AmeriCorps State/National, Senior Companions, Foster Grandparents, and Retired and Senior Volunteer Program, 39361-39367 [2011-16509]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 129 / Wednesday, July 6, 2011 / Proposed Rules
required for the establishment of a
tolerance exemption for inert
ingredients. Contact: Alganesh Debesai,
(703) 308–8353, e-mail address:
debesai.alganesh@epa.gov.
List of Subjects
Environmental protection,
Agricultural commodities, Feed
additives, Food additives, Pesticides
and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Dated: June 24, 2011.
Lois Rossi,
Director, Registration Division, Office of
Pesticide Programs.
Corporation for National and
Community Service, 1201 New York
Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20525.
Members of the public may review
copies of all communications received
on this rulemaking at https://
www.regulations.gov or at the
Corporation’s Washington, DC
headquarters.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Amy Borgstrom at (202) 606–6930. The
TDD/TTY number is (202) 606–3472.
You may request this notice in an
alternative format for the visually
impaired.
[FR Doc. 2011–16873 Filed 7–5–11; 8:45 am]
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
List of Topics
CORPORATION FOR NATIONAL AND
COMMUNITY SERVICE
45 CFR Parts 2510, 2540, 2551, 2552
RIN 3045–AA56
AmeriCorps State/National, Senior
Companions, Foster Grandparents,
and Retired and Senior Volunteer
Program
Corporation for National and
Community Service.
ACTION: Proposed rule with request for
comments.
AGENCY:
The Corporation for National
and Community Service (the
Corporation) proposes amendments to
its National Service Criminal History
Check regulations to require grantees to
conduct and document criminal history
checks (including both state criminal
history checks and FBI fingerprint
checks) on Senior Companions, Foster
Grandparents, Retired Senior Volunteer
Program grant-funded staff, Learn and
Serve America, AmeriCorps State/
National (including Education Award
Program) participants, and other
Corporation grant-funded participants
and grant-funded staff in all Corporation
programs, who, on a recurring basis,
have access to children, persons age 60
and older, or individuals with
disabilities.
SUMMARY:
To be certain your comments are
considered, they must reach the
Corporation on or before August 5,
2011.
jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
DATES:
You may send your
comments electronically through the
Federal government’s one-stop
rulemaking Web site at https://
www.regulations.gov. You may also mail
or deliver your comments to Amy
Borgstrom, Docket Manager,
ADDRESSES:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:52 Jul 05, 2011
Jkt 223001
I. Invitation to Comment
II. Background
(a) Prior to Passage of the Kennedy Serve
America Act of 2009
(b) Expanded Definition of ‘‘Covered
Individual’’
(c) Heightened Standard for Individuals
With Recurring Access to Vulnerable
Populations
III. Contents of Proposed Rule
(a) Definitions
(b) Eligibility Criteria—AmeriCorps State
and National
(c) National Service Criminal History
Checks Generally
(d) Special Rule for Individuals With
Recurring Access to Vulnerable
Populations
(e) Alternative Screening Protocol for
Individuals With Recurring Access to
Vulnerable Populations
(f) Consecutive Terms
(g) No Unaccompanied Access to
Vulnerable Populations Pending
Criminal History Results
(h) Documentation Requirements
(i) Costs
IV. Non-Regulatory Matters
V. Effective Dates
VI. Regulatory Procedures
I. Invitation To Comment
We invite you to submit comments
about these proposed regulations online
at https://www.regulations.gov. To
ensure that your comments have
maximum value in helping us develop
the final regulations, we urge you to
identify clearly the specific section or
sections of the proposed regulations that
each comment addresses and to arrange
your comments in the same order as the
proposed regulations. During and after
the comment period, you may inspect
public comments about these proposed
regulations submitted online at https://
www.regulations.gov, or in person in
room 10615, 1201 New York Avenue,
NW., Washington, DC, between the
hours of 9 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., Eastern
Time, Monday through Friday of each
week except Federal holidays.
PO 00000
Frm 00047
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
39361
Assistance to Individuals With
Disabilities in Reviewing the
Rulemaking Record
On request, we will supply an
appropriate aid, such as a reader or
print magnifier, to an individual with a
disability who needs assistance to
review the comments or other
documents in the public rulemaking
record for these proposed regulations. If
you want to schedule an appointment
for this type of aid, please contact the
person listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT.
II. Background
(a) Prior to Passage of the Kennedy
Serve America Act of 2009
The Corporation initially engaged in
rulemaking concerning the requirement
for grantees to conduct criminal history
checks on national service participants
and grant-funded staff in 2007. In that
rule, the Corporation required programs
to conduct National Service Criminal
History Checks—consisting of a
statewide search of a state’s criminal
registry (for both the state where the
individual resides at the time of
application and the state where the
individual will be serving) and a check
of the Department of Justice’s National
Sex Offender Public Web site
(NSOPW)—on all ‘‘covered
individuals.’’ Covered individuals were
those program staff and participants
who had recurring access to children,
the elderly, and to individuals with
disabilities. Recurring access was
defined as having contact with
individuals from one or more of the
above groups on more than one
occasion. The regulations did not cover
the RSVP and Learn and Serve
programs, nor did they cover the NCCC
and VISTA programs, which are
Federally operated programs that have
their own criminal history
requirements.
Those regulations offered the option
of requesting approval of an alternative
search procedure (also known as an
‘‘alternative screening protocol’’ or
‘‘ASP’’), which would permit an entity
that could demonstrate that it was
‘‘prohibited or otherwise precluded
under state law from complying with a
Corporation requirement relating to
criminal history checks or that [it] could
obtain substantially equivalent or better
information through an alternative
process’’ to use a process other than the
one outlined by the Corporation. (45
CFR 2540.206). Under this rule, an
entity had the option of using a national
FBI fingerprint-based check in lieu of
the state criminal registry check without
obtaining prior Corporation approval.
E:\FR\FM\06JYP1.SGM
06JYP1
39362
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 129 / Wednesday, July 6, 2011 / Proposed Rules
jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
(b) Expanded Definition of ‘‘Covered
Individuals’’
covered position to include individuals
who had been convicted of murder.
In 2009, Congress passed the Kennedy
Serve America Act of 2009 (Pub. L. 111–
13) (SAA), which amended the National
and Community Service Act of 1990 (42
U.S.C. 12501 et seq.) (NCSA) by
codifying the Corporation’s regulatory
National Service Criminal History
Check requirements, and by expanding
the categories of individuals required to
undergo criminal history checks. Under
the new statutory requirements, as of
October 1, 2009 (the effective date of the
SAA), any entity selecting an individual
to serve in a position in which the
individual receives a living allowance,
stipend, national service educational
award or salary through a program
receiving assistance under the national
service laws must conduct a criminal
history check on that individual.
Accordingly, the SAA expanded the
definition (and consequently the
number) of ‘‘covered individuals’’ to
those individuals described above
without regard to their access to
vulnerable populations.
As directed by the SAA, the
Corporation issued new regulations in
2009, expanding coverage to any
national service participant or grantfunded employee who received one of
the above-described payments for his or
her service or employment. (74 FR
46495). Now included in this group of
covered individuals are grant-funded
staff serving in any Corporation-funded
national service program, including
RSVP and Learn and Serve grant-funded
staff, as well as participants in all
Corporation grant programs, if the
individual receives one of the types of
remuneration described above. This
includes the Non-profit Capacity
Building and Social Innovation Fund
grant programs.
Pursuant to these regulations, each
individual meeting the amended
description of a ‘‘covered individual’’
hired or enrolled in a program on or
after October 1, 2009, is required to
undergo a full National Service Criminal
History Check including: (a) A search of
either (1) the state criminal registry in
the state in which the program is
operating and the state in which the
individual resides at the time of
application, or (2) a Federal Bureau of
Investigation (FBI) fingerprint check;
and (b) a nationwide check of the
NSOPW.
In addition to expanding the
definition of ‘‘covered individuals,’’ the
Serve America Act expanded the types
of offenses that would render an
individual ineligible to serve in a
(c) Heightened Standard for Individuals
With Recurring Access to Vulnerable
Populations
Under section 189D(d) of the NCSA,
as amended by the SAA, beginning
April 21, 2011, entities that select
covered individuals over the age of 18
who will have recurring access to
vulnerable populations as part of their
position must conduct both a statewide
criminal history check and an FBI
fingerprint-based check. As described
herein, section 189D(d)(3) of the NCSA
permits limited exceptions to this
heightened requirement.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:52 Jul 05, 2011
Jkt 223001
III. Contents of Proposed Rule
The Corporation is undertaking this
rulemaking to implement the
amendments made by the SAA with
regard to heightened screening
requirements for covered individuals
with recurring access to vulnerable
populations. In addition, this proposed
rule clarifies several existing
requirements, and makes several minor
technical corrections for clarity.
(a) Definitions
(1) Definition of ‘‘program.’’ (§ 2510.20)
The SAA amended the definition of
‘‘program’’ in the NCSA to include
newly-authorized programs such as
Campuses of Service, Serve America
and Encore Fellows, Silver Scholars, the
Social Innovation Fund, and activities
funded under programs such as the
Volunteer Generation Fund. This
proposed rule corrects the definition of
‘‘program’’ in regulation to align with
the definition in statute.
(2) Definition of ‘‘covered individual.’’
(§ 2540.200)
To clarify that it is not necessary to
conduct checks on individuals whose
connection to the program is tangential
(such as an individual who provides
training to participants and volunteers
on occasion but is otherwise not integral
to the operation of the program) or who
is intended as a beneficiary (such as a
child who receives a cash prize for
completing a service-learning project
hosted by the program), this rule
proposes to amend the definition of
‘‘covered individual’’ by removing the
clause ‘‘or other remuneration.’’ A
covered individual is any individual
who receives a Corporation grantfunded living allowance, stipend,
national service education award, or
salary for participation in or
employment by a program. An
individual who receives some financial
benefit through a national service
PO 00000
Frm 00048
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
program but who does not otherwise
perform any service to implement the
program is not a covered individual.
(b) Eligibility Criteria—AmeriCorps
State and National
The Serve America Act expanded the
list of offenses that would render an
individual ineligible for service to
include conviction for murder. The
Corporation amended its regulations to
align with this statutory change in 2009,
but through that rulemaking
inadvertently neglected to amend the
regulation on eligibility to serve in an
AmeriCorps State and National position.
This rule amends § 2522.200 to expand
the list of eligibility criteria to serve in
an AmeriCorps State and National to
include satisfaction of the National
Service Criminal History Check
eligibility criteria.
(c) National Service Criminal History
Checks Generally (§ 2540.202)
In practice, the National Service
Criminal History Check for covered
individuals includes: (1) a name or
fingerprint-based state registry check of
the state where the program is operating
and the state where the individual
resides at the time of application or
nationwide check by submitting
fingerprints to the FBI; and (2) a check
of the NSOPW. This proposed rule
makes technical edits to the regulatory
language to conform to current practice.
Since promulgating criminal history
check rules in 2007, the Corporation has
applied the first prong of this test to
programs operating in more than one
state by requiring such programs to
conduct the state registry check in the
state where the covered individual will
be primarily serving or working. This
proposed rule would also codify this
clarification.
(d) Special Rule for Individuals With
Recurring Access to Vulnerable
Populations (§ 2540.202)
As required by section 189D of the
NCSA, as amended by the SAA, under
this rule, unless the Corporation
approves an alternative screening
protocol under § 2540.206, for each
covered individual a program hires or
enrolls on or after April 21, 2011, who
is age 18 or older and whose position
will involve recurring access to
vulnerable populations, in addition to a
National Sex Offender Public Web site
(https://www.nsopw.gov) check, the
program must conduct: (1) A search (by
name or fingerprint) of the state
criminal registry for the state in which
the program operates and the state in
which the individual resides at the time
of application; and (2) a national search
E:\FR\FM\06JYP1.SGM
06JYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 129 / Wednesday, July 6, 2011 / Proposed Rules
by submitting fingerprints to the Federal
Bureau of Investigation.
‘‘Recurring access’’ is defined as ‘‘the
ability on more than one occasion to
approach, observe, or communicate
with, an individual, through physical
proximity or other means, including but
not limited to, electronic or telephonic
communication.’’ (45 CFR 2510.20).
In anticipation of this heightened
requirement, current grantees have
inquired into whether the Corporation
would be developing a centralized
mechanism for conducting FBI checks
for national service participants. While
the Corporation is committed to
identifying ways to decrease burden on
grantees, at this time no such
centralized mechanism is available.
jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
(e) Alternative Screening Protocol for
Individuals With Recurring Access to
Vulnerable Populations (§ 2540.206)
Under this proposed rule, an entity
may apply to the Corporation for
approval of an ASP that would relieve
the entity from the requirement to
conduct both the statewide and national
checks on a covered individual with
recurring access to vulnerable
populations.
The Corporation will approve an ASP
for this requirement if the entity
demonstrates: (1) The service provided
by the individual serving with the entity
to a vulnerable population is episodic in
nature or for a 1-day period; (2) the cost
to the program of complying with
§ 2540.202(b) of this chapter is
prohibitive; (3) the program is not
authorized, or is otherwise unable,
under state or Federal law, to access the
national criminal history background
check system of the FBI; or (4) the
program cannot comply with the
requirement for good cause, as
determined and approved by the
Corporation.
(1) Episodic Access (§ 2540.206)
Congress specifically exempted from
heightened coverage those individuals
whose access to vulnerable populations
is ‘‘episodic in nature or for a 1-day
period.’’ While the heightened coverage
applies to all individuals with
‘‘recurring access,’’ or access on more
than one occasion, it will not apply to
those individuals whose recurring
access is ‘‘episodic in nature.’’
For the purposes of this rule, the
Corporation proposes to define
‘‘episodic’’ as access that is not a
regular, scheduled, and anticipated
component of an individual’s position
description. If access to vulnerable
populations is not a regular, scheduled,
and anticipated component of the
position description, the program is not
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:52 Jul 05, 2011
Jkt 223001
required to conduct both an FBI and a
state check on the individual.
For example, consider an individual
who is applying for an AmeriCorps
position with an environmental program
that involves volunteer coordination. If
the program anticipates that the position
will involve coordinating high school
student volunteers on a regular basis,
the individual will need the heightened
check. However, if the program has no
reason to expect that the position will
involve coordinating 17-year-old and
younger volunteers because the program
has never operated in a youth
environment and does not have any
youth engagement goals, and does not
recruit high school age volunteers, any
contact with a child volunteer would be
irregular, unscheduled, and
unanticipated, and thus, episodic.
Therefore, it would be unnecessary to
conduct a heighted check on the
individual.
The Corporation does not propose a
numeric component for the
determination of whether or not access
is episodic. In other words, if a program
does not anticipate that a member will
have access to vulnerable populations,
the requirement would not materialize
after a specific number of incidents of
access occur.
The Corporation expects that in the
majority of cases it will be clear whether
or not access to vulnerable populations
is an anticipated, regular component of
a position description. Nevertheless, the
Corporation recommends that programs
specifically address contact with
vulnerable populations in each position
description. If incidental access
becomes unexpectedly regular or
frequent, a program may want to take
additional precautionary measures
based on the circumstances.
(2) Alternative Search Protocols
Approved for ‘‘Good Cause’’
The Corporation will publish on its
Web site those scenarios for which the
Corporation has approved ASPs for
‘‘good cause’’ based on requests
received following the publication of
this rule. This list may be expanded and
codified in regulation in the future.
(f) Consecutive Terms (§ 2540.203)
Under current 45 CFR 2540.203(c),
(redesignated as 2540.203(b) under this
proposed rule) it is not necessary to
perform an additional check on an
individual who serves in consecutive
terms of service with a program with a
break in service of fewer than 30 days.
This section permits a program to forego
additional checks for individuals
serving consecutive terms, but is based
upon a presumption that the additional
PO 00000
Frm 00049
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
39363
check would essentially replicate the
original check.
Each individual hired or enrolled into
a covered position that involves
recurring access to vulnerable
populations after April 21, 2011, is
required to undergo the enhanced
criminal history check. The fact that an
individual met the criminal history
check requirements at the time the
individual was hired or enrolled in a
prior term of service does not excuse the
individual from the enhanced
requirements at the time the individual
is hired or enrolled in a subsequent
term, even if there has been a break in
service of fewer than 30 days.
If a program can demonstrate that the
check performed on an individual
during the previous term would meet
the current requirements, it is not
necessary to perform an additional
check. For example, if, at the time the
covered individual was hired or
enrolled in a prior term, the program
conducted the NSOPR check, a state
check, and an FBI check, it is
unnecessary to replicate the entire
process for the subsequent term if there
is a break in service of fewer than 30
days.
(g) No Unaccompanied Access to
Vulnerable Populations Pending
Criminal History Results (§ 2540.204)
Under current rules, an individual for
whom the results of a required state
criminal registry check are pending is
not permitted access to vulnerable
populations ‘‘without being
accompanied by an authorized program
representative who has previously been
cleared for such access.’’ 45 CFR
2540.204(g). Since the initial
promulgation of this rule, it has come to
our attention that it is common for the
vulnerable beneficiary in question to be
accompanied by a parent, legal
guardian, teacher, doctor, nurse, or
other individual responsible for his or
her care.
The Corporation does not believe it is
necessary for a selected individual with
pending criminal history results to be
accompanied by an authorized program
representative who has received the
appropriate criminal history check
when the vulnerable individual is
accompanied by an individual
responsible for his or her care. Thus,
under this proposed rule, a covered
individual may be selected and placed
while state or FBI criminal history
checks are pending, so long as the
individual is not permitted access to
vulnerable populations without being
accompanied by: (1) An authorized
program representative who has
previously been cleared for such access;
E:\FR\FM\06JYP1.SGM
06JYP1
39364
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 129 / Wednesday, July 6, 2011 / Proposed Rules
(2) a family member or legal guardian of
the vulnerable individual; or (3) an
individual authorized by the nature of
his or her profession to have recurring
access to the vulnerable individual,
such as an education or medical
professional.
For example, a covered individual
who occasionally gives nature tours to
schoolchildren as part of an
environmental program would not be
required to be accompanied by an
authorized program representative on
the tour if the students are accompanied
by teachers or parents.
issuing governmental body meets or
exceeds the Corporation’s standards for
eligibility. For example, if a program
receives a document from the statewide
criminal registry that indicates the
individual has been ‘‘cleared’’ for
service based upon an agreement that
describes the offenses that would result
in ineligibility, that clearance document
may be retained as the result of the
criminal registry check.
(i) Costs (§ 2540.204)
The proposed rule requires grantees to
obtain and document a baseline
criminal history check for covered
individuals. The Corporation considers
the cost of this required criminal history
check a reasonable and necessary
program grant expense, such costs being
presumptively eligible for
reimbursement. In any event, a grantee
should include the costs associated with
its screening process in the grant budget
it submits for approval to the
Corporation.
The proposed rule codifies the
Corporation’s guidance that, except
where approved by the Corporation, a
grantee may not charge an individual for
the cost of a National Service Criminal
(h) Documentation Requirements
(§ 2540.205)
This proposed rule clarifies that it is
not necessary to retain the actual
documents produced as a result of
conducting the statewide or FBI
criminal registry search component of
the check. Rather, it is sufficient to
retain a summary of the results certified
by an authorized program
representative, along with written
documentation that the results were
considered in selecting the individual.
The program must have reviewed and
determined that the criteria used by the
History Check. In addition, because
criminal history checks are inherently
attributable to operating a program, such
costs may not be charged to a state
commission administrative grant.
We will monitor compliance with the
rules and requirements associated with
National Service Criminal History
Checks as a material condition of
receiving a Corporation grant. A
grantee’s failure to comply with this
requirement may adversely affect the
grantee’s access to grant funds or ability
to obtain future grants from the
Corporation. In addition, a grantee
jeopardizes eligibility for
reimbursement of costs related to a
disqualified individual if it fails to
perform or properly document (as
described herein) the required National
Service Criminal History Check on
covered individuals.
IV. Non-Regulatory Matters
Coverage Based on Start Date
The table below illustrates which
requirements apply to various program
types.
TABLE 1
Date individual hired or enrolled
Recurring access to vulnerable
populations
Before
November 23, 2007 *
November 23, 2007–
September 30, 2009
October 1, 2009–
April 20, 2011
On or after
April 21, 2011
N
Program:
AmeriCorps S & N .........
FGP ...............................
Senior Companions .......
RSVP staff .....................
VISTA program grants ...
Learn & Serve ...............
Other Grant Programs ...
Yes ........
No .........
Yes ........
No .........
Yes ........
No .........
Yes ........
No .........
Yes ........
No .........
Yes ........
No .........
Yes ........
No .........
S
F
N
S
F
N
S
F
N
S
F
X
..........
X
..........
X
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
X
..........
X
..........
X
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
X
..........
X
..........
X
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
..........
X
..........
X
..........
X
..........
X
..........
X
..........
X
..........
N = NSOPW; S = State registry check; F = FBI fingerprint check
* This applies to individuals who were enrolled or employed as of November 23, 2007, but were hired or enrolled prior to that date.
jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
V. Effective Dates
VI. Regulatory Procedures
The Corporation intends to make any
final rule based on this proposal
effective no sooner than 60 days after
the final rule is published in the Federal
Register. The requirement applies to
any covered individual hired or
enrolled on or after April 21, 2011.
However, programs have until 60 days
after the publication of the final rule to
complete the heightened check.
Executive Order 12866 and Executive
Order 13563
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:52 Jul 05, 2011
Jkt 223001
Executive Orders 13563 and 12866
direct agencies to assess all costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
PO 00000
Frm 00050
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
environmental, public health and safety
effects, distributive impacts, and
equity). Executive Order 13563
emphasizes the importance of
quantifying both costs and benefits, of
reducing costs, of harmonizing rules,
and of promoting flexibility. This rule
has been designated a ‘‘significant
regulatory action’’ although not
economically significant, under section
3(f) of Executive Order 12866.
E:\FR\FM\06JYP1.SGM
06JYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 129 / Wednesday, July 6, 2011 / Proposed Rules
Accordingly, the rule has been reviewed
by the Office of Management and
Budget.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
Unfunded Mandates
For purposes of Title II of the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995, 2 U.S.C. 1531–1538, as well as
Executive Order 12875, this regulatory
action does not contain any Federal
mandate that may result in increased
expenditures in either Federal, state,
local, or Tribal governments in the
aggregate, or impose an annual burden
exceeding $100 million on the private
sector.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This proposed rule contains no
information collection requirements and
is therefore not subject to the
requirements of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1980 (44 U.S.C. 3501
et seq.).
jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Executive Order 13132, Federalism
Executive Order 13132, Federalism,
prohibits an agency from publishing any
rule that has Federalism implications if
the rule either imposes substantial
direct compliance costs on state and
local governments and is not required
by statute, or the rule preempts state
law, unless the agency meets the
consultation and funding requirements
of section 6 of the Executive Order. The
proposed rule does not have any
Federalism implications, as described
above.
16:52 Jul 05, 2011
§ 2522.200 What are the eligibility
requirements for an AmeriCorps
participant?
45 CFR Part 2510
Grant programs—social programs.
45 CFR Part 2522
As required by the Regulatory
Flexibility Act of 1980 (5 U.S.C. 605
(b)), the Corporation certifies that this
rule, if adopted, will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
This regulatory action will not result in
(1) an annual effect on the economy of
$100 million or more; (2) a major
increase in costs or prices for
consumers, individual industries,
Federal, state, or local government
agencies, or geographic regions; or (3)
significant adverse effects on
competition, employment, investment,
productivity, innovation, or on the
ability of United States-based
enterprises to compete with foreignbased enterprises in domestic and
export markets. Therefore, the
Corporation has not performed the
initial regulatory flexibility analysis that
is required under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) for
major rules that are expected to have
such results.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
List of Subjects
Jkt 223001
Grant programs—social programs,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Volunteers.
45 CFR Part 2540
Administrative practice and
procedure, Grant programs—social
programs, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Volunteers.
45 CFR Part 2551
Aged, Grant programs—social
programs, Volunteers.
45 CFR Part 2552
Aged, Grant programs—social
programs, Volunteers.
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, the Corporation for National
and Community Service proposes to
amend chapter XXV, title 45 of the Code
of Federal Regulations as follows:
PART 2510—OVERALL PURPOSES
AND DEFINITIONS
1. The authority citation for Part 2510
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 12511.
2. Amend § 2510.20 by revising the
definition of ‘‘program’’ to read as
follows:
§ 2510.20
39365
Definitions.
*
*
*
*
*
Program. The term program, unless
the context otherwise requires, and
except when used as part of the term
academic program, means a program
described in section 112(a) (other than
a program referred to in paragraph (3)(B)
of that section), 118A, or 118(b)(1), or
subsection (a), (b), or (c) of section 122,
or in paragraph (1) or (2) of section
152(b), section 198B, 198C, 198H, or
a98K, or an activity that could be
funded under section 179A, 198, 198O,
198P, or 199N.
PART 2522—AMERICORPS
PARTICIPANTS, PROGRAMS, AND
APPLICANTS
1. The authority citation for Part 2522
continues to read as follows:
(a) * * *
(4) Satisfy the National Service
Criminal History Check eligibility
criteria pursuant to 45 CFR § 2540.201.
*
*
*
*
*
3. Revise § 2522.205 to read as
follows:
§ 2522.205 To whom must I apply eligibility
criteria relating to criminal history?
You must apply eligibility criteria
relating to criminal history to a
participant or staff position for which an
individual receives a Corporation grantfunded living allowance, stipend,
education award, or salary for
participation in or employment by a
program as defined in § 2510.20 of this
chapter.
§ 2522.206
[Removed and Reserved]
4. Remove and reserve § 2522.206.
5. Revise § 2522.207 to read as
follows:
§ 2522.207 What are the procedures I must
follow to determine an individual’s eligibility
to serve in a covered position?
In determining an individual’s
eligibility to serve in a covered position,
you must follow the procedures in part
2540 of this title.
PART 2540—GENERAL
ADMINISTRATIVE PROVISIONS
6. The authority citation for Part 2540
continues to read as follows:
Authority: E.O. 13331, 69 FR 9911; 18
U.S.C. 506, 701, 1017; 42 U.S.C. 12653,
12631–12637; 42 U.S.C. 5065.
7. Revise § 2540.200 to read as
follows:
§ 2540.200 To whom must I apply eligibility
criteria relating to criminal history?
You must apply eligibility criteria
relating to criminal history to an
individual applying for, or serving in, a
position for which the individual
receives a Corporation grant-funded
living allowance, stipend, education
award, or salary for participation in or
employment by a program as defined in
§ 2510.20 of this chapter.
8. Revise § 2540.201 to read as
follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 12571–12595;
12651b–12651d; E.O. 13331, 69 FR 9911
§ 2540.201 What eligibility criteria must I
apply to a covered position in connection
with the National Service Criminal History
Check?
2. Amend § 2522.200 by:
a. Removing the period at the end of
paragraph (a)(3) and adding a semicolon
in its place; and
b. Adding a new paragraph (a)(4) to
read as follows:
In addition to eligibility criteria
established by the program, an
individual shall be ineligible to serve in
a covered position if the individual—
(a) Refuses to consent to a criminal
registry check described in § 2540.202 of
PO 00000
Frm 00051
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\06JYP1.SGM
06JYP1
39366
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 129 / Wednesday, July 6, 2011 / Proposed Rules
this chapter or makes a false statement
in connection with a grantee’s inquiry
concerning the individual’s criminal
history;
(b) Is registered, or required to be
registered, on a state sex offender
registry or the National Sex Offender
Registry; and
(c) Has been convicted of murder, as
defined in section 1111 of title 18,
United States Code.
9. Revise § 2540.202 to read as
follows:
jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 2540.202 What search components of
the National Service Criminal History Check
must I satisfy to determine an individual’s
suitability to serve in a covered position?
(a) In general. Unless the Corporation
approves an alternative screening
protocol under § 2540.206 of this
chapter, in determining an individual’s
suitability to serve in a covered
position, you are responsible for
conducting and documenting a National
Service Criminal History Check, which
consists of the following two search
components:
(1) State or FBI criminal registry
search.
(i) A search (by name or fingerprint)
of the state criminal registry for
(A) The state in which the program
operates (for multi-state programs, the
state where the individual will be
primarily serving or working) and
(B) The state in which the individual
resides at the time of application; or
(ii) Submitting fingerprints to the
Federal Bureau of Investigation for a
national criminal history background
check; and
(2) National Sex Offender Public
Website. A name-based search of the
Department of Justice (DOJ) National
Sex Offender Public Website (NSOPW).
(b) Special rule for individuals
working with vulnerable populations.
Unless the Corporation approves an
alternative screening protocol under
§ 2540.206, for each covered individual
you hire or enroll on or after April 21,
2011, who is age 18 or older and whose
position will involve recurring access to
vulnerable populations, in addition to
an NSOPW check described in
paragraph (a)(2) of this section, you
must conduct both a state and
nationwide FBI criminal registry search,
consisting of—
(1) A search (by name or fingerprint)
of
(A) The state criminal registry for the
state in which your program operates
and
(B) The state in which the individual
resides at the time of application; and
(2) Submitting fingerprints to the
Federal Bureau of Investigation for a
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:52 Jul 05, 2011
Jkt 223001
national criminal history background
check.
10. Revise § 2540.203 to read as
follows:
§ 2540.203 When must I conduct a
National Service Criminal History Check on
an individual in a covered position?
(a) New Staff and Participants. You
must conduct a National Service
Criminal History Check upon selection
and before enrolling or hiring any new
covered individual. You must review
the results of the NSOPW prior to
enrolling or hiring the covered
individual. You may permit the covered
individual to commence grant-funded
work or service pending receipt of the
state or FBI criminal registry check
results so long as the individual is not
permitted access to vulnerable
populations without being accompanied
by an appropriate individual, as
described in § 2540.204(f) of this
chapter.
(b) Recurring Service. For an
individual who serves consecutive
terms of service in your program with a
break in service of no more than 30
days, no additional check is required
after the first term.
11. Amend § 2540.204 by:
a. Revising paragraph (f); and
b. Adding a new paragraph (g).
The revision and addition will read as
follows:
§ 2540.204 What procedures must I follow
in conducting a National Service Criminal
History Check for a covered position?
*
*
*
*
*
(f) Ensure that an individual, for
whom the results of a required state or
FBI criminal registry check are pending,
is not permitted to have access to
children, persons age 60 and older, or
individuals with disabilities without
being accompanied by:
(1) An authorized program
representative who has previously been
cleared for such access;
(2) A family member or legal guardian
of the vulnerable individual; or
(3) An individual authorized by
nature of his or her profession to have
recurring access to the vulnerable
individual, such as an education or
medical professional.
(g) Unless specifically approved by
the Corporation, a grantee may not
charge an individual for the cost of any
component of a National Service
Criminal History Check.
12. Revise § 2540.205(b) to read as
follows:
§ 2540.205 What documentation must I
maintain regarding a National Service
Criminal History Check for a covered
position?
*
PO 00000
*
Frm 00052
*
*
Fmt 4702
*
Sfmt 4702
(b) Maintain the results of the NSOPW
check, and the results or a summary of
the results issued by a state or Federal
government body of the state or FBI
searches performed for each National
Service Criminal History check (unless
precluded by state law), and document
in writing that an authorized program
representative considered the results in
selecting the individual.
13. Revise § 2540.206 to read as
follows:
§ 2540.206 Under what circumstances may
I follow alternative procedures in
conducting a National Service Criminal
History Check for a covered position?
(a) In general. If you demonstrate that
you are prohibited or otherwise
precluded under state law from
complying with a Corporation
requirement relating to criminal history
checks or that you can obtain
substantially equivalent or better
information through an alternative
process, the Corporation will consider
approving an alternative search protocol
that you submit in writing to the
Corporation’s Office of Grants
Management. The Office of Grants
Management will review the alternative
protocol to ensure that it:
(1) Verifies the identity of the
individual; and
(2) Includes a search of an alternative
criminal database that is sufficient to
identify the existence, or absence of, the
criminal offenses listed in § 2540.208 of
this chapter.
(b) Alternative Procedures for
Individuals With Recurring Access to
Vulnerable Populations. The
Corporation may exempt a program
from conducting either the statewide
and or FBI criminal history checks on
covered individuals with recurring
access to vulnerable populations, as
described in § 2540.202 of this chapter,
if the program demonstrates that:
(1) The service provided by the
individual serving with the entity to a
vulnerable population is episodic in
nature or for a 1-day period;
(2) The cost to the program of
complying with § 2540.202(b) of this
chapter is prohibitive;
(3) The program is not authorized, or
is otherwise unable, under state or
Federal law, to access the state registry
or the national criminal history
background check system of the FBI; or
(4) The program cannot comply with
§ 2540.202(b) of this chapter for good
cause, as determined and approved by
the Corporation.
(c) Episodic Access. For the purposes
of this section, an individual’s service to
a vulnerable population is considered to
be episodic in nature if the service is not
E:\FR\FM\06JYP1.SGM
06JYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 129 / Wednesday, July 6, 2011 / Proposed Rules
a regular, scheduled, and anticipated
component of the individual’s position
description.
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
§ 2540.207
50 CFR Part 21
[Removed and reserved].
14. Remove and reserve § 2540.207.
PART 2551—SENIOR COMPANION
PROGRAM
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 4950 et seq.; 42 U.S.C.
12651b–12651d; E.O. 13331, 69 FR 9911.
16. Amend § 2551.23 by adding a new
paragraph (l) to read as follows:
§ 2551.23 What are the sponsor’s program
responsibilities?
*
*
*
*
*
(l) Conduct criminal history checks on
all Senior Companions and Senior
Companion grant-funded employees
who enroll in, or are hired by, your
program after November 23, 2007, in
accordance with the National Service
Criminal History Check requirements in
45 CFR §§ 2540.200–207.
§§ 2551.26, 2551.27, 2551.28, 2551.29,
2551.30, 2551.31, 2551.32 [Removed and
Reserved].
17. Remove and reserve §§ 2551.26,
2551.27, 2551.28, 2551.29, 2551.30,
2551.31, 2551.32.
PART 2552—FOSTER GRANDPARENT
PROGRAM
18. The authority citation for Part
2552 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 4950 et seq., 42 U.S.C.
12651b–12651d; E.O. 13331, 69 FR 9911.
19. Amend § 2552.23 by adding a new
paragraph (l) to read as follows:
§ 2552.23 What are a sponsor’s program
responsibilities?
*
*
*
*
*
(l) Conduct criminal history checks on
all Foster Grandparents and Foster
Grandparent grant-funded employees
who enroll in, or are hired by, your
program after November 23, 2007, in
accordance with the National Service
Criminal History Check requirements in
45 CFR §§ 2540.200–207.
jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 2552.26, 2552.27, 2552.28, 2552.29,
2552.30, 2552.31, 2552.32 [Removed and
Reserved]
Dated: June 24, 2011.
Valerie Green,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2011–16509 Filed 7–5–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6050–28–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:52 Jul 05, 2011
Jkt 223001
[Docket No. FWS–R9–MB–2011–0020;
91200–1231–9BPP]
RIN 1018–AX78
15. The authority citation for part
2551 continues to read as follows:
20. Remove and reserve § 2552.26,
2552.27, 2552.28, 2552.29, 2552.30,
2552.31, 2552.32.
Fish and Wildlife Service
Migratory Bird Permits; Changes in the
Regulations Governing Raptor
Propagation
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Advance notice of proposed
rulemaking.
AGENCY:
We solicit recommendations
on whether the bald eagle (Haliaeetus
leucocephalus) and the golden eagle
(Aquila chrysaetos) should be included
among other raptors that may be
propagated in captivity under Federal
raptor propagation permits.
DATES: We will accept comments
received or postmarked by the end of
the day on October 4, 2011.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
by either one of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments
on Docket No. FWS–R9–MB–2011–
0020.
• U.S. mail or hand delivery: Public
Comments Processing, Attention: FWS–
R9–MB–2011–0020; Division of Policy
and Directives Management; U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service; 4401 North Fairfax
Drive, MS 2042–PDM; Arlington, VA
22203–1610.
We will not accept e-mail or faxes. We
will post all comments on https://
www.regulations.gov. This generally
means that we will post any personal
information that you provide. See the
Public Comments section below for
more information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr.
George T. Allen, 703–358–1825.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
Public Comments
Propagation of bald eagles and golden
eagles has not been allowed under the
raptor propagation permit regulations at
50 CFR 21.30. We are now considering
whether to permit this activity. We
request comments and suggestions on
this topic from the public, other
concerned governmental agencies, the
scientific community, industry, and
other interested parties.
You may submit your comments and
supporting materials only by one of the
methods listed in the ADDRESSES
section. We will not consider comments
PO 00000
Frm 00053
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
39367
sent by e-mail or fax, or written
comments sent to an address other than
the one listed in the ADDRESSES section.
If you submit a comment via https://
www.regulations.gov, your entire
comment—including any personal
identifying information—will be posted
on the Web site. If you submit a
hardcopy comment that includes
personal identifying information, you
may request that we withhold this
information from public review, but we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so. We will post all hardcopy
comments on https://
www.regulations.gov.
Comments and materials we receive,
as well as supporting documentation we
used in preparing this proposed rule,
will be available for public inspection at
https://www.regulations.gov, or by
appointment, during normal business
hours, at the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service (see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT).
Background
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service is
the Federal agency with the primary
responsibility for managing migratory
birds. Our authority is based on the
Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA, 16
U.S.C. 703 et seq.) and the Bald and
Golden Eagle Protection Act (BGEPA, 16
U.S.C. 668). Regulations governing the
issuance of permits for bald eagles and
golden eagles are in 50 CFR part 22 and
certain sections of 50 CFR part 21.
The MBTA allows the Secretary of the
Interior to issue permits for take and
possession of migratory birds for many
purposes. The BGEPA allows bald
eagles and golden eagles to be taken and
possessed under more restricted
circumstances. For example, only
golden eagles that are depredating on
livestock or wildlife may be taken from
the wild by falconers, and bald eagles,
no matter what their origin, cannot be
held for falconry. Eagles may not be
sold, purchased, or bartered under any
circumstances, regardless of whether
they are wild or captive-bred in origin.
Bald and golden eagles are the only
raptor species protected by the MBTA
that are not allowed under the current
raptor propagation permit regulations at
50 CFR 21.30 because those regulations
do not apply to these two species that
are also protected under the Bald and
Golden Eagle Protection Act (see 50 CFR
21.2(b)). We are evaluating whether to
amend the regulations to allow some
holders of valid raptor propagation
permits to propagate eagles as they can
many other raptor species. Most eagles
in captivity are held under permits for
exhibition/education, eagle falconry,
and Native American eagle aviaries. All
E:\FR\FM\06JYP1.SGM
06JYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 129 (Wednesday, July 6, 2011)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 39361-39367]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-16509]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
CORPORATION FOR NATIONAL AND COMMUNITY SERVICE
45 CFR Parts 2510, 2540, 2551, 2552
RIN 3045-AA56
AmeriCorps State/National, Senior Companions, Foster
Grandparents, and Retired and Senior Volunteer Program
AGENCY: Corporation for National and Community Service.
ACTION: Proposed rule with request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Corporation for National and Community Service (the
Corporation) proposes amendments to its National Service Criminal
History Check regulations to require grantees to conduct and document
criminal history checks (including both state criminal history checks
and FBI fingerprint checks) on Senior Companions, Foster Grandparents,
Retired Senior Volunteer Program grant-funded staff, Learn and Serve
America, AmeriCorps State/National (including Education Award Program)
participants, and other Corporation grant-funded participants and
grant-funded staff in all Corporation programs, who, on a recurring
basis, have access to children, persons age 60 and older, or
individuals with disabilities.
DATES: To be certain your comments are considered, they must reach the
Corporation on or before August 5, 2011.
ADDRESSES: You may send your comments electronically through the
Federal government's one-stop rulemaking Web site at https://www.regulations.gov. You may also mail or deliver your comments to Amy
Borgstrom, Docket Manager, Corporation for National and Community
Service, 1201 New York Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20525. Members of the
public may review copies of all communications received on this
rulemaking at https://www.regulations.gov or at the Corporation's
Washington, DC headquarters.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Amy Borgstrom at (202) 606-6930. The
TDD/TTY number is (202) 606-3472. You may request this notice in an
alternative format for the visually impaired.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
List of Topics
I. Invitation to Comment
II. Background
(a) Prior to Passage of the Kennedy Serve America Act of 2009
(b) Expanded Definition of ``Covered Individual''
(c) Heightened Standard for Individuals With Recurring Access to
Vulnerable Populations
III. Contents of Proposed Rule
(a) Definitions
(b) Eligibility Criteria--AmeriCorps State and National
(c) National Service Criminal History Checks Generally
(d) Special Rule for Individuals With Recurring Access to
Vulnerable Populations
(e) Alternative Screening Protocol for Individuals With
Recurring Access to Vulnerable Populations
(f) Consecutive Terms
(g) No Unaccompanied Access to Vulnerable Populations Pending
Criminal History Results
(h) Documentation Requirements
(i) Costs
IV. Non-Regulatory Matters
V. Effective Dates
VI. Regulatory Procedures
I. Invitation To Comment
We invite you to submit comments about these proposed regulations
online at https://www.regulations.gov. To ensure that your comments have
maximum value in helping us develop the final regulations, we urge you
to identify clearly the specific section or sections of the proposed
regulations that each comment addresses and to arrange your comments in
the same order as the proposed regulations. During and after the
comment period, you may inspect public comments about these proposed
regulations submitted online at https://www.regulations.gov, or in
person in room 10615, 1201 New York Avenue, NW., Washington, DC,
between the hours of 9 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., Eastern Time, Monday through
Friday of each week except Federal holidays.
Assistance to Individuals With Disabilities in Reviewing the Rulemaking
Record
On request, we will supply an appropriate aid, such as a reader or
print magnifier, to an individual with a disability who needs
assistance to review the comments or other documents in the public
rulemaking record for these proposed regulations. If you want to
schedule an appointment for this type of aid, please contact the person
listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
II. Background
(a) Prior to Passage of the Kennedy Serve America Act of 2009
The Corporation initially engaged in rulemaking concerning the
requirement for grantees to conduct criminal history checks on national
service participants and grant-funded staff in 2007. In that rule, the
Corporation required programs to conduct National Service Criminal
History Checks--consisting of a statewide search of a state's criminal
registry (for both the state where the individual resides at the time
of application and the state where the individual will be serving) and
a check of the Department of Justice's National Sex Offender Public Web
site (NSOPW)--on all ``covered individuals.'' Covered individuals were
those program staff and participants who had recurring access to
children, the elderly, and to individuals with disabilities. Recurring
access was defined as having contact with individuals from one or more
of the above groups on more than one occasion. The regulations did not
cover the RSVP and Learn and Serve programs, nor did they cover the
NCCC and VISTA programs, which are Federally operated programs that
have their own criminal history requirements.
Those regulations offered the option of requesting approval of an
alternative search procedure (also known as an ``alternative screening
protocol'' or ``ASP''), which would permit an entity that could
demonstrate that it was ``prohibited or otherwise precluded under state
law from complying with a Corporation requirement relating to criminal
history checks or that [it] could obtain substantially equivalent or
better information through an alternative process'' to use a process
other than the one outlined by the Corporation. (45 CFR 2540.206).
Under this rule, an entity had the option of using a national FBI
fingerprint-based check in lieu of the state criminal registry check
without obtaining prior Corporation approval.
[[Page 39362]]
(b) Expanded Definition of ``Covered Individuals''
In 2009, Congress passed the Kennedy Serve America Act of 2009
(Pub. L. 111-13) (SAA), which amended the National and Community
Service Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. 12501 et seq.) (NCSA) by codifying the
Corporation's regulatory National Service Criminal History Check
requirements, and by expanding the categories of individuals required
to undergo criminal history checks. Under the new statutory
requirements, as of October 1, 2009 (the effective date of the SAA),
any entity selecting an individual to serve in a position in which the
individual receives a living allowance, stipend, national service
educational award or salary through a program receiving assistance
under the national service laws must conduct a criminal history check
on that individual. Accordingly, the SAA expanded the definition (and
consequently the number) of ``covered individuals'' to those
individuals described above without regard to their access to
vulnerable populations.
As directed by the SAA, the Corporation issued new regulations in
2009, expanding coverage to any national service participant or grant-
funded employee who received one of the above-described payments for
his or her service or employment. (74 FR 46495). Now included in this
group of covered individuals are grant-funded staff serving in any
Corporation-funded national service program, including RSVP and Learn
and Serve grant-funded staff, as well as participants in all
Corporation grant programs, if the individual receives one of the types
of remuneration described above. This includes the Non-profit Capacity
Building and Social Innovation Fund grant programs.
Pursuant to these regulations, each individual meeting the amended
description of a ``covered individual'' hired or enrolled in a program
on or after October 1, 2009, is required to undergo a full National
Service Criminal History Check including: (a) A search of either (1)
the state criminal registry in the state in which the program is
operating and the state in which the individual resides at the time of
application, or (2) a Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) fingerprint
check; and (b) a nationwide check of the NSOPW.
In addition to expanding the definition of ``covered individuals,''
the Serve America Act expanded the types of offenses that would render
an individual ineligible to serve in a covered position to include
individuals who had been convicted of murder.
(c) Heightened Standard for Individuals With Recurring Access to
Vulnerable Populations
Under section 189D(d) of the NCSA, as amended by the SAA, beginning
April 21, 2011, entities that select covered individuals over the age
of 18 who will have recurring access to vulnerable populations as part
of their position must conduct both a statewide criminal history check
and an FBI fingerprint-based check. As described herein, section
189D(d)(3) of the NCSA permits limited exceptions to this heightened
requirement.
III. Contents of Proposed Rule
The Corporation is undertaking this rulemaking to implement the
amendments made by the SAA with regard to heightened screening
requirements for covered individuals with recurring access to
vulnerable populations. In addition, this proposed rule clarifies
several existing requirements, and makes several minor technical
corrections for clarity.
(a) Definitions
(1) Definition of ``program.'' (Sec. 2510.20)
The SAA amended the definition of ``program'' in the NCSA to
include newly-authorized programs such as Campuses of Service, Serve
America and Encore Fellows, Silver Scholars, the Social Innovation
Fund, and activities funded under programs such as the Volunteer
Generation Fund. This proposed rule corrects the definition of
``program'' in regulation to align with the definition in statute.
(2) Definition of ``covered individual.'' (Sec. 2540.200)
To clarify that it is not necessary to conduct checks on
individuals whose connection to the program is tangential (such as an
individual who provides training to participants and volunteers on
occasion but is otherwise not integral to the operation of the program)
or who is intended as a beneficiary (such as a child who receives a
cash prize for completing a service-learning project hosted by the
program), this rule proposes to amend the definition of ``covered
individual'' by removing the clause ``or other remuneration.'' A
covered individual is any individual who receives a Corporation grant-
funded living allowance, stipend, national service education award, or
salary for participation in or employment by a program. An individual
who receives some financial benefit through a national service program
but who does not otherwise perform any service to implement the program
is not a covered individual.
(b) Eligibility Criteria--AmeriCorps State and National
The Serve America Act expanded the list of offenses that would
render an individual ineligible for service to include conviction for
murder. The Corporation amended its regulations to align with this
statutory change in 2009, but through that rulemaking inadvertently
neglected to amend the regulation on eligibility to serve in an
AmeriCorps State and National position. This rule amends Sec. 2522.200
to expand the list of eligibility criteria to serve in an AmeriCorps
State and National to include satisfaction of the National Service
Criminal History Check eligibility criteria.
(c) National Service Criminal History Checks Generally (Sec. 2540.202)
In practice, the National Service Criminal History Check for
covered individuals includes: (1) a name or fingerprint-based state
registry check of the state where the program is operating and the
state where the individual resides at the time of application or
nationwide check by submitting fingerprints to the FBI; and (2) a check
of the NSOPW. This proposed rule makes technical edits to the
regulatory language to conform to current practice.
Since promulgating criminal history check rules in 2007, the
Corporation has applied the first prong of this test to programs
operating in more than one state by requiring such programs to conduct
the state registry check in the state where the covered individual will
be primarily serving or working. This proposed rule would also codify
this clarification.
(d) Special Rule for Individuals With Recurring Access to Vulnerable
Populations (Sec. 2540.202)
As required by section 189D of the NCSA, as amended by the SAA,
under this rule, unless the Corporation approves an alternative
screening protocol under Sec. 2540.206, for each covered individual a
program hires or enrolls on or after April 21, 2011, who is age 18 or
older and whose position will involve recurring access to vulnerable
populations, in addition to a National Sex Offender Public Web site
(https://www.nsopw.gov) check, the program must conduct: (1) A search
(by name or fingerprint) of the state criminal registry for the state
in which the program operates and the state in which the individual
resides at the time of application; and (2) a national search
[[Page 39363]]
by submitting fingerprints to the Federal Bureau of Investigation.
``Recurring access'' is defined as ``the ability on more than one
occasion to approach, observe, or communicate with, an individual,
through physical proximity or other means, including but not limited
to, electronic or telephonic communication.'' (45 CFR 2510.20).
In anticipation of this heightened requirement, current grantees
have inquired into whether the Corporation would be developing a
centralized mechanism for conducting FBI checks for national service
participants. While the Corporation is committed to identifying ways to
decrease burden on grantees, at this time no such centralized mechanism
is available.
(e) Alternative Screening Protocol for Individuals With Recurring
Access to Vulnerable Populations (Sec. 2540.206)
Under this proposed rule, an entity may apply to the Corporation
for approval of an ASP that would relieve the entity from the
requirement to conduct both the statewide and national checks on a
covered individual with recurring access to vulnerable populations.
The Corporation will approve an ASP for this requirement if the
entity demonstrates: (1) The service provided by the individual serving
with the entity to a vulnerable population is episodic in nature or for
a 1-day period; (2) the cost to the program of complying with Sec.
2540.202(b) of this chapter is prohibitive; (3) the program is not
authorized, or is otherwise unable, under state or Federal law, to
access the national criminal history background check system of the
FBI; or (4) the program cannot comply with the requirement for good
cause, as determined and approved by the Corporation.
(1) Episodic Access (Sec. 2540.206)
Congress specifically exempted from heightened coverage those
individuals whose access to vulnerable populations is ``episodic in
nature or for a 1-day period.'' While the heightened coverage applies
to all individuals with ``recurring access,'' or access on more than
one occasion, it will not apply to those individuals whose recurring
access is ``episodic in nature.''
For the purposes of this rule, the Corporation proposes to define
``episodic'' as access that is not a regular, scheduled, and
anticipated component of an individual's position description. If
access to vulnerable populations is not a regular, scheduled, and
anticipated component of the position description, the program is not
required to conduct both an FBI and a state check on the individual.
For example, consider an individual who is applying for an
AmeriCorps position with an environmental program that involves
volunteer coordination. If the program anticipates that the position
will involve coordinating high school student volunteers on a regular
basis, the individual will need the heightened check. However, if the
program has no reason to expect that the position will involve
coordinating 17-year-old and younger volunteers because the program has
never operated in a youth environment and does not have any youth
engagement goals, and does not recruit high school age volunteers, any
contact with a child volunteer would be irregular, unscheduled, and
unanticipated, and thus, episodic. Therefore, it would be unnecessary
to conduct a heighted check on the individual.
The Corporation does not propose a numeric component for the
determination of whether or not access is episodic. In other words, if
a program does not anticipate that a member will have access to
vulnerable populations, the requirement would not materialize after a
specific number of incidents of access occur.
The Corporation expects that in the majority of cases it will be
clear whether or not access to vulnerable populations is an
anticipated, regular component of a position description. Nevertheless,
the Corporation recommends that programs specifically address contact
with vulnerable populations in each position description. If incidental
access becomes unexpectedly regular or frequent, a program may want to
take additional precautionary measures based on the circumstances.
(2) Alternative Search Protocols Approved for ``Good Cause''
The Corporation will publish on its Web site those scenarios for
which the Corporation has approved ASPs for ``good cause'' based on
requests received following the publication of this rule. This list may
be expanded and codified in regulation in the future.
(f) Consecutive Terms (Sec. 2540.203)
Under current 45 CFR 2540.203(c), (redesignated as 2540.203(b)
under this proposed rule) it is not necessary to perform an additional
check on an individual who serves in consecutive terms of service with
a program with a break in service of fewer than 30 days. This section
permits a program to forego additional checks for individuals serving
consecutive terms, but is based upon a presumption that the additional
check would essentially replicate the original check.
Each individual hired or enrolled into a covered position that
involves recurring access to vulnerable populations after April 21,
2011, is required to undergo the enhanced criminal history check. The
fact that an individual met the criminal history check requirements at
the time the individual was hired or enrolled in a prior term of
service does not excuse the individual from the enhanced requirements
at the time the individual is hired or enrolled in a subsequent term,
even if there has been a break in service of fewer than 30 days.
If a program can demonstrate that the check performed on an
individual during the previous term would meet the current
requirements, it is not necessary to perform an additional check. For
example, if, at the time the covered individual was hired or enrolled
in a prior term, the program conducted the NSOPR check, a state check,
and an FBI check, it is unnecessary to replicate the entire process for
the subsequent term if there is a break in service of fewer than 30
days.
(g) No Unaccompanied Access to Vulnerable Populations Pending Criminal
History Results (Sec. 2540.204)
Under current rules, an individual for whom the results of a
required state criminal registry check are pending is not permitted
access to vulnerable populations ``without being accompanied by an
authorized program representative who has previously been cleared for
such access.'' 45 CFR 2540.204(g). Since the initial promulgation of
this rule, it has come to our attention that it is common for the
vulnerable beneficiary in question to be accompanied by a parent, legal
guardian, teacher, doctor, nurse, or other individual responsible for
his or her care.
The Corporation does not believe it is necessary for a selected
individual with pending criminal history results to be accompanied by
an authorized program representative who has received the appropriate
criminal history check when the vulnerable individual is accompanied by
an individual responsible for his or her care. Thus, under this
proposed rule, a covered individual may be selected and placed while
state or FBI criminal history checks are pending, so long as the
individual is not permitted access to vulnerable populations without
being accompanied by: (1) An authorized program representative who has
previously been cleared for such access;
[[Page 39364]]
(2) a family member or legal guardian of the vulnerable individual; or
(3) an individual authorized by the nature of his or her profession to
have recurring access to the vulnerable individual, such as an
education or medical professional.
For example, a covered individual who occasionally gives nature
tours to schoolchildren as part of an environmental program would not
be required to be accompanied by an authorized program representative
on the tour if the students are accompanied by teachers or parents.
(h) Documentation Requirements (Sec. 2540.205)
This proposed rule clarifies that it is not necessary to retain the
actual documents produced as a result of conducting the statewide or
FBI criminal registry search component of the check. Rather, it is
sufficient to retain a summary of the results certified by an
authorized program representative, along with written documentation
that the results were considered in selecting the individual. The
program must have reviewed and determined that the criteria used by the
issuing governmental body meets or exceeds the Corporation's standards
for eligibility. For example, if a program receives a document from the
statewide criminal registry that indicates the individual has been
``cleared'' for service based upon an agreement that describes the
offenses that would result in ineligibility, that clearance document
may be retained as the result of the criminal registry check.
(i) Costs (Sec. 2540.204)
The proposed rule requires grantees to obtain and document a
baseline criminal history check for covered individuals. The
Corporation considers the cost of this required criminal history check
a reasonable and necessary program grant expense, such costs being
presumptively eligible for reimbursement. In any event, a grantee
should include the costs associated with its screening process in the
grant budget it submits for approval to the Corporation.
The proposed rule codifies the Corporation's guidance that, except
where approved by the Corporation, a grantee may not charge an
individual for the cost of a National Service Criminal History Check.
In addition, because criminal history checks are inherently
attributable to operating a program, such costs may not be charged to a
state commission administrative grant.
We will monitor compliance with the rules and requirements
associated with National Service Criminal History Checks as a material
condition of receiving a Corporation grant. A grantee's failure to
comply with this requirement may adversely affect the grantee's access
to grant funds or ability to obtain future grants from the Corporation.
In addition, a grantee jeopardizes eligibility for reimbursement of
costs related to a disqualified individual if it fails to perform or
properly document (as described herein) the required National Service
Criminal History Check on covered individuals.
IV. Non-Regulatory Matters
Coverage Based on Start Date
The table below illustrates which requirements apply to various
program types.
Table 1
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date individual hired or enrolled
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Recurring access to vulnerable populations Before November 23, 2007 November 23, 2007- October 1, 2009- April On or after April 21,
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- * September 30, 2009 20, 2011 2011
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
N S F N S F N S F N S F
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Program:
AmeriCorps S & N............................ Yes............................... X ....... ....... X X ....... X X ....... X X X
No................................ ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... X X ....... X X .......
FGP......................................... Yes............................... X ....... ....... X X ....... X X ....... X X X
No................................ ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... X X ....... X X .......
Senior Companions........................... Yes............................... X ....... ....... X X ....... X X ....... X X X
No................................ ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... X X ....... X X .......
RSVP staff.................................. Yes............................... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... X X ....... X X X
No................................ ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... X X ....... X X .......
VISTA program grants........................ Yes............................... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... X X ....... X X X
No................................ ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... X X ....... X X .......
Learn & Serve............................... Yes............................... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... X X ....... X X X
No................................ ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... X X ....... X X .......
Other Grant Programs........................ Yes............................... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... X X ....... X X X
No................................ ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... X X ....... X X .......
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
N = NSOPW; S = State registry check; F = FBI fingerprint check
* This applies to individuals who were enrolled or employed as of November 23, 2007, but were hired or enrolled prior to that date.
V. Effective Dates
The Corporation intends to make any final rule based on this
proposal effective no sooner than 60 days after the final rule is
published in the Federal Register. The requirement applies to any
covered individual hired or enrolled on or after April 21, 2011.
However, programs have until 60 days after the publication of the final
rule to complete the heightened check.
VI. Regulatory Procedures
Executive Order 12866 and Executive Order 13563
Executive Orders 13563 and 12866 direct agencies to assess all
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public
health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). Executive
Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and
benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility. This rule has been designated a ``significant regulatory
action'' although not economically significant, under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866.
[[Page 39365]]
Accordingly, the rule has been reviewed by the Office of Management and
Budget.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
As required by the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (5 U.S.C. 605
(b)), the Corporation certifies that this rule, if adopted, will not
have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities. This regulatory action will not result in (1) an annual
effect on the economy of $100 million or more; (2) a major increase in
costs or prices for consumers, individual industries, Federal, state,
or local government agencies, or geographic regions; or (3) significant
adverse effects on competition, employment, investment, productivity,
innovation, or on the ability of United States-based enterprises to
compete with foreign-based enterprises in domestic and export markets.
Therefore, the Corporation has not performed the initial regulatory
flexibility analysis that is required under the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) for major rules that are expected to have
such results.
Unfunded Mandates
For purposes of Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995, 2 U.S.C. 1531-1538, as well as Executive Order 12875, this
regulatory action does not contain any Federal mandate that may result
in increased expenditures in either Federal, state, local, or Tribal
governments in the aggregate, or impose an annual burden exceeding $100
million on the private sector.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This proposed rule contains no information collection requirements
and is therefore not subject to the requirements of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1980 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
Executive Order 13132, Federalism
Executive Order 13132, Federalism, prohibits an agency from
publishing any rule that has Federalism implications if the rule either
imposes substantial direct compliance costs on state and local
governments and is not required by statute, or the rule preempts state
law, unless the agency meets the consultation and funding requirements
of section 6 of the Executive Order. The proposed rule does not have
any Federalism implications, as described above.
List of Subjects
45 CFR Part 2510
Grant programs--social programs.
45 CFR Part 2522
Grant programs--social programs, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Volunteers.
45 CFR Part 2540
Administrative practice and procedure, Grant programs--social
programs, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volunteers.
45 CFR Part 2551
Aged, Grant programs--social programs, Volunteers.
45 CFR Part 2552
Aged, Grant programs--social programs, Volunteers.
For the reasons stated in the preamble, the Corporation for
National and Community Service proposes to amend chapter XXV, title 45
of the Code of Federal Regulations as follows:
PART 2510--OVERALL PURPOSES AND DEFINITIONS
1. The authority citation for Part 2510 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 12511.
2. Amend Sec. 2510.20 by revising the definition of ``program'' to
read as follows:
Sec. 2510.20 Definitions.
* * * * *
Program. The term program, unless the context otherwise requires,
and except when used as part of the term academic program, means a
program described in section 112(a) (other than a program referred to
in paragraph (3)(B) of that section), 118A, or 118(b)(1), or subsection
(a), (b), or (c) of section 122, or in paragraph (1) or (2) of section
152(b), section 198B, 198C, 198H, or a98K, or an activity that could be
funded under section 179A, 198, 198O, 198P, or 199N.
PART 2522--AMERICORPS PARTICIPANTS, PROGRAMS, AND APPLICANTS
1. The authority citation for Part 2522 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 12571-12595; 12651b-12651d; E.O. 13331, 69
FR 9911
2. Amend Sec. 2522.200 by:
a. Removing the period at the end of paragraph (a)(3) and adding a
semicolon in its place; and
b. Adding a new paragraph (a)(4) to read as follows:
Sec. 2522.200 What are the eligibility requirements for an AmeriCorps
participant?
(a) * * *
(4) Satisfy the National Service Criminal History Check eligibility
criteria pursuant to 45 CFR Sec. 2540.201.
* * * * *
3. Revise Sec. 2522.205 to read as follows:
Sec. 2522.205 To whom must I apply eligibility criteria relating to
criminal history?
You must apply eligibility criteria relating to criminal history to
a participant or staff position for which an individual receives a
Corporation grant-funded living allowance, stipend, education award, or
salary for participation in or employment by a program as defined in
Sec. 2510.20 of this chapter.
Sec. 2522.206 [Removed and Reserved]
4. Remove and reserve Sec. 2522.206.
5. Revise Sec. 2522.207 to read as follows:
Sec. 2522.207 What are the procedures I must follow to determine an
individual's eligibility to serve in a covered position?
In determining an individual's eligibility to serve in a covered
position, you must follow the procedures in part 2540 of this title.
PART 2540--GENERAL ADMINISTRATIVE PROVISIONS
6. The authority citation for Part 2540 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: E.O. 13331, 69 FR 9911; 18 U.S.C. 506, 701, 1017; 42
U.S.C. 12653, 12631-12637; 42 U.S.C. 5065.
7. Revise Sec. 2540.200 to read as follows:
Sec. 2540.200 To whom must I apply eligibility criteria relating to
criminal history?
You must apply eligibility criteria relating to criminal history to
an individual applying for, or serving in, a position for which the
individual receives a Corporation grant-funded living allowance,
stipend, education award, or salary for participation in or employment
by a program as defined in Sec. 2510.20 of this chapter.
8. Revise Sec. 2540.201 to read as follows:
Sec. 2540.201 What eligibility criteria must I apply to a covered
position in connection with the National Service Criminal History
Check?
In addition to eligibility criteria established by the program, an
individual shall be ineligible to serve in a covered position if the
individual--
(a) Refuses to consent to a criminal registry check described in
Sec. 2540.202 of
[[Page 39366]]
this chapter or makes a false statement in connection with a grantee's
inquiry concerning the individual's criminal history;
(b) Is registered, or required to be registered, on a state sex
offender registry or the National Sex Offender Registry; and
(c) Has been convicted of murder, as defined in section 1111 of
title 18, United States Code.
9. Revise Sec. 2540.202 to read as follows:
Sec. 2540.202 What search components of the National Service Criminal
History Check must I satisfy to determine an individual's suitability
to serve in a covered position?
(a) In general. Unless the Corporation approves an alternative
screening protocol under Sec. 2540.206 of this chapter, in determining
an individual's suitability to serve in a covered position, you are
responsible for conducting and documenting a National Service Criminal
History Check, which consists of the following two search components:
(1) State or FBI criminal registry search.
(i) A search (by name or fingerprint) of the state criminal
registry for
(A) The state in which the program operates (for multi-state
programs, the state where the individual will be primarily serving or
working) and
(B) The state in which the individual resides at the time of
application; or
(ii) Submitting fingerprints to the Federal Bureau of Investigation
for a national criminal history background check; and
(2) National Sex Offender Public Website. A name-based search of
the Department of Justice (DOJ) National Sex Offender Public Website
(NSOPW).
(b) Special rule for individuals working with vulnerable
populations. Unless the Corporation approves an alternative screening
protocol under Sec. 2540.206, for each covered individual you hire or
enroll on or after April 21, 2011, who is age 18 or older and whose
position will involve recurring access to vulnerable populations, in
addition to an NSOPW check described in paragraph (a)(2) of this
section, you must conduct both a state and nationwide FBI criminal
registry search, consisting of--
(1) A search (by name or fingerprint) of
(A) The state criminal registry for the state in which your program
operates and
(B) The state in which the individual resides at the time of
application; and
(2) Submitting fingerprints to the Federal Bureau of Investigation
for a national criminal history background check.
10. Revise Sec. 2540.203 to read as follows:
Sec. 2540.203 When must I conduct a National Service Criminal History
Check on an individual in a covered position?
(a) New Staff and Participants. You must conduct a National Service
Criminal History Check upon selection and before enrolling or hiring
any new covered individual. You must review the results of the NSOPW
prior to enrolling or hiring the covered individual. You may permit the
covered individual to commence grant-funded work or service pending
receipt of the state or FBI criminal registry check results so long as
the individual is not permitted access to vulnerable populations
without being accompanied by an appropriate individual, as described in
Sec. 2540.204(f) of this chapter.
(b) Recurring Service. For an individual who serves consecutive
terms of service in your program with a break in service of no more
than 30 days, no additional check is required after the first term.
11. Amend Sec. 2540.204 by:
a. Revising paragraph (f); and
b. Adding a new paragraph (g).
The revision and addition will read as follows:
Sec. 2540.204 What procedures must I follow in conducting a National
Service Criminal History Check for a covered position?
* * * * *
(f) Ensure that an individual, for whom the results of a required
state or FBI criminal registry check are pending, is not permitted to
have access to children, persons age 60 and older, or individuals with
disabilities without being accompanied by:
(1) An authorized program representative who has previously been
cleared for such access;
(2) A family member or legal guardian of the vulnerable individual;
or
(3) An individual authorized by nature of his or her profession to
have recurring access to the vulnerable individual, such as an
education or medical professional.
(g) Unless specifically approved by the Corporation, a grantee may
not charge an individual for the cost of any component of a National
Service Criminal History Check.
12. Revise Sec. 2540.205(b) to read as follows:
Sec. 2540.205 What documentation must I maintain regarding a National
Service Criminal History Check for a covered position?
* * * * *
(b) Maintain the results of the NSOPW check, and the results or a
summary of the results issued by a state or Federal government body of
the state or FBI searches performed for each National Service Criminal
History check (unless precluded by state law), and document in writing
that an authorized program representative considered the results in
selecting the individual.
13. Revise Sec. 2540.206 to read as follows:
Sec. 2540.206 Under what circumstances may I follow alternative
procedures in conducting a National Service Criminal History Check for
a covered position?
(a) In general. If you demonstrate that you are prohibited or
otherwise precluded under state law from complying with a Corporation
requirement relating to criminal history checks or that you can obtain
substantially equivalent or better information through an alternative
process, the Corporation will consider approving an alternative search
protocol that you submit in writing to the Corporation's Office of
Grants Management. The Office of Grants Management will review the
alternative protocol to ensure that it:
(1) Verifies the identity of the individual; and
(2) Includes a search of an alternative criminal database that is
sufficient to identify the existence, or absence of, the criminal
offenses listed in Sec. 2540.208 of this chapter.
(b) Alternative Procedures for Individuals With Recurring Access to
Vulnerable Populations. The Corporation may exempt a program from
conducting either the statewide and or FBI criminal history checks on
covered individuals with recurring access to vulnerable populations, as
described in Sec. 2540.202 of this chapter, if the program
demonstrates that:
(1) The service provided by the individual serving with the entity
to a vulnerable population is episodic in nature or for a 1-day period;
(2) The cost to the program of complying with Sec. 2540.202(b) of
this chapter is prohibitive;
(3) The program is not authorized, or is otherwise unable, under
state or Federal law, to access the state registry or the national
criminal history background check system of the FBI; or
(4) The program cannot comply with Sec. 2540.202(b) of this
chapter for good cause, as determined and approved by the Corporation.
(c) Episodic Access. For the purposes of this section, an
individual's service to a vulnerable population is considered to be
episodic in nature if the service is not
[[Page 39367]]
a regular, scheduled, and anticipated component of the individual's
position description.
Sec. 2540.207 [Removed and reserved].
14. Remove and reserve Sec. 2540.207.
PART 2551--SENIOR COMPANION PROGRAM
15. The authority citation for part 2551 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 4950 et seq.; 42 U.S.C. 12651b-12651d; E.O.
13331, 69 FR 9911.
16. Amend Sec. 2551.23 by adding a new paragraph (l) to read as
follows:
Sec. 2551.23 What are the sponsor's program responsibilities?
* * * * *
(l) Conduct criminal history checks on all Senior Companions and
Senior Companion grant-funded employees who enroll in, or are hired by,
your program after November 23, 2007, in accordance with the National
Service Criminal History Check requirements in 45 CFR Sec. Sec.
2540.200-207.
Sec. Sec. 2551.26, 2551.27, 2551.28, 2551.29, 2551.30, 2551.31,
2551.32 [Removed and Reserved].
17. Remove and reserve Sec. Sec. 2551.26, 2551.27, 2551.28,
2551.29, 2551.30, 2551.31, 2551.32.
PART 2552--FOSTER GRANDPARENT PROGRAM
18. The authority citation for Part 2552 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 4950 et seq., 42 U.S.C. 12651b-12651d; E.O.
13331, 69 FR 9911.
19. Amend Sec. 2552.23 by adding a new paragraph (l) to read as
follows:
Sec. 2552.23 What are a sponsor's program responsibilities?
* * * * *
(l) Conduct criminal history checks on all Foster Grandparents and
Foster Grandparent grant-funded employees who enroll in, or are hired
by, your program after November 23, 2007, in accordance with the
National Service Criminal History Check requirements in 45 CFR
Sec. Sec. 2540.200-207.
Sec. 2552.26, 2552.27, 2552.28, 2552.29, 2552.30, 2552.31,
2552.32 [Removed and Reserved]
20. Remove and reserve Sec. 2552.26, 2552.27, 2552.28, 2552.29,
2552.30, 2552.31, 2552.32.
Dated: June 24, 2011.
Valerie Green,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2011-16509 Filed 7-5-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6050-28-P