Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request; Food Reporting Comparison Study (FORCS) and Food and Eating Assessment Study (FEAST) (NCI), 38669-38670 [2011-16613]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
38669
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 127 / Friday, July 1, 2011 / Notices
public conduct during advisory
committee meetings.
Notice of this meeting is given under
the Federal Advisory Committee Act (5
U.S.C. app. 2).
Dated: June 27, 2011.
Jill Hartzler Warner,
Acting Associate Commissioner for Special
Medical Programs.
[FR Doc. 2011–16576 Filed 6–30–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
National Institutes of Health
Submission for OMB Review;
Comment Request; Food Reporting
Comparison Study (FORCS) and Food
and Eating Assessment Study (FEAST)
(NCI)
SUMMARY: Under the provisions of
Section 3507(a)(1)(D) of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, the National
Cancer Institute (NCI), the National
Institutes of Health (NIH), has submitted
to the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) a request to review and approve
Participants and
study
the information collection listed below.
This proposed information collection
was previously published in the Federal
Register on April 15, 2011 (76 FR
21383). One public comment was
received on April 15 requesting a copy
of the data collection package. The
submission was sent to the requestor on
April 21. The purpose of this notice is
to allow an additional 30 days for public
comment. The National Institutes of
Health may not conduct or sponsor, and
the respondent is not required to
respond to, an information collection
that has been extended, revised, or
implemented on or after October 1,
1995, unless it displays a currently valid
OMB control number.
Proposed Collection: Title: Food
Reporting Comparison Study (FORCS)
and Food and Eating Assessment Study
(FEAST) (NCI). Type of Information
Collection Request: Extension. Need and
Use of Information Collection: The title
of this collection was previously, ‘‘24Hour Dietary Recall Method
Comparison and the National Cancer
Institute (NCI) Observational Feeding
Studies.’’ The objective of the two
studies is to compare the performance of
the newly developed computerized
Number of respondents
Questionnaire
Frequency of
response
Automated Self-Administered 24-Hour
Recall (ASA24) approach to collecting
24-hour recall (24HR) data with the
current standard, the intervieweradministered Automated Multiple Pass
Method (AMPM). The ultimate goal is to
determine to what extent the new
automated instrument can be used
instead of the more expensive
interviewer-administered instrument in
the collection of dietary intake data.
Frequency of Response: Twice. Affected
Public: Individuals. Type of
Respondents: For the FORCS study,
approximately 1,200 adult members
from three health maintenance
organization plans (in Minnesota,
California, and Michigan) between ages
20 and 70 years. For the FEAST study,
approximately 90 adult residents from
the Washington, DC metropolitan area
between ages 20 and 70 years. The
annual reporting burden is estimated at
866 hours (see table below). This
amounts to an estimated 2598 burden
hours over the 3-year data collection
period with a total cost to the
respondents $54,293. There are no
Capital costs, Operating costs, and/or
Maintenance costs to report.
Average time per response
minutes/hour
Annual hour
burden
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES6
1
5/60 (0.083)
148
400
1
5/60 (0.083)
33
400
400
1.00
1.00
5/60 (0.083)
30/60 (0.50)
33
200
ASA24 (Attach 2) ................................
Demographics and Health Questionnaire (Attach 6).
Demographics, Health and Preference
Questionnaire (Attach 7).
Screener (Attach 8) .............................
Reminder Telephone Call (Attach 10)
Eating 3 meals ....................................
400
360
1.00
1.00
30/60 (0.50)
10/60 (0.167)
200
60
360
1.00
15/60 (0.25)
90
33
33
33
1.00
1.00
1.00
5/60 (0.083)
5/60 (0.083)
135/60 (2.25)
6
6
151
33
1.00
30/60 (0.50)
34
33
1.00
10/60 (0.167)
11
3485
General Public for
FEAST.
1770
Either AMPM or ASA24 (Attach 1 or
2).
Demographics and Health Questionnaire (Attach 12).
General Public for
FORCS.
Refusal Reasons and Demographics
(Attach 4A, Screen 8).
Contact Information (Attach 4A,
Screen 5).
Screener (Attach 5) .............................
AMPM (Attach 1) ................................
........................
..................................................
866
Request for Comments: Written
comments and/or suggestions from the
public and affected agencies should
address one or more of the following
points: (1) Whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility; (2) The accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:54 Jun 30, 2011
Jkt 223001
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used; (3)
Ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and (4) Ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on those who are to respond, including
the use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
Direct Comments to OMB: Written
comments and/or suggestions regarding
PO 00000
Frm 00071
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
the item(s) contained in this notice,
especially regarding the estimated
public burden and associated response
time, should be directed to the
Attention: NIH Desk Officer, Office of
Management and Budget, Office of
Regulatory Affairs at
OIRA_submission@omb.eop.gov or by
fax to 202–395–6974. To request more
information on the proposed project or
to obtain a copy of the data collection
plans, contact Frances E. Thompson,
E:\FR\FM\01JYN1.SGM
01JYN1
38670
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 127 / Friday, July 1, 2011 / Notices
PhD, Project Officer, National Cancer
Institute, NIH, EPN 4095A, 6130
Executive Boulevard MSC 7335,
Bethesda, Maryland 20892–7335, or call
non-toll-free number 301–594–4410, or
Fax your request to 301–435–3710, or email your request, including your
address, to thompsof@mail.nih.gov.
Comments Due Date: Comments
regarding this information collection are
best assured of having their full effect if
received within 30 days of the date of
this publication.
Dated: June 27, 2011.
Vivian Horovitch-Kelley,
NCI Project Clearance Liaison, National
Institutes of Health.
[FR Doc. 2011–16613 Filed 6–30–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
National Institutes of Health
New Proposed Collection; Comment
Request; Neuropsychosocial Measures
Formative Research Methodology
Studies for the National Children’s
Study
SUMMARY: In compliance with the
requirement of Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,
for opportunity for public comment on
proposed data collection projects, the
National Institute of Child Health and
Human Development (NICHD), the
National Institutes of Health (NIH) will
publish periodic summaries of proposed
projects to be submitted to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for
review and approval. This proposed
information collection was previously
published in the Federal Register on
May 2, 2011, pages 24497–24498, and
allowed 60 days for public comment. No
comments were received. The purpose
of this notice is to allow an additional
30 days for public comment.
Proposed Collection
Title: Neuro-developmental and
Psycho-Social Measures Formative
Research Studies for the National
Children’s Study (NCS).
Type of Information Collection
Request: Generic Clearance.
Need and Use of Information
Collection: The Children’s Health Act of
2000 (Pub. L. 106–310) states:
(a) Purpose.—It is the purpose of this
section to authorize the National Institute of
Child Health and Human Development* to
conduct a national longitudinal study of
environmental influences (including
physical, chemical, biological, and
psychosocial) on children’s health and
development.
(b) In General.—The Director of the
National Institute of Child Health and
Human Development* shall establish a
consortium of representatives from
appropriate Federal agencies (including the
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention,
the Environmental Protection Agency) to—
(1) Plan, develop, and implement a
prospective cohort study, from birth to
adulthood, to evaluate the effects of both
chronic and intermittent exposures on child
health and human development; and
(2) Investigate basic mechanisms of
developmental disorders and environmental
factors, both risk and protective, that
influence health and developmental
processes.
(c) Requirement.—The study under
subsection (b) shall—
(1) Incorporate behavioral, emotional,
educational, and contextual consequences to
enable a complete assessment of the physical,
chemical, biological, and psychosocial
environmental influences on children’s wellbeing;
(2) Gather data on environmental
influences and outcomes on diverse
populations of children, which may include
the consideration of prenatal exposures; and
(3) Consider health disparities among
children, which may include the
consideration of prenatal exposures.
To fulfill the requirements of the
Children’s Health Act, the results of
formative research will be used to
maximize the efficiency (measured by
scientific robustness, participant and
infrastructure burden, and cost) of tools
to assess language, behavior, and
neurodevelopment, psychosocial stress,
and health literacy and thereby inform
data collection methodologies for the
National Children’s Study (NCS)
Vanguard and Main Studies. With this
submission, the NCS seeks to obtain
OMB’s generic clearance to conduct
formative research featuring neurodevelopmental and psycho-social
measures.
The results from these formative
research projects will inform the
feasibility (scientific robustness),
acceptability (burden to participants
and study logistics) and cost of NCS
Vanguard and Main Study neurodevelopmental and psycho-social
measures in a manner that minimizes
public information collection burden
compared to burden anticipated if these
projects were incorporated directly into
either the NCS Vanguard or Main Study.
Frequency of Response: Annual [As
needed on an on-going and concurrent
basis].
Affected Public: Members of the
public, researchers, practitioners, and
other health professionals.
Type of Respondents: Women of
child-bearing age, infants, children,
fathers, community leaders, members,
and organizations, health care facilities
and professionals, public health,
environmental, social and cognitive
science professional organizations and
practitioners, hospital administrators,
cultural and faith-based centers, and
schools and child care organizations.
These include both persons enrolled in
the NCS Vanguard Study and their peers
who are not participating in the NCS
Vanguard Study.
Annual reporting burden: See Table 1.
The annualized cost to respondents is
estimated at: $540,000 (based on $10 per
hour). There are no Capital Costs to
report. There are no Operating or
Maintenance Costs to report.
TABLE 1—ESTIMATED ANNUAL REPORTING BURDEN SUMMARY, ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE
Estimated
number of
respondents
Type of respondent
Adult Psychosocial Stress ................
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES6
Data collection activity
NCS participants ..............................
Members of NCS target population
(not NCS participants).
NCS participants ..............................
Members of NCS target population
(not NCS participants).
NCS participants ..............................
Members of NCS target population
(not NCS participants).
NCS participants ..............................
Child Developmental Measures ........
Health Disparities ..............................
Small, focused survey and instrument design and administration.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:54 Jun 30, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00072
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Estimated
number of responses per
respondent
Average
burden hours
per response
Estimated total
annual burden
hours
requested
4,000
4,000
1
1
1
1
4,000
4,000
4,000
4,000
1
1
1
1
4,000
4,000
4,000
4,000
1
1
1
1
4,000
4,000
4,000
2
1
8,000
E:\FR\FM\01JYN1.SGM
01JYN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 127 (Friday, July 1, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 38669-38670]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-16613]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
National Institutes of Health
Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request; Food Reporting
Comparison Study (FORCS) and Food and Eating Assessment Study (FEAST)
(NCI)
SUMMARY: Under the provisions of Section 3507(a)(1)(D) of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, the National Cancer Institute (NCI), the
National Institutes of Health (NIH), has submitted to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) a request to review and approve the
information collection listed below. This proposed information
collection was previously published in the Federal Register on April
15, 2011 (76 FR 21383). One public comment was received on April 15
requesting a copy of the data collection package. The submission was
sent to the requestor on April 21. The purpose of this notice is to
allow an additional 30 days for public comment. The National Institutes
of Health may not conduct or sponsor, and the respondent is not
required to respond to, an information collection that has been
extended, revised, or implemented on or after October 1, 1995, unless
it displays a currently valid OMB control number.
Proposed Collection: Title: Food Reporting Comparison Study (FORCS)
and Food and Eating Assessment Study (FEAST) (NCI). Type of Information
Collection Request: Extension. Need and Use of Information Collection:
The title of this collection was previously, ``24-Hour Dietary Recall
Method Comparison and the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Observational
Feeding Studies.'' The objective of the two studies is to compare the
performance of the newly developed computerized Automated Self-
Administered 24-Hour Recall (ASA24) approach to collecting 24-hour
recall (24HR) data with the current standard, the interviewer-
administered Automated Multiple Pass Method (AMPM). The ultimate goal
is to determine to what extent the new automated instrument can be used
instead of the more expensive interviewer-administered instrument in
the collection of dietary intake data. Frequency of Response: Twice.
Affected Public: Individuals. Type of Respondents: For the FORCS study,
approximately 1,200 adult members from three health maintenance
organization plans (in Minnesota, California, and Michigan) between
ages 20 and 70 years. For the FEAST study, approximately 90 adult
residents from the Washington, DC metropolitan area between ages 20 and
70 years. The annual reporting burden is estimated at 866 hours (see
table below). This amounts to an estimated 2598 burden hours over the
3-year data collection period with a total cost to the respondents
$54,293. There are no Capital costs, Operating costs, and/or
Maintenance costs to report.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of Frequency of Average time per response Annual hour
Participants and study Questionnaire respondents response minutes/hour burden
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Refusal Reasons and 1770 1 5/60 (0.083) 148
Demographics (Attach 4A,
Screen 8).
Contact Information (Attach 400 1 5/60 (0.083) 33
4A, Screen 5).
Screener (Attach 5).......... 400 1.00 5/60 (0.083) 33
General Public for FORCS................... AMPM (Attach 1).............. 400 1.00 30/60 (0.50) 200
ASA24 (Attach 2)............. 400 1.00 30/60 (0.50) 200
Demographics and Health 360 1.00 10/60 (0.167) 60
Questionnaire (Attach 6).
Demographics, Health and 360 1.00 15/60 (0.25) 90
Preference Questionnaire
(Attach 7).
Screener (Attach 8).......... 33 1.00 5/60 (0.083) 6
Reminder Telephone Call 33 1.00 5/60 (0.083) 6
(Attach 10).
General Public for FEAST................... Eating 3 meals............... 33 1.00 135/60 (2.25) 151
Either AMPM or ASA24 (Attach 33 1.00 30/60 (0.50) 34
1 or 2).
Demographics and Health 33 1.00 10/60 (0.167) 11
Questionnaire (Attach 12).
3485 .............. ............................ 866
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Request for Comments: Written comments and/or suggestions from the
public and affected agencies should address one or more of the
following points: (1) Whether the proposed collection of information is
necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency,
including whether the information will have practical utility; (2) The
accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the proposed
collection of information including the validity of the methodology and
assumptions used; (3) Ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity
of the information to be collected; and (4) Ways to minimize the burden
of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including
the use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques or other forms of information
technology.
Direct Comments to OMB: Written comments and/or suggestions
regarding the item(s) contained in this notice, especially regarding
the estimated public burden and associated response time, should be
directed to the Attention: NIH Desk Officer, Office of Management and
Budget, Office of Regulatory Affairs at OIRA_submission@omb.eop.gov or
by fax to 202-395-6974. To request more information on the proposed
project or to obtain a copy of the data collection plans, contact
Frances E. Thompson,
[[Page 38670]]
PhD, Project Officer, National Cancer Institute, NIH, EPN 4095A, 6130
Executive Boulevard MSC 7335, Bethesda, Maryland 20892-7335, or call
non-toll-free number 301-594-4410, or Fax your request to 301-435-3710,
or e-mail your request, including your address, to
thompsof@mail.nih.gov.
Comments Due Date: Comments regarding this information collection
are best assured of having their full effect if received within 30 days
of the date of this publication.
Dated: June 27, 2011.
Vivian Horovitch-Kelley,
NCI Project Clearance Liaison, National Institutes of Health.
[FR Doc. 2011-16613 Filed 6-30-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
