Privacy Act of 1974: Implementation of Exemptions; Department of Homeland Security/ALL-030 Use of the Terrorist Screening Database System of Records, 39315-39317 [2011-16806]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
39315
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
Vol. 76, No. 129
Wednesday, July 6, 2011
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
5 CFR Chapter XXI
12 CFR Chapters I, V, XV, and XVIII
17 CFR Chapter IV
19 CFR Chapter I
26 CFR Chapter I
27 CFR Chapter I
31 CFR Subtitle A and Chapters I, II, IV
Through VIII, IX, and X
48 CFR Chapter 10
Preliminary Plan for Retrospective
Analysis of Existing Rules; Notice of
Availability
Department of the Treasury.
Notice of availability; request
for comments.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Department of the
Treasury announces the availability of
its Preliminary Plan for Retrospective
Analysis of Existing Rules and invites
interested members of the public to
submit comments on the plan. Issued
pursuant to Executive Order 13563,
‘‘Improving Regulation and Regulatory
Review,’’ Treasury developed its
preliminary plan to facilitate the review
of existing regulations through the use
of retrospective review.
DATES: Comment due date: July 25,
2011.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are
invited to submit comments on all
aspects of the preliminary plan. You
may submit comments, identified by
docket number TREAS–DO–2011–0003
through the Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
Electronic Submission of Comments.
Interested persons must submit
comments electronically through the
Federal eRulemaking Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov. Electronic
submission of comments allows the
jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:52 Jul 05, 2011
Jkt 223001
commenter maximum time to prepare
and submit a comment, ensures timely
receipt, and enables the Department to
make them available to the public.
Comments submitted electronically
through the https://www.regulations.gov
Web site can be viewed by other
commenters and interested members of
the public.
Public Inspection of Comments.
Properly submitted comments will be
available for inspection and
downloading at https://
www.regulations.gov.
Additional Instructions. In general,
comments received, including
attachments and other supporting
materials, are part of the public record
and are immediately available to the
public. Do not include any information
in your comment or supporting
materials that you consider confidential
or inappropriate for public disclosure.
Dated: June 28, 2011.
George W. Madison,
General Counsel.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains notices to the public of the proposed
issuance of rules and regulations. The
purpose of these notices is to give interested
persons an opportunity to participate in the
rule making prior to the adoption of the final
rules.
SUMMARY:
Office of the Assistant General Counsel
for General Law, Ethics, and Regulation
at guidance@treasury.gov.
On
January 18, 2011, the President issued
Executive Order 13563, ‘‘Improving
Regulation and Regulatory Review,’’ to
ensure that federal regulations seek less
burdensome means to achieve policy
goals and that agencies give careful
consideration to the benefits and costs
of those regulations. The Executive
Order requires each agency to develop
a preliminary plan to periodically
review its existing significant
regulations to determine whether any
regulations should be modified,
streamlined, expanded, or repealed so
as to make the agency’s regulatory
program more effective or less
burdensome in achieving its regulatory
objectives.
On March 30, 2011 (76 FR 17572), the
Department published a notice and
request for comment in the Federal
Register that invited input from the
public in developing Treasury’s
preliminary plan and eleven comments
were received. On June 1, 2011, the
Department posted the preliminary plan
on its Open Government Web site,
https://www.treasury.gov/open and on
https://www.regulations.gov, and is
requesting public comments on the
plan. Comments may be submitted on or
before July 15, 2011.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
[FR Doc. 2011–16865 Filed 7–5–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810–25–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Office of the Secretary
6 CFR Part 5
[Docket No. DHS–2011–0060]
Privacy Act of 1974: Implementation of
Exemptions; Department of Homeland
Security/ALL—030 Use of the Terrorist
Screening Database System of
Records
Privacy Office, DHS.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Department of Homeland
Security is giving concurrent notice of a
newly established system of records
pursuant to the Privacy Act of 1974 for
the ‘‘Department of Homeland Security/
ALL—030 Use of the Terrorist Screening
Database System of Records’’ and this
proposed rulemaking. In this proposed
rulemaking, the Department proposes to
exempt portions of the system of records
from one or more provisions of the
Privacy Act because of criminal, civil,
and administrative enforcement
requirements.
Comments must be received on
or before August 5, 2011.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by docket number DHS–
2011–0060, by one of the following
methods:
• Federal e-Rulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: 703–483–2999.
• Mail: Mary Ellen Callahan, Chief
Privacy Officer, Privacy Office,
Department of Homeland Security,
Washington, DC 20528.
• Instructions: All submissions
received must include the agency name
and docket number for this rulemaking.
All comments received will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided.
• Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or
DATES:
E:\FR\FM\06JYP1.SGM
06JYP1
39316
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 129 / Wednesday, July 6, 2011 / Proposed Rules
comments received go to https://
www.regulations.gov.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the agency name and
docket number for this notice. All
comments received will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or
comments received, go to https://
www.regulations.gov.
For
general questions and privacy issues
please contact: Mary Ellen Callahan
(703–235–0780), Chief Privacy Officer,
Privacy Office, Department of Homeland
Security, Washington, DC 20528.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
I. Background
In accordance with the Privacy Act of
1974, 5 U.S.C. 552a, the Department of
Homeland Security (DHS) proposes to
establish a new system of records titled,
‘‘DHS/ALL—030 Use of the Terrorist
Screening Database (TSDB) System of
Records.’’ DHS is maintaining a mirror
copy of the Department of Justice (DOJ)/
Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)—
019 Terrorist Screening Records System
of Records (August 22, 2007, 72 FR
47073) in order to automate and
simplify the current method for
transmitting the TSDB to DHS and its
components.
Homeland Security Presidential
Directive 6 (HSPD–6), issued in
September 2003, called for the
establishment and use of a single
consolidated watchlist to improve the
identification, screening, and tracking of
known or suspected terrorists and their
supporters. The FBI/TSC maintains and
distributes the TSDB as the U.S.
government’s consolidated terrorist
watchlist. DHS and the FBI/TSC,
working together, have developed the
DHS Watchlist Service (WLS) in order
to automate and simplify the current
method for transmitting TSDB records
from the FBI/TSC to DHS and its
components.
The WLS will allow the FBI/TSC and
DHS to move away from a manual and
cumbersome process of data
transmission and management to an
automated and centralized process. The
WLS will replace multiple data feeds
from the FBI/TSC to DHS and its
components, as documented by
information sharing agreements, with a
single feed from the FBI/TSC to DHS
and its components. The WLS is a
system to system secure connection
with no direct user interface.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:52 Jul 05, 2011
Jkt 223001
DHS and its components are
authorized to access TSDB records via
the WLS pursuant to the terms of
information sharing agreements with
FBI/TSC. DHS is publishing this SORN
and has published privacy impact
assessments to provide additional
transparency into how DHS has
implemented WLS. DHS will review
and update this SORN no less then
biennially as new DHS systems come
online with the WLS and are approved
consistent with the terms of agreements
with FBI/TSC. There are five DHS
systems that currently receive TSDB
data directly from the FBI/TSC and will
use the WLS. These systems have
existing SORNs that cover the use of the
TSDB:
(1) Transportation Security
Administration (TSA), Office of
Transportation Threat Assessment and
Credentialing: DHS/TSA—002
Transportation Security Threat
Assessment System (May 19, 2010, 75
FR 28046);
(2) TSA, Secure Flight Program: DHS/
TSA—019 Secure Flight Records System
(November 9, 2007, 72 FR 63711);
(3) U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (CBP), Passenger Systems
Program Office for inclusion in TECS:
DHS/CBP—011 TECS System
(December 19, 2008 73 FR 77778);
(4) U.S. Visitor and Immigration
Status Indicator Technology (US-VISIT)
Program for inclusion into the DHS
Enterprise Biometrics Service (IDENT):
DHS/USVISIT—0012 DHS Automated
Biometric Identification System (June 5,
2007, 72 FR 31080); and
In addition, two DHS components
will receive TSDB data via the WLS in
the form of a computer readable extract.
The components’ use of the TSDB data
is covered by existing SORNs:
(1) Office of Intelligence and Analysis
(I&A): DHS/IA–001 Enterprise Records
System, (May 15, 2008 73 FR 28128),
and
(2) U.S. Immigration and Customs
Enforcement (ICE): DHS/ICE–009
External Investigations, (January 5, 2010
75 FR 404).
Information stored in the WLS will be
shared back with the FBI/TSC in order
to ensure that DHS and the FBI/TSC can
reconcile any differences in the database
and ensure DHS has the most up-to-date
and accurate version of TSDB records.
All other sharing will be conducted
pursuant to the programmatic system of
records notices and privacy impact
assessments discussed in this SORN.
DHS is planning future enhancements
to the WLS that will provide for a
central mechanism to receive
information from DHS components
when they encounter a potential match
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
to the TSDB and send this information
to the FBI/TSC. DHS will update this
SORN to reflect such enhancements to
the WLS, as part of its biennial reviews
of this SORN once that capability is
implemented.
DHS is publishing this SORN to cover
the Department’s use of the TSDB in
order to provider greater transparency to
the process.
Concurrent with the publication of
this SORN, DHS is issuing a Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking to exempt this
system from specific sections of the
Privacy Act.
II. Privacy Act
The Privacy Act embodies fair
information practice principles in a
statutory framework governing the
means by which the U.S. Government
collects, maintains, uses, and
disseminates personally identifiable
information. The Privacy Act applies to
information that is maintained in a
‘‘system of records.’’ A ‘‘system of
records’’ is a group of any records under
the control of an agency from which
information is retrieved by the name of
the individual or by some identifying
number, symbol, or other identifying
particular assigned to the individual. In
the Privacy Act, an individual is defined
to encompass U.S. citizens and lawful
permanent residents. As a matter of
policy, DHS extends administrative
Privacy Act protections to all
individuals where systems of records
maintain information on U.S. citizens,
lawful permanent residents, and
visitors.
The Privacy Act allows government
agencies to exempt certain records from
the access and amendment provisions. If
an agency claims an exemption,
however, it must issue a Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking to make clear to
the public the reasons why a particular
exemption is claimed.
DHS is claiming exemptions from
certain requirements of the Privacy Act
for DHS/ALL—030 Use of the Terrorist
Screening Database System of Records.
Some information in DHS/ALL—030
Use of the Terrorist Screening Database
System of Records relates to official
DHS national security and law
enforcement activities. These
exemptions are needed to protect
information relating to DHS activities
from disclosure to subjects or others
related to these activities. Specifically,
the exemptions are required to preclude
subjects of these activities from
frustrating these processes. Disclosure of
information to the subject of the inquiry
could also permit the subject to avoid
detection or apprehension. In addition,
as a recipient of a mirror copy of the
E:\FR\FM\06JYP1.SGM
06JYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 129 / Wednesday, July 6, 2011 / Proposed Rules
TSDB, which is maintained by the FBI/
TSC, DHS is carrying forward the
exemptions taken by the DOJ/FBI—019
Terrorist Screening Records System of
Records (August 22, 2007, 72 FR 47073)
in order to prevent these records from
improper disclosure. The exemptions
proposed here are standard law
enforcement and national security
exemptions exercised by a large number
of federal law enforcement and
intelligence agencies. In appropriate
circumstances, where compliance
would not appear to interfere with or
adversely affect the law enforcement
purposes of this system and the overall
law enforcement process, the applicable
exemptions may be waived on a case by
case basis.
A notice of system of records for DHS/
ALL—030 Use of Terrorist Screening
Database System of Records is also
published in this issue of the Federal
Register.
List of Subjects in 6 CFR Part 5
Freedom of information; Privacy.
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, DHS proposes to amend
Chapter I of Title 6, Code of Federal
Regulations, as follows:
PART 5—DISCLOSURE OF RECORDS
AND INFORMATION
1. The authority citation for Part 5
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 6 U.S.C. 101 et seq.; Pub. L.
107–296, 116 Stat. 2135; 5 U.S.C. 301.
Subpart A also issued under 5 U.S.C. 552.
Subpart B also issued under 5 U.S.C. 552a.
2. At the end of Appendix C to Part
5, add paragraph 55 to read as follows:
Appendix C to Part 5—DHS Systems of
Records Exempt From the Privacy Act
jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
*
*
*
*
*
55. The DHS/ALL—030 Use of Terrorist
Screening Database System of Records
consists of electronic and paper records and
will be used by DHS and its components. The
DHS/ALL—030 Use of Terrorist Screening
Database System of Records is a repository of
information held by DHS in connection with
its several and varied missions and functions,
including, but not limited to the enforcement
of civil and criminal laws; investigations,
inquiries, and proceedings there under;
national security and intelligence activities;
and protection of the President of the U.S. or
other individuals pursuant to Section 3056
and 3056A of Title 18. The DHS/ALL—030
Use of Terrorist Screening Database System
of Records contains information that is
collected by, on behalf of, in support of, or
in cooperation with DHS and its components
and may contain personally identifiable
information collected by other federal, state,
local, tribal, foreign, or international
government agencies. The Secretary of
Homeland Security has exempted this system
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:52 Jul 05, 2011
Jkt 223001
from the following provisions of the Privacy
Act, subject to the limitations set forth in 5
U.S.C. 552a(c)(3) and (c)(4); (d); (e)(1), (e)(2),
(e)(3), (e)(4)(G), (e)(4)(H), (e)(4)(I), (e)(5),
(e)(8), (e)(12); (f); (g)(1); and (h) pursuant to
5 U.S.C. 552a(j)(2). Additionally, the
Secretary of Homeland Security has
exempted this system from the following
provisions of the Privacy Act, subject to the
limitation set forth in 5 U.S.C. 552a(c)(3); (d);
(e)(1), (e)(4)(G), (e)(4)(H), (e)(4)(I); and (f)
pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(1) and (k)(2).
Exemptions from these particular subsections
are justified, on a case-by-case basis to be
determined at the time a request is made, for
the following reasons:
(a) From subsection (c)(3) and (4)
(Accounting for Disclosures) because release
of the accounting of disclosures could alert
the subject of an investigation of an actual or
potential criminal, civil, or regulatory
violation to the existence of that investigation
and reveal investigative interest on the part
of DHS as well as the recipient agency.
Disclosure of the accounting would therefore
present a serious impediment to law
enforcement efforts and/or efforts to preserve
national security. Disclosure of the
accounting would also permit the individual
who is the subject of a record to impede the
investigation, to tamper with witnesses or
evidence, and to avoid detection or
apprehension, which would undermine the
entire investigative process.
(b) From subsection (d) (Access to Records)
because access to the records contained in
this system of records could inform the
subject of an investigation of an actual or
potential criminal, civil, or regulatory
violation to the existence of that investigation
and reveal investigative interest on the part
of DHS or another agency. Access to the
records could permit the individual who is
the subject of a record to impede the
investigation, to tamper with witnesses or
evidence, and to avoid detection or
apprehension. Amendment of the records
could interfere with ongoing investigations
and law enforcement activities and would
impose an unreasonable administrative
burden by requiring investigations to be
continually reinvestigated. In addition,
permitting access and amendment to such
information could disclose security-sensitive
information that could be detrimental to
homeland security.
(c) From subsection (e)(1) (Relevancy and
Necessity of Information) because in the
course of investigations into potential
violations of federal law, the accuracy of
information obtained or introduced
occasionally may be unclear, or the
information may not be strictly relevant or
necessary to a specific investigation. In the
interests of effective law enforcement, it is
appropriate to retain all information that may
aid in establishing patterns of unlawful
activity.
(d) From subsection (e)(2) (Collection of
Information from Individuals) because
requiring that information be collected from
the subject of an investigation would alert the
subject to the nature or existence of the
investigation, thereby interfering with that
investigation and related law enforcement
activities.
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
39317
(e) From subsection (e)(3) (Notice to
Subjects) because providing such detailed
information could impede law enforcement
by compromising the existence of a
confidential investigation or reveal the
identity of witnesses or confidential
informants.
(f) From subsections (e)(4)(G), (e)(4)(H),
and (e)(4)(I) (Agency Requirements) and (f)
(Agency Rules), because portions of this
system are exempt from the individual access
provisions of subsection (d) for the reasons
noted above, and therefore DHS is not
required to establish requirements, rules, or
procedures with respect to such access.
Providing notice to individuals with respect
to existence of records pertaining to them in
the system of records or otherwise setting up
procedures pursuant to which individuals
may access and view records pertaining to
themselves in the system would undermine
investigative efforts and reveal the identities
of witnesses, and potential witnesses, and
confidential informants.
(g) From subsection (e)(5) (Collection of
Information) because with the collection of
information for law enforcement purposes, it
is impossible to determine in advance what
information is accurate, relevant, timely, and
complete. Compliance with subsection (e)(5)
would preclude DHS agents from using their
investigative training and exercise of good
judgment to both conduct and report on
investigations.
(h) From subsection (e)(8) (Notice on
Individuals) because compliance would
interfere with DHS’s ability to obtain, serve,
and issue subpoenas, warrants, and other law
enforcement mechanisms that may be filed
under seal and could result in disclosure of
investigative techniques, procedures, and
evidence.
(i) From subsection (e)(12) (Computer
Matching) if the agency is a recipient agency
or a source agency in a matching program
with a non-Federal agency, with respect to
any establishment or revision of a matching
program, at least 30 days prior to conducting
such program, publish in the Federal Register
notice of such establishment or revision.
(j) From subsection (g)(1) (Civil Remedies)
to the extent that the system is exempt from
other specific subsections of the Privacy Act.
(k) From subsection (h) (Legal Guardians)
the parent of any minor, or the legal guardian
of any individual who has been declared to
be incompetent due to physical or mental
incapacity or age by a court of competent
jurisdiction, may act on behalf of the
individual.
Mary Ellen Callahan,
Chief Privacy Officer, Department of
Homeland Security.
[FR Doc. 2011–16806 Filed 7–5–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
E:\FR\FM\06JYP1.SGM
06JYP1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 129 (Wednesday, July 6, 2011)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 39315-39317]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-16806]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Office of the Secretary
6 CFR Part 5
[Docket No. DHS-2011-0060]
Privacy Act of 1974: Implementation of Exemptions; Department of
Homeland Security/ALL--030 Use of the Terrorist Screening Database
System of Records
AGENCY: Privacy Office, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Homeland Security is giving concurrent
notice of a newly established system of records pursuant to the Privacy
Act of 1974 for the ``Department of Homeland Security/ALL--030 Use of
the Terrorist Screening Database System of Records'' and this proposed
rulemaking. In this proposed rulemaking, the Department proposes to
exempt portions of the system of records from one or more provisions of
the Privacy Act because of criminal, civil, and administrative
enforcement requirements.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before August 5, 2011.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by docket number DHS-
2011-0060, by one of the following methods:
Federal e-Rulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: 703-483-2999.
Mail: Mary Ellen Callahan, Chief Privacy Officer, Privacy
Office, Department of Homeland Security, Washington, DC 20528.
Instructions: All submissions received must include the
agency name and docket number for this rulemaking. All comments
received will be posted without change to https://www.regulations.gov,
including any personal information provided.
Docket: For access to the docket to read background
documents or
[[Page 39316]]
comments received go to https://www.regulations.gov.
Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name
and docket number for this notice. All comments received will be posted
without change to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal
information provided.
Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
comments received, go to https://www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For general questions and privacy
issues please contact: Mary Ellen Callahan (703-235-0780), Chief
Privacy Officer, Privacy Office, Department of Homeland Security,
Washington, DC 20528.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
In accordance with the Privacy Act of 1974, 5 U.S.C. 552a, the
Department of Homeland Security (DHS) proposes to establish a new
system of records titled, ``DHS/ALL--030 Use of the Terrorist Screening
Database (TSDB) System of Records.'' DHS is maintaining a mirror copy
of the Department of Justice (DOJ)/Federal Bureau of Investigation
(FBI)--019 Terrorist Screening Records System of Records (August 22,
2007, 72 FR 47073) in order to automate and simplify the current method
for transmitting the TSDB to DHS and its components.
Homeland Security Presidential Directive 6 (HSPD-6), issued in
September 2003, called for the establishment and use of a single
consolidated watchlist to improve the identification, screening, and
tracking of known or suspected terrorists and their supporters. The
FBI/TSC maintains and distributes the TSDB as the U.S. government's
consolidated terrorist watchlist. DHS and the FBI/TSC, working
together, have developed the DHS Watchlist Service (WLS) in order to
automate and simplify the current method for transmitting TSDB records
from the FBI/TSC to DHS and its components.
The WLS will allow the FBI/TSC and DHS to move away from a manual
and cumbersome process of data transmission and management to an
automated and centralized process. The WLS will replace multiple data
feeds from the FBI/TSC to DHS and its components, as documented by
information sharing agreements, with a single feed from the FBI/TSC to
DHS and its components. The WLS is a system to system secure connection
with no direct user interface.
DHS and its components are authorized to access TSDB records via
the WLS pursuant to the terms of information sharing agreements with
FBI/TSC. DHS is publishing this SORN and has published privacy impact
assessments to provide additional transparency into how DHS has
implemented WLS. DHS will review and update this SORN no less then
biennially as new DHS systems come online with the WLS and are approved
consistent with the terms of agreements with FBI/TSC. There are five
DHS systems that currently receive TSDB data directly from the FBI/TSC
and will use the WLS. These systems have existing SORNs that cover the
use of the TSDB:
(1) Transportation Security Administration (TSA), Office of
Transportation Threat Assessment and Credentialing: DHS/TSA--002
Transportation Security Threat Assessment System (May 19, 2010, 75 FR
28046);
(2) TSA, Secure Flight Program: DHS/TSA--019 Secure Flight Records
System (November 9, 2007, 72 FR 63711);
(3) U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), Passenger Systems
Program Office for inclusion in TECS: DHS/CBP--011 TECS System
(December 19, 2008 73 FR 77778);
(4) U.S. Visitor and Immigration Status Indicator Technology (US-
VISIT) Program for inclusion into the DHS Enterprise Biometrics Service
(IDENT): DHS/USVISIT--0012 DHS Automated Biometric Identification
System (June 5, 2007, 72 FR 31080); and
In addition, two DHS components will receive TSDB data via the WLS
in the form of a computer readable extract. The components' use of the
TSDB data is covered by existing SORNs:
(1) Office of Intelligence and Analysis (I&A): DHS/IA-001
Enterprise Records System, (May 15, 2008 73 FR 28128), and
(2) U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE): DHS/ICE-009
External Investigations, (January 5, 2010 75 FR 404).
Information stored in the WLS will be shared back with the FBI/TSC
in order to ensure that DHS and the FBI/TSC can reconcile any
differences in the database and ensure DHS has the most up-to-date and
accurate version of TSDB records. All other sharing will be conducted
pursuant to the programmatic system of records notices and privacy
impact assessments discussed in this SORN.
DHS is planning future enhancements to the WLS that will provide
for a central mechanism to receive information from DHS components when
they encounter a potential match to the TSDB and send this information
to the FBI/TSC. DHS will update this SORN to reflect such enhancements
to the WLS, as part of its biennial reviews of this SORN once that
capability is implemented.
DHS is publishing this SORN to cover the Department's use of the
TSDB in order to provider greater transparency to the process.
Concurrent with the publication of this SORN, DHS is issuing a
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking to exempt this system from specific
sections of the Privacy Act.
II. Privacy Act
The Privacy Act embodies fair information practice principles in a
statutory framework governing the means by which the U.S. Government
collects, maintains, uses, and disseminates personally identifiable
information. The Privacy Act applies to information that is maintained
in a ``system of records.'' A ``system of records'' is a group of any
records under the control of an agency from which information is
retrieved by the name of the individual or by some identifying number,
symbol, or other identifying particular assigned to the individual. In
the Privacy Act, an individual is defined to encompass U.S. citizens
and lawful permanent residents. As a matter of policy, DHS extends
administrative Privacy Act protections to all individuals where systems
of records maintain information on U.S. citizens, lawful permanent
residents, and visitors.
The Privacy Act allows government agencies to exempt certain
records from the access and amendment provisions. If an agency claims
an exemption, however, it must issue a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking to
make clear to the public the reasons why a particular exemption is
claimed.
DHS is claiming exemptions from certain requirements of the Privacy
Act for DHS/ALL--030 Use of the Terrorist Screening Database System of
Records. Some information in DHS/ALL--030 Use of the Terrorist
Screening Database System of Records relates to official DHS national
security and law enforcement activities. These exemptions are needed to
protect information relating to DHS activities from disclosure to
subjects or others related to these activities. Specifically, the
exemptions are required to preclude subjects of these activities from
frustrating these processes. Disclosure of information to the subject
of the inquiry could also permit the subject to avoid detection or
apprehension. In addition, as a recipient of a mirror copy of the
[[Page 39317]]
TSDB, which is maintained by the FBI/TSC, DHS is carrying forward the
exemptions taken by the DOJ/FBI--019 Terrorist Screening Records System
of Records (August 22, 2007, 72 FR 47073) in order to prevent these
records from improper disclosure. The exemptions proposed here are
standard law enforcement and national security exemptions exercised by
a large number of federal law enforcement and intelligence agencies. In
appropriate circumstances, where compliance would not appear to
interfere with or adversely affect the law enforcement purposes of this
system and the overall law enforcement process, the applicable
exemptions may be waived on a case by case basis.
A notice of system of records for DHS/ALL--030 Use of Terrorist
Screening Database System of Records is also published in this issue of
the Federal Register.
List of Subjects in 6 CFR Part 5
Freedom of information; Privacy.
For the reasons stated in the preamble, DHS proposes to amend
Chapter I of Title 6, Code of Federal Regulations, as follows:
PART 5--DISCLOSURE OF RECORDS AND INFORMATION
1. The authority citation for Part 5 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 6 U.S.C. 101 et seq.; Pub. L. 107-296, 116 Stat.
2135; 5 U.S.C. 301. Subpart A also issued under 5 U.S.C. 552.
Subpart B also issued under 5 U.S.C. 552a.
2. At the end of Appendix C to Part 5, add paragraph 55 to read as
follows:
Appendix C to Part 5--DHS Systems of Records Exempt From the Privacy
Act
* * * * *
55. The DHS/ALL--030 Use of Terrorist Screening Database System
of Records consists of electronic and paper records and will be used
by DHS and its components. The DHS/ALL--030 Use of Terrorist
Screening Database System of Records is a repository of information
held by DHS in connection with its several and varied missions and
functions, including, but not limited to the enforcement of civil
and criminal laws; investigations, inquiries, and proceedings there
under; national security and intelligence activities; and protection
of the President of the U.S. or other individuals pursuant to
Section 3056 and 3056A of Title 18. The DHS/ALL--030 Use of
Terrorist Screening Database System of Records contains information
that is collected by, on behalf of, in support of, or in cooperation
with DHS and its components and may contain personally identifiable
information collected by other federal, state, local, tribal,
foreign, or international government agencies. The Secretary of
Homeland Security has exempted this system from the following
provisions of the Privacy Act, subject to the limitations set forth
in 5 U.S.C. 552a(c)(3) and (c)(4); (d); (e)(1), (e)(2), (e)(3),
(e)(4)(G), (e)(4)(H), (e)(4)(I), (e)(5), (e)(8), (e)(12); (f);
(g)(1); and (h) pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(j)(2). Additionally, the
Secretary of Homeland Security has exempted this system from the
following provisions of the Privacy Act, subject to the limitation
set forth in 5 U.S.C. 552a(c)(3); (d); (e)(1), (e)(4)(G), (e)(4)(H),
(e)(4)(I); and (f) pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(1) and (k)(2).
Exemptions from these particular subsections are justified, on a
case-by-case basis to be determined at the time a request is made,
for the following reasons:
(a) From subsection (c)(3) and (4) (Accounting for Disclosures)
because release of the accounting of disclosures could alert the
subject of an investigation of an actual or potential criminal,
civil, or regulatory violation to the existence of that
investigation and reveal investigative interest on the part of DHS
as well as the recipient agency. Disclosure of the accounting would
therefore present a serious impediment to law enforcement efforts
and/or efforts to preserve national security. Disclosure of the
accounting would also permit the individual who is the subject of a
record to impede the investigation, to tamper with witnesses or
evidence, and to avoid detection or apprehension, which would
undermine the entire investigative process.
(b) From subsection (d) (Access to Records) because access to
the records contained in this system of records could inform the
subject of an investigation of an actual or potential criminal,
civil, or regulatory violation to the existence of that
investigation and reveal investigative interest on the part of DHS
or another agency. Access to the records could permit the individual
who is the subject of a record to impede the investigation, to
tamper with witnesses or evidence, and to avoid detection or
apprehension. Amendment of the records could interfere with ongoing
investigations and law enforcement activities and would impose an
unreasonable administrative burden by requiring investigations to be
continually reinvestigated. In addition, permitting access and
amendment to such information could disclose security-sensitive
information that could be detrimental to homeland security.
(c) From subsection (e)(1) (Relevancy and Necessity of
Information) because in the course of investigations into potential
violations of federal law, the accuracy of information obtained or
introduced occasionally may be unclear, or the information may not
be strictly relevant or necessary to a specific investigation. In
the interests of effective law enforcement, it is appropriate to
retain all information that may aid in establishing patterns of
unlawful activity.
(d) From subsection (e)(2) (Collection of Information from
Individuals) because requiring that information be collected from
the subject of an investigation would alert the subject to the
nature or existence of the investigation, thereby interfering with
that investigation and related law enforcement activities.
(e) From subsection (e)(3) (Notice to Subjects) because
providing such detailed information could impede law enforcement by
compromising the existence of a confidential investigation or reveal
the identity of witnesses or confidential informants.
(f) From subsections (e)(4)(G), (e)(4)(H), and (e)(4)(I) (Agency
Requirements) and (f) (Agency Rules), because portions of this
system are exempt from the individual access provisions of
subsection (d) for the reasons noted above, and therefore DHS is not
required to establish requirements, rules, or procedures with
respect to such access. Providing notice to individuals with respect
to existence of records pertaining to them in the system of records
or otherwise setting up procedures pursuant to which individuals may
access and view records pertaining to themselves in the system would
undermine investigative efforts and reveal the identities of
witnesses, and potential witnesses, and confidential informants.
(g) From subsection (e)(5) (Collection of Information) because
with the collection of information for law enforcement purposes, it
is impossible to determine in advance what information is accurate,
relevant, timely, and complete. Compliance with subsection (e)(5)
would preclude DHS agents from using their investigative training
and exercise of good judgment to both conduct and report on
investigations.
(h) From subsection (e)(8) (Notice on Individuals) because
compliance would interfere with DHS's ability to obtain, serve, and
issue subpoenas, warrants, and other law enforcement mechanisms that
may be filed under seal and could result in disclosure of
investigative techniques, procedures, and evidence.
(i) From subsection (e)(12) (Computer Matching) if the agency is
a recipient agency or a source agency in a matching program with a
non-Federal agency, with respect to any establishment or revision of
a matching program, at least 30 days prior to conducting such
program, publish in the Federal Register notice of such
establishment or revision.
(j) From subsection (g)(1) (Civil Remedies) to the extent that
the system is exempt from other specific subsections of the Privacy
Act.
(k) From subsection (h) (Legal Guardians) the parent of any
minor, or the legal guardian of any individual who has been declared
to be incompetent due to physical or mental incapacity or age by a
court of competent jurisdiction, may act on behalf of the
individual.
Mary Ellen Callahan,
Chief Privacy Officer, Department of Homeland Security.
[FR Doc. 2011-16806 Filed 7-5-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
