
self-supporting and operating on a non-profit basis and directs TVA to
sell power at rates as low as are feasible.
Dependable generating capacity on the TVA power system is about
37,200 megawatts (MW). TVA generates most of this power with 3 nuclear
plants, 11 coal-fired plants, 9 combustion-turbine plants, 3 combined
cycle plants, 29 hydroelectric plants, a pumped-storage facility, and
several small renewable facilities. A portion of delivered power is
provided through long-term power purchase agreements. TVA has generated
an annual average of about 153,100 gigawatt hours (GWh) of power in
recent years. The major sources for this power were coal (52 percent),
nuclear (28 percent), hydroelectric (6 percent), and natural gas (1
percent). Other sources comprised less than 1 percent of TVA
generation.
The recently completed IRP updates TVA's 1995 IRP, entitled Energy
Vision 2020. Consistent with Section 113 of the Energy Policy Act of
1992, the IRP planning process evaluated a range of existing and
incremental resources, including new power supplies, energy
conservation and efficiency, and renewable energy resources in order to
provide TVA's customers adequate and reliable service at the lowest
system cost.
Future Demand for Energy
TVA uses state-of-the-art energy forecasting models to predict
future demands on its system. Because of the uncertainty in predicting
future demands, TVA developed high, medium, and low forecasts for both
peak load (in MW) and annual net system energy (in GWh) through 2029.
Peak load is predicted to grow at an average annual rate of 1.3 percent
in the medium-growth Spring 2010 Reference Case, decrease slightly and
then remain flat under the low-growth forecast, and grow at an annual
rate of 2.0 percent under the high-growth forecast. Net system energy
is predicted to grow at an average annual rate of 1.1 percent in the
medium-growth case, decrease slightly and then remain flat under the
low-growth forecast, and grow at an annual rate of 1.9 percent under
the high-growth forecast.
Based on these load growth forecasts, TVA's current firm capacity
(including TVA generation, energy efficiency and demand response (EEDR)
measures, and power purchase agreements), and a 15 percent reserve
capacity requirement, TVA would need additional capacity and generation
or EEDR in the future. The medium growth case need for additional
generating capacity or EEDR programs is about 9,600 MWs and 29,100 GWhs
of generation in 2019 and about 15,500 MWs and 45,000 GWhs in 2029.
Corresponding needs for the high growth forecast are about 15,000 MWs
and 63,000 GWhs in 2019 and 27,000 MWs and 98,000 GWhs in 2020.
Corresponding needs for the low growth forecast are about 1,500 MWs in
2019 and 2,000 MWs in 2029; no additional generation would be required.
Alternatives Considered
Five alternative energy resource strategies were evaluated in the
Draft EIS and IRP. These resource planning strategies were identified
as potential alternative means to meet future electrical energy needs
on the TVA system (load demand) and achieve a sustainable future,
consistent with the Board's vision and the TVA Environmental Policy.
These alternative strategies are:
[[Page 39471]]
Strategy A--Limited Change in Current Resource Portfolio: Under
this strategy, TVA would continue to operate its existing generating
resources as long as possible, continue to implement its existing
Energy Efficiency and Demand Response (EEDR) programs, add renewable
energy resources, and rely on power purchases to meet additional load
demands on the TVA system.
Strategy B--Baseline Plan Resource Portfolios: Under this strategy,
which is the No Action Alternative, TVA would continue TVA's current
power planning approach including increasing its EEDR programs, adding
more renewable energy resources, and idling some existing coal-fired
generating units. Increased load demands above the capacity of these
resources primarily would be met by additional natural gas and nuclear
capacity.
Strategy C--Diversity Focused Resource Portfolio: Under this
strategy, compared to Strategy B, TVA would increase EEDR efforts, the
amount of renewable energy resources added to the power system, and the
amount of coal-fired capacity idled. To help manage increased amounts
of renewable resources and to further diversify the energy resources on
the TVA system, additional energy storage resources would be
constructed in the form of hydro-electric pump storage capacity.
Increased load demands above the capacity of these resources primarily
would be met by additional natural gas and nuclear capacity.
Strategy D--Nuclear Focused Resource Portfolio: Under this planning
strategy, additional EEDR, renewable, and energy storage resources
would be added to the power system similar to those in Strategy C.
However, this strategy includes the largest amount of idled coal
capacity (7,000 MWs), and the likelihood that more nuclear capacity
would be used to meet load demands is greater than in Strategy C.
Strategy E--EEDR and Renewables Focused Resource Portfolio: Under
this planning strategy, the largest amounts of EEDR and renewable
resources would be added to the TVA power system. Of the strategies,
the highest level of transmission system upgrades would be needed in
Strategy E.
The strategies were analyzed in the context of eight different
scenarios. A scenario is a set of uncertainties relevant to power
system planning and describes plausible future economic, financial,
regulatory and legislative conditions, as well as social trends and
adoption of technological innovations. One of the eight scenarios
served as the IRP reference or baseline case. Potential 20-year energy
resource plans or portfolios were developed for each combination of
strategy and scenario using a capacity planning model. The capacity
planning model built each portfolio from a range of potential energy
resource options that included TVA's existing demand-side and supply-
side resources and new EEDR programs, coal-fired generation with carbon
capture and sequestration, natural gas-fired generation, nuclear
generation, renewable generation such as hydroelectric, solar, biomass,
and wind energy, and energy storage resources. Each portfolio was
optimized for the lowest net Present Value of Revenue Requirements
while meeting energy balance, reserve, operational, and other
requirements. The portfolios were then evaluated using an hourly
production costing program to determine detailed revenue requirements
and short-term rates. Additional metrics developed to rank the
portfolios included financial risk, carbon dioxide emissions, thermal
cooling requirements, waste handling costs, and changes in total
employment and personal income.
The two alternative strategies ranked highest for the cost and risk
factors were Strategy C and Strategy E. Strategy B ranked in the middle
of the range and Strategy D and Strategy A ranked lowest. Strategies D
and E had the best (i.e., lowest) scores for the environmental metrics
and strategies A and B had the worst scores. The environmental scores
for Strategy A were lowest due to the continued operation of all TVA
coal plants and the likely reliance on natural gas for most future
capacity additions through power purchase agreements. The other four
strategies all had reductions in coal capacity and, under most
scenarios, nuclear capacity additions; these factors resulted in their
lower carbon dioxide emissions. The ranking of the strategies by the
two economic development metrics was similar. Strategies B and D
performed similarly and had greatest increases in total employment and
personal income under the high-growth scenarios. Strategies D and E
also performed similarly and were in the middle of the range. Strategy
A consistently ranked lowest for the economic development metrics.
Based on this comparison two alternative strategies, Strategy A--
Limited Change Resource Portfolio and Strategy D--Nuclear Focused
Resource Portfolio were eliminated from further consideration. An
additional alternative strategy was later developed from a blend of
features from the initial strategies in response to public comments on
the Draft IRP and EIS and additional analyses.
Strategy R--Recommended Planning Direction: Under this strategy
which was staff's recommended planning direction, an optimized mix of
diversified energy resources would be added to the TVA power system.
Major components of this mix are as follows:
EEDR--3,600 to 5,100 MW (11,400 to 14,400 GWh) by 2020,
with subsequent further investment depending upon program success;
Renewable additions--1,500 to 2,500 MW of cost effective
energy by 2020;
Coal-fired capacity idled--2,400 to 4,700 MW of maximum
net dependable capacity by 2017, with consideration for increasing the
amount of coal capacity idled;
Energy storage--850 MW of pumped storage capacity in 2020-
2024;
Nuclear additions--1,150 to 5,900 MW in 2013-2029;
Coal additions--0 to 900 MW with carbon capture ability in
2025--2029;
Natural gas additions--900 to 9,300 MW in 2012-2029 used
as intermediate supply source.
This planning strategy is a blend of Strategies C and E which
performed well financially, environmentally, and in terms of risk and
was identified as the preferred alternative in the Final EIS.
Public Involvement
TVA published a notice of intent to prepare the IRP EIS in the
Federal Register on June 15, 2009. TVA then actively engaged the public
through public scoping and public briefings during the development of
the IRP and EIS. Participants could attend the briefings in person or
by Web conference. TVA also established a Stakeholder Review Group with
members consisting of individuals from government agencies and
business, civic, and environmental organizations including TVA
customers and the Tennessee Valley Public Power Association. These
individuals were actively involved in the preparation of the IRP and
provided TVA comments and critiques of IRP analyses and process steps.
The Notice of Availability of the Draft IRP and EIS was published
in the Federal Register by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
(USEPA) on September 24, 2010. TVA accepted comments on the draft plan
and EIS until November 15, 2010. During the comment period, TVA held
five public meetings to describe the project and accept comments.
Stakeholders could also participate in the meetings by Web conference.
TVA received 501 comment submissions on
[[Page 39472]]
the Draft IRP and EIS. After considering and responding to all
substantive comments, developing the new alternative Strategy R, and
further evaluating the strategies, TVA issued the Final IRP and EIS.
The NOA for the Final IRP and EIS was published in the Federal Register
on March 11, 2011.
Environmentally Preferred Alternative
Alternative Strategy E--EEDR and Renewables Focused Resource
Portfolio would result in the lowest overall environmental impacts and
is the environmentally preferred alternative. Strategy R--Recommended
Planning Direction had the second lowest level of impacts to most
environmental resource areas. The difference in impacts between
Strategy E and Strategy R would be reduced if the amount of coal
generating capacity that is idled as Strategy R is implemented
approaches or exceeds the upper end of the 2,400 to 4,700 MW range.
Decision
On April 14, 2011, the TVA Board of Directors accepted the IRP and
authorized staff to implement the preferred alternative, the
Recommended Planning Direction. The Board also directed staff to repeat
the integrated resource planning process beginning no later than 2015.
Compared to the best-performing of the initially considered
alternative strategies, Strategy C--Diversity Focused Resource
Portfolio, and Strategy E--EEDR and Renewables Focused Resource
Portfolio, the recommend planning direction typically performed best
under the various scenarios on total plan cost and risk/benefit
comparisons and performed similarly to these other strategies with
respect to general economic conditions in the Tennessee Valley region
represented by total employment and personal income. However, it
performed slightly worse than Strategy E, but better than Strategy C,
with respect to environmental impacts.
Mitigation Measures
The reduction of environmental impacts was a major goal in TVA's
integrated resource planning process. As TVA deploys specific energy
resources, it will appropriately review and take measures to reduce
their potential environmental impacts. TVA's siting processes for
generation and transmission facilities, as well as processes for
modifying these facilities, are designed to avoid and/or minimize
potential adverse environmental impacts. Potential impacts will also be
reduced through pollution prevention measures and environmental
controls such as air pollution control systems, wastewater treatment
systems, and thermal generating plant cooling systems. Other
potentially adverse unavoidable impacts will be mitigated by measures
such as compensatory wetlands mitigation, payments to in-lieu stream
mitigation programs and related conservation initiatives, enhanced
management of other properties, documentation and recovery of cultural
resources, and infrastructure improvement assistance to local
communities.
Dated: June 24, 2011.
Van M. Wardlaw,
Executive Vice President, Enterprise Relations.
[FR Doc. 2011-16840 Filed 7-5-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8120-08-P