Bond Guarantee Program, 38577-38580 [2011-16682]
Download as PDF
38577
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
Vol. 76, No. 127
Friday, July 1, 2011
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains notices to the public of the proposed
issuance of rules and regulations. The
purpose of these notices is to give interested
persons an opportunity to participate in the
rule making prior to the adoption of the final
rules.
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Community Development Financial
Institutions Fund
12 CFR Chapter XVIII
Bond Guarantee Program
jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
AGENCY: Community Development
Financial Institutions Fund, U.S.
Department of Treasury.
ACTION: Request for public comment.
SUMMARY: This notice invites comments
from the public on issues regarding the
Community Development Financial
Institutions (CDFI) Bond Guarantee
Program created by the Small Business
Jobs Act of 2010. All materials
submitted will be available for public
inspection and copying.
DATES: All comments and submissions
must be received by August 15, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Comments may be sent by
mail to: Jodie Harris, Policy Specialist,
CDFI Fund, U.S. Department of the
Treasury, 601 13th Street, NW., Suite
200 South, Washington, DC 20005; by
e-mail to cdfihelp@cdfi.treas.gov; or by
facsimile at (202) 622–7754. Please note
this is not a toll free number.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Information regarding the CDFI Fund
and its programs may be downloaded
from the CDFI Fund’s Web site at
https://www.cdfifund.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Community Development Financial
Institutions Fund (CDFI Fund) was
created for the purpose of promoting
economic revitalization and community
development through investment in and
assistance to CDFIs. Its vision is to
economically empower America’s
underserved and distressed
communities through the provision of
low-cost capital to certified CDFIs. The
CDFI Fund was established by the
Riegle Community Development
Banking and Financial Institutions Act
of 1994.
The CDFI Bond Guarantee Program
(the program) was enacted through the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:19 Jun 30, 2011
Jkt 223001
Small Business Jobs Act of 2010 (Pub.
L. 111–240) on September 27, 2010. The
CDFI Fund will serve as the program
administrator and must administer the
program in accordance with sections
1134 and 1703 of the Small Business
Jobs Act, which amended the
Community Development Banking and
Financial Institutions Act of 1994, 12
U.S.C. 4701 et seq. (the Act) by adding
a new section 114A.
Section 114A authorizes the Secretary
of the Treasury (through the CDFI Fund)
to guarantee the full amount of notes or
bonds, including the principal, interest,
and call premiums not to exceed 30
years, issued by CDFIs to finance loans
for eligible community or economic
development purposes. The bonds or
notes will support CDFI lending and
investment by providing a source of
long-term, patient capital to CDFIs. In
accordance with Federal credit policy,
moreover, the Federal Financing Bank
(FFB), a body corporate and
instrumentality of the United States
Government under the general
supervision and direction of the
Secretary of the Treasury, finances
obligations that are 100% guaranteed by
the United States, such as the bonds or
notes to be issued by CDFIs under the
program. Because the FFB’s cost of
funds is equivalent to the current
Treasury rates for comparable
maturities, the FFB can provide CDFIs
the least expensive funds to generate
loans and represents the most efficient
way for CDFIs to finance 100%
Federally guaranteed obligations.
The CDFI Fund is required by statute
to promulgate program regulations by
September 27, 2011 and to implement
the program by September 27, 2012.
The CDFI Fund invites and
encourages comments and suggestions
germane to the mission, purpose, and
implementation of the CDFI Bond
Guarantee Program. The CDFI Fund is
particularly interested in comments in
the following areas:
1. Definitions
(a) Section 114A(a) of the Act
provides certain definitions applicable
to the CDFI Bond Guarantee Program. In
particular, Section 114A(a)(2) of the Act
defines eligible community or economic
development purpose as any purpose
described in section 108(b) [12 U.S.C.
4707(b)] and includes the provision of
community or economic development
in low-income or underserved rural
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
areas. The CDFI Fund is interested in
comments regarding all definitions
found in the Act as they relate to the
program, including the following:
(i) How should the term ‘‘lowincome’’ be defined as such term is used
in Section 114A(a)(2)?
(ii) How should the term ‘‘rural areas’’
be defined as such term is used in
Section 114A(a)(2)? For example, is a
rural community any census tract that is
not located in a metropolitan statistical
area (MSA)? Respondents should
discuss how a particular definition
would enable the program to target
businesses and residents in rural areas,
and discuss whether there are particular
measures that should not be used
because they may inadvertently
disadvantage certain populations (i.e.,
provide examples of particular
households or communities that would
not qualify under specific definitions).
(iii) How should the term
‘‘underserved’’ be defined and/or
measured?
(iv) Should ‘‘eligible community or
economic development purpose’’ be
defined to allow a CDFI or its
designated Qualified Issuer to only
invest inside the CDFI Fund Target
Market that it was certified to serve?
2. Use of Funds
(a) The Act defines a loan as any
credit instrument that is extended under
the CDFI Bond Guarantee Program for
any eligible community or economic
development purpose. Section 114A(b)
of the Act states that the Secretary of the
Treasury (the Secretary) shall guarantee
payments on bonds or notes issued by
a qualified issuer if the proceeds of the
bonds or notes are used in accordance
with this section to make loans to
eligible community development
financial institutions (CDFIs)
(1) For eligible community or
economic development purposes; or
(2) To refinance loans or notes issued
for such purposes.
The CDFI Fund invites and
encourages comments and suggestions
germane to the criteria and use of funds.
The CDFI Fund is particularly interested
in comments including the following:
(i) Should there be any limitations on
the types of loans that can be financed
or refinanced with the bond proceeds?
Are there any uses of bond or note
proceeds that should be excluded or
deemed ineligible regardless of the fact
E:\FR\FM\01JYP1.SGM
01JYP1
jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
38578
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 127 / Friday, July 1, 2011 / Proposed Rules
that the use was in a low-income or
underserved rural area?
(ii) Should the capitalization of:
(1) Revolving loan funds; (2) credit
enhancement of investments made by
CDFIs and/or others; or (3) loan loss
reserves, debt service reserves, and/or
sinking funds in support of a Federally
guaranteed bond, be included as eligible
purposes?
(iii) Should there be any limits on the
percentage of loans or notes refinanced
with the bond proceeds? If so, what
should they be?
(iv) Should CDFIs be allowed to use
bond proceeds to purchase loans from
other CDFIs? If so, should the CDFI that
sells the loans be required to invest a
certain portion of the proceeds from the
sale to support additional community
development activities?
(v) Should the CDFI Fund place
additional restrictions on the awardees’
loan products, such as a cap on the
interest rate, fees and/or late payment
penalties or on the marketing and
disclosure standards for the products? If
so, what are the appropriate
restrictions?
(b) Section 114A(c)(1) states that a
capital distribution plan meets the
requirements of the subsection if not
less than 90 percent of the principal
amount of guaranteed bonds or notes
(other than the cost of issuance fee) are
used to make loans for any eligible
community or economic development
purpose, measured annually, beginning
at the end of the one-year period
beginning on the issuance date of such
guaranteed bonds or notes. The CDFI
Fund welcomes comments regarding
this provision, specifically regarding
what penalties the CDFI Fund should
impose if an issuer is out of compliance.
(c) Section 114A(c)(2) states that not
more than 10 percent of the principal
amount of guaranteed bonds or notes –,
multiplied by an amount equal to the
outstanding principal balance of issued
notes or bonds, minus the risk-share
pool amount—may be held in a
relending account and may be available
for new eligible community or economic
development purposes.
(i) How should the CDFI Fund define
‘‘relending’’ account as stated in Section
114A(c)(2)? How should it differ from
the loans made under Section 114(c)(1)?
(ii) If the capitalization of revolving
loan funds is deemed an allowable use
of funds under Section 114A(a)(4), what
activities would be eligible under the
relending account?
(iii) If additional reserves are held,
should they be permitted to be funded
from the relending account?
(iv) Should a sinking fund, or any
other reserve to allow for the payment
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:19 Jun 30, 2011
Jkt 223001
of debt service, be permitted to be
funded from the relending account?
(d) Section 114A(d) states that each
qualified issuer shall, during the term of
a guarantee provided under the CDFI
Bond Guarantee Program, establish a
risk-share pool, capitalized by
contributions from eligible community
development financial institution
participants, of an amount equal to three
percent of the guaranteed amount
outstanding on the subject notes and
bonds.
(i) In the event that the CDFI Fund
determines that there is a risk of loss to
the government for which Congress has
not provided an appropriation, what
steps should the CDFI Fund take to
compensate for this risk?
a. Should the interest rate on the
bonds be increased?
b. Should a larger risk-share pool be
required?
c. Should the CDFI Fund require
restrictions, covenants and conditions
(e.g., net asset ratio requirement, first
loss requirements, first lien position;
over-collateralization, replacement of
troubled loans)?
(ii) How should the CDFI Fund assess
and compensate for different levels of
risk among diverse proposals without
unduly restricting the flexible use of
funds for a range of community
development purposes? For example:
a. Should the CDFI Fund take into
account the participation of a risksharing partner? What should be the
parameters of any such risk-sharing?
b. Should the Fund take into account
an independent, third-party credit rating
from a major rating agency?
(iii) Are there restrictions, covenants,
conditions or other measures the CDFI
Fund should not impose? Please
provide specific examples, if possible.
(iv) Should the qualified issuer be
allowed to set aside the three percent
from the bond proceeds or should these
funds be separate from the proceeds?
3. Guarantee Provisions
(a) Section 114A(a)(3) defines a
guarantee as a written agreement
between the Secretary and a qualified
issuer (or trustee) pursuant to which the
Secretary ensures repayment of the
verifiable losses of principal, interest,
and call premium, if any, on notes or
bonds issued by a qualified issuer to
finance or refinance loans to eligible
CDFI. The CDFI Fund invites and
encourages comments and suggestions
relating to the guarantee provisions,
especially:
(i) How should the CDFI Fund define
and determine ‘‘verifiable losses of
principal, interest, and call premium’’?
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
(ii) Should the CDFI Fund permit a
call upon the guarantee at any point
prior to the issuer liquidating the
available assets? If so, under what
condition should a call on the guarantee
be permitted?
(b) Section 114A(e)(1) indicates that
the Treasury guarantee shall be for the
full amount of a bond or note, including
the amount of principal, interest, and
call premiums not to exceed 30 years.
The Treasury may not guarantee any
amount less than $100 million per
issuance.
(i) Should the CDFI Fund set specific
guidelines or prohibitions for the
structure of the bond (e.g., callable,
convertible, zero-coupon)?
(ii) Should bonds that are used to
fund certain asset classes be required to
have specific terms or conditions?
Should riskier asset classes or borrowers
require additional enhancements?
(c) Section 114A(e)(2) states
limitations on the guarantees.
(1) The Secretary shall issue not more
than 10 guarantees in any calendar year
under the program.
(2) The Secretary may not guarantee
any amount under the program equal to
less than $100 million but the total of
all such guarantees in any fiscal year
may not exceed $1 billion.
(i) Can qualified issuers apply for
multiple issuances? Should there be a
limit per qualified issuer? If so, what
should that limit be?
4. Eligible Entities
(a) Section 114A(a)(1) defines an
eligible entity as a CDFI (as described in
section 1805.201 of title 12, Code of
Federal Regulations, or any successor
thereto) certified by the Secretary that
has applied to a qualified issuer for, or
that has been granted by a qualified
issuer, a loan under the program. The
CDFI Fund welcomes comments on
issues relating to eligible entities,
particularly with respect to the
following questions:
(i) Should the CDFI Fund require one
qualified issuer (or appointed trustee)
for all bonds and notes issued under the
program?
(ii) Should the CDFI Fund permit an
entity not yet certified as a CDFI to
apply for CDFI certification
simultaneous with submission of a
capital distribution plan?
(iii) Should the CDFI Fund allow all
existing CDFIs to apply, or should there
be minimum eligibility criteria?
(iv) The Act states that a qualified
issuer should have ‘‘appropriate
expertise, capacity, and experience, or
otherwise be qualified to make loans for
eligible community or economic
development purposes.’’ How should
E:\FR\FM\01JYP1.SGM
01JYP1
jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 127 / Friday, July 1, 2011 / Proposed Rules
the CDFI Fund determine that a
qualified issuer meets these
requirements?
(v) What penalties should be imposed
in the event that a CDFI participating in
the program ceases to be a certified
CDFI? What remedies and cure periods
should the CDFI Fund allow in the
event of a lapse in CDFI certification?
(b) Section 114A(a)(5) defines a
master servicer as an entity approved by
the Secretary in accordance with
subparagraph (B) to oversee the
activities of servicers, as provided in
subsection (f)(4).
(i) Should the CDFI Fund require one
servicer for all bonds and notes issued
under the program?
(ii) Should the CDFI Fund require the
master servicer and servicers to have a
track record of providing similar
services? How should the CDFI Fund
evaluate the capabilities of prospective
servicers and master servicers?
(iii) Should the CDFI Fund pre-qualify
servicers and make those groups known
to CDFIs wishing to submit a capital
distribution plan for consideration?
(iv) Should a CDFI issuer be allowed
to serve as its own servicer?
(v) Should the master servicer be
eligible to serve as a program
administrator or servicer for a qualified
issuer? If so, how should potential
conflicts of interest be managed?
(c) Section 114(a)(8) defines qualified
issuers as a CDFI (or any entity
designated to issue notes or bonds on
behalf of such CDFI) that meets certain
qualifications: (1) Have appropriate
expertise, (2) have an acceptable capital
distribution plan, and (3) be able to
certify that the bond proceeds will be
used for community development.
(i) How should a CDFI demonstrate its
expertise?
(ii) Are there any institutions that
should be prohibited from serving as
qualified issuers?
(iii) Should the CDFI Fund establish
minimum criteria for serving as a
qualified issuer?
(iv) Should the CDFI Fund set a
minimum asset size for CDFI
participation as a qualified issuer?
(v) Should the CDFI Fund require the
issuer to have a minimum net capital
(real equity capital) and require a set
amount of net capital be held for the
term of the bond? If so, what is a
reasonable level to require?
(vi) Should qualified issuers be
required to obtain an independent,
third-party credit rating from a major
rating agency?
5. Capital Distribution Plan
(a) Section 114A(a)(8)(B)(ii)(II) states
that a qualified issuer shall provide to
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:19 Jun 30, 2011
Jkt 223001
the Secretary: (aa) an acceptable
statement of the proposed sources and
uses of the funds and (bb) a capital
distribution plan that meets the
requirements of subsection (c)(1). The
CDFI Fund seeks comments relating to
the capital distribution plan
requirement, specifically:
(i) What elements should be required
in an acceptable statement of proposed
sources and uses of the funds? How
should the CDFI Fund measure
acceptability?
(ii) What elements should be required
in a capital distribution plan? Are there
examples of such plans, Federal or
otherwise, upon which the CDFI Fund
should model the CDFI Bond Guarantee
Program’s capital distribution plan
requirements and application materials?
(iii) Should the CDFI Fund require
specific intended uses of all the bond
proceeds in the capital distribution plan
or should the qualified issuers just be
required to demonstrate an intended
pipeline of underlying assets?
(iv) Should the CDFI Fund set
minimum underwriting criteria for
borrowers? Should applicants be
required to demonstrate satisfaction of
those criteria in the capital distribution
plan?
6. Accountability of Qualified Issuers
(a) The CDFI Fund welcomes
comments on how to monitor the use of
proceeds and financial performance of
qualified issuers, particularly with
respect to the following questions:
(a) What tests should the CDFI Fund
use to evaluate if 90 percent of bond
proceeds have been invested in
qualified loans? Should reports be
required from the qualified issuer more
frequently than on an annual basis?
(c) What types of tests should the
CDFI Fund use to evaluate satisfaction
of the low-income or rural requirement
set forth in Section 114A(a)(2)?
(d) What support, if any, would
applicants and awardees like to receive
from the CDFI Fund after having issued
a bond?
(e) What specific industry standards
for impact measures (businesses
financed, units of affordable housing
developed, etc.) should the CDFI Fund
adopt for evaluating and monitoring
loans financed or refinanced with
proceeds of the guaranteed notes or
bonds?
(f) Should achievement of some
standards or outcome measures be
mandatory?
(g) Are the approval criteria for
qualified issuers as listed in Section
114A(a)(8)(B) adequate? If not, what else
should be included?
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
38579
7. Prohibited Uses
(a) Section 114A(b)(5) provides
certain prohibitions on use of funds
including, ‘‘political activities, lobbying,
outreach, counseling services, or travel
expenses.’’ The CDFI Fund encourages
comments and suggestions germane to
prohibited uses established in the Act,
specifically as to whether there are other
prohibited uses that the CDFI Fund
should include.
8. Servicing of Transactions
(a) Section 114A(f) states that, in
general, to maximize efficiencies and
minimize cost and interest rates, loans
made under this section may be
serviced by qualified program
administrators, bond servicers, and a
master servicer. This section further
outlines the duties of the program
administrator, servicers, and the master
servicer. Comments regarding the
servicing of transactions are welcome,
specifically:
(i) The Act lists certain duties of a
program administrator. Should there be
other requirements?
(ii) The duties of a program
administrator suggest that the CDFI
Fund will serve as the program
administrator for all issuances. Should
the CDFI Fund require that each
qualified issuer have a designated
program administrator as suggested in
section 114A(a)(7)?
(iii) If so, should the servicer be
eligible to serve as a program
administrator for a qualified issuer?
(iv) Who should be responsible for
resolving troubled loans?
(v) On what basis should servicers be
compensated?
(vi) Are there any duties not listed
that should be included in sections
114A(f)(2) through 114A(f)(4)? Are there
any prohibitions or limitations that
should be applied?
9. General Compliance
The CDFI Fund welcomes comments
on general compliance issues related to
monitoring the guarantee portfolio,
particularly with respect to the
following questions:
(i) What types of compliance
measures should be required by the
CDFI Fund? Should the CDFI Fund
mandate specific reports to be collected
and reviewed by the servicer and
ultimately the master servicer? If so,
please provide examples.
(ii) The Act states that ‘‘repayment
shall be made on that portion of bonds
or notes necessary to bring the bonds or
notes that remain outstanding after such
repayment into compliance with the 90
percent requirement of paragraph (1).’’
E:\FR\FM\01JYP1.SGM
01JYP1
38580
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 127 / Friday, July 1, 2011 / Proposed Rules
How should the CDFI Fund enforce this
requirement?
(iii) What penalties should the CDFI
Fund impose if a qualified issuer is
deemed noncompliant?
(iv) The Act provides that the
qualified issuer pay a fee of 10 basis
points annually. What penalties should
be imposed for failure to comply?
10. General Comments
The CDFI Fund is also interested in
receiving any general comments and
suggestions regarding the structure of
the CDFI Bond Guarantee Program that
are not addressed above.
Authority: Pub. L. 111–240.
Dated: June 23, 2011.
Donna J. Gambrell,
Director, Community Development Financial
Institutions Fund.
[FR Doc. 2011–16682 Filed 6–30–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 71
[Docket No. FAA–2011–0087; Airspace
Docket No. 11–ASO–12]
Proposed Amendment of Class D
Airspace; Eglin AFB, FL
AGENCY: Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY: This action proposes to
amend Class D Airspace in the Eglin Air
Force Base (AFB), FL airspace area. The
Destin Non-Directional Beacon (NDB)
has been decommissioned and new
Standard Instrument Approaches have
been developed for Destin-Fort Walton
Beach Airport that would enhance the
safety and management of Instrument
Flight Rules (IFR) operations at the
airport.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before August 15, 2011. The Director
of the Federal Register approves this
incorporation by reference action under
title 1, Code of Federal Regulations, part
51, subject to the annual revision of
FAA, Order 7400.9 and publication of
conforming amendments.
ADDRESSES: Send comments on this rule
to: U.S. Department of Transportation,
Docket Operations, West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200
New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington,
DC 20590–0001; Telephone: 1–800–
647–5527; Fax: 202–493–2251. You
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:19 Jun 30, 2011
Jkt 223001
must identify the Docket Number FAA–
2011–0087; Airspace Docket No. 11–
ASO–12, at the beginning of your
comments. You may also submit and
review received comments through the
Internet at
https://www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John
Fornito, Operations Support Group,
Eastern Service Center, Federal Aviation
Administration, P.O. Box 20636,
Atlanta, Georgia 30320; telephone (404)
305–6364.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
Interested persons are invited to
comment on this rule by submitting
such written data, views, or arguments,
as they may desire. Comments that
provide the factual basis supporting the
views and suggestions presented are
particularly helpful in developing
reasoned regulatory decisions on the
proposal. Comments are specifically
invited on the overall regulatory,
aeronautical, economic, environmental,
and energy-related aspects of the
proposal.
Communications should identify both
docket numbers (FAA Docket No. FAA–
2011–0087; Airspace Docket No. 11–
ASO–12) and be submitted in triplicate
to the Docket Management System (see
ADDRESSES section for address and
phone number). You may also submit
comments through the Internet at
https://www.regulations.gov.
Annotators wishing the FAA to
acknowledge receipt of their comments
on this action must submit with those
comments a self-addressed stamped
postcard on which the following
statement is made: ‘‘Comments to
Docket No. FAA–2011–0087; Airspace
Docket No. 11–ASO–12.’’ The postcard
will be date/time stamped and returned
to the commenter.
All communications received before
the specified closing date for comments
will be considered before taking action
on the proposed rule. The proposal
contained in this notice may be changed
in light of the comments received. A
report summarizing each substantive
public contact with FAA personnel
concerned with this rulemaking will be
filed in the docket.
Availability of NPRMs
An electronic copy of this document
may be downloaded from and
comments submitted through https://
www.regulations.gov. Recently
published rulemaking documents can
also be accessed through the FAA’s Web
page at https://www.faa.gov/
airports_airtraffic/air_traffic/
publications/airspace_amendments/.
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
You may review the public docket
containing the proposal, any comments
received and any final disposition in
person in the Dockets Office (see the
ADDRESSES section for address and
phone number) between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal Holidays. An informal docket
may also be examined during normal
business hours at the office of the
Eastern Service Center, Federal Aviation
Administration, room 210, 1701
Columbia Avenue, College Park, Georgia
30337.
Persons interested in being placed on
a mailing list for future NPRMs should
contact the FAA’s Office of Rulemaking,
(202) 267–9677, to request a copy of
Advisory circular No. 11–2A, Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking distribution
System, which describes the application
procedure.
The Proposal
The FAA is considering an
amendment to Title 14, Code of Federal
Regulations (14 CFR) part 71 to amend
Class D airspace in the Eglin AFB, FL
area. The Destin NDB has been
decommissioned, and the NDB
approach cancelled. New standard
instrument approach procedures have
been developed for Destin-Fort Walton
Beach Airport. The existing Class D
airspace extending upward from the
surface would be modified for the safety
and management of IFR operations.
Class D airspace designations are
published in Paragraph 5000 of FAA
order 7400.9U, dated August 18, 2010,
and effective September 15, 2010, which
is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR
71.1. The Class D airspace designation
listed in this document will be
published subsequently in the Order.
The FAA has determined that this
proposed regulation only involves an
established body of technical
regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to
keep them operationally current. It,
therefore, (1) is not a ‘‘significant
regulatory action’’ under Executive
Order 12866; (2) is not a ‘‘significant
rule’’ under DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February
26, 1979); and (3) does not warrant
preparation of a Regulatory Evaluation
as the anticipated impact is so minimal.
Since this is a routine matter that will
only affect air traffic procedures and air
navigation, it is certified that this
proposed rule, when promulgated,
would not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities under the criteria of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act.
The FAA’s authority to issue rules
regarding aviation safety is found in
E:\FR\FM\01JYP1.SGM
01JYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 127 (Friday, July 1, 2011)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 38577-38580]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-16682]
========================================================================
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 127 / Friday, July 1, 2011 / Proposed
Rules
[[Page 38577]]
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Community Development Financial Institutions Fund
12 CFR Chapter XVIII
Bond Guarantee Program
AGENCY: Community Development Financial Institutions Fund, U.S.
Department of Treasury.
ACTION: Request for public comment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This notice invites comments from the public on issues
regarding the Community Development Financial Institutions (CDFI) Bond
Guarantee Program created by the Small Business Jobs Act of 2010. All
materials submitted will be available for public inspection and
copying.
DATES: All comments and submissions must be received by August 15,
2011.
ADDRESSES: Comments may be sent by mail to: Jodie Harris, Policy
Specialist, CDFI Fund, U.S. Department of the Treasury, 601 13th
Street, NW., Suite 200 South, Washington, DC 20005; by e-mail to
cdfihelp@cdfi.treas.gov; or by facsimile at (202) 622-7754. Please note
this is not a toll free number.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Information regarding the CDFI Fund
and its programs may be downloaded from the CDFI Fund's Web site at
https://www.cdfifund.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Community Development Financial
Institutions Fund (CDFI Fund) was created for the purpose of promoting
economic revitalization and community development through investment in
and assistance to CDFIs. Its vision is to economically empower
America's underserved and distressed communities through the provision
of low-cost capital to certified CDFIs. The CDFI Fund was established
by the Riegle Community Development Banking and Financial Institutions
Act of 1994.
The CDFI Bond Guarantee Program (the program) was enacted through
the Small Business Jobs Act of 2010 (Pub. L. 111-240) on September 27,
2010. The CDFI Fund will serve as the program administrator and must
administer the program in accordance with sections 1134 and 1703 of the
Small Business Jobs Act, which amended the Community Development
Banking and Financial Institutions Act of 1994, 12 U.S.C. 4701 et seq.
(the Act) by adding a new section 114A.
Section 114A authorizes the Secretary of the Treasury (through the
CDFI Fund) to guarantee the full amount of notes or bonds, including
the principal, interest, and call premiums not to exceed 30 years,
issued by CDFIs to finance loans for eligible community or economic
development purposes. The bonds or notes will support CDFI lending and
investment by providing a source of long-term, patient capital to
CDFIs. In accordance with Federal credit policy, moreover, the Federal
Financing Bank (FFB), a body corporate and instrumentality of the
United States Government under the general supervision and direction of
the Secretary of the Treasury, finances obligations that are 100%
guaranteed by the United States, such as the bonds or notes to be
issued by CDFIs under the program. Because the FFB's cost of funds is
equivalent to the current Treasury rates for comparable maturities, the
FFB can provide CDFIs the least expensive funds to generate loans and
represents the most efficient way for CDFIs to finance 100% Federally
guaranteed obligations.
The CDFI Fund is required by statute to promulgate program
regulations by September 27, 2011 and to implement the program by
September 27, 2012.
The CDFI Fund invites and encourages comments and suggestions
germane to the mission, purpose, and implementation of the CDFI Bond
Guarantee Program. The CDFI Fund is particularly interested in comments
in the following areas:
1. Definitions
(a) Section 114A(a) of the Act provides certain definitions
applicable to the CDFI Bond Guarantee Program. In particular, Section
114A(a)(2) of the Act defines eligible community or economic
development purpose as any purpose described in section 108(b) [12
U.S.C. 4707(b)] and includes the provision of community or economic
development in low-income or underserved rural areas. The CDFI Fund is
interested in comments regarding all definitions found in the Act as
they relate to the program, including the following:
(i) How should the term ``low-income'' be defined as such term is
used in Section 114A(a)(2)?
(ii) How should the term ``rural areas'' be defined as such term is
used in Section 114A(a)(2)? For example, is a rural community any
census tract that is not located in a metropolitan statistical area
(MSA)? Respondents should discuss how a particular definition would
enable the program to target businesses and residents in rural areas,
and discuss whether there are particular measures that should not be
used because they may inadvertently disadvantage certain populations
(i.e., provide examples of particular households or communities that
would not qualify under specific definitions).
(iii) How should the term ``underserved'' be defined and/or
measured?
(iv) Should ``eligible community or economic development purpose''
be defined to allow a CDFI or its designated Qualified Issuer to only
invest inside the CDFI Fund Target Market that it was certified to
serve?
2. Use of Funds
(a) The Act defines a loan as any credit instrument that is
extended under the CDFI Bond Guarantee Program for any eligible
community or economic development purpose. Section 114A(b) of the Act
states that the Secretary of the Treasury (the Secretary) shall
guarantee payments on bonds or notes issued by a qualified issuer if
the proceeds of the bonds or notes are used in accordance with this
section to make loans to eligible community development financial
institutions (CDFIs)
(1) For eligible community or economic development purposes; or
(2) To refinance loans or notes issued for such purposes.
The CDFI Fund invites and encourages comments and suggestions
germane to the criteria and use of funds. The CDFI Fund is particularly
interested in comments including the following:
(i) Should there be any limitations on the types of loans that can
be financed or refinanced with the bond proceeds? Are there any uses of
bond or note proceeds that should be excluded or deemed ineligible
regardless of the fact
[[Page 38578]]
that the use was in a low-income or underserved rural area?
(ii) Should the capitalization of: (1) Revolving loan funds; (2)
credit enhancement of investments made by CDFIs and/or others; or (3)
loan loss reserves, debt service reserves, and/or sinking funds in
support of a Federally guaranteed bond, be included as eligible
purposes?
(iii) Should there be any limits on the percentage of loans or
notes refinanced with the bond proceeds? If so, what should they be?
(iv) Should CDFIs be allowed to use bond proceeds to purchase loans
from other CDFIs? If so, should the CDFI that sells the loans be
required to invest a certain portion of the proceeds from the sale to
support additional community development activities?
(v) Should the CDFI Fund place additional restrictions on the
awardees' loan products, such as a cap on the interest rate, fees and/
or late payment penalties or on the marketing and disclosure standards
for the products? If so, what are the appropriate restrictions?
(b) Section 114A(c)(1) states that a capital distribution plan
meets the requirements of the subsection if not less than 90 percent of
the principal amount of guaranteed bonds or notes (other than the cost
of issuance fee) are used to make loans for any eligible community or
economic development purpose, measured annually, beginning at the end
of the one-year period beginning on the issuance date of such
guaranteed bonds or notes. The CDFI Fund welcomes comments regarding
this provision, specifically regarding what penalties the CDFI Fund
should impose if an issuer is out of compliance.
(c) Section 114A(c)(2) states that not more than 10 percent of the
principal amount of guaranteed bonds or notes -, multiplied by an
amount equal to the outstanding principal balance of issued notes or
bonds, minus the risk-share pool amount--may be held in a relending
account and may be available for new eligible community or economic
development purposes.
(i) How should the CDFI Fund define ``relending'' account as stated
in Section 114A(c)(2)? How should it differ from the loans made under
Section 114(c)(1)?
(ii) If the capitalization of revolving loan funds is deemed an
allowable use of funds under Section 114A(a)(4), what activities would
be eligible under the relending account?
(iii) If additional reserves are held, should they be permitted to
be funded from the relending account?
(iv) Should a sinking fund, or any other reserve to allow for the
payment of debt service, be permitted to be funded from the relending
account?
(d) Section 114A(d) states that each qualified issuer shall, during
the term of a guarantee provided under the CDFI Bond Guarantee Program,
establish a risk-share pool, capitalized by contributions from eligible
community development financial institution participants, of an amount
equal to three percent of the guaranteed amount outstanding on the
subject notes and bonds.
(i) In the event that the CDFI Fund determines that there is a risk
of loss to the government for which Congress has not provided an
appropriation, what steps should the CDFI Fund take to compensate for
this risk?
a. Should the interest rate on the bonds be increased?
b. Should a larger risk-share pool be required?
c. Should the CDFI Fund require restrictions, covenants and
conditions (e.g., net asset ratio requirement, first loss requirements,
first lien position; over-collateralization, replacement of troubled
loans)?
(ii) How should the CDFI Fund assess and compensate for different
levels of risk among diverse proposals without unduly restricting the
flexible use of funds for a range of community development purposes?
For example:
a. Should the CDFI Fund take into account the participation of a
risk-sharing partner? What should be the parameters of any such risk-
sharing?
b. Should the Fund take into account an independent, third-party
credit rating from a major rating agency?
(iii) Are there restrictions, covenants, conditions or other
measures the CDFI Fund should not impose? Please provide specific
examples, if possible.
(iv) Should the qualified issuer be allowed to set aside the three
percent from the bond proceeds or should these funds be separate from
the proceeds?
3. Guarantee Provisions
(a) Section 114A(a)(3) defines a guarantee as a written agreement
between the Secretary and a qualified issuer (or trustee) pursuant to
which the Secretary ensures repayment of the verifiable losses of
principal, interest, and call premium, if any, on notes or bonds issued
by a qualified issuer to finance or refinance loans to eligible CDFI.
The CDFI Fund invites and encourages comments and suggestions relating
to the guarantee provisions, especially:
(i) How should the CDFI Fund define and determine ``verifiable
losses of principal, interest, and call premium''?
(ii) Should the CDFI Fund permit a call upon the guarantee at any
point prior to the issuer liquidating the available assets? If so,
under what condition should a call on the guarantee be permitted?
(b) Section 114A(e)(1) indicates that the Treasury guarantee shall
be for the full amount of a bond or note, including the amount of
principal, interest, and call premiums not to exceed 30 years. The
Treasury may not guarantee any amount less than $100 million per
issuance.
(i) Should the CDFI Fund set specific guidelines or prohibitions
for the structure of the bond (e.g., callable, convertible, zero-
coupon)?
(ii) Should bonds that are used to fund certain asset classes be
required to have specific terms or conditions? Should riskier asset
classes or borrowers require additional enhancements?
(c) Section 114A(e)(2) states limitations on the guarantees.
(1) The Secretary shall issue not more than 10 guarantees in any
calendar year under the program.
(2) The Secretary may not guarantee any amount under the program
equal to less than $100 million but the total of all such guarantees in
any fiscal year may not exceed $1 billion.
(i) Can qualified issuers apply for multiple issuances? Should
there be a limit per qualified issuer? If so, what should that limit
be?
4. Eligible Entities
(a) Section 114A(a)(1) defines an eligible entity as a CDFI (as
described in section 1805.201 of title 12, Code of Federal Regulations,
or any successor thereto) certified by the Secretary that has applied
to a qualified issuer for, or that has been granted by a qualified
issuer, a loan under the program. The CDFI Fund welcomes comments on
issues relating to eligible entities, particularly with respect to the
following questions:
(i) Should the CDFI Fund require one qualified issuer (or appointed
trustee) for all bonds and notes issued under the program?
(ii) Should the CDFI Fund permit an entity not yet certified as a
CDFI to apply for CDFI certification simultaneous with submission of a
capital distribution plan?
(iii) Should the CDFI Fund allow all existing CDFIs to apply, or
should there be minimum eligibility criteria?
(iv) The Act states that a qualified issuer should have
``appropriate expertise, capacity, and experience, or otherwise be
qualified to make loans for eligible community or economic development
purposes.'' How should
[[Page 38579]]
the CDFI Fund determine that a qualified issuer meets these
requirements?
(v) What penalties should be imposed in the event that a CDFI
participating in the program ceases to be a certified CDFI? What
remedies and cure periods should the CDFI Fund allow in the event of a
lapse in CDFI certification?
(b) Section 114A(a)(5) defines a master servicer as an entity
approved by the Secretary in accordance with subparagraph (B) to
oversee the activities of servicers, as provided in subsection (f)(4).
(i) Should the CDFI Fund require one servicer for all bonds and
notes issued under the program?
(ii) Should the CDFI Fund require the master servicer and servicers
to have a track record of providing similar services? How should the
CDFI Fund evaluate the capabilities of prospective servicers and master
servicers?
(iii) Should the CDFI Fund pre-qualify servicers and make those
groups known to CDFIs wishing to submit a capital distribution plan for
consideration?
(iv) Should a CDFI issuer be allowed to serve as its own servicer?
(v) Should the master servicer be eligible to serve as a program
administrator or servicer for a qualified issuer? If so, how should
potential conflicts of interest be managed?
(c) Section 114(a)(8) defines qualified issuers as a CDFI (or any
entity designated to issue notes or bonds on behalf of such CDFI) that
meets certain qualifications: (1) Have appropriate expertise, (2) have
an acceptable capital distribution plan, and (3) be able to certify
that the bond proceeds will be used for community development.
(i) How should a CDFI demonstrate its expertise?
(ii) Are there any institutions that should be prohibited from
serving as qualified issuers?
(iii) Should the CDFI Fund establish minimum criteria for serving
as a qualified issuer?
(iv) Should the CDFI Fund set a minimum asset size for CDFI
participation as a qualified issuer?
(v) Should the CDFI Fund require the issuer to have a minimum net
capital (real equity capital) and require a set amount of net capital
be held for the term of the bond? If so, what is a reasonable level to
require?
(vi) Should qualified issuers be required to obtain an independent,
third-party credit rating from a major rating agency?
5. Capital Distribution Plan
(a) Section 114A(a)(8)(B)(ii)(II) states that a qualified issuer
shall provide to the Secretary: (aa) an acceptable statement of the
proposed sources and uses of the funds and (bb) a capital distribution
plan that meets the requirements of subsection (c)(1). The CDFI Fund
seeks comments relating to the capital distribution plan requirement,
specifically:
(i) What elements should be required in an acceptable statement of
proposed sources and uses of the funds? How should the CDFI Fund
measure acceptability?
(ii) What elements should be required in a capital distribution
plan? Are there examples of such plans, Federal or otherwise, upon
which the CDFI Fund should model the CDFI Bond Guarantee Program's
capital distribution plan requirements and application materials?
(iii) Should the CDFI Fund require specific intended uses of all
the bond proceeds in the capital distribution plan or should the
qualified issuers just be required to demonstrate an intended pipeline
of underlying assets?
(iv) Should the CDFI Fund set minimum underwriting criteria for
borrowers? Should applicants be required to demonstrate satisfaction of
those criteria in the capital distribution plan?
6. Accountability of Qualified Issuers
(a) The CDFI Fund welcomes comments on how to monitor the use of
proceeds and financial performance of qualified issuers, particularly
with respect to the following questions:
(a) What tests should the CDFI Fund use to evaluate if 90 percent
of bond proceeds have been invested in qualified loans? Should reports
be required from the qualified issuer more frequently than on an annual
basis?
(c) What types of tests should the CDFI Fund use to evaluate
satisfaction of the low-income or rural requirement set forth in
Section 114A(a)(2)?
(d) What support, if any, would applicants and awardees like to
receive from the CDFI Fund after having issued a bond?
(e) What specific industry standards for impact measures
(businesses financed, units of affordable housing developed, etc.)
should the CDFI Fund adopt for evaluating and monitoring loans financed
or refinanced with proceeds of the guaranteed notes or bonds?
(f) Should achievement of some standards or outcome measures be
mandatory?
(g) Are the approval criteria for qualified issuers as listed in
Section 114A(a)(8)(B) adequate? If not, what else should be included?
7. Prohibited Uses
(a) Section 114A(b)(5) provides certain prohibitions on use of
funds including, ``political activities, lobbying, outreach, counseling
services, or travel expenses.'' The CDFI Fund encourages comments and
suggestions germane to prohibited uses established in the Act,
specifically as to whether there are other prohibited uses that the
CDFI Fund should include.
8. Servicing of Transactions
(a) Section 114A(f) states that, in general, to maximize
efficiencies and minimize cost and interest rates, loans made under
this section may be serviced by qualified program administrators, bond
servicers, and a master servicer. This section further outlines the
duties of the program administrator, servicers, and the master
servicer. Comments regarding the servicing of transactions are welcome,
specifically:
(i) The Act lists certain duties of a program administrator. Should
there be other requirements?
(ii) The duties of a program administrator suggest that the CDFI
Fund will serve as the program administrator for all issuances. Should
the CDFI Fund require that each qualified issuer have a designated
program administrator as suggested in section 114A(a)(7)?
(iii) If so, should the servicer be eligible to serve as a program
administrator for a qualified issuer?
(iv) Who should be responsible for resolving troubled loans?
(v) On what basis should servicers be compensated?
(vi) Are there any duties not listed that should be included in
sections 114A(f)(2) through 114A(f)(4)? Are there any prohibitions or
limitations that should be applied?
9. General Compliance
The CDFI Fund welcomes comments on general compliance issues
related to monitoring the guarantee portfolio, particularly with
respect to the following questions:
(i) What types of compliance measures should be required by the
CDFI Fund? Should the CDFI Fund mandate specific reports to be
collected and reviewed by the servicer and ultimately the master
servicer? If so, please provide examples.
(ii) The Act states that ``repayment shall be made on that portion
of bonds or notes necessary to bring the bonds or notes that remain
outstanding after such repayment into compliance with the 90 percent
requirement of paragraph (1).''
[[Page 38580]]
How should the CDFI Fund enforce this requirement?
(iii) What penalties should the CDFI Fund impose if a qualified
issuer is deemed noncompliant?
(iv) The Act provides that the qualified issuer pay a fee of 10
basis points annually. What penalties should be imposed for failure to
comply?
10. General Comments
The CDFI Fund is also interested in receiving any general comments
and suggestions regarding the structure of the CDFI Bond Guarantee
Program that are not addressed above.
Authority: Pub. L. 111-240.
Dated: June 23, 2011.
Donna J. Gambrell,
Director, Community Development Financial Institutions Fund.
[FR Doc. 2011-16682 Filed 6-30-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P