Federal Acquisition Regulation; Equal Opportunity for Veterans, 39233-39234 [2011-16672]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 128 / Tuesday, July 5, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
encourage contractors to conduct
initiatives such as: (1) Establishment of
new rules and programs or re-evaluation
of existing programs to prohibit text
messaging while driving, and (2)
education, awareness, and other
outreach programs to inform employees
about the safety risks associated with
texting while driving. This requirement
applies to all solicitations and contracts.
Item VI—TINA Interest Calculations
(FAR Case 2009–034)
Dated: June 28, 2011.
Laura Auletta,
Acting Director, Office of Governmentwide
Acquisition Policy, Office of Acquisition
Policy.
Federal Acquisition Circular (FAC)
2005–53 is issued under the authority of
the Secretary of Defense, the
Administrator of General Services, and
the Administrator for the National
Aeronautics and Space Administration.
Unless otherwise specified, all
Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR)
and other directive material contained
in FAC 2005–53 is effective July 5, 2011,
except for Items I, II, III, V and VI which
are effective August 4, 2011.
Dated: June 27, 2011.
Richard Ginman,
Director, Defense Procurement and
Acquisition Policy.
Dated: June 28, 2011.
Joseph A. Neurauter,
Senior Procurement Executive/Deputy CAO,
Office of Acquisition Policy, U.S. General
Services Administration.
[FR Doc. 2011–16671 Filed 7–1–11; 8:45 am]
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES2
BILLING CODE 6820–EP–P
GENERAL SERVICES
ADMINISTRATION
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND
SPACE ADMINISTRATION
48 CFR Parts 1, 22, and 52
[FAC 2005–53; FAR Case 2009–007; Item
I; Docket 2010–0101, Sequence 1]
RIN 9000–AL67
DoD, GSA, and NASA are publishing
a final rule amending the FAR to revise
the clauses at FAR 52.214–27, FAR
52.215–10, and FAR 52.215–11 to
require compound interest calculations
be applied to Government overpayments
as a result of defective cost or pricing
data.
Dated: June 22, 2011.
William P. McNally,
Assistant Administrator for Procurement,
National Aeronautics and Space
Administration.
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Federal Acquisition Regulation; Equal
Opportunity for Veterans
Department of Defense (DoD),
General Services Administration (GSA),
and National Aeronautics and Space
Administration (NASA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCIES:
DoD, GSA, and NASA have
adopted as final, with changes, an
interim rule amending the Federal
Acquisition Regulation (FAR) to
implement Department of Labor (DOL)
regulations on equal opportunity
provisions for various categories of
military veterans. The interim rule
revised coverage and definitions of
veterans covered under the Vietnam Era
Veterans’ Readjustment Assistance Act
of 1972 and included new reporting
requirements established under that Act
and the Jobs for Veterans Act.
DATES: Effective Date: August 4, 2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Clare McFadden, Procurement Analyst,
at (202) 501–0044, for clarification of
content. For information pertaining to
status or publication schedules, contact
the Regulatory Secretariat at (202) 501–
4755. Please cite FAC 2005–53, FAR
Case 2009–007.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
I. Background
DoD, GSA, and NASA published an
interim rule in the Federal Register at
75 FR 60249 on September 29, 2010, to
implement DOL regulations on equal
opportunity provisions for various
categories of military veterans. The
interim rule revised coverage and
definitions of veterans covered under
the Vietnam Era Veterans’ Readjustment
Assistance Act of 1972 and included
new reporting requirements established
under that Act and the Jobs for Veterans
Act. The comment period closed
November 29, 2010. One respondent
submitted comments in response to the
interim rule.
II. Discussion and Analysis of Public
Comments
The Civilian Agency Acquisition
Council and the Defense Acquisition
VerDate Mar<15>2010
20:17 Jul 01, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
39233
Regulations Council (the Councils)
reviewed the comments in development
of the final rule. A discussion of the
comments and the changes made to the
rule as a result of those comments are
provided as follows:
A. Definitions
Comment: The respondent
recommended inclusion of the
definition of ‘‘Executive and Senior
Management,’’ as defined in the FAR
clause 52.222–35, Equal Opportunity for
Veterans, in the definitions section of
FAR subpart 22.13.
Response: The Councils have added
the definition to FAR 22.1301.
Comment: The respondent
recommended a change to the definition
of the term ‘‘other protected veteran.’’
Response: The FAR rule is
implementing the DOL rule and does
not have the latitude to expand the
meaning of the DOL definition. (See the
August 8, 2007, final rule of the Office
of Federal Contract Compliance
Programs, Department of Labor, 60–
300.2 (p), 72 FR 44393.)
B. Delete References to the VETS–100
Form
Comment: The respondent
recommends deleting all references to
the VETS–100 Form and the date of
December 1, 2003, to allow contractors
to submit all reports on the VETS–100A
Form.
Response: While understanding the
rationale for the recommendation, the
Councils are again bound by the DOL
rule.
C. Date of FAR Clause 52.244–6
Comment: The respondent
recommended that the FAR clause
52.244–6 date should be updated to
reflect the OCT 2010 change made to the
clause subsequent to the interim rule.
Response: When an interim rule is
finalized, the final rule automatically
retains any intervening changes to the
FAR baseline, such as clause dates. No
further change is required.
III. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders (E.O.s) 12866 and
13563 direct agencies to assess all costs
and benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, distributive impacts, and
equity). E.O. 13563 emphasizes the
importance of quantifying both costs
and benefits, of reducing costs, of
harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility. This is a significant
E:\FR\FM\05JYR2.SGM
05JYR2
39234
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 128 / Tuesday, July 5, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
regulatory action and, therefore, was
subject to review under section 6(b) of
E.O. 12866, Regulatory Planning and
Review, dated September 30, 1993. This
rule is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C.
804.
IV. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Department of Defense, the
General Services Administration, and
the National Aeronautics and Space
Administration certify that this final
rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities within the
meaning of the Regulatory Flexibility
Act, 5 U.S.C. 601, et seq., because
contractors are already required to
annually track and report their veteran
workforces on the VETS–100 Form in
accordance with the Vietnam Era
Veterans’ Readjustment Assistance Act
of 1972, as amended by the Jobs for
Veterans Act. This rule implemented a
new form, VETS–100A that simply
includes the revised categories of
veterans for reporting purposes.
V. Paperwork Reduction Act
The final rule does not contain any
information collection requirements that
require the approval of the Office of
Management and Budget under the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
chapter 35).
List of Subjects in 48 CFR Parts 1, 22,
and 52
Government procurement.
Dated: June 28, 2011.
Laura Auletta,
Acting Director, Office of Governmentwide
Acquisition Policy, Office of Acquisition
Policy.
Accordingly, the interim rule
amending 48 CFR parts 1, 22, and 52,
which was published in the Federal
Register at 75 FR 60249, September 29,
2010, is adopted as final with the
following changes:
PART 22—APPLICATION OF LABOR
LAWS TO GOVERNMENT
ACQUISITIONS
1. The authority citation for 48 CFR
part 22 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 40 U.S.C. 121(c); 10 U.S.C.
chapter 137; and 42 U.S.C. 2473(c).
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES2
22.1301
Definitions.
*
*
*
*
*
Executive and senior management
means—
VerDate Mar<15>2010
20:17 Jul 01, 2011
Jkt 223001
[FR Doc. 2011–16672 Filed 7–1–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820–EP–P
duplicate, overlapping, or conflicting
information from the different Federal
agencies.
Effective Date: August 4, 2011.
Mr.
Karlos Morgan, Procurement Analyst, at
(202) 501–2364 for clarification of
content. For information pertaining to
status or publication schedules, contact
the Regulatory Secretariat at (202) 501–
4755. Please cite FAC 2005–53, FAR
Case 2009–023.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
DATES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
I. Background
DoD, GSA, and NASA published a
proposed rule in the Federal Register at
75 FR 50731 on August 17, 2010, to
standardize the use of unique PIIDs
throughout the Government. Four
respondents submitted comments on the
proposed rule.
II. Discussion and Analysis of the
Public Comments
The Civilian Agency Acquisition
Council and the Defense Acquisition
Regulations Council (the Councils)
reviewed the public comments in the
development of the final rule. A
discussion of the comments and the
changes made to the rule as a result of
those comments are provided as
follows:
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
A. Agency and Office Identifier
GENERAL SERVICES
ADMINISTRATION
[FAC 2005–53; FAR Case 2009–023; Item
II; Docket 2010–0094, Sequence 1]
Comment: A respondent provided a
suggestion that the prescribed
identifiers include not only an agency
identifier, but an office identifier as
well.
Response: At this time, not all
agencies have an office-unique
identifier. However, as data
standardization efforts progress, this
may be a future area of consideration.
RIN 9000–AL70
B. Amendments
Federal Acquisition Regulation;
Unique Procurement Instrument
Identifier
Comment: A respondent suggested
that the term ‘‘amendments’’ be
removed from the proposed FAR 4.605,
as ‘‘amendments’’ are not reported to
the Federal Procurement Data System
(FPDS).
Response: ‘‘Amendments’’ will be
removed from the identified part, and
replaced with ‘‘solicitations’’, because
solicitation numbers are included in
FPDS contract action reports.
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND
SPACE ADMINISTRATION
48 CFR Part 4
Department of Defense (DoD),
General Services Administration (GSA),
and National Aeronautics and Space
Administration (NASA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCIES:
DoD, GSA, and NASA are
issuing a final rule amending the
Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) to
standardize use of unique Procurement
Instrument Identifiers (PIID) throughout
the Government. The lack of consistent
agency policies and procedures for
PIIDs subjected users of contract data,
including the Federal Government,
contractors, and the public, to potential
SUMMARY:
2. Amend section 22.1301 by adding,
in alphabetical order, the definition
‘‘Executive and senior management’’ to
read as follows:
■
(1) Any employee—
(i) Compensated on a salary basis at
a rate of not less than $455 per week (or
$380 per week, if employed in
American Samoa by employers other
than the Federal Government), exclusive
of board, lodging, or other facilities;
(ii) Whose primary duty consists of
the management of the enterprise in
which the individual is employed or of
a customarily recognized department or
subdivision thereof;
(iii) Who customarily and regularly
directs the work of two or more other
employees; and
(iv) Who has the authority to hire or
fire other employees or whose
suggestions and recommendations as to
the hiring or firing and as to the
advancement and promotion or any
other change of status of other
employees will be given particular
weight; or
(2) Any employee who owns at least
a bona fide 20-percent equity interest in
the enterprise in which the employee is
employed, regardless of whether the
business is a corporate or other type of
organization, and who is actively
engaged in its management.
*
*
*
*
*
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
C. Consistent Government Format
Comment: Two respondents requested
a consistent format for the PIIDs across
the Government.
Response: At this time it is not cost
effective to transition all Federal
agencies to a single PIID format across
the Government.
E:\FR\FM\05JYR2.SGM
05JYR2
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 128 (Tuesday, July 5, 2011)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 39233-39234]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-16672]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION
48 CFR Parts 1, 22, and 52
[FAC 2005-53; FAR Case 2009-007; Item I; Docket 2010-0101, Sequence 1]
RIN 9000-AL67
Federal Acquisition Regulation; Equal Opportunity for Veterans
AGENCIES: Department of Defense (DoD), General Services Administration
(GSA), and National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: DoD, GSA, and NASA have adopted as final, with changes, an
interim rule amending the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) to
implement Department of Labor (DOL) regulations on equal opportunity
provisions for various categories of military veterans. The interim
rule revised coverage and definitions of veterans covered under the
Vietnam Era Veterans' Readjustment Assistance Act of 1972 and included
new reporting requirements established under that Act and the Jobs for
Veterans Act.
DATES: Effective Date: August 4, 2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Clare McFadden, Procurement
Analyst, at (202) 501-0044, for clarification of content. For
information pertaining to status or publication schedules, contact the
Regulatory Secretariat at (202) 501-4755. Please cite FAC 2005-53, FAR
Case 2009-007.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
DoD, GSA, and NASA published an interim rule in the Federal
Register at 75 FR 60249 on September 29, 2010, to implement DOL
regulations on equal opportunity provisions for various categories of
military veterans. The interim rule revised coverage and definitions of
veterans covered under the Vietnam Era Veterans' Readjustment
Assistance Act of 1972 and included new reporting requirements
established under that Act and the Jobs for Veterans Act. The comment
period closed November 29, 2010. One respondent submitted comments in
response to the interim rule.
II. Discussion and Analysis of Public Comments
The Civilian Agency Acquisition Council and the Defense Acquisition
Regulations Council (the Councils) reviewed the comments in development
of the final rule. A discussion of the comments and the changes made to
the rule as a result of those comments are provided as follows:
A. Definitions
Comment: The respondent recommended inclusion of the definition of
``Executive and Senior Management,'' as defined in the FAR clause
52.222-35, Equal Opportunity for Veterans, in the definitions section
of FAR subpart 22.13.
Response: The Councils have added the definition to FAR 22.1301.
Comment: The respondent recommended a change to the definition of
the term ``other protected veteran.''
Response: The FAR rule is implementing the DOL rule and does not
have the latitude to expand the meaning of the DOL definition. (See the
August 8, 2007, final rule of the Office of Federal Contract Compliance
Programs, Department of Labor, 60-300.2 (p), 72 FR 44393.)
B. Delete References to the VETS-100 Form
Comment: The respondent recommends deleting all references to the
VETS-100 Form and the date of December 1, 2003, to allow contractors to
submit all reports on the VETS-100A Form.
Response: While understanding the rationale for the recommendation,
the Councils are again bound by the DOL rule.
C. Date of FAR Clause 52.244-6
Comment: The respondent recommended that the FAR clause 52.244-6
date should be updated to reflect the OCT 2010 change made to the
clause subsequent to the interim rule.
Response: When an interim rule is finalized, the final rule
automatically retains any intervening changes to the FAR baseline, such
as clause dates. No further change is required.
III. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders (E.O.s) 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess
all costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public
health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). E.O.
13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and benefits,
of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting flexibility.
This is a significant
[[Page 39234]]
regulatory action and, therefore, was subject to review under section
6(b) of E.O. 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, dated September 30,
1993. This rule is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C. 804.
IV. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Department of Defense, the General Services Administration, and
the National Aeronautics and Space Administration certify that this
final rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities within the meaning of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601, et seq., because contractors are already
required to annually track and report their veteran workforces on the
VETS-100 Form in accordance with the Vietnam Era Veterans' Readjustment
Assistance Act of 1972, as amended by the Jobs for Veterans Act. This
rule implemented a new form, VETS-100A that simply includes the revised
categories of veterans for reporting purposes.
V. Paperwork Reduction Act
The final rule does not contain any information collection
requirements that require the approval of the Office of Management and
Budget under the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. chapter 35).
List of Subjects in 48 CFR Parts 1, 22, and 52
Government procurement.
Dated: June 28, 2011.
Laura Auletta,
Acting Director, Office of Governmentwide Acquisition Policy, Office of
Acquisition Policy.
Accordingly, the interim rule amending 48 CFR parts 1, 22, and 52,
which was published in the Federal Register at 75 FR 60249, September
29, 2010, is adopted as final with the following changes:
PART 22--APPLICATION OF LABOR LAWS TO GOVERNMENT ACQUISITIONS
0
1. The authority citation for 48 CFR part 22 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 40 U.S.C. 121(c); 10 U.S.C. chapter 137; and 42
U.S.C. 2473(c).
0
2. Amend section 22.1301 by adding, in alphabetical order, the
definition ``Executive and senior management'' to read as follows:
22.1301 Definitions.
* * * * *
Executive and senior management means--
(1) Any employee--
(i) Compensated on a salary basis at a rate of not less than $455
per week (or $380 per week, if employed in American Samoa by employers
other than the Federal Government), exclusive of board, lodging, or
other facilities;
(ii) Whose primary duty consists of the management of the
enterprise in which the individual is employed or of a customarily
recognized department or subdivision thereof;
(iii) Who customarily and regularly directs the work of two or more
other employees; and
(iv) Who has the authority to hire or fire other employees or whose
suggestions and recommendations as to the hiring or firing and as to
the advancement and promotion or any other change of status of other
employees will be given particular weight; or
(2) Any employee who owns at least a bona fide 20-percent equity
interest in the enterprise in which the employee is employed,
regardless of whether the business is a corporate or other type of
organization, and who is actively engaged in its management.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2011-16672 Filed 7-1-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-EP-P